Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
Purification, characterization and sequence analysis of a laccase
from the ascomycete Mauginiella sp.
Hetti Palonen, Markku Saloheimo, Liisa Viikari, Kristiina Kruus∗
VTT Biotechnology, P.O. Box 1500, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
Received 8 January 2003; accepted 9 July 2003
Abstract
A laccase from the ascomycete Mauginiella sp. was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity and biochemically characterized. The
molecular mass of the laccase was 63 kDa as determined by mass spectrometry and it existed as six isoforms with isoelectric points
in the range of 4.8–6.4. The laccase showed activity towards the typical substrates: 2,2′ -azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulphonate
(ABTS), guaiacol, dimethoxyphenol (2,6-DMP), and syringaldazine. The pH optima on guaiacol, 2,6-DMP and ABTS were 4, 3.5 and
2.4, respectively. The enzyme was strongly, 98%, inhibited by 1 mM NaN3 and 88% by 1 mM KCN. The laccase was stable at neutral
pH, retaining 80% activity after 24 h at pH 6–8. The enzyme was sensitive to high temperatures: the half-life at 70 ◦ C was only 3 min.
A fragment of the laccase gene was isolated and its nucleotide sequence was determined. The laccase gene showed high identity to the
laccase genes lcc1 and lcc2 of the basidiomycetes Trametes versicolor and Trametes villosa, respectively.
© 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Laccase; Mauginiella sp.; Purification; Characterization; Amino acid sequence; Gene sequence
1. Introduction
Laccases (p-diphenol: dioxygen oxidoreductase, EC
1.10.3.2) are multi-copper enzymes, which catalyze the oxidation of a variety of organic and inorganic substrates coupled to the reduction of molecular oxygen to water with the
one-electron oxidation mechanism. Laccases catalyze the
oxidation of a broad range of substrates e.g. polyphenols,
substituted phenols, diamines, but also some inorganic compounds [1]. These enzymes are widely distributed enzymes
in nature. Laccase or laccase-like activity has been demonstrated in higher plants, in some insects and in a few bacteria
[2]. However, the best-known laccases are of fungal origin,
especially those belonging to the class of white-rot fungi.
Laccases of plant origin are reported to play an important, role in wound response and lignin synthesis [3],
whereas in fungi they are involved in lignin degradation
[4,5], as well as in several other functions, including pigmentation, fruiting body formation, sporulation, and pathogenesis [1]. Due to their interesting catalytic properties
laccases have gained considerable interest in various industrial areas. The most intensively studied applications have
included pulp delignification, textile dye bleaching, effluent
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +358-9-456-5143; fax: +358-9-456-2103.
E-mail address: Kristiina.Kruus@vtt.fi (K. Kruus).
0141-0229/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00247-3
detoxification, detergent components, as well as biopolymer modification [2]. In order to further develop enzymatic
oxidation technologies for industrial purposes, we screened
for novel fungal laccases in the VTT culture collection.
The strain VTT D-84228, deposited apparently incorrectly
as Geotrichum candidum, L-3 [6], was found to be an efficient laccase producer. The strain was originally isolated
from a North-American soil sample and was reported to
produce an aniline oxidase, a peroxidase [7] and a laccase
[8]. The culture filtrate of this microbe has been used for
the detoxification of contaminated soil [8]. In addition, the
strain has shown an ability to decolorize melanin produced
by blue-stain fungi [9]. During the course of this work the
fungal strain was re-identified as belonging to the genus
Mauginiella, whose species has not yet been re-identified.
Mauginiella, not a well-known fungus, has cell wall
and hyphal septa characteristic of anamorphic ascomycete
and may be related to Monilia [10]. Cavara [11] first described the fungus from Libya. The species was rediscovered in Morocco and renamed as Geotrichum scattae by
Maire and Werner [12]. The Mauginiella strain used in this
work was originally attributed apparently incorrectly as
Geotrichum candidum, L-3 (ATCC 26195). The taxonomy
of Geotrichum is complicated, since several species demonstrating considerably variation have been described in this
genus [13]. Many Mauginiella sp. have been incorrectly
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
described as Geotrichum sp. For example, in Microfungus
Collection & Herbarium, University of Alberta (UAMH), a
number of strains, originally filed as Geotrichum sp. were
later assigned to Mauginiella [13].
We report here the purification, characterization and
sequence analysis of the major laccase isoform from Mauginiella sp.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Fungal strain
Mauginiella sp. (VTT D-84228), originally isolated from
sand loam (USA), was maintained on potato dextrose agar
plates at 4 ◦ C. The strain was originally identified as Galactomyces geotrichum (ATCC 26195; anamorph Geotrichum
candidum). However during this study it was re-identified
as Mauginiella sp. (Dr. D.W. Minter, CABI Bioscience
Identification Service, UK). Members of this genus produce
conidia in branched chains by fragmentation of pre-existing
hyphae.
2.2. Media and culture conditions
The fungus was cultivated in liquid media (YM Broth,
Difco Laboratories, USA) containing (per litre) 3.0 g yeast
extract, 3.0 g malt extract, 5.0 g peptone, 10.0 g dextrose
and 0.04 l mineral stock solution containing (per litre)
1.0 g CaCl2 ·2H2 O (Merck, Germany), 1.0 g FeSO4 ·7H2 O
(Merck, Germany), 0.1 g ZnSO4 ·7H2 O (Merck, Germany),
0.16 g CuSO4 ·5H2 O (Merck, Germany), 1.0 g Na2 EDTA
(Merck, Germany). First, 100 ml of medium was inoculated
with agar pieces, cut from well-grown mycelium on potato
dextrose agar. After two days cultivation at 30 ◦ C under agitation (120 rpm), 50 ml of the culture was used to inoculate
500-ml culture medium and the fungus was further grown at
30 ◦ C under agitation (120 rpm). After 8 days the cells were
removed by filtration trough filter paper (Whatman no. 1).
The clear supernatant was frozen and used for purification.
2.3. Protein and enzyme activity determinations
Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad
DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, USA) with bovine serum
albumin as a standard. Laccase activity was determined according to Niku-Paavola et al. [14] using 2 mM ABTS, [2,
2′ -azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulphonate], (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) as a substrate. The oxidation of dimethoxyphenol (2,6-DMP) was performed by the
method reported by Heinzkill et al. [15], oxidation of guaiacol was measured according to Paszczynski et al. [16], and
oxidation of syringaldazine according to Leonowicz and
Grywnowicz [17]. The activity towards tyrosine was measured according to Lerch and Ettlinger [18]. All the activity
measurements were performed in 25 mM succinate buffer
855
(pH 4.5) at 25 ◦ C using a two-beam spectrophotometer
(Lambda 20, Perkin-Elmer, Germany). The activities were
expressed as katals (mol/s).
2.4. Purification of the laccase
The proteins were precipitated from the cell-free fermentation broth with ammonium sulphate (80% saturation). The precipitate was dissolved in 20 mM Tris-buffer
(pH 7.7) and the extra salt was removed by gel filtration
(65 ml; Bio-Gel P-6DG Desalting Gel; Bio-Rad, USA).
The sample in 20 mM Tris-buffer pH 7.7 was applied to a
Q-Sepharose anion exchange column (106 ml; Pharmacia,
Sweden), that was equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-buffer, pH
7.7. Proteins were eluted with a linear gradient (400 ml) of
Na2 SO4 (0–300 mM) in Tris-buffer. The eluate was monitored for absorbance at 280 nm, conductivity and laccase
activity. Laccase-positive fractions of the major peak were
pooled and Na2 SO4 was added to the final concentration
of 500 mM. The sample was applied to Phenyl Sepharose
Fast Flow hydrophobic interaction chromatography column (33 ml, Pharmacia) equilibrated with 500 mM Na2 SO4
in 20 mM Tris-buffer (pH 7.7). Proteins were eluted with
a decreasing (500–0 mM) Na2 SO4 gradient (120 ml) in
Tris-buffer pH 7.7. Laccase-positive fractions were pooled
and excessive salt was removed by ultrafiltration (Amicon
8010 ultrafiltration unit; PM10 membrane, Millipore, USA).
Finally the enzyme was concentrated with ultrafiltration, as
described above.
The purified laccase preparation was further analyzed
by anion exchange chromatography in a Mono-Q column
(1 ml; Pharmacia, Sweden) using ÄKTA explorer (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) in order to separate the isoforms. The
purified laccase sample was applied to the column, which
was equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-buffer, pH 7.7. Proteins
were eluted with a shallow, linear gradient of Na2 SO4
(0–135 mM; 20 ml).
Purification was followed by SDS–PAGE and isoelectric focusing (IEF) analysis. All purification steps were
performed at room temperature.
2.5. Determination of molecular mass by mass
spectrometry
The molecular mass was determined by MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry on a BiflexTM time-of-flight instrument
(Bruker–Daltonics, Germany) equipped with a nitrogen
laser operating at 337 nm. The protein sample was desalted
using Millipore C4 ZipTipTM (USA) and eluted with 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid in 60% acetonitrile. The eluate was
analyzed in the linear positive ion mode employed with
delayed extraction using saturated sinapic acid in a mixture
of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and 50% acetonitrile (1:2) as a
matrix. Samples were prepared by mixing 1 l of protein
with 1 l of sinapic acid matrix on the target plate and
dried under a gentle stream of warm air. The mass spectra
856
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
were calibrated externally with bovine serum albumin as
a standard.
2.10. Deglycosylation
The optical absorption spectrum of the purified Mauginiella laccase was measured at 250–750 nm with a Varian
Cary100 spectrophotometer (Varian Inc., Australia).
The effect of deglycosylation on the isoelectric point
and molecular mass of the laccase was analyzed. Deglycosylation was carried out using endo-H endoglycosidase
(Glyko, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Native isoelectric focusing and SDS–PAGE analysis were
performed from the deglycosylated samples.
2.7. Inhibition of laccase activity
2.11. Sequence analysis
The effect of potential inhibitors (EDTA, H2 O2 , KCN,
l-cysteine, NaN3 ) on laccase activity was tested by oxygen consumption method using oxygen electrode (Orion Research 081010) at room temperature under atmospheric air
saturation in sealed and fully filled 30-ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
Oxygen consumption rates were measured from solutions
containing 2 mM ABTS, 20 g laccase and 1 mM of various
inhibitors in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 5).
The N-terminal amino acid sequence and two internal
sequences of the tryptic digests of purified laccase were
carried out by the Edman degradation method using a PE
Biosystems Procise Sequencer (PE Biosystems, USA).
The primer sequences for the PCR approach were based
on the N-terminus and an internal amino acid sequence.
Genomic DNA was isolated from 5-day-old mycelium. The
mycelium were washed and lyophilized before DNA isolation by Easy DNA kit (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturers instructions. A fragment of the laccase gene was
amplified by PCR. The PCR-primers were constructed using
the published DNA sequence of T. villosa LCC2 [20]. The
forward primer was 5′ -GCC ATC GGG CCG GTC GCC
AGC CTC GT-3′ and the reverse primer 5′ -CCC GGC GAA
CCC AAC CGT TCC GAA-3′ . PCR program had an initial
denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of
94 ◦ C for 0.75 min, 55 ◦ C for 0.5 min and 72 ◦ C for 1.5 min.
A 1200 bp fragment was obtained from the PCR. It was
purified from agarose gel (QIAquick PCR purification kit;
Qiagen, USA) and cloned in to TOPO TA-cloning vector
(Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The plasmid was isolated using QIAprep Spin
Miniprep-kit (Qiagen, USA). DNA sequencing of the plasmid was carried out in both directions with appropriate
primers. The sequencing reactions were performed using
the ABI PRISM dRhodamin Terminator Cycle Sequencing
Kit (Perkin Elmer, Germany).
2.6. Spectrum
2.8. Thermal stability and pH dependency
The pH optima of laccase on ABTS, 2,6-dimetoxyphenol
(2,6-DMP) and guaiacol as substrates were determined
within a pH range of 2.3–7.0 using McIlvaine universal
buffer, diluted 1:4 with water. The stability of the enzyme at
different pH values was determined by incubating a laccase
solution (50 nkat/ml) in McIlvaine buffer at a pH range from
2.3 to 8.0, and in Tris-buffer at a pH range from 8.0 to 9.8.
The residual activity was measured at pH 4.5 using ABTS
as substrate. The temperature stability of the laccase was
determined at 50, 60, and 70 ◦ C for various time periods.
The enzyme solution (50 nkat/ml) was incubated in 60 mM
citrate buffer (pH 6) and the residual enzyme activity was
measured at pH 4.5 and temperature of 25 ◦ C using ABTS
as substrate.
2.9. Electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing
SDS–PAGE was performed using homogenous (12.5%)
polyacrylamide slab gels on PhastSystem (Pharmacia,
Sweden) and following the manufacture’s instruction. Alternatively, homogenous (12.0%) Tris–HCl Ready Gels
(Bio-Rad, USA) were used according to Laemmli [19]. The
low molecular weight calibration mixture (Pharmacia, Sweden) was used as a standard. Protein bands were visualized
by staining with Silver stain (Bio-Rad, USA).
The isoelectric point of the laccase was determined by
IEF within a pH range of 3.5–9.5 (Ampholine PAGplates;
Pharmacia, Sweden) on a LKB 2117 Multiphor II Electrophoresis System (LKB Pharmacia, Sweden) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. The pH gradient was
measured with a surface electrode from the gel. Laccase
activity was visualized by staining with 0.1% ABTS in
25 mM succinate buffer (pH 4.5).
3. Results
3.1. Enzyme production and purification
The fungus Mauginiella produced substantially high
amount of laccase in liquid culture. The organism was cultivated on a rich medium without any known inducers for
laccase. The fungus grew well and the production of laccase
started after four to five day’s cultivation. Within 8 days, a
laccase activity of 27 nkat/ml was reached.
A three-step purification procedure was developed for this
enzyme (Table 1). Ammonium sulfate precipitation followed
by anion exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography enriched the laccase by 82-fold. In anion exchange
chromatography (Q-Sepharose), laccase activity was eluted
at 30–150 mM Na2 SO4 concentration as two peaks. The
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
857
Table 1
Purification of laccase from Mauginiella sp.
Purification step
Volume
(ml)
Activity
(nkat/ml)
Protein
(mg/ml)
Specific activity
(nkat/mg)
Activity
yield (%)
Purification
factor
Culture filtrate
(NH4 )2 SO4 precipitation
Anion exchange
HIC
Concentrate
1300
65
57
42
9
26
419
286
310
1507
1.8
2.4
0.8
0.3
1.0
14
177
381
1192
1449
100
81
48
39
40
1
12
26
82
100
The specific activities were determined at pH 4.5.
major laccase-containing fraction, eluted at 30–50 mM salt
concentration, was further purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. The overall laccase activity yield was
40% (Table 1). The purified laccase showed intense blue
color, typical for laccases. The other laccase-containing
fraction from the anion exchange column eluted at
80–150 mM salt concentration, comprising about 5% of the
total laccase activity, was not purified and characterized in
this work.
3.2. Characterization of the purified laccase
Purification of the laccase from Mauginiella resulted in a
single protein band on SDS–PAGE with a molecular mass of
67 kDa as visualized by silver staining (shown in Fig. 1A).
According to the mass spectrometry analysis the molecular
mass of the laccase was 63.3 kDa.
The crude enzyme showed at least eight active isoforms
in the IEF (Fig. 2). The minor laccase-active fraction in
the anion exchange chromatography contained the isoforms
with pI at 2.9–3.5. The purified preparation showed six
laccase-active bands in IEF with estimated pIs of 4.8, 5.0,
5.2, 5.6, 6.0 and 6.4 (Fig. 2). The laccase active band at
pI 6.4 had the faintest color intensity, and the most intense
bands were detected at a pI range 5.0–5.6. Silver staining
showed also six bands (result not shown).
Deglycosylation of laccase by Endo H resulted in
about 5–7% decrease of molecular mass as determined
on SDS–PAGE (Fig. 1A). Deglycosylation modified only
slightly the isoelectric pattern. The number of the protein
bands remained the same (Fig. 1B). Thus, the modifications
of the N-glycan structures were obviously not the reason
for the multiple isoforms shown on IEF. In order to further
separate the isoforms, the purified laccase was loaded on
Mono-Q column and the proteins were eluted with a very
shallow salt gradient. The laccase active fractions eluted
at 10–50 mM sodium sulfate concentration as six partially
overlapping peaks. The isoelectric focusing revealed that
the different isoforms were not completely separated (data
not shown).
3.3. Spectrum
The purified laccase had an intense blue color characteristic for blue-copper proteins. The ultraviolet-visible
adsorption spectrum showed two peaks at 279 and 610 nm
and a shoulder at 330 nm. The peak at 610 nm is typical for
the type I copper and the shoulder at 330 nm indicates the
presence of the type III binuclear copper pair.
3.4. Inhibition and substrate specificity pattern
The Mauginiella laccase showed activity towards the
typical substrates of laccases. Table 2 presents the specific
Fig. 1. The effect of deglycosylation on the molecular mass of purified
Mauginiella laccase as analyzed by SDS–PAGE and silver staining (A)
and isoelectric points as analyzed by IEF and subsequent active staining
(B). Lanes: 1. Molecular weight marker (6.5, 16.5, 25, 32.5, 47.5, 62, 83,
175 kDa); 2 and 4; purified laccase and 3 and 5; deglycosylated laccase.
Fig. 2. Isoelectric focusing and subsequent active staining with ABTS.
Lane 1: culture filtrate of Mauginiella sp. (0.38 nkat), Lane 2: laccase
after anion exchange (0.29 nkat).
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
Table 2
Specific activities of Mauginiella laccase towards different substrates:
ABTS, guaiacol and 2,6-DMP at the optimum pH, pH 2.4, 4.0 and 3.5,
respectively and syringaldazine, DOPA and tyrosine at pH 4.5
Substrate
Specific activity
(nkat/mg)
Relative specific
activity (%)
ABTS
Guaiacol
2,6-DMP
Syringaldazine
DOPA
Tyrosine
2870
440
360
283
2.5
0
100
15.3
12.5
9.9
0.1
0
100
Residual activity (%)
858
80
60
40
20
0
0
30
60
90
1 20
Time (min)
Table 3
Inhibition of Mauginiella laccase by some selected inhibitors at 1 mM
concentration
Inhibitor
Inhibition (%)
EDTA
H2 O2
KCN
l-Cysteine
NaN3
48
54
88
0
98
activities of the purified laccase on various substrates. The
specific activity was highest with ABTS, 2870 nkat/mg.
Also guaiacol, 2,6-DMP, syringaldazine and DOPA were
oxidized, although the specific activity with DOPA was
very low. The Mauginiella laccase did not oxidize tyrosine.
The Mauginiella laccase was strongly inhibited (98–88%)
by 1 mM sodium azide and KCN (Table 3). It was also sensitive to H2 O2 and EDTA. l-Cysteine was not an inhibitor,
actually it increased the oxygen consumption rate in the reaction mixture with laccase and ABTS as substrate.
3.5. Thermal stability and pH dependency
Relative activity (%)
The pH optima for the purified laccase were determined
with ABTS, guaiacol and 2,6-DMP as substrates (Fig. 3).
The laccase had optimal activity at the lowest limit of the
pH range, pH 2.4, when ABTS was used as a substrate.
100
80
60
40
20
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
pH
Fig. 3. The pH optima of Mauginiella laccase with ABTS (䉱), 2,6-DMP
(䊊) and guaiacol (䊏). The value is the average of three independent
experiments.
Fig. 4. Thermal stability of Mauginiella laccase at 40 ◦ C (䉫), 50 ◦ C (䊊),
60 ◦ C (䊐) and 70 ◦ C (䉱). The pH was 6. The value is the average of
three independent experiments.
Oxidation of 2,6-DMP showed pH optimum around pH 3.5.
The pH optimum for guaiacol was also in the acidic pH
range, at pH 4.0. The laccase showed practically no activity
at pH values higher than six with any of the tested substrates.
However, the purified laccase remained stable within the
pH range of 4.0–8.0 after 24-h incubation. At lower pH
values the enzyme retained lower activity, e.g. at pH 2.4
approximately 40% residual activity was observed after a
24-h incubation (data not shown).
The laccase was not stable at higher temperatures during
prolonged incubation. Although the enzyme retained almost
full activity at 40 ◦ C after 2-h incubation, it showed half-lives
of about 40 min and 3 min at 60 and 70 ◦ C, respectively
(Fig. 4).
3.6. Sequence analysis of the laccase protein and gene
The N-terminal as well as the two internal amino acid
sequences of the purified Mauginiella laccase were determined, altogether 52 amino acid residues (Fig. 5). When
compared to the amino acid sequences of known laccases,
100% identity was found with two Trametes laccase sequences, namely T. villosa lcc2 gene (GenBank accession
number L49377) coding a laccase form 3 [20] and T. versicolor laccase I (lccI cDNA, GenBank accession number
U44430) [21]. In order to compare longer sequences of these
laccases, a gene fragment encoding the Mauginiella-laccase
(1200 bases), corresponding to about 52% of the laccase gene of T. versicolor laccase I, was cloned and sequenced (Fig. 5). This fragment covered the gene from the
N-terminus to the site encoding the more distal of the two
peptide sequences obtained from internal peptides.
The cloned fragment of the laccase gene of Mauginiella
showed the highest identity, 97% at the nucleotide level, to
T. versicolor lcc1 gene. In addition, the fragment displayed
94% identity with the T. villosa lcc2 gene at the nucleotide
level. The predicted protein coded by Mauginiella laccase
gene was different from the T. versicolor laccase I only in one
amino acid: an asparagine (N) residue near the N-terminus
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
859
Fig. 5. Nucleotide sequence of Mauginiella laccase (M-lac) aligned with the sequence of laccase I from T. versicolor (T-lac; GenBank accession number
U44430). Vertical lines show the conserved base pairs. The peptide sequences obtained from the isolated Mauginiella laccase are underlined. The
difference to T-lac in the predicted amino acid sequence is marked with a rectangle.
860
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
was replaced by an aspartic acid (D). The asparagine residue
is a potential N-glycosylation site in the Trametes laccase
sequence [21]. The laccase coded by the Mauginiella laccase gene differed from the laccase coded by T. villosa lcc2
gene (L49377) by three amino acid residues. The Mauginiella laccase gene appeared to contain seven introns in the
sequenced region at positions conserved with the Trametes
genes.
4. Discussion
The results reported here show that Mauginiella produces
multiple extracellular laccase isoforms that can be separated
by anion exchange chromatography into two fractions. The
main activity with pI values ranging from 4.8 to 6.4 was
purified and characterized in this work.
The purified Mauginiella laccase had characteristics
typical of fungal laccases. It was able to oxidize typical
substrates for laccases: various phenolic compounds and
ABTS. The highest activity was observed on ABTS, as reported for many other laccases like those from Pycnoporus
cinnabarinus and Coriolus hirsutus [22] and for Trichophyton rubrum laccase [23]. The second highest activity was
observed with guaiacol. For example, Melanocarpus albomyces laccase showed highest activity towards ABTS,
followed by syringaldazine, 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, and guaiacol [24]. Mauginiella laccase was inhibited by typical
inhibitors of laccase, however, l-cysteine did not inhibit
enzyme activity. Inhibition of laccase activity was tested by
monitoring the oxygen consumption in the reaction because
it has been shown [25] that the observed inhibition effect
of many sulfhydryl-containing compounds (e.g. l-cysteine)
were actually caused by the reduction of the oxidized substrate and not by true inhibition of the enzyme.
The pH optima of Mauginiella laccase were similar to
those of other fungal laccases, which typically preferred
an acidic environment [26]. Besides Mauginiella laccase,
also laccases from Polyporus pinsitus, Rhizonia solani and
Myceliophthora thermophila showed highest activity on
ABTS at the lower limit of the pH range tested (pH 2.7)
[27]. The enzyme was not stable at temperatures higher
than 50 ◦ C during prolonged incubation. As a comparison,
the laccase from Melanocarpus albomyces was reported to
have a half-life of 5 h at 60 ◦ C [24], whereas the half-life
of the Mauginiella laccase was only 40 min.
Ligninolytic fungi often express either constitutively or
under inductive conditions multiple laccase isoforms [26].
Separate genes encode the true isoforms and the genes can
be divided into different gene families [28]. For example,
Coprinus cinereus laccase has two isoforms [29], Pleurotus ostreatus at least four isoforms [30] and Cerrena maxima have three isoforms [31]. Trametes versicolor secreted
several isoforms of laccases and the genes and/or cDNAs
encoding six isoforms have been isolated [32]. The purified laccase from Trametes trogii had two isoforms with
a similar molecular mass and identical N-terminal amino
acid sequence [33]. Two laccase genes were cloned from P.
cinnabarinus and two isoforms with pIs of 5.4 and 3.7 could
be detected in culture filtrates of this fungus grown on cellulose [34,35]. Also heterogeneity in glycosylation has been
suggested to produce multiple isoforms of laccases. For example, two minor active isoforms (pIs 2.85 and 2.65) were
detected by isoelectric focusing of the homogenous, purified
Pycnoporus cinnabarinus laccase and may have represented
glycosylated isoforms of the enzyme. The predominant isoform had a pI of 3.0 [36].
SDS-electrophoresis of the Mauginiella laccase showed a
single protein of 67 kDa. The purified laccase showed repeatedly six bands in the isoelectric focusing between pIs 4.8 and
6.4, indicating the presence of multiple isoforms. The most
intense bands appeared at pI range from 5 to 5.6. Sequencing
of the protein, however, resulted in one N-terminal sequence
and homogeneous inner sequences thus implicating the existence of a single homogeneous polypeptide in the sample.
The different isoforms of Mauginiella laccase were partially separated by anion exchange chromatography on
Q-Sepharose and Mono-Q columns. Modification, or different amounts of N-glycans were obviously not the reason for
several isoforms detected in the IEF, since deglycosylation
of the laccase did not change the pI pattern. In conclusion,
it was likely that the different pI forms of Mauginiella laccase were caused by post-translational modifications of a
single polypeptide chain, and not by the heterogeneity of
the N-glycans.
The N-terminal and the internal amino acid sequences
from Mauginiella laccase, altogether 52 amino acid residues,
displayed 100% identity to the peptides corresponding to
Trametes versicolor lcc1 and Trametes villosa lcc2 genes.
Also the genomic laccase gene fragment, representing about
52% from the total Mauginiella laccase gene, was nearly
identical to the corresponding regions of the Trametes genes
(Fig. 5). This was unexpected, since the laccase sequences
of Ascomycetes usually have identities of 20–30% compared
to basidiomycete laccases. One possible explanation for
our findings could be that Mauginiella could have obtained
the laccase gene from a basidiomycete strain by horizontal
gene transfer at a much later time than that of the separation
between Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. Horizontal gene
transfer is widely accepted with prokaryotes [37]. It has
been recently shown to play a role in the evolution of fungi
as well [38,39].
The Mauginiella laccase showed the highest level of
identity to T. versicolor laccase I (U44430) [21]. T. versicolor laccases can be divided into two different groups
(laccases A and B) based upon their pI values, and have
been extensively characterized in terms of their spectroscopic properties: Laccase A contains isoelectric forms
with low pI (3.07–3.27; two forms) and laccase B with high
pI (4.64–6.76; 10 forms) [40,41]. The laccase I (U44430)
is obviously a laccase B isoform [42]. Bourbonnais et al.
[43] have purified and partially characterized two laccase
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
isoforms, namely laccase 1 and laccase 2, from 2.5-xylidine
induced T. versicolor culture supernatant. Mauginiella laccase resembled the laccase 1 in terms of molecular weight
and specific activity determined on ABTS.
The Mauginiella laccase gene also showed high similarity to the lcc2 gene encoding for the laccase form 3 of T.
villosa. T. villosa secretes at least three laccase forms and
five laccase genes have been cloned [20,28]. The laccase
form 3 coded by lcc2 has been reported to have pI values
of 6.2, 6.5, and 6.8 and a pH optimum at pH 6 on ABTS
[20], which differed considerably from the pH optimum of
Mauginiella laccase (at pH 2.4). The T. villosa laccase form
3 has not been properly characterized, thus we are not able
to conclude whether the Mauginiella laccase is similar in
terms of other biochemical properties.
Bordeleau and Bartha [6,7] have reported that Geotrichum
candidum (ATCC 26195) produced heat sensitive aniline
oxidase and peroxidase in liquid culture. Although aniline
oxidase activity is not mentioned in the Enzyme Nomenclature, some laccases have been reported to oxidize substituted
anilines [44]. Aniline oxidase activity might thus refer to
laccase activity. Indeed, the same strain was later reported to
produce an extracellular laccase [8], however, purification
or characterization of this laccase has not been reported.
We have shown here for the first time that Mauginiella
sp. is an efficient laccase producer. The laccase has enzymatic characteristics similar to many basidiomyceteous
laccases. We are currently testing the performance of this
laccase in various applications, including the enzymatic
treatments of lignocellulose.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Annikka Linnala-Kankkunen for
amino acid sequencing and Dr. Marja-Leena Niku-Paavola
for the critical reading of the manuscript. This work was part
of the research programme “VTT Industrial Biotechnology”
(Academy of Finland; Finnish Centre of Excellence programme, 2000–2005, Project no. 64330). H.P. acknowledges
financial support from the Nordic Energy Research program
and from the Emil Aaltonen foundation.
References
[1] Thurston CF. The structure and function of fungal laccases.
Microbiology 1994;140:19–26.
[2] Gianfreda L, Xu F, Bollag J-M. Laccases: a usefull group of
oxidoreductive enzymes. Bioremed J 1999;3:1–25.
[3] Bao W, O’Malley DM, Whetten R, Sederoff RR. A laccase associated
with lignification in loblolly pine xylem. Science 1993;260:672–4.
[4] Hatakka A. Lignin-modifying enzymes from selected white-rot fungi:
production and role in lignin degradation. FEMS Microbiol Rev
1994;13:125–35.
[5] Kersten PJ, Kalyanaraman B, Hammel KE, Reinhammar B, Kirk TK.
Comparison of lignin peroxidase, horseradish peroxidase and laccase
in the oxidation of methoxybenzenes. Biochem J 1990;268:475–80.
861
[6] Bordeleau LM, Bartha R. Biochemical transformations of
herbicide-derived anilines in culture medium and in soil. Can J
Microbiol 1972;18:1857–63.
[7] Bordeleau LM, Bartha R. Biochemical transformations of
herbicide-derived anilines: purification and characterization of
causative enzymes. Can J Microbiol 1972;18:1865–71.
[8] Shannon MJR, Bartha R. Immobilization of leachable toxic soil
pollutants by using oxidative enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol
1988;54:1719–23.
[9] Rättö M, Chatani M, Ritschkoff AC, Viikari L. Screening of
micro-organisms for decolorization of melanin produced by bluestain
fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;55:210–3.
[10] von Arx JA, van der Walt JP, Liebenberg NVDW. On Mauginiella
scattae. Sydowia 1981;34:42–5.
[11] Cavara F. Atrofia florale in Phoenix dactylifera di cirenaica. Rend R
Accad Naz Lincei 1925;6:65–7.
[12] Maire R, Werner RG. Fungi Maroccani. Mem Sc Nat Maroc
1937;45:1–147.
[13] Sigler L, Carmichael JW. Taxonomy of Malbranchea and some other
Hyphomycetes with arthroconidia. Mycotaxon 1976;4:349–488.
[14] Niku-Paavola M-L, Karhunen E, Salola P, Raunio V. Lignolytic
enzymes of the white-rot fungus Phlebia radiata. Biochem J
1988;254:877–84.
[15] Heinzkill M, Bech L, Halkier T, Schneider P, Anke T.
Characterization of laccases from wood-rotting fungi (family
Coprinaceae). Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:1601–6.
[16] Paszczynski A, Huynh V-B, Crawford R. Enzymatic activities
of an extracellular Mn-dependent peroxidase from Phanerochaete
chrysosporium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1985;29:37–41.
[17] Leonowicz A, Grzywnowicz K. Quantitative estimation of laccase
forms in some white-rot fungi using syringaldazine as a substrate.
Enzyme Microb Technol 1981;3:55–8.
[18] Lerch K, Ettlinger L. Purification and characterization of a tyrosinase
from Streptomyces glaucescens. Eur J Biochem 1972;31:427–37.
[19] Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly
of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680–5.
[20] Yaver DS, Xu F, Golightly EJ, Brown KM, Brown SH, Rey MW,
et al. Purification characterization molecular cloning and expression
of two laccase genes from the white rot basidiomycete Trametes
villosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:834–41.
[21] Ong E, Pollock WBR, Smith M. Cloning and sequencing of two
laccase complementary DNAs from the lignolytic basidiomycete
Trametes versicolor. Gene 1997;196:113–9.
[22] Eggert C, Temp U, Eriksson K-EL. The lignolytic system of the white
rot fungus Pycnoporus cinnabarinus: purification and characterization
of the laccase. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:1151–8.
[23] Jung H, Xu F, Li K. Purification and characterization of laccase
from wood-degrading fungus Trichophyton rubrum LKY-7. Enzyme
Microb Technol 2002;30:161–8.
[24] Kiiskinen L-L, Viikari L, Kruus K. Purification and characterization
of a novel laccase from the ascomycete Melanocarpus albomyces.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;59:198–204.
[25] Johannes C, Majcherczyk A. Laccase activity tests and laccase
inhibitors. J Biotechnol 2000;78:193–9.
[26] Bollag J-M, Leonowicz A. Comparative studies of extracellular
fungal laccases. Appl Environ Microbiol 1984;48:849–54.
[27] Xu F, Shin W, Brown SH, Wahleithner JA, Sundaram UM,
Solomon EI. A study of a series of recombinant fungal laccases
and bilirubin oxidase that exhibit significant differences in redox
potential, substrate specificity, and stability. Biochim Biophys Acta
1996;1292:303–11.
[28] Yaver DS, Golightly EJ. Cloning and characterization of three laccase
genes from the white-rot basidiomycete Trametes villosa: genomic
organization of the laccase family. Gene 1996;181:95–102.
[29] Schneider P, Caspersen MB, Mondorf K, Halkier T, Skov LK,
Østergaard PR, et al. Characterization of Coprinus cinereus laccase.
Enzyme Microb Technol 1999;25:502–8.
862
H. Palonen et al. / Enzyme and Microbial Technology 33 (2003) 854–862
[30] Palmieri G, Giardina P, Bianco C, Fontanella B, Sannia G. Copper
induction of laccase isoenzymes in the lignolytic fungus Pleurotus
ostreatus. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66:920–4.
[31] Koroleva OV, Gavrilova VP, Stepanova EV, Lebedeva VI, Sverdlova
NI, Landesman EO, et al. Production of lignin modifying enzymes by
co-cultivated white-rot fungi Cerrena maxima and Coriolus hirsutus
and characterization of laccase from Cerrena maxima. Enzyme
Microb Technol 2002;30:573–80.
[32] Brown MA, Zhongwei Z, Mauk AG. Expression and characterization
of a recombinant multi-copper oxidase: laccase IV from Trametes
versicolor. Inorg Chim Acta 2002;331:232–8.
[33] Garzillo AMV, Colao MC, Caruso C, Caporale C, Celletti D,
Buonocore V. Laccase from the white-rot fungus Trametes trogii.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998;49:545–51.
[34] Eggert C, LaFayette PR, Eriksson K-EL, Dean JFD. Molecular
analysis of a laccase gene from the white rot fungus Pycnoporus
cinnabarinus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64:1766–72.
[35] Temp U, Zierold U, Eggert C. Cloning and characterization of
a second laccase gene from the lignin-degrading basidiomycete
Pycnoporus cinnabarinus. Gene 1999;236:169–77.
[36] Schliephake K, Mainwaring DE, Lonergan GT, Jones IK, Baker
WL. Transformation and degradation of the disazo dye Chicago Sky
Blue by a purified laccase from Pycnoporus cinnabarinus. Enzyme
Microb Technol 2000;27:100–7.
[37] Doolittle WF. Lateral genomics. Trends Cell Biol 1999;9:5–8.
[38] Walton DW. Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of secondary
metabolite gene clusters in fungi: an hypothesis. Fungal Genet Biol
2000;30:167–71.
[39] Garcia-Vallve S, Romeu A, Palau J. Horizontal gene transfer of
glycosyl hydrolases of the rumen fungi. Mol Biol Evol 2000;17:352–
61.
[40] Reinhammar B. Laccase. In: Lontie R, editor. Copper proteins and
copper enzymes, vol. III. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1984. p. 1–35.
[41] Jonsson M, Pettersson E, Reinhammar B. Isoelectric fractionation
analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients.
VII. The isoelectric spectra of fungal laccase A and B. Acta Chem
Scand 1968;22:2135–40.
[42] Cassland P, Jönsson LJ. Characterization of a gene encoding Trametes
versicolor laccase A and improved heterologous expression in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae by decreased cultivation temperature. Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol 1999;52:393–400.
[43] Bourbonnais R, Paice MG, Reid ID, Lanthier P, Yaguchi M. Lignin
oxidation by laccase from Trametes versicolor and role of the
mediator 2,2′ -arabinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) in kraft
lignin depolymerization. Appl Environ Microb 1995;61:1876–80.
[44] Zouari N, Romette J-L, Thomas D. Purification and properties of
two laccase isoenzymes produced by Botrytis cinerea. Appl Biochem
Biotechnol 1987;15:213–25.