Polar Biol
DOI 10.1007/s00300-006-0248-9
O RI G I NAL PAPE R
A new species of Pareledone (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae)
from Antarctic Peninsula Waters
A. L. Allcock · J. M. Strugnell · P. Prodöhl ·
U. Piatkowski · M. Vecchione
Received: 26 May 2006 / Revised: 15 December 2006 / Accepted: 18 December 2006
Springer-Verlag 2007
Abstract During recent cruises aboard RV Polarstern
in the Antarctic Peninsula region, a new species of benthic octopodid was discovered whose generic aYnities
based on morphological characteristics were uncertain.
Molecular sequence analysis of six mitochondrial and
nuclear genes allows this species to be placed with conWdence within the genus Pareledone. The species is
described herein and morphological diagnostic characters are provided for its identiWcation.
Keywords Systematics · Pareledone felix ·
Octopodidae · Molecular phylogeny ·
Antarctic Peninsula
A. L. Allcock · J. M. Strugnell · P. Prodöhl
School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast,
97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK
J. M. Strugnell
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environmental Research
Council, High Cross, Madingley Road,
Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
U. Piatkowski (&)
FB Marine Ökologie, Leibniz-Institut für
Meereswissenschaften, IFM-GEOMAR,
Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
e-mail: upiatkowski@ifm-geomar.de
M. Vecchione
NMFS National Systematics Laboratory,
National Museum of Natural History,
10th and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA
Introduction
During research cruises to the Antarctic Peninsula
aboard RV Polarstern during 1996 (Kattner 1998), 2000
(Arntz and Brey 2001) and 2002 (Fütterer et al. 2003), a
considerable number of new species of octopuses were
discovered (Allcock et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004; Allcock
2005; Vecchione et al. 2005). These were placed in
genera that are either endemic to the Southern Ocean,
where they are usually abundant on the shelf and
continental slope (e.g., Pareledone, Megaleledone, and
Adelieledone), or conWned to the deep sea (e.g., Thaumeledone, Graneledone, and Praealtus). Of these new species, one was particularly hard to place taxonomically. It
displayed superWcial morphological similarities with the
genus Megaleledone (in terms of overall shape and web
depth), yet was internally similar to species of Pareledone. Pareledone is a genus which has radiated widely
throughout the Southern Ocean (Lu and Stranks 1994;
Allcock 2005). One group of species within this genus is
characterized by close-set raised papillae on the dorsal
mantle and sometimes other surfaces. The unplaced species was at Wrst thought to have a smooth integument
but it became apparent that, when alive, this species
could indeed raise small widely set papillae on its dorsal
mantle surface. This diVers from other papillated species
of Pareledone whose papillae remain raised at all times;
although the size of some enlarged papillae (e.g., supraocular papillae) can be varied in described species of
Pareledone, the papillae can never be completely Xattened. When seven new species of Pareledone were
described from the region of the Antarctic Peninsula
(Allcock 2005), the aberrant species was excluded as no
certainty had been reached as to its taxonomic placement. Following molecular sequence analysis, it is now
13
Polar Biol
clear that this species falls within Pareledone. The
molecular data are presented herein, and the new species is described as Pareledone felix sp. nov.
Materials and methods
As part of expedition ANTARKTIS XVII/3 (Arntz
and Brey 2001), RV Polarstern, the German icebreaker, Wshed in the area of the BransWeld Strait and
the South Shetland Islands between 24 April and 7
May 2000. Specimens were collected predominantly
with a commercial bottom trawl. The sampling yielded
21 specimens of P. felix sp. nov.
During expeditions ANTARKTIS XIV/2 (Kattner
1998) and ANTARKTIS XIX/3 (Fütterer et al. 2003),
a CCAMLR Wsh survey was conducted in the region of
Elephant Island, the continental shelf region north and
west of the southern South Shetland Islands, and the
shelf north of Joinville Island. Between 15 November
and 24 December 1996, a commercial bottom trawl
yielded 263 specimens of P. felix sp. nov. Between 29
January and 21 February 2002, a commercial bottom
trawl yielded 126 specimens of P. felix sp. nov.
Specimens were examined live where possible and
when freshly dead. A small number of specimens was
preserved in 4% formalin and shipped to UK where
they have been deposited in the zoological collections
of the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh
(NMSZ) under catalog numbers NMSZ 2000081 and
NMSZ 2002037. Prior to formalin Wxation, tissue
samples were taken from these vouchered specimens
and from vouchered specimens of other closely related
species in the vicinity and preserved in 70% ethanol for
subsequent application of molecular techniques. DNA
was extracted from a selection of these tissue samples
(Table 1) and used in molecular sequence analysis.
The DNA extraction protocol followed that of Taggart et al. (1992). BrieXy, 375 l of 0.2 M EDTA, 0.5%
sodium lauroylsarcosine (pH 8.0), and 10 l proteinase
K (20 mg/ml) were added to the tissue sample (»0.1 g)
and incubated overnight at 55°C. The following day
10 l RNAse (20 mg/ml) was added to each tube and
incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The solution was extracted
once with phenol and once with chloroform:isoamyl
alcohol (99:1). DNA was precipitated using three volumes of 92% ethanol and then washed overnight in
70% ethanol before being re-suspended in 30 l of
sterile TE (pH 8.0) and stored at 4°C.
Primers for four mitochondrial genes (12S rDNA,
16S rDNA, COI, COIII) were taken from the literature (Simon et al. 1990, 1991; Folmer et al. 1994;
Simon et al. 1994; Strugnell et al. 2004; Guizk et al.
2005) with the 12S rDNA and COI primers modiWed
slightly to match cephalopod sequences on GenBank.
Primers used for two nuclear genes (rhodopsin,
ODH) were designed in the conserved regions of
cephalopod and invertebrate sequences of these
genes present on GenBank and are available from the
authors on request.
PCR reactions were carried out in 25 l volumes.
Thermal cycling conditions consisted of a denaturation
Table 1 Cephalopod tissue samples used in this study
Species
Specimen
number
RV Polarstern
station number
Museum catalog
number
Adelieldone polymorpha
Megaleledone setebos
Pareledone albimaculata
P. albimaculata
Pareledone aequipapillae
P. aequipapillae
Pareledone aurata
P. aurata
Pareledone charcoti
P. charcoti
Pareledone cornuta
P. cornuta
Pareledone panchroma
Pareledone felix
P. felix
Pareledone serperastrata
P. serperastrata
Pareledone subtilis
P. subtilis
Pareledone turqueti
P. turqueti
219 AP
136 AP
1973 AP
1992 AP
222 AP
220 AP
450 AP
459 AP
422AP
428 AP
124 AP
44 AP
1913 AP
206 AP
393 AP
1898 AP
1897 AP
194 AP
193 AP
269 AP
119 AP
61/048-1
61/045-1
61/101-1
61/103-1
61/048-1
61/048-1
61/052-1
61/052-1
61/051-1
61/051-1
61/045-1
61/044-1
61/098-1
61/048-1
61/049-1
61/093-1
61/093-1
61/047-1
61/047-1
61/048-1
56/173-1
NMSZ 2002037.029
NMSZ 2002037.037
NMSZ 2002037.010
NMSZ 2002037.011
NMSZ 2002037.002
NMSZ 2000152.002
NMSZ 2002037.003
NMSZ 2002037.003
NMSZ 2002037.044
NMSZ 2002037.044
NMSZ 2002037.017
NMSZ 2002037.016
NMSZ 2002037.026
NMSZ 2002037.013
NMSZ 2002037.014
NMSZ 2002037.022
NMSZ 2002037.022
NMSZ 2002037.026
NMSZ 2002037.026
NMSZ 2002037.046
NMSZ 2000081.036
13
Polar Biol
step at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C
for 40 s, 50°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 90 s. A Wnal extension step of 72°C for 10 min was added in each case.
Annealing temperatures varied according to the primers used and are available from the authors on request.
AmpliWed products were puriWed using the QIAGEN
PCR puriWcation kit (QIAGEN Ltd., UK) following
manufacturer’s instructions. PuriWed PCR products
were commercially sequenced by Macrogen Inc
(Korea) in both directions using the same primers used
for PCR ampliWcation.
DNA sequences were compiled and aligned by eye
in Se-Al v2.0a11 Carbon (Rambaut 2002). It was necessary to introduce gaps to align sequences of 12S rDNA,
16S rDNA, and rhodopsin. The sequence data for each
gene was concatenated into a single dataset. Of the
2,755 characters used in the analysis, 357 (13%) were
found to be variable.
PAUP v4.0b10 (SwoVord 1998) was used to perform full heuristic searches. Starting trees were generated by neighbor joining (NJ) (Saitou and Nei 1987).
A GTR ( + I) likelihood model incorporating rate
heterogeneity was used. Branch swapping was performed using SPR (subtree pruning regrafting).
Parameters were then re-estimated and Wnally branch
swapping was performed using NNI (nearest-neighbor interchange). Substitution model parameter values were A = 0.33, C = 0.16, G = 0.15, T = 0.36,
AMC = 1.61, AMG = 6.29, AMT = 2.53, CMG = 1.72,
CMT = 14.17, GMT = 1.00, I = 0.64, = 0.74. ML
bootstrap values of clade support were generated
using the above parameters.
MrBayes 3 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) was
used to calculate marginal posterior probabilities
using the GTR + I + model of nucleotide substitution for each partition. Model parameter values were
treated as unknown and were estimated in each analysis. Random starting trees were used and analyses
were run 1 million generations, sampling the Markov
chain every 100 generations. The analysis was performed twice, in each case starting from a diVerent
random tree to ensure that the analyses were not
trapped in a local optima.
The program Tracer v1.3 (Rambaut and Drummond
2003) was used to ensure that the Markov chains had
reached stationarity and to also determine the correct
‘burn-in’ for the analysis (i.e., the number of initial
generations that must be discarded before stationarity
is reached).
For the morphological taxonomic analyses,
comparative material was made available by the
Australian Museum, Sydney (AM); the Museum
National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN); the
Natural History Museum, London (BMNH); the
Zoologisches Museum, Berlin (ZMB); and Museum
Victoria (NMV). Where indices are calculated, the
values given are the mean § standard deviation.
Size descriptors (e.g., large, deep), where given
alongside indices, follow the guidelines proposed at
the taxonomy workshop at the Cephalopod International Advisory Council Symposium in Phuket,
2003. Abbreviations used are those recommended in
the guidelines for octopus taxonomy published by
Roper and Voss (1983) and are as follows: mantle
length (ML), total length (TL), mantle width index
(MWI), head width index (HWI), web depth index
(WDI), funnel length index (FuLI), mantle arm
index (MAI), arm length index (ALI), arm sucker
index (ASI), opposite arm index (OAI), ligula
length index (LLI), calamus length index (CaLI),
egg length index (EgLI), and spermatophore length
index (SpLI).
Results
Sequences generated in this study are available from
GenBank under accession numbers EF102113EF102235. The phylogenetic tree is rooted using
Adelieledone polymorpha as previous phylogenetic
studies (Carlini et al. 2001; Strugnell et al. 2004) have
conWrmed its position to be basal to Pareledone
(Fig. 1). Pareledone turqueti is basal within Pareledone and is supported by a posterior probability (PP)
of 0.98 and a bootstrap (BS) of 58%. The rest of the
Pareledone taxon is divided into two clades
(PP = 0.99, BS = 55) (Fig. 1). The Wrst of these clades
is highly supported (PP = 1.00, BS = 97) and also contains highly supported relationships between Pareledone cornuta and P. albimaculata (PP = 0.99, BS =
85) and Pareledone charcoti and P. felix (PP = 1.00,
BS = 88). The placement of P. aequipapillae within
the clade is less well supported (PP = 0.51). The second clade is only supported by Bayesian posterior
probabilities (0.81) and contains a sister taxa relationship between Pareledone aurata and Pareledone subtilis (PP = 0.92, BS = 52) and a less well supported
relationship between Pareledone panchroma and Pareledone serperastrata (PP = 0.64).
Systematics
Octopodidae Orbigny 1840
Pareledone Robson 1932
P. felix sp. nov (Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5; Tables 2 and 3)
13
Polar Biol
Fig. 1 Maximum likelihood
(ML) tree depicting the
phylogenetic relationship of
12 species (21 individuals) of
Octopoda. The analysis
employed four mitochondrial
(12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, COI,
COIII) and two nuclear genes
(rhodopsin, ODH). Bayesian
support values are indicated
above the nodes, ML bootstrap values with 50% support
or greater are indicated below
the nodes
Material examined
Holotype: NMSZ 2002037.013, RV Polarstern, cruise
ANT XIX/3, Elephant Island, Stn 61/048-1, 61°10⬘S,
54°41⬘W, 278–343 m, one mature #. Paratypes: NMSZ
2000081.034, RV Polarstern, cruise ANT XVII/3, West
of Deception Island, Stn 56/173-1, 63°01⬘S, 61°09⬘W,
352–379 m, one submature #, one juvenile $, two
immature $, one submature $; NMSZ 2000081.039, RV
Polarstern, cruise ANT XVII/3, West of Deception
Island, Stn 56/174-1, 63°01⬘S, 61°09⬘W, 311–365 m, one
submature $; NMSZ 2000081.044, RV Polarstern,
cruise ANT XVII/3, west of Deception Island, Stn 56/
177-1, 62°50⬘S, 60°49⬘W, 200–202 m, three mature #,
one immature $, two submature $, two mature $; NMSZ
2000081.056, RV Polarstern, cruise ANT XVII/3, Drake
13
Passage, north of Livingstone Island, Stn
56/183-1,
62°07⬘S, 60°22⬘W, 200–204 m, one immature #, two
mature #, one mature $; NMSZ 2002037.012, RV
Polarstern, cruise ANT XIX/3, Elephant Island, Stn 61/
045-1, 60°59⬘S, 55°11⬘W, 196–269 m, one immature #,
one mature #, one submature $; NMSZ 2002037.014,
RV Polarstern, cruise ANT XIX/3, Elephant Island,
Stn 61/049-1, 61°12⬘S, 54°41⬘W, 272–306 m, one immature #, two submature #, four mature #, one immature
$, two submature $; NMSZ 2002037.015, RV Polarstern, cruise ANT XIX/3, Elephant Island, Stn 61/0631, 60°52⬘S, 55°31⬘W, 279–292 m, one juvenile $. Other
material: NMSZ 2000081.026, RV Polarstern, cruise
ANT XVII/3, BransWeld Strait, Stn 56/165-1, 63°01⬘S,
59°07⬘W, 615–621 m, one immature #; NMSZ 20000
81.029, RV Polarstern, cruise ANT XVII/3, BransWeld
Polar Biol
Fig. 2 Pareledone felix sp. nov. Whole animal. NMSZ 20000 81.029,
45 mm ML
Strait, Stn 56/166-1, 63°02⬘S, 59°10⬘W, 666 m, one
mature #, one mature $; NMSZ 2000081.049, RV
Polarstern, cruise ANT XVII/3, Drake Passage, north
of Livingstone Island, Stn 56/178-2, 61°59⬘S, 60°19⬘W,
804–930 m, one immature #, one mature #.
Comparative material examined
Moschites aurorae Berry 1917, holotype [AM
C40891], Mawson Antarctic Expedition stn 8, oV
Queen Mary Land, 66°08⬘S, 94°17⬘E, 219 m.
Pareledone framensis Lu and Stranks 1994, paratype [NMV F65667], RV Aurora australis stn
AA91-100, oV MacRobertson Land, 67°27.35⬘S,
68°50.34⬘E, 145–150 m.
Pareledone prydzensis Lu and Stranks 1994, paratype [NMV F65625], RV Aurora australis stn
Fig. 3 Pareledone felix sp. nov. Digestive tract with inset of upper
and lower beaks to same scale. NMSZ 2000081.029, 45 mm ML. a
anus; asg anterior salivary gland; bm buccal mass; cae caecum; cro
crop; dg digestive gland; oes oesophagus; psg posterior salivary
gland; r rectum; sto stomach
AA91-89 (2), oV Amery Iceshelf, 66°47⬘S,
72°36⬘W, 526–532 m.
Eledone turqueti Joubin 1905, lectotype [MNHN
5.7.1089], ‘Charcot’ Antarctic Expedition, Ile Wandel, 65°05⬘S, 25 m.
Moschites harrissoni Berry 1917, holotype [AM
C40892], Mawson Antarctic Expedition stn 10, oV
Shackleton Glacier, 65°06⬘S, 96°13⬘E, 494–595 m.
Moschites antarcticus Thiele 1920, lectotype [ZMB
Moll 110001a], Kaiser Wilhelm II Land, 66°47⬘S,
89°20⬘E, 385 m.
13
Polar Biol
Fig. 4 Pareledone felix sp.
nov. Reproductive anatomy.
NMSZ 2000081.044, 42 mm
ML, # and NMSZ
2000081.056, 60 mm ML, $. a
Calamus (4 mm) and ligula
(8 mm). b Male reproductive
tract. ag accessory gland; d
diverticulum; mg
mucilaginous gland; sg spermatophoric gland; ss spermatophoric sac; t testes; to
terminal organ; vd vas deferens. c Female reproductive
tract. o ovary; og oviducal
gland; po posterior oviduct. d
Transverse section through
egg (8 mm diameter)
Fig. 5 Pareledone felix sp. nov. Radula from specimen with ML
51 mm. Scale bar represents 0.5 mm
Moschites adelieana Berry 1917, holotype [AM
C40889], Mawson Antarctic Expedition stn 2, oV
Mertz Glacier, Adelieland, 66°55⬘S, 145°21⬘E, 450–
549 m.
Graneledone polymorpha Robson 1930, holotype
[BMNH 1951.4.26.26], Discovery Expedition stn
42, South Georgia, 120–204 m.
P. aequipapillae Allcock 2005, holotype [NMSZ
2003152.002], RV Polarstern, stn 61/048-1,
Elephant Island, 61°10⬘S, 54°34⬘W, 278–343 m.
P. albimaculata Allcock 2005, holotype [BMNH
1996192], RV Polarstern, stn 42/021, Elephant
Island, 61°10⬘S, 56°04⬘W, 169–175 m.
P. aurata Allcock 2005, holotype [NMSZ
2003152.001], RV Polarstern, stn 61/052-1, Elephant Island, 61°21⬘S, 55°14⬘W, 264–270 m.
13
P. cornuta Allcock 2005, holotype [BMNH
1996196], RV Polarstern, stn 42/004, Elephant
Island, 61°10⬘S, 56°04⬘W, 169–175 m.
P. panchroma Allcock 2005, holotype [NMSZ
2003152.005], RV Polarstern, stn 56/178-2, Elephant Island, 61°59⬘S, 60°19⬘W, 904–930 m.
P. serperastrata Allcock 2005, holotype [NMSZ
2003152.003], RV Polarstern, stn 61/092-1, Elephant Island, 61°01⬘S, 55°46⬘W, 123–159 m.
P. subtilis Allcock 2005, holotype [NMSZ
2003152.004], RV Polarstern, stn 61/047-1, Elephant Island, 61°04⬘S, 54°36⬘W, 308–399 m.
Graneledone setebos Robson 1932, holotype
[BMNH 1919.12.30.27], British Antarctic ‘Terra
Nova’ Expedition 1911–1912, stn 325, McMurdo
Sound, oV Cape Evans, 77°40⬘S, 166°30⬘W.
In addition, all specimens listed in Table 1 were examined and compared to the type material listed to check
identiWcations.
Diagnosis: Small benthic incirrate octopod. Mantle length 60 mm, total length to 150 mm. Stylets
present. Arms with uniserial row of suckers. Arms
approximately 1.5 times the length of body. Right
third arm of males hectocotylized; copulatory organ
with clearly diVerentiated ligula and calamus. Ligula
simple, without transverse ridges. Arm tips not
otherwise modiWed. Suckers small; distinct enlarged
suckers absent. Web deep to very deep. Gills with
7–9 lamellae per demibranch. Ink sac present, anal
Polar Biol
Table 2 Pareledone felix sp. nov: counts and measurements (mm) of male specimens
Status
Holotype
Paratype
Paratype
Paratype
Paratype
Repository
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
Catalog number
2002037.013 2000081.044 2000081.044 2000081.056 2000081.056 2000081.029 2002037.012 2002037.014
Vessel
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Station number
61/048-1
56/177-1
56/177-1
56/183-1
56/183-1
56/166-1
61/045-1
61/049-1
Depth (m)
278–343
200–202
200–202
200–204
200–204
666
196–269
272–306
Sex
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Maturity
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
42
41
39
41
44
44
43
45
115
39
31
20
115
38
33
17
115
41
35
17
116
39
31
17
116
42
32
19
124
44
35
20
127
43
32
23
144
43
34
23
10
10
10
12
13
10
11
14
12
14
9
12
12
12
12
12
27
40
25
40
27
40
28
45
27
45
30
45
28
45
27
45
30
34
29
30
29
32
33
32
30/30
34/32
31/30
28/34
32/34
35/36
33/38
36/30
33/34
32/33
30/30
28/34
32/34
37/37
33/38
38/34
33/32
31/31
32/31
26/31
32/34
34/37
33/35
35/30
26
31
27
26
D
27
30
63/62
70/60
67/63
61/64
d/60
64/62
d/77
77/78
59/57
63/55
62/66
62/65
62/67
66/67
67/75
81/74
61/60
54/55
63/62
64/63
64/62
65/66
66/73
85/67
64/66
55/62
64/63
66/70
67/72
67/72
77/73
85/84
7
3
38/28
7
2
36/26
7
2.5
38/25
7
2.5
39/27
8
2.5
38/27
7
3
40/26
8
3.5
33/25
8
3
38/27
13/12
8/8
10/10
8/8
10/10
8/8
9/10
8/8
11/11
8/8
11/11
8/8
11/12
8/7
12/12
9/8
8/8
9/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
7/7
8/8
6
2
61
8
4
70
8
5
70
7
3
67
8
3
67
6
1
55
7
2.5
66
7
2
68
1+1
4+1
5+1
2+1
1+1
1+1
3+1
Mantle length
(dorsal)
Total length
Mantle width
Head width
Full funnel
length
Free funnel
length
Funnel organ
length
Pallial aperture
Pallial aperture
(%)
Web depth
sector A
Web depth
sector B (l/r)
Web depth
sector C (l/r)
Web depth
sector D (l/r)
Web depth
sector E
Arm length
L1/R1
Arm length
L2/R2
Arm length
L3/Hc
Arm length
L4/R4
Arm width
Sucker diameter
Sucker count
L3/Hc
Gill length (l/r)
Gill lamellae:
inner (l/r)
Gill lamellae:
outer (l/r)
Ligula length
Calamus length
Spermatophore
length
No. of spermatophores
NMSZ
D
5+0
Paratype
Paratype
NMSZ
NMSZ
l left; r right; d damaged
13
Polar Biol
Table 3 Pareledone felix sp. nov: counts and measurements (mm) of female specimens
Status
Paratype
Paratype
Paratype
Paratype
Repository
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
NMSZ
Catalog number
2000081.44
2000081.44
2000081.44
2000081.056
2000081.029
2002037.014
Vessel
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Polarstern
Station number
56/177-1
56/177-1
56/177-1
56/183-1
56/166-1
61/049-1
Depth (m)
200–202
200–202
200–202
200–204
666
272–306
Sex
F
F
F
F
F
F
Maturity
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
Mature
43
41
40
60
45
48
120
44
33
20
109
41
32
18
106
44
29
17
149
58
33
26
132
47
34
24
124
40
29
21
12
10
8
16
14
9
12
12
9
16
17
14
28
45
32
28
45
28
28
45
28
29
45
33
33
45
43
26
45
32
34/33
28/28
31/29
37/38
42/41
32/34
38/34
28/29
32/31
37/38
47/42
31/35
35/34
28/29
31/31
34/37
44/45
33/35
33
26
30
38
29
59/56
57/55
56/52
d/70
68/74
62/63
61/59
57/57
57/60
75/75
75/72
62/59
64/60
59/58
55/60
71/75
75/75
62/65
66/65
62/61
56/61
76/74
76/79
64/66
8
3
38/38
7
3
37/39
7
3
40/38
7
4.5
36/38
8
4
36/38
8
3
37/37
12/11
9/10
9/9
13/11
13/14
12/12
9/9
8/9
8/8
8/8
8/8
9/8
8/9
8/9
8/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
14
4
27
12
4
22
10
3
31
22
8
54
12
4
42
9
4
39
Mantle length
(dorsal)
Total length
Mantle width
Head width
Full funnel
length
Free funnel
length
Funnel organ
length
Pallial aperture
Pallial aperture (%)
Web depth
sector A
Web depth
sector B (l/r)
Web depth
sector C (l/r)
Web depth
sector D (l/r)
Web depth
sector E
Arm length
L1/R1
Arm length
L2/R2
Arm length
L3/R3
Arm length
L4/R4
Arm width
Sucker diameter
Sucker count
L3/R3
Gill length
(l/r)
Gill lamellae:
inner (l/r)
Gill lamellae:
outer (l/r)
Egg length
Egg width
Number of eggs
30
Paratype
l left; r right; d damaged
Xaps present. Integument covered in small, widely
spaced papillae that appear as small, pale dots on the
mantle.
13
Description [based on eight mature male and six
mature female specimens for whom counts and measurements are given in Tables 2 and 3]: Animals small to
Polar Biol
medium sized (ML 60 mm; TL 149 mm). Mantle spherical
(MWI 98.1 § 6.6), head narrower than mantle (HWI
74.3 § 8.3). Funnel medium sized (FuLI 45.8 § 4.1), gently tapered; funnel organ W or VV shaped, usually VV.
Arms short (MAI 62.4 § 7). Arm lengths approximately
equal (ALI L1 150.4 § 14.8; L2 148.2 § 14.5; L3
148.2 § 17.4; L4 154.1 § 17.5). Suckers uniserial, small
(ASI 6.9 § 1), without sucker enlargement. Third right
arm of males hectocotylised, approximately equal in
length to opposite number (OAI 98.1 § 8.9). Ligula
medium to large (LLI 11.3 § 1.9); ligula groove long,
well-marked and shallow, without transverse ridges
(Fig. 4a). Calamus distinct and large (CaLI 38.4 § 13.8)
although quite variable in length (Fig. 4a). Hectocotylised
arm with 25–28 suckers, opposite arm with up to 40 suckers. Web deep to very deep (WDI 50.5 § 4.2), web sectors
approximately equal in depth although some variation is
apparent with sector E most commonly shallowest (but
only by a couple of mm) and sector A sometimes shallower than sectors B, C, and D. Ink sac present. Posterior
salivary glands medium sized, slightly shorter than length
of buccal mass (Fig. 3). Typical octopodid radula with
nine elements (Fig. 5). Gills with 7–9 lamellae per inner
demibranch and 7–9 lamellae per outer demibranch. Rostral tip of lower beak rounded (Fig. 3). Mature ovarian
eggs large, up to 22 mm, equivalent to an EgLI of 36.7
with approximately 12 follicular folds (Fig. 4d). Penis
diverticulum coiled (Fig. 4b). Spermatophores long, up to
70 mm (SpLI 155.1 § 16.6) and slender.
The integument is delicate and prone to damage,
especially on the web. Live animals are a pale blue to
green (Fig. 6). Papillae, which are scattered and widespread over the dorsal surface, are pale. The papillae
are small, and are not permanently raised as, for example, in P. charcoti. In dead specimens the integument
often appears completely smooth, the pale dots being
the only clue to where the papillae are situated.
Type locality: Antarctica, oV Elephant Island,
61°10⬘S, 54°41⬘W, 278–343 m.
Distribution: OV South Shetland Islands, including
oV Elephant Island, south into the BransWeld Strait and
north onto the slope of the Drake Passage. Found in a
wide range of depths from approximately 200 to 800 m.
Etymology: This name is in honor of Louise Allcock’s son Felix and Mike Vecchione’s father and
grandfather, both Felixes.
Discussion
Some initial diYculties were encountered in placing
this species. In cruise reports it has been referred to as
Pareledone (as P. sp. 1; Piatkowski et al. 1998: 44) and
Fig. 6 Pareledone felix sp. nov. Live animal
to Megaleledone? (as M. sp. 17; Piatkowski et al. 2003:
33). There are only three genera of shallow water
octopodids in the Southern Ocean: Adelieledone,
Pareledone and Megaleledone. All these taxa share certain morphological features in common, for example,
they have similarly sized uniserial suckers, a relatively
small number of large eggs, and a large calamus. Some
of the features commonly recorded in octopus taxonomy are of no use in diVerentiating between these taxa.
For example, in these taxa, the presence of an ink sac
appears to be depth dependant. In the shallower
A. polymorpha, the ink sac is clearly deWned whereas,
in the deeper A. piatkowski, the inksac is reduced
(Allcock et al. 2003a). Likewise in the shallower species of papillated Pareledone from the Antarctic Peninsula (P. charcoti, P. aequipapillae, P. albimaculata,
P. aurata, P. cornuta, P. serperastrata and P. subtilis),
which extend to depths of about 500 m, the ink sac is
present, whereas in P. panchroma, which inhabits
depths from about 450 to below 800 m, the ink sac is
absent (Allcock 2005). Other characters which are of
little use include the funnel organ whose shape varies
within taxa as well as between taxa, and characters
such as relative arm length show a continuum of variation between the taxa. A comparison of characters
between taxa (Table 4) shows, however, that there are
clear diVerences between P. felix sp. nov and other
genera. Adelieledone diVers from all other taxa in that
13
Polar Biol
Table 4 Comparison of characters between shallow water taxa of Antarctic octopods
Character
Adelieledone
Megaleledone
Pareledone
(papillated species)
Pareledone
(smooth species)
P. felix sp. nov.
Mantle
length (mm)
Total
length (mm)
Arm length
Sucker size
Ligula shape
to 90
to 250
to 63
to 120
to 60
to 250
to 900
to 190
to 350
to 150
ALI to 190
ASI 4–10
With transverse
ridges
LLI 10–16
Large, CaLI 35–50
ALI to 300
ASI 6–12
No transverse
ridges
LLI 3–6
Large, CaLI 30–40
ALI to 220
ASI 5–12
No transverse
ridges
LLI 7–13
Large, CaLI 25–50
ALI to 250
ASI 5–10
No transverse
ridges
LLI 6–9
Large, CaLI 30–40
WDI 20–40
W
WDI 40–60
VV
WDI 20–45
VV or W
WDI 20–30
VV
ALI to 190
ASI 5–9
No transverse
ridges
LLI 9–15
Large,
CaLI 30–60
WDI 45–60
VV or W
6–8
10–13
6–9
8–11
7–9
Present or
reduced
Present
Twice length
of buccal mass
Present
Present or absent
Present or reduced
Present
Absent
70–80% length of
buccal mass
16
Large and very robust
with blunt rostrum
Present
Short to medium,
SpLI 40–60
41
Present or absent
Approximately
equal to length
of buccal mass
Medium with
blunt rostrum
Present
Long, SpLI,
100–200
20
Present
Approximately
equal to length
of buccal mass
Medium with blunt
rostrum
Present
Long,
SpLI 110–150
19
Present
Slightly shorter
than length of
buccal mass
Medium with
blunt rostrum
Present
Long,
SpLI 120–180
22
200
130
70
130
54
Ligula size
Calamus size
Web depth
Funnel organ
shape
Gill lamellae
count
Ink sac
Anal Xaps
Size of posterior
salivary glands
Beak size/shape
Stylets
Spermatophore
length
Max egg
size (mm)
Max number
of eggs
Small and delicate
with sharp rostral tip
Absent
Medium, SpLI 60–80
it has no stylets, has very large posterior salivary
glands, has transverse ridges on its ligula, and has a
very distinctive lower beak shape with a sharp rostral
tip. P. felix diVers from Megaleledone in that the ligula
in Megaleledone is very small (LLI 3–6 vs. LLI 9–15 in
P. felix) as are the spermatophores (SpLI 40–60 vs.
SpLI 120–180 in P. felix). The gill lamellae count in
Megaleledone is much higher. Oddly, Megaleledone has
no anal Xaps (thought to be used in direct ink) despite
the presence of an ink sac. There is superWcial resemblance between P. felix and Megaleledone; however, in
that they both have very deep webs (WDI 45–60 in
P. felix, 40–60 in Megaleledone). In fact, juvenile Megaleledone and P. felix (which are approximately equal in
size) can be hard to tell apart without internal examination if they are in poor condition. P. felix shares with
other species of Pareledone similar beak morphology
and long spermatophores, and it aligns slightly more
closely with the group of papillated Pareledone sharing
characters such as a long ligula and similar body size at
maturity. The analysis of the molecular sequence data,
however, allows conWdent placement of P. felix within
this group.
13
Acknowledgments We would like to thank the Alfred Wegener
Institute for extensive sea time aboard RV Polarstern. Many
thanks to Iain Barratt for information on egg counts in Adelieledone and P. turqueti. JS is supported by a Natural Environment
Research Council Antarctic Funding Initiative grant (NE/
C506321/1) awarded to LA.
References
Allcock AL (2005) On the confusion surrounding Pareledone charcoti (Joubin 1905) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): endemic
radiation in the Southern Ocean. Zool J Linn Soc 143:75-108
Allcock AL, Hochberg FG, Rodhouse PGK, Thorpe JP (2003a)
Adelieledone, a new genus of octopodid from the Southern
Ocean. Antarct Sci 15:415-424
Allcock AL, Hochberg FG, Stranks TN (2003b) Re-evaluation of
Graneledone setebos (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) and
placement in the genus Megaleledone. J Mar Biol Ass UK
83:319-328
Allcock AL, Collins MA, Piatkowski U, Vecchione M (2004)
Thaumeledone and other deep water octopodids from the
Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res II 51:1883-1901
Arntz WE, Brey T (eds) (2001) The expedition ANTARKTIS
XVII/3 (EASIZ III) of RV “Polarstern” in 2000. Ber Polar
Meeresforsch (Rep Polar Mar Res) 402:1–181
Carlini DB, Young RE, Vecchione M (2001) A molecular phylogeny of the Octopoda (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) evaluated in
Polar Biol
light of morphological evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol
21:388–397
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA
primers for ampliWcation of mitochondrial cytochrome c
oxidase subunit from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol
Mar Biol Biotech 3:294–299
Fütterer DK, Brandt A, Poore GCB (eds) (2003) The expeditions
ANTARKTIS-XIX/3-4 of the research vessel POLARSTERN in 2002. Ber Polar Meeresforsch (Rep Polar Mar
Res) 470:1–174
Guizk MT, Norman MD, Crozier RH (2005) Molecular phylogeny of the benthic shallow-water octopuses (Cephalopoda:
Octopodinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:235–248
Kattner G (ed) (1998) The expedition ANTARKTIS XIV/2 of
RV “Polarstern” in 1996/97. Ber Polarforsch (Rep Polar
Res) 274:1–87
Lu CC, Stranks TN (1994) Synopsis of Pareledone & Megaleledone species, with description of two new species from East
Antarctica (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Mem Natl Mus
Vic 54:221–242
Piatkowski U, Allcock L, Hevia M, Steimer S, Vecchione M
(1998) Cephalopod ecology. In: Kattner G (ed) The expedition ANTARKTIS XIV/2 of RV “Polarstern” in 1996/1997.
Ber Polarforsch (Rep Polar Res) 274:41–47
Piatkowski U, Allcock L, Vecchione M (2003) Cephalopod diversity and ecology. In: Fütterer DK, Brandt A, Poore GCB
(eds) The expeditions ANTARKTIS-XIX/3-4 of the research vessel POLARSTERN in 2002. Ber Polar Meeresforsch (Rep Polar Mar Res) 470:32–38
Rambaut A (2002) Se-Al v2.0a11 carbon. Oxford University,
Oxford
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2003) Tracer. 1.0.1. Oxford
University, Oxford
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics
19:1572–1574
Roper CFE, Voss GL (1983) Guidelines for taxonomic descriptions of cephalopod species. Mem Natl Mus Vic 44:13–27
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new
method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol
4:406–425
Simon C, Pääbo S, Kocher T, Wilson AC (1990) Evolution of the
mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in insects as shown by the
polymerase chain reaction. In: Clegg M, O’Brian S (eds)
Molecular evolution, UCLA symposia on molecular and cellular biology, new series, vol 122. Alan R. Liss Inc., New
York, pp 142–180
Simon C, Franke A, Martin AP (1991) The polymerase chain
reaction: DNA extraction and ampliWcation. In: Hewitt GM,
Johnston AWB, Young JPW (eds) Molecular techniques in
taxonomy. NATO Advanced Studies Institute, H57. Springer, Berlin, pp 329–355
Simon C, Frati F, Beckenback A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994)
Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR
primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701
Strugnell JM, Norman MD, Drummond AJ, Cooper A (2004)
The octopuses that never came back to earth: neotenous origins for pelagic octopuses. Curr Biol 18:R300–R301
SwoVord DL (1998) PAUP*4.0—Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Assosiates Inc. Publishers, Sunderland
Taggart JB, Hynes RA, Prodöhl PA, Ferguson A (1992) A simpliWed protocol for routine total DNA isolation from salmonid Wshes. J Fish Biol 40:963–965
Vecchione M, Allcock L, Piatkowski U (2005) Unusual incirrate
octopods from the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica,
including Bathypurpurata profunda, a newly discovered genus and species of deepwater pygmy octopod (Cephalopoda). Phuket Mar Biol Centre Res Bull 66:109–115
13