Eumenes of Cardia. The last defender of the family of Alexander the Great

29
Eumenes of Cardia. The last defender of the family of Alexander the Great

Earlier, we talked about the origin and youth of Eumenes, a Greek from Kardia, who became the archigrammat (manager of the chancellery) of Alexander the Great, and after his death, along with Perdiccas, was a supporter of maintaining a unified state and a defender of the Argead dynasty. Perdiccas was killed by his own subordinates during a campaign in Egypt, but Eumenes won two resounding victories on his front in Asia Minor - over the governor of Armenia, Neoptolemus, and the beloved commander of the Macedonian army, Crater. For this, at a meeting of the Macedonian army, he was outlawed and sentenced to death.

As we remember from previous article, the last ruler of the state of Alexander was Antipater, who began his career as a commander under the father of this king, Philip II, and was even his friend. Antipater took the heirs of Alexander (the half-brother of Philip and the young son of the conqueror Alexander) to Macedonia. To carry out the will of the assembly of the army that sentenced Eumenes to death, he instructed Antigonus One-eyed, who ruled the satrapy located west of the province of Eumenes.




Supposed depiction of Antigonus One-Eyed

Antigonus accepted this commission with great enthusiasm, hoping to annex the lands of Eumenes to his possessions.

Antigonus vs. Eumenes


The war between Eumenes and Antigonus, who are often called the most talented commanders among the Diadochi, lasted three years. The first battle - at Orkinia, Eumenes lost due to the betrayal of two commanders. He was forced to take refuge in the mountain fortress of Nora, which Antigonus's army did not succeed in taking. Leaving part of his troops for the siege, Antigonus went to subdue Paphlagonia and Cappadocia. He defeated the army of Perdikkas' brother Alketes, forcing him to commit suicide in the besieged Thermis. Antigonus soon became the ruler of all of Asia Minor, only formally submitting to the regent Antipater.

The situation changed dramatically in the summer of 319 BC. e., when, dying, Antipater appointed as the successor not his son Cassander, but the 75-year-old Polyperchon, the former commander of the phalanx of Alexander. Outraged, Cassander fled to Antigonus, who was glad to start a new war. Now he hoped to capture Macedonia and Greece and become the regent of the empire (and later, perhaps, the king). By this time, the number of his troops, although dispersed over a large territory, reached 60 thousand infantrymen and 10 thousand cavalry soldiers. Antigonus also had 70 elephants at his disposal. Antigonus, of course, did not plan to give Macedonia to Cassander, intending only to use him in the war with Polyperchon. Handing Cassander 35 ships and 6 thousand soldiers, Antigonus sent him to fight in Greece. He himself, having entered into an alliance with Ptolemy, defeated the fleet of Polyperchon, commanded by Clit the White, and was preparing to transport his army through the Hellespont.

In this situation, Polyperchon decided to ally with Eumenes. He not only confirmed his rights to his former possessions, but also appointed him a strategist of Asia. Under the command of Eumenes, the corps of the famous argyrospids of Alexander the Great also passed. The power of Eumenes was recognized by many governors of the eastern provinces.

In turn, Antigonus entered into negotiations with Eumenes, sending to him Jerome of Cardia, mentioned in the first article, the future “historian of the Diadochi”, a countryman and friend of the hero of the article, as an envoy. However, Eumenes remained loyal to the Argead dynasty.

Asian Strategist


Having lulled the vigilance of Antigonus through negotiations, Eumenes managed to escape from the Nora fortress at the head of 500 horsemen. Joining along the way the detachments recruited in Cappadocia, he arrived in Cilicia. Here he took command of the army and, having received gold from the royal treasury in Sind, he recruited several thousand more soldiers in Phoenicia, Syria, Pisidia, Lycia and on the island of Cyprus. As a result, he had at his disposal about 12 infantrymen (including 3 argyrospides) and up to XNUMX horsemen. Olympias called on Eumenes for help and even wanted to appoint him as the tutor of his grandson - the son of Alexander from Roxana.


Olympias on a Roman medallion minted under the emperor Caracalla

Eumenes was going to cross to Macedonia on the ships that he began to build in Phoenicia, but these plans had to be canceled after Antigonus's victory over fleet Polyperchon.

Meanwhile, the appearance of the army of Eumenes in Asia Minor forced Antigonus to cancel his expedition to Macedonia. At the end of the autumn of 318, he moved against Eumenes a 24-strong army (20 infantry and 4 horsemen). Eumenes preferred to retreat to the east, where in the province of Susiana he was joined by the troops of some satraps, numbering more than 18 thousand infantry and about 4 thousand horsemen. Evdam, the satrap of India, the former taxiarch of the Thracian parts of Alexander, whom Diodorus Siculus calls the murderer of King Porus, brought 120 elephants. Antigonus received help from his allies - Seleucus and Python. Eumenes captured Seleucus' Babylon but was unable to get his army across the Tigris because the diadochus ordered the dam to be destroyed. Antigonus went to help Seleucus and Python, but in the spring of 317, Eumenes won a victory near the Koprot River: here, in front of the soldiers of the main enemy army, he defeated a seven thousandth detachment that had crossed this tributary of the Tigris.

After this, Antigonus was forced to retreat to Media, whose satrap was his ally Python. During the transition, his army suffered rather heavy losses in skirmishes with the Kossei tribe. Eumenes also led the army to winter quarters. It must be said that here, too, this Greek faced the Macedonian opposition. Satrap of Persia, Peucestes, a former somatophylac of Alexander, who was proud of the fact that in 325 BC. e. saved the king during the storming of the city of the Indian tribe of Mallas, claimed command of the united army due to the importance of his province.


Andre Castaigne. Alexander and a few companions within the Mallian town

The new commander of the argyrospids, Antigens, demanded that the strategist be chosen at a meeting of the Macedonian army. As for the ordinary argyrospids, whom Diodorus Siculus called "invincible troops, whose glory and deeds caused considerable fear among the enemies" and "troublemakers”, then these “authoritative” warriors used to swear allegiance to the commanders only after receiving full prepayment for their services. During 317 B.C. e. they managed to receive a salary from Eumenes three times - and they swore allegiance to him the same number of times.

Speaking of the winter camp of Eumenes' army, Plutarch describes it as "a place of holidays, debauchery, as well as pre-election intrigues”and compares with ... a democratic state. It is simply amazing that Eumenes then managed to restore at least some order.

The fighting resumed in the autumn of 317, when Antigonus's army met with the troops of Eumenes, who stood in its way, blocking the road to the lands of Seleucus near the modern city of Isfahan.

Battle of Paretaken


A description of this battle (as well as the Battle of Gabiene) can be found in "Historical library” by Diodorus Siculus, “Biography” by Eumenes Plutarch, “Strategems” by Polien and in the work of Cornelius Nepos “On famous foreign commanders”. Among other things, this battle is also famous for being the first in which independent command was entrusted to the son of Antigonus, Demetrius. At that time he was 19 years old, this commander will go down in history under the nickname Poliorket (Besieger of the city).


Demetrius I Poliorcetes. Roman copy of the XNUMXst century AD. e. from a Greek bust of the XNUMXrd century BC. e. Naples

By this time, the balance of forces of the opposing sides turned out to be as follows: the infantrymen were approximately equal (about 35 thousand in the royal army against 33 thousand in Antigonus), but Antigonus had an advantage in heavy infantry. He also had more cavalry soldiers (about 10 thousand against 6 thousand). But Eumenes had more elephants (125 versus 65).

Eumenes evenly distributed his elephants along the entire front, while Antigonus placed all the elephants on the left flank. In the center on both sides lined up heavily armed infantry, on the flanks - light infantry and cavalry. At the same time, the elite infantry units of Eumenes, the Macedonian argyrospides and hypaspists, who occupied positions in the center, were qualitatively superior to the similar formations of Antigonus, although they were inferior to them in numbers.

The results of the battle turned out to be ambiguous: the cavalry units of Eumenes were successful on one of the flanks. His foot soldiers overturned the enemy phalanx, but, pursuing it, lost their formation, came under attack from the horsemen of the right flank of Antigonus's army, commanded by the 19-year-old son of this diadochus, Demetrius. It was this attack that saved the army of Antigonus from defeat: the foot soldiers of the left flank of the advancing phalanx of Eumenes suffered heavy losses and were forced to stop. At the end of the day, both armies returned to their original positions, retaining their combat effectiveness and readiness for a new battle. Diodorus Siculus states:

“Although it was already the time of the light of the lamps ... the troops not only rallied, but again directed all their efforts to the battle, and even more, not only the strategists, but also the masses of the fighters were filled with zeal for victory. Since the night was clear, illuminated by the full moon, the armies lined up parallel to each other at a distance of about four pletras.

The losses of Antigonus were much higher, but the soldiers of Eumenes demanded to retreat to the convoy, where there were not only valuables that belonged to them personally, but also their wives with children. As a result, it turned out that the battlefield remained with the army of Antigonus. However, he was unable to break into the domain of Seleucus, where he planned to station his people for the winter. Without revealing a clear and indisputable winner, the armies of Eumenes and Antigonus dispersed in different directions.

Battle of Gabiene


During a break in hostilities, “democracy” again flourished in the troops of Eumenes. According to Plutarch, the subordinate satraps tolerated Eumenes only because the army trusted him only as a commander, considering him “the only one capable of commanding and waging war', and 'sparing the lives of soldiers". And the Macedonian warriors themselves considered them to be just good organizers and managers of feasts and all kinds of holidays. And because the satraps allegedly agreed to kill Eumenes immediately after the victory over Antigonus. In the meantime, not expecting an attack, they dispersed their troops in a valley located on the border of Media and Persia. Only his own few troops remained with Eumenes. Informed of this by his spies, Antigonus decided to break the enemy forces piecemeal. However, Eumenes, waiting for the approach of the main forces, set up camp on a hill, setting up many empty tents and lighting a large number of fires at night. Frustrated, Antigonus did not dare to attack Eumenes immediately, giving him time to gather allied troops. Finally, in the spring of 315 BC. e. the enemy armies entered the battle, which became fatal for Eumenes. The strategist of Asia had more foot soldiers (about 36 thousand against 22 thousand) and elephants (114 against 65), but Antigonus retained an advantage in cavalry (9 thousand against 6 thousand). The strike force of Eumenes was still the argyrospides, of which Diodorus Siculus writes:

“At this time, the youngest of the Silver Shields was about sixty years old, most of the others about seventy, and some even older, but they were all invincible because of experience and strength, such were the skills and courage acquired as a result of an uninterrupted series of battles.”

Since cavalry units traditionally operated on the flanks, Eumenes had to somehow hold his positions here until his phalanx overturned the enemy infantry in the center. And so he reinforced the left flank with sixty elephants, against which Antigonus was preparing a decisive blow. This (right) flank was commanded by Demetrius, the left was commanded by the satrap of Media Pithon, allied with Antigonus. Antigonus immediately got a head start, as the one and a half thousandth cavalry detachment of the satrap of Persis Pevkest went over to his side. And then the leader of the elephants, Eumenes, was killed, who now, being frightened, ran back. Eumenes himself was surrounded and with difficulty managed to break through to his troops. But his phalanx did succeed. Diodorus claims that the "aged" argyrospides of Eumenes

“They proved themselves so excellent in skill and strength that they did not lose a single one of their people, but killed more than five thousand of the opponents and defeated all the infantry detachments, the number of which was many times greater than their own.”


Polian says:

“When the battle was over, five thousand soldiers fell with Antigonus, and only three hundred with Eumenes.”

If not for the betrayal of Peucestus, whose cavalry could decide the fate of the battle, the battle would have ended with a terrible defeat of the troops of Antigonus. But even now the outcome of the battle was not determined. Diodorus says:

“The satraps said that it was necessary to retreat to the upper satrapies as quickly as possible, but Eumenes declared that they must remain and fight, because the enemy phalanx was defeated, and the cavalry forces on both sides were equal.”

Everything was decided by the breakthrough of the Median cavalry detachment to the camp of Eumenes: the “valiant” argyrospides, out of fear of losing their accumulated wealth, betrayed their commander Antigonus. Ironically, the warriors of Neoptolemus once did the same, who went over to the side of Eumenes in exchange for the promise of the preservation of personal property, with which they were going to someday return to Macedonia.

Despite the intercession of Demetrius, the son of Antigonus, and one of the old associates of Alexander Nearchus, Eumenes was sentenced to death and executed three days later.

On the fate of the argyrospids who betrayed Eumenes, Polien reports that Antigonus "honored them with abundant gifts", but then:

“Fearing their betrayal, he handed over a thousand of them to help Siberia, the satrap of Arachosia (this is a historical region on the territory of modern southeastern Afghanistan and northern Pakistan - V.R.), while the rest he sent to guard duty in other fortified and remote garrisons so that the area where they will serve becomes a prison for them. Soon nothing was heard of them.

And here is what Plutarch writes about them:

“Antigonus, seeing cruel and unbridled criminals in the argyrospids, removed them from himself and handed over to the ruler of Arachosia Sibyrtia with the order to destroy every single one so that none of them would return to Macedonia and see the Greek Sea.”

The commander of the argyrospides, Antigen, was placed in a wooden coffin and burned alive. The satrap of India Evdam was also executed. Diodorus Siculus says this:

“Now that Antigonus had unexpectedly defeated Eumenes and all the army that opposed him, he seized Antigens, the commander of the silver shields, threw him into a pit and burned him alive. He killed Evdam, who brought elephants from India, and Kelbaniya, and also some others of those who were always hostile to him.

Jerome of Cardia, a fellow countryman and friend of Eumenes, after the death of this commander, went to the service of Antigonus, then served his son Demetrius Poliorket. He died in Macedonian Pella about 250 BC. e. Jerome wrote The History of Alexander's Succession to the Throne, Now Lost, in which he spoke flatteringly of Eumenes and his new patrons. Plutarch, Diodorus Siculus and Cornelius Nepos referred to his work in their works. In addition, some information about Eumenes can be found in the work of Arrian "Anabasis of Alexander" (another name is "The History of the Campaigns of Alexander the Great") and in the "Macedonica" mentioned in the first article by Duris of Samos.

What happened to Antigonus? After the victory over Eumenes, this diadochus became too strong, which worried the rulers of other "shards" of Alexander's empire. Ptolemy, Lysimachus, Cassander and Seleucus, united, began a war against him. In the battle of Gaza (312 BC), they managed to defeat the son of Antigonus - Demetrius. But the war continued, and in 307 BC. e. Antigonus and Demetrius, who liberated Athens and Attica from the Macedonian troops of Cassander, began to be given divine honors there: in a specially written hymn, Demetrius was called the son of Poseidon and Aphrodite. In 306 BC. e. these "living gods" were the first among the Diadochi to proclaim themselves kings. And Demetrius, one of the first among the kings of the Western world, ordered to mint coins with his portrait - until that time, images of gods or dead heroes were applied on the front of the coins (the Diadochi used the image of Alexander the Great).


Demetrius I Polyorcetes on a tetradrachm minted 294-288 BC e.

The war of the Diadochi against Antigonus and Demetrius continued with varying success until 301 BC. e., when Antigonus was killed in a grandiose battle at Ipsus, and his power was divided by the victors. Demetrius Poliorketes fought until 285 BC. e., but he was forced to surrender to his father-in-law Seleucus Nicator and died two years later in the city of Apomea with the rank of an honorary prisoner. But his son Antigonus Gonatas, who managed to hire up to 9 Celts and negotiate an alliance with Aetolia, conquered Macedonia in 276 BC. e.


Antigonus II Gonatas and his mother Phila, daughter of Antipater. Detail of a fresco from Pompeii, circa 40 BC. e.

He became the founder of the Macedonian Antigonid dynasty, the last representative of which was King Perseus.


Tetradrachm of the last Macedonian king Perseus, minted between 179-172. BC e.

June 22, 168 BC e. he was defeated by the Romans at the Battle of Pydna, after which Macedonia forever lost its independence.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    12 December 2022 06: 27
    Eumenes was going to cross to Macedonia on the ships that he began to build in Phoenicia, but these plans had to be canceled after the victory of Antigonus over the fleet of Polyperchon.
    Is the fleet completed? Or they left it like that, not up to construction ..
    1. VLR
      +7
      12 December 2022 06: 43
      Built ships and those whose construction was started but not completed were traditionally burned after the decision to retreat to the east - so that the enemy would not get it.
      1. VLR
        +8
        12 December 2022 10: 23
        Meanwhile, if Eumenes had then reached Macedonia, it is likely that the son of Alexander the Great, a healthy and strong child, survived and his descendants would have ruled, at least in Macedonia and, most likely, in Greece. After all, no one disputed the power of the heirs - Alexander the Great, they were simply quietly killed - but until the end of their lives, Philip Arrhidaeus and Alexander IV were all recognized kings. Under the legitimate living king - the son of the great Alexander, protected by the wonderful commander Eumenes, none of the Diadochi would dare to proclaim himself king - they would all be listed as governors of Alexander IV. The children and grandchildren of the Diadochi would become kings. Of course, the Diadochi would have paid little attention to the decrees from Pella, would have grappled with each other, but they would hardly have dared to speak out against the son of Alexander - their own soldiers would not have "understood" them. As a result, the following Hellenistic states would probably have been formed: Macedonia, headed by the descendants of Alexander and its vassal Greece, Egypt of the Ptolemies, "Syria" of the Seleucids. What is interesting, most likely, in this case, Antigonus and his son Demetrius would have gained a foothold in Asia Minor and the East, cutting off a fair piece from the possessions of Seleucus.
        By the way, not Pyrrhus, but Alexander IV could come to the aid of the Greek cities of Southern Italy, oppressed by Rome. and, since his resources were vastly superior, he could inflict even more severe defeats on Rome and greatly slow down her expansion.
  2. +6
    12 December 2022 06: 37
    Thank you Valery!
    The story of Eumenes is indeed instructive - he who betrayed once, betrayed - the second!
  3. +4
    12 December 2022 06: 47
    Plutarch's comparison of the chaos arranged by the satraps in the camp of Eumenes with the order in a democratic state is strong.
  4. +3
    12 December 2022 07: 25
    Another 70-year-old argyrospids surprised. Behold, the people were strong. Now, if not at 40, then at 50, everyone is already on pills, and at the age of 70 these people walk back and forth across Asia, they “demolish” everyone and inspire horror in everyone. But the fate of this "disabled team" does not cause sympathy.
    1. VLR
      +6
      12 December 2022 08: 10
      Natural selection! The weak did not survive, even in noble families.
    2. +1
      12 December 2022 12: 19
      According to sources, Antigonus the One-Eyed fell in battle at the age of 80. Although the most incredible is the duel between Seleucus and Lysimachus, although information about it varies. The Diadochi entered into hand-to-hand combat with each other, although both were already well over 70 years old (some authors say that both were already 80 years old).
    3. +3
      12 December 2022 12: 46
      Now, if not at 40, then at 50 everything is already on pills,

      So then, after all, there were no pills, they got out as best they could. laughing
      But seriously, surgery was very advanced.

      But with constant wars, this is natural.
      And instead of the notorious pills, there were herbs, tinctures and elixirs. Turns out it helped. smile
  5. +6
    12 December 2022 07: 42
    After I myself tried to walk in formation with shields, I am always amazed at the training and combat skills of the ancient phalangists (not to be confused with the Spanish fascists). And yet, the pictures almost always show warriors walking with spears and shields at a normal pace, so this is impossible. We were taught to walk in close formation so that the left leg is forward, and the right one is pulled up to it. And in no other way.)))
    1. +1
      12 December 2022 12: 25
      Where did you go? The structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs or the modern National Guard?
      1. +4
        12 December 2022 13: 20
        Quote from: chimik70
        Where did you go? The structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs or the modern National Guard?

        penitentiary system.
  6. +7
    12 December 2022 09: 01
    Eumenes managed to escape from the Nora fortress at the head of 500 horsemen.
    Valery omitted the details of the siege of Nora, from which it would be clear how, after a three-year siege, Eumenes kept the horses not only uneaten, but also healthy.

    It was not for nothing that Plutarch combined the biographies of Eumenes and Sertorius. Two most talented ancient heroes. Both made their way to the top thanks to their abilities. Both became outcasts at some point and nevertheless returned to the top again. Both fell victim to the betrayal of those close to them. Great story, great article.
  7. +1
    12 December 2022 10: 24
    I read it with great interest!
    Thank you!

    Is there a mistake in the following text...

    Jerome of Cardia, a fellow countryman and friend of Eumenes, after the death of this commander, went to the service of Antigonus, then served his son Demetrius Poliorket. He died in Macedonian Pella about 250 BC. e.
    65 years have passed since the death of Eumenes. But even before the year 315, Jerome of Cardia already lived.
    1. VLR
      +4
      12 December 2022 10: 33
      The dates of the life of Jerome of Cardia are given as follows: 350 - 250 years. BC. That is. it turns out that he lived 100 years.
  8. +5
    12 December 2022 10: 25
    The "heirs" of Alexander tore each other for land and money. Shed blood.
    And Rome evolved...
    And then the Roman legions "reconciled" everyone!
    1. +3
      12 December 2022 11: 08
      Quote: hohol95
      The "heirs" of Alexander tore each other for land and money. Shed blood.
      And Rome evolved...
      And then the Roman legions "reconciled" everyone!

      Good day!
      There is nothing eternal under the sun.
      1. +4
        12 December 2022 11: 16
        And the "Terrible Two-horned" himself was "well done." Jumping across the battlefield and waving a "saber" is easier than doing state affairs.
        Richard "with the Lionheart" did exactly the same. Roamed through the deserts of Palestine, and the country lived on its own.
        Charles, who is XII, was their "follower". A sword, a horse and a regiment of tall drabants. He didn't need more! And Sweden itself will live while the king amuses himself in wars!
        The last of the Europeans was probably Buonapartius, which is Napoleon!
        The same thing, he himself led armies, conquered countries, escaped from the islands ...
        1. 0
          12 December 2022 14: 14
          Quote: hohol95
          Jumping across the battlefield and waving a "saber" is easier than doing state affairs.
          Richard "with the Lionheart" did exactly the same. Roamed through the deserts of Palestine, and the country lived on its own.
          Charles, who is XII, was their "follower". A sword, a horse and a regiment of tall drabants.

          It looks like someone in our time ... I just don’t understand who ... It’s for nothing that these figures personally participated on the battlefield, and did not sit in the rear ...
          1. +4
            12 December 2022 14: 21
            It looks like someone in our time ... I just don’t understand who ..

            I don't understand who either. request
            these figures personally participated on the battlefield

            Abbaldet! Personally!!!
            "Announce the entire list, please" (c)
            1. +2
              12 December 2022 14: 26
              Quote: Sea Cat
              Abbaldet! Personally!!!
              "Announce the entire list, please" (c)

              Duc - Alexander, Richard and Carl. Cleitus saved Alexander on the battlefield from death. Richard was taken prisoner. Well, Karl was wounded, and then completely killed in the trench.
              1. +4
                12 December 2022 14: 48
                So I'm talking about the heroes of our time wink
                Looks like someone these days...

                And about Alexandrov with Richards and Karlov, everything is clear. Yes
                1. 0
                  12 December 2022 14: 54
                  Quote: Sea Cat
                  So I'm talking about the heroes of our time

                  "Yes, there were people these days,
                  Not like the current tribe ... "(c)
          2. +2
            12 December 2022 14: 47
            So Prince Svyatoslav did not sit back and "took a part-time job" in what was then Bulgaria.
            Only that "part-time work", as usual, "came out sideways" ...
            And we will not touch on modern rulers.
            An article about the past, not about the present!
            1. 0
              12 December 2022 15: 00
              Quote: hohol95
              An article about the past, not about the present!

              History moves in a spiral. Only the instigators of wars (and their children, friends, relatives) are further and further from the front. And there is less and less personal responsibility for decisions.
              Quote: hohol95
              And we will not touch on modern rulers.

              We will, and how. For their activities affect us directly at the moment.
              1. +1
                12 December 2022 15: 04
                If they are within arm's reach of you, touch them.
                I am far from these people and I have no desire to "touch" them.
        2. ANB
          +2
          12 December 2022 22: 45
          . The last of the Europeans was probably Buonapartius, which is Napoleon!
          The same thing, he himself led armies, conquered countries, escaped from the islands ...

          However, Napoleon managed to deal with the state. The Napoleonic Code is still in effect. Maybe not completely.
  9. 0
    12 December 2022 20: 19
    The attitude towards traitors was quite pronounced even 2300 years ago.
    All "good Russians" are not translated like that, everyone thinks "you can't put me alive in a box" with Oxford and Yale then "... A cultured nation ...
    Someone really managed to live their Pennsylvanian life this way, because they were prepared as canned food for the future struggle with the USSR.
    But Antigonus did not need canned food ...
  10. 0
    12 December 2022 21: 45
    "O times, o morals ..." I'd better re-read Xenophon's Anabasis.