This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
Author's personal copy
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev
The biogeographical history of the cosmopolitan genus Ranunculus L.
(Ranunculaceae) in the temperate to meridional zones
Khatere Emadzade a, Berit Gehrke b, H. Peter Linder c, Elvira Hörandl a,⇑
a
Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
c
Institute for Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 November 2009
Revised 12 October 2010
Accepted 3 November 2010
Available online 13 November 2010
Keywords:
Ranunculus
Molecular phylogenetics
Biogeographical history
Dispersal
Vicariance
a b s t r a c t
Ranunculus is distributed in all continents and especially species-rich in the meridional and temperate
zones. To reconstruct the biogeographical history of the genus, a molecular phylogenetic analysis of
the genus based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences has been carried out. Results of biogeographical analyses (DIVA, Lagrange, Mesquite) combined with molecular dating suggest multiple colonizations
of all continents and disjunctions between the northern and the southern hemisphere. Dispersals
between continents must have occurred via migration over land bridges, or via transoceanic long-distance dispersal, which is also inferred from island endemism. In southern Eurasia, isolation of the western
Mediterranean and the Caucasus region during the Messinian was followed by range expansions and speciation in both areas. In the Pliocene and Pleistocene, radiations happened independently in the summerdry western Mediterranean–Macaronesian and in the eastern Mediterranean–Irano-Turanian regions,
with three independent shifts to alpine humid climates in the Alps and in the Himalayas. The cosmopolitan distribution of Ranunculus is caused by transoceanic and intracontinental dispersal, followed by
regional adaptive radiations.
Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Ranunculus s.str. is a cosmopolitan genus with approximately
600 species (Tamura, 1993, 1995) and the largest genus in Ranunculaceae. Ranunculus is distributed on all continents and it has a
worldwide distribution from the Tropics to the arctic and subantarctic zones. The genus is especially species-rich in temperate to
meridional zones (e.g., Ovczinnikov, 1937; Iranshahr et al., 1992;
Whittemore, 1997). In the tropical areas, species are restricted to
high mountain areas (e.g. African species; Tamura, 1993, 1995).
Species of Ranunculus are established in a variety of wet to dry habitats from the lowland to high alpine zones and show several morphological adaptations to different habitats (Paun et al., 2005). In
mountain areas, endemism contributes to the considerable species
diversity, but in lower altitudes widespread species are also quite
common. Ranunculus shows different levels of polyploidy, which
is sometimes connected to apomixis (Hörandl et al., 2005).
Monophyly of Ranunculus has been assumed by previous molecular phylogenetic studies (Hoot, 1994; Johansson, 1995, 1998; Ro
et al., 1997; Hörandl et al., 2005; Paun et al., 2005; Lehnebach
et al., 2007; Gehrke and Linder, 2009; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Emadzade et al., 2010). Previous studies (using cpDNA restriction sites,
⇑ Corresponding author. Fax: +43 1 4277 9561.
E-mail address: elvira.hoerandl@univie.ac.at (E. Hörandl).
1055-7903/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.002
Johansson, 1998; ITS sequences, Hörandl et al., 2005; matK/trnK
plus ITS, Paun et al., 2005; Lehnebach, 2008; Gehrke and Linder,
2009; Hoffmann et al., 2010) showed that the core Ranunculus
clade was subdivided into several well-supported clades that corresponded to widespread ecological groups (e.g., wetland and
aquatic species) or to regional geographical groups (e.g., in the
European mountain system; Hörandl et al., 2005; Paun et al.,
2005). Biogeographical studies focusing on certain areas suggested
multiple colonizations of Africa (Gehrke and Linder, 2009) and of
the Arctic (Hoffmann et al., 2010). However, the biogeographical
processes that have shaped the global distribution of buttercups
are still not well understood. The frequently observed intercontinental disjunctions in earlier studies could be due to wide distributions of the ancestors that have been separated via geographical
barriers, followed by allopatric speciation and diversification
(vicariance). Alternatively, the lineages within the clades had the
ability for dispersal via seeds or propagules to new areas, followed
by speciation and adaptation to new habitats. Endemism on oceanic islands like Hawaii, Juan Fernandez Islands, and Macaronesia
is another indication for the high ability of buttercups for longdistance dispersal (LDD), speciation and rapid adaptation to new
habitats. A northern hemispheric origin followed by vicariance
and transoceanic dispersal has shaped the distributional patterns
in Ranunculeae (Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). These genera,
however, are not as diversified and widely distributed as Ranunculus
Author's personal copy
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
s.str.; some of them are monotypic and regional endemics. In contrast, Ranunculus s.str., shows not only the ability for long-distance
dispersal to new areas, but also a potential for adaptive radiations
(Lockhart et al., 2001; Paun et al., 2005).
The origin of Ranunculus probably dates back to the late Oligocene, and was followed by several waves of diversification until the
Quaternary (Paun et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Emadzade
and Hörandl, in press). The high number of species and endemism,
the global distribution, and the observed temporal and spatial patterns make this genus interesting for studying historical biogeography. However, previous studies focused only on certain regions
(Mediterranean, Paun et al., 2005; Africa, Gehrke and Linder,
2009; Arctic, Hoffmann et al., 2010) and did not apply analytical
tools of biogeography. The biogeographical history of related genera has been presented elsewhere (Hörandl and Emadzade, in
press). A comprehensive biogeographical analysis of the cosmopolitan genus Ranunculus s.str. based on a worldwide sampling has
been so far missing.
Based on a molecular phylogenetic reconstruction (Figs. 1a and
1b), we focus here on a species-rich clade comprising mainly species of the temperate to the meridional zones (Fig. 1a, clades V–IX).
We did not attempt a reconstruction of the biogeographical history
of Ranunculus as a whole, because, at first, the backbone phylogeny
is not well resolved, and relationships of big clades (I–IX) to each
other are not well supported (Figs. 1a and 1b); second, the clades
with meridional-temperate (V–IX) species showed a better resolution compared to the high alpine, arctic or wetland groups (Fig. 1b,
clades I–IV). Previous molecular dating approaches (Paun et al.,
2005; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press) suggested origin and diversification of the meridional-temperate
clades already in the Miocene. Because of the age and the southern
distribution, the spatial–temporal diversification in these clades
was not so much influenced by range fluctuations and extinctions
due to Quaternary glaciations. The meridional to temperate clades
comprise species from all continents (except Antarctica), which allows for the analysis of intercontinental disjunctions, dispersal,
and vicariance events between continents in a global framework.
Previous phylogenetic studies suggest that the temperate zone
was the source area for both subtropical–tropical and arctic species
(Gehrke and Linder, 2009; Hoffmann et al., 2010). The biogeographical processes in the meridional to temperate zones are
therefore of crucial importance for understanding the biogeographical history of the genus.
The species-richness in these areas further raises the question
whether intracontinental dispersal and regional radiations have
played a role for the diversity and wide distribution of the genus.
For this question, the biogeographical patterns in southern Eurasia
can serve as a model system for other continents. This ‘‘ancient
Tethyan area’’ (Takhtajan, 1986) is of special interest for biogeographical questions because of its complex geological and climatic
history. In the Mediterranean area, sea-level fluctuations, including
desiccation and later re-flooding of the Mediterranean sea, establishment of a summer-dry climate and the uplift of mountain
chains have caused both geographic and eco-climatological differentiation processes in flowering plants (Thompson, 2005; Lo Presti
and Oberprieler, 2009). The direct geographical connection of the
Mediterranean to the Irano-Turanian region, and the continuation
of the European Alpine system in the Central Asian mountain
chains provide migration routes and have formed a distinct biogeographical area (‘‘ancient Tethyan area’’ sensu Takhtajan, 1986).
In contrast, the alpine–arctic (Fig. 1b, clades I, II and IV) and
the wetland clades (clade III) have been influenced by reticulate
evolution, hybridization and high frequencies of polyploids which
is problematic for tree-based biogeographical analyses because
of a non-hierarchical structure of data (Lockhart et al., 2001;
Hörandl et al., 2005, 2009). In clades I–III, our analyses confirmed
5
geographical patterns of previous studies (Hörandl et al., 2005;
Paun et al., 2005): clades I and II comprise mainly European alpine
species, while clade III consists of widespread wetland or aquatic
species. The evolutionary history of the alpine-arctic clade
(Fig. 1b, clade IV) will be presented elsewhere (Hörandl and
Emadzade, in press).
Molecular phylogenetic data, including molecular age estimates, provide a strong hypothesis for understanding the biogeographical history of the temperate–meridional species. We use
here the information from previous molecular dating studies (Paun
et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Emadzade and Hörandl, in
press) to provide a comprehensive hypothesis of the history of
Ranunculus in the meridional to temperate zones in a global context. We use biogeographical analyses to (1) develop hypotheses
for the spatial distribution of buttercups in the context of the geological history of the different continents, (2) to investigate the
main migration routes between continents and areas of diversity,
and (3) to reconstruct the main factor(s) shaping the modern distribution of the genus, including the relative role of long-distance
dispersal and vicariance. Additionally, we identify the main processes that have caused the modern distribution and diversity of
taxa in greater detail in the ‘‘Tethyan’’ clade, Fig. 1a, clade IX) comprising species from the whole Mediterranean–Macaronesian area,
the Circumboreal area, the Irano-Turanian region, Central Asia, and
the Himalayas.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material
We sampled 185 species of Ranunculus s.str. (Tamura, 1993,
1995) and 20 species of allied genera to develop a basic phylogenetic framework. This collection covers more than one third of
the buttercups from all continents except Oceania and Antarctica
from where samples were not available. However, only few buttercup species occur in these areas, and lack of samples from these
areas does not strongly influence the distribution patterns in the
temperate to meridional zones. The sampling further covers all
taxonomic sections sensu Tamura (1995). Anemone and Isopyrum
were used as outgroup taxa (Emadzade et al., 2010). A nuclear marker (the ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA) and two chloroplast markers (matK/trnK) were obtained from 71 new species and
combined with data from previous studies (Hörandl et al., 2005;
Paun et al., 2005; Gehrke and Linder, 2009; Hoffmann et al.,
2010). The psbJ–petA region was newly sequenced for all species.
We used only samples for which sequences of all markers were
available. Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers
are provided in Table 1.
2.2. DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing
Total genomic DNA from silica-dried or herbarium material was
extracted according to the CTAB-procedure (Doyle and Doyle,
1987) with some modifications (Tel-Zur et al., 1999). The whole
internal transcribed spacer region (ITS, including ITS1, the 5.8 gene,
ITS2) was amplified as a single piece with primers ITS 18sF and ITS
26sR (Gruenstaeudl et al., 2009) or in the case of degraded DNA
from poor quality herbarium tissue, in two pieces with additional
primers (ITS 5.8sF and ITS 5.8sR) as internal primers (Gruenstaeudl
et al., 2009). Sequencing of the matK/trnK region was performed
according to the protocol described by Paun et al. (2005). Amplification of the non-coding PsbJ/PetA region was carried out as a single piece in all samples by using primers of Shaw et al. (2007). PCR
was performed in 23 ll reactions containing 20 ll 1.1 Reddy Mix
PCR Master Mix (including 2.5 mM MgCl2; ABgene, Epsom, UK),
Author's personal copy
6
B, meridional-temperate clade
IX
VIII
VII
A, alpine- arctic- wetland clades
VI
V
IV
III
II
I
allied
genera
MP
R oxyspermus
R psilostachys
R rumelicus
R sprunerianus
R argyreus
R damascenus
R macrorrhynchus
R millefolius
R hierosolymitanus
R cicutarius
R garganicus
R millefoliatus
R heterorhizus
R illyricus
R montanus
R aduncus
R apenninus
R pollinensis
R sartorianus
R marschlinsii
R carinthiacus
R venetus
R pseudomontanus
R gouanii
R carpaticus
R villarsii
R afghanicus
R aucheri
R elbursensis
R termei
R leptorrhynchus
R linearilobus
R makaluensis
R macropodioides
R papyrocarpus
R regelianus
R paludosus
R pseudomillefoliatus
R olissiponensis
R bullatus
R gregarius
R spicatus
R cortusifolius
R gracilis
R asiaticus
R amblyolobus
R buhsei
R cappadocicus
R breyninus
R brachylobus
R fascicularis
R hispidus
R septentrionalis
R acriformis
R petiolaris
R hawaiiensis
R mauiensis
R maclovianus
R orthorhynchus
R diffusus
R oreophytus
R rarae
R tenuirostrus
R macounii
R repens
R marginatus
R muricatus
R cornutus
R trilobus
R serpens
R polyanthemos
R sardous
R submarginatus
R bulbosus
R neapolitanus
R multifidus
R pinnatus
R pensylvanicus
R silerifolius
R cantoniensis
R chinensis
R caprarum
R peduncularis
R bonariensis
R brutius
R dissectus
R caucasicus
R sojakii
R arvensis
R arvensis
R acris
R glabriusculus
R japonicus
R lanuginosus
R granatensis
R serbicus
R laetus
R laetus
R taisanensis
R grandiflorus
R kotschyi
R velutinus
R baldschuanicus
R cassius
R occidentalis
R uncinatus
R stagnalis
R tembensis
R chius
R parviflorus
R constantinopolitanus
R strigillosus
R sericeus
R pinardi
R cheirophyllus
R ficariifolius
R volkensii
R flagelliformis
R ophioglossifolius
R lateriflorus
R flammula
R reptans
R lingua
R alismifolius
R hydrophilus
R meyeri
IX. Tet hyan cl.
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
R rumelicus
R sprunerianus
R psilostachys
R argyreus
R damascenus
R oxyspermus
R macrorrhynchus
R millefolius
R hierosolymitanus
R cicutarius
R heterorhizus
R illyricus
R garganicus
R millefoliatus
R montanus
R sartorianus
R apenninus
R marschlinsii
R aduncus
R venetus
R carinthiacus
R pseudomontanus
R carpaticus
R gouanii
R pollinensis
R villarsii
R elbursensis
R termei
R aucheri
R leptorrhynchus
R linearilobus
R afghanicus
R makaluensis
R macropodioides
R papyrocarpus
R regelianus
R asiaticus
R gracilis
R olissiponensis
R paludosus
R pseudomillefoliatus
R spicatus
R bullatus
R gregarius
R cortusifolius
R amblyolobus
R cappadocicus
R buhsei
R breyninus
R brachylobus
R fascicularis
R hispidus
R acriformis
R hawaiiensis
R mauiensis
R petiolaris
R septentrionalis
R maclovianus
R orthorhynchus
R diffusus
R tenuirostrus
R macounii
R repens
R cornutus
R marginatus
R trilobus
R caprarum
R peduncularis
R oreophytus
R rarae
R serpens
R polyanthemos
R sardous
R submarginatus
R bulbosus
R neapolitanus
R cantoniensis
R chinensis
R pensylvanicus
R silerifolius
R muricatus
R multifidus
R pinnatus
R bonariensis
R brutius
R dissectus
R caucasicus
R sojakii
R arvensis
R granatensis
R serbicus
R laetus
R laetus
R lanuginosus
R taisanensis
R acris
R glabriusculus
R japonicus
R baldschuanicus
R cassius
R kotschyi
R velutinus
R occidentalis
R uncinatus
R stagnalis
R tembensis
R chius
R parviflorus
R constantinopolitanus
R strigillosus
R sericeus
R pinardii
R grandiflorus
R cheirophyllus
R volkensii
R ficariifolius
R flagelliformis
R ophioglossifolius
R lateriflorus
R flammula
R reptans
R lingua
R alismifolius
R hydrophilus
R meyeri
BI
10 changes
Fig. 1a. Phylogenetic relationships of Ranunculus species and allied genera of the combined plastid and ITS dataset based on Maximum Parsimony analyses (MP), and
Bayesian inference (BI). Bootstrap value P50 and posterior probability values P90 are indicated above branches. Tree overview is presented in the upper left-corner.
Author's personal copy
7
IV
III
II
I
allied
genera
Ficaria kochii
Ficaria verna
Coptidium lapponicum
Coptidium pallasii
Arcteranthis cooleyae
Trautvetteria grandis
Halerpestes cymbalaria
H uniflora
Oxygraphis polypetala
10 changes
Beckwithia andersonii
Cyrtorhynchy ranunculina
Peltocalathos baurii
Hamadryas delfinii
Callianthemoides semiverticillatus
Kumlienia hystricula
Isopyrum thalictroides
Anemone quinquefolia
III
A, alpine- arctic- wetland clades
VI
V
II
VII
I
VIII
allied genera
B, meridional-temperate clade
IX
Out group
R pulchellus
R brotherusii
R pseudopygmaeus
R nephelogenes
R longicaulis
R pseudohirculus
R hirtellus
R membranaceus
R punctatus
R adoneus
R nivalis
R pygmaeus
R pedatifidus
R cardiophyllus
R gelidus
R rufosepalus
R cassubicifolius
R carpaticola
R micranthus
R notabilis
R nipponicus
R peltatus
R trichophyllus
R sphaerospermus
R collinus
R papulentus
R natans
R radicans
R aquatilis
R penicillatus
R fuegianus
R gmelinii
R hyperboreus
R sceleratus
R lyallii
R apiifolius
R kuepferi
R seguieri
R aconitifolius
R platanifolius
R camissonis
R glacialis
R cacuminis
R bilobus
R alpestris
R traunfellneri
R crenatus
R magellensis
R amplexicaulis
R parnassifolius
R acetosellifolius
R pyrenaeus
R gramineus
R brevifolius
R hybridus
R thora
Krapfia clypeata
Laccopetalum giganteum
Ceratocephala orthoceras
Ceratocephala falcata
Myosurus minimus
IV
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Fig. 1b. Phylogenetic relationships of Ranunculus species and allied genera of the combined plastid and ITS dataset based on parsimony analyses. Bootstrap value P50 is
indicated above branches. Tree overview is presented in the upper left-corner.
1 ll of 0.4% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Promega, Madison, WI,
USA), and in the case of the ITS region, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
to reduce problems associated with DNA secondary structure, 1 ll
each primer (10 mmol/l) and 1 ll template DNA. PCR products
were purified using E. coli Exonuclease I and Calf Intestine Alkaline
Phosphate (CIAP; MBI-Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cycle sequencing was performed
using Big Dye™ Terminator v3.1 Ready Reaction Mix (Applied
Biosystems), using the following cycling conditions: 38 cycles of
10 s at 96 °C, 25 s at 50 °C, 4 min at 60 °C. All DNA regions were
sequenced in both directions. The samples were run on a 3130xl
Genetic Analyzers capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
2.3. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
The sequences were initially aligned using Clustal X (Thompson
et al., 1997). Subsequent corrections were carried out manually
using BioEdit version 7.0.9.0 (Hall, 1999). Indels were treated as
binary characters following the ‘‘simple indel coding method’’
(Simmons and Ochoterena, 2000) using the program SeqState version 1.36 (Müller, 2005), and the data set with gaps coded was
used for all analyses. Nuclear and chloroplast sequences were analyzed separately and combined. A heuristic search for most parsimonious (MP) trees was performed with PAUP version 4.0b8
(Swofford, 2002). The analyses involved 1000 replicates with stepwise random taxon addition, tree bisection–reconnection (TBR)
and branch swapping saving no more than 10 trees per replicate.
All characters were equally weighted and treated as unordered
(Fitch, 1971). Strict consensus trees were computed from all
equally most parsimonious trees. Internal branch support was estimated using non-parametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein, 1985)
with 1000 replicates and 10 addition sequences replicates.
To reduce the impact of model misspecification on tree topology accuracy (Sullivan and Swofford, 2001; Nylander, 2004) a
model based on Bayesian inference was used to reconstruct phylogeny in addition to maximum parsimony. Different partitions
Taxon
Country; collector, collection No.; Herbar
matK/trnK
psbJ–petA
GU257978
AY680201
AY680197
AY680199
AY680191
AY680190
AY680194
AY680195
GU257973
AY680193
AY680192
AY680196
GU552270
GU257974
GU257977
GU552271
GU257975
GU552272
AJ347913
GU257976
AY680200
AY680075
AY680081
HQ338296
AY680167
AY680030
AY680088
HQ338297
HQ338298
AY680078
HQ338299
AY680071
AY680091
AY680092
HQ338300
FM242844
AY680177
HQ650550
GU257963
HQ338301
AY680174
AY680077
GU257964
HQ338302
AY680187
AY680115
HQ338303
HQ338304
FM242860
AY680124
AY680114
HQ338305
AY680083
GU257980
–
AY954238
AY954236
AY954229
AY954230
AY954234
AY954233
GU257981
AY954231
AY954232
AY954237
GU552273
GU257982
GU257979
DQ490058
GU257983
Peru; Cano & al. 15196; USM; DQ400695
AJ414344
GU257984
AY954235
AY954226
AY954217
HQ338378
AY954199
HM565145
AY954143
HM565146
HM565147
AY954221
HM565148
AY954223
AY954150
AY954140
—
FM242780
AY954193
HQ650551
GU257985
HQ338379
AY954195
AY954220
GU257986
HQ338347
AY954212
AY954172
HM565149
HQ338348
FM242796
AY954188
AY954161
HQ338373
AY954218
GU257995
GU258002
GU258003
Gothenberg, BG; Johansson s.n.; GU258004
GU257996
GU257997
GU257997
GU257999
GU258005
GU258000
GU258001
GU258006
Argentina; Weigend 7003; M; GU258007
GU258011
GU258014
–
GU258008
Halle, BG; J.T. Johansson s.n.; GU258009
–
GU258012
GU258010
HQ338261
HQ338172
HQ338181
GU258015
USA, Utah; Tremetsberger s.n.; WU; HQ338195
HQ338206
HQ338217
HQ338228
HQ338239
HQ338250
HQ338262
HQ338273
Uruguay; Lorentz 533 W; GU258016
HQ338285
HQ338150
HQ650549
GU258017
GU258018
HQ338161
HQ338168
HQ338169
GU258019
HQ338192
GU258020
GU258021
HQ338170
HQ338171
HQ338173
HQ338174
HQ338175
HQ338176
GU258022
Author's personal copy
USA – Connecticut; Mehrhoff 12602; CONN
Canada; Jensen 28432; MPN
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson s.n.; GB
Argentina; Lehnebach s.n.; VALD
Iran; Rechinger Jr. 50857; W
Austria; Hörandl 3837; WU
Sweden; Johansson s.n.;
Alaska; Elven & al. SUP02-175; O
USA; Nunn 1775; RM
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson s.n.; GB
Sweden; Johansson s.n.; –
Italy – Rezia BG; Johansson 204; LD
Chile; Lehnebach s.n.; MPN
Argentina; Schönswetter AR08-20, WU
Austria; Hörandl 641; WU
Peru; Sanchez & al. 11173 F, CPUN, MPN
USA; L. Grant 286 ZT
Germany – Halle, BG; J.T. Johansson s.n.;
Genbank
Nepal; – 1926-3; LI
South Africa; Mucina 030103/22; WU
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson s.n.; –
Cult. Copenhagen BG; Johansson 274; LD
USA, Utah; Albach 844; WU
Germany – Bonn BG; Johansson 194; CONN
USA, Colorado; Ehrendorfer FER70; WU
Italy; Hörandl 6818; WU
Iran; Emadzade 114; WU
USA; Hörandl 9622; WU
Cult. Rezia BG; Johansson 242; LD
Iran; Emadzade 120; WU
Sweden – Lund BG; Johansson 222; LD
Italy; Hörandl 6069; WU
Chile; Lehnebach s.n.; VALD
USA; Hörandl 9625; WU
Turkey; Brause 45; LE
Germany – Kiel BG; Johansson 180; CONN
Iran; Emadzade 109; WU
Iran; Shooshtari 2569; TARI
Iran; Emadzade 101; WU
Denmark – Copenhagen BG; Johansson 272; LD
Italy; Hörandl 4574; WU
Argentina; Schönswetter AR08-2a; WU
Iran; Emadzade 115; WU
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson s.n;. GB
Austria; Hörandl 5249; WU
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9678; WU
Italy; Pittoni s.n.; M
Russia; Ahrns –; HAL
Sweden; Johansson s.n.; –
Greece; Hörandl & Gutermann 7191; WU
Greece; Huberk & Krug 13565; Z & ZT
USSR; Koropewa s.n.; W
GenBank accession Nos.
ITS
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Anemone quinquefolia L.
Arcteranthis cooleyae (Vasey & Rose) Greene
Beckwithia andersonii (A. Gray) Jeps.
Callianthemoides semiverticillatus (Philippi) Tamura
Ceratocephala falcata (L.) Pers.
C. orthoceras DC.
Coptidium lapponicum (L.) Tzvelev
C. pallasii (Schlecht.) Tzvelev
Cyrthorhyncha ranunculina Nutt ex. Torr. & A. Gray.
Ficaria fascicularis K.Koch
F. verna Huds. ssp. verna
Halerpestes cymbalaria (Pursh) Greene
H. uniflora (Phil. ex. Reiche) Emadzade et al.
Hamadryas delfinii Phil.
Isopyrum thalictroides L.
Krapfia clypeata (Ulbr.) Standl. & J.F.Macbr.
Kumlienia hystricula (A.Gray) E. Greene
Laccopetalum giganteum Ulbr.
Myosurus minimus L.
Oxygraphis polypetala Hook. F. & Thomson.
Peltocalathos baurii (McOwan) Tamura
R. acetosellifolius Boiss.
R. aconitifolius L.
R. acriformis A. Gray
R. acris L.
R. adoneus A. Gray
R. aduncus Gren. & Godr.
R. afghanicus Aitch. & Hemsl.
R. alismifolius Geyer ex Benth.
R. alpestris L.
R. amblyolobus Boiss. & Hohen.
R. amplexicaulis L.
R. apenninus (Chiov.) Pign.
R. apiifolius Pers. (Aphanostemma apiifolia)
R. aquatilis L.
R. argyreus Boiss.
R. arvensis L.
R. arvensis L.
R. asiaticus L.
R. aucheri Boiss.
R. baldschuanicus Regel ex Kom.
R. bilobus Bertol.
R. bonariensis Poir.
R. brachylobus Boiss. & Hohen.
R. brevifolius ssp. brevifolius Ten.
R. breyninus Cr.
R. brotherusii Freyn
R. brutius Tenore
R. buhsei Boiss.
R. bulbosus ssp. bulbosus L.
R. bullatus L.
R. cacuminis Strid & Papan.
R. camissonis Aucl.
8
Table 1
Materials, voucher information and GenBank accession numbers.
Taiwan; Huang 1975; HAST
Georgia, Caucasus; Hörandl 8269; WU
Chile; Juan Fernandez Isl., Landero 9355, OS
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson HZ 86-29, GB
Austria; Hörandl 4096; WU
Slovakia; Hörandl 8483; WU
Romania; Paun s.n.; WU
Lebanon; Maitland 289; LE
Germany; Hörandl 8476; WU
Georgia; Hörandl 8259; WU
Taiwan; Hörandl 9550; WU
Russia; Khakevich & Buch 1355; ZT
Greece; Gutermann & al. 34758; WU
Iran; Akhani 320156; Li
Canberra BG; Crisp & Telford 2227; CAN
Iran; Memarianii 117; WU
Azerbaijan; Schneeweiss 6806; WU
Cult. Halle BG; Johansson 237;LD
Austria; Hörandl 2818; WU
Turkey; Nydegger 41126; ZT
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9706; WU
Turkey; Walther 9258; LE
Iran; Emadzade 105; WU
USA Pennsylvania; Keener 2004-1; WU
Peru; Gute & Müler 309853; Li
Germany – Oldenburg BG; Johansson 193; CONN
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9677b; WU
Chile; L. & F. Ehrendorfer s.n.; VALD
Greece; Gutermann & al. 34974; WU
Xinjiang, China; Wang 28426; MPN
Russia; Skvortsov 10913; M
Sweden; Johansson s.n. –
USA, Alaska; Schröck 454907; LI
Cult. Schachen; Johansson s.n. –
Greece; Johansson s.n. –
cult. Krefeld BG; Johansson s.n. –
unknown; Johansson 266; LD
Georgia; Hörandl 8271; WU
Cult. Berlin – Dahlem BG; Johansson 232; LD
USA; Jeffery 650079; BISH
Turkey;Nydegger; 46083; M
Palestina; Favrat s.n.; ZT
Nepal; Tod 372997; LI
USA, Pennsylvania; Keener 2004-3b; WU
Sweden, Gothenburg BG; Johansson s.n. GB
Argentina; Schönswetter AR08-10; WU
Sweden; Johansson s.n. –
Sweden; Lundgren s.n.; –
China; XieLei XL200348; WU
Iran; Emadzade 113; WU
Austria; Hörandl 4336; WU
India; Lone 1750; WU
India; Lone 1761; WU
Unknown; Johansson 255; LD
Cult. Catania BG; Johansson 235; LD
Iran; Emadzade 111; WU
Afghanistan; Podlech 10374; M
Cult.Lund BG; Johansson s.n.; –
Pakistan; Millinger 470564; LI
HQ338306
AY680117
AY680151
AY680045
AY680093
AY680041
AY680096
FM242848
AY680040
AY680178
GU257965
HQ338307
AY680176
AY680103
AY680059
HQ338308
AY680153
AY680101
AY680086
HQ338309
HQ338310
FM242849
HQ338311
HQ338312
AY680182
AY680185
HQ338313
AY680064
AY680107
AY680054
HQ338315
AY680082
AY680063
AY680098
AY680120
AY680076
AY680165
AY680053
AY680100
HQ338316
HQ338317
HQ338318
AY680038
HQ338319
AY680189
–
AY680065
AY680119
AY680164
HQ338320
AY680085
HQ338321
HQ338321
AY680163
AY680179
HQ338323
HQ338324
AY680184
AY680051
HM565150
AY954173
HM565151
AY954124
AY954145
AY954111
AY954154
FM242784
AY954112
AY954192
GU257987
HQ338349
AY954201
AY954167
AY954137
HQ338350
AY954178
AY954160
AY954228
HM565153
HQ338351
FM242785
HQ338352
HM565154
AY954208
AY954204
HQ338375
AY954136
AY954165
AY954114
HQ338353
AY954219
AY954128
AY954151
AY954171
AY954227
AY954197
AY954203
AY954159
HM565155
HM565156
HQ338354
AY954120
HQ338355
AY954211
HM565157
AY954135
AY954162
AY954200
HQ338356
AY954213
HM56515
HQ338357
AY954194
AY954209
HQ338358
HQ338359
AY954206
AY954117
HQ338177
HQ338178
HQ338193
HQ338179
HQ338180
FJ619866
HQ338182
HQ338183
FJ619867
GU258023
GU258024
HQ338184
HQ338185
HQ338186
HQ338187
HQ338188
HQ338189
Portugal, Madeira; Hörandl 9586, WU; HQ338190
HQ338191
HQ338196
HQ338197
HQ338198
HQ338199
HQ338201
HQ338202
GU258025
HQ338203
Argentina; Schönswetter Ar08-14; WU; HQ338194
HQ338204
HQ338205
HQ338207
GU258027
FJ619879
HQ338209
HQ338210
HQ338211
HQ338212
HQ338213
HQ338214
HQ338215
HQ338216
HQ338218
HQ338220
HQ338221
HQ338222
HQ338223
HQ338224
HQ338225
HQ338226
HQ338227
GU258028
HQ338229
HQ338230
HQ338231
HQ338233
HQ338234
HQ338235
HQ338236
HQ338237
9
(continued on next page)
Author's personal copy
cantoniensis DC.
cappadocicus Willd.
caprarum Skottsb.
cardiophyllus Hook.
carinthiacus Hoppe
carpaticola Soó
carpaticus Herbich
cassius Boiss.
cassubicifolius W. Koch
caucasicus MB.
cheirophyllus Hayata
chinensis Bunge
chius DC.
cicutarius Schlecht.
collinus DC.
constantinopolitanus (DC.) d’Urv.
cornutus DC.
cortusifolius Willd.
crenatus Waldst. & Kit.
damascenus Boiss. & Gaill.
diffusus DC.
dissectus M. Bieb. var. napellifolius (DC.) P.H. Davis
elbursensis Boiss.
fascicularis Muhl.
flagelliformis Sm.
flammula L.
ficariifolius Leveill & Van
fuegianus Speg.
garganicus Ten.
gelidus Kar. & Kir.
glabriusculus Rupr.
glacialis L.
gmelinii ssp. gmelinii DC.
gouanii Willd.
gracilis Schleich.
gramineus L.
granatensis Boiss.
grandiflorus L.
gregarius Brot.
hawaiiensis A. Gray
heterorhizus Boiss. & Bal.
hierosolymitanus Boiss.
hirtellus Royle
hispidus Michx.
hybridus Biria
hydrophilus Gaudich.
hyperboreus Rottb.
illyricus L.
japonicus Thunb.
kotschyi Boiss.
kuepferi Greuter & Burdet
laetus Wallich ex D.Don
laetus Wallich ex D.Don
lanuginosus L.
lateriflorus DC.
leptorrhynchus Aitch. & Hemsl.
linearilobus Bunge
lingua L.
longicaulis C.A.Mey.
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
10
Table 1 (continued)
Taxon
New Zealand; Steel 24603; MPN
Chile;.Lehnebach s.n.; VALD
Canada; Alsos & Brysting CA72; ?
Iran; Mozaffarian 77929; TARI
Iran; Emadzade 108; WU
Italy; Baltisberger & Krug 12831; Z & ZT
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9700; WU
Cult. Copenhagen BG; Johansson 286; LD
Corse; Hörandl 6981; WU
USA; Oppenheimer 684216; WU
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9696; WU
South Africa; Gehrke et al. BG-Af 463, ZH
USA, Ohio; Lonsing 50563; Li
Cult. Graz BG; Johansson 293; LD
Iran; Emadzade 131; WU
Austria; Hörandl 666; WU
South Africa; Mucina 031102/7; WU
Cult. Siena BG; Johansson 210; LD
Russia; Tribsch 9558; WU
Greece; Johansson 224; LD
Pamir; Dickore 17912; M
Russia; Egorova s.n.; LE
Sweden; Johansson s.n.; –.
Austria; Hörandl 5612; WU
USA; Pykälä & Norris, 1139 W
Spain; Gutermann 37407; WU
France – Nantes BG J.T. Johansson 208 LD
Ethiopia; Gehrke et al. BG-Af 209, ZH
USA, Hörandl 9618 WU, UT
Iran; Emadzade 100; WU
Greece; Gutermann & al. 34754; WU
Cult. Canberra BG;Johansson 760141p; –
Iran; Tajeddini 110; WU
France/Spain Schneeweiss & al. 6509; WU
cult. Copenhagen BG; Johansson 287; LD
USA; Orthner 593; RM
Chile; Lehnebach s.n.; VALD
France – Nantes BG; Johansson 206; LD
England; G. Dahlgren BE9; LD
USA; Zila 447002; LI
Mexico; Stuessy 18581; WU
Iran; Ghahremanii 108; WU
Madagascar; Gehrke et al. BG-Af 247, ZH
Norway; Johansson 277; LD
Italy; Hörandl 8247; WU
Austria; Hörandl 5130; WU
Russia; Tribsch 9593; WU
Spain; Schneeweiss & al. 7253; WU
Slovakia; Hörandl 5904; WU
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9689; WU
Sweden – Lund BG; Johansson 219; LD
Nepal; Hörandl & Emadzade 9679; WU
Russia; Zimarskaya & al. s.n., LE
Sweden; Larson & Granberg 9345; WU
matK/trnK
psbJ–petA
AF323277
AY680158
HQ338325
HQ338326
HQ338327
HQ338328
HQ338329
AY680150
AY680089
HQ338330
HQ338331
EU288400
AY680042
AY680108
HQ338332
AY680094
AY680162
AY680148
AY680113
AY680123
HQ338333
FM242834
AY680046
AY680033
HQ338334
AY680109
AY680180
EU288412
HQ338335
GU257967
AY680102
AY680058
GU257968
AY680072
AY680175
GU257969
AY680154
AY680068
AY680070
AY680147
HQ338336
GU257970
EU288415
AY680080
AY680097
AY680121
AY680111
AY680110
AY680090
HQ338314
AY680106
HQ338337
FM242818
AY954242
AY954142
AY954181
HM565159
HQ338360
HM565160
HQ338376
HM565161
AY954177
AY954147
HM565162
HQ338361
EU288374
AY954113
AY954166
HQ338362
AY954149
AY954183
AY954191
AY954134
AY954187
HQ338363
FM242770
AY954123
AY954115
HM565164
AY954157
AY954207
HQ338377
HQ338364
GU257989
AY954155
AY954138
GU257990
AY954224
AY954202
GU257991
AY954180
AY954131
AY954130
AY954190
HQ338365
GU257992
EU288388
AY954216
AY954152
AY954185
AY954118
AY954156
AY954146
HQ338374
AY954170
HM565165
FM242754
AY954122
New Zealand; Schneeweiss & al. WU, GU258029
Argentina; Schönswetter AR08-17 WU; GU258030
HQ338238
HQ338240
HQ338241
HQ338242
HQ338243
HQ338244
HQ338245
HQ338246
HQ338247
HQ338248
HQ338249
HQ338251
HQ338252
HQ338253
HQ338254
HQ338255
GU258031
HQ338256
HQ338258
HQ338259
GU258032
FJ619873
HQ338263
HQ338264
HQ338265
HQ338266
HQ338267
GU258033
HQ338268
HQ338269
GU258034
GU258035
HQ338270
GU258036
–
GU258037
HQ338272
GU258038
HQ338274
GU258039
HQ338275
HQ338276
HQ338277
GU258040
HQ338278
HQ338279
HQ338280
HQ338219
HQ338281
HQ338282
HQ338284
HQ338232
Author's personal copy
lyallii Hook. f.
maclovianus Urv.
macounii Britton
macropodioides Briq.
macrorrhynchus Boiss.
magellensis Ten.
makaluensis Kadota
marginatus Urv.
marschlinsii Steud.
mauiensis A. Gray
membranaceus Royle
meyeri Harv.
micranthus Nutt.
millefoliatus Vahl
millefolius Banks & Soland.
montanus Willd.
multifidus Forssk.
muricatus L.
natans C.A.Mey.
neapolitanus Ten.
nephelogenes Edgew.
nipponicus Nakai
nivalis L.
notabilis Hörandl & Guterm.
occidentalis Nutt.
olissiponensis Pers.
ophioglossifolius Vill.
oreophytus Delile
orthorhynchus Hook.
oxyspermus Willd.
paludosus Poir.
papulentus Melville
papyrocarpus Rech. F., Aell. & Esfand.
parnassifolius ssp. parnassifolius L.
parviflorus L.
pedatifidus J.E. Smith,
peduncularis Sm.
peltatus ssp. peltatus Moench
penicillatus ssp. pseudofluitans (Dum.) Bab.
pensylvanicus L.
petiolaris Kunth ex DC.
pinardii (Stev.) Boiss.
pinnatus Poir.
platanifolius L.
pollinensis Chiovenda
polyanthemos L.
pseudohirculus Schrenk ex F.E. Fischer & C.A. Mey.
pseudomillefoliatus Grau
pseudomontanus Schur
cf. pseudopygmaeus Hand.-Mazz.
psilostachys Griseb.
pulchellus C.A.Mey
punctatus Jurtzev
pygmaeus Wahlenb.
GenBank accession Nos.
ITS
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
R.
Country; collector, collection No.; Herbar
AY680074
FM242857
EU288416
HQ338338
HQ338339
AY680186
AY680047
AY680104
AY680122
AY680095
GU257971
AY680079
FM242832
AY680166
HQ338340
AY954243
HQ338341
HQ338342
AY680066
AY954244
AY680105
EU288419
HQ338343
FM242841
HQ338344
EU288421
HQ338345
HQ338346
AY680188
AY954245
AY680067
AY680149
GU257972
AY680173
AY680087
AY680099
EU288424
AY680202
AY954225
FM242793
EU288389
HQ338366
HM565166
AY954205
AY954121
AY954168
AY954186
AY954148
GU257993
AY954215
FM242768
AY954196
HM565167
AY954184
HQ338367
HQ338368
AY954132
AY954158
AY954169
EU288392
HQ338369
FM242777
HQ338370
EU288393
HQ338371
HQ338372
AY954210
AY954222
AY954133
AY954176
GU257994
AY954198
AY954144
AY954153
EU288396
AF007945
GU258041
HQ338260
HQ338286
HQ338271
HQ338287
HQ338288
GU258042
HQ338289
HQ338290
HQ338283
GU258043
HQ338291
HQ338292
HQ338293
HQ338294
HQ338257
HQ338295
HQ338151
GU258044
HQ338152
HQ338153
HQ338154
HQ338155
HQ338156
HQ338157
HQ338158
HQ338159
HQ338160
GU258045
HQ338162
GU258046
HQ338163
GU258047
HQ338164
HQ338165
HQ338166
HQ338167
GU258013
Author's personal copy
Spain; Schneeweiss & al.; 6498 WU
Mongolia; Schamsran 44272, HAL
Malawit; Gehrke et al. BG-Af 304, ZH
Pamir, Vasak s.n.; W
Iran; Emadzade 107; WU
Switzerland; Willi br3; Z
Pakistan; Millinger392897; Li
Greece; Snogerup 5993b; LD
Sweden; Johansson s.n.; –
Cult. Copenhagen BG; Johansson 271; LD
Iran; Emadzade 112; WU
Sweden – Gothenburg BG; Johansson 226; LD
USA; Raven et al. 27447; LE
Cult. Mühlhausen BG; Johansson 249; LD
Iran; Emadzade 121; WU
Austria; Hörandl 9522; WU
Taiwan; Huang 1884; HAST
Iran; Emadzade 122; WU
Turkey; Dahlgren B87B; LD
cult. Wisley Bot. Garden, Johansson s.n. LD
Greece; Johansson 230; LD
Ethiopia; Gehrke & al. BG-Af 228; ZH
Iran; Emadzade 117; WU
Russia, Altai; Pobedimova 52; LE
Taiwan; Yang & al. 7474; TNM
Ethiopia; Gehrke & al. BG-Af 210; ZH
China; Podlech 55472; M
Iran; Mozaffarian 54814; TARI
Sweden – Lund BG; Johansson 223; LD
Austria; Hörandl 2518; WU
Greece; DahlgrenB23; LD
Belgium – Antwerpen BG; Johansson 217; LD.
USA; Holmgren 5379; ZT
The Netherlands – Rotterdam BG; Johansson 270; LD
Italy; Gutermann & al. 35349; WU
Austria; Hörandl 664; WU
Uganda; Gehrke & al. BG-Af 353; ZH
USA – California BG; Johansson 82.1322; –
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
R. pyrenaeus L.
R. radicans C.A. Mey.
R. rarae Exell
R. regelianus Ovcz.
R. repens L.
R. reptans L.
R. rufosepalus Franch.
R. rumelicus Griseb.
R. sardous Cr.
R. sartorianus Boiss. & Heldr.
R. sceleratus L.
R. seguieri ssp. seguieri Vill.
R. septentrionalis Poir.
R. serbicus Vis.
R. sericeus Banks & Soland.
R. serpens ssp. nemorosus (DC.) G. Lopez Gonzalez
R. silerifolius Lev.
R. sojakii Iranshahr & Rech. f.
R. sphaerospermus Boiss. & Blanche
R. spicatus Desf.
R. sprunerianus Boiss.
R. stagnalis Hochst. ex A. Rich.
R. strigillosus Boiss. & Hutt
R. submarginatus Ovcz.
R. taisanensis Hayata
R. tembensis Hochst. ex A. Rich.
R. tenuirostris J.Q.Fu
R. termei Iranshahr & Rech. f.
R. thora L.
R. traunfellneri Hoppe
R. trichophyllus Chaix
R. trilobus Desf.
R. uncinatus D. Don.
R. velutinus Schur
R. venetus Huter ex Landolt
R. villarsii DC.
R. volkensii Engl.
Trautvetteria grandis Honda
11
Author's personal copy
12
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
of the data set, ITS, matK, trnK, and psbJ–petA, were tested using
Mr. Modeltest 2.2 (Nylander, 2004) separately to determine the sequence evolution model that best described the present data. The
GTR + I + C substitution model was selected as the best fitting
model by both a hierarchical likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion as implemented in MrModeltest version 2.2
(Nylander, 2004) for all partitions, and it was used for final analysis
using Mr. Bayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003). Four Markov chains were run simultaneously for 5000,000 generations, and
these were sampled every 1000 generations. After the chains had
reached stationarity as judged from plots of likelihood and from
split variances being <0.01, data from the first 10% of generations
were discarded as the ’’burn-in’’. A majority rule consensus tree
was constructed and posterior probabilities (PP) of nodes were calculated from the remaining sample.
2.4. Optimization of ancestral distributions
For biogeographical investigations we chose the well-resolved
meridional-temperate clades V–IX (Fig. 1a, flammula, acris, polyanthemos, arvensis, and Tethyan clades) from the analyses of the
complete data set (see above), and analyzed each of them separately because of too low resolution in the backbone of the tree
topology. We used the parsimony based methods as implemented
in DIVA (DIVA v. 1.1, Ronquist, 1997) and Mesquite (Mesquite v.
2.6, Maddison and Maddison, 2009) and also the maximum likelihood method implemented in Lagrange (Lagrange v. 2.0.1, Ree and
Smith, 2008) to infer vicariance and dispersal events.
DIVA assumes that speciation is the result of vicariance, e.g.
either a split of a wide distribution in two areas, or a speciation
event within a single area, in which the two daughter species remain in their native area immediately following speciation (Ronquist, 1996, 1997).
A newly developed method represents a significant advance in
biogeographic methodology by using a maximum likelihood (ML)
statistical model (Lagrange; Ree and Smith, 2008). The program Lagrange not only finds the most likely ancestral areas at a node and
the split of the areas in the two descendant lineages, it also calculates the probabilities of these most-likely areas at each node (Ree
and Smith, 2008). This method includes information from biological and biotic factors by calculating the likelihood of biogeographical routes and areas occupied by most common ancestor for a
given phylogenetic tree topology and the present distributions of
taxa. For example, the rate of dispersal and local extinction, the
time of lineage survival, and the probabilities of dispersal between
geographic ranges at different geological times (Ree et al., 2005)
can all be incorporated in the reconstruction. Lagrange was employed here with a simple model of one rate of dispersal and
extinction constant over time and among lineages (Emadzade
and Hörandl, in press).
We further reconstructed ancestral states based on Fitch parsimony optimization (FPO) using Mesquite (Maddison and Maddison, 2009). Fitch parsimony calculates the most parsimonious
ancestral states at the nodes of the tree assuming free reversibility
for multistate characters and one step per state change. In general,
the FPO allows for fewer possible ancestral area reconstructions
than DIVA, because only terminals can have more than one state
(i.e., areas). Therefore, FPO assumes that geographic distributions
are the result of dispersal events rather than vicariance (e.g., Kron
and Luteyn, 2005).
To run Lagrange, an ultramatric tree is needed so we used ultrametric trees using the Bayesian analysis program BEAST v1.4.5
(Drummond and Rambaut, 2007) for all biogeographical analyses.
The partitioned BEAST.xml input file was created with BEAUti
v1.4.5 (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007). A GTR + I + C substitution
model which was determined as the best model for our data set
using Mr. Modeltest 2.2 (Nylander, 2004) and the gamma distribution were modeled with four categories. A Yule prior on branching
rates was employed and four independent MCMC analyses were
each run for 10,000,000 generations, sampling every 1000 generations. After discarding the first 10% of generations of each run as
burn-in, the four runs were combined using TreeAnnotator (Rambaut and Drummond, 2002) to obtain an ultramatric tree.
Distribution data were compiled from the literature (e.g., Ovczinnikov, 1937; Meusel et al., 1965; Lourteig, 1984; Riedl and Nasir, 1990; Iranshahr et al., 1992; Tutin and Cook, 1993; Rau, 1993;
Whittemore, 1997; Wencai and Gilbert, 2001) to assign species to
the five major geographic areas: Eurasia, N. America, S. America,
Africa, and Hawaii. Mediterranean species that extend their distribution along the coast of North Africa were coded as Eurasian only.
The distribution of each species of Ranunculus included in this
analysis is shown in Figs. 2a and 2b, and Appendix 1.
For the study of details of historical biogeography in the Eurasian clades (‘‘Tethyan clade’’) as a model of a restricted area, Eurasia was subdivided into an eastern and a western Mediterranean
area (including North Africa), Circumboreal, Irano-Turanian
(excluding C. Asian high mountains), Central Asia, Eastern Asia,
and the Himalaya-India region. Because the distribution matrix
containing 48 taxa and six areas was too large to be read by DIVA,
the tree was subdivided into two parts (Fig. 2b, sections A and B).
The optimization was performed in two steps: first, analysis of section A was processed alone and reduced to a single branch with its
optimized areas; second, analysis of section B included this single
branch (Ronquist, 1996).
3. Results
3.1. Phylogenetic analyses
The MP analyses of all 205 species based on ITS revealed 70
most parsimonious trees with CI = 0.3609 and RI = 0.8241, while
chloroplast markers only (matK/trnK, psbJ–petA) revealed 60 most
parsimonious trees with CI = 0.4772 and RI = 0.8503. The MP analysis of combined data resulted in 1120 most parsimonious trees
with CI = 0.4152 and RI = 0.8260. The ITS analysis did not resolve
well relationships within Ranunculus, showing a basal polytomy
(not shown). The strict consensus tree of the chloroplast DNA overall showed better statistical support. As in previous studies (Paun
et al., 2005; Gehrke and Linder, 2009; Hoffmann et al., 2010), the
main clades were retained with both datasets (not shown). Parsimony analysis of the combined data set revealed a better resolution and higher statistical support than the results of either data
set alone (Figs. 1a and 1b).
The topology provided by maximum parsimony (MP) of the
combined data displays nine well-supported clades (Figs. 1a and
1b; clades I–IX) which represent widespread ecological groups as
in previous studies (Johansson, 1998; Hörandl et al., 2005; Paun
et al., 2005; Lehnebach, 2008; Gehrke and Linder, 2009; Hoffmann
et al., 2010). The monophyly of these clades is well supported;
however, their relationship between each other yields only weak
support. Bayesian inference (BI) reveals the same clades (I–IX) as
the MP tree topology. In general the majority rule consensus tree
from the Bayesian analysis showed overall higher resolution between clades and high posterior probabilities (PP) for clades
(Fig. 1a). Both analyses confirm the separation of allied genera
from Ranunculus s.str. (Fig. 1b). The core Ranunculus clade shows
a gross subdivision into a group of clades, tending to colder and
more humid areas, or aquatic habitats (Fig. 1b, clade A, I–IV), while
a big clade with 94% BS and 100% PP units most species from the
(boreal) temperate to meridional (tropical) zones, tending to mesic
and dry habitats (Fig. 1a, clade B, V–IX).
Author's personal copy
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
13
Fig. 2a. Biogeographical optimization performed with the software DIVA, Lagrange, and Mesquite of meridional-temperate clade of Ranunculus: polyanthemos clade; acris
clade; flammula clade. This tree is based on the combined plastid and ITS dataset. Relevant nodes are numbered (in circles). Distributions of MRCAs reconstructed by DIVA are
indicated on each node. Age estimates for main nodes are indicated in My (Emadzade and Hörandl, in press), 95% high posterior density are given in parentheses. Different
line signatures show the highest probability migration routes suggested by Lagrange. Coloring shows ancestral area reconstruction under parsimony in Mesquite. Nodes of
interest for this study are indicated by bold margin. Coded as stated in the figure: N, N. America; S, S. America; E, Eurasia; F, Africa; H, Hawaii.
Author's personal copy
14
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Fig. 2b. Biogeographical optimization performed with the software DIVA, Lagrange, and Mesquite of meridional-temperate clade of Ranunculus: Tethyan clade; arvensis
clade. This tree is based on the combined plastid and ITS dataset. Relevant nodes are numbered and indicated by bold margin (in circles). Distributions of MRCAs
reconstructed by DIVA are indicated on each node. Age estimates for main nodes are indicated in My (Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). Different line signatures show the
highest probability migration routes suggested by Lagrange. Coloring shows ancestral area reconstruction under parsimony in Mesquite. Sections A and B refer to splitting of
the tree for DIVA analysis (see materials and methods). Coded as stated in the figure: C, Circumboreal; W, W. Mediterranean and Macaronesia; E, E. Mediterranean; I, IranoTuranian; A, C. Asia; H, Himalaya and India.
Clades I–IV (Fig. 1b, clade A, alpine-arctic-wetland clades)
mainly comprise species of high altitudes, latitudes, and wetlands.
These clades show in general a low resolution which may be due to
reticulate evolution, polyploidy and/or rapid speciation (see
Hörandl et al., 2005). The flammula clade (Fig. 1a, clade V) has a basal position in clade B with 100% BS and PP. The Tethyan, arvensis,
acris, polyanthemos clades formed a tetrachotomy (Huber, 2003)
in either MP or BI analyses with 100% BS and PP (Fig. 1a), although
each of these clades is well supported. The arvensis clade and the
Tethyan clade (Fig. 1a, clades VI, IX) consist of Eurasian species,
and both are well supported in both MP and BI analyses (100%
BS, 100% PP). The two remaining well-supported clades (acris,
polyanthemos clades; 100%, 91% BS, respectively, and 100% PP for
both) comprise species from all continents: Eurasia, North America, South America, Africa, and Oceania.
3.2. Biogeographical analyses
Ancestral area reconstructions from DIVA and Lagrange analyses on clades V–IX resulted in more or less similar distribution
ranges for most of the nodes (Appendix 1).
The most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the flammula clade
(Fig. 1a, clade V) occurred in four areas according to DIVA: Eurasia,
Africa, North America, and South America (Fig. 2a, node (1). Ranunculus meyeri from Africa and Ranunculus hydrophilus from South
America are sister in this clade (Fig. 2a, node 2, 53% BS, 100% PP).
DIVA reconstructed the MRCA of these two species in both Africa
and South America, although, Lagrange and Mesquite revealed the
MRCA only in Africa, and equivocal, respectively. South American
species (Ranunculus flagelliformis) and Eurasian species (Ranunculus
ophioglossifolius) formed a clade with 100% PP (Fig. 2a, node 3).
Author's personal copy
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Lagrange and Mesquite suggested that the current distribution of
these two species is due to dispersal from Eurasia to South America
(with 0.9166 Rel. Prob., in Lagrange). DIVA, however, suggested a
vicariance event for this node. The African species Ranunculus volkensii shows close relationships to eastern Asian and Indian species
(Fig. 2a, node 4, 69% BS, 100% PP). Lagrange and Mesquite revealed
that Eurasia was occupied by the MRCA of this clade (with 0.7199
Rel. Prob., in Lagrange). DIVA however, placed the MRCA within Eurasia and Africa and suggested vicariance for the current distribution
of these species.
The acris clade (Fig. 2a, clade VI) comprised Eurasian, North
American, and African species. DIVA, Lagrange and Mesquite analyses reconstructed Eurasia as the ancestral area of this clade
(Fig. 2a, node 5). Some North American species (Ranunculus occidentalis and Ranunculus uncinatus) are sister to a Eurasian clade
(Ranunculus baldschuanicus and Ranunculus cassius), which is sister
to an African clade (Ranunculus stagnalis and Ranunculus tembensis), but without high support (Fig. 2a, node 6). Lagrange and Mesquite reveals the MRCA of this clade in Eurasia (with 0.7918 Rel.
Prob., in Lagrange). DIVA reconstructed the distribution of the
MRCA in all three areas or in Eurasia and Africa (Fig. 2a, node 6).
The polyanthemos clade (Fig. 2a, clade VIII) is widespread. DIVA
reconstructed the ancestral area of this clade in Eurasia, North
America, Africa, and South America or in Eurasia and South America (Fig. 2a, node 7). Biogeographical analyses revealed multiple
colonizations of all regions. There is evidence of disjunctions of
North American and Eastern Asian species (Ranunculus pensylvanicus, Ranunculus silerifolius, Fig. 2a, node 8, 82% BS and 100% PP) and
of North American and Eurasia (Ranunculus macounii and Ranunculus repens Fig. 2a, node 9, 96% BS and 100% PP) in this clade. In both
cases, DIVA reconstructs the MRCA of these species in Eurasia and
North America but Lagrange and Mesquite revealed it in Eurasia
(with 0.6628 and 0.6712 Rel. Prob. respectively, in Lagrange). Africa has been colonized at least two times independently in this
clade which confirmed previous studies (Gehrke and Linder,
2009). The colonization of the Hawaiian archipelago occurred from
North America (Fig. 2a, node 11).
The arvensis clade (Fig. 2b, clade VII) includes five species. The
Eurasian widespread Ranunculus arvensis is sister to the remaining
species which have restricted distribution areas in the western Irano-Turanian and eastern Mediterranean regions. DIVA and Lagrange analyses showed that the MRCA of this clade had a
widespread distribution in Eurasia identical to the area currently
inhabited by Ranunculus arvensis (Fig. 2b, node 12), while the Mesquite analyses reconstructed the distribution of the MRCA in the Irano-Turanian region.
None of the biogeographical analyses revealed the ancestral
area of the Tethyan clade (Fig. 2b, clade IX) unambiguously. The
biogeographical history in the Tethyan clade shows several colonization events of the Irano-Turanian, the western and the eastern
Mediterranean regions. Eastern Mediterranean species mostly
show close relationships to Irano-Turanian species, rather than to
western Mediterranean and Macaronesian species. Circumboreal
species and high mountain European species are nested within
the Tethyan clade, indicating a migration of buttercups from lower
to higher altitudes/latitudes (Fig. 2b, nodes 20 and 21).
4. Discussion
4.1. Spatial–temporal development of the temperate–meridional clade
buttercups
The phylogenetic analysis of temperate–meridional groups revealed that closely related species occupy very distinct ranges with
intercontinental disjunctions in clades V, VI, and VIII (Fig. 2a), as it
15
was observed in related genera as well (Emadzade and Hörandl, in
press). However, the processes that have caused the frequent disjunctions between continents can be only understood in a global
spatial–temporal framework. Previous age estimates showed that
the stem and crown age group of the temperate–meridional clade
(B) date back to the early and mid Miocene, respectively (Paun
et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Emadzade and Hörandl, in
press). However, the dating approach of Emadzade and Hörandl
(in press) provided the highest accuracy for terminal nodes, because it used one external and three internal calibrations, while
the earlier studies had just one external calibration for the whole
tribe. Therefore, we used the age information of Emadzade and
Hörandl (in press) for dating the main biogeographical events
(Fig. 2a and 2b). We emphasize on the results of Lagrange analyses
because of the limitations of DIVA to reconstruct ancestral areas
correctly when speciation has been complicated and has been driven not only by vicariance (Kodandaramaiah, 2010).
We focus our conclusions on well-supported nodes that are
congruent in all phylogenetic reconstructions. Since the sampling
in clades V–VIII covers the meridional to temperate zones for all
continents, it is appropriate for understanding intercontinental
disjunctions. Clade IX indicates that a more comprehensive sampling adds mainly information on migrations and radiations within
continents, but does not influence so much the geographical patterns between continents. The Eurasian arvensis and the Tethyan
clades show distinct geographical groups, suggesting regional radiations after geographical separation. We use the well-sampled
Tethyan clade for a reconstruction of migration and diversification
processes in Eurasia that might have occurred in other continents
as well.
4.2. Inter and intracontinental disjunctions
4.2.1. North American–Eurasian disjunctions
At least one disjunction event between East Asia (R. silerifolius)
and North America (R. pensylvanicus) has happened in the Pleistocene (Fig. 2a, node 8, 82% BS, 100% PP), perhaps as a result of
migrations from East Asia to North America (suggested by Mesquite and Lagrange; only DIVA suggested a vicariance event). This
migration could have happened across the Bering Land Bridge
(BLB) or via long-distance dispersal (LDD) across the Pacific Ocean
about 1–2 million years ago (Ma) (Fig. 3, arrow 7). The BLB has
been thought to be a region of intercontinental exchange, and
was believed to be available through most of the Cenozoic (Tiffney
and Manchester, 2001). There is evidence that Beringia remained
ice-free during the full glacial events of the Pleistocene and existed
as a refugial area (Hulten, 1937; Hopkins, 1959; Yurtsev, 1974;
Cook et al., 2005).
A connection of Eastern Asian and North America via Oceania
and Australia is another reasonable hypothesis. Previous phylogenetic studies placed R. pensylvanicus as sister to a big clade comprising species from the Malesian mountains and from Australia
(Hörandl et al., 2005; Lehnebach, 2008). Since these studies did
not include Eastern Asian species and were based on ITS sequence
data only, they did not provide a robust phylogenetic framework
for a biogeographical hypothesis. However, even if Oceania were
involved in migration routes, transoceanic dispersal between areas
must have occurred as well.
The presence of other highly supported disjunctions (96%, 100%
PP) in the polyanthemos clade (Fig. 2a, node 9; R. macounii/R. repens) supports an exchange between North America and Eurasia.
There are three possibilities to explain this distribution pattern:
first, one could assume the presence of a widespread common
ancestor in both areas split up by vicariance after the break-up of
the North Atlantic Land Bridge (NALB) or Beringia Land Bridge
(BLB), followed by allopatric speciation, as suggested by DIVA.
Author's personal copy
16
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
7
9
3
11
9
10
4
2
Fig. 3. Intercontinental biogeographical connections at the tips of the phylogeny of meridional–temperate clade of Ranunculus. Arrows show important dispersal events
between continents. Numbers in circles referred to the nodes of the tree in Fig. 2a. Black circles represent terminal taxa.
Second, dispersal could have occurred from Eurasia to North America aided by a number of stepping stones; third, a single long-distance dispersal event could explain the observed pattern of
distribution. Both Lagrange and Mesquite support a dispersal
hypothesis. A vicariance scenario has been observed by a number
of studies that have investigated the southwest North AmericanMediterranean disjunctions (Fritsch, 1996, 2001; Liston, 1997; Hileman et al., 2001; Davis et al., 2002). The migration of plants by
hopping across the island chains is considered possible mainly in
the Miocene (Wen, 1999; Tiffney, 2000; Manos and Donoghue,
2001). Because of the age of this split (Pleistocene, Fig. 2a, node
9; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press), a migration via the BLB is most
likely. This pattern has also been reported in related genera of Ranunculeae (Emadzade and Hörandl, in press) as well as in other families (Blattner, 2005; Xiang et al., 2000). However, transoceanic
long-distance dispersal across the Pacific Ocean or the Atlantic
Ocean cannot be ruled out. Long-distance dispersal across the
Atlantic Ocean has been recorded in other genera (Fig. 3, arrow
8; Fritsch, 1996, 2001; Coleman et al., 2001, 2003; Wen and Ickert-Bond, 2009).
Analyses of our data suggest that the Hawaiian Islands were
colonized from North America (Fig. 2a, node 11) via long-distance
dispersal, across the 3900 km oceanic barrier (Fig. 3, arrow 11). On
the basis of comparative floristic studies, most natural introductions of Hawaiian flowering plants were probably from Southeastern Asian source areas (Fosberg, 1948). Directionality of prevailing
air currents, climatic similarities between the Hawaiian archipelago and Asian tropical areas provide some arguments that support
this idea. Since we have not sampled Southeastern Asia completely, we cannot reject a hypothesis of colonization of Hawaii
from this area. In contrast, about 20% of ancestral Hawaiian plant
colonists are thought to have dispersed from the Americas, despite
unfavorable prevailing winds and water currents (Fosberg, 1948;
Geiger et al., 2007; Harbaugh et al., 2009). However, long-distance
dispersal over the Pacific is confirmed in both cases. A close relationship to the Southern Pacific species Ranunculus caprarum, endemic to the Juan Fernandez archipelago, as hypothesized by
Skottsberg (1922), is not supported by our data, because this species is sister to South American taxa (Fig. 2a).
4.2.2. South American–North American disjunctions
The South American species Ranunculus maclovianus is sister to
the North American Ranunculus orthorhynchus with high bootstrap
support in the polyanthemos clade (Fig. 2a, node 10, 100% BS and
PP). Based on our biogeographical analyses and previous age estimates, migration from North America to South America has probably occurred in the Pleistocene (Fig. 2a, node 10; Emadzade and
Hörandl, in press). Because the position of North and South America has not changed so much since the Cretaceous (Scotese, 2001),
flora and fauna could exchange between North and South America
through the Isthmus of Panama. On the other hand, disjunctions of
plants between the west coast of North America and western South
America have been reported several times (Carlquist, 1983; Vargas
et al., 1998). The extant widespread distribution of R. orthorhynchus, extending to western North America, makes costal migration
of the MRCA by birds more likely (Fig. 3, arrow 10; Wen and IckertBond, 2009).
4.2.3. South American–African disjunction
Our data suggest one disjunction event between South America
(R. hydrophilus) and Africa (R. meyeri) in the Pleistocene (Fig. 2a,
node 2; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). Although DIVA suggested a vicariance event between South America and Africa, the
age of the whole flammula clade (2.9–10.9 My) indicates transoceanic dispersal between these two areas. A vicariance event due to
the Gondwana break-up would be 130–100 Myr old (Lomolino
et al., 2006). Ranunculus hydrophilus and most other species in this
clade occur in wetlands, where birds can be effective for dispersal.
Although Lagrange indicated dispersal from Africa to South America, support for this inference was too low to be considered reliable
(Fig. 3, arrow 2). Previous studies showed that LDD from South
America to South Africa happened in monotypic genera of Ranunculeae (Emadzade and Hörandl, in press), and in other families
(Givnish et al., 2004; Schaefer et al., 2009).
The African species are restricted to tropical alpine or high
mountain habitats (Gehrke and Linder, 2009), and appear in three
of the five studied clades (Fig. 2a). There are at least five colonization events of the African high mountains by Ranunculus as suggested by previous studies (Gehrke and Linder, 2009). Due to
Author's personal copy
17
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
addition of more samples from all continents to the data set, our
results did not confirm previous results that the African species
are nested only within Northern Hemisphere clades (Gehrke and
Linder, 2009). Our data show multiple colonizations of the tropical
zones from temperate zones of the Southern and the Northern
hemisphere.
14
13
15
4.2.4. African–Asian disjunctions
A close relationship of African species (Ranunculus volkensii) to
Asian species (Ranunculus ficariifolius, distributed in Nepal, Bhutan
Sikkim and Thailand) and Ranunculus cheirophyllus (distributed in
eastern Asia), is supported well in MP and BI analysis (Fig. 2a, node
4, 59% BS, 100% PP). The current distribution of these taxa and
inferences obtained from DIVA suggest that tectonic separation
of the Indian subcontinent from Gondwana happened 150 Ma (Raval and Veeraswamy, 2003). However, the very young age of the
flammula clade (2.9–10.9 My, Emadzade and Hörandl, in press)
makes this hypothesis unlikely. The data are more likely explained
by LDD from Asia to Africa, as suggested in ML analyses of Lagrange
and parsimony analyses of Mesquite (Fig. 3, arrow 4).
(a) Tortonian
14
15
4.2.5. Asian–South American disjunctions
Transoceanic dispersal from Eurasia to South America is
inferred from the sister relationship of the Mediterranean R.
ophioglossifolius and the South American R. flagelliformis in the
flammula clade (Fig. 2a, node 3; Fig. 3, arrow 3). Both species occur
in wetlands and could have been distributed by birds. Long-distance dispersal over the Atlantic Ocean has been suggested in allied genera and other families with similar distributions as well
(e.g., Wendel and Albert, 1992; Coleman et al., 2001, 2003; Tremetsberger et al., 2005; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press).
16
(b) Messinian
Eurasia has been colonized by Ranunculus and related genera
multiple times during the Neogene (Paun et al., 2005; Hoffmann
et al., 2010; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). Although Eurasian
species dominate in two of five clades (Tethyan and arvensis
clades), they are present in the other three clades as well. The Eurasian species showed interchange with all other continents
through land bridges or transoceanic dispersal (Fig. 3). The Tethyan
clade is one of the two clades comprising Eurasian species only
(with a few species colonizing also the Mediterranean zone of
North Africa, e.g., Ranunculus bullatus). We chose the Tethyan clade
to reconstruct the main processes in forming the modern distribution of descendants and effective factors in intracontinental dispersal in greater detail.
The origin of the Tethyan clade dates back to the middle
Miocene (Fig. 2b, node 13; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). None
of the biogeographical analyses could clearly reconstruct the
ancestral area of the Tethyan clade (Fig. 2b, node 13) with high
probability; therefore, biogeographical hypotheses remain tentative. If the Mediterranean and the Irano-Turanian region were
ancestral areas of this clade, a vicariance event during the Middle
Miocene could have isolated the breyninus subclade (Fig. 2b, nodes
13, 15) from its ancestors. This split might have corresponded to
the fluctuation of branchings out of the Paratethys and the maximum areal extension of Neo-Paratethys (Fig. 4a; Olteanu and Jipa,
2006). However, a dispersal scenario is also possible.
The breyninus subclade is sister to the other members of the
Tethyan clade (100% BS, PP), and it is distributed in the high mountain ranges from the Caucasus region to the Alps with its center of
morphological diversity in the Caucasus region. The common
ancestor of this subclade could have been isolated in the Greater
Caucasus until about 5 Ma and then extended its distribution
southwards to the Irano-Turanian region after retreat of the Parat-
14
20
4.3. The migration patterns in the Tethyan clade
15
19
18
16
17
(c) Pliocene & Pleistocene
Fig. 4. Reconstruction of vicariance and dispersal events in Circum-Mediterranean
Ranunculus based on biogeographical studies and dating of events (Emadzade and
Hörandl, in press). Arrows and dashed lines depict predominant dispersal and
vicariance events, respectively. Numbers in circles referred to nodes of the tree in
the Fig. 2b. The distribution of land mass and basins during different periods was
based on maps given in Meulenkamp and Sissingh (2003) and Olteanu and Jipa
(2006).
ethys. In the Pliocene and Pleistocene, Ranunculus breyninus colonized Turkey and the European mountains westwards to the Alps
(Fig. 4c).
Limitation and migration of ancestors to the Irano-Turanian
area took place in the late Miocene (Fig. 2b, nodes 16), which is
one of the most interesting stages of the Mediterranean and Paratethyan history. Geographically, this period was characterized by
closures of the Betic and Rifian corridors and isolation of the Mediterranean Sea from the Atlantic Ocean, leading to very thick evaporate deposits in the Mediterranean area, known as the ‘‘Messinian
Salinity Crisis’’ (Hsü et al., 1973; Hsü et al., 1977; Agustí et al.,
2006a, 2006b; Fauquette et al., 2006; Popov et al., 2006; Fig. 4a).
The crisis suddenly ended by the ‘‘re-flooding’’ of the Mediterranean basin through the Strait of Gibraltar at the beginning of the
Pliocene (Agusti et al., 2006b). After this arid period, the typical
summer-dry and winter-wet Mediterranean climate stabilized c.
3 Ma, and an evergreen shrub vegetation established in southern
Europe in the late Miocene (Suc, 1984; Willis and McElwain,
Author's personal copy
18
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
2002; Thompson, 2005). In this period, buttercups re-colonized the
Eastern Mediterranean area (E. Mediterranean clade, Fig. 2b), and
diversified in this area similar to other Mediterranean radiations
(e.g., in Anthemis, Lo Presti and Oberprieler, 2009). The diverse ecological conditions of the Mediterranean could have enhanced rapid
adaptive radiations (e.g., Guzmán et al., 2009). The separation of
the eastern Mediterranean and Irano-Turanian clades could be
either explained by vicariance (suggested by DIVA) or by dispersal
(suggested by Lagrange and Mesquite). Because of the geographical
vicinity and the lack of strong geographical barriers, dispersal is
more likely (Fig. 2b, node 19).
Our data indicate a closer relationship of the eastern Mediterranean region to the Irano-Turanian ancestors (Fig. 2b, node 19) than
to the western Mediterranean buttercup flora. The isolation of
areas during the Messinian salinity crisis (Fig. 4b) explains the differentiation between western and eastern part of the Mediterranean species as already observed in Paun et al. (2005). The
western Mediterranean clade diversified probably after the onset
of the Mediterranean climate in parallel to the eastern radiations,
and even reached Macaronesia with one species, R. cortusifolius.
All phylogenetic and biogeographical analyses support a close relationship of R. cortusifolius to Western Mediterranean species as observed by Paun et al. (2005), rather than to North African or eastern
Mediterranean species (as suggested earlier by Bramwell and Richardson, 1973). Age estimates placed the origin of this species in the
late Tertiary, when all of the Canary Islands were already formed
(Carracedo, 1994).
The initial uplift of the European Alpine system about 10–2 Ma
(Plaziat, 1981) provided opportunities for the evolution of alpine
taxa. The subalpine-alpine montanus group (Fig. 2b, node 20) originated in the western to central Mediterranean, with at least one
migration to the north/meridional to temperate and boreal zones
in the Late Pliocene (Fig. 2b, node 20). As the diversification of this
montanus clade began at the Plio-Pleistocene period (Fig. 2b, node
20; Emadzade and Hörandl, in press), its radiation could be related
to the glaciation cycles of the Quaternary. Similar patterns were recorded in other mountain plant groups (Kadereit and Comes, 2005;
Mráz et al., 2007). In contrast to the observations in Anthemis by Lo
Presti and Oberprieler (2009), buttercups show a progression from
summer-dry to montane humid climates. A multiple parallel colonization of high altitudes occurred in the eastern Irano-Turanian
clade. Ranunculus makaluensis originated from an ancestor in the
eastern Irano-Turanian region about 3.9 Ma (Fig. 2b, node 17)
and dispersed into the high altitudes of Eastern Himalaya, an area
that is under the regime of the summer-monsoon. The species is a
geographically isolated local endemic of the Makalu glacier region,
growing in c. 4000–4500 m altitude (Kadota, 1991), and has no
other Himalayan relative in this clade. Therefore, a long-distance
dispersal event is likely. The other alpine Himalayan species are
nested in clade IV, sister to North American, lowland European,
and arctic species (Fig. 1b, clade IV). Therefore, the high altitudes
of the Himalayas must have been colonized at least two times
independently. In the E. Irano-Turanian clade, Ranunculus elbursensis is confined to the high alpine zones (Iranshahr et al., 1992).
Three species colonize the mountain steppes of C. Asia (Ranunculus
afghanicus, Ranunculus regelianus, Ranunculus macropodioides),
whereby the two former reach the subalpine and alpine zones
(Ovczinnikov, 1937).
In summary, it is possible to distinguish three periods in the
Tethyan clade: (1) colonization of the Mediterranean by a group
of species in one (unknown) area in the middle Miocene
(Fig. 4a); (2) a putative viariance event during the Messinian, isolating the ancestors of the R. breyninus clade in the Caucasus region
and of the western Mediterranean clade (Fig. 4b); (3) range expansions and speciation in the Pliocene and Pleistocene (Fig. 4c), in
the west extending to Macaronesia, in the east extending to the
Eastern Mediterranean, the Irano-Turanian regions and to Central
Asia. Shifts to summer-wet climates in high mountain systems occurred three times independently: in the Alps by R. breyninus and
the montanus clade, and in the Himalayas by Ranunculus makaluensis. In all regions (except for the Himalayas), the colonization was
followed by a rapid radiation and diversification.
4.4. Capability of long-distance dispersal and rapid adaptation
Probably two main features could have made the genus cosmopolitan: successful dispersal over long distances, and establishment and survival in a wide range of habitats. Our data support
multiple independent colonizations of different continents. These
results reveal that long-distance dispersal may have played an
important role for the worldwide distribution of Ranunculus. Three
of five clades showed several intercontinental disjunctions within
the Northern Hemispheric, Southern Hemispheric and between
both hemispheres. The presence of endemic species of Ranunculus
in some isolated oceanic islands, for instance on the Hawaii, Juan
Fernandez, and Canarian Islands also suggests that LDD in this
genus is possible. Long-distance dispersal as an important factor
of modern distributions of taxa is recorded in other genera of Ranunculaceae as well (Miikeda et al., 2006; Ehrendorfer et al., 2009;
Emadzade and Hörandl, in press). Molecular-based phylogenetic
studies based on DNA sequences and estimates of divergence times
of lineages supported the role of dispersal as a primary process
shaping distribution patterns in both animals and plants (reviewed
by de Queiroz, 2005).
Achenes in buttercups do not have obvious morphological characters adaptive to dispersal by specific vectors, but Higgins et al.
(2003) showed that the relationship between morphological features and long-distance dispersal is poor. Indeed, Green et al.
(2008) showed that collected achenes of Ranunculus sceleratus from
faecal samples of Anas gracilis successfully germinated. Birds provide well-documented examples of vagrants overcoming distances
large enough to explain long-distance dispersal (e.g., Thorup,
1998). Especially the wide distribution of the flammula clade with
species adapted to wet habitats can be well explained with dispersal by birds. Local and transoceanic whirlpools could carry simply the small and light achenes of Ranunculus species as well.
Indeed, transfer of achenes by wind (anemochory), bird (ornithochory), and water (hydrochory) has been documented in Ranunculus (Müller-Schneider, 1986).
Ranunculus could shift to quite different climatic regimes with
long-distance and transoceanic dispersal. In the Tethyan clade,
shifts from summer-dry climates (Irano-Turanian, Mediterranean)
to summer-wet conditions (Alps, Himalayas) happened three times
independently (see above). Also in other continents, sister species
occur in contrasting climatic regimes, e.g. Ranunculus petiolaris
(occurring in the continental climate of southern North America)
and Ranunculus hawaiiensis and Ranunculus mauiensis (endemic to
subtropical oceanic islands). It seems that Ranunculus has not only
a high ability LDD to new areas but also to rapid adaptation to new
habitats. In summer-dry climates, buttercups have developed special morphological adaptations like tuberous roots (Tamura, 1995;
Paun et al., 2005). In the subtropical and tropical zones, they shift
to wetlands (e.g., R. petiolaris) or to high altitudes (e.g., the African
or Himalayan species). In contrast, species colonizing the Arctic
do not have any obvious novel morphological features, probably because of a pre-adaptation of buttercups to wet habitats (Hoffmann
et al., 2010). Establishment after long dispersal may be enhanced by
different reproductive strategies, such as vegetative propagation,
self-compatibility and agamospermy (Hörandl et al., 2005; Hörandl,
2008). Moreover, buttercups have generalist flowers and therefore
a broad spectrum of pollinators (Steinbach and Gottsberger, 1994),
which may help for establishment in new environments.
Author's personal copy
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
However, the high potential for dispersal and colonization of
new areas are not the only factors for the biogeographical history
of Ranunculus. In the Tethyan clade, we exemplify that geographical isolation is often followed by rapid speciation, probably due to
strong adaptive radiations. Ecological differentiation into various
micro-niches was recognized as a major factor for speciation in
the Ranunculus montanus clade (Dickenmann, 1982). Polyploidy
and hybridization can further contribute to sympatric speciation
and diversification (Hörandl et al., 2005). Previous studies based
on ITS sequence data on a larger regional sampling indicated major
radiations in New Zealand (Lockhart et al., 2001; Lehnebach, 2008),
Southern South America, Australia, and in the Malesian mountains
(Hörandl et al., 2005; Lehnebach, 2008) similar to those in the
Tethyan clade. The species-richness and the cosmopolitan distribution of Ranunculus are probably caused by the interplay of transoceanic plus intracontinental dispersal, and a potential for rapid
adaptation and speciation.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to D. Albach, M. Ghahremanii, J.T. Johansson, C.
Keener, C. Lehnebach, F. Lone, M. Mirtajeddini, H. Maroofi, C.
Rebernig, K. Safikhani, G. Schneeweiss, P. Schönswetter, T.F. Stuessy, and A. Tribsch for collecting materials, N. Tkach for some data
from Ranunculus s.str., the curators of the herbaria BISH, CAN,
CONN, GB, LD, LE, LI, M, MPN, RM, TARI, VALD, WU, W, ZH and
ZT for the loan of herbarium specimens and permission to use
materials for DNA extractions. The authors are grateful to the Commission for Interdisciplinary Ecological Studies (KIÖS) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW), the Austrian Science Fund
(FWF), Project I 310, and the National Geographic Society (Project
8773-08) for Grants to E.H., and the Austrian Exchange Service
(ÖAD) for a Ph.D. student Grant to K.E. The suggestions of two
anonymous reviewers have been of great value.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.002.
References
Agustí, J., Garcés, M., Krijgsman, W., 2006a. Evidence for African–Iberian exchanges
during the Messinian in the Spanish mammalian record. Palaeogeogr.,
Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 238, 5–14.
Agusti, J., Oms, O., Meulenkamp, J.E., 2006b. Introduction to the Late Miocene to
Early Pliocene environment and climate change in the Mediterranean area.
Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 238, 1–4.
Blattner, F.R., 2005. Multiple intercontinental dispersals shaped the distribution
area of Hordeum (Poaceae). New Phytol. 169, 603–614.
Bramwell, D., Richardson, I.B.K., 1973. Floristic connections between Macaronesia
and the East Mediterranean region. Monogr. Biol. Canarienses 4, 118–125.
Carlquist, S., 1983. Intercontinental dispersal. Sonderbd. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg
7, 37–47.
Carracedo, J.C., 1994. The Canary Islands: an example of structural control on the
growth of large oceanic-island volcanoes. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 60, 225–
241.
Coleman, M., Forbes, D.G., Abbott, R.J., 2001. A new subspecies of Senecio mohavensis
(Compositae) reveals Old–New World species disjunction. Edinb. J. Bot. 58,
389–403.
Coleman, M., Liston, A., Kadereit, J.W., Abbott, R.J., 2003. Repeat intercontinental
dispersal and Pleistocene speciation in disjunct Mediterranean and desert
Senecio (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 90, 1446–1454.
Cook, J.A., Hoberg, E.P., Koehler, A., Henttonen, A., Wickström, L., Haukisalmi, V.,
Galbreath, K., Chernyavski, F., Dokuchaev, N., Lahzuhtkin, A., MacDonald, S.M.,
Hope, A., Waltari, E., Runck, A., Veitch, A., Popko, R., Jenkins, E., Kutz, S., Eckerlin,
R., 2005. Beringia: intercontinental exchange and diversification of high latitude
mammals and their parasites during the Pliocene and Quaternary. Mamm.
Study 30, S33–S44.
Davis, C.C., Fritsch, P.W., Li, J., Donoghue, M.J., 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of
Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF
sequence data. Syst. Bot. 27, 289–302.
19
de Queiroz, A., 2005. The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical
biogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 68–73.
Dickenmann, R., 1982. Genetic-ecological investigations in Ranunculus montanus
Willd. s.l. from the alpine vegetation belt of Davos (Grisons). Veröff. Geobot.
Inst. ETH Stiftung Rübel, Zürich, 78, 1–89 (German with English abstract).
Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L., 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of
fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Am. 19, 11–15.
Drummond, A.J., Rambaut, A., 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by
sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214.
Ehrendorfer, F., Ziman, S.N., König, C., Keener, C.S., Dutton, B.E., Tsarenko, O.N.,
Bulakh, E.V., Bosßcaiu, M., Médail, F., Kästner, A., 2009. Taxonomic revision,
phylogeny and transcontinental distribution of Anemone section Anemone
(Ranunculaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 160, 312–354.
Emadzade, K., Hörandl, E, in press. Northern Hemisphere origin, transoceanic
dispersal, and diversification of Ranunculeae, DC. (Ranunculaceae) in the
Cenozoic. J. Biogeogr. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02404.x.
Emadzade, K., Lehnebach, C., Lockhart, P., Hörandl, E., 2010. A molecular phylogeny,
morphology and classification of genera of Ranunculeae (Ranunculaceae).
Taxon 59, 809–828.
Fauquette, S., Suc, J.-P., Bertini, A., Popescu, S.-M., Warny, S., Bachiri Taoufiq, N.,
Perez Villa, M.-J., Chikhi, H., Feddi, N., Subally, D., Clauzon, G., Ferrier, J., 2006.
How much did climate force the Messinian salinity crisis? Quantified climatic
conditions from pollen records in the Mediterranean region. Palaeogeogr.,
Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 238, 281–301.
Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the
bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Fitch, W.M., 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a
specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20, 406–416.
Fosberg, F.R., 1948. Introduction. In: Zimmerman, E.C. (Ed.), Insects of Hawaii.
Hawaii Univ. Press, Honolulu, HI, pp. 107–119.
Fritsch, P., 1996. Isozyme analysis of intercontinental disjuncts within Styrax
(Styracaceae): implications for the Madrean–Tethyan hypothesis. Am. J. Bot. 83,
342–355.
Fritsch, P., 2001. Phylogenetics and biogeography of the flowering plant genus
Styrax (Styracaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction sites and DNA
sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19,
387–408.
Gehrke, B., Linder, H.P., 2009. The scramble for Africa: pan-temperate elements on
the African high mountains. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2657–2665.
Geiger, J.M.O., Ranker, T.A., Neale, J.M.R., Klimas, S.T., 2007. Molecular biogeography
and origins of the Hawaiian fern flora. Brittonia 59, 142–158.
Givnish, T.J., Millam, K.C., Evans, T.M., Hall, J.C., Pires, J.C., Berry, P.E., Sytsma, K.J.,
2004. Ancient vicariance or recent long-distance dispersal? Inferences about
phylogeny and South American–African disjunctions in Rapateaceae and
Bromeliaceae based on ndhF sequence data. Int. J. Plant Sci. Suppl. 165, 35–54.
Green, A.J., Jenkins, K.M., Bell, D., Morris, P.J., Kingsford, R.T., 2008. The potential of
waterbirds in dispersing invertebrates and plants in arid Australia. Freshw. Biol.
53, 380–392.
Gruenstaeudl, M., Urtubey, E., Jansen, R.K., Samuel, R., Barfuss, M.H., Stuessy, T.F.,
2009. Phylogeny of Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae) inferred from DNA sequence
data and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 51, 572–587.
Guzmán, B., Dolores Lledó, N., Vargas, P., 2009. Adaptive radiation in mediterranean
Cistus (Cistaceae). PLoS ONE 4, e6362.
Hall, T.A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor
and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95–
98.
Harbaugh, D.T., Wagner, W.L., Allan, G.J., Zimmer, E.A., 2009. The Hawaiian
Archipelago is a stepping stone for dispersal in the Pacific: an example from
the plant genus Melicope (Rutaceae). J. Biogeogr. 36, 230–241.
Higgins, S.I., Nathan, R., Cain, M.L., 2003. Are long-distance dispersal events in
plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84, 1945–
1956.
Hileman, L.C., Vasey, M.C., Parker, V.T., 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of the
Arbutoideae (Ericaceae): implications for the Madrean–Tethyan hypothesis.
Syst. Bot. 26, 131–143.
Hoffmann, M.H., von Hagen, K.B., Hörandl, E., Röser, M., Tkach, N.V., 2010. Sources of
the arctic flora: origins of arctic species in Ranunculus and related genera. Int. J.
Plant Sci. 171, 90–106.
Hoot, S.B., 1994. Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on preliminary atpB, rbcL,
and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9, 241–
251.
Hopkins, D.M., 1959. Cenozoic history of the Bering Land Bridge. Science 129, 1519–
1528.
Hörandl, E., 2008. Evolutionary implications of self-compatibility and reproductive
fitness in the apomictic Ranunculus auricomus polyploid complex
(Ranunculaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 1219–1228.
Hörandl, E., Emadzade, K., in press. The evolution of alpine species in Ranunculus
(Ranunculaceae) – A global comparison. Taxon 60.
Hörandl, E., Paun, O., Johansson, J.T., Lehnebach, C., Armstrong, T., Chen, L., Lockhart,
P., 2005. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary traits in Ranunculus s.l.
(Ranunculaceae) inferred from ITS sequence analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 36,
305–327.
Hörandl, E., Greilhuber, J., Klimova, K., Paun, O., Temsch, E., Emadzade, K., Hodálová,
I., 2009. Reticulate evolution and taxonomic concepts in the Ranunculus
auricomus complex (Ranunculaceae): insights from morphological,
karyological and molecular data. Taxon 58, 1194–1215.
Author's personal copy
20
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Hsü, K.J., Ryan, W.B.F., Cita, M.B., 1973. Late Miocene desiccation of the
Mediterranean. Nature 242, 240–244.
Hsü, K.J., Montadert, L., Bernoulli, D., Cita, M.B., Erickson, A., Garrison, R.E., Kidd, R.B.,
Mèlierés, F., Müller, C., Wright, R., 1977. History of the Messinian salinity crisis.
Nature 267, 399–403.
Huber, B.A., 2003. On the terminology of polytomies. Cladistics 19, 273.
Hulten, E., 1937. Outline of the History of Arctic and Boreal Biota During Quaternary
Period. Bokforlags Aktiebolgaet, Thule, Stockholm.
Iranshahr, M., Rechinger, K.H., Riedl, H., 1992. Ranunculaceae. Flora Iranica.
Rechinger, K.H. (Ed.), Akad. Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz., vol. 171, pp. 1–249.
Johansson, J.T., 1995. A revised chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae.
Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9, 253–261.
Johansson, J.T., 1998. Chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping and the phylogeny
of Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 213, 1–19.
Kadereit, J.W., Comes, H.P., 2005. The temporal course of alpine plant diversification
in the Quaternary. In: Bakker, F.T., Chatrou, L.W., Gravendeel, B., Pelser, P. (Eds.),
Plant Species-level Systematics: New Perspectives on Pattern and Process.
A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, Liechtenstein, pp. 117–130.
Kadota, Y., 1991. Taxonomic Notes on Some Alpine Species of Ranunculus
(Ranunculaceae) in the Himalaya. Univ. Mus. Tokyo Bull., p. 34.
Kodandaramaiah, U., 2010. Use of dispersal–vicariance analysis in biogeography – a
critique. J. Biogeogr. 37, 3–11.
Kron, K.A., Luteyn, J.L., 2005. Origins and biogeographic patterns in Ericaceae: new
insights from recent phylogenetic analyses. In: Friis, I., Balslev, H. (Eds.), Plant
Diversity and Complexity Patterns. Det Kongelige Dansk Videnskaberneses
Selskap, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 479–500.
Lehnebach, C.A., 2008. Phylogenetic affinities, species delimitation and adaptive
radiation of New Zealand Ranunculus. Ph.D. thesis, Massey University,
Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Lehnebach, C.A., Cano, A., Monsalve, C., McLenachan, P., Hörandl, E., Lockhart, P.,
2007. Phylogenetic relationships of the monotypic Peruvian genus Laccopetalum
(Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 264, 109–116.
Liston, A., 1997. Biogeographic relationships between the Mediterranean and North
American floras: insights from molecular data. Lagascalia 19, 323–330.
Lo Presti, R.M., Oberprieler, C., 2009. Evolutionary history, biogeography and ecoclimatological differentiation of the genus Anthemis L. (Compositae,
Anthemideae) in the circum-Mediterranean area. J. Biogeogr. 136, 1313–1332.
Lockhart, P., McLechnanan, P.A., Havell, D., Glenny, D., Huson, D., Jensen, U., 2001.
Phylogeny, dispersal and radiation of New Zealand alpine buttercups: molecular
evidence under split decomposition. Ann. Miss. Bot. Garden 88, 458–477.
Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R., Brown, J.H., 2006. Biogeography, third ed. Sinauer
Associates Inc., Sunderland.
Lourteig, A., 1984. Ranunculaceae. In: Correa, M.N. (Ed.), Flora Patagonica, vol. IV-a.
Buenos Aires, pp. 284–321.
Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2009. MESQUITE: A Modular System for
Evolutionary Analysis. 2.6. <http://mesquiteproject.org>.
Manos, P.S., Donoghue, M.J., 2001. Progress in northern hemisphere
phytogeography: an introduction. Int. J. Plant Sci. Suppl. 162 (6), 1–2.
Meulenkamp, J.E., Sissingh, W., 2003. Tertiary palaeogeography and
tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Northern and Southern Peri-Tethys
platforms and the intermediate domains of the African–Eurasian convergent
plate boundary zone. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 196, 209–228.
Meusel, W., Jäger, E., Weinert, E., 1965. Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. G.
Fischer, Jena.
Miikeda, O., Kita, K., Handa, T., Yukawa, T., 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of
Clematis (Ranunculaceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Bot.
J. Linn. Soc. 152, 153–168.
Mráz, P., Gaudeul, M., Rioux, D., Gielly, L., Choler, P., Taberlet, P., 2007. Genetic
structure of Hypochaeris uniflora (Asteraceae) suggests vicariance in the
Carpathians and rapid post-glacial colonization of the Alps from an eastern
Alpine refugium. J. Biogeogr. 34, 2100–2114.
Müller, K., 2005. SeqState – primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic
DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinformatics 4, 65–69.
Müller-Schneider, P., 1986. Verbreitungsbiologie der Blütenpflanzen Graubündens,
diasporology of the spermatophytes of the grisons (Switzerland).
Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen. Insitutes der ETH, Stiftung Rübel,
Zürich 85, 1–263.
Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author.
Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
Olteanu, R., Jipa, D.C., 2006. Dacian basin environmental evolution during upper
neogene within the Paratethys domain. GeoEcoMarina 12, 91–106.
Ovczinnikov, P.N., 1937. Ranuculus. In: Komarov, W.A. (Ed.), Flora URSS, vol. VII.
Ranales and Rhoeadales. Botanicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk USSR, Moscow,
pp. 351–509 (English Translation 1970).
Paun, O., Lehnebach, C., Johansson, J.T., Lockhart, P., Hörandl, E., 2005. Phylogenetic
relationships and biogeography of Ranunculus and allied genera
(Ranunculaceae) in the Mediterranean region and in the European alpine
system. Taxon 54, 911–930.
Plaziat, J.C., 1981. Late Cretaceous to Late Eocene paleogeographic evolution of
southwest Europe. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 36, 263–320.
Popov, S.V., Shcherba, I.G., Ilyina, L.B., Nevesskaya, L.A., Paramonova, N.P.,
Khondkarian, S.O., Magyar, I., 2006. Late Miocene to Pliocene
palaeogeography of the Paratethys and its relation to the Mediterranean.
Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol. 238, 91–106.
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A., 2002. Tree Annotator Version 1.4 Part of the BEAST
Package. <http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/>.
Rau, M.A., 1993. Ranunculaceae. In: Sharma, B.D., Balakrishnan, N.P., Rao, R.R., Hajra,
P.K. (Eds.), Flora of India, vol. 1. Botanical survey of India, Calcutta, pp. 1–145.
Raval, U., Veeraswamy, K., 2003. India–Madagascar separation: breakup along a
pre-existing mobile belt and chipping of the Craton. Gondwana Res. 6, 467–485.
Ree, R.H., Smith, S.A., 2008. Maximum likelihood inference of geographic range
evolution by dispersal, local extinction, and cladogenesis. Syst. Biol. 57, 4–14.
Ree, R.H., Moore, M.R., Webb, C.O., Donoghue, M.J., 2005. A likelihood framework for
inferring the evolution of geographic range on phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59,
2299–2311.
Riedl, H., Nasir, Y., 1990. Ranunculaceae. In: Ali, S.I., Nasir, Y.J. (Eds.), Flora of
Pakistan, vol. 193. PanGraphics, Islamabad.
Ro, K., Keener, C.S., McPheron, B.A., 1997. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the
Ranunculaceae: utility of the nuclear 26S ribosomal DNA in inferring
intrafamiliar relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8, 117–127.
Ronquist, F., 1996. DIVA Version 1.1. Computer Program and Manual Available by
Anonymous FTP from Uppsala University.
Ronquist, F., 1997. Dispersal–vicariance analysis: a new approach to the
quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46, 195–203.
Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference
under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.
Schaefer, H., Heibl, C., Renner, S.S., 2009. Gourds afloat: a dated phylogeny reveals
an Asian origin of the ground family (Cucurbitaceae) and numerous oversea
dispersal events. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 843–851.
Scotese, C.R., 2001. Atlas of Earth History, vol. 1. PALEOMAP Project. Arlington,
Texas, USA.
Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E., Small, R.L., 2007. Comparison of whole
chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic
studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am. J. Bot. 94, 275–288.
Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based
phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369–381.
Skottsberg, C., 1922. Ranunculus caprarum. In: Skottsberg, C. (Ed.), The Natural
History of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, Part 2. Almqvist & Wiksells,
Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 123–124.
Steinbach, K., Gottsberger, G., 1994. Phenology and pollination biology of five
Ranunculus species in Giessen, Central Germany. Phyton 34, 203–218.
Suc, J.P., 1984. Origin and evolution of the Mediterranean vegetation and climate in
Europe. Nature 307, 429–432.
Sullivan, J., Swofford, D.L., 2001. Should we use model-based methods for
phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site
rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? Syst. Biol. 50,
723–729.
Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP; Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other
Methods). Ver. 4.0b. 8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Takhtajan, A., 1986. Floristic Regions of the World. University of California Press,
Berkeley, USA.
Tamura, M., 1993. Ranunculaceae. In: Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V. (Eds.), The
Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. 2. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons,
Magnoliid, Hamamelid, and Caryophyllid Families. Springer, Berlin, pp. 563–583.
Tamura, M., 1995. Angiospermae. Ordnung Ranunculales. Fam. Ranunculaceae. II.
Systematic Part. In: Hiepko, P. (Ed.), Natürliche Pflanzenfamilien, second ed.,
vol. 17aIV. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 223–519.
Tel-Zur, N., Abbo, S., Myslabodski, D., Mizrahi, Y., 1999. Modified CTAB procedure
for DNA isolation from epiphytic cacti of the genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus
(Cactaceae). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 17, 249–254.
Thompson, J.D., 2005. Plant Evolution in the Mediterranean. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgings, D.G., 1997. The
clustral X Windows interface. Flexible strategies for multiple sequence
alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 24, 4876–4882.
Thorup, K., 1998. Vagrancy of yellow-browed Phylloscopus inornatus and Pallas’
warbler Ph. proregulus in north-west Europe: misorientation on great circles?
Ringing Migr. 19, 7–12.
Tiffney, B.H., 2000. Geographic and classification influences on the Cretaceous and
Tertiary history of Euramerican floristic similarity. Acta Univ. Carol. Geol. 44, 5–
16.
Tiffney, B.H., Manchester, R.S., 2001. The use of geological and paleontological
evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the northern
hemisphere Tertiary. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 162, S3–S17.
Tremetsberger, K., Weiss-Schneeweiss, H., Stuessy, T.F., Samuel, R., Kadlec, G., Ortiz,
M.A., Talavera, S., 2005. Nuclear ribosomal DNA and karyotypes indicate a NW
African origin of South American Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae). Mol.
Phylogenet. Evol. 35, 102–116.
Tutin, T.G., Cook, C.D.K., 1993. Ranunculus. In: Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges,
N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. (Eds.), Flora Europaea I:
Psilotaceae to Platanaceae, second ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp.
269–290.
Vargas, P., Baldwin, B., Constance, L., 1998. Nuclear ribosomal DNA evidence for a
western North American origin of Hawaiian and South American species of
Sanicula (Apiaceae). PNAS 95, 235–240.
Wen, J., 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct
distributions in flowering plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 421–455.
Wen, J., Ickert-Bond, S.M., 2009. Evolution of the Madrean–Tethyan disjunctions
and the North and South American amphitropical disjunctions in plants. J. Syst.
Evol. 47, 331–348.
Wencai, W., Gilbert, M.G., 2001. Ranunculus. In: Flora China, vol. 6. Science Press,
Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp. 391–431.
Author's personal copy
K. Emadzade et al. / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2011) 4–21
Wendel, J., Albert, V., 1992. Phylogenetics of the cotton genus (Gossypium):
character state weighted parsimony analysis of chloroplast-DNA restriction
site data and its systematic and biogeography implications. Syst. Bot. 17, 115–
143.
Whittemore, A., 1997. Ranunculus. In: Flora of North America Committee (Eds.),
Flora of North America, North of Mexico, vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae
and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 88–135.
21
Willis, K.J., McElwain, J.C., 2002. The Evolution of Plants. Oxford Univ. Press, New
York.
Xiang, Q.-Y., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Manchester, S.R., Crawford, D.J., 2000. Timing the
Eastern Asian–Eastern North American floristic disjunction: molecular clock
corroborates paleontological estimates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15, 462–472.
Yurtsev, B.A., 1974. Problems of the Botanical Geography of Northeast Asia. Nauka,
Leningrad, Russia.