Abstract
Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit is one of the means to lighten heavy oil in refineries, and its regenerated flue gas is also the main source of air pollutants from refinery. However, it is not clear about the type and amount of pollutants discharged from FCC units in China. The emissions of regenerated pollutants in the stack flue gases of three typical FCC units in China were investigated in this study, including a partial regeneration unit without a CO boiler (U1), a partial regeneration unit with a CO boiler (U2), and a full regeneration unit (U3). Different monitoring methods were used to analyze the concentration of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), and the results showed that Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) monitoring results of SO2 and NOx are approximately 10 times and 5 times larger than those of the continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) data, respectively. Also, the contents of characteristic pollutants such as NH3, C6H6, HCN, C8H8, C2H4, CH4, and CO were also monitored by FTIR, and the emission factors based on coke burn-off rate and throughput were investigated. The pollutants in U1 exhibited relatively higher contents with the NH3, HCN, and C6H6 of 116.99, 71.94, and 56.41 mg/Nm3 in flue gas, respectively. The emission of regenerated pollutants in U2 and U3 are significantly different from U1. Regeneration processes (including coke properties, operating modes, and presence or absence of CO boilers) affected pollutants’ emission factors in varying degrees. At last, reasonable emission factors based on the different FCC regeneration processes contribute to the prediction, assessment, and control for the pollutant emission.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable for that specific section.
References
Babich IV, Seshan K, Lefferts L (2005) Nature of nitrogen specie in coke and their role in NOx formation during FCC catalyst regeneration. Appl Catal B Environ 59:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.02.008
Bao J, Sun L, Mo Z, Xie G, Tang J, Yang H (2017) Investigation on formation characteristics of aerosol particles during wet ammonia desulfurization process. Energy Fuel 31(8):8374–8382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00672
Behera B, Ray SS, Singh I (2007) In Fluid catalytic cracking VII: materials, methods and process innovations, Occelli ML, Ed. (Elsevier), pp. 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80195-9.
Behera B, Gupta P, Ray SS (2013) Structure and composition of hard coke deposited on industrial fluid catalytic cracking catalysts by solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Appl Catal A Gen 466:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.06.038
Bhatt AH, Zhang Y, Heath G (2020) Bio-oil co-processing can substantially contribute to renewable fuel production potential and meet air quality standards. Appl Energy 268:114937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114937
Cerqueira HS, Caeiro G, Costa L, Ramôa RF (2008) Deactivation of FCC catalysts. J Mol Catal A Chem 292:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2008.06.014
CONCAWE (2009) Refining BREF review-air emissions. 2009 edition. Report No. 4/09. Brussels: CONCAWE. https://www.concawe.eu/publication/report-no-409/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
CONCAWE (2019a) Air pollutant emission estimation methods for E-PRTR reporting by refineries, 2019 edition. Report No. 4/19. Brussels: CONCAWE. https://www.concawe.eu/publication/air-pollutant-emission-estimation-methods-for-e-prtr-reporting-by-refineries/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
CONCAWE (2019b) An overview of HCN emissions from FCCU’s and their potential impacts on human health. 2019 edition. report no. 1/19. Brussels: CONCAWE. https://www.concawe.eu/publication/an-overview-of-hcn-emissions-from-fccus-and-their-potential-impacts-on-human-health/. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
Cui S, Xu Y, Cheng C, Gong J (2010) Commercial ization and new developments of MIP technology. Acta Petroleisinica (Petroleum Processing Section), pp. 23–28. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/94167x/20100s1/1003552765.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
EEA (2019) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
Evans RE, Quinn GP (1993) Environmental Considerations Affecting FCC. Stud Surf Sci Catal 76:563–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(08)63838-0
Guo D, Cui Y, Wu D, Yang M, Qin Y (2013) Comparative analysis of MIP-CGP process and ARFCC process. Contemp Chem Ind 42:939–943+960. https://doi.org/10.13840/j.cnki.cn21-1457/tq.2013.07.032
Huang RT, Shi YJ, Yang LJ, Wu H, Pan DP (2016) Aerosol formation characteristics during ammonia-based WFGD processes. Energy Fuel 30:9914–9921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00528
IPCS (2004) Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 61: hydrogen cyanide and cyanides, human health aspects. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), WHO-Geneva 2004. https://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/cicad61. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
Ju F, Zhao XX, Luan H, Lin JX, Xiu GL, Ling H (2020) Effect of regeneration conditions on the emission of HCN in FCC regeneration process. Chem Eng J 389:124484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124484
Li F (2013) Application research of an innovative CEMS sample gas pretreatment technology. Anal Instrum 2:81–86. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=FXYQ201302022&DbName=CJFQ2013. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
Lu B, Huang C, Lu Q, Yang Q, Jin BL, Xia Y, Tang S, Gu ZP (2018) Inventory and emission characteristics of industrial source VOCs in Hangzhou. Environ Sci 39(02):533–542. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201706062
Luan H, Lin JY, Xiu GL, Ju F, Ling H (2020) Study on compositions of FCC flue gas and pollutant precursors from FCC catalysts. Chemosphere 245:125528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125528
Pan YY, Li N, Zheng JY, Yin SS, Li C, Yang J, Zhong LJ, Cheng DH, Deng SX, Wang SS (2015) Emission inventory and characteristics of anthropogenic air pollutants in Guangdong Province. Acta Sci Circumst 35(09):2655–2669. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2008.02.019
Sha Q, Lua MH, Huang ZJ, Yuan ZB, Jia GL, Xiao X, Wu YQ, Zhang ZW, Li C, Zhong ZG, Zheng JY (2019) Anthropogenic atmospheric toxic metals emission inventory and its spatial characteristics in Guangdong province, China. Sci Total Environ 670:1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.206
US EPA (1995/2008/15) AP 42, fifth edition: compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Vol. 1: stationary point and area sources. Chapter 5: petroleum industry. Research Triangle Park, NC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-compilation-air-emissions-factors. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
US EPA (2013) Petroleum refineries: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/petroleum-refineries-national-emission-standards-hazardous-air. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
US EPA (2015a) Emissions estimation protocol for petroleum refineries-Version 3.0. Research Triangle Park NC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/emissions-estimation-protocol-petroleum-refineries. Accessed 1 Jan 2020
US EPA (2015b) Review of emissions test reports for emissions factors development for flares and certain refinery operations. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, p 27711 https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/new-and-revised-emissions-factors-flares-and-new-emissions
Wang MZ, Hua W (2007) Application of oxygen-rich regeneration technology in catalytic cracking unit. Chem Ind Eng Progress 02), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2007.02.025.
Wei W, Cheng SY, Li GH, Wang G, Wang HY (2014) Characteristics of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from a petroleum refinery in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ 89:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.038
Xu Y (2002) Study on the effect of hydrogen transfer reaction on olefin conversion. Pet Process Petrochem 33:38–41. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2399.2002.01.009
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22008071), the Shanghai Sailing Program (NO.19YF1410800), and the grant from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19DZ1205007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hui Luan: conceptualization; writing—original draft; methodology. Cong Wu: writing—original draft; methodology; visualization. Feng Ju: revision, resources, funding acquisition. Guangli Xiu: conceptualization, project administration, writing—review and editing. Hao Ling: formal analysis. Helin Pan: formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to participate
The authors declare consent to participate.
Consent to publish
The authors declare consent to publish.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luan, H., Wu, C., Xiu, G. et al. Study on emission factors of FCC flue gas pollutants in petroleum refineries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 33400–33410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16767-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16767-1