Risk-Averse Versus Risk-Taking

“The most important thing to remember is this: to be ready at any moment to give up what you are for what you might become.”
– W. E. B. Du Bois

When your goal is to create change in the world, embracing risk is the foundation of leadership. Attempting to mitigate all risk out of an action eliminates any possibility that that action will result in substantive change.

Risk-averse people naively expect that success will simply to come to them.  Risk-takers understand that success requires creative, strategic pursuit. Your goal is to get people to act, and wholeheartedly embracing risk is the only prescription for overcoming complacency, apprehension, and fear of failure.

Risk ≠ Recklessness. The desire for change is not just emotional; it is also rooted in logic. Risk is calculated. It is a carefully considered series of if/then statements that reach a conclusion that risk has a return on investment. Without risk, the logic model remains theoretical. Risk demonstrates people’s capacity to achieve a stronger, more vibrant society.

risk-averse vs risk-takingRisk is not just about avoiding the negative. It is important to fall into the trap of thinking about risk the way that insurance companies do. If you only define risk in terms of the chance of damage, injury, or financial ruin, you will always see advocating for change as too risky.

Seeing risk only in terms of generating fear can incapacitate you. In leading change, it is important to replace, “we can’t do that because,” with “we can do that despite.” Sure, not all risks pay off. We learn from those. Some risks, however, will pay off. The ones that succeed create hope. They lessen fear. They strengthen resolve. They give you confidence.

When you embrace a strategy that might be considered risky, it can catch those who oppose you off guard. Your risk can also get the attention of the undecided, as you present an alternative that reflects your shared values. Risk is not just about avoiding the negative.

Risk is at the Core of Leadership

Be United
The idea of strength in numbers can make risk less scary. Leaders aren’t simply assessing risk on a personal level. They have locked arms with stakeholders sharing a common vision of what change needs to take place. Risks are shared as well.

Be Committed
Willingness to risk is a measure of commitment to values and to a shared vision of the change that needs to happen.

Be Creative
Willingness to risk is also a measure of creative thinking. If you can’t imagine a better future, it will never come about.

Be Radical
Transformative change is radical change.  Ending slavery was a radical idea. A woman voting was a radical idea. Don’t be concerned about being seen as radical. Be concerned about doing what is right.

Life is a continuous risk-taking process that goes something like this: risk, success or failure, learn, and repeat. You are working to change something. Change is impossible without risk, and change is required to better people’s lives.

Updated 17 June 2023

Author: John Hamerlinck

I am a writer, and a reader, speaker, consultant, and trainer with a fascination about how social change happens. I live in Minnesota, USA. Medium - https://medium.com/@HamerlinckJ

4 thoughts on “Risk-Averse Versus Risk-Taking”

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.