Skip to main content
Log in

Nestedness of flea assemblages harboured by small mammalian hosts revisited: phylogenetic and functional nestedness do not follow compositional nestedness

  • Research
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied compositional, phylogenetic, and functional nestedness in the flea assemblages of 14 host species across regions. Our main questions were (a) are a host’s flea assemblages compositionally, phylogenetically, or functionally nested? (b) Do similar processes drive these nestedness facets? (d) Are a host’s biological traits associated with nestedness of its flea assemblages? Rows of host matrices were ordered by decreasing species richness/the sum of the branch lengths of a phylogenetic tree/functional dendrogram or by decreasing region area or by increasing distance from the centre of a host’s geographic range. None of the matrices sorted by species richness/sum of branch lengths were nested from a compositional perspective, but they were significantly nested from phylogenetic and functional perspectives. Compositional, phylogenetic, and functional nestedness of matrices sorted by region area or by distance from the host’s geographic range centre varied between hosts. In some hosts, flea assemblages were nested from all three perspectives independently of how matrix rows were sorted, whereas in other hosts, the occurrence of significant nestedness depended on the order of the matrix rows. The degree of phylogenetic and functional nestedness for matrices sorted by the sum of branch lengths was associated with a host species’ morphoecological traits and the latitude of its geographic range. We conclude that consideration of nestedness based solely on species composition does not allow a comprehensive understanding of the patterns of parasite community structure. Nestedness should also be considered from phylogenetic and functional perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data on fleas and mammals used in the current study can be found in the Dryad Depository (Hadfield et al. 2013; https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jf3tj).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Samara Bell for helpful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BRK conceived of the study. BRK, ISK, and GIS collected and analysed the data. BRK drafted the manuscript. All authors finalised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris R. Krasnov.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable because this study used already published data.

Conflict of interest

BRK is a Subject Editor of Parasitology Research. Other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Julia Walochnik

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krasnov, B.R., Shenbrot, G.I. & Khokhlova, I.S. Nestedness of flea assemblages harboured by small mammalian hosts revisited: phylogenetic and functional nestedness do not follow compositional nestedness. Parasitol Res 123, 111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-024-08132-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-024-08132-1

Keywords

Navigation