Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the paediatric population

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is a preferred mode of treatment for paediatric obstructive hydrocephalus as a result of lesions in the vicinity of the aqueduct of sylvius and posterior third ventricle. It obviates the need of implanting a foreign body inside the brain and thus reduces hardware-related complications as are seen with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts (VP).

Method

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was done in nine cases of paediatric hydrocephalus (multiple etiologies) and the patients were followed up for a period of 18 months.

Results

In our series of nine cases, there was one ETV failure in a child of 14 months who required a conversion to VP shunt. Contusions in the fornix were seen in another patient who was of 3 months of age with post fossa tumour, but fortunately the patient did not have any gross memory deficits and was doing well after 6 months of follow-up. Intraventricular bleeding was seen in two cases which could be controlled with generous irrigation. External ventricular drain was not required in any patient. Rest of the eight patients improved slowly over the period of 6 months.

Conclusion

ETV is an attractive mode of treating obstructive hydrocephalus as it avoids the complications which can arise from implanting a foreign body. It requires a learning curve to master the technique. The literature of ETV in the paediatric population is reviewed along with our experience of nine cases of paediatric hydrocephalus with ETV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choudhary A, Sobti S, Zambre S, Bhaskar S (2020) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in failed ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric population. Asian J Neurosurg 15:937–940. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_117_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbaba S, Steinmetz M, Ross J, Moon D, Luciano M (2001) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for objective hydrocephalus in the pediatric population: evaluation of outcome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 11:S52–S54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yadav YR, Jaiswal S, Adam N (2006) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants. Neurol (India) 54:161–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogiwara H, Dipatri AJ Jr, Alden TD, Bowman RM, Tomita T (2010) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age. Childs Nerve Syst 26:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dandy WE (1918) Extirpation of the choroid plexus of the lateral ventricles in communicating hydrocephalus. Ann Surg 68:569–579. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-191812000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Oluigbo C, Keating R (2017) Endoscopic management of hydrocephalus and choroid plexus cauterization. In: Ammar A (ed) Hydrocephalus, Springer, Cham, pp 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61304-8_15

  7. Mixter WJ (1923) Ventriculoscopy and puncture of the floor of the third ventricle. Boston Med Surg J 188:277–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Putnam TJ (1934) Treatment of hydrocephalus by endoscopic coagulation of the choroid plexus. N Engl J Med 210:1373–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McNickle HF (1947) The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus. A simple method of performing third ventriculostomy. Br J Surg 34:302–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W (2006) Success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants: are there different age distributions? Childs Nerv Syst 22:1537–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Constantini S (2010) Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S et al (2009) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155:254-259.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Souweidane MM, Morgenstern PF, Kang S, Tsiouris AJ, Roth J (2010) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with a diminished prepontine interval. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:250–254. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.10.PEDS09187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukuhara T, Vorster SJ, Luciano MG (2000) Risk factors for failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 46:1100–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P et al (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. Neurosurg Focus 6:e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grant JA, McLone DG (1997) Third ventriculostomy: a review. Surg Neurol 47:210–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Venkataramana NK (2011) Hydrocephalus Indian scenario—a review. J Pediatr Neurosci 6:S11–S22. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.85704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohanty A, Das BS, Sastry Kolluri VR et al (1996) Neuroendoscopic fenestration of occluded foramen of Monro causing unilateral hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:248–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Haldar R, Singh Bajwa SJ (2019) Potential neuroendoscopic complications: an anesthesiologist’s perspective. Asian J Neurosurg 14:621–625. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_37_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yadav YR, Parihar V, Pande S, Namdev H, Agarwal M (2012) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosci Rural Pract 3:163–173. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.98222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodworth G, McGirt MJ, Thomas G et al (2007) Prior CSF shunting increases the risk of endoscopic third ventriculostomy failure in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in adults. Neurol Res 29:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teo C, Rahman S, Boop FA et al (1996) Complications of endoscopic neurosurgery. Child Nerv Syst 12:248–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouras T, Sgouros S (2013) Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. World Neurosurg 79:S22.e9–S22.e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amini A, Schmidt RH (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in a series of 36 adult patients. Neurosurg Focus 19:E9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurg 100:427–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Etus V, Ceylan S (2005) Success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children less than 2 years of age. Neurosurg Rev 28:284–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Drake J, Chumas P, Kestle J, Pierre-Kahn A, Vinchon M, Brown J et al (2006) Late rapid deterioration after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: additional cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 105:118–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Drake JM, Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group (2007) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60:881–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D, Jones R, Vonau M, Teo C et al (2008) Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 62:614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Warf BC (2005) Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone and combined with choroid plexus cauterization in infants younger than 1 year of age: a prospective study in 550 African children. J Neurosurg 103:475–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Warf BC (2005) Hydrocephalus in Uganda: the predominance of infectious origin and primary management with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 102:1–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baldauf J, Oertel J, Gaab MR, Schroeder HW (2007) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 2 years of age. Childs Nerv Syst 23:623–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0335-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Teo C, Jones R (1996) Management of hydrocephalus by endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jallo GI, Kothbauer KF, Abbott IR (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Focus 19:E11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Durnford AJ, Kirkham FJ, Mathad N, Sparrow OC (2011) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus: validation of a success score that predicts long-term outcome. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Naftel RP, Reed GT, Kulkarni AV, Wellons JC (2011) Evaluating the Children’s Hospital of Alabama endoscopic third ventriculostomy experience using the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: an external validation study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hader WJ, Walker RL, Myles ST et al (2008) Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in previously shunted patients. Neurosurgery 63:ONS168–ONS174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mudit Mehrotra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kataria, R., Mehrotra, M., Purohit, D.K. et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the paediatric population. J Ped Endosc Surg 3, 183–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-021-00117-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-021-00117-6

Keywords

Navigation