THE QUESTION IS: WHO AMONG THEM WERE AND ARE NOT JEWISH OR CRYPTO-JEWS, INCLUDING THEIR PUPPETS THEY PLACED AT THE HEAD OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS?
HEY, DEAR JESUS, SATAN DID NOT SUCCEED IN TEMPTING YOU, SO THEY SAY, BUT HE DID TEMPT AND DEVIL POSSESS THOSE CALLING THEMSELVES YOUR FOLLOWERS, CHRISTIANS AND CHRISTIC MUSLIMS ALIKE! OY VEY!
BUT, WHY DID YOU NOT ACCEPT RULERSHIP OVER THE WORLD, YOU FOOL, WHEN I KNOW (IT TOOK ME NEAR TO 70 YEARS) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ANY KINGDOM IN HEAVEN? THERE IS EVEN NO SUCH THING AS "HEAVEN" WITH A PARADISE AND A HELL AND NO DAY OF JUDGEMENT! THEY ARE BOTH RIGHT HERE ON EARTH, AND YOU YOU DID NOT EVEN KNOW THAT!
BUT, I KNOW WHY! AND YOU ARE FORGIVEN BECAUSE YOU STAYED AMONG US ONLY THREE YEARS, SO THEY SAY!
THIS ACCOUNT IS DAYS AWAY FROM DELETION. JUST AS I GET SOME TRACTION YT WHACKED 5 COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS ON ME - SOME ARE 2 YEARS OLD! THEY JUST BROUGHT THEM BACK UP. THE ACCOUNT WILL BE GONE.
There will be no war with Russia, China OR North Korea.
North Korea is "required" to keep South Korea and Japan in line. The thought of North Korea being attacked is a joke. But thats not stopping idiots from spreading the hippopotamus poo.
The DMZ is 20km from Seoul. War means the destruction of Seoul. North Korea, like Iran has miles of tunnels in it's mountain system and ballistic missiles. North Korea is a bad joke. It is "paid" to behave like an idiot.
North Korea is TOTALLY under the control of China and China does as it is told. Chines exchanged $6 Trillion of concrete "goods and services" to the United States in exchange for worthless "US Treasury Bonds" - "bits of paper". So, who is the "dick"? I tell ya what, YOU give me $5000 in laptops and mobile phones. I'll write on a piece of paper...maybe put a pretty gold edge on it - "IOU $5000". You are 5ft2 and 120 pounds. I am 6ft and 200 pounds. I am armed to the teeth. Who is the sucker? I don't bother paying it back. What ya gonna do about it?
China is TOTALLY dependent on the west. Wall Street can collapse the Chinese stock market in 20 seconds. China can barely feed it's people. It can barely provide them with enough water. In fact, China is in a water crisis. It can barely control it's population who are pissed off.China has 10,000 man "police divisions" to keep order in the central provinces. China has been "kill switched" by Israel.
Does anyone SERIOUSLY think all these leaders with their expensive weekend retreats, mistresses, expensive cars, hookers and private jets are going to risk a nuclear war? I mean, seriously. They have to live here.
The soul aim of this bullshit theater is to get YOU into line. To scare YOU to death and keep you distracted. People are waking up - not just to Israel - but to EVERYTHING. YOU must be put in your place and Donald "serial rapist" Trump is a part of that and most likely always was. We were Trumped.
The Middle East conflict will be contained. They are ALL in on it. This is ALL agreed. In two weeks, most likely less, Assad will be asked to leave by PUTIN. In the interests of..."peace". He will be retired to a Chateau in France with a nice Swiss bank account.
Syria will be split into three. Deaths will be limited to Shia and Sunni Muslims killing each other because Netanyahu gets off on that. No precious white people will die. Relax. Just the usual brown people. You should all be used to it by now.
Once Syria is broken up, Hizbollah will be cut off from Iran. Israel will go to work on Hizbollah and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. However, it may be that they get the US to threaten Iran back into it's box first. If that does not work then a "false flag" will have to be carried out. Provoke Iran to attack a carrier OR, a false flag IN Israel. Maybe drop a bomb on a Jewish Day School and kill 200 kids. That will be enough to nuke Iran with tactical s they dress up as "MOAB" cover stories.
Raytheon and Elbit Systems will be throwing giant parties.
The final aim - "cleans" the Gaza Strip completely - under the cloak of war and lots of dead jews...or the "appearance" of dead jews as they are experts now at the old crisis actors. The West Bank is finished anyway - completely broken up. Israel will just throw everyone over the border into Jordan but they must have a giant excuse to do it so there will have to be alot of "dead jews" or at least the appearance of "dead jews". The word "HolocaustTM" will get alot of use.
Everyone go back to sleep. Its business as usual.
The Yinon Plan unfolds.
There is NO double cross coming from Donald trump. He is owned %100 by Bi Bi and always was.
Looks Like Donald Trump May Well Be Jewish That Would Explain A Great Deal...
By Miles Mathis via Jim Kirwan 4-9-17
Share Our Stories! - Click Here
In his biography The Art of the Deal, Trump lied about his grandfather's country of origin, stating it was Sweden instead of Germany. So if you think these people wouldn't lie about their ancestry, you need to explain that whopper.
Trump was brought up in Jamaica Estates, Queens, which has a large Jewish population. He went to Kew-Forest School, ditto. Its other notable alumni include Katherine Weber, Jewish, Gideon Yago, Jewish, and Hank Azaria, Jewish. Googling on “attended Kew-Forest” brings up mostly Jewish names. Trump's father was on the Board of Trustees at Kew-Forest. By the way, it is very expensive.
His genealogy is a total mirage. I'll show you where to look. First go to his mother at Geni.com
Family Tree & Family History at Geni.com Create your family tree and invite relatives to share. Search 170 million profiles and discover new ancestors. Share photos, videos and more at Geni.com.
She is Mary Anne MacLeod. So they want you to think she is Scots. Then click on her father, Malcolm MacLeod. Then click on his mother, Anne MacLeod. She is the wife of Alexander MacLeod, so that is her married name. What is her maiden name? Whoops, it is also MacLeod, because her father is also named Alexander MacLeod. So both her father and her husband have the same first and last names? Did she marry her own father? Also, her birthyear is given as 1833. Note the 33. [Geni also fails to mention what we have to learn from the DailyMail: the name Trump was originally Drumpf.]
That can't be right, can it? So let's check the other genealogies. The second listed on a Google search is at About.com The largest source for Expert content on the Internet that helps users answer questions, solve problems, learn something new or find inspiration.
.But it has nothing to say about this. It stops just short of the Anne MacLeod problem. But it does tell us something interesting: both Trump's parents died at Long Island Jewish Medical Center. Wikitree matches Geni.
So let's return to Friedrich Drumpf, Donald's great-grandfather. Two of his sisters are listed as Elisabetha Freund and Syblia Schuster. Oi-vay! Those are both Jewish surnames. We just saw the name Schuster in my paper on Engels published two days ago. I reminded you there that Max Schuster, founder of Simon&Schuster, is now admitted to be Jewish. The Schuster in the Socialism project with Engels was also shown to be almost certainly Jewish. As for Freund, see Michael Freund, Moshe Aryeh Freund, Wilhelm Freund, Yoav Freund, Leopold Freund, and too many others to mention. So at least two of Trump's great-aunts married Jewish men. This reminds us that his daughter Ivanka married a Jewish man, Jared Kushner. We are told this is an anomaly, but it isn't. What is an anomaly is that Kushner admits he is Jewish.
Friedrich Drumpf's mother is named Katarina Kober. Not only is that possibly Jewish, but it lead to another suspicious scrubbing of the genealogy. Her father is given as Johann, but he has no parents. He is the only one in that generation whose parents are unknown. Even his wife's parents are known. I suggest the name isn't Kober, but Kolber. We have seen the genealogies being whitewashed this way again and again. Changing one letter is often the best way to do it. It is the most subtle, so it draws the least attention. Kolber is very often Jewish.
With more study, we find that Trump's aunt Elizabeth married William O. Walter. That name is also possibly Jewish. We find a William Walter as Director of Jewish Family Services in York, PA. Also a William Walter just buried at Jewish Memorial Chapel of Long Island. Also a William O. Walter marrying a Cora Neuhauser in Lebanon, PA, in 1924. That name is also probably Jewish. And most curiously, a William Walter, Esq. listed in the Jewish Missionary Intelligence of June, 1896. More research discovers his firm were the honorary stockbrokers of this London Jewish society in 1900. That is interesting because it directly ties to my previous paper on Friedrich Engels and Robert Owen. Owen's brother in-law was James Haldane Stewart, who worked for the Jews' Society in the 1830s and 40s, a precursor of this Jewish Missionary Intelligence. At any rate, this may be our William Walter or his father, given that date. His father is scrubbed at Geni. The names Walter and Walters were chosen by Jews entering the US, as a new name, as we see from Barbara Walters. Her father Louis Walters was original Louis Abrahams.
Both Trump and his father ran with top Jews in New York, including Samuel Lindenbaum and his father Abraham (Bunny), and Roy Cohn. These guys weren't just their attorneys, they were their enablers. As the NYT says in the 2012 obituary of Samuel Lindenbaum:
Mr. Lindenbaum cultivated a scholar’s knowledge of the Zoning Resolution, the arcane document that governs development in New York. As a result, he was able to bend the resolution to his clients’ will without breaking it. And because his clients were major builders and landowners — among them Harry B. Helmsley, Harry Macklowe, Larry A. Silverstein, Jerry I. Speyer, Leonard Litwin, Steven Roth and Donald J. Trump; the Fishers and Tisches and Rudins and Roses. . .
Notice anything about that list? Everyone on it “except” Trump is admitted to be Jewish. Curious, no?
Ivana is also Jewish. Geni.com lists her father's name as both Knavs and Zelnícek. I'll give you a hint: drop the second “e”. You get Zelnick. It is Yiddish for haberdasher. Clothier. It's Jewish, too. See Robert Zelnick, Strauss Zelnick, Bob Zelnick, etc. Robert was a fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford. Strauss was President of 20th Century Fox. Bob was ABC News producer. Also Friedrich Zelnik, silent film producer. Also David O. Selznick, whose name was originally Zeleznick, or, alternately, Zelnick. He and his father were major Hollywood producers.
Comment by Kirwan: So he married a jew, that makes his children jews and his adult children have married jews, his aunt’s married jews, his great aunt’s married jews, yada, yada, yada.
See the complete, original article by Miles Mathis here
- See more at: http://rense.com/general96/trumpjewish.htm#sthash.PYAah9i5.dpuf
Muhammad Ali's family launch campaign against Donald Trump's travel ban
Alis have first-hand experience of tightened immigration controls after being detained at Florida airport in February
S
The Alis have been fighting for religious justice 'as a family, for a very long time'CBS This Morning/Youtube
The son of boxing legend Muhammad Ali has launched a religious freedom campaign in opposition to President Trump’s controversial ‘travel ban’.
Mr Ali Jr and his mother, Khalilah Camacho Ali, will attend a Democratic Committee on border security in Washington on Thursday to discuss the “Step Into The Ring” campaign.
Launching the initiative, Ms Camacho Ali said: “If I don’t speak up now, they’re going to keep harassing us.”
“We, as a family, have been fighting this for a very long time,” she said. “We are going to continue to fight for religious justice.”
The campaign hopes to galvanise anti-Trump sentiment on Twitter with the hashtag #AlivsTrump, and draw on the support of other prominent figures from the boxing world, such as Evander Holyfield and Larry Roberto Duran.
Mr Duran, a Panamanian lightweight champion, said last year he would love to “step into the ring” with Donald Trump, “to see how many Latinos he’s going to deport and to see how really strong he is”.
The Alis experienced tightened immigration controls first-hand when they were detained at a Florida airport in February.
Mr Ali Jr, who was returning from a Black History Month event in Jamaica, was questioned for almost two hours by immigration officials. He and his mother later said they felt targeted because they are Muslim, and have Arabic names.
"I'm paranoid. I'm just waiting for somebody to mess with me. That's not a good feeling when you have to travel," Ms Camacho Ali said when asked how the incident has affected her.
Both were born in the United States and hold valid US passports.
After widespread outrage and legal opposition to President Trump’s first ‘travel ban’, which barred travellers from 12 Muslim-majority nations entering the United States indefinitely, the government issued a revised executive order.
For 120 days, the US will not allow any new refugees into the country and for 90 days, visas will not be issued to people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
ALMOST NOBODY is interested in the truth and its practicality! So,why do I still write and post for the public? It is not an addiction, but only a way of survival by acquiring the maximum of "knowledge" and understanding as much as possible about matters regarding the humans and monsters inhabiting this alien planet, with the hope that my grandchildren and a few other will benefit from it! (BAFS)
Al- Hijaz, Homeland of Abraham and the Israeli prophetsAn Arab’s geographical map for Abraham's journeybased on Arabia historical accounts T. Ahmed, Ammar Rajab
Al-Tajdeed Cultural and Social Society Kingdom of Bahrain June 2006 WWW.Tajdeed.org Second edition- July 2006
Note: This paper has been presented at the Second World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies held at Amman- Jordon. It represents an abstract of a comprehensive research work published by Al-Tajdeed Society in an Arabic book of 550 pages, entitled "Neda' Al Surat- Kidnap of the Prophets Geography". The book is readily available for downloading from the society's website. Most of the Arabic originating references quoted in this paper are currently unavailable in English; hence the relevant references are cited in the original language only. Abstract:
By the end of the last century, new stunning hypothesis emerged amongst theologians and historians advocating that the prevailing common understanding of the Israeli prophets' geographical homelands and journey routes were radically erroneous. The new hypothesis suggests that Asir province (situated in the southern part of Al-Surat Mountains, stretching alongside the western coastal border of Arabia, bounded between Yemen’s northern borders and the holy city of Makkah) was indeed the actual geographical theater which accommodated most of the Israeli prophets’ birthplaces, revelations, preaching, and burials. Subsequent research work narrowed down the prophets lands to Makkah county situated within the Hijaz and Asir Surat Mountains. This holy city emerged as the real and the only homeland of Abraham, Lot, Sara, Hagar and Ishmael as revealed in this paper. This whole hypothesis stemmed from the inconceivable inconsistencies in the biblical accounts of geographical landscapes traversed by the prophets, besides the lack of any supporting archeological evidences to date either in Palestine, Syria, Iraq or Egypt. Interestingly enough, all the researchers who have concluded that south west Arabia was the actual homeland of the Israeli prophets have reached their findings through different research and analysis methodologies. This paper, however, seeks to address missing elements that are needed to complement the ongoing research work in this field, namely:
1.None of the present research work conducted an in-depth analytical study in the ancient Arabic historical literatures to provide Arabic historical evidences confirming that the Israeli prophets were actually Arabic people who reside in Arabia.
2.None of the researchers has explained when and how the prophets' real whereabouts had been shifted from their real geographical positions in Arabia towards the north and systematically projected over another vast Arabian land stretching from the River Euphrates in Iraq all the way to the River Nile in Egypt.
3.None of the researches so far has identified the entity that created the prevailing illusions masking the real whereabouts of the Arabic Israeli prophets, nor clarified what their motives were.
In addition to addressing the above issues, this paper concludes that Arabic historical literature do contains substantial evidences indeed supporting the hypothesis in question. Moreover, it presents a draft of a new geographical map illustrating Abraham’s journey based on ancient Arabic accounts on these events, as an alternative to the controversial widespread biblical geographical map printed on the back cover of contemporary published bibles.
Introduction:
In his book entitled "The Bible Came from Arabia" published in 1984, Kamal Al Salibi caused a stir. He concluded that the events and narratives of the Old Testament did not originate in Palestine as internationally accepted but rather in the province of Asir, in the south-west of Arabia, precisely between Makkah and Yemen. Al-Salibi was astonished at the number of biblical places' names found in the Asir province. Unlike the blatant inconsistencies between the biblical narratives and the supposedly corresponding places in Palestine, he found a more coherent geographical correlation between the regions holding the same biblical names in Asir and the distances traveled by the prophets, as narrated in the old testaments tales. Despite adopting different research methodologies, the same conclusion was reached by Dr. Ahmed Dawood who published his findings in 1991 in a book entitled "The Arabs, the Samies, the Hebrews, the Israelis and the Jews". Alongside many stunning revelations published in his book, Dr. Dawood presented a blueprint of a tiny landscape in Asir south of Makkah, where he pinpointed the actual whereabouts of the biblical Misr (referred to afterwards as Egypt) the homeland of Moses and the Israeli tribe, and the nearby Yerushalayim - the legendary Dawood temple. Furthermore, during 1994, Dr. Ziad Mouna also published a book illustrating his findings as denoted in the title of his book “The Torah Geography- Misr and the Israelis in Asir”. Overlooking fine details, these eastern scholars along with many other contemporary western historians and researchers have all came to agree on the conclusion that the Torah's geographical emplacement is not south Syria, as commonly understood, but further deep to the south in the Arabian Asiri mountains. However, this concurring conclusion has left behind a trail of unresolved questions and consequential discrepancies, such as why the written Islamic history is not only contradicts this conclusion but also stresses its synergy with the common geographical knowledge preached by the bible? What is the extent of political and religious impact on the region if this theory ultimately gets substantiated and internationally recognized? When and who shifted the biblical geographical emplacement to the wrong location? What are the motives behind such an international falsification? How did the perpetrators succeed in convincing multinational generations to accept this false biblical geography? On the other hand, this new paradigm shift helps in resolving many old and new mysteries, such as why all archeological attempts to-date have failed to decisively identify Moses’ Pharaoh from amongst the unearthed Egyptian kings? Why the western nations, unlike Easterners, are still unaware of the simple fact that Abraham had lived and resided most of his lifetime in Makkah and its nearby surroundings? And why, for that matter, doesn't Abraham's journey exhibited in western maps show any reference to Makkah? And how does all this relate to the evolution of the prevailing Arab Israeli political and military conflict over the same land?
This paper aims to focus on two prime questions with the sole objective of qualifying or otherwise disqualifying the recent theories shifting the biblical geography. The other questions listed above, as well as many other related issues, have been thoroughly addressed in a book written in Arabic, published and distributed by Al-Tajdeed Cultural and Social Society situated at the Kingdom of Bahrain. The two main arguments of concern in this paper are:
1.Assuming that the biblical geographical setting has been shifted at some stage in history from it's original homeland in Asir mountains to Palestine; an assumption contemplated recently by many eastern and western theologians and historians, then the question arises as to why doesn't the written Arab history reflect this presumed transgression of their heritage? Or does it? Why have the Arabs remained silent before such a historical sabotage since they were and still are the natives and inhabitants of Arabia where Asir is situated?
2.The proposed shifting theory cannot be substantiated unless the perpetrators are identified and their motives are determined. So who are those who embarked in what looked more like a "mission impossible" and worked hard on re-documenting significant historical events to make them sound and appear as if they had occurred in different places? And what were their motives?
Overview of the Actual Journey of the Patriarch Abraham:
Following a comprehensive research in the Arabic pre-Islamic historical narrations, and through a bold critical analysis of many contradicting and incoherent narratives, a new map showing the most likely route of Abraham’s journey is emerging slowly. Unlike the popular vividly detailed map exhibited at the back cover of the holy bible, the proposed map in this paper ismostly bound between the start and end points of this journey, and requires more fill-in the gaps and fine-tuning details which necessitate further research, field inspection and possibly archeological exploration. What makes the proposed map credible, unique and of value for future study and research is that it is built from many fragmented narratives of the Arabic pre-Islamic documented history as narrated by ancient Arabic historians. It resolves inherent inconsistencies between the followers of the three most recent religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) and relieves them from the persisting dilemma of "sacred" narratives that contradict reality in terms of time and place. Most importantly, the new map is entirely consistent with the teachings of the Holy Quran and the core of the Syriac Torah.
Photo 1: Aerial picture of the Red sea and the Hijaz region at the west border of Saudi Arabia, illustrating Abraham’s Journey route between Horan and Makkah.
As illustrated in the satellite photo 1, the proposed map for Abraham's journey suggests that his trajectory commenced at Horan valley, which is located at about 300 km south of the holy city of Makkah. Horan was the place, which sheltered Abraham during his infancy through adolescence age. He was taken there most likely on foot by his mother seeking protection from their near by village – Ur- where he was born. Horan's physical location still appears on Saudi Arabia's modern maps under the name of “Horan Valley” وادي حوران ( Approx. 19o 46’ 01” N - 42o 22‘ 04” E ), see figure 1.
Figure 1: Horan in the modern Saudi Arabia maps.
He grew up as a shepherd in the neighborhood of this Hijazi Mountain until he came to confront his ancestor's beliefs, which led to the death sentence pronounced against him; however he miraculously escaped this death and left that area accompanied by his young wife Sarah and his nephew Lot. They headed north following the traders' route and sought shelter at Arapha city (عرفة) (Ar-bah' or Arba as inscribed in the Greek Torah). Arapha valley is now a well-known location for it is one of the main holy places that Muslim pilgrims have to visit as part of their annual pilgrimage rituals. In this area, Abraham and his companionship settled down in a tiny terrain that belonged then to a tribal sheikh named Abu Mallek (أبو مالك), precisely near a cluster of trees under the care of a Hijazi Arab by the name of Namera (نمرة) or (Mamre as inscribed in the Greek Torah), see photo 2.
Photo 2: Aerial view of Makkah area showing Mamre (Namera) location 17km east of Beit Allah (Bethel) at Beer Sheba wilderness known today as Makkah (Mecca).
The spot of land (Approx 21o 21’ 08” N – 39o 58’ 04” E) where Abraham installed his tents next to Namera's trees was since then named after the owner of the trees, i.e. "Namera نمرة". This name remained adjacent to this land until this very moment, and has been historically marked with stone landmarks and humble structures generation after generation until a huge mosque was recently built in the place and named "Namera" mosque (see photo 3). Millions of pilgrims gather around this mosque every year during the annual Hajj in memory of the place where Abraham and Sarah spent most of their lifetime. At his old age Abraham housed his second wife Hagar and his infant son Ishmael in a barren waterless valley located at about 17 Km to the west of his tents at Namera, thus paving the way to the revitalization of a long forgotten holy site initially established by the nucleus of the first human race - Adam and Eve.
The first spot of land that witnessed the first man’s repentance, and housed the first worship ceremony ever experienced by mankind, is geographically still preserved and is known until today as Beit Allah بيت الله (or Bethel as inscribed in the Greek Torah) which literally means in both Syriac and Arabic - the Mighty Lord's House. Beit Allah is now situated at the heart of the city of Makkah where Islam evolved and spread. Beit Allah is approximately located at coordinates 21o 25’ 19 N – 39o 49’ 34” E. see image 1.
Image 1: At Makkah precisely at Beit Allah (Bethel) Millions of pilgrims, roam around Al Kaba (Kadish) since Abraham time.
On their way to Arapha from Horan, Young Abraham and his small company had to cross many flowing rivers as well as dry riverbeds. The most famous of which was the Phorat· river فرات)) (or Euphrates river as inscribed in the Greek Torah) which runs from the Garden of Eden, downhill on the eastern cliffs of the Hijaizi Surat mountains. The famous Phorat River is dry today, however the great riverbed or valley it carved behind is clearly discernible as shown in photo 4. The commonly known river, pronounced “Phorat“ by easterners and “Euphrates” by westerners, which runs along the west half of Iraq is not the original river nor is its twin river bearing the name Dijlah (دجلة) (or Tigris· as inscribed in the Greek Torah) in fact both their names belong to the original rivers springing specifically from the Garden of Eden. This legendary lost garden is located somewhere on the top of Surat Mountains or inside them closer to Makkah where Adam and Eve resided as narrated in the Ancient Arabic History.
Photo 3: Namera Mosque at Arapha valley erected in memorial of Abraham’s’ first house where he lived with Sarah. Millions of pilgrims in white clothing still visit the site during the annual Hajj.
The above is a quick and brief overview of Abraham's journey as emerged from Al Tajdeed Society's extensive research on the pre-Islamic Arabic history. Contrary to the common belief, this map does not contain any reference to Egypt, Iraq or Syria as no credible evidences were found to support this claim apart from conflicting and contradictory narratives, all of them traced back to one single source - the Geek Torah.
Photo 4: Satellite image showing the riverbed left behind the Al Phorat (Euphrates) river in Saudi Arabia.
To understand how this map emerged, one needs first to examine the authenticity and credibility of the current map internationally distributed on some bible’s back covers. Once it is demonstrated that the map in question is inconsistent and unauthentic only then the right questions should be asked in quest for the right answers. A good starting point is to examine the claim that Abraham and his Patriarch sons visited or dwelt in Egypt.
Egyptology – The Deactivated History:
While viewing the pyramids during his visit to Egypt, the Israeli Prime minister Mr. Menachem Begin was reported to have said that his ancestors participated in the building of the Pyramids ’. These comments disturbed many Egyptian officials as reflected in the following news agency report, "The Egyptian minister of Culture Farouk Hosni is reported to have refuted once again Israel's claims on the role played by Jews in building al-Jiza pyramids and their contribution to building certain archaeological areas in al-Fantin island (Jazirat al_fantin) in Aswan. Hosni told journalists " The Jews did not take part in building the pyramids which are considered royal tombs, and it was not permitted to those who follow a religion other than that of the Pharaoh, the King, to take part in building these holy tombs and temples. Hosni added, "The Jews entered Egypt with our Master Abraham (Ibrahim) and some of them left after the defeat of the Hexos and they had no mentionable role in building the Pharos civilization." Mr. Hosni’s statement is a representative sample of the dilemma that Egyptian officials and scholars have to endure when confronted with allegations alienating them from the best of their legacy and heritage. At one end the Egyptian officials confirm that Jews had indeed entered and settled in Egypt during Abraham or Yusuf times; basing this confirmation on few Islamic historical references. The Egyptians also label their ancient sociopolitical system using the Torah term "Pharaoh's” civilization. In addition, they identify their own ancient kings by the title "Pharaohs" which is an Old Testament trademark. On the other hand, the Egyptian scholars deny the Jewish claimed role in building the pyramids or any other significant landmark while they were enslaved by the Egyptian dignitaries!
It is safe to say that the Egyptian public at large, and scholars in particular, have not yet actively considered their own advanced and well documented national history but relied instead on a a highly controversial foreign historical source – the Torah - in order to track down the sequence of events that took place in their own land during the times of the Patriarchs* (1700-1300 B.C). This conclusion can be easily asserted by asking the Egyptian archeologists, historians and scholars few fundamental decisive questions. These questions relate to the core of the major biblical events claimed to have occurred in Egypt, namely:
1.Do the countless Egyptian excavations, archeological sites and unearthed heritage show any evidence or reference to a non-Egyptian figure named "Abraham" who alleged to have resided in Egypt anytime between the years 1800 and 1700 B.C?
2.Is there any evidence suggesting that a non-Egyptian figure named Yusuf assumed a treasurer position around1600 B.C.?
3.Does any ancient Egyptian papyrus or manuscript mention anything about an Israeli leader named Moses who confronted one of the prominent Egyptian kings around 1300 B.C?
4.Do the Egyptian ancient documents mention that the king who confronted Moses drowned in the red sea 400 km from his capital or even the Nile River or any other watercourse?
5.Are there any traces of references found in the thousands of ancient Egyptian scripts mentioning the detailed biblical exodus of more than half a million people around the year 1300 B.C?
6.Does any papyrus refer to the famous miraculous sea-crossing of more than half a million fleeing people?
7.Have any reference been found between the years 5000 and 32 B.C. indicating that the kings of Egypt were called or referred to as "Pharos" other than the dubious "big house" notion?
The answers to all questions above have been negative to date. Dr Firas Sawah, a prominent Syrian scholar, summed it all up in one of his books when he wrote “ As regards the exodus time, the consensus is that it occurred around 1260 B.C during Ramses II time... however and despite all scholars dedicated efforts, no credible Egyptian historical proof has thus far been secured to support the exodus tale from Egypt … and the Egyptian ancient manuscripts remain absolutely silent with regards to this eminent Torah originated tale...one simply can’t believe that six hundred thousands enslaved Jewish families suddenly evacuate from the Egyptian delta heading towards the Suez border where they confronted the Egyptian King and Army in a retreat skirmish contact, and eventually caused his death and his army's defeat in a miraculous manner without the slightest reference to such a drastic sequence of events in the well documented and preserved Egyptian historical records?! ” Furthermore, one would expect that identifying the famous “Pharaoh” mummy in view of the specified chronological order which associates him with Ramses II or to his immediate son Merenptah should be an easy task. This is because the tombs and the historical records of those two particular kings have been found, red and translated longtime ago. Despite these archeological findings, there is yet no evidence or any shred of reference correlating any of these kings to Moses and the Israelis as narrated in the Greek Torah. Dr. Zahi Hawas - Secretary General of the Supreme Council for Antiquities - sums up this arguments in a press interview saying “…the examination of all relevant royal mummies proved that none of them fits Moses Pharaoh. No conclusive evidence is yet at hand to identify the pharaoh …” In its simplest form and under normal academic circumstances, these mere facts would be more than sufficient to immediately alienate the possibility of the biblical exodus taking place in Egypt. Consequently, whoever emphasized that the major biblical events had indeed taken place in Egypt should have submitted their tangible proof, otherwise all such claims, based on Egyptology, are to be dismissed and with all objectivity and common sense considered unfounded until credible evidences are made available. For the independent and free mind observers, the current situation is clearly running the other way around. The accurate and credible history of a highly civilized nation has been positioned at the passenger seat and restricted to attract tourists, while a literally stranger historical source – the Old Testament that originated outside Egypt - is placed at the driving seat to steer the country towards its predetermined fate. This obscure and difficult to comprehend status quo managed so far to prevail due to several factors; namely:
* Those who are supposed to defend their national history are not doing so! The Egyptians themselves, being a historically religious nation, would naturally hold on to the privilege and honor of hosting the Patriarchs. Therefore, they would mentally and emotionally favor waiting as long as it takes to extract from their own national history evidences to support foreign historical claims suggesting that the Patriarchs had dwelt in their lands. Thus, they waited for more than 2300 years in vain and no one is prepared to draw a conclusion and close this file.
* The Patriarchs and the land of their eventful life are mentioned in the holy Quran. Having Egypt associated with the Patriarchs meant that their homeland gained another blessing by having it referred to in the Islamic holy book. This is clearly noticed from the banner posted at the Cairo airport which holds a welcome statement extracted from the holy Quran.
* The post Islamic historians to date have kept on stressing that the Israeli Patriarchs and the Israeli people entered and resided in Egypt, which has added more weight in favor of the biblical claims.
The predicament experienced by the scientific community is that, on one hand, millions of Jewish, Christian and Moslem masses are persistently insisting that Egypt was indeed a geographical central point in the Patriarchs' lives especially for Moses; while on the other hand, the Egyptian history does not offer the slightest tangible evidence of any of these major claimed events! The believers resolved this contradiction by mentally marginalizing the genuine and authentic land history with idolatry or paganism terms as biblically preached, in the hope that the holy biblical claims will ultimately get substantiated. Equally, the researchers and archeologists are increasingly perplexed while observing the widening divide between what they actually discover and what they ought to discover under the believers pressure. As it stands, and due to the holy nature of their references, it hardly occurred to the believing masses that the Egyptian history is the credible genuine source of information that needs to be seriously considered, and since this history has remained obstinately silent about the biblically claimed events, then it is obvious that such events may had occurred but certainly not in Egypt. It hardly occurred to the scholars of the three religions that it is about time they embarked on a major paradigm shift by returning back to their own source of information, be it holy revelations or historical quotations, to review their understanding of how for example have they concluded that the exodus had occurred in Egypt geographically. The researchers at Al-Tajdeed Society embarked on this paradigm shift and consequently re-examined the Arabic and Islamic history books and references and critically analyzed tens of contradictory quotes and texts. The outcome was stunning; for it was found that unlike what is being preached by many Islamic religious scholars, the holy Quran not only didn't vindicate that the Patriarchs were in Egypt, but also sought to correct this erroneous widespread understanding by refuting this claim all together. Furthermore, it was found that Islamic historians did not corroborate these claims but were simply reiterating the mistaken misunderstanding traced back to the biblical tales which shaped the public awareness and knowledge in Arabia more than 800 years before the Quran was revealed. It also turned out that the pre-Islamic history contains a variety of information indicating that the biblical geographical scenes were in fact in Arabia itself. To unfold our "Da Vinci code" version in this paper, let us start by reviewing the Holy Quran verses that are considered by the Moslem scholars as the unequivocal proof that the Israeli exodus headed by Moses had indeed occurred in Egypt.
Misr vs. Egypt - The overlooked key fact:
As narrated in both the Quran and the Old Testament, Musa [Moses] confronted a person named Fir'awn [Pharaoh]. One verse in the Quran cites a statement made by Fir'awn to his people mentioning a key geographical location. The official translation of the verse in question is: "[51] And (Fir'awn) proclaimed among his people, saying: "O my people! does not the dominion of Egypt belong to me, (witness) these streams flowing underneath my (palace)? what! see ye not then?" [52] "Am I not better than this (Musa), who is a contemptible wretch and can scarcely express himself clearly?" (Az-Zukruf, Ch 43 verse 51-52) In this given context, western English readers could reasonably conclude that Muslims are in accord with the biblical account on Mose’s geographical emplacement, i.e. Egypt. What most western readers won't realize however is that they are reading a mistranslation of the holy verse, one which doesn't echo what the verse actually says in Arabic! The Arabic version of the same verse doesn't mention the name Egypt at all. What it mentions all over is the name "Misr". The correct translation ought to read "… "O my people! Does not the dominion of Misr belong to me? …". In fact, it is not adequate to translate proper names since they are an expression of a distinctive identity of a person or a place, and therefore should solely be vocally transliterated in translations; just like the names of Musa and Fir'awn as indicated in the above verses. Why was the name "Misr" transformed into "Egypt" during the translation process? The answer to this particular question will be revealed later, but first let us consider the following scenario: Had the translation mentioned the real name i.e. Misr as the homeland of both Fir'awn and Musa, then the western readers would naturally inquire about where this place "Misr" was? If the answer was: it is the country known by the name Egypt, then another questions will raise, which is why are Muslims calling an ancient worldwide known country by the name "Misr" while the rest of the world identifies it by the name "Egypt"? If someone said that probably this country was called Misr during Musa time around 1300 B.C, then this will raise another series of questions such as called Misr by whom? And why? Why is there no reference in the Egyptian records during that era, i.e. under Ramses II, that Egyptian kingdom was named “Misr” nor in era before or after the 19th dynasty to which Ramses II is assigned? Why are there no such references in the historical records of all ancient Egypt's contemporary neighboring civilizations to support the claim that their ancient neighbor was named "Misr", despite the active political and economical relationships between them? If the answer is that it was called Misr after Islam by the Muslim nations, then another set of questions will surface, such as since when has this name been projected on Egypt? What does this name "Misr" mean? And why have the Muslim nations in particular, named this ancient valley by the name “Misr”? Why has the rest of the world retained the old name and not changed it to "Misr” in turn? These questions and many others have not been raised by western ancient as well as contemporary scholars and theologians simply because they were all under the impression that Muslim nations are in agreement with the biblical geography as transpires from the readily available translations of he holy Quran. This inadvertent oversight from the translators of the Quran had deprived western scholars from raising authentic arguments to the conflicting information they inherited from the Greek Torah via the Christian church. Equally, Muslim nations views and beliefs remained for centauries unquestioned and unchallenged by any other nation, which eventually hardened their inherited inaccurate understanding of the Patriarchs geographical locations mentioned in the holy Quran. This cycle contributed in shadowing the Christian and the Muslim worlds, as well as many Jewish communities, in a long term illusion which has been challenged to date only by the holy Quran and Egyptology revelations.
On the reasons that led Muslim translators to transform the name "Misr" to "Egypt", the answer goes back to the fact that Egypt currently has two formal names. One is recognized by non Muslims which is "Egypt", while the other is "Misr", which is recognized by all Muslims in the world including Egyptians themselves who introduce themselves as "Misries" to the Muslims and as "Egyptians" to the rest of the world. Realizing that most westerns are unaware that Egypt is called Misr amongst the Muslims, the translators of the Quran decided to simplify the issue by systematically replacing every "Misr" in the Quran with “Egypt”, so that the western readers would understand which land the Quran refers to, as they imagined. The translators had obviously good intentions, but did the holy Quran really need any help to identify which land it meant? Why should Muslims assume that whenever the Quran literally mentions the name "Misr" it actually means "Egypt"? Is this long-established central assumption accurate? Or is it about time that it is subjected to a critical analysis and review?
The main rational evidence supporting the contemporary Muslims belief that Egypt was Yusuf’s land and Moses’ exodus ground, is that the Quran states that Pharaoh and the Patriarchs were in Misr as mentioned above, and since Egypt is known amongst the Muslims by the name "Misr", then it follows that Egypt must be the land of Moses and Yusuf. This deduction may sound perfectly logical. The argument, however, is irrespective of what Egypt is called today, since the Pharaoh declared to his people that he was the owner of Misr as stated in the verse above, then what really matters is to prove that during the year 1300 B.C. Egypt was indeed called Misr by its people. If this argument is substantiated than one could safely conclude that the Muslims reasoning is soundly proven. For some reasons, Muslim nations thought that this fundamental argument has been addressed and settled long time ago. However, it came out that this argument has never been seriously addressed, and if investigated, it would reveal to Muslims that their current belief with respect to the Patriarchs’ geography is not only unfounded but also in discord with the teachings of the Quran!
The cumulative discoveries available to the public prove that Egypt was not called Misr during the 19th Egyptian dynasty. There isn't a single Egyptian record that mentions the upper and or the Lower Egypt by a single name pronounced "Misr" or any other name phonetically close to it. In fact there is no evidence to prove that the name Misr was used to identify Egypt at any recorded era let alone during the 19th dynasty. On the contrary, what is mentioned in Egypt’s ancient history, as narrated in Osiris and Isis myths is the name Koptos or Coptoª which were gradually converted in to Gebt (قبط) and then to El-Gibt (القبط) and finally E-gypt as pronounced by the westerns. As to the records of the ancient western civilizations, all the mythical literatures and maps refer to this land under no name but Egypt or Egipt. The Greek Danaos Daughters’ myth is a good example, which proves that the name "Egypt" is extremely old and it resisted any attempts to change it. As to the ancient eastern nations, all of them referred to Egypt under the same name "Gebt "قبط except for the early Muslims who for some reason decided to discontinue using it. This fact necessitates an investigation on the time when Muslims started calling El-Gibt القبط by the name Misr مصر and the reasons of this mutation. According to the Arabic history, during the times of prophet Mohamed (pbuh) (570-632 A.D), Egypt was known amongst the people of Arabia by the name Al-Gipt (القبط) .This is obvious from the message that the prophet sent to the Egyptian ruler Al-Mokawkas inviting him to embrace Islam, see figure 2 for an image of the preserved original hand-written manuscript. What interests us from this letter are the following extracts " In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. From Mohammed Ben Abdullah to Al-Mokawkas the chief of Gipt, … If you decline you will bear the burden of the Gipties sins …” ، This particularly valuable letter clearly indicates that Al-Gipt was Egypt’s formal name up to the time of prophet Mohammed (pbuh). The reply that came from Al-Mokawkas also confirms that the Egyptians at that time introduced themselves to Arabia as Gipties: “… To Mohamed Ben Abdulla from Al-Mokawkas the chief of Gipt … I honored your messenger and I sent you appreciation presents and two bondwomen whom are highly valued in Gipt …”،
Figure 2: The manuscript of the Message sent by the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) to the Egyptian ruler showing the words Al-Gipt ( E - gypt) with no mention of the name Misr.
Despite the fact that the Egyptians didn't recognize the name "Misr" for their land, as reflected in the reply, yet the people of Arabia during the prophet's time were referring to Egypt amongst themselves as "Misr"! This is inevitably demonstrated in many records and correspondences from that era. For example, the second caliphate Omer Ben Al Khataab sent a letter to his army leader Amro Ben Al Aas, advising him to treat the Giptis kindly. Interestingly, the letter referred to this same land by both names: “… let it be known to you that Misr land is spared from Khoms… and the prophet Mohamed praised the Giptis…” The use of the name "Misr" amongst early Muslims and not using it in their correspondences with the Egyptians themselves indicate that the early Arabian Muslims used two names to identify the land of the Nile. Other historical references indicate that both names existed in their daily dialogue before even the Islamic era. The difference between the two names is significant. "Misr" is used within Arabia only and has a biblical origin. "Gipt" however is used with the Egyptians and the rest of the world which does not recognize Misr as a name of Egypt. Phonetic analysis of the name "Al-Gipt" reveals that it is actually equivalent to "Egypt". In other words, the Arabian people until the dawn of Islam shared the same ancient name that identified this land with the rest of the world. It was sometime after the entry of Arabian Muslims into Al-Gipt, that the internationally known name was gradually replaced by "Misr" and remained so until now· . Therefore one concludes that Misr is not Egypt’s original name and that it is not old enough to apply to the pharaoh’s statement when he declared to his people of his time that he is the owner of Misr. Therefore, by searching for pharaoh and Musa in Egypt While the Quran clearly states that they were in a place called Misr, the Muslims are actually looking in the wrong place. The question now is: if Muslims are looking in the wrong place, why have the ancient as well as the contemporary Jews and Christians been considering Egypt as the homeland of Musa and Pharaoh as well?
The Septuagint – Egypt’s holy dungeon:
While Arabia was directly receiving the heavenly revelations one after the other, the European nations, like other nations, were also receiving the same revelations but through the traders and scholars who traveled or migrated to their lands carrying along the news and knowledge of the latest heavenly revelations. Like the Quran, the Torah in the form of the Ten Commandments was first revealed in Arabia, it was documented at some stage in the Arabic Syriac language. During their exile in Babylon (586 B.C) the Israeli Rabbis produced what they called the Torah containing the Ten Commandments in addition to historical accounts of the Israeli tribes. That Syriac Torah might have been the first recognized written holy book produced by Israeli Rabbis. In that Syriac book, Mizraim / Mitsrayim was the documented name of the place where Musa and the Pharaoh lived. This name is consistent with the holy Quran account as indicated in the above-mentioned verse¨ . The geographical locations of the major events were obviously clear and well-known to the ancient believers until the appearance of the Septuagint (السبعونية) - the Greek Torah.
The Septuagint is the first Greek translation of the Syriac Torah. It could be the first translations of the Arabic Syriac Torah to any other foreign language. It was compiled in Egypt around 282 B.C only shortly after it fell under Alexander the Great's control. Ptolemy Ben Philadelphus, the Greek sovereign, requested that the latest revelation at that time be translated to Greek. A team of seventy rabbis produced the translation and it is reported that within seventy days the Greek Torah was ready for publishing. In that Geek book, a slight alteration was introduced during the translation process. Every Arabic Syriac word which reads “mzarm” was translated to this Greek word "Αἰγύπτου" which reads “Ae-gypti” ,i.e Mizraim was transformed during the translation process to Ae-gypti. This indescribable act was all that was needed to create a large scale long-life illusion. Unlike Misr or Mizeruim, Ae-gypti or E-gypt as pronounced today has always referred to an internationally well-known vast and highly civilized ancient country. The moment the Greek Torah was approved by Ptolemy Ben Philadelphus, Egypt was portrayed as “Israeli land” in the subconscious of the Europeans as well as all Geeks’ widespread colonies. Consequently, since 282 B.C, generation after generation passed on the false “sacred” information on Egypt's role in the Patriarchs eventful geography until it became an irrefutable fact. This was happening on an international scale, whereas the ancient Egyptians themselves have not seriously resisted this infiltration and fictitious implantation of scenes and events into their history and heritage. In fact, they might have viewed the Septuagint’s claim that the Patriarchs had dwelt in their land as another privilege to the Egyptian already glamorous historical fame. What the ancient Egyptians missed, however, is that by accepting this foreign forged addendum into their unwritten history, they have in fact accepted, in the long term, to give away their land and civilization to a little insignificant tiny Arabian tribe, while their great Egyptian civilization is being absorbed into the “promised land” saga alongside Iraq and Syria. This ancient deal is the source of today’s confusion and frustration of Egyptian scholars when every now and then someone arrives from overseas to insolently boast his ancestors presumed role in building the great pyramids! This will sadly remain the case until Egyptian scholars and officials decide to establish independent research teams to review their history from the time the Septuagint was issued, and objectively examine the damage inflected by this Greek Torah on the their kings' reputation and civilization achievements. This might be the only way for the Egyptian nation to escape the Septuagint sacred dungeon.
The Egyptian pharaoh – The living Holy Hoax:
In his numerous lectures, Dr Zahi Hawas keeps on utilizing the Torah word “Pharaohs” when making references to his country's greatest ancient kings. Equally, he confirms that despite the exhausting national and international archeological missions, there are not to date any objective scientific evidence to the assumption that Remeses II or his son Marnabtah were the Torah’s described Egyptian king during Musa time. The case usually stops at this dead-end point, and indications are that this will not change unless a sharp detour is made. The answer to this impasse was spotted by a well-known Islamic historian named Al-Masooedy ( *** - 946). As reported by the Al-Atabaki, Al-Masooedy documented his findings following a personal investigation. He wrote “… I have asked a group of Gipti (اقباط) scholars while I was at Al-Saeid (الصعيد )(Upper Egypt) about the meaning of the name Fir'awn (pharaoh). They didn’t know the meaning of the word nor did it exist in their Gipti language!! ...” The same meaningless "Pharaoh" word in Gipti language was also reported by Ibn Khaldun . This is the answer to the impasse which the majority of contemporary as well as past scholars might find difficult to submit to. As linguistically confirmed , there is no word pronounced "Pharaoh" in the Gipti language nor is it a written or used word amongst the Gipti public, let alone a famous Royal title. The closest pronunciation to the word Pharaoh most scholars are holding to is “per-aa” as explained by Marie Parsons “… it should be pointed out that "pharaoh", the most popular "title" of the Egyptian King, is not Egyptian at all. That is to say, the Egyptians did not call their King "Pharaoh" until very late in their history, and then only as non-Egyptians took up the word. "Pharaoh" is a Hebrew pronunciation of the Egyptian word, per-aa, meaning Great House, and was first used as a label for the king himself around 1450 BC. ..” This highly controversial solution has been refuted by many other scholars and researchers such as M S M Saifullah, `Abdullah David & Elias Karim . Michael S. Sanders sums up the topic saying“…As can be readily seen it just is not possible to translate Pir’u as Pharaoh unless one has a predilection to so do...”
Despite the confirmation that the word Fir’awn doesn’t belong to the Gipti language nor was it the title of Egyptian kings, it remains true that this word is repeatedly mentioned in the holy Quran as well as the Bible. This persisting contradiction should have instigated researchers to look for this name outside Egypt. It was nearly effortless to find out that the name exists indeed and it has an unambiguous meaning in Arabia. The linguistically compound word needs to be first disassembled to its original root. The root of this Arabic word Fir’awn (فرعون) is Far’a (فرع), this linguistic rooting system is customary in the Arabic language. For example the root of word Sidoon (صيدون)is Saida (صيدا), and for Sa'dwoon (سعدون) is Sa’d (سعد ) and for Babylon (بابلون) is Babel (بابل) etc. By looking up the Arabic dictionary for the meaning of the root Far’a(فرع) the answer is immediately evident. Amongst the many meanings this root holds, one finds the following fundamental meaning “The top or the chief of something i.e. be it land, mountain, body, people etc…” This means that the word Fir’awn is not a name but a title of social order. The Arabian history and language provides further stunning personal information regarding Fir’awn himself which supports this finding. Ben Asaker, Ben Kathir and Al-Majlessy report the following information to the fact that Fir’awn was married to an Arabian lady “… Fir’awn’s wife was Asia (اسيا)daughter of Mozahim (مزاحم) Ben Abdullah (عبد الله) Ben Al Rayan (الريان) Ben Al Walid (الوليد), Mozahim was Misr’s Fir’awn during Yuousf’s time…”،، These names are reported to have been confirmed by the prophet Mohamed (pbuh) himself. For those familiar with Arabic names, they would immediately realize that such names could not be found in ancient Egypt as they can only be found to-date in their Arabia homeland. To the surprise of our researchers, many Arabic historians have indeed reported a name for Fir’awn himself. The following is a quote found in several references “… I asked Mousa Ben Jaffer to explain to me the meaning of the following Quranic verse requesting Musa and Haron to approach Fir’awn ([43] Go, both of you, to Fir’awn (Pharaoh), verily, he has transgressed. [44] And speak to him mildly, perhaps he may accept admonition or fear Allâh." Jaffer replied that the meaning of “And speak to him mildly” is to address him during the speech by his title Abu Musaab (ابا مصعب) as Fir’awn name was Al Walied (الوليد) Ben Musaab (مصعب)… ” ،،. These names and title are closely related to Arabian tribes. Al Hamawi wrote in his book the following details about Fir'awn, revealing his personal astonishment: "… Fir’awn was from Bialie Arabs, he was short with fair skin and long beard, he ruled Misr 500 years then Allah perished him in the water and his name was Mussab (مصعب) , some people claimed that he was a Gipti descendent, and not from the Amalek (العمالقه) !?" This quote indicates that during the author's time, other sources were claming that Fir’awn was Gipti which was surprising to the narrator. Sadly today, what he quoted is causing astonishment and what he questioned became internationally common knowledge! The Amalek, to whom Fir’awn belongs, has been mentioned in the Torah as well as the Arabian history. They are a well know ancient tribe that lived in Makkah and nearby as reported by Dr. Ahmed Amin "… The Akhbariyen (Ancient Arab historians) mentioned that the Amalek inhabited Makkah, Madina and Hijaz, they were tyrants and Musa confronted them. The Jews dwelt in Hijiaz after the fall of the Amalek". Al Shibani, however, reported that Fir’awn's name was actually Kaboows (قابوس). He wrote "… then Misr was ruled by Kaboows (قابوس) Ben Musaab (مصعب) Ben Moawya (معاوية) Ben Nomir (نمير ) Ben Al Salows (السلوس) Ben Qarn (قاران) Ben Amro(عمرو) Ben Amalek (عملاق) …" So Fir'awn first name could be Musaab or Kaboows and both names are of Hijaizi origin and are not expected to be found amongst the royal Gipti names. The same information was also known to some Arab Jews and Christians as narrated by al Qurtabi and Al Shookani whom wrote: “… Wahab· (وهب) reported that the people of the book¨ knew Fir’awn by the name Al Walid (الوليد) Ben Musaab (مصعب) Ben Al Rayan (الريان) and his title was Abu Morah (ابو مره)…” ، This quote indicates that not all "the people of the book" were fully influenced by the Septuagint fake dogma. However, the total absence of Fir’awn's name from their documents, or at least those documents made available to the public, indicates that Fir’awn's identity was systematically kept out of reach.
The amount of Arabic history or history-related references that mentioned Kaboows or Musaab or Al Walid as the first name for Moses’ Fir’awn are more than staggering fifty. Here is a list for the researchers' reference:
,,،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،،
This abundantly cited historical information on Fir’awn's identity will most likely come across as surprising for many Muslim readers as well as Christens and Jews. This is because some of the early post-Islamic historians have adopted and documented the Septuagint originated forged details preached by most Arab Jewish and Christen tribes for more than 800 years before the Islamic revelation. Their historical documents became Islamic references for the forthcoming generations of historians until today. The contradicting details between the pre-Islamic original information and the post-Islamic borrowed ones generated palpable discrepancies, the solution for which was to gradually deactivate the original Arabian history like was the case with the Egyptian history in favor of the prevailing inaccurate western one.
Having discovered Fir’awn's full name from the history of the land where he lived and later ruled, there is no point in looking for him among the list of Gipti royal names. Doing so is like looking for a king named Abdullah among medieval Christian Scottish Royal family list. What are the chances of finding such a name in such a place, position and time?
To sum up, against the schemes of Ptolemy and the 70 rabbis, Egyptology resisted the implantation of the Tyrant Fir’awn in its Gipti heritage. Equally, Arabian history rejected this forgery and resisted the amputation of Musa from Arabia by retaining enough historical information to trace the origin of biblical events. It is high time we realized that there were no Pharaohs in Egypt and this expired title should be returned back to where it had always belonged, in Arabia.
In Search for the Patriarch in Arabia – Uncovering the desert sand:
As explained earlier, the Geek Torah committed a forgery. The word "Misr" in the original Syriac text has been intently replaced during the translation process by the word Al Gipt. Consequently, the low profile word “Misr” never been mentioned to the westerns believers while it started to fade away in the eastern believers' minds and awareness in favor of the high profile “Egypt”. Despite its insignificant size, Misr was however the theater of major biblical events. So where was Misr located?
Arabian history vindicated by the holy Quran states that Abraham lived in Makkah. In fact both he and his son Ishmael constructed Beit Allah- the Ka'bah as mentioned in this verse: “[127] And remember Ibrahim and Isma'il raised the foundations of the House (the Ka'bah at Makkah( (with this prayer): "Our Lord! Accept (this service) from us: for Thou art the All-Hearing, the All-Knowing” (Al-Baqarah - Ch1 verse: 127). Many other important events took place around Makkah including the site where Ishmael was offered in sacrifice· “[102] Then, when (the son) reached (the age of) (serious) work with him, he said: "O my son! I see in vision that I offer thee in sacrifice: now see what is thy view!" (the son) said: "O my father! do as thou art commanded: thou will find me, if Allah so wills, one practicing Patience and Constancy!" (Asl-Safat - Ch 37 verse: 102). The location of the sacrifice place is still preserved and has been since known under the name Mena(منى) or Ishmael Altar, where millions of Muslim pilgrims offer oblations every year from the time of Abraham. Mena Altar is located 6 km east Makkah (see photo 5) next to the Arapha (عرفة) valley which contains Namera Mosque. According to Arabia history we read “... Gabriel said to Abraham carry enough water with you. They went to Mena valley, then to Arapha valley.He erected his tents in Namera- This place since then was marked with white stones to preserve it, and it was anciently known as Abrahams Masjed (prayer place) the same place is now annexed to the Namera Mosque...”،، These places are mentioned in the Torah but geographically shifted outside their real locations and systematically scattered allover Palestine.
Photo 5: Close up satellite image of the most important sites of Abraham’s eventful life which are also sites for the annual Islamic Hajj rituals.
Abraham, according to Arabian history was a stranger to Makkah area. His dialect was Syriac while the tribes there were speaking 'irebah (عاربة) ; both different dialects originating from one mother language known for the purpose of this research as Arabic. He crossed the Surat Mountains and settled in Namera, as mentioned in the Torah. Therefore he was labeled with the title they usually assign those strangers whom they allow to settle down amongst them as will be detailed latter. The transient boundary can be roughly estimated from a quote reported by Al-Andulsy (الاندلسي) who wrote: “Tohama (تهامة) is the region stretching along side the red sea including Makkah and al 'iber ¨ العبر)) , Al towr (الطور) and the island. So the Al a’br is the area between the Phorat river (Eupharteª )(الفرات) and the Arab desert…”.By constructing a map of this description in Arabia we can identify the area, which includes the Surat Mountains overlooking Arapha valley, see photo 6· .
Since Abraham was one of those who crossed the mountains and descended in the valley of Arapha, he was titled with the Arabic word “‛ibrîy” (عبري) which literally means “the person in transit or the person who crossed over a natural topography such as mountain, river or sea”. The Syriac pronunciation of the same word is also “‛ibrîy” as both are dialect of the same language and people. The local people of Arapha labeled him with this title for a long time until, as mentioned in the Torah; it was changed from “‛ibrîy to Ibrahim إبراهيم” as he became a formal resident of Makkah. By adding the Syriac definition article to the word ‛ibrîy, which is the letter “H”, the word becomes H‛ibrîy or H-'ibrew (العابر) which literally means "The person in transient". With time, this simple denomination transformed into the famous word “Hebrew” and was inflated beyond its original meaning to denote the identity of a nation with a distinctive language and religion. The Torah itself clearly indicates that being Hebrew does not necessarily mean one is Israeli (i.e. son of Jacob). This is obvious from Mose’s direct teachings to the Israelis “…If thou buy a Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.” It is forbidden to enslave a fellow Israeli as per Judaism teachings. Therefore, this only means that the word “Hebrew” is originally an expression used for Israeli as well as any other person as long as he/she is in transit (traveler or crosser). This term simply never meant to be an expression of a distinctive religion, nationality or identity and using it in such a context is a historical abuse.
Photo 6: Light filtered satellite image showing the Phorat riverbed (Euphrates) (shown in fine green line) stretching from the top of the Surat Mountains to south Iraq. The river is bounding the "Arab desert" situated between the A’ber (Surat Mountains) and the great river valley.
At this stage we can address another key question: Where from did Abraham come to Arapha valley? According to the holy Quran he didn’t come from far away “[48] "And I will turn away (seclude) from you (all) and from those whom ye invoke besides Allah: I will call on my Lord: perhaps, by my prayer to my Lord, I shall be not unblest." (Maryam Ch 19 verse 48) This verse reveals a conversation between Abraham and his people after they tried to execute him. He indicated that he will not migrate but rather seclude اعتزلكم)) which implies that he can still conveniently get in touch if he chooses to. The holy Quran did mention many other conversations between Abraham and his father after the fire execution attempt, which proves that his fathers land was not geographically far away from Makkah where he secluded.
According to the prophet Mohamed (pbuh), Abraham was kept off site by his mother in a place called Horan, as per this quote "… Abraham's mother took her child Abraham and fled during the night to protect him from the Tyrant Nimrod. She placed him near three trees on a fast flowing river called Horan …"،،،، . In line with the Septuagint proposed geography, some of the early Jewish scholars claimed that this “Horan” was located in northern Syria to the east bank of the Iraqi Euphrates River at approximately 1600 km from Makkah, see photo 7.
Photo 7: The Real Horan (Abraham Fathers' home) in Asir Compared to the location of Horan as successfully forged by the Septuagint Rabbis.
However, there are many places called Horan in Arabia. One of them is on a river bank near the Phorat river (the original Euphrates river) and is only 300 km south of Makkah located at 19o 46 " 19' North and 42o 22" 04' East. Examining the satellite images for this Horan, one can immediately spot the riverbed valley which is dry today, and can observe its proximity to Makkah, which demonstrates how Abraham was able to travel between Makkah and his father's land conveniently. This Horan is also located at the south of the river Phorat, which springs from Adam’s Eden Garden, located on the top of the Surat Mountains and flows all the way down eastwards to collect on a huge dry lake situated at the lowlands of south Iraq, as shown in figures 3 ,4. The place of the dried lake is named Najaf (نجف)§ . Proving that this ancient giant Arabian river was the famous Phorat, which lost its name and identity to that running from Turkey to Iraq has been comprehensively addressed in two of the Al Tajdeed research work. Abraham had to cross the Phorat River in his way to Makkah; a detail mentioned in the Torah and the Arabic historical documents. We therefore have very good reasons to believe that this is most likely the real Horan mentioned in the Torah.
On the question about where Abraham headed from Horan, it is revealed in this verse “[99] He said: "I will go to my Lord! He will surely guide me! [100] "O my Lord! grant me a righteous (son)!” (Al Saffat Ch 37 verses 99-100). He went to Namera located in the vicinity of Beit Allah, the House of The All Mighty Lord at Makkah. According to the Quran, he was young when he left Horan and he had his first son at an old age while he was in Namera. He apparently did not know where was the exact location of the house “[26] And (remember) when We showed Ibrâhim (Abraham) the site of the (Sacred)
House (the Ka'bah at Makkah) (saying): "Associate not anything (in worship) with Me” (Al Haj Ch 22 verse 26). Once he realized where the sacred site was, which was then an empty dry barren valley, he had to own it in order to publicizes it for all worldwide believers to be. Consequently, he intentionally and purposely moved Hagar and his son Ishmael to the sacred valley 17 km to the west of Namera where his wife Sarah lived “[37] "O our Lord! I have made some of my offspring to dwell in a valley without cultivation, by Thy Sacred House; in order, O our Lord, that they may establish regular Prayer: so fill the hearts of some among men with love towards them, and feed them with Fruits so that they may give thanks.” (Ibrahim Ch 14 verse 37) The Torah indirectly confirms the short distance between where Abraham lived at Namera and the sacred place through this quote “..And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.”.
As mentioned, the trip from Namera to the final destination to Beersheba required only "bread, and a bottle of Water" which implies that the distance traveled by the child and his mother was far more shorter than the trajectory suggested by the Septuagint, which stretches as far as 1250 km from Palestine all the way to Beersheba at Paran· . The Torah further indicates that once the bottle of water dried out shortly after arriving to the sacred valley of Beersheba, water supply was miraculously made available: “And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink”.
Figure 3: Numerous ancient maps shows the presence of giant river traversing Arabia from the Surat Mountains to a lake south of Iraq. This is the real Phorte فرات(Euphrates) river springing from Eden garden south of Makkah.
Figure 4: Satellite image clearly showing the riverbed of the same great Phorat (Euphrates) river drawn in the ancient maps. The low land at the Iraqi Ahwar was the lake collecting the flowing water springing from Paradise.
According to Arabs historians, this well of water sprung underneath Ishmael feet and is called today Beer Zimzum. It still provides water to the annual multimillion pilgrims and is located only few meters from Beit Allah (Al Ka’aba). The Torah however indicates that this well was later called Beerª sheba (بير شبعة) . “Sheba” was the name given by Abraham to the well as mentioned in this quote “And he said, For these seven ewe lambs shalt thou take of my hand, that they may be a witness unto me, that I have dug this well Wherefore he called that place Beersheba; because there they sware both of them.”. It should not be surprising to note that according to Arab historians Beer Zimzum was actually called Beer Sheba at some stage, as revealed in this conclusive unnoticed quote “ Amongst the old names of Beer Zimzum are Gabriel foot mark (ركضة جبريل), Ishmaels dug hole (حفيرة اسماعيل), Wabra (وبرة), Sheba (شبعة), …”’’’’’’. Other historians quote the same name as (شباعة) "Shebah"،،،،،،،،،، This is the genuine well-known Beersheba mentioned in the Torah, and can be seen in photo 8. Furthermore, and in accordance with the Arabic history, the association of Hagar with Makkah is engraved even in the Jewish memory as commented by Ibn Ezra "…Or 'Well of the lifegiving vision,' (HaKethav VeHaKabbalah); 'Well of the vision of the Living One' (Rashi; Targum); or 'Well to the Living One who sees me' (Ibn Ezra). Ibn Ezra identifies this with Zimum (or in other versions, Zimzum), where the Arabs hold an annual festival (Haj). This is Zemzem near Mecca. According to this, however, Hagar headed into the Arabian Peninsula rather than toward Egypt”
Photo 8: Pilgrims still access beer Sheba (Zimzum) for fresh water. The beer (water well) is located next to Beit Allah (Bethel).
As to the exact location where Ishmael and his mother Hagar lived, it is specified in the following Torah quotation "And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt." Ignoring the Septuagint-originated word "Egypt" in the above quote, let us investigate where Paran wilderness was? Paran or Pharan is reported in the Arabic memory as follows "... Pharan is the Hebrew name for Makkah Mountains…"''' Other Arabic historians quote "... Pharan is an Arabic pronunciation of a Hebrew origin word, which is associated with Makkah old names mentioned in the Torah. It is also said that it is the name for the Makkah's mountains…"، Ben Katheer also adds one more important piece of information to the following quote which reveals how close Mamera, where Sarah's house was, in relation to Abraham's second wife’s house at the sacred valley of Beersheba; "... and Abraham used to frequently check up on the welfare of his family at Pharan…" Bearing in mind that Abraham was very old when he had his first son Ishmael, so one shouldn't expect such anticipated frequent family visits to have taken place by traveling a regular return trip of about 2500 km from Makkah to Palestine. Consequently, Beersheba has been deliberately shifted with the rest of the other key places to end up scattered all over south Syria (Palestine) creating an archeological "mission impossible" to find evidence supporting the chronology and geography of the events in question.
The damage inflicted through shifting the Patriarchs’ homeland from the south to the north of Arabia did not only affect the names of places but the tribes' identity as well. We will mention here one tribe only which had to be shifted to north Arabia because of its simultaneous existence with the Patriarchs. The "Canaanite الكنعانيون" for example has been repeatedly mentioned in the Torah. Their first encounter with the Patriarchs is quoted here “…And Abram passed through the land to the place of Sichem, to the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land…” Investigation revealed that the Canaanites (الكنعانيون) is a clear one letter mispronunciation of the famous Arabic ancient tribe named "Kananites الكنانيون" this Arab tribe was living in the Arapha area. In fact they left behind their name on the landscape they inhabited which stretched between makkah valley to Mena valley (Ishmael Altar) located at the direct proximity of Arapha Valley. Ben Jumhoor wrote “… Al Mohasab (المحصب) is the valley between Makkah and Mena, it is also known the plane of Makkah and the low land of the Kananites ((الكنانيون tribe…” As to the claim that even the Canaanite were the ancient inhabitants of south Syria, Dr Dawood strongly refutes this unfounded claim despite its propagation. He commented: “… It is amazing how the genuine history of the ancient Arab Syrians who inhabited this land for more than 10 thousand years is being masked and concealed and replaced by the Torah mentioned Canaanites tribe. This is being done while every scholar is aware that no such name existed in the ancient Syrian history...” He also added “… Dr Ali Asaf stressed in his book (The ancient Syrian kingdoms) that none of the ancient Syrian kingdoms identified itself by the name or the title Canaanites or Amorites. In fact when Sankhow (سانخو) issued his book (Phoenician History) in 9 volumes during Musa time in the 14th century B.C, no mention of the name " Canaanites " was made anywhere in his history. The same is true with Herodotus who never cited the word "Canaanites" when mentioning the Syrians or the Phoenician…”
Figure 5: Al Taneium or Tuwa valley at Makkah city 6 km from Beit Allah (Beer Sheba)
In fact the Arabian pre -Islamic historical narrations offer much more coherent information only if they were made to surface. For example, Muslims believe that the prophet Mohamed did not initiate the annual Hajj, which was rather initiated by his great grand father Abraham and was practiced since then on a wide national and international scale, which included for example the Persians. Al Massodi and AL Homawi wrote “…the Farsi people (Persians) in ancient times used to come from Fars (Iran) to Beit Allah in Makkah with great offerings in appreciation to the holiness of Abraham and they consider Beit Allah the most sacred temple on earth..” ، But who were expected to perform the pilgrimage (Hajj) in its first initiation stages? They must be Abraham’s sons, the Patriarchs Isaac, Ishmael and Israel (Jacob) and their descendants. This is also clearly mentioned in the following quote “…Al-Zobeir (الزبير) reported that “..about seventy thousands of the Children of Israel (بني أسرائيل) used to take off their shoes at Al Taneium and walk bear footed to Beit Alla to perform Hajj..” , Al Taneium, is situated about 6 km from Beit Allah ,see figure 5, it contains now a large mosque and is considered one of the purification stations for Muslims (mostly children of Ishmael) who intend to perform Hajj, where they take off their shoes and normal clothing and take a shower before wearing the 2 pieces white pilgrim clothing in preparation before heading to Beit Allah. So both the Children of Israel and the children of Ishmael used to perform Hajj at Beit Allah revealed by their Grandfather. The interesting part is that the children of Ishmael continued performing Hajj at the same valley identified by Abraham which happened to be located at the incense Yamani trade route. While, the children of Israel before Christ time decided to make themselves a duplicate Bethel at a convenient place in south Syria located at the Chinese silk trade route. Muslims abandoned this duplicate position forever when Prophet Mohammed converted the Islamic prayer's direction – Al Qibla (القبلة) - from Palestine back to Makkah. Unfortunately, the prophet's valiant act was not fully understood or properly studied. Consequently, the early Muslims' explanation to that stunning act was that “the Prophet liked to face Makkah during prayer and the Lord answered his prophet’s beseech!” and this crucial and highly revealing prophecy act was closed at this level of shallow rationalization!
Another interesting clarification found in the Arabian history is related to the whereabouts of the place were Musa had a dialog with the Lord. The holy Quran recounts this notable event in the following verse “[12] "Verily I am thy Lord! therefore (in My presence) put off thy shoes: thou art in the sacred valley Tuwa.” The valley of Tuwa is the same valley which contains Taneium Mosque mentioned above as clearly evident from the following quote “ …Before they enter Beit Allah, the Children of Israel used to take of their shoes once they reached du Tuwa..” . Taneium has always been a sacred place during both pre and post Islamic era, but most Arabs are unaware that this extraordinary manifestation could be the foundation for the inherited sanctity. The other precise information that the Torah missed out is the exact location where the visiting Angles met Abraham. This sacred extraordinary meeting was mentioned in the Quran as well as the Torah “[69] There came Our Messengers to Ibrahim with glad tidings. They said, "Peace! "he answered, "Peace!" and hastened to entertain them with a roasted calf. [70] But when he saw their hands went not towards the (meal), he felt some mistrust of them, and conceived a fear of them. They said: "Fear not: we have been sent against the people of Lot." According to Arabic resources the location of this meeting is revealed in this prayer quote: “...In your glorious and generous name by which you appeared to Musa at Tur Sina and to Abraham at Musageed Al-khief before, and to Isaac at Beersheba, and to Jacob at Beit eal (Beit Allah)...” ' Masjeed Al-khief is visited by Muslims annually during Hajj and it is located at Mena valley's border, refer to photos 5 & 9.
Photo 9: Al-khief mosque near Ishmael Altar at Mena valley erected in memory of the place where the three angles visited Abraham.
The above verse mentioned Lot’s people in the messengers' dialog with Abraham. Lot moved to where those wicked people dwelt seeking grassland for his cattle: "And there was strife between the herdsmen of Abram's cattle and the herdsmen of Lot's cattle: and the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelt then in the land". Such strife between herdsmen shouldn't have made Lot to move farther than 1250 km away from Makkah as sketched in the Septuagint's account. Few kilometers from Paran / Makkah area would provide enough grassland for Lot’s cattle; a fact that stressed evidently in the holy Quran "[133] So also was Lot among those sent (by Us). [134] Behold, We delivered him and his adherents, all [135] Except an old woman who was among those who lagged behind: [136] Then We destroyed the rest. [137] Verily, ye pass by their (sites) by day, [138] And by night: will ye not understand?" (As safat ch 37 verses 133-138) These verses were direct informative speech to Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) while he was at Makkah. The verse in question informed him and his followers that "ye pass by their (sites) by day, [138] And by night: will ye not understand?" Surely, he understood how close Sodom was from Makkah. Furthermore, the Quran clearly called for investigation and when reading this verse "[35] And We have left thereof an evident Sign (of Sodom), for any people who (care to) understand" (Al – Ankabut ch 29 verse 35). Unlike the Christens driven expedition missions, the Muslims barley showed any interest in looking for Sodom in fulfillment of the above verse. The advise however, offered here for the Christians investigators is that looking for Sodom on the floor of the Dead sea is a total waste of time and effort as one cannot consider a concealed village under layers of hard crystal salt at the bottom of the Dead Sea as an "evident sign" that one can look for! According to both the Quran and the Syriac Torah, one has to look for Sodom within few kilometers around Makkah / Paran. It should not be hard to find it if only the Septuagint's falsified information is declined as a source of sacred sites geographical locater.
Misrs – The Traders’ service villages:
The word "Misr" is repeated 5 times in the holy Quran. Four times in reference and one time description as we read in the following verse which reveals a dialog between Musa and the children of Israel that took place during the exodus from Misr to the holy land "[61] And remember ye said: "O Musa! We cannot endure one kind of food (always); so beseech thy Lord for us to produce for us of what the earth growth its pot-herbs, and cucumbers, its garlic, lentils, and onions." He said: "Will ye exchange the better for the worse? Go ye down to any town, and ye shall find what ye want!"... " (Al-Baqarah ch 2 verse: 61). The expression "any town" in the verse is pronounced in the Quran Arabic text as “Misra” and is mentioned in the Torah as Mosera· . This indicates that the word “Misr” is not a distinctive expression but rather a descriptive one. This is exactly what it meant to be as far as the Arabic language is concerned. Misr in Arabic means destination and it is used to describe any urban village or town, which used to mark the travelers and traders final or transitory destination. Accordingly, any urban village or town interconnected with the traders' national and international routes network is described as “Misr” to distinguish such urban stations from the others rural landscapes.
In addition to this descriptive meaning, Misr is also a word used to describe the process of urbanization. When used in this context the pronunciation is "Missr" (مصّر). Both uses of the word Misr is evident in the early Arabic descriptions of the rural urbanization process as we read in this quote "…the Khalifate Omer Ben Al Katab managed to urbanize (Missr مصّر)) few Misrs (الامصار) and he said: the known Misrs are seven, Al Madina is a Misr, Al Sham (South Syria) is a Misr, Al Khoofa is a Misr, Al Basrah is a Misr …." Unlike Muslims who almost confined the term Misr to naming a land as vast as Egypt, the Quran presented the word in its proper context when mentioning Misr. Therefore as per the verse above, Misr means any urban area where Goods are stored and traders can congregate along the trade routes to sell, buy or exchange Goods, as well as to rest or to re-water and re-stock the camel caravans with food supply. Plenty of research works has been devoted to such important economical stations in the ancient world especially Arabia. Such stations are described as "Misrs" and each is called “Misra” as per the Quran or Mosera as per the Torah. This implies that there should be tens of Misrs scattered all over Arabia headed by tens of different Kings or Fir’awns or Sheiks. Accordingly, since we have already mentioned the full name of Mose’s Fir’awn, what about Abraham’s Fir’awn? He also visited a Misr during his time as per the Torah. The Arabic history confirms this visit and provides the required name:“ …Abraham then decided to leave…He arrived at Misr controlled by one of the Fir’awns and his name was Sinan (سنان) Ben Alwan (علوان) Ben Abuid (عبيد) Ben Owlag (عولج) Ben Amelak (عملاق) Ben Lawd (لاوذ) Ben Sam (سام) Ben Noah (نوح) It is said that he was the brother of Al Dahak (الضحاك) whom appointed him to head Misr." Another set of genuine Hijazi Arabian names. This raises the following question: Was Abraham's Misr different from his grandson's Yusuf? And the same question applies to Mose's Misr as well?
What we concluded from the previous sections is that Abraham resided at Beersheba (Makkah). His son Ishmael was born at Namera (Mamre) and he therefore must have had his other son Isaac and grandson Jacob at Beersheba as well. Jacob didn't live far away from Beit Allah since he and his 12 sons (the Israelis nucleus) dwelt in an area close to the trade route around Makkah. This is obvious from the verse mentioning a dialogue between the brothers of Yusuf, “[10] Said one of them: "Slay not Yusuf, but if ye must do something, throw him down to the bottom of the well: he will be picked up by some caravan of travelers." (Yusuf ch 12 verse 10). The caravan travelers picked him up and went to their next destination which is the next Misr on their trade route. What escaped Yusuf’s brothers is the possibility that he will be sold at a Misr close to Makkah where they lived. This is obvious from this verse “[19] Then there came a caravan of travelers: they sent their water-carrier (for water), and he let down his bucket (into the well). He said: "Ah there! good news! here is a (fine) young man!" so they concealed him as a treasure! but Allah knoweth well all that they do! [20] The (Brethren) sold him for a Miserable price, for a few dirhams counted out: in such low estimation did they hold him!" (Yusuf ch 12 verse: 20).
Figure 6: Misr as locations as per both Dawood and Salibi. Both locations are on top of the Surat Mountains in Asir south of Mokkah
Here is another mistranslation based on a misunderstanding of what the Quran narrated. The Quran didn't mention who were the sellers of Yusuf at a Miserable price. All it mentioned was "They sold him". The early Muslims assumed that the "They" was referring to Yusuf’s brothers based on Jews false information. In fact "They" is referring to the merchants as the brothers cleared the area once they dropped Yusuf in the well. Selling the Goods at low price meant the merchants wanted to get rid of the new unexpected traveler. He had to be watered and fed and carried over a camel. Therefore, within few traveling days they offered him for sale in one of the Misrs along the route at low price to get ride of him. Therefore, we have good reasons to believe that this Misr should not be far away from Makkah.
Dawood suggested in one of his books that Misr is located at the top of the Surat mountains about 250 km south of Makkah, see figurer 6, while Kamal Al Salabi findings puts it further south in the midway between Al Baha and Al Namas. We believe that both could have been Misrs at some stage, but none should necessarily be the Misr in which Yusuf was sold. However, we can add one certain point here which is that the king of Yusuf’s Misr name indicates that he must have been from the proposed region as indicated in this quote "...Yusufs lived in al Aziz (العزيز) house for thirteen years and when he was thirty years old he was appointed as head of Misr by the king then, who’s name was Al Rayan (الريان) Ben Al Walied (الوليد) Ben Thoran (ثوران) Ben Arashah (ارشة) Ben Amro (عمرو ) Ben Amelak (عملاق) Ben Lawad (لاوذ) Ben Sam (سام) Ben Noah (نوح)…"،، Another blatant Hijazi full name, which Egyptology will deny the presence or incrustation in Egypt.
Misr during Yusuf’s time was a mix of multi tribal Arabs. The Torah called them Mizris. The Israelis were the new settler at that Misr as they were invited by Yusuf to reside in the Al Rayan Misr. The Israelis total number on the planet earth then was exactly 13 Arab people, Israel (Jacob) and his 12 sons including Yusuf in addition to their children who, as per the Torah, mounted up to 70 persons. Knowing that approximately 200 years separate Yusuf from Moses, How many progeny can 12 persons multiply in the span of 200 years? The Torah’s exaggerated number is a staggering 600,000 persons when in fact they should not exceed 3000 at extreme most, including children, men and women of all ages. Nevertheless, according to many believers and politicians, those were the "strong workforce" whom are claimed to have built the mighty pyramids in ancient Egypt!
Photo 10: The real Misr that has been projected to the world as the mighty Kingdom of Egypt most likely looked more of a small fort on the trade route similar to this image.
It is note worthy too that only few of the total Israelis believed in Moses and hence only few of them accompanied him in the exodus as revealed in the Quran "[83] But none believed in Musa except some children of his People, because of the fear of Fir'aun and his chiefs, lest they should persecute them; and certainly Fir'aun was mighty on the earth and one who transgressed all bounds" (Yunus ch 10 vers 83). Accordingly, the rest of Israelis remained in Misr and became the new property owners when the news of the pharaoh's death reached Misr; “[59] Thus it was, but We made the Children of Israel inheritors of such things." (As shurura ch 26 verse: 59). The rest of the Misris also had a share in the Misr, as stated in this verse "[28] Thus (was their end)! and We made other people inherit (those things)!" (Ad-Dukhan ch 44 verse 28). What concerns us here is the size of this Misr that was occupied by 3000 Israelis only and say another 3000 non Israelis. That was the capacity of the land of what is claimed to be the great kingdom of Egypt, when in fact it was nothing more than a village located near a small fort situated on the main trade route similar to the one shown in photo 10.
Assuming that Misr's location was to the south of Makkah, as per Dawood and Al Salibi, then where was Moses heading to when he left the Misr of the Fir’awn Kabwoos? According to the Torah they headed to the promised holy land which can't be mistaken for any other place but Makkah for it contained Beit Allah and Abrahams new home, "…Send for thee men, and they spy the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the sons of Israel; one man, one man for the tribe of his fathers ye do send, every one a prince among them.` 13:3 And Moses sendeth them from the wilderness of Paran by the command of Jehovah; all of them are men, heads of the sons of Israel they are," Here we read the familiar names again, Paran (فاران) and Canaan/ Kanan (كنان) of which we already demonstrated the association with Makkah, based on the Arabian historical records. Equally, it should not be surprising to learn that the long Arabian history preserved such narrations which describe a region containing Pharan area “…the passenger would travel the distance of two stations (Misrs) in the wilderness area until he reaches Pharan's sea coast where Qaran city was. There the Pharaoh drowned. The wilderness is about forty square Farsakhs (فرسخ) in which the Israelis spent 40 years in wandering (التيه) …”، In another narration we read “… it is reported that Musa confronted Arab tribes such as Tasum (طسم) and Jadys (جديس) and Amalek (العماليق) and Jurhm (جرهم) and the people of Madun (اهل مدين) and he reached Pharan (Paran) mountain which is Makkah ….” All these tribes are Arabs who dwelt in Arabia and Makkah region. In fact Ishmael's wife was from Jurhm tribe as engraved in the Arabian memory whereas the Greek Torah claimed her as “Egyptian”. Moreover, the name Kadish (قادش) (Holy, or Kadesh-Barnea, sacred desert of wandering) where Musa arrived at the end of the exodus trip is nothing but one of Makkah’s old name as reported by the Arab ancient historians “… Kadis (قادس) is one of the names of Beit Allah. It was called so to express holiness and the place of purification from sins…”، Furthermore, we read this quote “…I recall sixteen names for Makkah, one of them is Makkah, Kuthy (كوثي) … Kadis (قادس)…”. Regarding the names Gerar (جرار) and Gaza (غزة), they are to-date two neighborhoods in Makkah pronounced respectively as “Gerwal” (جرول) and “Gaza” (غزة , refer to figurer 5, and both are close to Beersheba which is known today by the name Beer Zimzum.
The concealed fact: Paran is the old name for Makkah Mountains surrounding Beit Allah (Bethel). While Abraham was dwelling Namrea with his first wife Sarah, 17 km away, he erected another house for his second wife Hagar next to Beersheba or as know today beer Zimzum in order to revive the most sacred place on earth since Adam and Eve time.
How did the Septuagint do it? – How to hide a mountain in a desert?
Undoubtedly, the shifting theory is obvious based on the Arabian historical scripts. The remaining question is how this historical forgery managed to spread worldwide and become a holy illusion. The answer lies in the following Quranic verse "[79] Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is from Allah," to traffic with it for a Miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby." (Al-i-IMran Ch 3 verse 79). The Quran confirms that the forged information was successfully trafficked because it was daredevilry marketed under the name of "Allah". Obviously, this emotionally masking approach shrouded the common sense of people and hindered their analyzing abilities leading to the acceptance of many contradictions and inconsistencies. The scholars of all three religions chose to ignore the blatant contradictions, or in extreme cases opted to resolve the resulting ambiguities with supernatural answers. For instance, to rationalize the notion that Abraham was traveling between Makkah and Palestine in the Torah given circumstances, one comes across such narrations as "… While at Palestine Abraham was requested to take Ishmael and Hagar to Makkah. He therefore boarded them on the Al-Buraq· and carried with him water in a goat skin bottle and some dry dates, and headed to Beit Allah …"''
Bearing in mind how the forged information was trafficked, we can put forth a scenario for the sequence of events since the Septuagint was released. During 282 B.C, and while Egypt was under Greek occupation, the Greek ruler in collaboration with 70 rabbis translated the Syriac Torah. The following verse most likely was addressing this particular drastic event "[78] There is among them a section who distort the Book with their tongues: (as they read) you would think it is a part of the Book, but it is no part of the Book; and they say, "That is from Allah," but it is not from Allah: it is they who tell a lie against Allah, and (well) they know it!" (Al-i-IMran Ch 3 verse 78). The translation which was called the Septuagint concealed the word "Misr" and replaced it with "Egypt". Ptolemy Ben Philadelphus would make financial benefits once Egypt becomes a holy land in the eyes of the western world, while the Jews rabbis would secure a bigger and more strategic lands for their future offspring under the made up "Promised - land" saga located on the rich Silk Trade Route as a substitute for the hard to get Incense Trade Route. The Greek and western people in general started to learn and educate their children with these forged accounts thinking they were authentic. The successive Roman empires also adopted the Septuagint as a source of holy teachings and once they grew into a universal super power, they effectively enforced and effectively spread the fake history in the old world. The fragmented and militarily weak Eastern generations were confused between what their ancestors' memory held with respect to the geographical locations and that preached by their contemporary successive western superpowers, namely the Greek and the Romans. The result was apparently the retrogression of the eastern genuine history in favor of the Roman church which insisted that Egypt was the land of the exodus and Iraq was the birth place of Abraham as they learned it from the Septuagint. This was the case for about 800 years before the Quran was revealed. The Quran like the New Testament stated that forged information had already spread and settled in the people's belief system and called for correction. Saturated with the inherited forged information, the early Muslims appeared not only unaware of the extent of damage done, but also started to explain the Quran verses in view of what they have already learned from the early Arab converted Jews who were saturated with the Septuagint teachings. Consequently, the forged teachings managed to reach the Muslims contemporary mosques and schools curriculums. What made it worse is that after the Islamic conquest of Egypt, it gradually lost its ancient name in favor of another name "Misr" which happened to resemble the biblical name for the place of the exodus. This made the Muslim generations strongly believe that Egypt, which they exclusively call Misr, was truly the exodus place.
Reversing the cycle – Diffusing the holy delusion:
Approximately 2280 years had elapsed since the Septuagint was published. Three main factors combined to facilitate the successful domination of the forged information on the ancient as well as the contemporary worlds. These factors are: 1- Presenting the forged information through sacred channels (70 Rabbis & Torah) 2- The existence of a political superpower prepared to promote the forged information amongst the public (Geek Ptolemies followed by the Roman Empires) 3-The believers' ignorance of the fact that their absolute fatalist submission could be the gateway to their abuse and control (a common behavior amongst most believers). These pivotal factors are still controlling factors against any attempt to diffuse the prevailing illusion. The publication of the Septuagint based bibles will continue regardless of the opposing archeological discoveries or the denial of the Egyptology findings. Today's images of Ptolemy Ben Philadelphus discovered the latent power of the old established "holy" forgery and embarked on making full use of it. Consequently, the implantation of the “Promised Land” forged legend in the Arab world is systematically pursued by the highest political powers and organizations not for religious purposes but rather for political and commercial strategic intentions the main of which is to physically split the African Arab nations from the Asian ones. This was the unannounced outcome of the 1905 London conference, which drafted the Arabic world current state of affairs. The only hope left is educating the believers of all three religions (Jews, Christians and Muslims) of the nature and the extent of the historical abuse committed by international politicians and bankers against their sacred sites and beliefs. However, this is not attainable unless the scholars, researchers and scientists establish study research task teams, and make their findings available to the followers of the three most resent religions.
Conclusion:
Around 282 B.C., masses of ancient Europeans primarily the Greeks followed by the Romans started to learn the heavenly teachings through a Greek book translated from a Syriac origin Torah. Seventy Rabbis were the translators of this book, which contained forged teachings concerning the geographical whereabouts of the Israeli prophets. The successful trafficking the forged teachings in a holiness shroud resulted in the creation of tow Bethel (House of God), two Beersheba, two Kadesh, two pilgrimage places, two Gaza, two kingdom of heavens, and two centers of earth … etc. The only explanation of the obvious similarities of events and site names between the Old Testament, which advocates south Syria as the main biblical theater, and the ancient Arabian History which indicates that Makkah region was the principal scene, lies in the conclusion that targeted places had been deliberately shifted from their original locations. The obvious contradictions and inconsistency of some details within both the Greek Torah and the post Islamic Arabian history support this conclusion. Through this paper, it was demonstrated that the Septuagint authors are to be held accountable for the prevailing universal illusion with respect to the Patriarchs geography. In fact, they were the intellectual team that deliberately replaced the name "Misr" with the name "Egypt" in order to pave the way for the mass removal of the entire holy sites from their original emplacement and project them all over Iraq, Syria and Egypt in preparation to activate the "holy" promised-land ideology. This serious copy and past type forgery could not have been trafficked successfully without the political will power of Greek Ptolemy Ben Philadelphus who supported the falsification most probably for tourism and religious attraction purposes. The holy Quran as well as the New Testament had repeatedly stated that grave falsification had occurred before the Islamic and Christian eras, which remained unaddressed until this very moment. The consequences of this ignorance was and is entirely tragic, as genuine holy places faded away from the majority of believers' awareness especially the westerns, and false sites erected in place for others, ancient· nations identities were lost or exchanged, wars waged and political and military conflicts over land and historical made-up rights stirred. The entire Arabic world is politically unstable primarily due to made-up disputes over delusive "holy" lands and sites. This will remain the case as long as today's Ptolemies are in support of the ancient Septuagint illusion for whatever financial and/or political drives. Fortunately, the world is rapidly shrinking into a small village, concealing the truth is becoming increasingly difficult. Unfortunately, the only other foreseeable way out of the pressed for “promised land” saga and its inescapable aftermath is dreadfully through the promised Armageddon.
For any required information or further clarifications, please contact the research and studies division in the Al-Tajdeed Cultural and Social Society – Kingdom of Bahrain. Email : tajdeed@tajdeed.org
___________________________________
1.Egypt & the Israelites in south west Arabia-Ziad Mouna – UK- ISBN:1-85513-247-8 2.Genesis 35:27 (http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C035.htm ); Genesis 23:2; Joshua 15:16; 15:61;18:18;18:22- 3.Genesis 13:18 (http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C013.htm); Genesis 14:13;14:24;18:1;23:17;23:19;25:9 .... 4.Genesis 12:8 (http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C012.htm ) ; Genesis 13:3; 28:19; 31:13; 35:3; 35:6 …. • Euphrates is the Greek pronunciation of the Syriac originating word Perâth. 5.Genesis 2:14 (http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C002.htm ) ; Genesis 15:18, …. 6.Refer to "Paradise and the Surat mountains" one of Al Tajdeed Society research work to be published by 2006 year end. • Tiger is the Greek pronunciation of the Syriac originating word Hiddekel. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigris ) 7.مختار السويفي- أم الحضارات - ص 127 8.http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP7900 9.Arabic news - Egypt renews denial of Jewish participation in building the Pyramids Egypt, History, 4/14/2001 http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/010414/2001041408.html •The Patriarchs referred to here are Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, Yusuf and Moses. 10.فراس السواح- الحدث التوراتي والشرق الأدنى القديم- ص 198 11.News paper article " Was Ramses II Moses Pharaoh?""رمسيس الثاني هل هو فرعون موسى؟"– جريدة الأيام- العدد 5916- تاريخ 22 مايو 2005- مملكة البحرين 12.Holy Quran: http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=43&nAya=51&t=eng 13.http://www.sacred-texts.com/egy/leg/leg42.htm ª The letter "S" is usually added by the Greeks to the names hence it should be dropped when reverting the name to its origin pronunciation. 14.The free dictionary http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Danaus 15.العلامة المجلسي - بحار الأنوار- ج 2 ، ص 383 16.جمال الدين الزيعلي - نصب الراية- ج 6 ،ص 564 17.الأحمدي الميانجي- مكاتيب الرسول -ج 2، ص 424 18.محمد بن سعد- الطبقات الكبرى- ج 1 ،ص 260 19.المتقي الهندي - كنز العمال - ج 5 ص 759 · Research shows that the Muslims didn’t call Egypt by the name Misr because it is biblically or Quranically originated, but rather because the new capital at that time "AL Fustat" (الفسطاط) was considered the main fully equipped trading and ruling center and gradually became the travelers destination. Distention in Arabic language is coincidently pronounced and written as "Misr'. Therefore, the Muslims called the Fustat (الفسطاط) city the "Destination" i.e. The Misr. This is how gradually the name Misr originated and spread though out the valley. Refer to the below reference. 20.جمعية التجديد، مملكة البحرين – نداء السراة - اختطاف جغرافيا الأنبياء – ص 110 21.Salibi, Kamal, The Bible Came from Arabia, London, Jonathan, 1985 22.كمال الصليبي - البحث عن يسوع –ص 31 ¨ There are other 4 verses which also mention Misr as the homeland of Musa. 23.The Septuagint online: http://www.kalvesmaki.com/LXX/Texts.htm 24.المسعودي - التنبيه والإشراف- ص 182 25.Paleo-Hebrew (Before 585 B.C.)، Genesis 21:21 http://www.hebrewoldtestament.com/index2.htm 26.جمال الدين الأتابكي- النجوم الزاهرة- ج 1 ،ص 61 27.ابن خلدون- تاريخ ابن خلدون -ج 2 ، ص 74 28.This site contains the Pyramid Texts pronounced in Gipti language. The word Pharaoh doesn’t exit anywhere in the hundreds of preserved manuscripts: http://www.pyramidtexts.com/ 29.Royal Titles for Kings of Egypt By Marie Parsons: http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/titles.htm 30.Quranic Accuracy Vs. Biblical Error: The Kings & Pharaohs Of Egypt ,M S M Saifullah, `Abdullah David & Elias Karim http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/Contrad/External/josephdetail.html 31.PHARAOHS and CAMELS; Only in Arabia!: http://www.biblemysteries.com/lectures/pharaohscamels.htm 32.فَرْعُ كلّ شيء: أَعْلاه لسان العرب ج8 ص 246 33.تاريخ دمشق –ابن عساكر ج 61 ص 20 34.البداية والنهاية- ابن كثير ج1 ص 276 35.بحار الأنوار-المجلسي ج13 ص 51 36.علل الشرائع - الشيخ الصدوق ج 1 ص 67 37.لسان العرب - ابن منظور ج 31 ص 323 38.الصحاح - الجوهري ج 6 ص 2177 39.معجم البلدان - الحموي ج 5 ص 140 40.تاريخ العرب قبل الإسلام - الدكتور أحمد أمين سليم ص 121 41.الكامل في التاريخ – الشيباني -ج1 ص112 · Wahab is a Jewish scholar. He converted to Islam shortly after the prophet Mohamed death. ¨ The people of the book is a Quranic expression refereeing to Jews and Christians. 42.تفسير القرطبي-القرطبي ج1 ص 383 43.فتح القدير-الشوكاني ج1 ص 82 44.الرحاب الندية في مذهب النصرانية و اليهودية- السيد محمد الموسوي –ص 282 45.علل الشرائع - الشيخ الصدوق ج 1 ص 67 46.معاني الأخبار- الشيخ الصدوق ص 50 47.شرح أصول الكافي - مولي محمد صالح المازندراني ج 9 ص 220 48.وسائل الشيعة (الإسلامية) - الحر العاملي ج 11 ص 373 49.الصراط المستقيم - علي بن يونس العاملي ج 2 ص 45 50.بحار الأنوار - العلامة المجلسي ج 31 ص 15 51.شرح نهج البلاغة - ابن أبي الحديد ج 01 ص 94 52.فيض القدير شرح الجامع الصغير - المناوي ج 3 ص 121 53.التبيان - الشيخ الطوسي ج 1 ص 220 54.تفسير مجمع البيان - الشيخ الطبرسي ج 1 ص 203 55.التفسير الصافي - الفيض الكاشاني ج 2 ص 223 56.التفسير الأصفى - الفيض الكاشاني ج 2 ص 760 57.تفسير نور الثقلين - الشيخ الحويزي ج 3 ص 380 58.تفسير الميزان - السيد الطباطبائي ج 41 ص 161 59.جامع البيان - إبن جرير الطبري ج 1 ص 385 60.زاد المسير - ابن الجوزي ج 1 ص 65 61.تفسير القرطبي - القرطبي ج 1 ص 383 62.تفسير ابن كثير - ابن كثير ج 1 ص 94 63.ئفسير الثعالبي - الثعالبي ج 1 ص 235 64.فتح القدير - الشوكاني ج 1 ص 82 65.الأخبار الطوال- الدينوري ص 4 66.معجم البلدان - الحموي ج 5 ص 140 67.كتاب المحبر- محمد بن حبيب البغدادي ص 467 68.تاريخ اليعقوبي - اليعقوبي ج 1 ص 186 69.تاريخ الطبري - الطبري ج 1 ص 272 70.أخبار الزمان- المسعودي ص 269 71.الشفا بتعريف حقوق المصطفى - القاضي عياض ج 1 ص 98 72.قصص الأنبياء- الجزائري ص 259 73.الصحاح - الجوهري ج 6 ص 2177 74.لسان العرب - ابن منظور ج 31 ص 323 75.مختار الصحاح- محمد بن عبد القادر ص 259 76.القاموس المحيط - الفيروز آبادى ج 4 ص 255 77.مجمع البحرين - الشيخ الطريحي ج 3 ص 391 78.تاج العروس - الزبيدي ج 7 ص 25 79.شذرات الذهب- المقدسي ج2 ص 65 80.مرآة الجنان-اليافعي ج2 ص 96 81.الكامل في التاريخ –الشيباني ج1 ص 130 82.المنتظم- أبو الفرج ج1 ص 332 83.الإنس الجليل – العليمي ج1 ص 74 84.النجوم الزاهرة- بردي ج 1 ص 58 85.فتوح مصر وأخبارها- ابن اعين ج1 ص 76 86.تلقيح فهوم أهل الأثر- ابن الجوزي ج1 ص 332 87.فيض القدير-المناوي ج3 ص 93 88.عمدة القارئ - العيني ج2 ص 59 89.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=2&nAya=127&t=eng · Unlike the Greek Torah, the Quran confirms that Ishmael and not Isaac was the one offered for sacrifice. 90.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=37&nAya=102&t=eng 91.الكافي - الشيخ الكليني ج 4 ص 207 : 92.الحدائق الناضرة - المحقق البحراني ج 61 ص 350 93.فقه الصادق (ع) - السيد محمد صادق الروحاني ج 11 ص 357 : ¨ (al 'iber) means the transient borders. ª The Euphrates river mentioned in the above quote is located in Arabia south of Makkah and has nothing to do with the river in Iraq named after this Arabian genuine river. 94.معجم ما استعجم - البكري الأندلسي ج 1 ص 10 · Note that it is believed that the revir valley is continuous all the way from the top of the Surat mountains to north Iraq via the Hafr Albatun valley, therefore authors added a connection green line to the valley. 95.Genesis 17:5 : http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B02C021.htm 96.Exodus 21:2 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B02C021.htm 97.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=19&nAya=48&t=eng 98.الهداية الكبرى- الحسين بن حمدان الخصيبي ص 98 99.بحار الأنور-المجلسي ج21 ص40 100.الفضائل لشاذان- بن جبرئيل القمي ص126 101.مدينة المعاجز - السيد هاشم البحراني ج 1 ص 52 § Najaf نجفis a now a well known city in south Iraq. The word consists of two parts "Ny" (ني) and "Jaf" (جف) which latterly means as per the Arabic Akkadia dialect "Dry sea" refer to: 102.نداء السراة-اختطاف جغرافيا الانبياء –جمعية التجديد الثقافية -2006، الجنة تحت اقدام السراة- جمعية التجديد الثقافية 103.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=37&nAya=99&t=eng 104.http://quran.muslim-web.com/sura.htm?aya=022026 105.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=14&nAya=37&t=eng 106.Genesis 21:14 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C021.htm · Paran motioned in the Torah is defiantly Makkah as will be revealed later. 107.Genesis 21:19; Same as above ª Beer is an Arabic word which means water well. 108.Genesis 21:30-31 Same above source 109.المحقق البحراني - الحدائق الناضرة - ج 17 ص341 110.جعفر كاشف الغطاء - كشف الغطاء - ج 1 ص 114 111.محمد الريشهري - الحج والعمرة في الكتاب والسنة –ص 114 112.الشيخ الصدوق- الخصال- 454 113.الحر العاملي – وسائل الشيعة (آل البيت) - ج 13 -ص 246 114.العلامة المجلسي- بحار الأنوار - ج 96 ص243 115.السيد البروجردي - جامع أحاديث الشيعة - ج 10 - ص 39 116.لسان العرب- ابن منظور- ج 8 ص 171 117.الشعراني- العهود المحمدية ص243 118.جار الله الزمخشري- الفايق في غريب الحديث -ج2 ص 180 119.الطبراني- المعجم الكبير- ج10 ص 271 120.ابن أبي شيبة الكوفي- المصنف-ج4 ص 358 121.عبد الرزاق الصنعاني- المصنف-ج5 ص 117 122.الهيثمي- مجمع الزوائد-ج 3 ص 286 123.الدر المنثور- جلال الدين السيوطي - ج 3 ص 222 124.سبل الهدى والرشاد- الصالحي الشامي-ج1 ص 182 125.معجم البلدان-الحموي- ج3 ص 317 126.النهاية في غريب الحديث- ابن الأثير- ج2 ص 441 127.Genesis 16:15: http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C016.htm 128.Navigating the Bible: http://bible.ort.org/books/pentd2.asp?ACTION=displaypage&BOOK=1&CHAPTER=16 129.Genesis 21:21 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C021.htm 130.صفة جزيرة العرب- الهمداني -ص86 131.لسان العرب – ابن منظور -ج5- ص43 132.النهاية في غريب الأثر ج3/ص405 133.معجم البلدان ج4/ص225 134.البداية والنهاية - ابن كثير ج 2 ص 231 : 135.هداية الحيارى في أجوبة اليهود والنصارى- ابن قيم الجوزية 48 136.تفسير ابن كثير ج4- ص15 137.Genesis 12:6 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C012.htm 138.الأقطاب الفقهية- ابن أبي جمهور ص 66 139.العرب والساميون والعبرانيون وبنو إسرائيل و اليهود-أحمد داوود ص184 140.التنبيه والأشراف- المسعودي ص 95 141.معجم البلدان - الحموي ج 3 ص 147 142.أخبار مكة للفاكهي -ج2- ص267 143.حلية الأولياء للاصبهاني ص298 144.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=20&nAya=12&t=eng 145.أخبار مكة للفاكهي ج2/ص257 146.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=11&nAya=69&t=eng 147.مصباح المتهجد- الشيخ الطوسي ص 418 148.بحار الأنوار - العلامة المجلسي ج 78 ص 99 149.Genesis 13:7 http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B01C013.htm 150.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=37&nAya=133&t=eng 151.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=29&nAya=35&t=eng 152.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=2&nAya=61&t=eng · It is proposed here that the authors of the Septuagint missed this word from the systematic process of replacing Misr with Egypt. 153.http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B05C010.htm 154.تاريخ اليعقوبي ج: 2 ص: 154 155.http://nabataea.net/trader.html 156.http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/mosera.html 157.الكامل في التاريخ –الشيباني ج1/ص77 158.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=12&nAya=10&t=eng 159.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=12&nAya=20&t=eng 160.تاريخ الطبري - الطبري ج 1 ص 255 161.بحار الأنوار - العلامة المجلسي ج 21 ص 282 162.البداية والنهاية - ابن كثير ج 1 ص 239 163.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=10&nAya=83&t=eng 164.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=26&nAya=58&t=eng 165.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=44&nAya=28&t=eng 166.http://www.htmlbible.com/kjv30/B04C013.htm 167.المواعظ والاعتبار- المقريزي- ص 268 168.الروض المعطار في خبر الأقطار-الحميري-ص149 169.المواعظ والاعتبار-المقريزي-ص 1242 170.http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/ebd/ebd215.htm 171.معجم ما استعجم - البكري الأندلسي ج 1 ص 270 172.سبل الهدى والرشاد - الصالحي الشامي ج 1 ص 170 173.المجموع - محيى الدين النووي ج 8 ص 3 174.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=2&nAya=79&t=eng · Al-Buraq is a legendary flying creature some report it looks like a woman headed flying horse others report it is more of a mix bread between a horse and a mule with 2 wings. All descriptions of this flying creature are originating from Jewish ancient tales. 175.تفسير ابن كثير ج4/ص15 176.لروض الأنف- السهيلي ص55 177.http://quran.al-islam.com/Targama/DispTargam.asp?nType=1&nSeg=0&l=eng&nSora=3&nAya=78&t=eng 178.مسخ الصورة- جمعية التجديد الثقافية – مملكة البحرين -: www.Tajdeed.org 179.http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/am/publish/article_9.shtmlposted by Tajdeed at 8:32 AM | 64 comments
What’s the significance of having a central bank within a country and why should you concern yourself, your family and colleagues?
Central banks are illegally created PRIVATE banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family.
The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook.
Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.
The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation. Please do not confuse this with the term globalization. Mononation and globalization couldn’t be more different in concept, scope and purpose. Mononation is one state. It has one government. One set of laws for all ordinary citizens, no laws for the elite. Globalization refers to communicating, trading, interacting, etc. among separate, different, independent, sovereign countries.
The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation.
Our own Federal Reserve is an illegally emplaced private bank that is directly responsible for creating all the US’s depressions, recessions, and the inflation and deflation of our dollar. The Fed controls the printing of our own currency, and then charges the US government interest on those loans. The interest is growing each year, making it difficult if not impossible for our government to pay it. How do we pay this interest? By the US Personal Income Tax. This tax goes to the Rothschild family.
In the coming months, as I continue to gather intel and write a book about The First Sphere of Influence, I will share more and more. For now, I kindly ask that you read each of the 165 lines below. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe my intel. You can click on each bank and visit its website. I’ve seen each one. They’re real. And they’re one of the reasons why each country is in such deep debt to this insidious family, the Rothschilds.
By the way, if you’re curious what the US debt is to the BIS, please refer to the table at the end of this article, taken from the latest statistical results provided by the Joint External Debt Hub, which receives data from the BIS, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Want to know what banks they actually own? Here is the complete list:
Afghanistan: Bank of AfghanistanAlbania: Bank of AlbaniaAlgeria: Bank of AlgeriaArgentina: Central Bank of ArgentinaArmenia: Central Bank of ArmeniaAruba: Central Bank of ArubaAustralia: Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustria: Austrian National BankAzerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan RepublicBahamas: Central Bank of The BahamasBahrain: Central Bank of BahrainBangladesh: Bangladesh BankBarbados: Central Bank of BarbadosBelarus: National Bank of the Republic of BelarusBelgium: National Bank of BelgiumBelize: Central Bank of BelizeBenin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary AuthorityBhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of BhutanBolivia: Central Bank of BoliviaBosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana: Bank of BotswanaBrazil: Central Bank of BrazilBulgaria: Bulgarian National BankBurkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Burundi: Bank of the Republic of BurundiCambodia: National Bank of CambodiaCame Roon: Bank of Central African StatesCanada: Bank of Canada – Banque du CanadaCayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary AuthorityCentral African Republic: Bank of Central African StatesChad: Bank of Central African StatesChile: Central Bank of ChileChina: The People’s Bank of ChinaColombia: Bank of the RepublicComoros: Central Bank of ComorosCongo: Bank of Central African StatesCosta Rica: Central Bank of Costa RicaCôte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Croatia: Croatian National BankCuba: Central Bank of CubaCyprus: Central Bank of CyprusCzech Republic: Czech National BankDenmark: National Bank of DenmarkDominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican RepublicEast Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central BankEcuador: Central Bank of EcuadorEgypt: Central Bank of EgyptEl Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El SalvadorEquatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African StatesEstonia: Bank of EstoniaEthiopia: National Bank of EthiopiaEuropean Union: European Central BankFiji: Reserve Bank of FijiFinland: Bank of FinlandFrance: Bank of FranceGabon: Bank of Central African StatesThe Gambia: Central Bank of The GambiaGeorgia: National Bank of GeorgiaGermany: Deutsche BundesbankGhana: Bank of GhanaGreece: Bank of GreeceGuatemala: Bank of GuatemalaGuinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Guyana: Bank of GuyanaHaiti: Central Bank of HaitiHonduras: Central Bank of HondurasHong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary AuthorityHungary: Magyar Nemzeti BankIceland: Central Bank of IcelandIndia: Reserve Bank of IndiaIndonesia: Bank IndonesiaIran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of IranIraq: Central Bank of IraqIreland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of IrelandIsrael: Bank of IsraelItaly: Bank of ItalyJamaica: Bank of JamaicaJapan: Bank of JapanJordan: Central Bank of JordanKazakhstan: National Bank of KazakhstanKenya: Central Bank of KenyaKorea: Bank of KoreaKuwait: Central Bank of KuwaitKyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz RepublicLatvia: Bank of LatviaLebanon: Central Bank of LebanonLesotho: Central Bank of LesothoLibya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest)Uruguay: Central Bank of UruguayLithuania: Bank of LithuaniaLuxembourg: Central Bank of LuxembourgMacao: Monetary Authority of MacaoMacedonia: National Bank of the Republic of MacedoniaMadagascar: Central Bank of MadagascarMalawi: Reserve Bank of MalawiMalaysia: Central Bank of MalaysiaMali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Malta: Central Bank of MaltaMauritius: Bank of MauritiusMexico: Bank of MexicoMoldova: National Bank of MoldovaMongolia: Bank of MongoliaMontenegro: Central Bank of MontenegroMorocco: Bank of MoroccoMozambique: Bank of MozambiqueNamibia: Bank of NamibiaNepal: Central Bank of NepalNetherlands: Netherlands BankNetherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands AntillesNew Zealand: Reserve Bank of New ZealandNicaragua: Central Bank of NicaraguaNiger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Nigeria: Central Bank of NigeriaNorway: Central Bank of NorwayOman: Central Bank of OmanPakistan: State Bank of PakistanPapua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New GuineaParaguay: Central Bank of ParaguayPeru: Central Reserve Bank of PeruPhilip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng PilipinasPoland: National Bank of PolandPortugal: Bank of PortugalQatar: Qatar Central BankRomania: National Bank of RomaniaRussia: Central Bank of RussiaRwanda: National Bank of RwandaSan Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San MarinoSamoa: Central Bank of SamoaSaudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary AgencySenegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Serbia: National Bank of SerbiaSeychelles: Central Bank of SeychellesSierra Leone: Bank of Sierra LeoneSingapore: Monetary Authority of SingaporeSlovakia: National Bank of SlovakiaSlovenia: Bank of SloveniaSolomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon IslandsSouth Africa: South African Reserve BankSpain: Bank of SpainSri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri LankaSudan: Bank of SudanSurinam: Central Bank of SurinameSwaziland: The Central Bank of SwazilandSweden: Sveriges RiksbankSwitzerland: Swiss National BankTajikistan: National Bank of TajikistanTanzania: Bank of TanzaniaThailand: Bank of ThailandTogo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)Tonga: National Reserve Bank of TongaTrinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and TobagoTunisia: Central Bank of TunisiaTurkey: Central Bank of the Republic of TurkeyUganda: Bank of UgandaUkraine: National Bank of UkraineUnited Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom: Bank of EnglandUnited States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkVanuatu: Reserve Bank of VanuatuVenezuela: Central Bank of VenezuelaVietnam: The State Bank of VietnamYemen: Central Bank of YemenZambia: Bank of ZambiaZimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
According to humanfree: Virtually unknown to the general public is the fact that the US Federal Reserve is a privately owned company, siting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws.
This privately owned company (controlled by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans) prints the money FOR the US Government, which pays them interest for the “favor.” This means that if we would reset the nation’s debt today and would begin reprinting money, we would be in debt to the FED from the very first dollar loaned to our Government.
Also, most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency.
To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed).
Its main goal is to make sure the American people pay their tax and be good little slaves.
In 1835, US President Andrew Jackson declared his disdain for the international bankers:
“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”
There followed an (unsuccessful) assassination attempt on President Jackson’s life. Jackson had told his vice president, Martin Van Buren:
“The bank, Mr. Van Buren, is trying to kill me.”
This was the beginning of a pattern of intrigue that would plague the White House itself over the coming decades. Both Lincoln and JFK have been murdered for trying to rid the country of banksters.
The world’s Megabanks
There are two Megabanks that offer loans to all the countries around the planet, the World Bank and the IMF. The first one is jointly owned by the world’s top banking families, with the Rothschilds at the very top, while the second one is privately owned by the Rothschilds alone.
These two Megabanks offer loans to “developing countries” and use their almost impossible-to-pay-back interests to get their hands on the real wealth: land and precious metals.
But that’s not all! An important part of their plan is to also exploit a country’s natural resources (like petrol or gas) via their covertly-owned companies, refine them, and sell them back to the same country, making a huge profit.
But in order for these companies to operate optimally, they need a solid infrastructure, which is usually lacking in the so called “developing countries.” So before the banksters even offer the almost impossible-to-pay-back loans, they make sure that most of the money will be invested in — you’ve guessed it — infrastructure.
These “negotiations” are carried out by the so called “Economic Hitmen”, who succeed by handsomely rewarding (i.e. bribing) or threatening with death those who are in the position to sell away their country.
For more information on the subject, I suggest reading the Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
The one bank that rules them all, the “Bank for International Settlement,” is — obviously — controlled by the Rothschilds and it is nicknamed the “Tower of Basel.”
The true power of the Rothschilds goes FAR beyond the Banking Empire
If you are not yet amazed by the power of the Rothschilds (I know you are), please know that they are also behind all wars since Napoleon. That’s when they’ve discovered just how profitable it is to finance both sides of a war and they’ve been doing it ever since.
In 1849, Guttle Schnapper, the wife of Mayer Amschel stated: “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” So, the world is still at war because it is very, very profitable to the Rothschilds and their parasite bankster bloodlines. And for as long as we will continue to use money, the world will never know peace.
It is shocking for many to find out that the United States of America is a corporation ruled from abroad. Its original name was the Virginia Company and it was owned by the British Crown (it should not be mistaken for the Queen, which functions largely in a ceremonial capacity only).
The British Crown donated the company to the Vatican, which gave the exploitation rights back to the Crown. The US Presidents are appointed CEOs and their business is to make money for the British Crown and the Vatican, who take their share of the profits every year.
The British Crown covertly rules the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state, know as The City of London. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England. Guess who is controlling the Bank of England? Yes, the Rothschilds!
In 1815, Nathan Mayer made the following statement: “I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”
The House of Rothschild is really at the top of the pyramid of power. They are behind the New World Order and the complete domination of the world agenda. They are behind the European Union and the Euro and they are behind the idea of a North American Union and the Amero. They are controlling all of the world’s secret services and their private army is NATO.
Je suis Musulman christique, français naturalisé, avant ce con de Catalan sioniste de Manuel Valls, et, travaillant avec les Juifs pendant 13 ans, en qualité de directeur de l’Hôtel Windsor, en plein quartier juif et pédé, j’ai eu le temps de savoir qui est ou n’est pas raciste, et, qui contrôle la France sioniste, pédé, et pédophile.
Cette vidéo me donne envie de vomir tellement qu’elle pue le racisme.
« Marie S'infiltre au meeting de Marine Le Pen et a rencontré des gens tout à fait charmants! À voir jusqu'au bout !”
Des gens charmants, oui, des ignorants, et des menteurs pour la plupart, et, qui puent le racisme misislamiste, et islamophobes à plein nez!
À voir jusqu’au bout ? J’ai vomi à mi-chemin, et il a fallu que je coure dégueuler aux toilettes (aux chiottes, on dit en France !) !
Mais, merci quand même de nous prouver ce que je savais depuis fort longtemps. Depuis 1990, je n’ai pu rentrer en France, et vit en exil en Angleterre à cause de ces fascistes et racistes acoquinés à Israël, et l’Axe du Mal américano-sioniste !
100,000 militaires dans les rues de Paris ?
La Ligue (Terroriste aux USA !) de Défense Juive (LDJ) qui est entraînée dans les locaux de la Police aux frais des contribuables, et ces cons qui accusent les Musulmans et l’Islam ?
La liberté d’expression en France, tu parles ! Même ce commentaire ne survivra pas longtemps, mais, je m’en fiche totalement ! C’est déjà sur mon Blog !
BAFS
Ce mardi 25 avril 2017
Unable to post comment.Try Again ISRAEL AND GODLESSNESS ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT ISLAM OR MUSLIMS!
The development of the modern nation states throughout the Arab world is a fascinating and heartbreaking process. 100 years ago, most Arabs were part of the Ottoman Empire/Caliphate, a large multi-ethnic state based in Istanbul. Today, a political map of the Arab world looks like a very complex jigsaw puzzle. A complex and intricate course of events in the 1910s brought about the end of the Ottomans and the rise of these new nations with borders running across the Middle East, diving Muslims from each other. While there are many different factors leading to this, the role that the British played in this was far greater than any other player in the region. Three separate agreements made conflicting promises that the British had to stand by. The result was a political mess that divided up a large part of the Muslim world.
The Outbreak of World War I
In the summer of 1914, war broke out in Europe. A complex system of alliances, a militaristic arms race, colonial ambitions, and general mismanagement at the highest government levels led to this devastating war that would claim the lives of 12 million people from 1914 to 1918. On the “Allied” side stood the empires of Britain, France, and Russia. The “Central” powers consisted of Germany and Austria-Hungary.
The Ottoman Empire in 1914 at the start of the war
At first, the Ottoman Empire decided to remain neutral. They were not nearly as strong as any of the other nations fighting in the war, and were wracked by internal and external threats. The Ottoman sultan/caliph was nothing more than a figurehead at this point, with the last powerful sultan, Abdulhamid II, having been overthrown in 1908 and replaced with a military government led by the “Three Pashas”. They were from the secular Westernized group, the Young Turks. Financially, the Ottomans were in a serious bind, owing huge debts to the European powers that they were not able to pay. After trying to join the Allied side and being rejected, the Ottomans sided with the Central Powers in October of 1914. The British immediately began to conceive of plans to dissolve the Ottoman Empire and expand their Middle Eastern empire. They had already had control of Egypt since 1888 and India since 1857. The Ottoman Middle East lay right in the middle of these two important colonies, and the British were determined to exterminate it as part of the world war.
The Arab Revolt
One of the British strategies was to turn the Ottoman Empire’s Arab subjects against the government. They found a ready and willing helper in the Hejaz, the western region of the Arabian Peninsula. Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the amir (governor) of Makkah entered into an agreement with the British government to revolt against the Ottomans. His reasons for allying with the foreign British against other Muslims remains uncertain. Possible reasons for his revolt were: disapproval with the Turkish nationalist objectives of the Three Pashas, a personal feud with the Ottoman government, or simply a desire for his own kingdom. Whatever his reasons were, Sharif Hussein decided to revolt against the Ottoman government in alliance with the British. In return, the British promised to provide money and weapons to the rebels to help them fight the much more organized Ottoman army. Also, the British promised him that after the war, he would be given his own Arab kingdom that would cover the entire Arabian Peninsula, including Syria and Iraq. The letters in which the two sides negotiated and discussed revolt were known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, as Sharif Hussein was communicating with the British High Commissioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon.
Arab rebels with the British-designed Flag of the Arab Revolt
In June of 1916 Sharif Hussein led his group of armed Bedouin warriors from the Hejaz in an armed campaign against the Ottomans. Within a few months, the Arab rebels managed to capture numerous cities in the Hejaz (including Jeddah and Makkah) with help from the British army and navy. The British provided support in the form of soldiers, weapons, money, advisors (including the “legendary” Lawrence of Arabia), and a flag. The British in Egypt drew up a flag for the Arabs to use in battle, which was known as the “Flag of the Arab Revolt”. This flag would later become the model for other Arab flags of countries such as Jordan, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, and Kuwait. As World War One progressed through 1917 and 1918, the Arab rebels managed to capture some major cities from the Ottomans. As the British advanced into Palestine and Iraq, capturing cities such as Jerusalem and Baghdad, the Arabs aided them by capturing Amman and Aqaba. It is important to note that the Arab Revolt did not have the backing of a large majority of the Arab population. It was a minority movement of a couple thousand tribesmen led by a few leaders who sought to increase their own powers. The vast majority of the Arab people stayed away from the conflict and did not support the rebels or the Ottoman government. Sharif Hussein’s plan to create his own Arab kingdom was succeeding so far, if it were not for other promises the British would make.
The Sykes-Picot Agreement
British and French control according to the Sykes-Picot Agreement
Before the Arab Revolt could even begin and before Sharif Hussein could create his Arab kingdom, the British and French had other plans. In the winter of 1915-1916, two diplomats, Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and François Georges-Picot of France secretly met to decide the fate of the post-Ottoman Arab world. According to what would become known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the British and French agreed to divide up the Arab world between themselves. The British were to take control of what is now Iraq, Kuwait, and Jordan. The French were given modern Syria, Lebanon, and southern Turkey. The status of Palestine was to be determined later, with Zionist ambitions to be taken into account. The zones of control that the British and French were given allowed for some amount of Arab self-rule in some areas, albeit with European control over such Arab kingdoms. In other areas, the British and French were promised total control. Although it was meant to be a secret agreement for a post-WWI Middle East, the agreement became known publicly in 1917 when the Russian Bolshevik government exposed it. The Sykes-Picot Agreement directly contradicted the promises the British made to Sherif Hussein and caused a considerable amount of tension between the British and Arabs. However, this would not be the last of the conflicting agreements the British would make.
The Balfour Declaration
Another group that wanted a say in the political landscape of the Middle East were the Zionists. Zionism is a political movement that calls for the establishment of a Jewish state in the Holy Land of Palestine. It began in the 1800s as a movement that sought to find a homeland away from Europe for Jews (most of which lived in Germany, Poland, and Russia).
Arthur Balfour and the original Balfour Declaration
Eventually the Zionists decided to pressure the British government during WWI into allowing them to settle in Palestine after the war was over. Within the British government, there were many who were sympathetic to this political movement. One of those was Arthur Balfour, the Foreign Secretary for Britain. On November 2nd, 1917, he sent a letter to Baron Rothschild, a leader in the Zionist community. The letter declared the British government’s official support for the Zionist movement’s goals to establish a Jewish state in Palestine:
“His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
Three Conflicting Agreements
By 1917, the British had made three different agreements with three different groups promising three different political futures for the Arab world. The Arabs insisted they still get their Arab kingdom that was promised to them through Sharif Hussein. The French (and British themselves) expected to divide up that same land among themselves. And the Zionists expected to be given Palestine as promised by Balfour. In 1918 the war ended with the victory of the Allies and the complete destruction of the Ottoman Empire. Although the Ottomans existed in name until 1922 (and the caliphate existed in name until 1924), all the former Ottoman land was now under European occupation. The war was over, but the Middle East’s future was still in dispute between three different sides.
The mandates that the League of Nations created after WWI
Which side won? None fully got what they wanted. In the aftermath of WWI, the League of Nations (a forerunner to the United Nations) was established. One of its jobs was to divide up the conquered Ottoman lands. It drew up “mandates” for the Arab world. Each mandate was supposed to be ruled by the British or French “until such time as they are able to stand alone.” The League was the one to draw up the borders we see on modern political maps of the Middle East. The borders were drawn without regard for the wishes of the people living there, or along ethnic, geographic, or religious boundaries – they were truly arbitrary. It is important to note that even today, political borders in the Middle East do not indicate different groups of people. The differences between Iraqis, Syrians, Jordanians, etc. were entirely created by the European colonizers as a method of dividing the Arabs against each other. Through the mandate system, the British and the French were able to get the control they wanted over the Middle East. For Sharif Hussein, his sons were allowed to rule over these mandates under British “protection”. Prince Faisal was made king of Iraq and Syria and Prince Abdullah was made king of Jordan. In practice, however, the British and French had real authority over these areas. For the Zionists, they were allowed by the British government to settle in Palestine, although with limitations. The British did not want to anger the Arabs already living in Palestine, so they tried to limit the number of Jews allowed to migrate to Palestine. This angered the Zionists, who looked for illegal ways to immigrate throughout the 1920s-1940s, as well as the Arabs, who saw the immigration as encroachment on land that had been theirs since Salah al-Din liberated it in 1187. The political mess that Britain created in the aftermath of WWI remains today. The competing agreements and the subsequent countries that were created to disunite Muslims from each other led to political instability throughout the Middle East. The rise of Zionism coupled with the disunity of the Muslims in that region has led to corrupt governments and economic decline for the Middle East as a whole. The divisions that the British instituted in the Muslim world remain strong today, despite being wholly created within the past 100 years.
Bibliography: Fromkin, David. A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East. New York: H. Holt, 2001. Hourani, Albert Habib. A History Of The Arab Peoples. New York: Mjf Books, 1997. Print. Ochsenwald, William, and Sydney Fisher. The Middle East: A History. 6th. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003. Print.
The Man Behind The Curtain: Israeli Colonel Among ISIS Forces In Iraq
By F. William Engdahl
This was definitely not supposed to happen. It seems that an Israeli military man with the rank of colonel was “caught with IS pants down.” By that I mean he was captured amid a gaggle of so-called IS – or Islamic State or ISIS or DAESH depending on your preference – terrorists, by soldiers of the Iraqi army. Under interrogation by the Iraqi intelligence he apparently said a lot regarding the role of Netanyahu’s IDF in supporting IS.
In late October an Iranian news agency, quoting a senior Iraqi intelligence officer, reported the capture of an Israeli army colonel, named Yusi Oulen Shahak, reportedly related to the ISIS Golani Battalion operating in Iraq in the Salahuddin front. In a statement to Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency a Commander of the Iraqi Army stated, “The security and popular forces have held captive an Israeli colonel.” He added that the IDF colonel “had participated in the Takfiri ISIL group’s terrorist operations.” He said the colonel was arrested together with a number of ISIL or IS terrorists, giving the details: “The Israeli colonel’s name is Yusi Oulen Shahak and is ranked colonel in Golani Brigade… with the security and military code of Re34356578765az231434.”
Comment:The news of this capture went further:
… that the relevant bodies are now interrogating the Israeli colonel to understand the reasons behind his fighting alongside the ISIL forces and the presence of other Zionist officers among ISIL terrorists.
The Iraqi security forces said the captured colonel has already made shocking confessions.
Several ISIL militants arrested in the last one year had already confessed that Israeli agents from Mossad and other Israeli espionage and intelligence bodies were present in the first wave of ISIL attacks on Iraq and capture of Mosul in Summer 2014, but no ranking Israeli agent had been arrested.
Political and military experts told FNA that the capture of the Israeli colonel will leave a grave impact on Iraq’s war strategy, including partnership with Israeli allies.
Why Israel?
Ever since the beginning of Russia’s very effective IS bombing of select targets in Syria on September 30, details of the very dirty role of not only Washington, but also NATO member Turkey under President Erdogan, Qatar and other states has come into the sunlight for the first time.
It’s becoming increasingly clear that at least a faction in the Obama Administration has played a very dirty behind-the-scenes role in supporting IS in order to advance the removal of Syrian President Bashar al Assad and pave the way for what inevitably would be a Libya-style chaos and destruction which would make the present Syrian refugee crisis in Europe a mere warmup by comparison.
The “pro-IS faction” in Washington includes the so-called neo-conservatives centered around disgraced former CIA head and executioner of the Iraqi “surge” General David Petraeus. It also includes US General John R. Allen, who since September 2014 had served as President Obama’s Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and, until she resigned in February 2013, it included Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Significantly, General John Allen, an unceasing advocate of a US-led “No Fly Zone” inside Syria along the border to Turkey, something President Obama refused, was relieved of his post on 23 October, 2015. That was shortly after launch of the highly-effective Russian strikes on Syrian IS and Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front terrorist sites changed the entire situation in the geopolitical picture of Syria and the entire Middle East.
UN Reports cites Israel
That Netanyahu’s Likud and the Israeli military work closely with Washington’s neo-conservative war-hawks is well-established, as is the vehement opposition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran. Israel regards the Iranian-backed Shi’a Islamist militant group, Hezbollah, based in Lebanon, as arch foe. Hezbollah has been actively fighting alongside the Syrian Army against ISIS in Syria. General Allen’s strategy of “bombings of ISIS” since he was placed in charge of the operation in September 2014, as Russia’s Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov have repeatedly pointed out, far from destroying ISIS in Syria, had vastly expanded their territorial control of the country. Now it becomes clear that that was precisely the intent of Allen and the Washington war faction.
Since at least 2013 Israeli military have also openly bombed what they claim were Hezbollah targets inside Syria. Investigation revealed that in fact Israel was hitting Syrian military and Hezbollah targets who are valiantly fighting against ISIS and other terrorists. De facto thereby Israel was actually helping ISIS, like General John Allen’s year-long “anti-ISIS” bombings.
That a faction in the Pentagon has secretly worked behind-the-scenes to train, arm and finance what today is called ISIS or IS in Syria is now a matter of open record. In August 2012, a Pentagon document classified “Secret,” later declassified under pressure of the US NGO Judicial Watch, detailed precisely the emergence of what became the Islamic State or ISIS emerging from the Islamic State in Iraq, then an Al Qaeda affiliate.
The Pentagon document stated:
“…there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition [to Assad-w.e.] want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).”
The supporting powers to the opposition in 2012 then included Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the USA and behind-the-scenes, Netanyahu’s Israel.
Precisely this creation of a “Salafist Principality in eastern Syria,” today’s territory of ISIL or IS, was the agenda of Petraeus, General Allen and others in Washington to destroy Assad. It’s what put the Obama Administration at loggerhead with Russia, China and Iran over the bizarre US demand Assad must first go before ISIS can be destroyed. Now the game is in the open for the world to see Washington’s duplicity in backing what the Russian’s accurately call “moderate terrorists” against a duly-elected Assad. That Israel is also in the midst of this rats’ nest of opposition terrorist forces in Syria was confirmed in a recent UN report.
What the report did not mention was why Israeli IDF military would have such a passionate interest in Syria, especially Syria’s Golan Heights.
Why Israel wants Assad Out
In December, 2014 the Jerusalem Post in Israel reported the findings of a largely ignored, and politically explosive report detailing UN sightings of Israeli military together with ISIS terrorist combatants. The UN peacekeeping force, UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF), stationed since 1974 along the Golan Heights border between Syria and Israel, revealed that Israel had been working closely with Syrian opposition terrorists, including Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front and IS in the Golan Heights, and “kept close contact over the past 18 months.” The report was submitted to the UN Security Council. Mainstream media in the US and West buried the explosive findings.
The UN documents showed that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) were maintaining regular contact with members of the so-called Islamic State since May of 2013. The IDF stated that this was only for medical care for civilians, but the deception was broken when the UNDOF observers identified direct contact between IDF forces and ISIS soldiers, including giving medical care to ISIS fighters. Observations even included the transfer of two crates from the IDF to ISIS forces, the contents of which have not been confirmed. Further the UN report identified what the Syrians label a “crossing point of forces between Israel and ISIS,” a point of concern UNDOF brought before the UN Security Council.
The UNDOF was created by a May, 1974 UN Security Council Resolution No. 350 in the wake of tensions from the October 1973 Yom Kippur War between Syria and Israel. It established a buffer zone between Israel and Syria’s Golan Heights according to the 1974 Disengagement of Forces Agreement, to be governed and policed by the Syrian authorities. No military forces other than UNDOF are permitted within it. Today it has 1,200 observers.
Since 2013 and the escalation of Israeli attacks on Syria along the Golan Heights, claiming pursuit of “Hezbollah terrorists,” the UNDOF itself has been subject to massive attacks by ISIS or Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front terrorists in the Golan Heights for the first time since 1974, of kidnappings, of killings, of theft of UN weapons and ammunition, vehicles and other assets, and the looting and destruction of facilities. Someone obviously does not want UNDOF to remain policing the Golan Heights.
Israel and Golan Heights Oil
In his November 9 White House meeting with US President Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu asked Washington to reconsider the fact that since the 1967 Six-Days’ War between Israel and the Arab countries, Israel has illegally occupied a significant part of the Golan Heights. In their meeting, Netanyahu, apparently without success, called on Obama to back formal Israeli annexation of the illegally-occupied Golan Heights, claiming that the absence of a functioning Syrian government “allows for different thinking” concerning the future status of the strategically important area.
Of course Netanyahu did not address in any honest way how Israeli IDF and other forces had been responsible for the absence of a functioning Syrian government by their support for ISIS and Al Nusra Front of Al Qaeda.
In 2013, when UNDOF began to document increasing contact between Israeli military and IS and Al Qaeda along the Golan Heights, a little-known Newark, New Jersey oil company, Genie Energy, with an Israeli daughter company, Afek Oil & Gas, began also moving into Golan Heights with permission of the Netanyahu government to explore for oil. That same year Israeli military engineers overhauled the forty-five mile border fence with Syria, replacing it with a steel barricade that included barbed wire, touch sensors, motion detectors, infrared cameras, and ground radar, putting it on par with the Wall Israel has constructed in the West Bank.
Interestingly enough, on October 8, Yuval Bartov, chief geologist from Genie Energy’s Israeli subsidiary, Afek Oil & Gas, told Israel’s Channel 2 TV that his company had found a major oil reservoir on the Golan Heights: “We’ve found an oil stratum 350 meters thick in the southern Golan Heights. On average worldwide, strata are 20 to 30 meters thick, and this is 10 times as large as that, so we are talking about significant quantities.” As I noted in an earlier article, the International Advisory Board of Genie Energy includes such notorious names as Dick Cheney, former CIA head and infamous neo-con James Woolsey, Jacob Lord Rothschild and others.
Of course no reasonable person in their right mind would suggest there might be a link between Israeli military dealings with the ISIS and other anti-Assad terrorists in Syria, especially in the Golan Heights, and the oil find of Genie Energy in the same place, and with Netanyahu’s latest Golan Heights “rethink” appeal to Obama. That would smell too much like “conspiracy theory” and all reasonable people know conspiracies don’t exist, only coincidences. Or? In fact, to paraphrase the immortal words of Brad Pitt in the role of West Virginia First Lieutenant Aldo Raine in the final scene of Tarantino’s brilliant film, Inglorious Basterds, it seems that ‘Ol Netanyahu and his pecker-suckin pals in the IDF and Mossad just got caught with their hands in a very dirty cookie jar in Syria.
Comment: Israel and Western powers have been creating, funding, directing, and fighting among terrorists for a long time. Its nothing new, but is a fact that rarely seems to make it into the Western media and to the awareness of most people. Or if it does, the implications are never explored. No surprise there. Perhaps that will now begin to change since these types of ‘smoking guns’ have never been better documented and more apparent.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. (NEO)
Additional comment by Sott.net:Israel and Western powers have been creating, funding, directing, and fighting among terrorists for a long time. Its nothing new, but is a fact that rarely seems to make it into the Western media and to the awareness of most people. Or if it does, the implications are never explored. No surprise there. Perhaps that will now begin to change since these types of ‘smoking guns’ have never been better documented and more apparent.
I have a mission to bring a voice to, and put a face on, the reality of the suffering of the citizens of the Middle East. Not what you see on The Mainstream Media, or what is heralded by Western Governments, but reality as reported by journalists who live and see this deadly injustice daily. Tune in for Middle East Rising live broadcasting via The Liberty Beacon Radio network, brought to you by The Liberty Beacon project. The truth must be told! Follow me at Twitter: @wbgazafree & @mideastrising
“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it…
IN FRANCE THE FLAG OF ISRAEL IS ALLOVER THE PLACE, INCLUDING IN CHURCHES! THERE IS EVEN A ZIONIST MOSQUE RUN BY A FREEMASON, DALIL BOUBAKEUR, A BITCH OF ISRAEL!
Lilith John Collier 1887 (The Atkinson Art Gallery, Southport, England)
7.Eve & Lilith
In an effort to explain inconsistencies in the Old Testament, there developed in Jewish literature a complex interpretive system called the midrash which attempts to reconcile biblical contradictions and bring new meaning to the scriptural text.
Employing both a philological method and often an ingenious imagination, midrashic writings, which reached their height in the 2nd century CE, influenced later Christian interpretations of the Bible. Inconsistencies in the story of Genesis, especially the two separate accounts of creation, received particular attention. Later, beginning in the 13th century CE, such questions were also taken up in Jewish mystical literature known as the Kabbalah.
According to midrashic literature, Adam's first wife was not Eve but a woman named Lilith, who was created in the first Genesis account. Only when Lilith rebelled and abandoned Adam did God create Eve, in the second account, as a replacement. In an important 13th century Kabbalah text, the Sefer ha-Zohar ("The Book of Splendour") written by the Spaniard Moses de Leon (c. 1240-1305), it is explained that:
At the same timeJehovah created Adam, he created a woman, Lilith, who like Adam was taken from the earth. She was given to Adam as his wife. But there was a dispute between them about a matter that when it came before the judges had to be discussed behind closed doors. She spoke the unspeakable name of Jehovah and vanished.
In the Alpha Betha of Ben Sira (Alphabetum Siracidis, or Sepher Ben Sira), an anonymous collection of midrashic proverbs probably compiled in the 11th century C.E., it is explained more explicitly that the conflict arose because Adam, as a way of asserting his authority over Lilith, insisted that she lie beneath him during sexual intercourse (23 A-B). Lilith, however, considering herself to be Adam's equal, refused, and after pronouncing the Ineffable Name (i.e. the magic name of God) flew off into the air.
Adam, distraught and no doubt also angered by her insolent behaviour, wanted her back. On Adam's request, God sent three angels, named Senoy, Sansenoy, and Semangelof, who found her in the Red Sea. Despite the threat from the three angels that if she didn't return to Adam one hundred of her sons would die every day, she refused, claiming that she was created expressly to harm newborn infants. However, she did swear that she would not harm any infant wearing an amulet with the images and/or names of the three angels on it.
At this point, the legend of Lilith as the "first Eve" merges with the earlier legend of Sumero-Babylonian origin, dating from around 3,500 BCE, of Lilith as a winged female demon who kills infants and endangers women in childbirth. In this role, she was one of several mazakim or "harmful spirits" known from incantation formulas preserved in Assyrian, Hebrew, and Canaanite inscriptions intended to protect against them. As a female demon, she is closely related to Lamashtu whose evilness included killing children, drinking the blood of men, and eating their flesh. Lamashtu also caused pregnant women to miscarry, disturbed sleep and brought nightmares.
In turn, Lamashtu is like another demonized female called Lamia, a Libyan serpent goddess, whose name is probably a Greek variant of Lamashtu. Like Lamashtu, Lamia also killed children. In the guise of a beautiful woman, she also seduced young men. In the Latin Vulgate Bible, Lamia is given as the translation of the Hebrew Lilith (and in other translations it is given as "screech owl"and "night monster").
It needs to be remembered that these demonic "women" are essentially personifications of unseen forces invented to account for otherwise inexplicable events and phenomena which occur in the real world. Lilith, Lamashtu, Lamia and other female demons like them are all associated with the death of children and especially with the death of newborn infants.
It may be easily imagined that they were held accountable for such things as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS, also called crib death, or cot death) where an apparently healthy infant dies for no obvious reason. Cot death occurs almost always during sleep at night and is the most common cause of death of infants. Its cause still remains unknown.
By inventing evil spirits like Lilith, Lamashtu, and Lamia, parents were not only able to identify the enemy but also to know what they had to guard against. Amulets with the names of the three angels were intended to protect against the power of Lilith.
Lilith also personified licentiousness and lust. In the Christian Middle Ages she, or her female offspring, the lilim, became identified with succubae (the female counterparts of incubi) who would copulate with men in their sleep, causing them to have nocturnal emissions or "wet dreams."
Again, Lilith and her kind serve as a way of accounting for an otherwise inexplicable phenomenon among men. Today, 85 percent of all men experience "wet dreams" (the ejaculation of sperm while asleep) at some time in their lives, mostly during their teens and twenties and as often as once a month. In the Middle Ages, celibate monks would attempt to guard against these nocturnal visits by the lilith/succubus by sleeping with their hands crossed over their genitals and holding a crucifix.
Through the literature of the Kabbalah, Lilith became fixed in Jewish demonology where her primary role is that of strangler of children and a seducer of men. The Kabbalah further enhanced her demonic character by making her the partner of Samael (i.e. Satan) and queen of the realm of the forces of evil.
In this guise, she appears as the antagonistic negative counterpart of the Shekhinah ("Divine Presence"), the mother of the House of Israel. The Zohar repeatedly contrasts Lilith the unholy whorish woman with the Shekhinah as the holy, noble, and capable woman. In much the same way, Eve the disobedient, lustful sinner is contrasted with the obedient and holy Virgin Mary in Christian literature.
Through her couplings with the devil (or with Adam, as his succubus*), Lilith gave birth to one hundred demonic children a day (the one hundred children threatened with death by the three angels). In this way, Lilith was held responsible for populating the world with evil. (*a female demon believed to have sexual intercourse with sleeping men.)
If you ask how Lilith herself, the first wife of Adam, became evil, the answer lies in her insubordination to her husband Adam. It is her independence from Adam, her position beyond the control of a male, that makes her "evil."
She is disobedient and like Eve, and indeed all women who are willful, she is perceived as posing a constant threat to the divinely ordered state of affairs defined by men.
Lilith is represented as a powerfully sexual woman against whom men and babies felt they had few defenses and, except for a few amulets, little protection. Much more so than Eve, Lilith is the personification female sexuality.
Her legend serves to demonstrate how, when unchecked, female sexuality is disruptive and destructive. Lilith highlights how women, beginning with Eve, use their sexuality to seduce men. She provides thereby a necessary sexual dimension, which is otherwise lacking, to the Genesis story which, when read in literal terms, portrays Eve not as some wicked femme fatale but as a naive and largely sexless fool. Only as a Lilith-like character could Eve be seen as a calculating, evil, seductress.
Lilith is referred to only once in the Old Testament. In the Darby translation of Isaiah 34:14 the original Hebrew word is rendered as "lilith"; according to Isaiah, when God's vengeance has turned the land into a wilderness, "there shall the beasts of the desert meet with the jackals, and the wild goat shall cry to his fellow; the lilith also shall settle there, and find for herself a place of rest." The same word is translated elsewhere, however, as "screech owl, "night creatures,""night monsters," and "night hag."
Although it has been suggested that the association with night stems from a similarity between the Sumero-Babylonian demon Lilitu and the Hebrew word laylah meaning "night,"Lilith nonetheless seems to have been otherwise associated with darkness and night as a time of fear, vulnerability, and evil.
In her demonized form, Lilith is a frightening and threatening creature. Much more so than Eve, she personifies the real (sexual) power women exercise over men.
She represents the deeper, darker fear men have of women and female sexuality. Inasmuch as female sexuality, as a result of this fear, has been repressed and subjected to the severest controls in Western patriarchal society, so too has the figure of Lilith been kept hidden.
However, she lurks as a powerful unidentified presence, an unspoken name, in the minds of biblical commentators for whom Eve and Lilith become inextricably intertwined and blended into one person. Importantly, it is this Eve/Lilith amalgam which is used to identify women as the true source of evil in the world.
In the Apocryphal Testament of Reuben (one of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, ostensibly the twelve sons of Jacob), for example, it is explained that:
Women are evil, my children: because they have no power or strength to stand up against man, they use wiles and try to ensnare him by their charms; and man, whom woman cannot subdue by strength, she subdues by guile. (Testament of Reuben: V, 1-2, 5)
References to Lilith in the Talmud describe her as a night demon with long hair (B. Erubin 100b) and as having a human likeness but with wings (B. Nidda 24b). In Rabbi Isaac ben Jacob ha-Kohen's "Treatise on the Emanations on the Left," written in Spain in the 13th century, she is described as having the form of a beautiful woman from her head to her waist, and "burning fire" from her waist down. Elsewhere, Rabbi Isaac equates her with the primordial serpent Leviathan.
Crudely drawn images of Lilith can be seen on amulets (see Magical or Prophylactic images of Lilith in incantation bowls and on amulets).
Lilith? Babylonian terra-cotta relief, c. 2000 BCE (Collection of Colonel James Colville)
A Babylonian terra-cotta relief dated to around 2000 BCE in the collection of Colonel Norman Corville has been identified as a representation of Lilith (the identification has been questioned by a number of scholars). The relief shows a nude woman with wings and a bird's taloned feet. She wears a hat composed of four pairs of horns and holds in each upraised hand a combined ring and rod (similar to an Egyptian shen ring amulet). She stands on two reclining lions and is flanked by owls.
Despite the fact that she is not officially recognized in the Christian tradition, in the Late Middle Ages she is occasionally identified with the serpent in Genesis 3 and shown accordingly with a woman's head and torso. For example, the bare-breasted woman with a snake's lower parts posed seductively in the branches of the tree between Adam and Eve in the scene of the temptation carved into the base of the trumeau in the left doorway of the West façade of the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris has been identified as Lilith.
Adam, Lilith, and Eve relief sculpture, c. 1210 CE Base of trumeau, left portal, West Façade, Notre Dame, Paris
From the very beginning there were grave doubts about allegations of mass killings of European Jews. Although such reports were a major feature of the Allies'"psychological warfare" campaign during the Second World War, top British and American officials in a position to know what was going on in German-ruled Europe did not believe what their own governments were telling the world. In July 1943, the chairman of the Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, commented: "The Poles, and to a far greater extent the Jews, tend to exaggerate German atrocities in order to stoke us up." At the suggestion of the British government, it was therefore agreed to delete the reference to gas chambers from a joint Allied declaration on German atrocities in Poland that was issued later that year by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin. (B. Wasserstein, Britain and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945 [London: 1979], pp. 295-96.)
During the immediate postwar period -- which saw a flurry of often grotesque anti-German atrocity propaganda as well as horrible "revelations" from the Nuremberg trials -- a few thoughtful individuals remained skeptical. George Orwell, for example, wondered in May 1945: "Is it true about the German gas ovens in Poland?"(S. Orwell and I. Angus, eds., The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell [New York: 1968], Vol. 3, p. 371.)
Encyclopaedia Britannica Prudence
More remarkable, there is no mention of "extermination" or "gas chambers" in the early postwar editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, published from 1947 to 1956 (and perhaps earlier and later). Jewish historian Jacob Rader Marcus provided a prudent and generally accurate description of the wartime fate of Europe's Jews in his essay on modern Jewish history published in these editions of the authoritative reference work. ("Jews,"Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1947 and 1956 editions, Vol. 13, p. 63 C.)
Under the heading "World War II and the Jews," Marcus wrote:
In World War II the situation of Jewry in the mass settlements of eastern Europe was even worse, for the national socialists set out deliberately to destroy large numbers of Polish and Russian-Jewish civilians. If but a fraction of the atrocities reported were accurate, then many thousands of defenseless Jewish non-combatants, men, women and children, were butchered after September 1939 ... In the conquered lands, from France to Poland, practically all Jews lost their political and civil rights; their property and businesses were confiscated, and their children, in most lands, were driven out of the elementary and higher schools. They lost the right to freedom of movement and in some lands were even deprived of almost all cultural and recreational opportunities and social relations. Quite a number sought to ameliorate their lot by converting to Christianity, particularly in Slovakia, Croatia, Hungary and Italy ... In order to effect a solution of the Jewish problem in line with their theories, the Nazis carried out a series of expulsions and deportations of Jews, mostly of original east European stock, from nearly all European states. Men, frequently separated from their wives, and mothers from their children, were sent by the thousands to Poland and western Russia. There they were put into concentration camps, or huge reservations, or sent into the swamps, or out on the roads, into labour gangs. Large numbers of them perished under the inhuman conditions under which they laboured. While every other large Jewish centre was being embroiled in war, American Jewry was gradually assuming a position of leadership in world Jewry.
Marcus' relatively reserved treatment of this issue, entirely ignoring the lurid horror stories then in wide circulation, is all the more noteworthy in light of his stature as an eminent scholar of Jewish history. He had studied in Germany during the early 1920s, receiving his doctorate from the University of Berlin in 1925. During his lifetime he authored more than 250 scholarly articles and numerous acclaimed historical studies, including The Rise and Destiny of the German Jew (1934), The Jew in the Medieval World (1938), and a four-volume work, United States Jewry, 1776-1985 (1989-93). At the time of his death in November 1995, Marcus was a distinguished professor of American Jewish history at the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion. With the passage of time, the scholarly circumspection shown by Marcus in this Encyclopaedia Britannica article has become very rare, even among prominent scholars. Encouraged by an intense and growing media campaign in the United States, historians dealt with the wartime fate of Europe's Jews in an ever more credulous, subjective and even quasi-religious fashion. This trend, which became particularly more pronounced after the 1970s, shows no sign of diminishing. From The Journal of Historical Review, July/August 1997 (Vol. 16, No. 4), page 38.
Postby Laurentz Dahl» 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:06 am)
I recently came across this in David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism (p.277):
(...) the first thing I did was pull out my much-thumbed volumes of the 1956 Encylopaedia Brittanica.It had only one reference to Nazi atrocities against the Jews. The extensive Second World War article made no mention of Nazi pogroms against the Jews. The edition also has no articles devoted to the "Holocaust". In an article titled "Jews," there was a short section on the Jews during the war. This article, written by Jacob Marcus, perhaps the preeminent Jewish historian in the world at that time, cited many Jewish writers and authorities as sources, including Encyclopedia Judaica, Judishe Lexicon, the Jewish Encyclopedia, and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. A pro-Jewish perspective dominated the article, and Marcus described Jewish conditions under the Nazis with these words:
"In order to effect a solution of the Jewish problem in line with their theories, the Nazis carried out a series of expulsions and deportations of Jews, mostly of original east European stock, from nearly all European states.
Men frequently separated from their wives, and others from children, were sent by the thousands to Poland and western Russia. There they were put into concentration camps, or huge reservations, or sent into the swamps, or out on the roads, into labour gangs. Large numbers perished under the inhuman conditions which they labored. While every other large Jewish center was being embroiled in war, American Jewry was gradually assuming a position of leadership in world Jewry." [found in the 1947, 52 and 56 editions]
Duke claims that this is the only description of what is known today as the "Holocaust" in the 1947, 1952 and 1956 editions of the respected encyclopedia and that nothing about gas chambers or the figure of 6 million dead Jews can be found in them. Quite remarkable if true. Since I don't have the possibility to check up on this myself (I don't live in an English speaking country, so the only 1956 EB edition available in a public library is probably many hundred miles away from me) could someone please answer me whether what Duke claims is correct or not?
y Kiwichap» 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:04 am)
Encyclopedia Britannica. I have owned the 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, and 14th edition. I did have the 15th edition, but I swapped it with a college, here in Auckland for the 14th. That was when the you-know-who took over Britannica, it flew across the Atlantic and was lost to scholarship forever. It is now a political rag, each subject is writen by a pundit of the faith. Now the 14 edition of Britannica, [1963] concerning the holocaust says nothing, that is the word holocaust. Under Jew, nothing, yet the subjects are extensive, historically, politically etc. However under the subject 'World War II', [vol 23] after more than 50 pages of great stuff, in the 'conclusion', talking about the death toll of all belligerants,
"The loss of life because of the privations, cruel treatment and mass murders which were a feature of the axis concentration camps had to be included in any comprehensive record of costs in terms of human lives"
And thats it. Perhaps this was the beginning.
There was no holocaust. Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Postby Laurentz Dahl» 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:05 am)
Thanks for looking this up! Seems like Duke's claim is correct then. Quite astounding when you think of a) the fact that a Jew (who was not only a historian but also IIRC a rabbi) wrote the passage on the fate of European Jewry during WWII that Duke quotes, and b) that the bulk of the modern Holocaust story was in place (that is, steam chambers, electrocution &c had been thrown down the memory hole) and accepted as an "undeniable fact" by western scholars and populace alike by around 1950. However, it's not unique. I think Marcus' is more or less part of the same phenomenon as the "missing gas chambers" in the war memoirs of the western allied leaders. I guess it went down something like this: After the end of the war and the Nuremberg trials, at least some of the top allied leaders knew, more or less, that the gassing stories were fraudulent propaganda. Also, a number of scholars, such as Marcus, must have guessed the real nature of the 'Extermination' allegations. Most of those leaders who knew the truth (or part of it) must have thought that the propaganda lies about gassings would be discarded after a few years or at most a couple of decades, in the same way as the anti-German greuelpropaganda was discarded a few years after WWI, when it no longer filled a purpose. When de Gaulle, Eisenhower et.al. wrote their war memoirs, they purposely did not mention the gas chambers, since they foresaw a day when the gassing canard would be exposed as fraudulent. Probably in order to save their future reputations, they decided to neither deny nor mention the gas chambers in their war memoirs. Likewise, Marcus probably thought the gassing allegations wouldn't last that long and therefore wrote down what he thought had actually happened to the Jews of Europe during WWII in the Brittanica entry. They were all gravely mistaken about the life span of the Myth, and those of them who lived to realize this simply chose to keep quiet, not wanting or daring to investigate the Holocaust story or to expose the fraud. More than 60 years has passed since the end of WWII, and the Myth still serves a purpose, it's still vital - it has in fact grown stronger for each year rather than waned, even if a lot of cracks are starting to show in its fundament of clay. But this of course, purely speculation. We will perhaps never know for sure. PS. I remember that I read in some revisionist text a few years ago about some rather well known American historian in whose posthumous belongings a note was found that showed that he disbelieved the Holocaust story. I don't remember his name or what text it was. Someone?
Postby disillusioned» 1 decade 1 year ago (Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:34 pm)
There is another thread here about a Jewish "survivor" of a concentration camp. When he first wrote his memoirs, there was no mention of the gas chambers (or he wrote that they did not exist... I don't remember). Later, he was coerced into writing that although he did not see them he is assured they did in fact exist by other people. Perhaps there should be a "missing gas chambers" hall of fame.
I'm thinking of getting Duke's book...do you recommend it? The book's also available as a download, but I cant read anything that's longer than five pages on a computer without my eyes hurting. I suspect that I'm not the only one to feel this way...and that's why overly long posts are useless...pack your information as concisely as you can. http://www.solargeneral.com/pdf/
Laurentz Dahl wrote:I recently came across this in David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism (p.277):
(...) the first thing I did was pull out my much-thumbed volumes of the 1956 Encylopaedia Brittanica. It had only one reference to Nazi atrocities against the Jews. The extensive Second World War article made no mention of Nazi pogroms against the Jews. The edition also has no articles devoted to the "Holocaust". In an article titled "Jews," there was a short section on the Jews during the war. This article, written by Jacob Marcus, perhaps the preeminent Jewish historian in the world at that time, cited many Jewish writers and authorities as sources, including Encyclopedia Judaica, Judishe Lexicon, the Jewish Encyclopedia, and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. A pro-Jewish perspective dominated the article, and Marcus described Jewish conditions under the Nazis with these words:
"In order to effect a solution of the Jewish problem in line with their theories, the Nazis carried out a series of expulsions and deportations of Jews, mostly of original east European stock, from nearly all European states.
Men frequently separated from their wives, and others from children, were sent by the thousands to Poland and western Russia. There they were put into concentration camps, or huge reservations, or sent into the swamps, or out on the roads, into labour gangs. Large numbers perished under the inhuman conditions which they labored. While every other large Jewish center was being embroiled in war, American Jewry was gradually assuming a position of leadership in world Jewry." [found in the 1947, 52 and 56 editions]
Duke claims that this is the only description of what is known today as the "Holocaust" in the 1947, 1952 and 1956 editions of the respected encyclopedia and that nothing about gas chambers or the figure of 6 million dead Jews can be found in them. Quite remarkable if true.
Since I don't have the possibility to check up on this myself (I don't live in an English speaking country, so the only 1956 EB edition available in a public library is probably many hundred miles away from me) could someone please answer me whether what Duke claims is correct or not?
Postby Laurentz Dahl» 1 decade 1 year ago (Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:36 am)
disillusioned wrote:There is another thread here about a Jewish "survivor" of a concentration camp. When he first wrote his memoirs, there was no mention of the gas chambers (or he wrote that they did not exist... I don't remember).
Later, he was coerced into writing that although he did not see them he is assured they did in fact exist by other people.
Perhaps there should be a "missing gas chambers" hall of fame.
Yes, such a list would probably open the eyes of at least some people.
friedrich braun wrote:I'm thinking of getting Duke's book...do you recommend it?
I think it's decent. It mostly relies on quotes from Jewish sources and is generally well-written, without too many political rants. However, I don't think it adds much new information regarding zionist control over media, the relation between Jews and bolshevism &c. If you feel that you are already well-read on the subject, there is no need to buy it I think.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw6VJbu3p_o
THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT 38 MEN AND A DOG MURDERED!!!
HEAR THE WATCHMEN'S JOURNEY WOW FIELD McCONNELL SPEAKS OUR ABOUT THE TRUTH CONCERNING THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THEIR INFILTRATION INTO OUR DAILY LIVES.
DON'T MISS THIS. TICKETS FOR BOISE IDAHO AVAILABLE NOW.. GET THEM WHILE YOU CAN “Please join Mission Christian and help the Veterans and their families that the Obama/Clinton machine left behind.
FIELD: "GOD WILL RETURN TO TAKE US HOME"? THE WATCHMAN: Amen, Amen, and Amen to that! And "Christians" say they are not POLYTHEISTS, and accuse the "Hindus" of polytheism!
CHRIST WAS A MONOTHEIST!
And he never believed in a Trinity or in Three Gods in One!
N.B.This is not meant to offend. Beliefs are just beliefs!
HEAR THE WATCHMEN'S JOURNEY WOW! FIELD McCONNELL SPEAKS OUT ABOUT THE TRUTH CONCERNING THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT AND THEIR INFILTRATION INTO OUR DAILY LIVES. DON'T MISS THIS. TICKETS FOR BOISE IDAHO AVAILABLE NOW. GET THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
“Please join Mission Christian and help the Veterans and their families that the Obama/Clinton machine left behind.
'Isa, 'Isho,Yeshua,Yehoshuah ... are all the transliteration of a Semitic name meaning "SAVIOUR", and was a very common name in Palestine. The same name is transliterated as JOSHUAH, the murdering general of Moses.
The word LORD is wrong!
Why do Christians not use the ORIGINAL NAMES instead of translated names like IESUS, JESUS, etc.?
Christians are very confused as they use the term LORD for GOD and hence claim JESUS IS GOD!
Even Field is very confused when he says JESUS IS ALIVE, because God never died!
He means JESUS THE MAN IS ALIVE!
How more messed up can one be?
A man-God, a God, and, a Holy Ghost or Spirit (they are not sure!) and even Mary as the Mother of God! That's FOUR GODS!
European racism has always prevented the use of the real name of Mary although it is known! Why? Because it sounds too Semitic or Arabic! But, many are called by Mary's original name!
I agree with everything Field says except when he drags in his belief system.
To find Kevin's articles, interviews, books, youtubes, and more, go to www.TruthJihad.com
Friday, April 28, 2017
Ex-CIA now Open Source Intel Luminary Robert David Steele; Ex-political prisoner and refugee Brendon O'Connell
This show broadcasts LIVE 8 to 10 pm Eastern Friday, April 21st at FreedomSlips.com - click on Studio B - then gets archived about 24 hours later. For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – Click HERE! Or if you prefer, PAYPAL a one time donation, or a regular payment, to truthjihad(at)gmail[dot]com.
First hour: Former CIA Clandestine Services Officer Robert David Steelewill be giving a "new stump speech ... at the Cosmoplitan Club in NYC on 18 May — it will be video-taped and posted to YouTube and is the official start of the 2nd American Revolution." Get a preview of the revolution on tonight's show. Donations welcome here.
In this show, Steele predicts that a major pedophilia scandal, unleashed by a Wikileaks data-dump, will destroy the careers of several leading Republican political figures, leading to a Democratic sweep in the 2018 elections and the impeachment and conviction of Donald Trump.
Second hour: Brendon O'Connellspent three years in prison based on this youtube video. Meanwhile, every single day, tens of thousands of examples of vastly worst hate speech – directed against victims, not oppressors – permeate all forms of Western discourse, and are accepted and internalized by hundreds of millions of people. Did O'Connell speak truth to power? Did he express or exaggerate that truth in offensive terms? What are the limits of discourse when speaking out against oppression to a member of the oppressor group who is essentially an apologist for genocide? Only a moral imbecile could think O'Connell ever deserved prison. Whether you think he deserves a medal for valor, or a verbal reprimand for going too far, is another matter. Watch the video, listen to this show, and decide for yourself.
A large Muslim festival has been cancelled due to escalating racial tensions post Brexit.
Up to 2,000 people were expected to gather in East Park, Southampton, to celebrate Eid - the end of the holy month of Ramadan - today and tomorrow.
But organisers the British Bangladeshi Cultural Academy have cancelled the event after far-right groups threatened to hold a protest in the city following the EU referendum vote.
+3
Up to 2,000 people were expected to gather in East Park, Southampton, to celebrate Eid - the end of the holy month of Ramadan - today and tomorrow (stock image of Eid prayers)
Although the demonstrations, which include a rival anti-racist and pro-refugee march, are not linked to the festival or planned for the same day, organisers believe it is 'for the good of all communities' to cancel it.
Members of the far-right Pie and Mash Squad, who describe themselves as 'a group of people who love Pie n Mash and Britain the way it used to be', along with a faction of the group called South Coast Resistance, say they will hold a demonstration in the city.
Posting on social media they encouraged demonstrators to 'join us to celebrate Brexit and an end to mass immigration'.
They have also put up posts saying 'no more refugees'.
A number of groups such as pro-refugee organisation Refugees Welcome and anti-facist group Southampton AntiFa held a counter-demonstration in the same area on Saturday.
Shere Sattar, chairman of the British Bangladesh Cultural Academy, said: 'We have considered the political situation and unrest in UK after leaving the EU, the rise of racist activity and comments around other cities around the country, and Pie and Mash deciding to visit Southampton.
+3
A number of groups such as pro-refugee organisation Refugees Welcome and anti-facist group Southampton AntiFa held a counter-demonstration in the same area on Saturday (stock image)
'We the British Bangladeshi Cultural Academy with other organisations have decided that for the good for all communities in our city it would be best if we cancel the huge gathering in the city park for Eidul Fitre prayer.'
Mr Sattar added that although the gathering for Eid, which is held to mark the end of the Islamic Holy Month of fasting, has been cancelled, they hope to hold other events in Southampton later this year.
He said: 'We are positive that by September we are hoping all those activities would be at rest, so that we can continue with our normal lives and community activities without any interruptions.
'We urge everyone to be at their best in this unrestful time in the country. We all should contribute everything we can to keep our city and the community safe.'
Police have said they are aware of the demonstrations and had planned to ensure the events were peaceful.
The UK has seen a 57 per cent rise in race-hate crime following the referendum decision to leave the EU last week. Among the dozens of reported incidents are.
MUSLIM ACCOUNTANT ATTACKED WITH A CROWBAR WHILE ARTIST IS ABUSED OVER BURKA-THEMED ARTWORK
A young Muslim man was attacked with a crowbar and an artist was abused for her burka exhibit in two of the latest thought to be Brexit-related crimes.
Yasmeen Sabri was told to 'go back to Saudi Arabia' as she showed off her work at the Royal College of Art on Wednesday evening.
The 24-year-old woman, who is actually from Jordan, was shocked when a woman walked into the centre and started hurling racist abuse.
The artist's burka-inspired work called 'Walk a Mile in her Veil' was damaged in the fracas as guests looked on in horror.
Ms Sabri's work, which is for master's degree, invites people to try on the burka to see how they feel wearing the garment.
Shocked Yasmeen, who does not wear the veil herself and has lived in London for six years, told The Evening Standard: 'This lady just came in off the street and started insulting me.
'She was saying "you don't belong here, you don't belong in England"'.
Some of the guests tried to calm the woman down but she started shouting 'Arabs don't belong here, Arabs should leave the city.'
Security guards eventually took the woman to one side at the Kensington gallery but not before she had damaged part of the exhibit.
Police later arrested a 69-year-woman on suspicion of criminal damage and inciting racial hatred.
A 23-year-old Muslim man was driving his BMW when he was attacked in a separate incident he thinks is connected to Brexit.
Trainee accountant Adil Jamil was in Leyton when a crowbar-wielding man started swiping his car.
He was sat in traffic driving his friend back from a mosque when a man 'calmly' approached him.
Mr Jamil told the Standard: '[The man] looked at my face and for a split second I saw his eyes light up. He started to run straight at me.
'He was coming towards me brandishing this metal pole in the air in front of him, I knew I was in trouble.
The man smashed the car's windscreen before Mr Jamil was able to drive to safety.
But the attacker then allegedly went after a Somalian taxi driver whilst shouting racial abuse about Muslims.
The man was tackled by an off-duty security guard who was in the vehicle behind Mr Jamil.
Police were called to the scene and arrested a man in his mid-40s on suspicion of carrying an offensive weapon.
+3
The scene at halal butchers Kashmir Meat and Poultry shop in Walsall after it was fire bombed on Monday
PENSIONERS FORCED TO EVACUATE DAY CENTRE OVER RACIAL THREATS
Meanwhile, vulnerable pensioners were forced to evacuate a day centre in Manchester after receiving threats of 'a backlash against the black community'.
More than 20 elderly people, some using wheelchairs, had to flee the Hulme-based African Caribbean Care Group after the menacing phone call on Wednesday afternoon.
Police are now investigating the call which was received by the centre's manager Dorothy Evans.
In the conversation, which was recorded by the charity's phone system, the caller makes the chilling threat to the city's black community and bizarrely links it to the unprovoked attack on a bus driver in Cheetham Hill on Monday afternoon.
Manager Ms Evans was stunned to receive the anonymous call telling her that people were going to get 'f***** up' as a result of the incident on the 135 First Bus service on Monday afternoon.
Ms Evans said she had no idea what they were talking about at first, yet feared there was an immediate risk to the people at the centre and began to move them out.
JE DIS MERDE AUX RACISTES ET AUX SIONISTES DU MONDE ENTIER!
HELP, SOME JEWS AND ZIONISTS WANT TO KILL ME!
AU SECOURS, DES JUIFS ET LES SIONSITES VEULENT MA PEAU !
« ANNE FRÉMAUX », UN AUTEUR DU SITE INFAMANT, RACISTE, ANTI-ARABE, ANTI MUSULMAN, ANTI ISLAMIQUE ET ISLAMICIDE « RIPOSTE LAÏQUE », ME MENACE DE RÉPRESSION POLICIÈRE ET JUDICIAIRE.
1.« je viens de découvrir par hasard que vous utilisez ma photo ainsi que celle d'un membre de ma famille dans votre site infamant.
2.« je viens de déposer plainte auprès de la police contre M B.A.FRÉMAUX-SOORMALLY au nom de la loi concernant Les atteintes à la vie privée ( visées par l’article 9 du code civil et par les articles 226-1 et 226-7 du code pénal). »
« J'ai également opéré un signalement de votre site auprès des services de polices au nom de 'l' Incitation à la haine raciale'. »
« Je vous prie de retirer, dans les plus brefs délais, toute mention de ma personne ou d'un quelconque membre de ma famille dans votre site. »
CHRISTIAN-ZIONIST FRANCE ALLOWS AND ENCOURAGES RACISM, HATRED AND INCITATION TO VIOLENCE AGAINST MUSLIMS!
HOMOSEXUALS, TRANSVESTITES, PROSTITUTES, WHORES, CAN WEAR ANYTHING THEY WANT, BUT NOT MUSLIMS!
MARINE LE PEN'S FATHER JEAN MARIE AND HIS ARMY OF ASSASSINS, RAPISTS AND TORTURERS COULD DO THIS TO MUSLIMS DURING THEIR SECOND HOLOCAUST IN ALGERIA IN 1957, AND IT IS MUSLIMS THAT THEY HATE IN FRANCE, EVEN THOSE WHO COLABORATED WITH THEM!
(The above picture was posted on facebook by a Jew, KOEN ROFFEL)
KOEN ROFFEL
« RIPOSTE LAÏQUE » INCITE OUVERTEMENT À LA DISCRIMINATION, LA HAINE ET À LA VIOLENCE EN CONTRAVENTION TOTALE DE LA LIBERTÉ DE RELIGION OU DE CONVICTION
ET, EN CONTRAVENTION TOTALE DE LA DÉCLARATION UNIVERSELLE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME
Article 19
Tout individu a droit à la liberté d'opinion et d'expression, ce qui implique le droit de ne pas être inquiété pour ses opinions et celui de chercher, de recevoir et de répandre, sans considérations de frontières, les informations et les idées par quelque moyen d'expression que ce soit.
Article 20
1. Toute personne a droit à la liberté de réunion et d'association pacifiques. 2. Nul ne peut être obligé de faire partie d'une association.
Alors que je n’ai aucun accès aux médias publics, où seuls certains ont le droit à la liberté d’expression, mon Blog d’amateur « Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus » sert de medium d’éducation, d’information, de recherches, d’analyses, de synthèses, de créativité, constamment mis à jour, un médium autobiographique et de culture universelle, d’humour, de mysticisme et de poésie, parfois, tout en appelant à la fraternité des humains, quels qu’ils soient, à la liberté et la justice pour toutes et tous, à la paix, l’amour et la tolérance, et, surtout à une France unie fondée sur des valeurs communes qui firent la « grandeur » de la France de jadis.
Évidemment, mes conclusions gênent car elles condamnent systématiquement l’esclavagisme moderne, le sionisme, le racisme, l’impérialisme et le colonialisme militaires, politiques et génocidaires, la laïcité, dogme totalitaire d’état, et à la carte, l’immoralité, l’usure, les OGM, les guerres économiques, bactériologiques et autres, la pollution planétaire, les armes de destruction massive, les manipulations médiatiques, les corporations qui pillent et polluent la planète tout entière, l’endoctrinement athée et forcé par le système éducatif français, soi-disant laïque, etc.
Je suis un Serviteur de Dieu, qu’Il ‘existe’ ou pas.
J’obéis à toutes les lois non tyranniques.
Je suis être souverain et homme libre de la terre.
Je n’appartiens à aucun groupement religieux ou politique spécifique.
Je suis universaliste.
Je ne baisse l’échine devant aucun humain ou gouvernement.
Je suis pour la paix, la liberté, la justice et la moralité.
VIVE LA FRANCE LIBRE POUR TOUS SES CITOYENS ET CITOYENNES !
BAFS
Ce lundi 3 mars 2014
ATTACKS AGAINST ISLAM AND MUSLIMS GO UNPUNISHED EVEN IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND IN THE JUDEO "WHITE EUROPEAN WEST" IN GENERAL!
EN FRANCOPHONIE 2014, QUI SUINTE LA HAINE, LE RACISME ET LA VIOLENCE?
« FRANCE FRANCMAÇONNIQUE RACISTE, FASCISTE, ET RÉPUBLIQUE JUIFISTE SIONISTE ET LAÏQUE DE MERDE, ANTICHRIST ET ANTI-CATHOLIQUE ! » (Ce poste date du 12 décembre 2010)
Je ne vous connais ni d’Ève ni d’Adam. Aussi, avant de proférer des menaces, et de me diffamer, et salir ma réputation, je vous prierai de bien vouloir m’informer qui vous êtes réellement, et de me confirmer si vous êtes bien la personne « Anne Frémaux » qui est l’un des auteurs affichés sur le site « infamant » : RIPOSTE LAÏQUE qui ne cesse d’inciter à la haine et à la violence contre les Musulmans, et à dénigrer l’Islam, y compris sur Youtube.
Remarquez que j’ai mis trois points d’interrogation après votre nom entre les deux photographies accessibles au grand public sur Internet. Si ce n’est pas de vous dont il s’agit, veuillez me le faire savoir le plus vite possible, et je retirerai les photos en question immédiatement en vous faisant mes excuses. (Mais, je les ai quand même enlevées, vu votre objection.)
Quant au nom « Anne Frémaux », c’est celui d’un des auteurs de « Riposte Laïque » qui est dans le domaine public et non privé.
Quant aux membres de votre famille, veuillez avoir l’obligeance de m’informer de qui il s’agit justement car je n’ai nullement l’intention de porter atteinte à leur vie privée et ni à la vôtre d’ailleurs. Figurez-vous que des Frémaux sont aussi de MA famille. Et, s’il y a des racistes anti-Musulmans et anti-Chrétiens, des fascistes anti-Dieu, et des « Sémites » parmi, ce n’est point de ma faute !
Et, je me dois de défendre l’honneur et la dignité de celles et de ceux qui ne le sont pas, que cela vous plaise ou non.
Essayant de m’intimider avec vos démarches policières ou judiciaires, sans même essayer de dialoguer avec moi, vous classe immédiatement avec la tribu totalitaire qui se veut avoir le monopole de la liberté d’expression en France et ailleurs, qui nous attaque, nous diabolise, et nous interdit de nous défendre, et qui a pris mon pays, la France, en otage.
Pour votre gouverne, je n’ai jamais incité à la violence, et ni à la haine, mais toujours appelé à la fraternité universelle, à la justice, à la liberté, et, surtout à l’unité des religions, y compris le christianisme et le judaïsme (non sionistes), et l’hindouisme.
ET, C’EST MOI QUE CERTAINS FRANÇAIS « DE SOUCHE » APPELLENT RACISTE, NAZI ET ANTISÉMITE INCITANT À LA HAINE ET À LA VIOLENCE (CONTRE LES SIONISTES ET APARTHEID ISRAËL !!!), ET M’EMPÊCHENT D’ÊTRE PLEINEMENT MUSULMAN, FRANÇAIS ET LIBRE???????
Merde alors, et ma femme qui n'est pas juive!Quand même!
Mes cinqépouses furent toutes musulmanes au moment de notre union, une Russe, une Franco-mauricienne mixte, une Polonaise, une Française, et couramment une Américaine, ce qui me valut d'ailleurs d’être traité de raciste anti-Noirs par quelques uns de mes amis et amies « colorés » !!
[N.B. The above post was removed without warning from my Blog and it contained the same family name « Anne Frémaux » claimed is hers! Mysterious coincidence?]
Avec une telle manigance, il est impossible de communiquer directement avec vous.
Dans l'attente de votre réponse, je vous prie d'agréer, Madame/Mademoiselle, mes salutations distinguées.
B.A. Frémaux-Soormally
Ce lundi 3 mars 2014
ADDENDUM
Anne Frémaux, as usual French racists, fascists, Zionists, Sayanim and liars have big mouths and are also cowards as I received no reply from her or her Bolshevik Gestapo!
(Tuesday 2 May 2917, but my Blog was tampered with several times)
FRANCE FRANCMAÇONNIQUE RACISTE, FASCISTE, ET RÉPUBLIQUE JUIFISTE SIONISTE, ET LAÏQUE DE MERDE, ANTICHRIST ET ANTI-CATHOLIQUE !
Muslim and Islam hater Marine Le Pen targets halaal and kosher food:
French National Front to stop Muslim and Jewish pupils having pork-free school dinners
'We will not accept any religious demands in school menus,' the party's leader Marine Le Pen told a radio station
France’s far-right National Front party will prevent schools from offering Muslim and Jewish pupils pork-free lunches in the towns where it won in recent local elections, its leader Marine Le Pen announced on Friday.
She said that arrangements catering to Muslim and Jewish, pupils who cannot eat pork according to religious restrictions, contradict the country’s secular values.
“We will not accept any religious demands in school menus,” Le Pen told RTL radio. “There is no reason for religion to enter the public sphere, that's the law.”
France has seen periodic controversies over schools that substitute pork on menus to cater to Muslim and Jewish children, while some of the FN's new mayors complain there are too many halal shops in their towns.
But Muslims view France, which is officially a secular republic despite being overwhelmingly Catholic, as imposing its values on them and other religious minorities. In 2011, a controversial law was introduced banning full-face veils in public.
Le Pen hailed the victory as showing the party had finally established itself as France's third political force behind ruling Socialists and mainstream conservatives, and predicts a strong showing in May's European Parliament elections.
Far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen said on Friday it would prevent schools from offering non-pork alternatives to Muslim pupils in the 11 towns it won in local elections, saying such arrangements were contrary to France's secular values.
France's republic has a strict secular tradition enforceable by law, but faith-related demands have risen in recent years, especially from the country's five-million-strong Muslim minority, the largest in Europe.
'We will not accept any religious demands in school menus,' Le Pen told RTL radio. 'There is no reason for religion to enter the public sphere, that's the law.'
Pork is forbidden under Jewish and Muslim dietary laws.
Marine Le Pen says schools in towns run by her National Front party will stop serving non-pork alternatives to Muslim children
+3
Le Pen congratulates newly elected Steeve Briois, the party mayor of Henin-Beaumont, one of 11 towns the party won in local elections
The mayor of Arveyres, Benoit Gheysens told AFP the move was being taken because of the cost of providing alternative meals, many of which went to waste.
'Often children who did not take the substitute dinner complained as well and left the pork. It distressed the staff to see how much food was wasted,' Gheysens said.
In the eastern town of Hayanges FN mayor Fabien Engelmann has also proposed a'Pork Fest' to liven up the town centre, a plan he insists is not designed to offend Muslims but which will do little to alleviate high local unemployment.
The anti-immigrant National Front has consistently bemoaned the rising influence of Islam in French pubic life.
+3
France's newly appointed Prime minister Manuel Valls (right) speaks with French President Francois Hollande before the first cabinet meeting of his government at the Elysee Palace in Paris
France has seen periodic controversies over schools that substitute beef or chicken for pork from menus to cater to Muslim children.
Some of the FN's new mayors have complained there are too many halal shops in their towns.
The party won control of 11 town halls and a large district in the port city of Marseille in municipal elections on Sunday, more than double its record from the 1990s.
Le Pen hailed the victory as showing the party had finally established itself as France's third political force behind ruling Socialists and mainstream conservatives, and predicts a strong showing in May's European Parliament elections.
In the extended one to one, Farage and Le Pen dug into the biggest issues of 2017 - from Brexit to Trump, as well as the rise of the right across Europe.
You can watch the full interview in English above.
This video will explain WHY there are many complications to everything that happens. Its not just "Israel" and "Operation Talpiot" etc...its major corruption exposes and meeting Tony Sami and Roger Reaves.
Tony was the travel agent who brought in the original WTC bombers in 1994. Then he bought in Muhammad Atta via STT Travel, based in New York. I guess you find this hard to believe? Amazing who they hide out in Western Australia.
Roger Reaves was the top transporter for the Medellin and Cali Cartel. Close friend of Jorge Ochoa and Pablo Escobar. I became good friends with Roger while in jail. Roger was doing 18 to life for the importation of one ton of cocaine into Western Australia.
I did a video for Roger and got his book published.
Roger was the best friend and employee of Barry Seal - infamous Iran Contra operative. Surprised you haven't heard the name Roger Reaves before?
Enjoy my complicated little life...this is why I am a little stressed and why the WA establishment hate my guts. They stuck me in jail to teach me a lesson and they got hurt...better think twice before putting professional gossips in jail.
Brendon. I hope you get to see this message. I believe this to be EXTREMELY important. You recently did a video on the tipping point for bringing about real change. As valid as it was, I think it is crucial to understand the strategies that have, and are, being used against us for the implementation of the New World Order, and where many of us may be making a tragic mistake. I see many activists playing directly into the plans that were laid out over a century ago. I will start with a quote from Israeli historian Benny Morris concerning the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl. While Herzl claimed that the establishment of a "Jewish" state would cure anti-semitism, he also promoted anti-semitism to further his cause. This is the trap. "Herzl regarded Zionism's triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe's interests to rid the Jews and relieved of anti-semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that anti-semitism would be harnessed to his own--Zionist-purposes." (Benny Morris, Righteous Victims, p. 21) Anti-semitism would be used as a strategy by the Zionists! This may sound very confusing to many I would think. Now let me quote what Albert Pike had laid out for the third act WW3, the clash of civilizations. “The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. This is the clash of civilizations, the mutual destruction from which the New World Order will arise. What we have here is the simple divide and conquer strategy, which I believe is in action right now. Western powers, Zionists have been funding and militarizing terrorist Islamic factions, along with false flags for the purposes of vilifying all of Islam. And to great effect as is clearly evident. On the other side we have the natural vilification of the terrorist state of Israel, which is rising, this is also going to be used as a weapon against us! Do you see what I am getting at? It is very important for us not to demonize all Muslims, and likewise it is equally important not to demonize all Jews. I know that you do not do this, however I see it everywhere, it is natural and I have been guilty of that myself. Jews and Arabs once lived peacefully alongside each other before Zionism took root. Can we get there again? I think it is extremely important to expose these strategies that are being used against us so we can effectively counter them. We need to bring the good hearted and honest Jewish people into our fight. We need to understand that the war on terror and on Islam has been manufactured. We need to unite these polarities, find our common ground, which is simply happiness, peace and prosperity and a future for our children. What all just and moral people want. This is the only way to dissolve the divide and conquer strategy. It is with love we can win this war, our hatred for either Muslim, Jew or both will be our defeat just as it was planned. Please let me know if you got this message and your thoughts if you have time. Thanks mate, I'm an Aussie as well.
ACHTUNG!
Has it not been reported that it was a MOSSAD agent that played the role of the real MUHAMMAD ATTA who was murdered the following day of the EXPLOSIONS on 11/9/2001 after he had spoken with his father on the telephone?
HIZBULLAH, HIZB ALLAH, THE ONLY PARTY OF GOD LAWFUL TO MUSLIMS TO FIGHT IN THE NAME OF GOD AND FOR MUSLIMS AND ALL THE OPPRESSED IN THE WORLD!
HOORAY FOR HEZBOLLAH! Mike KING
The Israelis want southern Lebanon and the Litani River. The brave militias of Hezbollah (Images 2 & 3) won't allow that to happen. -- Sieg Heil boys, Sig Heil!
A favorite whipping boy of Sulzberger's Jew York Slimes, the Lebanese Muslim military and political organization known as Hezbollah has long been designated as a "terrorist group" by the Israeli vassal states known as the United States and the European Union. Indeed, a Google Search for the term "Hezbollah Terrorist" yields hundreds-of-thousands of results. So, those Hezbollah thugs must be some really "bad guys," right? A closer look indicates otherwise.
Hezbollah ("The Party of God") was formed in 1982 in response to expansionist Israel's invasion of southern Lebanon and brutal bombardment of the Muslim areas of the northern-central capital city of Beirut. The oh-so-predictable Zionist pretext for the invasion and air raids was "to fight terrorism." The real reason dates back to the original founding of "Israel." For geographic, industrial, and fresh water reasons, the Zionists have always wanted the Litani River to delineate the northern border of Israel.
The Israelis want southern Lebanon and the Litani River. The brave militias of Hezbollah (Images 2 & 3) won't allow that to happen. -- Sieg Heil boys, Sig Heil!
The entire basin of the Litani River is located within the borders of Lebanon. The Litani rises in the north and flows south and southwestwards. The river enters a gorge, flows about 30 kilometers and turns right (to the west), finally emptying into the Mediterranean Sea. It is no secret that Israel is a water-poor state and that the problem is getting worse. The nearest part of the Litani to Israel is just four kilometers from Israel's border, which makes it very tempting for dry Israel to covet. Litani has high quality water with very low salinity. Harnessing of Litani power (by damming) is also essential to Lebanon's industrial and agricultural development. The river passes through tunnels and stocks of hydro-plants to the coast, where it is used for irrigation for areas south of Beirut.
As far back as 1905, early Zionist settlers openly called for the Litani to be diverted southward because it seemed "the waters of the Jordan basin would be insufficient for the future needs of Palestine"(Israel). The Litani, because of its water, was suggested to become part of the "national Jewish entity" in 1919. This radical proposal by Zionist founding father Chaim Weizmann and friends was rejected by the League of Nations. The Litani remained part of post-Ottoman Lebanon instead.
There were also pre-statehood Jewish claims for the Litani during the 1940's. David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, suggested the inclusion of the Litani in the coming Jewish state. The Zionists proposed that seven-eighths of the Litani be "leased to Israel." Where the Litani makes a 90 degree angle, turning deeper into Lebanon and only 2.5 miles from the Lebanese/Israeli border, the river flows within easy tunneling distance from Israel - and very close to regions which Israel controls.
Zionist legends Ben Gurion (with Hiroshima Harry Truman in Image 1) and Weizmann(with Hiroshima Harry Truman in Image 2) openly advocated for control of the Litani River basin. Bibi Satanyahu still wants to achieve this long-cherished goal.
In 1945, a comprehensive water plan for the region included changing the course of the Litani toward the Jordan and using its water for irrigation along the Jordan Valley and in central Palestine. Naturally, this was never implemented because the Arabs did not want to help the coming terror state of Israel. Ben Gurion actually said the Litani should be Israel's northern border.
Water, in general, was also a source of conflict in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. After that war, Moshe Dayan, defense minister, said that Israel achieved "provisionally satisfying frontiers, with the exception of those with Lebanon." Israel hoped that it would have use of the Litani by the mid 1980s, when it projected that it would have fully used up the waters captured in the 1967 war. That was when Israel destroyed Beirut, but the Zionists still didn't get the Litani. UN peacekeepers occupied southern Lebanon instead. America pulled out when a Mossad false-flag blew up a marine barracks in October, 1983, killing 241 marines. Another attack killed 57 French troops.
1- June, 1982: Israel terror-bombed Beirut. 2 & 3- October, 1983: 241 U.S. Marines were blown up in an attempt to frame Iran and the new Hezbollah group.
In 2005, the Mossad / CIA complex triggered the 'Cedar Revolution' in Lebanon by killing a prominent Lebanese politician and fingering Syria. The goal of this "color revolution" was to muscle Syrian and Iranian influence out of Lebanon, thus leaving Hezbollah isolated. The phony revolution failed.
In 2006, Israel used the pretext of "kidnapped Israeli soldiers" to invade southern Lebanon. Pardon the mild vulgarity, but the invading Israeli Defense Forces got their sorry asses kicked so hard they ran back into Israel crying, literally!
After the 2005 Cedar Revolution fizzled, the 2006 invasion was an unmitigated rout! Soft and weak Israeli soldiers then openly cried for their fallen fellow invaders.
Israel's goal of seizing everything from the Litani southward is what one might call an "open conspiracy." Though the Litani River controversy is never discussed in the popular TV media, it is indeed sometimes written about in scholarly journals, research papers, and even in some "mainstream" press articles (here, here, here). Continuing to stand in the way of Israel's water grab are the heroic Iranian-Syrian backed freedom fighters of Hezbollah who have proven time and again that they are more than a match for the lily-livered child-killing bullies of expansionist Israel. As long as those two sponsoring states, especially Iran, remain viable; Hezbollah isn't going away anytime soon. And that, my friends, isthe real reason why Satanyahu and his U.S. neo-con cheerleaders are so obsessed with dragging America to war against Iran -- a nation that poses no threat to Israel and doesn't even share a border with it!
1- Disciplined and well-armed, Hezbollah Green Berets ain't no joke!
2- Iran is not even close to Israel (about 700 miles away).
The real "threat" to Israel is Iran's financial and military support of the Lebanese Hezbollah and Syria.
Israel's need for water, lust for more land and its history of dirty tricks makes it conceivable, no, probable, that it may already be using the Litani. The Jewish State has been accused of using tunnels to divert waters from the Litani for its own use; but because the area in question is occupied by Israeli troops, these claims cannot be proven. However, the fact that Israel will not allow journalists in the area is very suspicious, as is everything else the Zionists do.
Satanyahu's hatred for Iran has nothing to do with its imaginary nuclear weapons program. The real game is to trick* America into destroying Hezbollah's sponsors and grab some more territory, and water, in southern Lebanon (and beyond!).
*No trick! The USA, the UNO, the VATICAN, and the entire West are all behind it! And the checkmate will and must happen soon unless the sheeple, zombies, cowards, hypocrites, and the families of victim wake up and FIGHT BACK by all means necessary! (BAFS)
WHITE 'GENOCIDE' (1 out of 10?) AND THE SOUTH AFRICAN WEALTHY WHITE APARTHEID ISRAEL WMD BITCHES.
MANDELA WAS A TRAITOR SOLD OUT TO THE WHITE RACIST AND JEWISH MONOPOLIES AND HEGEMONIES!
APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA WORKED WITH APARTHEID ISRAEL ON WMD!
HAVE THEY NOT GONE TO AUSTRALIA, CANADA, THE USA, NEW ZEALAND, SOUTH AMERICA, AND EUROPE, LEAVING THEIR OWN BEHIND?
Nothing new under God's or Satan's sky!
South Africa: The White Refugees No One Wants
In South Africa, White Boers are forced to live in shanty towns because the post-Nelson Mandela era isn’t as “rainbow” as was promised.
(White Genocide Project) For over a decade, laws have been in place which deliberately put Whites at a severe disadvantage when looking for work. 400,000 White South Africans now live in poverty, almost one out of ten. White South Africans who are lucky enough to find work, must worry about being raped, tortured and murdered if they work on farms. Stay Connected With Us
Things are so bad that a presidential candidate had to promise “never a white genocide under our rule.” This particular camp is in Munsieville, near Johannesburg. There are about 80 more camps full of outcast Whites in the country.They want to leave, but most cannot afford it, and few countries are willing to take more than a handful. You will not hear about these real refugees on the TV because they are White.The mass media won’t document the suffering and farm murder genocide of White South Africans because it does not fit their narrative. White people are supposed to be the oppressors who hold all the power, and we are nasty as well because we don’t want our countries to become “rainbow” nations . . . like the “rainbow” nation South Africa is supposed to be.
Our own governments and ruling classes are trying to bring about the “rainbow” by moving millions of non-Whites into every majority White country on the face of the planet.It’s not “diversity” if you eliminate a race of people, it’s genocide. This is White genocide because we White people are the only ones who will lose our countries.
The INCREDIBLE Picture that Proves Adolf Hitler Lived to 95 with his Brazilian Lover
The leader of the Third Reich fled to Paraguay, via Argentina, before settling in a small town in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, according to a "shocking" new book.
Hitler is said to have used the assumed name of Adolf Leipzig and was known to the 12,000 locals in Nossa Senhora do Livramento as "the Old German". The man at the centre of the controversial claim is pictured, two years before his death in 1984, posing happily with his black girlfriend Cutinga. Simoni Renee Guerreiro Dias, who wrote Hitler in Brazil - His Life and His Death, claims he was in the area hunting for buried treasure using a map given to him by friends withing the Vatican. She insists that "Hitler was using his lover Cutinga to hide his true identity as a vile Aryan supremacist".
Stay Connected With Us
Simoni, a Brazilian jew, refuses to accept that the Fuhrer shot himself in his Berlin bunker on April 30 1945. She is demanding that Leipzig's remains be exhumed and his DNA tested tested against living relatives of Hitler.
She told local journalists: "I just laughed at first, I thought it was a joke. Today I'm convinced it is true and Adolf Hitler didn't end up here by chance."
Simoni spent two years in the small town near the Bolivian border, which was founded during an 18th century gold rush, investigating her oddball theory. She has linked the Fuhrer's alleged arrival in the area to a Vatican offer of ownership rights over buried Jesuit treasure in a cave near his adopted home. And she claims that he chose the surname of Leipzig because it was the birthplace of Hitler's favourite composer, Bach. Her suspicions about Adolf Leipzig increased after she Photoshopped a moustache onto the grainy picture she obtained of him and compared it to photos of the German leader. According to Simoni, an unidentified Polish nun recognised an elderly man due to have an op at a hospital in Cuiaba in the early eighties as Hitler and demanded he leave - but was reprimanded by a superior who claimed he was there on Vatican orders. Conspiracy theorists have long argued Hitler escaped from Germany and fled to south America, following fellow Nazis Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele. This theory became the centre of a fresh row last year when two British authors were accused of plagiarism by a journalist in Argentina. Gerrard Williams and Simon Dunstan claimed in a 2011 book Grey Wolf: The Escape of Adolf Hitler, that the Fuhrer fled with his mistress Eva Braun to Patagonia and had two daughters before dying in 1962 aged 73. The book was later made into a documentary film. Argentine journalist accused the British pair of using his research to substantiate claims made in the book, a charge Williams and Dunstan denied. The claims about Hitler's life in Argentina were ridiculed by historian Guy Walters, who described them as "2,000 per cent rubbish" when the book came out. He added: "It's an absolute disgrace. There's no substance to it at all. It appeals to the deluded fantasies of conspiracy theorists and has no place whatsoever in historical research." Academics in Brazil have also rubbished the theory Hitler lived and died in Nossa Senhora do Livramento. Candido Moreira Rodrigues, a history professor at Mato Grosso's Federal University said: "There's nothing new in people who claim to be historians coming up with the most far-reaching theories about Hitler supposedly living in south America and subsequently dying in one of the countries in this region." Tens of thousands of National Socialists escaped after the war, including the famous Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele. Investigators probing Hitler's demise were hampered by the lack of any physical evidence for his death. Fantasists were given added ammunition he didn't die in his Berlin bunker when 2009 DNA tests on skull fragments found near the bunker and believed to be his, turned out to belong to a woman. Rochus Misch, a former bodyguard of Adolf Hitler who has been named as the last man to see the Fuhrer alive during his final hours in Germany, died last September aged 96. Misch, who lived with Hitler and his mistress in their underground refuge as the allies closed in, told before his death he saw Hitler slumped with his head on the table after hearing a gunshot behind his closed door. (Express.co.uk)
Reconciliation (not the Roman Catholic way) is what will bring peace at a global level! But, others, including the perverts like the Hitler haters, prefer genocidal wars, racism, hatred, inciting to violence, and the systematic violations of all our God-given rights! Thank you, Mike, for giving me the opportunity to write this reminder! An old Arab Tradition is that PARADISE LIES AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER! Hindus from Hindustan, of all religions, have embraced this concept!
Klara Hitler
HITLER'S POETIC TRIBUTE TO ELDERLY MOTHERS
Posted by Mike King
What kind of 'monster' could write such a poem?
AN APPEAL FOR PATIENCE ANDKINDNESS TOWARD ONE'S AGING MOTHER
When your mother has grown older,And you have grown older,When what was once easy and effortlessNow becomes a burden,
When her dear, faithful eyesNo longer see life as they once did,When her feet, grown tired,No longer want to carry her as she walks —
Then give her your arm for support;Accompany her with gladness and joy.The hour will come when, weepingYou will accompany her on her final walk.
And if she asks for something, then answer her.And if she asks again, then speak.And if she asks yet again, respond to her,Not stormily, but with gentle calm.
I mothered my grandchildren, so I understand what Adolf (a common Jewish name in France) was writing about!
And if she cannot understand you well,Explain everything to her joyfully.The hour will come, the bitter hour,When her mouth will ask for nothing more.
(Adolf Hitler)
*"Denk es," from the Sunday Morgenpost, Munich, May 14, 1925
*
Must See!
Adorable old German lady toasts to Hitler (as stupid children / grandchildren laugh and "correct" her)
"Mary (Miriam for Muslims) is a symbol and embodiment of female chastity, purity, and loving motherhood. At a higher level, she embodies the divine feminine – that aspect of God which manifests on the human level as all-embracing motherly love, tenderness, extreme compassion, receptivity, and similar qualities that we think of as feminine." Dr Kevin Barrett
However, in my understanding, even as a Muslim, the VIRGINITY of MIRIAM was the same virginity as all virgins! The Biblical word Christians translated as VIRGIN from the Jewish heavily corrupted records (hardly to do with God!) meant, according to my research, YOUNG UNMARRIED WOMAN OR GIRL. Most is fabricated around the birth and mission of Jesus!
Even the Islamic text should be taken metaphorically to make sense of God and religion in general! I even took God, Heaven and Hell, and the Day of Judgement out of the equation, and found that Islam remained 100% intact! It is all about the level at which we read the texts and its contextualization.
It’s Mothers’ Day. The Pope is back in the Vatican, in the wake of his trip to Portugal yesterday to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Miracle of Fatima. So today is an auspicious occasion to discuss the deeper meaning of the most famous modern “apparition of the Virgin Mother.” All sorts of rumors have swirled around the “Third Secret” delivered by Mary, mother of Jesus, peace upon them both, to the world in general and the Church in particular, by way of three shepherd children who first witnessed the miracle on May 13, 1917. The Vatican supposedly released the full text of the Third Secret on June 26, 2000. It portrays, in visionary symbolic terms, an apocalyptic war in which Godly people in general, and/or Godly churchmen in particular (including the Pope) are martyred by ungodly forces. For various reasons, many skeptics claim the text revealed in 2000 is not the full Third Secret. They say the full Secret is more detailed – and more pointed in its condemnation of satanic-freemasonic infiltration of the Church…concerning which, check out my articles: Was Pope Benedict fired by the Knights of Malta? The Real “Pope Crisis”: Sexual Freemasonry and the New World Order Though the various attempts to interpret the Secret’s visionary-symbolic images are certainly interesting, they miss the larger point, which was eloquently stated many decades ago by Archbishop Fulton Sheen:
The Koran, which is the Bible of the Moslems, has many passages concerning the Blessed Virgin. First of all, the Koran believes in her Immaculate Conception, and also, in her Virgin Birth…..The Koran also has verses on the Annunciation, Visitation, and Nativity. Angels are pictured as accompanying the Blessed Mother and saying, Oh Mary, God has chosen you and purified you, and elected you above all the women of the earth. In the 19th chapter of the Koran there are 41 verses on Jesus and Mary. There is such a strong defense of the virginity of Mary here that the Koran in the fourth book, attributes the condemnation of the Jews to their monstrous calumny against the Virgin Mary. Mary, then, is for the Moslems the true Sayyida, or Lady. The only possible serious rival to her in their creed would be Fatima, the daughter of Mohammed himself. But after the death of Fatima, Mohammed wrote: Thou shalt be the most blessed of women in Paradise, after Mary. In a variant of the text Fatima is made to say; I surpass all the women, except Mary. This brings us to our second point; namely, why the Blessed Mother, in this 20th Century should have revealed herself in the significant little village of Fatima, so that to all future generations she would be known as “Our Lady of Fatima.” Since nothing ever happens out of Heaven except with a finesse of all details, I believe that the Blessed Virgin chose to be known as “Our Lady of Fatima” as pledge and a sign of hope to the Moslem people, and as an assurance that they, who show her so much respect, will one day accept her divine Son too. Evidence to support these views is found in the historical fact that the Moslems occupied Portugal for centuries. At the time when they were finally driven out, the last Moslem chief had a beautiful daughter by the name of Fatima. A Catholic boy fell in love with her, and for him she not only stayed behind when the Moslems left, but even embraced the Faith. The young husband was so much in love with her that he changed the name of the town where he lived to Fatima. Thus the very place where our Lady appeared in 1917 bears a historical connection to Fatima, the daughter of Mohammed.
Why would the Virgin Mary choose a town named Fatima, named after the daughter of the Prophet Muhammad, for her most celebrated and most important apparition? This is the real secret, the deepest secret, of Fatima. And it isn’t really all that hard to decrypt.
First, let us recall the “deep significance” of the Virgin Mary in religious history, iconography, and symbolism. Mary (Miriam for Muslims) is a symbol and embodiment of female chastity, purity, and loving motherhood. At a higher level, she embodies the divine feminine – that aspect of God which manifests on the human level as all-embracing motherly love, tenderness, extreme compassion, receptivity, and similar qualities that we think of as feminine. Mary exploded into Christian consciousness as a sort of “return of the repressed.” Mariolatry was a deep, symbolic rebellion against the Church Fathers’ unbalanced focus on the male aspect of God, and their neglect of the divine feminine. The Trinity – an all-male reproduction fantasy that replaces the actual “reproductive trinity” (mother, father, and child) with an all-male facsimile (father, son, and “holy spirit”) – exemplifies this extreme spiritual disequilibrium at the heart of traditional Christianity. The revelation to Prophet Muhammad establishing Islam corrected this error in Christianity much more clearly and explicitly:
People of the Book, do not go to excess in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God; His word, directed to Mary, a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’—desist, that is better for you—God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust. (4:171)
Islam eliminates the “holy trinity” in favor of Divine Unity (tawheed). It forcefully argues that “God the Father” is a bad metaphor. And it establishes “divine feminine” qualities as the first and most emphasized of the qualities of God: All-Mercifulness and All-Compassion. These two qualities, rahman and raheem, both derive from the word for womb. They express the kind of absolute love and compassion and mercy that, in the human world, is best exemplified by a mother’s love for her children. (Happy Muslim Mother’s Day!) So the real Secret of Fatima is not merely that the Church Fathers will be martyred in an apocalyptic war if they don’t stop the satanic-freemasonic infiltration of the Church. Such martyrdom and apocalypse (in the bad sense) would also be punishment for Christianity’s error in seeing God as purely masculine and not at all feminine.
Heed the Virgin of Fatima, o ye Christians! Return to a more balanced vision of the Divine, as urged by Mariolatry and plainly stated by God’s revelation to Prophet Muhammad!
But maybe it isn’t just the Christians who are in need of correction and guidance. Today’s Muslims, despite being custodians of the most recent and well-preserved of Divine revelations, should also look to Fatima. For Fatima, the daughter of Prophet Muhammad, is at the heart of the schism that is wreaking havoc in the Islamic heartlands today: the “Sunni vs. Shia” split. The Shia trace their chain of political and spiritual authority back to Fatima, mother of the Imams. The Sunnis, with the exception of some Sufis, do not. In her novel Loin de Medine, the late Algerian feminist novelist Assia Djebar imagines Fatima struggling to gain her rightful inheritance. In Djebar’s vision, the first schism in Islam was caused by an “old boys’ network” that refused to allow daughters to inherit political and spiritual authority.
So in Islam too, “Fatima” encodes a primordial mistake, a preference for male over female.
Thus the Apparition of Fatima urges all universal monotheists – the world’s four billion Christians and Muslims – to refrain from idolatrous worship of the merely masculine. Yes, of course God is ineffable, far above the human. But to the extent that we intuit God’s qualities at the human level, we need to rebalance our vision to include the divine feminine. So the Virgin of Fatima was calling out to both Christians and Muslims, warning us about the hyper-masculinization of our culture that has produced the mass slaughters of modern mechanized warfare. But was she also warning us about our spiritual enemies? One especially noxious strain of Talmudic Judaism vilifies Jesus and his mother Mary. A notorious passage in the Talmud imagines Jesus boiling in excrement. Another calls Mary a liar and a whore. Recall the words of Archbishop Sheen:
There is such a strong defense of the virginity of Mary here that the Koran in the fourth book, attributes the condemnation of the Jews to their monstrous calumny against the Virgin Mary.
A heretical, satanic offshoot of Talmudic Judaism – traceable to the false messiah Shabtai Zvi and his successor Jacob Frank – founded and steered freemasonry, and soon gained control of the usury banking empires that dominate today’s West, and much of the globe. These are the people behind the “sexual freemasonry” that has infested the Vatican and other centers of power. A mutation of the same movement founded (or at least infiltrated and steered) atheistic world Communism. And of course it runs today’s bankster-driven capitalism. These are all manifestations of the “War on God,” and collectively they represent the enemy that the Miracle of Fatima warns us against. Russia seems to have a special place in the Fatima prophecies. The 1917 Russian Revolution was a Jewish-atheist-led movement that targeted Russian Orthodox Christianity and Islam – burning and destroying churches and mosques, raping and murdering and pillaging the faithful – yet protecting Judaism and constructing synagogues everywhere. The neocon-CIA-Zionist National Review tells us: “In 1917, World War I was still raging, and the Russian Revolution broke out in October. The Virgin indicated that Russia would be the instrument through which God chastised the world for its sins. Russia, she said, would spread its “errors.” For the most part, Fátima scholars understand the “errors” to be those of Communism. The Virgin predicted that wars and persecutions would be rampant, various nations would be annihilated, good people would be martyred, and the pope would suffer much.” Today, Russia is returning to Christianity – so the Freemasonic Zionists are demonizing her leadership and encircling her with nuclear weapons. These enemies of God have manipulated Western culture to pervert sexuality, debase womanhood and especially motherhood, and destroy the family as the basis of civilization. They hate Putin because he tries to keep Pussy Rioters from vandalizing churches with pornography, and supports traditional Russian family values. And one of the reasons they declared all-out war on Islam with their 9/11 coup d’etat is that Muslims are resisting the New World Order’s forcible perversion of sexuality and family. Muslim women, in particular, continue to embrace motherhood and family values. Muslims have lower rates of crime, suicide, drug addiction, divorce, STDs, alcoholism, depression, and other negative social indicatorsdue to the relative resiliency of the Muslim family unit, which is built around the purity, chastity, and mercifully-compassionate loving motherhood of the Muslim woman. The demon-driven enemies of God hate this. That is why they are obsessed with trying to degrade and debase Muslim women in the Muslim lands they invade, occupy, and destroy.
Israeli Army T-shirt popular with soldiers shows a target on a pregnant Muslim woman’s belly
Top Israeli politician calls for murdering Palestinian mothers along with their children
Who better exemplifies the qualities of the Blessed Virgin of Fatima: The Muslim mothers of Palestine, who struggle to raise beautiful children in the depths of Zionist-created hell? Or the Zionist women like Ayalet Shaked who are devoted to their mass murder? Christians, by allowing themselves to be deceived by the demon that is Satanic-Freemasonic Zionism, have become complicit in the destruction of their Church … and, God forbid, the world. That is what we were warned about in the Message of the Virgin of Fatima. Mothers’ Day 2017 would be a good day to repent.
Primo: there is no such thing as Islamic IDEOLOGY! (I just returned from 2 days and 2 nights of baby caring and ‘worshiping’)
Secundo:“Islamic Ideology Flourishes Because Christians Deny Biblical Orthodoxy, Pastor Warns!” WARNING? ACHTUNG? ISLAM THE ENEMY? WHAT THE HELL? OY VEY! The world has recently seen one racist MARINE LE PEN spread BIG lies about Islam, hatred towards Muslims, and incite to violence against them in France only to please other racists and fanatic in order to win the elections! SHE LOST! Does this stupid pastor hope to win the confidence of apostate or renegade Christians by lying about Islam or any other people’s religion? According to him Islam has nothing to offer to the world! He should read Bonaparte et l’Islam or other works by non-Muslim Western authors like Thomas Carlyle, John William Draper, Alphonse de Lamartine, Tolstoy, Goethe, etc.! In Islam, Christ is a Muslim, Christ submitted to the will of God! Even the Gospel says so!
Tertio: Does Christian faith depend on Islam or Muslims? Quatro: Vickie Jacobs has been doing a great job for quite a long time to wake us up! WHERE ARE YOU, CHRISTIANS?
BAFS
Muhammad Ali Ben MarcusAsk any Arabic-speaking Catholic how he or she calls Mary (Miriam, Myriam, Miryam...)? UM ALLAH, that is, the MOTHER oF ALLAH! Thank you, Vickie! YA OUM ALLAH! Or YA UM ALLAH! Sung by Fairuz, a Christian CATHOLIC! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrKPP4FU8fE
· Reply· Remove Preview· 13 mins· EditedThe main dogmatic difference between Christians and Muslims: Catholics and other Christian worship Jesus as God which makes their Gospels UNCHRISTIC! But, Islam recommends humankind to come to COMMON TERMS despite all their differences. "Jesus, you are my God, only your love can heal. You are the (eternal) love of my soul forever. Jesus, you are(that) what I want/long for.
I bow/kneel before you(worship you), my God. I confess, you are my king, here is my life in your hands. So do what you want (do with with it what you want)
Come and reign in my heart, come, I yearn for you! my lips chant for you, I love you for ever.
Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger (AD) – has linked Serco’s Demon face-recognition software, allegedly used by City & Guilds alumni to help Hillar...
AV8 is this coming weekend. Field's presentation can be downloaded from the link below with more details on the event and guest speakers. AV8 2018 – FIELD MCCONNELL ON PEDOPHILIA http://www.abel...
Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger (AD) – has linked the Liberal hazing of B.C. pig farm 'guests' ('96-'02) to CAI managing partner Tracey McVicar ...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7353182 Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger (AD) – has linked Bin Laden’s To...
Link to full broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7315964 Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger – has linked Dina Powell’s alleged bla...
David Hawkins back from Oz Full show at Livestream: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7298838 Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger – has li...
This might be the last opportunity for me to address my German compatriots. I am supposed to start serving my prison sentence on April 19, 2017, for another 3.5 years. I am 81 years old, and there...
FIELD McCONNELL, ANNAPOLIS GRAD, US MARINE CORPS PILOT, RETIRED AIRLINE PILOT, CONNECTS THE DOTS TO HILLARY'S CONNECTION TO 9/11 AND MH370 AIRLINE COVER UP. INTEL FROM THE INSIDE. To access archi...
To Whom It May Concern: Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger – has linked Serco air traffic controllers' apparent OODA Loop (Observe Orient Decide Ac...
Field McConnell – United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger – alleges that Serco is using Crown Agents and Crown rights rules to generate fake news at crime scenes associat...
Field McConnell, United States Marine and Global Operations Director of Abel Danger, has linked Serco's alleged use of Demon face-recognition software to search for, track and blackmail pedophile n...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7145006 Abel Danger (AD) has explained how Serco appears to use 8(a) fraudsters and Con Air pedophiles – allegedly tracked by...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President Trump can stop Serco’s alleged use of Demon face-recognition software to blackmail deep-state pedophiles on the federal bridge* and neutralize “Angel is...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President Trump can link Serco’s alleged injection of fake news through Osama bin Laden’s London office in the mid ‘90s to murder-for-hire networks apparently use...
Karl Lentz is an expert on the courts, the law, and the abuse of common men and women by those dressed in black. Karl will be given and open mic on today's impromptu Abel Danger show expected to a...
We were blessed to have Filed McConnell on our show and like Robert Steele, Field is a bank of knowledge. In this episode we talk about his new projects, Piizza/Pedogate, the CIA and much more. BTW...
Abel Danger (AD) claims that Field McConnell’s sister Kristine Marcy had Timothy McVeigh executed on June 11, 200 to conceal her alleged role in the Waco siege of April 19, 1993, her alleged use of...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President Trump can stop Serco from injecting fake news of aircraft crashes into the Federal Bridge Certification Authority and its apparent use of Demon ICE* fac...
Abel Danger (AD) explains below how President Trump can purge fake-news injects from Serco's phony resilience exercises where its 8(a) companies allegedly use Demon face-recognition software to ext...
Abel Danger (AD) explains below how former banker Steve Bannon may have fooled President Trump by using Serco 8(a) companies to inject fake news on 9/11 through a witting or unwitting former BBC di...
Link to Livestream Broadcast https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7024739 Abel Danger (AD) has explained (see below) how President Trump could purge fake news from Serco’s alleged media plays ...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/7012445 Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President Trump can defeat Serco’s 8(a) pedophile newsgroups, allegedly blackmaile...
United States Marine Field McConnell – Global Operations Director of Abel Danger – has explained how Trump hotels can use Serco’s Demon face recognition software to purge the hotel industry of pedo...
Link to Livestream Broadcast https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6968482 United States Marine Field McConnell – Global Operations Director of Abel Danger (AD) – has shown how CAI Special Inv...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6954991 Abel Danger (AD) has shown how Serco shareholders can extort the owners or operators of Trump Hotels by deploying “t...
Link to Livestream Broadcast https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6932738 Abel Danger (AD) has shown how ICE Foundation Board Director Kristine Marcy may have trapped President Trump by having...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6913631 Abel Danger (AD) has explained why Serco shareholders with custody of the assets of the SBA Office of SBIC Liquidatio...
Link to Livestream Broadcast: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6904392 In 1989 Obama, Cameron, Thatcher, Zuma and Blatchford re routed 3 nukes from an Israeli ship to a ship registered in ...
Link to Livestream Broadcast https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6892459 Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump is targeted by a hotel-based “Jackal” assassination ne...
Abel Danger (AD) claims that James "Mad Dog" Mattis could use a Qui tam lawsuit to expose Serco's alleged use of the Marriott hotel chain to bypass the U.S. National Command Authority with the Defe...
AD claims that former First Lady Hillary Clinton and Kristine 'Con Air' Marcy outsourced the Office of SBIC [8(a)] Liquidation to Serco shareholders in November 2000 and appointed BNY Mellon as tru...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can use a Qui tam lawsuit to stop Serco shareholders from the ongoing extortion of 8(a) companies through the Office of SBIC Liquidat...
This is the correct show for Thursday. Livestream Broadcast link: https://livestream.com/abeldanger/events/6836488 1. Defense Red Switch Network – Auctioned ‘Flash Override’ access to federal bri...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can link Serco's apparent qui tam procurement frauds on the Obamacare program to the various liquidated [SBIC] 8(a) companies and kil...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can link the ISIS "Turkey Shoot" in Istanbul on New Year's Day to Serco's alleged qui tam frauds on the U.S. Defense Ammunition Cente...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can link news injects (lies) about Russian spies from Serco's Vice President of Intelligence Business and National Security Advisor M...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can link a 'dark web' alibi service for Serco shareholders including Goldman Sachs, HSBC and the British and Saudi Arabian government...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how Michelle Obama appears to have served Northern Trust as an alien property custodian for the first live-broadcast mass snuff film in human history which was produc...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump can deploy the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity to identify and then eradicate Hotel Serco’s 8(a) networks together with their user...
Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump became a victim of loan sharks on 9/11 when Serco shareholders met on the 47th floor of WTC#1 (North Tower) to switch four-minute war...
Music courtesy of Thunderbird will do just fine featuring Chad the Bad (elevenhundred springs cover) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JRGaNtABsI Abel Danger (AD) has explained online how Donald Tr...
1. Abel Danger (AD) has explained to Donald Trump how Serco appears to have used ad hoc way points during the Boeing hijacks on 9/11 to link Goldman Sachs liquidators at the Offutt Air Force Base t...
1. Abel Danger (AD) has explained how President-elect Donald Trump became a target for Serco’s 8(a) loan-sharking bankers who allegedly allowed Clinton Foundation donors to stand down the Defense R...
1. Abel Danger (AD) has checked Elaine Chao's and Norman Mineta's alibis for their apparent use of the DOT crisis management center (CMC) to guide Serco 8(a) bombs in Zulu time on 9/11 and allow We...
They say WE are the Conspiracy Theorists...but check out what THEY promote!! ----- SCREW MY CABLE BILL ----- I have Completely ELIMINATED my Cable Bill FOREVER! This is NO JOKE! This is NOT a S...
1. Abel Danger (AD) has explained how Donald Trump can stop Serco from selling 8(a) timeline alibis to the likes of Norman Mineta (‘Lyin’ Norm’) which allegedly helped him conceal a Federal Bridge ...
Byron Dale and Greg Soderberg talk about the consequences of a debt-money-based system where all the money is created through loans; how interest grows the debt, but not the money supply; and other...
1. Abel Danger (AD) has linked Hillary Clinton’s alleged development of a Federal Bridge Certification Authority snuff-film archive to an 8(a)-company visa service apparently launched in 1994 by Se...
Livestream from last Tuesday. Credit to: Mosley Boxing for video below Sugar Ray Robinson Knockout Highlights & Tribute - Greatest p4p!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukn1PCzHq4k
1. Abel Danger (AD) has explained to Donald Trump's transition team how to recapture the Defense Red Switch Network from Valerie Jarrett and how to destroy any sensitive compartmented information f...
Few know that former PM (of England) Cameron's great grand father was a chief head of the drug laundering, child trafficking, and weapons dealing HSBC. Otherwise, Cameron's legacy was just another...
The "American Patriot" is a News commentary and events vlog channel. - It mission is to catalog and preserve as much of the political History of the United States for future generations to access. Man
WATCH ORIGINAL PEDO ISLAND REPORT - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Bw54mtGq1U - Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, his relationship with Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and other...
Civil Case 3:07-cv-49 will be refiled now that the Clinton Foundation has been determined to be the network that was invisible when the original case HAWK'S CAFE v. GLOBAL GUARDIANS was filed in Fa...
1. Abel Danger (AD) believes that a President Donald Trump will need a five-star general to bomb weapons caches developed by mentors of the Federal Bridge Certification Authority and arrest the 8(a...
A viewer took the time to write, and send me what he did, please take a few minutes to listen to what he wrote, if you agree, please pass it along to your like minded friends.
1. Abel Danger (AD) has recognized the Clinton Foundation as a RICO Enterprise which allegedly took control of the US Patent and Trademark Office in 1996 and created a patent pool of weaponized dev...
This is what "Hagar", the young Egyptian wife of mythical Abraham (his second wife) would have looked like, the one Abraham the Coward kicked out of her home with her son Ishmael, upon order from Sarah, and against God's Order!
By Dr. David Duke. When I was first began to understand the ultra-racist, supremacist ideology of Judaism and Zionism, I came into contact with the theory that present-day Jews are genetically unrelated to the historical Jewish community.
The allegation, known as the “”Khazar theory”, claims that the Ashkenazim Jews of today are actually the descendants of the Khazar people, a Central Asiatic nomadic tribe that allegedly converted to Judaism in the 9th Century AD. It is claimed that these newly-minted Jews then migrated into what is now Russia, Eastern Europe and later Western and Northern Europe. The theory is also used to advance the idea that Jewish actions are character are not genetic or racial because the Khazar people adopted the Talmudic values of Sephardic and other Jews who were unrelated to them.
Interestingly enough, the Khazar theory was launched, and is still to this day, driven primarily by Communist Jews and other Jews who promote it in the Gentile community as a refutation that the Jews can’t be racist because they are not a race!It is ironic that the three most prominent exponents of the theory that “the Jews are not a race” all have almost exaggerated caricatures of features people ascribe as Jewish. Above, left to right: Zionist extremist and Communist Party member Arthur Koestler (author of the “The Thirteenth Tribe”); Jewish geneticist Eran Elhaik; and Shlomo Sand, an Israeli academic and former member of the Union of Israeli Communist Youth (Banki). All three maintain that large numbers of present-day Jews are completely genetically unrelated to the Middle Eastern-origin Jews who wrote the Babylonian Talmud.
For years I accepted the Khazar theory as true. After it, all it was repeated by some writers who also recognized the leading Jewish role in Communism and their leadership in many other subversive movements.
It was only later, when I considered the question logically and scientifically, were my doubts about the Khazar theory aroused.
One thing that I did not know then was that Koestler, the communist Jew who popularized the Khazar Theory bragged in a Jewish magazine that he advanced the theory as way to fight against anti-Semitism. His theory was that since the Gospels and Europeans blamed Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, if he could make Europeans believe that they are not related by blood to the Christkiller Jews talked about in the New Testament that he could lessen hatred against Jews. One must remember until the Jewish triumph of “Christian Zionism” 99 percent of Christianity viewed Jews as the greatest enemies of Jesus Christ and God, as the New Testament makes very, very clear. So in those days some Jews, such as Koestler saw an advantage to say that the Jews were not actually related to the Jews who crucified Christ and so persecuted Christians.
Koestler’s official biography, written by Michael Scammell, specifically quotes him on why he wrote The Thirteenth Tribe.
”His argument was that if he could persuade people that a non-Jewish “Khazar” heritage formed the basis of modern Jews, then this would be a weapon against European racially-based anti-Semitism.“Should this theory be confirmed, the term ‘anti-Semitism’ would become void of meaning,” he said.According to Scammell, Koestler told French biologist Pierre Debray-Ritzen he“was convinced that if he could prove that the bulk of Eastern European Jews were descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear.” (Source: Scammell, Michael. Koestler: The Literary and Political Odyssey of a Twentieth-Century Skeptic, Random House, 2009, ISBN 978-0-394-57630-5, p. 546.)
In the 1950s the Khazar Theory was also promoted by Benjamin Friedman, a prominent rich Jew who converted to Christianity and turned against the Jews. It was certainly self-serving for him to promote the idea that Jewishness was mostly cultural and religious and not racial in nature therefore facilitating more acceptance of him.
There are three fundamental issues which need to addressed: the scientific evidence; thehistorical-logical evidence; and the reasons why the Khazar theory came about.
Part I: The Scientific Evidence—Twelve DNA Studies Which Disprove the “Khazar Theory”
“[D]espite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level.
“Admixture estimates suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into Ashkenazi and Roman Jewish communities . . . Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations were not statistically different. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora.”
The study found that Ashkenazi Jews in particular “share more common paternal lineages with other Jewish and Middle Eastern groups than with non-Jewish populations in areas where Jews lived in Eastern Europe, Germany and the French Rhine Valley. This is consistent with Jewish traditions in placing most Jewish paternal origins in the region of the Middle East.”
3. A September 2006 study titled “European Population Substructure: Clustering of Northern and Southern Populations” (Michael F Seldin et.al., PLOS Genetics, DOI: 0.1371/journal.pgen.0020143) found that both Ashkenazi Jews as well as Sephardic Jews showed more than 85% membership in the ‘southern’ European group which made their results “consistent with a later Mediterranean origin of these ethnic groups.”
5. A January 2009 study titled “A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans” (Anna C Need et.al., Genome Biology, 2009; 10(1): R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r7) found that “individuals with full Jewish ancestry formed a clearly distinct cluster from those individuals with no Jewish ancestry.”
This study showed that in DNA terms, Jews, both Sephardic and Ashkenazim, cluster as a distinct group—something that, if the Khazar theory was true, would be impossible.
“Jewish populations show a high level of genetic similarity to each other, clustering together in several types of analysis of population structure. These results support the view that the Jewish populations largely share a common Middle Eastern ancestry and that over their history they have undergone varying degrees of admixture with non-Jewish populations of European descent.”
7. A December 2009 study titled “The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people” (Doron M. Behar, et. al., Nature 466, 238–242 (08 July 2010) doi:10.1038/nature09103) analyzed individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations in order to “provide comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north Africa.”
The results identified a“previously unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East” and that “Most Jewish samples form a remarkably tight subcluster,” and that “trace[s] the origins of most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant.”
8. A June 2010 study titled “Abraham’s children in the genome era: major Jewish diaspora populations comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared Middle Eastern ancestry” (Atzmon et al., American Journal of Human Genetics, 2010;86:850-859) refuted the idea of large-scale genetic contributions of Central and Eastern European and Slavic populations to the formation of Ashkenazi Jewry.
This study found used genome-wide analysis of seven Jewish groups (Iranian, Iraqi, Syrian, Italian, Turkish, Greek, and Ashkenazi) and “demonstrated distinctive Jewish population clusters, each with shared Middle Eastern ancestry, proximity to contemporary Middle Eastern populations, and variable degrees of European and North African admixture.”
This paper specifically excluded the “Khazar theory” as an origin for present-day Jews, saying “the genetic proximity . . . is incompatible with theories that Ashkenazi Jews are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs.”
9. A March 2012 study by Steven M. Bray et. al., titled “Signatures of founder effects, admixture, and selection in the Ashkenazi Jewish population” (Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences, 16222–16227, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004381107) found that the “Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population . . . has a common Middle Eastern origin with other Jewish Diaspora populations” while concluding that the Ashkenazi Jewish population has had the most European admixture.
10. A March 2012 study by Christopher L. Campbell et. al., titled “North African Jewish and non-Jewish populations form distinctive, orthogonal clusters” (Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204840109) found that genome-wide analysis of five North African Jewish groups (Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian, Djerban, and Libyan) “demonstrated distinctive North African Jewish population clusters with proximity to other Jewish populations.”
Furthermore, the study showed, the Sephardic Jewish genome is “compatible with the history of North African Jews—founding during Classical Antiquity with proselytism of local populations, followed by genetic isolation with the rise of Christianity and then Islam, and admixture following the emigration of Sephardic Jews during the Inquisition.”
Finally, this study added “These populations showed a high degree of endogamy and were part of a larger Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jewish group.”
(*Endogamy: the practice of marrying within a specific ethnic group, rejecting others on such a basis as being unsuitable for marriage or for other close personal relationships.)
11. In his book, “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People” (Oxford University Press, USA; May 2012), Harry Ostrer, a professor of Pathology and Genetics at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University and Director of Genetic and Genomic Testing at Montefiore Medical Center, Medicine, concluded that “Jews exhibit a distinctive genetic signature.” (Jews Are a ‘Race,’ Genes Reveal–Author Uncovers DNA Links Between Members of Tribe, The Jewish Daily Forward, May 04, 2012).
Ostrer, who is also director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, said in his conclusion that “Jews are a homogeneous group with all the scientific trappings of what we used to call a race.”
Ostrer also deals specifically with the Khazar theory. He pointed out that the findings from the Jewish HapMap Project (see below) completely refute“the theories that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs.” (Jews: A religious group, people or race?, Jerusalem Post, 8/26/2012)
12. The Jewish HapMap Project, a joint project of Albert Einstein College of Medicine and New York University School of Medicine, was created to “understand the structure of the genomes in Jewish populations” and is an outgrowth of the Human HapMap Project.
According to this project, “Jewish populations are remarkable for maintaining continuous genetic, cultural, and religious traditions over 4000 years, despite residence all over the world.”
Its findings, based on first hand DNA studies amongst Jewish populations around the globe, found no evidence to support a Central Asian DNA origin for Jewry.
According to the Jerusalem Post, the “Jewish HapMap Project in New York City has so far shown “in exquisite detail what had been conjectured for a century. Jewish populations from the major Jewish Diaspora groups – Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Mizrahi – form a distinctive population cluster that is closely related to Semitic and European populations. Within this larger Jewish cluster, each of the Jewish populations formed its own subcluster.
“A high degree of mixing of Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Italian and Syrian Jews caused them to become more closely related to each other than they were to Middle Eastern, Iraqi and Iranian Jews. This genetic split seemed to have occurred about 2,500 years ago.” (Jews: A religious group, people or race?, Jerusalem Post, 8/26/2012)
DNA Studies Find that Ashkenazim Jews have 30% European Admixture
Both the Behar study (section 7 above) and the Atzmon study (section 8 above) were commented upon by the British former deputy editor of the journal Nature, and currently the scientific correspondent for the New York Times, Nicholas Wade, in an article in that newspaper as follows:
“Jewish communities in Europe and the Middle East share many genes inherited from the ancestral Jewish population that lived in the Middle East some 3,000 years ago, even though each community also carries genes from other sources — usually the country in which it lives,” adding that a “major surprise from both surveys is the genetic closeness of the two Jewish communities of Europe, the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim.”
Wade pointed out that the two studies “refute the suggestion made by the historian Shlomo Sand in his book ‘The Invention of the Jewish People’ that Jews have no common origin but are a miscellany of people in Europe and Central Asia who converted to Judaism at various times.
“Jewish communities from Europe, the Middle East and the Caucasus all have substantial genetic ancestry that traces back to the Levant; Ethiopian Jews and two Judaic communities in India are genetically much closer to their host populations,” Wade wrote.
“The shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish community are related to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10 times higher than the relationship between two people chosen at random off the streets of New York City.
“Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys find. The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.” (Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity, Nicholas Wade, New York Times, June 9, 2010).
Eran Elhaik’s Single Study Attempts to Refute the Mass of Earlier DNA Evidence
The mass of DNA and genetic evidence is, therefore, overwhelmingly indicative that, despite a certain amount of European admixture among Ashkenazim Jewry, there is still a clearly definable Middle Eastern genetic component to both Ashkenazim and Sephardic Jewry.
Despite all of these studies—and many more, too numerous to list individually here—in December 2012, a single individual by the name of Eran Elhaik, from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, attempted to refute all of the above mentioned evidence.
His paper, titled “The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses” was published in the journal Genome Biological Evolution ((2013) 5 (1):61-74.doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs119).
In a nutshell, Elhaik—whose rather obviously Jewish physical appearance should by itself indicate that there is indeed a common Jewish “type” (how else can many Jews be physically “recognized” as Jews?)—argues that his method of doing comparative studies between present-day Central Asian populations, Ashkenazim Jews and non-Jewish test groups, “proves” that Ashkenazim Jews are a hotchpotch of genetic origins, with a strong link to what he identifies as the “Khazar” tribe.
Even though Elhaik’s work is the only single paper (as opposed to literally dozens of opposing DNA studies), written by a single Jewish individual (as opposed to the other papers which were written by dozens and dozens of scientists from around the globe, Jewish and non-Jewish alike), it has quickly become the most-quoted “proof” of the “Khazar Theory.”
Critical Errors in Elhaik’s Paper
Elhaik’s paper has a number of errors, some small and a number of major ones. But they are all serious, because even the “small” errors cast doubt on his academic ability and motivation.
For example, his paper discusses in detail what he sees as the geographic origin of the Khazars—yet he completely misidentifies the geographic location of one of his test sample groups, the Mbuti and Biaka Pygmies.
These two groups, Elhaik asserts at least twice, are to be found in “South Africa.”
Actually, the Mbuti and Biaka Pygmies are nowhere near South Africa, and are only to be found literally half a continent away, in the Congo.
While this may seem a “small” error, it does indicate sloppiness in research which certainly does not bode well for the rest of the paper.
This sloppiness is again repeated when Elhaik asserts that “Eastern and Central European Jews account for approximately 90% of over 13 million worldwide Jews.”
In reality, the figure is far less. Of the estimated 13 million Jews worldwide, 8 million are Ashkenazim and 5 million are Sephardic, a division of 61% “European Jews” to 39% “non-European Jews.” And it should be pointed out that the Zionist State of Israel actually has a Sephardic and Mizrahi (non-Ashkenazi) Jewish majority among Jews.
These actual facts on Jewish ethnicity are readily available, and Elhaik’s motivation for making this clearly false claim could only be ascribed to a desire to underscore his general assertion, namely that most Jews are not Middle Eastern in origin and that Jews are not race, or a genetically similar people.
The most important error in Elhaik’s paper, however, is actually openly admitted: namely that there is actually no “Khazar DNA” in existence, against which any sort of measurement can be taken.
Elhaik himself admits this in his paper: the “Khazars have been vanquished and their remains have yet to be sequenced. . .”—in other words there is no record of what exactly Khazar DNA might have been.
As there is no record of what Khazar DNA is—it is, ipso facto, physically impossible to determine who is descended from it and who is not.
Elhaik attempts to circumvent this major problem by selecting what he calls “surrogate populations”—in this case, “contemporary Middle Eastern and Caucasus populations.”
Anyone with a basic understanding of historical events in the Caucasus in particular will immediately see that Elhaik’s assertion that current populations in that region can be taken to reflect those of 1,500 years ago, is highly problematic and quite simply, unsustainable.
The Caucasus, a region at the border of Europe and Asia, situated between the Black and the Caspian seas, has been crisscrossed by numerous peoples and races over the last 2000 years, ranging from Indo-Europeans, Semites, Mongols and others—and is today highly genetically diverse. A claim that DNA samples from this region can be taken as any sort of DNA yardstick, is dubious to say the very least.
Finally, Elhaik’s methodology in comparing the DNA samples is, to make an understatement, unique to him. As Marcus Feldman, director of Stanford University’s Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, said, “He [Elhaik] appears to be applying the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody else has obtained from essentially similar data.” (‘Jews a Race’ Genetic Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack by DNA Expert. The Jewish Daily Forward, May 07, 2013)
Interestingly, the study which was cited in the New York Times of the “Jews as a race” is exactly the same conclusion that was reached by German National Socialist anthropologists and other experts who studied race science in the United States and elsewhere. Also, many of the present-day extensive studies have been carried out by both Gentile and Jewish geneticists alike, obviating any claims of racial bias.
Elhaik’s theory is completely refuted by the new, most massive and most complete study ever done of the Jewish Genome
One of Elhaik’s arguments was that the previous studies (referenced above) “were done in the pregenome-wide era using uniparental markers and including different reference populations”—implying that their results are not in line with the most modern DNA sequencing methodology.
In fact, at least one study—which appeared after Elhaik’s work was first published—has confirmed the accuracy of the original studies, and also completely refuted Elhaik’s hypothesis.
Titled “No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews,” this study was published by the journal Human Biology in August 2013 (Behar, Doron M. et.al.; Human Biology, Access Pre-Prints. Paper 41), this paper emphasized the serious error with Elhaik’s work:
“Because the Khazar population has left no obvious modern descendants that could enable a clear test for a contribution to Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, the Khazar hypothesis has been difficult to examine using genetics.
“Furthermore, because only limited genetic data have been available from the Caucasus region, and because these data have been concentrated in populations that are genetically close to populations from the Middle East, the attribution of any signal of Ashkenazi-Caucasus genetic similarity to Khazar ancestry rather than shared ancestral Middle Eastern ancestry has been problematic.”
This latest, most massive study of the Jewish genome was a worldwide effort of geneticists, both Gentile and Jewish, to analyze Jewish genetics. Researchers from laboratories around the globe, including Estonia, Russia, Italy, Greece, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Armenia, the US, and Israel, gathered together the largest Jewish DNA data set ever yet assembled. The paper explained as follows:
“Here, through integration of genotypes on newly collected samples with data from several of our past studies, we have assembled the largest data set available to date for assessment of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic origins.”
“Employing a variety of standard techniques for the analysis of population genetic structure, we find that Ashkenazi Jews share the greatest genetic ancestry with other Jewish populations, and among non-Jewish populations, with groups from Europe and the Middle East.
“No particular similarity of Ashkenazi Jews with populations from the Caucasus is evident, particularly with the populations that most closely represent the Khazar region. Thus, analysis of Ashkenazi Jews together with a large sample from the region of the Khazar Khaganate corroborates the earlier results that Ashkenazi Jews derive their ancestry primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe, that they possess considerable shared ancestry with other Jewish populations, and that there is no indication of a significant genetic contribution either from within or from north of the Caucasus region.”
The latest, most up-to-date and modern DNA analysis has, therefore, completely refuted the “Khazar Theory.”
It is important to understand that this refutation has come from non-Jewish and Jewish scientists from dozens of different universities and geneticists all over the world, and cannot be ascribed to a “conspiracy.”
Part II: The Historical-Logical Evidence
The Historical Record Shows Jewish Physical Consistency
One of the most obvious indicators of genetic commonality is physical appearance. European people broadly resemble each other; African people broadly resemble each other; Chinese people broadly resemble each other; Australian Aborigines broadly resemble each other and so on.
It is a characteristic of genetically similar people to physically resemble each other.
Jews are no different in this regard to any other people. They too show a resemblance to each other—this is why it is possible to often “recognize” a Jewish person by his physical appearance.
A good example in point is the already mentioned Jewish geneticist Eran Elhaik, who, despite physically embodying a Jewish sterrotype recognized around the world, tries to claim that there is no genetic commonality amongst Jews.
The “Khazar theory” holds that most Ashkenazim Jews are not Semitic, but are “Central Asian” converts to Judaism.
Proponents of the “Khazar theory” fail to understand the logical consequence of their belief—namely that a supposed Central Asian origin of “most” Ashkenazim Jews means that they will not physically resemble other Jews.
As anyone can see, this is not the case. Sephardic Jews are, on average, slightly darker than Ashkenazim Jews, but there is no doubt that there is a physical similarity which allows them still to be recognized as such.
Above: These two illustrations make the point even more dramatically. On the left, the Ashkenazim Jewess, Barbara Streisand, New York, 1966. On the right, a Jewish leader of Israelite trade delegation as portrayed on a mural on the wall of the 18th Dynasty (1400 BC) Tomb of Sobekhotep, Thutmose IV; Egypt. Two thousand years before the alleged Khazar conversion and they look the same as modern Ashkenazi Jews.
Streisand’s paternal grandparents came from Galicia (Poland–Ukraine) and her maternal grandparents came from Russia—if anyone would be “Khazar,” according to that theory, it would be her. Nonetheless, she closely resembles the only designated Jew as portrayed on an Egyptian tomb from 3.400 years ago, the leader of a Jewish trade delegation to Egypt.
The genetic continuity is clear—and if the Khazar theory was true, there would be no physical similarity, because there would have been a racial sea change in Jewish appearance.
Left: The famous banker of Pompeii, Jucundus, who lived circa 20–62 AD. (700 years before the alleged Ashkenazi conversion) Identified as a Jew by the German anthropologist, Hans F.K. Günther, in his book “Racial Elements of European History” (Fig, 240a and b, chapter VIII). Alongside, the Ashkenazi Jew, Abe Foxman of the ADL. The similarity between Jucundus and Foxman is clear, and serves a further indication of the physical continuity of the Jewish type over centuries—something that would be impossible if the “Khazar theory” was true.
In addition to genetic studies, there have been extensive physiological comparison of Jewish remains from burial sites from ancient Israel and present-day Ashkenazi and Sephardic physiology, all of which conclusively shows their similarity across both the Sephardic and Ashkenazi spectrum—and their difference from European populations.
Jewish Supremacist Behavior Through the Millennia Disprove the “Khazar Theory”
Another piece of the jigsaw which disproves the Khazar theory, is that Jewish Supremacist behavior has remained constant throughout the millennia—from biblical times right through to the present day.
Most Christians are aware of the behavior of the Old Testament Jews—who burn, rampage, kill rape and enslave their way through Palestine supposedly on order of their tribal God. They are aware of the fact that the gospels of the New Testament show that elite of the Jews, the Pharisees, were the biggest enemies of Christ and arranged for his crucifixion, and the New Testament is clear that they led the persecution of Christians which has continued through both Jewish Bolshevism and the cultural assault in the Zio global media.
It must also be clear that the Talmud, the books of Jewish law promoting Jewish extremist supremacism and hatred against all non-Jews, was written hundreds of years before any alleged Khazar conversion.
While it another debate altogether as to the historical accuracy of those events, there is no question about Jewish interaction with Gentiles—and Romans in particular—during the first century AD.
The world’s first anti-Jewish riots broke out in the city of Alexandria in 38 AD, and re-occurred in 66 AD, 115 AD, 118 AD, and 411 AD. In that year, the archbishop of Alexandria, Cyril, ordered the expulsion of all Jews from the city.
The Roman historian Socrates of Constantinople (not be confused with the Socrates of Classical Greece), in his Ecclesiastical History, recorded the reasons for this first great expulsion of Jews from a non-Jewish city in detail, and reveals behavior by Jewish Supremacists exactly as the world experiences it today, over 1,500 years later:
“. . .[T]he Jews were continually factious; and there was added to their ordinary hatred of the Christians . . . Cyril, on being informed of this, sent for the principal Jews, and threatened them with the utmost severities unless they desisted from their molestation of the Christians. These menaces, instead of suppressing their violence, only rendered the Jewish populace more furious, and led them to form conspiracies for the destruction of the Christians, one of which was of so desperate a character as to cause their entire expulsion from Alexandria” (Socrates, Hist. Eccl., VII, 13; PC, LXXXII, 759 ff).
The very first Jewish community outside of the Middle East was established in Rome in 139 BC—and it was not long before their activities roused Roman public opinion against them.
The famous orator Cicero, among others, frequently spoke against the presence of Jews during sittings of the Roman senate. In his famous Pro Flacco oration (which dealt with the case of a Roman aristocrat, Lucius Valerius Flaccus, accused of unlawfully confiscating Jewish money), Cicero said:
“Now let us take a look at the Jews and their mania for gold. You chose this site, [chief prosecutor] Laelius, and the crowd which frequents it, with an eye to this particular accusation, knowing very well that Jews with their large numbers and tendency to act as a clique are valuable supporters to have at any kind of public meeting.”
Many other prominent and famous Romans, such as Seneca, Juneval, and Tacitus all went on record as complaining about the activities of Jews within the Roman Empire.
The Roman historian Tacitus, in his most famous work, Histories, described the activities of the Jews as follows:
“In order to secure the allegiance of his people in the future, Moses prescribed for them a novel religion quite different from those of the rest of mankind. Among the Jews all things are profane that we hold sacred; on the other hand they regard as permissible what seems to us immoral . . . The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews.
“But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. They will not feed or intermarry with gentiles. Though a most lascivious people, the Jews avoid sexual intercourse with women of alien race. Among themselves nothing is barred. They have introduced the practice of circumcision to show that they are different from others.” (Tacitus, Histories, 5.2–5).
The famous British historian Edward Gibbon, in his monumental work, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, (Lippincourt, Philadelphia, 1878, vol. 2, page 4), discussed Jewish Supremacist behavior in Roman times this way:
“From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyria, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the Legions against a race of fanatics whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of all human kind.”
Anti-Jewish literature during Roman times was very widespread. One work by the Greek, Apion, was so well-known that the Romanized Jewish historian Josephus (who wrote the famous account of the Jewish uprising of 70 AD, called The Jewish Wars) wrote an entire book trying to refute Apion’s arguments.
The Roman Emperor Tiberius formally expelled the Jews from Rome in 19 AD. They returned shortly thereafter, only to be expelled once again in 49 AD.
In 116 AD, Emperor Trajan ordered that all Jews in Mesopotamia should be killed, saying that they were the cause of continual uprisings in that region.
One of the most famous emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire, Justinian (527–565 AD), adopted a comprehensive anti-Jewish policy which barred Jews from the civil service, military posts, and any other positions of influence in his government.
All of these events pre-date the supposed “Khazar conversion” by centuries—yet it can be seen that the identical behavioral patterns are on display before and after the supposed “Khazar” infusion.
Logic dictates that if the racial make-up of Jews changed substantially after the year 700 AD, then their behavioral traits would also have changed.
The fact that they did not, is yet more proof that there was no racial sea-change amongst Jews as is claimed by the supporters of the “Khazar theory.”
The historical-logical evidence therefore clearly shows that there has been no change in Jewish Supremacist behavior from the time of the ancient Romans to the present-day. If there had been large-scale conversions, as the “Khazar theory” claims, the genetic continuity of the Jewish people would have been disrupted, which would likely have caused a change in behavior.
As this behavior as remained constant, the historical account indicates that the “Khazar theory” is untrue.
Part III: The Reasons Why the “Khazar Theory” Has Come About
1. The “Khazar Theory” Deflects Attention from the Most Racist Jews of all, the Sephardic Jewish Extremists, suggests that there is not “Jewish problem” but a Khazar or Ashkenazi problem.
The “Khazar theory” falls down when it is understood that it only attempts to explain the origin of the “European” or Ashkenazim Jews—and completely ignores the Sephardic and Mizrahi element of Jewry, which compromises nearly 40% of all Jews today and a majority of Jews in the Zionist State of Israel.
The ludicrousness of the situation is underlined when it is appreciated that the Sephardic element of Jewry tends to be the most religious and the most orthodox. They most closely follow the dictates of the Talmud and the Torah laws—and are therefore most immersed in the racist supremacy and anti-Gentile hatred which guides all Jewish behavior.
It was, after all, the former chief rabbi of the Sephardic Jews in Israel who announced that Gentiles are donkeys, created by God only to serve Jews, among many other overtly racist comments. This ultra racist Jew, Rabbi Yosef, recently died and had the largest funeral in the history of Israel.
By focusing on the bogus “Khazar” theory, its proponents deflect attention away from the proven historical record that Jewish Supremacist behavior is common to both Ashkenazim and Sephardic Jewish extremists.
This is proven by the fact that Israel uses DNA tests to check if potential immigrants to that country are Jewish or not.
If there was a wide divergence between Ashkenazim and Sephardic Jewry, as the “Khazar theory” would maintain, then it would not be possible for Israel to genetically distinguish who is a Jew and who is not.
2. The “Khazar Theory” is Popular Among Anti-Zionists (For the Wrong Reasons)
In the wake of the Second World War and establishment of the Zionist State of Israel, the Khazar theory gained traction in the anti-Zionist movement.
It seemed to be powerful argument against Zionism. If the leaders of the Zionist movement had no relation to the historical people called Jews in the Mideast, then the theoretical rationale of the Zionists to claim Palestine as a historical homeland, was demolished.
This logic is, of course, fundamentally flawed, because it matters not if modern Jews were related or partly related to Jews who lived in the region 2,000 years earlier.
No matter what the case, there is no moral justification for the Jewish terrorist creation of Israel. It is a crime against humanity to drive hundreds of thousands of men, women and children from their land and homes, terrorize them and murder thousands, just because of a claim that one’s distant ancestors supposedly lived there millennia ago.
It this “logic” is carried through to its conclusion, then it would be “justified” to drive from their homes 99.9 percent of the people alive on planet Earth—because there is hardly a region on earth that has not been subjected to invasions or migrations throughout history.
To explain this inconsistency another way: by using the “Khazar theory” as “proof” that the Zionists cannot claim Israel because they are not the real Jews, the anti-Zionists are in fact saying that IF it can be shown that the Zionists ARE the real Jews, then they would have the right to claim Palestine as a homeland. Remember that a majority of Jews in Israel are Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews who are non-Ashkenazi.
This “logic”, as detailed above, is false.
3. The “Khazar Theory” is a Tactic to Disguise Jewish Supremacist Racism
The “Khazar argument” is intrinsically related to the question of whether the present-day Jews are a religion or a race.
Prominent Jews have long referred to Jews as a “race,” even in modern times.
If there was any leader of world Jewry in the days before The Second World War it was Nahum Goldman, the President of the World Zionist organization. He said:
“The Jews are divided into two categories, those who admit they belong to a race distinguished by a history thousands of years old, and those who don’t. The latter are open to the charge of dishonesty.”
Even the current prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking before a gathering of Jews from all over the world, candidly referred to the “Jewish race”: “If Israel had not come into existence after World War II than [sic] I am certain the Jewish race wouldn’t have survived.” (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front page.)
Leading Jews have always defined themselves as much more than a religion but as people of special genealogy, and expressed the ultimate supremacism that God has chosen them above all others.
Israel is a Jewish religious state, in which the religious dictates hold supreme. The rabbis determine all the important issues: immigration, education, housing, and marriage. It matters not if a person believes in God or not—the only thing that counts is if one is of Jewish lineage, or Jewish descent.
It matters not if one’s Jewish mother was an atheist or a Haredim, or if her great grandmother was religious or not—what ultimately counts is one’s blood, not one’s belief in God.
Ironically, this is not only true in Israel. It is true in the very synagogues of the Jewish religion across the globe. Atheist? No problem as long as if you are of the tribe.
The tactic of claiming that Judaism is simply a religion is an effective defensive strategy.
Whenever anyone complains about Jewish domination of any institution (achieved by favoring their own and disfavoring their non-Jewish competitors), Jewish Supremacists simply say that they are a “religion” like any other, rather than an ethnic group.
People in America, Europe, and the Western world, all overwhelmingly endorse the concept of religious freedom—and thus they equate criticism of Jewish actions as “religious bigotry” and oppression. “After all,” the claim is made, “it is just a religion.”
This is a Jewish Supremacist tactic: They disguise Jewish racism through religious dogma, rather than admitting ethnic nationalism.
I have come to believe that the Khazar theory is one more piece of controlled opposition as illustrated in Orwell’s 1984 where Emmanuel Goldstein is supposedly Big Brother’s opposition, but in fact he is part of the Big Brother apparatus.
How convenient it is to suggest that Jews are not a race, not a related people that gives them a unity and strength in conflict with other peoples.
One cannot explain the power of Zionism unless one understands Jewish tribalism.
Jewish tribalism (racism) and favoritism and preference for fellow Jews combined with discrimination against non-Jews ultimately enables them to take over almost any institution.
Without Jewish racism, Zionism could not flourish, for that is what gives the Jewish extremists its enormous economic, media and political influence.
Christians who propagate the “Khazar theory” should not forget that the Talmud is perhaps the most anti-Christ tome ever written. The Talmud portrays Jesus being boiled in human excrement—“forever”!
The Talmud as well the gospel recounting of the Jewish persecution behind the crucifixion of Christ all took place hundreds of years before any supposed Khazar conversion!
How convenient it is for the anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish supremacist efforts be divided on the foundation of the Jewish problem.
Bear in mind, the problem we face is not a “Khazar” problem, it is a Jewish problem, it is a problem of extremist Jewish racism and supremacism which continually plunges our world into war, hatred, tyranny and degradation.
It is for these reasons, that I no longer believe the Khazar theory.
Anyone who opposes Jewish extremism, supremacism and Zionism I consider an ally and brother in the cause for the liberation of Europeans and every people on the Planet from the Zio-Globalist threat.
I accept whole heartedly those who still believe the Khazar theory, but at the same time I must express what I think to be the truth: that, overall, the theory does more harm than good in our efforts to oppose Jewish tribalism.
As a final note is important to show that Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews are not claimed to be Khazars by anyone and they were throughout the Mediterranean world at the time of Christ some 900 years before any alleged Khazar conversion. They were the ones who crucified Christ, the ones Christ railed against. Some of the very same people who expose the Talmud and the Jewish role in Christ crucifixion are now telling us that Jews are actually Khazars today! Not a single Khazar wrote a word of the vicious Talmud. The most important Jewish rabbi in Israel is the Chief Sephardic Rabbi, as typified by the late Ovadia Yosef. Yosef was viciously anti-Gentile and anti European and anti-Palestinian. When he died he was honored like no other Israeli citizen in history — with the largest funeral honored by all Ashkenazi, Sephardi and Mizrahi.
Although I am friends with and respect all who believe in the Khazar theory if they are fighting against the Jewish Supremacists, I though will personally will no longer endorse what I believe is a patently false idea fostered upon us by Jewish communists who seek to lessen our understanding of the core threat of Jewish racism and Jewish tribalist supremacism.
When people tell us the threat of Ashkenazi Jews it confuses people on the subject to no end. It deflects from the fundamental fact that the Jewish establishment, i.e. every major Jewish organization of all types of Jews– is working for our genocide.
By 
