Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:18:26.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

External features and life cycle of Cucumaricola notabilis nov.gen. et sp., a copepod parasite of the holothurian, Cucumaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Nellie F. Paterson
Nellie F. Paterson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Cucumaricola notabilis, a new genus and species of Copepoda, occurs in cysts in the coelom of Cucumaria frauenfeldi Ludwig collected at Sea Point, Blaauwberg Strand and Dalebrook in the Cape Peninsula.

2. An account is given of the features of the sexually dimorphic males and females.

3. Fertilized eggs and nauplius larvae are also contained in the cysts and, from observations on living material, it has been established that, after escaping from the cysts, the larvae metamorphose within a short period into the copepodid stage. There are two copepodid stages, the first an active swimming form and the second a quiescent phase from which the juvenile parasite develops.

4. Although of uncertain systematic position, this parasite seems to be nearly related to the Chondracanthidae. This conclusion is based on the similarity of the trunk appendages of the adult female to those of Acanthochondria as described by Oakley (1930), and also on the general agreement of the ontogeny with that of Acanthochondria cornuta investigated by Heegaard in 1947. It is further suggested that it may be assigned to the key devised by Delamare Deboutteville & Nunes-Ruivo (1955) for certain copepod parasites having some affinity with the Chondracanthidae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 48 , Issue 3-4 , November 1958 , pp. 269 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baer, J. G. (1952). Ecology of Animal Parasites. Urbana: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Delamare Deboutteville, CL. (1951). Présence de la sous-famille des Pharodinae Illg (Copépodes, Chondracanthidae) en Méditerranée et remarques sur la classification et la biologie des Chondracanthidae. Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 87, 139–55.Google Scholar
Delamabe Deboutteville, Cl. & Nunes-Ruivo, L. (1955). Echiurophilus fizei n.g. n.sp., copépode parasite d'un échiuride d'Indochine. Vie et Milieu, 6, no. 1, 101–12.Google Scholar
Friend, G. F. (1941). The life-history and ecology of the salmon gill-maggot, Salmincola salmonea (L.) (Copepod Crustacean). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 60, pt. ii, 503–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R. (1931–1933). British Fresh-Water Copepoda, 3 vols. Ray Soc. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R. (1934). The development of certain parasitic Copepoda of the families Caligidae and Clavellidae. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 177–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R. (1945). Some notes on the development and classification of parasitic Copepoda. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (11), 12 121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R. (1947). Some notes on parasitic Copepoda. Developmental stages in the family Lernaeopodidae. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 27, 133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heegaard, P. (1944). A new copepod (Scambicornus hamatus) parasitic on a Japanese holothurian. Vidensk. Medd. dansk. naturh. Foren. Kbh. 107, 359–66.Google Scholar
Heegaard, P. (1947). Contribution to the phylogeny of the arthropods: Copepoda. Spolia zool. Mus. Hauniensis, 8, 1–227.Google Scholar
Hockley, A. R. (1951). On the biology of Mytilicola intestinalis (Steuer). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 30, 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K. (1946–1947). A contribution to the question of the mouth-parts of copepods. Ark. Zool. Stockh. 38 A, no. 5, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Lang, K. (1948). Copepoda ‘Notodelphyoida’ from the Swedish West Coast, with an outline on the systematics of the copepods. Ark. Zool. Stockh. 40 A, no. 14, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1925). A revision of the British species of Clavella (Crustacea, Copepoda), with a diagnosis of new species, C. devastatrix and C. invicta. Parasitology, 17, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1926). Ommatokoita superba n.g. et sp., a parasitic copepod of Somniosus microcephalus. Parasitology, 18, 224–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. & Oakley, C. L. (1927). Lernentominae, a new subfamily of Chondracanthidae (Crustacea: Copepoda), with a description of Oralien triglae Blainville. Parasitology, 19, 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1928 a). Brachiella obesa, a parasitic copepod of Trigla cuculus, with a description of the male. Parasitology, 20, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1928 b). The genera Charopinus and Lernaeopodina (Copepoda) as represented by the collection in the British Museum. Parasitology, 20, 273–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1928 c). Degeneracy in parasitic Copepoda in relation to the distribution of their hosts in time. Parasitology, 20, 421–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1930). Further remarks on the genus Lernaeopoda, including a description of a new species, L. bivia. Parasitology, 22, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, Th. & Dollfus, R. Ph. (1932). Les copépodes parasites de mollusques. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 10, 129–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, C. L. (1930). The Chondracanthidae (Crustacea: Copepoda), with a description of five new genera and one new species. Parasitology, 22, 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, Y. K. (1927). Staurosoma, copépode parasite d'une actinie: description de Staurosoma caulleryi sp.n. Annot. zool. jap. 11, 173–81.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A. (1940). The anatomy of Ophioica asymmetrica sp.n., a eopepod endoparasitic in an ophiuroid. J. Linn. Soc. Zool. Lond. 41, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephensen, K. (1933). Some new copepods, parasites of ophiurids and echinids. Vidensk. Medd. dansk. naturh. Foren. Kbh. 93, 197–213.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. (1935). Some endoparasitic copepods found in echinids. Vidensk. Medd. dansk. naturh. Foren. Kbh. 98, 221–8.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B. (1911 a). North American parasitic copepods. Part 9. The Lernaeopodidae. Development of Achtheres ambloplitis Kellicott. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 39, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. B. (1911 b). North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Ergasilidae. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 39, 263–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. B. (1915). North American parasitic copepods belonging to the Lernaeopodidae, with a revision of the entire family. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 47, 565–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. B. (1922). North American parasitic copepods belonging to the family Dichelesthiidae. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 60, Art. 5, 98 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. B. (1932). The copepods of the Woods Hole region, Massachusetts. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 158, 1–635.Google Scholar