Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:32:27.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Foraminiferida of the Plymouth region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. W. Murray
J. W. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The seasonal changes in the foraminiferid populations along the Tamar-Eddy-stone profile have been shown for the winter, spring and summer of 1962. No single environmental factor appears to be wholly responsible for these changes but temperature is considered to be important. Variable salinities are of secondary importance in the Tamar. These seasonal changes have been compared with those observed at Christchurch and found to be different, presumably because of the different temperature and salinity conditions prevailing in the two estuaries.

A qualitative assessment of the energy input of the environment from the nature of the deposited sediment has shown a good positive correlation between the distribution of the Miliolacea and a high-energy environment. All other superfamilies show a negative correlation with high energy, but the Cassidulinacea show a preference for a moderate-energy environment during the summer.

Foraminiferids, found not to be very abundant in the Plymouth region, show a trend toward greater numerical abundance and greater diversity in passing out o t sea. The shortage of living foraminiferids is tentatively correlated with a restricted food supply.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 1965 , pp. 481 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buchanan, J. B. & Hedley, R. H., 1960. A contribution to the biology of Astrorhiza limicola (Foraminifera). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 549–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N. 1948. A submerged ancient cliff near Plymouth. Nature, Lond., Vol. 161, p. 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlmann, A. J., Hulings, N. C. & Glover, E. D., 1963. Stages of glauconite formation in modern foraminiferal sediments. J. sedim. Petrol., Vol. 33, pp. 87–96.Google Scholar
Fairbridge, R. W., 1961. Eustatic changes in sea level. In Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 4. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Folk, R. L., 1951. Stages of textural maturity in sedimentary rocks. J. sedim. Petrol., Vol. 21, pp. 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. & Spooner, G. M., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. I. Introduction. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 17, pp. 501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1958. A contribution to the biology and cytology of Haliphysema (Foraminifera). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 130, pp. 569–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1960. New observations on Pelosphaera cornuta. Contr. Cushman Fdn. foramin. Res., Vol. 11, pp. 54–6.Google Scholar
Heron-Allen, E. & Earland, A., 1916. The Foraminifera of the shore sands and shallow water zone of the south coast of Cornwall. Jl R. microsc. Soc., pp. 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron-Allen, E. 1930. The Foraminifera of the Plymouth District. Jl R. microsc. Soc., Vol. 50, pp. 46–84, 161–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1961. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. Vol. 41, pp. 397–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepps, M. W., 1942. Studies on Polystomella Lamarck (Foraminifera). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 25, pp. 607–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. B. & Lackey, E. W., 1963. Microscopic algae and protozoa in the waters near Plymouth in August 1962. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimore, M., 1961. The deep channel of the Tamar estuary. Rep. Trans. Devonshire Ass., Vol. 93, pp. 304–9.Google Scholar
Lister, J. J., 1895. Contributions to the life history of the Foraminifera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, Vol. 186, pp. 401–54.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 3rd Ed.Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the lower estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 17, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. W., 1962. A new bottom-water sampler for ecologists. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. W., 1963. Ecological experiments on Foraminiferida. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 621–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. W., 1965. The significance of benthic foraminiferids in plankton samples. J.Palaeont., Vol. 39, pp. 156–7.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W., 1965. Two species of British Recent Foraminiferida. Contr. Cushman Fdn. foramin. Res. (In the press).Google Scholar
Myers, E. H., 1942 a. Biological evidence as to the rate at which tests of Foraminifera are contributed to the sediments. J. Palaeont., Vol. 16, pp. 397–8.Google Scholar
Myers, E. H., 1942 b. A quantitative study of the productivity of Foraminifera in the sea. Proc. Am. phil. Soc., Vol. 85, pp. 325–42.Google Scholar
Myers, E. H., 1943. Life activities of Foraminifera in relation to marine ecology. Proc. Am. phil. Soc., Vol. 86, pp. 439–58.Google Scholar
Nyholm, K. G., 1962. Morphogenesis and biology of the Foraminifer Cibicides lobatulus. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Vol. 33, pp. 157–96.Google Scholar
Phleger, F. B., 1960. Ecology and Distribution of Recent Foraminifera. Johns Hopkins Press. 297 pp.Google Scholar
Robson, G. C., 1923. Molluscan life on the South Dogger Bank. Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 15, pp, 174–8.Google Scholar
SOuthward, A. J., 1960. On changes of sea temperature in the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 449–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOuthward, A. J., 1963. The distribution of some plankton animals in the English Channel and approaches. III. Theories about long-term biological changes, including fish. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stride, A. H., 1963. Current-swept sea floors near the southern half of Great Britain. Q. J. geol. Soc. Lond., Vol. 119, pp. 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, W. R., 1952. Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res. Vol. 3, pp. 56–60.Google Scholar
Worth, R. H., 1904. Foraminifera. In: Plymouth Marine Invertebrate Fauna. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. Vol. 7, pp. 155–298.Google Scholar