Skip to main content

Teaching About Supercomplexity in Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supercomplexity in Interaction
  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

After having outlined the concept of supercomplex adaptive systems and the model of the 4Es of interaction in detail, this chapter is devoted to an exploration of how to teach about interaction in a different way by applying the 4Es concept in teaching and attempting to work on the cognitive and affective aspects of it with learners. A case study of an initial trial of using the 4Es in teaching will be described in the second part of the chapter. The question of what effective interaction learning is discussed and the author suggests bringing the notion of heartfulness into teaching and learning in order to foster a better understanding of this subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term heartfulness is used here as defined in this paragraph and is not associated with the https://heartfulness.org/en/movement.

  2. 2.

    Word taken out to maintain anonymity, two instances in this sentence.

References

  • Adami, H. 2009. Les documents authentiques dans la formation des adultes migrants: pratiques. pédagogiques et contraintes institutionnelles. Mélanges Crapel 31: 159–172. http://revues.univ-nancy2.fr/melangesCrapel/. 7 December 2009.

  • Bloom, B.S., M.D. Engelhart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl (eds.). 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmen, R. 2015. What is heartfulness? Finnish. [Online] Available at http://fi.heartfulness.org/blog/2015/06/17/what-is-heartfulness/. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Chastain, A. 2017. Dynamic diversity: Identifying and embracing unifying principles to foster meaningful interaction in ever-changing contexts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser, and M.J. Farr (eds.). 1988. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognitive processes in critical thinking. 2009. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 17(2): 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, E. 2017. The secret to learner learning: Cognitive engagement | TESOL. Hongkongtesol.com. [Online] Available at https://hongkongtesol.com/blog/2017/05/secret-learner-learning-cognitive-engagement. Accessed 14 May 2019.

  • Daugherty, A. 2014. From mindfulness to heartfulness: A journey of transformation through the science of embodiment. Bloomington, IN: Balboa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D.K. 2006. The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a learner outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education 10 (3): 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R., and H. Tyne. 2010. Authenticity and autonomy in language learning. Bulletin suissede Linguistique appliquée, Neuchâtel: Institut de linguistique de l’Université 92: 86–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golombek, P., and M. Doran. 2014. Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 39: 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W.B. 2003. Intercultural communication: Introduction. In Cross-cultural and intercultural communication, ed. W.B. Gudykunst, 163–166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D. 2015. Mindfulness in cross-cultural trainings: An interdisciplinary approach for contemporary needs. In Contemporary approaches in training and education for cross-cultural competence—Potentials, challenges and limits. Austria: International Association of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartson, R., and P. Pyla. 2012. Mental models and conceptual design. The UX Book, 299–332. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2019. The 6 dimensions model of national culture by Geert Hofstede. Geert Hofstede. [Online] Available at https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Holden, N. 2002. Cross-cultural management—A knowledge management perspective. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, Dell H. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, ed. J.B. Pride and J. Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M., and U. Wilensky. 2006. Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1): 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. 2015. Compassion and mindfulness. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7E7FBSlB1U.

  • Kupers, R., R. Hipkins, and J. Drake. 2015. Complexity—A big idea for education? Rolandkupers.com. [Online] Available at http://www.rolandkupers.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Complexity-paper__Oct2015_final.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2019.

  • Larkin, J.H., J. McDermott, D.P. Simon, and H.A. Simon. 1980. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 208: 1335–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majlergaard, F. 2014. Why you should never use Hofstede to assess cultural differences. Gugin.com. [Online] Available at https://gugin.com/never-use-hofstede/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Mansfield, B. 2018. Teacher as environment: The embodiment of heartfulness in teaching practice. PhD Thesis, University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Agudo, J. 2018. Emotions in second language teaching. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—A failure of analysis. Human Relations 55 (1): 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickan, Peter. 1997. Classroom talk and second language learning. Master of Education (Hons.) thesis, University of Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindful. 2019. Mindful. [Online] Available at https://www.mindful.org/. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Murphy, J. 2019. What do we mean by communication effectiveness? Talking Mats. [Online] Available at https://www.talkingmats.com/mean-communication-effectiveness/. Accessed 13 May 2019.

  • Myers, M.D., and F.B. Tan. 2002. Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. The Journal of Global Information Management 10 (1): 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded Edition). In Committee on developments in the science of learning and committee on learning research and educational practice, ed. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, R.R. Cocking, and S. Donovan. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nias, J. 1996. Thinking about Feeling: the emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education 26 (3): 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemiec, R.M. 2017. On heartfulness. In Future directions in wellbeing, ed. M. White, G. Slemp, and A. Murray, 123–128. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries | English. 2019. Heartfulness | definition of heartfulness in English by Oxford Dictionaries. [Online] Available at https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/heartfulness. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Phillips, A. 2010. What’s wrong with essentialism? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 11(1): 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J., and S. Menendian. 2019. The problem of othering: Towards inclusiveness and belonging. Othering and Belonging. [Online] Available at http://www.otheringandbelonging.org/the-problem-of-othering/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Rubin, H.J., and I.S. Rubin. 2012. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, O. 2016. Heartfulness practice. Mindful Schools. [Online] Available at https://www.mindfulschools.org/personal-practice/heartfulness-practice/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Spencer-Oatey, H. 2013. Mindfulness for intercultural interaction: A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts. Available at GlobalPAD Open House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H., and P. Franklin. 2009. Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511.

  • Srinivasan, M. 2014. Teach, breathe, learn. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztabnik, B. 2019. Complexity—What does it mean and how to teach it. Talks with Teachers. [Online] Available at http://talkswithteachers.com/complexity-what-does-it-mean-and-how-to-teach-it/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Ting-Toomey, S. 1999. Communicating across cultures. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick.ac.uk. 2019. Teaching for complexity. [Online] Available at https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/cetl/filmspublications/sociologiststalking/teachingforcomplexity/. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  • Widdowson, H. 1998. Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly 32 (4): 705–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Orange .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Orange, V. (2019). Teaching About Supercomplexity in Interaction. In: Supercomplexity in Interaction. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28018-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics