Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing conservation of forest diversity: a country-wide approach in Mexico

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent vegetation study [Palacio-Prieto et al. (2000) Bol Inst Geogr UNAM 43:183–203] showed that Mexico’s forest area has declined to 33.3%, from originally 52.0% of the country’s land area. In order to assess strategies for tree diversity conservation, we compiled a list of 846 tree species native to Mexico, and determined for each the presence or absence in 234 geographical squares of 1° latitude by 1° longitude (approximately 106  ×  106 km). On the average, any two squares shared only 6% of their species composition. Using a standard optimization method from engineering and economics [Dantzig (1963) Linear programming and extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 625 p], we determined the minimally necessary land area in Mexico to conserve the 846 tree species, while securing that each species is found in an area of (approximately) 1,100 km2 of currently existing forest vegetation. Furthermore, we took into account 15 existing protected areas with a size of at least 1,100 km2 each. With these constraints, the total minimum area needed to conserve all 846 tree species is 45,136 km2 of currently existing forest vegetation, or 2.3% of Mexico’s surface. While this analysis can be refined with subsequent field work, the proposed reserve network indicates that efficient land use planning on a national scale may be able to conserve tree species diversity in a relatively small portion of Mexico, even after severe deforestation has taken place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez-Buylla ER, García-Barrios R, Lara-Moreno C, Martínez-Ramos M (1996) Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest tree species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:387–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedward M, Pressey RL, Keith DA (1992) A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol Conserv 62:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CC (1972, reprinted 1985) Olmedieae, Brosimeae (Moraceae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 7. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 229 p

  • Bohs L (1994) Cyphomandra (Solanaceae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 63. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 176 p

  • Bush MB (2002) Distributional change and conservation on the Andean flank: a palaeoecological perspective. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns MA, Dirzo R, Zadroga F (1995) Forests of Mexico. J For 93(7):21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Rodríguez P, Medellín RA (1998) Assessing conservation priorities in megadiverse Mexico: mammalian diversity, endemicity, and endangerment. Ecol Appl 8:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R, ReVelle C (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Pap Reg Sci 32:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Stoms DM, Davis FW (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol Conserv 76:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Gerrard R, Hollander A, Stoms DM (2000) Understanding the tradeoffs between site quality and species presence in reserve site selection. For Sci 46:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DB, Palmer MW, Clark DA (1999) Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 80(8):2662–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan RS (1967, reprinted 1987) Swartzia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Swartzieae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 1. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 228 p

  • Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams PH, Pressey RL, Camm JD, Kershaw M, Kiester AR, Downs B, Hamilton R, Huso M, Sahr K (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol Conserv 80:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1951) Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, pp 339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig GB (1963) Linear programming and extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 625 p

  • Dirzo R, García MC (1992) Rates of deforestation in Los Tuxtlas, a neotropical area in Southeast Mexico. Conserv Biol 6:84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman R, Samuelson PA, Solow RM (1958, republished in 1987). Linear programming and economic analysis. Dover Publications, New York, USA, 525 p

  • Duivenvoorden JF (1995) Tree species composition and rain forest–environment relationships in the middle Caquetá area, Colombia, NW Amazonia. Vegetatio 120:91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra DP (1984) Mathematical programming for natural resource managament. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 318 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjon A, Styles BT (1997) Pinus (Pinaceae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 75. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 293 p

  • Fischer DT, Church RL (2003) Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. For Sci 49: 555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996) Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp 77–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry AH (1980) Bignoniaceae – Part I (Crescentieae and Tourrettieae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 25(I). The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 131 p

  • Gentry AH (1992) Bignoniaceae – Part II (Tribe Tecomeae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 25(II). The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 371 p

  • Gilbert KC, Holmes DD, Rosenthal RE (1985) A multiobjective discrete optimization model for land allocation. Manage Sci 31:1509–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Hinostrosa C, Hernández HM (2000) Diversity, geographical distribution, and conservation of Cactaceae in the Mier y Noriega region, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 9:403–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Rodríguez G, Palacio-Prieto JL (2001) The Mexican national forest inventory 2000–2001: updating land cover maps using Landsat 7 ETM+ images. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research, 11–15 June 2001, Québec City, Canada. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), pp 393–401

  • Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D (2002) Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekking WHA (1988) Violaceae Part I – Ronorea and Rinoreocarpus, Flora Neotropica Monograph 46. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 208 p

  • Hernández HM, Bárcenas RT (1996) Endangered cacti in the Chihuahuan desert: II. Biogeography and conservation. Conserv Biol 10:1200–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ (1990) Introduction to operations research. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 954 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Manríquez G. 1996. Biogeografía de los árboles nativos de la Península de Yucatán: un enfoque para evaluar su grado de conservación. Tesis de Doctorado en Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., Mexico, 189 p

  • Ibarra-Manríquez G, Sinaca S (1995) Lista florística comentada de la Estación de Biología Tropical “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz, México. Revista Biol Trop 43:75–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Manríquez G, Sinaca S (1996a) Estación de Biología Tropical “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz, México: Lista florística comentada (Mimosaceae a Verbenaceae). Revista Biol Trop 44:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Manríquez G, Sinaca S (1996b) Lista comentada de plantas de la Estación de Biología Tropical “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz, México (Violaceae-Zingiberaceae). Revista Biol Trop 44:427–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Manríquez G, Villaseñor JL, Durán-García R (1995) Riqueza de especies y endemismo del componente arbóreo de la Península de Yucatán, México. Bol Soc Bot México 57:49–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaastra RC (1982) Pilocarpinae (Rutaceae), Flora Neotropica Monograph 33. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 198 p

  • Landrum LR (1986) Campomanesia, Pimenta, Blepharocalyx, Legrandia, Acca, Myrrhinium, and Luma (Myrtaceae). Flora Neotropica Monograph 45. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 179 p

  • Lawler JJ, White D, Master LL (2003) Integrating representation and vulnerability: two approaches for prioritizing areas for conservation. Ecol Appl 13:1762–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott EJ (1993) Annotated checklist of the vascular flora of the Chamela Bay region, Jalisco, Mexico. Occasional Pap Calif Acad Sci 148:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas PJM, Westra LYT, collaborators (1992) Rollinia, Flora Neotropica Monograph 57. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 190 p

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas JF, Velázquez A, Palacio-Prieto JL, Bocco G, Peralta A, Prado J (2002) Assessing forest resources in Mexico: wall-to-wall land use/cover mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:966–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F, Hernández- XE (1963) Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación. Bol Soc Bot México 28:29–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls AO, Margules CR (1993) An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol Conserv 64:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, Carroll C, Vance-Borland K, Wuerthner G (2002) A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Conserv Biol 16:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio-Prieto JL, Bocco G, Velázquez A, Mas JF, Takaki-Takaki F, Victoria A, Luna-González L, Gómez-Rodríguez G, López-García J, Palma M, Trejo-Vázquez I, Peralta A, Prado-Molina J, Rodríguez-Aguilar A, Mayorga-Saucedo R, González F (2000) La condición actual de los recursos forestales en México: resultados del Inventario Forestal Nacional 2000. Bol Inst Geogr UNAM 43:183–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington TD (1990) Sapotaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 52. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 771 p

  • Pennington TD, Sarukhán J (1998) Árboles tropicales de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, and Fondo de la Cultura Económica, México D.F., Mexico, 521 p

  • Pennington TD, Styles BT, Taylor DAH (1981) Meliaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 28. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 472 p

  • Poppendieck HH (1981) Cochlospermaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 27. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 34 p

  • Prance TP (1972) Chrysobalanaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 9. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 410 p

  • Prance TP (1989) Chrysobalanaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 9-S. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 268 p

  • Pressey RL, Taffs KH (2001) Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biol Conserv 100:355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle CS, Williams JC, Boland JJ (2002) Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environ Model Assess 7:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Optimisation in reserve selection procedures – why not? Biol Conserv 107:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer JG (1993) Lauraceae: Nectandra, Flora Neotropica Monograph 60. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 333 p

  • Rzedowski J (1986) Vegetación de México. Limusa, México D.F., Mexico, 432 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J (1991a) Diversidad y orígenes de la flora fanerogámica de México. Acta Bot Mex 14:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J (1991b) El endemismo en la flora fanerogámica mexicana: una apreciación analítica preliminar. Acta Bot Mexicana 15:47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J (1993) Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J (eds) Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distributions. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J, Reyna-Trujillo T (1990) Vegetación potencial. Map IV.8.2 of the Atlas Nacional de México, Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Sætersdal M, Line JM, Birks HJB (1993) How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, Western Norway. Biol Conserv 66:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer HO (1980) Flacourtiaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 22. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 499 p

  • Sleumer HO (1984) Olacaceae, Flora Neotropica Monograph 38. The New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, New York, USA, 159 p

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, USA, 573 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder SA, Tyrell LE, Haight RG (1999) An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in national forests. For Sci 45:458–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa M, Ricker M, Hernández HM (2001) Tree species of the family Leguminosae in Mexico. Harvard Pap Bot 6:339–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa M, Ricker M, Hernández HM (2003) An index for the tree species of Leguminosae in Mexico. Harvard Pap Bot 7:381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley PC (1920–1926) Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contrib US Natl Herbarium 23:1–1721

  • Svenning JC, Kinner DA, Stallard RF, Engelbrecht BMJ, Wright SJ (2004) Ecological determinism in plant community structure across a tropical forest landscape. Ecology 85(9):2526–2538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todzia CA (1988) Chloranthaceae: Hedyosmum, Flora Neotropica Monograph 48. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA, 139 p

  • Underhill LG (1994) Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol Conserv 70:85–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conser 55:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela S, Reyes C, Becerra G (coordinators) (1999) Atlas forestal de México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, México D.F., and Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Texcoco, Mexico, 103 p

  • Villaseñor JL, Ibarra-Manríquez G (1998) La riqueza arbórea de México. Bol Inst Bot Univ Guadalajara 5:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Villaseñor JL, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Ocaña D (1998) Strategies for the conservation of Asteraceae in Mexico. Conserv Biol 12:1066–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaseñor JL, Meave JA, Ortiz E, Ibarra-Manríquez G (2003). In: Morrone JJ, Llorente-Bousquets J (eds) Biogeografía y conservación de los bosques tropicales húmedos de México: una perspectiva latinoamericana de la biogeografía. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. Mexico, pp 209–216

  • Villers-Ruíz L, Trejo-Vázquez I (1998) Climate change on Mexican forests and natural protected areas. Global Environ Change 8(2):141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt T (1993) Composition, floristic affinities, and origins of the canopy tree flora of the Mexican Atlantic slope rain forests. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J (eds) Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distributions. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 595–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Gibbons D, Margules C, Rebelo A, Humphries C, Pressey R (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv Biol 10:155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was initiated with funding from Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) in 1998, and we are grateful for their support. Furthermore, we thank Laura Arriaga and the team from CONABIO for providing data on tree species distributions. Eladio Velasco Sinaca helped with the data processing. Finally, several anonymous reviewers made observations that led to improvements in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Ricker.

Appendices

Appendix 1: List of 846 tree species and their distributions in 234 geographical squares

The appendix is too extensive to be published here, and therefore is available upon request from the authors (mricker@ibiologia.unam.mx, gibarra@oikos.unam.mx, ems@ibiologia.unam.mx, hmhm@ibiologia.unam.mx). In addition to the sources of the information, it lists the species alphabetically including the plant family, species author, some (important) synonyms, maximum tree height, and the code numbers (as in the maps of Figs. 1, 2, and 5) for the squares in which the species was detected.

Appendix 2: Formulation of the linear optimization problem

MINIMIZE

$$ \begin{aligned} &0.0204 x_{1}+0.0063 x_{1a}+0.4702 x_{2}+0.1246 x_{3}+0.0438 x_{4} +0.2228 {\it x}_{5}+\\ &0.0189 {\it x}_{6}+0.2359 x_{7}+0.6334 x_{8}+0.5232 x_{9}+0.5793 x_{10}+0.5315 x_{11}+\\ &0.7871 x_{12}+0.6836 x_{13}+0.7325 x_{14}+0.4283 x_{15}+0.1425 x_{16}+0.1561 x_{17} +\\ &0.1327 x_{18}+0.2193 x_{19}+0.3199 x_{20}+0.3189 x_{21}+0.3898 x_{22}+0.4057 x_{23} +\\ &0.7778 x_{24}+0.5394 x_{25}+0.7265 x_{26}+0.7597 x_{27}+0.6779 x_{28}+0.2299 x_{29} +\\ &0.1482 x_{30}+0.4704 x_{31}+0.9054 x_{32}+0.8536 x_{33}+0.2610 x_{34}+0.0820 x_{35} +\\ &0.0283 x_{36}+0.0447 x_{37}+0.0457 x_{38}+0.2799 x_{39}+0.2967 x_{40}+0.4812 x_{41} +\\ &0.4508 x_{42}+0.5155 x_{43}+0.6796 x_{44}+0.7513 x_{45}+0.3527 x_{46}+0.0032 x_{47} +\\ &0.3079 x_{48}+0.8225 x_{49}+0.8372 x_{50}+0.5119 x_{51}+0.0060 x_{52}+0.1605 x_{53} +\\ &0.2944 x_{54}+0.2005 x_{55}+0.2380 x_{56}+0.4949 x_{57}+0.4409 x_{58}+0.4991 x_{59} +\\ &0.5953 x_{60}+0.5430 x_{61}+0.0930 x_{62}+0.0643 x_{63}+0.6040 x_{64}+0.5592 x_{65} +\\ &0.5725 x_{66}+0.3526 x_{67}+0.0048 x_{68}+0.0488 x_{69}+0.3304 x_{70}+0.1898 x_{71} +\\ &0.1150 x_{72}+0.0497 x_{73}+0.0472 x_{74}+0.2627 x_{75}+0.6300 x_{76}+0.3702 x_{77} +\\ &0.0627 x_{77a}+0.3177 x_{78}+0.1603 x_{79}+0.1385 x_{80}+0.0302 x_{81}+0.0843 x_{82} +\\ &0.1270 x_{83}+0.5045 x_{84}+0.2432 x_{85}+0.1755 x_{86}+0.1398 x_{87}+0.6228 x_{88} +\\ &0.5415 x_{89}+0.1190 x_{90}+0.0199 x_{91}+0.0244 x_{92}+0.0944 x_{93}+0.4275 x_{94} +\\ &0.1041 x_{95}+0.0284 x_{96}+0.1053 x_{97}+0.4262 x_{98}+0.8297 x_{99}+0.4561 x_{100} +\\ &0.0014 x_{101}+0.0072 x_{102}+0.0000 x_{103}+0.0419 x_{104}+0.4204 x_{105}+0.4814 x_{106} +\\ &0.0216 x_{107}+0.0044 x_{108}+0.0100 x_{109}+0.2868 x_{110}+0.5681 x_{111}+0.8654 x_{112} +\\ &0.4084 x_{113}+0.0002 x_{114}+0.2507 x_{115}+0.1011 x_{116}+0.0071 x_{117}+0.0776 x_{118} +\\ &0.3070 x_{119}+0.0843 x_{120}+0.0456 x_{121}+0.0031 x_{122}+0.0488 x_{123}+0.1313 x_{124} +\\ &0.7674 x_{125}+0.8944 x_{126}+0.1611 x_{127}+0.0074 x_{128}+0.0011 x_{129}+0.0295 x_{130} +\\ &0.0213 x_{131}+0.0080 x_{132}+0.0064 x_{133}+0.0842 x_{134}+0.1299 x_{135}+0.2214 x_{136} +\\ &0.0655 x_{137}+0.0095 x_{138}+0.0060 x_{139}+0.0701 x_{140}+0.5418 x_{141}+0.8682 x_{142} +\\ &0.7915 x_{143}+0.0836 x_{144}+0.0144 x_{145}+0.0010 x_{146}+0.0173 x_{147}+\\ &0.0117 x_{150}+0.1548 x_{151}+0.0322 x_{152}+0.0180 x_{153}+0.0025 x_{154} +\\ &0.0034 x_{155}+0.0106 x_{156}+0.3308 x_{157}+0.8302 x_{158}+0.8720 x_{159}+0.6685 x_{160} +\\ &0.0770 x_{161}+0.0140 x_{163}+0.0311 x_{164}+0.0024 x_{165}+0.0351 x_{166} +\\ &0.0550 x_{167}+0.0347 x_{168}+0.0627 x_{169}+0.0034 x_{170}+0.0003 x_{171}+0.0216 x_{172} +\\ &0.4018 x_{173}+0.8731 x_{174}+0.8402 x_{175}+0.5650 x_{176}+0.0487 x_{177}+0.0003 x_{178} +\\ &0.0011 x_{179}+0.0041 x_{180}+0.1039 x_{183}+0.0595 x_{184} +\\ &0.0059 x_{185}+0.0056 x_{186}+0.0202 x_{187}+0.3364 x_{188}+0.4533 x_{189}+0.8775 x_{190} +\\ &0.8685 x_{191}+0.3139 x_{192}+0.1628 x_{193}+0.0006 x_{194}+0.0017 x_{195}+0.0000 x_{196} +\\ &0.0006 x_{197}+0.0007 x_{198}+0.0160 x_{199}+0.0354 x_{200}+0.0006 x_{201}+0.0037 x_{202} +\\ &0.0000 x_{203}+0.2109 x_{204}+0.4163 x_{205}+0.8366 x_{206}+0.4387 x_{207}+0.2724 x_{208} +\\ &0.3141 x_{209}+0.0110 x_{210}+0.0000 x_{211}+0.0003 x_{212} +\\ &0.0000 x_{215}+0.0026 x_{216}+0.0105 x_{217}+0.0946 x_{218}+0.4736 x_{219}+0.3060 x_{220} +\\ &0.3115 x_{221}+0.0822 x_{222}+0.0532 x_{223}+0.0392 x_{225}+0.0000 x_{226} +\\ &0.0000 x_{227}+0.0000 x_{228}+0.0072 x_{229}+0.0664 x_{230}+0.0300 x_{231}+0.1076 x_{232} +\\ &0.0997 x_{233}+0.0118 x_{234}+0.0013 x_{235}+0.0000 x_{236}+0.0441 x_{237}+0.0208 x_{238} +\\ &0.0508 x_{241}+0.0389 x_{242}\\ \end{aligned} $$

SUBJECT TO

{DISTRIBUTION CONSTRAINTS:}

{Acacia acatlensis}

$$ \begin{aligned} &0.4702 x_{2}+0.7871 x_{12}+0.7778 x_{24}+0.5394 x_{25} +0.7597 x_{27}+0.2967 x_{40}+0.4812 x_{41} +\\ &0.4508 x_{42}+0.5155 x_{43}+0.5953 x_{60}+0.0930 x_{62} +0.2627 x_{75}+0.1398 x_{87}+0.8654 x_{112}\geq 0.1 \end{aligned} $$

...826 constraint inequalities in accordance with the distributions in Appendix 1...

{Zygia stevensonii}

$$ \begin{aligned} &0.2193 x_{19}+0.4704 x_{31}+0.2610 x_{34} +0.3079 x_{48}+0.8225 x_{49}+0.8372 x_{50}+0.0643 x_{63} +\\ &0.3177 x_{78}\geq 0.1 \end{aligned} $$

{CONSTRAINTS FOR SPECIES WITH A TOTAL EXTENSION SMALLER THAN 10% OF A SQUARE:}

   

{CONSTRAINTS FOR FORCING LARGE EXISTISTING CONSERVATION AREAS INTO THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION:}

   

{CONSTRAINTS THAT THE COEFFICIENTS SHALL BE PROPORTIONS, TAKING ON VALUES ONLY BETWEEN 0 AND 1:}

$$ \begin{aligned} &x_{1}\geq 0, x_{1a}\geq 0, x_{2}\geq 0,{\ldots}, x_{242}\geq 0\\ &x_{1}\leq 1, x_{1a}\leq 1, x_{2}\leq 1,{\ldots}, x_{242}\leq 1 \end{aligned} $$

Appendix 3: Tree species with restricted south-north range (1 square only)

Amphitecna regalis, A. steyermarkii, Anisocereus gaumeri, Antirhea lucida, Attalea butyracea, Bernardia spongiosa, B. wilburi, Bunchosia mcvaughii, Carpodiptera ameliae, Cassia hintonii, Ceiba grandiflora, Cordia bicolor, C. salvadorensis, Cyphomandra rojasiana, Ebenopsis ebano, Eremosis oolepis, Erythrina caribaea, Erythroxylum panamense, Esenbeckia flava, Eugenia sotoesparzae, Eupatorium galeottii, Hamelia longipes, Jacquinia arborea, Jatropha bullockii, Licania gonzalezii, L. mexicana, L. sparsipilis, Lonchocarpus cochleatus, L. hintonii, L. mutans, L. unifoliolatus, Malpighia novogaliciana, Mappia racemosa, Micropholis melinoniana, Mosiera contrerasii, Nectandra leucocome, N. purpurea, Nopalea inaperta, Opuntia excelsa, Parathesis conzattii, P. psychotrioides, Parmentiera parviflora, Pereskia lychnidiflora, Phyllanthus grandifolius, Pilosocereus gaumeri, Pinus jaliscana, P. maximartinezii, P. muricata, P. nelsoni, native germplasm of P. radiata, P. rzedowskii, Piranhea mexicana, Pourouma bicolor, Pouteria rhynchocarpa, P. squamosa, Prosopis glandulosa, Psychotria sarapiquensis, Quararibea fieldii, Rhacoma puberula, Rinorea deflexiflora, R. uxpanapana, Sebastiania tikalana, Sideroxylon eucoriaceum, S. excavatum, S. lanuginosum, S. peninsulare, Sloanea medusula, S. petenensis, Stenocereus eichlamii, S. laevigatus, and Xylosma velutinum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricker, M., Ramírez-Krauss, I., Ibarra-Manríquez, G. et al. Optimizing conservation of forest diversity: a country-wide approach in Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 16, 1927–1957 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9112-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9112-z

Keywords

Navigation