Skip to main content

Differential Diagnosis of the Liver Mass

  • Reference work entry
General Surgery
  • 642 Accesses

Pearls and Pitfalls

  • Currently, most liver masses are asymptomatic and are identified incidentally during survey for chronic liver diseases or other purposes.

  • Many liver masses occur in cirrhotic livers secondary to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections.

  • Abdominal ultrasonography is the most convenient imaging modality to screen patients at risk for liver masses and will differentiate cystic from solid tumors.

  • Dynamic computed tomography (CT) is recommended to assess the liver tumor and remainder of the abdominal cavity simultaneously.

  • CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and angiography can be valuable and complementary in the evaluation of liver masses.

  • Tumor markers, such as α-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), may help to narrow the differential diagnosis.

  • Positron emission tomography (PET) has not proven useful or cost-effective for differentiating most liver masses.

  • Liver biopsy is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Readings

  • Gibbs JF, Litwin AM, Kahlenberg MS (2004) Contemporary management of benign liver tumors. Surg Clin N Am 84:463–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstingl RM, Schwarz W, Vogl TJ (2003) Contrast agents. In: Vogl TJ, Lencioni R, Hammerstingl RM, Bartolozzi C (eds) Magnetic resonance imaging in liver disease. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart/New York, pp 45–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WC, Jeng LB, Chen MF (2002) Estimation of prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 89:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WC, Jeng LB, Chen MF (2000) Hepatectomy for hepatitis B-, hepatitis C-, and dual hepatitis B- and C-related hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:265–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CN, Lee WC, Chen MF, Tsay PK (2003) Predictors of long-term disease-free survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: two decades of experience at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital. Ann Surg Oncol 10:916–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lee, WC., Chen, MF. (2009). Differential Diagnosis of the Liver Mass. In: Bland, K.I., Büchler, M.W., Csendes, A., Sarr, M.G., Garden, O.J., Wong, J. (eds) General Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-833-3_93

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-833-3_93

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-832-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-833-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics