Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The metazoan parasite fauna of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta of Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal comprised 15 species including three species of Monogenea, seven species of Digenea and five species of Crustacea. Digeneans were the dominant members in the parasite spectrum while infections with ectoparasitic monogeneans and crustaceans were rare. The digeneans Opechona bacillaris and Lecithocladium angustiovum which occurred with high prevalence and mean intensity are the typical parasites of the mackerel. The parasitic fauna in general is found to be a reflection of the planktonivorous diet of the host. Except for two species of digeneans, Lecithocladium angustiovum and Aponurus laguncula, all the remaining species of metazoans showed narrow specificity to R. kanagurta, indicating a high degree of host specialization. The parasitological data may prove useful for differentiating stocks of R. kanagurta.

Free full text 


Logo of jparadisLink to Publisher's site
J Parasit Dis. 2011 Jun; 35(1): 66–74.
Published online 2011 Apr 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-011-0028-5
PMCID: PMC3114970
PMID: 22654318

Metazoan parasites of the Indian mackerel, Rastrelliger kanagurta (Scombridae) of Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal

Abstract

The metazoan parasite fauna of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta of Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal comprised 15 species including three species of Monogenea, seven species of Digenea and five species of Crustacea. Digeneans were the dominant members in the parasite spectrum while infections with ectoparasitic monogeneans and crustaceans were rare. The digeneans Opechona bacillaris and Lecithocladium angustiovum which occurred with high prevalence and mean intensity are the typical parasites of the mackerel. The parasitic fauna in general is found to be a reflection of the planktonivorous diet of the host. Except for two species of digeneans, Lecithocladium angustiovum and Aponurus laguncula, all the remaining species of metazoans showed narrow specificity to R. kanagurta, indicating a high degree of host specialization. The parasitological data may prove useful for differentiating stocks of R. kanagurta.

Keywords: Metazoan parasites, Indian mackerel, Rastrelliger kanagurta, Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal

Introduction

The Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) forms an important fishery along east and west coasts of India appearing in line and trawler catches almost throughout the year. Especially during the months February to May, it dominates the fish landings along these coasts. Vast information is available on the biology of this fish including food and feeding habits (Bhimachar and George 1952; Rao and Rao 1957; Kuthalingam 1959; Venkataraman 1961; Luther 1973; Sivadas and Bhaskaran 2009), reproductive biology (Pradhan 1956) and population biology Jayasankar et al. 2004).

Despite its common occurrence in the Indian waters, the parasite fauna has not been subjected to any detailed study. The available information deals with descriptions or reports of single or few parasite species belonging to Monogenea (Tripathi 1954; Unnithan 1964; Gupta and Krishna 1977; Raju and Rao 1978, Murugesh 1995), Digenea (Madhavi 1972, 1977, 1982; Gupta and Govind 1981; Gupta and Puri 1981; Gupta and Ahmad 1976; Madhavi et al. 1986; Gupta and Gupta 1987); Crustacea (Gnanamuthu 1951; Pillai 1961, 1962, 1965, 1967; Tripathi 1962; Bennet 1967) and Isopoda (Ravichandran et al. 2009; Ramesh Kumar and Ravichandran 2010). Rohde (1989) published a comprehensive account on Monogenea of Rastrelliger sp. collected from different geographic areas.

During our studies on metazoan parasite communities of marine fishes of Visakhapatnam coast, an analysis was made on the species composition of metazoan parasites of Rastrelliger kanagurta. This paper deals with the various parasite species found in Rasterlliger kanagurta of Visakhapatnam coast of Bay of Bengal and discusses the role of the mackerel as a host for various metazoan parasites.

Materials and methods

One hundred and eighty-four individuals of R. kanagurta ranging in size from 120 to 240 mm and collected between January 2006 and January 2007 from fish landings at Fishing Harbour of Visakhapatnam were examined. Standard methods were followed for collection, fixation and identification of parasites. Monogeneans and digeneans were fixed in AFA, stained with alum carmine and mounted in balsam. Copepods were fixed in 10% formalin, cleared in lactic acid and dissected using fine needles. Diagrams were drawn with the help of a camera lucida. For each species data on prevalence and mean intensity to infection were recorded. The definitions for ecological terms were followed from Bush et al. (1997).

Results

Fifteen species of metazoan parasites including three species of Monogenea, seven species of Digenea and five species of Copepoda were found infecting the fish (Table 1). Infections with cestodes and acanthocephalans were not found. The few Larval cestodes and nematodes found were not included here because of their rare occurrence.

Table 1

List of metazoan parasite species found in Rastrelliger kanagurta and their site of infection in the host

Name of the parasiteSite
MONOGENEA
 Family Gastrocotylidae
  Eyelevera typica Unnithan, 1968Gills
 Family: Mazocraeidae
  Pseudoanthocotyle jagannath (Tripathi, 1954)Gills
  Khunia sprostonae Price, 1961Gills
DIGENEA
 Family Lepocreadiidae
  Opechona bacillaris (Mollin, 1859) Dollfus, 1927Pyloric caeca and Intestine
  Prodistomum waltairensis (Madhavi, 1972) Bray and Gibson,Intestine
  Prodistomum orientalis (Layman,1930) Bray and Gibson,Pyloric caeca and Intestine
 Family Gorgoderidae
  Phyllodistomum sp.Urinary bladder
 Family Didymozoidae,
  Renodidymocystis yamagutii Madhavi, 1982Blood vessels
 Family Hemiuridae (Looss, 1899) Luhe, 1901
  Lecithocladium angustiovum Yamaguti, 1953Stomach
 Family Lecithasteridae Odhner, 1905
  Aponurus laguncula Looss, 1906Gills and stomach
COPEPODA
 Family Bomolochidae
  Orbitocolax aculeatus Pillai, 1967Gills
  Nothobomolochus kanagurta Pillai, 1965Gills
 Family Caligidae
  Caligus kanagurta Pillai, 1961Gills
 Family Anthosomatidae
  Lernanthropus kanagurta Tripathi, 1962Gills
 Family Lernaeoceridae
  Peniculus scomberi Gnanamuthu, 1951Fin rays

Monogenea

Family GASTROCOTYLIDAE

Eyelavera typica Unnithan, 1968

Syn: E. parukhini Lebedev, 1980

Remarks

Genus Eyelavera was erected by Unnithan (1968) with E. typica Unnithan, 1968 from the gills of R. kanagurta from the coast of Trivandrum (Arabian sea) as the type species. Rohde (1989) provided a redescription of E.typica based on material collected from Rastrelliger spp from different localities in Indo-Pacific and considered E. parukhini Lebedev, 1980 described from Scomber japonicus from the Red Sea as a junior synonym of E. typica. Murugesh (1995) reported the species from R. kanagurta from Visakhapatnam coast (Bay of Bengal). During the present study, infections with the species were noted in R. kanagurta, however with low prevalence of 5.4% and mean intensity of 1.2.

Family MAZOCRAEIDAE

Pseudanathocotyle jagannath (Tripathi, 1957) Price, 1961

Syn: Indomazocraes jagannath Tripathi, 1957; Scomberocola eyela Unnithan, 1964

Remarks

Tripathi (1954) erected the genus Indomazocraes to include I. jagnnath from R. kanagurta from the coast of Trivandrum (Arabian sea). Price (1961) synonymised the genus Indomazocraes Tripathi, 1959 with Pseudanthocotyle Bychowsky and Nagibina, 1954 thus I. jagannath Tripathi, 1959 became P. jagannath (Tripathi, 1959). Subsequently Rohde (1989) and Murugesh (1995) repoted the species from Rastrelliger spp but referred the species under the genus Indomazocraes.

In the present locality infections with P. jagannath occurred frequently the prevalence and mean intensity to infection were 17.9% and 1.9 respectively.

Kuhnia sprostonae Price, 1961

Synonyms: Khunia indica Tripathi, 1959; K. minorchis Raju and Rao, 1978; K. microlepidotusi Gupta and Krishna, 1977; K. minor of Rohde, 1980

Remarks

Four species of the genus Kuhnia have been recorded from Scombrid fishes of India: Kuhnia indica Tripathi, 1959,K. microlepidotusi Gupta and Krishna, 1977, K. pricei Gupta and Krishna, 1979 and K. minorchis Raju and Rao, 1977. Murugesh (1995) reported K. microlepidotusi from R. kanagurta from Visakhapatnam coast. It is also reported from the same host from Arabian Sea (Mamaev and Parukhin 1986). Rohde (1989) based on a study of specimens collected from Rastrelliger spp from different geographic areas considered K. microlepidotusi as a synonym of K. sprostonae. Murugesh (1995) considered K. minorchis as a synonym of K. microlepidotusi.

The present specimens possessed all the characteristic features of K. sprostonae. Infections occurred with a prevalence of 16.3% and mean intensity of 2.3.

Digenea

Family LEPOCREADIIDAE

Opechona bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Dollfus, 1927 (Fig. 1)

Synonyms: Distomum bacillare Molin, 1859; Distomum (Dicrocoelium) bacillare of Barbagallo and Drago (1903); Pharyngora bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Nicoll, 1910; Distomum increscens Olsson, 1868; Pharyngora retractilis Lebour, 1908; Distomum sp. Nicoll, 1909; Pharyngora olssoni Yamaguti, 1934; Neopechona olssoni (Yamaguti, 1934); Lepidapedon elongatum Chernyshenko, 1949; Opechona sp., Mackenzie, 1974; Lepocreadium guptai Gupta and Gupta, 1987.

Remarks

O. bacillaris has earlier been reported from R. kanagurta of Visakhapatnam and Kalingapatnam coasts (Bay of Bengal) by Madhavi (1972) and Madhavi et al. (1986). The species is characterized by somewhat elongated body narrowed anteriorly, presence of eye-spot pigment, infundibuliform oral sucker, small ventral sucker, pseudo-oesophagus shorter than oesophagus, gonads in posterior third of the body, vitellarium follicles extending to near the posterior border of ventral sucker, post testicular space 348–742 long and eggs measuring 78–80 by 36–40.

O. bacillaris is cosmopolitan in distribution. Bray and Gibson (1990) have furnished details of hosts, geographic distribution and synonyms of O. bacillaris and provided a key for separation of valid species of the genus Opechona Looss, 1907. They considered Lepocreadium guptai Gupta and Gupta, 1987 as a synonym of O. bacillaris and regarded many Indian species of the genus namely O. siddiqui Ahmad, 1984 from R. kanagurta,O. ahmadi Gaevskaya, 1990 from Pomadaysmaculatus, O. moshina Ahmad, 1984 from Scomberoides tala, O. vinodae Ahmad, 1984 from Pampus argenteus and O. travassosi Ahmad, 1991 from Fistularia villosa as speciesinquirendae, since clarification is required as to the presence or absence of a uroproct, an important character used for the separation of Prodistomum spp from Opechona spp.

During the present study several specimens of O. bacillaris were collected from R. kanagurta the prevalence and mean intensity to infection were 33% and 3.4 respectively. The specimens agreed in all details with the description provided by Bray and Gibson (1990) for the species from North-East Atlantic region except for the following differences: Body is narrow anteriorly where as in N-E Atlantic forms it is more or less of uniform width. External seminal vesicle is surrounded by numerous prostatic gland cells, their presence not reported in N-E Atlantic forms. Vitellarian follicles are less dense and extended anteriorly only up to the base of cirrus sac rather than just posterior to ventral sucker as reported for N-E Atlantic forms. Testes are more anteriorly located and are contiguous.

Prodistomum waltairensis (Madhavi, 1972) Bray and Gibson, 1990.

Synonym: Opechona waltairensis Madhavi, 1972.

Remarks

This species was originally described as O. waltairensis by Madhavi (1972) but Bray and Gibson (1990) included it under the genus Prodistomum Linton, 1910 on the basis of the absence of a uroproct.

P. waltairensis is characterized by the long slender body, sub-equal suckers, pre-pharynx and oesophagus more or less of equal size, lobed gonads, vitellarium extending to the level of bifurcation and excretory vesicle to the level of pharynx. It closely resembles P. hynnodi Yamaguti, 1938, but differs mainly in having lobed gonads.

Prodistomum orientalis (Layman, 1930) Bray and Gibson, 1990 (Fig. 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12639_2011_28_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Prodistomum orientalis

Synonyms: Pharyngora orientalis (Layman, 1930); Opechona orientalis (Layman, 1930); Opechona scomberi (Yamaguti, 1938); Lepocreadium puriensis Gupta and Gupta, 1987.

This species originally included under the genus Opechona has been transferred to Prodistomum as P. orientalis by Bray and Gibson (1990) based on the absence of an uroproct.

Bray and Gibson (1990) furnished details of the synonyms, the hosts and geographic distribution as well as the characteristic features of the species. The present specimens agreed fully with the description given by Bray and Gibson. A few prostatic cells that occurred surrounding external seminal vesicle were not reported by Bray and Gibson. The present specimens also keyed to P. orientalis in the key provided by Raychard et al. (2008) for differentiation of specie of the genus Prodistomum.

P. orientalis has been recorded from R. kanagurta from Aden (Indian Ocean) by Parukhin (1976). Records from the related hosts include those from Sulawes (N-W Pacific ocean) by Yamaguti (1953) and North-west Australia by Korotaeva (1974) and Bay of Bengal by Zhukov (1960). Taking into consideration the preference to scombrid hosts and also the morphological features, Bray and Gibson considered Lepocreadium puriensis Gupta and Gupta, 1987 from R. brachysoma from Puri coast, Bay of Bengal as a synonym of P. orientalis.

Family GORGODERIDAE

Phyllodistomum sp.

Remarks

Fairly large sluggish flukes measuring 4-6 mm, appearing deep brown in colour and the gut engorged with blood were found in the kidneys of R. kanagurta during the months of Nov–Jan. Only 5 out of 184 fish examined showed the infection each infected fish harbored two flukes, giving a prevalence of 2.7% and mean intensity of 2.0. The organization of the body suggested the genus Phyllodistomum. The species is yet to be identified.

Family DIDYMOZOIDAE

Renodidymocystis yamagutii Madhavi, 1982

Remarks

The genus Renodidymocystis was erected by Madhavi (1982) with R.yamagutii from the kidneys of R. kanagurta, Bay of Bengal as the type species. During the present study, infections with the didymozoid occurred in the kidneys and also blood vessels, the prevalence of infection were fairly high being 45.6%. The forms agreed fully with the original description, except that the eggs were 12 by 6–8 μm rather than 8–10 by 4 μm in the type specimens.

Family HEMIURIDAE

Lecithocladium angustiovum Yamaguti, 1953 (Fig. 3).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12639_2011_28_Fig3_HTML.jpg

Lecithocladium angustiovum

Synonyms: L. scomberi Yamaguti, 1953; L. bulbolabrum Reid et al., 1966; L. indicum Gupta and Gupta, 1981; L. manteri Gupta and Puri, 1982; L. microlepidotusi Gupta and Govind, 1981; L. siddiqui Gupta and Gupta, 1987; L. tewari Gupta and Gupta, 1987; L. unibulbolabrum Fischthal and Thomas, 1997; L. cibium Gupta and Jain, 1992. Clupenurus thynensis Bilqees et Knight, 1985; Clupenurus scomberomori Wang, 1982; L. jagannath Ahmad, 1981.

Remarks

In the genus Lecithocladium as many as 32 species were recorded from marine fish of Indian region. Most of these are not well defined and many of them may not be valid species. Gibson and Bray (1986) in an attempt to clear the confusion reduced the number of species recorded from Indo- Malayan region from 40 to 6. Further, it is also felt that some of the hemiurid genera erected from Indian region such as Clefticolletta Sahai and Srivastava, 1978; Bengalotrema Malhotra, Nanda, Mukherjee, Ghosh, Sukul and Capoor, 1989 may be synonymous to Lecithocladium (see Gibson 2002).

L. angustiovum is the most dominant digenean found in R. kanagurta in the present locality, occurring with a prevalence of 88.5%.

Family LECITHASTERIDAE

Aponurus laguncula Looss, 1907 (Fig. 4)

Synonyms: Aponurus spp. of Linton, 1940; A. trachinoti Manter, 1940; A. trachinoti (Yamaguti, 1971); A. elongatus Siddiqi and Cable, 1960; A. orientalis Ahmad, 1981; A. waltairensis Hussain, Rao and Shyamasundari, 1985.

Bray and Mackenzie (1990) furnished details of the hosts, geographic distribution and earlier reports of A. laguncula. This species is highly polyxenic and has a wide geographic distribution. A notable feature of the species is the wide range in egg size, 24–42 × 10–21. The egg shape is also considered distinctive with narrow more or less pointed anopercular end.

In view of the wide variation in egg size and the euryxenic nature, Bray and Mackenzie (1990) expressed the view that many of the species reported under genus Aponurus would fall synonyms to A. laguncula. They examined the validity of the various species reported under the genus and discussed the characters used for separating them from A. laguncula. The most significant features for separation of species are considered to be the size of sinus sac, sucker proportions and the alignment of gonads.

Four species of Aponurus have been recorded from marine fishes of India, A. breviformis Srivastava, 1939, A. bengalensis Srivastava, 1939, A. orientalis Ahmad, 1981 and A. waltairensis Hussain, Rao and Shyama Sundari, 1984. Bray and Mackenzie expressed the view that all these four species may be synonymous to A. laguncula. During the present study infections with A. laguncula are noted in R. kanagurta as well as in other marine fish hosts such as carangids, lutianids, polynemids, Arius spp, Terapon spp and Nemipterus sp., thus confirming the euryxenic nature of A. lagancula. The flukes occurred attached to buccal cavity or anterior part of stomach and appeared in small numbers in gill washings. The prevalence of infection is 16.8%.

Copepoda

Family BOMOLOCHIDAE

Orbitocolax aculeatus (Pillai, 1962) Pillai, 1967

Synonym: Bomolochus aculeatus Pillai, 1962

Remarks

Pillai (1962) described Bomolochus aculeatus from R. kanagurta from Arabian sea. Later he (Pillai, 1967) considered this species under the genus Orbitocolax Shen, 1957.

The present specimens agreed with the description given by Pillai (1967) in all characters including the host. The prevalence and mean intensity of O. aculeatus were low and the infection was found only in the months of January and September.

Nothobomolochus kanagurta (Pillai, 1965) Pillai, 1967

Synonym: Bomolochus kanagurta Pillai, 1965

Remarks

Pillai (1961) reported the species as Bomolochus kanagurta Pillai, 1965 based on material collected from R. kanagurta from Kerala. Later he (Pillai, 1967) placed it under the genus Nothobomolochus. During present study infection was found only in the month of May 06, in one out of 39 fish examined and two individuals of the parasite were obtained. Lin and Ho (2004) reported the species from R. kanagurta from Taiwan.

Family CALIGIDAE

Caligus kanagurta Pillai, 1961

Remarks

Caligus kanagurta was described by Pillai (1961) and Silas and Ummerkutty (1967), from R. kanagurta from Kerala, Arabian sea. Ho et al. (2000) reported this species off from Decapterus kurroides from Taiwan.

In the present locality, infections with the species occurred sporadically only during certain months of the year, both prevalence and mean intensity to infection were low (4.3 and 1.25 respectively).

Family ANTHOSOMATIDAE

Lernanthropus kanagurta Tripathi, 1962

Remarks

L. kanagurta was first described by Tripathi (1962) from R. kanagurta and Megalaspis cordyla from India. Later it was described by Silas and Ummerkutty (1967) from scombrid hosts including R. kanagurta from India. Cressey and Cressey (1980) reported a single specimen of the parasite from R. brachyura from Borneo. They mentioned that this may be a rare parasite of Rastrelliger spp. and Megalaspis spp. Pillai (1985) regarded this species as a synonym of L. corniger Yamaguti, 1954.

In the present study this species occurred with low prevalence (0.54%) and intensity (1.0). R. kanagurta may be an accidental host for the species.

Family LERNAEOCERIDAE

Peniculus scomberi Gnanamuthu, 1951

Remarks

P. scomberi was described by Gnanamuthu (1951) from R. kanagurta from Madras coast, Bay of Bengal. Only four individuals of this species were obtained during the present study. The specimens agreed with the description of P. scomberi given by Gnanamuthu (1951) in all characters. Specific characters include: the trunk is six and half times longer than broad and the width of the fourth segment is four and half times to the width of the trunk, cephalothorax is uniformly swollen, slightly twisted and asymmetrical.

Discussion

The study based on examination of 184 R. kanagurta collected as monthly samples from Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal revealed the metazoan parasite fauna of the scombrid fish to be fairly rich comprising of 15 species of parasites including three species of monogeneans, seven species of digeneans and five species of copepods. Cestodes, nematodes and acanthocephalans were not found. The parasite fauna of R. kanagurta is dominated by digeneans belonging to Hemiuridae and Lepocreadiidae and this situation would be related to the feeding behaviour of R. kanagurta which comprises planktonic organisms, crustaceans etc. Information available on the life cycles of Lecithocladium spp. and Aponurus spp. indicates that planktonic organisms such as medusae and copepods serve as intermediate hosts (Koie 1991). Similarly the life cycle of O. bacillaris also involves medusae as second intermediate hosts (Koie 1975). Although the complete life cycle of didymozoids is still not known, the available knowledge indicates that the copepods serve as second intermediate hosts (Cable and Nahhas 1962 and Madhavi 1968). Thus the parasite fauna of R.kanagurta is a clear reflection of its planktonivorous diet. The scarcity of larval cestode and nematode infections suggests that R. kanagurta might be occupying the peak trophic level in the food web and may not constitute an important food item for the larger carnivorous fish. Examples such as these indicate the importance of the status of the fish in the food web as a determinant of species richness and diversity of parasites in the marine ecosystem (Marcogliese 2001).

Some of the parasite species like L. angustiovum, O. bacillaris, Prodistomum spp. and R. yamagutii that occurred with high prevalence and mean intensity are to be regarded as typical parasites of this fish. In general the parasite fauna exhibited a high degree of host specificity. Except for A.laguncula which is found to be polyxenic, all the other species showed specificity to R.kanagurta or other species of scombrid fish. The low number of generalist parasites observed may reflect the reduced exchange of parasites between R. kanagurta and other marine fish. A high degree of adaptability, both physiological and ecological, is thus seen between the host R. kanagurta and its parasite fauna.

The three species of monogeneans and five species of copepods occurred with low prevalence and intensity indicating that R. kanagurta from this locality is not a suitable host for these ectoparasites. Out of the five species, three species Orbitocolax aculeatus, Nothobomolochus kanagurta, and Peniculus scomberi are specific to R. kanagurta. Caligus kanagurta and Lernanthropus kanagurta occurred not only on Rastrelliger but also on carangid fish.

The parasite fauna of R. kanagurta also shows a distribution parallel to the host distribution. Rohde (1989) undertook a detailed study of monogenean fauna of Rastrelliger spp, and reported all the three species of monogeneans recorded during the present study. Four of the seven species of digeneans reported during the present study namely O.bacillaris, P. orientalis, L. angustiovum and A. laguncula were also recorded from other parts of Indo-Pacific region. Further P. waltairensis is closely related to Prodistomum hynnodi Yamaguti, 1938 recorded from scombrid fish from off the coast of Japan. Three out of five species of parasitic copepods have also been recorded from the other regions of Indo-Pacific region especially off the coast of China and Taiwan. It is evident that the lack of endemicity, the high degree of host specificity and probably also the high degree of predictability are characteristic features of the parasite fauna of R. kanagurta.

The preliminary studies carried out by earlier workers on biology and genetic population structure of R. kanagurta from different geographical areas revealed the possibility of existence of different stocks (Jones and Silas 1962; Luther 1973; Menezes et al.1993; Jayasankar et al.2004). The stock from Andaman coast for instance differs significantly from the stock at Arabian sea in details of the seasonal breeding cycle. The genetic studies also revealed the occurrence of different stocks in R. kanagurta (Jayasankar et al.2004). Parasites are now increasingly used as indicators for the differentiation of stocks in marine fish (Mckenzie 2002). Although qualitative differences may not exist in the parasite fauna of R.kanagurta from different regions there is a possibility that quantitative differences exist in the occurrence of various species of parasites. For example Rohde (1989) provided data on the prevalence of monogenean species on R. kanagurta off the coast of Penang and a comparison with the present data collected at Bay of Bengal, revealed that the prevalence of infection with various monogeneans at Penang is very low (Rohde 1989) as compared to the situation prevailing in the present locality. The data suggests that the monogeneans are better adapted to warm tropical waters of Bay of Bengal. A detailed study of the parasite fauna of this fish from different geographical areas would be expected to provide valuable information.

Acknowledgement

Our grateful thanks are due to the Ministry of Environment and Forests for providing funds to carry out this work under the AICOPTAX programme.

References

  • Bennet SP. Bomolochus jonesi sp nov. parasitic on the eye of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 1967;9:132–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Bhimachar BS, George PC. Observations on the food and feeding habits of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) Proc Indian Acad Sci B. 1952;36:105–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray RA, Gibson DI. The Lepocreadiidae (Digenea) of fishes of the north-east Atlantic: review of the genera Opechona Looss, 1907 and Prodistomum Linton, 1910. Syst Parasit. 1990;15:159–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray RA, Mackenzie K. Aponurus laguncula Looss, 1907 (Digenea: Lecithasteridae): a report from herring Clupea harengus L., in the eastern channel and a review of its biology. Syst Parasit. 1990;17:115–124. 10.1007/BF00009799. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cable RM, Nahhas FM. Lepas sp., second intermediate host of a didymozoid trematode. J Parasitol. 1962;48:34. 10.2307/3275405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cressey RF, Cressey HB. Parasitic copepods of mackerel and Tuna-like fishes (Scombridae) of the world. Smithson Contrib Zool. 1980;311:1–186. [Google Scholar]
  • Esch GW, Bush AO, Aho JM. Parasite communities: patterns and processes. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibson DI. Family Hemiuridae Looss, 1899. In: Gibson DI, Jones A, Bray RA, editors. Keys to the trematoda, vol 1. Wallingford: CAB International; 2002. pp. 307–340. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibson DI, Bray RA. The Hemiuridae (Digenea) of fishes from north-east Atlantic. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) (Zoology series) 1986;51:1–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Gnanamuthu CP. Two new species of copepods of the genus Peniculus parasitic on Madras fishes. Rec Indian Mus. 1951;49:221–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta V, Ahmad J. Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes. On some new, known digenetic trematodes of the family Bucephalidae Poche, 1907 from marine fishes of Puri, Orissa, India. An Inst Biol Univ Nac Auton Mexico. 1976;47:9–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta PC, Govind H. Studies on trematode parasites of fishes. On four new species of the genus Lecithocladium Luhe, 1901 from marine fishes of Puri Coast, Orissa. Kanpur Univ Res J (Sci.) 1981;2:31–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta PC, Gupta VC. Two new species of the genus Lepocreadium Stossich, 1904 (Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) from marine fishes, Bay of Bengal, off Puri Coast, Orissa, India. Proc Parasitol. 1987;3:36–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta SP, Krishna Monogenetic trematodes of fishes. On three new species of the genus Kuhnia Sproston, 1945 from marine fishes of Puri, Orissa. Indian J Helminth. 1977;29:33–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta V, Puri M. Six new species of the genus Lecithocladium Luhe, (Hemiuridae Luhe, 1901) from marine fishes of Puri, Orissa. Indian J Helminthol. 1981;33:58–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Ho JS, Lin CL, Chen SN. Species of Caligus Muller. 1785(Copepoda: Caligidae) parasitic on marine fishes of Taiwan. Syst Parasit. 2000;46:159–179. 10.1023/A:1006342120411. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayasankar P, Thomas PC, Paulton MP, Mathew J. Morphometric and genetic analysis of Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) from Peninsular India. Asian Fishery Sci. 2004;17:201–215. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones S, Silas EG (1962) Mackerel from the Andaman Sea. In: Proceedings of the symposium on scombroid fishes, vol 1. Mar Biol Assoc India, India, pp 253–282
  • Koie M. On the morphology and life history of Opechona bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Looss, 1907 (Trematoda: Lepocreadiidae) Ophelia. 1975;13:63–86. 10.1080/00785326.1974.10430592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koie M. Aspects of the morphology and life cycle of Lecithocladium excisum (Digenea, Hemiuridae), a parasite of Scomber spp. Int J Parasitol. 1991;21:597–602. 10.1016/0020-7519(91)90065-F. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Korotaeva VD. Helminths of some marine commercial fishes of the suborder Scomberoidiei from the Australian region IZV. Tikhoo. Nauch. Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Rybnogo Khozyaistai. Okeanografi. 1974;88:61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuthalingam MDK. Observations on the food and feeding habits of post larvae, juveniles and adults of some Madras fishes. J Madras Univ. 1959;29:139–150. [Google Scholar]
  • Lin C, Ho JS. Three species of Nothobomolochus Vervoort, 1962 (Copepoda: Bomolochidae) parasitic on marine fishes landed at Mi-tuo fishing port in Southern Taiwan. J Fish Soc Taiwan. 2004;31:201–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Luther G. Observations on the biology and fishery of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuv.) from Andaman Islands. Indian J Fish. 1973;20:425–474. [Google Scholar]
  • Madhavi R. A didymozoid metacercaria from the copepod, Paracalanus aculeatus Giesbrecht, from Bay of Bengal. J Parasitol. 1968;54:629. 10.2307/3277098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madhavi R. Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Waltair coast, Bay of Bengal. 1. Family Lepocreadiidae. J Parasitol. 1972;58:217–225. 10.2307/3278073. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madhavi R (1977) Some new digenetic trematodes (Monorchiidae) from marine fishes of Waltair coast, Bay of Bengal. Excerta Parasit Mem. Doctor Eduardo Caballero y Caballero Inst. Biology Publications, pp 233–246
  • Madhavi R. Didymozoid trematodes (including new genera and species) from Marine fishes of Waltair Coast, Bay of Bengal. Syst Parasit. 1982;4:99–124. 10.1007/BF00018992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madhavi R, Narasimhulu SV, Shameem U. Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Kalingapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal Families Lepocreadiidae, Deropristidae and Schistorchiidae. Riv Parassit. 1986;47:112–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcogliese DJ. Pursuing the parasites up the food chain: implications of food web structure and function on parasite communities in aquatic systems. Acta Parasitol. 2001;46:82–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Mckenzie K. Parasites as biological tags in population studies of marine organisms: an update. Parasitology. 2002;124:153–163. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Menezes MR, Naik S, Martins M. Genetic divergence in the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuv.) from the coastal waters of Peninsular India and the Andaman. SeaIndian J Fish. 1993;40:135–141. [Google Scholar]
  • Murugesh M. Monogenetic trematodes from scombrid fishes of the Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal. J Nat Hist. 1995;29:1–26. 10.1080/00222939500770011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parukhin AM (1976) Parasitic worms in food fishes of the southern seas. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (In Russian)
  • Pillai NK. Copepods parasitic on South Indian fishes. Pt. 1 Caligidae. Bull Res Inst Univ Kerala. 1961;8:87–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Pillai NK. On a new species of Bomolochus (Copepoda) with remarks on Orbitocolax Shen. J Parasit. 1962;48:613–617. 10.2307/3274923. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pillai NK. Copepods parasitic on South Indian fishes Family Bomolochidae. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1965;62:38–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Pillai NK (1967) Copepods parasitic on South Indian fishes. A review. In: Proceedings of the symposium on Crustacea. Symposium series, vol 2. Mar Biol Assoc India, India, 1556–1680
  • Pillai NK (1985) The fauna of India. Copepod parasites of marine fishes. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta
  • Pradhan LB. Mackerel fishery of Karwar. Indian J Fish. 1956;3:141–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Price EW. North American monogenetic trematodes, IX The families Mazocraeidae and Plectanocotylidae. Proc Biol Soc Wash. 1961;74:127–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Raju VV, Rao KH. Monogenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Waltair coast, Bay of Bengal. Riv Parassit. 1978;39:79–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramesh Kumar G, Ravichandran S. New host record, Rastrelliger kanagurta, for Nerocilaphaeopleura parasites (Crustacea, Isopoda, Cymothoidae) Middle-East J Sci Res. 2010;5:54–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Rao KVN, Rao KP. Difference in the food of young and adult Indian mackerel, Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) Nature. 1957;180:711–712. 10.1038/180711b0. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ravichandran S, Ramesh Kumar G, Mahesh Babu B, Kumarvel K. Infestation of Rastrelligerkanagurta, with Cymathoid isopod, Joryma brachysoma in the Colachel environment of Southwest Coast of India. World J Fish Mar Sci. 2009;1:80–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Raychard KA, Blend CK, Dronen NO. New species of Prodistomum Linton, 1910 (Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) from the longtail bass, Hemanthias luptus (Ginsburg, 1952) in the Bay of Campedu, Gulf of Mexico. J Parasitol. 2008;94:905–908. 10.1645/GE-1432.1. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rohde K. Gill Monogenea of Rastrelliger spp (Scombridae) Syst Parasitol. 1989;14:79–91. 10.1007/BF00016902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silas EG, Ummerkutty ANP (1967) Parasites of scombroid fuishes. Pt. II. Parasitic copepods. In: Symposium on scombropid fishes, vol 3, India, pp 876–993
  • Sivadas M, Bhaskaran MM. Stomach content analysis of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) from Calicut, Kerala. Indian J Fish. 2009;56:143–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Tripathi YR. Studies on the parasites of Indian fishes. IV. Trematoda, Monogenea, Microcotylidae. Records Indian Mus. 1954;52:231. [Google Scholar]
  • Tripathi YR. Parasitic copepods from Indian fishes III. Families Anthostomatidae and Dichelesthidae. Proc First All India Congr Zool. 1962;2:191–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Unnithan RV. On five new species of monogenetic trematodes parasitic on the gills of marine fishes from the South west coast of India. Treubia. 1964;26:159–178. [Google Scholar]
  • Unnithan RV. On six species of monogenetic trematodes parasitic on the gills of marine fishes from the Indian seas. Treubia. 1968;27:141–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Venkataraman G. Studies on food and feeding relationships of the inshore fishes off Calicut on the Malabar Coast. Indian J. Fish. 1961;7:275–306. [Google Scholar]
  • Yamaguti S. Parasitic worms mainly from Celebes. Part 3. Digenetic trematodes of fishes I. Acta Medicinae Okayama. 1953;8:257–295. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhukov EV. Endoparasitic worms of the fishes in the sea of Japan and south Kuril shallow-waters. Trudy Zoologischekago Inst Leningrad. 1960;28:3–129. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Springer

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.