Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Reconstructing Mood in Awyu-Dumut Ruth Wester Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, visiting at anu Kioloa, March 17th , 2012 Location of Awyu-Dumut Languages Greater Awyu Language Family Greater Awyu Awyu-Dumut Becking-Dawi kor Dumut Awyu axu psa shi yen ywb dwb Ndeiram man kom (wng) (tyn) (tsa) (kyd) Awyu-Dumut and Neighboring Languages Three Types of Verbs non-finite semi-finite finite mood – + + person-number – + + tense – – + Three Types of Verbs non-finite semi-finite finite mood – + + person-number – + + tense – – + orat ke-r-an do korü ko Ngetap light be-real[non1.sg]-past and descend.ss go.ss watchhut ti-gen build-real[non1.sg] ‘When it became light, he descended and built a watchhut’(Mandobo, Drabbe 1959:17) Irrealis Mood in Awyu, Kombai and Dumut • irrealis is not overtly marked • irrealis verb forms have optative, adhortative or intentional meaning • Aghu, Dumut languages and Kombai have separate future tense, while Pisa and Shiaxa do not. For Yenimu: unknown. Irrealis Mood in Awyu, Kombai and Dumut • irrealis is not overtly marked • irrealis verb forms have optative, adhortative or intentional meaning • Aghu, Dumut languages and Kombai have separate future tense, while Pisa and Shiaxa do not. For Yenimu: unknown. • For pa, pd and pad, we can reconstruct *ø as marking irrealis, and (verb stem + *ø + subject person-number) as the irrealis verb form. Awyu realis markers • -d is a realis marker that occurs in first person forms, -k is the realis form that appears in non-first person forms • -d analyzed by Drabbe as part of the person-number morpheme, while -k was analyzed by Drabbe as a ‘ligature’ Awyu realis markers • -d is a realis marker that occurs in first person forms, -k is the realis form that appears in non-first person forms • -d analyzed by Drabbe as part of the person-number morpheme, while -k was analyzed by Drabbe as a ‘ligature’ • for Proto Awyu, *-d is reconstructed as a first person realis marker, and *-k as a non-first person realis marker Dumut realis markers -t and -ken • Yonggom Wambon, Digul Wambon and Mandobo each have two realis paradigms, one with realis marker -t and one with realis marker -ken. • These verb forms have different functions and frequencies in the three languages: Dumut realis markers -t and -ken • Yonggom Wambon, Digul Wambon and Mandobo each have two realis paradigms, one with realis marker -t and one with realis marker -ken. • These verb forms have different functions and frequencies in the three languages: Conjoined form: DS form: Thematic form: Percentage: ywb -t X ywb -ken X dwb -t ywb -ken X man -t man -ken X 0.1% 99.9% X 92% 8% 38% X 62% Dumut realis markers -t and -ken • Yonggom Wambon, Digul Wambon and Mandobo each have two realis paradigms, one with realis marker -t and one with realis marker -ken. • These verb forms have different functions and frequencies in the three languages: Conjoined form: DS form: Thematic form: Percentage: ywb -t X ywb -ken X dwb -t ywb -ken X man -t man -ken X 0.1% 99.9% X 92% 8% 38% X 62% • For pd, reconstruct a scenario similar to the one found in Yonggom Wambon: *-t and *-ken occurring as realis markers in two competing independent conjoined verb paradigms. Kombai realis markers Kombai realis markers are like those of the Awyu languages: -d in first person, -g in non-first person. ũ-d-e kill-real-1sg ũ-g-e kill-real-non1sg ũ-d-efo kill-real-1pl ũ-g-eno kill-real-non1pl Proto Awyu-Dumut mood 1. Scenario 1: Like pa, pad had two realis markers: *-t for first person forms and *-ken for non-first person forms. Proto Awyu-Dumut mood 1. Scenario 1: Like pa, pad had two realis markers: *-t for first person forms and *-ken for non-first person forms. 2. Scenario 2: Like pd, pad had two different (competing) realis paradigms, a realis *-t paradigm and a realis *-ken paradigm. Proto Awyu-Dumut mood 1. Scenario 1: Like pa, pad had two realis markers: *-t for first person forms and *-ken for non-first person forms. 2. Scenario 2: Like pd, pad had two different (competing) realis paradigms, a realis *-t paradigm and a realis *-ken paradigm. 3. Scenario 3: Mood is not reconstructable for pad. Proto Awyu-Dumut mood 1. Scenario 1: Like pa, pad had two realis markers: *-t for first person forms and *-ken for non-first person forms. 2. Scenario 2: Like pd, pad had two different (competing) realis paradigms, a realis *-t paradigm and a realis *-ken paradigm. 3. Scenario 3: Mood is not reconstructable for pad. 4. Scenario 4: ??? Other.