Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 6))

Abstract

Monoecious, andromonoecious, dioecious, gynodioecious, or polygamous, erect or scandent trees, shrubs, lianas with quickly-deciduous scales, without tendrils, or annual or perennial herbs with erect or prostrate stems, rarely suffrutices, rhizomatous shrubs, ericoid subshrubs, or epiphytic shrubs, glabrous or glabrescent, rarely puberulent, densely pilose, or hirsute and stellate pubescent, often with elastic threads in soft tissues that are evident when broken, unarmed or with thorns, rarely with stems terminating in sharp points, rarely with glandular stems, rarely with buttressed trunks. Leaves simple, alternate, opposite, or subopposite, rarely whorled, subverticillate, or irregularly scattered, fasciculate on short shoots, or opposite on mature branches and alternate on juvenile branches, petiolate or rarely sessile, rarely geniculate, blade laminar, rarely needle- or scalelike, venation pinnate, rarely acrodromous, secondary veins reticulate or rarely distinct crossbars, rarely with abaxial domatia in axils or larger veins, margins entire, crenate, serrate, dentate, spinose, glandular-toothed, spinosedentate, rarely notched; stipules small and caducous, rarely 0. Inflorescences axillary or terminal, rarely epiphyllous or cauliflorous, thyrsoid, cymose, fasciculate, or flowers solitary, rarely paniculate, umbellate-cymose, umbellate, racemose, or in spikes. Flowers actinomorphic, rarely ±; zygomorphic with 4 of 5 petals arched, bisexual or unisexual, rarely perigynous with short or cupular hypanthium, perianth (3)4–5(6)-merous, sepals and petals free, rarely petals medially connate; disk intrastaminal, stamens on disk, or extrastaminal, annular, margins upturned, pulvinate, or cupular, fleshy or membranous, sometimes indistinct or 0, continuous, rarely discontinuous, entire, lobed, or angular, rarely lacerate or irregularly lobed; stamens (2)3–5, rarely numerous, rarely 3 long and 2 short, rarely alternating with staminodes, staminodial or 0 in female flowers, alternate with petals when stamen number equals petal number, anthers (1)2-celled, basifixed to dorsifixed, sometimes versatile, dehiscing longitudinally, obliquely, or transversely, introrse, latrorse, or extrorse, rarely apical, connective sometimes apiculate, rarely pustular, with bilobed extension, or tipped by white gland, androgynophore occasionally +; ovary superior to half-inferior, often partially immersed in disk, present as pistillode or essentially absent in male flowers, completely or incompletely (1)2–5(10)-Jocular, rarely each locule horizontally divided into 1-ovulate locelli, placentation axile, rarely intruded parietal or basal, ovules erect, axile, or pendulous, 1–12(-numerous) per locule; style terminal, simple, short to 0, stigma simple or lobed, rarely ovary with stigmatic lines on each carpel on margin of an apical hollow with style-like central column arising from base of hollow. Fruit a loculicidally and/or septicidally dehiscent capsule, rarely beaked, schizocarp of 2–5 indehiscent mericarps, drupe, berry, or samara with a single apical wing, 3–5 lateral wings, or a single surrounding wing, rarely an indehiscent capsule or nut with lateral style, pericarp woody, bony, coriaceous, fleshy, or chartaceous, rarely fibrous, capsules smooth, angular, deeply lobed, transversely flattened and lobed to base, or rarely lobed ± halfway to base or entirely connate, rarely echinate, laterally winged, with lateral or oblique horn-like outgrowths, or flattened along each locule. Seeds 1-numerous, smooth or occasionally furrowed, with unbranched or occasionally branched raphe, albuminous or exalbuminous, sometimes winged, wing membranous, basal, sometimes reduced to narrow stipe, apical, or surrounding seed, exarillate or aril basal to completely enveloping seed, aril membranous, fleshy, rarely with basal or apical filamentous extensions, or mucilaginous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Adatia, R.D., Gavde, S.G. 1962. Embryology of the Celastraceae. In: Plant embryology: a symposium. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airy Shaw, H.K. 1965. Diagnosis of new families, new names, etc., for the seventh edition of Willis’s `Dictionary’. Kew Bull. 18: 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airy Shaw, H.K., Cutler, D.F., Nilsson, S. 1973. Pottingeria, its taxonomic position, anatomy and palynology. Kew Bull. 28: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H. 1990. The taxonomic status of Cassine L. s.l. (Celastraceae) in southern Africa. M.Sc. Thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1992. Palynology and intergeneric relationships in some southern African species of subfamily Cassinoideae ( Celastraceae ). Grana 31: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1993a. Bark structure and inter-generic relationships of some Southern African Cassinoideae ( Celastraceae ). IAWA J. 14: 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1993b. Wood structure and generic status of some southern African Cassinoideae ( Celastraceae ). IAWA J. 14: 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1997. A taxonomic revision of Cassine L. s.str. ( Cassinoideae: Celastraceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 63: 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1998a. A taxonomic revision of Maurocenia ( Celastraceae), a Western Cape monotypic endemic. Bothalia 28: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R.H., van Wyk, A.E. 1998b. A taxonomic revision of Allocassine N. Robson (Celastraceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 64: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baas, P., Geesink, R., van Heel, W.A., Muller, J. 1979. The affinities of Plagiopteron suaveolens Griff. (Plagiopteraceae). Grana 18: 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon, H.E. 1880. The natural history of plants. London: L. Reeve and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, W.R. 1984. Stackhousiaceae. In George, A.S. (ed.) Flora of Australia 22: 186–199. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, J.H. 1910. Koeberliniaceae. North Am. Flora 25: 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K.S. 1973. Chromosome numbers of tree species of a lowland tropical community. J. Arnold Arbor. 54: 422–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D., McDougall, L. 1995. Ecology of Sydney plant species part 3: dicotyledon families Cabombaceae to Euphorbiaceae. Cunninghamia 4: 217–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D. 1862. Genera plantarum. London: A. Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, E. 1953. Morphological studies in the Celastraceae. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 69: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakelock, R.A. 1951. A synopsis of the genus Euonymus L. Kew Bull. 2: 210–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, W.M. 1940. Diploidy, polyploidy, and winter hardiness relationships in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 27: 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J.L. 1967. The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 54: 1069–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, J.D., Leigh, J.H. 1995. Rare or threatened Australian plants. Canberra: CSIRO Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brizicky, G.K. 1964a. The genera of Celastrales in the south-eastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 45: 206–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brizicky, G.K. 1964b. Polyembryony in Euonymus (Celas-traceae). J. Arnold Arbor. 45: 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüning, R., Wagner, H. 1978. Übersicht über die CelastraceenInhaltsstoffe: Chemie, Chemotaxonomie, Biosynthese, Pharmakologie. Phytochemistry 17: 1821–1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkill, H.M. 1985. The useful plants of west tropical Africa. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S. 1987. Wood anatomy and relationships of Stackhousiaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S.R. 1993. Celastraceae. In: Heywood, V.H. (ed.) Flowering plants of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M.W. et al. 1993. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1954. The durian theory extended - II. The aril-late fruit and the compound leaf. Phytomorphology 4: 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1976. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croizat, L. 1947. A study in the Celastraceae: Siphonodonoideae subf. nov. Lilloa 13: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuatrecasas, J. 1948. Studies in South American plants, I. Lloydia 11: 185–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. New York: D. Appleton and Company. den Hartog née Van Ter Tholen

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M., Baas, P. 1978. Epidermal characters of the Celastraceae sensu lato. Acta Bot. Neerl. 27: 355–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vogel, E.F. 1980. Seedlings of Dicotyledons: structure, development, types. Descriptions of 150 woody Malesian taxa. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri, M.J. 1972. La region de los bosques andinopatagonicos. Buenos Aires: INTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou, 1955. A revision of the genus Celastrus. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 42: 215–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou, 1958. A conspectus of the genus Bhesa (Celastraceae). Blumea 4: 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou, 1962. Celastraceae–I. In: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Malesiana I, 6: 227–291. Leyden: Flora Malesiana Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou, 1964. Celastraceae–II. In: van Steenis, C.G.G.J. (ed.) Flora Malesiana I, 6: 389–421. Leyden: Flora Malesiana Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding Hou, 1969. Pollen of Sarawakodendron (Celastraceae) and some related genera, with notes on techniques. Blumea 17: 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, P.M., Drewes, S.E., van Dtaden, J., MacRae, S., Dickens, C.W.S. 1987. An anatomical, phytochemical and ultrastructural characterization of the elastic threads of Maytenus acuminata. S. Afr. J. Bot. 53: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, G.D., Baird, L.M., Fickler, C. 1987. Celastrus scandens and Celastrus orbiculatus: comparisons of reproductive potential between a native and an introduced woody vine. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 114: 260–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G. 1952. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual, 1998. Chapter 2, parts D-K. Retrieved 13 June 2000 from the World Wide Web http://www.ussc.gov/1998guid/98chap-l.htm.

  • Forman, L.L. 1965. A new genus of Ixonanthaceae with notes on the family. Kew Bull. 19: 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, P.A. 1986. The ecology of seed dispersal in two species of callitrichid primates (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis). Am. J. Primatol. 10: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getahun, A., Krikorian, A.D. 1973. Chat: coffee’s rival from Harar, Ethiopia. I. Botany, cultivation and use. Econ. Bot. 27: 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of flowering plants. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., Tobe, H., Carlquist, S., Patel, V.C. 1985. Familial position of the cape genus Empleuridium. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72: 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görts-van Rijn, A.R.A., Mennega, A.M.W. 1994. 110. Hippocrateaceae. In: Görts-van Rijn, A.R.A. (ed.) Flora of the Guianas 16: 3–81. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1877. Characters of some little known or new genera of plants. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts 12: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1960. Essai de clé pour la détermination des pollens des Hippocratéacées Ouest-Africaines. Pollen Spores 2: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1962. Monographie des Hippocratéacées d’Afrique occidentale. Mém. Inst. Franç. Afri. Noire 64: 1–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1978. Révision monographique des Hippocrateze (Celastr.). 1. Les espèces de Madagascar. Adansonia 17: 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1983. Révision des Hippocratecz (Celastrecr). 3. Fruits, graines et structures placentaires. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris Adansonia IV, 5B: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1986. Celastraceae Hippocrateoideae. In: Morat, P. (ed.) Flore du Gabon (avec compléments pour d’autres pays d’Afrique et Madagascar) 29: 1–287. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Phanérogamie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, N. 1990. Celastracées (Hippocrateoidées). In: Satabié, B., Morat, P. (eds.) Flore du Cameroun 32: 3–243. Yaoundé: Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur de l’Informatique et de la Recherche Scientifique Mesires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammel, B.E. 1997. Three new species of Celastraceae from Costa Rica, one disjunct from Mexico. Novon 7: 147–155. Hegnauer, R. 1964, 1966, 1989. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hideux, M.J., Ferguson, I.K. 1976. The stereostructure of the exine and its evolutionary significance in Saxifragaceae sensu lato. In: Ferguson, I.K., Muller, J. (eds.) The evolutionary significance of the exine. London: Academic Press, pp. 327–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton-Taylor, C. 1996. Red data list of southern African plants. Pretoria: National Botanical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J.D. 1857. On the growth and composition of the ovarium of Siphonodon celastrineus Griffith, especially with reference to the subject of its placentation. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 22: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1967. The genera of flowering plants: (Angiospermae) based principally on the Genera Plantarum of G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants: Dicotyledons: facts and theory with over 550 illustrations and maps by the author. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, A., Griffiths M., Levy, M. 1992. The new royal horticultural society dictionary of gardening. London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikuse, M. 1956. Pollen grains of Japan. Tokyo: Hirokawa Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, W.T., Baas, P. 1973. Comparative leaf anatomy of Kokoona and Lophopetalum ( Celastraceae ). Blumea 21: 153–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.C. 1975. Synopsis of Canotia ( Celastraceae) including a new species from the Chihuahuan Desert. Brittonia 27: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordaan, M., van Wyk, A.E. 1999. Systematic studies in subfamily Celastroideae (Celastraceae) in southern Africa: reinstatement of the genus Gym nosporia. S. Afr. J. Bot. 65: 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Prain, D. 1898. Descriptions of some new plants from the north-eastern frontiers of India. J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 67: 284–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, P. 1908. Handbook of flower pollination. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, J., Co ornes, D.A., White, S.M. 1998. Consistencies in post-dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy-fruited species among seasons, years and sites. Funct. Ecol. 12: 683–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krikorian, A.D., Getahun, A. 1973. Chat: coffee’s rival from Harar, Ethiopia. II. Chemical composition. Econ. Bot. 27: 378–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, J.G. 1933. Novo genero de Celastraceas da flora amazonica. Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 6: 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J. 1853. The vegetable kingdom, or, the structure, clas-sification, and uses of plants, illustrated upon the natural system. London: Bradbury and Evans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobreau-Callen, D. 1977. Les pollens des Celastrales (illustrations, commentaires). Mém. Tray. Inst. Montpellier École Prat. Hautes Etudes 3: 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loesener, T. 1942a. Celastraceae. In: Engler, A., Harms, H., Mattfeld, J. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 20b. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, pp. 87–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loesener, T. 1942b. Hippocrateaceae. In: Engler, A., Harms, H., Mattfeld, J. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 20b. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, pp. 198–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourteig, A., O’Donell, C.A. 1955. Las Celastraceas de Argentina y Chile. Natura 1: 181–233, pl. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. 1892. A contribution to our knowledge of seedlings. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell, C.L. 1939. Revision of the American Celastraceae I. Wimmeria, Microtropis, and Zinowiewia. Contrib. Univ. Michigan Herb. 3: 5–46, pl. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell, C.L. 1970. Studies of American plants–II. Wrightia 4: 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell, C.L. 1971. Studies of American plants–III. Wrightia 4: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell, C.L. 1985. Two species of the genus Gymnosporia ( Celastraceae) in South America. Phytologia 57: 313–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A.C., Zim H.S., Nelson, A.L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattfeld, J. 1942. Stackhousiaceae. In: Engler, A., Harms, H., Mattfeld, J. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 20b. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, pp. 240–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauritzon, J. 1936a. Zur Embryologie und systematischen Abgrenzung der Reihen Terebinthales und Celastrales. Bot. Not. 1936: 161–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauritzon, J. 1936b. Embryologische angaben über Stackhousiaceae, Hippocrateaceae und Icacinaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 30: 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, P.N. 1976. Cytology of Himalayan hardwoods. Calcutta: Sree Saraswaty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisner, C.F. 1837. Plantarum vascularium genera secundum ordines naturales digesta eorumque differentiae et affinitates tabulis diagnosticis expositae. Lipsiae: Libraria Weidmannia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennega, A.M.W. 1972. A survey of the wood anatomy of the New World Hippocrateaceae. In: Ghouse, A.K.M. (ed.) Research trends in plant anatomy–K.A. Chowdhury commemoration volume. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennega, A.M.W. 1994. Wood and timber: Hippocrateaceae. In: Gifts-van Rijn, A.R.A. (ed.) Flora of the Guianas 16: 110–140. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennega, A.M.W. 1997. Wood anatomy of the Hippocrateoideae (Celastraceae). IAWA J. 18: 331–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1950. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers, J. 1856. Remarks on the nature of the outer fleshy cov-ering of the seed in the Clusiaceze, Magnoliaceæ, etc., and on the development of the raphe in general, under its various circumstances. Trans. Linn Soc. Lond. 22: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers, J. 1872. On the Hippocrateaceae of South America. Trans. Linn Soc. Lond. 28: 319–432, pl. 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.R., Soltis, D.E. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80: 631–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhwezi, 0. 1999. The use of Loeseneriella apocynoides around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, southwest Uganda. In: Timberlake, J., Kativu, S. (eds.) African plants: biodiversity, taxonomy and uses. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. 1883. The fertilisation of flowers. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, I.H. 1995. Systematics and leaf anatomy of the Celastraceae sensu stricto of New Caledonia. Doctoral dissertation. Zürich: Universität Zürich, 97, pl. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narang, N. 1965. The life-history of Stackhousia linariaefolia A. Cunn. with a discussion on its systematic position. Phytomorphology 3: 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar, M.P., Sastry, A.R.K. 1987. Red data book of Indian plants. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, S., Lusty, C., MacKinven, A. 1998. The world list of threatened trees. Cambridge: World Conservation Press. Palmer

    Google Scholar 

  • E., Pitman, N. 1972. Trees of southern Africa. Cape

    Google Scholar 

  • Town: A.A. Balkema. Pant, D.D., Kidwai, P.F. 1966. Epidermal structure and stomatal ontogeny in some Celastraceae. New Phytol. 65: 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrier de la Bâthie, H. 1942. Au sujet des affinités des Brexia et des Célastracées et de deux Brexia nouveaux de Madagascar. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 89: 219–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, A. 1891. Die Arillargebilde der Pflanzensamen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 13: 492–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.F.V. 1927. The role of the “bushdove” Columba arquatrix T. and K., in fruit-dispersal in the Knysna forests. S. Afr. J. Sci. 24: 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planchon, J.-E. 1845. Développements et caractères des vrais et des faux arilles. Ann. Sci. Nat. III, 3: 275–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raintree Nutrition Inc., 2000a. Chuchuhuasi. Retrieved 13 June 2000 from the World Wide Web http://www.raintree.com/chuchuhuasi.htm.

  • Raintree Nutrition Inc., 2000b. Espinheira santa. Retrieved 13 June 2000 from the World Wide Web http://www.rain-tree.comichuchuhuasi.htm.

  • Record, S.J. 1943. The American woods of the orders Celastrales, Olacales, and Santalales. Trop. Woods 53: 1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, S.J., Hess, R.W. 1943. Timbers of the New World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, H.N. 1930. The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Ashford, Kent: L. Reeve and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, N. 1965. New and little known species from the Flora Zambesiaca area XVI: taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Celastraceae. Bol. Soc. Brot. 39: 5–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, N.K.B. 1966. Celastraceae (incl. Hippocretaceae). In: Exell, A.W., Fernandes, A., Wild, H. (eds.) Flora Zambesiaca 2, pt. 2. London: Crown Agents, pp. 355–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, N.K.B., Hallé, N., Mathew, B., Blakelock, R. 1994. Celastraceae. In: Polhill, R.M. (ed.) Flora of tropical east Africa 108. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, M., Olmos, F., Galetti, M. 1993. Seed dispersal by tapir in southeastern Brazil. Mammalia 57: 460–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf, P.O. 1974. Euonymus L. In: Schopmeyer, C.S. (ed.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, V., Spichiger, R., Manen, J.F. 1997. Polyphyletism of Celastrales deduced from a chloroplast noncoding DNA region. Molec. Phylo. Evol. 7: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W. et al. 2000. See general references. Savolainen, V., Fay, M.F. et al. 2000. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebsebe, D. 1985. The genus Maytenus (Celastraceae) in NE tropical Africa and tropical Arabia. Acta Univ. Upsal Symb. Bot. 25: 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng-ye, L. 1992. Bhesa sinica. In: Li-kuo, F., Jian-ming, J. (eds.) China plant red data book–rare and endangered plants 1. Beijing: Science Press, pp. 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M.P. in press. Hippocrateaceae. In: Morat, P. (ed.) Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M.P., Hedin, J.P. 1999. Relationships and morphological character change among genera of Celastraceae sensu lato (including Hippocrateaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 86: 723–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M.P., Clevinger, C.C., Savolainen, V., Archer, R.H., Mathews, S., Doyle, J.J. 200la. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B and morphology. Am. J. Bot. 88: 313–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M.P., Savolainen, V., Clevinger, C.C., Archer, R.H., Davis, J.I. 2001b. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26 S nrDNA, phytochrome B, atpB, rbcL, and morphology. Molec. Phylo. Evol. 19: 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, A., Davidar, P. 1992. Seed dispersal ecology of a wind dispersed rain forest tree in the western Ghats, India. Biotropica 24: 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. 1940. The American species of Hippocrateaceae. Brittonia 3: 341–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.C. 1941. Notes on old world Hippocrateaceae. Am. J. Bot. 28: 438–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons: a handbook for laboratories of pure and applied biology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Nickrent, D.L., Johnson, L.A., Hahn, W.J., Hoot, S.B., Sweere, J.A., Kuzoff, R.K., Kron, K.A., Chase, M.W., Swensen, S.M., Zimmer, E.A., Chow, S.M., Gillespie, L.J., Kress, W.J., Sytsma, K.J. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18 S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D.E. et al. 2000. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonder, O.W. 1859–1860. Rutaceae. In: Harvey, W.H., Sonder, O.W. (eds.) Flora capensis: being a systematic description of the plants of the Cape colony, Caffraria, and Port Natal, vol. 1. Dublin: Hodges, Smith and Co., pp. 369–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stant, M.Y. 1951. Notes on the systematic anatomy of Stackhousia. Kew Bull. 1951: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staszkiewicz, J. 1997. The variability of seeds of Euonymus europaeus and E. verrucosus (Celastraceae). Fragm. Florist. Geobot. Series Polon. 10: 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szendrei, K. 1981. The chemistry of khat. Bull. Narcotics 32: 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1981. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H., Raven, P.H. 1984. The embryology and relationships of Alzatea Ruiz and Pay. ( Alzateaceae, Myrtales). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71: 844–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H., Raven P.H. 1993. Embryology of Acanthothamnus, Brexia and Canotia (Celastrales): a comparison. Bot. J. Linn Soc. 112: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. 1937. Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen 1. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. 1943. Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen 3. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, L.J. 1986. Once and for all it is Paxistima. Castanea 51: 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl, L. 1972. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wyk, A.E. 2002. Celastraceae. In: Coates Palgrave, K. (ed.) Trees of southern Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudeva Rao, M. K., Chakrabarty, T. 1985. Nicobariodendron Vasud. and T. Chakrab. (Celastraceae): a new genus from the Nicobar Islands, India. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 7: 513–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velenovsk, J. 1910. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen. Prag: Fr. Rivnâc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt, B. 1968. Brexiaceae. In: Milne-Redhead, E., Polhill, R.M. (eds.) Flora of tropical east Africa, vol. 108A. London: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, O. 1894. Flacourtiaceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III, 6a. Leipzig: Engelmann, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C.J. 1979. Breeding system and seed set in Euonymus europaeus (Celastraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 132: 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, G.W. 1974. Celastrus scandens L. In: Schopmeyer, C.S. (ed.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, pp. 295–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L.C. 1943. History and orthography of the Celastraceous genus “Pachystima” Rafinesque. Am. Midl. Nat. 29: 792–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O.E., Bowden, W.M. 1947. Oriental and American bittersweet hybrids. J. Heredity 38: 125–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, H.D. 1937. Chromosomenstudien an der schleswig-holsteinischen Angiopermen-Flora I. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 55: 262–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelger, J.L., Schorno, H.X., Carlini, E.A. 1981. Behavioural effects of cathinone, an amine obtained from Catha edulis Forsk.: comparisons with amphetamine, norpseudoephedrine, apomorphine and nomifensine. Bull. Narcotics 32: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simmons, M.P. (2004). Celastraceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants · Dicotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07257-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07257-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05714-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07257-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics