Dissertationes Archaeologicae
ex Instituto Archaeologico
Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae
Ser. 3. No. 4.
Budapest 2016
Dissertationes Archaeologicae ex Instituto Archaeologico
Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae
Ser. 3. No. 4.
Editor-in-chief:
Dávid Bartus
Editorial board:
László Bartosiewicz
László Borhy
Zoltán Czajlik
István Feld
Gábor Kalla
Pál Raczky
Miklós Szabó
Tivadar Vida
Technical editors:
Dávid Bartus
Gábor Váczi
Proofreading:
Szilvia Szöllősi
Zsófia Kondé
Available online at http://dissarch.elte.hu
Contact: dissarch@btk.elte.hu
© Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences
Budapest 2016
Contents
Articles
Pál Raczky – András Füzesi
9
Öcsöd-Kováshalom. A retrospective look at the interpretations of a Late Neolithic site
Gabriella Delbó
43
Frührömische keramische Beigaben im Gräberfeld von Budaörs
Linda Dobosi
117
Animal and human footprints on Roman tiles from Brigetio
Kata Dévai
135
Secondary use of base rings as drinking vessels in Aquincum
Lajos Juhász
145
Britannia on Roman coins
István Koncz – Zsuzsanna Tóth
161
6th century ivory game pieces from Mosonszentjános
Péter Csippán
179
Cattle types in the Carpathian Basin in the Late Medieval and Early Modern Ages
Method
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
213
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Field Reports
Tamás Dezső – Gábor Kalla – Maxim Mordovin – Zsófia Masek – Nóra Szabó – Barzan
Baiz Ismail – Kamal Rasheed – Attila Weisz – Lajos Sándor – Ardalan Khwsnaw – Aram
Ali Hama Amin
233
Grd-i Tle 2016. Preliminary Report of the Hungarian Archaeological Mission of the Eötvös Loránd
University to Grd-i Tle (Saruchawa) in Iraqi Kurdistan
Tamás Dezső – Maxim Mordovin
The first season of the excavation of Grd-i Tle. The Fortifications of Grd-i Tle (Field 1)
241
Gábor Kalla – Nóra Szabó
263
The first season of the excavation of Grd-i Tle. The cemetery of the eastern plateau (Field 2)
Zsófia Masek – Maxim Mordovin
277
The first season of the excavation of Grd-i Tle. The Post-Medieval Settlement at Grd-i Tle (Field 1)
Gabriella T. Németh – Zoltán Czajlik – Katalin Novinszki-Groma – András Jáky
291
Short report on the archaeological research of the burial mounds no. 64. and no. 49 of ÉrdSzázhalombatta
Károly Tankó – Zoltán Tóth – László Rupnik – Zoltán Czajlik – Sándor Puszta
307
Short report on the archaeological research of the Late Iron Age cemetery at Gyöngyös
Lőrinc Timár
325
How the floor-plan of a Roman domus unfolds. Complementary observations on the Pâture du
Couvent (Bibracte) in 2016
Dávid Bartus – László Borhy – Nikoletta Sey – Emese Számadó
337
Short report on the excavations in Brigetio in 2016
Dóra Hegyi – Zsófia Nádai
351
Short report on the excavations in the Castle of Sátoraljaújhely in 2016
Maxim Mordovin
361
Excavations inside the 16th-century gate tower at the Castle Čabraď in 2016
Thesis abstracts
András Füzesi
369
The settling of the Alföld Linear Pottery Culture in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county. Microregional
researches in the area of Mezőség in Nyírség
Márton Szilágyi
395
Early Copper Age settlement patterns in the Middle Tisza Region
Botond Rezi
Hoarding practices in Central Transylvania in the Late Bronze Age
403
Éva Ďurkovič
417
The settlement structure of the North-Western part of the Carpathian Basin during the middle and
late Early Iron Age. The Early Iron Age settlement at Győr-Ménfőcsanak (Hungary, Győr-MosonSopron county)
Piroska Magyar-Hárshegyi
427
The trade of Pannonia in the light of amphorae (1st – 4th century AD)
Péter Vámos
439
Pottery industry of the Aquincum military town
Eszter Soós
449
Settlement history of the Hernád Valley in the 1st to 4/5th centuries AD
Gábor András Szörényi
467
Archaeological research of the Hussite castles in the Sajó Valley
Book reviews
Linda Dobosi
477
Marder, T. A. – Wilson Jones, M.: The Pantheon: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge
University Press. Cambridge 2015. Pp. xix + 471, 24 coloured plates and 165 figures.
ISBN 978-0-521-80932-0
Implication of non-invasive archaeological
methods in Brigetio in 2016
Dávid Bartus
Institute of Archaeological Sciences
Eötvös Loránd University
bartus.david@btk.elte.hu
Zoltán Czajlik
Institute of Archaeological Sciences
Eötvös Loránd University
czajlik.zoltan@btk.elte.hu
László Rupnik
Institute of Archaeological Sciences
Eötvös Loránd University
rupnik.laci@gmail.com
Abstract
The non-invasive archaeological research in the territory of the Roman settlement of Brigetio has been continued in 2016. Our previously applied methods have been supplemented with RPAS aerial prospection and
documentation. The aim of the present paper is to provide a presentation of the results and experiences of
conventional and RPAS aerial photography, field walking and complex GIS-analysis, as well as the relationship
of aerial photography and field data.
Aerial archaeology
Due to the work of O. Braasch and I. Kuzma the aerial archaeological research of the region
has more than 25 years of history.1 The archive imagery related to the Ripa Pannonica, studied
by Zs. Visy, has provided valuable information regarding the topography of Brigetio.2 The
area in question was systematically photographed by Z. Czajlik during the past nearly ten
years. Meanwhile a scientific programme supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research
Fund has been launched in order to claim more detailed knowledge about the structure of
Brigetio and its surroundings (NRDIO 108667). According to the above mentioned research our
knowledge about the topography of the Roman settlement has significantly increased.3 Thus it
was reasonable to continue the aerial archaeological survey in 2016.
The only flight which concerned the area this year was carried out on 22th June. A C150 airplane
flown by pilot Dániel Horváth was used during the operation. The images were captured by a
Nikon D300 camera mounted with a Nikkor ED 24-70 mm objective. The flight took place in
the afternoon by clear, windy weather. The visibility has proved to be outstanding in vertical
and horizontal directions alike.
1
2
3
Kuzma 1995, 64; Rajtár 1997, 122; Braasch 2003, 44, Abb. 1–2.
Visy 1985, 53–57; Visy 2003, figs. 32 and 35.
The latest results were published in several papers, see Borhy et al. 2011; Rupnik – Czajlik 2013; Borhy et
al. 2017.
DissArch Ser. 3. No. 4 (2016) 213–232.
DOI: 10.17204/dissarch.2016.213
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Accordingly to the early summer period we have focused our attention to the plots which were
sown with winter wheat. The crops tend to provide light yellow or light green background
colour during this period which generally does not last longer than a couple of days. The
negative structures like pits and ditches appear in dark green while the positive ones of stone
walls and paved surfaces can be observed in dark yellow. In spite of the generally promising date
the number of definable archaeological features were limited. The outlines of the crop-marks
were obscure which made it hard to conclude whether they have an archaeological origin. The
main reason of this unfortunate circumstance was the high level of moisture in the soil caused
by the rainy late spring and early summer weather. However a smooth difference was to be
observed: the higher grounds like terraces and combs proved to be more sensible than the lower
alluvial plains. Moreover the crop rotation has also turned into unfavourable state. Among
other things most of the plots covering the canabae were sown with maize. According to our
expectations the conditions of aerial archaeology proved to be far from preferential in 2016.
Although the Roman settlement and its surroundings were completely observed (Fig. 1), limited
result have been obtained. As a positive exception, part of a rural settlement marked by pits
and perhaps sunken featured houses can be mentioned, which was detected close to the estuary
of a stream (Szila-völgyi-patak) into Szőny-Füzitői Channel (Fig. 2). Based on the archive data
and the result of the field walk performed later the site can be dated to the Roman Period. It is
presumably an element belonging to the settlements which occupied the hinterland of Brigetio.
From May 2016 a new DJI Phantom 4 quadcopter has been involved to the aerial archaeological
survey of the research area and to the documentation of the ongoing excavations. The new
platform gave us greater flexibility than the traditional high-wing airplane. We were able to
take images at different times of the day, making it possible to choose the best visibility. Thus
the particular plots could be observed even day by day in order to find the best condition of the
vegetation. In spite of the unfavourable weather described above the flights using the drone
were more effective than the one carried out with an airplane on 22th June.
The northern section of the legionary fortress which was covered by wheat appeared to be
the most suitable and coherent area from the aerial archaeological point of view after the
first flights. We have taken images from different altitudes and circumstances more than a
dozen times. One of the most important results was the detailed documentation of an apsidal
stone building found close to the eastern gate of the fortress (porta principalis dextra) (Fig. 9.1).
It was first documented in 2009,4 but due to the new images we were able to create a more
elaborated ground plan. The negative crop marks of the stone foundations could be observed
in various quality from the end of May until harvest (Fig. 3). The advantages of the series of
images taken under different conditions can be exceedingly seen in the hybrid view made of
the images from 10th and 28th of June (Fig. 4). According to the results some questions have
arisen. The orientation of the building was adjusted to the main axis of the castrum, but the
negative crop marks which draw out the ground plan were more visible than in the case of
any other buildings inside the fortress. It seems the foundations are closer to the surface than
anywhere else in the questionable plot. What could the explanation be for that? Two possible
answers come into play. Either the building was built later than the other parts of the legionary
4
Borhy et al. 2011, 47–48, Fig. 45; Lóki – Szabó – Visy 2011, 63, Fig. 47; Rupnik – Czajlik 2013, 75, Fig. 4, C.
214
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
fortress, or the erosion of the surface must have been more intensive here. Theoretically an
apsidal building can be identified as a medieval church but in this particular case the apse is
situated on the western side, moreover, we have no information of any medieval buildings
or finds nearby. According to the field walk (Fig. 5) which was performed in narrow, three
meters wide transects, the decisive majority of the collected artefacts were to be dated to the
Roman period, but none of them to the Medieval Age. We have also recorded the density of the
stone and Roman tile fragments lying on the surface. Their concentration around the apsidal
building is very expressive (Fig. 6). Based on these facts we may suggest that the building was
originally erected during the Late Roman Period, however, a future excavation is destined to
reveal the function and age of the building.
According to the early excavations taken place around the legionary fortress the Late Antique
cemeteries were situated directly in front of the fossa by the southern and eastern sides.5
Moreover, Late Roman burials came to light in the former territory of the canabae in the
northern area of the Pannonia-dűlő6 and also in the site Komárom/Szőny-Dunapart.7 The aerial
imagery has given evidence that a similar arrangement existed by the western side. Positive
crop-marks of previously unknown rectangular graves were observed in the vicinity of the
fossa not far from the porta principalis sinistra (Fig. 9.2). It can be studied how the nature of the
crop-marks changed during a short period between 15th and 21th of June (Fig. 7).
The exact location of the western gate (porta principalis sinistra) is unknown, it must be
somewhere under the present-day railway and main road crossing the fortification.8 The
area in question cannot be easily surveyed because it is covered by the railway, the road and
detached houses. Due to the recent aerial archaeological evidences the street net of the canabae
can be reconstructed quite well.9 Negative crop-mark of a short street section was identified in
the northern section of the so-called Pannónia-dűlő during the 2009 summer campaign. The
continuation of this street heading in north-eastern direction through the present-day long
and narrow plots was captured by drone footage in 2016 (Fig. 8). We have every reason to
believe that this street has connected to the limes road in front of the gate (Fig. 9.3), which
supports our earlier reconstruction.10
Field walks
Due to the recent year’s research program mentioned above, the structure and topography of
the Roman Brigetio have been discovered in more detail. However, a Roman city cannot be fully
interpreted without knowing the geography and the settlement pattern of the surrounding
area. In a cooperation with our colleagues from the Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences
in Eötvös Loránd University we have theoretically reconstructed the geomorphological appearance the questionable area based on archive maps, digital terrain models and soil drillings.11
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Paulovics 1941, 152–153; Barkóczi 1949, 69; Barkóczi 1951, 9–10, 1. kép; Barkóczi 1965.
Borhy et al. 2012, 263–264.
Bartus et al. 2014, 439, Fig. 1.
Barkóczi 1951, 9, 2. kép.
Borhy et al. 2011, 47–48, Fig. 45; Szabó 2011, 157–158, Fig. 144; Rupnik – Czajlik 2013, 77; Pl. 11.
Rupnik – Czajlik 2013, 77; Pl. 11.
Viczián et al. 2013.
215
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
According to our research we strongly believe that the Romans had built a dam in order to
regulate the water system south from Brigetio, which was destroyed later. The existence of
this system must be confirmed as many ways as possible. One of the objectives of our field
walks is to reconstruct the – not only the Roman – topography of the research area, which will
hopefully provide useful data to refine the environmental reconstruction. On the other hand
we would like to verify the sites captured by aerial photography. Last but not least the field
survey was included in the curriculum of the Instute of Archaeological Sciences of the Eötvös
Loránd University thus giving students an opportunity to practice.
The method of the survey has been predefined by the fact that the staff mostly consisted by
unexperienced persons. We formed small groups of three or four students mentored by an
archaeologist, each of them equipped with a hand-held GPS device. The territory was surveyed
in transects according to the plot system. The distance held between each transect varied
between 10 and 25 meters in order to maintain the range of audibility between the teacher and
the students. The artefacts were recorded as waypoints with the help of the GPS devices and
they were normally packed per transect and per GPS separately. Some type of the findings
such as stones, tiles, pottery dating to the 18–20th centuries were not collected, but marked
and noted in the field report. The advantage of the applied method was that it has provided
structured data with a comparatively high resolution which has allowed us not only to define
the extension of the archaeological site but to obtain information about its inner relations and
density, even about distribution by archaeological periods. Its disadvantage is that the process
is time-consuming thus not suitable to investigate larger regions. We spent ten days on the
field during 2016, and surveyed more than 270 acres (Fig. 10). The evaluation of the material is
in progress, but some results can be presented henceforth.
The plot found in the eastern foreground of the legionary fortress was an important part of
our field survey. According to L. Barkóczi the area was sparsely occupied by stone buildings
which were interpreted as parts of Roman villa estates.12 One of these structures was excavated
by A. Radnóti in 194013 and another stone building was discovered by E. Számadó during the
construction works of a pipeline in 1992.14 The archaeological features have been disturbed
by World War 2 bomb craters and several construction works related to the neighbouring oil
refinery and storage facility. Traces of these interventions can be easily identified in both archive
and modern aerial imagery (Fig. 11). According to the georeferenced photographs we were
able to create a map of this area.15 It seems that a huge proportion of it was covered by stone
buildings or at least their foundation was made of stones. Although no clue of the street system
was identifiable, we suppose that these remains are better to be interpreted as part of the canabae
instead of individual villas. By the time of the field walk the plot in question was divided into
two parcels with different types of cultivation, which led to uneven surface visibility. Growing
wheat covered the eastern part, while the western part was ploughed and flatted. The dispersion
of the artefacts on the surface was compared with the map drawn on the basis of the aerial
images. The sparse structure of the buildings is reflected by both sources (Fig. 12).
12
13
14
15
Barkóczi 1949, 68, Fig. 1; Barkóczi 1951, 9, Fig. 1.
MNM RA 439.Sz.VII; B. Thomas 1964, 265-267, Abb. 142.
Számadó 2010, 151-152, Fig. 38.
It was partially published: Rupnik – Czajlik 2013, 75, Fig. 5.
216
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
The so-called Vasállás is located on the southern bank of the Szőny-Füzitői-Channel, and it is
divided into several parts by an artificial channel and roads. It is known from an earlier field
walk performed by E. Számadó and L. Borhy (KÖH ID No.: 59494).16 L. Barkóczi supposed that
the Roman road heading from Brigetio towards Aquincum was running through this area.17
Between 2008 and 2015, multiple series of aerial images were taken on the site by Z. Czajlik.
We have created a rectified photomap of the area based on these images (Fig. 13, above). Beside
the traces of a rural settlement characterized by pits, sunken featured houses and trenches
and other structures. We were not able to fully elaborate the plan as certain areas remained
hidden due to the wind damage and disadvantageous geological conditions. According to the
high density of sherds collected on the surface these areas must have been occupied by similar
settlement structures (Fig. 13, below).
No unambiguous negative crop-marks of the road leading to Aquincum can be identified, but
parallel trenches are visible based on which two possible paths can be supposed (Fig. 14, above).
A light dispersion of gravel on the surface was recorded by the northern section close to the
modern road to Bélapuszta (Fig. 14, below). Another evidence proving the existence of the road
was provided by a soil drill which was performed on the bank of the Szőny-Füzitői-Channel. A
thick layer of gravel presumably belonging to the road in question has been documented in the
face of the drill (Fig. 14, above). According to these data the line of the road mentioned by L.
Barkóczi can be reconstructed, fitting fairly to the street system of the canabae (Fig. 15).
In the southern part of the Vasállás plot, at least fifteen circular trenches can be seen in the
aerial images (Fig. 16.1). The origin of these features is uncertain. The traces of World War II
bomb craters are often visible due to similar crop-marks, but we did not find any proof that the
area in question had been affected by bombing during the war. The other possible explanation
is that the circular features belong to burial mounds, which are frequently indicated by circular
trenches without any trace of inside structure. The field walk was not successful in this area,
because the surface was mostly covered by high-grown weed. Thus further investigation is
needed in order to identify and date these circular objects.
The list of objects in question captured by aerial imagery continues with a polygonal trench
system found in the south-eastern part of the plot (Fig. 16.2). Although the circumstances
were quite favourable by the time of our field survey, no surface finds have been recorded
here. This structure might have been built during the 19th century as an outpost of the
fortification system surrounding Komárom.18 North of this earthwork several rectangular crop-marks of graves (approximately 50) are visible, which are mostly adjusted in lines.
The field survey did not provide artefacts neither in the case of the fortification nor the cemetery.
Conclusion
Due to the combined elaboration of the aerial photographs and the systematic field survey in
front of a GIS background we were able to collect and organise detailed information about the
16 Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum Régészeti Adatbázis (Hungarian National Museum Archaeology Database),
http://archeodatabase.hnm.hu/hu/node/68068, accessed 07.03.2017.
17 Barkóczi 1949, 69; Barkóczi 1951, 8, 1. kép.
18 Szamódy – Csikány – Horváth 1998, 116.
217
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
extension and structure of the sites. Some features, like graves, enclosures and trenches cannot
be detected by field walks, but they become visible using aerial imagery. The methodological
and GIS implicated field survey can refill and correct either the archive data of a known site or
the information based on aerial photography. Obviously these methods are comprehensive to
each other. Hopefully we will be able to expand the boundaries of our research to a wider area
around Komárom involving geophysical measurements in order to gain a more elaborated
view of the historical landscape.
Acknowledgment
The field walks were supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund and the Klapka György
Museum of Komárom. We are very grateful for the help of István Koós from the Office of Building
Affairs and Cultural Heritage, Tatabánya. We owe thanks to our colleagues András Bödőcs and
Bence Simon from the Eötvös Loránd University. Last but not least, the following students have
taken part of the field works: Ferenc Barna, Luca Búr, Róbert Eppel, Rebeka Gergácz, Fruzsina
Hege, Dóra Hományi, Bianka Horváth, Bence Jőrös, Zsófia Kelemen, Zoltán Kiss, Dalma Kollerits,
Adrienn Leibinger, Dániel Polyák, Dorottya Rakó, Katalin Szarvas, Zsóka Varga.
References
Barkóczi, L. 1949: A brigetiói tábor és canabae topográfiája (Nouvelles données pour la topographie de
Brigetio). Antiquitas Hungarica 3, 67–72.
Barkóczi, L. 1951: Brigetio. Dissertationes Pannonicae Ser. 2, No. 22. Budapest.
Barkóczi, L. 1965: New Data on the History of Late Roman Brigetio. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum
Hungaricae 13, 215–257.
Bartus, D. – Borhy, L. – Delbó, G. – Számadó, E. 2014: A new Roman bath in the canabae of Brigetio
Short report on the excavations at the site Szőny-Dunapart in 2014. Dissertationes Archaeologicae
Ser. 3, No. 2, 437–450.
Borhy, L. – Bartus, D. – Czajlik, Z. – Rupnik, L. – Számadó, E. 2011: Brigetio (Komárom/Szőny):
Tábor – város a Duna mellett. Brigetio (Komárom/Szőny) – Fortress/City next to the Danube.
In: Visy, Zs. (ed.): Rómaiak a Dunánál. A Ripa Pannonica Magyarországon mint világörökségi
helyszín. – Romans on the Danube. The Ripa Pannonica in Hungary as a World Heritage Site.
Pécs, 42–51.
Borhy, L. – Számadó, E. – Dévai, K. – Sey, N. 2012: Komárom-Szőny, MOL-bázistelep. In: Kisfaludy,
J. (ed.): Régészeti kutatások Magyarországon 2010 – Archaeological Investigations in Hungary
2010. Budapest, 263–264.
Borhy, L. – Czajlik, Z. – Rupnik, L. – Nagy, B. – Puszta, S. – Bödőcs, A. – Bartus, D. 2017:
Nondestruktív lelőhelykutatási módszerek integrált alkalmazása Brigetioban és környékén 2014–
2015-ben. In: Magyarország régészeti topográfiája – Múlt-jelen-jövő. (In press).
Braasch, O. 2003: Die Donau hinab – archäologische Flüge in Ungarn. In: Visy, Zs. (ed.): Régészeti
műemlékek kutatása és gondozása a 3. évezred küszöbén. Pécs, 41–65.
Lóki, R. – Szabó, M. – Visy, Zs. 2011: A PTE kutatócsoportja által felmért lelőhelyek katalógusa. In:
Visy, Zs. – Szabó, M. – Priskin, A. – Lóki, R. (eds.) A Danube limes program régészeti kutatásai
218
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
2008–2011 között. Jelentés a Danube Limes Unesco World Heritage Site pályázat keretében a
PTE BTK Régészet Tanszékének kutatócsoportja által végzett kutatásokról – The Danube Limes
project archaeological research between 2008–2011. Report on the research carried out by the
research team of the Department of Archaeology, University of Pécs within the framework of
the Danube Limes Unesco World Heritage Site project. Pécs, 53–100.
Kuzma, I. 1995: Luftbildarchäologie in der Slowakei. In: Kunow, J. (ed.): Luftbildarchäologie in Ost- und
Mitteleuropa. Forschungen zur Archäologie im Land Brandenburg 3. Berlin, 251–258.
Paulovics, I. 1941: Funde und Forschungen in Brigetio (Szőny). In: Alföldi, A. (ed.): Laureae Aquincenses
Memoriae valentine Kuzsinszky dicatae II. Dissertationes Pannonicae Ser. 2, No. 11. Budapest,
118–164.
Rajtár, J. 1997: Die Legionen Mark Aurels im Vormarsch. In: Oexle, J. (ed.): Aus der Luft – Bilder
unserer Geschichte: Luftbildarchäologie in Zentraleuropa. Dresden, 58–67.
Rupnik, L. – Czajlik, Z. 2013: Aerial archaeological survey of the legionary camp and military town
at Brigetio. In: Czajlik, Z. –Bödőcs, A. (eds.): Aerial Archaeology and Remote Sensing from
the Baltic to the Adriatic. Selected Papers of the Annual Conference of the Aerial Archaeology
Research Group, 13th–15th September 2012, Budapest, Hungary. Budapest, 71–78, Pl. 11–12.
B. Thomas, E. 1964: Römische Villen in Pannonien. Beiträge zur pannonischen Siedlungsgeschichte.
Budapest.
Szamódy, Zs. – Csikány, T. – Horváth, Cs. 1998: Komárom erődváros. Komárom.
Számadó, E. 2010: Régészeti kutatások Komárom/Szőny területén a római kori Brigetióban, 1990–2010
között (The Archaeological Research at Komárom (Szőny Neighbourhood) on the Territory of
the Roman Brigetio, 1990–2010); (Cercetarea archeologica de la Komárom (cartierul Szony), pe
teritoriul Brigetio-ului roman, 1990–2010). Terra Sebus, 141–176.
Viczián, I. – Nagy, B. – Deák, M. – Szeberényi, J. – Rupnik, L. 2013: Environmental Reconstruction of
the Area of Roman Brigetio (Komárom, Hungary). Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica
47, 95–105.
Visy, Zs. 1985: Der pannonische Limes in Ungarn. Budapest.
Visy, Zs. 2003: The ripa Pannonica in Hungary. Budapest.
219
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 1. The track of the flight carried out on 22th June 2016.
Fig. 2. Traces of a Roman age rural settlement in the territory of Brigetio (Photo: Z. Czaljik, 22.06.2016).
220
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 3. Development of the crop-marks showing the apsidal stone building in the castra. Above
left: 03.06.2016; Above right: 06.06.2016; Middle left: 10.06.2016; Middle right: 14.06.2016; Below left:
23.06.2016; Below right: 28.06.2016 (Photos: D. Bartus – L. Rupnik).
221
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 4. Apsidal building. Hybrid view of images taken on the 10th and 28th of June (Photo: D. Bartus and
L. Rupnik).
222
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 5. The ground plan of the apsidal building and the result of the field walks.
Fig. 6. The heat map showing the density of stone and tile fragments around the apsidal building.
223
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 7. Positive crop-marks of the graves in front of the fossa near the porta principalis sinistra, by
different visibility.
224
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 8. Traces of a street connecting the porta principalis sinistra with the canabae.
225
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 9. The position of the archaeological features documented using the quadcopter around the castra
legionis.
Fig. 10. The areas around Komárom affected by field surveys.
226
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 11. The interpreted ground plan of the area east of the fortress, displayed in archive (above) and
modern oblique images (below).
227
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 12. The results of the field survey concerning the area east of the fortress. The GPS-tracks and the
location of the collected artefacts (above), and the heat map weighted by the surface finds (below).
228
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 13. The photomap of the Vasállás site (above), and the interpreted crop-marks (below).
229
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 14. Section of the Vasállás site with the possible paths of the Roman road heading from Brigetio to
Aquincum (above) and the spread of gravel on the surface in the line of the road (below).
230
Implication of non-invasive archaeological methods in Brigetio in 2016
Fig. 15. The possible reconstruction of the road net which might have occupied the southern part of the
canabae and the Vasállás.
231
Dávid Bartus – Zoltán Czajlik – László Rupnik
Fig. 16. Traces of circular structures (1), 19th century fortification (2) and a cemetery (3) in the Vasállás
site.
232