Article contents
Two new conidial lichenicolous fungi from Spain indicate the distinction of Lichenodiplis and Minutoexcipula
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2009
Abstract
Two new conidial lichenicolous fungi are described from Spain: Lichenodiplis crespoae on Cyphelium notarisii and Minutoexcipula tephromelae on Tephromela atra. Lichenodiplis crespoae differs from all the described species of the genus in the narrower and shorter conidia, and the host Cyphelium notarisii. Minutoexcipula tephromelae is characterized by subglobose, conidiogenous cells occasionally bearing 1–2 long proliferating extensions, short conidia and by the host Tephromela atra.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009
References
Areskoug, V. & Thor, G. (2005) Distribution status and ecology of the lichen Cyphelium notarisii in Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici 42: 317–326.Google Scholar
Atienza, V. (2002) Two new species of Minutoexcipula (mitosporic fungi) from Spain. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 82: 141–152.Google Scholar
Atienza, V. & Hawksworth, D. L. (1994) Minutoexcipula tuckerae gen. et sp. nov., a new lichenicolous deuteromycete on Pertusaria texana in the United States. Mycological Research 98: 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, F. & Diederich, P. (1996) Lichenodiplis hawksworthii sp. nov., a third lichenicolous species of Lichenodiplis (Coelomycetes). Herzogia 12: 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diederich, P. (2003) New species and new records of American lichenicolous fungi. Herzogia 16: 41–90.Google Scholar
Diederich, P. (2004) Lichenodiplis, Minutoexcipula. In Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region (Nash, T. H. III, Ryan, B. D., Diederich, P., Gries, C. & Bungartz, F., eds), 2: 672–673. Tempe: Lichens Unlimited.Google Scholar
Fos, S. & Atienza, V. (2007) Nuevas aportaciones a los fondos y a la lista de líquenes del Banco de Datos de Biodiversidad (BDB) de la Comunidad Valenciana. In Libro de resúmenes XVI Simposio de Botánica Criptogámica, Universidad de León pp.146–147.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (1994) Beiträge zu einem Prodromus der lichenicolen Pilze Österreichs und angrenzender Gebiete. I. Einige neue oder seltene Arten. Herzogia 10: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafellner, J. (2007) The lichenicolous fungi inhabiting Tephromela species. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 96: 103–128.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. (1981) The lichenicolous coelomycetes. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany 9: 1–98.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. (2004) A fourth site for Cyphelium notarisii (Physciaceae) in Spain. Lazaroa 25: 89–91.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. & Dyko, B. J. (1979) Lichenodiplis and Vouauxiomyces: two new genera of lichenicolous Coelomycetes. Lichenologist 11: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratyuk, S. V. (1996) Four new species of lichenicolous fungi. In Botany and Mycology for the Next Millennium: Collection of Scientific Articles Devoted to the 70th Anniversary of Academician K. M. Sytnik. (Wasser, S P., ed.): 309–315. Kiev: N. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany.Google Scholar
Nimis, P.L. & Martellos, S. (2008) The information system on Italian lichens. http://dbiodbs.univ.trieste.it/Google Scholar
Pérez-Ortega, S. (2007) Contribución al conocimiento de los líquenes y hongos liquenícolas de Castilla y León I. Botanica Complutensis 31: 13–22.Google Scholar
Sarrión, F., Aragón, G. & Burgaz, A.R. (1999) Studies on mazaediate lichens and calicioid fungi of the Iberian Peninsula. Mycotaxon 71: 169–198.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by