Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:21:06.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ventricular septal defect: diagnosis and treatments in the neonates: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Ahmed Adan
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 3GE, UK
Loay Eleyan
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 3GE, UK
Mariam Zaidi
Affiliation:
Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Amr Ashry
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
Ram Dhannapuneni
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK
Amer Harky*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 3GE, UK Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, LiverpoolL14 3PE, UK Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Amer Harky, MBChB MRCS, MSc, Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, United Kingdom. Tel: +44-151-228-4811. E-mail: aaharky@gmail.com

Abstract

Background:

Medical advancements have encouraged minimally invasive surgical repair of congenital heart defects such as ventricular septal defects (VSDs), and the diagnostic process can now be carried out using non-traditional techniques such as pulse oximetry. This, in turn, has improved clinical outcomes with reduced complication rates post-surgery. However, the variations in type of VSDs, age of patient, comorbidities, and access to closure devices may limit the efficacy of surgical advancements.

Methods:

Articles were identified amongst Scopus, MEDLINE, and PubMed using various relevant search strings using PRISMA guidelines. Of the 115 articles initially extracted, 10 were eventually reviewed after duplicates and irrelevant studies were removed.

Results:

Of the 24 eligible articles, 10 papers were selected for analysis. Minimally invasive approaches to VSD repair was associated with satisfactory short-term outcomes when compared to open repair. For diagnosis of congenital VSD, whilst recent advances such as pulse oximetry method and genome analysis are more sensitive, the limited availability and access to such investigatory methods must be recognised.

Conclusion:

Pulse oximetry and fetal echocardiography are established non-invasive diagnostic tools for VSD. The recent advances in minimally invasive treatment options including periventricular approach and transcatheter techniques have improved patient outcomes, yet at the expense of higher residual rates. Careful patient selection for each technique and follow-up should be planned through multidisciplinary team meetings.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Amer Harky and Ahmed Adan have equal contributions.

References

Axt-Fliedner, R, Schwarze, A, Smrcek, J, Germer, U, Krapp, M, Gembruch, U Isolated ventricular septal defects detected by colour Doppler imaging: evolution during fetal and first year of postnatal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 266273. doi: 10.1002/uog.2716 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo-valenzuela, N, Peixoto, A, Araujo Júnior, E. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a review of current knowledge. Indian Heart J 2018; 70:150164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todros, T, Capuzzo, E, Gaglioti, P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Images in Paediatr Cardiol 2001; 3: 318.Google ScholarPubMed
Graham, T. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39 821 newborns. Yearbook Cardiol 2010; 2010: 145146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, A. Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness. Clin Gov 2012; 17.Google Scholar
Fu, Y. Transcatheter Device Closure of Muscular Ventricular Septal Defect. Pediatr Neonatol 2011; 52: 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penny, D, Vick, G. III Ventricular septal defect. Lancet [Internet] 2011 [cited 24 September 2020]; 377. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)61339-6/fulltext Google ScholarPubMed
Graham, T. Current Expectations for Surgical Repair of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defects. Yearbook Cardiol 2011; 2011: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, The, PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Med 2009; 6: e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, H, Lu, F-x, Zhou, J, et al. Minimally invasive perventricular versus open surgical ventricular septal defect closure in infants and children: a randomised clinical trial. Heart 2018; 104: 20352043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Yang, L, Yu, S, et al. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 11591168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewer, AK, Middleton, LJ, Furmston, AT, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet 2011; 378: 785794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, C, Yan, Y, Ren, Y, Li, X, Gui, Y. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by fetal echocardiography in second trimester: a Chinese multicenter study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2017; 96: 454463.10.1111/aogs.13085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sands, A, Casey, F, Craig, B, Dornan, J, Rogers, J, Mulholland, H. Incidence and risk factors for ventricular septal defect in “low risk” neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999; 81: F61F63 10.1136/fn.81.1.F61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisselrooij, A, Teunissen, A, Clur, S, et al. Why are congenital heart defects being missed? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55: 747757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockman, J. First Day of Life Pulse Oximetry Screening to Detect Congenital Heart Defects. Yearbook Pediatr 2010; 2010: 173175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, X, Zhao, Q, Ma, X, et al. Pulse oximetry could significantly enhance the early detection of critical congenital heart disease in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatrica 2016; 105: e499e505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, P. Recent advances in managing septal defects: ventricular septal defects and atrioventricular septal defects. F1000Res 2020.Google Scholar
Dakkak, W, Oliver, TI. Ventricular Septal Defect. [Updated 2020 Nov 20]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470330 Google Scholar
Rao, P. Management of Congenital Heart Disease: State of the Art—Part II—Cyanotic Heart Defects. Children 2019; 6: 54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharland, G. Fetal cardiac screening and variation in prenatal detection rates of congenital heart disease: why bother with screening at all? Future Cardiol 2012; 8: 189202.10.2217/fca.12.15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allan, L. CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Antenatal diagnosis of heart disease. Heart 2000; 83: 367367.10.1136/heart.83.3.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaekers, P, Mannaerts, D, Jacquemyn, Y. Re: Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease-results of a national screening programme. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 122: 14201421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Medina, K, Barrera-Castañeda, M, Vargas-Acevedo, C, et al. Quality of life in children with infrequent congenital heart defects: cohort study with one-year of follow-up. Health QualLife Outcomes 2020; 18.Google ScholarPubMed
Mellion, K, Uzark, K, Cassedy, A, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 781788.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovalenko, A, Anda, E, Odland, J, Nieboer, E, Brenn, T, Krettek, A. Risk Factors for Ventricular Septal Defects in Murmansk County, Russia: A Registry-Based Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thakkar, B, Patel, N, Shah, S, et al. Perventricular device closure of isolated muscular ventricular septal defect in infants: a single centre experience. Indian Heart J. 2012; 64: 559567.10.1016/j.ihj.2012.09.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed