Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Phytomedicine
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phymed
Hepatoprotective activity of Erythrina × neillii leaf extract and
characterization of its phytoconstituents
T
Riham O. Bakra, , Marwa A.A. Fayedb, Ahmed M. Fayezc, Salma K. Gabra, Ahlam M. El-Fishawyd,
Taha S.El-Alfyd
⁎
a
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts,, Giza 11787, Egypt
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City, Egypt
c
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Giza 11787, Egypt
d
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt
b
A R T I C LE I N FO
A B S T R A C T
Keywords:
Erythrina × neillii
Alkaloids
Flavonoids
Antihepatotoxic
Background: Natural antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents have the ability to restore normal balance to
destructed liver cells. The genus Erythrina has attracted attention for its broad spectrum of physiological activities and its rich polyphenolic and alkaloid contents.
Hypothesis/Purpose: The major phytoconstituents of Erythrina × neillii, an ornamental coral tree and a hybrid
between E. herbacea and E. humeana that was not previously studied, were investigated. The hepatoprotective
effect and underlying mechanisms were also assessed.
Study design and methods: The main phytoconstituents in the different fractions of the alcoholic leaf extract
(dichloromethane and ethyl acetate) were identified using high resolution high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HR-HPLC-MS-MS) based on the fragmentation pattern and molecular
formula of the identified compounds and on previous literature. In addition, the hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of three doses of E. × neillii alcoholic leaf extract (100, 250, 500 mg/kg)
were investigated in methotrexate (MTX)-intoxicated rats and were compared with those of silymarin-treated
rats. Liver function parameters were obtained, and a histopathological study was performed. In addition, the
anti-inflammatory mediators and the antioxidant system in the liver tissues were assessed.
Results: The dichloromethane extract revealed an abundance of alkaloids (25), in addition to tentatively identifying flavone (1), flavanone (1) and three fatty acids. Additionally, thirty-six compounds belonging to different
classes of phytoconstituents with a predominance of flavonoids (21), O/C-flavone and flavonol glycosides, followed by alkaloids (9), fatty acids (4) and (2), and phenolic glycoside were identified in the ethyl acetate extract.
Compared with MTX, alcoholic leaf extract (500 mg/kg) ameliorated the MTX-induced alterations by improving
several biochemical marker levels, fighting oxidative stress in serum and liver tissues, and decreasing inflammatory mediators; this finding was further confirmed by the histopathological study.
Conclusion: This study reveals E. × neillii, a rich source of flavonoids and alkaloids, which could be further
exploited to provide a promising and safe antihepatotoxic agent source.
Introduction
plants and their formulations, as they increase the rate of the natural
healing process of the liver. Hence, the search for an effective liver
protective drug persists (Stickel and Schuppan, 2007).
Experimental models are used to validate the hepatoprotective activity of those systems used in traditional medicine. Methotrexate
Liver diseases represent extremely serious health problems with
large economic losses in modern society. In the traditional system of
medicine, liver diseases have been successfully treated using medicinal
Abbreviations: MTX, methotrexate; HR-HPLC/MS/MS, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry; ROS, reactive oxygen species;
TNF, tumour necrosis factor; SEM, standard error of the means; ANOVA, analysis of variance; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP,
alkaline phosphatase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH, blood reduced glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MPO, myeloperoxidase; DM, dichloromethane; EA, ethyl
acetate; LC, liquid chromatography; LD50, lethal dose
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: romar@msa.eun.eg (R.O. Bakr).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2018.09.231
Received 10 February 2018; Received in revised form 26 August 2018; Accepted 28 September 2018
0944-7113/ © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
obtained from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Netherlands), MilliQ water was
used for LC analysis.
ALT, AST, ALP, MDA, GSH and SOD were obtained from
Biodiagnostic, Egypt. TNF-α ELISA kits were obtained from Uscn Life
Science Inc., USA. Silymarin and methotrexate (MTX) were obtained
from Loba-chemie Co. (Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). Petroleum ether,
dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and ethanol were obtained
from El-Nasr Pharm. Chem. Co. (Cairo, Egypt).
(MTX) is one of the drugs used to induce hepatotoxicity. The pathogenesis of MTX-induced hepatotoxicity has been attributed to a redox
imbalance, either due to depletion of the antioxidant system and/or
generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), suggesting that antioxidants may have a therapeutic benefit (Pravenec et al., 2013).
The genus Erythrina is a member of flowering plants in the pea family (Fabaceae); it consists of more than 200 species and contributes
greatly to folk medicine. Various species are utilized as tranquilizers
against insomnia, inflammation, colic, syphilis, rheumatic pain, jaundice and liver ailments (García-Mateos et al., 2001). Therefore, the
species of Erythrina represent an interesting field of study. Phytochemical studies have demonstrated a variety of phytoconstituents,
including terpenes and alkaloids, as well as flavonoids, especially isoflavones, pterocarpans, flavanones and isoflavanones (Chawla and
Kapoor, 1995; Hussain et al., 2016; Majinda et al., 2005). Due to this
wide variation in active constituents, the documented bioactivities of
isolated metabolites showed a wide range of medicinal uses, including
antimicrobial activity with high efficacy against resistant organisms
and anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antidepressant, cytotoxic and
muscle relaxant activities (Anupama et al., 2012; Nyandoro et al., 2017;
Setti-Perdigão et al., 2013).
In a continuation of our investigation of Erythrina × neillii
Mabberley & Lorence, the hybrid derived from the cross between E.
herbacea and E. humeana (Gabr et al., 2017), where no reports dealing
with its phytoconstituents or biological activities were found. Herein,
we report an investigation of dichloromethane and ethyl acetate extracts using HR-HPLC-MS-MS, and we highlight some of its biological
activities.
Plant extraction
Two hundred grams of powdered leaves were extracted with 70%
ethanol and then fractionated beginning with petroleum ether
(b.r.40–60 °C) followed by dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and butanol.
The extraction with each solvent continued until exhaustion. Each extract was distilled off under reduced pressure and dried to a constant
weight. Dichloromethane (DM) and the ethyl acetate (EA) extracts were
subjected to HR-HPLC-MS-MS.
HR-HPLC-MS\MS analysis
The identification of the major metabolites in the DM and EA
fractions was performed using HR-HPLC-MS-MS. The mobile phase
consisted of 2% acetic acid (pH 2.6) (A) and 80% methanol (B) using
gradient elution; from 5 to 50% B at 30 °C at a flow rate of 100 μl/min
(Hassaan et al., 2014). Eluted compounds were detected from 120 to
1500 m/z using a Bruker micro-TOF-Q Daltonics (API) time-of-flight
mass spectrometer (Bremen, Germany) equipped with an ion spray
(pneumatically assisted electrospray) in the negative and positive ion
modes using the following instrument settings: nebulizer gas, nitrogen,
1.6 bar; dry gas, argon, 200 °C; capillary, 4000 V. The data were processed using X-Calibur 2.2 SP1 software from Thermo Scientific (Berlin,
Germany), and the major compounds were tentatively identified by
comparing their mass spectra with the reference literature and
searching the phytochemical dictionary of natural products database.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Leaves of E. × neillii Mabberley & Lorence were collected during the
flowering period in October 2012 from El-Zohria garden, Cairo. The
leaves were kindly identified by Dr. Gwilym P. Lewis, Legume Research
Leader, Comparative Plant & Fungal Biology. Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, UK. The voucher specimen was deposited at the Herbarium of the
Faculty of Pharmacy, MSA University, under registration number
(RS020) and at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of
Pharmacy, Cairo University (no.1-11-2012), and duplicates were
housed in the Kew Herbarium (K).
Biological assays
Acute toxicity study
The lethality test (LD50) was estimated orally in rats, according to
the OECD guideline no. 420. Overnight fasted rats were divided into
sixteen groups of six rats each. The rats were treated with increased
doses (1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 5000 mg/kg body weight) of the
alcoholic extract of the leaves of E. × neillii suspended in the vehicle.
The control group was given vehicle alone (water) and was kept under
the same conditions. Animals were observed for 24 h for signs of toxicity and number of deaths. They were observed continuously for one
hour for any gross behavioural changes such as drowsiness, restlessness,
writhing, convulsions, piloerection and symptoms of toxicity and
mortality, if any, and then periodically for the next 6 h, and again at
24 h for signs of acute toxicity. Furthermore, the incidence of mortality
for each group was recorded. Food and water were provided ad libitum
(no. 2001).
Animals
Adult male Wistar albino rats, weighing 200–250 g, were purchased
from the National Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt. The animals
were kept at the animal centre, Faculty of Pharmacy, October
University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA), Egypt. The animals
were housed under appropriate temperature and humidity conditions
(25 ± 2 °C and 60–70% humidity). Animals were fed standard pellet
chow (El-Nasr Chemical Co., Abou-Zaabal, Cairo, Egypt) and were
supplied with water ad libitum. All the procedures involving animals
and their care were in conformity with the institutional guidelines
(ethics committee for animal experimentation, Faculty of Pharmacy,
Cairo University) and complied with national and international laws on
the care and use of laboratory animals.
Experimental design for hepatotoxicity
A total of forty-eight rats were divided into six groups of eight animals each. Three different doses of E. × neillii alcoholic extract (100,
250 and 500 mg/kg) were tested, and the schedule of treatment was as
follows: Group (1): Rats received saline for five days and served as a
normal control group. Group (2): Rats received MTX (20 mg/kg, ip) at a
single dose and then received saline for four days and served as a negative control group. Groups (3, 4 and 5): Rats received MTX (20 mg/
kg, ip) at a single dose and then received oral E. × neillii alcoholic extract (100, 250, 500 mg/kg, respectively) for four days. Group (6): Rats
received MTX (20 mg/kg, ip) at a single dose and then received oral
silymarin (100 mg/kg) for four days (De et al., 2015).
Chemicals, biochemicals and instrumentation
For HR-HPLC-MS-MS, chromatographic separation was performed
using an HPLC system consisting of a liquid chromatograph (Agilent
1200 Waldbronn, Germany), equipped with a high-performance auto
sampler, binary pump, and PDA detector G 1314 C (SL), and a
Superspher 100 RP-18 (75 × 4 mm i.d.; 4 μm) column (Merck,
Darmstadt, Germany). Acetonitrile and formic acid (LCMS grade) were
10
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
Nitrogenous compounds in the DM fraction of E. × neillii detected in
the positive mode showed essentially similar fragmentation patterns.
Most of the identified alkaloids showed methyl losses from the methoxy
group (15 Da). Pk 1, identified as erythratine/11-methoxyerysopine/
erysotinone/ erysosalvine with a molecular ion peak at m/z
316.15427 [M+H]+, and fragments at m/z 301 [M+H−CH3]+, 285
[M+H−OCH3]+, 284 [M+H−OCH4]+, 283 [M+H−OCH5]+, 258
[M+H−C3H6O]+, 245 [M+H−C4H7O]+ showed a typical fragmentation pattern as previously described (Chawla and Kapoor, 1995). Pk 2
was tentatively identified as erysotine (m/z 318.16975, M+H) and
showed fragments at m/z 287 [M+H−OCH3]+ and 260 [M
+H−C3H6O]+. Pk 4 was tentatively identified as erysopine (m/z
286.14342, M+H), showing fragments at m/z 271 [M+H−15]+, 255
[M+H−31]+, while the fragment at m/z 228 [M+H−58]+ corresponds to an RDA fragmentation (Amer et al., 1991). All other alkaloids
typically have the same fragmentation pattern and similar molecular
ion peaks, as shown in Table 1.
Serum and tissue preparation
Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus twentyfour hours after the last dose of treatments under light ether anaesthesia
in non-heparinized tubes, and the serum was separated after centrifugation and stored at −20 °C. Animals were later sacrificed; the livers were excised and divided into two portions: the first portion was
used for the histopathological study, and the second portion was
homogenized for the determination of MDA, GSH and SOD levels.
Biochemical analysis
Biochemical parameters assessing liver functions (ALT, AST and
ALP) were determined spectrophotometrically using commercial kits
(Beutler et al., 1963). The liver homogenate was centrifuged, and the
MDA, GSH and SOD tissue contents were determined for an estimation
of antioxidant activity (Nishikimi et al., 1972). To determine the antiinflammatory activity, MPO and TNF-α were evaluated using an ELISA
kit (Hycult Biotechnology, USA) (Grisham et al., 1990).
Histopathological study
Autopsy samples from the liver were fixed in 10% formalin and
embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (4 μm) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and then examined microscopically
(Bott, 2014).
Flavonoids and fatty acids
A minor appearance of flavonoids was observed in the DM
(Table 1), where one flavanone (Pk 26, prenyl naringenin) and one
flavone aglycone (Pk 28, apigenin) have been tentatively identified in
addition to three fatty acids (Table 1, Pk 27, 29, 30) identified as 7oxotetradecanedioic acid, 12 oxododecanoic acid and 10,16 dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid, respectively, in comparison with previous literature (Farag et al., 2016a,b; Stevens et al., 1997).
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the means ± standard error of the
mean (SEM). Comparisons between different groups were carried out
by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the TukeyKramer test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. GraphPad
software InStat (version 2) was used to carry out statistical analysis.
Ethyl acetate fraction
Alkaloids. The elution order of secondary metabolites in the EA fraction
(Fig. 2) followed a sequence of decreasing polarity, whereby
cinnamates and alkaloids eluted first, followed by flavonoid
glycosides, and finally triterpenes and fatty acids (Farag et al.,
2016a). A glycosylated form of Erythrina alkaloids was identified in
the E. × neillii EA fraction analysed by HR-HPLC-MS-MS (Table 2). The
fragmentation of the glycoside is carried out by a neutral loss of the
glycosyl unit to yield a protonated aglycone ion that fragments in the
same pattern as the free protonated alkaloid. Pk 1 was tentatively
identified as 15-β-D-glucoerysopine or 16-β-D-glucoerysopine with a
pseudomolecular ion peak at m/z 448.19587[M+H]+, and fragments
at m/z 433 denoting the loss of a methoxyl group followed by a
fragment at m/z 269 [M+H−OCH3-hex]+, showing the loss of a
hexose moiety (Wanjala and Majinda, 2000)..Pk 2 (m/z 344.14913,M
+H) with fragments at m/z 329 [M+H−CH3]+ and 311[M+H−33]+
helped in its tentative identification as 11-β-hydroxyerysotramidine
(Juma and Majinda, 2004). Pk 3 (m/z 344.18560, M+H) showed
characteristic fragments at m/z 329 [M+H−15]+ corresponding to the
loss of a methyl group, in addition to a peak at 286 [M+H−58]+,
which corresponds to an RDA fragmentation, beside fragments at m/z
273 [M+H−71]+ and 272 [M+H−72]+, which helped in its
tentative identification as erythristemine (Amer et al., 1991).
Similarly, Pk 4 (m/z 316.15395, M+H) presented a similar MS
fragmentation spectrum and fragments at m/z 314, 298 [M
+H−18]+, which represents the loss of a molecule of water, and
284 [M+H−31]+ corresponded to the loss of a methoxy group and
was therefore tentatively identified as erysovine-N-oxide (Cui et al.,
2009). Pk 6 (m/z 298.14310, M+H) showed a characteristic base peak
at m/z 267 denoting the loss of OCH3 in addition to the loss of the
allylic substituent at C-3, which helped in its tentative identification as
erythraline (Mohammed et al., 2012), while Pk 10 was tentatively
identified as erythrartine-N-oxide (m/z 346.16382, M+H) with a
characteristic fragment at m/z 330 [M+H−O]+ (Juma and
Majinda, 2004). Erythraline, erythrartine and erystrotrine were
previously identified in E. herbacea (Garin-Aguilar et al., 2005).
Results and discussion
Chemical analysis
HR-HPLC/MS/MS analysis
Mass spectroscopy can be an extremely useful tool when dealing
with small quantities of material. The combination of ESI positive and
negative modes permitted the tentative identification of thirty compounds in the DM fraction and a total of thirty-six compounds in the EA
fraction by the interpretation of their fragmentation patterns combined
with information from the available literature. The identities, retention
times, and observed molecular and fragmentation information for the
tentatively identified peaks are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Notably,
this is the first comprehensive metabolite profile of E. × neillii plants.
Dichloromethane fraction
The DM fraction (Fig. 1) showed the prevalence of alkaloids. Nitrogenous compounds are better detected in the positive mode, warranting the importance of acquiring data in both positive and negative
ionization modes. The Erythrina alkaloids are of the spiran system and
are divided into two groups: those that contain a conjugated 1,6-diene
system [e.g., erythraline] and those that contain an isolated l (6)-double
bond [e.g., erythratine]. The mass spectra of all the aromatic diene
alkaloids showed essentially the same fragmentation pattern, which
showed major peaks at [M+H] +, [M+H−15 / M+H−CH3]+, [M
+H−31 / M+H−OCH3]+, [M+H−33 / M+H−OCH5]+, [M
+H−58 / M+H−C3H6O]+, [M+H−71 / M+H−C4H7O]+, [M
and
[M
+H−72,
[M+H−84
/
M+H−C5H8O]+
+H−85]+(Dyke and Quessy, 1981).
The fragmentations of the second group of Erythrina alkaloids, those
having a l (6)-double bond, were more complex and varied than those
of the above group. The ions [M+H−15]+ and [M+H−31]+ were of
relatively minor importance. One ion that was of general importance in
the spectra of this second group was that corresponding to a retro-DielsAlder reaction (RDA) in ring A [M+H−58]+ (Wu and Huang, 2006).
Flavonoids. Analysis of the EA fraction of E. × neillii in the negative
mode revealed the tentative identification of fifteen flavones with C11
12
Peak no.
Rt (min)
Molecular formula
Error ppm
Molecular ion m/z
±
MS/MS
Proposed compound
1
3.87
C18H21NO4
−0.173
316.15427 [M+H]+
301 [M+H−15]+, 285 [M+H−31]+, 284 [M+H−32]+, 283 [M+H−33]+, 258 [M+H−58]+, 245
[M+H−71]+
2
3
4.66
4.79
C18H23NO4
C17H19NO3
−0.738
0.175
318.16975 [M+H]+
286.14382 [M+H]+
300, 287 [M+H−31]+,260 [M+H−58]+, 259 [M+H−59]+, 239, 228
255, 254 [M+H−32]+, 237
4
5
6
7
4.83
5.19
5.55
8.73
C17H19NO3
C18H19NO4
C24H31NO8
C19H23NO4
−1.223
−0.115
−1.716
−0.650
286.14342
314.13816
462.21145
330.16977
8
9.66
C17H17NO3
−0.844
284.12788 [M+H]+
Erythratine
11-methoxyerysopine
Erysotinone
Erysosalvine
Erysotine
Erysoline
Erysonine
Erysopine
Erythrinine
Gluco-erysodine
11-β-hydroxyerysotrine or erysotrine-Noxide
erythrocarine
9
10.70
C18H19NO4
−0.524
314.13852 [M+H]+
10
11
10.78
11.80
C18H19NO4
C18H21NO3
−0.285
−0.600
314.13840 [M+H]+
300.15924 [M+H]+
12
13
12.18
13.81
C19H25NO4
C19H23NO3
−3.296
−0.255
332.18454 [M+H]+
314.17489 [M+H]+
14
15.83
C18H21NO4
−0.285
316.15405 [M+H]+
+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
271
299
431
314
[M+H−15], 255 [M+H−31]+, 254 [M+H−32]+, 253 [M+H−33]+, 237, 228.
[M+H−15]+,296, 286, 270, 254, 240, 237, 226
[M+H−31]+, 430, 269, 268, 242
[M+H−15]+, 312, 299 [M+H−31]+, 298, 280, 270, 256, 229,153
269 [M+H−15]+, 266, 253 [M+H−31]+, 252 [M+H−32]+, 251 [M+H−33]+, 234, 225 [M+H−58]+,
217, 207
299 [M+H−15]+, 296, 283 [M+H−31]+, 282 [M+H−32]+, 264, 256 [M+H−58]+, 243 [M+H−71]+,
229
299 [M+H−15]+, 298, 296, 283 [M+H−31]+, 282, 264, 256, 229, 211
269 [M+H−31]+, 268 [M+H−32]+, 251
314, 301 [M+H−31]+, 300 [M+H−32]+, 298, 282, 271, 253, 242, 229
299 [M+H−15]+, 283 [M+H−31]+, 270, 256 [M+H−58]+, 254, 242 [M+H−72]+, 230 [M+H−84]+,
229 [M+H−85]+
298, 284, 266, 257, 229
15
16
17
17.65
17.89
18.00
C18H19O4N
C16H17NO4
C19H21NO4
−0.588
0.817
−2.574
314.13850 [M+H]
288.12327 [M+H]+
328.15349 [M+H]+
282, 264, 223, 176
271, 253, 235, 217, 180, 161
310, 296 [M+H−32]+, 266, 252, 178
18
18.25
C18H19NO3
−0.560
298.14321 [M+H]+
19
18.43
C19H21NO4
−2.178
328.15362 [M+H]+
283 [M+H−15]+, 280, 267 [M+H−31]+, 266 [M+H−32]+, 265 [M+H−33]+, 249, 240 [M+H−58]+,
227 [M+H−71]+, 226 [M+H−72]+, 214 [M+H−84]+, 175, 143, 137
313 [M+H−15]+, 298 [M+H−30]+, 297 [M+H−31]+, 296 [M+H−32]+, 286, 271, 237, 191, 178
+
11-oxoerysodine
Erysodienone
Erysodine
Erysovine
Erythratidine
Erysotrine
Erythravine or
erythramine
Erythratinone
8-oxo-α/β-erythroidine
Erysotramidine/
coreximine/
scoulerine
Erythraline
271.15282 [M–H]–
253, 240, 227, 191, 173, 155, 135, 121, 111
7-oxotetradecanedioic acid
269.04527 [M–H]−
213.14862
[M+H]+
289.23760 [M+H]+
251, 225, 209, 201, 181, 161
195
Apigenin
12-oxododecanoic acid
271 [M+H−18]+, 253, 229
(10S)-10,16-dihydroxyhexadecanoic acid
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
19.62
20.38
23.56
27.57
33.58
44.65
46.00
C19H19NO4
C21H25NO5
C20H25NO4
C25H33NO9
C19H23NO5
C18H15NO4
C20H20O5
−3.050
−1.503
−0.575
−1.018
−0.518
−1.820
−2.375
326.13769
372.17999
344.18506
492.22179
346.16472
310.10682
341.13754
27
46.65
C14H24O5
3.023
28
29
64.72
68.88
C15H10O5
C12H22O3
3.048
0.464
30
70.87
C16H33O4
0.913
Boldface digits reflects the base peak (100% abundance).
Fragment ions are listed in order of relative abundances.
[M+H]
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
[M+H]+
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
308, 294 [M+H−32] , 280, 267
341 [M+H−31]+, 340 [M+H−32]+
329 [M+H−15]+, 313 [M+H−31]+, 312 [M+H−32]+, 298, 286 [M+H−58]+, 281, 269, 250, 230
474, 330
330 [M+H−15]+, 328, 314, 296, 268, 258, 238, 192, 183, 165
292, 279 [M+H−31]+, 278 [M+H−32]+
323, 311, 281, 187, 175, 161, 137
11-methoxyerythraline or
8-oxoerythrinine
Erythrabine
Erythrascine
Erythristemine
11-β-methoxyglucoerysodine
Erythratine-N-oxide
Crystamidine
Prenyl naringenin
+
R.O. Bakr et al.
Table 1
The tentatively identified metabolites in the E. × neillii dichloromethane fraction using HPLC/MS-MS.
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
Table 2
The tentatively identified metabolites in E. × neillii ethyl acetate extract using the HR-HPLC/MS-MS technique.
Peak no.
Rt min.
Molecular
formula
∆ mass ppm
Molecular ion m/z ±
MS/MS
Proposed compound
1
2.91
C23H29NO8
−1.614
448.19587 [M+H]+
433 [M+H−OCH3]+, 269 [M+H−OCH3-hex]+
2
5.24
C19H21NO5
−0.347
344.14913 [M+H]+
3
8.12
C20H25NO4
−0.03
344.18560 [M+H]+
329 [M+H−CH3] +, 311 [M+H−33] +, 299, 277, 271,267,
255, 241, 223
329 [M+H−15]+, 313 [M+H−31]+, 312 [M+H−32]+, 286
[M+H−58]+, 273 [M+H−71]+, 272 [M+H−72]+
314, 298 [M+H−H2O]+, 284 [M+H−32]+, 266, 255, 237,
176, 154
315, 312, 299, 283, 267, 251, 235, 223,214
15-β-D-glucoerysopine
or
16-β-D-glucoerysopine
11-β-hydroxyerysotramidine
+
4
10.45
C18H21NO4
−1.217
316.15395 [M+H]
5
10.50
C19H23NO4
−2.286
330.16923 [M+H]+
6
7
11.29
12.62
C18H19NO3
C20H23NO5
-0.670
−0.277
298.14310 [M+H]+
358.16480 [M+H]+
8
9
10
18.91
22.66
22.71
C15H18O8
C19H23NO5
C19H23NO5
2.541
−1.587
−3.118
325.09262[M–H]−
346.16435 [M+H]+
346.16382 [M+H]+
285, 283, 267, 239, 213, 175
343 [M+H−CH3]+,327 [M+H−OCH3]+, 312, 297, 288, 281,
270, 255, 226, 209, 182
163 [M–H−162]
330 [M+H−O]+, 329, 315 [M+H−OCH3]+, 297, 283
330 [M+H−O]+, 329, 315 [M+H−OCH3]+, 283, 255.
11
12
13
24.02
28.37
39.15
C18H24O13
C21H22O11
C27H30O15
14
40.74
C26H28O14
2.087
3.211
1.692
0.880
0.448
447.11425
449.10928
593.15108 [M–H]−
595.16627 [M+H]+
563.13998 [M–H]−
385, 324, 310, 285 [M–H−162] 179, 153 [M–H−162−132]
287 [M–H−162], 269, 259
575 [M–H–H2O], 473 [M–H−120], 503 [M–H−90], 383, 353
577, 559, 541, 529, 457, 433
545, 503, 473 [M–H−90], 443 [M–H−120], 425, 383, 353
15
42.08
C26H28O15
1.198
579.13514 [M–H]−
16
43.35
C21H20O11
2.085
447.09312
489 [M–H−90], 459 [M–H−120], 399 [459−60], 369
[M–H−90]
429 [M–H−H2O], 357 [M–H−90], 327 [M–H−120]
17
18
19
20
44.57
49.08
49.85
51.41
C25H26O13
C21H20O11
C22H22O11
C27H30O14
1.769
2.0107
1.891
1.747
533.12991
447.09313 [M–H]−
461.10871 [M–H]−
577.15619 [M–H]−
473 [M–H−60], 443 [M–H−90], 383, 353
387, 327 [M–H−120], 285 [M–H−162]
341 [M–H−120], 371 [M–H−90], 443.23
503 [M–H−74], 457 [M–H−120], 487 [M–H−90], 471
[M–H−106], 383, 353
21
22
23
24
53.22
54.40
54.41
54.78
C20H18O9
C15H10O5
C21H19O12
C27H30O14
2.497
0.775
2.176
1.885
401.09 [M–H]−
271.06031 [M+H]+
463.08811 [M–H]−
577.15627
25
55.15
C26H28O13
1.559
547.14547 [M–H]-
311 [M–H−120], 341 [M–H−90], 383
253, 239, 226, 211, 198, 152
341, 301, 443
559 [M–H−18], 487 [M–H−90], 473 [M–H−104], 457
[M–H−120], 383, 353
529, 473, 457, 443, 425, 383, 353
−
26
27
55.46
55.94
C20H18O11
C28H30O15
1.853
1.410
433.07734 [M–H]
605.15095
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
56.10
57.34
60.74
62.73
65.92
71.93
72.93
C21H20O11
C21H18O11
C20H32O10
C21H20O10
C21H20O10
C18H30O3
C18H32O3
2.264
0.833
2.079
2.335
2.011
2.588
2.468
447.0932 [M–H]−
447.09256 [M+H]+
431.19207 [M–H]−
431.09828 [M–H]−
431.10 [M–H]−
293.21188 [M–H]−
295.22750 [M–H]−
371, 301, 269, 179, 161
545 [M–H−60], 515 [M–H−90], 473 [M–H−104], 443, 383,
353
327, 301, 285, 269
427, 333, 271
371, 341, 311, 269, [M–H−162]
371, 341, 311, 285, 269, 179, 161
369, 341, 311, 269
275, 265, 249, 231, 223, 211, 183
295, 277, 251, 235, 185, 183, 171, 155
35
36
75.97
78.77
C18H30O2
C18H32O2
3.042
2.877
277.2175[M–H]−
279.23[M–H]−
259, 233, 231, 221, 195, 179
279, 266, 261, 259, 250, 235, 204, 96
Erythristemine
Erysovine-N-oxide
11-β-hydroxyerysotrine
Erythraline
11-β-methoxyerysotramidine
Coumaroyl glucoside
11-α-hydroxyerysotrine N-oxide
11-β-hydroxyerysotrine Noxide [(erythrartine-N-oxide)]
Gentisic acid pentosyl hexoside
Eriodyctiol hexoside
Apigenin 6,8C-dihexoside
Apigenin 6-C-pentoside 8-Chexoside
Arabinopyranosylorientin
Luteolin 6-C-hexoside (isoorientin)
Apigenin 6-C-dipentoside
Kaempferol hexoside
Diosmetin glucoside
Apigenin -6-C-rhamnoside 8-Chexoside
Apigenin pentoside
Apigenin
Quercetin hexoside
Apigenin 6-C-hexoside-rhamnoside
Apigenin -6-C-di-pentoside-methyl
ether
Quercetin pentoside
Apigenin-8-C-hexoside6-C-pentoside acetate
Quercetin rhamnoside
Apigenin glucuronide
Apigenin O-hexoside
Kaempferol rhamnoside
Apigenin 6-C-hexoside (isovitexin)
Hydroxy-octadecatrienoic acid
15-hydroxy-9,11-octadecadienoic
acid
Linolenic acid
Linoleic acid
Boldface digits reflects the base peak (100% abundance).
Fragment ions are listed in order of relative abundances.
18, 31), based on their MS/MS fragmentation. Pk 13 (593.15108,
M–H) showed a base peak at m/z 473 [M–H−120]− in addition to
fragments at m/z 503 [M–H−90]− and 575 [M–H−H2O]− denoting a
C-hexosyl flavone. Additional hexose was revealed by fragments at m/z
383 and 353. The very low intensity of a fragment at m/z 341
[M–H−sugar-90]− and [M–H−sugar-H2O]− suggested a symmetric
Di-C-glucoside (Becchi and Fraisse, 1989). Therefore, Pk 13 was
tentatively identified as apigenin 6,8C-dihexoside. Pk 14 (m/z
563.13998, M–H) showed a characteristic fragment at m/z 545 [MH−18]−, denoting the loss of one molecule of water. The fragment at
m/z 473 [M–H−90]−, appearing as a base peak in addition to a
fragment at m/z 443 [M–H−120]−, denotes a hexosyl moiety at C-8,
while the fragment at m/z 503 [M–H−60]− >50% denotes the
and O-glycosylation, five flavonols, and one flavanone (Table 2),
whereby the nature of the sugars could be revealed by elimination of
the sugar residue, that is, 176 amu (hexuronic acid), 162 amu (hexose:
glucose or galactose), and 132 amu (pentose) (Farag et al., 2016a).
Apigenin showed twelve conjugates with the predominance of Cglycosylation detected by the neutral loss of 120 amu (0,2 cross-ring
cleavage), 90 amu (0,3 cross-ring cleavage), and 18 amu (loss of H2O).
Apigenin conjugates showed C-6 derivatives (Pk 24, 32), C-8 (Pk 13)
and a combination of both (Pk 14, 20, 27) in addition to Oglycosylation (Pk 30). Luteolin conjugate appeared at Pk 15 and 16
and was identified as luteolin pentosyl hexoside and luteolin C-6
hexoside, in addition to diosmetin (Pk 19). Flavonols were also
identified, including quercetin (Pk 23, 26, 28) and kaempferol (Pk
13
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
Fig. 1. Total ion chromatograms of E. × neillii dichloromethane fraction. A: positive mode. B: negative mode. Peak numbers follow those used for compound
identification as listed in Table 1.
acid (Pk 36, 279.23, M–H) were identified in the negative mode in the
EA (Farag et al., 2016a,b).
attachment of an extra C-linked pentose at C-6. The fragment at m/z
353 [M–H−120−90]− and 383 [M–H−120–60]− confirmed the
tentative identification of Pk 14 as apigenin 6-C-pentosyl-8-Chexoside. Pk17 (533.12991, M–H) was tentatively identified based on
fragments at m/z 443 [M–H−90]−, appearing as the base peak and m/z
473 [M–H−60]−, revealing a pentoside loss. Pk 17 was tentatively
identified as apigenin 6-C-dipentoside. Pk 25 (547.14547, M–H)
showed the same fragmentation pattern with an extra mass difference
of 14 amu in molecular ion and was identified as apigenin-6-C-dipentoside-methyl ether.
Pk 20 (577.15619, M–H) showed a base peak at m/z 503
[M–H−74]−, followed by fragments at m/z 457 [M–H−120]− and
473 [M–H−104]−, assigning a typical rhamnoside fragmentation pattern. The appearance of fragments at m/z 487, 383 and 353 denoted an
extra hexosyl moiety. The high intensity of rhamnosyl fragments confirmed its attachment at 6-C and the hexosyl at 8-C. Therefore, Pk 20
was tentatively identified as apigenin-6-C-rhamnoside 8-C-hexoside
(Ferreres et al., 2003). The O-glycosides were also identified with apigenin O-hexoside (Pk 30) in addition to the tentatively identified flavonols as kaempferol hexoside (Pk 18).
Biological assays
Preliminary acute toxicity study
To assess the E. × neillii extract safety margin, acute toxicity was
monitored followed by any behavioural or apparent changes. In the
acute toxicity study, compared to vehicle-treated rats, the treated rats
with different doses of E. × neillii extract (up to 4000 mg/ kg b. wt.)
were alive and had no adverse effects related to their general behaviour, appearance, body weight and food consumption, while 5000 mg/
kg b.wt led to 20% mortality. This finding indicates a wide safety
margin of up to 4 g/kg according to (OECD, 2001). For further studies,
the concentration was fixed as 1/20 LD50 (250 mg/kg b.wt).
Hepatoprotective activity
Effect of E. × neillii on liver function parameters. The ability of the total
alcoholic extract to protect against MTX-induced hepatotoxicity was
assessed in a rat animal model in which silymarin was chosen as a
positive control. Treatment of the rats with MTX resulted in a
significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in liver aminotransferases (AST and
ALT) and ALP levels, indicative of hepatocyte damage in accordance
with previously reported data (Tunali-Akbay et al., 2010). In addition,
MTX led to a significant increase in MDA in accordance with
(Kose et al., 2012) and a reduction of GSH activity; GSH is an
Oxygenated fatty acids
With a delayed appearance, hydroxy-octadecatrienoic acid (Pk 33,
293.21188, M–H), 15-hydroxy-9,11-octadecadienoic acid (PK 34,
295.2275, M–H), linolenic acid (Pk 35, 277.2175, M–H), and linoleic
14
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
Fig. 2. Total ion chromatograms of E. × neillii ethyl acetate fraction. A: positive mode. B: negative mode. Peak numbers follow those used for compound identification as listed in Table 2.
Table 3
Effects of the alcoholic extract of E. × neillii on various biochemical parameters in MTX-intoxicated rats.
Parameter
ASTc (U/ml)
ALTd(U/ml)
ALPe(U/ml)
Control
10.85
± 1.09
24.16
± 1.92
59.89
± 4.33
MTX
117.50a
± 9.75
137.33a
± 11.86
156.44a
± 12.58
E. × neillii extract
100 mg/kg
250 mg/kg
500 mg/kg
Silymarin (100 mg/kg)
55.89b
± 4.33
46.37b
± 3.20
78.23b
± 5.45
46.78b
± 3.62
39.25b
± 3.12
71.36b
± 6.61
28.67b
± 2.11
31.78b
± 2.65
67.22b
± 4.17
24.21b
± 1.83
26.33b
± 1.67
62.33
± 5.88
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 6.
a
Significantly different from the normal control group at P ≤ 0.05.
b
Significantly different from the MTX control group at P ≤ 0.05.
c
Aspartate aminotransferase.
d
Alanine aminotransferase.
e
Alkaline phosphatase.
and ALT levels, in addition to a 58% decrease in ALP levels; these effects were comparable to those of silymarin (80% and 60%, respectively).
At the oxidant status level, compared with silymarin, the administration of E. × neillii at 100, 250 and 500 mg/kg in the MTX-intoxicated
rats significantly mitigated lipid peroxidation activity, with a significant decrease in the hepatic tissue content of MDA and a significant
increase in the hepatic tissue content of GSH and hepatic tissue activity
of SOD in a dose-dependent manner (Table 4).
endogenous protective antioxidant known to protect from free oxygen
radicals in hepatic tissue. The silymarin control group, along with the
E. × neillii-administered groups, ameliorated the MTX-induced
alterations, and a well-characterized antihepatotoxic activity was
observed (Table 3).
Treatment of rats with different doses (100, 250 and 500 mg/kg) of
the alcoholic extract of the leaves of E. × neillii for 4 days resulted in
significant decreases in serum AST, ALT and ALP levels in a dose-dependent manner compared with those in the MTX and silymarin control
groups (P < 0.05; Table 3). The best effect was observed at a dose of
500 mg/kg of E. × neillii, which contributed to a 76% decrease in AST
Anti-inflammatory activity of E. × neillii extract. The exposure of rats to
15
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
Table 4
Effects of the alcoholic extract of E. × neillii on oxidative stress in MTX-intoxicated rats.
Parameter
MDAc
nmol/g.tissue
GSHd
mg/g.tissue
SODe
U/mg.tissue
Control
96.27
± 9.11
422.78
± 32.65
96.25
± 6.88
MTX
271.18a
± 17.02
128.93a
± 10.12
33.29a
± 3.12
E. × neillii extract
100 mg/kg
250 mg/kg
500 mg/kg
Silymarin (100 mg/kg)
149.33b
± 13.50
171.67
± 14.17
59.38b
± 4.56
139.78b
± 10.23
322.33b
± 23.83
75.34b
± 7.27
125.67 b
± 8.89
345.67 b
± 29.62
81.17b
± 7.67
110.75b
± 9.77
351.27b
± 27.89
87.66b
± 6.97
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 8.
a
Significantly different from the normal control group at P ≤ 0.05.
b
Significantly different from the MTX control group at P ≤ 0.05.
c
Malondialdehyde.
d
Reduced glutathione.
e
Superoxide dismutase.
Table 5
Effects of the alcoholic extract of E. × neillii on inflammatory mediators in MTX-intoxicated rats.
Parameter
TNF-α1 pg/mg.tissue
MPO2 U/mg.tissue
Control
85.28
± 7.02
26.87
± 1.12
MTX
297.30a
± 28.89
93.25a
± 8.95
E. × neillii extract
100 mg/kg
250 mg/kg
500 mg/kg
Silymarin (100 mg/kg)
139.67b
± 11.11
58.48b
± 5.23
124.56b
± 10.18
44.50b
± 4.11
103.67b
± 9.27
37.75b
± 3.12
109.82b
± 8.76
40.33b
± 3.70
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, n = 8.
1
Tumour necrosis factor-alpha.
2
Myeloperoxidase.
a
Significantly different from the normal control group at P ≤ 0.05.
b
Significantly different from the MTX control group at P ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 3. Histological structure of the liver cells showing changes in the normal liver cells after the application of MTX and different doses of E. × neillii alcoholic
extract compared with silymarin. A: Normal control group showing a normal histological structure of the central vein and surrounding hepatocytes, B:
Methotrexate control group showing severely degenerated surrounding hepatocytes and fatty changes with a dilated and congested central vein, C: E. × neillii
100 mg/kg identifying inflammatory cell infiltration in the portal area and the few micro fat vacuoles in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes, D: E. × neillii 250 mg/kg
showing few haemorrhages and mild dilatation in the central vein with fat vacuoles in the hepatocytes, E: E. × neillii 500 mg/kg almost normal hepatocytes, a
normal central vein with mild congestion in hepatic sinusoids. F: Silymarin 100 mg/kg showing almost normal hepatocytes with mild vascular degeneration.
(Table 5).
Histopathological examination confirmed the improvement in biochemical parameters. The liver excised from the normal control group
rats showed a normal histological structure of the hepatocytes and
central vein with no histopathological alteration (Fig. 3A). In contrast,
the liver of the MTX control rats showed severe dilatation and congestion in the central vein with degeneration in the surrounding
MTX resulted in a significant increase in the hepatic tissue content of
the inflammatory mediators TNF-α and MPO compared with that of the
control group, while treatment of rats with 100, 250 and 500 mg/kg
alcoholic extract resulted in a significant decrease in the hepatic tissue
content of TNF-α and MPO in a dose-dependent manner. Compared
with silymarin, the dose of 500 mg/kg of the alcoholic extract
decreased the hepatic tissue content of TNF-α and MPO significantly
16
Phytomedicine 53 (2019) 9–17
R.O. Bakr et al.
hepatocytes in addition to the fatty changes (Fig. 3B). Treatment of the
intoxicated rats with 100 mg extract of E. × neillii resulted in a liver
showing congestion in the central vein, few inflammatory cells infiltrating in the portal area with few micro fat vacuoles in the cytoplasm
of hepatocytes (Fig. 3C), while rats given 250 mg extract of E. × neillii
showed mild dilatation in the central vein and very few micro fat vacuoles in hepatocytes (Fig. 3D). The best effect was observed in the liver
of rats given the 500 mg extract of E. × neillii, showing almost normal
hepatocytes and a normal central vein with mild congestion in hepatic
sinusoids; a similar pattern was seen with silymarin (Fig. 3E and F,
respectively).
This study showed that E. × neillii extract improved liver function,
possibly due to the free radical scavenging and antioxidant activities of
its constituents, especially flavonoids, which can impair the activation
of MTX into the reactive form. In addition, these extracts are capable of
protecting normal cells from cell death by trapping lipid and peroxyl
radicals, abolishing the enhancement of lipid per-oxidative processes
(Ercisli and Orhan, 2007; Mukherjee et al., 2013). This finding was in
accordance with the previous reports of hepatoprotective activities in
various Erythrina species (Donfack et al., 2008; Mujahid et al., 2017).
Ercisli, S., Orhan, E., 2007. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra)
and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem. 103, 1380–1384. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.054.
Farag, M.A., Mekky, H., El-Masry, S., 2016a. Metabolomics driven analysis of Erythrina
lysistemon cell suspension culture in response to methyl jasmonate elicitation. J. Adv.
Res. 7, 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.07.002.
Farag, M.A., Rasheed, D.M., Kropf, M., Heiss, A.G., 2016b. Metabolite profiling in
Trigonella seeds via UPLC-MS and GC-MS analyzed using multivariate data analyses.
Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408, 8065–8078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9910-4.
Ferreres, F., Silva, B.M., Andrade, P.B., Seabra, R.M., Ferreira, M.A., 2003. Approach to
the study of C-glycosyl flavones by ion trap HPLC-PAD-ESI/MS/MS: application to
seeds of quince (Cydonia oblonga). Phytochem. Anal. 14, 352–359. https://doi.org/
10.1002/pca.727.
Gabr, S.K., Bakr, R.O., Elshishtawy, H.M., El-Fishawy, A.M., El-Alfy, T.S., 2017. Botanical
and genetic characters of Erythrina×neillii cultivated in Egypt. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.
27, 273–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2017.02.005.
García-Mateos, R., Soto-Hernández, M., Vibrans, H., 2001. Erythrina americana miller
(“Colorín”; Fabaceae), a versatile resource from Mexico: a review. Econ. Bot. https://
doi.org/10.1007/BF02866562.
Garin-Aguilar, M.E., del Toro, G.V., Soto-Hernández, M., Kite, G., 2005. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis of alkaloids extracted
from seeds of Erythrina herbacea. Phytochem. Anal. 16, 302–306. https://doi.org/10.
1002/pca.821.
Grisham, M.B., MacDermott, R.P., Deitch, E.A., 1990. Oxidant defense mechanisms in the
human colon. Inflammation 14, 669–680.
Hassaan, Y., Handoussa, H., El-Khatib, A.H., Linscheid, M.W., El Sayed, N., Ayoub, N.,
2014. Evaluation of plant phenolic metabolites as a source of Alzheimer's drug leads.
Biomed Res. Int. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/843263.
Hussain, M.M., Tuhin, M.T.H., Akter, F., Rashid, M.A., 2016. Constituents of Erythrina - a
potential source of secondary metabolities: a review. Bangladesh Pharm. J. 19, 237.
https://doi.org/10.3329/bpj.v19i2.29287.
Juma, B.F., Majinda, R.R.T., 2004. Erythrinaline alkaloids from the flowers and pods of
Erythrina lysistemon and their DPPH radical scavenging properties. Phytochemistry
65, 1397–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.029.
Kose, E., Sapmaz, H.I., Sarihan, E., Vardi, N., Turkoz, Y., Ekinci, N., 2012. Beneficial
effects of montelukast against methotrexate-induced liver toxicity: a biochemical and
histological study. Sci. World J. 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/987508.
Majinda, R.R.T., Wanjala, C.C.W., Juma, B.F., 2005. Bioactive non-alkaloidal constituents
from the genus Erythrina. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 32, 821–853. https://doi.org/10.
1016/S1572-5995(05)80070-5.
Mohammed, M.M.D., Ibrahim, N.A., Awad, N.E., Matloub, A.A., Mohamed-Ali, A.G.,
Barakat, E.E., Mohamed, A.E., Colla, P.L., 2012. Anti-HIV-1 and cytotoxicity of the
alkaloids of Erythrina abyssinica Lam. growing in Sudan. Nat. Prod. Res. 26,
1565–1575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2011.573791.
Mujahid, M., Hussain, T., Siddiqui, H.H., Hussain, A., 2017. Evaluation of hepatoprotective potential of Erythrina indica leaves against antitubercular drugs induced
hepatotoxicity in experimental rats. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 8, 7–12. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jaim.2016.10.005.
Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, S., Choudhury, S., Adhikary, A., Manna, K., Dey, S., Sa, G., Das, T.,
Chattopadhyay, S., 2013. Pomegranate reverses methotrexate-induced oxidative
stress and apoptosis in hepatocytes by modulating Nrf2-NF-κB pathways. J. Nutr.
Biochem. 24, 2040–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.07.005.
Nishikimi, M., Appaji Rao, N., Yagi, K., 1972. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the
reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 46, 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(72)
80218-3.
Nyandoro, S.S., Munissi, J.J.E., Kombo, M., Mgina, C.A., Pan, F., Gruhonjic, A.,
Fitzpatrick, P., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Rissanen, K., Erdélyi, M., 2017. Flavonoids from
Erythrina schliebenii. J. Nat. Prod. 80, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
jnatprod.6b00839.
OECD, 2001. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4, test no. 425: acute
oral toxicity - up-and-down procedure. Guidel. Test. Chem. 26. https://doi.org/10.
1787/9789264071049-en.
Pravenec, M., Kozich, V., Krijt, J., Sokolová, J., Zídek, V., Landa, V., Simáková, M.,
Mlejnek, P., Silhavy, J., Oliyarnyk, O., Kazdová, L., Kurtz, T.W., 2013. Folate deficiency is associated with oxidative stress, increased blood pressure, and insulin resistance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am. J. Hypertens. 26, 135–140. https://
doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hps015.
Setti-Perdigão, P., Serrano, M.A.R., Flausino, O.A., Bolzani, V.S., Guimarães, M.Z.P.,
Castro, N.G., 2013. Erythrina mulungu alkaloids are potent inhibitors of neuronal
nicotinic receptor currents in mammalian cells. PLoS One 8. https://doi.org/10.
1371/journal.pone.0082726.
Stevens, J.F., Ivancic, M., Hsu, V.L., Deinzer, M.L., 1997. Prenylflavonoids from Humulus
lupulus. Phytochemistry 44, 1575–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(96)
00744-3.
Stickel, F., Schuppan, D., 2007. Herbal medicine in the treatment of liver diseases. Dig.
Liver Dis. 39, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.004.
Tunali-Akbay, T., Sehirli, O., Ercan, F., Sener, G., 2010. Resveratrol protects against
methotrexate-induced hepatic injury in rats. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 13, 303–310.
Wanjala, C.C.W., Majinda, R.R.T., 2000. Two novel glucodienoid alkaloids from Erythrina
latissima seeds. J. Nat. Prod. 63, 871–873. https://doi.org/10.1021/np990540d.
Wu, W.N., Huang, C.H., 2006. Structural elucidation of isoquinoline, isoquinolone, benzylisoquinoline, aporphine, and phenanthrene alkaloids using API-ionspray tandem
mass spectrometry. Chinese Pharm. J. 58, 41–55.
Conclusion
This study provides the first report for the characterization of the
phytoconstituents of E. × neillii via HR-HPLC/MS/MS, revealing a
variety of active constituents in the dichloromethane and ethyl acetate
fractions (mainly alkaloids and flavonoids). In addition, this study
documents the powerful hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of this hybrid plant correlated with traditional use in
liver ailments.
Conflict of interests
There are no known conflicts of interests associated with this publication, and there has been no financial support for this work that
could have influenced its outcome.
Funding sources
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding
agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Amer, M.E., Shamma, M., Freyer, A.J., 1991. The tetracyclic Erythrina alkaloids. J. Nat.
Prod. 54, 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50074a001.
Anupama, V., Narmadha, R., Gopalakrishnan, V.K., Devaki, K., 2012. Enzymatic alteration in the vital organs of streptozotocin diabetic rats treated with aqueous extract of
Erythrina Variegata bark. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 4, 134–147.
Becchi, M., Fraisse, D., 1989. Fast atom bombardment and fast atom bombardment collision-activated dissociation/mass analysed ion kinetic energy analysis of C-glycosidic flavonoids. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 18, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.
1002/bms.1200180207.
Beutler, E., Duron, O., Kelly, B.M., 1963. Improved method for the determination of blood
glutathione. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 61, 882–888.
Bott, R., 2014. Bancroft's theory and practice of histological techinques. In: IGARSS 2014,
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
Chawla, A.S., Kapoor, V.K., 1995. Erythrina Alkaloids. Alkaloids Chem. Biol. Perspect. 9,
85–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042089-9.50010-3.
Cui, L., Thuong, P.T., Fomum, Z.T., Oh, W.K., 2009. A new erythrinan alkaloid from the
seed of Erythrina addisoniae. Arch. Pharm. Res. 32, 325–328. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s12272-009-1302-2.
De, S., Sen, T., Chatterjee, M., 2015. Reduction of oxidative stress by an ethanolic extract
of leaves of Piper betle (Paan) Linn. decreased methotrexate-induced toxicity. Mol.
Cell. Biochem. 409, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-015-2524-x.
Donfack, J.H., Njayou, F.N., Rodrigue, T.K., Chuisseu, D.D.P., Tchana, N.A., Vita Finzi, P.,
Tchouanguep, M.F., Ngadjui, T.B., Moundipa, P.F., 2008. Study of a hepatoprotective
and antioxidant fraction from Erythrina senegalensis stem bark extract: in vitro and in
vivo. Pharmacologyonline 1, 120–130.
Dyke, S.F., Quessy, S.N., 1981. Erythrina and related alkaloids. Alkaloids Chem. Physiol.
18, 1–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-0813(08)60236-5.
17