Escape Conditioning and Avoidance Conditioning

Understanding Escape Conditioning and Avoidance Conditioning in Dog Training

In dog training, conditioning techniques are pivotal for shaping behaviors and ensuring dogs respond appropriately to various stimuli. Escape conditioning and avoidance conditioning play significant roles. Both are grounded in operant conditioning principles but differ in their approaches and applications. This article delves into the definitions, examples, and applications of escape conditioning and avoidance conditioning in dog training.

Escape Conditioning in Dog Training

Definition: Escape conditioning, a form of negative reinforcement, involves teaching a dog to perform a specific behavior to escape or terminate an unpleasant stimulus. The key feature here is that the dog learns to engage in the desirable behavior once the aversive condition has begun.

Example in Dog Training:

Imagine you have a dog that pulls on its leash during walks. To apply escape conditioning:

1. Aversive Stimulus: Apply gentle but firm pressure on the leash when the dog starts to pull.
2. Desired Behavior: The pressure is maintained until the dog stops pulling and begins walking beside you.
3. Reinforcement: The pressure on the leash is immediately released when the dog stops pulling, thus relieving the discomfort.

Application:

• Basic Obedience: Teaching commands like “down” or “off” can involve applying pressure on the dog’s leash and releasing it as soon as the dog complies.
• Response to Cues: Dogs learn to respond faster to cues that terminate discomfort, leading to more consistent obedience.

Avoidance Conditioning in Dog Training

Definition: Avoidance conditioning occurs when a dog learns to perform a specific behavior to avoid the onset of an unpleasant stimulus. Unlike escape conditioning, the aversive condition does not need to start for the dog to learn the desired behavior; the dog’s action prevents the aversive stimulus altogether. Avoidance conditioning works best after a dog has already been exposed to aversive stimuli and understands how to escape it through escape conditioning first.

Example in Dog Training:

Using the leash-pulling scenario:

1. Cue Introduction: Before the dog reaches the end of the leash and feels pressure, give a verbal cue such as "heel."
2. Desired Behavior: Train the dog to walk beside you upon hearing the cue, thus avoiding the leash pressure.
3. Reinforcement: The dog receives positive reinforcement (like a treat or praise) for maintaining the desired behavior and avoiding the aversive stimulus.

Application:

• Preventive Behavior: Avoidance conditioning is effective for teaching dogs to prevent unwanted behavior preemptively. For example, a dog might learn to return to its handler when called (the “come” command) to avoid aversive stimulation from an electric collar.
• Proactive Training: It encourages dogs to be proactive in following commands to maintain comfort and receive positive reinforcement.

Comparison of Escape Conditioning and Avoidance Conditioning

1. Nature of Aversive Stimulus:

• Escape Conditioning: The aversive stimulus is already present, and the dog learns to perform a behavior to end it.
• Avoidance Conditioning: The aversive stimulus is anticipated but not yet present, and the dog learns to perform a behavior to prevent it.

2. Timing of Behavior:

• Escape Conditioning: The dog performs the behavior after the aversive stimulus has started.
• Avoidance Conditioning: The dog performs the behavior before the aversive stimulus starts, based on a pre-learned cue.

3. Reinforcement:

• Escape Conditioning: Negative reinforcement occurs through the removal of the aversive stimulus.
• Avoidance Conditioning: The reinforcement involves avoiding the aversive stimulus and often includes positive reinforcement for the correct behavior.

Additional Example:

Invisible fence systems - We want to concentrate on teaching the dog how to escape the correction (run toward the inside of barrier once corrected), before we concentrate on teaching the dog how to completely avoid the correction.

If the dog does not learn how to run toward the yard when corrected (escape conditioning), he may continue through the invisible barrier if he accidentally comes too close to the boundary. Since the electric correction goes away on either side of the boundary, crossing to the wrong side may become a habit for escaping an invisible fence correction.

Conclusion

Escape conditioning and avoidance conditioning are powerful tools in dog training when applied thoughtfully and humanely. By understanding the nuances of these techniques, trainers can effectively guide dogs toward desired behaviors, enhancing their responsiveness and reliability. Whether the goal is to teach basic obedience, manage complex behaviors, or address specific behavioral issues, these conditioning methods offer structured avenues for creating a harmonious and well-behaved canine companion. The emphasis should always remain on clear communication, consistency, and reinforcement that respects the dog's well-being.