doi:10.1017/S1742170510000347 Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 26(1); 72–91 The potential of herbaceous native Australian legumes as grain crops: a review Lindsay W. Bell1*, Richard G. Bennett2, Megan H. Ryan2, and Heather Clarke3,y 1 CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia. School of Plant Biology M084, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. 3 Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. *Corresponding author: Lindsay.Bell@csiro.au 2 Accepted 25 June 2010; First published online 18 August 2010 Research Paper Abstract Many agricultural systems around the world are challenged by declining soil resources, a dry climate and increases in input costs. The cultivation of plants that are better adapted than current crop species to nutrient poor soils, a dry climate and low-input agricultural systems would aid the continued profitability and environmental sustainability of agricultural systems. This paper examines herbaceous native Australian legumes for their capacity to be developed as grain crops adapted to dry environments. The 14 genera that contain herbaceous species are Canavalia, Crotalaria, Cullen, Desmodium, Glycine, Glycyrrhiza, Hardenbergia, Indigofera, Kennedia, Lotus, Rhynchosia, Swainsona, Trigonella and Vigna. A number of these genera (e.g., Glycine, Crotalaria, Trigonella and Vigna) include already cultivated exotic grain legumes. Species were evaluated based on the extent to which their natural distribution corresponded to arid and semi-arid climatic regions, as well as the existing information on traits related to harvestability (uniformity of ripening, propensity to retain pod, pod shattering and growth habit), grain qualities (seed size, chemistry, color and the absence of toxins) and fecundity. Published data on seed yield were rare, and for many other traits information was limited. The Australian species of Vigna, Canavalia and Desmodium mainly have tropical distributions and were considered poorly suited for semi-arid temperate cropping systems. Of the remaining genera Glycyrrhiza and Crotalaria species showed many suitable traits, including an erect growth habit, a low propensity to shatter, flowers and fruits borne at the end of branches and moderate to large seeds (5 and 38 mg, respectively). The species for which sufficient information was available that were considered highest priority for further investigation were Glycine canescens, Cullen tenax, Swainsona canescens, Swainsona colutoides, Trigonella suavissima, Kennedia prorepens, Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa, Crotalaria cunninghamii and Rhynchosia minima. Key words: domestication, novel crops, perennial, adaptation, arid, climate change Introduction Increasing crop diversity can reduce our reliance on just a few major food crops and improve the sustainability and resilience of agriculture in the future1,2. With dry climatic conditions, reduced allocations of water for agriculture and increasing demands for food production from currently marginal areas, species adapted to more stressful environments are needed. In addition, alternative crops with improved efficiency of fertilizer use and reduced reliance on pesticides would improve the sustainability of our agricultural yPresent address: The University of Notre Dame, PO Box 1225, Fremantle, WA 6959, Australia. systems3. Benefits of protection of soil from erosion, reduced leaching of water and nutrients, and additional forage for livestock could also be provided by perennial grain crops2,4,5. Exploring the wild native flora provides an exciting and substantial opportunity to identify species with potential as alternative grain crops for the future6. Australia, because of its arid climate and infertile and poor soils, is a good place to look for potential new grain crops adapted to harsh growing environments. Yet, the potential of Australia’s native flora for use in agriculture has been relatively underexplored. Some Australian grasses and legumes have been investigated as potential pastures or forage species7–13, but little work has been conducted on their suitability as grain crops. Woody legumes such as Acacia spp. could have some use as alternative sources of # Cambridge University Press 2010 Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops grain14, but herbaceous species are more suited to modern broad-acre farming systems because they can be mechanically harvested and are more easily removed and rotated with other crops. One Australian grass, Microlaena stipoides, has been investigated to a limited extent for grain production15, yet herbaceous legumes have received little attention. Rivett et al.16 examined a number of native Australian plants for their potential as grain crops and found that the legumes Hardenbergia violacea, Crotalaria cunninghamii and Kennedia nigricans warranted further examination as they possessed relatively large seeds with substantial amounts of crude protein and oil. There are a few modern examples where efforts have been made to domesticate legumes for grain production in agricultural systems where grain legumes are/were lacking; Lupinus angustifolius (narrow-leafed lupin)17, Lupinus luteus (yellow lupin)18 and Desmanthus illinoensis (Illinois bundleflower)19. Evidence with these species and advances in our understanding of crop domestication and in the technologies associated with crop breeding should allow rapid advances in the future20. However, the domestication of Australian legumes may be more difficult, as there is little or no history of predomestication. This means that the net may need to be cast wide, as many species are unlikely to possess traits common to domesticated plants21. While Australian aboriginals manipulated their environment to ensure food supply, notably through the use of fire, they did not generally practice agriculture in a way close to modern cultivated cropping systems. In addition, while seed grindstones have been found in many areas and there are reports of aboriginal seed collecting from grasses and of the use of seed from 50 species of Acacia, there is no indication that the seeds of native herbaceous legumes were other than a very occasional source of food22. Hence, Australian native herbaceous legumes have not been subjected to the same predomestication pressures that have acted upon other species that have been cultivated by ancient peoples or were simply present (as weeds) in early agricultural systems23,24. We examined the 14 genera of Australia’s native legumes that contain herbaceous species for their suitability as grain crops. While little useful information was available for many species, we found that at least nine species merit further investigation. Species identified were most likely to be adapted to the climate of Australia’s semi-arid cropping regions, but they may have applications in other semi-arid environments throughout the world or in areas predicted to experience a dry climate in the future. Approach and Desirable Plant Attributes Among Australia’s legumes, there are 14 genera that contain herbaceous species. Information was gathered on three main aspects: species distribution in arid or semi-arid climatic range; traits related to harvestability, grain size and yield potential; and grain chemistry and nutritional qualities (discussed below). Some genera also include currently 73 cultivated grain legume crops exotic to Australia (e.g., Glycine, Vigna, Trigonella and Canavalia). This close relationship could indicate genera that possess suitable agronomic characteristics, or closely related species that may be suitable for hybridization with the cultivated crop, to either improve the agronomic traits of a wild species or transfer desirable characteristics into the cultivated species (e.g., abiotic or biotic stress tolerance)5. The hybridization of Australian perennial Glycine species with soybean is one such example25,26. Together, this information is used to identify genera and species with the most desirable attributes and the greatest immediate potential as grain crops. Information was not available for some aspects of some species, particularly in rarer or less studied species. Hence, suppositions were drawn only where sufficient information was available. Other species may also have desirable characteristics or potential in different agro-climatic conditions. Beyond the scope of this review was an assessment of the weed risk of these species. Indigenous species can be regarded as weeds when growing outside their natural range, and some species of Fabaceae are commonly mentioned in this context in Australia including some of the genera assessed in this paper27. Potential adaptation to arid and semi-arid environments Information on the distribution of Australian native herbaceous legumes was obtained from collection locations available from the Australian Virtual Herbarium28 and matched against Australia’s agro-climatic regions29. Species were prioritized if their distribution corresponded to the arid interior (G and E6) or semi-arid environments with sufficient capacity for plant growth in winter–spring (E2, E3 and E4) (Fig. 1). Species that occur in these agroclimatic regions likely possess adaptations to short or erratic growing seasons, and hot and dry climatic conditions, such as physiological drought tolerance mechanisms or reproductive strategies which enable them to avoid these stresses (e.g., rapid flowering and deep roots). Excluded from the target region were tropical (i.e., H, I1, I2, I3, J1, J2 and E7) and cold climatic (i.e. B1 and B2) regions, because plant growth is limited during winter– spring due to lack of moisture and cold, respectively. Also, Australian species from northern origins are more likely to have flowering promoted by short days (short-day plants), while long-day plants grow at higher latitudes, including the Australian agricultural zone. Short-day plants have limited potential in these southern temperate areas. Although cool-season grain crop production is common in agroclimatic regions E1 (wet ‘Mediterranean’) and D5 (coolseason and wet), the target region was restricted to the less favorable climatic regions with a shorter winter–spring growing season (i.e., E2—dry ‘Mediterranean’, E3— temperate, subhumid and E4—subtropical, subhumid). Agro-climates F3 and F4 are warm and wet environments and were also excluded as they have a few climatic stresses 74 L.W. Bell et al. Figure 1. Agro-climatic regions of Australia (adapted from29). The target climatic regions include the arid and semi-arid regions too dry for field crops (i.e., G and E6) and the semi-arid cropping zone where moisture is a major growth limitation and with sufficient capacity for growth in winter–spring (i.e., E4, E3 and E2). that reduce plant growth throughout the year. A wider species distribution was also regarded as favorable as it suggests greater adaptability and a greater capacity to exploit within species variability. Harvestability Plant traits that influence grain harvestability are critical in the domestication process30 and hence were considered important aspects for evaluating the agronomic potential of wild legume species. Plants with a self-supporting, erect or semi-erect growth habit and those that set pods close to the top of the plant would be most favorable for mechanical harvesting, while highly prostrate species may be difficult to harvest. Species with a twining or rambling habit were not regarded as ideal, but were not removed from consideration. Many current grain legume crops originated from ancestors with a climbing, creeping or straggling growth habit and their domestication has shortened internode length and reduced indeterminate branching (e.g., Phaseolus, Vigna, Glycine, Pisum and Arachis)31. Pod dehiscence and indeterminate growth habit is ubiquitous among undomesticated legumes and domesticated grain and forage legumes alike (e.g., soybean32 and birdsfoot trefoil33). While pod indehiscence (non-shattering) overcomes some agronomic challenges, it is clear that this is not a disqualifying trait, as selection for indehiscence during domestication has occurred for most modern crops and would also occur in native Australian legumes. Grain size and yield potential Legume grain or seed size is obviously an important aspect as it influences the potential market uses and agronomic performance. Large seeds also offer advantages for crop establishment especially from greater depth, under greater competition (e.g., weed burden) and in low-nutrient or moisture conditions34. Cultivated grain legumes have large seeds compared to their wild relatives and seed size has been increased substantially through active selection, and hence it is likely that the seed size of wild legumes would be smaller than that of cultivated grain legumes. For example, the seed size has increased at least tenfold in Phaseolus coccineus (French bean) and by at least fivefold in other legume species31. This is also demonstrated in the germplasm of L. angustifolius (narrow-leaf lupin), where seed size may vary substantially from 29 to 244 mg, with the ‘wild’ types generally smaller seeded35. Despite the appeal of species with larger seeds, small seeds may actually be equally appealing, especially if they contain high concentrations of a desirable product such as oils (e.g., Brassica napus, canola). Attractive small seeds or those that have special properties or novel appearance may also have a market as whole grains similar to sesame (Sesamum indicum), poppy (Papaver somniferum) or linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Species exhibiting high overall fecundity and the capacity to self-fertilize are highly desirable. Most domesticated grain legumes are self-fertilizing with the exception of P. coccineus, Vicia faba and Cajanus cajan31. Some difficulties might occur with domesticating outcrossing species Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops due to the ability to outcross with their wild counterparts and to reintroduce undesirable traits. Species capable of self-fertilizing would be less problematic for future breeding. Annual species may have a greater overall fecundity, because their survival relies on producing viable seeds, but perennial species may be equally productive provided they flower and reproduce in their first year5. Many domesticated annual grain legumes have originated from a perennial life form, most likely because of the selection pressure for increasing seed yield31. Grain chemistry and nutritional qualities Native legumes found to produce seeds with high concentrations of protein and/or oils/fats are clearly desirable. In addition, those with favorable amino acid or fatty acid profiles or the presence of unique compounds that can benefit human health may have a significant market as a health food. In most cases, little information is available on the nutritive qualities of native Australian legumes. On the other hand, a number of Australia’s native legumes are known to possess potent bioactive compounds, some of which may be toxic (e.g., swainsonine and hydrogen cyanide (HCN)), but some of which have pharmaceutical functions or can provide human health benefits at the correct concentrations (e.g., furanocoumarins and phytoestrogens)36,37. Many cultivated grain legumes contain antinutritional compounds which have been lowered by breeding (e.g., alkaloids in lupins)38. Canavalia The genus Canavalia consists of approximately 70 species mostly of tropical origin. Several species are legume grain crops of secondary importance, including common jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis), sword bean (Canavila gladiata) and Canavalia cathartica. Raw seeds of Canavalia contain a number of anti-nutritional factors including phenolics, tannins, saponins, concanavalin A, canavanine, cyanogenic glycosides and HCN39,40. Canavalia are famous for the presence of the lectin, concanavalin A which has commercial importance as a reagent in glycoprotein biochemistry and immunology41,42. Four species of Canavalia are found in Australia but none are endemic; Canavalia rosea, Canavalia carthartica, Canavalia sericea and Canavalia papuana. These are mostly found in tropical, coastal hinterland regions (Fig. 2a). While C. rosea is found further south than other species into the subtropics, it is mainly confined to coastal and high-rainfall areas (Fig. 2a). Because Canavalia match poorly with our target climatic regions, they are not considered further here, although they may have some potential as an adapted legume crop for the tropics. They possess large seeds and are a rich protein source39,42. 75 Crotalaria Crotalaria is a genus of herbaceous plants and woody shrubs commonly known as rattlepods because seeds become loose in the pod as they mature and rattle when the pod is shaken. Around 600 or more species of Crotalaria are described worldwide, mostly from the tropics with at least 500 species known from Africa; 19 species are native to Australia43. Some exotic species of Crotalaria have agronomic uses (e.g., Crotalaria spectabilis, Crotalaria ochroleuca, Crotalaria longirostrata and Crotolaria juncea (sunn hemp))43. The Australian native Crotalaria species are mainly found in tropical regions. Four species occur further south in the target region; Crotalaria eremaea (desert rattlepod), Crotalaria mitchelli (yellow rattlepod), C. cunninghamii (green birdflower or parrot pea) and Crotalaria dissitiflora (plains rattlepod) (Fig. 2b). C. eremaea and C. cunninghamii occur mainly on sandy or well-drained soils in lowrainfall regions of central Australia44. C. mitchelli occurs on sandy soils in the tropical and subtropical areas of the east coast with > 500 mm mean annual rainfall45. C. dissitiflora occurs on heavy clay soils also in the subtropics and tropics although it occurs further inland and in lower-rainfall regions than C. mitchelli45. Crotalaria includes annual, biennial and perennial species that can range in form from herbs to shrubs (0.3–3 m high). The four species occurring in the target region have erect or ascending habits; C. cunninghamii is an erect perennial subshrub growing to 1 m or higher, C. eremaea is an erect subshrub 0.5–1 m high, C. dissitiflora is an erect-sprawling short-lived perennial <30 cm high and C. mitchelli is an erect—decumbent woody forb about 60 cm high44. All these species flower in winter–spring (C. cunninghamii sometimes in autumn) and are generally open pollinated by insects. C. dissitiflora has been observed to shed its leaves during winter45. A notable and advantageous characteristic of these species is that flowers and pods are borne at branch ends46, which favors mechanical harvesting. Some Crotalaria shatter explosively, while pods of others are more stable and slower to shatter46. Some Crotalaria have large seeds (e.g., 38 mg in C. cunninghamii) (Table 1), while others are smaller (e.g., those of C. dissitiflora are only 2–3 mm long). Seeds are often smooth and vary in color (yellow in C. dissitiflora, greenish–gray in C. mitchelli and red–brown in Crotalaria smithiana). Due to its large seed size and substantial protein and oil content (Table 2), C. cunninghamii was previously identified as a species worthy of further investigation16. Toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids are produced by some members of this genus and these can be poisonous to livestock47, but whether these are present in seeds of the four species that occur in the target region is unknown. C. dissitiflora is suspected of poisoning livestock, but there is conflicting evidence45. Everist47 suggests that the toxicity might be lost when plants are cut. C. eremaea is often eaten by sheep, suggesting low or no alkaloid problems and 76 L.W. Bell et al. (a) (c) (b) (d) Figure 2. Distribution of a selection of widely distributed Australian native Canavalia (a), four native Crotalaria spp. (b) and Cullen spp. (c, d) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28. C. cunninghamii is reputedly edible by humans without any indication that prior treatment is necessary44,48. Overall, Australian Crotalaria seem to have a number of characteristics which suggest they warrant further investigation for their potential as grain crops. In particular, C. cunninghamii has a desirable growth habit, produces large seeds which contain high levels of protein and some oil, and does not seem to produce toxic alkaloids (Table 3). Little agronomic information was available on the other three species found in arid and semi-arid regions of Australia (i.e., C. eremaea, C. mitchelli and C. dissitiflora), but these may also warrant further investigation. Cullen The Cullen genus includes 32 species of which 25 are endemic to Australia49. It has been explored for forage plants in the past and again recently in Australia11,50,51. While no species of Cullen are used commercially, the closely related Psoralea genus includes one economically important plant native to India. Psoralea corylifolia seeds have medicinal properties, which are thought to be imparted due to their content of furanocoumarin, in particular psoralen. Cullen in Australia is widely distributed across a range of climates from summer- to winter-dominant rainfall and the average annual rainfall of the distribution across species ranges from 200 to 1300 mm51. All species of Cullen occur within the target region and 12 of these species mainly occur in low-rainfall environments with an annual average rainfall £ 400 mm51. Of these species, Cullen australasicum, Cullen graveolens, Cullen pallidum and Cullen discolor mainly occurred in the lower-rainfall regions (Fig. 2c and 2d). Cullen cinereum has a slightly more tropical distribution than the other species; although, it is also found throughout the target zone (Fig 2c). Cullen species have been reported to have excellent drought tolerance where they have been evaluated as forage plants11,52. All species have a deep tap-root which may become woody in the perennial species. Roots of Cullen patens Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops 77 Table 1. Seed size of Australian native herbaceous legumes. Means in brackets, where a range of material has been measured. Species Seed mass (mg) Crotalaria cunninghamii Cullen australasicum1 C. cinereum1 C. cinereum1 C. cinereum1 C. graveolens1 C. pallidum1 C. patens1 C. patens1 C. plumosum1 C. tenax1 Glycine canescens G. canescens G. clandestina G. tomentella G. latifolia G. latifolia Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa Hardinbergia violacea H. violacea H. comptoniana Indigofera colutea I. linnaei I. linnaei I. australis Kennedia coccinea K. coccinea K. eximia K. nigricans K. prorepens K. prorepens K. prostrata K. prostrata K. prostrata K. rubicunda Lotus australis L. australis L. cruentis Rhynchosia minima R. minima R. minima R. minima Swainsona canescens S. canescens S. colutoides S. kingii S. formosa S. purpurea S. swainsonoides Trigonella suavissima Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata V. lanceolata V. vexillata V. vexillata 38.5 5.5 4.2 4.1 5.5 2.3 3.2–6.4 (4.8) 8.4 2.82 11.3 4.4 5.6 5.9–8.9 4.2 5.0 11.1 6.6–12.5 5.4 38.5 22 38.3–45.2 1.1 1.8 1.9 5.2 8.8 26.3 9.0 15.6 12.4 6.6 29.7 31.9 9.3–44.4 24.4 2.7 1.3–1.9 1.8 11.8 8.8–20.4 (12.1) 9.4 16.8 2.1 1.3 2.9 2.6 3.9 2.8 7.2 1.0 7.4–27.0 (13.4) 1 2 20–34 8.1–17.7 7.0–19.5 (11.1) Indicates whole fruit (pod + seed). Immature seeds harvested. Reference 16 11 108 36 Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished 108 57 36 Unpublished 108 Unpublished 109 57 110 69 Unpublished 16 109 111 108 108 Unpublished 16 16 111 Unpublished 16 112 Unpublished 111 86 Unpublished 109 112 Unpublished 88 57 91 108 Unpublished 108 Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished Unpublished 104 103 113 105 data data data data data data data data data data data data data data data data data data data (syn. Psoralea eriantha) have been reported to penetrate to a depth of 4 m, and this was associated with the drought resistance of this species53. Another evident adaptation to drought is the dense coverings of glandular hairs on the leaves of some Cullen species (e.g., C. pallidum and C. patens). Strong soil-type associations are rare in many Cullen species (e.g., C. australasicum), but some species have particular preferences; for example, C. tenax seems to prefer heavy clay soils and C. pallidum is predominately found on deep sand dunes and sandy soils45,49,51. The Australian species of Cullen include shrubs, subshrubs and herbs and a number of them have a favorable growth habit and phenology, as outlined below. Nineteen species are herbaceous or semi-herbaceous, of which 16 are perennial or short-lived perennials. C. graveolens, Cullen plumosum and Cullen walkingtonii are annual or biennials49. Most Australian taxa bloom in the first year49. Flowering mainly occurs in spring, but indeterminate flowering continues throughout the year provided sufficient moisture is available49,53. In a glasshouse study, Bourgaud et al.36 recorded that flowering occurs around 40 days after germination in C. cinereum (about 900 degree days) and around 60 days after germination in C. plumosum (1340 degree days). Flowering of C. australasicum and C. patens is controlled by day length according to Britten and De Lacy54, with long-day treatments (i.e., < 12–13 h dark) inducing flowering. They also found that genotypes vary in their response, indicating differences in phenological adaptations within these species. In C. australasicum, flowering and fruiting times are extremely variable in the first year, but with greater synchrony in the second year11. Many Cullen also seem to be capable of self-pollinating. Britten and Dundas55 found that erect types in the Psoralea patens complex (i.e., C. australasicum) were 50–75% selfing, while the prostrate and semi-erect lines (i.e., C. patens) were outcrossing only. Bourgaud et al.36 noted that C. cinereum and C. plumosum are capable of selfpollinating. Using microsatellite markers, Kroiss et al.56 estimated the outcrossing rate in C. australasicum to be at least 3–13% and hybrids were formed with C. pallidum, but not C. discolor or C. patens. A couple of studies have found Cullen to allocate significant resources to reproduction and produce useful amounts of seed. Bourgaud et al.36 found seed yields up to 1.65 g plant - 1 (47% of dry matter) from C. cinereum and 1.75 g plant - 1 for C. plumosum (60% of dry matter). The higher yield from C. plumosum was due to the greater seed mass (11.3 mg), while the whole plant biomass was less than C. cinereum. The production of seeds from C. tenax has also been measured at 22 g plant - 1 (4820 seeds) (Bennett, unpublished data). Kerridge and Skerman53 recorded that the reproductive parts of C. pallidum made up 42% of plant biomass when the plants were left to grow for 12 weeks. Cullen are characterized by indehiscent (non-shattering) fruits with the seeds adherent to the pericarp (pod). Fruit sizes of Cullen typically range from 4 to 6 mg, although 78 L.W. Bell et al. Table 2. Chemical composition of seeds of some native Australian legumes16. Seeds were obtained from a commercial native seed service and had presumably been collected from the wild. Fatty acid composition (% of total fat) Species Crude protein1 (%) Fat (%) 16 : 0 18 : 0 18 : 1 18 : 2 18 : 3 P : S ratio 23.3 21.0 18.8 27.4 23.9 3.8 8.1 2.8 3.0 9.1 17.2 12.1 17.6 12.3 14.9 6.8 5.1 3.8 7.0 6.5 26.0 23.2 26.3 29.2 30.2 46.5 55.9 45.6 43.9 41.0 3.3 5.0 6.2 6.4 4.4 2.1 3.4 2.4 2.6 2.1 Crotalaria cunninghamii Hardenbergia violacea Indigofera australis Kennedia coccinea Kennedia nigricans 1 2 2 Protein was calculated as 5.7r%N. Ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids. Table 3. Prioritization of species for further investigation as grain legume crops. Species with little information are not included (?—indicates where information is unknown). Species Highest priority species Cullen tenax Crotalaria cunninghamii Glycine canescens Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa Distribution1 Life cycle2 Habit3 for further investigation **** P Sp, C **** P E Seed size4 Flowers in first year Pollination Pod/seed retention Small Large Y ? Selfing ? Low ? **** **** P P T E, C Mod. Mod. Y ? Selfing ? Low High Kennedia prorepens Rhynchosia minima Swainsona canescens Swainsona colutoides **** *** **** *** P P A/B A/B T T–SE SE, Sp E Mod.–Large Mod.–Large Small Small Y ? Y Y Open Selfing Open Selfing Low Variable Mod-High Mod, delayed Trigonella suavissima **** A E–SE Small Y ? ? Y Y Y Y Variable Variable ? Variable Low ? Moderate priority species with a number of Cullen australasicum **** P Cullen cinereum *** A/B Cullen graveolens *** A/B Cullen pallidum *** P suitable attributes E Mod. E, Sp Small–mod. E–SE Small Sp Small–mod. Glycine latifolia ** P T Mod. Y Open Selfing ? Open, some selfing ? Glycine tabacina Kennedia coccinea Indigofera australis Swainsona formosa Swainsona swainsonoides ** * *** **** *** P P P A P T P, T E, Sp SE, Sp Sp Small–mod. Large Mod. Small Small Y Y ? Y Y ? ? ? ? Open ? Low N ? Y Open Open Selfing Very low Species with some valuable attributes but some limitations Kennedia prostrata ** P P, T Large Kennedia nigricans * P P, T Large Lotus cruentus **** A Sp, C Small 1 2 3 4 Other notable qualities/ information Aerial seed Pods on branch ends Salt tolerance and pods easy to thresh Good pod retention Waterlogging & potential salt tolerance Collected and selected as a forage Match between species distribution and targeted agro-climates; ****—highly favorable, ***—favorable, **—moderate, *—poor. P, perennial; A, annual; B, biennial. E, erect; SE, semi-erect; P, prostrate; T, twining/trailing; Sp, spreading; C, clumping/crown forming. Large, 10–20 mg; Mod., 5–10 mg; Small, < 5 mg. Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops fruits >8 mg have been measured in C. patens and C. plumosum (Table 1). Smaller fruits (2.8 mg) were found for C. patens by Silcock and Smith57, but this included many immature seeds which probably reduced the average seed mass. The non-shattering nature of Cullen is advantageous for harvesting, but fruit retention on the plant is variable. Skerman58 reports that ripe pods of C. patens drop to the ground and seed harvesting would need to be performed by suction. The pods of several species (e.g., C. australasicum, C. patens, C. pallidum and C. discolor) fall from the plant enclosed in the calyx, which can be very hairy49. This, and the adherence of the seed to its pod, also poses some complications about the ability to thresh the seed of Cullen, unless processing could utilize the whole fruit. Dear et al.11 state that the seed of C. australasicum is easily threshed from the pod without damage. However, since the seed is completely adhered to the pod, it is likely that they were referring to the removal of the woolly calyx material. No information was found on the protein or oil content of Cullen seed/fruit, but like other members of the Psoraleae family, Australian Cullen species are known to contain the furanocoumarins psoralen and angelicin59–61. Furanocoumarins are potent photosensitizing agents that may cause phototoxic reactions, but they are also pharmaceutically useful for the treatment of skin disorders such as psoriasis, vitiligo, leukoderma and leprosy62. The seeds of Australian Cullen species have been found to contain between 1000 and 8000 mg kg - 1 dry weight (DW) of furanocoumarins (depending on species) and have been proposed as potential sources for pharmaceutical use36,61,62. C. cinereum (syn. Psoralea cinerea) and C. plumosum were identified with the highest levels of furanocoumarins, but they have also been measured in Cullen lachnostachys (syn. Psoralea lachnostachys) and Cullen pustulatum (syn. Psoralea pustulata) and are likely to exist in many other species. The fruits generally contain the highest concentration of furanocoumarins, up to 5500 ppm in Cullen corylifolia (native to India) and the majority ( >70%) of this is found in the cotyledon of the fruit60,63. Vegetative material may also contain significant levels of furanocoumarins (up to 1600 ppm)60,64, which may affect the health of grazing animals by inducing photodermatitis. However, furanocoumarins also play an important role in plant health by controlling pathogens and insect activity. In addition to furanocoumarins, some Psoralea and Cullen species can also contain the flavonoid, daidzein, which is increasingly studied because of its activity in cancer prevention and treatment65. Daidzein has been found in the fruits of two Australian species, C. cinereum (8.2 mg g - 1 DW) and C. tenax (27.5 mg g - 1 DW) and was also present in their stems61,65. C. patens and C. cinereum were found to also contain lectins and trypsin inhibiting proteins39. A number of Cullen species warrant further investigation for potential as grain crops (Table 3), because they are able to produce large amounts of seed of moderate size, are selfcompatible, have an erect growth habit, and the ability to grow and flower in their first year. High-priority species 79 have a reputation for high seed production (e.g., Cullen tenax and C. cinereum) or display an annual life cycle (e.g., C. graveolens). Also an exciting attribute is the likely presence of furanocoumarins which may provide a pharmaceutical market for Cullen seed. However, the problem of separating the seed from the calyx is a significant issue and their market success would rely on uses that can utilize the whole fruit. Desmodium Desmodium, also known as tick-trefoils or tick clovers, is a large and taxonomically confusing genus containing about 300 species of which 21 species are native to Australia43. No Desmodium species are grown as grain crops, but some are cultivated as forage for livestock (e.g., Desmodium intortum and Desmodium uncinatum) and as living mulch or green manures. Most Australian Desmodium occur in the tropics and subtropics and only three species are distributed within the target region; Desmodium varians (slender ticktrefoil), Desmodium campylocaulon (creeping tick-trefoil) and Desmodium brachypodum (large tick-trefoil) (Fig. 3a). D. varians occurs at the furthest south in the temperate regions of Australia, but is mainly found in moister regions. D. varians is a trailing or twining perennial that can flower all year round, although flowering is usually concentrated in the warmer months. D. campylocaulon and D. brachypodum are mainly found in the inland subtropics and tropics. Both are erect and twining long-lived perennial subshrubs growing up to 60–100 cm high, which flower from late spring to autumn46. All three species have a warm-season-dominant growth pattern and seem to prefer climates where rainfall is summer-dominant. An advantageous characteristic of Desmodium species is that their reproductive racemes are at branch ends and in some species are held well above the foliage (e.g., D. brachypodum)46. Desmodium pods also do not split or dehisce at maturity, but they have a saw-like pod with segments that separate at maturity which enclose an individual seed (known as a loment) and are individually dispersed46. No information was found on the seed constituents or the presence of toxins or other bioactive compounds in the seed of Australian Desmodium, although some Desmodium species are known to contain alkaloids in their leaves. Overall, we consider the Desmodium species to be of marginal interest because of the little information on the agronomic and seed attributes, and their tendency toward moister- and summer-dominant rainfall environments. Glycine Australia is the center of diversity for the Glycine genus, which contains the most important legume grain crop worldwide, soybean (Glycine max). The 23 Glycine species native to Australia make up the subgenus Glycine, while the cultivated G. max and its ancestor Glycine soja make up the 80 L.W. Bell et al. (a) (b) (c) Figure 3. Distribution of Australian native Desmodium spp. (a) and Glycine spp. (b, c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28. subgenus Soja, which originates in South-East Asia. Numerous attempts to hybridize wild Glycine and G. max have been made and have mainly been successful with tetraploid (2n = 80) types of Glycine tomentella5. Australian Glycine species have been investigated for beneficial traits for soybean improvement, such as drought tolerance66, 2–4D resistance67 and resistance to diseases (e.g., Phakospora pachyrhizi, soybean rust)25,26,68. Glycine are highly palatable to stock and have been investigated for their agronomic potential as pasture species, with one variety of Glycine latifolia commercially released in Australia69. Glycine species occur across Australia, with four species widely distributed: Glycine canescens (silky glycine), Glycine tabacina (variable glycine), Glycine clandestina (twining glycine) and Glycine tomentella (rusty glycine) (Fig. 3b and c). G. canescens had the most desirable distribution as it occurred across the targeted agro-climatic zones, in particular, within the arid interior (Fig. 3b). Young plants of G. canescens have been reported to have particularly good adaptation to low-P stress, partly due to a high seed P concentration70. G. tomentella occurs within targeted regions, mainly in the subtropical, subhumid climatic zone (i.e., E4), but its distribution indicates a tendency toward more tropical adaptation, and hence was considered less suitable (Fig. 3b). G. tabacina and G. clandestina occur predominantly in regions of eastern Australia with wetter climates and were found to a lesser extent within the target regions (Fig. 3b and c). Other evidence suggests that G. tabacina is better adapted to drier environments than G. tomentella due to its smaller leaflet size, the exhibition of paraheliotropism and its ability to maintain photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence at low water availability66. Within their distribution, G. canescens and G. tomentella are commonly found on sandy soils, G. clandestina on sandy red earths and G. tabacina is more suited to heavier and deeper soils45. Less widely distributed Glycine species that occur within the target regions include G. latifolia (subtropical regions) and Glycine rubignosa, while Glycine latrobeana was not suitable as its distribution is limited to cooler, moist environments of southeastern Australia (Fig. 3c). All Australian Glycine are perennial twining herbs. Most are active and flower in the warmer months and usually in the first year after establishment45. G. clandestina flowers in spring to early summer, G. tabacina in summer and G. tomentella in spring and autumn. G. canescens flowers most of the year and is highly indeterminate45. Some accessions of G. latifolia grown in Queensland are exceptionally fast to flower, ranging from 13 to 59 days to first flower in the establishment year69, suggesting that germplasm adapted to short growing seasons are available. In G. tomentella, Jones et al.69 found flowering to be day length sensitive, with flowering inhibited at longer day lengths (>16 h), but flowering was initiated with shorter day lengths (< 12 h). However, variability between accessions was found. Phenology of node appearance and flowering in Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops G. tomentella is also driven by thermal time, with flowering occurring after 60 days under warmer conditions (28/24 C day/night temperatures, i.e., 1560 degree days) and 75 days under cooler temperatures (24/20 C day/night, i.e., 1650 degree days)71. Seeds of wild Glycine species are typically moderate in size (5–10 mg). Measured seed weights are often between 4 and 6 mg for G. canescens, G. clandestina and G. tomentella (Table 1). G. latifolia has larger seeds (6.6– 12.5 mg) (Table 1), with seed size of the released forage cultivar Capella being 12.5 mg69. Glycine seeds are oblong or ovoid, vary from smooth shiny to roughened dull seed coats and differ in color between species (G. canescens— olive-brown, G. clandestina—red–brown, G. tabacina and G. tomentella—purplish–black). Surprisingly, no data on the seed composition of wild Australian native Glycine were found in the literature. Like soybean and G. soja, Australian native Glycine are known to produce isoflavones, although these have not been specifically measured in seeds. Taiwanese wild Glycine species including G. tabacina and G. tomentella were reported to have lower isoflavone concentrations in seeds compared to stems and roots72. Many of these are phytoestrogens have a range of health benefits and applications37. G. canescens and G. latifolia contain genistin, daidzein and coumestrol; G. tabacina contains quercetin and kaempterol; and apigenin was found in G. tomentella, G. tabacina and G. falcata73. Alkaloids have been reported in Glycine sericea74, but these are generally not considered to be a problem in Glycine. Overall, Australian native Glycine are of significant interest for further appraisal as a grain crop. They have attractive seeds of moderate size which potentially contain chemicals with pharmaceutical applications. The major constraint for most wild Glycine is their twining/trailing habit, which is not desirable in a crop plant. Of the Glycine species, we judge that G. canescens is the highest priority for further investigation because of its distribution in arid regions of Australia (Table 3). G. latifolia, because of its larger seeds and evidence of germplasm with quick maturity, also has a number of suitable attributes. More information is required on the seed chemistry and seed yield potential of many species of native Australian Glycine. Because of their close relationship and potential for hybridization with soybean, this information would also be useful for identifying novel or advantageous traits for soybean breeding. Glycyrrhiza Glycyrrhiza is a genus of about 18 species, which includes only one species native to Australia, Glycyrrhiza acanthocarpa (native liquorice and native lucerne). The genus is best known for liquorice, which is the product of the roots of Glycyrrhiza glabra, a species native to the Mediterranean region. Russian liquorice (Glycyrrhiza echinata) and Chinese liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) are also 81 cultivated, the latter being important in traditional Chinese medicine. G. acanthocarpa occurs from the semi-arid to arid fringe of southern Australia’s cropping regions, thus appears well adapted to water-limited environments with a winterdominant growing season (Fig 4a). It occurs in various habitats and soil types from sandy to clay soils, but is especially common on soils prone to flooding. It has been found to be reasonably tolerant of waterlogging and saline conditions (growth reduced to 59% of control under 120 mM of NaCl solution) (Rogers and Spokes, unpublished data), but performed poorly in a series of field experiments in waterlogging-prone sites due to poor establishment and poor biomass production75. G. acanthocarpa is an erect to semi-prostrate to ascending perennial subshrub growing 1 m high. It flowers from early spring through to late summer and produces single-seeded pods covered in hard bristles or prickles. Advantageously, these pods are indehiscent or tardily dehiscent, which means pods do not split at maturity, or if so, quite late46. Seeds of G. acanthocarpa are kidney-shaped and attractively colored, usually olive-green, mottled with black46. Seeds are quite small, being about 2.5 mm long and about 5 mg (Table 1). No documented information was found on seed yield, seed protein or oil content, or the presence of bioactive compounds or toxins in seeds. Other exotic Glycyrrhiza are known to possess a number of medically beneficial properties76; whether these active chemicals occur in the seeds of G. acanthocarpa is unknown. Overall, we consider G. acanthocarpa to be worth further appraisal as a grain crop (Table 3). It has a suitable growth habit, its pods are indehiscent, it has moderate-sized attractive seeds and its distribution suggests a high suitability to Australia’s more arid cropping regions. More information is required on the seed chemistry and seed yield potential of this species. Hardenbergia Hardenbergia is a genus of three species, all endemic to Australia. H. violacea (false sarsparilla, purple coral tree and happy wanderer) is widely grown as a hardy ornamental garden plant, with many cultivars available. H. violacea is a widespread species found in many habitats, although it generally tends toward higher-rainfall regions (Fig. 4a). Hardenbergia comptoniana is only found in southwestern Australia and mainly around the wetter coastal regions with mean rainfall greater than 700 mm per annum (Fig. 4a). All species are climbing vines, but sometimes can assume a subshrub form. Pods are dehiscent and in some cases these can be explosive77. Hardenbergia are large-seeded (22–45 mg) (Table 1) and can contain favorable concentrations of crude protein and oils16 (Table 2). Despite these positive attributes, we consider Hardenbergia to be of marginal interest as they are primarily adapted to moist environments and their twining 82 L.W. Bell et al. (a) growth habit would be a further obstacle to their development as a grain crop. Indigofera (b) (c) Figure 4. Australian distribution of native Rhyncosia, Glycyrrhiza and Hardenbergia spp. (a), Indigofera spp. (b) and Kennedia spp. (c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28. Indigofera is a large genus of about 700 species of which 33 are native to Australia43. They occur throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the world, with a few species reaching the temperate zone. These are mostly shrubs, although some are herbaceous, and a few can become small trees up to 5–6 m tall. Most species are dry-season or winter deciduous. Several of the exotic species (especially Indigofera tinctoria and Indigofera suffruticosa) are commercially grown to produce the dye, indigo. Most Australian Indigofera occur principally in the tropics and only Indigofera australis (Austral indigo), Indigofera brevidens (desert indigo), Indigofera colutea (rusty indigo) and Indigofera linnaei (Birdsville indigo) occur within our target region to any significant extent (Fig. 4b). I. australis occurs further south than the other three species and is found throughout the winter-dominant rainfall regions (Fig. 4b). I. australis and I. brevidens prefer sandy soils from granite or sandstone origin and commonly occur on granite plains and outcrops and river flats78. These four Indigofera species all have favorable growth habits and winter–spring growth patterns. I. australis is a highly variable species, but is often an erect spreading shrub with flexible stems growing up to 2.5 m tall46. It flowers in winter to early spring and flowers and pods are held in leaf axils, distributed along the stem. I. brevidens and I. colutea are both smaller perennial subshrubs growing 0.4–1 m high, although I. brevidens is often spiny which may limit its suitability for agriculture46. I. colutea flowers in autumn, while I. brevidens flowers from spring to early summer45. Indigofera seed are small with a squarish, blunt shape and the seed coat is often spotted. Seeds of I. australis appear to be larger (about 5 mg) than those of I. colutea and I. linnaei (< 2 mg) (Table 1). I. australis seeds have been found to contain 19% crude protein and 2.8% oils, which was lower than other native legumes tested16 (Table 2). Indigofera are also known to contain a variety of antinutritional or bioactive compounds such as indospicine and 3-nitropropanoic acid39,78. I. linnaei is known to contain indospicine in its leaves and seeds which can cause a toxic condition in horses but not cattle79. I. australis can also contain HCN and is suspected of being toxic to grazing livestock while flowering45. Despite the presence of antinutritional factors, a variety of Indigofera species did not reduce the growth rate of rats fed their seed or leaves78, indicating their potential as animal feed. Some exotic species of Indigofera actually have analgesic properties and have been used historically as anti-inflammatories and for pain alleviation (e.g., Indigofera articulata, Indigofera oblongifolia, I. suffruticosa and Indigofera aspalthoides)80. Whether these qualities are present in Australian Indigofera Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops or if the active compounds are present in the seeds is unknown. Of Australia’s Indigofera species, I. australis appears to have the greatest potential for temperate agriculture due to its larger seeds and more southern distribution, although it has been found to have lower protein and fat content than some other native legumes (Table 3). Seeds of Indigofera may also offer some novel medicinal uses, although their chemistry still remains to be explored. Kennedia Kennedia have long been identified as legumes with agricultural potential8. In particular, Kennedia from lowrainfall wheatbelt areas of Australia have been suggested as possible forage plants (e.g., Kennedia prostrata, Kennedia stirlingii and Kennedia prorepens)81–83. Yet, no species have been domesticated, although a number of them are grown as ornamentals. The Kennedia genus contains 15 species all of which are endemic to Australia43. The most widely distributed species are K. prostrata, found across southern Australia but mainly in moister regions, and K. prorepens, found throughout the arid regions of central Australia (Fig. 4c). There are nine Kennedia species endemic to southwestern Australia, eight of these species have quite localized distributions mainly along the southern coast or higher rainfall coastal regions outside the target region (i.e., K. nigricans, Kennedia glabrata, Kennedia beckxiana, Kennedia carinata, Kennedia eximia, Kennedia stirlingii, Kennedia macrophylla and Kennedia microphylla) (not shown). The one more widely distributed western Australian species, Kennedia coccinea, is predominantly found in the highrainfall regions, although it occurs to a lesser extent in the target regions (Fig. 4c). Silsbury and Brittan84 observed that the distribution of K. carinata corresponded to regions with a >7-month growing season and K. coccinea to regions with a 6-month growing season, while K. prostrata was found in drier regions with a shorter growing season (5 months). There are three Kennedia species only found in eastern Australia; Kennedia rubicunda has a wide distribution but mainly occurs in higher-rainfall environments along the east coast (Fig. 4c); Kennedia procurrens is found within the target region, although almost entirely within the subtropical subhumid region (E4) (Fig. 4c); and Kennedia retrorsa has a small distribution outside the target region (not shown). Kennedia species are mainly found in woodland or forest habitats and have a preference for light, well-drained soils. This adaptation to light-textured soils also suggests that they have some tolerance of drought and poor soil fertility. Two recent studies show that K. prostrata and K. prorepens seedlings grew better than some other perennial legumes under low phosphorus stress, partly due to high seed phosphorus concentrations70. However, these same studies show that these two species are particularly intolerant of high mineral soil phosphorus concentrations and thus would be suited only to low input agriculture on 83 poor soils. A further problem with Kennedia is a high degree of seed dormancy which has proved difficult to overcome. All Kennedia are evergreen prostrate or climbing perennials. They are herbaceous but often have woody stems at their base. Most species display indeterminate flowering from late winter into early summer with pod maturity reached about 1 month later. K. prorepens flower throughout winter beginning in autumn until late spring. Flowers are open pollinated by insects or birds. Elongated pea-like pods contain 4–50 seeds. Mature pods are dehiscent, but valves do not twist at maturity. One study has reported seed production of 200 kg ha - 1 from K. prostrata at the onset of November at Merredin in the Western Australian wheatbelt82. This was about 10% of the total shoot biomass at this time. However, flowering and seed production did not occur until the second growing season for K. prostrata82. This is commonly recognized in K. prostrata, while other Kennedia species (e.g., K. prorepens and K. coccinea) flower in their first year. Kennedia have quite large seeds compared to many of the other native legumes, with many species having seeds > 10 mg. Seeds up to 44 mg have been measured in K. prostrata, but the seed size in this and other species seems to be highly variable (Table 1). The chemical composition of seeds of some Kennedia species has shown them to possess high levels of protein and favorable fatty acids. K. coccinea and K. nigricans were found to have > 24% protein and fatty acids consisted of 20% saturated, 30% monounsaturated and 50% polyunsaturated fats. K. nigricans (9%) had higher total fat/oil content than in K. coccinea (3%)16 (Table 2). K. prostrata seeds have also been found to contain >22% protein (N%r5.7), which was concentrated in the embryo and cotyledon85. The embryo and cotyledons made up only 23.7% of the seed weight compared to the testa (seed coat) which made up 75% of the seed weight and contained over 30% of its N and P86. This contrasts strongly with many domesticated grain legumes, where the testa consists of a small proportion of the seed’s dry matter (e.g., Pisum 10.4% and Lupinus 12.7–33.7%) and contains < 5% of the seed’s N and P85,87. Hence, it appears that significant gains could be made in improving the total protein yield from Kennedia seed by selecting for thinner seed coat. The thick testa in K. prostrata probably imparts the dormancy and longevity required for seeds to persist over many years. High levels of seed dormancy have also been seen in other Kennedia (over 95% seeds were dormant at maturity in K. rubicunda), which can cause problems for uniform and reliable germination that would be required in a crop. Selection for soft, thin seed coats in cultivated grain legumes has removed the dormancy imparted by a thick testa, and has enabled nutrients which might have otherwise gone to this structure to be directed to the embryo31. Although no major toxicity problems have been documented with Kennedia, Rivett et al.16 found K. nigricans and K. coccinea seeds to contain significant concentrations 84 of canavanine, 8.1 and 6.0 mol%, respectively. However, the presence of canavanine in some of these seeds should not prove an obstacle to their food use since the apparent toxicity of this compound is low. Overall, Kennedia are an interesting genus to consider further as a grain crop. They have large seeds (up to 45 mg) with advantageous nutritional qualities, some species produce copious seeds in the first year. As with Glycine, a major constraint is their twining/trailing habit which is not favorable in a crop plant. Of the Kennedia species, K. prorepens has the most desirable distribution and appears well adapted to arid environments and hence was prioritized for further investigation (Table 3). Germplasm of K. prostrata also has some desirable adaptations to challenging environments, but its inability to flower and set seed in its first year is a major constraint (Table 3). Lotus The Lotus genus (bird’s foot trefoils and deer vetches) includes between 70 and 150 species (depending on author). Several species are cultivated as forage plants in many regions of the world, but not as a grain crops (e.g., Lotus corniculatus, Lotus pedunculatus and Lotus glaber). The genus is large, but only two species are native to Australia, Lotus australis and Lotus cruentus. Both L. australis and L. cruentus are found in the target region throughout southern and inland Australia, but of the two, L. cruentus may have greater adaptation to the lower-rainfall regions (Fig. 5a). Both species are found on a wide range of soil types and habitats and are considered to be drought resistant45. Both Australian Lotus species can perenniate and flower in their first year, although L. cruentus often acts as an annual and produces copious seeds88. L. australis has an erect-ascending habit growing up to 60 cm in height, while L. cruentus is more prostrate to ascending46. Flowering can occur all year round, but mainly occurs in spring with maturity in early to mid summer46. Plants are pollinated by insects, commonly bees, although L. cruentus appears to be reasonably self-compatible (Richard Bennett, unpublished data). One major limitation of Lotus species for grain production is the loss of seed due to their continuous flowering and high propensity for the pod to shatter at maturity. Seed shattering (dehiscence) is a major problem for seed production in domesticated Lotus species used as forage plants and seed losses can vary between 5 and 88%33. Lotus species are generally small seeded, with seeds weighing between 1.3 and 2.7 g (Table 1). Seed are often smooth, very round and brown colored with a mottled appearance. The content of protein, oils or other compounds in the seed from Lotus species is unknown. Both Australian Lotus species contain HCN in their shoots, which is associated with numerous cases of poisoning in cattle and sheep39,45. However, significant variability in HCN content has been identified in L. australis, enabling genotypes with low HCN L.W. Bell et al. (a) (b) (c) Figure 5. Distribution of Australian native Lotus and Trigonella spp. (a), a selection of widely distributed Swainsona spp. (b) and native Vigna spp. (c) mapped against targeted agro-climatic regions; semi-arid cropping zone (E2, E3 and E4)—light gray; and the arid interior (E6 and G)—dark gray (see Fig. 1). Data sourced from Australian Virtual Herbarium28. Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops to be selected and bred89. Highest concentrations of HCN are found in the leaves and flowers; concentrations are much lower in the seeds and pods and decrease as pods mature90. Thus, HCN is unlikely to be a major difficulty in seeds of Lotus species and could actually be advantageous in vegetative parts to provide protection from insect herbivory, while the seed remains palatable. Australian Lotus species have attracted interest as potential forage legumes for low-rainfall environments89, but they seem less well suited as grain crops. They have quite small seeds, and their unappealing appearance would limit their novelty as a whole-seed product. Their propensity to shatter is a major agronomic problem and the lack of interest in using more domesticated Lotus species for grain production indicates that these species have limited suitability as grain crops (Table 3). Rhynchosia Rhynchosia includes more than 200, mostly tropical, species, with six species native to Australia. Several species in the genus are commonly called rosary bean because of their attractive red, blue, black, mottled or bicolored seeds. The pantropical species Rhynchosia minima is highly variable and has four varieties described in Australia [var. amaliae, australis ( = eurycarpa), minima and tomentosa]. R. minima has previously been investigated as a potential forage plant and with many ecotypes that vary in their adaptation and growth characteristics there is significant opportunity to exploit this species91. Most Australian Rhynchosia are restricted to subtropical and tropical regions of Australia, but the most widespread species, R. minima (snout bean), is also found across the arid regions of central Australia and commonly within the target region (Fig. 4a). R. minima is found in a variety of habitats but most often on self-mulching heavy clay soils46,91. However, it has been collected from sands and sandy loams91. It is regarded as a hardy plant and tolerant of drought. R. minima is a slender climbing or trailing perennial herb. It germinates on summer rains and flowers during spring–summer and produces abundance of seed46,91. Days for flowering vary from 43 to 14291. Pod indehiscence was found in most accessions of Rhynchosia, but some accessions do retain seeds longer than others91. Seeds of R. minima are reasonably large, kidney-shaped and grayish, brown or black and often mottled. The seed size may vary substantially, ranging from 8.8 to 20.4 mg91. There is no information on the concentrations of protein or oils in R. minima seed, but they have been found to contain some chemicals of pharmaceutical interest including prodelphinidin (antibiotic), gallic and protocatechuic acid (antiasthmatic and antioxidant)6,80. Overall, R. minima warrants further appraisal as a grain crop (Table 3). It has large attractive seeds and is regarded as a productive seed producer. Significant variability exists in important agronomic attributes such as days to flowering, 85 pod indehiscence and seed size, providing the potential to identify and select desirable genotypes to improve grain production. Its distribution suggests that it is tolerant of water-limited environments, but its preference for heavy clay soils restricts its applicability in some regions. Swainsona Swainsona includes 85 species of which 84 are endemic to Australia. The best known of these species is Swainsona formosa (Sturt’s desert pea), which is grown as an ornamental flowering plant, but little is known about most of these species. Swainsona are generally found throughout the arid interior of Australia with most occurring within our target region. Many species are not widely distributed, but the more widely distributed species include S. formosa, Swainsona canescens, Swainsona colutoides and Swainsona swainsonoides (Fig. 5b). Many species also exhibit characteristics of plants adapted to dry environments such as hairy leaves and branches, and a deep tap root. Swainsona includes plants with annual, biennial and perennial life cycles and most could be described as small subshrubs that range from prostrate to semierect92. At least a few species are winter growing which flower and set seed in spring (e.g., S. canescens). Most species seem to be predominantly open pollinated by insects or birds92, but some have a degree of self-compatibility. A few species are known to exhibit exceptional fecundity, for example, well-grown plants of S. canescens are capable of setting approximately 80,000 seeds (Bennett, unpublished data). Generally, the genus is described as dehiscent, but a number of species are known to be indehiscent or tardily indehiscent (e.g., S. canescens, S. colutoides, Swainsona pyrophila and Swainsona fraseri), where pods senesce with seeds are still enclosed. Seeds of Swainsona are usually small (< 3 mg) and kidney-shaped. However, S. swainsonoides appears to have larger seeds (> 7 mg) than other species (Table 1). Seeds usually have hard seed coats, which induce dormancy. Aborigines ate at least one Swainsona species, Swainsona galegafolia (Darling pea), which was eaten green and has a similar taste to the common garden pea93. Its green seed (69% moisture content) contains 31% protein, 33% carbohydrate, 26% fiber and 6% fat (on a dry matter basis)93. However, while 64% of the seed is edible, no information about the inedible component was provided. No information on the constituents of seed of other Swainsona was found. Swainsona also gives its name to the toxic alkaloid swainsonine39; while this is poisonous to livestock, its effect on humans is unknown. Aplin and Cannon74 report that the concentration of alkaloids in general (not only swainsonine) in the vegetative material of other Swainsona species was high in Swainsona rostellata, moderate in Swainsona campestris, S. canescens, Swainsona incei, Swainsona stipularis and low in Swainsona cyclocarpa, Swainsona flavicarinata and Swainsona occidentalis. 86 Species reputedly or proven to be poisonous when grazed by livestock include Swainsona galegifolia, Swainsona sejuncta, Swainsona greyana, Swainsona lessertiifolia, Swainsona luteola, Swainsona microphylla, Swainsona oroboides and Swainsona procumbens94. Seeds of S. galegifolia and S. sejuncta contain 2900 and 1700 mg kg - 1 of swainsonine, respectively27. There are few data on seed swainsonine concentration in other Swainsona species, but it would be expected to be negligible in species with low concentrations in vegetative material. For example, the swainsonine concentration in the stems or leaves of S. galegifolia (up to 7500 mg kg - 1) and S. sejuncta (up to 5200 mg kg - 1) is approximately 2.5 times the concentration in the seeds27. Thus species such as S. formosa, which have low concentrations of swainsonine in leaves (70 mg kg - 1) and flowers (210–490 mg kg - 1), may have very low concentrations in seeds27. Despite the lack of information on many Swainsona species, a number of them have characteristics which suggest that they are worthy of further investigation for their grain production potential (Table 3). In particular, S. canescens and S. colutoides are high-seed-producing species, which have delayed dehiscence, an erect growth habit and are not reported to contain high concentrations of swainsonine. Being an annual species with low risk of swainsonine problems, S. formosa may also be of further interest. Some other widely distributed Swainsona species (S. swainsonoides, Swainsona purpurea and Swainsona kingii) may also have potential, but lack information. Trigonella Of the 80 species in the genus Trigonella, Trigonella suavissima (sweet fenugreek) is the only native of Australia43. This species has been investigated for its potential as a forage plant95. Several exotic Trigonella species are important for culinary, nutritional or medical reasons96. The most widely used is fenugreek (Trigonella feonum-graecum), which is cultivated throughout semi-arid regions of the world as an alternative multipurpose crop that can be grown for grain, forage or green manure97,98. T. suavissima is a winter-growing annual or ephemeral, flowering between autumn and spring46. It occurs throughout inland arid environments in central Australia, where it is typically found on heavy clay soils of river banks, floodplains and depressions45 (Fig. 5a). It is rarely found on sandy soils45. It is particularly prevalent in inland Australia after winter–spring rains or cool-season floods, forming dense swards on flood plains. Thus, while it occurs in arid environments its ephemeral life cycle allows it to avoid severe water stress rather than tolerate water deficit. T. suavissima has also shown good tolerance of salinity compared to other native and exotic legumes, with a growth of 106% of control at 40 mM NaCl concentration99. T. sauvissima has a desirable growth habit, being decumbent to ascending and reaching 50 cm in height46. Few agronomic data are available on the seed production L.W. Bell et al. potential of T. sauvissima, yet it is reputed to have a high level of fecundity45. Collected accessions of the species have flowered between 111 and 118 days after sowing, but because of its ephemeral life cyle in arid climates, it is likely that earlier flowering material exists. It is commonly pollinated by insects, but its self-compatibility is unknown100. A favorable attribute of T. sauvissima is that it can be indehiscent or tardily dehiscent, yet fruits are often shed from plants at maturity92,100. The seed of one tested accession of T. suavissima is small (1 mg, Table 1), substantially smaller than its grain legume relative, fenugreek (9–22 mg)97. The small seeds of T. suavissima may limit its yield potential as a grain crop. However, it could have been used as a multipurpose pasture and crop species (as for fenugreek), as it is regarded as a valuable and nutritious fodder source where it grows naturally95. There are no published studies of seed chemical composition or the presence of bioactive compounds in T. suavissima. Fenugreek contains a number of bioactive chemicals and has beneficial medicinal and nutritional qualities101. The presence of these qualities in T. suavissima is worth exploring. Overall, T. suavissima is deserving of further appraisal as a grain crop (Table 3). It has a suitable growth habit and a number of desirable agronomic attributes, but in particular its distribution in arid environments suggests an ability to avoid or tolerate water stress. Its seeds potentially contain chemicals with pharmaceutical applications. The major limitation appears to be small seed size, warranting exploration for germplasm with greater seed size. More information is required on the seed chemistry and seed yield potential of this species. Vigna The Vigna genus contains a number of species that are widely grown as grain legumes throughout the world (e.g., mung bean (Vigna radiata), azuki bean (Vigna angularis) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)) and some secondary grain legumes (e.g., Vigna acontifolia (moth bean), Vigna lanceolata (pencil yam), Vigna mungo (urad bean, black gram), Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut), Vigna umbellata (rice bean) and Vigna vexillata (zombi pea))98. Five species of Vigna are indigenous to Australia and one is endemic (V. lanceolata)102. Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata is the putative progenitor to the cultivated mungbean (V. radiata) and is a native of Australia43. Australian Vigna species are predominately tropical species or are mainly found in higher-rainfall environments (Fig. 5c). V. lanceolata is the only species that occurs to any extent in our target region. It is a highly diverse species with a number of genotypes that exhibit significant variation in important agronomic traits (e.g., seed yield, days to flowering and frost tolerance)103. The key differences in agronomic traits between native Vigna and modern cultivars are longer time to flowering and maturity, smaller seed size, higher levels of hardseededness, a more prostrate Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops and twining habit and a lower seed yield and harvest index104–106. Overall, Australian Vigna are of secondary interest to us because of their predominantly tropical distribution and others have previously investigated their agronomic potential104–106. Conclusion Australia has a diverse flora of herbaceous legumes and their agricultural potential and, especially, their potential to produce grain products has been little assessed. For many species, data are sparse and must also be considered with caution because of the likelihood that past studies have not adequately captured species’ variability. Nevertheless, many species possess characteristics that would be useful in marginal grain growing environments due to their adaptation to arid and semi-arid climates and, sometimes, infertile soils. A major challenge for a number of species (e.g., Glycine, Kennedia and Rhynchosia) is their twining growth habit. However, this was the case in many of the progenitors of modern legume grain crops (e.g., Glycine, Vigna, Phaseolus, Pisum and Arachis)31. Similarly, substantial increases in seed size and the removal of seed dormancy mechanisms have previously been achieved through plant breeding, and so while many Australian native species have small seeds, there is a potential to increase seed size. Similarly, seeds of many undomesticated legumes are likely to have a high proportion of seed coat, as seen in K. prostrata86, which if reduced could increase protein yield and reduce problems with hardseededness. Little information exists on the chemical constituents of many native Australian legumes, but some have a potential market because they possess attractive seeds (especially small-seeded species, e.g., Glycine and Glycyrrhiza) or because they possess bioactive compounds with prospects for use as natural medicines (e.g., Glycine, Cullen, Trigonella and Indigofera). While the germplasm of native legumes is currently stored in Australian Genetic Resource Centres107, it is likely that these collections do not come close to fully representing the diversity present in natural populations and any serious attempt at domestication of most native legumes would need to commence with a comprehensive collection of wild germplasm51. This paper identifies a number of species with the greatest immediate potential to be developed as alternative grain legumes; however, additional basic information on the seed constituents, phenology, breeding system and reproductive potential of these species is required to narrow the list further. This is especially necessary in genera where little current data exist (e.g., Swainsona, Glycyrrhiza and Crotalaria). This work has been initiated and some preliminary studies will be reported in a forthcoming paper. Once two or three most promising species are identified, a preliminary selection and breeding program could commence to begin the domestication process. This process could commence with a—perhaps more limited—germplasm acquisition program, but before significant gains 87 could be made, more substantial germplasm acquisition and characterization activities would be needed. Concurrently, evidence on the potential applications and market niche for grain from these species would be required. Ongoing collaboration with the food and/or nutraceutical industry would help this process. In addition, agronomic and physiological research should focus on confirming adaptive characteristics and agronomic suitability and help to focus future breeding priorities. Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) for their funding of this research. We are also grateful to Jens Berger and Jon Clements for their comments on the paper. References 1 Brummer, E.C. 1998. Diversity, stability, and sustainable agriculture. Agronomy Journal 90:1–2. 2 Glover, J.D. 2005. The necessity and possibility of perennial grain production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:1–4. 3 Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., and Swift, M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504. 4 Bell, L.W., Ewing, M.A., and Wade, L.J. 2010. Perennial wheat: a review of environmental and agronomic prospects for development in Australia. Crop and Pasture Science, in press. 5 Cox, T., Bender, M., Picone, C., Van Tassel, D.L., Holland, J.B., Brummer, E.C., Zoeller, B.E., Paterson, A.H., and Jackson, W. 2002. Breeding perennial grain crops. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 21:59–91. 6 Morris, J.B. 1997. Special-purpose legume genetic resources conserved for agricultural, industrial, and pharmaceutical use. Economic Botany 51:251–263. 7 Lodge, G.M. 1996. Temperate native Australian grass improvement by selection. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39:487–497. 8 Millington, A.J. 1958. The potential of some native West Australian plants as pasture species. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 42:1–6. 9 Britten, E.J. and De Lacy, I. 1979. Assessment of the genetic potential for pasture purposes of the Psoralea erianthapatens complex, a native legume of the semiarid zone. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19:53–58. 10 Cohen, R.D.H. and Wilson, G.P.M. 1981. Laboratory estimates of the nutritive value of some herbaceous native legumes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21:583–587. 11 Dear, B.S., Li, G.D., Hayes, R.C., Hughes, S.J., Charman, N., and Ballard, R.A. 2007. Cullen australasicum (syn. Psoralea australasica): a review and some preliminary studies related to its potential as a low rainfall perennial pasture legume. The Rangeland Journal 29:121–132. 12 Gutteridge, R.C. and Whiteman, P.C. 1975. Effect of defoliation frequency on growth and survival of four accessions of Psoralea eriantha. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15:493–497. 88 13 Robinson, K., Bell, L.W., Bennett, R.G., Henry, D.A., Tibbett, M., and Ryan, M.H. 2007. Perennial legumes native to Australia—a preliminary investigation of nutritive value and response to cutting. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:170–176. 14 Lister, P.R., Holford, P., Haigh, T., and Morrison, D.A. 1996. Acacia in Australia: Ethnobotany and potential food crop. In J. Janick (ed.). Progress in New Crops. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. p. 228–236. 15 Davies, C.L., Waugh, D.L., and Lefroy, E.C. 2005. Variation in seed yield and its components in the Australian native grass Microlaena stipoides as a guide to its potential as a perennial grain crop. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56:309–316. 16 Rivett, D.E., Tucker, D.J., and Jones, G.P. 1983. The chemical composition of seeds from some Australian plants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34:427–432. 17 Buirchell, B.J. and Sweetingham, M.W. 2006. Lupin genetic improvement for targeted environments and markets. In 13th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference, Perth, Western Australia. Australian Society of Agronomy. Available at Web site http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2006/plenary/ environment/4808_buirchellb.htm#TopOfPage&rsquo (accessed August 7, 2010). 18 Berger, J.D., Adhikari, K.N., Wilkinson, D., Buirchell, B.J., and Sweetingham, M.W. 2008. Ecogeography of the Old World lupins. 1. Ecotypic variation in yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59:691–701. 19 Kulakow, P., Benson, L., and Vail, J. 1990. Prospects for domesticating Illinois bundleflower. In J. Janick and J. Simon (eds). Advances in New Crops. Timber Press, Portland, OR. p. 168–171. 20 Vaughan, D.A., Balazs, E., and Heslop-Harrison, J.S. 2007. From crop domestication to super-domestication. Annals of Botany 100:893–901. 21 Fuller, D.Q. 2007. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the old world. Annals of Botany 100:903–924. 22 Brand-Miller, J.C. and Holt, S.H.A. 1998. Australian Aboriginal plant foods: a consideration of their nutritional composition and health implications. Nutrition Research Reviews 11:5–23. 23 Casas, A., Otero-Arnaiz, A., Perez-Negron, E., and ValienteBanuet, A. 2007. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Annals of Botany 100:1101–1115. 24 Erskine, W., Smartt, J., and Muehlbauer, F. 1994. Mimicry of lentil and the domestication of common vetch and grass pea. Economic Botany 48:326–332. 25 Hartman, G.L., Wang, T.C., and Hymowitz T. 1992. Sources of resistance to soybean rust in perennial Glycine species. Plant Disease 76:396–399. 26 Singh, B.B., Gupta, C.C., and Singh, B.D. 1974. Sources of field resistance to rust and yellow mosaic diseases in soybean. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 34:400–404. 27 Martyn, A., Tyler, J., Offord, C., and McConchie, R. 2003. Swainsona sejuncta: a species of ornamental promise or a potential weed? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43:1369–1381. 28 Australian Vertual Herbarium. 2008. [Online Database]. Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research. Available at Web site http://www.chah.gov.au/apc/index.html L.W. Bell et al. 29 Hutchinson, M.F., McIntyre, S., Hobbs, R.J., Stein, J.L., Garnett, S., and Kinloch, J. 2005. Integrating a global agro-climatic classification with bioregional boundaries in Australia. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14:197–212. 30 Weeden, N.F. 2007. Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the ‘domestication syndrome’ for legumes? Annals of Botany 100:1017–1025. 31 Smartt, J. 1976. Comparative evolution of pulse crops. Euphytica 25:337–339. 32 Bailey, M.A., Mian, M.A.R., Carter, T.E. Jr., Ashley, D.A., and Boerma, H.R. 1997. Pod dehiscence of soybean: identification of quantitative trait loci. Journal of Heredity 88: 152–154. 33 Garcia-Diaz, C.A. and Steiner, J.J. 2000. Birdsfoot trefoil seed production: III. Seed shatter and optimal harvest time. Crop Science 40:457–462. 34 Leishman, M.R., Wright, I.J., Moles, A.T., and Westoby, M. 2000. Chapter 2—The Evolutionary Ecology of Seed Size. In M. Fenner (ed.). Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. p. 31–57. 35 Cowling, W., Buirchell, B., and Tapia, M. 1988. Lupin Lupinus L. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 36 Bourgaud, F., Allard, N., Forlot, P., and Guckert, A. 1990. Study of two pharmaceutically useful Psoralea (Leguminosae) species: influence of inoculation on growth, grain and dry matter yield. Agronomie 10:1–8. 37 Setchell, K.D. 1998. Phytoestrogens: the biochemistry, physiology, and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 68:1333S– 1346S. 38 Lin, R., Renshaw, D., Luckett, D., Clements, J., Yan, G., Adhikari, K., Buirchell, B., Sweetingham, M., and Yang, H. 2009. Development of a sequence-specific PCR marker linked to the gene ‘pauper’ conferring low-alkaloids in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) for marker assisted selection. Molecular Breeding 23:153–161. 39 Jermyn, M.A. 1985. Endemic Australian legumes as possible crop plants - preliminary studies with Erythrina vespertilio and other leguminous seeds. In G.P. Jones (ed.). The Food Potential of Seeds from Australian Native Plants. Deakin University Press, Geelong, Australia. p. 93–118. 40 Belmar, R. and Morris, T.R. 1994. Effects of raw and treated jack beans (Canavalia ensiformis) and canavanine on the short-term feed intake of chicks and pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 123:407–414. 41 Rüdiger, H. and Gabius, H.-J. 2001. Plant lectins: occurrence, biochemistry, functions and applications. Glycoconjugate Journal 18:589–613. 42 Sridhar, K. and Seena, S. 2006. Nutritional and antinutritional significance of four unconventional legumes of the genus Canavalia—a comparative study. Food Chemistry 99:267–288. 43 Legume Web—ILDIS World Database of Legumes version 10. 2008 [updated November 6, 2008; cited]. Available at Web site http://www.ildis.org/LegumeWeb 44 The Australian Arid Lands Botanic Garden. 2008 [updated 2008; cited January 12, 2010]. Available at Web site http:// www.australian-aridlands-botanic-garden.org/general/ plants/plant0.htm Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops 45 Cunningham, G., Mulham, W., Milthorpe, P., and Leigh, J. 1981. Plants of Western New South Wales. Soil Conservation Service of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 46 PlantNET—The Plant Information Network System of Botanic Gardens Trust. Botanic Gardens Trust, Sydney, Australia; 2010 [updated 2010, February 4, 2010; cited]. Available at Web site http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au 47 Everist, S.L. 1974. Poisonous Plants of Australia. Angus & Robertson, Sydney. 48 Crib, A.B. and Crib, J.W. 1976. Wild Food in Australia. Fontana, Collins, Australia. 49 Grimes, J.W. 1997. A revision of Cullen (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Australian Systematic Botany 10:565– 648. 50 Burbridge, N.T. 1980. Psoralea pallida, a new species of Fabaceae from arid Australia. Telopea 2:127–128. 51 Bennett, R.G., Ryan, M.H., Colmer, T.D., and Real, D. 2010. Prioritisation of novel pasture species for use in waterlimited agriculture: a case study of Cullen in the western Australian wheatbelt. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, in press. 52 Suriyagoda, L.D.B., Ryan, M.H., Renton, M., and Lambers, H. 2010. Multiple adaptive responses of Australian native perennial legumes with pasture potential to grow in phosphorus- and moisture-limited environments. Annals of Botany 105:755–767. 53 Kerridge, P.C. and Skerman, P.J. 1968. The distribution and growth characteristics of the native legume Psoralea eriantha in Western Queensland. Tropical Grasslands 2:41–50. 54 Britten, E.J. and De Lacy, I.H. 1977. Comparative photoperiod response of different accessions in the P. erianthapatens group of the legume genus Psoralea. In 3rd International Congress of the Society for the Advancement of Breeding Researches in Asia and Oceania (SABRAO), Canberra, Australia. p. 22–26. 55 Britten, E.J. and Dundas, I.S. 1985. A dimorphic pollination system in a potentially valuable semiarid pasture legume, the Psoralea patens complex. In Proceedings of the XV International Grassland Congress, August 24–31, 1985, Kyoto, Japan. Science Council of Japan and Japanese Society of Grassland Science, Nishi-nasuno, Tochigi, Japan. p. 209–210. 56 Kroiss, L., Moody, M., Barker, S.J., Byrne, M., and Ryan, M. 2009. Development, characterization and transferability of microsatellite markers for Cullen australasicum (Leguminosae). Conservation Genetics 10:1803–1805. 57 Silcock, R.G. and Smith, F.T. 1990. Viable seed retention under field conditions by western Queensland pasture species. Tropical Grasslands 24:65–74. 58 Skerman, P.J. 1957. Bullamon lucerne (Psoralea eriantha Benth) A plant worth watching. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 23:337–339. 59 Innocenti, G., Bourgaud, F., Piovan, A., and Favretto, D. 1997. Furocoumarins and other secondary metabolites from Psoralea canescens. International Journal of Pharmacognosy: A Journal of Crude Drug Research 35:232–236. 60 Innocenti, G., Piovan, A., Filippini, R., Caniato, R., and Cappelletti, E.M. 1997. Quantitative recovery of furanocoumarins from Psoralea bituminosa. Phytochemical Analysis 8:84–86. 61 Nguyen, C., Bouque, V., Bourgaud, F., and Guckert, A. 1997. Quantification of daidzein and furanocoumarin conjugates 89 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 of Psoralea cinerea L. (Leguminosae). Phytochemical Analysis 8:27–31. Innocenti, G., Dall’Acqua, F., Guiotto, A. and Caporale, G. 1977. Investigation of skin-photosensitizing activity of various kinds of Psoralea. Planta Medica 31:151–155. Raghav, C.S., Kidwai, M.A., Singh, B.M., Suneja, P., Mohan, J., Kumar, A., Pareek, S.K., Singh, M., and Somayajulu, K.K. 2003. Agronomical and chemical evaluation of babchi (Cullen corylifolia) germplasm. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 73:567–569. Innocenti, G., Cappelletti, E.M., and Caporale, G. 1984. Morphological and chemical characteristics of some Australian Psoralea species. International Journal of Crude Drug Research 22:97–109. Bouque, V., Bourgaud, F., Nguyen, C., and Guckert, A. 1998. Production of daidzein by callus cultures of Psoralea species and comparison with plants. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 53:35–40. Kao, W.Y., Tsai, T.T., and Shih, C.N. 2003. Photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll a-fluorescence of three wild soybean species in response to NaCl treatments. Photosynthetica 41:415–419. Hart, S.E., Glenn, S., and Kenworthy, W.W. 1991. Tolerance and the basis for selectivity to 2,4-D in perennial Glycine species. Weed Science 39:535–539. Burdon, J. 1988. Major gene resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in Glycine canescens, a wild relative of soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 75:923–928. Jones, R.M., Brown, A.H.D., and Coote, J.N. 1996. Variation in growth and forage quality of Glycine latifolia (Benth.) Newell and Hymowitz. Genetic Resources Communication 26:1–11. Pang, J., Tibbett, M., Denton, M.D., Lambers, H., Siddique, K.H.M., Bolland, M.D.A., Revell, C.K., and Ryan, M.H. 2010. Variation in seedling growth of 11 perennial legumes in response to phosphorus supply. Plant and Soil 328:133–143. Kenworthy, W.J., Brown, A.H.D., and Thibou, G.A. 1989. Variation in flowering response to photoperiod in perennial Glycine species. Crop Science 29:678–682. Lin, S.J., Lay, H.L., Wu, S.T., and Thseng, F.S. 2005. Contents of certain isoflavones in Glycine dolichocarpa, G. tabacina and G. tomentella collected in Taiwan. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 13:260–266. Vaughan, D.A. and Hymowitz, T. 1984. Leaf flavonoids of Glycine subgenus Glycine in relation to systematics. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 12:189–192. Aplin, T.E.H. and Cannon, J.R. 1970. Distribution of alkaloids in some Western Australian plants. Economic Botany 25:366–380. Li, G.D., Lodge, G.M., Moore, G.A., Craig, A.D., Dear, B.S., Boschma, S.P., Albertsen, T.O., Miller, S.M., Harden, S., Hayes, R.C., Hughes, S.J., Snowball, R., Smith, A.B., and Cullis, B.C. 2008. Evaluation of perennial pasture legumes and herbs to identify species with high herbage production and persistence in mixed farming zones in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48:449–466. Ross, I.A. 2001. Medicinal Plants of the World Vol. 2: Chemical Constituents, Traditional and Modern Uses. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ. Wilson, P. and Wilson, M. 2006. Chapter 3—Seed and fruit structure. In L. Seedman and D. Merritt (eds). Australian 90 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 L.W. Bell et al. Seeds—A Guide to their Collection, Identification and Biology. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. p. 11–19. Aylward, J.H., Court, R.D., Haydock, K.P., Strickland, R.W., and Hegarty, M.P. 1987. Indigofera species with agronomic potential in the tropics. Rat toxicity studies. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38:177–186. Gracie, A. 1996. Agnote 657. Birdsville Disease. Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries, Darwin, Australia. GRIN (Germplasm Resources Information Network), Beltsville, MD: USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program [cited]. Available at Web site http://www.ars-grin. gov/ (accessed August 7, 2010). Cocks, P.S. 2001. Ecology of herbaceous perennial legumes: a review of characteristics that may provide management options for the control of salinity and waterlogging in dryland cropping systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52:137–151. Silsbury, J.H. 1952. Studies in the Genus Kennedya (vent.) with a view to its development as a pasture legume [Honours]. University of Western Australia. Silsbury, J.H. 1958. Agricultural potentialities of the genus Kennedya Vent. in Western Australia. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 24:237–242. Silsbury, J.H. and Brittan, N.H. 1955. Distribution and ecology of the genus Kennedya [i.e. Kennedia] Vent. in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 3:113–135. Hocking, P.J. 1980. The mineral nutrition of developing fruits of Kennedia prostrata R. Br. Ex Ait., a perennial Australian legume. Australian Journal of Botany 28:633–644. Hocking, P.J. and Kortt, A.A. 1987. Growth and nutrient accumulation by fruits of the perennial legume, Hardenbergia violacea, with special reference to myrmecochory. New Phytologist 105:89–102. Clements, J.C., Dracup, M., Buirchell, B.J. and Smith, C.G. 2005. Variation for hull and pod wall percentage and other traits in a germplasm collection and historical cultivars of lupins. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 75–83. Moles, A.T., Warton, D.I. and Westoby, M. 2003. Seed size and survival in the soil in arid Australia. Austral Ecology 28:575–585. Real, D., Sandral, G., Warden, J., Nutt, L., Bennett, R., and Kidd, D. 2005. Breeding Lotus australis Andrews for low cyanide content. In XX International Grasslands Congress: Offered Papers, Dublin, Ireland. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Gebrehiwot, L. and Beuselinck, P.R. 2001. Seasonal variations in hydrogen cyanide concentration of three Lotus species. Agronomy Journal 93:603–608. Harding, W.A.T., Pengelly, B.C., Cameron, D.G., Pedley, L., and Williams, R.J. 1989. Classification of a diverse collection of Rhynchosia and some allied species. Genetic Resources Communication No. 13. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Brisbane, Australia. Florabase—The Western Australian Flora. Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation; 1998 [updated 1998; cited]; Available at Web site http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/ Brand, J. and Cherikoff, V. 1985. Nutrients in native plants 1. In G.P. Jones (ed.). The Food Potential of Seeds from 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 Australian Native Plants. Deakin University Press, Geelong, Australia. p. 31–45. Gardiner, M.R., Linto, A.C., and Applin, T.E.H. 1969. Toxicity of Swainsona canescens for sheep in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20:87–97. Halloran, G.M. and Pennell, A.L. 1981. Distribution and variability in development of the genus Trigonella in Asia Minor and its possible use in Australian environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32: 793–800. Acharya, S., Srichamroen, A., Basu, S., Ooraikul, B., and Basu, T. 2006. Improvement in the nutraceutical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Nutraceutical and Functional Food 28:1–9. McCormick, K., Norton, R., and Eagles, H. 2009. Phenotypic variation within a fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) germplasm collection. II. Cultivar selection based on traits associated with seed yield. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56:651–661. Hymowitz, T. 1990. Grain Legumes. In J. Janick and J. Simon (eds). Advances in New Crops. Timber Press, Portland, OR. p. 54–57. Rogers, M.E., Craig, A.D., Munns, R.E., Colmer, T.D., Nichols, P.G.H., Malcolm, C.V., Barrett-Lennard, E.G., Brown, A.J., Semple, W.S., Evans, P.M., Cowley, K., Hughes, S.J., Snowball, R., Bennett, S.J., Sweeney, G.C., Dear, B.S., and Ewing, M.A. 2005. The potential for developing fodder plants for the salt-affected areas of southern and eastern Australia: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45:301–329. Dear, B.S., Moore, G.A., and Hughes, S.J. 2003. Adaptation and potential contribution of temperate perennial legumes to the southern Australian wheatbelt: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43:1–18. Bordia, A., Verma, S.K., and Srivastava, K.C. 1997. Effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum L.) on blood lipids, blood sugar and platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 56:379–384. Lawn, R.J. and Watkinson, A.R. 2002. Habitats, morphological diversity, and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53:1305–1316. Lawn, R.J. and Holland, A.E. 2003. Variation in the Vigna lanceolata complex for traits of taxonomic, adaptive or agronomic interest. Australian Journal of Botany 51: 295–307. Lawn, R.J. and Rebetzke, G.J. 2006. Variation among Australian accessions of the wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) for traits of agronomic, adaptive, or taxonomic interest. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57:119–132. Grant, T., Lawn, R.J., and Bielig, L.M. 2003. Variation among Australian accessions of Vigna vexillata for traits of agronomic, adaptive, or taxonomic interest. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54:243–250. Rebetzke, G.J. and Lawn, R.J. 2006. Adaptive responses of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) to photothermal environment. II. Growth, biomass, and seed yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57:929–937. Potential of native Australian legumes as grain crops 107 Hughes, S.J., Snowball, R., Reed, K.F.M., Cohen, B., Gajda, K., Williams, A.R., and Groeneweg, S.L. 2008. The systematic collection and characterisation of herbaceous forage species for recharge and discharge environments in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48:397–408. 108 Jurado, E., Westoby, M., and Nelson, D. 1991. Diaspore weight, dispersal, growth form and perenniality of central Australian plants. Journal of Ecology 79:811–828. 109 Auld, T.D. and O’Connell, M.A. 1991. Predicting patterns of post-fire germination in 35 eastern Australian Fabaceae. Austral Ecology 16:53–70. 110 McDonald, C.K. 2002. Germination response to temperature in tropical and subtropical pasture legumes. 1. Constant 91 temperature. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42:407–419. 111 Bell, D.T., Rokich, D.P., McChesney, C.J., and Plummer, J.A. 1995. Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia. Journal of Vegetation Science 6:797–806. 112 Denton, M.D., Sasse, C., Tibbett, M., and Ryan, M.H. 2006. Root distributions of Australian herbaceous perennial legumes in response to phosphorus placement. Functional Plant Biology 33:1091–1102. 113 James, A.T. and Lawn, R.J. 1991. Inheritance of selected traits in accessions of Vigna vexillata (L) A. Rich of Australian and African origin. Australian Journal of Botany 39:415–429.