Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges, Edited by John N.A Hooper and Rob W.M. Van Soest
© Kluwer AcademiclPlenum Publishers, New York, 2002
Family Microcionidae Carter, 1875
John N.A. Hooper
Queensland Museum, P.O. Box 3300, South Brisbane, Qld, 4101, Australia. (lohnH@qm.qld.gov.au)
Microcionidae Carter (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida), including Clathriidae, Ophlitaspongiidae, contains 77 nominal genera of which
only 9 genera and 12 subgenera are considered to be valid (one incertae sedis). There are approximately 470 described (valid) species
worldwide, living predominantly in shallow waters with a few recorded from deeper seas, and with many other species still collected but
remaining undescribed. Microcionids typically have three skeletal regions delineated by the distribution of different structural megascleres: (1) the choanosomal skeleton (with principal monactinal spicules enclosed within spongin fibres and spined monactinal spicules typically echinating fibres; in two groups this is replaced by a basal or axial renieroid skeleton of smooth or acanthose styles or strongyles,
with or without echinating spicules); (2) an extra-fibre subectosomal skeleton (with tracts of larger auxilIary monactinal spicules ascending to the surface); (3) and a non-tangential ectosomal skeleton (with smaller auxillary styles forming a surface crust perpendicular to the
surface). Megascleres are predominantly smooth ectosomal and choanosomal styles, with some diactinal and acanthose modifications.
Microscleres are palmate isochelae, only exceptionally modified to superficial arcuate-like or anchorate-like forms (produced by torsion
of the shaft and detachment of alae), and toxas with diverse morphologies including microxea-like and raphidiform toxas in few species.
Skeletal structures range from 'hymedesmioid' and 'microcionid' in encrusting taxa, to plumo-reticulate and occasionally axially compressed in some species, but usually irregularly reticulate in most taxa. Occasionally spicules are partially or completely replaced by detritus. Two subfamilies are recognised: Ophlitaspongiinae de Laubenfels (with a secondary renieroid spongin fibre and/or spiculose skeleton
overlaying a primary reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or hymedesmioid spiculo-spongin skeleton) and Microcioninae Carter (lacking
a secondary renieroid reticulate skeleton, having only a reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose hymedesmoid, microcionid or axially compressed primary skeleton).
Keywords: Porifera; Demospongiae; Poecilosclerida; Microcionina; Microcionidae; Microcioninae; Clathria (Clathria); C. (Wilsonella);
C. (Microciona); C. (Dendrocia); C. (Axosuberites); C. (Isociella); C. (Thalysias); Holopsamma; Echinochalina (Echinochalina);
E. (Protophlitaspongia); Pandaros; Ophlitaspongiinae; Antho (Antho); A. (Acarnia); A. (Isopenectya); Artemisina; Echinoclathria;
Ophlitaspongia; Sigmeurypon (incertae sedis).
- -...- -
- - - - - - - - - - -
DEFINITION, DIAGNOSIS, SCOPE
Diagnosis
Synonymy
Microcionina with encrusting, lobate, arborescent or flabellate growth forms. Skeleton differentiated into choanosomal
(axial), subectosomal (extra-axial) and ectosomal regions. Axial
skeleton formed by unispicular or multispicular tracts of choanosomal (principal) megascleres, typically coring spongin fibres or
sometimes simply bound together by collagen. Fibres echinated by
(acantho-) styles (accessory spicules). Skeletal structures include
isodictyal, renieroid, reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or
hymedesmioid, but never radial. Subectosomal (extra-axial) skeleton formed by tracts of subectosomal (auxiliary) spicules, usually
dispersed outside of fibres, rarely well organised but usually with
some degree of difference between axial and extra-axial regions.
Ectosomal skeleton ranges from membraneous, or with protruding
larger (subectosomal auxiliary) spicules, or with a special category
of smaller (ectosomal auxiliary) spicules. Principal megascleres
monactinal, predominantly smooth or only partially spined, occasionally vestigial or absent completely, supplemented by another
category of acanthose diactinal spicules, or sometimes replaced by
detritus. Auxiliary megascleres usually monactinal, rarely quasidiactinal, smooth shaft and basal spines, more slender than
choanosomal spicules. Echinating styles or subtylostyles smooth,
partially or completely spined. Renieroid skeleton composed of
acanthose or occasionally smooth styles or 'dumbell' spicules.
Microscleres include toxas of several morphologies (including
raphidiform and rarely microxeote toxas), and palmate isochelae.
Microcionina Carter, l875c. Microcionidae Hentschel, 1923.
Clathriidae Lendenfeld, 1884. Ophlitaspongiidae de Laubenfels,
1936a.
Definition
Microcionina with terminally spined ectosomal styles, rarely
modified to quasidiactinal or diactinal forms; three skeletal regions
defined by the presence of different forms of structural styles:
(1) choanosomal (axial) skeleton (with spongin fibres enveloping
principal styles echinated by acanthose or smooth styles; in two
groups this is replaced by a basal or axial renieroid skeleton of
smooth or acanthose styles or strongyles, with or without echinating spicules); (2) subectosomal (extra-axial or extra-fibre) skeleton
(with individual or tracts of auxiliary styles ascending to the surface); and (3) ectosomal skeleton (with smaller auxiliary styles
forming a surface crust tangential, paratangential or perpendicular
to the surface). One or more skeletal regions may be lost or modified. Megascleres predominantly smooth styles but may be modified and/or supplemented by quasidiactinal or diactinal forms, or
lost completely and replaced with detritus. Microscleres include
palmate isochelae and diverse forms of toxas.
432
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Some species have modified chelae, arcuate-like or anchorate-like,
a result of torsion of the shaft and detachment of alae, but these are
exceptional. Larvae viviparous.
Scope
Microcionidae is a highly specious family, containing about
580 described species (of which about 470 are 'valid'), with many
other undescribed species already known from various collections
worldwide (Hooper, unpublished data). 82 nominal genera have
been included in the family at one time or another, of which 77
were recognized as (potentially) residing here (Hooper, 1996a, and
more recent additions). Most of these genera were merged into
others (e.g., Levi, 1960b; Simpson, 1968; Van Soest, 1984b;
Bergquist & Fromont, 1988; Hooper, 1990b; Hooper &
Wiedenmayer, 1994; Hooper, 1996a; Howson & Chambers, 1999),
leaving only 9 valid genera and 12 subgenera: Clathria (with subgenera Clathria, Wilsonella, Microciona, Dendrocia, Axosuberites,
Isociella, Thalysias), Antho (with subgenera Antho, Acarnia,
Isopenectya), Echinoclathria, Holopsamnw, Echinochalina (with
subgenera Echinochalina, Protophlitaspongia), Artemisina and
Ophlitaspongia, plus Pandaros and Sigmeurypon as incertae sedis.
Microcionidae are found in all seas, are sometimes highly diverse
and prevalent in shallow coastal waters, comprising up to 16% of
species in some regional faunas (Hooper & Levi, 1993a; Hooper,
1996a). Most species have been recorded from shallow-waters but
some range down to 2500m depth (Hartman, 1982), and it is likely
that the family is substantially more diverse than presently known.
History and biology
The disagreement as to which of Microcionidae Carter and
Clathriidae Hentschel had priority was settled by Hooper (1996a)
based on Article 40 of the International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature (Anon., 1999). Hooper (1996a) also provided
a comprehensive revision of the family based on extensive
re-examination of type material of all nominal type species of genera and over 400 nominal species, primarily from the Indo-west
Pacific region.
Several substantial taxonomic publications have appeared for
this family, including descriptions of regional faunas, analyses of
morphological characters, chemotaxonomy and/or detailed taxonomic revisions (Hallmann, 1920; Levi, 1960b; Van Soest, 1984b;
Bergquist & Fromont, 1988; Hooper, I 990b, 1996a; Hooper &
Levi, 1993a; Hooper et al., 1992). These studies have produced
several schemes based on the emphasis of certain characters over
others, such as patterns of skeletal architecture (Levi, 1960b),
megasclere form and distribution within the skeleton (Hallmann,
1920), ectosomal structure and composition (Van Soest, 1984b),
microsclere geometry and diversity (e.g., de Laubenfels, 1936a).
More recently all these features, based on a consensus of opinions,
were combined into a contemporary classification (Bergquist &
Fromont, 1988), with the net result being a proliferation of genera
not all of which can be justifiably supported on phylogenetic
grounds. This 'consensus' classification is rejected here, although
ultimately molecular data may confirm or refute this opinion.
The most recent phylogenetic analysis (Hooper, 1996a) was
based primarily on structural features of the skeleton, particularly
skeletal architecture and skeletal differentiation. Lesser support
was given to megasclere geometry and virtually no support was
accorded microsclere modification (cf. Hajdu et al., 1994a).
433
Differences with similar families
Microcionidae is very difficult to define in terms of one
or more apomorphies. It differs from other families of
Microcionina in lacking certain features: such as apically spined
diactinal ectosomal tylotes or tornotes characteristic of Acarnidae;
small oxeote or stylote ectosomal spicules forming bouquets,
unique to Raspailiidae; or having rhabdostyles and several peculiar
microscleres seen in Rhabderemiidae. Similarly, the four families
of Microcionina differ from the Myxillina and Mycalina in lacking
particular characters, as opposed to possessing unique ones
(Myxillina with tridentate-derived chelae; Mycalina with sigmancistra derivatives), yet both these latter suborders may also have
palmate chelae in addition to their derived microscleres.
Following a recent comprehensive revision (Hooper, 1996a)
Microcionidae is now restricted to genera having predominantly
smooth monactinal ectosomal and choanosomal spicules.
It excludes certain microcionid-like genera with true tylotes or
strongylotes as their ectosomal spicules (e.g., Acarnus,
Megaciella). These taxa are now included in Acarnidae, as defined
by their ectosomal features (Hajdu et al., 1994a). However, the
definition barely differentiates species with modified or reduced
quasidiactinal (styloid) auxiliary megascleres (e.g., several
Echinoclathria, Holopsamnw and Echinochalina species), or
quasimonactinal (amphistrongylote or tornote-like) auxiliary
megascleres (e.g., Protophlitaspongia). These modified auxiliary
spicules are usually asymmetrical and are interpreted here as
convergent upon true diactinal spicules. These anomalous microcionids share certain characteristics of both Microcionidae and
Acarnidae, and the importance of these characters at higher levels
of systematics must therefore be questioned, or a certain level of
homoplasy must be accomodated in the phylogeny of the suborder.
Similarly, the definition given above cannot always clearly
distinguish some Microcionidae from some Raspailiidae, but this is a
Fig. 1. Idealised microcionid skeletal structure. Key: I, ectosomal skeleton.
2, subectosomal skeleton. 3, choanosomal skeleton. 4, basal spongin fibre.
5, echinating acanthostyle. 6, reticulate fibre skeleton. 7, isotropic extrafibre skeleton. 8, detrital entrapping fibre. 9, renieroid reticulate secondary
fibre skeleton. 10, microcionid radial fibre skeleton. II, hymedesmioid
spicule skeleton. 12, plumose/dendritic fibre skeleton. 13, coring principal
spicules. 14, subectosomal auxuliary spicules. 15, spicate spicule skeleton.
16, ectosomal auxiliary spicules. Modified from Hooper (1996a).
434
Porifera· Demospongiae • PoeciloscIerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Fig. 2. Range of skeletal structures in Microcionidae. Arrows indicate diagnostic features (as mentioned in the Key to genera and subgenera).
A-I, Microcioninae. A, Clathria (Clathria) (C. (C.) lipochela Burton). B, Clathria (Microciona) (C. (M.) antarctica (Topsent)). C, Clathria (Dendrocia)
(C. (D.) pyramida Lendenfeld). D, Clathria (Wilsonella) (C. (w.) australiensis Carter). E, Clathria (Axosuberites) (C. (A.) canaliculatus (Whitelegge)).
F, Clathria (lsociella) (C. (I.) eccentrica (Burton)). G, Clathria (Thalysias) (C. (7:) rubra (Lendenfeld)). H, Holopsamma (H. crassa Carter). I,
Echinochalina (Echinochalina) (E. (E.) australiensis (Ridley)). A-I, modified from Hooper (1996a).
problem of semantics rather than a biological one. In general, most
species of Raspailiidae have well-compressed axial skeletons,
well-differentiated axial and extra-axial skeletons, and special
bouquets of ectosomal spicules surrounding the larger choanosomal spicules protruding through the surface. In contrast, most
Microcionidae lack these two former features, or they are only
poorly developed and probably convergent, perhaps related to habit
(e.g., flexuous whip-like growth forms). Nevertheless, there are
examples in both families where the boundaries between taxa
blur, such as the microcionid-like Raspailia (Clathriodendron)
arbuscula (see Hooper, 1991: figs 19-20), and the raspailiidlike Clathria (Axosuberites) canaliculata (see Hooper, 1996a:
figs 118-119). Conversely, the two families are consistently differentiated by this latter ectosomal feature, and possession of chelae
microscleres in Microcionidae (absent in Raspailiidae), which
appear to be more important characters than skeletal structure.
Hajdu et al. (1994a) restricted Microcionina (and hence
Microcionidae) to taxa with only palmate isochelae, tacitly
excluding several microcionid-1ike genera specifically created
for species with tridentate-derived (arcuate or anchorate) chelae.
Theoretically, this is a viable system for the suprafamily classification of Microcionidae, but in practical terms it is not always possible to distinguish between true tridentate-derived chelae and
palmate chelae with 'arcuate' or 'anchorate' modifications (i.e., partial torsion of the shaft and partial or complete detachment of alae
from the shaft). These few anomalies have yet to be fully resolved.
Previous reviews
De Laubenfels (1936a: 112), Levi (1960b: 50), Simpson
(1968: 102), Van Soest (1984b: 90), Wiedenmayer (1989: 56),
Bergquist & Fromont (1988: 106), Hooper & Wiedenmayer (1994:
252), Hooper (1996a: 1).
PROPOSAL FOR A DIVISION OF M1CROCIONIDAE
Hooper's (1996a) analysis of Microcionidae showed that
there were two fundamental groups of genera within the family,
differentiated primarily by their skeletal structure, the complexity
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
435
Fig. 3. Range of skeletal structures in Microcionidae (cont.). A-B , Microcioninae. A, Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia) (E. (P.) tuberosa Hooper).
B, Pandaros (P. acanthifolium D&M). C-H, Ophlitaspongiinae. C, Antho (Antho) (A. (A.) tuberosa (Hentschel» . D, Antho (Acamia) (A. (A.) ridleyi
(Hentschel». E, Antho (Isopenectya) (A. (I.) chartacea (Whitelegge» . F, Artemisina (A. jovis Dendy). G, Echinoclathria (E. parkeri Hooper).
H, Ophlitaspongia (0. papilla Bowerbank). A.C-G. modified from Hooper (l996a). B. modified from Van Soest (l984b). H. modified from Howson &
Chambers (1999).
or differentiation of the skeleton, and the presence or absence,
respectively, of a secondary renieroid reticulate skeleton overlaying
the primary (reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or hymedesmioid)
skeleton. (1) One group, contammg Artemisina, Antho,
Echinoclathria and Ophlitaspongia, has suggested myxillid-like
features, most possessing a secondary renieroid skeleton overlaying
a primary reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or hymedesmioid
spiculo-spongin skeleton. (2) The other group, containing Clathria,
Echinochalina, Holopsamma and Pandaros, has suggested
raspailiid-like features including similarities to typical raspailiid
genera (e.g., Clathria (Axosuberites) and Raspai/ia) and atypical
raspailiid genera (e.g., Echinochalina (Echinochalina) and
Echinodictyum, respectively) (Figs 1-3). Within the second group
there are also several subgenera of Clathria indicated as being possibly polyphyletic (Hooper, 1996a). This second group has only a primary skeletal structure, with reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose
hymedesmoid, microcionid or axially compressed skeletal architectures. These groups are elevated here to subfamily status:
Ophlitaspongiinae and Microcioninae, respectively.
The possibility that designated subgenera should be elevated to
full generic status was rejected by Hooper (1996a), on the basis that
the characters inferring polyphyly (e.g., partial substitution of coring megascleres by detritus in Wilsonella, and loss of principal
spicules completely in Dendrocia) are homoplasious, representing
convergences through functional acquisition or secondary loss of
particular features, rather than real apomorphies. Thus, some of
these subgeneric taxa may be artificial given the existence of these
homoplasies, but the use of this subfamily classification allows us to
construct both a working phylogenetic hypothesis as well as the
production of a useful, working classification. Of dubious phylogenetic value are the possession of acanthose strongyles in place of
acanthose styles in Antho and Plocamia, presence of detritus within
fibres in Clathria (Wilsonella), and encrusting habit in Clathria
(Microciona). Conversely, other subgenera have a more substantial
phylogenetic basis and are more easily justified within the classification presented here (e.g., stylote versus oxeote structural megascleres in Echinochalina and Protophlitaspongia; presence or
absence of ectosomal specialisation in Thalysias and Clathria).
436
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
KEYS TO MICROCIONIDAE
Key to subfamilies
(1) With a single primary skeletal structure: reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose hymedesmioid, microcionid or axially compressed
(Figs 2A-I, 3A-B) ........................................................................................................................................................ Microcioninae
With a secondary renieroid spongin fibre and/or spiculose skeleton overlaying a primary reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or
hymedesmioid spiculo-spongin skeleton (Fig. 3C-H) ........................................................................................... Ophlitaspongiinae
Key to genera and subgenera (Refer to Figs 1-3 for skeletal structures)
(1) Choanosomal skeleton more-or-less undifferentiated, unstructured ................................................................................... Artemisina
Choanosomal skeleton well structured, ranging from hymedesmioid to reticulate, but lacking any differentiated components ....... 2
Choanosomal skeleton well structured, predominantly reticulate, differentiated into two distinct structural components (e.g., primary
renieroid skeleton overlaid by secondary plumose or radial skeletons) .............................................................................................. 7
(2) Choanosomal fibres cored by one or more category of principal spicules ................ ................................. ........................ ................. 3
Choanosomal fibres cored by auxiliary spicules partially (or sometimes wholly) replaced by detritus ............................................. 5
Choanosomal fibres cored by auxiliary spicules identical to those in ectosomal and subectosomal skeletons .................................. 6
Choanosomal fibres form a ladder-like isodictyal reticulation, but only primary fibres cored by plumose columns of megascleres and
transverse fibres virtually clear ..................................................................................................................................... Ophlitaspongia
Choanosomal fibres or skeletal tracts cored by auxiliary spicules different from those in peripheral skeleton .................... Pandaros
(3) Choanosomal skeleton without any marked axial compression or differentiated axial and extra-axial regions ................................. 4
Choanosomal skeleton with noticeably compressed axis and well differentiated axial and extra-axial (radial, plumose or plumoreticulate) regions; lacking echinating megascleres ........................................................................................ Clathria (Axosuberites)
Choanosomal skeleton evenly renieroid reticulate throughout, with well developed spongin fibres cored by smooth principal styles;
lacking echinating megascleres .............................................................................................................................. Clathria (Isociella)
Choanosomal skeleton hymedesmioid or microcionid, with basal layer of spongin lying on substrate without ascending fibre nodes
ranging to ascending non-anastomosing columns of spongin fibres; bases of principal styles perpendicular to the substrate or forming
plumose tracts in ascending fibres, and with acanthostyles or smooth styles echinating megascleres, differentiated from principal
styles coring fibres ............................................................................................................................................ Clathria (Microciona)
(4) With a single category of subectosomal auxiliary spicule forming the ectosomal skeleton, producing tangential, paratangential or
plumose tracts; choanosomal skeleton predominantly reticulate or plumo-reticulate ........................................... Clathria (Clathria)
With two categories of auxiliary spicules, smaller ectosomal spicules generally overlaying larger subectosomal spicules forming
discrete bundles or continuous palisade on surface .............................................................................................. Clathria (Thalysias)
(5) Echinating acanthostyles differentiated from principal spicules coring fibres ................................................... Clathria (Wilsonella)
Echinating styles or acanthostyles identical to principal styles coring spongin fibres .................................................... Holopsamma
(6) Echinating acanthostyles differentiated from auxillary spicules coring the fibres ............................................. Clathria (Dendrocia)
Fibres cored by a single category of auxillary styles identical to those forming subectosomal and ectosomal skeletons, and echinated
by smooth styles derived from principal spicules ............................................................................. Echinochalina (Echinochalina)
Fibres cored by a single category of auxiliary oxeas or styles different from principal oxeas, anisoxeas or styles that echinate
fibres ........................................................................................................................................... Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia)
(7) Primary skeleton renieroid, cored by axially or basally compressed tracts of acanthostyles; secondary skeleton subisodictyal or
plumo-reticulate, cored by smooth principal styles in plumose tracts .......................................................................... Antho (Antho)
Primary skeleton renieroid, cored by axially or basally compressed tracts of acanthostrongyles; secondary skeleton subisodictyal or
plumo-reticulate, cored by smooth principal styles in plumose tracts ....................................................................... Antho (Acarnia)
Primary skeleton composed of axially compressed spongin fibres cored by renieroid tracts of sparsely spined principal styles intermingled with plumose or plumo-reticulate tracts of smooth principal styles, overlaid by secondary extra-axial plumose skeleton cored
by larger smooth principal styles .......................................................................................................................... Antho (Isopenectya)
Primary renieroid reticulate skeleton cored by smooth principal styles and echinated by identical spicules, with secondary radial
extra-axial skeleton on exterior edge of skeleton cored only by larger smooth principal styles .................................. Echinoclathria
SUBFAMILY MICROCIONINAE CARTER, 1875
Definition
Synonymy
Microcionidae lacking a secondary renieroid skeleton, with
only a reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose hymedesmioid, microcionid or axially compressed primary skeleton.
Microcionina Carter,
1923.
1875c. Microcionidae Hentschel,
Scope
Type genus
Clathria Schmidt, 1862.
Four genera and seven subgenera: Clathria (Clathria
(Clathria), C. (Wilsonella), C. (Microciona), C. (Dendrocia),
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
C. (Axosuberites), C. (lsociella), C. (Thalysias)), Echinochalina,
Holopsamma and Pandaros.
437
SUBGENUS CLATHRIA SCHMIDT, 1862
Synonymy
CLATHRIA SCHMIDT, 1862
Synonymy
Clathria Schmidt, 1862: 57 (see subgenera for full synonymy).
Type species
Clathria compressa Schmidt, 1862: 58 (by subsequent
designation; Schmidt, 1864: 35).
Definition
Microcioninae with auxiliary styles in one or two categories
fonning various ectosomal structures ranging from membraneous
paratangential to a dense erect palisade of brushes; choanosomal
skeleton well-structured, hymedesmioid to reticulate, with mostly
smooth styles enclosed within spongin fibres and fibres echinated
by mostly acanthose smaller styles.
Diagnosis
Thinly encrusting, massive, digitate, lamellate, flabellate,
arborescent or occasionally fistulose growth fonns. Ectosomal
skeleton composed of monactinal auxiliary spicules in one or two
categories forming structures ranging from sparse, mostly membraneous (subgenus Microciona), sparse, paratangential (subgenus
Clathria) to a dense erect palisade of brushes on the surface (subgenus Thalysias). Choanosomal skeletal tracts usually enclosed
within spongin fibres, sometimes simply with nodal spongin; fibres
cored by smooth, basally spined or partially spined principal monactinal megascleres, usually geometrically different from auxiliary
megascleres, sometimes secondarily lost and cored by single category of auxiliary subtylostyle (subgenus Dendrocia), or sometimes
replaced partially or fully by detritus in fibres (subgenus
WilsoneUa). Echinating megascleres partially or entirely acanthose, occasionally smooth or vestigial spination, sometimes secondarily lost (subgenera Axosuberites, [sociella). Choanosomal
structure ranges from hymedesmioid, leptoclathrid to microcionid
plumose (subgenus Microciona), renieroid (subgenus [sociella),
plumo-reticulate or reticulate, with (subgenus Axosuberites) or
without compressed axis and radial extra-axial regions.
Microscleres include palmate isochelae and modified fonns, and
toxas with smooth or spined points, occasionally absent.
Remarks
The above definition is necessarily broad to encompass the
seven subgenera included in Clathria. These characters span a
wide spectrum of states, most of which are interpreted as secondary losses rather than unique apomorphies, and many characters
show intennediate states making it virtually impossible to maintain
strict generic boundaries recognised by earlier authors.
Distribution
Worldwide, predominantly shallow waters.
Clathria Schmidt, 1862: 57. [Clatharia] Kumar, 1925: 221
(lapsus). Allocia Hallmann, 1920: 768 (type species Spanioplon
cheliferum Hentschel, 1911: 362 (by original designation and
monotypy), holotype 2MB 4440). Antherochalina Lendenfeld,
1887c: 741, 786 (type species Antherochalina crassa Lendenfeld,
1887c: 787 (by subsequent designation; Burton, 1934a: 558), holotype BMNH 1886.8.27.450). Bipocillopsis Koltun, 1964b: 79 (type
species Bipocillopsis nexus Koltun, 1964b: 80 (by monotypy) holotype ZIL 10644). Dictyociona Topsent, 1913b: 579, 618 (type
species Microciona discreta Thiele, 1905: 447 (by monotypy),
holotype 2MB 3302). Labacea de Laubenfels, 1936a: 125 (type
species Clathriajuncea sensu Burton, 1931a: 343 (by original designation), schizotype BMNH 1926.2.19.2 (unconfinned)). Ligrota
de Laubenfels, 1936a: 125 (type species Clathria lobata Vosmaer,
1880: 151 (by original designation) holotype RMNH 276).
Litaspongia de Laubenfels, 1954: 162 (type species
Ophlitaspongia arbuscula Row, 1911: 347 (by original designation) holotype BMNH 1912.2.1.63). Paresperia Burton, 1930c:
501 (type species Paresperia intermedia Burton, 1930c: 501 (by
monotypy) holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.912). Marleyia Burton,
1931a: 346 (type species Marleyia irregularis Burton, 1931a: 346
(by original designation) holotype NM 1279). Pitalia Gray, 1867a:
524 (type species Reniera jrondiculata Schmidt, 1864: 39 (by
monotypy) fragment of holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.542). Ramoses
de Laubenfels, 1936a: 109 (type species Clathria pauper
Brondsted, 1927: 3 (by original designation and monotypy) schizotype BMNH 1930.11.5.2). Thalyseurypon de Laubenfels, 1936a:
107 (type species Spongia raphanus Lamarck, 1814: 444 (by original designation) holotype MNHN DT572). Taxonomic decision
for synonymy: Hooper (1996a), and this work.
Type species
Clathria compressa Schmidt, 1862: 58 (by subsequent designation; Schmidt, 1864: 35).
Definition
Clathria with only a single category of auxiliary style
fonning a sparse paratangential ectosomal skeleton; choanosome
without marked difference between axial and extra-axial
regions.
Diagnosis
Predominantly massive, lamellate, digitate, flabellate or
arborescent growth fonns; ectosomal skeleton composed of a single undifferentiated category of auxiliary megasclere; choanosomal skeletal structure plumo-reticulate or reticulate, usually without
marked difference between axial and extra-axial regions; spongin
fibres cored by completely smooth, basally spined or partially
spined principal megascleres, geometrically differentiated from
auxiliary megascleres, but sometimes secondarily lost; echinating
megascleres entirely or partially acanthose, occasionally smooth,
sometimes secondarily lost. Microscleres include palmate
isochelae and modified fonns, and toxas with smooth or spined
points.
Porifera· Demospongiae • PoeciloscIerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
438
c
B
A
Fig. 4. Clathria (Clathria). A-I, C. (C.) compressa Schmidt. A, choanosomal principal style. B, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyle. C, echinating
acanthostyle (scale A-C, 50 f.lm). D, palmate isochelae. E, spined accolada toxa (scale D-E, 10 f.lm). F, fragment of holotype BMNH 1867.7.2.6.78 (scale
30mm). G, ectosomal skeleton (scale 150 f.lm). H, choanosomal skeleton (scale 150 f.lm). I, fibre structure (scale 50 f.lm) .
Description of type species
Clathria compressa Schmidt, 1862 (Fig. 4).
Synonymy. Clathria compressa Schmidt, 1862: 8; Thalysias
compressa; de Laubenfels, 1936a: 105.
Material examined. Holotype: LMJG 15509 (schizotypes
BMNH 1867.7.26.78, BMNH 1910.1.1.2362, 2363) - Adriatic.
Refer to Hooper (1996a) for full list of other type material examined.
Description. Erect, arborescent, thinly lamellate, branching
growth form. Surface even, not hispid. Choanosomal skeleton
regularly reticulate, with well developed spongin fibres forming
regular or irregular anastomoses of differentiated primary and
secondary spongin fibres. Fibres cored by choanosomal principal
subtylostyles in muItispicular ascending tracts and uni- or bispicular transverse connecting tracts, and echinated by acanthostyles
perpendicular to or at acute angles to spongin fibres. Ectosomal
skeleton with tangential layer of subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles, of a single size category. Megascleres basally spined
choanosomal principal subtylostyles (220-345 X 8-14/-Lm),
entirely smooth subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles (164-235 X
3-6/-Lm), and echinating acanthostyles with even spination
(75-116 X 6-9/-Lm). Microscleres small palmate isochelae
(6-11 /-Lm) and forceps-shaped or accolada toxas with spinose
extremities (32-148 X 1.5-4/-Lm).
Remarks. Of the 160 named species originally described
in, or subsequently referred to Clathria (Clathria), or one of its
synonyms listed above, 115 are thought to be valid and most appropriately placed in this subgenus (the others being junior synonyms
of established species or referred to other families).
Pitalia Gray is a new synonym included here in Clathria
(Clathria), overlooked by Hooper (1996a). Paresperia Burton also
belongs to Clathria, as originally suspected by Burton (1930c).
Van Soest & Stone (1986: 45) suggested it was closer to
Esperiopsis (? Mycalidae), and was followed by Hooper (1996a:
86) in this determination. Van Soest et at. (2000) returned it to
Clathria, although again with question, and re-examination of type
material in this work supports its allocation to Microcionidae rather
than to Mycalidae. The species is poorly known only from a single
record from Norway, and type material is imperfect (holotype
slides
BMNH
1910.1.1.912,
2606-7). Re-examination
of these slides by Hooper (1996a: 86) failed to adequately fix
the affinities of this species. The choanosomal skeleton is loosely
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
reticulate, formed by smaller acanthose styles (principal spicules),
bearing an even covering of minute spines (330 X 9/-Lm), and
larger subtylostyles with microspined bases (auxiliary spicules)
(510 X 8 /-Lm) also scattered throughout the choanosomal skeleton,
although this skeleton is not obviously divisible into primary or
secondary tracts as seen in many other Clathria. Echinating acanthostyles are absent. Both principal and auxiliary megascleres form
a loose tangential ectosomal reticulation, and microscleres consist
only of palmate isochelae (24/-Lm long). Assigning this species
accurately to a subgenus is currently impossible given the poor
quality of type material. Its lack of echinating acanthostyles indicates possible affinities to Clathria (Isociella) and C. (Axociella),
but both of these subgenera have distinctive skeletal structure
(isodictyallrenieroid reticulate, and axially compressed, extra-axial
radial to plumo-reticulate, respectively), and neither has spinose
principal spicules. Isociella is also exclusively Gondwanan in distribution. Paresperia is, by default, left in Clathria (Clathria), and
for the time being is considered a greatly reduced form of this
genus (lacking acanthostyles and any definite skeletal structure).
SUBGENUS WILSONELLA CARTER, 1885
Synonymy
Wilsonella Carter, 1885d: 366 (Not Hallmann, 1912: 242).
Clathriopsamma Lendenfeld,
1888: 227 (type species
Clathriopsamma reticulata Lendenfeld, 1888:227 (by subsequent
designation; Hallmann, 1920: 771), lectotype AM G9135). Aulenella
Burton & Rao, 1932: 345 (type species Aulenella foraminifera
Burton & Rao, 1932: 345 (by original designation) holotype 1M
P1167/1). Psammotoxa de Laubenfels, 1936a: 99 (type species
Phoriospongia guettardi Topsent, 1933: 19 (by original designation), lectotype and paralectotype MNHN DT532, 3398, respectively
(here designated». Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper
(1996a), and this work.
Type species
Wilsonella australiensis Carter, 1885d: 366 (by monotypy).
Definition
Clathria with sand grains and foreign spicules partially or
completely replacing coring spicules inside fibres; coring spicules
same or very similar geometry to auxiliary spicules located outside
fibres; skeletal architecture reticulate.
Diagnosis
Lobate, clavulate, lamellate or bulbous growth forms; surface
arenaceous, and ectosome either lacking any megascleres or with
sparsely scattered auxiliary styles; choanosomal skeleton reticulate,
cavernous, with fibres cored by sand grains and detritus and varying
quantities of principal spicules, and echinated by acanthostyles;
principal and auxiliary styles usually poorly differentiated in their
geometry; microscleres include palmate isochelae and toxas.
Description of type species
Clathria (Wilsonella) australiensis (Carter, 1885d) (Figs 2D, 5).
439
Synonymy. Wilsonella australiensis Carter, 1885d: 366;
Clathria australiensis; Dendy, 1896: 33; Clathria (Wilsonella)
australiensis; Hooper, 1996a: 183, figs 83-84. Clathria australiensis var. spinulata Hentschel, 1911: 374; Clathriopsamma lobosa
Lendenfeld, 1888: 149; Thorecta ramsayii Lendenfeld, 1888: 149;
Sigmatella corticata var. elegans Lendenfeld, 1888: 199 (Not
Clathria australiensis; Levi, 1967a: 22. Not Ophlitaspongia australiensis Ridley, 1884a: 442. Not Echinochalina australiensis;
Thiele, 1903a: 961).
Material examined. Lectotype: BMNH 1886.12.15.43 Port Phillip, Victoria, Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper
(1996a: 183).
Description. Shape lobate, lobate-digitate, club-shaped,
thickly lamellate, thickly encrusting-bulbous or rarely fistulose
growth forms; large oscules on apical or lateral margins of surface
lobes; surface arenaceous; ectosome membraneous, without specialized dermal megascleres; choanosomal skeleton irregularly
reticulate, with clearly differentiated primary and secondary spongin fibres, forming a vaguely longitudinal reticulation with cavernous meshes; primary ascending fibres producing ascending
lines abundantly cored by detritus, lightly cored by auxiliary styles,
heavily echinated by acanthostyles, particularly at fibre nodes;
smaller secondary spongin fibres mainly transverse, connecting
with primary elements, with no or little detritus, paucispicular
tracts of auxiliary styles and lightly echinated by acanthostyles;
auxiliary megascleres coring fibres occupy only a small proportion
of fibre diameter; megascleres are choanosomal auxiliary styles
coring fibres differ from subectosomal auxiliary styles; only in
being slightly thicker and lacking characteristic apical microspines
of the latter; coring spicules relatively thin, straight, smooth,
mostly hastate, with slightly subtylote and occasionally microspined bases (62-152 X 2.5-4 /-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary styles,
dispersed between fibres and in dermal skeleton, straight, usually
hastate, subtylote bases with microspines on both points and bases
(92-152 X 2.5-4 /-Lm); echinating acanthostyles small, evenly spinose or with granular, vestigial spines, slightly subtylote bases,
fusiform points (49-68 X 2-4.5 /-Lm); microscleres are palmate
isochelae relatively large, unmodified (11-18 /-Lm); toxas oxhorn,
uncommon, rare in some specimens, often forming trichodragmata, usually with wide, angular, central curves and slightly
reflexed points (35-89 X 0.5-1 /-Lm).
Remarks. This group of arenaceous microcionids has
already become well known under the name of Clathriopsamma
(e.g., Hooper, 1990b; Hooper & Levi, 1993a), whereas Hooper
(1996a) noted that the inclusion of C. (Wilsonella) australiensis in
this group unfortunately means that the senior name Wilsonella
(1885) must take precedence over Clathriopsamma (1888).
Unlike Clathria (Dendrocia), in which there is only a single
category of coring and extra-fibre megasclere, most Clathria
(Wilsonella) have more than one form of auxiliary style, one coring
the fibres (choanosomal megascleres) and one outside of fibres
(subectosomal megascleres). In some cases (e.g., c. (W) australiensis, C. (W) ensiae), these spicules are only slightly different
in their geometry, although showing clear differences in their
spination; in others (e.g., c. (W) reticulata, C. (W) mixta) these
spicules are quite different; whereas in one (c. (W) abrolhosensis)
there is no apparent difference, and this is interpreted as a convergence or subsequent loss of a spicule category. Clathria
(Dendrocia) and Clathria (Wilsonella) can also be distinguished by
their skeletal architecture - being predominantly plumose in the
former and reticulate in the latter.
Porifera' Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
440
t o .-
.'
'.
C--.,
'.
r
'.
B
Fig. 5. Clathria (Wilsonella). A-L, C. (w.) australiensis (Carter). A, subectosomal auxiliary subtylosty1e. B, choanosomal auxiliary subtylostyle. C, echi·
nating acanthostyle. D, Oxhom toxa. E, palmate isochela (scale A-E, 25 /-Lm). F, holotype BMNH 1886.12.15.43 (scale 30 mm). G, choanosomal skeleton
(scale I mm). H, peripheral skeleton (scale 500 /-Lm). I, continuum in basal and apical spination on auxiliary subtylostyles (scale 5 /-Lm). J, echinating acanthostyle (scale 20 /-Lm). K, oxhom toxas (scale 20 /-Lm). L, palmate isochelae (scale 5 /-Lm). A-L, modified from Hooper (l996a).
Psammotoxa de Laubenfels, 1936a is also a synonym of
Clathria (Wilsonella), previously overlooked by Hooper (1996a).
Its type species, Phoriospongia guettardi Topsent was a new name
proposed for two specimens erroneously identified as Spongia
carduus by Lamarck, 1814. The lectotype re-examined is of massive
flabellate growth form, with well developed spongin fibres forming a nearly regular reticulation of primary (ascending) and secondary (connecting) tracts, partially cored by foreign detritus and
multispicular tracts of smooth styles, the latter confined mainly to
the axis of the fibre, and echinated sparsely by acanthostyles. The
ectosomal skeleton was not observed (dry material, from which the
surface is abraded). Microscleres consist of two forms of toxas,
long and sinuous ones that form dragmata, and smaller wingshaped forms.
SUBGENUS MICROCIONA BOWERBANK, 1862
Synonymy
Microciona Bowerbank, 1862b: 1109. [Abila] Gray, 1867a:
539 (preocc.) (Not Abila Gray, 1867a: 522) (type species
Microciona laevis Bowerbank, 1866:124 (by monotypy) holotype
BMNH 1877.5.21.1543). [Aaata] de Laubenfels, 1930: 27 (preocc.). Anaata de Laubenfels, 1932: 89 (replacement name for
[Aaata] de Laubenfels) (type species Aaata spongigartina de
Laubenfels, 1930: 27 (by original designation) holotype USNM
21428). Axocielita de Laubenfels, 1936a: 118 (type species
Microciona similis Stephens, 1915b: 441 (by original designation)
holotype RSME 1921.143.1447). Fisherispongia de Laubenfels,
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
1936b: 460 (type species Fisherispongia ferrea de Laubenfels,
1936b: 460 (by original designation) holotype USNM 22239).
Holorodesmia Topsent, 1928c (type species Hymedesmiaflaccida
Topsent, 1927b (by monotypy». Hymantho Burton, 1930c: 503
(type species Hymantho normani Burton, 1930c: 503 (by original
designation) holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.791). Hymeraphia, in part,
Hentschel, 1912: 377 (not Hymeraphia Bowerbank, 1864: 189).
Leptoclathria Topsent, 1928c: 298 (type species Leptoclathria
haplotoxa Topsent, 1928c: 298 (by monotypy) holotype MNHN
DT1101). Ophistospongia Gray, 1867a: 514 (type species
Ophistospongia australis Gray, 1867a (by monotypy), from
Bowerbank, 1864: pI. 17, fig. 288; holotype unknown).
Paratenaciella Vacelet & Vasseur, 1971: 103 (type species
Paratenaciella microxea Vacelet & Vasseur, 1971: 103 (by original
designation) holotype MNHN DN27). Pseudanchinoe Burton,
1929a: 433 (type species Stylostichon toxiferum Topsent, 1913b:
621 (by original designation and monotypy) holotype MNHN
DT1612). Sophax Gray, 1867a: 521 (type species Microciona
fallax Bowerbank, 1866: 128 (by monotypy) lectotype BMNH
1910.1.1.71). Wetmoreus de Laubenfels, 1936a: 112 (type species
Microciona novaezealandica Brondsted, 1924b: 463 (by original
designation) holotype UZM not found). Taxonomic decision for
synonymy: Hooper (1996a), and this work.
Type species
Microciona atrasanguinea Bowerbank, 1862b (by subsequent
designation; Bowerbank, 1864: 188).
Definition
Clathria with persistently encrusting growth form, with
hymedesmioid skeletal architecture consisting of a basal layer of
spongin, typically with ascending, plumose, non-anastomosing
spongin fibre nodes, and megascleres embedded and erect on basal
layer.
Diagnosis
Thinly or thickly encrusting growth forms; ectosomal
skeleton with a single undifferentiated category of auxiliary
styles sparsely dispersed on or near surface, lying paratangential
or tangential to surface; choanosomal skeleton essentially
hymedesmioid, with a basal layer of spongin bearing echinating
and principal styles embedded in and perpendicular to it, forming
single or plumose ascending columns, and in the latter case having
spicule bundles partially enclosed by ascending, plumose, nonanastomosing spongin fibres (fibre nodes); principal styles frequently with prominent basal tyle and/or with basal spination;
microscleres palmate isoche1ae and various toxa morphologies.
Description of type species
Clathria (Microciona) atrasanguinea (Bowerbank, 1862b)
(Fig. 6).
Synonymy. Microciona
atrasanguinea;
Bowerbank,
1862a: 824; Microciona atrosanguinea; Gray, 1867a: 535;
Microciona atrasanguineum; Cuenot, 1903: 4; Clathria
(Microciona) atrasanguinea; Van Soest, 1993b: 103; Amphilectus
atrasanguineus; Vosmaer, 1880: 115; Plumohalichondria atrasanguinea; Hanitsch, 1890: 207; Scopalina atrosanguinea; Schmidt,
441
1866b: 149; Schmidt, 1866a: 15; cf. Microciona prolifera;
Vosmaer, 1935: 604.
Material examined. Holotype: BMNH 1930.7.3.225 - NE
Atlantic. Refer to Hooper (1996a) for full list of other type material
examined.
Description. Encrusting growth form. Surface hispid,
uneven. Choanosomal skeleton hymedesmioid, with spongin fibres
reduced to basal layer lying on substrate, bearing erect, nonanastomosing, rarely branching, scattered fibre nodes perpendicular
to substrate ('microcionid' fibres), each cored by plumose ascending columns of choanosoma1 principal subtylostyles, wholly or
partly embedded in fibres, with points of spicules usually projecting through ectosome. Echinating acanthostyles also erect on fibre
nodes. Subectomal skeleton with tangential layer of subectosomal
auxiliary subtylostyles, singly or in bundles on surface. Ectosomal
skeleton without specialized spiculation, but choanosomal and
subectosomal spicules protude through surface. Megascleres
choanosomal principal subtylostyles with smooth or microspined
bases (102-385 X 11-22/-Lm), evenly spined echinating acanthostyles (62-87 X 4-9/-Lm), and smooth or basally spined subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles (122-295 X 2-8 /-Lm). Microscleres
palmate isochelae (uncommon) (12-17 /-Lm) and oxhom to wingshaped toxas (42-110 X 1.5-4/-Lm).
Remarks. Of 118 named species originally described in, or
subsequently referred to Microciona or one of its synonyms listed
above, 103 appear to be valid taxa (the others being junior synonyms of established species) (Hooper, 1996a). Microciona (s.s.)
differs from Clathria (s.s.) in having an encrusting growth form, a
reduced hymedesmioid skeleton with erect fibre nodes cored by
plumose tracts of principal and echinating spicules standing erect
on the substrate (='microcionid' architecture of Levi, 1960b), and
smooth toxas. The critical difference between these genera,
therefore, is the possession of the plumose, non-anastomosing
fibre nodes, whereas other encrusting genera in the family have
simply hymedesmioid skeletal construction (e.g., Leptoclathria,
Anaata, Hymantho), a basal renieroid reticulation (e.g., some
Antho, Plocamilla), or an isodictyal fibre skeleton arising from
a hymedesmioid base (Ophlitaspongia). By comparison, erect or
massive genera of Microcionidae commonly have reticulate or
plumo-reticulate skeletons (e.g., Clathria, Holopsamma), renieroid
or subisodictyal skeletons (e.g., Isociella, Isopenectya, Pandaros),
or virtually halichondroid skeletal architecture (e.g., Artemisina).
There are many contemporary authors who maintain this distinction between Microciona and erect non-plumose genera, such as
Clathria at the generic level (e.g., Levi, 1969; Wiedenmayer,
1977b; Pulitzer-Finali, 1983; Uriz, 1984a,b; Wintermann-Kilian &
Kilian, 1984; Boury-Esnault & Lopes, 1985; Bergquist & Fromont,
1988), whereas Van Soest (1984b) and Hooper (1996a) recognise
the taxon only at the subgenus level because this particular skeletal
architecture is clearly linked to some extent by the ontogeny of
the sponge individual (Simpson, 1968), and probably largely a
phenotypic response to prevailing ecological conditions. Hooper
(1996a) included Seriatula Gray (1867a: 515) (type species
Spongia seriata Grant, 1826c: 116 (by monotypy) holotype
BMNH 1847.9.7.14) into synonymy with Ophlitaspongia
Bowerbank, and hence into synonymy with Microciona (following Simpson, 1968), but this was shown to be an incorrect assumption whereby S. seriata is identical to Halichondria panicea
Pallas (Howson & Chambers, 1999). Differences between
Microciona and other genera are discussed below (see
Ophlitaspongia).
442
Porifera' Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Fig. 6. Clathria (Microciona). A-G, C. (M.) atrasanguinea (Bowerbank). A, choanosomal principal subtylostyles (scale 100 !Lm). B, echinating acanthostyles (scale 25!Lm). C, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles (scale 100 !Lm). D, oxhorn and wing-shaped toxas (scale 50 !Lm). E, palmate isochela
(scale 5!Lm). F, skeletal structure (scale 200 !Lm). G, reconstruction of skeleton.
SUBGENUS DENDROCIA HALLMANN, 1920
Diagnosis
Synonymy
Massive, lobate, globular, digitate and flabellate growth
forms; with a single undifferentiated category of smooth auxiliary
spicule (style, subtylostyle or modified style) forming plumose
or plumo-reticulate choanosomal tracts, ectosomal brushes and
also dispersed between skeletal tracts. Echinating acanthostyles
usually heavily spined and distributed evenly over skeletal tracts.
Microscleres include isochelae ranging from typical palmate form
(straight shaft, lateral alae fused to shaft), modified palmate
forms (thickened, curved shaft, partially detached lateral alae) to
'anchorate-like' forms (alae detached from shaft, shaft with lateral
ridge); toxas if present include oxhorns.
Dendrocia Hallmann, 1920: 767. Paradoryx Hallmann, 1920:
767 (type species Clathria dura Whitelegge, 1901: 83 (by original
designation) holotype AM G3046). Wilsonella in part; sensu
Hallmann, 1912: 242 (not Carter, 1885d: 366). Taxonomic decision
for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
Type species
Clathria pyramida Lendenfeld, 1888: 222 (by original
designation).
Description of type species
Definition
Clathria with only a single undifferentiated category of
structural megasclere (auxiliary styles) forming choanosomal and
ectosomal skeletons.
Clathria (Dendrocia) pyramida Lendenfeld, 1888 (Figs 2C, 7).
Synonymy. Clathria pyramida Lendenfeld, 1888: 222;
Wilsonella pyramida; Hallmann, 1912: 240; Dendrocia pyramida;
Hallmann, 1920: 767; Clathria (Wilsonella) pyramida; Hooper,
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
443
Fig. 7. Clathria (Dendrocia). A-I, C. (D.) pyramida Lendenfeld. A, echinating acanthostyle. B, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyle. C, palmate isochelae
(scale A-C, 50 jJom). D, paraIectotype of C. alata NMVG2283 (scale 30 mm). E, section through choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 jJom). F, peripheral skeleton
(scale 1 mm). G, fibre characteristic (scale 100 jJom). H, echinating acanthostyles and pattern of spination (scales L-R, 20, 50, 10 jJom respectively).
I, palmate isochela (scale 10 jJom). A-I, modified from Hooper (l996a).
1996a: 242; Clathria alata Dendy, 1896: 34; Wilsonella alata
Hallmann, 1912: 241. Dendrocia alata Hallmann, 1920: 767.
Material examined. Lectotype: AMG9047 - Port Jackson,
NSW, Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper (l996a: 242).
Description. Shape massive, lobate, lobo-digitate, irregular
growth form with small lobate surface projections; large oscules on
apex of lobes, each with slightly raised membraneous lip; smooth,
relatively even, bulbous, fleshy surface; ectosome microscopically
hispid with dense crust of subectosomal auxiliary styles forming
continuous, erect, regular (straight) or irregular (stellate, paratangential), plumose palisade; choanosomal skeleton irregularly
plumo-reticulate, with sinuous spongin fibres ascending to surface
in meandering tracts; fibres anastomose more frequently at axis
than in peripheral skeleton; peripheral fibres and skeletal tracts
often diverge becoming plumose in subectosomal region, or form a
paratangential layer immediately below erect ectosomal skeleton;
fibres cored by muitispicular, sinuous tracts of subectosomal auxiliary styles; acanthostyles heavily echinate most fibres; choanosomal principal megascleres absent, or at least undifferentiated from
auxiliary spicules; subectosomal auxiliary styles thin, hastate,
straight or slightly curved towards basal end, usually with smooth,
slightly subtylote bases that taper towards end into a small point
(partially mucronate), points hastate (208-321 X 4-8 /-Lm); acantho styles club-shaped, subtylote, with large spines mostly confined
on base and more-or-less aspinose towards point; spines usually
robust (87-135 X 8-12 /-Lm); microscleres isochelae large, very
abundant, primarily palmate, heavily silicified, usually with thickened and slightly curved shaft, large lateral alae completely fused
to shaft resembling 'wings', with front ala free, but sometimes with
reduced alae and sigmoid curvature (21-27 /-Lm); toxas absent.
Remarks. Seven species are included in Clathria
(Dendrocia), all of which are endemic to temperate Australian
waters, with hypothesised Gondwanan origins.
Dendrocia, like Wilsonella, differs from other microcionids in
having auxiliary styles both coring fibres and forming the ectosomal skeleton. However, whereas Wilsonella has two categories of
auxiliary spicules and detritus is incorporated into the skeleton,
Dendrocia has only one category of structural spicule throughout
444
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Fig.8. Clathria (Axosuberites). A-K, C. (A.) cylindrica (Ridley & Dendy). A, choanosomal principal subtylostyle (coring fibres). B, subectosomal auxil-
iary style (coring extra-axial skeleton). C, ectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles (scale A-C, 100 J.Lm). D, oxhom toxa. E, palmate isochelae (scale D-E,
25 J.Lm). F, holotype BMNH 1887.5.2.96 (scale 30 mm). G, choanosomal skeleton (scale 1 mm). H, fibre characteristic (scale 100 J.Lm). I, cross-section
through branch (scale 1 mm). J, palmate isochelae (scale 10 J.Lm). K , oxhom toxas (scale 20 J.Lm). A-K, modified from Hooper (l996a).
the skeleton. Dendrocia also has a characteristic dendritic or
plumo-reticulate skeletal architecture, whereas Wilsonella is invariably reticulate. In having only one geometric form of auxiliary
spicule producing the extra-fibre skeleton (i.e., subectosome and
ectosomal regions) the genus has closest affinities with Clathria,
whereas in skeletal structure (with a continuous ectosomal palisade
of spicules) the genus resembles the Thalysias condition. For this
reason Dendrocia is enigmatic, and Hooper (1990b) maintained it
as a separate taxon, whereas earlier Van Soest (1984b) had indicated that it was probably a synonym of Clathria.
SUBGENUS AXOSUBERITES TOPSENT, 1893
Tenaciella Hallmann, 1920: 772 (type species Esperiopsis canaliculata Whitelegge, 1906: 471 (by monotypy) lectotype AM G4325).
Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a), and this work.
Type species
Axosuberites fauroti Topsent, 1893a: 179 (by monotypy).
Definition
Clathria with axial skeleton compressed and well differentiated
from plumose(-reticulate) extra-axial skeleton; echinating spicules
absent; ectosomal skeleton with special category of (smaller)
auxiliary style forming surface brushes.
Synonymy
Diagnosis
Axosuberites Topsent. 1893a: 179. Axociella Hallmann. 1920:
779 (type species Esperiopsis cylindrica Ridley & Dendy, 1886:
340 (by original designation) holotype BMNH 1887.5.2.96).
Digitate. whip-like. arborescent and flabellate growth forms;
with well differentiated axial and extra-axial skeletal architecture,
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
reminiscent of Raspailiidae; axial skeleton markedly compressed,
reticulate; extra-axial skeleton radial, plumose or plumo-reticulate
composed of large subectosomal auxiliary styles-subtylostyles;
specialised ectosomal skeleton present composed of smaller auxiliary spicules; echinating megascleres absent although principal
spicules may protrude through fibres at acute angles; microscleres
absent or may include palmate isochelae and toxas.
Description of type species
Axosuberitesfauroti Topsent, 1893a: 179 (by monotypy) (Not
figured; referto Hooper, 1996a: fig. l1c-d).
Synonymy. Axosuberites fauroti Topsent, 1893a: 179-181,
fig. 3. ? Rhaphidophlus fauroti; Van Soest, 1984b: 130. Clathria
(Axociella)fauroti; Hooper, 1996a: 247.
Material examined. Holotype: MNHN DTl859 (fragment)Tadjoura, Gulf of Aden, Arabian Gulf.
Description. Flabellate, flattened digitate growth form.
Surface hispid, conulose. Choanosome with compressed reticulate
axis and plumose extra-axial skeleton, with only light spongin
fibres. Axial fibres produce close-meshed reticulation of multispicular tracts cored by choanosomal principal subtylostyles forming criss-cross reticulation, tracts plumose near periphery.
Echinating megascleres absent. Subectosomal extra-axial skeleton
well differentiated from axial region, with ascending plumose
columns of larger subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles arising
from peripheral choanosomal skeleton. Ectosome with brushes of
smaller auxiliary subtylostyles overlaying larger subectosomal
spicules. Megascleres entirely smooth choanosomal principal subtylostyles-tylostyles, and two size classes of auxiliary
subtylostyles-tylostyles, both with smooth bases. Microscleres
absent.
Description of type species ofAxociella.
Clathria (Axociella) cylindrica (Ridley & Dendy, 1886) (Fig. 8).
Synonymy. Esperiopsis cylindrica Ridley & Dendy, 1886:
340; Axociella cylindrica Hallmann, 1920: 780 (Not Axociella
cylindrica; Sim & Byeon, 1989: 39); Clathria cylindrica; Hooper
& Wiedenmayer, 1994: 262. Clathria (Axociella) cylindrica;
Hooper, 1996a: 251, figs 120--121. (Not Rhaphidophlus cylindricus Kieschnick, 1900: 53).
Material examined. Holotype: BMNH 1887.5.2.96 - off
Port Jackson, NSW, Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper
(1996a: 251).
Description. Shape thin, cylindrical digitate, branching,
whip-like, with thin, dichotomously branched, cylindrical or
slightly flattened, distally tapering branches; firm, flexible, tough
consistency; surface even, felt-like, unomamented, prominently
hispid; ectosome with sparse, plumose brushes of small ectosomal
auxiliary subtylostyles forming discrete, discontinuous bundles on
surface, arising from ends of radial skeletal columns, scattered
around larger, protruding subectosomal auxiliary styles which
project some distance through surface; choanosomal skeletal structure with clearly differentiated axial and extra-axial components,
markedly compressed in axis and radial in extra-axis; compressed
axial skeleton with longitudinal fibres cored by short choanosomal
principal subtylostyles, interconnected by thinner pauci- or aspicular fibres; axial fibres heavily collagenous, and fibre anastomoses
very close-meshed forming elongate reticulation; echinating
megasc1eres absent; radial extra-axial skeleton with large auxiliary
styles perpendicular to axis, forming pauci- or multispicular radial
(non-plumose) tracts associated with very light, ascending spongin
445
fibres but very few transverse uni- or aspicular connecting fibres;
megascleres include choanosomal principal subtylostyles coring
axial fibres relatively short, slightly curved at centre, with smooth
subtylote or sometimes evenly rounded bases and fusiform points
(215-395 X 5-15 /-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary styles forming
extra-axial bundles much longer and thicker than principal
spicules, with smooth rounded or tapering (hastate) bases, and
fusiform points (424--725 X 15-29 /-Lm); ectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles straight, variable length, with smooth rounded or slightly
subtylote bases and fusiform points (208-575 X 6-10 /-Lm);
microscleres palmate isochelae unmodified, differentiated into two
size classes, with long lateral alae entirely fused to shaft and completely fused front ala (6-13,19-25 /-Lm); toxas oxhom, thick, with
wide central curvature and slightly reflexed points (45-130 X
2.5-6/-Lm).
Remarks. The inclusion of Axosuberites into synonymy
with Axociella (Van Soest, 1984b; Hooper, 1996a) unfortunately
requires that the former name takes precedence, based on seniority,
a fact overlooked by Hooper (1996a). The type species of both
nominal genera are redescribed here whereas the latter is better
known from the recent literature.
The existence of microcionids with compressed axial skeletons
and differentiated axial and extra-axial skeletons supports the proposal for a closer relationship between Microcionidae and
Raspailiidae, as proposed by Hooper (1990b, 1991), and formalised
further by Hajdu et al. (1994a) in the subordinal classification of
Poecilosclerida as suborder Microcionina. In particular, Axociella is
most reminiscent of Raspailia (Syringella) and Ectyoplasia. Crucial
characters differentiating the Axosuberites group from typical
Raspailiidae are the possession of chelae and absence any true echinating spicules in the former, versus possession of a specialized
ectosomal skeleton (composed of small styles or oxeas in brushes
surrounding larger protruding spicules) in the latter (see Hooper,
1991, 1996a). Despite contrary arguments by Van Soest (1984b),
Axosuberites is considered here to be sufficiently different from
Thalysias in its skeletal construction to be differentiated at the
supraspecific level (although not for the reason that it lacks echinating acanthostyles, as suggested by Simpson, 1968).
SUBGENUS ISOCIELLA HALLMANN, 1920
Synonymy
Isociella Hallmann, 1920: 784.
Type species
Phakellia jlabellata, in part (sensu Ridley & Dendy, 1886:
478) (by monotypy) (Not P. jlabellata Carter, 1885d: 363).
Synonymous with Phakellia jacksoniana (Dendy, 1897: 236)
(holotype BMNH 1887.5.2.9), both junior synonyms of Clathria
macropora, in part, Lendenfeld, 1888: 221 (holotype AMZ466).
Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
Definition
Clathria with evenly renieroid reticulate choanosomal skeleton,
with spongin fibres cored by entirely smooth principal styles;
echinating megascleres absent.
446
Porifera' Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
B
I
'H
Fig. 9. Clathria (lsociella). A-H, C. (I.) macropora Lendenfeld. A, choanosomal principal styles. B, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles (scale A-B ,
100 fLm). C, modified palmate isochelae (scale 25!Lm). D, paralectotype of Phakellia jacksoniana BMNH 1887.5.2.8 (scale 30mm). E, choanosomal
skeleton (scale 1 mm). F, semi-renieroid fibres (scale 500 !Lm). G, bases of subectosomal auxiliary styles (scale 10 fLm). H, modified palmate isochelae
(scale 5!Lm). A-H, modified from Hooper (l996a).
Diagnosis
Massive, bulbous, lobate, digitate and flabellate growth
forms; skeletal structure with relatively homogeneous renieroid or
subrenieroid, wide-meshed reticulation; main skeleton with primary
plumose ascending, multi spicular tracts cored by smooth
choanosomal styles, interconnected by secondary, uni- or paucispicular tracts cored by same spicules, and choanosomal spicules
sometimes diverging and forming plumose brushes at surface;
echinating megascleres absent; ectosomal skeleton with single category of auxiliary spicule, tangential, paratangential. Microscleres
palmate-derived isochelae and toxas.
Description of type species
Clathria (lsociella) macropora Lendenfeld, 1888 (Fig. 9).
Synonymy. Phakellia jlabellata Ridley & Dendy, 1886: 478
(Not Phakelliaflabellata Carter, 1885d: 363); Clathria macropora,
in part, Lendenfeld, 1888: 221. Clathria (lsociella) macropora;
Hooper, 1996a: 271. (Not Plectispa macropora Lendenfeld, 1888:
226. Not Clathria macropora Whitelegge, 1901: 91. Not Wilsonella
macropora; Hallmann, 1912: 203. Not Plumohalichondria australis
Whitelegge, 1901: 90); lsociellajlabellata Hallmann, 1920: 784;
Phakellia jacksoniana Dendy, 1897: 236; lsociella jacksoniana;
Bergquist & Tizard, 1967: 187.
Material examined. Holotype: AM Z466 - Port Stephens,
NSW, Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper (1996a: 271).
Description. Shape irregularly flabellate-digitate or flabellate,
planar, with short cylindrical stalk, one or more thinly lobate, bifurcated branches, with rounded, digitate, uneven or shaggy margins;
oscules small, in special areas (sieve-plates) scattered over surface
of branches, with series of stellate subdermal drainage canals
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
surrounding each osculum; branches with separate inhalant and
exhalant faces, one porous, rugose, with irregular longitudinal
ridges, microconules or irregular striations, other smooth, membraneous; ectosome membraneous, hispid, with points of choanosomal principal styles protruding through surface, individually or in
multispicular plumose bundles; surface skeleton with relatively
sparse tangential, paratangential or sometimes plumose erect skeleton of small subectosomal auxiliary styles projecting between principal spicules, sometimes surrounding (in proximity of) principal
spicules reminiscent of Raspailiidae; choanosomal skeleton with
very slightly compressed axis and plumose sub-isodictyal extraaxis; axial region with moderately heavy spongin fibres, forming
tight irregularly reticulate meshes cored by paucispicular tracts of
choanosomal principal styles; axis (corresponding to centrallamellae and basal stalk) has few ascending, primary tracts, forming
multispicular, halichondroid structures, producing few multispicular, dendritic tracts running from basal stalk to periphery; extraaxial skeleton with plumose spicule tracts bound by collagen
(without fibre component), ascending to surface, cored by uni-,
pauci- or less frequently multi spicular tracts of choanosomal
principal styles; primary ascending extra-axial spicule tracts perpendicular to axis, interconnected by more-or-Iess transversely orientated, smaller secondary uni- or paucispicular tracts producing
the predominantly subisodictyal structure; peripheral spicule tracts
more plumose than deeper choanosomal tracts; meshes produced
by spicule-fibre anastomoses in extra-axial region rectangular or
triangular in shape; echinating acanthostyles absent; megascleres
choanosomal principal styles long or short, thick, slightly curved at
centre, less often straight, with rounded or slightly tapering,
smooth bases, varying from fusiform to hastate points (369-552 X
21-35/-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary styles variable in length, thin,
straight or very slightly curved, with basal terminations varying
from evenly rounded, tapering hastate, quasi-diactinal mucronate
or slightly subtylote, and with hastate points (191-424 X 4-9/-Lm);
microscleres palmate isochelae with highly modified, relatively
small alae bearing wing-shaped fluted processes; lateral alae
entirely fused to shaft; front ala complete or bifurcated with medial
tooth; chelae frequently twisted or occasionally anisochelate
(8-16 /-Lm); toxas absent.
Remarks. Four species of Isociella are known for the
Australian fauna, three from the tropical coasts of WA, NT and Qld,
and one temperate species from NSW. The type species is also known
from SE Indonesia, and only one other species is known from the New
Zealand fauna. Isociella has a slightly compressed axial skeleton partially offset from a diverging, plumose, subisodictyal reticulate extraaxial skeleton, showing vague structural similarities to Ceratopsion
and Raspailia (Syringella) (family Raspailiidae). This skeletal structure could also justify its inclusion in the subgenus Axosuberites, but it
is considered here that the subisodictyal reticulation dominates the
skeleton and is more characteristic of Isociella than Axosuberites,
whereas in the latter subgenus the axial compression and differentiation between axis and extra-axis are predominant features.
SUBGENUS THALYSIAS DUCHASSAING &
MICHELOTTI, 1864
Synonymy
Thalysias
Duchassaing &
Michelotti,
1864:
82.
Rhaphidophlus Ehlers, 1870: 19 (type species Spongia eratitia
447
Esper, 1797: 195 (by original designation; Ehlers, 1870: 18)
schizotypes 2MB 4577). Tenaeia Schmidt, 1870: 56 (type species
Tenaeia clathrata Schmidt, 1870: 56 (by monotypy) (schizotype
BMNH 1870.5.3.156); junior synonym of Spongia virgultosa
Lamarck, 1814: 444 (fragments of holotype MNHN DNBE1344,
1338». [Echinonema] Carter, 1875c: 194 (nomen nudum); Carter,
1881b: 378 (type species Eehinonema typieum Carter, 1881b: 377
(by typonymy) (lectotype BMNH 1877.5.21.149); junior synonym
of Spongia eaetiformis Lamarck, 1814: 440 (lectotype MNHN
DT580». Thalassodendron Lendenfeld, 1888: 222 (type species
Thalassodendron typiea Lendenfeld, 1888: 223 (by indication)
(holotype unknown». Stylotellopsis Thiele, 1905: 456 (type
species Stylotellopsis amabilis Thiele, 1905: 456 (by monotypy)
holotype 2MB 3309). Colloclathria Dendy, 1922b: 74 (type
species Colloclathria ramosa Dendy, 1922b: 74 (by monotypy)
holotype BMNH 1921.11.7.64). Damoseni de Laubenfels, 1936a:
110 (type species Hymeraphia miehaelseni Hentschel, 1911: 351
(by original designation) fragment of holotype SMF969T).
Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
Type species
Spongia virgultosa Lamarck, 1814 (by subsequent designation;
de Laubenfels, 1936a: 104) (holotype MNHN missing, schizotype
BMNH 1954.2.20.67); junior synonym of Spongia juniperina
Lamarck, 1814 (lectotype MNHN DT570) (de Laubenfels,
1936a: 104).
Definition
Clathria with two categories of auxiliary styles forming a
specialized ectosomal skeleton, the smaller usually forming discrete bundles or a continuous palisade perpendicular to the surface;
echinating megascleres present.
Diagnosis
Thickly encrusting, massive, globular, digitate, flabellate and
arborescent growth forms; with specialized ectosomal skeleton of
differentiated size classes of auxiliary (subtylo)styles, with smaller
ectosomal spicules usually overlaying larger subectosomal ones
forming erect brushes in a continuous palisade, or discrete bundles,
paratangential or rarely tangential to surface. Choanosomal skeleton without any marked differentiation between axial and extraaxial regions. Echinating acanthostyles usually present.
Microscleres are palmate isochelae and diverse forms of toxas.
Description of type species
Clathria (Thalysias)juniperina (Lamarck, 1814) (Fig. 10).
Synonymy. Spongia juniperina Lamarck, 1814: 444;
Clathriajuniperina; Hooper & Wiedenmayer, 1994: 270. Clathria
(Thalysias) juniperina; Hooper, 1996a: 346, figs 176-177 (Not
Pandaros juniperina; Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864: 90. Not
Thalysias juniperina de Laubenfels, 1936a: 105); Rhaphidophlus
clathratus Hallmann, 1912: 209 (Not Tenacia clathrata Schmidt,
1870: 56).
Material examined. Lectotype: MNHN DT570 - SW coast
of Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper (1996a: 346).
Description. Shape ranges from thickly encrusting to frondose, lamellate, clathrous, with or without free or anastomosing
448
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
?,
;:
c @セ
B'
A
Fig. 10. Clathria (Thalysias). A-F, I-L, C. (T.) juniperiTUl (Lamarck). G-H, C. (T.) reinwardti Vosmaer. A, larger subectosomal auxiliary style. B, smaller ectosomal auxiliary style. C, choanosoma! principal style. D, echinating acanthostyle (scale A-D, 100 ILm). E, sinuous, accolada and u-shaped toxas. F, palmate
isochelae (scale E-F, 25 ILm). G, paralectotype MNHN DT3354. H, choansomal skeleton (scale 1 mm). I, echinated fibre (scale 200 ILm). J, echinating acanthostyle (scales L-R, 20 and 10 ILm). K, palmate isochelae (scale 5ILm). L, toxas (scales L-R, 10,2 and 20 ILm). A-L, modified from Hooper (1996a).
branches; surface relatively smooth, even, with white subdermal
canals in encrusting forms, or irregularly microconulose or
clathrous in more massive forms; ectosomal skeleton crust-like,
easily detachable, relatively thin but dense palisade of erect or
paratangential brushes supported by paratangential tracts of larger
subectosomal auxiliary megascleres immediately below surface;
peripheral fibres immediately subectosomal with vaguely ascending multi spicular subectosomal tracts arising to surface; choanosomal skeleton irregularly reticulate, with very heavy spongin fibres
forming oval meshes; fibres usually with paucispicular core of
subectosomal auxiliary styles occupying only a small proportion of
fibre diameter, and fewer choanosomal principal styles which are
entirely enclosed in, or project from fibres; in some cases fibres
completely uncored, whereas others contain abundant, disorganized auxiliary megascleres; fibres typically heavily echinated,
some enveloping echinating megascleres entirely, some fibres
without echinating megascleres; megascleres choanosomal principal styles straight or slightly curved near basal end, with smooth,
rounded or very slightly subtylote bases (170-280 X 9-12 f.Lm);
subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles straight or curved, sometimes
with multiple curves (sinuous), with smooth subtylote bases
(169-310 X 4-6.5 f.Lm); ectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles with
prominent subtylote, smooth bases (93-110 X 2-4.5 f.Lm); acanthostyles small, stubby, with rounded or only slightly subtylote
bases, with few spines and extensive aspinose regions on necks and
points; spines large, bulbous, erect (45--65 X 5-8 f.Lm); microscleres palmate isochelae unmodified, incompletely differentiated into
two size classes; lateral alae entirely fused to shaft, approximately
same length as front ala and completely detached from front ala
(6-9, 12-16.5 f.Lm); toxas very variable in length, mostly thin,
ranging from accolada forms with large central curvature and
slightly reflexed points, large curvature and simply u-shaped, to
asymmetrical sinuous forms (55-180 X 0.8-1.5 f.Lm).
ReTlUlrks. Of 137 named species described in, or referred to
Thalysias or one of its synonyms, 93 are thought to be valid.
Hooper (1996a) notes that the taxon Clathria juniperina as
presently understood (e.g., Van Soest, 1984b) is probably composite, incorporating two or more sibling species, with disjunct
populations from the Caribbean (e.g., Hartman, 1955; Simpson,
1968; Wiedenmayer, 1977b; Van Soest, 1984b), and Indian Ocean
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
(Lamarck, 1814, 1816) (i.e., of Spongia juniperina). The accepted
interpretation is that the nominotypical population from the Indo-west
Pacific be known as C. (T.) juniperina whereas the West Indies population accept the most senior available name for several Caribbean
species presently included in synonymy with Spongia virgultosa.
The primary and only consistent morphological feature that
distinguishes Thalysias from other Clathria-like taxa is the
presence of a specialized ectosomal skeleton, consisting of two differentiated categories of auxiliary subtylostyles which form
brushes on the surface (either as discrete brushes (s.s.) or a continuous palisade). It differs from Axociella in having echinating
acanthostyles.
449
remainder being either junior synonyms or more appropriately included in other genera), of which all live in the Indo-west
Pacific.
SUBGENUS ECHINOCHAUNA TmELE, 1903
Synonymy
Echinochalina Thiele, 1903a: 961. Tablis de Laubenfels,
1936a: 76 (type species Echinochalina anomala Hallmann, 1912:
292 (by original designation) holotype AM G 10548).
Echinoclathria sensu Uriz, 1988: 89 (Not Echinoclathria Carter,
1885d). Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
ECHINOCHAUNA TIDELE, 1903
Type species
Synonymy
Echinochalina Thiele, 1903a: 961 (see subgenera for full
synonymy).
Ophlitaspongia australiensis Ridley, 1884a: 442 (by subsequent designation; Hallmann, 1912: 288).
Definition
Type species
Ophlitaspongia australiensis Ridley, 1884a: 442 (by subsequent designation; Hallmann, 1912: 288).
Echinochalina with smooth monactinal, quasi-monactinal or
secondarily derived true diactinal auxiliary megascleres coring
fibres, and smooth or spined monactinal principal spicules echinating fibres.
Definition
Diagnosis
Microcioninae with monactinal, quasi-monactinal or thin
diactinal auxiliary megascleres both coring spongin fibres and
forming extra-fibre and ectosomal tracts, and principal spicules
(styles or oxeas) echinating fibres.
Diagnosis
Thickly encrusting, massive, lobate, bulbous, clavulate,
clathrous, honeycomb-reticulate, tubulo-digitate, digitate and
arborescent growth forms; with monactinal, quasi-monactinal or
thin diactinal auxiliary megascleres tangential or erect on ectosome; choanosomal skeleton irregularly reticulate; fibres cored by
tracts of auxiliary megascleres, identical to those in ectosomal
skeleton, and echinated by principal megascleres varying from true
monactinal, quasi-diactinal to true diactinal forms, smooth or acanthose; microscleres may include palmate isochelae and toxas.
Remarks
The genus contains two groups of species: one (Echinochalina
(Echinochalina» with true monoactinal spicules, showing superficial affinities with Holopsamma (having honeycomb reticulate
growth forms) and the Raspailiidae (fibre characteristics), and the
other with quasi-diactinal or secondarily modified true diactinal
megascleres (Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia» superficially
resembling Niphatidae (Haplosclerida). Both groups are linked by
the common possession of auxiliary megascleres coring fibres and
principal megascleres echinating fibres.
Distribution
Twenty six species have been included in Echinochalina
at one time or another, of which only twenty are valid (with the
Thickly enrusting, massive, lobate, bulbous, clavulate,
branching, clathrous, honeycomb-reticulate, and digitate growth
forms; ectosomal skeleton, interstitial skeleton and spongin fibres
cored by smooth auxiliary megascleres (subtylostyles, tornostyles
or quasi-stongyles); fibres echinated by smooth or spined principal
styles; ectosomal skeleton with single or tracts of auxiliary megascleres tangential or paratangential to the surface; choanosomal
architecture reticulate with differentiated multi spicular primary
and paucispicular secondary tracts composed of auxiliary megascleres; microscleres if present palmate isochelae or toxas.
Description of type species
Echinochalina (Echinochalina) australiensis (Ridley, 1884a)
(Figs 21, 11).
Synonymy. Ophlitaspongia australiensis Ridley, 1884a:
442. Echinochalina australiensis; Thiele, 1903a: 961.
Echinochalina (Echinochalina) australiensis; Hooper, 1996a: 518,
figs 278-279.
Material examined. Holotype: BMNH 1881.10.21.299 Port Molle (Airlee), Qld, Australia. Other material. Refer to
Hooper (1996a: 518).
Description. Shape
massive,
branching,
clathrous,
honeycomb-reticulate growth form, fibre-branches flattened, with
cavernous, angular meshes; oscules small situated between adjacent fibre bundles; conulose surface produced by anastomosing
fibre bundles ('lacunae'), interconnected by translucent ectosomal
membrane stretched between adjacent conules; ectosome membraneous, with thinner choanosomal, undulating fibres lying
immediately below ectosome cored by paucispicular tracts of auxiliary megascleres, and with irregular layer of auxiliary megascleres scattered tangential to surface; choanosomal skeleton vaguely
450
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
II
I J
Fig. 11. Echinochalina (Echinochalina). A-J, E. (E.) australiensis (Ridley). A, auxiliary subtylostyles/tomostyles (interstitial and coring fibres). B, principal subtylostyles (echinating fibres) (scale A-B, 50 /-Lm). C, holotype BMNH 1881.10.21.299 (scale 30mm). D, choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 /-Lm).
E, fibre characteristics (scale 100 /-Lm). F, skeletal reconstruction. G, principal subtylostyle (scale 50 /-Lm). H, principal spicule terminations (scale 10 /-Lm).
I, auxiliary tornostyle (scale 100 /-Lm). J, auxiliary spicule terminations (5 /-Lm).
regularly reticulate composed of primary, distinctly ascending,
multispicular fibres interconnected at irregular intervals by numerous transverse, paucispicular, secondary fibres; fibre anastomoses
form rounded or elongate, narrow meshes; fibres cored by auxiliary
megascleres, sparsely echinated by principal subtylostyles; megascleres principal subtylostyles (echinating fibres) straight, smooth,
tapering, rounded or slightly subtylote bases, fusiform or slightly
telescoped points (83-131 X 6-9.5 jl.m); auxiliary megascleres
(coring fibres and interstitial) straight, thin, subtylostyles, tomostyles or quasi-strongyles, with smooth, rounded, or very slightly
subtylote bases, tapering-rounded points (147-192 X 1.5-4.5 jl.m);
microscleres absent.
Remarks. Refer to Protophlitaspongia.
SUBGENUS PROTOPHUTASPONGIA BURTON, 1934
Synonymy
Protophlitaspongia Burton, 1934a: 562 (Not Protophlitaspongia; de Laubenfels, 1954: 96; Pulitzer-Finali, 1986: 138).
Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia); Hooper 1996a: 543.
Type species
Siphonochalina bispiculata Dendy, 1895: 246 (by original
designation).
Definition
Echinochalina with diactinal or quasi-monactinal auxiliary
megascleres coring fibres, and diactinal or quasi-monactinal principal spicules echinating fibres.
Diagnosis
Thickly encrusting, massive, lobate, bulbous-digitate, digitate
and arborescent growth forms; ectosomal skeleton, interstitial
skeleton and spongin fibres cored by auxiliary diactinal or quasimonactinal spiCUles; fibres echinated by principal diactinal or quasimonactinal spicules; ectosomal skeleton with erect plumose brushes
of auxilIary spicules arising from peripheral spongin fibres;
choanosomal skeleton reticulate to sub-isodictyal with differentiated
primary multispicular and secondary paucispicular tracts of auxiliary
megascleres; microscleres if present palmate isochelae or toxas.
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
451
H
Fig. 12. Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia). A, E. (E.) bispiculata (Dendy). A, auxiliary oxeas (interstitial and coring fibres). B, principal oxea (echinating
fibres) (scale A-B, 100 fJ-m). C, lectotype NMV G2319 (scale 30 mm). D, choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 fLm). E, fibre characters (100 fJ-m) . F, spiculospongin fibre characteristics (scale 100 fJ-m). G, auxiliary oxea and termination (scales 50, 10 fJ-m). H, principal oxea and terminations (scales L-R,
50, 1 fJ-m). I, skeletal reconstruction.
°
Description of type species
Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia) bispiculata (Dendy,
1895) (Figs 3A, 12).
Synonymy. Siphonochalina bispiculata Dendy, 1895: 246;
Diplodermia bispiculata; Hallmann 1912: 255; Protophlitaspongia
bispiculata; Burton, 1934a: 562; Echinochalina bispiculata; Hooper
& Levi, 1993a: 1279. Echinochalina (Protophlitaspongia) bispiculata; Hooper, 1996a: 543, figs 296-297.
Material examined. Lectotype: NMV G2319 - Port Phillip
Heads, Vic., Australia. Other material. Refer; to Hooper (1996a:
543).
Description. Shape massive, subspherical, irregularly
lobate, with short bulbous surface lobes, or subcylindrical, flattened digitate sponge; oscules small, scattered over surface, particularly on apex of surface lobes; surface optically even, minutely
reticulate; ectosome microscopically hispid with scattered plumose
brushes of long, thin auxiliary oxeas, arising from the points of
peripheral fibres and paratangential to surface; choanosomal fibres
immediately below surface although spicule tracts more plumose
in peripheral skeleton than at core; choanosomal skeleton regularly
reticulate to subisodictyal, with well developed fibres divided
into primary, ascending, multi spicular fibres forming distinctly
plumose tracts within core of fibre, interconnected at more-or-less
regular intervals by slightly thinner secondary, transverse, uni-,
pauci- or aspicular fibres; fibres cored by long, thin auxiliary oxeas
and echinated by short, stout principal oxeas; fibre anastomoses
form cavernous ovoid meshes; principal megascleres echinating
fibres straight, short, thick, invariably smooth, hastate oxeas, with
abruptly pointed or telescoped ends (31-45 X 2-5.5 j.Lm); auxiliary
megascleres coring fibres long, thin, straight, hastate or rarely
fusiform oxeas (105-266 X 2-5 j.Lm); microscleres absent.
452
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Remarks. In species of Protophlitaspongia structural
megascleres (coring and echinating fibres) are diactinal and do not
appear to be modified from monactinal forms, unlike all other
microcionids. Consequently, the inclusion of this taxon in the
Microcionidae is equivocal but supported by the possession of
more-or-less plumose ascending, primary spicule tracts, true echinating megascleres, isochelae and toxa microscleres in several
species, and the possession of true monactinal ectosomal spicules in
several species. The coring and echinating megascleres are equated
here with auxiliary and principal spicules, respectively, of typical
Echinochalina. Dendy (1896) originally included the type species
in the Haplosclerida, but remarked on its unique spicule arrangement, particularly the ectosomal structure and fibre echination.
Burton (1934a) subsequently assigned the type species to
Microcionidae, for similar reasons as those outlined above, whereas
de Laubenfels (1936a) referred it to the Desmacididae because, he
suggested, the hastate diactinal megascleres closely resembled
those of Guitarra and Liosina, although it lacked poecilosclerid
microscleres. Nevertheless, E. (P.) bispiculata is included with
Echinochalina since it has a paratangential ectosomal skeleton composed of auxiliary megascleres, reticulate spongin fibres and echinating principal spicules, whereas other species described by de
Laubenfels (1936a) (P. aga, P. ada and P. antillana) were referred to
the Desmacididae and Haplosclerida (Hooper, 1996a).
HOLOPSAMMA CARTER, 1885
Synonymy
[Halrne] Lendenfeld, 1886a: 285 (preocc.) (Not Halrne
Pascoe, 1869). (type species Holopsarnma larninaefavosa Carter,
1885b: 212 (by subsequent designation; de Laubenfels, 1936a: 17)
holotype BMNH 1886.12.15.312). Holopsarnrna Carter, 1885b:
211. Plectispa Lendenfeld, 1888: 225 (type species Plectispa
rnacropora, in part, Lendenfeld, 1888: 226 (by subsequent designation; Hallmann, 1912: 204) holotype AM G9159). Aulena; in part,
Lendenfeld, 1888: 228 (Not Lendenfeld, 1886a: 309). Taxonomic
decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
Type species
Holopsarnma crassa Carter, 1885b: 211 (by subsequent designation, de Laubenfels, 1936a: 98) (lectotype BMNH
1886.12.15.313; Hooper & Wiedenmayer, 1994), a senior synonym
of Halrne globosa Lendenfeld, 1886a: 303 (lectotype BMNH
1886.8.27.71) (cf. Wiedenmayer, 1989: 63).
Definition
Microcioninae of 'honeycomb reticulate' growth form with
coring and echinating spicules identical in geometry, or coring
spicules replaced partially or completely by detritus.
completely replaced by detritus although those echinating fibres usually always present. Microscleres palmate isochelae and rarely toxas.
Description of type species
Holopsarnma crassa Carter, 1885b (Figs 2H, 13).
Synonymy. Holopsarnma crassa Carter, 1885b: 211; Aulena
crassa Lendenfeld, 1889a: 101; Echinoclathria crassa; Hallmann,
1912: 287 (Not Antherochalina crassa Lendenfeld, 1887c: 787);
Halrne rnicropora Lendenfeld, 1886a: 303; Halrne globosa
Lendenfeld, 1886a: 303; Echinoclathria globosa; Wiedenmayer,
1989: 63.
Ma1erialexamined. Lectotype: BMNH 1886.12.15.313-Port
Phillip, Vic., Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper (1996a: 487).
Description. Shape massive, subcylindrical, or lobatedigitate honey-combed reticulate sponge, large oscules slightly
recessed within reticulate meshes, surrounded by thin membraneous lip in life; surface reticulate, lacunose, consisting of irregularly
meandering ridges forming large meshes producing characteristic
honey-comb growth form, in life covered by moderately thin,
translucent dermal membrane stretched between adjacent ridges;
ectosome heavily arenaceous, with a thick sandy external cortex
covered by a fine membraneous ectosomal skeleton usually containing a tangential layer of auxiliary spicules, in tracts or scattered
singly across surface, but easily detached; subectosomal region
undifferentiated from choanosome, fibres immediately subectosomal; choanosomal skeleton irregularly reticulate, with heavy, relatively homogeneous, lamellated spongin fibres fully cored by sand
grains, with or without a core of choanosomal principal styles;
fibres usually always echinated by principal styles but sometimes
echinating spicules reduced in heavily arenaceous specimens;
choanosomal principal styles coring and echinating fibres short,
thin, straight, with rounded or tapering smooth bases, fusiform,
sharply pointed (53-81 X 1.2-6/-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary
spicules long, slender, strongylote styles, straight or slightly curved
or sinuous, with slightly subtylote bases, evenly rounded or bifid
points (188-261 X 1.5-6/-Lm); microscleres palmate isochelae
small, straight shaft, long, thick lateral alae fully fused to shaft,
nearly completely detached from front ala, front ala shorter than
lateral alae (8-15 /-Lm); toxas absent.
Remarks. The genera Holopsarnrna and Echinoclathria,
as defined here, have been confused throughout the literature and
several names (Echinoclathria, Ophlitaspongia, Plectispa, Halrne)
have been used interchangeably for all species. However,
Holopsarnrna differs substantially from Echinoclathria in having a
distinctive 'honeycombed reticulate' growth form, homogeneous
fibre reticulation, a single size class of choanosomal spicule found
both inside fibres and echinating fibres (lacking the larger,
extra-axial styles found in the peripheral skeleton of most
Echinoclathria). When respective type species are compared it is
surprising why these genera have ever been confused at all.
Distribution. Twenty four named species have been
referred to this genus at one time or another, of which only ten are
well established, all of which are endemic to the Gondwanan fauna.
Diagnosis
'Honeycombed reticulate' growth form consisting of tightly
anastomosing flattened fibre-branches (lacunae); choanosomal
skeleton simply reticulate, without any axial compression or differentiation between axial and extra-axial skeletons; principal spicules
core and echinate fibres, those inside fibres sometimes partially or
PANDAROS DUCHASSAING & MICHELOTTI, 1864
Synonymy
Pandaros Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864: 88.
Porifera· Demospongiae • PoeciioscIerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
453
E
I.H
Fig. 13. Holopsamma. A-J, H. crassa Carter. A, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles/strongyles. B, principal style (coring and echinating fibres) . C,
palmate isochela (scale A-C, 50!-Lm). D, specimen SAM TS4085 . E, lectotype BMNH 1886.12.15.313 (scale D-E, 30mm). F, choanosomal skeleton
(scale 1 mm). G, fibre characteristics (scale 200 !-Lm). H, palmate isochelae (scale 5 !-Lm). I, base and bifid point of auxiliary spicule (scale 5 !-Lm). J, base
and point of principal spicule (scale 10 !-Lm).
Type species
Description of type species
Pandaros acanthifolium Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864: 90
(by subsequent designation; de Laubenfels, 1936a: 123).
Pandaros acanthifolium Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864
(Figs 3B, 14).
Synonymy. Pandaros acanthifolium Duchassaing &
Michelotti, 1864: 90; Pandaros arbusculum, in part, Duchassaing &
Michelotti, 1864: 88; Thalyseurypon conulosa Hechtel, 1965: 44.
Materio.l examined. Lectotype: TM POR57 (fragments
USNM31020, MNHN DNBE1309, BMNH 1928.11.12.15a,16a)St. Thomas, Virgin Is., Caribbean.
Description. Bushy arborescent growth form. Surface
highly conulose, with flattened or lobate lamellae. Choanosomal
skeleton reticulate, with well developed flattened spongin fibres
(trabeculae) cored by choanosomal principal subtylostyles lying in
all directions within fibres (from isodictyal reticulate to echinating)
and with sparse acanthostyles echinating or also incorporated
into fibres. Subectosomal skeleton radial, reduced to single long
subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles protruding through surface
and also scattered throughout mesohyl. Ectosome without special
spicules. Megasc1eres smooth choanosomal principal subtylostyles-tylostyles, often with slightly rhabdose bases and terminal
or subterminal basal swellings, and often polytylote or irregular
terminations, with large size range (84-435 X 3-11 /-Lm), long
Definition
Microcioninae with flattened spongin fibres cored by smooth
slightly rhabdose auxiliary styles and echinated by rare acanthose
and smooth styles.
Diagnosis
Bushy arborescent growth form; with well developed
choanosomal skeletal reticulation of spongin fibres woven into
flattened anastomosing branches, or forming continuous sheets
without any regular architecture; fibres cored by auxiliary styles,
subtylostyles to tylostyles, predominantly smooth, distributed
within fibres in criss-cross fashion; fibres echinated by rare acanthostyles, rarely smooth styles; few anisotomotes, verging on
oxeas, scattered throughout mesohyl; sparsely dispersed tangential
subectosomal auxiliary spicules dispersed throughout peripheral
skeleton; microsc1eres absent.
454
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
E
Fig. 14. Pandaros. A-G, P. acanthifolium Duch. & Mich. A, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyle (scale 100 fLm). B, sinuous raphidifonn anisotomotes
(scale 50 fLm). C, principal subtylostyles (scale 100 fLm). D, 'echinating' acanthostyle (scale 50 fLm). E, section through peripheral skeleton (scale
500 fLm). F, part of lectotype BMNH 1928.l1.12.15a (scale 30 mm). G, skeletal reconstruction (after Van Soest, 1984b).
curved or straight subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles
(340--665 X 5-13 /Lm), lightly acanthose or rarely smooth styles
'echinating' fibres (160-195 X 5-8 /Lm), and long curved or sinuous, raphidiform spicules verging on anisotomotes (303-455 X
2-4/Lm). Microscleres absent.
Remarks. The above diagnosis is compiled from
re-examination of type and recent material of Pandaros acanthifolium (schizotype MNHN DNBE1309, specimen BMNH
1884.7.11.2) and the redescription of live populations by Van Soest
(1984b). The important features of this species and genus Pandaros
are: (1) the prominently flattened fibres cored by smooth slightly
rhabdose principal subtylostyles-tylostyles (more reminiscent of
Rhabderemiidae than Microcionidae); (2) the sparse, lightly spined
styles which more closely resemble a second category of principal
spicules than they do echinating (accessory) spicules typical of
other Microcionidae; furthermore, these spicules are only rarely
seen echinating fibres, but more commonly they are incorporated
into them together with the principal megascleres; (3) the
long subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles that protrude through
the surface (more similar to a reduced Raspailiidae, such as
Echinodictyum or Ceratopsion, than to typical Microcionidae); and
(4) the possession oflong raphidiform, sinuous or curved spicules
(classed as 'microscleres' with question by Van Soest, 1984b) that
have irregular terminations - sometimes stylote and sometimes
strongylote - which he calls anisotomotes.
Pandaros is a borderline taxon that could be legitimately
included in either Raspailiidae or Microcionidae. In fact Van
Soest (1984b) noted that only the presence of rare echinating
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecllosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
acanthostyles in P. acanthifolium gives any cause to link it to the
Microcionidae at all. He speculated that it might be necessary to
erect a separate family for the species, or even remove it from the
Poecilosclerida altogether, as it also shows affinities with axinellid
genera such as Ptilocaulis. There are no microscleres to give any
further clues as to its affinities. Pandaros is maintained as a separate genus and included in Microcionidae on a tentative basis until
further evidence is forthcoming. Of the twelve species previously
referred to Pandaros, only the type species clearly belongs here.
Raspailia kasumiensis Tanita (MMBS SIS-052), which Hoshino
(1981a) referred to Thalyseurypon, should also be allocated to
Pandaros in its skeletal architecture and spiculation (as suggested
earlier by Hooper, 1990b).
Wiedenmayer (1977b) merged Thalyseurypon with Pandaros,
because he considered that the type species of the former (viz.,
Spongia raphanus Lamarck) had architecture closely comparable
to P. acanthifolium (Hechtel, 1965), but this is not upheld here. The
only features these genera have in common is in lacking microscleres. Wiedenmayer (1977b) also speculated that the genus had a
close relationship with Echinoclathria (=Holopsamma as defined
here), based on alleged similarities in skeletal architecture, and he
suggested that the two genera probably intergrade in habit and
spiculation, but these suggested affinities were not noted from
re-examination of relevant specimens.
455
Definition
Ophlitaspongiinae with choanosomal skeleton modified to a
basal or axial renieroid reticulation of acanthose or occasionally
smooth styles and!or strongyles, overlaying a plumose(-reticulate)
subectosomal skeleton of smooth principal styles, with or without
echinating spicules.
Diagnosis
Encrusting, massive, bulbous, lobate, digitate and flabellate
growth forms; skeleton with 2 distinct components: (1) primary
(basal or axial) renieroid choanosomal skeleton replacing usual
microcionid choanosomal skeleton, composed of acanthostyles and!
or acanthostrongyles; (2) secondary (extra-axial, subectosomal)
skeleton composed of smooth choanosomal styles forming
dendritic, plumose, subisodictyal or plumo-reticulate tracts, or
simply echinating main spiCUle tracts; secondary skeleton usually
arising from nodes of renieroid skeleton, or ascending upwards
from basal spongin fibres, with or without axial compression;
spongin fibres relatively poorly developed; additional category
of echinating acanthostyles present or absent; ectosomal skeleton
tangential, paratangential or plumose tracts of 1 or 2 categories
of auxiliary styles; microscleres diverse forms of isochelae and
toxas.
Distribution
Remarks
Known only from the Caribbean.
SUBFAMILY OPHLITASPONGllNAE
DE LAUBENFELS, 1936
Synonymy
Ophlitaspongiidae de Laubenfels, 1936a.
Defmition
Microcionidae with a secondary renieroid spiculospongin skeleton (see Fig. 1, symbol 9) overlaying a primary reticulate, plumo-reticulate, plumose or hymedesmioid skeletal
architecture.
Scope
Four genera and three subgenera: Antho (Antho (Antho),
A. (Acamia), A. (!sopenectya», Artemisina, Echinoclathria and
Ophlitaspongia.
ANTHO GRAY, 1867
Synonymy
Antho Gray, 1867a: 524 (see subgenera for full synonymy).
Type species
Myxilla involvens Schmidt, 1864: 37 (by monotypy).
Under Van Soest & Stone's (1986) system all microcionids
having a renieroid basal (or axial) skeleton composed of acanthose
megascleres are grouped in a single genus (Antho s.l.). This system
was supported by Hooper (1996a) with the distinction that three
subgenera are recognised within Antho based on structure and
composition of the renieroid skeleton: the nominotypical subgenus
Antho (with predominantly (acantho)styles forming the renieroid
skeleton, less often acanthostrongyles, without echinating
acanthostyles), Acamia (with predominantly (acantho)strongyles
forming the renieroid skeleton, less often acanthostyles, and
a special category of echinating acanthostyles overlap the main
skeleton), and !sopenectya (with an axially compressed and extraaxially renieroid reticulate skeleton composed of two forms of
choanosomal spicules inside spongin fibres, overlaid by a second
extra-axial plumose skeleton). It could be argued that !sopenectya
(s.s.) could also be included in Echinoclathria, given the close
resemblance in growth form and renieroid skeletal structure with
the type species E. leporina, but in !sopenectya the renieroid skeleton is composed of sparsely spined principal styles (clearly differentiated from the larger smooth styles of the extra-axial skeleton),
with differentiated axial (compressed) and extra-axial (renieroid)
regions, overlaid by a second extra-axial (plumose) skeleton composed oflarger, smooth principal styles. In Echinoclathria, as redefined by Hooper (1996a) based on its type species, megascleres of
the renieroid skeleton are exclusively smooth, and the larger,
smooth principal styles which form a radial skeleton are only found
on the surface, embedded in peripheral fibres. Nevertheless, both
genera, Antho and Echinoclathria, differ from other microcionids
in having a basically renieroid skeletal construction and it is possible that Echinoclathria are highly derived forms of Antho (loss of
spinated principal spicules, loss of extra-fibre skeleton, loss of
spined acanthostyles (geometrically different from principal
spicules».
456
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Distribution
Indo-Pacific, W Indian Ocean, NE and NW Atlantic,
Mediterranean.
SUBGENUS ANTHO GRAY, 1867
Synonymy
Antho Gray, 1867a: 524. Anomoclathria Topsent, 1929a: 26
(Not Topsent, 1932a: 103) (type species Alcyonium opuntioides
Lamarck, 1815: 164 (by original designation) lectotype MNHN
DT654). Anthoarcuata Bakus, 1966b: 431 (type species
Anthoarcuata graceae Bakus, 1966b: 431 (by original designation
and monotypy) holotype USNM 36284 (161848)). Dictyoclathria
Topsent, 1920a: 18 (type species Clathria morisca Schmidt, 1868:
9 (by original designation) (schizotype BMNH 1868.3.2.21); junior synonym of Antho involvens (Schmidt, 1864) (Levi, 1960b: 57)
schizotype BMNH 1867.3.11.92). [Dyctioclathria] FerrerHernandez, 1921: 172 (lapsus). Isociona Hallmann, 1920: 768
(type species Lissodendoryx tuberosa Hentschel, 1911: 326 (by
monotypy) holotype 2MB 4417). Jia de Laubenfels, 1930: 28
(type species Jiajia de Laubenfels, 1930: 28 (by original designation) holotype USNM 21510). Plocamilla, in part, Burton, 1935a:
402 (Not Plocamilla Topsent, 1928c: 63). ? Quintoxilla de
Laubenfels, 1950a: 18 (type species Myxilla arcitenens Topsent,
1892b: 24, by original designation; no extant type material).
Quizciona de Laubenfels, 1936a: 111 (type species Microciona
heterospiculata Brondsted, 1924b: 465 (by original designation)
schizotype BMNH 1901.12.26.13). Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a), and this work.
Type species
Myxilla involvens Schmidt, 1864: 37 (by monotypy).
Definition
Antho with predominantly (acantho)styles forming the
renieroid skeleton, less often acanthostrongyles, without echinating acanthostyles.
Diagnosis
Encrusting, lobate and digitate growth forms; with a primary
basal renieroid choanosomal skeleton composed of acanthostyles
and/or acanthostrongyles; secondary extra-axial (subectosomal)
skeleton plumose, plumo-reticulate, or simply composed of
choanosomal styles echinating (project from) basal renieroid skeleton; spongin fibres poorly developed; special category of echinating
acanthostyles absent; ectosomal skeleton with tangential, paratangential, or plumose tracts of one size of auxiliary styles or subtylostyles; microscleres include diverse forms of isochelae and toxas.
in part; Topsent, 1892b: 23; Clathria morisca Schmidt, 1864: 37,
45; Dictyoclathria morisca; Topsent, 1920a: 18; Plocamia inconstans; Topsent, 1925c: 661; Holoplocamia inconstans; de
Laubenfels, 1936a: 75. Antho inconstans; Ackers, Moss & Picton,
1992: 140; Isodictya beani Bowerbank, 1866: 274; Dictyoclathria
beanii; Arndt, 1935: 81; Amphilectus beanii; Vosmaer, 1880: 115;
Clathria beanii; Ridley, 1881: 485; Myxilla beanii; Topsent,
1892b: 23; Artemisina mediterranea Babic, 1921: 87; Microciona
virgula Sara & Siribelli, 1960: 77; ? Artemisina paradoxa Babic,
1921: 87; Clathria paradoxa; Burton, 1930c: 528; Antho paradoxa;
Pulitzer-Finali, 1983: 610. ? Raspailia incrustans Swarczewsky,
1906: 52.
Material examined. Holotype: LMJG (fragment BMNH
1867.3.11.92) - Adriatic.
Description. Thinly encrusting growth forms; surface
rugose, hispid; choanosomal skeleton renieroid reticulate with
acanthostyles-strongyles coring spongin fibres, or simply united
at nodes by variable quantities of spongin, producing triangular
and rectangular skeletal meshes; junctions of skeletal meshes with
principal choanosomal styles echinating fibre nodes, standing erect
or at oblique angles, in tufts or singly; true echinating megascleres
absent (i.e., undifferentiated from choanosomal principal styles);
ectosome contains tangential or paratangential multi spicular
brushes of subectosomal auxiliary styles protruding through
surface; megascleres acanthose principal styles/strongyles of
renieroid basal skeleton (124-187 X 2-12 /-Lm), smooth or slightly
acanthose principal styles/subtylostyles of the choanosomal skeleton (164-335 X 9-14 /-Lm), and smooth subectosomal auxiliary
styles, often with basal spines (175-386 X 4-7 /-Lm); microscleres
palmate isochelae (13-20/-Lm), wing-shaped and accolada toxas
(22-175 X 1-4/-Lm).
Remarks. Twenty two named species have been included in,
or referred to, Antho (Antho), although only twelve of these are
currently widely accepted as being valid. The subgenus was
recently revised (Hooper, 1996a) and needs no further discussion
here apart from some comment on the inclusion of Quintoxilla de
Laubenfels in the above synonymy, with question. The type species
is described as thinly encrusting, having large acanthostyles 330 X
4-5/-Lm, echinating acanthostyles 190/-Lm long, and ectosomal
smooth tylostyles or tylostrongyles (no sizes given). Microscleres
are toxas 90-330 /-Lm long, 'palmate tridentate' chelae 20/-Lm long,
and flexuous raphides which could be young toxas 100/-Lm long,
often forming bundles (toxodragmata). No skeletal structure was
described, but Topsent's (1892b) inclusion of the taxon in Myxilla
was presumbably on account of an observed reticulate arrangement
of the skeleton, and this, together with megasclere and microsclere
geometries, suggests affinities with Antho. De Laubenfels' (1936a)
assumption that chelae are anchorate is unfounded. Unfortunately
there appears to be no surviving type material (or slides) of the type
species (Hooper, Van Soest, personal observations of the MNHN
collections), so these details and the true allocation of this taxon
cannot be verified. It remains Antho (Antho) incertae sedis.
SUBGENUS ACARNIA GRAY, 1867
Description of type species
Synonymy
Antho (Antho) involvens Schmidt, 1864 (Figs 3C, 15).
Synonymy. Myxilla involvens Schmidt, 1864; Hymedesmia
involvens; Schmidt, 1866a: 16; Antho involvens; Gray, 1867a: 524;
Desmacodes involvens; Vosmaer, 1880: 108; Myxilla banyulensis,
Acarnia Gray, 1867a: 515. Plocamia Schmidt, 1870: 62 (type
species Plocamia gymnazusa Schmidt, 1870: 62 (by subsequent designation; Burton, 1935a: 401 (holotype possibly LMJG, schizotype
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
457
A
Fig. 15. Antho (Antho) . A-G, A. (A.) involvens (Schmidt). H-I. A. (A.) tuberosa (Hentschel). A, subectosomal auxiliary styles. B , smooth principal styles
of the choanosomal skeleton (scale A-B , 50 fLm) . C,acanthostyles/strongyles of the renieroid basal skeleton (scale 100 fLm). D, wind-shaped and accolada
toxas (scale 25 fLm). E, palmate isochelae (scale 10 fLm) . F, ectosomal skeleton. G. choanosomal skeleton (scale F-G, 250 fLm). H, choanosomal skeletal
structure (scale 250 fLm) . I,renieroid skeleton (scale 50 fLm) .
MNHN DCL1105L» (Fig. 17). [Dirrhopaluml Ridley, in Ridley &
Duncan, 1881: 477 (unjustified replacement name for Plocamia) .
Plocamiopsis Topsent, 1904b: 155 (type species Plocamiopsis
signata Topsent, 1904b: 155 (by monotypy) ho1otype MNHN
DT947). Heteroclathria Topsent, 1904c: 93 (type species
Heteroclathria hallezi Topsent, 1904c: 94 (by original designation
and monotypy) schizotype MNHN DT1884). Lissoplocamia
bイセョ、ウエ・L@
1924b: 470 (type species Lissoplocamia prima
bイセョ、ウエ・
L@ 1924b: 470 (by original designation) holotype not seen;
specimen MNHN DCL637 ex. South Africa). Plocamilla Topsent,
1928c: 63 (Not Burton, 1935a: 402) (type species Isodictya coriacea Bowerbank, 1874b: 136 (by original designation; Topsent,
1928c: 63) holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.251). Anomoclathria; in
part, Topsent, 1932: 103 (Not Topsent, 1929a: 26). Protoclathria
Burton, 1932b: 320 (type species Protoclathria simplicissima
Burton, by monotypy, type material not examined). Holoplocamia
de Laubenfels, 1936a: 75 (type species Holoplocamia penneyi de
Laubenfels, 1936a: 75 (by original designation) holotype USNM
22460). Echinoplocamia Burton, 1959a: 252 (type species
Echinoplocamia arbuscula Burton, 1959a: 252 (by original designation) holotype BMNH 1936.3.4.413). Taxonomic decision for
synonymy: Hooper (1996a), and this work.
Type species
Hymeniacidon cliftoni Bowerbank, 1862a (by monotypy)
(junior synonym of Spongia frondifera Lamarck, 1814; Hooper,
1996a: 422).
458
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecllosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Fig. 16. Antho (Acarnia). A-L, A. (A.) frondifera (Lamarck). A, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles. B, choanosomal principal subtylostyles. C, acanthotylostrongyles of the renieroid skeleton. D, wing-shaped toxa. E, palmate isochelae (scales A-E, 50/-Lm). F, lectotype MNHN DT565 scale 30 mm.
G, choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 /-Lm). H, renieroid skeleton (scale 100 /-Lm). I, toxa (scale 50 /-Lm). J, acanthotylostrongyles (scale 50 /-Lm). K, palmate
isochelae (scale 5 /-Lm). L, bases of choanosomal principal style and auxiliary subtylostyle (scale 5/-Lm).
Definition
Antho with predominantly (acantho)tylostrongyles forming
the renieroid skeleton, less often acanthostyles, and a special category of echinating acanthostyles overlap the main skeleton.
Diagnosis
Encrusting, lobate, digitate and flabellate growth forms; with
regular basal or axial renieroid skeleton of acanthostrongyles (less
frequently acanthostyles or smooth tylostrongyles), with or without spongin fibres. Renieroid tracts may be echinated by acanthostyles at spongin fibre nodes. Basal renieroid skeleton overlays
hymedesmioid, leptoclathriid or microcionid main skeleton composed of echinating (acantho-)styles and/or choanosomal styles,
standing perpendicular to base or axis, joining with echinating
megascleres to produce ascending plumose skeletal tracts. Extraaxial (subectosomal) skeleton plumose, dendritic, or subisodictyal,
composed of choanosomal styles, originating from substrate or
simply confined to periphery, forming tangential, paratangential
or plumose extra-axial tracts. Ectosomal skeleton with or without
specialized spiculation (one or two categories of auxiliary styles).
Microscleres include diverse forms of isochelae and toxas.
Description of type species
Antho (Acamia)frondifera (Lamarck, 1814) (Fig. 16).
Synonymy. Spongia frondifera Lamarck, 1814: 445;
Lamarck, 1816: 374. Anomoclathria frondifera; de Laubenfels,
1936a: 108. Antho frondifera; Hooper & Wiedenmayer, 1994: 256.
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Antho (Plocamia) frondifera; Hooper, 1996a: 422, figs 216-217.
Anomoclathria opuntioides var. frondifera Topsent, 1929a: 26-29,
figs 10-14; Topsent, 1932a: 103, pI. 1, figs 6-7. Hymeniacidon
cliftoni Bowerbank, 1862a: 773, pI. 30, fig. 9; Bowerbank, 1864:
276, figs 70, 291. Acamia cliftoni; Gray, 1867a: 515. (Not
Alcyonium opuntioides Lamarck, 1815: 164.)
Material examined. Lectotype: MNHN DT565 - ? Sw.
Australia (Turgot collection). Paralectotype: MNHN DT3356 same details. Holotype of H. cliftoni: BMNH 1877.5.21.608 (fragments BMNH 1877.5.21.616, 1185,218) - SW Australia.
Description. Lobate, thickly flabellate, digitate fans with
uneven, digitate margins and irregular lobate surface. Large oscules
scattered evenly over surface and lateral margins of digits, with
remnants of stellate drainage canals converging on each oscule.
Ectosomal skeleton membraneous, heavily collagenous, with some
embedded detritus and sparse tangential and paratangential tracts or
single auxiliary subtylostyles scattered near periphery, sometimes
forming bundles protruding through ectosome; points of (smooth)
choanosomal principal styles from ascending plumose tracts protrude only slightly through collagenous surface membrane; subectosomal skeleton virtually undifferentiated from choanosome,
although peripheral choanosomal styles of plumose skeleton
slightly more dense, diverging, than tracts in skeletal core.
Choanosomal skeleton with two distinct components: (1) ascending
plumose and (2) basaUaxial renieroid (in some places isodictyal).
Plumose skeleton with pauci- or multispicular tracts of smooth
choanosomal principal styles ascending to surface, rarely branching
or anastomosing; tracts associated with, but not necessarily coring,
heavy, dark brown, spongin-coated algal filaments (ostensibly
Ficus; Topsent, 1932a), which dominate skeleton; filaments up to
250 f.Lm diameter, 300-400 f.Lm apart, branching, diverging from
base of sponge through sponge surface. Renieroid skeleton composed of 1 or 2 acanthotylostrongyles abreast forming square or triangular meshes up to 120 f.Lm diameter, even mesh size throughout
skeleton, overlaying plumose skeleton; some detritus scattered
between renieroid skeletal meshes, usually coated with spongin;
mesohyl not intact although some granular collagen containing
microscleres scattered between spicule meshes. Megascleres:
choanosomal principal styles entirely smooth, short, robust,
slightly curved at centre, with rounded or slightly subtylote bases,
fusiform points (88-118 X 4--13 f.Lm). Acanthotylostrongyles of the
renieroid skeleton thick or thin, rounded or slightly subtylote at both
ends, heavily spined particularly at points, spines large, conical or
slightly recurved, sharply pointed (85-103 X 3-14 f.Lm). Subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles long, very slender, curved at centre or
sinuous, subtylote usually microspined bases, fusiform or occasionally telescoped points (120-184 X 1-2.5 f.Lm). Microscleres:
palmate isochelae large, unmodified, with front and lateral alae
approximately same length, lateral alae entirely fused to shaft, front
ala detached along lateral margin (15-20 f.Lm long). Toxas wingshaped, short, moderately thick, with large central curvature and
slightly reflexed points (40-116 X 1-2 f.Lm).
Remarks. The inclusion of Hymeniacidon cliftoni
Bowerbank into synonymy with the type species of Plocamia
(Spongia frondifera Lamarck) unfortunately requires that the subgenus name be emended to Acarnia. Previously, Hooper (1996a: 422)
suspected that the two species were synonymous but the available
type material of Acarnia was so poor to be uncertain. Subsequent
examination of a better slide preparation confirms this synonymy.
Twenty two nominal species have been referred to this subgenus, all of which are presently recognized as valid species by
459
current authors. However, one of those species (A. (Acarnia)
erecta) is very poorly known, and it is also possible that a number
of other species will be eventually merged. The nominal genus
Echinoplocamia was also overlooked by Hooper (1996a) and is
included here as a new synonym within the subgenus.
It is possible that species with smooth tylostrongyles forming
the renieroid skeleton ('sausage-shaped spicules' of Ridley, in
Ridley & Duncan, 1881) should be separated into a separate taxon
(e.g., subgenus Plocamia). These spicules superficially appear
to be geometrically distinct from (and therefore possibly not
homologous with) acanthotylostrongyles in typical Acarnia
(Fig. 17). These smooth smooth 'sausage-shaped spicules' are found
in the nominal genera Plocamia (including Dirrhopalum),
Heteroclathria and Lissoplocamia. However, skeletal structures are
identical between both groups without any other obvious corroboratory characters to support their differentiation. Another nominal
f
B
A
C
E
Fig. 17. Antho (Acamia), cont. A-E, A. (A.) gymnazusa (Schmidt, 1870)
(type species of Plocamia Schmidt). A, echinating acanthostyle (scale 50 j..l.m).
B, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyle. C, choanosomal principal styles (scale
B-C, 100 j..l.m). D, tylostrongyles (scale 50 j..l.m). E, toxas (scale 10 j..l.m).
460
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
genus, Protoclathria Burton, 1932b, is also included here as a
synonym of Antho (Acamia), overlooked by Hooper (1996a). The
type species, P. simplicissima Burton from Tristan da Cunha, is a
massive pyriform sponge with a hispid, even surface. The skeleton
is renieroid, composed of dense reticulation of triangular, mostly
multispicular meshes cored by a single category of smooth
subtylostyle (260 X 15 /-Lm), occasionally with oxeote modification, intermingled with modified acanthostrongyles (180 X 12/-Lm)
coring fibres, apparently not echinating them. No ectosomal
spicules were described and microscleres are also apparently
absent. It is likely that this species was imperfectly described
by Burton (1932b) as no mention was made of a secondary
plumose or plumo-reticulate skeleton common to all members
of Antho.
SUBGENUS ISOPENECTYA DALLMANN, 1920
Synonymy
[sopenectya Hallmann, 1920: 789. Clathriella Burton, 1935c:
73 (type species Clathriella primitiva Burton, 1935c: 73 (byoriginal designation) holotype BMNH 1938.7.4.93). Taxonomic decision for synonymy: Hooper (1996a).
Type species
Clathria (?) chartacea Whitelegge, 1907: 497 (by monotypy).
Definition
Antho with an axially compressed and extra-axially renieroid
reticulate skeleton composed of two forms of choanosomal
spicules inside spongin fibres, overlaid by a second extra-axial
plumose skeleton.
Diagnosis
Bulbous, arborescent and flabellate growth forms; with three
skeleton components: (1) renieroid reticulation of acanthose styles,
(2) overlayed by isodictyal or subisodictyal reticulation of smooth
styles coring spongin fibres, (3) surmounted by plumose or radial
extra-axial skeleton of larger smooth styles, perpendicular to axis,
in peripheral region; skeleton may be slightly compressed at core,
spongin fibres only moderately developed; echinating megascleres
absent; ectosomal skeleton with single category of auxiliary subtylostyle forming tangential or paratangential tracts; microscleres
absent.
Description of type species
Antho (lsopenectya) chartacea (Whitelegge, 1907)
(Figs 3E, 18).
Synonymy. Clathria (?) chartacea Whitelegge, 1907: 497.
[sopenectya chartacea; Hallmann, 1920: 789. Antho chartacea;
Rudman & Avern, 1989: 335. Antho (lsopenectya) chartacea;
Hooper, 1996a: 433, figs 221-222. Antherochalina perforata
Lendenfeld, 1887c: pl.22, fig.44 (Not Antherochalina perforata
Lendenfeld, 1887c: 788; Lendenfeld, 1888: 89-90).
Material examined. Holotype: AMZ436 - Off Coogee,
NSW, Australia. Other material. Refer to Hooper (1996a: 433).
Description. Shape thinly flabellate with long, thickly
cylindrical stalk, very thin lamellae, slightly digitate or evenly
rounded margins; firm, barely compressible, flexible, slightly
spiky; optically smooth, even surface; ectosome prominently
hispid, with pauci- or multispicular plumose brushes of larger,
smooth choanosomal principal styles protruding through surface,
forming a vestigial radial extra-axial skeleton, arising from paucior multi spicular tracts of (marginally) smaller smooth principal
styles in subectosomal region; subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles tangential, paratangential, or rarely plumose, at base of
protruding choanosomal spicule brushes; peripheral skeleton
relatively cavernous in comparison to the central choanosomal
skeleton, moderately heavily collagenous; choanosomal skeletal
structure with 3 distinct components: (1) slightly compressed spongin fibres forming close-meshed anastomoses at core of skeleton,
more cavernous towards surface, (2) renieroid skeleton composed
of acanthose styles, overlaying other structures, (3) longitudinal,
ascending tracts of smooth principal styles, marginally smaller
than those protruding through surface, forming subisodictyal tracts
at core, more plumose in periphery, and usually (but not invariably)
associated with larger spongin fibres; spongin fibres in axial skeleton heavy, producing irregularly oval or elongate meshes, cored by
uni- or bispicular tracts of smaller, smooth choanosomal principal
styles; fibres closer to surface regularly anastomosing, widemeshed, forming regularly renieroid (triangular) spicule meshes
and oval or elongate fibre meshes, cored by uni- or bispicular tracts
of smaller acanthose styles; plumose extra-fibre skeleton composed of uni-, pauci- or multi spicular ascending tracts of smooth
choanosomal styles standing perpendicular to axis, becoming
increasingly plumose, larger, and typically multispicular towards
periphery; echinating megascleres absent; megascleres smooth
choanosomal principal styles long, thick, slightly curved or
straight, with rounded or very slightly subtylote bases, rarely with
basal microspination, fusiform points (168-274 X 13-17 /-Lm);
acanthose choanosomal styles of renieroid skeleton short, thick,
fusiform, slightly curved or straight, with rounded or slightly subtylote bases, lightly microspined bases and points, with fewer
spines scattered on shaft, occasionally completely smooth shaft
(92-127 X 9-12.5 /-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles
short, thin, usually straight, with prominent subtylote, typically
microspined bases, hastate points, abrupt points, or sometimes telescoped or bifid points (163-243 X 2-4.5 /-Lm); microscleres absent.
Remarks. Incuding the present work [sopenectya contains
only four species, three from the SW. Pacific and one from the NW
Pacific Ocean. All species lack microscleres but this is interpreted
as a secondary loss and consequently not given primary diagnostic
importance. Hallmann (1920) created [sopenectya for the type
species primarily on the basis of having a renieroid skeleton, with
two categories of choanosomal styles, without echinating acanthostyles, and without microscleres. The type species has obvious
affinities with Antho. It differs from other microcionids with
myxillid-like renieroid skeletons (viz., Antho (Antho), Antho
(Acamia), Clathria (Clathria) and Clathria ([sociella» in having a
condensed axis and more-or-less plumose extra-axial skeletons
cored by smooth choanosomal (principal) styles, in one or more
size categories, together with the usual renieroid structure overlaying the remainder of the skeleton composed of acanthose (or sometimes smooth) styles different from principal spicules.
The subgenus superficially resembles Echinoclathria leporina, mainly in the emphasis of the compressed central skeleton and
subrenieroid skeletal structure in both species, whereas megascleres
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
461
A
Fig. 18. Antho (lsopenectya). A-K, A. (I.) chartacea (Whitelegge). A, choanosomal principal style. B, subectosomal auxiliary style. C, acanthostyle of the
renieroid skeleton (scale A-C, 25 fLm). D, holotype AMZ436 (scale 30 mm). E, choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 fLm). F, fibre characteristics (scale 100 fLm).
G, acanthostyle (scale 50 fLm). H, acanthostyle shaft spines (scale 5 fLm). I, base of principal style (scale 10 fLm). J, base of auxiliary style (scale 5 fLm).
K, tips of auxiliary styles (scale 5 fLm).
forming these skeletons are quite different. Choanosomal megascleres in A. (I.) chartacea are clearly differentiated: small acanthose styles forming the renieroid skeleton (not echinating fibres),
small smooth styles forming a secondary radial ascending skeleton,
and larger smooth styles forming the peripheral perpendicular
skeleton. By comparison, in E. Zeporina there is a smaller size class
of smooth principal styles both coring and echinating heavy spongin fibres, forming a renieroid skeletal structure, and a second,
larger class of smooth principal styles forming a sparse radial or
plumose peripheral skeleton (embedded in peripheral fibres). This
latter structure links the two groups. Antho chartacea should also
be contrasted with the renieroid raspailiid genus Amphinomia,
which also has acanthose structural spicules (Hooper, 1991).
ECHINOCLATHRIA CARTER, 1885
Synonymy
[Echinoclathria] Carter, 1884b: 204 (nomen nudum). Echinoclathria Carter, 1885d: 355 (Not Uriz, 1988: 89).
Type species
Echinoclathria tenuis Carter, 1885d: 355 (by subsequent designation; Burton, 1934a: 562) (holotype BMNH 1886.12.15.147);
junior synonym of Spongia Zeporina Lamarck, 1814: 444 (Topsent,
1932a: 101) (holotype MNHN LBIM DT567).
462
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
'A
F
Fig. 19. Echinoclathria. A-H, E. Jeporina (Lamarck). A, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles. B, principal styles/subtylostyles (coring and echinating
fibres) (scale A-B, 25 f.Lm). C, holotype of junior synonym E. tenuis (scale 30 mm). D, choanosomal skeleton (scale 500 f.Lm). E, fibre characteristics (scale
100 f.Lm). F, base of larger principal style (protruding through surface) (scale 10 f.Lm). G, base of smaller principal style (in renieroid skeleton; scale 5 f.Lm).
H, reconstruction of choanosomal skeleton.
Definition
Ophlitaspongiinae with the choanosomal skeleton consisting
of a relatively homogeneous renieroid spongin fibre reticulation
cored by smaller, smooth principal spicules and echinated by the
same spicules, and a vestigial radial extra-axial skeleton composed
of larger principal spicules forming plumose brushes on the external surface.
Diagnosis
Thickly encrusting, bulbous, claviform, bushy, digitate,
lamellate, arborescent and flabellate growth forms; with two distinct
skeletal components: (1) predominantly renieroid reticulate main
skeleton cored by smaller, smooth principal styles, echinated by
identical spicules (occasionally absent), typically very well developed spongin fibres sometimes slightly compressed at axis, more
openly reticulate towards periphery; and (2) a vestigial radial extraaxial skeleton perched on the external surface, barely extending into
choanosome, consisting of larger, smooth principal spicules, with
identical geometry to those at core, forming radial or plumose
brushes on surface. Ectosomal skeleton with single size class of
auxiliary subtylostyle lying paratangentially or embedded perpendicular to surface. Microscleres include toxas and palmate isochelae.
Description of type species
Echinoclathria Zeporina (Lamarck, 1814) (Fig. 19).
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Synonymy. Spongia leporina Lamarck, 1814: 444. Echinoclathria leporina; Topsent, 1932a: 101. Ophlitaspongia leporina;
Burton, 1934a: 558. Echinoclathria tenuis Carter, 1885d: 355.
Ophlitaspongia tenuis; Dendy, 1896: 37 (Not Clathria tenuis
Hentschel, 1911: 377; Parish etal., 1991: 56). Phakelliapapyracea
Carter, 1886c: 379. Antherochalina tenuispina Lendenfeld,
l887c: 789.
Material examined. Holotype: MNHN DT567
'Australian Seas'. Other material. Refer to Hooper (1996a: 462).
Description. Shape persistently very thin, flabellate digits
ranging from single elongate planar fans with evenly rounded margins, to bifurcate palmate digits growing in more than one plane, with
uneven margins, usually with cylindrical basal stalk; oscules small
dispersed over margins of digits; surface even; ectosome microscopically hispid, with larger sizes of principal style/subtylostyle
protruding through surface, singly or in brushes, forming vestigial
plumose or radial extra-axial skeleton in peripheral region, with a
distinct tangential layer of subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles, in
pauci- or multispicular tracts, underlying erect principal spicule
brushes; choanosomal skeleton with three components: (1) irregularly isodictyal, slightly compressed axis with single, thickened
central core of heavy fibres, vaguely separated into primary,
plumose, arborescent, ascending pauci- or multi spicular fibres producing radial tracts, and secondary, mostly transverse uni- or paucispicular, regularly renieroid fibres; (2) more open-reticulate
renieroid or subrenieroid extra-axial region; and (3) (vestigial)
plumose or radial skeleton in peripheral region with spicule tracts
increasingly plumose, protruding through fibres, in peripheral
skeleton; fibres cored and sparsely echinated by smaller choanosomal principal styles/subtylostyles in choanosomal skeleton (larger
in peripheral skeleton); echinating principal spicules located predominantly on primary fibres; fibre anastomoses form rectangular,
triangular, or less often oval meshes more compressed in axis than
at periphery; megascleres choanosomal principal styles larger in
peripheral region than in axis, thick, straight or slightly curved,
with smooth, evenly rounded, or slightly tapering subtylote bases,
sometimes quasi-oxeote, rarely microspined bases, usually with
fusiform points (62-305 X 4-14 !-Lm); subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyles long, thin, straight, slightly curved, or frequently sinuous, with predominantly smooth, occasionally microspined,
subtylote bases, hastate points (148-321 X 1.5-4.2 !-Lm);
microscleres absent.
Remarks. Sixty nine species names have been referred to or
included in Echinoclathria (or one of its synonyms) at one time or
another, but of these only 29 are appropriately referred here (most
of the remainder belonging either to Holopsamma or Clathria, or
are junior synonyms or homonyms of other taxa).
Echinoclathria is similar to Antho (/sopenectya), as noted
above, differing in having only two skeletal components: a relatively homogeneous renieroid choanosomal skeleton composed of
smaller, smooth principal spicules; a vestigial radial extra-axial
skeleton on the external surface. /sopenectya has in addition a
renieroid skeleton of acanthose spicules, and the smooth principal
styles form longitudinal tracts extending all the way from the axis
to the surface and beyond. The difficulty lies in trying to determine
affinities of species in either genus with reduced structural characters. For example, A. (/.) punicea Hooper has spined renieroid
spicules whereas E. riddlei Hooper has smooth renieroid spicules,
and both species have a reduced extra-fibre skeleton.
Within Echinoclathria most of the variability concerns the
development of the extra-fibre skeleton. In some species
463
(e.g., E. leporina, E. confragosa (Hallmann» there are obvious size
differences between principal styles coring fibres in the choanosome and those protruding through the surface, whereas in others
(e.g., E. nodosa Carter) there is no obvious size differences
between principal styles at the core and those at the periphery,
although structurally these are similar to the first condition. In others (e.g., E. egena Wiedenmayer, E. waldoschmitti de Laubenfels)
there is further reduction whereby the extra-fibre skeleton is virtually absent and all spicules are vestigial, poorly silicified. Further
discussion of the genus, particularly in relation to its alleged similarities to Ophlitaspongia (sensu Howson & Chambers, 1999), are
presented below (see Ophlitaspongia).
Distribution
Eighteen species are confined to the Indo-west Pacific region,
and another eleven have been recorded from the Caribbean,
SW Atlantic, Arctic, Mediterranean and W Indian Ocean.
ARTEMISINA VOSMAER, 1885
Synonymy
Artemisina Vosmaer, 1885a: 25. [Artenisinal Burton, 1934b:
54 (lapsus). Qasimella Thomas, 1974: 311 (type species Qasimella
indica Thomas, 1974: 311 (by original designation) holotype
CMFRI T841l not seen). Taxonomic decision for synonymy:
Hooper (l996a).
Type species
Artemisina suberitoides Vosmaer, 1885a: 25 (by monotypy)
(holotype ZMA POR443); junior synonym of Suberites arciger
Schmidt, 1870: 47 (Burton, 1930c: 528) (schizotype BMNH
1870.5.3.90).
Definition
Ophlitaspongiinae lacking a distinctive choanosomal skeleton
or definite spongin fibres, lacking echinating spicules, and having
a nearly radial ectosomal skeleton.
Diagnosis
Massive, cushion-shaped, bulbous, clavulate, tubular, digitate
and flabellate growth forms; without choanosomal fibres or indefinite fibres, whereas skeletal architecture consists of vaguely ascending longitudinal tracts of spicules bound by abundant collagen,
cored by smooth choanosomal principal subtylostyles in a more-orless confused halichondroid reticulation of vaguely multispicular
ascending and scattered transverse megascleres; echinating megascleres absent; subectosomal peripheral skeleton more radially
arranged; ectosome membraneous, skin-like, with smooth styles of
a single size category protruding through surface, forming paratangential or erect, discrete spicule bundles; microscleres palmate or
arcuate isochelae and toxas with smooth or spined points.
Description of type species
Artemisina arcigera (Schmidt, 1870) (Fig. 20).
464
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
H
I
F
A
C
Fig.20. Artemisina. A-I, A. arcigera. J, A. jovis Dendy. A, choanosomal principal subtylostyle (scale I ()() !Lm). B, base of principal subtylostyle (scale 20 !Lm).
C, subectosomal auxiliary style (scale 50 !Lm). D, base of auxiliary style (scale 10 !Lm). E, wing-shaped toxas (scale 50 !Lm). F, spined tip of toxa (scale
2 !Lm). G, palmate isochelae (scale 5 !Lm). H, fragment of holotype BMNH 1870.5.3.90 (scale 30mm). I, section through peripheral skeleton (scale 250 !Lm).
J, reconstruction of peripheral skeleton.
Synonymy. Suberites arciger Schmidt, 1870: 47; Artemisina
suberitoides Vosmaer, 1885a: 25; Artemisina arcigera; Lundbeck,
1905: 110; Artemisina arcigera; Burton, 1959b: 42.
Material examined. Holotype: ZMUC (not seen) (fragment
BMNH 1870.5.3.90) -Arctic.
Description. Massive, subspherical growth form. Surface
skin-like, microscopically hispid, with few raised oscules; texture
distinctly stringy. Choanosomal fibres indefinite or absent, overall
architecture plumo-reticulate, nearly halichondroid in places, composed of multi spicular ascending and paucispicular transverse
tracts of choanosomal principal styles, bound together with collagen. Echinating megasc1eres absent. Ectosomal skeleton plumose,
composed of single category of subectosomal auxiliary styles
forming discontinuous palisade of discrete brushes. Megasc1eres
smooth choanosomal principal subtylostyles (416-624 X 9-12
/Lm) and smooth fusiform subectosomal auxiliary styles or subtylostyles (275-390 X 8-16 /Lm). Microsc\eres palmate isochelae
(8-14/Lm) , and wing-shaped toxas with spinous extremities
(55-280 X 2-4/Lm).
Remarks. Defining Artemisina in phylogenetic terms is
most difficult. The taxon has no real distinctive features, although
it differs from other Microcionidae in lacking a distinctive
choanosomal skeleton or definite spongin fibres (also found in
the nominal genus Qasimella Thomas which Hooper, 1996a
synonymised with Artemisina), lacking echinating spicules, and
having a nearly radial ectosomal skeleton reminiscent of some
Ceratopsian (Raspailiidae; Hooper, 1991). These characteristics,
two of which might be interpreted as reductions or secondary
losses and the third as a convergence, are the only definable morphological apomorphies. Moreover, ectosomal structure varies
between several species, ranging from the typical condition composed of erect brushes (e.g., A. arcigera) to a tangential layer of
spicules in criss-cross fashion (e.g., A. meZana Van Soest). This
variability is equivalent to the MycaZe subgenera Carmia and
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Aegagropila, respectively (e.g., Topsent, 1924). At least one
species lacks a specialized ectosomal skeleton completely (e.g.,
A. transiens Topsent).
Some species of Artemisina have honeycombed reticulate
growth forms, approaching the characteristic Holopsamma morphology, but there is no consistency or pattern of gross morphologies amongst Artemisina, and in any case it is unlikely that the
genus can be defined on that basis. De Laubenfels (1936a) and
Ristau (1978b) suggested that Artemisina could be characterized by
the absence of echinating acanthostyles and by the presence of spinous extremities on toxas. Neither character has much systematic
value at the generic level. In the present interpretation echinating
acanthostyles represent the retention of an ancestral character, in
which case their presence or absence does not constitute a valid reason to define a phylogenetic grouping, and in any event they occur
and disappear throughout numerous microcionid and raspailiid taxa.
Similarly, toxas with spinous extremities are also known to occur in
many Microcionidae, including the type species Clathria compressa
Schmidt (and other species Microciona spinarchus Carter & Hope,
M. coccinea Bergquist, M. rubens Bergquist, Eurypon acanthotoxa
Stephens, M. spinatoxa Hoshino, Stylostichon toxiferum Topsent,
Labacea juncea Burton, Plocamia ridleyi Hentschel, and
Ophlitaspongia thielei Burton). They also occur in genera which
have an ectosomal structure consistent with the Myxillidae (e.g.,
Melonchela clathrata Koltun), and consequently it is not parsimonious to base a definition of Artemisina on this feature. Similarly,
several other species of Artemisina have smooth toxas (e.g., A.
melana), and one (A. archegona Ristau) has oxeote toxas similar to
Paratenaciella microxea Vacelet and Vasseur.
Thus, in the broad sense Artemisina contains a heterogenous
assemblage of species, which prompted Burton (1930c) to divide
the group into three sections based on the number of megasclere
categories present. The simplest forms have only one category
of spicule (choanosomal principal megascleres; e.g., A. transiens
Topsent); the typical form has two categories of megascleres
(larger choanosomal principal styles and smaller subectosomal
auxiliary styles; e.g., A. arcigera); and the third form has an incompletely differentiated series of three megasclere types (two
choanosomal spicules and one subectosomal spicule; A. plumosa
Hentschel). In all these forms species are only really united in their
lax choanosomal skeletal structure.
Distribution
Predominant in colder waters including Antarctica, Arctic,
Greenland, Iceland, New Zealand, NE and SW Atlantic, NW, NE
and SW Pacific, but also recorded from Mediterranean, Caribbean,
central Indian Ocean and SW Pacific.
OPHLITASPONGIA BOWERBANK, 1866
Synonymy
Ophlitaspongia Bowerbank,
Ophlitaspongia of most authors).
1866:
14,
378.
(Not
Type species
Ophlitaspongia papilla Bowerbank, 1866: 378 (by original
designation).
465
Definition
Ophlitaspongiinae with isodictyal reticulate spongin fibre
skeleton arising from a hymedesmioid basal fibre skeleton; mineral
skeleton is predominantly or exclusively plumose, with no or very
few spicules coring transverse fibres; echinating megascleres
absent although principal subtylostyles protrude through fibres in
plumose arrangement; and megascleres are exclusively smooth
subtylostyles.
Diagnosis
Encrusting growth form; with an isodictyal reticulate, ladderlike, spongin fibre skeleton composed of parallel ascending fibres
with regular cross-connecting fibres arising from a hymedesmioid
basal layer of spongin fibre. Mineral skeleton exclusively plumose,
with only ascending fibres cored by plumose columns of entirely
smooth principal subtylostyles, with very few or no spicules coring
the transverse connecting fibres. Tracts of principal subtylostyles
protrude through ascending fibres, diverging towards the surface.
True echinating spicules absent but principal styles project from
fibres as echinating spicules and/or in spicate arrangement.
Microscleres include toxas and palmate isochelae (the latter absent
in the type species).
Description of type species
Ophlitaspongia papilla Bowerbank, 1866 (Figs 3H, 21).
Synonymy. Ophlitaspongia papilla Bowerbank, 1866: 14; ?
Clathria papilla; Schmidt, 1870: 77; Echinoclathria papilla;
Hanitsch, 1894a; Ophistospongia papilla; Gray, 1867a: 515.
Material examined. Holotype: BMNH 1910.1.1.395 Vazon Bay, Guernsey.
Description (partly from Howson & Chambers, 1999, and
re-examination of type material). Thinly encrusting, with firm
elastic texture, smooth and finely hispid surface with regularly
arranged oscules flush with surface, lacking subdermal drainage
canals. Ectosomal skeleton consists of sparse paratangential bundles of auxiliary sUbtylostyles usually at the ends of ascending
choanosomal tracts, and also scattered tangential to the surface
together with toxas. Choanosomal skeleton consists of parallel
columns of well developed spongin fibres arising from a
hymedesmioid basal fibre skeleton, with ascending fibres regularly
interconnected by transverse ones, forming a ladder-like isodictyal
reticulation. Ascending fibres cored by plumose tracts of choanosomal principal subtylostyles whereas transverse fibres are rarely
cored. True echinating megasc1eres absent. Choanosomal spicule
tracts protrude through the ectosome in sparse bundles, and in some
places they can be said to be 'echinating' whereas in others merely
'spicate' (i.e., protruding from fibres in plumose fashion). Mesohyl
is highly collagenous and contains scattered auxiliary subtylostyles
and toxas. Megascleres consist choanosomal principal subtylostyles, completely smooth, often curved, widest at the centre and
tapering towards both terminations, with a well developed subtylote
swelling and constricted 'neck' (64-143 X 5-13/-lm). Subectosomal
auxiliary subtylostyles short, thin, straight, entirely smooth, with
well developed subtylote basal swelling (71-167 X 2-3/-lm).
Microscleres consist of oxhorn to wing-shaped toxas in a single but
wide-ranging size class (64-127 X 2-4/-lm); chelae absent.
Remarks. The history of Ophlitaspongia is complex and
tortuous, based largely on misidentifications, misdiagnoses and
466
Porifera· Demospongiae • PoecUoscierida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
Fig. 21. Ophlitaspongia. A-F, O. papilla Bowerbank. A, choanosomal principal subtylostyles. B, subectosomal auxiliary subtylostyle (scale A-B,
50 f.lm). C, oxhom and wing-shaped toxas (scale 50 f.lm). D, section through peripheral skeleton (scale 200 f.lm). E, fibre characteristic (scale 100 f.lm).
F, skeletal reconstruction.
incorrect assumptions concerning type material. The genus was
erected by Bowerbank (1866) with O. papilla nominated as the
type species (with holotype BMNH 1910.1.1.395). Simpson
(1968) subsequently proposed that O. papilla was a synonym of
O. seriata (Grant, 1826c; with alleged holotype being BMNH
1847.9.7.14; but see below), which therefore became the senior
name for the type species, and which was also reportedly cytologically identical to Microciona atrasanguinea Bowerbank, 1862b
(the type species of Microciona Bowerbank, 1863; holotype
BMNH 1930.7.3.225). Thus, under this interpretation, adopted
by many contemporary authors (including Hooper, 1996a),
Microciona became the senior-most available name for a group of
largely encrusting taxa characterised in having smooth echinating megascleres and hymedesmioid or microcionid skeletal
architecture. However, the genus was recently resurrected by
Howson & Chambers (1999) without any full or appropriate discussion of the significance or implications of its important morphological characters within the Microcionidae, and consequently
a detailed resume of these justifications is provided here.
Howson & Chambers (1999) discovered that the concept of
"0. seriata" of authors was based on a false premise. They rediscovered Grant's original slide preparation of Spongia seriata
(UCLZ B73; 'Spongia seriata Gr "variety of S. papillaris ?"') which
they found was identical to Halichondria panicea Pallas (i.e.,
Grant's, 1826c diagnosis of S. seriata was incorrect). They negated
the long-held assumption that Johnson's (1842) material (BMNH
1847.9.7.14) was the holotype of S. seriata (e.g., Simpson, 1968;
see Hooper, 1996a: 62); and that Johnston (1842) had in his possession material of a new species (BMNH 1847.9.7.14), which
he misidentified as Grant's taxon. Johnson's (1842) material is
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
identical to Bowerbank's (1866) material of O. papilla (BMNH
1910.1.1.395), and therefore, O. papilla Bowerbank becomes the
next available species name for the concept of "0. seriata" sensu
Johnston and authors, and the type species of Ophlitaspongia.
Similarly, comparisons between the holotype of Microciona
atrasanguinea (BMNH 1930.7.3.225) and Ophlitaspongia papilla
show that Simpson (1968) was incorrect in merging the two taxa,
and in his conclusion that Ophlitaspongia was a synonym of
Microciona. The two species are not at all closely related in their
skeletal details, virtually having only their encrusting growth forms
in common. Not only was spicule morphology very incongruent,
but also skeletal structure, the number and distribution of spicule
categories present, and spicule sizes differed significantly between
the two species. This finding therefore raises questions concerning
the systematic value of Simpson's (1968) unique cytological data
used at the supraspecific level given its flawed taxonomic basis.
Differences between Ophlitaspongia and Microciona are clear
from their respective type material, and these descriptions (see
above) form the bases of the respective diagnoses. Ophlitaspongia
has a very prominent spongin skeleton that forms an isodictyal reticulation, ranging from a hymedesmioid basal fibre skeleton to near
the surface, whereas the mineral skeleton is exclusively plumose,
principal spicules coring only ascending fibres and no or only very
few spicules coring the transverse fibres; there are no true echinating
spicules (although principal subtylostyles protrude through fibres in
plumose arrangement); and megascleres are exclusively smooth subtylostyles. By comparison, Microciona has a plumose, ascending
(i.e., non-reticulate) spongin fibre skeleton with fibre nodes arising
from a hymedesmioid spongin base ('microcionid' architecture), and
adjacent fibre nodes do not form a reticulation (i.e., they are exclusively plumose). The spicule skeleton consists of choanosomal principal subtylostyles (larger, smooth or basally spined styles) forming
ascending plumose tracts usually perched on the ends of spongin
fibre nodes, well differentiated from smaller echinating (acantho-)
styles which are dispersed over the basal layer of spongin and
ascending fibre nodes, individually or in bundles. Both genera have
smooth wing-shape toxas, and smooth auxilliary subtylostyles
forming an extra-fibre and/or dermal skeleton.
At present Ophlitaspongia is restricted to two species in the
NE Atlantic (Howson & Chambers, 1999). Although other authors
have reported alleged populations of O. papilla (or O. seriata sensu
Johnson) from New Zealand (Bergquist et al., 1968, 1969, 1973)
and South Africa (Levi, 1963), it is highly unlikely these are conspecific with the NE Atlantic species given the reported differences between the highly disjunct populations. However, this
assumption is difficult to test given that no voucher material has
been located (NMNZ, AMS or MNHN). The NZ species was never
formally described, although Bergquist & Sinclair (1968) stated
that 'there is ... no doubt that this sponge is conspecific with
O. seriata Bowerbank from Britain'. However, from the brief
description provided by Hogg (1967) it appears that the NZ species
is not related to O. papilla, but closer to Microciona aceratoobtusa
(i.e., having smaller smooth echinating spicules clearly differentiated from the larger principal spicules in fibres; the mineral skeleton is plumose as is the fibre skeleton, with plumose bulbous fibre
nodes but no reticulations between fibres). It is clear that Hogg
(1967) did not re-examine any type material, and this New Zealand
population is more appropriately referred to Microciona. Levi's
(1963) material of '0. seriata' from South Africa probably also
represents a separate species of Microciona, with differentiated
coring and echinating subtylostyles (albiet both smooth), although
467
the skeleton reportedly consists of a reticulate network of horny
fibres (reminiscent of Ophlitaspongia s.s.). Levi states that the
South African and North Atlantic populations are 'in all points
identical', but this has yet to be corroborated through re-examination
of relevant type material (although it is highly probable that Levi's
voucher material does not exist).
Many other records of Ophlitaspongia species in the literature
can also be referred to Echinoclathria. A comparison between the
emended definition of Echinoclathria (Hooper, 1996a, differing from
previous concepts ofthe genus; e.g., Hallmann, 1911, 1912), Clathria
and Microciona (as revised by Hooper, 1996a), and Ophlitaspongia
(as revised by Howson & Chambers, 1999, and summarised here)
shows each to have substantially different fibre structure, skeletal
structure and distribution of spicule types within fibres. There is
no doubt that each serves its purpose to group like-taxa, but it is
still equivocal at what level they diverge (genus or subgenus).
Echinoclathria has two distinct skeletal components: (1) an evenly
renieroid reticulate skeleton, including a slightly compressed axis,
with all axial fibres cored by smaller principal choanosomal styles
and echinated by the same principal choanosomal styles; (2) the
extra-axial or peripheral skeleton is radial, vestigial, with the largest
principal spicules perched on the outer radial fibres and projecting
through the surface individually or in bundles; in addition to this there
are also auxiliary styles or subtylostyles tangential or erect on the surface. By comparison, Ophlitaspongia has a homogeneous isodictyal
reticulate fibre skeleton in both the basal and peripheral regions, with
a compressed layer of spongin fibres lying on the substrate and regularly reticulate spongin fibres arising from this base, producing a
regular isodictyal fibre network divided into ascending primary and
secondary transverse elements. Mostly only the primary ascending
fibres are cored by principal choanosomal spicules producing a
strictly plumose mineral skeleton; there is no differentiated radial
skeletal component in the periphery (as in Echinoclathria); there are
no true echinating spicules (as in Echinoclathria); and whereas the
fibre skeleton is reticulate the mineral skeleton is plumose.
In resurrecting Ophlitaspongia, and recognising these differences between it and Echinoclathria, it could be argued that some
of the species described by Hooper (1996a) may be conceivably
included in it. However, these arguments are rejected as follows.
(1) Echinoclathria egena Wiedenmayer, 1989 lacks true echinating
spicules, and its skeletal strucutre is dendro-reticulate. However,
although spicules coring the transverse connecting fibres are
reduced, as compared to those in ascending fibres at least, many
reticulate tracts are definitely present such that overall mineral
skeletal structure remains reneiroid reticulate (certainly not
plumose as in Ophlitaspongia). Moreover, ascending tracts
of spicules are confined entirely to within the axes of fibres, not
diverging, protruding through fibres or as plumose columns as
in Ophlitaspongia. This species should, therefore, be left
in Echinoclathria and the alleged similarities between it and NE
Atlantic Ophlitaspongia species should be attributed to (i.e.,
hypothesised as) a secondary loss of connecting transverse spicule
tracts, with the consequent reduction in renieroid structure, and
secondary loss of echinating spicules. (2) Echinoclathria subhispida Carter, 1885d also has few transverse connecting spicule tracts,
producing a nearly radial mineral skeleton. But true echinating
spicules are present; spongin fibres are well compressed in the
axial skeleton and clearly diverging in the peripheral region (not
homogeneously isodictyal renieroid as in Ophlitaspongia);
spicules are confined to straight tracts in the axes of fibres and not
diverging-plumose as in Ophlitaspongia. This species should also
468
Porifera· Demospongiae • Poecilosclerida • Microcionina • Microcionidae
be retained in Echinoclathria, with the assumption that transverse
spicule tracts have again been secondarily lost. (3) Some of the
N Atlantic and Mediterranean species included in Echinoclathria
by Hooper (1996a: 480) are speculative, such as E. beringensis
(Hentschel, 1929), E. hjorti Arnesen, 1920, E. translata (PulitzerFinali, 1977), but these do not clearly fit into the revised concept of
Ophlitaspongia either (Howson & Chambers, 1999), and their precise assignment requires re-eva1uation. Earlier interpretations of
Echinoclathria, conceived (and grossly misinterpreted) mainly by
Hallmann (1912) are invalid, as unfortunately was Wiedenmayer's
(1989) assessment of the genus. Echinoclathria as redefined by
Hooper (1996a) includes only those species agreeing with the type
species, E. leporina, with most others redistributed to Holopsamma,
Echinochalina or Clathria (Wilsonella). In my opinion none of the
Echinoclathria described by Hooper (1996a) should be transferred
or returned to Ophlitaspongia (with the possible exception of these
three N Atlantic and Mediterranean species).
Wiedenmayer (1989: 59) provided a succinct discussion
of Ophlitaspongia (sensu stricto), Ophlitaspongia (of authors)
and Echinoclathria. He noted that Simpson (1968) merged
Ophlitaspongia in Microciona based on re-examination of 'topotypes' of the type species O. papilla. Wiedenmayer (1989) upheld
Simpson's decision (for no apparent reason, apart from the fact
that Simpson had apparently already done the ground-work of
re-examining specimens collected from the vicinity of the type
locality, and therefore there was no further reason to question his
conclusions). Wiedenmayer was followed by several other authors,
including Hooper (1996a), correctly noting that most species
of Ophlitaspongia were more closely related to species of
Echinoclathria or Echinochalina (i.e., renieroid reticulation, echinating spicules, etc., as defined above), whereas the type species
O. papilla was clearly different. Of contemporary authors Levi
(1960b) and Van Soest (1984b) provided virtually monospecific
definitions for Ophlitaspongia, which in retrospect they were correct and it is this concept which is maintained here (i.e., isodictyal
reticulate fibre skeleton, plumose mineral skeleton, homogeneous
coring spicules, no echinating spicules) and not one which includes
Microciona or Echinoclathria as potential synonyms.
Distribution
Restricted to the NE Atlantic.
SIGMEURYPON TOPSENT, 1928 (INCERTAE SEDIS)
Synonymy
Sigmeurypon Topsent, 1928c: 59.
Type species
Microciona jascispiculiferum Carter, 1880b (by original
designation).
Definition
? Microcionidae with hymedesmioid spongin fibres cored by
erect long styles and acanthostyles, with a tangential ectosomal
skeleton composed of oxeas (? anisoxeas) and scattered raphides (?
raphidiform toxas) and sigmas (? chelae).
Diagnosis
Thinly encrusting growth form. Surface even and hispid.
Choanosomal skeleton basally compressed uncored spongin fibres
lying on the substrate and a thin mesohyl containing raphides and
sigmas. Subectosomal skeleton with long smooth styles embedded
in basal spongin, standing perpendicular to substrate and protruding through ectosome. Echinating acanthostyles present and erect
on substrate, interspersed with choanosomal megascleres.
Ectosomal skeleton with protruding styles from choanosome and
bundles of raphides lying tangential to surface. Structural megascleres styles and acanthostyles. Microscleres raphides occurring
singly or in bundles (trichodragmata).
Description of type species
Sigmeuryponjascispiculiferum (Carter, 1880b) (not illustrated)
Synonymy. Microcionajascispiculiferum Carter, 1880b: 44.
Sigmeuryponjascispiculiferum; Hooper, 1991: 1394.
Material examined. None. Holotype: LFM (destroyed).
Description (from Carter, 1880b). Thinly encrusting platelike growth form. Surface even and hispid. Ectosomal skeleton
with bundles of raphides (trichodragmata) (280/Lm long) lying
tangential to the substrate and also forming erect brushes.
Choanosomal skeleton basally compressed hymedesmioid fibres
with rhabdose bases of long styles (980 X 25 /Lm) and echinating
acanthostyles (70/Lm long) erect on the substrate, with the former
projecting a long way through the surface; microscleres raphides
and (?) sigmas (8/Lm chord length) dispersed throughout mesohyl.
Structural megascleres subectosomal styles, ectosomal oxeas and
acanthostyles. Microscleres ? sigmas and raphides occurring singly
or in bundles (trichodragmata).
Remarks. There is no surviving material of M. jascispiculiferum. The holotype was destroyed in the LFM during World
War II (Ms Shirley Stone, pers. comm.), and no spicule preparations were discovered in the BMNH. Therefore, the type species of
Sigmeurypon is only known from Carter's (1880b) brief original
description. It is possible that raphides recorded by him are raphidiform toxas, which are known to occur in several microcionids
(e.g., Hooper et al., 2000). Furthermore, it is also possible that
'sigmas' recorded by Carter (1880b) in this species are actually
examples of sigmoid isochelae. These possibilities prompted
de Laubenfels (1936a: 110) to refer this species to his genus
Damoseni in the family Microcionidae, but it is not possible to confirm or refute those ideas without checking type material. If these
assumptions are correct then it is probable that it is no more than
a thinly encrusting Clathria (Microciona). However, the species
and genus are incertae sedis with no resolution possible without
new material.
Distribution
Monotypic, from Sri Lanka.