Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermodynamic calculations for the salt crystallisation damage in porous built heritage using PHREEQC

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work considers the crystallisation mechanisms of the most common and aggressive salts that generate stress in porous building stones as a result of changing ambient conditions. These mechanisms include the salt crystallisation that result from decreasing relative humidity and changes in temperature and, in hydrated salts, the dissolution of the lower hydrated form and the subsequent precipitation of the hydrated salt. We propose a new methodology for thermodynamic calculations using PHREEQC that includes these crystallisation mechanisms. This approach permits the calculation of the equilibrium relative humidity and the parameterization of the critical relative humidity and crystallisation pressures for the dissolution–precipitation transitions. The influence of other salts on the effectives of salt crystallisation and chemical weathering is also assessed. We review the sodium and magnesium sulphate and sodium chloride systems, in both single and multicomponent solutions, and they are compared to the sodium carbonate and calcium carbonate systems. The variation of crystallisation pressure, the formation of new minerals and the chemical dissolution by the presence of other salts is also evaluated. Results for hydrated salt systems show that high crystallisation pressures are possible as lower hydrated salts dissolve and more hydrated salts precipitate. High stresses may be also produced by decreasing temperature, although it requires that porous materials are wet for long periods of time. The presence of other salts changes the temperature and relative humidity of salt transitions that generates stress rather than reducing the pressure of crystallisation, if any salt has previously precipitated. Several practical conclusions derive from proposed methodology and provide conservators and architects with information on the potential weathering activity of soluble salts. Furthermore, the model calculations might be coupled with projections of future climate to give as improved understanding of the likely changes in the frequency of phase transitions in salts within porous stone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelo CAJ, Postma DJ (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. Balkema Publishers/Taylor & Francis, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold A, Zehnder K (1990) Salt weathering on monuments. In: Advanced workshop analytical methodologies for the investigation of damaged stones. Pavia, Italy

  • Balboni E, Espinosa-Marzal RM, Doehne E, Scherer GW (2011) Can drying and re-wetting of magnesium sulfate salts lead to damage of stone? Environ Earth Sci 63:1463–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente D, García-del-Cura MA, Fort R, Ordóñez S (1999) Thermodynamic modelling of changes induced by salt pressure crystallisation in porous media of Stone. J Cryst Growth 204:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente D, García-del-Cura MA, Fort R, Ordóñez S (2004a) Durability estimation of porous building stones from pore structure and strength. Eng Geol 74:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente D, García-del-Cura MA, García-Guinea J, Sánchez-Moral S, Ordóñez S (2004b) The role of pore structure in salt crystallization in unsaturated porous stone. J Cryst Growth 260:532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavente D, Brimblecombe P, Grossi CM (2008) Salt weathering and climate change. In: Colombini MP, Tasso L (eds) New trends in analytical, environmental and cultural heritage chemistry. Transworld Research Network, pp 277–286

  • Benavente D, Sanchez-Moral S, Fernandez-Cortes A (2011) Cañaveras JC, Elez J, Saiz-Jimenez C (2011) Salt damage and microclimate in the Postumius Tomb, Roman Necropolis of Carmona, Spain. Environ Earth Sci 63:1529–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimblecombe P (2010) Heritage climatology. In: Lefevre RA, Sabbioni C (eds) Climate change and cultural heritage. Bari—Italy, Edipuglia, pp 54–57

  • Brischke C, Rapp AO, Bayerbach R, Morsing N, Fynholm P, Welzbacher CR (2008) Monitoring the material climate of wood to predict the potential for decay: results from in situ measurements on buildings. Build Env 43:1575–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardell C, Benavente D, Rodríguez-Gordillo J (2008) Weathering of limestone building material by mixed sulfate solutions. Characterization of stone microstructure, reaction products and decay forms. Mater Charact 59:1371–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charola AE, Pühringer J, Steiger M (2007) Gypsum: a review of its role in the deterioration of building materials. Environ Geol 52:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipera SJ, Vaniman DT (2007) Experimental stability of magnesium sulfate hydrates that may be present on Mars. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correns CW (1949) Growth and dissolution of crystals under linear pressure. Disc. Faraday Soc 5:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Marzal RM, Scherer GW (2008) Crystallization of sodium sulfate salts in limestone. Environ Geol 56:605–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Marzal RM, Scherer GW (2010) Advances in understanding damage by crystallization. Acc Chem Res 43:897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Marzal RM, Scherer GW (2013) Impact of in-pore salt crystallization on transport properties. Environ Earth Sci 69:2657–2669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Marzal RM, Hamilton A, McNall M, Whitaker K, Scherer GW (2011) The chemomechanics of crystallization during rewetting of limestone impregnated with sodium sulfate. J Mater Res 26:1472–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, Stoops G, Abtahi A (1980) SEM morphologies of halite (NaCl) in soils. J Microscopy 120:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Cortes A, Benavente D, Cuezva S, Cañaveras JC, Álvarez-Gallego M, García-Antón E et al (2013) Effect of water vapour condensation on the radon content in subsurface air in a hypogeal inactive-volcanic environment in Galdar cave, Spain. Atmos Environ 75:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatt RJ (2002) Salt damage in porous materials: how high supersaturations are generated. J Cryst Growth 242:435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen C, Mirwald PW (2009) Moisture sorption behaviour of salt mixtures in porous Stone. Chemie der Erde Geochem 69:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans W (1978) Thermodynamic stability of sodium sulfate heptahydrate. Z Phys Chem NF 111:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie AS, Viles HA (1997) Salt weathering hazards. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi CM, Brimblecombe P, Menéndez B, Benavente D, Harris I, Déqué M (2011) Climatology of salt transitions and implications for stone weathering. Sci Total Environ 409:2577–2585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaga AC (1998) Kinetic Theory in the Earth Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Libowitzky E, Giester G (2003) Washing soda (natron), Na2CO3·10H2O, revised: crystal structures at low and ambient temperatures. Mineral Petrol 77:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke WF (1965) Solubilities of Inorganic and Metal Organic Compounds. Am Chem Soc 1–2

  • Linnow K, Zeunert A, Steiger M (2006) Investigation of sodium sulfate phase transitions in a porous material using humidity- and temperature-controlled X-ray diffraction. Anal Chem 78:4683–4689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Arce P, Doehne E, Martin W, Pinchin S (2008) Magnesium sulfate salts and historic building materials: experimental simulation of limestone flaking by relative humidity cycling and crystallization of salts. Mater Constr 58:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubelli B, van Hees RPJ, Brocken HJP (2004) Experimental research on hygroscopic behaviour of porous specimens contaminated with salts. Constr Build Mater 18:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Martinez J (2008) Influencia de la alteración sobre las propiedades mecánicas de calizas, dolomías y mármoles. Evaluación mediante estimadores no destructivos (ultrasonidos). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Alicante (in Spanish)

  • Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) User’s guide to PHREEQC (version 2)—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Water Res Inv 99:4259

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2013) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3—a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Water Tech Meth

  • Pitzer KS (1991) Ion interaction approach: theory and data correlation. In: Pitzer KS (ed) Activity coefficients in electrolyte solutions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 75–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer LN, Parkhurst DL, Fleming GW, Dunkle SA (1998) USGS Water Res Inv 88:4153

    Google Scholar 

  • Price C (1978) The use of the sodium sulphate crystallization test for determining the weathering resistance of untreated stone. Deterioration and protection of stone monuments. International Symposium, Paris, 3.6

  • Price CA (ed) (2000) An expert chemical model for determining the environmental conditions needed to prevent salt damage in porous materials. In: Protection and Conservation of the European Cultural Heritage Research Report no. 11. Archetype Publications, London

  • Rodríguez-Navarro C, Doehne E (1999) Salt weathering: influence of evaporation rate, supersaturation and crystallisation pattern. Earth Surf Proc Land 24:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Navarro C, Doehne E, Sebastián E (2000) How does sodium sulfate crystallize? Implications for the decay and testing of building materials. Cem Concr Res 30:1528–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Agudo E, Lubelli B, Sawdy A, van Hees R, Price C, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2011) An integrated methodology for salt damage assessment and remediation: the case of San Jerónimo Monastery (Granada, Spain). Env Earth Sci 63:1475–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidov TA, Espinosa-Marzal RM, Pel L, Scherer GW (2012) Nucleation of sodium sulfate heptahydrate on mineral substrates studied by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Cryst Growth 338:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Moral S, Luque L, Cuezva S, Soler V, Benavente D, Laiz L et al (2005) Deterioration of building materials in Roman catacombs: the influence of visitors. Sci Total Environ 349:260–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawdy A, Price C (2005) Salt damage at Cleeve Abbey, England. Part I; a comparison of theoretical prediction and practical observations. J Cultural Heritage 6:361–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer GW, Flatt R, Wheeler G (2001) Materials science research for the conservation of sculpture and monuments. MRS Bull 26:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiro M, Ruiz-Agudo E, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2012) Damage mechanisms of porous materials due to in-pore salt crystallization. Phys Rev Lett 109:265503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger M (2005) Crystal growth in porous materials–I: the crystallization pressure of large crystals. J Cryst Growth 282:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger M, Asmussen S (2008) Crystallization of sodium sulfate phases in porous materials: the phase diagram Na2SO4–H2O and the generation of stress. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:4291–4306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger M, Kiekbusch J, Nicolai A (2008) An improved model incorporating Pitzer’s equations for calculation of thermodynamic properties of pore solutions implemented into an efficient program code. Const Build Mater 22:1841–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger M, Charola AE, Sterflinger K (2011a) Weathering and Deterioration. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (eds) Stone in Architecture, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 227–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger M, Linnow K, Ehrhardt D, Rohde M (2011b) Decomposition reactions of magnesium sulfate hydrates and phase equilibria in the MgSO4–H2O and Na+–Mg2+–Cl–SO4 2−–H2O systems with implications for Mars. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:3600–3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunagawa I (1981) Characteristics of crystal growth in nature as seen from the morphology of mineral crystals. Bull Mineral 104:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang IN (1997) Thermodynamic and optical properties of mixed salt aerosols of atmospheric importance. J Geophys Res 102:1883–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hodenberg R, Kühn R (1967) Zur Kenntnis der Magnesiumsulfathydrate und der Effloreszenzen des Kieserits von Hartsalzen. Kali Steinsalz 4:326–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Freeman JJ, Jolliff BL (2009) Phase transition pathways of the hydrates of magnesium sulfate in the temperature range 50 ºC to 5 ºC: implications for sulfates on Mars. Geophys Res 114:E04010

    Google Scholar 

  • Wely PK (1959) Pressure solution and the force of crystallisation. A phenomenological theory. J Geophys Res 64:2001–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler A (1994) Constant humidity solutions. In: Lide DR (ed) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 74th CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, pp 15–25

  • Zehnder K, Schoch O (2009) Efflorescence of mirabilite, epsomite and gypsum traced by automated monitoring on-site. J Cult Heritage 10:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out in the framework of the research projects CGL2011-25162 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) and IJP 2006/R2 (the Royal Society Joint Project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Benavente.

Appendix 1: PHREEQC input files calculations

Appendix 1: PHREEQC input files calculations

PHREEQC is used for calculating a variety of reactions and processes in natural waters and laboratory experiments. A full description of many alternatives for input and the mathematical background can be found in the manual of the programme by Parkhurst and Appelo (1999, 2013), Appelo and Postman (2005) and at the link: http://www.xs4all.nl/~appt/.

The aim of this Appendix is to show how the calculations were carried out (for the PHREEQC users) and to present this widely used geochemical code to the researchers in the heritage conservation as a new tool to model salt weathering. Of course, there are other ways to structure the input file for modelling salt crystallisation. Here, we try to build up the input an easy and intuitive way. The number of calculations can be increased using the REACTION keyword, by adding or removing chemical, minerals or water; and REACTION_TEMPERATURE, which changing the temperature of the solution. Results can be delivered in a spreadsheet-type format (e.g. EXCEL) using the keyword SELECTED_OUTPUT keyword.

Calculation of pressure crystallisation by dissolution of the lower hydrated form and the precipitation of the hydrated salt

Examples of these transitions are thenardite (Na2SO4) → mirabilite (Na2SO4·10H2O); thenardite (Na2SO4) → heptahydrite (Na2SO4·7H2O); hexahydrite (MgSO4·6H2O) → epsomite (MgSO4·7H2O) and are recorded in Table 4. This calculation considers that water dissolves the lower hydrated form until equilibrium is reached (ϕ = 0). The resulting solution is then supersaturated in the hydrated salt at a given temperature. The temperature interval in which hydrated phase is more stable than lower hydrated form is reported in Tables 4.

PHREEQC calculates the saturation index and pressure crystallisation using the Current’s equation (Eq. 1). This thermodynamic calculation can be carried out considering the following:

Dissolution–precipitation in pure water

This calculation only considers the simple transformation by dissolution–precipitation at a given temperature or changing the temperature of solution using the REACTION_TEMPERATURE keyword. For example, the dissolution of thenardite and mirabilite precipitation at 20 °C can be calculated as:

The output of this simple calculation provides interesting results: composition of solution (or pore water); pH; ionic conductivity (evaluation ionic diffusion); density (necessary to fluid transport studies); ionic strength; distribution of species and the saturation index. The resulting solution is saturated in mirabilite and heptahydrite. Using the Corren’s equation (Eq. 1), crystallisation pressure of mirabilite precipitation after thenardite dissolution at 20 °C is then estimated as follows:

$$P_{\text{c}} = \frac{RT \cdot \ln10}{{v_{\text{c}} }}\phi = \frac{8.3145 \cdot (20 + 273.15) \cdot \ln10}{220}0.53 = 13.56\,{\text{MPa}}.$$
(A1)

The calculation at different temperatures through the REACTION_TEMPERATURE keyword can be preformed using the following input file:

This example calculates the saturation index of mirabilite at 7 temperatures from 0 to 30 °C at constant intervals. This keyword also permits the user to specify temperatures or as steps, as done below. In this example, we calculate the equilibrium from 0 to 30 °C in 7 steps (0 30 in 7 steps).

The output file contains a large quantity of results. PHREEQC can select some of parameters using the SELECTED_OUPUT keyword in a text or EXCEL file. These parameters include the saturation index, pH, activities, temperature, etc. In the previous example, the excel file contains the saturation index for mirabilite, heptahydrite and thenardite and solution temperature.

Pressure crystallisation is calculated using Corren’s equation, the saturation index and a fitted linear function of temperature. Table 4 gives linear expressions for different mineral transitions using the our methodology.

Presence of other salts

The presence of other salts is a common situation buildings. Their influence on mineral transitions and the crystallisation pressure is easy to be evaluated using PHREEQC. The chemical composition of solution is changed, in isothermal conditions, using a given chemical composition of solution or through REACTION keyword. For example, the presence of 1 mol Kg−1 NaCl in the hexahydrite → epsomite transition at 20 °C can be computed as follows:

The input file for calculating this transition by adding 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3, 4 and 5 mol of NaCl at 20 °C presents the following structure:

In this example, the EXCEL output file contains temperature, Cl concentration and the saturation index of epsomite, hexahydrite, halite and mirabilite, although a widely options can be selected for the user at the SELECTED_OUTPUT data block. The presence of other ions in solution generates a multicomponent saline solution and, consequently, other minerals can precipitate and generate stress. Figures 3 and 6 are produced using this method.

Chemical dissolution of the host rock

The dissolution of calcite in the presence of saline solutions increases the concentration of calcium and bicarbonate–carbonate ions. As commented in the previous section, the presence of ions can precipitate other minerals. The input file might include the following information:

This example displays the mirabilite precipitation after thenardite dissolution at 20 °C. As the equilibrium is imposed (thermodynamic approach), thenardite dissolves in pure water with the rock-forming calcite in equilibrium with the atmospheric CO2 (open system). The resulting solution is supersaturated in mirabilite and is slightly substantiated in gypsum, which might precipitate after some evaporation.

Precipitation from the solution

Equilibrium or deliquescence relative humidity

The equilibrium or deliquescence relative humidity, RHeq, of a salt is the relative humidity in which crystallises in an aqueous solution and varies with the temperature and by the presence of other ions in the solution. RHeq can be obtained by calculating water activity as described above. The input file is similar to other described in “Appendix 1.” Water activity is displayed in the “description of solution” in the output file. For example, RHeq for halite at 20 °C can be calculated using the following input file:

In this example, halite solubility is 6.088 mol kg−1 and the activity of water is 0.755 and therefore RHeq = 75.5 %. The influence of temperature and other ions can be evaluated using the previous input file or through the REACTION_TEMPERATURE or REACTION keywords. For example:

The EXCEL file contains the log a w for temperatures in the range of 0–60 °C.

Mineral precipitation by varying temperature and/or concentration

At high values of equilibrium relative humidity (higher than RH eq ) salts can also be precipitated from an aqueous solution by decreasing the temperature.

Mineral precipitation from a saturated solution is produced by decreasing temperatures and/or increase concentration. This pathway can be carried out through a simple speciation by calculating a multiple of speciation. A simple speciation includes the chemical composition and temperature of the solution as follows:

This example calculates the saturation index of minerals of MgSO4 system (epsomite; hexahydrite; Kieserite; Pentahydrite and Starkeyite) in a 4 mol kg−1 MgSO4 solution at 20 °C. Pressure crystallisation is calculated using Eq. (1).

However, multiple calculations are recommended since a multiple set of saturation indexes (and crystallisation pressures) are obtained. Moreover, the mineral stability zones can be graphically displayed as in Figs. 2 and 5. The input file requires either the REACTION_TEMPERATURE or REACTION keywords in order to save time in the calculation. Thus, the REACTION_TEMPERATURE keyword is used for an each concentration as follows:

whereas the REACTION keyword is considered for each temperature:

Saturation index each mineral is obtained and pressure crystallisation is calculated using Eq. (1).

Precipitation from saline pore water

The analysis of chemical composition of soluble salts within stones is a frequent procedure for conservators and architects. Salt analysis permits to estimate the theoretical mineral precipitation sequence, which has not been considered in the present paper. We here include a sort reference that can illustrate this interesting task.

A simple speciation can be carried out defining the chemical composition, pH and temperature of solution. Calculation of the saturation indexes of minerals provides a good idea of the precipitation sequence that may occur in the stone.

This approach can be improved by the simulation of evaporation, which is accomplished by removing water from the chemical system. Thus, water can be removed by an irreversible reactant with a negative reaction coefficient in the REACTION keyword input. An interesting example that can illustrate this simulation is accessed in the User’s Guide to PHREEQC:

http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc.v1/html/phqc_55.html.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benavente, D., Brimblecombe, P. & Grossi, C.M. Thermodynamic calculations for the salt crystallisation damage in porous built heritage using PHREEQC. Environ Earth Sci 74, 2297–2313 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4221-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4221-1

Keywords

Navigation