MORPHOLOGY, SYSTEMATICS, EVOLUTION Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae): Neotype Designation and Description LEOPOLDO M. RUEDA,1 E. L. PEYTON,2 AND SYLVIE MANGUIN3 Department of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Ð7500 J. Med. Entomol. 41(1): 12Ð22 (2004) ABSTRACT Detailed morphological descriptions and illustrations are provided for the adult male and female, male genitalia, pupal, and larval stages of Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald, a major vector of human malaria in Central and South America. Taxonomic and related literature records, diagnostic features, distribution, and bionomics of the species are included. A neotype male for the species from the type locality of Grenada is designated. KEY WORDS Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, neotype, description, mosquitoes, malaria Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald is considered a major vector of human malaria in Central and South America, particularly in Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, and Argentina (Pan American Health Organization 1994). It is widely distributed in the New World (Rozeboom 1941). It is found from the southern United States (40⬚ N) to the northern part of Argentina (30⬚ S) along the Andes, with eastern extension into Venezuela and the Lesser Antilles (Manguin et al. 1996). It is the most important malaria vector in the foothills of mountainous areas and other elevated (up to 2800 m), rugged malaria-endemic areas of North, Central, and South America (Aitken 1945, Rodriguez and Loyola 1989, Gorham et al. 1973). Anopheles pseudopunctipennis was Þrst described by Theobald (1901: 305Ð306) from one male and one female from Grenada (Dr. Hatton, per Dr. Daniels), mounted in balsam. However, these two specimens, as in the case of other Daniels material, are presumably lost or nonextant. The original adult description (Theobald 1901) was incomplete for accurate identiÞcation of the species, and no detailed descriptions of the larval and pupal stages, or of the male terminalia have been made from the type locality (Grenada). In view of this, it becomes imperative to provide detailed This research was performed under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and the Smithsonian Institution, with institutional support provided by both organizations. 1 Corresponding author: Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Museum Support Center, MRC 534, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746 (e-mail: ruedapol@msc.si.edu). 2 Deceased. 3 Current address: Center of Biology and Management of Populations (CBGP) Ð IRD, Campus International de Baillarguet CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier, Lez Cedex. France. descriptions of various life stages and to designate a neotype for this important species. From 1944 Ð1950, Þve subspecies and one variant of An. pseudopunctipennis were morphologically described from different areas of South America, including Ecuador, Colombia, Chile, and Argentina. Three names that were applied to this species between 1907Ð 1912 are currently in synonymy. In the present paper, descriptions and illustrations are provided for the adult female and male, pupa, and larva of this species from the type locality. A male neotype from the type locality is also designated. Materials and Methods Except for wing spot nomenclature, which is taken from Wilkerson and Peyton (1990), the terminology and abbreviations of Harbach and Knight (1980, 1982) are used in the morphological characters and illustrations. Acronyms of type depositories are as follows: Division de Malariologia/Instituto Nacional Para Programas Especiales de Salud, Bogota, Colombia (DMB), Instituto Biologie “Juan Noe,” Santiago, Chile (IZC), Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina (MACN). Abbreviations used are as follows: E, egg; F, female; G, genitalia; L, larva; Le, larval exuviae; LU, location unknown; M, male; NE, type nonexistent; P, pupa; Pe, pupal exuviae; ssp., subspecies; var., variety. An asterisk following the abbreviation of a given life stage indicates that part of the life stage was illustrated in the publication cited. Collection codes of the most recent collections consist of a country code in capital letters followed by a collection number (e.g., GR-33-1 is an individual from collection 33 from Grenada) (specimen numbers 1Ð99 are used if there are associated larval and pupal exuviae, numbers 100 and up are used January 2004 RUEDA ET AL.: NEOTYPE DESIGNATION AND DESCRIPTION of An. pseudopunctipennis if there is only a pupal exuviae). Progeny from a single female are indicated by a number in parentheses, e.g., GR 33(5)-1 is an individual from female number 5. Taxonomic Treatment Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis Theobald (Figs. 1Ð3) Anopheles pseudopunctipennis Theobald 1901: 305 (M, F). Type: Grenada (NE); Howard et al. 1917: 1020 (M*, F*, L*); Aitken 1945: 327 (M, F*, P*, L, E*, taxonomy, biology); Vargas and Martinez Palacios 1956: 83 (M*, F*, P*, L*). Anopheles peruvianus Tamayo 1907. In Tamayo and Garcia 1907: 35 (M*, F*, P*, L*). Type: Huacachina, San Pedro de Lloc, Lima, Verano, Otono, Chanchmayo, Peru (NE); Lane 1953: 160 (listed as synonym). Proterorhynchus argentinus Brethes 1912: 15 (M, F). Type: North Tucuman, Salta, Jujuy, Santiago del Estero, Argentina (MACN); Howard et al. 1917: 1015 (listed as synonym); Casal, in Belkin, Schick and Heinemann 1968: nine (lectotype desig.). Anopheles tucumanus Lahille 1912: 253 (F*). Type: Rio Sali, Argentina (NE); Howard et al. 1917: 1015 (listed as synonym). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. pseudopunctipennis Theobald, Levi-Castillo 1944: 1 (M*, E*); Aitken 1945: 344; Carpenter, Middlekauff and Chamberlain 1946: 66 (M*, F*, L*); Freeborn, in Boyd 1949: 391; Lane 1953: 160 (M*, F*, P*, L*, E*); Carpenter and LaCasse 1955: 46 (M* F*, L*). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. levicastilloi Levi-Castillo 1944: 1 (M*, E*; as variety). Type: Guayasa, Ecuador (LU); Levi-Castillo 1945: 41 (M*, F, P, L*, E*; to ssp. status); Lane 1953: 160 (possible synonymy with An. (Ano.) pseudopunctipennis ssp. psuedopunctipennis). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. rivadeneirai Levi-Castillo 1945: 33 (M*, F*, L*, E*). Type: Provs. of Carchi, Imbabura, Pichincha, Cotopaxi, Tungurahua, Chimborazo, Canar, Azuay and Loja; Interandian Region, Ecuador (LU); Lane 1953: 160 (possible syn. with An. (Ano.) pseudopunctipennis ssp. psuedopunctipennis). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. pattersoni Alvarado and Heredia 1947: 73 (E*; as var.). Type: Tucuman, Argentina (NE); Lane 1953: 161 (to ssp. status). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis var. bifoliata Qsorno-Mesa and Munoz-Sarmiento 1948: 105 (M*, L*, E*). Type: Florida, Valle del Cauca, Colombia (DMB). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. neghmei Mann 1950: 34 (M, F*, L*, E*). Type: Ouebrada de Minemine, Tarapaca, Chile (IZC). Anopheles (Anopheles) pseudopunctipennis ssp. noei Mann 1950: 37 (M, F, L*, E*). TYPE: Oasis de Suca, Tarapaca, Chile (IZC). Other Literature Records. Shannon and Davis 1927: 662Ð 678 (notes on biology, Argentina); Shannon 1930: 13 442Ð 447 (larval habitats, Peru); Hoffmann 1931: 523Ð 529 (larval habitats, Mexico); Hoffmann and Samano 1938: 182Ð192 (larval habitats, Mexico); Root and Andrews 1938: 565Ð578 (larval habitats, Grenada); Simmons 1941: 113Ð130 (as malaria vector, Central and South America); Rodriguez and Loyola 1989: 15Ð 40 (as malaria vector in mountainous areas, Mexico); Savage et al. 1990: 612Ð 619 (larval habitats, Mexico); Rejmankova et al. 1991: 827Ð 839 (larval habitats, Mexico), Rejmankova et al. 1993: 979 Ð991 (larval habitats, Belize); Estrada-Franco et al. 1992: 297Ð299 (cross breeding, electrophoretic analysis); EstradaFranco et al. 1993a: 735Ð745 (enzyme electrophoresis, Mexico, Peru, Bolivia); Estrada-Franco et al. 1993b: 746 Ð755 (cross breeding, Mexico, Peru, Bolivia); Fernandez-Salas et al. 1994 (larval habitats, Mexico); Manguin et al. 1993: 405Ð 406 (larval habitats and abundance, Grenada); Manguin et al. 1995: 362Ð377 (electrophoretic survey, population genetics, North, Central and South America); Manguin et al. 1996: 620 Ð 625 (larval habitats, North, Central and South America); Bond-Compean et al. 1998: 220 (larval habitat, Mexico); Coetzee et al. 1999: 650 Ð 652 (cross breeding, cytogenetics, Mexico, Grenada). Original Description In support of previous and present interpretations of the name pseudopunctipennis, the original description given by F. V. Theobald (1901) is as follows. “Wings much as in An. punctipennis Say, but the fringe with yellow spots. Legs long, unbanded, brown, pale at the base. Fore ungues of male unequal, mid and hind equal and simple. Female. Antenna brown, basal joint testaceous, base of the second joint pale, and also a small pale band at the base of all the following joints; proboscis dark brown, labela yellowish; palpi dark brown, densely scaled at the base, apex yellow, and also two narrow yellow bands below, slightly hairy, hairs black, except at the apex, where they are yellow; clypeus dark brown. Thorax yellowish-brown (denuded), with a dark patch on each side of the mesonotum behind; metanotum dark brown; pleurae yellowish brown, with darker brown patches. Abdomen brown, the segments paler at the base; hairy. Legs deep brown, coxae, trochanters, and base of femora pallid; knee spot pale; ungues equal and simple. Halteres with pale stem and fuscous knob. Wings with two yellowish-white spots on the upper costal border, rest of the edge black, rather densely scaled; Þrst submarginal cell longer and narrower than second posterior cell, its stem nearly as long as the cell; mid cross-vein a little nearer the base of the wing than supernumerary cross-vein; posterior cross-vein still nearer the base of the wing; scales of the wings disposed as follows: First long vein with three distinct large white spots, one at the base, one underneath the large costal spot, and one between; second long vein with a dark patch near its base, all the lower branch of the fork-cell dark, and most of the upper; third long vein mostly yellowishwhite, with two black patches, one toward the base, the other toward the tip; fourth long vein mostly pale, 14 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 41, no. 1 Fig. 1. An. pseudopunctipennis, adult. (A) Female habitus. (B) Female wing, part. (C) Male head. Scale in mm. January 2004 RUEDA ET AL.: NEOTYPE DESIGNATION AND DESCRIPTION of An. pseudopunctipennis 15 Fig. 2. An. pseudopunctipennis. (A) Pupa cephalothorax. (B) Pupa metathorax and abdomen, left side dorsal, right side ventral. (C) Male genitalia. Scale in mm. 16 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 41, no. 1 Fig. 3. An. pseudopunctipennis, larva. (A) Thorax and abdominal segments IÐVI, left side dorsal, right side ventral. (B) Head, left side dorsal, right side ventral. (C) Spiracular apparatus, dorsal aspect. (D) Pecten and pecten teeth. (E) Abdominal segments VIIIÐX, side view. Scale in mm. January 2004 RUEDA ET AL.: NEOTYPE DESIGNATION AND DESCRIPTION of An. pseudopunctipennis with two small black patches, branches of the fork-cell all dark scaled; Þfth long vein with a black spot near the base, rest mostly yellow, upper branch of the fork mostly dark, a small yellow spot at the apex and another toward its base, lower branch mostly yellowish, with a black apical spot; sixth vein with basal half creamy, the apical half dark, except a small yellow patch where it joins the wing border; fringe brown, with a yellow spot at the junction of each vein. Length Ð 5 mm. Male. Last two joints of the palpi swollen and clavate, pale, basal joints dark brown, densely scaled with deep brown scales, with a narrow pale band, not quite as long as the thin proboscis, which is brown, with yellow labelae; antennae gray, with narrow brown bands and ßaxen brown hairs, apical joint about half length of the joint; basal lobe of the genitalia simple, claspers long and thin; fore ungues unequal, the larger one uniserrated, the smaller minute and simple; mid and hind ungues small, equal and simple. Wings much as in the female, but the fork-cells shorter. Length Ð 5 mm, with proboscis 7.5 mm.” Supplemental Description Below are additional characters of value in deÞning this species. Female (Fig. 1AÐB). Integument light to dark brown with silvery or grayish pollinosity. Head. Interocular space with 7Ð10 (n ⫽ 12 for this and the following measurements and counts except where indicated) long, pale setae and intermixed of long and small, narrow, appressed white scales; vertex, occiput and upper portion of postgena with numerous erect, truncate scales; patch of white scales on the middle portion of vertex; patch of dark brown to black scales on lateral portion of vertex, occiput and upper portion of postgena; long dark brown to black setae on ventral portion of postgena. Clypeus bare. Pedicel of antenna with 7Ð23 (n ⫽ 16) small, dorsolateral, narrow to broad, grayish white spatulate scales; ßagellomere 1 with numerous narrow to broad white spatulate scales. Scales of maxillary palpus slender, spatulate mostly dark brown to black with intermixed dark brown setae; narrow band of white scales at base of palpomere 3, and at base and apex of palpomere 4; palpomere 5 mostly white scaled; base of maxillary palpus with long, erect dark setae; length of maxillary palpus 1.59 Ð 2.3 mm (mean ⫽ 1.78 mm, n ⫽ 22); ratio of length of palpomeres 2Ð5 to total length of palpus, 2 ⫽ 0.20 Ð 0.33 (mean ⫽ 0.26, n ⫽ 22), 3 ⫽ 0.32Ð 0.41 (mean ⫽ 0.37, n ⫽ 22), 4 ⫽ 0.15Ð 0.22 (mean ⫽ 0.18, n ⫽ 22), 5 ⫽ 0.08 Ð 0.13 (mean ⫽ 0.11, n ⫽ 22); ratio of palpomeres 2Ð5, 0.86 Ð 0.96 (mean ⫽ 0.92, n ⫽ 22); ratio of palpomeres 4 Ð5, 0.26 Ð 0.31 (mean ⫽ 0.29, n ⫽ 22); palpus 0.62Ð1.18 (mean ⫽ 0.99, n ⫽ 22) forefemur length. Proboscis dark scaled, base with long, erect setae and scales; proboscis length 1.71Ð2.10 mm (mean ⫽ 1.86 mm, n ⫽ 22); proboscis 0.97Ð1.13 (mean ⫽ 1.04, n ⫽ 22) palpus length. Thorax. Scutal integument dark brown with a broad, median longitudinal pale frosty pruinose stripe; median stripe with narrow pale yellow scales and setae; median anterior promontory with 17 patch of intermixed pale yellow, narrow, short and long scales. Darker lateral portions of scutum with longer dark setae. Scutal fossa, antealar area and supraalar area slightly pale dusted. Scutellum dark, slightly pale dusted with 11Ð24 shorter and 13Ð24 long setae, short setae intermixed pale yellow and dark brown, long setae dark brown. Antepronotum with 14 Ð21 dark brown setae. Pleuron brown to dark brown; upper proepisternum with 2Ð7 setae, without scales; prespiracular area with 1Ð 4 setae, without scales; prealar area with 4 Ð10 setae; without scales; upper mesokatepisternum with 1Ð5 setae, without scales; lower mesokatepisternum with 1Ð 4 setae, without scales; upper mesepimeron with 5Ð9 setae, rarely one fusiform white scale. Legs. Coxae and trochanters light to dark yellow with pale to brown setae; hindcoxae usually with two short, fusiform, dark scales; anterior surface of trochanter with light yellow scales; femora, tibiae and tarsi dark; apices of femora and tibiae with spots of pale scales. Forefemur length 1.56 Ð2.73 mm (mean ⫽ 1.84 mm, n ⫽ 24), ratio of forefemur length to proboscis length 0.77Ð1.53 (mean ⫽ 0.97). Wing (Table 1). Length (measured from humeral cross vein) 2.76 Ð3.21 mm (mean ⫽ 2.99 mm). Dark scales brown to black, pale wing scales white and pale yellow. Vein C dark scaled from basal to sectoral area; base of Rs white scaled; R4 ⫹ 5 with two dark spots; vein M mostly white scaled. Anal vein (1A) with pale spots at base and apex and dark spot (0.5 vein length) at distal half before apex. Pale wing fringe spots present at the distal end of each vein. Halter. Scabellum and pedicel with pale to pale brown integument; dorsal surface of pedicel with few pale scales at apex; capitellum dark brown to black. Abdomen. Integument dark brown to black with some grayish pollinosity. Terga and sterna covered with pale brown to golden brown setae. Male (Fig. 1C, 2C). As in female except for the following sexual differences. Maxillary palpus 0.83Ð1.01 length of proboscis (mean ⫽ 0.91; n ⫽ 12 for this and following measurements except where indicated), apex of palpomere 3 and all palpomere 4 and 5 enlarged. Maxillary palpus (Fig. 1C) with dark brown and pale yellow scales; palpomere 2 with slightly erect dark scales at base and few pale yellow scales at apex; palpomere 3 dark scaled with pale yellow scales at base and some pale yellow setae at apex; palpomere 4 pale yellow scaled, inner surface with yellowish long setae, and base and apex with few dark scales; palpomere 5 usually totally pale yellow with numerous yellowish short setae and few dark short setae, sometimes with few dark scales on lateral surface. Proboscis length 1.68 Ð2.46 mm (mean ⫽ 1.95 mm), dark brown scales; labela dark brown. Foreungues with slightly curved submedian tooth and blunt, external basal tooth. Ninth tergal lobe (Fig. 2C) stout, about as long as wide. Gonocoxite 1.08 Ð1.83 times as long as wide; dorsal (postrotational) surface with shorter and long setae, very long setae distally and numerous very small spicules; most mesal parabasal spines (parabasal 1) stout with slightly recurved tip, borne on slightly raised base; parabasal 2 longer and Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] Ð Ð 1Ð3 (2) [3] Ð Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] Ð Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 2Ð4 (3) [3] 1Ð4 (3) [3] 1Ð4 (2) [2, 1] 1Ð3 (2) [2] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1 [1] 3Ð5 (3) [3] 1 [1] 1Ð4 (2) [2] 1Ð3 (3) [3] Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (1) [3] 2Ð5 (2) [4] 1Ð2 (2) [1, 2] 1Ð3 (2) [3] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (2) [3] 2Ð3 (3) [3, 2] 1 [1] 1Ð3 (2) [2, 1] 1Ð3 (1) [2] Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1Ð3 (2) [3, 2] 1Ð5 (2) [4, 3] 1Ð5 (3) [3] 1Ð3 (2) [2] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð5 (3) [4, 3] 2Ð4 (3) [3, 2] 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1 [1] Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1Ð3 (2) [2, 3] 2Ð3 (2) [3] 1Ð7 (6) [6, 7] 1Ð5 (1) [2, 5] 2Ð4 (3) [2, 3] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð7 (3) [3] 1Ð4 (3) [3] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 2Ð4 (3) [2, 3] 2Ð6 (5) [6, 5] 1 [1] 1Ð3 (1) [2] 3Ð11 (6) [7, 5] 1Ð4 (3) [3] 1Ð6 (3) [6, 4] 1Ð4 (3) [4] 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) [2] 1Ð3 (1) [1] Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 3Ð6 (4) [4] 3Ð6 (5) [5] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð8 (1) [8] 3Ð7 (5) [6, 5] 1Ð2 (1) [1, 2] 1Ð4 (2) [2, 3] Ð 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1] Ð Ð 1 [1] Ð 10Ð20 (12) [18, 20] 1Ð7 (5) [6, 5] 1Ð5 (3) [2, 1] 3Ð10 (5) [7] 1Ð3 (2) [2, 3] 1 [1] 1Ð5 (1) [Ð] Ð 1 [1] Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð IX VIII Ð 1Ð3 (1) [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (1) [1, 2] 1Ð2 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (1) [1] 1Ð2 (1) [1, 2] 1 [1] 1Ð3 (2) [2] 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) [2, 1] 1Ð4 (1) [4, 1] 1Ð3 (2) [3, 1] Ð Ð more slender than 1; parabasal 1 base 0.24 Ð 0.36 from base of gonocoxite; parabasal 2 base 0.20 Ð 0.33 from base of gonocoxite; internal setae slender, longer than parabasal 1, base 0.51Ð 0.72 distance from base of gonocoxite. Claspette. Dorsal lobe of claspette (Fig. 2C) with three overlapping bladelike apical Þlaments, and ventral lobe with two long slender apical setae and a short weak subapical seta; remainder of ventral lobe and area between it and dorsal lobe with numerous prominent short spicules. Aedeagus cylindrical, broad and furcate at base; two pairs of aedegeal leaßets at apex; leaßets slender, slightly curved and serrated. Gonostylus 1.06 Ð1.48 length of gonocoxite; many minute setae on dorsal side of gonostylus; gonostylar claw short and blunt. The descriptive statistics for ratios of male neotype costal and subcostal wing spot lengths/length of wing measured from humeral crossvein are shown in brackets in Table 1. Pupa (Fig. 2AÐB). Position and development of setae as Þgured; range and modal number of branches, and number of branches of male neotype shown in Table 2. Exuviae colorless to light brown. Cephalothorax. Trumpet simple with deep meatal cleft; length 0.44 Ð 0.56 mm (mean ⫽ 0.51 mm, n ⫽ 24 for this and the following measurements and counts except where indicated), width 0.11Ð 0.16 mm (mean ⫽ 0.13 mm, measured at base of pinna), index 2.99 Ð 4.24 (mean ⫽ 3.85); pinna evenly rounded distally. Abdomen. Seta 6-I simple, slender; 7-I with 1Ð5 branches; 9-I simple, slender, shorter than 6-I. Seta 1-II-VII well developed; 8-II absent; 9-II simple, slender; 9-III short, pointed 0.41Ð1.00 (mean ⫽ 0.68) length of 9-II; 9-IV strong, pointed, 0.94 Ð2.12 (mean ⫽ 1.54) length of 9-III; 9-VVIII long, pointed, spine-like; 9-V 1.37Ð2.88 (mean ⫽ 1.90) length of 9-IV; 9-VI 0.97Ð1.52 (mean ⫽ 1.19) length of 9-V; 9-VII 1.00 Ð1.43 (mean ⫽ 1.22) length of 9-VI; 9-VIII 0.69 Ð1.69 (mean ⫽ 0.99) length of 9-VII; 9-VI 0.23Ð 0.42 (mean ⫽ 0.37) length of segment VI; 9-VII 0.35Ð 0.60 (mean ⫽ 0.44) length of segment VII; 9-VIII 0.30 Ð 0.65 (mean ⫽ 0.39) length of segment VIII. Segment VII 0.76 Ð1.11 (mean ⫽ 1.01) length of 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 a Fourteen wings from the neotype and alloneotype, and 12 individuals; male neotype is shown in brackets. VII 0.13 ⫾ 0.02 [0.14] 0.11 ⫾ 0.01 [0.11] 0.19 ⫾ 0.02 [0.20] 0.08 ⫾ 0.02 [0.07] 0.21 ⫾ 0.03 [0.15] 0.06 ⫾ 0.02 [0.09] 0.03 ⫾ 0.00 [0.02] VI 0.10Ð0.17 0.08Ð0.13 0.16Ð0.23 0.07Ð0.11 0.15Ð0.25 0.02Ð0.09 0.02Ð0.03 V 0.09 ⫾ 0.01 [0.08] 0.22 ⫾ 0.02 [0.20] 0.07 ⫾ 0.01 [0.10] 0.03 ⫾ 0.01 [0.03] Abdominal segments 0.07Ð0.10 0.19Ð0.25 0.05Ð0.10 0.02Ð0.03 IV 0.69 ⫾ 0.06 [0.75] III 0.57Ð0.79 II Mean ⫾ SD I Vein C Basal dark to sector dark (BD⫹PHD⫹HD⫹PD⫹SD) Subcostal pale (SCP) Preapical dark (PD) Preapical pale (PP) Apical dark (AD) Vein R-R1 Presector dark (PSD) Sector pale (SP) Sector dark (SD) Subcostal pale (SCP) Preapical dark (PD) Preapical pale (PP) Apical dark (AD) Range Cephalothorax CT Wing spot Seta no. Table 1. An. pseudopunctipennis: descriptive statistics for ratios of veins C and R-R1 wing spot lengths/length of wing measured from humeral crossveina Vol. 41, no. 1 Paddle Pa JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Table 2. Pupal setal branching for An. pseudopunctipennis: range mode (in parentheses) based on counts made on 14 –26 setae of the neotype, alloneotype, and 24 specimens collected with them; male neotype is shown in brackets 18 January 2004 RUEDA ET AL.: NEOTYPE DESIGNATION AND DESCRIPTION of An. pseudopunctipennis 19 Table 3. Larval setal branching for An. pseudopunctipennis: range mode (in parentheses) based on counts made on 12–22 setae of the neotype and alloneotype, and 20 specimens collected with them; male neotype is shown in brackets Seta no. Head Thorax 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 16Ð23 (20) [22] 15Ð18 (16) [18] 16Ð26 (25) [24, 25] 3Ð6 (4) [3, 4] 3Ð8 (4) [4] 2Ð5 (4) [4, 2] 23Ð37 (31) [35, 27] 3Ð7 (6) [4, 6] 1Ð7 (1) [7] 10Ð18 (16) [17, 15] 13Ð22 (16) [13] C P Abdominal segments M T I II III Ð Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] 1 [1] 1Ð2 (1) 28Ð44 (36) 1 [1] 2Ð4 (2) [4] 1Ð6 (2) [5] 10Ð17 (15) [16, 17] 5Ð11 (8) [5] 1 1 [1] 2Ð4 (3) [2, 3] 3Ð6 (5) [5, 4] 2Ð4 (3) [4] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 12Ð19 (12) [18] 1 [1] 2Ð3 (3) [2] 4Ð5 (5) [5] 3Ð6 (6) [5, 6] 2Ð6 (3) [3] 17Ð28 (24) [21] 2Ð4 (4) [4] 21Ð58 (44) [49] 3Ð8 (5) [5] 5Ð7 (7) [5, 7] 4Ð9 (7) [5] 1 [1] 3Ð5 (4) [3] 2Ð6 (3) [5] 35Ð53 (38) [41, 36] 41Ð49 (49) [49] 35Ð49 (41) [37, 41] 15Ð30 (15) [30] 5Ð8 (7) [8] 30Ð53 (38) [Ð] 32Ð46 (42) [45, 42] 42Ð48 (44) [43, 48] 2Ð5 (3) [2, 3] 26Ð44 (44) [35, 39] 10Ð15 (12) [15] 36Ð58 (42) [42] Ð 2Ð4 (3) [2] 2Ð4 (3) [2, 4] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 4Ð6 (4) [4] 5Ð9 (8) [5, 2] 3Ð7 (7) [4, 7] 1 [1] 1 [Ð] 1 [1] 2Ð5 (3) [3] 2Ð3 (2) [2, 3] 1Ð3 (1) [2, 3] 1 [1] 1 [1] 1 [1] 2Ð5 (3) [5] 2Ð4 (2) [4] 2Ð3 (3) [2, 3] 1 [1] 2Ð3 (2) [2] 1Ð3 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (1) [1] 1Ð3 (1) [1, 3] 1Ð4 (2) [4, 1] Ð 9Ð13 (12) [9] 2Ð3 (2) [2] 2Ð3 (3) [3] 3Ð5 (3) [3] 3Ð4 (3) [3] 5Ð8 (7) [6] 8Ð20 (8) [8] Ð Ð Ð 1 [1] Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Ð Abdominal segments Seta no. IV V VI VII VIII X 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 [1] 14Ð18 (16) [17, 18] 1 [1] 1Ð4 (4) [4] 2Ð4 (2) [2] 3Ð6 (5) [5] 5Ð10 (8) [10, 9] 2Ð4 (3) [3] 2Ð4 (2) [4, 3] 3Ð6 (5) [4, 5] 1Ð3 (2) [1, 2] 1Ð4 (2) [4, 1] 1Ð3 (1) [1, 3] 3 [3] 1 [1] Ð 1 [1] 14Ð18 (16) [15, 14] 1 [1] 3Ð4 (3) [3] 3Ð5 (5) [4, 5] 3Ð6 (4) [4, 6] 5Ð8 (5) [7, 8] 2Ð5 (3) [4, 3] 3Ð4 (3) [3] 3Ð5 (5) [5, 4] 1Ð5 (3) [3] 2Ð4 (3) [3] 1Ð3 (2) [3] 3Ð5 (3) [5, 4] 1 [1] Ð 1 [1] 13Ð18 (16) [17, 18] 1Ð2 (2) [2] 1 [1] 1 [1] 4Ð7 (5) [5] 4Ð7 (6) [4, 5] 3Ð4 (3) [3] 3Ð4 (3) [Ð] 1 [1] 2Ð4 (3) [4] 1Ð4 (2) [4] 1Ð3 (3) [1] 8Ð13 (12) [13] 1 [1] Ð 1 [1] 14Ð16 (15) [15, 14] 2Ð4 (4) [4] 2Ð3 (3) [3] 1Ð2 (2) [2] 4Ð5 (5) [4] 3Ð6 (3) [6] 2Ð4 (3) [3] 3Ð8 (7) [3] 1 [1] 3Ð5 (5) [3] 1Ð3 (2) [1] 2Ð3 (3) [3] 3Ð6 (4) [3] 1 [1] Ð 1 [1] 1Ð3 (3) [2, 3] 3Ð5 (5) [5] 4Ð6 (5) [4, 5] 1Ð3 (1) [3, 2] 2Ð5 (4) [4, 5] 1-S 2-S 6-S 7-S 8-S 9-S Ð Ð 1Ð3 (1) [3] Ð Ð 1 [1] 16Ð51 (18) [19] 6Ð22 (6) [12] 9 [9] Ð 2Ð6 (4) [2] 3Ð5 (4) [Ð] 1Ð2 (2) [2] 1 [1] 3Ð5 (3) [5] 2Ð4 (3) [3] Ð Ð Ð Ð C, head; P, prothorax; M, mesothorax; T, metathorax. segment VI; segment VIII 1.00 Ð1.24 (mean ⫽ 1.11) length of segment VI; segment VIII 1.00 Ð1.63 (mean ⫽ 1.12) length of segment VII. Segment VII 0.76 Ð1.11 (mean ⫽ 1.01) width of segment VI (width at posterior margins); segment VIII 1.00 Ð1.24 (mean ⫽ 1.12) width of segment VI; segment VIII 1.00 Ð1.63 (mean ⫽ 1.12) width of segment VII. Width/length of segment VI 1.94 Ð2.71 (mean ⫽ 2.36), VII 1.79 Ð3.30 (mean ⫽ 2.22), VIII 1.67Ð2.02 (mean ⫽ 1.89). Paddle length 0.74 Ð 0.96 mm (mean ⫽ 0.87 mm, n ⫽ 13), width 0.54 Ð 0.69 mm (mean ⫽ 0.61 mm, n ⫽ 13), length/ width ratio 1.32Ð1.56 (mean ⫽ 1.44, n ⫽ 13) somewhat oval; refractile index 0.82Ð 0.94 (mean ⫽ 0.90, n ⫽ 13); length of marginal spicules 0.01Ð 0.04 mm (mean ⫽ 0.02 mm, n ⫽ 13). Larva (Fig. 3). Position and development of setae as Þgured; range and modal number of branches and number of branches of male neotype as shown in Table 3. Head. Lightly pigmented, particularly in the middle part; length 0.80 Ð 0.94 mm (mean ⫽ 0.87 mm, n ⫽ 11), width 0.56 Ð 0.78 mm (mean 0.72 mm, n ⫽ 11). Antennal length 0.24 Ð 0.30 mm (mean ⫽ 0.27 mm, n ⫽ 12), slightly tapered toward apex, 5.67Ð 8.67 (mean ⫽ 6.76, n ⫽ 12) longer than wide; with 11Ð19 (mode ⫽ 14, n ⫽ 18) spicules on mesal and ventral surfaces; spicule length 0.01Ð 0.02 mm (mean ⫽ 0.01 mm, n ⫽ 23). Seta 1-A single, slender, 0.04 Ð 0.08 mm (mean ⫽ 0.07 mm, n ⫽ 12), inserted 0.34 Ð 0.42 (mean ⫽ 0.37) from base of antenna; 2,3-A single, pointed; 4-A with 2Ð5 branches (mode ⫽ 3, n ⫽ 13); 5-A short, spine-like, 0.15Ð 0.60 (mean ⫽ 0.32, n ⫽ 12) length of seta 1-A; 6-A spine-like ⬇2Ð3 times longer than seta 5-A. Seta 2-C single 1.00 Ð1.53 (mean ⫽ 1.27, n ⫽ 12) length of 3-C; seta 2-C almost close to mate of opposite side 0.02Ð 0.03 mm (mean ⫽ 0.03 mm, n ⫽ 11); 3-C single, 0.66 Ð1.00 (mean ⫽ 0.80, n ⫽ 12) length of 2-C, clypeal index (distance between bases 2-C and 3-C on one side/ distance between bases of 2-C) 1.75Ð3.00 (mean ⫽ 3.07, n ⫽ 12). Thorax. Seta 1-P single or double; 9 Ð12-P single; 9 Ð12-P setal support plate spine length 0.05 mm. Seta 9 Ð11-M single; 9-M 2.00 Ð2.20 (mean ⫽ 2.09, n ⫽ 7) length 10-M; seta 12-M with 2Ð3 branches; 9 Ð12-M setal support plate spine length 0.08 Ð 0.13 mm (mean ⫽ 0.10 mm, n ⫽ 13). Seta 9 Ð11-T single; 9-T 2.02Ð2.40 (mean ⫽ 2.17, n ⫽ 10) length of 10-T; seta 12-T with 1Ð3 branches; 9 Ð12-T setal support plate spine length 0.08 Ð 0.13 mm (mean ⫽ 0.09 mm, n ⫽ 12); 13-T with 2Ð3 branches. Abdomen. Seta 1-I with 2Ð 4 branches (mode 2, n ⫽ 12); 1-II single or with 2Ð 6 branches (mode ⫽ 2, n ⫽ 12) arising on the distal half. 20 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Seta 1-III-VII palmate with well developed leaßets, each leaßet with short Þlament; 0-II-VIII, 14-III-VIII weakly developed; 0, 8, 14-I, 14-II absent or rare; 3-I-III, VI single; 3-IV, V, VII, VIII branched; 6-II-VII branched. Anterior tergal plates on segments III-VIII small, ⬇0.20 width of the segment, not enclosing small median posterior plate. Seta 1-X single, long, 0.92Ð1.67 (mean ⫽ 1.27, n ⫽ 11) length of saddle; 1-X inserted on saddle. Saddle with minute, sparse spicules on lateral surface. Integument of posterior margin of segment X with strongly developed, dark spicules. Setae 2Ð3-X with hook-like tips that are used to hold the larvae on substrate in a water current. Spiracular apparatus. Pecten plate with 12Ð18 spines; arrangement of spines alternating long and short, with 5Ð10 (mode ⫽ 7, n ⫽ 20) long spines and 4 Ð9 (mode ⫽ 7, n ⫽ 20) short spines; long spines 1.67Ð5.40 (mean ⫽ 2.92, n ⫽ 38) length of short spines. Two posterolateral spiracular lobe plates each with elongate, slender, sclerotized projection or “tail” from inner caudal margin. Table 3 also shows the range and modal number of branches of siphon setae (1, 2, 6 Ð9-S). Type Material. Neotype: Male with associated slide mounted larval and pupal exuviae and slide mounted genitalia, from the progeny brood of a female captured on human bait, data as follows: Grenada, Rio Sallee, Chambord Estate, S. Manguin, and E. L. Peyton Coll. 13 April 1992, 12⬚ 12⬘ N, 61⬚ 37⬘W, collection and specimen no. GR 30(1)-2. Deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. (WRBU ACC No. 1539/WRBU/ USUHS). Alloneotype: Female with associated slide mounted larval and pupal exuviae, collection and specimen no. GR 30(1)-3, with same collection data as male neotype. Other Material Examined. A total of 182 specimens in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, consisting of 50 females, 36 males, 48 pupal exuviae, 27 larval exuviae, 14 larvae, and 7 male genitalia. Grenada. Rio Sallee, St. Patrick, E. L. Peyton coll., 13 April 1992, 12o 12⬘ N, 61o 37⬘W. GR 29 Ð23 M PeLe; GR 29 Ð33 M; GR 29 Ð36 M; GR 29 Ð37 F; GR 29 Ð108 M; GR 30(1)-1 M PeLe; GR 30(1)-100 M Pe; GR 30(1)101 F Pe; GR 30(1)-102Ð103 M Pe; GR 31 L; GR 31Ð3 PeLe; GR 31Ð17 F; GR 31Ð35-38 F; GR 31Ð113 M Pe; GR 31Ð114 Pe; GR 31Ð115 Pe; GR 31Ð116 F Pe; GR 31Ð117-120 M Pe; GR 31Ð121-129 Pe; GR 31Ð131 F Pe; GR 31Ð132 Pe; GR 31Ð134-135 M Pe; GR 31Ð137 Pe; GR 31Ð138 M Pe; GR 31Ð137 M; GR 31Ð141 M Pe; GR 31Ð142-144 Pe; GR 31Ð145-149 M Pe; GR 33 L; GR 33(1) L; GR 33Ð1 PeLe; GR 33Ð2-6 F PeLe; GR 33Ð7 PeLe; GR 33Ð 8 F; GR 33Ð9 F PeLe; GR 33Ð10 F; GR 33Ð11-12 M PeLe; GR 33Ð13-15 PeLe; GR 33Ð 17-19 PeLe; GR 33Ð20 M PeLe; GR 33Ð21-24 F PeLe; GR 33Ð25-26 F; GR 33Ð27 PeLe; GR 33Ð28 F PeLe; GR 33Ð100-118 Pe; GR 33Ð117 M; GR 33Ð119 M; GR 33Ð121-128 F; GR 33Ð129-130 M; GR 33Ð132-134 F; GR 33Ð133-134 F; GR 33Ð135-136 M; GR 33Ð137-139 F; GR 33Ð140 M; GR 33Ð142 F; GR 33Ð143 M; GR 33Ð145 F; GR 33Ð146 M; GR 33Ð147-153 F; GR 33Ð154 M; GR 33Ð155-156 F; GR 33Ð158-160 M. Soubise River, Vol. 41, no. 1 St. Andrew, W. A. Hoffman coll., 26 August 1929, LAR 41, 710106 Ð3, 4, 5, 6 G; LAR 41, 710201Ð1 G; Chambord Mineral Spring, St. Patrick, LAR 48, 710201Ð 4 G; R. Martinez, coll., 28 October 1963, Queens Park Oval, St. George, GR 90, 710106 Ð3 G. Distribution. Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, United States, Venezuela. Medical Importance. Through out its range, An. pseudopunctipennis is generally the most important vector of malaria in mountainous areas during the dry season (Shannon et al. 1927, Aitken 1945, Rodriguez and Loyola 1989). It transmits malaria in highly elevated areas up to 2,800 m in Bolivia (Hackett 1945, Gorham et al. 1973). It is also the dominant malaria vector in seven of 19 (37%) countries with endemic malaria (Pan American Health Organization 1994), including Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Peru (Manguin et al. 1996). Bionomics. The larvae of An. pseudopunctipennis are found in a variety of habitats but they occur frequently in sun-exposed freshwater stream pools containing Þlamentous green algae (e.g., Spirogyra, Oedogonium, Cladophora, Closterium, Enteromorpha) and aquatic vegetation with clear, shallow, and stagnant water (Manguin et al. 1996). The green algae provide oviposition substrates for gravid adult females as well as food and shelter for the mosquito larvae. Larval habitats are common in dry environments in valleys and foothills. Larvae are tolerant of water temperature ßuctuations and drought. This species is most abundant during the dry season. Larval abundance is usually negatively associated with seasonal rainfall. Heavy rains cause rivers and tributaries to rise suddenly and transform into rapidly ßowing waters. As a consequence, typical oviposition and larval breeding sites such as ßood-plain pools, stream margins, and ditches are destroyed by excessive ßooding. Alternative larval habitats include spring-seepages, ground pools, lagoons, rock pools, artiÞcial containers (e.g., reservoirs, tanks, fountains, well holes), rice paddies, and marshy meadows. Larvae are found in habitats with acidic, neutral and alkaline water (pH 4.5Ð 8.8), freshwater to brackish water (conductivities from below 650 up to 8,350 uS), at elevations as low as sea level up to 3,200 m. Adult females are highly anthropophilic and they enter houses readily for shelter. The indoor resting females usually attack humans. They also feed freely outdoors on humans, cattle, horses, and other animals. Discussion Although Theobald (1901) provided the original description of An. pseudopunctipennis, it was not sufÞcient for accurate identiÞcation of the species. This resulted in confusions and misidentiÞcations of the species in many parts of its geographical range in North, Central, and South America (Manguin et al. January 2004 RUEDA ET AL.: NEOTYPE DESIGNATION AND DESCRIPTION of An. pseudopunctipennis 1993). The morphological information in this paper may help in solving those problems. Anopheles pseudopunctipennis has the following diagnostic features. Adult female: Maxillary palpus has palpomere 5 mostly white scaled; base of wing vein Rs white scaled; vein M predominantly pale scaled. Adult male: The male terminalia has dorsal lobe of claspette with three overlapping bladelike apical Þlaments. Aedeagus is cylindrical, broad and furcate at base; two pairs of aedegeal leaßets at apex; leaßets slender, slightly curved, and serrated. Larva: The spiracular apparatus has two posterolateral spiracular lobe plates each with elongate, slender, sclerotized projection or “tail” from inner caudal margin. Seta 2-IV single; 3-C single; 9-M and 9-T about twice the length of 10-M and 10-T. Detailed comparisons of pupal characters of An. pseudopunctipennis and related species are needed to further clarify species differences. Other morphological features described in this paper for larva, pupa, and adults may be used to separate An. pseudopunctipennis from related species. The status of An. pseudopunctipennis as a single species or a species complex is controversial and confusing (Estrada-Franco et al. 1992, 1993a, 1993b; Manguin et al. 1995; Munstermann 1995; Coetzee et al. 1999). Manguin et al. (1995) conducted a comprehensive electrophoretic survey of 42 populations of this species collected from 10 countries in North, Central, and South America throughout its geographic distribution. They found no Þxed electromorphic differences separating the populations of the species. Based on the isoenzme analyses, however, they found three geographic populations of An. pseudopunctipennis, with Grenada (type-locality) populations as a distinct one. Estrada-Franco et al. (1992, 1993a, 1993b) found genetic differences among geographic strains of An. punctipennis in neotropical America, and they suggested the presence of at least allopatric sibling species in the region. Coetzee et al. (1999) suggested a third species of An. pseudopunctipennis complex based on cytogenetic tests of mosquito populations from Mexico and Grenada. With the designation of neotype and detailed descriptions of various life stages of An. pseudopunctipennis, future studies may be conducted using various tools, including morphological, molecular, or biochemical, to solve the complexity of this widespread species. Because of its major involvement in malaria transmission, there is an urgent need to clarify the taxonomy of An. pseudopunctipennis complex, if multiple species exist, through comparisons of various populations of mosquitoes from different countries of North, Central and South America. Acknowledgments We thank Bruce A. Harrison, Richard C. Wilkerson, YiauMin Huang, and Jan E. Conn for reviewing the manuscript and providing invaluable advice. E. L. Peyton (deceased) initiated this research project but was unable to continue because of his illness and early death. Thanks also to Taina R. Litwak for her illustrations, and Ralph E. Harbach for 21 checking and conÞrming the nonexistent of type specimens of the An. pseudopunctipennis in the Natural History Museum, London. Jim Pecor provided technical support in the curation of specimens and preparation of slide mounts. References Cited Aitken, T.H.G. 1945. Studies on the anopheline complex of western America. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 7: 273Ð364. Alvarado, C. A., and R. L. Heredia. 1947. Observaciones sobre una nueva variedad del Anopheles (A.) pseudopunctipennis Theobald 1901, encontrada en la provincia de Tucuman (Nota previa). An. Inst. Med. Reg. Univ. Tucuman 2: 73Ð78. Belkin, J. N., R. X. Schick, and S. J. Heinemann. 1968. Mosquito studies (Diptera: Culicidae). V. Mosquitoes originally described from Middle America. Contr. Am. Entomol. Inst. 1: 1Ð95. Bond-Compean, J. G., J. I. Arredondo-Jimenez, and M. H. Rodriguez. 1998. Inßuence of Þlamentous algae on Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, p. 220. In C. Clark and Y. N. Rangel [eds.], Mosquito vector control and biology in Latin America Ð an eight symposium. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 14: 219 Ð233. Boyd, M. F. 1949. Malariology. A comprehensive survey of all aspects of this group of diseases from a global standpoint. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA. Brethes, J. 1912. Los mosquitos de la Republica Argentina. Bol. Inst. Entomol. Pat. Reg. 1: 1- 48. Carpenter, S. J., and W. J. LaCasse. 1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Carpenter, S. J., W. W. Middlekauff, and R. W. Chamberlain. 1946. The mosquitoes of the southern United States east of Oklahoma and Texas. Am. Midl. Nat. Monogr. 3: 1Ð292. Coetzee, M., J. G. Estrada-Franco, C. A. Wunderlich, and R. H. Hunt. 1999. Cytogenetic evidence for a species complex within Anopheles pseudopunctipennis Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). Am. J. Trop. Med. 60: 649 Ð 653. Estrada-Franco, J. G., M. C. Ma, G. C. Lanzaro, R. Gwadz, C. Galvan-Sanchez, J. L. Cespedes, R. Vargas-Sagarnaga, and R. Rodriguez. 1992. Evidencia genética de un complejo de especie en Anopheles pseudopunctipennis pseudopunctipennis. Bol. Sanit. Panam. 113: 297Ð299. Estrada-Franco, J. G., G. C. Lanzaro, M. C. Ma, A. WalkerAbbey, P. Romans, C. Galvan-Sanchez, J. L. Cespedes, R. Vargas-Sagarnaga, A. Laughinghouse, I. Columbus, and R. W. Gwadz. 1993a. Characterization of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis sensu lato from three countries of Neotropical America from variation in allozymes and ribosomal DNA. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 49: 735Ð745. Estrada-Franco, J. G., M. C. Ma, R. W. Gwadz, R. Sakai, G. C. Lanzaro, A. Laughinghouse, C. Galvan-Sanchez, J. L. Cespedes, and R. Vargas-Sagarnaga. 1993b. Evidence through cross mating experiments of a species complex in Anopheles pseudopunctipennis sensu lato: a primary malaria vector of the American continent. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 49: 746 Ð755. Fernandez-Salas, I., D. R. Roberts, M. H. Rodriguez, and C. F. Marina-Fernandez. 1994. Bionomics of larval populations of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in the Tapachula foothills area, southern Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 10: 477Ð 486. Gorham, J. R., C. J. Stojanovich, and H. G. Scott. 1973. Illustrated key to the anopheline mosquitoes of western South America. Mosq. Syst. 5: 97Ð156. 22 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY Hackett, L. W. 1945. The malaria of the Andean region of South America. Rev. Inst. Salub. Enferm. Trop. 6: 239 Ð 252. Harbach, R. E., and K. L. Knight. 1980. Taxonomists, glossary of mosquito anatomy. Plexus, Marlton, NJ. Harbach, R. E., and K. L. Knight. 1982. Corrections and additions to taxonomistsÕ glossary of mosquito taxonomy. Mosq. Syst. 13: 201Ð217. Hoffmann, C. C. 1931. On Anopheles pseudopunctipennis and its relation to malaria in Mexico. South. Med. J. 25: 523Ð529. Hoffmann, C. C., and A. B. Samano. 1938. Los criaderos invernales de Anopheles pseudopunctipennis en el estado de Oaxaca. An. Inst. Biol. 9: 182Ð192. Howard, L. O., H. G. Dyar, and F. Knab. 1917. The mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Systematic description, part II, vol. 4. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 159. Lahille, F. 1912. Sobre un Anopheles, una Stegomyia y la notacion de las nervaduras alares de los mosquitos. An. Mus. Nac. B. Aires 23: 253Ð263. Lane, J. 1953. Neotropical Culicidae. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brasil. Levi-Castillo, R. 1944. El complejo “Pseudopunctipennis” en el Ecuador (Diptera Ð Culicidae). Guayaquil Univ., Guayaquil, Ecuador. Levi-Castillo, R. 1945. Los anofelinos de la Republica del Ecuador, vol. 1: 1Ð172. Artes GraÞcas Senefelder, Guayaquil, Ecuador. Manguin, S., E. L. Peyton, A. C. James, and D. R. Roberts. 1993. Apparent changes in the abundance and distribution of anopheles species on Grenada Island. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 9: 403Ð 407. Manguin, S., D. R. Roberts, E. L. Peyton, I. Fernandez-Salas, M. Barreto, R. Fernandez Loayza, R. E. Elgueta Spinola, R. Martinez, M. F. Granaou, and M. H. Rodriguez. 1995. Biochemical systematics and population genetic structure of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, vector of malaria in Central and South America. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53: 362Ð377. Manguin, S., D. R. Roberts, E. L. Peyton, E. Rejmankova, and J. Pecor. 1996. Characterization of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis larval habitats. J. Am. Control Assoc. 12: 619 Ð 626. Mann, F. G. 1950. Dos nuevas sub-especies del Anopheles pseudopunctipennis Th. 1901. Biologica, Santiago VIIIÐXI: 33Ð 42. Munstermann, L. E. 1995. Mosquito systematics: current status, new trends, associated complications. J. Vector Ecol. 20: 129 Ð138. Osorno-Mesa, E., and F. Munoz-Sarmiento. 1948. Una nueva variedad de Anopheles pseudopunctipennis. Caldasia 5: 105Ð113. Pan American Health Organization. 1994. Status of malaria programs in the America. XLII Report. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC. Vol. 41, no. 1 Rejmankova, E., H. M. Savage, M. Rejmanek, J. I. ArredondoJimenez, and D. R. Roberts. 1991. Multivariate analysis of relationships between habitats, environmental factors and occurrence of anopheline mosquito larvae Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in southern Chiapas, Mexico. J. Appl. Ecol. 28: 827Ð 841. Rejmankova, E., D. R. Roberts, R. E. Harbach, J. Pecor, E. L. Peyton, S. Manguin, R. Kreig, J. Polanco, and L. Legters. 1993. Environmental and regional determinants of Anopheles (Dipt.: Culicidae) larval distribution in Belize, Central America. Environ. Entomol. 22: 979 Ð992. Rodriguez, M. H., and E. G. Loyola. 1989. Situación epidemiológica actual y perspectives de la investigación entomólogica en Mexico. Memorias, IV Simpos. Nac. Entomol. Med. Vet. Oaxtepec, Mor., Mexico, Soc. Mex. Entomol., pp. 15Ð 40. Root, F. M., and J. Andrews. 1938. Malaria and anopheline survey of Grenada. B.W.I. Am. J. Hyg. 27: 549 Ð579. Rozeboom, L. E. 1941. Distribution and ecology of the Anopheles mosquitoes of the Caribbean region, pp. 98 Ð 107. In F. R. Moulton [ed.], A symposium on human malaria, with special reference to North America and the Caribbean Region. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Publ. 15. Savage, H. M., E. Rejmankova, J. I. Arredondo-Jimenez, D. R. Roberts, and M. H. Rodriguez. 1990. Limnological and botanical characterization of larval habitats for two primary malarial vectors, Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, in coastal areas of Chiapas State, Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 6: 612Ð 620. Shannon, R. C. 1930. Observations on Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in Peru. Am. J. Hyg. 12: 442Ð 448. Shannon, R. C., and N. C. Davis. 1927. Condiciones de reproducción de Anopheles pseudopunctipennis en la provincia de Tucumán durante la estación seca. Rev. Inst. Bacteriol. 17: 662Ð 678. Simmons, J. S. 1941. The transmission of malaria by the Anopheles mosquitoes of North America, pp. 113Ð130. In F. R. Moulton [ed.]. A symposium on human malaria, with special reference to North America and the Caribbean Region. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Publ. 15. Tamayo, M. O., and C. A. Garcia. 1907. Las aguas de Huacachina informe presentado a la Sociedad GeograÞca de Lima. Mem. Municip. Lima 1906: 1Ð 63. Theobald, F. V. 1901. A monograph of the Culicidae or mosquitoes, vol. 2. British Museum Natural History, London, England. Vargas, L., and A. Martinez Palacios. 1956. Anofelinos mexicanos. Taxonomia y distribucion. Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia, Comicion Nacional para erradicacion del paludismo, Mexico, D. F., Mexico. Wilkerson, R. C., and E. L. Peyton. 1990. Standardized nomenclature for the costal wing spots of the genus Anopheles and other spotted-wing mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 27: 207Ð224. Received for publication 3 October 2002; accepted 3 September 2003.