Europace Advance Access published May 17, 2013
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Europace
doi:10.1093/europace/eut106
Arrhythmic complications after electrical
cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation: The FinCV
study
Toni Grönberg 1, Ilpo Nuotio 2, Marko Nikkinen 3, Antti Ylitalo 4, Tuija Vasankari 1,
Juha E.K. Hartikainen3, and K.E. Juhani Airaksinen 1*
Received 25 January 2013; accepted after revision 3 April 2013
Aims
To determine the incidence and risk factors of arrhythmic complications after electrical cardioversion of acute atrial
fibrillation (AF).
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Methods
Our retrospective multicentre study collected data from 7660 cardioversions of acute (,48 h) AF in 3143 consecutive
and results
patients. Immediate arrhythmic complications were evaluated after 6906 (90.2%) electrical cardioversions performed in
2868 patients. We also assessed the predictors of arrhythmic complications and whether post-cardioversion bradycardia
or asystole led to later a permanent pacemaker implantation. Altogether, 63 (0.9%) electrical cardioversions resulted in
bradyarrhythmia in 54 patients. Asystole (.5 s) occurred immediately after 51 cardioversions leading to a short resuscitation in seven cases and two patients needed extrinsic pacing after the cardioversion. In nine cases, asystole was
followed by bradycardia. Bradycardic ventricular rate (,40 b.p.m.) alone was seen after 12 procedures. No ventricular
arrhythmias needing intervention were detected. Old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.10,
P , 0.0001], female sex (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4 –4.8, P ¼ 0.004), and unsuccessful cardioversion (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1 –4.6,
P ¼ 0.03) were the independent predictors of bradycardic complications. Slow ventricular rate, use of digoxin, beta
blocker, or antiarrhythmic medication did not increase the risk of bradycardic complications. Pacemaker was implanted
in 24 (44.4%) patients after a median delay of 66 days.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Conclusion
Bradycardic complications are rare and usually benign after cardioversion of acute AF. They seem to reflect sinus node
dysfunction and often result in later implantation of a permanent pacemaker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Keywords
Atrial fibrillation † Cardioversion † Arrhythmic complication † Bradycardia
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia and
is a major burden to modern health care system associated with
significant morbidity and mortality.1
Since 1960s, direct current cardioversion has been successfully
used to terminate highly symptomatic AF2 and according to the
current guidelines, recent onset AF (,48 h) may be cardioverted
to sinus rhythm under appropriate anticoagulation.3
Small retrospective cohort studies have shown that electrical
cardioversion is a safe and efficient procedure.4 – 6 There is an
increased risk for thromboembolic complications if no adequate anticoagulation is used. Arrhythmias, most often bradycardia and sinus arrest are also known complications after
cardioversion of AF. The pre-operative identification of highrisk patients may be useful, but there are no large-scale
studies on the incidence and risk factors of acute arrhythmic
complications after electrical cardioversion of acute AF. The
purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the incidence, risk
factors, and clinical consequences of arrhythmic complications
in a large patient population undergoing electrical cardioversion
of acute AF.
* Corresponding author: Tel: +358 2 3131005; fax: +358 2 3132030, Email: juhani.airaksinen@tyks.fi
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2013. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Downloaded from http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/ at Turku University Library on May 20, 2013
1
Heart Center, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland; 2Division of Medicine, Department of Acute Internal Medicine, Turku University Hospital,
Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland; 3Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland; and 4Heart Center, Satakunta Central Hospital,
Sairaalantie 3, FIN-28500 Pori, Finland
Page 2 of 4
What’s new?
† No previous study has focused on arrhythmic complications
after electrical cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation.
† Our multicentre study with a large number of patients shows
that immediate arrhythmic complications are rare and essentially bradyarrhythmias.
† Older women are a high-risk group for these complications.
† Post-cardioversion bradyarrhythmias seem to reflect sinus
node dysfunction and .40% of patients were later treated
with a permanent pacemaker.
The FinCV study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01380574) is a
part of a wider protocol in progress to assess acute complications
of cardiac procedures in Western Finland.7 – 9 In this study, data
were collected at the emergency clinics of two university hospitals
from 2003 through 2010 and at one central hospital during
the year 2010. Emergency department patients (age ≥18 years)
with a primary diagnosis of AF were identified, and patient records
and databases were used to assess the type and duration of AF, relevant clinical data, and cardioversion details. Patients living outside the
catchment area of the hospital were excluded to get complete
follow-up data. None of the patients was excluded by the severity
of symptoms caused by the AF. A total of 7660 consecutive cardioversions were identified in 3143 patients with acute (duration of
symptoms ,48 h) AF. For this analysis, we focused on 2868 patients
who underwent 6906 electrical cardioversions and chemical cardioversions were excluded from the present analysis.
Diagnosis of AF was confirmed by 12-lead ECG according to the
standard criteria. Synchronized direct-current cardioversions were
performed according to the contemporary guidelines under
general anaesthesia with propofol, midazolam, or ethomidate, propofol being the most commonly used anaesthetic.10 Six hours of
fasting was required before the cardioversion in patients with no
haemodynamic problems. Electrocardiogram, blood pressure, and
oxygen saturation were monitored continuously. Either paddles or
pads were used and positions with pads were antero-posterior or
antero-lateral. Initial energy (70–200 J) was chosen according to clinical characteristics of the patient and increased to 200 –360 J for subsequent shocks. Transition to biphasic devices occurred in 2004.
Cardioversion was considered successful if sinus rhythm was
restored and the patient was discharged from the cardioversion
unit in sinus rhythm. The primary study outcome measures were
bradycardia defined as heart rate ,40 b.p.m. and asystole .5 s immediately after the cardioversion. We also recorded ventricular
tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in the emergency room and
deaths were recorded during the hospital stay. The case notes of
all patients with bradycardic complications were checked for implantation of a pacemaker after the cardioversion episode.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows 17.0
software (SPSS Inc.) and SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute
Inc.). Data are presented as mean values + SD or frequency percentages. The x2 and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare differences between proportions. Student’s t-test was used for analysis
of continuous data. Differences were considered significant if the
null hypothesis could be rejected at the 0.05 probability level. Since
primary study outcome was binary and repeated cardioversions of
same individuals were included in analyses, the generalized linear
model (GENMOD) procedure with repeated measures option was
used in the univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
A total of 3143 patients underwent 7660 cardioversions (electrical or
medical) for acute AF in emergency clinics of three hospitals. Electrical cardioversion was used to convert 6906 (90.2%) attacks of AF in
2868 patients. The mean age of the patients averaged 62.4 +
12.3 years and cardioversion was performed on males 4470 times
(64.7%). The success rate for electrical cardioversion was 94.2%.
The incidence of bradyarrhythmic complications was 63 (0.9%) in
54 patients after 6906 electrical cardioversions. There were 51
(0.7%) cases of asystole (.5 s) followed by bradycardia in 9 patients.
In seven cases, the asystole resulted in short resuscitation and two
patients were treated with extrinsic pacing. Significant bradycardia
alone (,40 b.p.m.) was registered in 12 patients immediately after
cardioversion. There were no cases of ventricular fibrillation or
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with and
without bradycardic complications after cardioversion
No
complications
(N 5 6843)
Asystole or
bradycardia
(N 5 63)
P
value
................................................................................
Age (years)
62.3 + 12.3
72.2 + 7.1
0.000
Female sex
2395 (35.0)
41 (65.1)
0.000
Hypertension
Diabetes
3351 (49.0)
677 (9.9)
32 (50.8)
6 (9.5)
0.77
0.92
Known vascular
disease
Heart failure
2058 (30.1)
26 (41.3)
0.054
384 (5.6)
5 (7.9)
0.40
No previous
history of atrial
fibrillation
Beta-blockers
1484 (21.7)
9 (14.3)
0.16
5223 (76.3)
47 (74.6)
0.75
Digoxin
476 (7.0)
6 (9.5)
0.45
Amiodarone
Dronedarone
273 (4.0)
30 (0.4)
2 (3.2)
0 (0)
1.00
1.00
Flecainide
970 (14.2)
4 (6.3)
0.076
Propafenone
Quinidine or
disopyramide
Ventricular rate
(of AF)
Unsuccessful
cardioversion
109 (1.6)
75 (1.1)
1 (1.6)
0 (0)
1.00
1.00
109 + 26
111 + 22
0.46
390 (5.7)
8 (12.7)
0.03
Values are mean + SD or number (%).
Downloaded from http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/ at Turku University Library on May 20, 2013
Methods
T. Grönberg et al.
Page 3 of 4
Arrhythmic complications after electrical cardioversion of acute AF
ventricular tachycardia needing intervention. Only one death (due to
aortic dissection) occurred within 24 h after cardioversion.
Baseline characteristics of patients according to the incidence of
bradycardic complications are summarized in Table 1. Bradycardic
complications were rare (0.2%) in younger (,65 years) male
patients, but the incidence increased significantly to 3.1% in older
female patients (Figure 1). Bradycardic complications were more
common after unsuccessful cardioversion (2.0 vs. 0.8%, P ¼ 0.03),
but the pericardioversion use of propafenone, flecainide, amiodarone, or dronedarone did not increase the risk of bradyarrhythmias.
In multivariate analysis, old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95%
confidence interval (CI) 1.05 –1.10, P , 0.0001], female sex
(OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4 –4.8, P ¼ 0.004), and unsuccessful cardioversion
(OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1 –4.6, P ¼ 0.03) were confirmed to be significant
independent predictors of bradycardic complications. Slow
Male
3.0%
Female
2.0%
1.0%
<64
65-74
>75
Figure 1 The incidence of bradyarrhythmic complications
according to sex and age.
Discussion
Our study shows that electrical cardioversion of acute AF is safe
and immediate arrhythmic complications are rare and essentially
bradyarrhythmias. Bradycardic complications occurred in 0.9% of
the electrical cardioversions and were mostly transient and seldom
needed any specific treatment. Advanced age was the major predictor of bradycardic complications. Secondly, female gender also
increased the risk of bradycardic complications, but contrary to
expectations, slow ventricular rate during AF or drugs such as
beta blockers and digoxin were not associated with increased risk
for asystole or bradycardia.
An interesting new finding in our study was that .40% of the
patients with bradycardic complications after cardioversion were
later treated with a permanent pacemaker implantation. Sinus node
dysfunction is associated with increased risk of AF.11 Cardioversion
results in temporary asystole and can be considered as a surrogate
for assessment of sinus node recovery time during electrophysiological study. Thus, asystole after cardioversion seems to reveal
subtle SND. One common denominator for SND and AF is atrial fibrosis.12 It has been suggested that SND and AF may be manifestations of ‘fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy’.13 Recently published study
demonstrated the importance of regional remodelling near the
Table 2 Previously published studies on bradyarrhythmic complications after electrical cardioversion of AF
Author
No. of
cases
Age
Success
(%)
Male
(%)
Type of AF
(acute/persistent)
74
94% acute
89
124
Median
60
Mean 57
74
98% acute
97
Definitions of bradycardia or
asystole
Bradycardia or
asystole (%)
New bradycardia requiring
medication or pacing
New arrhythmia requiring medication
or pacing
Bradycardia ,50/min
0
..............................................................................................................................................................................
Scheuermeyer
et al.18
Scheuermeyer
et al.19
Burton et al. 5
216
388
Mean 61
55
99% acute
86
Michael et al.20
80
Mean 62
56
21% acute
89
Bradycardia ,60/min,
atrio-ventricular blocks
0
712
Mean 65
65
Persistent
88
NA
1.0
543
2522
Mean 67
Mean 63
72
69
Persistent
Persistent
88
NA
NA
Asystole .10 s or bradycardia within
4 weeks requiring specific
treatment
1.5
1.0
Siaplaouras
et al.23
111
Mean 65
NA
Persistent
100
Sinus arrest with escape rhythm
0.9
Botkin et al.4
532
Mean 65
69
Persistent
90
NA
0.8
Pisters et al.6
Morani et al.21
Gallagher et al.22
0
0.3
Downloaded from http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/ at Turku University Library on May 20, 2013
4.0%
ventricular rate of AF, digoxin, or beta-blockers did not increase
the risk of bradycardic complications.
A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 24 (44.4%) patients
with bradycardic complications. The main indication for pacemaker
implantation was sinus node dysfunction (SND) revealed in the
cardioversion. The median time between the index cardioversion
and pacemaker implantation was 66 days (mean 299 days). In eight
patients, pacemaker was implanted within a week after the index
cardioversion. The only significant predictor for implantation of
pacemaker after bradyarrhythmia was unsuccessful cardioversion
(OR 6.2; 95% CI 1.1 –33.6, P ¼ 0.045).
Page 4 of 4
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements to clinical investigators for the collection of
the data by centre: Turku University Hospital, Turku: I Nuotio,
T Grönberg, T Vasankari, A Karmi, KEJ Airaksinen. Satakunta
Central Hospital, Pori: M Ampio, K Ruuhijärvi, A Ylitalo. Kuopio
University Hospital, Kuopio: M Nikkinen, P Autere, E Parikka, T Rautiainen, S Rissanen, M-L Sutinen, M Tuhkalainen, JEK Hartikainen.
18.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
20.
Funding
21.
17.
19.
This work was supported by unrestricted grants from the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Helsinki, Finland.
22.
References
23.
1. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and
stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation
(ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370 –5.
Lown B, Perlroth MG, Kaidbey S, Abe T, Harken DE. ‘Cardioversion’ of atrial fibrillation. A report on the treatment of 65 episodes in 50 patients. N Engl J Med 1963;
269:325 – 31.
Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH et al. 2012
focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an
update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2012;14:1385 –413.
Botkin SB, Dhanekula LS, Olshansky B. Outpatient cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias: efficacy, safety, and costs. Am Heart J 2003;145:233 –8.
Burton JH, Vinson DR, Drummond K, Strout TD, Thode HC, McInturff JJ. Electrical
cardioversion of emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg
Med 2004;44:20–30.
Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, Prins MH, Le Heuzey JY, Maggioni AP, Camm AJ et al. Clinical
correlates of immediate success and outcome at 1-year follow-up of real-world cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Europace 2012;14:666 –74.
Korkeila P, Mustonen P, Koistinen J, Nyman K, Ylitalo A, Karjalainen P et al. Clinical
and laboratory risk factors of thrombotic complications after pacemaker implantation: a prospective study. Europace 2010;12:817–24.
Airaksinen KE, Biancari F, Karjalainen P, Mikkola R, Kuttila K, Porela P et al. Safety of
coronary artery bypass surgery during therapeutic oral anticoagulation. Thromb Res
2011;128:435 –9.
Annala AP, Karjalainen PP, Biancari F, Niemelä M, Ylitalo A, Vikman S et al. Long-term
safety of drug-eluting stents in patients on warfarin treatment. Ann Med 2012;44:
271 –8.
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA et al. ACC/
AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:
full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology
Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm
Society. Europace 2006;8:651 –745.
Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease. JAMA 1968;206:645 –6.
Burstein B, Nattel S. Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:802 – 9.
Kottkamp H. Fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy: a specific disease/syndrome supplying
substrates for atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, sinus node disease, AV node
disease, and thromboembolic complications. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:
797 –9.
Chang HY, Lin YJ, Lo LW, Chang SL, Hu YF, Li CH et al. Sinus node dysfunction in atrial
fibrillation patients: the evidence of regional atrial substrate remodelling. Europace
2013;15:205 –11.
Levy T, Walker S, Rochelle J, Paul V. Evaluation of biatrial pacing, right atrial pacing,
and no pacing in patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:
426 –9.
Carlson MD, Ip J, Messenger J, Beau S, Kalbfleisch S, Gervais P et al. A new pacemaker
algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:627–33.
Hohnloser SH, Healey JS, Gold MR, Israel CW, Yang S, van Gelder I et al. Atrial overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation: insights from ASSERT. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:
1667 –73.
Scheuermeyer FX, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, Innes G, Heslop C, Macphee J et al..
Thirty-day and 1-year outcomes of emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation and no acute underlying medical cause. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60:755 –65.
Xavier Scheuermeyer F, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, Innes G, Poureslami I, Sighary M.
Thirty-day outcomes of emergency department patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or flutter. Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:408 –15.
Michael JA, Stiell IG, Agarwal S, Mandavia DP. Cardioversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:379 –87.
Morani G, Cicoira M, Pozzani L, Angheben C, Zanotto G, Vassanelli C. Outpatient
electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: 8 years’ experience. Analysis of shockrelated arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009;32:1152 – 8.
Gallagher MM, Yap YG, Padula M, Ward DE, Rowland E, Camm AJ. Arrhythmic complications of electrical cardioversion: relationship to shock energy. Int J Cardiol 2008;
123:307 – 12.
Siaplaouras S, Buob A, Heisel A, Böhm M, Jung J. Outpatient electrical cardioversion
of atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety and patients’ quality of life. Int J Cardiol 2005;105:
26 –30.
Downloaded from http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/ at Turku University Library on May 20, 2013
sinus node in AF patients.14 Pacemaker treatment has been reported
to reduce the incidence of AF.15,16 On the other hand, the largest,
prospective, multicentre trial failed to show any benefit from atrial
overdrive pacing on the incidence of new-onset AF.17
In our study, unsuccessful cardioversion was found to be the only
predictor which triggered implantation of pacemaker after bradycardic complication. We cannot provide explanation for this finding,
although it seems reasonable to assume that the long pauses
caused by the shocks together with inability to gain sinus rhythm
had led to the decision.
To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has focused on
arrhythmic complications after electrical cardioversion of acute AF.
Previously published studies4 – 6,18 – 23 have been retrospective and
most of them have dealt with elective cardioversion of persistent
AF (Table 2). Patient populations have been heterogeneous and the
criteria for bradycardia have been variable or not available. Our
results differ from those of previous small acute AF studies which
have reported nearly non-existent risk of complications (0– 0.3%).
Because of the low number of patients, none of the previous
studies could demonstrate any risk factors for bradycardic complications. In line with the present findings, clinically meaningful ventricular
arrhythmias were absent. The incidence of bradyarrhythmias after
cardioversion of persistent AF has ranged from 0.8 to 1.5% suggesting
that the longer duration of AF may increase bradycardic episodes
after cardioversion.
One limitation of our study is the retrospective analysis of case
notes and databases that may underestimate the number of minor
events which were not deemed clinically significant. On the other
hand, retrospective study avoids any selection bias and may give a
more realistic insight to real life. Our findings cannot be applied to
elective or pharmacological cardioversions of AF.
In conclusion, our large retrospective study shows that electrical
cardioversion of acute AF is a safe procedure. Bradycardic complications are rare, but should be taken into consideration especially when
treating older female patients. They seem to uncover subtle SND and
often lead to a permanent pacemaker implantation.
T. Grönberg et al.