Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species have often been reported as plant pathogens, non-pathogenic endophytes or saprobes, commonly isolated from a wide range of hosts. The primary aim of the present study was to resolve the taxonomy and phylogeny of a large collection of Diaporthe species occurring on diverse hosts, either as pathogens, saprobes, or as harmless endophytes. In the present study we investigated 243 isolates using multilocus DNA sequence data. Analyses of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) region, and partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1), beta-tubulin (TUB), histone H3 (HIS) and calmodulin (CAL) genes resolved 95 clades. Fifteen new species are described, namely Diaporthe arengae, D. brasiliensis, D. endophytica, D. hongkongensis, D. inconspicua, D. infecunda, D. mayteni, D. neoarctii, D. oxe, D. paranensis, D. pseudomangiferae, D. pseudophoenicicola, D. raonikayaporum, D. schini and D. terebinthifolii. A further 14 new combinations are introduced in Diaporthe, and D. anacardii is epitypified. Although species of Diaporthe have in the past chiefly been distinguished based on host association, results of this study confirm several taxa to have wide host ranges, suggesting that they move freely among hosts, frequently co-colonising diseased or dead tissue. In contrast, some plant pathogenic and endophytic taxa appear to be strictly host specific. Given this diverse ecological behaviour among members of Diaporthe, future species descriptions lacking molecular data (at least ITS and HIS or TUB) should be strongly discouraged.

Free full text 


Logo of persooniaLink to Publisher's site
Persoonia. 2013 Dec; 31: 1–41.
Published online 2013 Mar 28. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158513X666844
PMCID: PMC3904044
PMID: 24761033

Diaporthe: a genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi

Abstract

Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species have often been reported as plant pathogens, non-pathogenic endophytes or saprobes, commonly isolated from a wide range of hosts. The primary aim of the present study was to resolve the taxonomy and phylogeny of a large collection of Diaporthe species occurring on diverse hosts, either as pathogens, saprobes, or as harmless endophytes. In the present study we investigated 243 isolates using multilocus DNA sequence data. Analyses of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) region, and partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1), beta-tubulin (TUB), histone H3 (HIS) and calmodulin (CAL) genes resolved 95 clades. Fifteen new species are described, namely Diaporthe arengae, D. brasiliensis, D. endophytica, D. hongkongensis, D. inconspicua, D. infecunda, D. mayteni, D. neoarctii, D. oxe, D. paranensis, D. pseudomangiferae, D. pseudophoenicicola, D. raonikayaporum, D. schini and D. terebinthifolii. A further 14 new combinations are introduced in Diaporthe, and D. anacardii is epitypified. Although species of Diaporthe have in the past chiefly been distinguished based on host association, results of this study confirm several taxa to have wide host ranges, suggesting that they move freely among hosts, frequently co-colonising diseased or dead tissue. In contrast, some plant pathogenic and endophytic taxa appear to be strictly host specific. Given this diverse ecological behaviour among members of Diaporthe, future species descriptions lacking molecular data (at least ITS and HIS or TUB) should be strongly discouraged.

Keywords: Diaporthales, Diaporthe, Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST), Phomopsis, systematics

INTRODUCTION

Species of Diaporthe and their Phomopsis asexual states have broad host ranges and are widely distributed, occurring as plant pathogens, endophytes or saprobes, but also as pathogens of humans and other mammals (Webber & Gibbs 1984, Carroll 1986, Boddy & Griffith 1989, Rehner & Uecker 1994, Garcia-Reyne et al. 2011, Udayanga et al. 2011). Diaporthe spp. are responsible for diseases on a wide range of plants hosts, some of which are economically important worldwide, causing root and fruit rots, dieback, cankers, leaf spots, blights, decay and wilt (Uecker 1988, Mostert et al. 2001a, van Rensburg et al. 2006, Santos et al. 2011, Thompson et al. 2011).

Currently, MycoBank (accessed Sept. 2012) lists more than 1 000 names in the genus Phomopsis, while Diaporthe contains more than 860 names. In the past species have chiefly been described under the assumption they are host-specific, leading to a proliferation of names based on the hosts from which they were isolated (Uecker 1988). However, subsequent studies have found that many species are able to colonise diverse hosts as opportunists, and that several different species could even co-occur on the same host or lesion (Brayford 1990, Rehner & Uecker 1994, Mostert et al. 2001a, Farr et al. 2002, Crous & Groenewald 2005). Curiously, some species of Diaporthe can be either pathogenic or harmless endophytes depending on the host and its health. For example, D. phaseolorum is pathogenic to soybean (Santos et al. 2011), but endophytic in mangroves (Laguncularia racemosa) (Sebastiane et al. 2011). With the deletion of Art. 59 from the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), asexual and sexual names of fungi receive equal status (Hawksworth et al. 2011, Wingfield et al. 2012). Because the name Diaporthe (1870) predates Phomopsis (1905), Diaporthe is adopted in the present study for this group of fungi (Santos et al. 2010, 2011, Crous et al. 2011, Udayanga et al. 2012).

Diaporthe (incl. its Phomopsis state) has been reported as one of the most frequently encountered genera of endophytic fungi in several plant hosts (Murali et al. 2006, Botella & Diez 2011). The genus has also frequently been recognised as a producer of interesting enzymes and secondary metabolites (Isaka et al. 2001, Kobayashi et al. 2003, Dai et al. 2005, Elsaesser et al. 2005) with antibiotic (Bandre & Sasek 1977, Dettrakul et al. 2003, Lin et al. 2005) or anticancer (Kumaran & Hur 2009) activity. Furthermore, species of Diaporthe have in the past been noted to deter herbivory (Brayford 1990, Weber 2009, Vesterlund et al. 2011), have lignocellulolytic activities (Jordaan et al. 2006), or have been applied as bioherbicides (Ash et al. 2010).

The accurate application of accepted names of plant pathogenic fungi is essential for the development of effective biosecurity and trade policies (Crous & Groenewald 2005, Wingfield et al. 2012). The taxonomy of many groups of plant pathogenic fungi has in the past been based on host association (Crous et al. 2013, Groenewald et al. 2013). Although some species of Diaporthe are host specific, a great number have been noted to occur on more than one host (Brayford 1990, Rehner & Uecker 1994, Farr et al. 2002). Similar observations led Wehmeyer (1933) to the conclusion that host-association was not informative enough in Diaporthe, thereby reducing the number of species from 650 to only 70 in the genus. However, this revision was based strictly on morphological characters of the Diaporthe sexual state, and connections to the Phomopsis asexual states (prior to molecular analyses) had been identified only in 20 % of the species (Wehmeyer 1933).

Although the classification of Diaporthe has been on-going, species are presently being redefined based on a combination of morphological, cultural, phytopathological, mating type and DNA sequence data (Rehner & Uecker 1994, Zhang et al. 1998, Mostert et al. 2001a, Farr et al. 2002, Santos et al. 2010).

However, even when using a combination of morphological and molecular data, the delimitation of species within the genus Diaporthe only proved satisfactory once multi-gene DNA sequence data were generated (Castlebury & Mengistu 2006, van Rensburg et al. 2006, Santos et al. 2010, Udayanga et al. 2012), since this adds valuable information in the resolution of complex evolutionary relationships. The aims of the present study were thus to: 1) provide a multi-gene phylogeny for the genus Diaporthe based on a large set of well-identified cultures deposited in the CBS culture collection; 2) to identify potential isolates for epitypification, thereby fixing the application of previously established names; 3) to link Diaporthe names to their Phomopsis asexual states; and 4) to identify a collection of mostly sterile endophytic Diaporthe strains isolated from several medicinal hosts in Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolates

In the present study we analysed 243 Diaporthe isolates (Table 1), as well as the outgroup Diaporthella corylina. Isolates were obtained from several sources, including 40 endophytic strains isolated from medicinal plants in Brazil (LabGeM/UFPR collection, Curitiba, Brazil), and three isolates from the EMBRAPA-SOJA collection, Londrina, Brazil. A further 199 isolates were obtained from the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS), or the working collection of P.W. Crous (CPC) housed at CBS.

Table 1

Host / substrate, locality, collector and GenBank accession numbers of strains included in the study.

SpeciesOriginal nameStrain1Isolation sourceHost familyLocalityCollectorGenBank Accession numbers (ITS, CAL, HIS, TEF1, TUB)2
Diaporthe acaciigenaD. acaciigenaCBS 129521; CPC 17622 (ex-type)Acacia retinodes, leavesMimosaceaeAustraliaP.W. Crous, I.G. Pascoe & J. EdwardsKC343005KC343247KC343489KC343731KC343973
Diaporthe acerinaD. acerinaCBS 137.27Acer saccharumAceraceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343006KC343248KC343490KC343732KC343974
Diaporthe alleghaniensisD. alleghaniensisCBS 495.72; ATCC 24097 (ex-type)Betula alleghaniensis, branchesBetulaceaeCanadaR.H. ArnoldKC343007KC343249KC343491KC343733KC343975
Diaporthe alneaD. alneaCBS 146.46Alnus sp.BetulaceaeS. TruterKC343008KC343250KC343492KC343734KC343976
D. alneaCBS 159.47Alnus sp.BetulaceaeS. TruterKC343009KC343251KC343493KC343735KC343977
Diaporthe ambiguaD. ambiguaCBS 114015; STE-U 2657; CPC 2657 (ex-epitype)Pyrus communisRosaceaeSouth AfricaS. DenmanKC343010KC343252KC343494KC343736KC343978
D. ambiguaCBS 117167; STE-U 5414; CPC 5414Aspalathus linearis, crownFabaceaeSouth AfricaJ.C. Janse van RensburgKC343011KC343253KC343495KC343737KC343979
D. ambiguaCBS 123210; Di-C003/10Foeniculum vulgareApiaceaePortugalJ.M. SantosKC343012KC343254KC343496KC343738KC343980
D. ambiguaCBS 123211; Di-C002/9Foeniculum vulgareApiaceaePortugalJ.M. SantosKC343013KC343255KC343497KC343739KC343981
D. scabraCBS 127746; IMI 395956Platanus acerifoliaPlatanaceaeItalyG. GranataKC343014KC343256KC343498KC343740KC343982
D. helianthiCBS 187.87Helianthus annuusAsteraceaeItalyA. ZazzeriniKC343015KC343257KC343499KC343741KC343983
Diaporthe ampelina, comb. nov.P. viticolaCBS 111888; ATCC 48153; STE-U 2673; CPC 2673Vitis viniferaVitaceaeUSA: CaliforniaJ.D. CucuzzaKC343016KC343258KC343500KC343742KC343984
P. viticolaCBS 114016; STE-U 2660; CPC 2660; PV F98-1 (ex-neotype)Vitis viniferaVitaceaeFranceP. LarignonAF230751AY745026AY745056JX275452
P. viticolaCBS 114867; STE-U 4708; CPC 4708Vitis viniferaVitaceaeTurkeyM. ErkanKC343017KC343259KC343501KC343743KC343985
P. viticolaCBS 267.80; STE-U 2671; CPC 2671Vitis viniferaVitaceaeItalyA. ZazzeriniKC343018KC343260KC343502KC343744KC343986
Diaporthe amygdaliP. amygdaliCBS 111811; STE-U 2632; CPC 2632Vitis viniferaVitaceaeSouth AfricaL. MostertKC343019KC343261KC343503KC343745KC343987
P. amygdaliCBS 115620; FAU 1005Prunus persica, cankersRosaceaeUSA: GeorgiaW. UddinKC343020KC343262KC343504KC343746KC343988
P. amygdaliCBS 120840; STE-U 5833; CPC 5833Prunus salicina, woodRosaceaeSouth AfricaU. DammKC343021KC343263KC343505KC343747KC343989
P. amygdali 3BCBS 126679 (ex-epitype)Prunus dulcisRosaceaePortugalE. DiogoKC343022KC343264KC343506KC343748KC343990
P. amygdali 55ACBS 126680Prunus dulcisRosaceaePortugalE. DiogoKC343023KC343265KC343507KC343749KC343991
Diaporthe anacardii, comb. nov.P. anacardiiCBS 720.97 (ex-epitype)Anacardium occidentaleAnacardiaceaeEast AfricaM. PuccioniKC343024KC343266KC343508KC343750KC343992
Diaporthe angelicaeP. foeniculiCBS 100871Foeniculum vulgare, dying twigApiaceaeItalyL. MugnaiKC343025KC343267KC343509KC343751KC343993
D. angelicaeCBS 111591; AR 3724Heracleum sphondylium, decaying stemsApiaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343026KC343268KC343510KC343752KC343994
D. angelicaeCBS 111592; AR3776 (ex-epitype)Heracleum sphondylium, decaying stemsApiaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343027KC343269KC343511KC343753KC343995
D. angelicaeCBS 123215; Ph-C133/1Foeniculum vulgareApiaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343028KC343270KC343512KC343754KC343996
P. asteriscusCBS 344.86Eryngium maritimum, leaf spotsApiaceaeFranceH.A. van der AaKC343029KC343271KC343513KC343755KC343997
D. angelicaeCBS 501.90Heracleum sphondylium, seedsApiaceaeFranceH.A. van der AaKC343030KC343272KC343514KC343756KC343998
Diaporthe arctiiD. arctiiCBS 136.25Arctium sp.AsteraceaeA.W. ArcherKC343031KC343273KC343515KC343757KC343999
Diaporthe arecae, comb. nov.P. phoenicicolaCBS 161.64 (ex-isotype)Areca catechu, fruitArecaceaeIndiaH.C. SrivastavaKC343032KC343274KC343516KC343758KC344000
D. citriCBS 535.75Citrus sp., fruitsRutaceaeSurinameI. BlockKC343033KC343275KC343517KC343759KC344001
Diaporthe arengae, sp. nov.P. pittosporiCBS 114979; HKUCC 5527 (ex-type)Arenga engleriArecaceaeHong KongK.D. HydeKC343034KC343276KC343518KC343760KC344002
Diaporthe aspalathiD. aspalathiCBS 117168; STE-U 5420; CPC 5420Aspalathus linearis, crownFabaceaeSouth AfricaJ.C. Janse van RensburgKC343035KC343277KC343519KC343761KC344003
D. aspalathiCBS 117169; STE-U 5428; CPC 5428 (ex-type)Aspalathus linearis, branchFabaceaeSouth AfricaJ.C. Janse van RensburgKC343036KC343278KC343520KC343762KC344004
D. aspalathiCBS 117500; STE-U 5408; CPC 5408Aspalathus linearisFabaceaeSouth AfricaS. LamprechtKC343037KC343279KC343521KC343763KC344005
Diaporthe australafricanaD. australafricanaCBS 111886; STE-U 2676; CPC 2676 (ex-type)Vitis viniferaVitaceaeAustraliaR.W.A. SchepersKC343038KC343280KC343522KC343764KC344006
D. australafricanaCBS 113487; STE-U 2655; CPC 2655Vitis viniferaVitaceaeSouth AfricaL. MostertKC343039KC343281KC343523KC343765KC344007
Diaporthe batatasD. batatasCBS 122.21Ipomoea batatasConvolvulaceaeUSAL.L. HarterKC343040KC343282KC343524KC343766KC344008
Diaporthe beckhausiiD. beckhausiiCBS 138.27Viburnum sp.CaprifoliaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343041KC343283KC343525KC343767KC344009
Diaporthe brasiliensis, sp. nov.CBS 133183; LGMF924; CPC 20300 (ex-type)Aspidosperma tomentosum, endophytic in leafApocynaceaeBrazilK. RodriguezKC343042KC343284KC343526KC343768KC344010
LGMF926; CPC 20302Aspidosperma tomentosum, endophytic in leafApocynaceaeBrazilK. RodriguezKC343043KC343285KC343527KC343769KC344011
Diaporthe carpiniD. carpiniCBS 114437; UPSC 2980Carpinus betulusCorylaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343044KC343286KC343528KC343770KC344012
Diaporthe caulivoraD. caulivoraCBS 127268; Dpc1 (ex-neotype)Glycine max, stemFabaceaeCroatiaK. VrandečićKC343045KC343287KC343529KC343771KC344013
D. phaseolorum var. caulivoraCBS 178.55; ATCC 12048; Alfaro 243Glycine soja, mature stemFabaceaeCanadaA.A. HildebrandKC343046KC343288KC343530KC343772KC344014
Diaporthe celastrinaD. celastrinaCBS 139.27Celastrus scandensCelastraceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343047KC343289KC343531KC343773KC344015
Diaporthe chamaeropis, comb. nov.P. phoenicicolaCBS 454.81Chamaerops humilis, dead part of leafArecaceaeGreeceH.A. van der AaKC343048KC343290KC343532KC343774KC344016
D. sarothamniCBS 753.70Spartium junceum, dead branchFabaceaeCroatiaJ.A. von ArxKC343049KC343291KC343533KC343775KC344017
Diaporthe cinerascensP. cinerascensCBS 719.96Ficus carica, branchMoraceaeBulgariaE. IlievaKC343050KC343292KC343534KC343776KC344018
Diaporthe citriD. conorumCBS 199.39ItalyG. GoidánichKC343051KC343293KC343535KC343777KC344019
D. citriCBS 230.52Citrus sinensis, decaying fruitRutaceaeSurinameN.J. van SuchtelenKC343052KC343294KC343536KC343778KC344020
Diaporthe sp.LGMF946; CPC 20322Glycine max, seedFabaceaeBrazilA. AlmeidaKC343053KC343295KC343537KC343779KC344021
Diaporthe convolvuli, comb. nov.P. convolvuliCBS 124654; DP 0727Convolvulus arvensis, leavesConvolvulaceaeTurkeyD. BernerKC343054KC343296KC343538KC343780KC344022
Diaporthe crataegiD. crataegiCBS 114435; UPSC 2938Crataegus oxyacanthaRosaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343055KC343297KC343539KC343781KC344023
Diaporthe crotalariaeD. crotalariaeCBS 162.33 (ex-type)Crotalaria spectabilisFabaceaeUSAG.F. WeberKC343056KC343298KC343540KC343782KC344024
Diaporthe cuppateaP. cuppateaCBS 117499; STE-U 5431; CPC 5431 (ex-type)Aspalathus linearisFabaceaeSouth AfricaJ.C. Janse van RensburgKC343057KC343299KC343541KC343783KC344025
Diaporthe cynaroidisD. cynaroidisCBS 122676; CMW 22190; CPC 13180 (ex-type)Protea cynaroides, leaf litterProteaceaeSouth AfricaS. MarincowitzKC343058KC343300KC343542KC343784KC344026
Diaporthe decedensD. decedensCBS 109772; AR 3459Corylus avellanaCorylaceaeAustriaW. JaklitschKC343059KC343301KC343543KC343785KC344027
D. decedensCBS 114281; UPSC 2957Corylus avellanaCorylaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343060KC343302KC343544KC343786KC344028
Diaporthe detrusaD. detrusaCBS 109770; AR 3424Berberis vulgarisBerberidaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343061KC343303KC343545KC343787KC344029
D. detrusaCBS 114652; UPSC 3371Berberis vulgarisBerberidaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343062KC343304KC343546KC343788KC344030
D. detrusaCBS 140.27Berberis vulgarisBerberidaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343063KC343305KC343547KC343789KC344031
Diaporthe elaeagniP. elaeagniCBS 504.72Elaeagnus sp., twigElaeagnaceaeNetherlandsJ. GremmenKC343064KC343306KC343548KC343790KC344032
Diaporthe endophytica, sp. nov.CBS 133811; LGMF916; CPC 20292 (ex-type)Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343065KC343307KC343549KC343791KC344033
LGMF911; CPC 20287Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343066KC343308KC343550KC343792KC344034
LGMF919; CPC 20295Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343067KC343309KC343551KC343793KC344035
LGMF928; CPC 20304Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343068KC343310KC343552KC343794KC344036
LGMF934; CPC 20310Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343069KC343311KC343553KC343795KC344037
LGMF935; CPC 20311Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343070KC343312KC343554KC343796KC344038
LGMF937; CPC 20313Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343071KC343313KC343555KC343797KC344039
LGMF948; CPC 20324Glycine max, seedFabaceaeBrazilA. AlmeidaKC343072KC343314KC343556KC343798KC344040
Diaporthe eresD. eresCBS 101742Fraxinus sp., fallen fruitOleaceaeNetherlandsG.J.M. VerkleyKC343073KC343315KC343557KC343799KC344041
D. medusaeaCBS 102.81Juglans regia, twigJuglandaceaeItalyM. BisiachKC343074KC343316KC343558KC343800KC344042
D. eresCBS 109767; AR 3538; WJ 1643Acer campestreAceraceaeAustriaW. JaklitschKC343075KC343317KC343559KC343801KC344043
D. arctiiCBS 110.85Arctium sp., dead stemsAsteraceaeNetherlandsM. de NooijKC343076KC343318KC343560KC343802KC344044
P. skimmiaeCBS 122.82Skimmia japonica, dying twigsRutaceaeNetherlandsH.A. v. KesterenKC343077KC343319KC343561KC343803KC344045
Phomopsis sp. no. 23CBS 129168Rhododendron sp.EricaceaeLatviaI. ApineKC343078KC343320KC343562KC343804KC344046
D. conorumCBS 186.37Picea abies, seedlingPinaceaeUKT.R. PeaceKC343079KC343321KC343563KC343805KC344047
P. controversaCBS 250.38Fraxinus excelsior, living and dead twigOleaceaeUK: ScotlandJ.A. MacDonaldKC343080KC343322KC343564KC343806KC344048
P. sticticaCBS 267.32W.G. HutchinsonKC343081KC343323KC343565KC343807KC344049
P. rudisCBS 267.55Laburnum × watereri ‘Vossii’FabaceaeNetherlandsI. de BoerKC343082KC343324KC343566KC343808KC344050
P. ranojeviciiCBS 283.85Allium giganteum, dead stemAlliaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343083KC343325KC343567KC343809KC344051
D. eresCBS 287.74Sorbus aucuparia, dead branchRosaceaeNetherlandsW.M. LoerakkerKC343084KC343326KC343568KC343810KC344052
P. osmanthiCBS 297.77Osmanthus aquifolium, leaf tipOleaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343085KC343327KC343569KC343811KC344053
P. cactiCBS 365.97Opuntia sp., cladodesCactaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343086KC343328KC343570KC343812KC344054
P. crustosaCBS 370.67; MUCL 9931Ilex aquifolium, dead leafAquifoliaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343087KC343329KC343571KC343813KC344055
D. perniciosaCBS 375.61Malus sylvestris, rotten fruitRosaceaeGeigyKC343088KC343330KC343572KC343814KC344056
P. phaseoliCBS 422.50Phaseolus vulgarisFabaceaeNetherlandsGoossensKC343089KC343331KC343573KC343815KC344057
P. cotoneastriCBS 439.82; BBA P-407; IMI 162181a (isotype of Phomopsis cotoneastri)Cotoneaster sp.RosaceaeUK: ScotlandH. ButinKC343090KC343332KC343574KC343816KC344058
P. cruciferaeCBS 445.62Alliaria officinalisBrassicaceaeNetherlandsG.H. BoeremaKC343091KC343333KC343575KC343817KC344059
P. durandianaCBS 485.96Rumex hydrolapathum, dead stemPolygonaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343092KC343334KC343576KC343818KC344060
D. sepositaCBS 528.83Wisteria sinensis, dead branchFabaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343093KC343335KC343577KC343819KC344061
P. abutilonisCBS 688.97Abutilon sp.MalvaceaeNetherlandsA. AptrootKC343094KC343336KC343578KC343820KC344062
P. crustosaCBS 694.94Ilex aquifolium, twigs suffering from diebackAquifoliaceaeNetherlandsG.J.M. VerkleyKC343095KC343337KC343579KC343821KC344063
P. magnoliicolaCBS 791.68Magnolia × soulangeana, withering leafMagnoliaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343096KC343338KC343580KC343822KC344064
P. triticiCBS 841.84Hordeum sp., leaf spotPoaceaeGermanyM. HossfeldKC343097KC343339KC343581KC343823KC344065
Diaporthe eugeniae, comb. nov.P. eugeniaeCBS 444.82Eugenia aromatica, leafMyrtaceaeWest SumatraR. KasimKC343098KC343340KC343582KC343824KC344066
Diaporthe fibrosaD. fibrosaCBS 109751; AR 3425Rhamnus catharticaRhamnaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343099KC343341KC343583KC343825KC344067
D. fibrosaCBS 113830; UPSC 2117Rhamnus catharticaRhamnaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343100KC343342KC343584KC343826KC344068
Diaporthe foeniculaceaD. foeniculaceaCBS 111553Foeniculum vulgare, base of senescent stemApiaceaeSpainA.J.L. PhillipsKC343101KC343343KC343585KC343827KC344069
D. foeniculaceaCBS 111554Foeniculum vulgare, base of senescent stemApiaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343102KC343344KC343586KC343828KC344070
P. theicolaCBS 116957; NZ-37Pyrus pyrifoliaRosaceaeNew ZealandW. KandulaKC343103KC343345KC343587KC343829KC344071
D. neotheicolaCBS 123208; Di-C004/5 (ex-type of D. neotheicola)Foeniculum vulgareApiaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343104KC343346KC343588KC343830KC344072
D. neotheicolaCBS 123209; Di-C004/4 (ex-type of D. neotheicola)Foeniculum vulgareApiaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343105KC343347KC343589KC343831KC344073
P. mali f.sp. amygdaliCBS 171.78Prunus amygdalus, dried fruitRosaceaeItalyA. CiccaroneKC343106KC343348KC343590KC343832KC344074
P. theicolaCBS 187.27 (ex-type of P. theicola)Camellia sinensis, leaves and branchesTheaceaeItalyM. CurziKC343107KC343349KC343591KC343833KC344075
P. diospyriCBS 287.56Diospyros kaki, twig, after frost damageEbenaceaeItalyM. RibaldiKC343108KC343350KC343592KC343834KC344076
D. sepositaCBS 357.69Wisteria sinensis, dead twigsFabaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343109KC343351KC343593KC343835KC344077
P. casuarinaeCBS 400.48IndiaS.R. BoseKC343110KC343352KC343594KC343836KC344078
P. bougainvilleaeCBS 603.88Bougainvillea spectabilis, peduncles of flowersNyctaginaceaePortugalH.A. van der AaKC343111KC343353KC343595KC343837KC344079
Diaporthe ganjae, comb. nov.P. ganjaeCBS 180.91; ILLS 43621 (ex-type)Cannabis sativa, dead leafCannabaceaeUSA: IllinoisJ.M. McPartlandKC343112KC343354KC343596KC343838KC344080
Diaporthe gardeniae, comb. nov.P. gardeniaeCBS 288.56Gardenia florida, stemRubiaceaeItalyM. RibaldiKC343113KC343355KC343597KC343839KC344081
Diaporthe helianthiD. helianthiCBS 344.94Helianthus annuus, seedAsteraceaeKC343114KC343356KC343598KC343840KC344082
D. helianthiCBS 592.81 (ex-type)Helianthus annuus, overwintering stemAsteraceaeSerbiaM. Muntañola-CvetkovicKC343115KC343357KC343599KC343841KC344083
Diaporthe cf. heveae 1P. heveaeCBS 852.97Hevea brasiliensisEuphorbiaceaeBrazilD.S. AttiliKC343116KC343358KC343600KC343842KC344084
Diaporthe cf. heveae 2P. heveaeCBS 681.84Hevea brasiliensis, leafEuphorbiaceaeIndiaK. JayarathnamKC343117KC343359KC343601KC343843KC344085
Diaporthe hickoriaeD. hickoriaeCBS 145.26 (ex-type)Carya glabraJuglandaceaeUSA: MichiganL.E. WehmeyerKC343118KC343360KC343602KC343844KC344086
Diaporthe hongkongensis, sp. nov.P. pittosporiCBS 115448; HKUCC 9104; AT 646 DF 24 (ex-type)Dichroa febrífuga, fruitHydrangeaceaeHong KongK.D. HydeKC343119KC343361KC343603KC343845KC344087
Diaporthe hordei, comb. nov.P. hordeiCBS 481.92Hordeum vulgare, rootPoaceaeNorwayL. SundheimKC343120KC343362KC343604KC343846KC344088
Diaporthe impulsaD. impulsaCBS 114434; UPSC 3052Sorbus aucupariaRosaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343121KC343363KC343605KC343847KC344089
D. impulsaCBS 141.27Sorbus americanaRosaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343122KC343364KC343606KC343848KC344090
Diaporthe inconspicua, sp. nov.Diaporthe sp.CBS 133813; LGMF930; CPC 20306 (ex-type)Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343123KC343365KC343607KC343849KC344091
Diaporthe sp.LGMF922; CPC 20298Spondias mombinAnacardiaceaeBrazilK. RodriguezKC343124KC343366KC343608KC343850KC344092
Diaporthe sp.LGMF931; CPC 20307Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343125KC343367KC343609KC343851KC344093
Diaporthe infecunda, sp. nov.Diaporthe sp.CBS 133812; LGMF906; CPC 20282 (ex-type)Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343126KC343368KC343610KC343852KC344094
Diaporthe sp.LGMF908; CPC 20284Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343127KC343369KC343611KC343853KC344095
Diaporthe sp.LGMF912; CPC 20288Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343128KC343370KC343612KC343854KC344096
Diaporthe sp.LGMF917; CPC 20293Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343129KC343371KC343613KC343855KC344097
Diaporthe sp.LGMF918; CPC 20294Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343130KC343372KC343614KC343856KC344098
Diaporthe sp.LGMF920; CPC 20296Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343131KC343373KC343615KC343857KC344099
Diaporthe sp.LGMF933; CPC 20309Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343132KC343374KC343616KC343858KC344100
Diaporthe sp.LGMF940; CPC 20316Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343133KC343375KC343617KC343859KC344101
Diaporthe juglandinaD. juglandinaCBS 121004; DP 0659Juglans sp., dead woodJuglandaceaeUSA: TennesseeL. VasilyevaKC343134KC343376KC343618KC343860KC344102
Diaporthe longispora, comb. nov.D. strumella var. longisporaCBS 194.36 (ex-type)Ribes sp.GrossulariaceaeCanadaL.E. WehmeyerKC343135KC343377KC343619KC343861KC344103
Diaporthe lusitanicaeD. lusitanicaeCBS 123212; Di-C001/5 (ex-type)Foeniculum vulgare, stemApiaceaePortugalJ.M. SantosKC343136KC343378KC343620KC343862KC344104
D. lusitanicaeCBS 123213; Di-C001/3Foeniculum vulgare, stemApiaceaePortugalJ.M. SantosKC343137KC343379KC343621KC343863KC344105
Diaporthe manihotiaP. manihotCBS 505.76Manihot utilissima, leavesEuphorbiaceaeRwandaJ. SemalKC343138KC343380KC343622KC343864KC344106
Diaporthe mayteni, sp. nov.CBS 133185; LGMF938; CPC 20314 (ex-type)Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343139KC343381KC343623KC343865KC344107
Diaporthe megalosporaD. megalosporaCBS 143.27Sambucus canadensisCaprifoliaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343140KC343382KC343624KC343866KC344108
Diaporthe melonisD. phaseolorum var. sojaeCBS 435.87Glycine sojaFabaceaeIndonesiaH. VermeulenKC343141KC343383KC343625KC343867KC344109
D. melonisCBS 507.78 (ex-isotype)Cucumis meloCucurbitaceaeUSA: TexasL. Beraha & M.J. O’BrienKC343142KC343384KC343626KC343868KC344110
Diaporthe musigenaD. musigenaCBS 129519; CPC 17026 (ex-type)Musa sp., leavesMusaceaeAustraliaP.W. Crous & R.G. ShivasKC343143KC343385KC343627KC343869KC344111
Diaporthe neilliaeD. neilliaeCBS 144.27Spiraea sp.RosaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343144KC343386KC343628KC343870KC344112
Diaporthe neoarctii, sp. nov.D. arctiiCBS 109490; GB 6421; AR 3450 (ex-type)Ambrosia trifidaAsteraceaeUSA: New JerseyG. BillsKC343145KC343387KC343629KC343871KC344113
Diaporthe nobilisP. castaneaCBS 113470; DAOM 226800Castanea sativa, chestnuts collected in grocery storeFagaceaeKoreaK.A. SeifertKC343146KC343388KC343630KC343872KC344114
P. fukushiiCBS 116953; NZ-26Pyrus pyrifoliaRosaceaeNew ZealandW. Kandula & L. CastleburyKC343147KC343389KC343631KC343873KC344115
P. fukushiiCBS 116954; NZ-27Pyrus pyrifoliaRosaceaeNew ZealandW. Kandula & L. CastleburyKC343148KC343390KC343632KC343874KC344116
D. perniciosaCBS 124030; GJS 77-49Malus pumila, barkRosaceaeNew ZealandG.J. SamuelsKC343149KC343391KC343633KC343875KC344117
Phomopsis sp. no. 22CBS 129167Rhododendron sp.EricaceaeLatviaI. ApineKC343150KC343392KC343634KC343876KC344118
D. nobilisCBS 200.39Laurus nobilis, stemLauraceaeGermanyKotthoffKC343151KC343393KC343635KC343877KC344119
D. pullaCBS 338.89Hedera helixAraliaceaeYugoslaviaM. Muntañola-CvetkovicKC343152KC343394KC343636KC343878KC344120
P. conorumCBS 587.79Pinus pentaphylla, bonzai imported from Japan into NetherlandsPinaceaeJapanG.H. BoeremaKC343153KC343395KC343637KC343879KC344121
Diaporthe nomuraiD. nomuraiCBS 157.29Morus sp.MoraceaeJapanK. TogashiKC343154KC343396KC343638KC343880KC344122
Diaporthe novemD. novemCBS 127269; 5-27/3-1Glycine max, seedFabaceaeCroatiaT. DuvnjakKC343155KC343397KC343639KC343881KC344123
D. novemCBS 127270; 4-27/3-1 (ex-type)Glycine max, seedFabaceaeCroatiaT. DuvnjakKC343156KC343398KC343640KC343882KC344124
D. novemCBS 127271; 5/27/3-3Glycine max, seedFabaceaeCroatiaT. DuvnjakKC343157KC343399KC343641KC343883KC344125
D. pardalotaCBS 354.71Polygonatum odoratum, leavesConvallariaceaeRomaniaO. ConstantinescuKC343158KC343400KC343642KC343884KC344126
Diaporthe sp.LGMF943; CPC 20319Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343159KC343401KC343643KC343885KC344127
Diaporthe oncostomaD. oncostomaCBS 100454Robinia pseudoacacia, leaf spotFabaceaeGermanyH. ButinKC343160KC343402KC343644KC343886KC344128
D. oncostomaCBS 109741; AR 3445Robinia pseudoacaciaFabaceaeRussiaL. VasilyevaKC343161KC343403KC343645KC343887KC344129
D. oncostomaCBS 589.78Robinia pseudoacacia, dead branchesFabaceaeFranceH.A. van der AaKC343162KC343404KC343646KC343888KC344130
P. crustosaCBS 809.85Ilex aquifolium, leafAquifoliaceaeGermanyM. HesseKC343163KC343405KC343647KC343889KC344131
Diaporthe oxe, sp. nov.CBS 133186; LGMF942; CPC 20318 (ex-type)Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343164KC343406KC343648KC343890KC344132
CBS 133187; LGMF936; CPC 20312Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343165KC343407KC343649KC343891KC344133
LGMF915; CPC 20291Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343166KC343408KC343650KC343892KC344134
LGMF939; CPC 20315Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilS.A.V. PileggiKC343167KC343409KC343651KC343893KC344135
LGMF945; CPC 20321Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343168KC343410KC343652KC343894KC344136
Diaporthe padi var. padiD. decorticansCBS 114200; UPSC 2569Prunus padusRosaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343169KC343411KC343653KC343895KC344137
D. valsiformisCBS 114649; UPSC 3496Alnus glutinosaBetulaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343170KC343412KC343654KC343896KC344138
Diaporthe paranensis, sp. nov.CBS 133184; LGMF929; CPC 20305 (ex-type)Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343171KC343413KC343655KC343897KC344139
Diaporthe perjunctaD. perjunctaCBS 109745; ARSEF 3461; AR 3461 (ex-epitype)Ulmus glabraUlmaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343172KC343414KC343656KC343898KC344140
Diaporthe perseae, comb. nov.P. perseaeCBS 151.73Persea gratissima, young fruitLauraceaeNetherlands AntillesE. LavilleKC343173KC343415KC343657KC343899KC344141
Diaporthe phaseolorumP. oleariaeCBS 113425Olearia cf. raniAsteraceaeNew ZealandG.J.M. VerkleyKC343174KC343416KC343658KC343900KC344142
D. phaseolorumCBS 116019; STAM 30Caperonia palustrisEuphorbiaceaeUSA: MississippiA. MengistuKC343175KC343417KC343659KC343901KC344143
D. phaseolorumCBS 116020; STAM 31Aster exilisAsteraceaeUSA: MississippiA. MengistuKC343176KC343418KC343660KC343902KC344144
Diaporthe sp.CBS 127465; GJS 83-379Actinidia chinensis, rotting fruitActinidiaceaeNew ZealandS.R. PennycookKC343177KC343419KC343661KC343903KC344145
D. melonisCBS 257.80L. BerahaKC343178KC343420KC343662KC343904KC344146
Diaporthe sp.LGMF927; CPC 20303Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343179KC343421KC343663KC343905KC344147
Diaporthe sp.LGMF941; CPC 20317Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343180KC343422KC343664KC343906KC344148
Diaporthe pseudomangiferae, sp. nov.P. mangiferaeCBS 101339 (ex-type)Mangifera indicaAnacardiaceaeDominican RepublicP. de LeeuwKC343181KC343423KC343665KC343907KC344149
P. mangiferaeCBS 388.89Mangifera indica, peel of fruitAnacardiaceaeMexicoKC343182KC343424KC343666KC343908KC344150
Diaporthe pseudophoenicicola, sp. nov.P. mangiferaeCBS 176.77Mangifera indica, showing diebackAnacardiaceaeIraqM.S.A. Al-MomenKC343183KC343425KC343667KC343909KC344151
P. phoenicicolaCBS 462.69 (ex-type)Phoenix dactylifera, dead tops of green leavesArecaceaeSpainH.A. van der AaKC343184KC343426KC343668KC343910KC344152
Diaporthe pustulataD. pustulataCBS 109742; AR 3430Acer pseudoplatanusAceraceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343185KC343427KC343669KC343911KC344153
D. pustulataCBS 109760; AR 3535Acer pseudoplatanusAceraceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343186KC343428KC343670KC343912KC344154
D. padiCBS 109784; AR 3419Prunus padusRosaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343187KC343429KC343671KC343913KC344155
Diaporthe raonikayaporum, sp. nov.CBS 133182; LGMF923; CPC 20299 (ex-type)Spondias mombin, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilK. RodriguezKC343188KC343430KC343672KC343914KC344156
Diaporthe rhoinaD. rhoinaCBS 146.27Rhus toxicodendronAnacardiaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343189KC343431KC343673KC343915KC344157
Diaporthe saccarata, comb. nov.P. saccarataCBS 116311; STE-U 3743; CPC 3743 (ex-type)Protea repens, cankersProteaceaeSouth AfricaS. DenmanKC343190KC343432KC343674KC343916KC344158
Diaporthe schini, sp. nov.CBS 133181; LGMF921; CPC 20297 (ex-type)Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343191KC343433KC343675KC343917KC344159
LGMF910; CPC 20286Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343192KC343434KC343676KC343918KC344160
Diaporthe sclerotioidesP. sclerotioidesCBS 296.67; ATCC 18585; IMI 151828 (ex-type)Cucumis sativus, rootCucurbitaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der KesterenKC343193KC343435KC343677KC343919KC344161
P. sclerotioidesCBS 710.76; PD 76/674Cucumis sativus, rootCucurbitaceaeNetherlandsKC343194KC343436KC343678KC343920KC344162
Diaporthe scobinaP. scobinaCBS 251.38Fraxinus excelsior, living and dead twigOleaceaeUK: ScotlandJ.A. MacDonaldKC343195KC343437KC343679KC343921KC344163
Diaporthe sojaeP. longicollaCBS 100.87Glycine sojaFabaceaeItalyP. GiunchiKC343196KC343438KC343680KC343922KC344164
P. longicollaCBS 116017; DP 0508; STAM 28Euphorbia nutansEuphorbiaceaeUSA: MississippiA. MengistuKC343197KC343439KC343681KC343923KC344165
P. longicollaCBS 116023; STAM 35Glycine maxFabaceaeUSA: MississippiA. MengistuKC343198KC343440KC343682KC343924KC344166
P. longicollaCBS 127267; PL4Glycine max, stemFabaceaeCroatiaK. VrandečićKC343199KC343441KC343683KC343925KC344167
D. phaseolorum var. sojaeCBS 180.55; ATCC 12050; CECT 2024; Alfaro 245Glycine soja, mature stemFabaceaeA.A. HildebrandKC343200KC343442KC343684KC343926KC344168
D. phaseolorum var. sojaeCBS 659.78; NRRL 13656Glycine soja, seedlingFabaceaeUSAJ. MarcinkowskaKC343201KC343443KC343685KC343927KC344169
Diaporthe sp. 1D. phaseolorumCBS 119639; B 11861Man, abscessGermanyK. PlechullaKC343202KC343444KC343686KC343928KC344170
Diaporthe sp.LGMF947; CPC 20323Glycine max, seedFabaceaeBrazilA. AlmeidaKC343203KC343445KC343687KC343929KC344171
Diaporthe sp. 2Diaporthe sp.LGMF932; CPC 20308Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343204KC343446KC343688KC343930KC344172
Diaporthe sp. 3P. conorumCBS 287.29Pseudotsuga menziesiiPinaceaeUK: ScotlandG.G. HahnKC343205KC343447KC343689KC343931KC344173
Diaporthe sp. 4Diaporthe sp.LGMF944; CPC 20320Maytenus ilicifolia, endophytic in petioleCelastraceaeBrazilR.R. GomesKC343206KC343448KC343690KC343932KC344174
Diaporthe sp. 5CBS 125575Acer opalusAceraceaeItalyW. JaklitschKC343207KC343449KC343691KC343933KC344175
Diaporthe sp. 6P. pittosporiCBS 115584; HKUCC 7784; AT 7Maesa perlarius, fruitMyrsinaceaeHong KongK.D. HydeKC343208KC343450KC343692KC343934KC344176
P. pittosporiCBS 115595; HKUCC 10129Maesa perlarius, fruitMyrsinaceaeHong KongK.D. HydeKC343209KC343451KC343693KC343935KC344177
Diaporthe sp. 7P. anacardiiCBS 458.78Anacardium occidentaleAnacardiaceaeIndiaH.C. GovinduKC343210KC343452KC343694KC343936KC344178
Diaporthe sp. 8Diaporthe sp.LGMF925; CPC 20301Aspidosperma tomentosumApocynaceaeBrazilK. RodriguezKC343211KC343453KC343695KC343937KC344179
Diaporthe stictica, comb. nov.P. sticticaCBS 370.54Buxus sempervirens, dead twigBuxaceaeItalyM. RibaldiKC343212KC343454KC343696KC343938KC344180
Diaporthe subordinaria, comb. nov.P. subordinariaCBS 101711Plantago lanceolata, blackened seedPlantaginaceaeNew ZealandB. AlexanderKC343213KC343455KC343697KC343939KC344181
P. subordinariaCBS 464.90Plantago lanceolata, stalkPlantaginaceaeSouth AfricaR. ShivasKC343214KC343456KC343698KC343940KC344182
Diaporthe tecomaeP. tecomaeCBS 100547Tabebuia sp., mycocecidium caused by Prosopodium tecomicolaBignoniaceaeBrazilA. AptrootKC343215KC343457KC343699KC343941KC344183
Diaporthe terebinthifolii, sp. nov.CBS 133180; LGMF914; CPC 20290 (ex-type)Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343216KC343458KC343700KC343942KC344184
LGMF907; CPC 20283Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343217KC343459KC343701KC343943KC344185
LGMF909; CPC 20285Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343218KC343460KC343702KC343944KC344186
LGMF913; CPC 20289Schinus terebinthifolius, endophytic in leafAnacardiaceaeBrazilJ. LimaKC343219KC343461KC343703KC343945KC344187
Diaporthe toxicaD. toxicaCBS 534.93; ATCC 96741 (ex-type)Lupinus angustifolius, stemFabaceaeWestern AustraliaJ.B. NunnKC343220KC343462KC343704KC343946KC344188
D. toxicaCBS 535.93Lupinus sp.FabaceaeWestern AustraliaP.M. WilliamsonKC343221KC343463KC343705KC343947KC344189
D. toxicaCBS 546.93Lupinus sp., stemFabaceaeWestern AustraliaP.M. WilliamsonKC343222KC343464KC343706KC343948KC344190
Diaporthe vacciniiD. vacciniiCBS 118571; G.C.A.DvaccVaccinium corymbosumEricaceaeUSA: MichiganG.C. AdamsKC343223KC343465KC343707KC343949KC344191
P. vacciniiCBS 122112; FAU 474Vaccinium macrocarponEricaceaeUSA: New JerseyL. CarrisKC343224KC343466KC343708KC343950KC344192
P. vacciniiCBS 122114; FAU 634Vaccinium corymbosumEricaceaeUSA: MichiganD.C. RamsdellKC343225KC343467KC343709KC343951KC344193
P. vacciniiCBS 122115; FAU 590Vaccinium corymbosumEricaceaeUSA: MichiganD.C. RamsdellKC343226KC343468KC343710KC343952KC344194
P. vacciniiCBS 122116; DF 5022Vaccinium corymbosumEricaceaeUSA: North CarolinaD.F. FarrKC343227KC343469KC343711KC343953KC344195
D. vacciniiCBS 160.32; IFO 32646 (ex-type)Oxycoccus macrocarposEricaceaeUSA: MassachusettsC.L. ShearKC343228KC343470KC343712KC343954KC344196
Diaporthe vexansP. vexansCBS 127.14Solanum melongenaSolanaceaeUSAL.L. HarterKC343229KC343471KC343713KC343955KC344197
Diaporthe viticolaP. controversaCBS 100170Fraxinus excelsior, leaf spotOleaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343230KC343472KC343714KC343956KC344198
D. aucubaeCBS 106.95Aucuba japonica, branches and twigsAucubaceaeNetherlandsG.J.M. VerkleyKC343231KC343473KC343715KC343957KC344199
D. medusaeaCBS 109492Laburnum anagyroidesFabaceaeAustriaA.Y. RossmanKC343232KC343474KC343716KC343958KC344200
D. pardalotaCBS 109768; AR 3478Epilobium angustifoliumOnagraceaeCanadaM. BarrKC343233KC343475KC343717KC343959KC344201
D. viticolaCBS 113201; STE-U 5683; CPC 5683 (ex-epitype)Vitis viniferaVitaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343234KC343476KC343718KC343960KC344202
D. viticolaCBS 114011; CPC 2677Vitis viniferaVitaceaePortugalA.J.L. PhillipsKC343235KC343477KC343719KC343961KC344203
D. circumscriptaCBS 114436; UPSC 2960Sambucus cf. racemosaCaprifoliaceaeSwedenK. & L. HolmKC343236KC343478KC343720KC343962KC344204
D. medusaeaCBS 266.85; PD 85/25Rosa rugosaRosaceaeNetherlandsG.H. BoeremaKC343237KC343479KC343721KC343963KC344205
D. woodiiCBS 312.91Lupinus arboreus, dead stemFabaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der Aa & F. MeursKC343238KC343480KC343722KC343964KC344206
P. salicinaCBS 446.62Salix sp., twigSalicaceaeNetherlandsG.H. BoeremaKC343239KC343481KC343723KC343965KC344207
D. woodiiCBS 449.82Lupinus sp., dead stemFabaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343240KC343482KC343724KC343966KC344208
P. dipsaciCBS 502.85Dipsacus fullonum, dead stemDipsacaceaeNetherlandsH.A. van der AaKC343241KC343483KC343725KC343967KC344209
P. asphodelinaCBS 759.95Asphodelus albus, 1-yr-old stemsAsphodelaceaeFranceG.J.M. VerkleyKC343242KC343484KC343726KC343968KC344210
D. aucubaeCBS 794.96Aucuba japonicaAucubaceaeUKG.J.M. VerkleyKC343243KC343485KC343727KC343969KC344211
Diaporthe woodiiD. woodiiCBS 558.93Lupinus sp., stemFabaceaeWestern AustraliaP.M. WilliamsonKC343244KC343486KC343728KC343970KC344212
Diaporthe woolworthiiD. woolworthiiCBS 148.27Ulmus americanaUlmaceaeL.E. WehmeyerKC343245KC343487KC343729KC343971KC344213
Diaporthella corylinaCBS 121124; AR 4131Corylus sp., dying stemsCorylaceaeChina: FuyuanL.N. VassiljevaKC343004KC343246KC343488KC343730KC343972

1 AR: Collection of A.Y. Rossman; ATCC: American type culture collection; CBS: CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CECT: Coleccion Española de Cultivos Tipo, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CPC: Collection Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; DAOM: Plant Research Institute, Department of Agriculture (Mycology), Ottawa, Canada; HKUCC: University of Hong Kong Culture Collection, Department of Ecology and Biodiversity, Hong Kong, China; IFO: Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, Japan; IMI: International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.; LGMF: Culture collection of Laboratory of Genetics of Microorganisms, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil; MUCL: Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; NRRL: National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois, U.S.A.; PD: Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, The Netherlands; STE-U: Stellenbosch University culture collections, South Africa; UPSC: Fungal Culture Collection at the Botanical Museum, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

2 TUB: partial beta-tubulin gene; CAL: partial calmodulin gene; HIS: partial histone H3 gene; ITS: internal transcribed spacer regions of the nrDNA and intervening 5.8S nrDNA; TEF1: partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene.

DNA isolation, amplification and phylogenetic analysis

Colonies were cultivated on 2 % potato-dextrose agar (PDA), and genomic DNA extraction was undertaken using the UltraClean™ Microbial DNA Kit (MO Bio, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Using 20 isolates, we screened nine loci, of which the five more informative loci were selected for multi-gene analyses.

The primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) were used to amplify the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene operon, including the 3’ end of the 18S nrRNA, the first internal transcribed spacer region, the 5.8S nrRNA gene; the second internal transcribed spacer region and the 5’ end of the 28S nrRNA gene. The primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999) were used to amplify part of the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (TEF1) and the primers ACT-512F and ACT-783R (Carbone & Kohn 1999) were used to amplify part of the actin gene (ACT). The primers Gpd1-LM and Gpd2-LM (Myllys et al. 2002) were used to amplify part of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) gene, and part of the calmodulin (CAL) gene was sequenced using the primers CAL-228F and CAL-737R (Carbone & Kohn 1999). The primers CYLH3F (Crous et al. 2004b) and H3-1b (Glass & Donaldson 1995) were used to amplify part of the histone H3 (HIS) gene, and the primers T1 (O’Donnell & Cigelnik 1997) and Bt-2b (Glass & Donaldson 1995) to amplify part of the β-tubulin gene (TUB). The primers NMS1 and NMS2 (Li et al. 1994) were used to amplify an internal region of the mitochondrial SSU (mtSSU). The partial large subunit nrDNA (LSU) was sequenced using the primers LSU1Fd (Crous et al. 2009a) and LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990).

Amplification reactions had a total reaction volume of 12.5 μL which was composed of 1× PCR buffer (Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany), 5.6 % DMSO (v/v), 20 μM dNTPs, 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers, 0.25 U of BioTaq Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany), and 10 ng of genomic DNA. PCR conditions were the same for all loci, except for the MgCl2 concentration: 2 mM MgCl2 for the genes LSU and TEF1, 1.5 mM MgCl2 for the genes ACT, GPDH, mtSSU, ITS and TUB, and 1 mM MgCl2 for CAL and HIS genes. The PCR conditions were: start step of 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at adequate annealing temperature, and 1 min at 72 °C, followed by a finishing step of 3 min at 72 °C and a cool down step to 4 °C. The annealing temperature varied for each gene: 61 °C (ACT, GPDH, mtSSU); 58 °C (CAL, ITS, HIS); 55 °C (TEF1, TUB) and 48 °C (LSU).

However, some of these primer pairs failed to amplify with some isolates included in this study, and therefore additional combinations were used. The amplification reaction and cycle conditions were the same except the annealing temperature and MgCl2 concentration. For the amplification of TEF1 with primers EF1-728F and EF2 (O’Donnell et al. 1998), 52 °C and 2 mM MgCl2; TUB with primers T1 (O’Donnell & Cigelnik 1997) and CYLTUB1R (Crous et al. 2004b), 50 °C and 1 mM MgCl2; CAL with primers CAL-228F and CAL2Rd (Quaedvlieg et al. 2011, Groenewald et al. 2013), 58 °C and 1 mM MgCl2.

Amplicons were sequenced using both PCR primers with a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and sequences were analysed on an ABI Prism 3700 DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Foster City, CA, USA). The consensus sequences were visually inspected using MEGA v. 5 software (Tamura et al. 2011). The alignment of obtained sequences was performed using the online MAFFT interface (Katoh & Toh 2008; http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server).

For the phylogenetic analyses based on Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian inference, we chose the best evolutionary models for each data partition using the software MrModelTest v. 2.3 (Nylander 2004). MrBayes v. 3.1.1 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) was used to generate the phylogenetic trees under optimal criteria per data partition. The heating parameter was set at 0.3 and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis of four chains was started in parallel from a random tree topology and lasted until the average standard deviation of split frequencies came below 0.01. Trees were saved each 10 000 generations and the resulting phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) was printed with Geneious v. 5.5.4 (Drummond et al. 2011) and the layout of the tree was done in Adobe Illustrator v. CS5.1. Diaporthella corylina (CBS 121124) was used as outgroup in the phylogenetic analyses based on its position as sister family in Diaporthales (Vasilyeva et al. 2007). New sequences generated in this study were deposited in NCBIs GenBank nucleotide database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; Table 1) and the alignment and phylogenetic tree in TreeBASE (study S13943; www.treebase.org).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g001a.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g001b.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g001c.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g001d.jpg
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g001e.jpg

Consensus phylogram of 22 104 trees resulting from a Bayesian analysis of the combined 5-gene sequence alignment. Clades are numbered on the right of the boxes and Diaporthe species names in purple reflect new combinations and in red new species. Strain accession numbers are followed by the original species name (black, when applicable), the isolation source (green) and country of origin (blue). Accession numbers and names in bold represent strains known to be ex-type strains or are considered to be authentic for the species. Red dots indicate strains from medicinal plants and yellow dots from humans. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown at the nodes and the scale bar represents the expected changes per site. The tree was rooted to Diaporthella corylina (strain CBS 121124).

Locus resolution and SNP detection

Neighbour-joining analyses using the general time-reversible substitution model were applied to each data partition individually to check the stability and robustness of each species clade under each dataset using PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) (TreeBASE study S13943). Alignment gaps were treated as missing data and all characters were unordered and of equal weight. Any ties were broken randomly when encountered. The robustness of the trees obtained was evaluated by 1 000 bootstrap replications (Hillis & Bull 1993). In the present study, both the analysis of the combined alignment (Fig. 1) and of the individual loci were used to determine the species boundaries. For each clade in the combined analysis, the position of the members of that clade was determined in the phylogenetic tree obtained from each of the individual loci to check whether these members still represent a single clade in the individual gene tree. In this way the robustness of a given clade could be evaluated together with the posterior probability value of that clade. A species was only counted if it was distinct from its closest relatives and the species clade contained all the associated strains.

Unique fixed nucleotide positions are used to characterise and describe several sterile species (see applicable species notes). For each sterile species that was described, the closest phylogenetic neighbour(s) were selected from Fig. 1 and this focused dataset was subjected to SNP analyses. These single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined for each aligned data partition using DnaSP v. 5.00.07 (Librado & Rozas 2009).

Taxonomy

All descriptions provided are based on colonies sporulating in culture, which for the most part only formed the asexual morph. Colonies were subcultured onto 2 % tap water agar supplemented with sterile pine needles (PNA; Smith et al. 1996), or autoclaved leaf pieces of Ilex aquifolium, Maytenus ilicifolia or Schinus terebinthifolius, PDA, oatmeal agar (OA), and 2 % malt extract agar (MEA) (according to Crous et al. 2009b), and incubated at 20 °C under a 12 h near-ultraviolet light (400–315 nm) (Sylvania Blacklight-Blue, Osram Nederland B.V., Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands), 12 h dark cycle to promote sporulation. Structures were mounted in clear lactic acid, and 50 measurements determined for conidia, and 30 for other structures. The 95 % confidence levels were determined, and the extremes given in parentheses. Colony diameters were determined at 25 °C in darkness on PDA, OA and MEA. Colony colours (surface and reverse) were described after 14 d using the colour charts of Rayner (1970). Nomenclatural novelties and descriptions were deposited in MycoBank (www.MycoBank.org; Crous et al. 2004a).

RESULTS

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The most suitable genes for Diaporthe species delimitation in this study were found to be CAL, HIS, ITS, TEF1 and TUB. The amplified genomic regions of these genes were more informative, and the combined analysis provided a more robust species identification, from which phylogenetic relationships could be inferred.

The manually adjusted, combined (ITS, TUB, CAL, TEF1 and HIS) alignment for the Bayesian analysis contained 243 isolates (including the outgroup sequences) and 2 435 characters were used in the phylogenetic analysis. The number of unique site patterns per data partition were 210, 616, 242, 281 and 183, respectively and were based on 466, 874, 355, 316 and 424 alignment positions, respectively. Based on the results of MrModeltest, the following priors were set in MrBayes for the different data partitions: all partitions had dirichlet base frequencies and GTR+I+G models with inverse gamma-distributed rates were implemented for ITS and HIS, and HKY+I+G with inverse gamma-distributed rates for TUB, CAL and TEF1. The Bayesian analysis lasted 14 735 000 generations and the consensus trees and posterior probabilities were calculated from the 22 104 trees left after discarding 7 368 trees (the first 25 % of generations) for burn-in (Fig. 1). Ninety-five clades are recognised and discussed here.

Locus resolution and SNP detection

The mtSSU and LSU regions had very few informative sites for the tested strains and were therefore not selected as good markers at species level. The ACT and GPDH regions were also discarded as suitable candidates for the multi-gene analyses because of their long branch lengths which made unambiguous alignments impossible. These four loci were therefore not used for further amplification and sequencing on the complete dataset. The remaining five loci had varied success for species identification and some phylogenetic lineages were more prone to less variability than others. Fifty-eight of the 95 species could be identified by all five loci. The loci are treated individually below:

  • CAL – The locus could distinguish 74 of the 95 species (78 % success). It had difficulty separating: D. endophytica and D. phaseolorum (clades 4, 5); D. angelicae, D. arctii and D. subordinaria (clades 17–19); D. alleghaniensis, D. alnea, D. celastrina, D. eres, D. juglandina, D. neilliae and D. nobilis (clades 60–62, 64–67); and D. eugeniae, D. musigena, D. perseae, D. pseudomangiferae, D. pseudophoenicicola, Diaporthe sp. 6 and Diaporthe sp. 7 (clades 82–86, 88, 89). A single strain each of D. angelicae (clade 17), D. novem (clade 22) and D. terebinthifolii (clade 9) clustered separate from the other strains of the species.

  • HIS – The locus could distinguish 84 of the 95 species (88 % success). It had difficulty separating: D. australafricana and D. viticola (clades 49, 50); D. celastrina, D. eres and D. nobilis (clades 66, 67, 62); D. arecae and D. perseae (clades 86, 87); and D. pseudophoenicicola and Diaporthe sp. 8 (clades 89, 90). A single strain each of D. endophytica (clade 5) and D. terebinthifolii (clade 9) clustered separate from the other strains of the species. This is the only locus that can distinguish D. angelicae (clade 17).

  • ITS – The locus could distinguish 75 of the 95 species (79 % success). It had difficulty separating: D. angelicae, D. arctii and D. subordinaria (clades 17–19); D. cynaroides and D. viticola (clades 48, 50); D. alnea, D. neilliae and D. nobilis (clades 60–62); D. arengae, D. eugeniae and D. pseudomangiferae (clades 81–83); D. arecae and D. perseae (clades 86, 87); and D. aspalathi and D. woodii (clades 93, 94). A single strain each of D. arecae (clade 87), D. inconspicua (clade 75), D. novem (clade 22) and D. terebinthifolii (clade 9), and two strains each of D. impulsa (clade 51) and D. infecunda (clade 23), clustered separate from the other strains of the species. This is the only locus that can distinguish D. celastrina (clade 17) and D. eres (clade 67).

  • TEF1 – The locus could distinguish 72 of the 95 species (76 % success). It had difficulty separating: D. tecomae, D. terebinthifolii (clades 9, 10); D. angelicae, D. arctii and D. subordinaria (clades 17–19); D. australafricana and D. viticola (clades 49, 50); D. celastrina and D. juglandina (clades 65, 66); D. eres and D. nobilis (clades 67, 62); D. chamaeropis, D. cinerascens and D. foeniculaceae (clades 76–78); and D. arengae, D. arecae, D. eugeniae, D. musigena, D. perseae, D. pseudomangiferae, D. pseudophoenicicola, Diaporthe sp. 6 and Diaporthe sp. 8 (clades 81–87, 89, 90).

  • TUB – The locus could distinguish 84 of the 95 species (88 % success). It had difficulty separating: D. endophytica and D. phaseolorum (clades 4, 5); D. alleghaniensis, D. celastrina, D. eres, D. juglandina, D. nobilis and D. vaccinii (clades 62–67); and D. aspalathi and D. woodii (clades 93, 94). A single strain of D. angelicae (clade 17) clustered separate from the other strains of the species. This is the only locus that can distinguish D. perseae (clade 86).

Descriptions based on DNA characters are provided for three species in the Taxonomy section, namely D. endophytica (clade 5), D. inconspicua (clade 75) and D. infecunda (clade 23). Diaporthe endophytica (clade 5) was compared to D. phaseolorum (clade 4); D. inconspicua (clade 75) to D. anacardii (clade 69), D. chamaeropis (clade 77), D. cinerascens (clade 76), D. elaeagni (clade 73), D. foeniculacea (clade 78), D. hickoriae (clade 72), D. oncostoma (clade 70), D. saccarata (clade 71) and D. stictica (clade 74); and D. infecunda (clade 23) to D. angelicae (clade 17), D. arctii (clade 19), D. cuppatea (clade 20), D. lusitanicae (clade 21), D. neoarctii (clade 16), D. novem (clade 22) and D. subordinaria (clade 18).

Taxonomy

The multigene analyses resulted in 95 well-supported clades correlating to 243 isolates of Diaporthe (Table 1, Fig. 1). Fifteen new species are described, nine of which were isolated from medicinal plants (Aspidosperma tomentosum, Maytenus ilicifolia, Schinus terebinthifolius, Spondias mombin) in Brazil (clades 5, 9, 11, 23, 30, 31, 34, 35 and 36). Twenty-eight clades contain ex-type strains of presently known species, or strains accepted as authentic for the species name or which could be designated as epitypes in the present study, and were therefore well-resolved (7, 8, 12, 14, 17, 20–22, 24, 26–28, 40, 42, 43, 45, 48–50, 63, 64, 69, 71, 72, 84 and 91–93). The sexual-asexual relationship was resolved for several taxa, and is reported below. New combinations in Diaporthe are introduced below for several Phomopsis names that represented well-resolved taxa. Several potential epitypes were identified during this study, which are discussed below.

Diaporthe acaciigena Crous, Pascoe & Jacq. Edwards, Persoonia 26: 123. 2011

Specimen examined. Australia, Victoria, Otway Ranges, Anglesea, S38°23′21.7″ E144°11′12.7″, on leaves of Acacia retinodes, 16 Oct. 2009, P.W. Crous, I.G. Pascoe & J. Edwards (holotype CBS H-20581, ex-type culture CPC 17622 = CBS 129521).

Notes — Clade 43 contains the ex-type culture of D. acaciigena isolated from Acacia retinodes in Australia. This species is morphologically similar to D. amygdali (clade 42) (Crous et al. 2011), and closely related to D. pustulata (clade 44).

Diaporthe acerina (Peck) Sacc., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 1: 611. 1882

Basionym. Valsa acerina Peck, Ann. Rep. N.Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 73. 1876. 1874.

Specimen examined. Unknown, from Acer saccharum, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 137.27).

Notes — Clade 39 is represented by D. acerina, isolated from Acer saccharum. This species is genetically similar to D. perjuncta (clade 40). It is known to occur in Europe and North America on dead limbs and trunks of Acer pseudoplatanus, A. saccharinum, A. saccharum, A. spicatum, and Acer sp. (Aceraceae) (Spielman 1985, Farr et al. 1989).

Diaporthe alleghaniensis R.H. Arnold, Canad. J. Bot. 45: 787. 1967

Specimen examined. Canada, Ontario, on branches of Betula alleghaniensis, June 1972, R.H. Arnold (ex-type culture CBS 495.72 = ATCC 24097 = DAOM 45776).

Notes — Clade 64 contains the ex-type strain of D. alleghaniensis, isolated from Betula alleghaniensis in Canada. Diaporthe alleghaniensis causes canker and dieback of B. alleghaniensis, B. lenta, B. papyrifera and B. pendula in Canada (Arnold 1975), but has also been reported from Japan (Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe alnea Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 207. 1870 (1869–1870)

  • = Phomopsis alnea Höhn., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl., Abt. 1 115: 681 (33 of repr.). 1906.

Specimens examined. Unknown, on Alnus sp., June 1946, S. Truter (CBS 146.46); on Alnus sp., Aug. 1947, S. Truter (CBS 159.47).

Notes — Clade 61 consists of two isolates from Alnus (presumably collected in the Netherlands). Diaporthe alnea causes dieback of Alnus glutinosa (alder) and A. incana (grey alder). It has been reported from Europe, Russia and the USA (Munk 1957, Oak & Dorset 1983, Moricca 2002, Mel’nik et al. 2008, Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe ambigua Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 311. 1870

Specimens examined. Italy, Sicily, Catania, on Platanus acerifolia, G. Granata (CBS 127746 = IMI 395956); Perugia, on Helianthus annuus, Mar. 1987, A. Zazzerini (CBS 187.87). – Portugal, Vale Andeiro, on Foeniculum vulgare, J.M. Santos (CBS 123210 = Di-C003/10, CBS 123211 = Di-C002/9). – South Africa, Western Cape Province, from Pyrus communis, deposited 2002, S. Denman (ex-epitype culture CBS 114015 = CPC 2657); Western Cape Province, on crown of Aspalathus linearis, 15 May 1997, J.C. Janse van Rensburg (CBS 117167 = CPC 5414).

Notes — Clade 26 represents D. ambigua, which contains two isolates previously misidentified as D. scabra (CBS 127746) and D. helianthi (CBS 187.87), and four isolates of D. ambigua, including the ex-epitype culture. Diaporthe ambigua is an important pathogen of Malus domestica, Prunus salicina and Pyrus communis in South African fruit orchards. Infection by D. ambigua is associated with sunken lesions with longitudinal cracks on affected fruit trees. The fungus rapidly kills nursery rootstocks, but also kills mature rootstocks over a longer period of time (Smit et al. 1996). This species is also found as saprobe on wild fennel (Santos & Phillips 2009). It has been reported on Aspalathus linearis (van Rensburg et al. 2006), Foeniculum vulgare, Malus domestica (Smit et al. 1996, Santos & Phillips 2009), Malus sylvestris (Crous et al. 2000), Prunus spp. (Smit et al. 1996, Mostert et al. 2001a), Pyrus communis (Nitschke 1867), Pyrus ussuriensis (Tai 1979) and Vitis vinifera (van Niekerk et al. 2005). It is widely distributed, and is known from China, Cuba (Tai 1979), Germany (Nitschke 1867), South Africa (Smit et al. 1996), UK (Dennis 1986) and the USA (Washington) (Shaw 1973).

Diaporthe ampelina (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802922

Basionym. Phoma ampelina Berk. & M.A. Curtis, Grevillea 2, 18: 81. 1873.

  • Phomopsis ampelina (Berk. & M.A. Curt.) Grove, Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 4: 184. 1919.

  • = Phoma viticola Sacc., Michelia 2: 92. 1880.

  • Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc., Ann. Mycol. 13: 118. 1915.

  • = Fusicoccum viticolum Reddick, Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 263: 331. 1909.

  • Phomopsis viticola (Reddick) Goid., Atti Reale Accad. Naz. Lincei 26: 107. 1937.

  • = Phomopsis viticola Sacc. var. ampelopsidis Grove, Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 4: 183. 1919.

  • = Diaporthe neoviticola Udayanga, Crous & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 56: 166. 2012 (a nom. nov. based on Phoma viticola Sacc.).

Conidiomata pycnidial, eustromatic, subepidermal, brown to black, scattered or aggregated, globose, flask-like to conical, outer surface smooth, convoluted to unilocular, singly ostiolate, up to 430 μm wide and 190–300 μm tall, including short necks which rarely occur. Pycnidial wall consisting out of two regions of textura angularis; the outer region brown, 2–3 cells thick, 5–7 μm wide, inner region brown, 3–4 cells thick, 7–15 μm wide, with the outside cells compressed. Conidial mass globose or in cirrhi, white, pale-yellow to yellow, but predominantly pale-yellow. Alpha conidiophores cylindrical, some filiform, rarely septate and branched, 5–35 × 1–3 μm (av. = 25 × 2 μm). Alpha conidiogenous cells subcylindrical, tapering towards the apex, collarettes and periclinal thickening present, 3–19 × 1–2 μm (av. = 10 × 1.5 μm). Alpha conidia commonly found, fusoid-ellipsoidal, apex acutely rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, multi-guttulate with guttules grouped at the polar ends, rarely biguttulate, (7–)9.5–10.5(–13) × (1.5–)2–3(–3.5) μm (av. = 10 × 2.5 μm). Beta conidiophores ampulliform to subcylindrical, rarely branched, 10–34 × 1–2 μm (av. = 26 × 1.5 μm). Beta conidiogenous cells subcylindrical, tapering towards the apex, collarette and periclinal thickening present, 7–14 × 1–2 μm (av. = 11–1.5 μm). Beta conidia less common than alpha conidia, straight, curved or hamate, 20–25 × 0.5–1 μm (av. = 23–1 μm). Gamma conidia rarely observed, fusoid to subcylindrical, apex acutely rounded, base subtruncate, multi-guttulate, 12–18 × 1.5–2 μm (av. = 15 × 2 μm). Description adapted from Mostert et al. (2001a).

Specimens examined. France, Bordeaux, Naujan-et-Postiac, on Vitis vinifera (Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine), May 1998, P. Larignon (PREM 56460 neotype, ex-neotype culture CBS 114016). – Italy, Perugia, on Vitis vinifera, May 1980, A. Zazzerini (CBS 267.80 = CPC 2671). – Turkey, from Vitis vinifera, 1 Dec. 2001, M. Erkan (CBS 114867 = CPC 4708). – USA, California, on Vitis vinifera, J.D. Cucuzza (CBS 111888 = ATCC 48153 = CPC 2673).

Notes — Grove (1919) distinguished P. ampelina (K 58408) from P. viticola by its external appearance on the host. However, Mostert et al. (2001a) re-examined the type specimen, and found alpha conidia to be ellipsoid-fusoid, 8–12 × 2.5–3.5 μm, within the range of P. viticola (Mostert et al. 2001a: f. 29), and thus considered them to be synonymous. Udayanga et al. (2012) proposed D. neoviticola as a nom. nov. for P. viticola, but this name is superfluous, as the older epithet ‘ampelina’ has precedence and should be adopted.

Diaporthe ampelina (clade 53) is a well-resolved species. It causes cane and leaf spot and infections of pruning wounds of Vitis and Ampelopsidis spp. (Vitaceae). Several species of Diaporthe can infect the host and cause variable symptoms in different parts of the vine (canes, leaves and fruits) causing considerable confusion in the taxonomy of these species on grapevine (Phillips 1999, Scheper et al. 2000, Mostert et al. 2001a). Merrin et al. (1995) studied the variation of Diaporthe in Australia using morphology. They identified two taxa (Phomopsis taxon 1 and taxon 2), which cause cane and leaf blight of Vitis spp.; and taxon 2 was identified as showing more resemblance to P. viticola. Mostert et al. (2001a) studied the species occurring on grapevines in South Africa using morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterisation and clarified the taxonomy of this complex. Diaporthe ampelina (= Phomopsis viticola, D. neoviticola, Phomopsis taxon 2 from Australia) was found to be the cause of cane and leaf spot disease, and was neotypified. Although the sexual morph has never been reported, Santos et al. (2010) found both MAT loci to be present in this species, and showed that it is heterothallic. However, the sexual morph could not be induced in culture by crossing opposing mating types.

Diaporthe amygdali (Delacr.) Udayanga, Crous & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 56: 166. 2012

Basionym. Fusicoccum amygdali Delacr., Bull. Soc. Mycol. France 21: 280. 1905.

  • Phomopsis amygdali (Delacr.) J.J. Tuset & M.T. Portilla, Canad. J. Bot. 67, 5: 1280. 1989.

Specimens examined. Portugal, Mirandela, from Prunus dulcis, 2010, E. Diogo (ex-epitype culture CBS 126679); Tavira, on Prunus dulcis, 2010, E. Diogo (CBS 126680). – South Africa, Western Cape Province, on Vitis vinifera, 1 Mar. 1997, L. Mostert (CBS 111811 = CPC 2632); Western Cape Province, in wood on Prunus salicina, 2008, U. Damm (CBS 120840 = CPC 5833). – USA, Georgia, cankers on Prunus persica, Mar. 1994, W. Uddin (CBS 115620 = FAU 1005).

Notes — Diaporthe amygdali (clade 42) is the causal agent of twig canker and blight of almonds (Prunus dulcis) and peach (P. persica) wherever these hosts are grown (Diogo et al. 2010). It was first described as Fusicoccum amygdali causing cankers on almonds in France (Delacroix 1905). Tuset & Portilla (1989) re-examined the type specimen of F. amygdali and, based on morphology and symptomatology, they considered that it would be best accommodated in the genus Phomopsis. Clade 42 contains the ex-epitype strain (CBS 126679), five Phomopsis amygdali isolates from Prunus dulcis in Portugal, from P. persica in USA, P. salicina in South Africa, and from Vitis vinifera in South Africa.

Diaporthe anacardii (Early & Punith.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802923; Fig. 2

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g002.jpg

Diaporthe anacardii (CBS 720.97). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b. conidiomata sporulating on PDA; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. beta conidia; f. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Basionym. Phomopsis anacardii Early & Punith., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 59, 2: 345. 1972.

Conidiomata pycnidial, sporulating profusely on OA, globose, up to 600 μm diam, multilocular, black, erumpent; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 1–3-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 10–25 × 2–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells 9–16 × 1.5–2 μm, phialidic, cylindrical to cymbiform, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1–1.5 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette slightly flared, up to 2 μm long when present. Paraphyses rarely present, hyaline, smooth, 1–3-septate, cylindrical with obtuse ends, extending above conidiophores. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid to ellipsoid, tapering towards both ends, straight, apex subobtuse, base bluntly rounded with flattened hilum, (6.5–)7–8(–9) × (2–)3(–3.5) μm. Gamma conidia not observed. Beta conidia spindle-shaped, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex subacutely rounded, base truncate, tapering from lower third towards apex, curved, (15–)20–25 × 1.5(–2) μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On OA dirty white with moderate aerial mycelium and patches of iron-grey. On PDA having patches of dirty white and umber, reverse bay with patches of umber. On MEA having patches of dirty white and olivaceous-grey, reverse umber with patches of olivaceous-grey.

Specimens examined. East Africa, on Anacardium occidentale, Apr. 1997, M. Puccioni (epitype designated here CBS H-21101, culture ex-epitype CBS 720.97). – Kenya, on Anacardium occidentale, 4 Dec. 1969, M.P. Early (holotype IMI 144866).

Notes — Phomopsis anacardii (clade 69 as D. anacardii) was described from Anacardi occidentalis in Kenya, and also recorded from Nigeria, Guinea and Cuba (Early & Punithalingam 1972).

Diaporthe angelicae (Berk.) D.F. Farr & Castl., Mycoscience 44: 204. 2003. — Fig. 3

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g003.jpg

Diaporthe angelicae (CBS 111591). a, b. Transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. alpha and beta conidia; f. conidiogenous cells giving rise to beta conidia; g. beta conidia. — Scale bars: a = 140 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Basionym. Sphaeria angelicae Berk., Mag. Zool. Bot.: 28. 1837.

  • Diaporthopsis angelicae (Berk.) Wehm., The genus Diaporthe Nitschke: 228. 1933.

  • Mazzantia angelicae (Berk.) Lar. N. Vassiljeva, Pyrenomycetes of the Russia Far East. I. Gnomoniaceae: 49. 1993.

  • = Leptosphaeria nigrella Auersw., Mycol. Eur. Pyr. 5/6, pl. 12, f. 163. 1869.

  • Diaporthe nigrella (Auersw.) Niessl, Beitr.: 51. 1872.

  • Diaporthopsis nigrella (Auersw.) Fabre, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. 6 15: 35. 1883.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to ellipsoidal, aggregated or scattered, dark brown to black, immersed, ostiolate, 100–281 μm wide, 70–200 μm tall, lacking necks, with outer surface covered in hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose or exuding in cirrhi, white to pale luteous or pale yellow. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical, rarely branched, tapering towards the apex, aseptate, (12–)13–16(–18) × 3(–4) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, straight to curved, tapering towards the apex, collarette not flared, periclinal thickening inconspicuous, 8–10(–11) × 3(–3.5) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, oblong to ellipsoid, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, (7–)8–10(–11) × 3(–4) μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, spindle shaped, slightly curved, (19–)22–26(–28) × (1–)2 μm. Gamma conidia not observed (CBS 111592).

Culture characteristics — See Castlebury et al. (2003).

Specimens examined. Austria, Karnten, St. Margareten, decaying stems of Heracleum sphondylium, Aug. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (CBS 111591 = AR 3724); Niederosterreich, Ottenstein, decaying stems of Heracleum sphondylium, Aug. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (ex-epitype culture CBS 111592 = AR3776). – France, Bretagne, La Ville Borée, near Quessoy, on seeds of Heracleum sphondylium, 27 July 1990, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 501.90); sea dunes near Seignose le Penon, on Eryngium maritimum, leaf spots, 10 June 1986, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 344.86). – Italy, San Casciano, Prov., Florence, twig blight of Foeniculum vulgare, July 1996, L. Mugnai (CBS 100871). – Portugal, Malveira da Serra, Sintra, on Foeniculum vulgare, A.J.L. Phillips (CBS 123215 = Ph-C133/1).

Notes — Diaporthe angelicae (clade 17) is known to cause stem decay in several hosts including Heracleum sphondylium (Apiaceae) and Foeniculum vulgare (Apiaceae) in Europe and North America (Santos & Phillips 2009). Wehmeyer (1933) not only linked the conidial form of Phomopsis asteriscus to the sexual state Diaporthopsis angelicae, but also stated that Diaporthe berkeleyi was a synonym of Diaporthopsis angelicae. However, Castlebury et al. (2003) showed that Diaporthopsis is a synonym of Diaporthe, and also designated an epitype for D. angelicae.

Diaporthe arctii (Lasch) Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 268. 1870

Basionym. Sphaeria arctii Lasch, in Rabenh., Klotzsch. Herb. Vivum Mycol.: no. 1046. 1846.

  • Phomopsis arctii (Lasch) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt., Pars 1: Fungi. Pyrenomycetae. Xylariaceae, Valsaceae, Ceratostomataceae: 226. 1906.

Specimen examined. Unknown, from Arctium sp., Sept. 1925, A.W. Archer (CBS 136.25).

Notes — There are several clades that contain isolates previously identified as D. arctii (clades 16, 19, part 2 and 67, part 4). We suspect that clade 19 may represent the real D. arctii, as it is basal to D. subordinaria, and Wehmeyer (1933) regarded the latter (from Plantago lanceolata) as synonym of D. arctii (from Arctium).

Diaporthe arecae (H.C. Srivast., Zakia & Govindar.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802924

Basionym. Subramanella arecae H.C. Srivast., Zakia & Govindar., Mycologia 54, 1: 7. 1962.

Specimens examined. India, on fruit of Areca catechu, Feb. 1964, H.C. Srivastava (isotype CBS H-7808, ex-isotype culture CBS 161.64). – Suriname, on fruits of Citrus sp., Oct. 1975, I. Block (CBS 535.75).

Notes — The Diaporthe isolate from citrus (CBS 535.75) could well be distinct, but more strains are required to resolve this clade (clade 87).

Diaporthe arengae R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802925; Fig. 4

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g004.jpg

Diaporthe arengae (CBS 114979). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b, c. conidiogenous cells; d. beta conidia; e, f. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the host genus from which it was collected, Arenga.

Pycnidia in culture on PNA sporulating poorly, subglobose, up to 250 μm diam, black, erumpent; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostiole; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline in upper region, pale brown at base, smooth, 0–6-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 10–60 × 2.5–4 μm. Conidiogenous cells 8–15 × 1.5–2.5 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1–1.5 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette not flared, up to 2 μm long when present. Paraphyses not observed. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, guttulate, fusoid-ellipsoid, tapering towards both ends, apex subobtuse, base with flattened hilum, (5–)6–7(–9) × (2–)2.5(–3) μm. Gamma conidia not observed. Beta conidia rarely observed, subcylindrical, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex bluntly rounded, base truncate, tapering absent to very slight, curved, 20–25 × 1.5 μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On MEA surface with fluffy aerial mycelium, pale luteous, in reverse orange with patches of sienna. On OA umber with patches of sienna and saffron, in reverse umber with patches of saffron. On PDA surface with fluffy white aerial mycelium, umber with patches of saffron, in reverse umber with patches of pale luteous to luteous.

Specimen examined. Hong Kong, Victoria Peak, from Arenga engleri, 7 Oct. 1999, K.D. Hyde (holotype CBS H-21104, culture ex-type CBS 114979 = HKUCC 5527).

Notes — The Diaporthe species occurring on palms are summarised by Fröhlich et al. (1997). Diaporthe arengae (clade 81) is distinguished from known species based on a combination of its conidial morphology and host.

Diaporthe aspalathi E. Jansen, Castl. & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 55: 71. 2006

Basionym. Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalis F.A. Fernández, Mycologia 88: 438. 1996 (non D. meridionalis Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 638. 1878).

Specimens examined. South Africa, Western Cape Province, Clanwilliam, Langebergpunt, in branch on Aspalathus linearis, J.C. Janse van Rensburg (ex-type culture CBS 117169 = CPC 5428); in crown on Aspalathus linearis, 17 Oct. 1997, J.C. Janse van Rensburg (CBS 117168 = CPC 5420); on Aspalathus linearis, 2 Dec. 1996, S. Lamprecht (CBS 117500 = CPC 5408).

Notes — Diaporthe aspalathi (clade 93) causes soybean stem canker in the South-eastern USA (Fernández & Hanlin 1996), and is not closely related to D. phaseolorum as might be expected. Although morphologically similar, this species clustered apart from the reference strain of D. phaseolorum (clade 4). Diaporthe aspalathi is also the main causal organism of canker and dieback of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis), and not D. phaseolorum as reported earlier (Smit & Knox-Davies 1989a, b, van Rensburg et al. 2006).

Diaporthe australafricana Crous & Van Niekerk, Australas. Pl. Pathol. 34: 33. 2005

Specimens examined. Australia, on Vitis vinifera, 1 July 1995, R.W.A. Schepers (ex-type culture CBS 111886 = CPC 2676). – South Africa, on V. vinifera, 1 Nov. 1997, L. Mostert (CBS 113487 = CPC 2655).

Notes — Clade 49 contains two isolates of D. australafricana, one of them being the ex-type strain (CBS 111886), which is a sibling species of D. viticola in clade 50 (van Niekerk et al. 2005). Both species were described from Vitis vinifera, but D. australafricana is thus far only known from grapevines in Australia and South Africa.

Diaporthe batatas Harter & E.C. Field, Phytopathology 2: 121. 1912

Specimen examined. USA, on Ipomoea batatas, Feb. 1921, L.L. Harter (CBS 122.21).

Notes — Clade 8 consists of a single strain of D. batatas isolated from Ipomoea batatas in the USA. This species and D. phaseolorum have in the past been considered as varieties, namely D. phaseolorum var. batatatis and D. phaseolorum var. batatae. However, the genetic data revealed no homology between the two species. Although it is not certain if CBS 122.21 (culture sterile) is an ex-type strain of D. batatas, it is regarded as authentic for the name.

Diaporthe beckhausii Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 295. 1870

Specimen examined. Unknown, from Viburnum sp., Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 138.27).

Notes — Clade 47 is represented by D. beckhausii, which was isolated from Viburnum sp. (origin unknown, presumably North America, whereas the species was originally described from Viburnum collected in Germany). Diaporthe beckhausii is known from woody stems of Betula sp., Cydonia japonica, Elaeagnus angustifolia, Halesia sp., Menispermum canadense, Menispermum sp., V. opulus, Viburnum sp. and V. tinus in temperate North America and Europe (Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe brasiliensis R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802926; Fig. 5

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g005.jpg

Diaporthe brasiliensis (CBS 133183). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f, g. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 80 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the country where it was collected, Brazil.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to conical, immersed, scattered or aggregated, brown to black, ostiolate, 70–160 μm wide, 60–140 μm tall, necks 60–130 μm tall, outer surface smooth; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose, white to pale-luteous. Conidiophores hyaline, cylindrical, filiform, straight to curved, 1–3-septate, (17–)20–27(–30) × 2(–4) μm. Alpha conidiogenous cells hyaline, cylindrical, filiform, straight to curved, collarette flared, with slight periclinal thickening, (7–)8–12(–14) × 2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, ellipsoid to irregular, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, 6–7(–8) × 2–3 μm. Beta and gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with an entire edge, surface mycelium dense and felty, buff, grey-olivaceous or olivaceous-grey; colonies covering dish after 2 wk at 25 °C in the dark; reverse olivaceous, dull green, olivaceous-buff. On OA raised, entire edge, surface mycelium dense felty, smoke-grey to grey-olivaceous; reverse purplish grey to pale purplish grey, grey olivaceous or olivaceous buff. On MEA raised, with an entire edge, buff, smoke-grey, with patches of olivaceous-grey and vinaceous-buff; reverse dark mouse-grey, buff.

Specimens examined. Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, endophytic species isolated from leaf of Aspidosperma tomentosum (popular name Peroba-do-campo), July 2007, K. Rodriguez (holotype CBS H-21100, ex-type culture CBS 133183 = LGMF 924 = CPC 20300); same collection details (LGMF 926 = CPC 20302).

Notes — Endophytic isolates (clade 36) from a medicinal plant in Brazil.

Diaporthe carpini (Pers.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 205. 1870 (1869–1870)

Basionym. Sphaeria carpini Pers., Syn. Meth. Fung. (Göttingen) 1: 39. 1801.

Specimen examined. Sweden, Skåne, S. Mellby par., Stenshuvud, on Carpinus betulus, 14 Apr. 1989, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114437 = UPSC 2980).

Notes — Diaporthe carpini (clade 55) is known from several European countries, where it occurs on Carpinus spp.

Diaporthe caulivora (Athow & Caldwell) J.M. Santos, Vrandečić & A.J.L. Phillips, Persoonia 27: 13. 2011

Basionym. Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora Athow & Caldwell, Phytopathology 44: 323. 1954.

Specimens examined. Canada, Ontario, in mature stem on Glycine soja, Mar. 1955, A.A. Hildebrand (CBS 178.55 = ATCC 12048 = CECT 2023). – Croatia, in stem on Glycine max, K. Vrandečić (ex-neotype culture CBS 127268).

Notes — Clade 91 is represented by two isolates of D. caulivora on Glycine soja and G. max, respectively obtained from Canada (CBS 178.55) and Croatia (ex-neotype: CBS 127268). The soybean canker species complex was recently treated by Santos et al. (2011).

Diaporthe celastrina Ellis & Barthol., J. Mycol. 8, 4: 173. 1902

Specimen examined. Unknown, on Celastrus scandens, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 139.27).

Notes — Strains from the USA are required to confirm the identity of this culture (clade 66).

Diaporthe chamaeropis (Cooke) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802927; Fig. 6

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g006.jpg

Diaporthe chamaeropis (CBS 454.81). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b. conidiomata sporulating on PNA; c–e. conidiogenous cells; f. alpha conidia; g. beta conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Basionym. Phoma chamaeropis Cooke, Grevillea 13 (no. 68): 95. 1885.

  • Phomopsis chamaeropsis (Cooke) Petr., as ‘Phomopsis chamaeropis’, Ann. Mycol. 17, 2/6: 83. 1920 (1919).

Conidiomata pycnidial in culture on PNA, globose, up to 400 μm diam (up to 600 μm diam on OA), black, erumpent; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 1–5-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 10–50 × 2–2.5 μm. Conidiogenous cells 10–20 × 1.5–2 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1–1.5 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette not observed. Paraphyses not observed. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid to ellipsoid, tapering towards both ends, straight, apex subobtuse, base subtruncate, (5–)6–8(–9) × 2(–2.5) μm. Gamma conidia not observed. Beta conidia spindle-shaped, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, tapering from lower third towards apex, curved, (20–)22–27(–30) × 1.5(–2) μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On OA with moderate aerial mycelium, surface dirty white with patches of pale olivaceous-grey, reverse with patches of dirty white and sienna. On MEA surface dirty white with patches of olivaceous-grey, reverse sienna, with patches of luteous. On PDA surface olivaceous-grey with patches of dirty white, reverse iron-grey.

Specimens examined. Croatia, Rab, slope behind Hotel ‘Imperial’, on dead branch of Spartium junceum, July 1970, J.A. von Arx (CBS 753.70). – Greece, Thessaloniki, dead part of leaf of Chamaerops humilis, Aug. 1981, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 454.81).

Notes — Conidial dimensions closely fit those provided in the original description (on Chamaerops humulis from Czechoslovakia; Uecker 1988), suggesting that these cultures (clade 77) could be authentic for the name.

Diaporthe cinerascens Sacc., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 1: 679. 1882. — Fig. 7

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g007.jpg

Diaporthe cinerascens (CBS 719.96). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. conidiogenous cells; d. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

  • = Phoma cinerescens Sacc., Michelia 1 (no. 5): 521. 1879.

  • Phomopsis cinerascens (Sacc.) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. Pyrenomycetae 2, 1: 278. 1906.

Conidiomata pycnidial, sporulating poorly on MEA, globose, up to 300 μm diam, black, erumpent; creamy-luteous conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 1–3-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 17–30 × 2–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells 8–18 × 2–3 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1.5–2 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette mostly absent, slightly flared when present, up to 2 μm long. Paraphyses not observed. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid to ellipsoid, tapering towards both ends, straight, apex subobtuse, base subtruncate, 7–8(–9) × (2.5–)3 μm. Gamma conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, ellipsoid-fusoid, apex acutely rounded, base subtruncate, 8–12 × 3 μm. Beta conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On MEA with profuse aerial mycelium, surface dirty white, reverse ochreous with patches of umber. On PDA with sparse aerial mycelium, surface olivaceous-grey, reverse iron-grey. On OA surface with moderate aerial mycelium, olivaceous-grey to pale olivaceous-grey.

Specimen examined. Bulgaria, Kostinbrod, Plant Protection Institute, on branch of Ficus carica, 1995, E. Ilieva (CBS 719.96).

Notes — Diaporthe cinerascens (clade 76) represents a European species occurring on Ficus, so the present culture could be authentic for the name, as the conidial dimenions match those provided in the original description. This species was orginally associated with canker and dieback of Ficus spp. in Italy (Saccardo 1879), and the causal organism identified as Phomopsis cinerascens (sexual morph: Diaporthe cinerascens) by Grove (1935). Diaporthe cinerascens affects all commercial figs in California (Ogawa & English 1991), and is found in several geographical locations of the world (Hampson 1981, Anderson & Hartman 1983, Benschop et al. 1984, Banihashemi & Javadi 2009). Ficus spp. are important exotic garden ornamentals across the USA and Canada as well as in the tropics.

Diaporthe citri F.A. Wolf, J. Agric. Res. 33, 7: 625. 1926

  • = Phomopsis citri H.S. Fawc., Phytopathology 2, 3: 109. 1912.

Specimens examined. Brazil, on seed of Glycine max, A. Almeida EMBRAPA/PR (LGMF 946 = CPC 20322). – Italy, unknown host, June 1939, G. Goidánich (CBS 199.39). – Suriname, Paramaribo, on decaying fruit of Citrus sinensis, Apr. 1932, N.J. van Suchtelen (CBS 230.52).

Notes — Clade 6 is represented by three isolates. One isolate (CBS 199.39) was previously identified as D. conorum from Italy, while another originates from soybean seed collected in Brazil (LGMF 946), and the third isolate is from Citrus sinensis in Suriname (CBS 230.52). Because D. conorum is regarded as synonym of D. eres (clade 67), we tentatively refer to this clade as D. citri, awaiting more isolates from Citrus. Diaporthe citri is a serious pathogen that is widely distributed, and associated with melanosis and stem-end rot of citrus fruits (Punithalingam & Holliday 1973, McKenzie 1992, Mondal et al. 2007, Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe convolvuli (Ormeno-Nuñez, Reeleder & A.K. Watson) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802928

Basionym. Phomopsis convolvuli Ormeno-Nuñez, Reeleder & A.K. Watson, Canad. J. Bot. 66, 11: 2232. 1988.

Specimen examined. Turkey, isolated from leaves with anthracnose on Convolvulus arvensis, D. Berner (CBS 124654 = DP 0727).

Notes — Phomopsis convolvuli (clade 3) was originally described from diseased leaves of Convolvulus arvensis in Québec (Ormeno-Nuñez et al. 1988). The isolate of Phomopsis convolvuli studied here (CBS 124654), was found causing anthracnose on field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), a troublesome perennial weed to many important agricultural crops in the world, and was considered potentially useful as biological control agent (Kuleci et al. 2009).

Diaporthe crataegi (Curr.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 204. 1870

Basionym. Valsa crataegi Curr., Trans. Linn. Soc. London 22: 278. 1858.

Specimen examined. Sweden, Skåne, Trolle-Ljungby par., Tosteberga, on Crataegus oxyacantha, 15 Apr. 1989, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114435 = UPSC 2938).

Notes — Clade 41 is represented by D. crataegi isolated from Crataegus oxyacantha in Sweden. The species is common on C. chrysocarpa, C. laevigata and C. oxyacantha in Canada and Europe (Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe crotalariae G.F. Weber, Phytopathology 23: 602. 1933

  • = Phomopsis crotalariae G.F. Weber, Phytopathology 23: 602. 1933.

Specimen examined. USA, on Crotalaria spectabilis, Oct. 1933, G.F. Weber (ex-type culture CBS 162.33).

Notes — Clade 92 contains the ex-type strain (CBS 162.33) of D. crotalariae isolated from Crotalaria spectabilis in the USA.

Diaporthe cuppatea (E. Jansen, Lampr. & Crous) Udayanga, Crous & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 56: 166. 2012

Basionym. Phomopsis cuppatea E. Jansen, Lampr. & Crous, Stud. Mycol. 55: 72. 2006.

Specimen examined. South Africa, Western Cape Province, on Aspalathus linearis, 2006, J. Janse van Rensburg (holotype CBS H-19687, ex-type culture CBS 117499 = STE-U 5431 = CPC 5431).

Notes — Diaporthe cuppatea (clade 20) is known only from the original collection made from dying branches of Aspalathus linearis in South Africa (van Rensburg et al. 2006).

Diaporthe cynaroidis Marinc., M.J. Wingf. & Crous, CBS Biodiversity Ser. (Utrecht) 7: 39. 2008

Specimen examined. South Africa, Western Cape Province, on leaf litter of Protea cynaroides, 26 June 2000, S. Marincowitz (ex-type culture CBS 122676 = CMW 22190 = CPC 13180).

Notes — Clade 48 contains the ex-type culture of D. cynaroidis (CBS 122676), which was isolated from Protea cynaroides in South Africa (Marincowitz et al. 2008). This species is closely related to D. australafricana and D. viticola (clades 49 and 50, respectively).

Diaporthe decedens (Pers.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 30. 1871

Basionym. Sphaeria tessella var. decedens Pers., Syn. Meth. Fung. (Göttingen) 1: 48. 1801.

Specimens examined. Austria, on Corylus avellana, Oct. 2001, W. Jaklitsch (CBS 109772 = AR 3459). – Sweden, Öland, Kastlösa par., on Corylus avellana, 7 June 1989, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114281 = UPSC 2957).

Notes — Diaporthe decedens represents a European species on Corylus. Clade 68 consists of two isolates obtained on Corylus avellana from Austria and Sweden.

Diaporthe detrusa (Fr.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 205. 1870 (1869–1870)

Basionym. Sphaeria detrusa Fr., in Kunze & Schmidt, Mykologische Hefte (Leipzig) 2: 43. 1823.

  • = Phoma detrusa Sacc., Michelia 2: 96. 1880.

  • Phomopsis detrusa (Sacc.) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. Pars 1: Fungi. Pyrenomycetae. Xylariaceae, Valsaceae, Ceratostomataceae 1, 1: 195. 1906.

Specimens examined. Austria, on Berberis vulgaris, Oct. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (CBS 109770 = AR 3424). – Sweden, Uppland, Hållnäs par., on Berberis vulgaris, 14 May 1991, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114652 = UPSC 3371). – Unknown, on Berberis vulgaris, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 140.27).

Notes — Clade 54 contains three isolates of D. detrusa obtained from Berberis vulgaris in Austria, Sweden and one of them with an unknown origin (presumably North America). This European species is known to also occur in the USA (Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe elaeagni Rehm, Syll. Fung. 14: 546. 1899. — Fig. 8

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g008.jpg

Diaporthe elaeagni (CBS 504.72). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b. conidiomata sporulating on PDA; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. beta conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

  • ?= Phoma elaeagni Sacc., Michelia 1, 3: 354. 1878.

  • Phomopsis elaeagni (Sacc.) Petr., Ann. Mycol. 19, 1–2: 48. 1921.

Specimen examined. Netherlands, Maassluis, on twig of Elaeagnus sp., May 1972, J. Gremmen (CBS 504.72).

Notes — In culture CBS 504.72 (clade 73) primarily produces beta conidia (spindle shaped, 16–22 × 2 μm, thus wider than seen on average in most other species); alpha conidia rarely observed, fusoid-ellipsoidal, 7–10 × 2–3 μm, thus correlating with dimensions of Phomopsis elaeagni (Sacc.) Petr., which is a homonym of P. elaeagni Sacc. Furthermore, conidial dimensions of the asexual state of D. elaeagni are not known. Additional collections and type studies are thus required to resolve the complex occurring on Elaeagnus.

Diaporthe endophytica R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802929

Etymology. Named after its endophytic growth habit.

Cultures sterile. Diaporthe endophytica (clade 5) differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbour, D. phaseolorum (clade 4), by unique fixed alleles in five loci based on alignments of the separate loci deposited in TreeBase as study S13943: ITS positions 357 (C), 359 (G), 360 (T), 368 (A), 369 (A), 371 (A), 372 (G) and 373 (G); TUB positions 135 (C) and 592 (T); CAL position 145 (G); TEF1 positions 18 (G), 26 (T), 40 (T), 42 (A), 63 (A), 124 (A), 175 (A) and 343 (A); HIS position 369 (C).

Culture characteristics — Colonies with sparse aerial mycelium, covering the dish after 2 wk at 25 °C. On PDA buff, honey to isabelline; reverse smoke-grey. On OA smoke-grey to olivaceous-grey. On MEA buff with umber patches; reverse dark mouse-grey, with patches of isabelline.

Specimens examined. Brazil, endophytic in leaf on Schinus terebinthifolius, July 2007, J. Lima (LGMF 911 = CPC 20287, LGMF 919 = CPC 20295), (holotype CBS H-21107, culture ex-type LGMF 916 = CPC 20292 = CBS 133811); endophytic in petiole on Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 928 = CPC 20304, LGMF 934 = CPC 20310, LGMF 935 = CPC 20311, LGMF 937 = CPC 20313); in seed on Glycine max, A. Almeida EMBRAPA/PR (LGMF 948 = CPC 20324).

Notes — Clade 5 represents a distinct lineage, containing eight sterile isolates originating from Brazil. Four of them were isolated from Maytenus ilicifolia, three from S. terebinthifolius and one from soybean seeds. Isolates could not be induced to sporulate on any of the media defined in this study, nor on sterilised plant host tissue placed on WA.

Diaporthe eres Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 245. 1870

  • = Phomopsis cotoneastri Punith., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 60, 1: 157. 1973.

  • = Phoma oblonga Desm., Ann. Nat. Sci. Bot. 20: 218. 1853.

  • Phomopsis oblonga (Desm.) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. Pars 1: Fungi. Pyrenomycetae. Xylariaceae, Valsaceae, Ceratostomataceae: 248. 1906.

Specimens examined. Austria, on Acer campestre, Oct. 2001, W. Jaklitsch (CBS 109767 = AR 3538 = WJ 1643). – Germany, Monheim, on leaf spot of Hordeum sp., 5 Aug. 1984, M. Hossfeld (CBS 841.84). – Italy, Milano, on twig of Juglans regia, Dec. 1980, M. Bisiach (CBS 102.81). – Latvia, on Rhododendron sp., I. Apine (CBS 129168). – Netherlands, Oostvoorne, on dead stems of Arctium sp., 13 Dec. 1984, M. de Nooij (CBS 110.85); Soest, Dalweg, on fallen fruit of Fraxinus sp., 21 Feb. 1999, G. Verkley (CBS 101742); Veldhoven, on dead branch of Sorbus aucuparia, Nov. 1973, W.M. Loerakker (CBS 287.74); Baarn, garden Chopinlaan, on dead branch of Wisteria sinensis, 6 June 1983, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 528.83); Soest, inside house, on Abutilon sp., 26 Mar. 1997, A. Aptroot (CBS 688.97); Baarn, potted plant, on cladodes of Opuntia sp., 23 Sept. 1996, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 365.97); on Alliaria officinalis, Feb. 1962, G.H. Boerema (CBS 445.62); Baarn, on dead leaf of Ilex aquifolium, 11 June 1967, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 370.67 = MUCL 9931); Prov. Zuid-Holland, Huize Oud-Poelgeest, Oegstgeest, dieback of Ilex aquifolium, 21 Nov. 1994, G.J.M. Verkley (CBS 694.94); Baarn, garden Eemnesserweg 90, on dead stem of Rumex hydrolapathum, 19 Mar. 1996, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 485.96); Baarn, Cantonspark, on withering leaf of Magnolia × soulangeana, 23 Oct. 1968, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 791.68); Zuid-Holland, Ridderkerk, Huys ten Donck, on leaf tip of Osmanthus aquifolium, 7 May 1977, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 297.77); on Phaseolus vulgaris, Sept. 1950, Goossens (CBS 422.50); Baarn, on dead stem of Allium giganteum, May 1985, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 283.85); from Laburnum × watereri ‘Vossii’, Apr. 1935, I. de Boer (CBS 267.55); Boskoop, nursery, dying twigs of Skimmia japonica, Nov. 1981, H.A. v. Kesteren (CBS 122.82). – UK, Scotland, on living and dead twig of Fraxinus excelsior, Feb. 1938, J.A. MacDonald (CBS 250.38); on Cotoneaster sp., 1971, H. Butin (ex-type culture of P. crotoneaster CBS 439.82 = BBA P-407 = IMI 162181a); Oxford, on Picea abies seedling, Nov. 1937, T.R. Peace (CBS 186.37). – Unknown, on rotten fruit of Malus sylvestris, May 1961, Geigy (CBS 375.61); May 1932, W.G. Hutchinson (CBS 267.32).

Notes — Diaporthe eres (clade 67) is the type species of the genus Diaporthe, and is present in several hosts, though it is known to be morphologically highly variable (Castlebury et al. 2002). Wehmeyer (1933) described this species on more than 60 hosts, and listed several synonymies based on morphological data. A detailed morphological study is required to designate a suitable epitype strain for D. eres, and to resolve the status of all its purported synonyms.

Diaporthe eugeniae (Punith.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802930

Basionym. Phomopsis eugeniae Punith., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 63, 2: 232. 1974.

Specimens examined. West Sumatra, on Eugenia aromatica, May 1973, J. Waller (holotype IMI 177560); Lampung, on leaf of Eugenia aromatica, July 1982, R. Kasim (CBS 444.82).

Notes — Diaporthe eugeniae (clade 83) was originally described on Eugenia aromatica from West Sumatra. Although the present isolate could be authentic for the name, it unfortunately proved to be sterile.

Diaporthe fibrosa (Pers.) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 204. 1870 (1869–1870)

Basionym. Sphaeria fibrosa Pers., Syn. Meth. Fung. (Göttingen) 1: 40. 1801.

Specimens examined. Austria, Vienna, on Rhamnus cathartica, Oct. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (CBS 109751 = AR 3425). – Sweden, Uppland, Dalby par., Hässleborg, on Rhamnus cathartica, 10 Mar. 1987, K. & L. Holm (CBS 113830 = UPSC 2117).

Notes — Clade 52 consists of two isolates from Rhamnus cathartica collected in Sweden and Austria. Diaporthe fibrosa was originally described from Europe on Rhamnus, so these cultures may well prove to be authentic for the name.

Diaporthe foeniculacea Niessl, in von Thümen, Contr. Ad. Fl. Myc. Lusit. 2: 30. 1880. — Fig. 9

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g009.jpg

Diaporthe foeniculacea (CBS 111554). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d–f. conidiogenous cells; g. beta conidia; h. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 250 μm, all others = 10 μm.

  • = Phoma foeniculina Sacc., Syll. Fung. 3: 125. 1884.

  • Phomopsis foeniculina (Sacc.) Câmara, Agron. Lusit. 9: 104. 1947.

  • = Phomopsis theicola Curzi, Atti Ist. Bot. Univ. Pavia, 3 sér., 3: 65. 1927.

  • = Diaporthe neotheicola A.J.L. Phillips & J.M. Santos, Fung. Diversity 34: 120. 2009.

Conidiomata pycnidial, eustromatic, multilocular, immersed, ostiolate, dark brown, scattered or aggregated, 350–890 μm wide, 160–320 μm tall, necks absent, outer surface covered with hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose to conical and exuding in cirrhi, yellow to reddish brown. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical and cylindrical, filiform, branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–3-septate, (19–)20–28(–32) × 2(–3) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical and filiform, straight, slightly tapering towards the apex, collarette not flared, prominent periclinal thickening, (10–)11–15(–17) × 2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, oblong to ellipsoidal, apex bluntly rouded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate (6–)7–9 × 2(–3) μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, slightly curved, (26–)28–32(–34) × 1(–2) μm. Gamma conidia not observed (based on isolate CBS 111554).

Specimens examined. India, Calcutta, unknown host, Feb. 1948, S.R. Bose (CBS 400.48). – Italy, on leaves and branches of Camellia sinensis, Oct. 1927, M. Curzi (ex-type culture of P. theicola CBS 187.27); Perugia, on Diospyros kaki, June 1956, M. Ribaldi (CBS 287.56); Apulia, near Bari, on Prunus amygdalus, winter 1974/75, A. Ciccarone (CBS 171.78). – Netherlands, Baarn, ‘Madoera’, back frond, on Wisteria sinensis, 24 Apr. 1969, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 357.69). – New Zealand, Waikato region, on Pyrus pyrifolia, 2001, W. Kandula (CBS 116957). – Portugal, near Lisbon, São Marcos, base of senescent stem of Foeniculum vulgare, Apr. 2002, A.J.L. Phillips (CBS 111554); Évora, Foeniculum vulgare, 1 Nov. 2007, A.J.L. Phillips (ex-type cultures of Diaporthe neotheicola CBS 123209, CBS 123208); Pedras del Rei, near Tavira, on Bougainvillea spectabilis, 15 June 1988, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 603.88); Madeira, Serra da Agua, base of senescent stem of Foeniculum vulgare, Aug. 2001, A.J.L. Phillips (CBS 111553).

Notes — Diaporthe foeniculacea (clade 78) was originally described from Foeniculum vulgare in Portugal, and represents an older name for D. theicola and D. neotheicola. There are many described species that occur on Foeniculum vulgare (wild fennel). Among them, P. theicola and its teleomorph D. neotheicola (Santos & Phillips 2009), and D. foeniculacea, the causal agent of stem necrosis of fennel. Phillips (2003) redescribed D. foeniculacea, and established the sexual-asexual connection between D. foeniculacea and Phomopsis foeniculina. The synonymy of D. neotheicola under D. foeniculacea is based on the fact that the cultures matching the original descriptions are in fact genetically identical. However, as there are no ex-type strains of D. foeniculacea, this synonymy strongly relies on the earlier opinion of Phillips (2003). Either way, this matter can only be resolved once an epitype has been designated for D. foeniculacea, fixing the application of the name. We recommend that additional collections linked to stem necrosis of fennel in Portugal are obtained, before this decision is made.

Diaporthe ganjae (McPartl.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802932

Basionym. Phomopsis ganjae McPartl., Mycotaxon 18, 2: 527. 1983.

Specimen examined. USA, Illinois, Hannah City, dead leaf of Cannabis sativa, deposited Mar. 1991, J.M. McPartland (holotype HA 10987, ex-type culture ILLS 43621 = CBS 180.91).

Notes — Diaporthe ganjae (clade 24) is known only from the original collection taken from wilted, dead leaves of Cannabis sativa in Illinois, USA (McPartland 1983). Phylogenetically D. ganjae is closely related to an isolate identified as D. manihotia (CBS 505.76), isolated from Manihot utilissima in Rwanda (clade 25).

Diaporthe gardeniae (Buddin & Wakef.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802933

Basionym. Phomopsis gardeniae Buddin & Wakef., Gard. Chron., ser. 3 103: 45. 1938.

  • = Phomopsis gardeniae H.N. Hansen & Barrett, Mycologia 30, 1: 18. 1938 (homonym).

Specimen examined. Italy, on stem of Gardenia florida, June 1956, M. Ribaldi (CBS 288.56).

Notes — Diaporthe gardeniae (clade 59) causes gardenia canker in Gardenia jasminoides, G. lucida and Gardenia sp. (Farr & Rossman 2012). This disease is considered as serious (Tilford 1934, Huber 1936, Miller 1961). It was originally observed in 1894 in England (Cooke 1894), and has since been reported from the USA (Preston 1945) and India (Mathur 1979). All parts of the plant are susceptible to infection, including roots, stems and leaves (McKenzie et al. 1940), although cankered stems are the most diagnostic symptoms for this disease.

Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvetk., Mihaljč. & M. Petrov, Nova Hedwigia 34: 433. 1981

  • = Phomopsis helianthi Munt.-Cvetk., Mihaljč. & M. Petrov, Nova Hedwigia 34: 433. 1981.

Specimens examined. Serbia, Vojvodina, overwintering stem on Helianthus annuus, 1980, M. Muntañola-Cvetkovic (ex-type culture CBS 592.81 = CBS H-1540). – Unknown, on seed of H. annuus, June 1994, Vanderhave Res., Rilland, Netherlands (CBS 344.94).

Notes — Diaporthe helianthi (clade 14) is associated worldwide with stem canker and grey spot disease of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) (Muntañola-Cvetkovic′ et al. 1981). Yield reductions of up to 40 % have been recorded in Europe (Masirevic & Gulya 1992) including the former Yugoslavia as well as France where it was considered a major pathogen of sunflower (Battilani et al. 2003, Debaeke et al. 2003). Diaporthe helianthi is also widespread in the sunflower growing regions of the USA (Gulya et al. 1997). The wide geographic distribution, and high genetic variability of the pathogen lead to the evolution of new strains that could be more aggressive, causing large yield losses and a decline in disease control (Pecchia et al. 2004, Rekab et al. 2004).

Diaporthe cf. heveae 1

Specimen examined. Brazil, São Paulo, from Hevea brasiliensis, Apr. 1997, D.S. Attili (CBS 852.97) (originally identified as Phomopsis heveae).

Notes — Diaporthe heveae and Phomopsis heveae were both described from Hevea in Sri Lanka, and could represent the same species. Two isolates deposited in CBS under this name, CBS 852.97 (from Hevea brasiliensis in Brazil) and CBS 681.84 (from Hevea brasiliensis in India) were shown to represent two distinct species (clades 46 and 80, respectively). However, as both were found to be sterile, their taxonomy could not be resolved.

Diaporthe cf. heveae 2

Specimen examined. India, Kerala, Kottayam, in leaf on Hevea brasiliensis, Sept. 1984, K. Jayarathnam (CBS 681.84).

Notes — Isolate CBS 681.84 (clade 80, P. heveae from Hevea brasiliensis in India) is sterile, and thus its taxonomy could not be resolved. Diaporthe heveae has been reported from Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Thailand (Holliday 1980, Zhuang 2001, Udayanga et al. 2011).

Diaporthe hickoriae Wehm., Monogr. Gen. Diaporthe Nitschke & Segreg., Univ. Michigan Stud., Sci. Ser. 9: 149. 1933

Specimen examined. USA, Michigan, on Carya glabra, June 1926, L.E. Wehmeyer (ex-type culture CBS 145.26).

Notes — Diaporthe hickoriae (clade 72) occurs on the bark of Carya glabra in the USA (Wehmeyer 1933).

Diaporthe hongkongensis R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802934; Fig. 10

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g010.jpg

Diaporthe hongkongensis (CBS 115448). a, b. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. beta conidia; f. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the location where it was collected, Hong Kong.

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial to embedded on PDA, solitary to aggregated, globose with central ostiole, exuding a creamy conidial cirrhus; pycnidial up to 200 μm diam; wall of 3–6 layers of brown textura angularis. Conidiophores lining the inner cavity, reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, ampulliform to subcylindrical with prominent apical taper, 5–12 × 2–4 μm; apex with periclinal thickening and minute collarette, 1 μm long. Paraphyses intermingled among conidiophores, hyaline, smooth, frequently branched below, up to 4-septate, with clavate terminal cell, up to 80 μm long, apex 2–8 μm diam. Alpha conidia hyaline, smooth, granular to guttulate, aseptate, fusiform, tapering towards both ends, mostly straight, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, (5–)6–7(–8) × (2–)2.5(–3) μm. Gamma conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, ellipsoid-fusoid, apex subobtuse, base truncate, 10–13 × 2 μm. Beta conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, spindle-shaped, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, widest in mid region, mostly curved in upper part, 18–22 × 1.5–2 μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C, with moderate aerial mycelium. On OA surface dirty white with patches of pale olivaceous-grey, reverse dirty white with patches of olivaceous-grey and iron-grey. On PDA surface iron-grey, with patches of dirty white, reverse iron-grey. On MEA surface dirty white with patches of olivaceous-grey, reverse iron-grey with patches of dirty white.

Specimen examined. Hong Kong, Tai Po Kau, on fruit of Dichroa febrifuga, 20 Feb. 2002, K.D. Hyde (holotype CBS H-21103, culture ex-type CBS 115448 = HKUCC 9104).

Notes — Isolate CBS 115448 (clade 79; reported as Phomopsis pittospori on Dichroa febrifuga from Hong Kong) is morphologically distinct from P. pittospori (from Pittosporum twigs in California; alpha conidia 6–8 × 1.5 μm, beta conidia 18–20 × 1 μm), with wider alpha and beta conidia.

Diaporthe hordei (Punith.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802935

Basionym. Phomopsis hordei Punith., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 64, 3: 428. 1975.

Specimen examined. Norway, Fellesbygget, As, on root of Hordeum vulgare, Oct. 1992, L. Sundheim (CBS 481.92).

Notes — Diaporthe hordei (clade 13) was described from Hordeum vulgare in the UK. Although the present culture could be authentic (from Hordeum collected in Norway), it proved to be sterile, so its morphology could not be confirmed.

Diaporthe impulsa (Cooke & Peck) Sacc., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 1: 618. 1882

Basionym. Valsa impulsa Cooke & Peck, Ann. Rep. N.Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. 27: 109. 1875 (1874).

Specimens examined. Sweden, Uppland, Dalby par., Jerusalem, on Sorbus aucuparia, 24 Oct. 1989, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114434 = UPSC 3052). – Unknown, on Sorbus americana, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 141.27).

Notes — Clade 51 is represented by two isolates of D. impulsa occurring on Sorbus spp. Diaporthe impulsa is a known pathogen of Sorbus spp., and has a wide geographic distribution (Farr & Rossman 2012). It was originally described from Sorbus in the USA, thus CBS 141.27 may well prove to be a good reference strain for the species.

Diaporthe inconspicua R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802936

Etymology. Referring to its inconspicuous nature, growing as endophyte in host tissue.

Cultures sterile. Diaporthe inconspicua (clade 75) differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbours, clade 68–74 and 76–78, by unique fixed alleles in four loci based on alignments of the separate loci deposited in TreeBase as study S13943: TUB positions 33 (A), 102–104 and 106–111 (indels), 127 (G), 149 (C), 151 (A), 195 (C), 204 (T), 357 (G), 446 (G), 449 (C), 465 (T), 484 (T), 559 (A), 592 (A), 629 (T), 653 (T), 708 (C), 732 (C), 754 (A), 763 (C), 784 (A) and 787 (G); CAL positions 28 (C), 102 (G), 114 (T), 148 (T), 152 (T), 153 (A), 157 (C), 170 (G), 199 (C) and 281 (C); TEF1 positions 9 (T), 16 (A), 22 (A), 29 (G), 30 (G), 81 (C), 86 (C), 87 (A), 88 (A), 89 (T), 131 (A), 275 (A), 298 (C) and 315 (T); HIS positions 139 (T), 211 (T), 244 (T) and 408 (T).

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering the dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On OA spreading, flat with sparse aerial mycelium, surface cream in centre, umber in outer region. On PDA surface and reverse cream to dirty white with sparse aerial mycelium. On MEA with sparse aerial mycelium, surface becoming folded, dirty white in centre, sienna in outer region, and luteous in reverse.

Specimens examined. Brazil, on petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (holotype CBS H-21102, ex-type culture LGMF 930 = CPC 20306 = CBS 133813); same collection details (LGMF 931 = CPC 20307); on Spondias mombin, 2007, K. Rodriguez (LGMF 922 = CPC 20298).

Notes — Sterile endophytic isolates (clade 75) from medicinal plants in Brazil.

Diaporthe infecunda R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802937

Etymology. Named after its sterile growth in culture.

Cultures sterile. Diaporthe infecunda (clade 23) differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbours, clade 16–22, by unique fixed alleles in five loci based on alignments of the separate loci deposited in TreeBase as study S13943: ITS positions 108 (T), 279 (C), 292 (G), 359 (C) and 360 (G); TUB positions 11 (indel), 106 (G), 138 (T), 140 (A), 153 (G), 155 (T), 184 (A), 197 (G), 202 (C), 302 (A), 354 (A), 369–374 (indels), 398 (G), 407 (indel), 414 (C), 422 (T), 424 (G), 425 (C), 432 (G), 452 (C), 454 (C), 458 (C), 461 (G), 479 (T), 482 (T), 486 (C), 540 (T), 572 (C), 622 (A), 694 (T), 696 (T), 697 (G), 716 (C), 728 (C), 776 (G), 778 (G) and 796 (C); CAL positions 64 (T), 83 (T), 104 (G), 146 (C), 151 (C), 155 (G), 159 (C), 172 (C), 176 (T), 179 (A), 184 (G), 197 (T), 206 (T), 212 (C) and 221 (T); TEF1 positions 6 (A), 9 (G), 13 (G), 16 (C), 21 (A), 30 (G), 32 (indel), 39 (A), 40 (A), 41 (G), 42 (T), 43 (A), 79 (G), 83 (T), 90 (T), 92 (T), 96 (A), 97 (C), 106 (C), 116 (A), 120 (C), 123 (A), 127 (A), 132 (A), 135 (G), 173 (G), 255 (T), 284 (A), 294 (C), 299 (C) and 309 (A); HIS positions 173 (T), 196 (T), 197 (G), 199 (C/T), 221 (C), 222 (C), 230 (G), 263 (C), 264 (T), 268 (C), 273 (T) and 279 (C).

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering the dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On PDA surface umber with patches of white, reverse chestnut. On MEA surface dirty white, reverse umber. On OA surface with patches of dirty white and umber.

Specimens examined. Brazil, on leaf of Schinus terebinthifolius, July 2007, J. Lima (holotype CBS H-21095, ex-type culture LGMF 906 = CPC 20282 = CBS 133812); additional isolates with same collection details (LGMF 908 = CPC 20284, LGMF 912 = CPC 20288, LGMF 917 = CPC 20293, LGMF 918 = CPC 20294, LGMF 920 = CPC 20296); in petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 933 = CPC 20309, LGMF 940 = CPC 20316).

Notes — Clade 23 represents endophytic isolates from leaves of medicinal plants growing in Brazil. It consists of eight isolates, two from Maytenus ilicifolia, and six from Schinus terebinthifolius.

Diaporthe juglandina (Fuckel) Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 281. 1870

Basionym. Aglaospora juglandina Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani Exsicc., suppl. 7 (no. 2101–2200): no. 2159. 1868.

Specimen examined. USA, Tennessee, Great Smoky Mts National Park, dead wood of Juglans sp., L. Vasilyeva (CBS 121004).

Notes — Diaporthe juglandina (clade 65) represents a European taxon described from Juglans. European collections are required to confirm whether this name can be applied to the clade.

Diaporthe longispora (Wehm.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802938

Basionym. Diaporthe strumella var. longispora Wehm., Mycologia 28, 1: 46. 1936.

Specimen examined. Canada, Ontario, Toronto, on Ribes sp., May 1936, L.E. Wehmeyer (ex-type culture CBS 194.36).

Notes — Clade 27 comprises the ex-type culture of D. strumella var. longispora isolated from Ribes sp., and forms a sister clade with D. sclerotioides (clade 28). Diaporthe strumella is found on woody limbs, especially of Ribes spp. in temperate North America and Europe (Farr & Rossman 2012). As D. strumella var. longispora is morphologically clearly a distinct species, we elevate this variety to species status.

Diaporthe lusitanicae A.J.L. Phillips & J.M. Santos, Fung. Diversity 34: 118. 2009

Specimen examined. Portugal, Lisbon, Oeiras, Estação Agronómica Nacional, stem of Foeniculum vulgare, 14 Aug. 2007, J.M. Santos (ex-type cultures CBS 123212 = Di-C001/5, CBS 123213 = Di-C001/3).

Notes — This species (clade 21) was described in 2009 on senescent stems of Foeniculum vulgare (wild fennel) in Portugal by Santos & Phillips (2009).

Diaporthe manihotia Punith., Kavaka 3: 29. 1976 (1975)

  • = Phomopsis manihotis Swarup, L.S. Chauhan & Tripathi, Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 28, 4: 345. 1966.

Specimen examined. Rwanda, on leaves of Manihot utilissima, 9 July 1976, J. Semal (CBS 505.76).

Notes — Phomopsis manihotis (clade 25 as D. manihotia) causes leaf spot of cassava (Manihot esculenta), though the disease is also referred to as Phomopsis blight of tapioca. Severe infection leads to defoliation and stem lesions. Affected areas become shrivelled with numerous pycnidia embedded in the tissue. On severely infected stems the bark starts to gradually peel off, leading to partial or total girdling. The disease is known from Africa (Ethiopia, Nigeria), Asia (India), Central America and West Indies (S.E. Dominica), and South America (Colombia) (Sarbhoy et al. 1971, Mathur 1979, Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe mayteni R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802939; Fig. 11

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g011.jpg

Diaporthe mayteni (CBS 133185). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f. beta conidia; g. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 85 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the host genus from which it was collected, Maytenus.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose, immersed, scattered and aggregated, brown to black, ostiolate, 70–230 μm wide, 40–150 μm tall, with short necks, 40–140 μm; outer surface smooth or covered in hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose or exuding in cirrhi; predominantly yellow, pale luteous to cream. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical to cylindrical, rarely branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–3-septate, (10–)13–27(–36) × (2–)3(–4) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, rarely tapering towards the apex, collarette present and not flared, with prominent periclinal thickening, (5–)6–10(–13) × 2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, oblong to ellipsoid, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse; biguttulate, (5–)6(–7) × (2–)3 μm. Beta and gamma conidia absent.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with entire edge, cottony, olivaceous buff, with primrose aerial mycelium in concentric rings, with olivaceous patches; colonies reaching 66 mm diam after 2 wk at 25 °C; reverse olivaceous buff and greenish olivaceous. On OA flat, with entire edge, cottony appressed, buff, white, the center of the colony pale olivaceous-grey, patches isabelline and luteous; colonies reaching 56 mm diam; reverse buff and pale olivaceous grey. On MEA flat, with entire edge, aerial mycelium cottony, white to pale olivaceous grey or olivaceous buff; colonies reaching 37 mm diam; reverse hazel, ochreous, with patches greenish black and olivaceous black.

Specimen examined. Brazil, Paraná, Colombo, endophytic species isolated from petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia (popular name Espinheira Santa), July 2007, R.R. Gomes (holotype CBS H-21096, ex-type culture CBS 133185 = LGMF 938 = CPC 20314).

Notes — Diaporthe mayteni (clade 30) grows endophytically in Maytenus ilicifolia in Brazil.

Diaporthe megalospora Ellis & Everh., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 42: 235. 1890

Specimen examined. Unknown, from Sambucus canadensis, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 143.27).

Notes — Diaporthe megalospora (clade 15) is known on Sambucus canadensis from North America (Wehmeyer 1933, Hanlin 1963, Farr & Rossman 2012). Fresh collections are required to designate an epitype, and fix the genetic application of the name.

Diaporthe melonis Beraha & M.J. O’Brien, Phytopathol. Z. 94, 3: 205. 1979

  • = Phomopsis cucurbitae McKeen, Canad. J. Bot. 35: 46. 1957.

Specimens examined. Indonesia, Java, Muneng, Exp. Station, on Glycine soja, Sept. 1987, H. Vermeulen (CBS 435.87). – USA, Texas, Rio Grande Valley, on Cucumis melo, 1978, L. Beraha & M.J. O’Brien (ex-isotype culture CBS 507.78, specimen derived from culture CBS H-891).

Notes — Clade 7 represents D. melonis (Beraha & O’Brien 1979), and contains the ex-isotype culture, and one isolate previously identified as D. phaseolorum var. sojae (though the two isolates are not identical). Diaporthe melonis is frequently reported on soybean (Santos et al. 2011). Phomopsis cucurbitae (treated here as synonym) is reported to have a cosmopolitan distribution, and to cause black rot disease of greenhouse cucumbers (McKeen 1957, Punithalingam & Holliday 1975, Ohsawa & Kobayashi 1989).

Diaporthe musigena Crous & R.G. Shivas, Persoonia 26: 119. 2011

Specimen examined. Australia, Queensland, Brisbane Botanical Garden, on leaves of Musa sp., 14 July 2009, P.W. Crous & R.G. Shivas (ex-type culture CBS 129519 = CPC 17026).

Notes — Clade 84 represents D. musigena, isolated from Musa sp. in Australia (Crous et al. 2011).

Diaporthe neilliae Peck, Ann. Rep. N.Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. 39: 52. 1887 (1886)

Specimen examined. Unknown, on Spiraea sp., Sep. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 144.27).

Notes — Diaporthe neilliae (clade 60) was originally described from Spiraea sp. from North America. The origin of the present isolate, however, remains unclear (presumably North America).

Diaporthe neoarctii R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802940, Fig. 12

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g012.jpg

Diaporthe neoarctii (CBS 109490). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d–f. conidiogenous cells; g. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 225 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after its superficial resemblance to Diaporthe arctii.

Conidiomata pycnidial, ampulliform to finger-like, aggregated, dark brown to black, immersed, ostiolate, 300–450 μm wide, 200–670 μm tall, with prominent necks 240–560 μm long, outer surface covered with hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose, pale yellow. Conidiophores hyaline, ampulliform to subcylindrical, filiform, branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, rarely septate, (12–)13–17(–18) × (2–)3 μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, straight, tapering towards the apex, collarette flared, periclinal thickening prominent, (10–)11–13(–14) × (1.5–)2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, fusoid, apex acute, base obtusely rounded to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, (9–)11–13(–14) × 3(–4) μm. Beta and gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies with sparse aerial mycelium, covering the dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On MEA umber with patches of greyish sepia, umber in reverse. On PDA fuscous-black on surface and in reverse.

Specimen examined. USA, New Jersey, isolated from Ambrosia trifida, May 2001, G. Bills (holotype CBS H-21094, ex-type culture CBS 109490 = GB 6421 = AR 3450).

Notes — Isolates originally identified as D. arctii cluster in clades 19 and 67 (Fig. 1). Diaporthe neoarctii (clade 16) was isolated from Ambrosia trifida in New Jersey, USA, and differs morphologically from the ex-type culture of D. arctii (alpha conidia 7 × 3–3.5 μm) (clade 19). Based on these differences D. neoarctii is described as a novel species.

Diaporthe nobilis complex

Specimens examined. Germany, Münster, on stem of Laurus nobilis, Feb. 1939, Kotthoff (CBS 200.39). Japan, isolate from Pinus pentaphylla bonzai plant imported from Japan into the Netherlands, May 1979, G.H. Boerema (CBS H-16732, culture CBS 587.79). – Korea, on imported chestnuts (Castanea sativa), collected in grocery store in Sydney, Australia, 5 July 1999, K.A. Seifert (CBS 113470 = DAOM 226800). – Latvia, Rhododendron sp., I. Apine (CBS 129167). – New Zealand, on bark of Malus pumila, G.J. Samuels (CBS 124030 = GJS 77-49); Waikato region, on Pyrus pyrifolia, 2001, isol. W. Kandula, det. L. Castlebury (CBS 116953 = NZ-26, CBS 116954 = NZ-27). – Yugoslavia, on Hedera helix, July 1989, M. Muntañola-Cvetkovic (CBS 338.89).

Notes — Clade 62 is poorly resolved in this dataset, but has some internal structure, suggesting that it contains several potentially distinct species. More isolates would be required to resolve their taxonomy. Isolates in this clade were originally identified as Phomopsis fukushii (on Pyrus pyrifolia, New Zealand), P. conorum (on Pinus pentaphylla, the Netherlands), P. castanea (on Castanea sativa, UK), Diaporthe perniciosa (Malus pumila, New Zealand), D. pulla (on Hedera helix, Yugoslavia) and D. nobilis (on Laurus nobilis, Germany).

Diaporthe nomurai Hara, in Hara, Diseases of cultivated plants: 140. 1925. — Fig. 13

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g013.jpg

Diaporthe nomurai (CBS 157.29). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b–e. conidiogenous cells; f. alpha conidia; g. beta conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Conidiomata in culture on OA sporulating poorly, globose, up to 300 μm diam, black, erumpent; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 0–1-septate, rarely branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 10–20 × 2–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells 6–10 × 1.5–3 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal, with slight taper towards apex, 1–1.5 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette not flared, minute. Paraphyses not observed. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid-ellipsoid to clavate, straight to variously curved, tapering towards both ends, straight, apex subobtuse, base truncate, (7–)9–11(–13) × (2.5–)3 μm. Gamma conidia not observed. Beta conidia spindle-shaped, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, tapering from lower third towards apex, gently curved, (20–)25–27(–30) × 1.5(–2) μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies reaching up to 8 cm diam after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On MEA surface isabelline, reverse sepia. On OA surface pale mouse grey with concentric rings of mouse grey; reverse mouse grey. On PDA surface and reverse fuscous-black, with sparse aerial mycelium.

Specimen examined. Japan, on Morus sp., Dec. 1929, K. Togashi (CBS 157.29).

Notes — Clade 58 represents D. nomurai from Morus sp. in Japan. Diaporthe nomurai is known from hosts such as Morus alba, M. bombycis, M. latifolia and Morus sp. (Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe novem J.M. Santos, Vrandečić & A.J.L. Phillips, Persoonia 27: 14. 2011

  • = Phomopsis sp. 9 van Rensburg et al., Stud. Mycol. 55: 65. 2006.

Specimens examined. Brazil, endophytic in petiole on Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 943 = CPC 20319). – Croatia, Slavonija, in seed on Glycine max, Sept. 2008, T. Duvnjak (holotype CBS H-20462, ex-type cultures CBS 127270 = 4-27/3-1, CBS 127271 = 5/27/3-3, CBS 127269 = 5-27/3-1). – Romania, Calugareni, Distr. Mizil, living leaves on Polygonatum odoratum, 31 July 1970, O. Constantinescu (CBS 354.71).

Notes — Clade 22 represents D. novem (Santos et al. 2011), and contains an endophytic isolate (LGMF 43) from Maytenus ilicifolia, one isolate previously identified as Diaporthe pardalota on Polygonatum odoratum from Romania, and three isolates of D. novem which includes the ex-type isolate. Isolate LGMF 943 represents higher genetic variation than the other isolates, and appears to represent a different species. Since this isolate did not sporulate, further morphological characterisation was not possible and we refrain from excluding it from the species pending collection of more strains to clarify its status.

Diaporthe novem was reported as pathogen of Aspalathus linearis (van Rensburg et al. 2006) as Phomopsis sp. 9. It was recently described as pathogen of Glycine max (Santos et al. 2011). This species was also reported on Hydrangea macrophylla (Santos et al. 2010), Helianthus annuus and Vitis vinifera (Santos et al. 2011). It is known to occur in Brazil, Romania, Croatia, Italy (Rekab et al. 2004), Portugal (Santos et al. 2010) and South Africa (van Niekerk et al. 2005, van Rensburg et al. 2006).

Diaporthe oncostoma (Duby) Fuckel, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins Naturk. 23–24: 205. 1870. (1869–1870). — Fig. 14

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g014.jpg

Diaporthe oncostoma (CBS 100454). a. Conidiomata sporulating on OA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d–f. conidiogenous cells; g. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 225 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Basionym. Sphaeria oncostoma Duby, in Rabenh., Klotzsch. Herb. Vivum Mycol.: no. 253. 1854.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to ellipsoidal, aggregated as well as scattered, dark brown to black, immersed, ostiolate, 430–1170 μm wide, 370–790 μm tall, lacking necks, with outer surface covered in brown hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose or exuding in cirrhi, white to pale luteous or pale yellow. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical, branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–2-septate, (10–)11–19(–22) × 3(–4) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, straight or curved, tapering towards the apex, collarette not flared, periclinal thickening prominent, (6–)7–9(–10) × (2–)3 μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, fusoid to ellipsoidal, straight to slightly curved, acute at apex, subobtuse at base, bi- or multi-guttulate, (7.5–)9–11(–12) × (2–)3(–4) μm. Gamma conidia hyaline, smooth, ellipsoid-fusoid, apex acutely rounded, and tapering towards truncate base, (11–)12–16 × 3(–3.5) μm. Beta conidia and sexual morph not observed in culture.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On MEA surface dirty white with profuse aerial mycelium, reverse umber. On OA surface dirty white with patches of umber, same in reverse. On PDA surface and reverse sienna, with sparse aerial mycelium.

Specimens examined. France, Hte Savoie, Aigueblanche-Bellecombe, outlet of river Morel in Isère, on dead branches of Robinia pseudoacacia, 17 July 1978, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 589.78). – Germany, Wolfenbüttel, on leaf spot of Robinia pseudoacacia, 15 Nov. 1996, H. Butin (CBS 100454); Berlin, on leaf of Ilex aquifolium, Nov. 1985, M. Hesse (CBS 809.85). – Russia, on Robinia pseudoacacia, June 2000, L. Vasilyeva (CBS 109741 = AR 3445).

Notes — Diaporthe oncostoma (clade 70) has been considered to be a saprobic, or low virulence pathogen, which plays some role in natural pruning and self-thinning of black locust forests (Robinia pseudoacacia) (Vajna 2002). However, this fungus has been reported as a causal agent of canker and severe dieback disease of black locust in Russia (Scerbin-Parfenenko 1953) and in Greece (Michalopoulos-Skarmoutsos & Skarmoutsos 1999).

Although isolate CBS 809.85 was obtained from Ilex aquifolium in Germany, we treat it as belonging to D. oncostoma, as it matches the other strains phylogenetically as well as morphologically.

Diaporthe oxe R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802941; Fig. 15

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g015.jpg

Diaporthe oxe (CBS 133186). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f. beta conidia; g. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 100 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. The word ‘oxe’ is an expression used in northeastern Brazil that means amazement or surprise, in relation to the number of novel species isolated as endophytes from medicinal plants in Brazil.

Conidiomata pycnidial ampulliform to finger-like, eustromatic, convoluted to unilocular, semi-immersed, scattered, dark brown to black, ostiolate, 60–170 μm wide, 60–220 μm tall; necks variable in length, 20–150 μm, outer surface covered with hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose or exuding in cirrhi, pale-luteous to cream or pale-yellow. Conidiophores hyaline, ampulliform to subcylindrical, branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–2-septate, (14–)17–25(–27) × (2–)3 μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, straight to curved, tapering towards the apex, collarette flared, periclinal thickening prominent, (5–)6–10(–12) × 2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, oblong to ellipsoid, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, (5–)6–7(–8) × (2–)3 μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, curved or hamate, (17–)22–30(–33) × 2–3 μm. Gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with an entire edge, surface mycelium dense and felty, ochreous to fulvous, dark brick, honey, buff, exudates rarely present as colourless drops; colonies reaching 49 mm diam after 2 wk at 25 °C; reverse umber, ochreous to fulvous. On OA flat, with an entire edge, surface mycelium dense and felty, rosy buff, pale olivaceous-grey, iron-grey, with patches olivaceous buff, exudates in colourless and pale luteous drops; colonies reaching 40 mm diam; reverse dark brick, olivaceous. On MEA raised, with an entire edge, surface mycelium dense and felty, buff, rosy-buff, with chestnut coloured exudates in the centre of the colony, and pale luteous at the periphery; colonies reaching 49 mm diam; reverse chestnut and bay.

Specimens examined. Brazil, on petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (holotype CBS H-21098, ex-type culture CBS 133186 = LGMF 942 = CPC 20318); same collection details (CBS 133187 = LGMF 936 = CPC 20312); on leaf of Schinus terebinthifolius, July 2007, J. Lima (LGMF 915 = CPC 20291); on petiole of M. ilicifolia, S.A.V. Pileggi (LGMF 939 = CPC 20315); on petiole of M. ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 945 = CPC 20321).

Notes — Endophytic isolates (clade 34) from medicinal plants in Brazil.

Diaporthe padi var. padi G.H. Otth, Mitth. Naturf. Ges. Bern: 99. 1871 (1870)

Specimens examined. Sweden, Uppland, Dalby par., Tuna, on Prunus padus, 17 Apr. 1988, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114200 = UPSC 2569); Dalarna, Folkärna par., Sonnbo, on Alnus glutinosa, Dec. 1992, K. & L. Holm (CBS 114649 = UPSC 3496).

Notes — Diaporthe padi var. padi (clade 56) represents a European taxon occurring on Prunus. We chose the name D. padi over D. decorticans, as the basionym of the latter, Sphaeria decorticans, is an illegitimate homonym.

Diaporthe paranensis R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802942, Fig. 16

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g016.jpg

Diaporthe paranensis (CBS 133184). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f. alpha and beta conidia. — Scale bars: b = 100 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after Paraná, the state in Brazil from where it was collected.

Conidiomata pycnidial, ampulliform, semi-immersed, scattered, brown to black, ostiolate, 130–220 μm wide, 60–130 μm tall; prominent necks 50–210 μm long, outer surface smooth or covered in hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose, pre-dominantly pale-luteous to yellow and some cases green-olivaceous. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical to cylindrical, filiform, branched above the septa on a globose cell, not tapering towards the apex, 2–3-septate, (14–)15–22(–26) × (2–)3(–4) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, rarely tapering towards the apex, collarette present and flared, slight periclinal thickening, (5–)8–14(–15) × 2(–3) μm. Alpha conidia hyaline, fusoid-ellipsoidal, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, (6–)7–8(–9) × (2–)3 μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, curved or hamate and slightly curved, (16–)17–21(–23) × (1–)2 μm. Gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with an entire edge, mycelium growing in concentric rings, cottony texture, white to smoke-grey; colonies reaching up to 64 mm diam after 2 wk at 25 °C; reverse buff and isabelline. On OA flat, with an entire edge, aerial mycelium in concentric rings, ranging in colour from smoke-grey to grey-olivaceous and white in the centre; colonies reaching 44 mm diam; reverse iron-grey, grey-olivaceous to olivaceous-buff. On MEA flat, with an entire edge, aerial mycelium growing in concentric rings, with cottony texture, pale olivaceous-grey to grey-olivaceous and buff; colonies reaching 56 mm diam; reverse umber, fulvous with patches of greenish black.

Specimen examined. Brazil, Paraná, Colombo, endophytic species isolated from petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia (popular name Espinheira Santa), July 2007, R.R. Gomes (holotype CBS H-21099, ex-type culture CBS 133184 = LGMF 929 = CPC 20305).

Notes — Endophytic isolate (clade 35) from medicinal plant in Brazil.

Diaporthe perjuncta Niessl, Hedwigia 15: 153. 1876

Specimen examined. Austria, from Ulmus glabra, Oct. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (ex-epitype culture CBS 109745 = ARSEF 3461 = AR 3461).

Notes — Diaporthe perjuncta (clade 40) is associated with fallen branches of Ulmus campestris and U. glabra (Ulmaceae). This species is found in Austria, Germany and Portugal. Diaporthe perjuncta is distinguished from D. viticola and D. australafricana based on morphology and DNA sequence data (van Niekerk et al. 2005). Pathogenicity studies and endophytic isolation of ‘D. perjuncta’ from grapevines in Australia and South Africa in fact represent isolates of D. australafricana (Mostert et al. 2001a, Rawnsley et al. 2004, van Niekerk et al. 2005).

Diaporthe perseae (Zerova) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802944; Fig. 17

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g017.jpg

Diaporthe perseae (CBS 151.73). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b–d. conidiogenous cells; e. alpha and beta conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Basionym. Phomopsis perseae Zerova, J. Bot. Acad. Sci. RSS Ukraine 1, 1–2: 307. 1940.

Conidiomata pycnidial in culture on MEA, globose, up to 400 μm diam, black, erumpent; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 1–3-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 15–35 × 3–4 μm. Conidiogenous cells 8–17 × 1.5–2.5 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1–1.5 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette prominent, up to 5 μm long. Paraphyses hyaline, smooth, subcylindrical with obtuse ends, 2–4-septate, up to 60 μm long, 3 μm diam. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid to ellipsoid, tapering towards both ends, straight, apex subobtuse, base subtruncate, (6–)7–8(–9) × 2(–2.5) μm. Gamma conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, ellipsoid-fusoid, apex acutely rounded, base subtruncate, 9–14 × 1.5–2 μm. Beta conidia spindle-shaped, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, tapering from lower third towards apex, curved, (15–)22–25(–28) × 1.5(–2) μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C, with moderate aerial mycelium. On OA surface ochreous, with patches of dirty white and iron-grey. On PDA surface dirty white with patches of sienna, reverse sienna with patches of umber. On MEA surface sienna, with patches of umber, reverse umber with patches of sienna.

Specimen examined. Netherlands Antilles, Martinique, on young fruit of Persea gratissima, 10 July 1972, E. Laville (CBS 151.73).

Notes — Diaporthe perseae (clade 86) was originally described from branches of dying Persea gratissima trees in Russia. Based on the morphology (alpha conidia 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.5 μm; Uecker 1988), this strain could be authentic for the name.

Diaporthe phaseolorum (Cooke & Ellis) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 692. 1882

Basionym. Sphaeria phaseolorum Cooke & Ellis, Grevillea 6, 39: 93. 1878.

Specimens examined. Brazil, endophytic in petiole on Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 927 = CPC 20303, LGMF 941 = CPC 20317). – New Zealand, from Olearia cf. rani, 22 Jan. 2003, G.J.M. Verkley (CBS 113425); Actinidia chinensis, rotting fruit, kiwifruit orchard, S.R. Pennycook (CBS 127465 = GJS 83-379). – Unknown, Apr. 1980, L. Beraha (CBS 257.80). – USA, Mississippi, from Caperonia palustris, Oct. 2003, A. Mengistu (CBS 116019); Mississippi, from Aster exilis, Oct. 2003, A. Mengistu (CBS 116020).

Notes — Clade 4 represents isolates of D. phaseolorum. It includes two endophytic isolates from Maytenus ilicifolia collected in Brazil, one isolate previously misidentified as D. melonis (CBS 257.80), two isolates respectively from Caperonia palustres and Aster exilis in the USA (Mengistu et al. 2007), one isolate from Olearia cf. rami, and one from Actinidia chinensis. The ITS and TEF1 sequences of this clade are similar to sequences (GenBank U11323, U11373 and EU222020, respectively) of a well-characterised isolate of D. phaseolorum (ATCC 64802 = FAU458). By accepting this clade as authentic for D. phaseolorum, we follow the precedent set by van Rensburg et al. (2006), Mengistu et al. (2007) and Santos et al. (2011).

Diaporthe pseudomangiferae R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802945; Fig. 18

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g018.jpg

Diaporthe pseudomangiferae (CBS 101339). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b. conidiomata sporulating on PDA; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. beta conidia; f. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after its morphological similarity to Phomopsis mangiferae.

Conidiomata pycnidial, erumpent to superficial on PDA, globose, up to 300 μm diam with elongated necks with central ostioles that exude yellow-orange to cream conidial droplets; walls of 6–8 layers of brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, 1–3-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 20–30 × 2–2.5 μm. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral with slight apical taper, 10–15 × 2–3 μm; collarette flared, up to 3 μm long. Paraphyses hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, septate, extending above conidiophores, straight to flexuous, unbranched or branched below, up to 80 μm long, 2–3 μm wide at base. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, smooth, guttulate to granular, fusiform, tapering towards both ends, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, (6–)7–9(–10) × (2–)2.5(–3) μm. Beta and gamma conidia not seen (description based on CBS 101339).

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C, with moderate aerial mycelium. On OA surface and reverse dirty white with patches of iron-grey. On PDA surface dirty white to ochreous, reverse umber. On MEA surface greyish sepia with patches of iron-grey, reverse greyish sepia with patches of iron-grey.

Specimens examined. Dominican Republic, from Mangifera indica, P. de Leeuw, ATO-DLO, Wageningen (holotype CBS H-21105, culture ex-type CBS 101339). – Mexico, on fruit peel of Mangifera indica (CBS 388.89).

Notes — Although these isolates (clade 82) were originally described as representative of P. magiferae (dead leaves of Mangifera indica, Pakistan), they differ in having larger conidiomata, longer conidiophores and larger alpha conidia.

Diaporthe pseudophoenicicola R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. —MycoBank MB803839; Fig. 19

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g019.jpg

Diaporthe pseudophoenicicola (CBS 462.69). a, b. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; c, d. conidiogenous cells; e. alpha conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after its morphological similarity to Diaporthe phoenicicola.

Conidiomata pycnidial on MEA, up to 400 μm diam, erumpent, globose with neck; ostiole exuding yellow-orange conidial droplets; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline, smooth, densely aggregated, 1–3-septate, branched, cylindrical, straight to curved, 12–45 × 1.5–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral with slight apical taper, 12–20 × 1.5–2 μm, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette flared, 2–5 μm long. Paraphyses hyaline, smooth, cylindrical, 1–3-septate, extending above conidiophores, straight to flexuous, unbranched or branched, up to 100 μm long, and 3 μm wide at base. Alpha conidia aseptate, hyaline, granular, smooth, fusiform, tapering towards both ends, straight, acutely rounded apex, and truncate base, (6–)7–8(–9) × (2–)2.5(–3) μm. Beta and gamma conidia not seen (description based on CBS 462.69).

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C, with sparse aerial mycelium. On MEA surface dirty white with patches of sienna, reverse umber with patches of sienna. On OA surface dirty white with patches of sienna. On PDA surface ochreous with patches of olivaceous-grey, reverse iron-grey with patches of ochreous.

Specimens examined. Iraq, Prov. Basrah, Shalt El Arab, showing dieback on Mangifera indica, 1976, M.S.A. Al-Momen (CBS 176.77). – Spain, Mallorca, Can Pastilla, dead tops of green leaves on Phoenix dactylifera, 27 May 1969, H.A. van der Aa (holotype CBS H-21106, culture ex-type CBS 462.69).

Notes — Diaporthe pseudophoenicicola (clade 89) is distinct from D. phoenicicola (conidia 8–12 × 2–2.5 μm; Uecker 1988) by having shorter, and wider alpha conidia. A similar strain was isolated from Mangifera indica in Iraq (CBS 176.77), suggesting that this species has a wider host range.

Diaporthe pustulata Sacc., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 1: 610. 1882

Specimens examined. Austria, on Acer pseudoplatanus, Oct. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (CBS 109742 = AR 3430 and CBS 109760 = AR 3535); Raab, Au Wald, on Prunus padus, Oct. 2001, A.Y. Rossman (CBS 109784 = AR 3419).

Notes — Clade 44 contains one isolate from Prunus padus and two isolates from Acer pseudoplatanus, all isolated from Austria. Clade 56 contains another isolate on Prunus padus from Sweden. Clearly there are two different species from Prunus, one isolated in Austria and another in Sweden. Because D. pustulata was originally described on Acer pseudoplatanus, we tentatively apply this name to isolates in clade 44. To clarify the status of isolates in clades 44 and 56, however, additional isolates and a comparison with type materials would be required.

Diaporthe raonikayaporum R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802947; Fig. 20

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g020.jpg

Diaporthe raonikayaporum (CBS 133182). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d. conidiogenous cells; e. beta with a few alpha conidia; f. alpha conidia. — Scale bars: b = 100 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Raoni + Kayapo = after the name of a leader (Raoni) of the indigenous Kayapo ethnic tribe in Brazil. The Kayapos are inhabitants of the Amazon region in Brazil. They use the medicinal plant Spondias mombin, from which this species was isolated, as adornment or ornament, and for its medicinal properties.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to conical or ampullifom, eustromatic and convoluted or unilocular, scattered, dark brown to black, immersed, ostiolate, 110–200 μm wide, 50–130 μm tall, with prominent necks 40–140 μm long, outer surface smooth or covered in hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose or exuding in cirrhi, white to pale-luteous. Conidiophores hyaline, ampulliform to subcylindrical, filiform, branched above the septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–3-septate, (16–)17–22(–26) × (2–)3 μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, straight to curved, tapering towards the apex, collarette not flared, periclinal thickening prominent, (5–)7–9(–10) × (2–)3 μm. Alpha and gamma conidia are formed in the same conidiogenous cells. Alpha conidia hyaline, oblong to ellipsoid, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, (6–)7(–8) × (2–)3 μm. Beta conidia not observed. Gamma conidia hyaline, fusoid to subcylindrical, slightly curved, apex bluntly rounded, base obtuse to subtruncate, bi- to multi-guttulate, or eguttulate, (7–)9–11(–13) × (1–)2 μm.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with an entire edge, aerial mycelium forming concentric rings with cottony texture, olivaceous-buff, isabelline to honey on surface; colonies reaching 63 mm diam after 2 wk at 25 °C; reverse pale purplish grey to smoke-grey. On OA flat, with an entire edge, aerial mycelium forming concentric rings, white, olivaceous on surface, colonies reaching 31 mm diam; reverse buff and greenish olivaceous. On MEA flat, with a lobate edge, aerial mycelium forming wooly concentric rings, olivaceous-grey, greenish olivaceous and patches of amber on surface, colonies reaching 51 mm diam; reverse brown-vinaceous.

Specimen examined. Brazil, Pará, Redenção, endophytic species isolated from leaf of Spondias mombin (popular name Cajazeira and Taperebá), July 2007, K. Rodriguez (holotype CBS H-21097, ex-type culture CBS 133182 = LGMF 923 = CPC 20299).

Notes — Endophytic isolate (clade 31) from medicinal plant in Brazil.

Diaporthe rhoina Feltgen, Vorstud. Pilzfl. Luxemb., Nachtr. III: 145. 1903

Specimen examined. Unknown, on Rhus toxicodendron, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 146.27).

Notes — This species (clade 95) was originally described on Rhus typhina from Luxembourg. European isolates of this pathogen will need to be collected to confirm the identity of CBS 146.27, which is presumably of North American origin.

Diaporthe saccarata (J.C. Kang, L. Mostert & Crous) Crous, comb. nov. — MB802948

Basionym. Phomopsis saccarata J.C. Kang, L. Mostert & Crous, Sydowia 53, 2: 230. 2001.

Specimen examined. South Africa, Western Cape Province, Jonkershoek Mountains, Stellenbosch, on cankers of Protea repens, Mar. 1999, S. Denman (ex-type culture CBS 116311 = CPC 3743).

Note — Diaporthe saccarata (clade 71) is known to cause a canker disease on shoots of Protea repens in South Africa (Mostert et al. 2001b).

Diaporthe schini R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802949; Fig. 21

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g021.jpg

Diaporthe schini (CBS 133181). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PDA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f. beta conidia. — Scale bars: b = 135 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the host genus from which it was isolated, Schinus.

Conidiomata pycnidial, eustromatic, multilocular, immersed to erumpent, ostiolate, dark brown to black, scattered or aggregated, 80–270 μm wide, 70–240 μm tall, prominent necks 70–220 μm long, outer surface covered with hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose, pale-luteous to cream. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, rarely branched, tapering towards the apex, 0–1-septate, (11–)12–17(–20) × (2–)3(–4) μm. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, subcylindrical and filiform, straight, tapering towards the apex, collarette not observed, with prominent periclinal thickening 5–6(–7) × (1–)2 μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, curved or hamate (14–)22–28(–30) × (1–)2 μm. Alpha and gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with a lobate margin, surface mycelium sparse, felty and appressed, buff, honey to isabelline; colonies reaching 30 mm diam after 2 wk at 25 °C; reverse greyish sepia, smoke-grey. On OA with a lobate margin, surface mycelium flat, sparse, felty and appressed, smoke-grey, olivaceous-grey, or olivaceous buff; colonies reaching 21 mm diam; reverse pale mouse-grey to olivaceous-grey or buff. On MEA with a lobate margin, surface mycelium flat, dense, felty and appressed, buff with umber patches; colonies reaching 30 mm diam; reverse dark mouse-grey, umber, with patches of isabelline or luteous.

Specimen examined. Brazil, Paraná, Curitiba, endophytic species isolated from leaf of Schinus terebinthifolius (popular name Aroeira), July 2007, J. Lima (holotype CBS H-21093, culture ex-type CBS 133181 = LGMF 921 = CPC 20297); same collection details (LGMF 910).

Notes — Other than D. schini (clade 11), additional endophytic isolates were also obtained from Schinus terebinthifolius in Brazil, but these are morphologically different and cluster in clades 5 and 9 (D. endophytica and D. terebinthifolii).

Diaporthe sclerotioides (Kesteren) Udayanga, Crous & K.D. Hyde, Fung. Diversity 56: 166. 2012

Basionym. Phomopsis sclerotioides Kesteren, Neth. Jl. Pl. Path. 73: 115. 1967.

Specimens examined. Netherlands, Maarssen, on root of Cucumis sativus, June 1967, H.A. van der Kesteren (ex-type culture CBS 296.67 = ATCC 18585 = IMI 151828 = PD 68/690); Roermond, on root of C. sativus, Dec. 1976 (CBS 710.76 = PD 76/674).

Notes — Diaporthe sclerotioides (clade 28) was originally described from roots of Cucumis sativus in the Netherlands. This species has subsequently been reported to cause black root rot of Citrullus lanatus, Cucurmis sativus, C. ficifolia, C. maxima and C. moschata in various countries in the world (Udayanga et al. 2011).

Diaporthe scobina Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 293. 1870

  • = Phomopsis scobina Höhn., Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl., Abt. 1 115: 681 (33 of repr.). 1906.

Specimen examined. Scotland, living and dead twig of Fraxinus excelsior, Feb. 1938, J.A. MacDonald (CBS 251.38).

Notes — Clade 38 is represented by D. scobina isolated from Fraxinus excelsior in Scotland. The fungus is known on this host from Scotland and Poland (Mulenko et al. 2008, Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe sojae Lehman, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 10: 128. 1923

  • Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae (Lehman) Wehm., The genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its segregates 47: 1933.

  • = Phomopsis longicolla Hobbs, Mycologia 77: 542. 1985.

  • Diaporthe longicolla (Hobbs) J.M. Santos, Vrandečić & A.J.L. Phillips, Persoonia 27: 13. 2011.

Specimens examined. Croatia, on Glycine max stem, Sept. 2005, K. Vrandečić (specimen CBS H-20460, culture CBS 127267). – Italy, Bologna, from Glycine soja, 1986, P. Giunchi (specimen CBS H-16776, culture CBS 100.87). – Unknown, on Glycine soja (‘Blackhawk’) mature stem, A.A. Hildebrand (CBS 180.55 = ATCC 12050 = CECT 2024). USA, Mississippi, from Euphorbia nutans, A. Mengistu (CBS 116017 = DP 0508) and from Glycine max, Oct. 2003, A. Mengistu (CBS 116023); on Glycine soja seedling, J. Marcinkowska (CBS 659.78 = NRRL 13656).

Notes — Isolates of D. phaseolorum var. sojae clustered in two distincts clades (clade 1, D. sojae; clade 7, D. melonis). Diaporthe sojae causes pod and stem blight of soybean, while P. longicolla is known to cause seed decay (Santos et al. 2011). Several authors have found it difficult to distinguish them based on disease symptoms alone, and usually report them together (Almeida & Seixas 2010). Hobbs et al. (1985) described P. longicolla as a different species to D. sojae (Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae) based on morphological characters. Both symptom types, however, have also been linked to the same species (Kulik 1984, Morgan-Jones 1989, Kulik & Sinclair 1999). Considering their genetic similarity based on the five genes studied here, disease etiology and common host, it appears that these isolates belong to the same species, which is distinct from D. phaseolorum (clade 4). Diaporthe sojae (clade 1) is an older name than D. longicolla, and is therefore applied to this clade.

Diaporthe sp. 1

Specimens examined. Brazil, EMBRAPA/PR, on Glycine max seed, A. Almeida (LGMF 947 = CPC 20323). – Germany, Bielefeld, human abscess, K. Plechulla (CBS 119639 = B 11861).

Notes — Isolates from clade 2 appear to represent a novel species, Diaporthe sp. 1 (sterile). It is represented by CBS 119639, isolated from an abscess of a male patient in Germany, and isolate LGMF 947, obtained from soybean seeds in Brazil. Isolates from this clade share a low genetic homology to isolates of the clade 4 (D. phaseolorum; Fig. 1, part 1).

Diaporthe species commonly described from soybean were also reported as opportunistic human pathogens. In 1999, a species of Phomopsis was reported as etiological agent of a subcutaneous infection on the finger of an immunosuppressed farmer and this genus was added to the list of fungi capable to cause human disease (Sutton et al. 1999). In 2011, D. sojae (as Phomopsis longicolla), a known pathogen of soybean, was identified as causing skin infection in an immunocompromised patient after kidney transplantation. The authors believed that this patient acquired the fungus at least 5 yr before, when he had contact with seeds or soybean plants in Equatorial Guinea (Garcia-Reyne et al. 2011).

Another phytopathogenic species also described in soybean, Diaporthe phaseolorum, was reported causing osteomyelitis in patients with positive serology for human lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), disturbing the immune response. The patient was a farmer and inoculation occurred possibly through injury with Amaranthus spinosus thorns (Iriart et al. 2011).

Diaporthe sp. 2

Specimen examined. Brazil, on petiole of Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 932 = CPC 20308).

Notes — Sterile, endophytic isolate from medicinal plant in Brazil, which appears to represent a novel species (clade 29).

Diaporthe sp. 3

Specimen examined. Scotland, on Pseudotsuga menziesii, Mar. 1929, G.G. Hahn (CBS 287.29).

Notes — Clade 32 was tentatively named Diaporthe sp. 3, and is represented by a single isolate previously identified as Phomopsis conorum, and obtained from Pseudotsuga menziesii in Scotland. This clade was not resolved, because there are at least eight different conifer species without any ex-type cultures (Udayanga et al. 2011).

Diaporthe sp. 4

Specimen examined. Brazil, endophytic in petiole on Maytenus ilicifolia, July 2007, R.R. Gomes (LGMF 944 = CPC 20320).

Notes — Sterile endophytic isolate (clade 33) from a medicinal plant in Brazil, appearing to represent an undescribed species.

Diaporthe sp. 5

Specimen examined. Italy, from Acer opalus, W. Jaklitsch (CBS 125575).

Notes — This isolate (clade 37) represents a novel species occurring on Acer, which will be treated separately as part of another study (W. Jaklitsch, pers comm.).

Diaporthe sp. 6

Specimens examined. Hong Kong, University Drive, on fruit of Maesa perlarius, 18 Dec. 2000, K.D. Hyde (CBS 115595 = HKUCC 10129, CBS 115584 = HKUCC 7784).

Notes — The two strains (clade 85) studied here were originally identified as P. pittospori (described from Pittosporum twigs, USA, California), which seems highly unlikely, as they were isolated from fruit of Maesa perlarius in Hong Kong. Unfortunately both strains proved to be sterile, so their identity could not be confirmed.

Diaporthe sp. 7

Specimen examined. India, Bangalore, on Anacardium occidentale, Aug. 1978, H.C. Govindu (CBS 458.78).

Notes — The identity of the present isolate (identified as Phomopsis anacardii) could not be confirmed, as the culture proved to be sterile. However, phylogenetically (clade 88) it represents a distinct taxon from D. anacardii (clade 69), and when recollected, should be described as new.

Diaporthe sp. 8

Specimen examined. Brazil, from Aspidosperma tomentosum, K. Rodriguez (LGMF 925 = CPC 20301).

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C, with moderate aerial mycelium. On PDA surface ochreous, reverse pale luteous. On OA surface and reverse luteous. On MEA surface pale luteous, reverse orange to apricot.

Notes — Although this isolate (clade 90) appears to represent an undescribed species based on phylogenetic data, it proved to be sterile. As we presently only have a single strain of this taxon, its treatment will have to await further collections.

Diaporthe stictica (Berk. & Broome) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802950

Basionym. Phoma stictica Berk. & Broome, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. II 5: 370. 1850.

  • Phomopsis stictica (Berk. & Broome) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. 2, 1: 276. 1906.

Specimen examined. Italy, Perugia, on dead twig of Buxus sempervirens, Dec. 1954, M. Ribaldi (CBS 370.54).

Notes — Diaporthe stictica (clade 74) represents a European species occurring on Buxus sempervirens (Italy, Germany). Although the present isolate could be authentic for the name, this could not be confirmed based on morphology, as the isolate proved to be sterile.

Diaporthe subordinaria (Desm.) R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB802951

Basionym. Phoma subordinaria Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. ser. 3, 9: 284. 1849.

  • Phomopsis subordinaria (Desm.) Traverso, Fl. Ital. Crypt. Pars 1: Fungi. Pyrenomycetae. Xylariaceae, Valsaceae, Ceratostomataceae: 232. 1906.

Specimens examined. New Zealand, blackened seed of Plantago lanceolata, Apr. 1999, B. Alexander (CBS 101711). – South Africa, Eastern Cape Province, Grahamstown, on stalks of Plantago lanceolata, 2 Dec. 1989, R. Shivas (CBS 464.90).

Notes — Diaporthe subordinaria (clade 18) has a global distribution on Plantago lanceolata, on which it causes a stalk disease (de Nooij & van der Aa 1987). It is possible that the disease relates to several different species occurring on Plantago, but this matter can only be resolved following futher collections and correlation with type material.

Diaporthe tecomae Sacc. & P. Syd., Syll. Fung. 14: 550. 1899 (nom. nov. for D. interrupta Niessl). — Fig. 22

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g022.jpg

Diaporthe tecomae (CBS 100547). a. Conidiomata forming on PNA; b, c. conidiogenous cells; d. beta conidia. — Scale bars = 10 μm.

  • ?= Phoma tecomae Sacc., Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 8: 201. 1876.

  • Phomopsis tecomae (Sacc.) Traverso & Spessa, Bol. Soc. Brot. Coimbra, sér. 1, 25: 124. 1910.

Conidiomata pycnidial, sporulating poorly on OA, globose, up to 1 mm diam, black, erumpent, multilocular; cream conidial droplets exuding from central ostioles; walls consisting of 3–6 layers of medium brown textura angularis. Conidiophores hyaline in upper region, pale brown at base, smooth, 1–3-septate, branched, densely aggregated, cylindrical, straight to sinuous, 20–30 × 2–3 μm. Conidiogenous cells 8–15 × 1.5–3 μm, phialidic, cylindrical, terminal and lateral, with slight taper towards apex, 1 μm diam, with visible periclinal thickening; collarette not flared, minute. Paraphyses not observed. Beta conidia spindle-shaped, aseptate, smooth, hyaline, apex acutely rounded, base truncate, tapering from lower third towards apex, apex strongly curved, (17–)22–24(–26) × 1.5(–2) μm. Alpha and gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies covering dish after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C. On OA fluffy, dirty white with patches of grey olivaceous. On PDA dirty white with patches of olivaceous grey and isabelline, reverse with patches of dirty white, brown vinaceous and dark brick. On MEA dirty white with patches of isabelline and olivaceous grey, reverse brown vinaceous with patches of dark brick.

Specimen examined. Brazil, Sao Paulo, Serra da Mantiqueira, mycocecidium caused by Prosopodium tecomicola on living young branch of Tabebuia sp., 27 Sept. 1997, coll. A. Aptroot, isol. H.A. van der Aa (specimen CBS H-16834, culture CBS 100547).

Notes — Diaporthe tecomae was a new name proposed for D. interrupta Niessl (on Tecoma radicans, Portugal), as the epithet was already occupied. The link between the Diaporthe and Phomopsis state remains to be proven. The asexual morph was originally described as Phoma tecomae (from Italy on Tecoma radicans, conidiophores 20 × 1 μm, conidia 8 × 3 μm; Saccardo 1878), and is probably distinct from the fungus represented by CBS 100547, which occurs on Tabebuia sp. in Brazil. However, as no ex-type strains are available of D. tecomae (clade 10), and no alpha conidia were observed in culture, this could not be confirmed, and is pending fresh collections.

Diaporthe terebinthifolii R.R. Gomes, C. Glienke & Crous, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB802952; Fig. 23

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is per-31-1-g023.jpg

Diaporthe terebinthifolii (CBS 133180). a. Conidiomata sporulating on PNA; b, c. transverse section through conidiomata, showing conidiomatal wall; d, e. conidiogenous cells; f. beta conidia. — Scale bars: b = 100 μm, c = 25 μm, all others = 10 μm.

Etymology. Named after the host species from which it was isolated, Schinus terebinthifolius.

Conidiomata pycnidial, globose to conical, immersed, ostiolate, brown to black, scattered or aggregated, 95–110 μm wide, 140–160 μm tall, rarely forms necks, but when present, they are short and covered with hyphae; pycnidal wall consisting of brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis; conidial mass globose, white or pale-luteous to cream. Conidiophores hyaline, subcylindrical, filiform, branched above septa, tapering towards the apex, 1–2-septate, (13–)15–21(–22) × 2(–3) μm. Beta conidiogenous cells hyaline, ampulliform to subcylindrical and filiform, tapering towards the apex, collarette present and not flared, slight periclinal thickening, (3–)6–10(–14) × 2(–3) μm. Beta conidia hyaline, smooth, curved or hamate, (18–)20–24(–26) × 1(–2) μm. Alfa and gamma conidia not observed.

Culture characteristics — Colonies on PDA flat, with an entire edge, aerial mycelium cottony, greyish white, colonies reaching 64 mm diam after 2 wk in the dark at 25 °C; reverse buff. On OA flat, entire edge, aerial mycelium cottony, with concentric rings, pale olivaceous-grey, smoke-grey and greyish white, colonies reaching 48 mm diam; reverse olivaceous-grey and olivaceous buff. On MEA flat, with an entire edge; aerial mycelium cottony, smoke-grey, colonies reaching 60 mm diam; reverse umber with patches of fuscous-black.

Specimens examined. Brazil, Paraná, Curitiba, endophytic species isolated from leaf of Schinus terebinthifolius (popular name Aroeira), July 2007, J. Lima (holotype CBS H-21097, ex-type culture CBS 133180 = LGMF 914 = CPC 20290); same collection details (LGMF 909 = CPC 20285, LGMF 907 = CPC 20283, LGMF 913 = CPC 20289).

Notes — The multigene analysis of isolates in clade 9 exhibited insignificant homology to sequences found in GenBank. An isolate previously identified as Phomopsis tecomae (CBS 100547) also resides in this clade, but is morphologically distinct. No morphologically similar isolates are known from S. terebinthifolius, and thus we designate these isolates as representative of a new taxon.

Diaporthe toxica P.M. Will., Highet, W. Gams & Sivasith., Mycol. Res. 98: 1367. 1994

Specimens examined. Western Australia, Morawa, on stem of Lupinus angustifolius, 6 May 1991, J.B. Nunn (ex-type culture CBS 534.93 = ATCC 96741); Serpentine, on Lupinus sp., 8 June 1993, P.M. Williamson (CBS 535.93); Medina, on Lupinus sp., 8 June 1993, P.M. Williamson (CBS 546.93).

Notes — Clade 45 contains three isolates of D. toxica, including the ex-type culture (CBS 534.93), isolated from Lupinus angustifolius in Western Australia. Two varieties of Phomopsis (P. leptostromiformis var. leptostromiformis and P. leptostromiformis var. occidentalis) were identified as causing disease in Lupinus sp. Diaporthe woodii was later recognised as the sexual state of P. leptostromiformis var. occientalis (Punithalingam 1974), while Williamson et al. (1994) designated the name D. toxica for the sexual state of the toxicogenic variety, P. leptostromiformis var. leptostromiformis.

Lupins (Lupinus spp.) are grown in many parts of the world as a grain legume crop. The seeds are used for animal feed and increasingly as flour for human consumption. The plants increase soil nitrogen and are grown in rotation with other crops. In Australia the stubble left after harvesting aids soil conservation and is a valuable summer feed for livestock. Diaporthe toxica is considered to be an important limiting factor to more extensive sowing of lupins. This organism has been reported to cause stem blight in young lupins (Lupinus luteus) (Ostazeski & Wells 1960) and to produce phomopsins (Culvenor et al. 1977). These mycotoxins cause the animal liver disease known as lupinosis (Gardiner 1975, Allen & Wood 1979).

Diaporthe vaccinii Shear, U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 258: 7. 1931

  • = Phomopsis vaccinii Shear, U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 258: 7. 1931.

Specimens examined. USA, Massachusetts, on Oxycoccus macrocarpos, Mar. 1932, C.L. Shear (ex-type culture CBS 160.32 = IFO 32646); Michigan, on Vaccinium corymbosum, G.C. Adams (CBS 118571); New Jersey, on V. macrocarpon, 1988, L. Carris (CBS 122112 = FAU 474); Michigan, on V. corymbosum, 1992, D.C. Ramsdell (CBS 122114 = FAU 634, CBS 122115 = FAU 590); North Carolina, from V. corymbosum, pre-1999, D.F. Farr (CBS 122116 = DF 5022).

Notes — Clade 63 consists of six isolates of D. vaccinii, including the ex-type strain (CBS 160.32) isolated on Vaccinium corymbosum from the USA. Diaporthe vaccinii causes fruit rot and twig blight and leaf spots of Vaccinium spp. (blueberries) in the USA (Alfieri et al. 1984, Farr et al. 2002, Farr & Rossman 2012). The principal hosts are American and European cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon, V. oxycoccos, V. oxycoccos var. intermedium), highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum) and rabbiteye blueberry (V. ashei). Diaporthe vaccinii is restricted to cultivated Vaccinium species. The wild European species, V. oxycoccos, which usually occurs in mountain bogs, could be a potential reservoir for the pest. In the EPPO region it has been reported from Romania (found in experimental plots of introduced American cultivars, but did not establish (Teodorescu et al. 1985)), UK (found in plants originally imported from the Netherlands and USA, but did not establish (Wilcox & Falconer 1961, Baker 1972)).

Symptoms in susceptible blueberry cultivars include blighting of 1-yr-old woody stems with flower buds. Infected succulent, current-year shoots wilt in 4 d and become covered with minute lesions. The fungus continues to travel downward through the stem, killing major branches, and often entire plants (Wilcox 1939, Daykin & Milholland 1990). Infected fruits turn reddish-brown, soft, mushy, often splitting and causing leakage of juice (Milholland & Daykin 1983).

Diaporthe vexans (Sacc. & P. Syd.) Gratz, Phytopathology 32: 542. 1942

Basionym. Phoma vexans Sacc. & P. Syd., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 14, 2: 889. 1899.

  • Phomopsis vexans (Sacc. & P. Syd.) Harter, J. Agric. Res. 2, 5: 338. 1914.

Specimen examined. USA, from Solanum melongena, Dec. 1914, L.L. Harter (CBS 127.14).

Notes — Diaporthe vexans (clade 12) causes fruit rot, leaf spot, stem and tip blight disease of eggplants (Solanum melongena and S. wendlandii) and other solanaceous species, Acacia sp. (Fabaceae), Prunus sp. (Rosaceae) and Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae), Capsicum annuum and Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae). The disease is widespread in North America, the West Indies, and Eastern and Central Asia, also in Africa (Senegal, Tanzania, Zambia) and Mauritius (Punithalingam & Holliday 1972). Additional records include Brunei, Haiti, Iran, Iraq and Romania (Harter 1914, Farr & Rossman 2012).

Diaporthe viticola Nitschke, Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 264. 1870

Specimens examined. Austria, Vienna, Risenbergbach-Weg, on Laburnum anagyroides, May 2001, A.R. Rossman (CBS 109492). – Canada, British Columbia, Sidney, on Epilobium angustifolium, Oct. 2001, M. Barr (CBS 109768 = AR 3478). – France, Dordogne, near Sarlat la Canéda, 1-yr-old stems on Asphodelus albus, 20 May 1995, G. Verkley (CBS 759.95). – Netherlands, Utrecht, Baarn, in branches and twigs of Aucuba japonica, Jan. 1995, G. Verkley (CBS 106.95); on Rosa rugosa, 18 Mar. 1985, G.H. Boerema (CBS 266.85 = PD 85/25); Lelystad, in dead stem on Lupinus sp., May 1982, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 449.82); Wieringermeer, Robbenoordbos, in dead stem on Lupinus arboreus, 12 Mar. 1991, H.A. van der Aa & F. Meurs (CBS 312.91); Flevoland, trees in front of Info Centre Lepelaarsplassen, in leaf spot on Fraxinus excelsior, 31 Aug. 1997, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 100170); Baarn, in dead stem on Dipsacus fullonum, 14 June 1985, H.A. van der Aa (CBS 502.85); on twig on Salix sp., Apr. 1962, G.H. Boerema (CBS 446.62). – Portugal, on Vitis vinifera (Galego durado), 1 Jan. 1998, A.J.L. Phillips (CBS 114011 = CPC 2677); Burgaes, Santo Tirso, on Vitis vinífera, 16 Feb. 1998, A.J.L. Phillips (ex-type culture CBS 113201 = CPC 5683). – Sweden, Skåne, Maglehem par., on Sambucus cf. racemosa, 14 Apr. 1989, K. Holm & L. Holm (CBS 114436 = UPSC 2960). – UK, Sheffield, on A. japonica, July 1996, G. Verkley (CBS 794.96).

Notes — Diaporthe viticola (clade 50) is known from several hosts, but especially from grapevines, on which it causes a cane spot disease in Europe (Portugal, Germany). Merrin et al. (1995) referred to several Australian isolates from grapevines as Phomopsis taxon 1. The same species was reported by Phillips (1999) as D. perjuncta and by Scheper et al. (2000) as D. viticola. In a subsequent study, Mostert et al. (2001a) chose to follow Phillips (1999) and applied the name D. perjuncta to taxon 1. However, they also noted that minor morphological differences existed in perithecia and ascospores between the European and Southern Hemisphere material, which led to the description of a novel taxon, D. australafricana, for isolates from Australia and South Africa (van Niekerk et al. 2005), and the epitypification of D. viticola based on European material. Based on the results obtained here, D. viticola (clade 50) is closely related to D. australafricana (clade 49), and is clearly distinguishable from D. perjuncta (clade 40).

Diaporthe woodii Punith., Mycol. Pap. 136: 51. 1974

  • = Phomopsis leptostromiformis var. occidentalis, R.G. Shivas, J.G. Allen & P.M. Will., Mycol. Res. 95: 322. 1991.

Specimen examined. Western Australia, Medina, stems of Lupinus sp., 8 July 1993, P.M. Williamson (CBS H-5319, culture CBS 558.93).

Notes — Clade 94 represents Diaporthe woodii (CBS 558.93), which was characterised by Williamson et al. (1994), based on the ex-type strain (IMI 166508). Diaporthe crotalariae (clade 92), D. aspalathi (clade 93) and D. woodii are closely related species. Diaporthe woodii causes stem rot, stem cankers, leaf infections and seed decay of Lupinus angustifolius and L. cosenfinii, and blight and seed discoloration of L. albus, L. angustifolius, L. cosentinii, L. luteus, L. pilosus and Trifolium subterraneum (subterranean clover). The fungus is known to occur in Brazil, South Africa, USA (Florida), and Western Australia (Williamson et al. 1994).

Diaporthe woolworthii (Peck) Sacc., Syll. Fung. (Abellini) 1: 615. 1882

Basionym. Valsa woolworthii Peck, Ann. Rep. N.Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 73. 1876 (1875).

Specimen examined. Unknown, on Ulmus americana, Sept. 1927, L.E. Wehmeyer (CBS 148.27).

Notes — Clade 57 contains a single isolate of D. woolworthii from Ulmus americana. This taxon represents an American species occurring on Ulmus, so this culture (presumably from North America), could prove to be authentic for the name.

DISCUSSION

A major aim of the present study was to resolve the taxonomy of Diaporthe species occurring on diverse hosts, either as pathogens, saprobes, or as harmless endophytes. To delimitate these taxa, nine genes were screened, from which the best five were selected to conduct a multi-gene phylogenetic analysis (ITS, TEF1, ACT, HIS and CAL). Diaporthe represents a highly complex genus containing numerous cryptic species, several of which are newly described in the present study, while others remain unclear, awaiting fresh collections and type studies. Many Diaporthe species that are morphologically similar proved to be genetically distinct, and several isolates that were formerly identified based on their host, were shown to represent different taxa.

Although the genera Diaporthe and Phomopsis have received much taxonomic attention, few phylogenetic studies have thus far been conducted, and hence the taxonomy of this group is still problematic. Due to the lack of reference strains, and the fact that few gene loci other than ITS have in the past been used for DNA analysis, most of the conclusions reached thus far have been incorrect, meaning that published literature will have to be interpreted with care.

In this study we studied 15 endophytic Diaporthe species from Brazil. Three were not identified to species level, two were identified as D. novem and D. phaseolorum, while a further 10 were described as new. High genetic diversity was found amongst the analysed isolates from medicinal plants. Species of Diaporthe are commonly isolated as endophytes from several hosts in temperate and tropical regions (Bussaban et al. 2001, Murali et al. 2006, Rossman et al. 2007, Botella & Diez 2011, González & Tello 2011). Skaltsas et al. (2011) isolated 108 Diaporthe isolates from asymptomatic leaves and bark of three different hosts (Hevea brasiliensis, H. guianensis and Micandra spp.) from Cameroon, Mexico and Peru. Using a multigene approach, the authors found more than 40 phylogenetic species, of which several appeared to represent novel taxa (Skaltsas et al. 2011).

Despite members of Diaporthe commonly being described as phytopathogenic, an increasing number of reports link this genus to endophytic studies, focusing on its potential as a producer of enzymes and novel secondary metabolites, with antibiotic, fungicide and anticancer activity (Dai et al. 2005, Elsaesser et al. 2005, Lin et al. 2005, Silva et al. 2005, Wu et al. 2008, Kumaran & Hur 2009, Weber 2009, Vesterlund et al. 2011).

The ecology of species of Diaporthe remains poorly understood, as some endophytes isolated from the medicinal plant Maytenus ilicifolia were identified as D. phaseolorum (clade 4) and D. novem (clade 22), respectively know as pathogen of soybean (Santos et al. 2011) and Aspalathus linearis (van Rensburg et al. 2006). Diaporthe novem is also reported from hosts such as Hydrangea macrophylla (Santos et al. 2010), Helianthus annuus and Vitis vinifera (Santos et al. 2011). These reports agree with the pogo stick hypothesis, postulating that host-specific fungal plant pathogens frequently exhibit the ability to colonise non-host tissue, enabling them to disperse further, in an attempt to find the host on which they are pathogenic (Crous & Groenewald 2005).

The taxonomy of Diaporthe (incl. Phomopsis) has traditionally been based on host association, with species being described on the assumption that they are host-specific. In the present study the taxonomy of all Diaporthe isolates deposited in the CBS culture collection over time were reviewed, based on this assumption. The employment of this criterion, has led to an exponential growth in the number of taxa described in Diaporthe thus far (Uecker 1988). However, in spite of the apparent synonymies outlined in this study, there was evidence for a huge proliferation of cryptic taxa that were formerly overlooked based on a morphological approach in the absence of molecular data. Species delimitation in Diaporthe based on morphological characters is challenging, as most taxa in culture do not produce all spore states of the asexual (alpha, beta and gamma conidia) or the sexual morph. The description of novel taxa in Diaporthe in the absence of molecular data (at least ITS and HIS or TUB; see discussion in next section) should thus be strongly discouraged in the future.

In conclusion thus, it seems that in spite of the fact that these taxa readily colonise or co-colonise non-hosts (see also Rehner & Uecker 1994, Mostert et al. 2001a, Farr et al. 2002, Diogo et al. 2010), there is still a multitude of undescribed taxa awaiting further study in this complex. It is thus hoped that the phylogenetic backbone generated here provides a stable platform to enable future studies by others interested in the biology of Diaporthe.

Phylogenetic species recognition by genealogical concordance

Taylor et al. (2000) developed the Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) concept to define the limits of sexual species, using the phylogenetic concordance of multiple unlinked genes. This concept has proved greatly useful in fungi, because it is more finely discriminating than other species concepts, as several species are unable to be crossed, or cannot be recognised due to the lack of distinguishing morphological characters or sterility (Reynolds 1993, Taylor et al. 2000, Cai et al. 2011). The adoption of genealogical concordance for species recognition in Diaporthe enabled us to distinguish species that were otherwise not possible to identify due to either sterility, or the loss of specific character states. For instance, D. viticola and D. australafricana are two closely related species (clades 50 and 49, respectively) associated with grapevines. They are morphologically similar, but occur on different continents (van Niekerk et al. 2005). These species have probably accumulated genetic differences due to their geographical isolation. Several cryptic species were recently described in other genera using the GCPSR criterion, some of which are consistent with allopatric divergence, because these species occupy non-overlapping areas separated by geographic barriers, e.g. in Cladosporium (Bensch et al. 2012), Colletotrichum (Damm et al. 2012a, b), Harknessia (Crous et al. 2012), Ilyonectria (Cabral et al. 2012a, b) and Phyllosticta (Glienke et al. 2011), to name but a few. Using the GCPSR concept it is possible to define the genetic variation observed in some species, but still insufficient to establish them as distinct species, since genetic flow still occurs between them. For example, isolates of clades 79–90 clustered differently based on analyses of the different genes, probably because of recent gene flow among them.

We have compared the location and monophyly of the strains in each clade in the phylogenetic tree of the combined alignment (Fig. 1) to those phylogenetic trees obtained from the individual loci to determine the species boundaries and species resolution. The five loci selected for the Bayesian phylogeny have a similar resolution for species discrimination, ranging from TEF1 resolving 72 out of the 95 species, to HIS and TUB resolving 84 of the 95 species.

The ITS region, which is often considered to be less than optimal for closely related species, was not much better or worse (resolving 75 of the 95 species) than the other included loci. However, given the recent acceptance of the ITS region as official fungal barcode (Schoch et al. 2012) and its intermediate resolving power in the present study, this locus should not be discarded from future studies. Also, TEF1, which has in the past been used as additional locus for phylogenetic studies of Diaporthe, performed the worst in this study (resolving 72 of the 95 species), although this was not much worse than ITS and CAL (resolving 75 and 74 of the 95 species, respectively). The HIS and TUB regions appear to have the best resolution for species discrimination in the present study and therefore are good candidates as secondary markers to the commonly used ITS region. Similar results were also reported for ITS, CAL, TEF1 and TUB by Udayanga et al. (2012), who suggested that TUB be considered as secondary phylogenetic marker for Diaporthe.

The importance of epitypification in Diaporthe

The best option to supplement poor type material is via epitypification (Cannon et al. 2012). To employ the GCPSR concept in fungi, DNA is mostly extracted from poorly preserved, ancient herbarium specimens with difficulty, and in many cases it only results in short sequences of the ITS region (Quaedvlieg et al. 2011, Cheewangkoon et al. 2012). Therefore, epitypification of living material, and its preservation and deposit in publically available collections and databases, are important steps to provide a stable platform to enable others to test future hypotheses. Although it is not a prerequisite, it is strongly recommended that the chosen epitype should originate from the same geographical region and host, and have morphological, cultural and pathological characteristics similar to those described in the original publication (see Damm et al. 2012a, b, Cannon et al. 2012, Weir et al. 2012).

Despite the fact that close to 2 000 species of Diaporthe (incl. Phomopsis) have been described in literature, hardly any ex-type strains are available today, the majority of which were included in the present study. Due to the lack of ex-type strains, the taxonomy of several species continue to be unresolved, some of which are important plant pathogens. A serious effort will thus be called for to recollect and redescribe all these old names. An alternative approach would be to simply start over, ensuring that all newly described names are based not only on morphology, but also supplemented by DNA barcodes. However, as long as fungal nomenclature is governed by the ICN, this seems unobtainable. Eventually though, all mycologists will realise that a stable fungal nomenclature must incorporate DNA data, and that this is only achievable if mycology follows a code of nomenclature that incorporates this requirement.

Acknowledgments

We thank the technical staff, Arien van Iperen (cultures), Marjan Vermaas (photographic plates) and Mieke Starink-Willemse (DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing) for their invaluable assistance. We are grateful to the Brazilian agency CAPES for financial support to Renata R. Gomes.

REFERENCES

  • Alfieri JR, Langdon KR, Wehlburg C, Kimbrough JW. 1984. Index of plant diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry Bulletin 11: 1–389 [Google Scholar]
  • Allen JG, Wood PM. 1979. The prevention of lupinosis by making lupin hay. Australian Veterinary Journal 55: 38–39 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Almeida AMR, Seixas CDS, editors. (eds). 2010. Soyabeans: root and stem diseases and interrelationships with soil management and culture. Embrapa Soja, Londrina [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson RG, Hartman JR. 1983. Phomopsis twig blight on weeping figs indoors: a case study. Foliage Digest 6: 38–58 [Google Scholar]
  • Arnold RH. 1975. Diaporthe alleghaniensis. Fungi Canadenses 70: 1–2 [Google Scholar]
  • Ash GJ, Stodart B, Sakuanrungsirikul S, Anschaw E, Crump N, et al. 2010. Genetic characterization of a novel Phomopsis sp., a putative biocontrol agent for Carthamus lanatus. Mycologia 102: 54–61 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Baker JJ. 1972. Report on diseases of cultivated plants in England and Wales for the years 1957–1968. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Technical Bulletin 25: 148 [Google Scholar]
  • Bandre TR, Sasek V. 1977. Antibiotic activity of pyrenomycetes under submerged conditions. Folia Microbiologica 22: 269–274 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Banihashemi Z, Javadi AR. 2009. Further investigations on the biology of Phomopsis cinerascens, the cause of fig canker in Iran. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 48: 454–460 [Google Scholar]
  • Battilani P, Rossi V, Girometta B, Delos M, Rouzet J, et al. 2003. Estimating the potential development of Diaporthe helianthi epidemics in Italy. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 33: 427–431 [Google Scholar]
  • Bensch K, Braun U, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2012. The genus Cladosporium. Studies in Mycology 72: 1–401 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Benschop K, Tewari JP, Toop EW. 1984. Phomopsis twig die-back of some woody interior ornamentals in Alberta. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 64: 29–31 [Google Scholar]
  • Beraha LR, O’Brien MJ. 1979. Diaporthe melonis sp. nov., a new soft rot of market cantaloupes. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 94: 199–207 [Google Scholar]
  • Boddy L, Griffith GS. 1989. Role of endophytes and latent invasion in the development of decay communities in sapwood of angiospermous trees. Sydowia 41: 41–73 [Google Scholar]
  • Botella L, Diez JJ. 2011. Phylogenic diversity of fungal endophytes in Spanish stands of Pinus halepensis. Fungal Diversity 47: 9–18 [Google Scholar]
  • Brayford D. 1990. Variation in Phomopsis isolates from Ulmus species in the British Isles and Italy. Mycology Research 94: 691–697 [Google Scholar]
  • Bussaban B, Lumyong L, Lumyong P, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD. 2001. Endophytic fungi from Amomum siamense. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 47: 943–948 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cabral A, Groenewald JZ, Rego C, Oliveira H, Crous PW. 2012a. Cylindrocarpon root rot: multi-gene analysis reveals novel species within the Ilyonectria radicicola species complex. Mycological Progress 11: 655–688 [Google Scholar]
  • Cabral A, Rego C, Nascimento T, Oliveira H, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2012b. Multi-gene analysis and morphology reveal novel Ilyonectria species associated with black foot disease of grapevines. Fungal Biology 116: 62–80 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai L, Giraud T, Zhang N, Begerow D, Cai G, Shivas RG. 2011. The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Diversity 50: 121–133 [Google Scholar]
  • Cannon PF, Damm U, Johnston PR, Weir BS. 2012. Colletotrichum – current status and future directions. Studies in Mycology 73: 181–213 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553–556 [Google Scholar]
  • Carroll GC. 1986. The biology of endophytism in plants with particular reference to woody perennials. In: Fokkema NJ, Heuvel J van den, editors. (eds), Microbiology of the phyllosphere: 205–222 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar]
  • Castlebury LA, Farr DF, Rossman AY, Jaklitsch WJ. 2003. Diaporthe angelicae comb. nov., a modern description and placement of Diaporthopsis in Diaporthe. Mycoscience 44: 203–208 [Google Scholar]
  • Castlebury LA, Mengistu A. 2006. Phylogenetic distinction of Diaporthe/Phomopsis isolates from soybeans. Systematic Mycology and Microbiology 57: 1–13 [Google Scholar]
  • Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Jaklitsch WJ, Vasilyeva LN. 2002. A preliminary overview of the Diaporthales based on large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 94: 1017–1031 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheewangkoon R, Groenewald JZ, Hyde KD, To-anun C, Crous PW. 2012. Chocolate spot of Eucalyptus. Mycological Progress 11: 61–69 [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke MC. 1894. Answers to correspondents. Gardeners’ Chronicle 15: 605 [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, Wingfield MJ, Verkley GJM, et al. 2013. Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in Mycology 75: 37–114 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. 2004a. MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Studies in Mycology 50: 19–22 [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Groenewald JZ. 2005. Hosts, species and genotypes: opinions versus data. Australasian Plant Pathology 34: 463–470 [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risede J-M, Hywel-Jones NL. 2004b. Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with sphaeropedunculate vesicles. Studies in Mycology 50: 415–430 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Shivas RG, Edwards J, Seifert KA, et al. 2011. Fungal Planet description sheets: 69–91. Persoonia 26: 108–156 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Phillips AJL, Baxter AP. 2000. Phytopathogenic fungi from South Africa. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Plant Pathology Press [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Schoch CL, Hyde KD, Wood AR, Gueidan C, et al. 2009a. Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Studies in Mycology 64: 17–47 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Summerell BA, Shivas RG, Carnegie AJ, Groenewald JZ. 2012. A re-appraisal of Harknessia (Diaporthales), and the introduction of Harknessiaceae fam. nov. Persoonia 28: 49–65 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Crous PW, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Samson RA, editors. (eds). 2009b. Fungal Biodiversity. CBS Laboratory Manual Series 1: 1–269. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  • Culvenor CCJ, Beck AB, Clarke M, Cockrum PA, Edgar JA, et al. 1977. Isolation of toxic metabolites of Phomopsis leptostromiformis responsible for lupinosis. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 30: 269–277 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Dai J, Krohn K, Floerke U, Gehle D, Aust HJ, et al. 2005. Novel highly substituted biaryl ethers, phomopsines D-G, isolated from endophytic fungus Phomopsis sp. from Adenocarpus foliolosus. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 23: 5100–5105 [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Cannon PF, Woudenberg JHC, Baroncelli R, Crous PW. 2012a. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Studies in Mycology 73: 1–36 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Damm U, Cannon PF, Woudenberg JHC, Johnston PR, Weir BS, et al. 2012b. The Colletotrichum boninense species complex. Studies in Mycology 73: 1–36 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daykin ME, Milholland RD. 1990. Histopathology of blueberry twig blight caused by Phomopsis vaccinii. Phytopathology 80: 736–740 [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Estragnat A, Reau R. 2003. Influence of crop management on sunflower stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi). Agronomie 23: 581–592 [Google Scholar]
  • Delacroix G. 1905. Sur une maladie des Amendiers en Provence. Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 21: 180–185 [Google Scholar]
  • Dennis RWG. 1986. Fungi of the Hebrides. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew [Google Scholar]
  • Dettrakul S, Kittakoop P, Isaka M, Nopichai S, Suyarnsestakorn C, et al. 2003. Antimycobacterial pimarane diterpenes from the fungus Diaporthe sp. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 7: 1253–1255 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Diogo ELF, Santos JM, Phillips AJL. 2010. Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 44: 107–115 [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, et al. 2011. Geneious v5.4, Available from http://www.geneious.com/
  • Early MP, Punithalingam E. 1972. Phomopsis anacardii sp. nov. on Anacardium occidentale. Transactions of British Mycological Society 59: 345–347 [Google Scholar]
  • Elsaesser B, Krohn K, Floerke U, Root N, Aust HJ, et al. 2005. X-ray structure determination absolute configuration and biological activity of phomoxanthone. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 21: 4563–4570 [Google Scholar]
  • Farr DF, Bills GF, Chamuris GP, Rossman AY. 1989. Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota [Google Scholar]
  • Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Putnam ML. 2002. A new species of Phomopsis causing twig dieback of Vaccinium vitis-idaea (lingonberry). Mycological Research 106: 745–752 [Google Scholar]
  • Farr DF, Rossman AY. 2012. Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved December, 2012, from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/
  • Fernández FA, Hanlin RT. 1996. Morphological and RAPD analyses of Diaporthe phaseolorum from soybean. Mycologia 88: 425–440 [Google Scholar]
  • Fröhlich J, Hyde KD, Guest DI. 1997. Fungi associated with leaf spots of palms in north Queensland, Australia. Mycological Research 101: 721–732 [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia-Reyne A, López-Medrano F, Morales JM, Esteban CG, Martín I, et al. 2011. Cutaneous infection by Phomopsis longicolla in a renal transplant recipient from Guinea: first report of human infection by this fungus. Transplant Infectious Disease 13: 204–207 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gardiner MR. 1975. Lupinosis. Journal of Agriculture 16: 26–30 [Google Scholar]
  • Glass NL, Donaldson G. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Glienke C, Pereira OL, Stringari D, Fabris J, Kava-Cordeiro V, et al. 2011. Endophytic and pathogenic Phyllosticta species, with reference to those associated with Citrus Black Spot. Persoonia 26: 47–56 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • González V, Tello ML. 2011. The endophytic mycota associated with Vitis vinifera in central Spain. Fungal Diversity 47: 29–42 [Google Scholar]
  • Groenewald JZ, Nakashima C, Nishikawa J, Shin HD, Park JH, et al. 2013. Species concepts in Cercospora: spotting the weeds among the roses. Studies in Mycology 75: 115–170 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Grove WB. 1919. Species placed by Saccardo in the genus Phoma. Part 1. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information of the Royal Botanical Gardens Kew 4: 177–201 [Google Scholar]
  • Grove WB. 1935. British stem- and leaf-fungi (Coelomycetes). Cambridge University Press, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Gulya TJ, Rashid KY, Masirevic SM. 1997. Sunflower diseases. In: Schneiter AA, editor. (ed), Sunflower technology and production: 313–319 American Society of Agronomy, Madison USA [Google Scholar]
  • Hampson MC. 1981. Phomopsis canker on weeping fig in Newfoundland. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 61, 1: 3–5 [Google Scholar]
  • Hanlin RT. 1963. A revision of the Ascomycetes of Georgia. Mimeo series, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station 175: 1–65 [Google Scholar]
  • Harter LL. 1914. Fruit-rot, leaf-spot and stem-blight of the eggplant caused by Phomopsis vexans. Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 331–338 [Google Scholar]
  • Hawksworth DL, Crous PW, Redhead SA, Reynolds DR, Samson RA, et al. 2011. The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2: 105–112 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182–192 [Google Scholar]
  • Hobbs TW, Schmitthenner AF, Kuter GA. 1985. A new Phomopsis species from soybean. Mycologia 77: 535–544 [Google Scholar]
  • Holliday P. 1980. Fungus diseases of tropical crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Huber GA. 1936. A Phomopsis canker and gall disease of gardenia. Florist Exchange and Horticultural Trade World 86, 10: 11 [Google Scholar]
  • Iriart X, Binois R, Fior A, Blanchet D, Berry A, et al. 2011. Eumycetoma caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum (Phomopsis phaseoli): a case report and a mini-review of Diaporthe/Phomopsis spp. invasive infections in humans. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 17: 1492–1494 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Isaka M, Jaturapat A, Rukseree K, Danwisetkanjana K, Tanticharoen M, Thebtaranonth Y. 2001. Phomoxanthones A and B, novel xanthone dimers from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis species. Journal Natural Products 64: 1015–1018 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordaan A, Taylor JE, Rossenkhan R. 2006. Occurrence and possible role of endophytic fungi associated with seed pods of Colophospermum mopane (Fabaceae) in Botswana. South African Journal of Botany 72: 245–255 [Google Scholar]
  • Katoh K, Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 286–298 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kobayashi H, Meguro S, Yoshimoto T, Namikoshi M. 2003. Absolute structure, biosynthesis, and anti-microtubule activity of phomopsidin, isolated from a marine derived fungus Phomopsis sp. Tetrahedron 59: 455–459 [Google Scholar]
  • Kuleci E, Tunali B, Berner DK, Cavin CA, Castlebury LA. 2009. First report of leaf anthracnose caused by Phomopsis convolvuli on field bindweed in Turkey. Plant Disease 93: 847 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kulik MM. 1984. Failure of Phomopsis phaseoli to produce mature pycnidia in senescent soybean stems at the end of the growing season. Mycologia 76: 863–867 [Google Scholar]
  • Kulik MM, Sinclair JB. 1999. Phomopsis seed decay. In: Hartman GL, Sinclair JB, Rupe JC, editors. (eds), Compendium of soybean diseases: 31–32 American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, USA [Google Scholar]
  • Kumaran RS, Hur B. 2009. Screening of species of the endophytic fungus Phomopsis for the production of the anticancer drug taxol. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 54: 21–30 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Li KN, Rouse D, German TL. 1994. PCR primers that allow intergeneric differentiation of ascomycetes and their application to Verticillium spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 4324–4331 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Librado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v. 5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin X, Huang Y, Fang M, Wang J, Zheng Z, Su W. 2005. Cytotoxic and antimicrobial metabolites from marine lignicolous fungi, Diaporthe sp. FEMS Microbiology Letters 251: 53–58 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Marincowitz S, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Wingfield MJ. 2008. Microfungi occurring on the Proteaceae in the fynbos. CBS Biodiversity Series 7: 1–166 CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • Masirevic S, Gulya TJ. 1992. Sclerotinia and Phomopsis – two devastating sunflower pathogens. Field Crops Research 30: 271–300 [Google Scholar]
  • Mathur RS. 1979. The Coelomycetes of India. Delhi, India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, India [Google Scholar]
  • McKeen CD. 1957. Phomopsis black rot of cucurbits. Canadian Journal of Botany 35: 43–50 [Google Scholar]
  • McKenzie EHC. 1992. Fungi of the Kermadec Islands. Mycotaxon 45: 149–170 [Google Scholar]
  • McKenzie MA, Jones LH, Gilgut CJ. 1940. Phomopsis gardeniae in relation to gardenia culture. Plant Disease Reporter 24: 58–62 [Google Scholar]
  • McPartland J. 1983. Phomopsis ganjae sp. nov. on Cannabis sativa. Mycotaxon 18: 527–530 [Google Scholar]
  • Mel’nik VA, Shabunin DA, Popov ES. 2008. Contributions to the studies of mycobiota in Novgorod and Pskov regions. II. Coelomycetes. Mikologiya i Fitopatologiya 42: 43–52 [Google Scholar]
  • Mengistu A, Castlebury LA, Smith JR, Rossman AY, Reddy KN. 2007. Isolates of Diaporthe-Phomopsis from weeds and their effect on soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 29: 283–289 [Google Scholar]
  • Merrin SJ, Nair NG, Tarran J. 1995. Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australasian Plant Pathology 24: 44–56 [Google Scholar]
  • Michalopoulos-Skarmoutsos HG, Skarmoutsos G. 1999. Pathogenicity of fungi affecting black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) in Greece. Phytoparasitica 27: 233–234 [Google Scholar]
  • Milholland RD, Daykin ME. 1983. Blueberry fruit rot caused by Phomopsis vaccinii. Plant Disease 67: 325–326 [Google Scholar]
  • Miller HN. 1961. Annual report of the agricultural experiment stations, Florida, for the year ending June 30, 1961. Revue of Applied Mycology 42: 236 [Google Scholar]
  • Mondal SN, Vicent A, Reis RF, Timmer LW. 2007. Saprophytic colonisation of citrus twigs by Diaporthe citri and factors affecting pycnidia production and conidial survival. Plant Disease 91: 387–392 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Morgan-Jones G. 1989. The Diaporthe/Phomopsis complex: taxonomical considerations. In: Pascale AJ, editor. (ed), World Soybean Research Conference IV Proceedings: 1699–1706. Orientación Gráfica Editora, Buenos Aires, Argentina [Google Scholar]
  • Moricca S. 2002. Phomopsis alnea, the cause of dieback of black alder in Italy. Plant Pathology 51: 755–764 [Google Scholar]
  • Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang JC, Phillips AJL. 2001a. Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia 93: 146–167 [Google Scholar]
  • Mostert L, Kang JC, Crous PW, Denman S. 2001b. Phomopsis saccharata sp. nov., causing a canker and die-back disease of Protea repens in South Africa. Sydowia 53: 227–235 [Google Scholar]
  • Mułenko W, Majewski T, Ruszkiewicz-Michalska M, editors. (eds)2008. A preliminary checklist of micromycetes in Poland. In: Biodiversity of Poland 9: 752. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków [Google Scholar]
  • Munk A. 1957. Danish pyrenomycetes. A preliminary flora. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv Udgivet af Dansk Botanisk Forening, Copenhagen 17: 1–491 [Google Scholar]
  • Muntañola-Cvetkovic M, Mihaljcevic M, Petrov M. 1981. On the identity of the causative agent of a serious Phomopsis-Diaporthe disease in sunflower plants. Nova Hedwigia 34: 417–435 [Google Scholar]
  • Murali TS, Suryanarayanan TS, Geeta R. 2006. Endophytic Phomopsis species: host range and implications for diversity estimates. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 52: 673–680 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Myllys L, Stenroos S, Thell A. 2002. New genes for phylogenetic studies of lichenized fungi: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and beta-tubulin genes. Lichenologist 34: 237–246 [Google Scholar]
  • Niekerk JM van, Groenewald JZ, Farr DF, Fourie PH, Halleen F, Crous PW. 2005. Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines. Australasian Plant Pathology 34: 27–39 [Google Scholar]
  • Nitschke T. 1867. Pyrenomycetes Germanici. Die Kernpilze Deutschlands, Breslau 1.
  • Nooij MP de, Aa HA van der. 1987. Phomopsis subordinaria and associated stalk disease in natural populations of Plantago lanceolata. Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 2318–2325 [Google Scholar]
  • Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden [Google Scholar]
  • O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 103–116 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E, Nirenberg HI. 1998. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90: 465–493 [Google Scholar]
  • Oak SW, Dorset RD. 1983. Phomopsis canker of European black alder found in Kentucky seed-production areas. Plant Disease 67: 691–693 [Google Scholar]
  • Ogawa JM, English H. 1991. Disease of temperate zone tree fruit and nut crops. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California: Publication 3345. [Google Scholar]
  • Ohsawa T, Kobayashi T. 1989. Concave rot of melon fruit caused by two Phomopsis fungi. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 55: 410–419 [Google Scholar]
  • Ormeno-Nuñez ZR, Eeleder D, Watson K. 1988. A new species of Phomopsis recovered from field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Canadian Journal of Botany 66: 2228–2233 [Google Scholar]
  • Ostazeski SA, Wells HD. 1960. A phomopsis stem blight of yellow lupins (Lupinus luteus L.). Plant Disease Reporter 44: 66–67 [Google Scholar]
  • Pecchia S, Mercatelli E, Vannacci G. 2004. Intraspecific diversity within Diaporthe helianthi: evidence from rDNA intergenic spacer (IGS) sequence analysis. Mycopathologia 157: 317–326 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips AJL. 1999. The relationship between Diaporthe perjuncta and Phomopsis viticola on grapevines. Mycologia 91: 1001–1007 [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips AJL. 2003. Morphological characterization of Diaporthe foeniculacea and its Phomopsis anamorph on Foeniculum vulgare. Sydowia 55: 274–285 [Google Scholar]
  • Preston DA. 1945. Host index of Oklahoma plant diseases. Oklahoma Agricultural College, Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 21: 1–168 [Google Scholar]
  • Punithalingam E. 1973. Two new species of Phomopsis. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 60: 157–160 [Google Scholar]
  • Punithalingam E. 1974. Studies on Sphaeropsidales in culture. II. Mycological Papers 136: 1–63 [Google Scholar]
  • Punithalingam E, Holliday P. 1972. Phomopsis vexans. CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria No. 338.
  • Punithalingam E, Holliday P. 1973. Diaporthe citri. CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria No. 396.
  • Punithalingam E, Holliday P. 1975. Phomopsis cucurbitae. CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria No. 469.
  • Quaedvlieg W, Kema GHJ, Groenewald JZ, Verkley GJM, Seifbarghi S, et al. 2011. Zymoseptoria gen. nov.: a new genus to accommodate Septoria-like species occurring on graminicolous hosts. Persoonia 26: 57–69 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rawnsley B, Wicks TJ, Scott ES, Stummer BE. 2004. Diaporthe perjuncta does not cause Phomopsis cane and leaf spot disease of grapevine in Australia. Plant Disease 88: 1005–1010 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rayner RW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Rehner SA, Uecker FA. 1994. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 1666–1674 [Google Scholar]
  • Rekab D, Sorbo G del, Reggio C, Zoina A, Firrao G. 2004. Polymorphisms in nuclear rDNA and mtDNA reveal the polyphyletic nature of isolates of Phomopsis pathogenic to sunflower and a tight monophyletic clade of defined geographic origin. Mycological Research 108: 393–402 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rensburg JCJ van, Lamprecht SC, Groenewald JZ, Castlebury LA, Crous PW. 2006. Characterization of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa. Studies in Mycology 55: 65–74 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds DR. 1993. The fungal holomorph: an overview. In: Reynolds DR, Taylor JW, editors. (eds), The fungal holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics: 15–25 CAB International, Wallingford, UK [Google Scholar]
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rossman AY, Farr DF, Castlebury LA. 2007. A review of the phylogeny and biology of the Diaporthales. Mycoscience 48: 135–144 [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. 1878. Fungi Veneti novi vel critici auctore. Series VIIII. Appendicula. Michelia 1: 351–355 [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. 1879. Fungi Gallici lecti a cl. viris P. Brunaud, C.C. Gillet et Abb. Letendre. Michelia 1: 500–538 [Google Scholar]
  • Santos JM, Correia VG, Phillips AJL. 2010. Primers for mating-type diagnosis in Diaporthe and Phomopsis: their use in teleomorph induction in vitro and biological species definition. Fungal Biology 114: 255–270 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos JM, Phillips AJL. 2009. Resolving the complex of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species occurring on Foeniculum vulgare in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 34: 111–125 [Google Scholar]
  • Santos JM, Vrandečić K, Ćosić J, Duvnjak T, Phillips AJL. 2011. Resolving the Diaporthe species occurring on soybean in Croatia. Persoonia 27: 9–19 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarbhoy AK, Lal G, Varshney JL. 1971. Fungi of India. Navyug Traders, New Delhi, India [Google Scholar]
  • Scerbin-Parfenenko AL. 1953. Rakovye i sosudistye bolezni listvennyh porod. Goslesbumisdat, Moskva-Leningrad [Google Scholar]
  • Scheper RWA, Crane DC, Whisson DL, Scott ES. 2000. The Diaporthe teleomorph of Phomopsis Taxon 1 on grapevine. Mycological Research 104: 226–231 [Google Scholar]
  • Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, et al. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 6241–6246 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Sebastiane FLS, Lacava PT, Fávaro LCL, Rodrigues MBC, Araújo WL, et al. 2011. Genetic transformation of Diaporthe phaseolorum, an endophytic fungus found in mangrove forests, mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Current Genetics 58: 21–33 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw CG. 1973. Host fungus index for the Pacific Northwest - I. Hosts. Washington State University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 765: 1–121 [Google Scholar]
  • Silva GH, Teles HL, Trevisan HC, Bolzani VS, Young MCM, et al. 2005. New bioactive metabolites produced by Phomopsis cassiae, an endophytic fungus in Cassia spectabilis. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society 16: 1463–1466 [Google Scholar]
  • Skaltsas D, Castlebury L, Chaverri P. 2011. Delimitation of tropical endophytic Phomopsis species from three euphorbiaceous hosts: Hevea brasiliensis, H. guianensis, and Micandra sp. Inoculum 62, 3: 41 [Google Scholar]
  • Smit WA, Knox-Davies PS. 1989a. Die-back of rooibos tea caused by Diaporthe phaseolorum. Phytophylactica 21: 183–188 [Google Scholar]
  • Smit WA, Knox-Davies PS. 1989b. Comparison of Diaporthe phaseolorum isolates from rooibos tea, Aspalathus linearis. Phytophylactica 21: 301–306 [Google Scholar]
  • Smit WA, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD. 1996. A new canker disease of apple, pear, and plum rootstocks caused by Diaporthe ambigua in South Africa. Plant Disease 80: 1331–1335 [Google Scholar]
  • Smith H, Wingfield MJ, Crous PW, Coutinho TA. 1996. Sphaeropsis sapinea and Botryosphaeria dothidea endophytic in Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 62: 86–88 [Google Scholar]
  • Spielman LJ. 1985. A monograph of Valsa on hardwoods in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1355–1378 [Google Scholar]
  • Sutton DA, Timm WD, Morgan-Jones G, Rinaldi MG. 1999. Human phaeohyphomycotic osteomyelitis caused by the coelomycete Phomopsis saccardo 1905: criteria for identification, case history, and therapy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37: 807–811 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts [Google Scholar]
  • Tai FL. 1979. Sylloge Fungorum Sinicorum. Science Press, Academica Sinica, Peking [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, et al. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31: 21–32 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Teodorescu G, Copaescu V, Florea S. 1985. The behaviour of some blueberry cultivars to the main mycoses in Romania. Acta Horticulturae 165: 159–165 [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson SM, Tan YP, Young AJ, Neate SM, Aitken EA, Shivas RG. 2011. Stem cankers on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Australia reveal a complex of pathogenic Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species. Persoonia 27: 80–89 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tilford PE. 1934. Stem canker disease of gardenia. Bulletin of the Ohio Agriculture Experiment Station 19 (168): 116–117 [Google Scholar]
  • Tuset JJ, Portilla MT. 1989. Taxonomic status of Fusicoccum amygdali and Phomopsis amygdalina. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1275–1280 [Google Scholar]
  • Udayanga D, Xingzhong L, Crous PW, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. 2012. A multi-locus phylogenetic evaluation of Diaporthe (Phomopsis). Fungal Diversity 56: 157–171 [Google Scholar]
  • Udayanga D, Xingzhong L, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AHA, Hyde KD. 2011. The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common pathogens. Fungal Diversity 50: 189–225 [Google Scholar]
  • Uecker FA. 1988. A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology. Mycological Memoirs 13: 1–231 [Google Scholar]
  • Vajna L. 2002. Diaporthe oncostoma causing stem canker of black locust in Hungary. Plant Pathology 51: 393 [Google Scholar]
  • Vasilyeva LN, Rossman AY, Farr DF. 2007. New species of the Diaporthales from eastern Asia and eastern North America. Mycologia 99: 916–923 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Vesterlund SR, Helander M, Faeth SH, Hyvönen T, Saikkonen K. 2011. Environmental conditions and host plant origin override endophyte effects on invertebrate communities. Fungal Diversity 47: 109–118 [Google Scholar]
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Webber J, Gibbs JN. 1984. Colonization of elm bark by Phomopsis oblonga. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 82: 348–352 [Google Scholar]
  • Weber D. 2009. Endophytic fungi, occurrence and metabolites. In: Anke T, Weber D, editors. (eds), Physiology and genetics. The mycota 15: 153–195. Springer-Verlag, Berlin [Google Scholar]
  • Weber GF. 1933. Stem canker of Crotalaria spectabilis caused by Diaporthe crotalariae n. sp. Phytopathology 23: 602 [Google Scholar]
  • Wehmeyer LE. 1933. The genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its segregates. University of Michigan Studies Scientific Series 9: 1–349 [Google Scholar]
  • Weir B, Johnston PR, Damm U. 2012. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Studies in Mycology 73: 115–180 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee J, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. (eds), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315–322 Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA [Google Scholar]
  • Wilcox HJ, Falconer MA. 1961. New or uncommon plant pests. Plant Pathology 10: 123–124 [Google Scholar]
  • Wilcox MS. 1939. Phomopsis twig blight of blueberry. Phytopathology 29: 136–142 [Google Scholar]
  • Williamson PM, Higher AS, Gams W, Sivasithamparam K, Cowling WA. 1994. Diaporthe toxica sp. nov. the cause of lupinosis in sheep. Mycology Research 98: 1364–1368 [Google Scholar]
  • Wingfield MJ, Beer ZW de, Slippers B, Wingfield BD, Groenewald JZ, et al. 2012. One fungus one name promotes progressive plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 13: 604–613 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu SH, Chen YW, Shao SC, Wang LD, Li ZY, et al. 2008. Ten-membered lactones from Phomopsis sp., an endophytic fungus of Azadirachta indica. Journal of Natural Products 71: 731–734 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang AW, Riccioni L, Pedersen WL, Kollipara KP, Hartman GL. 1998. Molecular identification and phylogenetic grouping of Diaporthe phaseolorum and Phomopsis longicolla isolates from soybean. Phytopathology 88: 1306–1314 [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhuang WY. 2001. Higher fungi of tropical China. Mycotaxon, Ithaca, USA [Google Scholar]

Articles from Persoonia : Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Naturalis Biodiversity Center & Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations
Jump to Data

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/71244216
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/71244216

Article citations


Go to all (168) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.