Abstract
Background and aims
Sarcocornia comprises about 28 species of perennial succulent halophytes distributed worldwide, mainly in saline environments of warm-temperate and subtropical regions. The genus is characterized by strongly reduced leaves and flowers, which cause taxonomic difficulties; however, species in the genus show high diversity in growth form, with a mat-forming habit found in coastal salt marshes of all continents. Sarcocornia forms a monophyletic lineage with Salicornia whose species are all annual, yet the relationship between the two genera is poorly understood. This study is aimed at clarifying the phylogenetic relationship between Sarcocornia and Salicornia, interpreting biogeographical and ecological patterns in Sarcocornia, and gaining insights into putative parallel evolution of habit as an adaptation to environmental factors.Methods
A comprehensively sampled and dated phylogeny of Sarcocornia is presented based on nuclear ribosomal DNA (external transcribed spacer) and chloroplast DNA (atpB-rbcL, rpl32-trnL) sequences; representative samples of Salicornia were also included in the analyses. To infer biogeographical patterns, an ancestral area reconstruction was conducted.Key results
The Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage arose during the Mid-Miocene from Eurasian ancestors and diversified into four subclades: the Salicornia clade, the American Sarcocornia clade, the Eurasian Sarcocornia clade and the South African/Australian Sarcocornia clade. Sarcocornia is supported as paraphyletic, with Salicornia nested within Sarcocornia being sister to the American/Eurasian Sarcocornia clade. The American and the South African/Australian Sarcocornia clade as well as the Salicornia clade were reconstructed to be of Eurasian origin. The prostrate, mat-forming habit arose multiple times in Sarcocornia.Conclusions
Sarcocornia diversified in salt-laden environments worldwide, repeatedly evolving superficially similar prostrate, mat-forming habits that seem advantageous in stressed environments with prolonged flooding, high tidal movement and frost. Some of these prostrate-habit types might be considered as ecotypes (e.g. S. pacifica or S. pillansii) while others represent good ecospecies (e.g. S. perennis, S. decumbens, S. capensis), hence representing different stages of speciation.Free full text
Phylogeny, biogeography and ecological diversification of Sarcocornia (Salicornioideae, Amaranthaceae)
Abstract
Background and Aims Sarcocornia comprises about 28 species of perennial succulent halophytes distributed worldwide, mainly in saline environments of warm-temperate and subtropical regions. The genus is characterized by strongly reduced leaves and flowers, which cause taxonomic difficulties; however, species in the genus show high diversity in growth form, with a mat-forming habit found in coastal salt marshes of all continents. Sarcocornia forms a monophyletic lineage with Salicornia whose species are all annual, yet the relationship between the two genera is poorly understood. This study is aimed at clarifying the phylogenetic relationship between Sarcocornia and Salicornia, interpreting biogeographical and ecological patterns in Sarcocornia, and gaining insights into putative parallel evolution of habit as an adaptation to environmental factors.
Methods A comprehensively sampled and dated phylogeny of Sarcocornia is presented based on nuclear ribosomal DNA (external transcribed spacer) and chloroplast DNA (atpB-rbcL, rpl32-trnL) sequences; representative samples of Salicornia were also included in the analyses. To infer biogeographical patterns, an ancestral area reconstruction was conducted.
Key Results The Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage arose during the Mid-Miocene from Eurasian ancestors and diversified into four subclades: the Salicornia clade, the American Sarcocornia clade, the Eurasian Sarcocornia clade and the South African/Australian Sarcocornia clade. Sarcocornia is supported as paraphyletic, with Salicornia nested within Sarcocornia being sister to the American/Eurasian Sarcocornia clade. The American and the South African/Australian Sarcocornia clade as well as the Salicornia clade were reconstructed to be of Eurasian origin. The prostrate, mat-forming habit arose multiple times in Sarcocornia.
Conclusions Sarcocornia diversified in salt-laden environments worldwide, repeatedly evolving superficially similar prostrate, mat-forming habits that seem advantageous in stressed environments with prolonged flooding, high tidal movement and frost. Some of these prostrate-habit types might be considered as ecotypes (e.g. S. pacifica or S. pillansii) while others represent good ecospecies (e.g. S. perennis, S. decumbens, S. capensis), hence representing different stages of speciation.
INTRODUCTION
Sarcocornia A.J. Scott (glasswort, samphire) is one of 16 genera in the Salicornioideae (Kadereit et al., 2006) and comprises about 28 succulent species which can be found in saline vegetation worldwide, predominantly in warm-temperate and to a lesser extent in subtropical regions (Davy et al., 2006; Kadereit et al., 2006; Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Steffen et al., 2010). These perennial herbs, subshrubs and shrubs are characterized by strongly simplified morphology giving a particular appearance to the plants (Fig. 1A–F). The genus Sarcocornia was established by Scott (1977) who separated it from Salicornia L. and Arthrocnemum Moq. on the basis of morphological characters. Salicornia and Sarcocornia show strong morphological similarity and can be distinguished only by inflorescence characters and life form. The individual flowers of Sarcocornia, which is always perennial, are more or less equal in size and arranged in a horizontal row, while in Salicornia, which is always annual, the distinctly unequal sized flowers show a triangular arrangement and the two lateral flowers are in contact with each other beneath the central flower (Kadereit et al., 2007). Both genera can be distinguished from Arthrocnemum and other Salicornioideae by their membranous testa, covered with papillae or hairs, a horseshoe-shaped embryo and the lack of perisperm (Scott, 1977).
Morphological characteristics and growth forms of Sarcocornia: the genus comprises perennial herbs, subshrubs and shrubs of strongly deviating growth form. The articulated, decumbent to erect stems are composed of fleshy, cylindrical, barrel- or club-shaped internodes (segments) and more or less constricted nodes that often bear adventitious roots (C, D, F–H). The segments emerge from the opposite connate leaves that are strongly reduced and only visible as a small rim at the upper edge of each segment, all forming a vascular cylinder enclosed by an inner water storage tissue and an outer photosynthetically active chlorenchyma (cortex). The spike-like inflorescence is a thyrse (A, B, D) with 3–12 strongly reduced flowers per cyme (for detailed descriptions see: Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Steffen et al., 2010; de la Fuente et al., 2013). (A) Sarcocornia blackiana, Yalgorup National Park, Western Australia; (B) S. pacifica, Tomales Bay, California; with a Cuscuta growing on it; (C) S. littorea, Pearly Beach, Western Cape, South Africa; (D) S. xerophila, Knersvlakte, Western Cape, South Africa (A–D all erect, broomy or speading shrubs); (E) dense cushions forming clonal S. pulvinata, Moquegua, Peru; (F) loose carpet-forming clonal S. tegetaria, Langebaan Lagoon, Western Cape; (G) short-lived prostrate herb S. natalensis subsp. affinis, West Coast, Western Cape, South Africa; (H) loose spreading spider-like clonal S. capensis, West Coast, Western Cape, South Africa. Photo credits: A, C, D, F, G: L. Mucina; B, F: G. Kadereit; E: D. Montesinos Tubée.
A molecular phylogeny of the subfamily based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and atpB–rbcL spacer sequences revealed Sarcocornia formed a monophyletic lineage together with Salicornia L., which is clearly separated from Arthrocnemum (Kadereit et al., 2006). The Salicornia/Sarcocornia clade is sister to a clade comprising Halosarcia P.G. Wilson and the exclusively Australian genera Pachycornia Hook.f., Sclerostegia P.G. Wilson, Tecticornia Hook.f and Tegicornia P.G. Wilson (now all included in Tecticornia according to Shepherd and Wilson, 2007). The Salicornia/Sarcocornia lineage diversified during the Middle Miocene (14·2–9·4
Ma) and split into three primary clades: (1) American/Eurasian Sarcocornia, (2) Salicornia and (3) South African/Australian Sarcocornia. These findings are congruent with a detailed molecular phylogeny of Salicornia based on external transcribed spacer (ETS) sequence data (Kadereit et al., 2007). Relationships among these three clades remain unresolved. In the ITS tree, Salicornia arises from within the South African/Australian Sarcocornia, while in the atpB–rbcL spacer tree it originates from within the American/Eurasian Sarcocornia. In the ETS tree, Salicornia is sister to a clade comprising American and Eurasian Sarcocornia. However, none of these topologies receives sufficient statistical support and it remains unclear if Sarcocornia is paraphyletic with respect to Salicornia.
Ecologically Sarcocornia and Salicornia are very similar. Both genera contain predominantly typical halophytes found in coastal salt marshes, tidal mud flats, coastal cliffs, inland salt pans and edges of saline lakes throughout the world (Davy et al., 2006; Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Steffen et al., 2010; de la Fuente et al., 2013; Fig. 2). Here, the high ambient salinity (exacerbated by seasonal lack of precipitation) and frequent and often prolonged flooding are the driving ecological forces in the environments occupied by Sarcocornia (Fig. 2C, F). Only rarely do they occur in habitats experiencing low salinity levels such as semi-desert quartz patches [S. xerophila (Tölken) A.J. Scott] in South Africa (Steffen et al., 2010; Fig. 2A). Some members of Sarcocornia also inhabit continental areas of high mountain ranges but always associated with saline habitats (e.g. Montesinos Tubée, 2012; Fig. 2D).
Habitats of Sarcocornia. (A) Inland quartz patch supporting stone-plant-rich succulent scrub, habitat of S. xerophila, Knersvlakte, Western Cape, South Africa; (B) edge of the subtropical Avicennia marina mangrove fringed by dense carpet of low-growth carpet-forming S. quinqueflora, Little Lagoon, Denham, Western Australia; (C) colourful mosaic of light-coloured patches of non-clonal patch-forming short-lived herbaceous S. natalensis subsp. affinis and deep-purple, dense populations of the west Coast ecotype of S. meyeriana, Jakkalsrivier Lagoon near Lambert’s Bay, West Coast, South Africa; (D) high-altitude salt pan at Moquegua, Peru – habitat of S. pulvinata; (E) supratidal terrace of the coastal salinas near San Quintin, Baja California, Mexico, with S. pacifica, Arthrocnemum terminale and Sporobolus virginicus (Lycium sp. in foreground); (F) bank of coastal lagoon (Harvey Lake) cut of the sea (Indian Ocean) near Preston in Western Australia – the fringes of the lake are habitats of S. blackiana; (G) strandline separating the low-tidal microterrace with S. tegetaria and slightly elevated terrestrial (supratidal terrace) with S. pillansii (West Coast arid ecotype) in the semi-arid estuary of the Olifants River Mouth near Vredendal, Namaqualand, South Africa. All photos: L. Mucina (except for D: D. Montesinos Tubée).
Sarcocornia occurs in the Mediterranean and winter-mild Atlantic coasts of Europe, the Americas, southern Africa and Australia (compare Table 1). In Flora Europaea (Ball, 1964) only two species are accepted, the type species S. perennis (Miller) A.J. Scott [as Arthrocnemum perenne (Miller) Moss] and S. fruticosa (L.) A.J. Scott [as A. fruticosum (L.) Moq.]. However, more recent work concentrating on the Western Mediterranean added Sarcocornia alpini (Lag.) Rivas-Martínez (Castroviejo, 1990), S. hispanica Fuente, Rufo & Sánchez-Mata (de la Fuente et al., 2011) and S. pruinosa Fuente, Rufo & Sánchez-Mata (de la Fuente et al., 2013) showing that the diversity of the genus in the Mediterranean was probably underestimated. A molecular study based on ITS sequence data revealed that S. hispanica is sister to all other Eurasian Sarcocornia species that form a large polytomy (de la Fuente et al., 2013). Sarcocornia hispanica is also morphologically distinct by a partial fusion of seed and pericarp and by conical seeds papillae (de la Fuente et al., 2011). Although lacking unique mutations in ITS, the remaining species are either ecologically and/or morphologically distinct (compare Table 1).
Table 1.
Currently accepted species of Sarcocornia (Salicornioideae, Amaranthaceae), their distribution, habitat, growth form and chromosome number
| Species* | Distribution | Habitat | Growth form | Chromosome number (2n) | No of accessions included in this study† | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurasian & North African Sarcocornia | ||||||
| S. alpini (Lag.) Rivas-Martínez | Iberian Peninsula | Middle to high intertidal zones; inland salt pans | Prostrate to erect sub-shrub, sometimes rooting at the nodes | 18 (diploid) | 1 | de la Fuente et al. (2013) |
| S. fruticosa (L.) A.J. Scott | Mediterranean coasts, Atlantic coast of France | Upper tidal and supratidal coastal terraces | Erect shrub | 36, 54, 72 (tetraploid to octoploid) | 6 | Castraviejo (1990), Greuter et al. (1984) |
| S. hispanica Fuente, Rufo & Sánchez-Mata | SE Iberian Peninsula | Saline depressions outside of tidal influence, endorheic lakes, canals of salt works | Erect shrub | 54 (hexaploid) | 2 | de la Fuente et al. (2011) |
| S. perennis (Miller) A.J. Scott | Atlantic coasts of W and S Europe and N Africa, Mediterranean coasts | Intertidal zone of salt marshes | Mat-forming, decumbent sub-shrub, rooting at the nodes | 18 (diploid) | 7 | Davy et al. (2006) |
| S. pruinosa Fuente, Rufo & Sánchez-Mata | Atlantic coasts of France, Spain and Portugal | Intertidal zone of salt marshes | Erect sub-shrub, occasionally rooting at the nodes | 72 (octoploid) | – | de la Fuente et al. (2013) |
| American Sarcocornia | ||||||
| S. ambigua (Michx.) M.A. Alonso & M.B. Crespo | Atlantic coasts of North America, Caribbean coasts | Coastal salt marshes | Prostrate to erect shrub sometimes rooting at the base | – | 10 | Ball (2003), Alonso and Crespo (2008) |
| S. andina (Phil.) Freitag, M.A. Alonso & M.B. Crespo | Atacama Desert in Chile | Saline soils of the high plateaus | Sub-caespitose, cushion-like dwarf shrub, rooting at the nodes | – | 1 | Alonso and Crespo (2008) |
| S. magellanica (Phil.) M.A. Alonso & M.B. Crespo | Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego in Argentina | Coastal salt marshes | Mat-forming, decumbent sub-shrub, rooting at the nodes | – | 3 | Alonso & Crespo (2008) |
| S. neei (Lag.) M.A. Alonso & M.B. Crespo | Pacific Coast of Chile and Peru, through the northern half of Argentina, to the Atlantic coast of Argentina | Saline deserts | Erect shrub | – | 8 | Alonso and Crespo (2008) |
| S. pacifica (Standl.) A.J. Scott | Pacific coast of North America from Alaska to Baja California, inland in southern California and Death Valley bordering the Panamint Lakes | Coastal salt marshes | Prostrate to erect shrub, sometimes rooting at the nodes | – | 22 | Ball (2003) |
| S. pulvinata (R.E. Fr.) A.J. Scott | Altiplano Andino in Peru and Bolivia | Strongly saline soils on the edges of temporary, endorheic salt pans | Pulvinate, in dense tuffs | – | 1 | Alonso and Crespo (2008) |
| S. utahensis (Tidestr.) A.J. Scott | Utah south to Texas and northern Mexico; shores of the Gulf of Mexico from north-eastern Mexico eastwards to Louisiana, with a disjunct location in the Bahamas | Coastal salt marshes and inland saline habitats | Erect to decumbent shrub | – | 3 | Ball (2003) |
| South African Sarcocornia | ||||||
| S. capensis (Moss) A.J. Scott | Western and Eastern Cape of South Africa | Inland salt pans, supratidal terraces in estuarine salt marshes, depressions | Decumbent creeping shrub, rooting at the nodes | – | 8 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. decumbens (Tölken) A.J. Scott | Southern and eastern coasts of South Africa and Mozambique | Coastal and inland salt marshes | Decumbent, often mat-forming sub-shrub, rooting at the nodes | – | 6 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. decussata S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit | Western Cape of South Africa | Inland quartz patches and adjacent saline alluvia | Erect or spreading shrub | – | 3 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. dunensis (Moss) S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit | Lüderitz, Namibia | Sandy edges of arid-region saline flats | Decumbent creeping sub-shrub, rooting at the nodes | – | 1 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. freitagii S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit | West coast of South Africa | Inland salt pans and saline alluvia | Prostrate to decumbent short-lived perennial herb | – | 2 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. littorea (Moss) A.J. Scott | West and South Coasts of South Africa | Coastal cliffs | Erect shrub | – | 5 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. mossambicensis Brenan | Southern Mozambique | Estuarine flats and edges of mangroves | Prostrate to decumbent sub-shrub, mat-forming, rooting at the nodes | – | – | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. mossiana (Tölken) A.J. Scott | Western Cape of South Africa | Inland salt pans and saline alluvia | Spreading shrub | – | 4 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. natalensis (Bunge ex Ung.-Sternb.) A.J. Scott | Atlantic and Indian Ocean coasts of Namibia, South Africa and Mozambique | Wetlands, coastal and inland salt pans and salt marshes | Prostrate to decumbent herb or sub-shrub | – | 16 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. pillansii (Moss) A.J. Scott | South African coasts | Supratidal terraces of coastal salt marshes, inland salt pans and saline alluvia | Erect (sometimes decumbent) shrub | – | 24 (incl. putative hybrids) | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. tegetaria S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit | Atlantic and Indian Ocean coasts of Namibia, South Africa and Mozambique | Intertidal zones of estuaries | Prostrate to decumbent sub-shrub, mat-forming, rooting at the nodes | – | 10 (incl. putative hybrids) | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. terminalis (Tölken) A.J. Scott‡ | Namaqualand in South Africa | Elevated, saline river alluvia | Erect shrub | – | 4 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| S. xerophila (Tölken) A.J. Scott | Namaqualand in South Africa | Inland quartz patches | Erect shrub | – | 1 | Steffen et al. (2010) |
| Australian Sarcocornia | ||||||
| S. blackiana (Ulbr.) A.J. Scott | Southern and western coasts of Australia, coasts of Tasmania, coasts and inland localities of New Zealand and New Caledonia | Rarely flooded saline habitats | Erect shrub | – | 2 | Wilson (1980, 1984) |
| S. globosa P.G. Wilson | Western Australia | Elevated edges of saline lakes and alluvia | Erect shrub | 18 (diploid) | 1 | Shepherd and Yan (2003), Wilson (1980, 1984) |
| S. quinqueflora (Bunge ex Ung.-Sternb.) A.J. Scott | Eastern, southern and western coasts of Australia, coasts of Tasmania, coasts and inland localities of New Zealand and New Caledonia | Intertidal habitats, supratidal flats, edges of inland salt lakes and pans | Mat-forming, decumbent subshrub | 36 (tetraploid) | 2 | Shepherd and Yan (2003), Wilson (1980, 1984) |
*This compilation does not include subspecies.
†Our assessment for the sampling in this study was based on previous molecular studies, and biogeographical and morphological diversity. The first was only available for Eurasian and North African Sarcocornia (de la Fuente et al., 2013). Detailed molecular studies were not available for the American, South African and Australian species. Therefore, we used more accessions for these regions. In the Americas we had to cover a very large distribution area for Sarcocornia (Alonso and Crespo, 2008) and in South Africa we had to cover very high morphologoical diversity (Steffen et al., 2010).
‡The systematic status of S. terminalis remains unclear. Morphologically it is most similar to S. pillansii (Steffen et al., 2010), although Tölken (1967) states in his original description strong similarities to S. mossiana.
Seven species of Sarcocornia are native to the Americas (Ball, 2003; Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Table 1), three in North America and four in South America. Four of the American species are predominantly coastal species (Figs 1B and and2E)2E) while three occur exclusively or predominantly inland, two of these being endemic to the high plateaus of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Peru. Sarcocornia andina (Phil.) Freitag, M.A. Alonso & M.B. Crespo grows on dry high-latitude flanks (3100−3500m) of the Andes and S. pulvinata (R.E. Fr.) A.J. Scott over 3500m on the Altiplano Andino (Figs 1E and and2D;2D; Table 1).
From Australia, three species have been described (Wilson, 1980, 1984; Figs 1A and and2B).2B). Sarcocornia quinqueflora (Ung.-Sternb.) A.J. Scott and Sarcocornia blackiana (Ulbr.) A.J. Scott show a wide distribution along Australian, Tasmanian and New Caledonian coasts as well as a few inland localities in New Zealand and New Caledonia (http://herbier-noumea.plantnet-project.org/intro?strLangue=fr; Connor, 1984). Sarcocornia blackiana is found in rarely flooded saline habitats, while S. quinqueflora prefers intertidal habitats, but also occurs on supratidal flats and along the edges of inland salt lakes and pans (Fig. 2B). The third species, S. globosa, is restricted to inland areas and occurs on elevated edges of saline lakes and alluvia of Western Australia (Wheatbelt; Datson, 2002).
The centre of diversity of the genus is clearly located in southern Africa where 12 species are recognized (Steffen et al., 2010). The widespread Sarcocornia tegetaria S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit and the narrow endemic S. mossambicensis Brenan occupy the lower zone of estuarine salt marshes where they are subject to tidal flooding (Figs 1F and and2G).2G). Also, S. dunensis (Moss) S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit is a coastal taxon endemic to sabkhas of the Namibian Desert coast. Other species can be found in salt marshes and tidal flats along the southern African coastline, although they are not necessarily restricted to coastal habitats but also occur in inland localities such as salt pans, brackish lakes and saline bottoms of intermittent rivers (Fig. 2G). Of these S. natalensis (Bunge ex Ung.-Sternb.) A.J. Scott and Sarcocornia pillansii (Moss) A.J. Scott are the most widespread while S. capensis (Moss) A.J. Scott and S. decumbens (Tölken) A.J. Scott show a more restricted distribution (Table 1). Sarcocornia littorea (Moss) A.J. Scott is ecologically unique as it occurs exclusively on surf-splashed coastal cliffs. In the Western Cape of South Africa there are five strictly inland taxa. Sarcocornia xerophila is endemic to the quartz patches of the Knervslakte in southern Namaqualand (Fig. 2A), while S. decussata S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit occurs on quartz patches and adjacent saline alluvia in the Piketberg region. Sarcocornia freitagii S. Steffen, Mucina & G. Kadereit is a local endemic of the surroundings of Veldrif, where it occurs in salt pans and the alluvia of intermittent saline streams. Sarcocornia terminalis (Tölken) A.J. Scott has been described from banks of intermittent saline rivers in Namaqualand. Finally Sarcocornia mossiana is the most abundant inland species, occurring in saline depressions and on alluvia of rivers draining the West Coast and the Overberg region of the Western Cape. There are also some deep inland populations (limited to semi-desert scrub on quartz patches) that might be assigned to S. mossiana in the broad sense although these are in need of further enquiry.
The strongly reduced morphology of Sarcocornia results in a paucity of characters useful for species delimitations. Seed micromorphology proved to be valuable (Wilson, 1980, 1984; Ball, 2003; Davy et al., 2006; Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Steffen et al., 2010; Guilló et al., 2013) and probably stomatal position might become a valuable character in the future (Guilló et al., 2013). Other morphological features such as growth form, shape and size of segments, and inflorescence characters have also proved useful taxonomically. However, these traits must be considered critically and preferably in combination with each other to allow unambiguous species identification. It is, for instance, unwise to rely solely on growth form as the shape of branching and form is more than often not preserved on herbarium specimens, the dry tissues change their shape in dramatic manner (O’Callaghan, 1992; Datson, 2002) and reliable habit notes are a rarity.
In Sarcocornia, there are mat-forming, decumbent subshrubs, often showing clonal growth patterns (S. capensis, S. decumbens, S. dunensis, S. magellanica, S. mossambicensis, S. perennis, S. quinqueflora, S. tegetaria), prostrate to decumbent herbaceous perennials (S. freitagii, S. natalensis) and more or less erect shrubs (S. ambigua, S. blackiana, S. decussata, S. fruticosa, S. globosa, S. hispanica, S. littorea, S. mossiana, S. neei, S. pacifica, S. pillansii, S. utahensis, S. xerophila; Fig. 1; Table 1). In high altitudes of the Andes, two peculiar, cushion-forming species can be found (S. andina and S. pulvinata). The clonal habit, involving above-ground creeping stems rooting at nodes, found in the intertidal zone of estuaries and salt-marshes on various continents (e.g. S. magellanica, S. mossambicensis, S. perennis and S. tegetaria) is suggestive of a filtering pressure of the local stress factors on selecting traits producing putative ecological adaptations. Interestingly, prostrate or mat-forming eco-morphotypes of widespread species such as S. pillansii might have originated multiple times and display local adaptation, a pattern also found in Salicornia (Teege et al., 2011).
Due to their high salt tolerance, high nutritional value and long tradition of consumption by humans, Salicornia and Sarcocornia are among the most promising halophyte crops (Ventura and Sagi, 2013, and references therein). They serve as model plants to develop cultivation systems for halophyte food production using saline irrigation. Equally important might be their role in rehabilitation of salinized environments (Barrett-Lennard, 2003). To assess genetic diversity and to select the most promising candidate species within the two genera, phylogenetic, genetic and cytological background studies are essential. For Salicornia, known to be a taxonomically notoriously difficult genus, several phylogenetic and genetic studies have been conducted (Kadereit et al., 2007, 2012; Vanderpoorten et al., 2010; Teege et al., 2011; Slenzka et al., 2013) yielding important insights regarding breeding system, polyploidization, phenotypic plasticity, local adaptation, dispersal and biogeography. For Sarcocornia, such data are still scarce and a worldwide phylogenetic treatment of the genus is still missing.
Using molecular–phylogenetic analyses based on ETS, atpB–rbcL and rpl32–trnL sequences and a broad sampling of Sarcocornia the present study is aimed at (1) clarifying the phylogeny of the genus Sarcocornia and its relationship to Salicornia, (2) interpreting the biogeographical and ecological patterns in Sarcocornia and (3) contributing to understanding of putative parallel evolution of habit types in response to environmental factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Plant material and sampling
We used herbarium specimens from Aarhus University (AAU), Ankara University (ANK), Botanical Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem (B), California Academy of Sciences (CAS), Field Museum of Natural History (F), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz (MJG), University of Michigan (MICH), Moscow State University (MW), Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Sydney (NSW), Kassel University (KAS), Herbario Nacional de Bolivia, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (LPB), Leipzig University (LZ), Osnabrück University (OSBU), Royal Ontario Museum (TRT), Erindale College, University of Toronto (TRTE), and University of California (UC) for this study (Supplementary Data Table S1). Sampling of currently recognized Sarcocornia species is nearly complete according to recent taxonomic treatments (Wilson, 1984; Ball, 2003; Davy et al., 2006; Alonso and Crespo, 2008; Steffen et al., 2010). We included multiple accessions for most species to test for species monophyly. Representative species of Salicornia were included as informed by the studies of Kadereit et al. (2007, 2012). Representatives of Microcnemum, Arthrocnemum and Tecticornia were included as outgroups (Kadereit et al., 2006). Altogether 167 accessions were included in the phylogenetic analyses representing approx. 28 species of Sarcocornia, approx. 10 species of Salicornia and four outgroups (Supplementary Data Table S1).
Sequencing and phylogenetic inference
Total DNA was extracted from 20mg of dried leaf-material using the Dneasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s specifications. PCR was carried out in a T-Professional or T-Gradient Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). Table 2 gives the details of primer sequences, PCR recipe and cycler programme for each marker. We selected two variable chloroplast (cp) markers, atpB–rbcL spacer and rplL32–trnL spacer, and ETS as the most variable nuclear marker known for Salicornioideae (Kadereit et al., 2007, 2012). We did not use ITS because of its limited variability in Sarcocornia (Kadereit et al., 2006; de la Fuente et al., 2013). PCR products were checked on 1 % agarose gels and purified subsequently using the NucleoSpin Gel and PCR clean-up-Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer’s manual. DNA sequences were obtained using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in combination with the primers mentioned above following a purification step using an Illustra SephadexTM G-50 Fine DNA Grade (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). DNA fragments were sequenced using an automatic capillary sequencer GA3130XL (Applied Biosystems) following the Sanger method. Forward and reverse sequences were edited and merged to consensus sequences, which then were aligned using Sequencher 4.1.4 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). All alignments were checked and corrected manually.
Table 2.
PCR conditions and primer sequences for the three markers sequenced in this study.
| Marker | Primer sequences and references | PCR recipe (µL); 25-µL aliquots | Cycler programme |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETS | ETS Salicornia-F 5′-GTCCCTATTGTGTAGATTTCAT-3′; 18S-II R 5′-CTCTAACTGATTTAATGAGCCATTCGCA-3′ (Kadereit et al., 2007) | ddH2O 16·3, MgCl2 (50mgmL−1) 2·25, buffer 2·5, dNTPs (10µm) 0·25, Taq polymerase 0·2, F primer (10µm) 1, R primer (10µm) 1, DNA template 1·5 | 95 °C for 4min, 30 cycles of [95 °C for 30s, 50·5 °C for 45s, 72 °C for 4min], 50·5 °C for 72s, 72 °C for 8min |
| or 97 °C for 90s, 35 cycles of [97 °C for 20s, 69 °C for 90s, 72 °C for 90s], 72 °C for 7min | |||
| rpL32–trnL spacer | trnL (UAG): 5′-CTGCTTCCTAAGAGCAGCGT-3′; rpl 32-F: 5′-CAGTTCCAAAAAAACGTACTTC-3′ (Shaw et al., 2007) | ddH2O 19·45, MgCl2 (50mgmL−1) 0·6, buffer 2·5, dNTPs (10µm) 0·25, Taq polymerase 0·2, F primer (10µm) 0·5, R primer (10µm) 0·5, DNA template 1·0 | 94 °C for 60s, 35 cycles of [94 °C for 30s, 52 °C for 50s, 72 °C for 60s], 94 °C for 30s, 52 °C for 72s, 72 °C for 8min |
| atpB–rbcL spacer | atpB–rbcL-spacer F 5′-GAAGTAGTAGGATTGATTCTC-3′; atpB–rbcL-spacer R 5′-CAACACTTGCTTTAGTCTCTG-3′ (Kadereit et al., 2006) | ddH2O 19·25, MgCl2 (50mgmL−1) 1, buffer 2·5, BSA 0·25, dNTPs (10µm) 0·25, Taq polymerase 0·25, F primer (10µm) 0·5, R primer (10µm) 0·5, DNA template 0·5 | 94 °C for 1min, 35 cycles of [94 °C for 20s, 56 °C for 30s, 72 °C for 60s], 94 °C for 20s, 56 °C for 80s, 72 °C for 8min |
At first the chloroplast data set consisting of the atpB–rbcL spacer and rplL32–trnL spacer sequences and the nuclear data set consisting of ETS sequences were analysed separately. For all accessions included in both partitions (cp and nuclear) a combined analysis was then conducted. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses including bootstrapping were performed using RaxML for all three matrices (cp, nuclear, combined; Stamatakis, 2006; Stamatakis et al., 2008). The cp data set contained a high number of informative indels. Therefore, in a parsimony analysis 27 informative indels were coded in a 0/1 matrix in the cp data set. Parsimony analyses were performed for the cp and nuclear data set using PAUP* (Swofford, 2003) with 1000 replicates of random addition of sequences and TBR branch swapping. A maximum of 20 best trees were stored for each replicate. Bootstrap support was calculated using ten random additions of taxa in 100 bootstrap replicates. Otherwise the same settings as in the heuristic search were used.
Additionally, trees and node ages were generated using BEAST v1.5.4 (Rambaut and Drummond, 2003; Drummond and Rambaut, 2007). The BEAST xml input files were generated with BEAUti v1.5.4 (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007). Monophyly of the ingroup (all except Arthrocnemum) was constrained to root the tree. The following settings were chosen: substitution model parameters GTR+G with four categories for G, relaxed clock model with exponential distribution, and a birth and death demographic model were assumed (Drummond et al., 2006). We used published node ages to constrain the stem node age of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage (Kadereit et al., 2006). The corresponding prior age constraints used in the analyses were 14·6–19·6Ma for the stem of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia clade. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method was initiated twice independently on a random starting tree with 30000000 iterations and sampling frequency of 1000. Convergence of model parameters was confirmed using TRACER (Rambaut and Drummond, 2003). Burn-in values were determined empirically from the likelihood values and posterior probability (PP) clade support was calculated together with the medians and 95 % confidence limits for ages of the nodes. The post-burn-in tree sample was sub-sampled to obtain approx. 1000 trees for use in character optimizations.
Ancestral area analysis
The ancestral area analysis was conducted using RASP software (Yu et al., 2010, 2011). Five broad areas based on the extant distribution of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage were coded: A=Eurasia/North Africa, B=North America, C=South America, D=southern Africa and E=Australia. Outgroups were coded according to their distribution, Microcnemum=A, Tecticornia=E and Arthrocnemum=A. For the coding for Arthrocnemum we choose not to consider the North American A. subterminale because it seems not to be closely related to A. macrostachyum (G. Kadereit, unpubl. res.). One thousand random post-burn-in trees from the BEAST analysis of the ETS data set (see above) were loaded in RASP and a Bayesian MCMC analysis was conducted with 50000 generations, ten runs and a sample frequency of 100. The maximum number of ancestral areas was in three independent runs set to two, three and four allowing widespread ancestors. Relative frequencies of ancestral areas were plotted on a condensed tree.
RESULTS
Phylogenetic inference
The combined data set included 2284 aligned positions and 44 accessions (Bayesian tree in Fig. 3). The cp data included 1769 aligned positions, 205 of which were variable (ML tree in Supplementary Data Fig. S1), and the ETS data set included 515 aligned positions, 250 of which were variable (dated Bayesian tree in Fig. 4). The cp data set is lacking accessions of S. alpini, S. dunensis, S. magellanica and S. hispanica. Supported branches did not differ in the Bayesian, ML and parsimony approaches. Incongruency between cp and nuclear data were found only in terminal branches mainly among the South African accessions. Basal branches show no topological conflict in the gene trees and the combined matrix revealed a well-supported tree with increased support values along the basal branches. As the cp data were mostly uninformative among closely related species we did not compile a data set that was strictly congruent with the ETS data set but we aimed to represent all major clades and subclades found in the much larger ETS data set.
Dated Bayesian tree based on sequences of two chloroplast markers (atpB–rbcL spacer and rpL32–trnL spacer) combined with ETS sequences of 41 accessions of Sarcocornia (Sa.) and Salicornia (Sl.). The tree was rooted with Arthrocnemum (= Ar.); other abbreviations: Mi.=Microcnemum, Te.=Tecticornia. Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities (>0·95)/ML bootstrap values (>50), respectively. Numbers at nodes refer to mean node ages and the respective bars to the 95 % confidence intervals of the age estimate. Numbers at the end of each taxon name refer to the lab code (Supplementary Data Table S1).
Chronogram of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage based on the ETS sequence data and 164 accessions of Sarcocornia and Salicornia. The tree was rooted with Arthrocnemum (= Ar.); other abbreviations: Mi.=Microcnemum, Te.=Tecticornia. Numbers above branches are posterior probabilities (>0·95)/ML bootstrap (>50) values, respectively. Numbers at nodes are the mean node ages and bars refer to the 95 % confidence intervals of the respective node age. The numbers at the end of each taxon name refer to the lab code (Supplementary Data Table S1). Accessions with identical ETS sequences were summarized under one terminal. Terminals written in blue refer to species that show a true mat-forming growth form. The tree was calibrated using the published node ages for the stem of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage (see Kadereit et al., 2006). Crucial results of the ancestral area analysis are plotted on the tree (see inset legend for colour coding of the areas). Numbers in the respective area colour refer to relative frequencies of ancestral areas at the respective node.
All data sets revealed a strongly supported Sarcocornia/Salicornia clade with three congruently well-supported sub-lineages, the Salicornia clade, American Sarcocornia clade and Eurasian Sarcocornia clade (Figs 3 and and4;4; Fig. S1). The combined analysis additionally shows good support for the monophyly of Salicornia plus Eurasian/American Sarcocornia and these are sister to a highly supported South African Sarcocornia (Fig. 3). In contrast, the gene trees fail to resolve the monophyly of South African Sarcocornia and their sister group relationship to Salicornia plus Eurasian/American Sarcocornia. The South African (including Australian) accessions of Sarcocornia formed a monophyletic group with weak support only in the ETS tree (Fig. 4). In the cp tree two clades of South African accessions form a polytomy with a clade comprising the Salicornia clade/American Sarcocornia clade/Eurasian Sarcocornia clade. Relationships among the Salicornia clade, American Sarcocornia clade and Eurasian Sarcocornia clade are not resolved in the cp tree (Fig. S1) while there is weak support for a sister group relationship of Salicornia and American/Eurasian Sarcocornia in the ETS tree (Fig. 4).
Ancestral area analysis
Relative frequencies of ancestral areas did not change significantly in the independent runs with the maximum number of areas per node set to two, three or four. The full reconstruction is available from the corresponding author upon request. The ancestral area reconstructions of the most interesting nodes are mapped on the tree shown in Fig. 4.
DISCUSSION
Phylogenetic relationship of Sarcocornia and Salicornia and biogeographical considerations
Our broadly sampled molecular trees of the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage revealed that both genera form a well-supported clade (Figs 3 and and4)4) that originated probably during the Mid-Miocene from ancestors probably distributed in Eurasia (Fig. 4). This supports previous findings (Kadereit et al., 2006) but on the basis of a much more extensive data set. Both gene trees and the combined tree support a paraphyletic Sarcocornia with Salicornia more closely related to the Eurasian/American clade of Sarcocornia. Statistical support for a nested Salicornia within Sarcocornia is low in the ETS tree [ML bootstrap support (BS) 65, parsimony BS<50, PP<0·95; Fig. 4], high in the cp tree (ML BS 97, parsimony BS<94; Supplementary Data Fig. S1) and high in the combined analysis (ML BS 99, PP=1; Fig. 3). Monophyly of the Eurasian plus American Sarcocornia is only weakly supported in the ETS tree (ML BS 63, parsimony BS<50, PP<0·95; Fig. 4). Monophyly of the South African/Australian Sarcocornia is also only weakly supported by the ETS data (ML BS 65, parsimony BS<50, PP=0·99; Fig. 4) but highly supported in the combined analysis (ML BS 94, PP=1; Fig. 3). A paraphyletic Sarcocornia raises the question of taxonomic adjustments in the lineages, an issue that is dealt with later in this Discussion.
The South African/Australian Sarcocornia clade probably originated from the Eurasian ancestors and started to diversify during the Late Miocene (Fig. 4). As the ETS data set provides better resolution for the South African/Australian lineage than the cpDNA and combined data sets our discussion is based mainly on the ETS tree. Sarcocornia capensis is not monophyletic but forms a polytomy together with a clade containing the remaining South African/Australian species (PP=0·99). However, this species is morphologically distinct from the other taxa and can be easily recognized (Steffen et al., 2010). The clade with the remaining taxa consists of four groups in a polytomy that started to diversify during the Pliocene. The Australian accessions included in our analyses form a monophyletic group well nested within this Southern African clade (PP=1). Therefore, Sarcocornia can be considered a rather ‘recent’ addition to the Australian flora, probably reaching Australia during the Pliocene (see also Kadereit et al., 2005). This claim is also well supported by the fact that the ETS data showed hardly any variation in the Australian accessions of Sarcocornia, despite considerable morphological variation of this genus in Australia (G. Kadereit and L. Mucina, unpubl. res.). The shrub-forming species S. decussata, S. littorea and S. mossiana are well supported as monophyletic (PP=1). However, two accessions putatively identified as S. natalensis and S. pillansii are also grouped in this clade. Sarcocornia xerophila (also a shrub) is ecologically distinct from all other species as it grows solely on quartz patches in southern Namaqualand (Steffen et al., 2010). Relationships of this taxon remain unresolved in the ETS tree, while it is weakly supported as sister to the Australian species in the cp tree (ML BS 63, parsimony BS 57; Fig. S1). The clade containing the remaining South African species is well supported (PP=1) and splits into two subclades. Sarcocornia decumbens and S. tegetaria are well supported as sister to each other (PP=1). Both mat-forming species are characterized by adventitious roots, yet S. decumbens can easily be identified as it is the only South African species with more than three flowers per cyme (Steffen et al., 2010). Together these two species are sister to a clade comprising the prostrate, rosette-shaped S. freitagii and S. natalensis as well as the shrub-forming S. pillansii and S. terminalis (PP=0·97). This clade diversified rather recently during the Quaternary, and relationships within this group remain largely unresolved. However, it is obvious that accessions assigned to a certain taxon appear in different lineages in this clade. Sarcocornia natalensis, for example, can be found in two different subclades that are statistically moderately supported. Furthermore, accessions identified as S. capensis and S. tegetaria or interspecific hybrids also appear in this clade. Approximately 14 % of the sequences generated from South African material show additional peaks indicating hybridization. In southern Africa, often two or more species (in some places up to six!) can be found in the same locality. Here they occupy different positions along salinity and inundation gradients, thus showing strong ecological differentiation. Hybrid sequences are mainly found in the S. natalensis/pillansii clade as well as in S. capensis. Furthermore, hybrids between South African Sarcocornia species, based on morphological data, have been described (Tölken, 1967; O’Callaghan, 1992; Steffen et al., 2010). South African Sarcocornia also shows different ploidy levels, even within species (L. Mucina, unpubl. res.). Hybridization has been shown in Eurasian Sarcocornia (Castroviejo and Lago, 1992; Figueroa et al., 2003), and the morphological, karyological and molecular data point towards hybridization in South African Sarcocornia.
The clade consisting of American and Eurasian Sarcocornia plus Salicornia was reconstructed to be of Eurasian origin (Fig. 4). For Salicornia, an eastern Mediterranean or Asian origin was proposed and the South African species of Salicornia clearly form two derived lineages in Salicornia that reached South Africa during the Pleistocene independently (Kadereit et al., 2007; Slenzka et al., 2013). This supports the closer relatedness of Salicornia to the originally Northern Hemisphere (Eurasian and American) Sarcocornia.
American Sarcocornia is clearly monophyletic (Figs 3 and and4)4) and most likely derived from Eurasian ancestors. The ancestral area of the crown node of the American clade was reconstructed to be located in the Northern Hemisphere (either North America or Eurasia or both). The distribution of the American accessions (Supplementary Data Fig. S2) studied shows a clear geographical signal in the phylogenetic relationships of the American species. With high statistical support, the North American S. utahensis is sister to the remaining American species. This first split within American Sarcocornia dates back to the Late Miocene (approx. 5–6Ma; Figs 3 and and4).4). Sarcocornia utahensis is mainly found at inland localities, rarely on the coast. The South American inland species Sarcocornia andina is sister to a clade consisting of two widely distributed coastal clades, the East coast clade with S. ambigua and the West coast clade with S. pacifica, S. neei and S. magellanica (including also the Andean S. pulvinata; Figs 3 and and4).4). The two clades are comparatively young, having diversified in the Quaternary, and as they show no further resolution, the relationships among S. pacifica, S. neei, S. magellanica and S. pulvinata remain uncertain. While S. magellanica and S. pulvinata are clearly differentiated by morphological characters from S. neei and S. pacifica (Alonso and Crespo, 2008) the separation of S. pacifica and S. neei seems to be merely based on geographical separation (North vs. South America).
Resolving relationships among Eurasian species of Sarcocornia seems difficult. De la Fuente et al. (2013) using ITS sequence data and a sampling that was largely restricted to the Iberian Peninsula found S. hispanica to be sister to the remaining species with good support, although relationships among S. perennis, S. alpini, S. fruticosa and S. pruinosa remained unclear in their analyses. In contrast to de la Fuente et al. (2013), our ETS data (Fig. 4) support a sister group relationship of S. fruticosa and the remaining species. The latter branch splits into two supported clades, one containing samples that were mostly identified as S. perennis and S. alpini (one sample) and the other clade containing samples of S. hispanica. Although the sampling included here is limited, the S. fruticosa clade and the S. perennis clade seem to be widely distributed, occurring in the Western and Eastern Mediterranean, S. perennis even reaching the surrounds of the Dead Sea and the coast of Senegal (Supplementary Data Table S1). According to the results of Guilló et al. (2013) seed and stomatal characters are reliable for the identification of Sarcocornia species in the Mediterranean region. Therefore, the three clades found in this study are well separated by molecular and morphological characters. The S. perennis/S. alpini/S. pruinosa clade shows seeds with hairs while S. fruticosa and S. hispanica show seeds with papillae (de la Fuenté et al., 2013; Guilló et al., 2013). Additionally, S. perennis and S. alpini show prominent stomata while S. fruticosa and S. hispanica have sunken stomata (Guilló et al., 2013; our pers. obs.). This latter character is not known for S. pruinosa. To resolve relationships within the S. perennis/S. alpini/S. pruinosa clade, more variable markers than ITS and ETS are needed (de la Fuenté et al., 2013; Fig. 4). However, S. alpini and S. pruinosa are distinguished by further morphological and ecological characters (de la Fuenté et al., 2013). Interestingly, S. hispanica, a species with a predominantly inland distribution, is sister to a widely distributed and mostly coastal clade, similar to patterns found in the American Sarcocornia clade.
On growth forms and ecological diversification in Sarcocornia
Salicornioideae is a subfamily that comprises roughly 100 species and consists entirely of leaf- or stem-succulent halophytes (Ulbrich, 1934; Kühn et al., 1993; Kadereit et al., 2006). The most diverse lineages within Salicornioideae are the Australian Tecticornia sensu lato (Shepherd et al., 2004) and the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage. Both represent highly specialized hygro-halophyte lineages that started to diversify during the Mid-Miocene (Kadereit et al., 2006). In contrast to other Salicornioideae, Tecticornia and the Sarcocornia/Salicornia lineage show the fusion of opposite bracts and the inflorescence axis forms rather compact, tightly packed, club-shaped spikes with flowers hidden and protected in cavities. In many species the tepals are fused, leaving only a small opening through which stigmata and anthers are presented. These changes in inflorescence and flower morphology might have favoured increased cleistogamy which can, for example, be observed in Salicornia (Kadereit et al., 2007, and references therein; Vanderpoorten et al., 2010). High self-fertility might be of profound advantage during colonization processes along coasts as well as in remote inland localities. In Salicornia, diversification is promoted by the rapid dispersal of inbreeding lines while hybridization seems to be rare (Kadereit et al., 2007; Vanderpoorten et al., 2010; Teege et al., 2011). In contrast, molecular and morphological evidence indicates that hybridization might be common in Sarcocornia (Castroviejo and Lago, 1992; Figueroa et al., 2003; Steffen et al., 2010).
The low growth, most commonly manifested in prostrate, creeping forms, and sometimes forming cushion (pulvinate) structures, appears to be a characteristic feature of stressed habitats. Here the impeded access to nutrients (high salinity, low available water) and in consequence impeded nutrient uptake impose natural constraints on biomass production (Grime’s concept of ‘ecological stress’: Grime, 2002, and an ecophysiological understanding as discussed by Schultze et al., 2005). Low (creeping or cushion-forming) status is also of advantage in climatically exposed environments, such as at high altitudes or high latitudes (Billings and Mooney, 1968; Körner, 1999). From their positions in the tree (Fig. 4), it is clear that the prostrate and mat-forming growth form in Sarcocornia arose multiple times; however, these superficially similar growth-form types are most probably a result of a plethora of environmental filters fostering traits responsive to stress (e.g. high salinity, high-frequency and prolonged flooding, high drag from tidal movement, occurrence of frost and ice formation). The evolutionary processes underpinning the trait selection leading to the prostrate/cushion growth forms is an intriguing topic for ‘evo-devo’ research. Furthermore, the different prostrate growth forms found within the different lineages of Sarcocornia might represent different stages of speciation (Lowry, 2012).
Sarcocornia pacifica, for example, typically grow as more or less erect shrubs possessing a well-developed primary central root system and few or no adventitious roots (P. Ball, pers. obs.). Towards its northern distribution limit, the species tends to a low growth-form, creeping on the surface, with main branches spreading horizontally in all directions with short erect vegetative and flowering shoots, and hence producing what appears to be mats, but these do not necessarily root. This apparently mat-forming type occurs where the species reaches areas where tall erect stems are damaged by frost. These forms of S. pacifica were previously called ‘S. perennis’ (see Davy et al., 2006, and references therein) and might represent locally adapted ecotypes. They can be found, for example, in the vicinity of Victoria (B.C., Canada). In Florida S. ambigua occurs in extensive tidal flats where the plants are subjected to frequent tidal movement. Here a creeping ecotype of the species but with only few roots at the nodes has also evolved, albeit without the influence of frost. The creeping habit of what is known today as S. tegetaria (Steffen et al., 2010) misled European taxonomists visiting South Africa who ‘recognized’ the local taxon as ‘Salicornia perennis’ (Moss, 1954; Davy et al., 2006). It is interesting that the mat-forming (clonal) taxa in southern Africa (S. tegetaria, S. decumbens, S. natalensis) are associated with increased flooding stress/disturbance (either regular tidal influence of less-predictable yet seasonal fluctuating water levels of inland salt lakes). The most complicated creeping/clonal growth form characterized by thin, intertwined branches that may be several metres in length, profusely rooting at nodes, is found in S. capensis which grows on sandy supratidal terraces. Due to their morphological and ecological distinctness we consider the South African mat-forming types as clearly separate ecospecies (Steffen et al., 2010). Interesting ecotypes are common in the extremely variable species S. pillansii; among the various morphotypes of this species are also decumbent forms (Steffen et al., 2010). In Australia, although the genetic distinction between S. quinqueflora and S. blackiana has not yet been established, the growth forms tell an interesting story worth investigating in more detail: the creeping forms (S. quinqueflora) are limited to low-tidal and more frequently flooded environments, while S. blackiana occurs on high ground along the flooding gradients.
In Europe the low-tidal creeping and clonal S. perennis and upper tidal or non-tidal erect-shrub species S. alpini and S. fruticosa follow a similar ecological pattern to that described for S. quinqueflora/S. blackiana. While S. fruticosa is genetically clearly distinct and phylogenetically separated (Fig. 4; Davy et al., 2006), S. perennis and S. alpini are not differentiated by ITS (de la Fuente et al., 2013) and ETS sequence data (this analysis). However, these two have been carefully investigated by a reciprocal transplantation experiment showing clear niche differentiation of the two taxa along a saltmarsh elevation gradient with very limited overlap of their fundamental niches (Redondo-Gómez et al., 2007). Niche differentiation in these two taxa was attributed to intolerance to low redox potential in S. alpini and intolerance to hypersalinity in S. perennis. Finally, S. magellanica, which belongs to the American clade, is in contrast to the creeping forms of S. pacifica (see above) a truly mat-forming species with roots at the nodes and (again) strongly resembles mat-forming forms of the Eurasian S. perennis (Alonso and Crespo, 2008). It occurs in saltmarshes where it is subjected to tidal movement and winter frost.
In summary, we suggest that the sub-cosmopolitan distribution of Sarcocornia is a result of a combination of effective long-distance dispersal (possibly the same drivers as we have hypothesized to disperse Salicornia, including birds and sea currents; Kadereit et al., 2007, 2012) and the ability to remain (by means of clonal growth ensuring population stability under steadily changing environmental conditions) in newly colonized habitats. These new and changing habitats posed similar ecological gradients such as salinity, frequency and duration of flooding and its impact on the redox potential of the sediment, drag and disturbance from tidal movement, and occurrence of frost and ice formation to Sarcocornia, causing the evolution of locally adapted ecotypes and eventually ecospecies that appear superficially similar but evolved independently.
Taxonomic issues of the Salicornia/Sarcocornia clade
Salicornia is clearly nested within Sarcocornia, which means that Sarcocornia is a paraphyletic taxon. Furthermore, a critical assessment shows that traditional characters used to separate the two genera are inconsistent. Scott’s (1977) main morphological arguments for separating Sarcocornia were the perennial habit and the equal-sized flowers. However, Sarcocornia contains short-lived, herbaceous perennials such as S. natalensis and S. freitagii. Within the Salicornioideae there are other genera that contain annuals and perennials (e.g. Halopeplis, Tecticornia). Distinctly smaller lateral flowers and their composition in a triangle might be more convincing. However, also in Sarcocornia there are many species with three-flowered cymes in which the lateral flowers are smaller than the central one (e.g. S. freitagii). In Salicornia there are species with a tendency to reduce the number of flowers to one (S. meyeriana, S. europaea subsp. disarticulata) and there are species in which the outline of the flowers in no longer visible (S. heterantha). Hence, with the discovery of more and more overlapping variation in both genera, Scott’s (1977) concept seems outdated.
There are several clades within Sarcocornia in which species delimitation is particularly difficult due to either the lack of molecular resolution or morphological distinctness or both. These are, for example, in America the clade containing S. pacifica, S. neei, S. pulvinata and S. magellanica, in South Africa the clade containing S. pillansii, S. natalensis and S. freitagii (Fig. 4), the Australian species of Sarcocornia and the Sarcocornia perennis clade of the Eurasian species. These groups need further attention using more variable molecular markers. Taxonomic adjustments in the Sarcocornia/Salicornia clade should await the detailed analyses of these subclades.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data are available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org and consist of the following. Table S1: species and accessions included in the molecular analysis. Figure S1: ML tree based on the two chloroplast markers (atpB–rbcL spacer and rpL32–trnL spacer) and 42 accessions of Sarcocornia and Salicornia. Figure S2: distribution of American accessions of Sarcocornia included in the phylogenetic analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all collectors (Supplementary Data Table S1) for proving the numerous samples for this project. We thank the curators of AAU, ANK, B, CAS, F, MJG, MICH, MW, NSW, KAS, LPB, LZ, OSBU, TRT, TRTE and UC for loan of material or provision of leaf samples. Two anonymous reviewers and Tim Flowers (Sussex) provided helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Maria Geyer (Mainz) kindly assisted with the art work and Stefanie Lokan (Mainz) generated a number of sequences of the American Sarcocornia during a lab course. We thank the German Science foundation (DFG) and the University of Mainz for financial support [grants to G. Kadereit (DFG: KA1816/2-2)]. L.M. acknowledges the logistic support of the Iluka Chair (The University of Western Australia). We thank the provincial conservations authorities of the CapeNature, Northern Cape Conservation Service and the South African National Parks for plant collecting permits.
LITERATURE CITED
- Alonso MA, Crespo MB. 2008. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on South American taxa of Sarcocornia (Chenopodiaceae). Annales Botanici Fennici 45: 241–254. [Google Scholar]
- Ball PW. 1964. Arthrocnemum Moq., Salicornia L. In: Tutin TG, Burgess NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, Vol. 1 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–102. [Google Scholar]
- Ball PW. 2003. 38. Chenopodiaceae Ventenat: 21. Arthrocnemum, 22. Salicornia, 23. Sarcocornia . In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, eds. The Flora of North America, Vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press, 381–387. [Google Scholar]
- Barrett-Lennard ED. 2003. Saltland pastures in Australia. A practical guide, 2nd edn. Perth: State of Western Australia. [Google Scholar]
- Billings WD, Mooney HA. 1968. The ecology of arctic and alpine plants. Biological Reviews 43: 481–529. [Google Scholar]
- Castroviejo S. 1990. Sarcocornia. In: Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Montserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L, eds. Flora iberica: Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares . Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico CSIC, 526–531. [Google Scholar]
- Castroviejo S, Lago E. 1992. Datos acerca de la hibridación en el género Sarcocornia (Chenopodiaceae). Anales Jardín Botánico de Madrid 50: 163–170. [Google Scholar]
- Connor HE. 1984. Gynodioecism in Sarcocornia quinqueflora (Salicornieae) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 22: 433–439. [Google Scholar]
- Datson B. 2002. Samphires in Western Australia: A field guide to Chenopodiaceae Tribe Salicornieae . Perth: Department of Conservation and Land Management. [Google Scholar]
- Davy AJ, Bishop GF, Mossman H, et al. 2006. Biological Flora of the British Isles, no. 244: Sarcocornia perennis (Miller) A.J. Scott. Journal of Ecology 94: 1035–1048. [Google Scholar]
- de la Fuente V, Rufo L, Sánchez-Mata D. 2011. Sarcocornia hispanica, a new species of Sarcocornia A.J. Scott (Chenopodiaceae) from the Iberian Peninsula. Lazaroa 32: 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- de la Fuente V, Oggerin M, Rufo L, et al. 2013. A micromorphological and phylogenetic study of Sarcocornia A.J. Scott (Chenopodiaceae) on the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Biosystems 147: 158–173. [Google Scholar]
- Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4: e88. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Figueroa ME, Castillo JM, Redondo S, et al. 2003. Facilitated invasion by hybridization of Sarcocornia species in a salt-marsh succession. Journal of Ecology 91: 616–626. [Google Scholar]
- Greuter W, Burdet HM, Long G. 1984. Med-Checklist 1. Geneva: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève. [Google Scholar]
- Grime JP. 2002. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
- Guilló A, Alonso A, Juan A. 2013. New insights into steminal and stomatal morphology and their contribution to the taxonomy of the Old World succulent perennial Salicornioideae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299: 1185–1203. [Google Scholar]
- Kadereit G, Gotzek D, Jacobs S, Freitag H. 2005. Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae . Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5: 59–80. [Google Scholar]
- Kadereit G, Mucina L, Freitag H. 2006. Phylogeny of Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae): diversification, biogeography, and evolutionary trends in leaf and flower morphology. Taxon 55: 617–642. [Google Scholar]
- Kadereit G, Ball P, Beer S, et al. 2007. A taxonomic nightmare comes true: phylogeny and biogeography of glassworts (Salicornia L., Chenopodiaceae). Taxon 56: 1143–1170. [Google Scholar]
- Kadereit G, Piirainen M, Lambinon J, Vanderpoorten A. 2012. Cryptic taxa should have names. Reflections on the glasswort genus Salicornia (Amaranthaceae). Taxon 61: 1227–1239. [Google Scholar]
- Körner C. 1999. Alpine plant life. Functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Kühn U, Bittrich V, Carolin R, et al. 1993. Chenopodiaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 2 Berlin: Springer, 253–281. [Google Scholar]
- Lowry DB. 2012. Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 241–257. [Google Scholar]
- Montesinos Tubbé DB. 2012. Vegetación halófila de tres localidades andinas en la vertiente pacífica del sur de Perú. Chloris Chilensis 15, 2 (available from http:www.chlorischile.cl). [Google Scholar]
- Moss C. 1954. The species of Arthrocnemum and Salicornia in Southern Africa. Journal of South African Botany 20: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- O’Callaghan M. 1992. The ecology and identification of the southern African Salicorniae (Chenopodiaceae). South African Journal of Botany 58: 430–439. [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2003. Tracer v. 1.5 (available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer). [Google Scholar]
- Redondo-Gómez S, Castillo JM, Luque CJ, Luque T, Figueroa ME, Davy AJ. 2007. Fundamental niche differentiation in subspecies of Sarcocornia perennis on a salt marsh elevational gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 347: 15–20. [Google Scholar]
- Scott AJ. 1977. Reinstatement and revision of Salicorniaceae J. Agardh (Caryophyllales). Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 75: 255–307. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd KA, Wilson PG. 2007. Incorporation of the Australian genera Halosarcia, Pachycornia, Sclerostegia and Tegicornia into Tecticornia (Salicornioideae, Chenopodiaceae). Australian Systematic Botany 20: 319–339. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd KA, Yan G. 2003. Chromosome number and size variations in the Australian Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae) – evidence of polyploidisation. Australian Journal of Botany 51: 441–452. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd KA, Waycott M, Calladine A. 2004. Radiation of the Australian Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae) based on evidence from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 91: 1387–1397. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Schultze E-D, Beck E, Muller-Honestein K. 2005. Plant ecology . Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Smith RL. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94: 275–288. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Slenzka A, Mucina L, Kadereit G. 2013. Salicornia L. (Amaranthaceae) in South Africa and Namibia: rapid spread and ecological diversification of cryptic species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 172: 175–186. [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A fast bootstrapping algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758–771. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Steffen S, Mucina L, Kadereit G. 2010. A revision of Sarcocornia in South Africa, Namibia and Mozambique. Systematic Botany 35: 390–408. [Google Scholar]
- Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4 . Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Teege PK, Kadereit JW, Kadereit G. 2011. Tetraploid European Salicornia species are best interpreted as ecotypes of multiple origin. Flora 206: 910–920. [Google Scholar]
- Tölken HR. 1967. The species of Arthrocnemum and Salicornia (Chenopodiaceae) in southern Africa. Bothalia 9: 255–307. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson PG. 1980. A revision of the Australian species of Salicorniae (Chenopodiaceae). Nuytsia 3: 3–154. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson PG. 1984. Chenopodiaceae. In: George AS, ed. Flora of Australia,Vol. 4 Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 81–334. [Google Scholar]
- Ulbrich E. 1934. Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn, vol. 16c Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 379–584. [Google Scholar]
- Vanderpoorten A, Hardy OJ, Lambinon J, Raspé O. 2010. Two reproductively isolated cytotypes and a swarm of highly inbred, disconnecting populations: a glimpse into Salicornia evolutionary history and challenging taxonomy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 630–644. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Ventura Y, Sagi M. 2013. Halophyte crop cultivation: the case for Salicornia and Sarcocornia. Environmental and Experimental Botany 92: 144–153. [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Harris A J, He XJ. 2010. S-DIVA (Statistical Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis): a tool for inferring biogeographic histories. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 848–850. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y, Harris A J, He XJ. 2011. RASP (reconstruct ancestral state in phylogenies) 2.0 beta (available from http://mnh.scu.edu.cn/soft/blog/RASP). [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu260
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall:
https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-pdf/115/3/353/17847556/mcu260.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1093/aob/mcu260
Article citations
What Is Wrong with Frankenia nodiflora Lam. (Frankeniaceae)? New Insights into the South African Sea-Heaths.
Plants (Basel), 12(14):2630, 13 Jul 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37514245 | PMCID: PMC10383076
Recovery from Salinity and Drought Stress in the Perennial Sarcocornia fruticosa vs. the Annual Salicornia europaea and S. veneta.
Plants (Basel), 11(8):1058, 13 Apr 2022
Cited by: 8 articles | PMID: 35448785 | PMCID: PMC9031041
A Review on Sarcocornia Species: Ethnopharmacology, Nutritional Properties, Phytochemistry, Biological Activities and Propagation.
Foods, 10(11):2778, 11 Nov 2021
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 34829059 | PMCID: PMC8625059
Review
Free full text in Europe PMCSarcocornia perennis: A Salt Substitute in Savory Snacks.
Foods, 10(12):3110, 15 Dec 2021
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 34945661 | PMCID: PMC8701967
The drying process of Sarcocornia perennis: impact on nutritional and physico-chemical properties.
J Food Sci Technol, 57(12):4443-4458, 07 May 2020
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 33087958 | PMCID: PMC7550502
Go to all (9) article citations
Other citations
Data
Data behind the article
This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.
BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Higher Novel L-Cys Degradation Activity Results in Lower Organic-S and Biomass in Sarcocornia than the Related Saltwort, Salicornia.
Plant Physiol, 175(1):272-289, 25 Jul 2017
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 28743765
Radiation of the Australian Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae)--based on evidence from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences.
Am J Bot, 91(9):1387-1397, 01 Sep 2004
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 21652372
Evolutionary diversification of the African achyranthoid clade (Amaranthaceae) in the context of sterile flower evolution and epizoochory.
Ann Bot, 122(1):69-85, 01 Jun 2018
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 29688271 | PMCID: PMC6025207
A Review on Sarcocornia Species: Ethnopharmacology, Nutritional Properties, Phytochemistry, Biological Activities and Propagation.
Foods, 10(11):2778, 11 Nov 2021
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 34829059 | PMCID: PMC8625059
Review
Free full text in Europe PMCMacroevolutionary patterns of salt tolerance in angiosperms.
Ann Bot, 115(3):333-341, 30 Nov 2014
Cited by: 17 articles | PMID: 25452251 | PMCID: PMC4332609
Review Free full text in Europe PMC