Next Article in Journal
Investigational Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Agents under Clinical Development
Next Article in Special Issue
EBNA1 IgM-Based Discrimination Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients and Healthy Controls
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting the MHC Ligandome by Use of TCR-Like Antibodies
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Diagnostic and Clinical Utility of Autoantibodies in Systemic Vasculitis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibodies
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/antib8020033
antibodies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ion Channel Targeting with Antibodies and Antibody Fragments for Cancer Diagnosis

by
Claudia Duranti
and
Annarosa Arcangeli
*
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibodies 2019, 8(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib8020033
Submission received: 21 March 2019 / Revised: 17 May 2019 / Accepted: 20 May 2019 / Published: 24 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody-Based Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The antibody era has greatly impacted cancer management in recent decades. Indeed, antibodies are currently applied for both cancer diagnosis and therapy. For example, monoclonal antibodies are the main constituents of several in vitro diagnostics, which are applied at many levels of cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the great improvement provided by in vivo imaging, especially for early-stage cancer diagnosis, has traced the path for the development of a complete new class of antibodies, i.e., engineered antibody fragments. The latter embody the optimal characteristics (e.g., low renal retention, rapid clearance, and small size) which make them ideal for in vivo applications. Furthermore, the present review focuses on reviewing the main applications of antibodies and antibody fragments for solid cancer diagnosis, both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we review the scientific evidence showing that ion channels represent an almost unexplored class of ideal targets for both in vitro and in vivo diagnostic purposes. In particular, we review the applications, in solid cancers, of monoclonal antibodies and engineered antibody fragments targeting the voltage-dependent ion channel Kv 11.1, also known as hERG1.

1. Introduction

Antibodies have become common and essential research instruments over the last fifty years, providing highly specific and versatile tools for a wide array of experimental applications in many fields. Furthermore, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and, more recently, recombinant antibodies have gained clinical applications for diagnosis and therapy of different diseases, including cancer [1,2]. The translation of antibodies from basic research into the clinic has therefore significantly changed the prognosis for different classes of human cancers. The great success of the clinical application of antibodies mainly relies on the high versatility of these biological molecules. Indeed, antibodies combine the specificity of antigen targeting with, e.g., the possibility to be easily conjugated with various molecular or chemical agents, thus improving their pharmacological efficacy. Targeted therapeutic strategies have recently raised the possibility of tailoring cancer treatment to an individual patient after assessing the peculiar molecular characteristics of the tumor under treatment. Such refined diagnostic assessments can be achieved using antibody molecules. The fusion between diagnostic imaging techniques and therapeutic intervention is important to address cancer heterogeneity [3]. The term “theranostics” was hence coined to describe a molecular tool having both diagnostic and therapeutic applications [4]. Moreover, several platforms linking a diagnostic tool, often represented by an antibody, with a defined therapeutic compound have been developed and marketed. Such “companion diagnostics” are embodying an indispensable part of personalized cancer medicine [5].
The present review focuses on reviewing the main applications of mAbs for cancer diagnosis in vitro. Moreover, we address how the technology of engineering antibody molecules, and in particular the possibility of developing antibody fragments, is greatly impacting on in vivo molecular imaging, for diagnostic applications in solid cancers. We also provide strong evidence that ion channels are relevant molecular devices in cancer establishment and progression, and that can be exploited for either in vitro or in vivo cancer diagnosis. In particular, the diagnostic and prognostic applications, in solid cancers, of mAbs and antibody fragments targeting the voltage-dependent ion channel Kv11.1, also known as hERG1, are thoroughly discussed.

2. Antibody-Based Cancer Diagnostics

Solid cancer diagnosis is currently based on imaging techniques (e.g., Computer-Assisted Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, etc.), laboratory assays (e.g., tests for circulating tumor markers such as the carcinoembryonic antigen) and the pathological evaluation of either biopsies or surgical specimens. The latter can take advantage of either biomolecular techniques or antibody-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) to provide further insights for patients’ prognostic stratification and therapeutic choice. The number and type of techniques available to allow physicians to detect and diagnose cancer had significant changes in the last years. In fact, more accurate and reproducible imaging techniques have been developed and applied to the clinical setting. Moreover, novel cancer biomarkers have been identified to improve diagnosis and prognosis. In this scenario, antibodies represent key devices for both in vitro and in vivo diagnosis, since they can specifically recognize specific cancer biomarkers in tissues and body fluids. In particular, while mAbs represent good molecular tools to detect cancer biomarkers in vitro, in tissue specimens, their use in vivo is hindered by several concerns (see Section 3.2) and are progressively being substituted by antibody fragments [6].
Hereafter, the main antibody-based in vitro and in vivo techniques for cancer diagnosis are reported.

2.1. In Vitro Cancer Diagnostics

Solid cancer diagnosis in vitro is now routinely improved by the detection of clinically validated biomarkers through IHC on paraffin-embedded tissue slides. After antibody binding to the specific antigen, the target region can be visualized by an enzyme-linked (e.g., horseradish peroxidase) or a fluorescent dye, a radioactive tracer or a colloidal gold reagent. The positivity of the tumor for a given marker is hence evaluated, applying predetermined cutoffs. New IHC techniques have improved both the optical resolution and the sensitivity of detection, mainly through the use of amplification procedures, despite the risks of false-positive and false-negative staining [6]. Some “in vitro diagnostics” (IVD) based on antibodies (and the related IHC technique) have been clinically validated and are currently applied in the clinical practice (see Table 1). mAbs can also be utilized as “companion diagnostics”, i.e., diagnostics that can be associated with the use of a particular treatment, either a small molecule or a therapeutic antibody. The path to companion diagnostics started in 1998 with the approval of the therapeutic humanized mAb Trastuzumab, which was paralleled by the simultaneous approval of a diagnostic test, the HercepTest. Some of the approved companion diagnostics are reported in Table 1.
An emerging application of antibodies for cancer diagnostic and prognostic purposes relies on the use of “omics” data [7]. However, both IHC and omics strategies display some disadvantages, since they can hardly address tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, tumor biopsies are not always able to reveal the overall antibody binding or the overall expression of the biomarker. Both hindrances have been recently addressed through the so called “liquid biopsy”, aimed at the detection of either circulating, cell-free, DNA or of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). CTCs detection can help to monitor a patient’s condition, including the tracking of the genomic evolution of the tumor. CTC studies are accomplished through microfluidics platforms, and a new approach includes the use of EpCAM expression levels for the capture of CTCs. Besides anti-EpCAM antibodies, other antibodies targeting specific tumor biomarkers are now under development to improve microfluidic-based CTC analyses [8].

2.2. In Vivo Cancer Diagnostics: Molecular Imaging

The accuracy that allows antibodies to precisely identifying their targets has stimulated their application also for in vivo imaging, thus improving the diagnostic imaging approaches currently used. For example, the 18F-Fluoridexyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) imaging represents an invaluable diagnostic and prognostic tool to detect high levels of glycolytic activity, a sign of malignant transformation. However, FDG-PET is not free of false negatives (e.g., tumors with more indolent growth or dependent on different metabolic pathways) or false positives, as in the case of infection or inflammation [9]. Notably, the majority of imaging probes actually in use to detect cancer can also detect inflammation, thus leading to significant numbers of potential false positives. Hence, using antibodies for in vivo imaging may lead to a versatile approach which allows more accurate diagnosis, staging and hence disease management. Some practical examples of mAbs recognizing cancer specific biomarkers that are approved by the FDA and/or EMA and are currently used in the clinical setting are shown in Table 2A. Among these, ProstaScint is a mAb used in prostate cancer patients as a diagnostic imaging agent to detect nodal metastases “pre-prostatectomy”, or recurrence in post prostatectomy patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The therapeutic mAbs, cetuximab and trastuzumab, are also used as in vivo tracers. In particular, the dual-labeled (111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye800)m is capable of tracking HER2 overexpression in breast cancer patients [10]. cetuximab has been repurposed for fluorescent imaging and is in phase I and phase II clinical trials for malignant glioma and pancreatic cancer imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery with IRDye-800CW [11].
Although antibodies have definitely improved cancer diagnostics through their application in IVD kits, the use of mAbs as molecular imaging tools for in vivo diagnostics still needs further improvements. In other words, antibodies need to be designed differently for their use as diagnostics in vitro and for their application as in vivo imaging agents. When injected in vivo, in fact, whole antibodies display long serum half-lives (1–3 weeks), which are favorable if they are envisaged to be applied as therapeutics, thanks to the enhancement of the exposure of target tissues to the antibody. Moreover, the effector domain (crystallizable fragment, Fc) often exerts biological activities which are essential for the therapeutic functions of the whole antibody molecule [12]. However, such characteristics are drawbacks for the use of such molecules as imaging agents, as several days are required to obtain a good signal-to-noise ratio, and a biological activity is undesirable for an imaging agent.
Many of the disadvantages of whole antibody molecules have been overcome thanks to antibody engineering, producing smaller and highly versatile molecules [13], which maintain the specificity of mAbs but allow higher tumor penetration and shorter clearance times, both optimal characteristics for diagnostic purposes.

3. Antibody Fragments for Cancer Diagnostics

Generally, the preservation of the variable fragment (Fv) domain in engineered antibody fragments preserves the antigen binding. Conversely, the absence of the Fc region abolishes the immune interactions mediated by the complement and by other effectors. The elimination of the Fc region also blocks recycling through the path of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), facilitating the contrast and thus the visualization of targeted tissues through rapid clearance from the blood [13]. Smaller fragments allow the use of radionuclides that decay rapidly (for example through labeling with 18F), thus resulting in reduced radiation exposure. Furthermore, the use of antibodies with a reduced molecular weight (below ~60 kDa) speeds up the elimination through the renal clearance [14]. The main structural characteristics, molecular weight and renal clearance of different engineered antibody fragments are shown in Figure 1 and described in the following paragraph.

3.1. Antibody Fragments: Characteristics and Development

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics and target specificities between intact and fragmented antibodies has been performed, and the results show that recombinant antibodies retain the antigen specificity of the intact Igs from which they derive advantageous characteristics regarding tumor penetrance and retention. Furthermore, antibody fragments have several formats which are reported in Figure 1: scFv-Fc (≈ 100 KDa), minibodies (Mb; scFv-CH3 dimers, ≈ 80 kDa), F(ab’)2 and Fab (≈ 50 KDa), bispecific antibodies (≈ 55-60 KDa) and scFv (≈ 25 KDa) [12]. The F(ab) fragment is an antibody structure that still binds to antigens but is monovalent and lacks the Fc portion. An antibody digested by the enzyme papain yields two F(ab) fragments of about 50 kDa each and an Fc fragment [15].
Another class of antibody fragments is based on single-domain antibodies.
Among sdAbs, the so called nanobodies merit attention. Nanobodies (~15kDa) are fragments of heavy single-variable heavy chains (VHHs), originated from antibodies found in the camelids. The small size of these antibodies allows them to bind to epitopes to which intact molecules cannot access [16] and makes them appropriate for applications where an extremely short time of clearance is desired. The latter is also determined by the size, the charge and by the presence/absence of conjugated parts. Fragments with weights lower than the renal threshold (~60 kDa) are eliminated through the kidneys, while larger molecules are instead cleared through the liver. Nanobodies can be used in diagnostics both at the initial stages for the detection of the tumor itself and then to evaluate the expression of a target for therapeutic intervention or for monitoring of the disease. This class of molecules can be coupled with various nanocarriers (e.g., iron oxide nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, gold nanostructures, and carbon nanomaterials), which could be suitable for anticancer drug delivery [17].
From the diagnostic point of view, two important classes of antibody fragments are the scFvs, single-chain variable fragments, and the bispecific antibodies. scFvs have a molecular weight around 25 kDa and are composed of VH and VL chains, joined via a flexible peptide linker. The first scFv molecules were developed in 1988 and represent the smallest functional VH–VL domains of an antibody necessary for the high-affinity binding of an antigen. Peptide linkers are fundamental for the assembly of functional scFv antibodies, as they join the VH and VL chains and usually vary from 10 to 25 amino acids in length and typically include hydrophilic amino acids. The most common linker is the decapenta-peptide (Gly4Ser)3. The variable regions can be connected in either the VH-linker-VL (most common) or VL-linker-VH orientation. In any case, such orientations can affect expression efficiency, stability and antigen binding activity [18].
Another class of antibodies which has gained great attention is that of bispecific antibodies, among which single-domain diabody (scDb) is the most versatile format. The first work on bispecific antibody generation was published in 1961 and described the production of chimeric antibodies containing two different antigen-binding sites simultaneously. Such molecules are capable of binding two different antigens at the same time, thus allowing the recognition of two different targets which might be crucial in the diagnostic setting. scDbs conjugate the bispecificity with the characteristics (low molecular weight, high tissue penetration, and good clearance times) of antibody fragments [19].

3.2. Applications of Antibody Fragments for in Vivo Imaging

Recent examples of antibody fragments used as in vivo diagnostics combined encompass several of the aforementioned formats even though this field offers great space for improvement as few of such molecules are actually used for in vivo imaging diagnostic applications. Among those few are many Fab fragments for HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) targeting and the use of 124I-PSCA (Prostate Stem Cell Antigen)-specific minibody in order to assess the response to prostate cancer treatment using enzalutamide [9]. Moreover, F(ab’)2 and Fab fragments radiolabeled with 111In (Indio111) and minibodies and diabodies labeled with 89Zr (Zirconium 89) have been used for imaging with SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) or PET (Positron Emission Tomography) in small animals targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). The great interest in fragments of antibodies is demonstrated by several papers using nanobodies [20,21] and affibodies [22]. So far, preclinical studies have been performed to give insights into the biochemical and biophysical features of several antibody fragments as imaging agents [23,24]. Ogasawara and colleagues demonstrated that antibodies specific for phosphatidylserine can be a valuable tool to assess cell death in response to treatment [25]. Direct imaging with antibodies could also offer a suitable technique to determine the development of resistance to therapy. Li and colleagues [9] focused on MET receptor, using various antibody fragments derived from an anti-MET antibody to obtain images of non-small-cell lung cancer xenografts from cell lines resistant to targeted anti-EGFR therapy due to the overexpression of MET.
Finally, bispecific radioimmunoconjugates (bsRICs) capable of binding to HER2 and EGFR were developed for both therapy and diagnostic applications and tested in preclinical models. The aim of these studies was to better decipher the mechanisms underlying trastuzumab resistance related to the overexpression of EGFR in patients with HER2-positive carcinomas. These bsRICs are composed of the trastuzumab Fab (ligand for HER2) linked to EGF (ligand for EGFR) via a long spacer (polyethylene glycol). Such antibodies show good specificity and low uptake in normal organs except for the kidneys [26]. We report, in Table 2, the main monoclonal and engineered antibody fragments which are used in vivo and have already been approved by the FDA and/or EMA.

4. Ion Channels in Cancer

Ion channels are membrane proteins which, besides controlling cell excitability and ionic and fluid homeostasis, are emerging to be particularly relevant in cancer [27]. In particular, being mainly present on the plasma membrane of cancer cells, ion channels can mediate the cross-talk between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment to drive different features of neoplastic progression (e.g., cell proliferation and survival, cell invasiveness, and pro-angiogenic programs) [28]. What is more, ion channels represent one of the rare druggable molecular classes and are increasingly recognized as novel and valuable molecular targets for antineoplastic therapy [29]. Some ion channel modulators, previously used in not oncological settings, are currently in clinical trials for cancer treatment (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
Ion channels are involved in tumor progression through different mechanisms. For example, K+ channels allow uncontrolled tumor cell proliferation by setting the membrane potential (Vm) to rather depolarized values. The Ca2+-dependent K+ (KCa) channels can couple Vm to variations of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). The latter is a finely tuned process that involves both plasma membrane (e.g., ORAI1 and TRPC1 channels) and intracellular (e.g., STIM1) proteins. In several types of cancer cells, [Ca2+]i regulates critical cellular processes such as gene expression and motility. Another channel type likely relevant to cancer is the volume-regulated anion channel VRAC, formed by a multimeric assembly of LRRC8A–LRRC8E proteins. The regulatory effects of VRAC on cellular volume (in particular in the process called apoptotic volume decrease (AVD)) play a crucial role in cancer progression and metastasis, as well as in drug resistance.
Another anion channel frequently upregulated in cancer is the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel TMEM16A, also called ANO1. Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels are often expressed de novo in carcinomas. Besides contributing to tumor “electrical excitability”, they can regulate intracellular Na+ concentrations [Na]i and in turn activate Na+-driven exchangers. In any case, Nav are mainly involved in the triggering of cell invasiveness and metastatic spread. The Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels are also dysregulated in cancer, where they can also operate in conjunction with growth factor receptors: TRPC1 binds to the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR1) and drives cell proliferation by a modulation of bFGF-triggered Ca2+ signals; the TRP Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channel binds to FGFR2 in lung adenocarcinoma cells, and activates the metastatic process thanks to this strict binding. Some cancer-related ion channels operate in a non-canonical way: Kv 11.1 (hERG1), for example, is strictly associated with the β1 subunit of integrin adhesion receptors in tumors, and stimulates peculiar intracellular signaling pathways that regulate the metastatic process [30]. Besides the plasma membrane, ion channels are present in intracellular organelles of tumor cells, such as mitochondria, where they play a central role in the regulation of either metabolic state or apoptosis. The expression and role of ion channels in cancers has been extensively reviewed by us and other authors. Hence we refer to extensive reviews and related references for further details on this topic [27,28,29,30,31]. The main ion channel types expressed in solid cancers are depicted in Figure 2 and listed in Table 3. A concise picture of the functional aspects of ion channels and a focus on the structural features of voltage-gated ion channels are shown in Box 1 and Figure 3.
Box 1. Insights into ion channel main structure features.
Antibodies 08 00033 i001

5. Development of Antibodies Towards Ion Channels

Ion channels include a very broad collection of structural and functional proteins. Such variety makes their targeting with antibodies a fascinating job. However, the design of antibodies against these structurally complex proteins is often challenging (Figure 2 and Box 1). In particular, the presence of short, poorly accessible extracellular loops (Figure 3) makes the identification of antibodies targeting ion channels from the extracellular side very complex work [111]. Overall, when developing an antibody towards an ion channel, several characteristics of the protein along with the difficulties in protein expression and manipulation, as well as in screening, must be taken into account [112]. Considering the above-mentioned issues, the development of monoclonal antibodies against ion channels still remains a challenge, justifying why only very few antibodies (Table 5) against those ion channels that are expressed in solid tumors have been developed so far [113].
The only example of an antibody targeting a cancer-related ion channel (the purinergic receptor P2X7) which has recently entered into the clinic with the potential to be approved as a first-generation therapy is BIL010t. BIL010t is a polyclonal antibody that targets a conformational epitope of the channel in its non-functional form (nfP2X7, Biosceptre). Given the hurdles faced in the aforementioned development of the antibody, some agonist antibodies against the same antigen were also developed. One of them is capable of inducing the cell death of P2X7-positive T cells, hence offering the possibility of a potential application for onco-immunotherapy [114]. Fully human antibodies targeting the Orai1 protein were raised through the immunization of the “Xenomouse” using U2OS cells overexpressing human Orai1 as immunogens. One of them was able to impair cell proliferation in peripheral blood human T lymphocytes [115,116]. In 2014, a well-conceived and simple strategy to isolate functional antibodies targeting the voltage-dependent Na+ channel, Nav1.7, was published [117]. To this purpose, mice immunization was performed using a peptide (VELFLADVEG) located in the loop between the S3 and S4 helices in domain II (Box 1 and Figure 3). Although almost sixteen different antibodies were isolated against TrpA1, all showing high immunogenicity, their therapeutic potential was considered poor due to their lack of potency. A mAb against Eag1 was isolated immunizing mice with a fusion protein composed by residues 374–452 of the E3 loop between the S5–S6 transmembrane segments (i.e., the only scarce extracellular portion which might be exposed and thus targetable by an antibody). The latter was fused to the C-terminal tetramerization domain of the channel (residues 872–932) [118]. The molecule was able to inhibit Eag1 currents in HEK cells transfected with the channel and gave good results for the in vivo imaging of tumor xenografts but lacked biological activities. To induce apoptosis in Eag1-positive tumor cells, an anti-Eag1 scFv derived from the aforementioned mAb was joined to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) [119]. This antibody, scFv62-TRAIL, was demonstrated to be a potential tool to overcome resistance to drugs. Overall, such findings demonstrate the possible application of these antibodies in cancer diagnosis as well as for targeted cancer therapy and theranostics [120].

6. Ion Channels in Cancer Diagnostics: The Story of Kv11.1/hERG1

One of the ion channels that is over-expressed and deregulated in human cancers is the voltage-dependent K+ channel, Kv11.1, also known as hERG1. In humans, hERG1 is physiologically expressed only in selected tissues: cardiac myocytes (where it contributes to the repolarizing potassium current IKr), pancreatic beta cells and neuronal cells of some selected areas of the CNS [49]. Since its first discovery in 1995 [86,124], hERG1 has been shown to be aberrantly expressed in human cancers of different histogenesis. In cancer cells, hERG1 modulates the main cancer-related intracellular signaling pathways (FAK, ERK, AKT, NFkB, HIF-α, small GTPases, etc.) and hence drives many characteristics of neoplastic progression. Some examples, related to solid cancers, are reported in Table 5. Overall, many data were obtained both in vitro and in vivo, supporting the notion that hERG1 can be considered a novel cancer biomarker.

6.1. Development of Anti-hERG1 Antibodies

While only a few examples of antibodies targeting cancer-related ion channels [113] are detectable in literature so far, our research group has developed a mAb directed against hERG1, which turned out to be applicable for diagnostic purposes through IHC [88,91]. The hERG1-mAb was developed through the immunization of Balb/c mice following the Hybridoma Technology methodology and using a 14-amino acid synthetic peptide which encompasses the extracellular S5-P loop of the protein (highlighted in green in Figure 3). The specific sequence is EQPHMDSRIGWLHN. One out of the positive clones obtained from cell fusion, clone A12, showed the best performances in biological assays and was thus patented (patent Ref. n° FI2006A000008). Thanks to the use of this antibody, strong scientific evidence has been provided demonstrating that hERG1 represents a novel cancer biomarker in patients with both solid cancers and hematologic malignancies [30,125]. A summary of the main clinical evidence obtained so far in solid cancer, especially those arising from the gastrointestinal tract, are detailed below.

6.2. Evidence for hERG1 Being a Novel Tumor Biomarker for in Vitro Diagnostics (IVD)

The hERG1-mAb has given encouraging results in different clinical studies, when more than 1500 human tumor samples were analyzed through IHC (see Table 5), reaching a high diagnostic and prognostic value for surgeons and clinical oncologists. The same antibody (and its engineered derivative described in paragraph 6.3) may have another clinical application in the endoscopic setting to detect hERG1 in pre-cancerous or cancerous lesions of GI tracts. In fact, hERG1 is over-expressed in Barrett’s esophagus (BE), a precursor lesion for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EA), while absent in normal esophageal mucosa [95] and can identify patients with higher probability to malignant progression towards EA [97]. In other words, the hERG1 biomarker could identify high-risk BE patients and might be exploited for endoscopic surveillance of BE patients, thus allowing an early EA diagnosis.
hERG1 is also highly expressed in primary Gastric Cancer (GC): a study performed on 508 surgical samples showed a hERG1 immunoreactivity in 69% of cases, with a statistically significant negative prognostic impact in early-stage GC and in precancerous lesions (gastric metaplasias and dysplasias) [96]. In particular, hERG1 expression in gastric metaplastic/dysplastic lesions could determine an innovative prognostic marker of progression towards GC of the intestinal histotype.
Much work has been done evaluating hERG1 expression in colorectal cancer (CRC). In the early stages, (TNM stage I and II) CRC hERG1 associates with Glut-1, VEGF-A, CA-IX, and EGFR, and behaves as an independent negative prognostic factor. In metastatic CRC (TNM stage IV), hERG1 represents a factor of positive response to anti-angiogenesis therapy (bevacizumab) [126]. In particular, hERG1-positive patients have a lower risk to progress during bevacizumab treatment. hERG1 can hence be proposed as a prognostic biomarker to identify patients to be treated with antiangiogenic agents, both in first- and second-line treatments.
In Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), hERG1 is expressed in roughly 60% of surgically resectable (TNM stages II and III) cases. By using our hERG1-mAb and applying a double scoring system, based on both signal intensity and percentage of labeled cells, a high hERG1 scoring was significantly associated with worse prognosis, both in the univariate and multivariate analysis. These results thus indicate hERG1 as an independent prognostic factor of worse prognosis in PDAC [88].
Finally, similar data were obtained by Pointer and colleagues [127], using the same mAb developed by our group. The authors concluded that hERG1 can be considered a potential Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) survival marker, since patients whose tumor was positive for hERG1 had a shorter survival compared to hERG1-negative cases. In addition, hERG1 behaved as a positive biomarker of therapy response, since those patients whose tumor was hERG1 positive and were treated with chemotherapy plus a hERG1 blocker (for the treatment of co-morbidities) had a longer survival compared to patients not treated with a hERG1 blocker. This finding led the authors to conclude that already approved hERG1 blockers might be considered as adjuvant therapy in high hERG1-expressing GBM patients [127].
All the above-mentioned results were obtained through IHC, using the anti-hERG1 mAb developed by us. Such a tool was hence very important to propose hERG1 as a potential prognostic marker. The translation potential of such data was corroborated by the possibility of detecting hERG1 in vivo, after its labeling with Alexa-680. In preclinical mouse models, the labeled mAb was able to identify hERG1-expressing PDAC tumors either in PDAC xenografts or in transgenic mice that develop tumor in the pancreas due to the expression of mutated Kras and Trp53 in pancreatic ductal cells [128]. Although, the anti-hERG1 mAb showed valuable proof of concept for in vivo use in preclinical mouse models, the antibody has been extensively implemented and has given promising results as an in vivo imaging tool after its engineering in the scFv format [122] (see below).

6.3. Targeting hERG1 for Molecular Imaging

Moving from the monoclonal antibody, we have developed a single-chain variable fragment antibody, anti-hERG1scFv. The antibody was mutagenized, substituting a phenylalanine residue in the third framework of the VH domain with a cysteine residue. The resulting scFv–hERG1–Cys showed much higher stability and protein yield, with better affinity and more advantageous binding kinetics, compared to the parental anti-hERG1scFv. The scFv–hERG1–Cys properly bound the native hERG1 antigen expressed on cells, was stable in serum, and displayed a fast pharmacokinetic profile (half-life of 3.1 h) once injected intravenously in nude mice. Moreover, no general toxicity or cardiac toxic effects were detected. The in vivo distribution of an Alexa Fluor 750 conjugated scFv–hERG1–Cys showed a good tumor-to-organ ratio, ideal for visualizing hERG1-expressing tumor masses in vivo. Such findings allowed us to state that the scFv–hERG1–Cys possesses features which make it a suitable tool for application in cancer molecular imaging ([122], patent Ref: 102017000083637).
The scFv was further developed in order to produce a bispecific antibody in the format of scDb, directed against the hERG1–β1 complex, which is a macromolecular complex formed between hERG1 and β1 integrins which selectively occurs in cancers [102]. Such an antibody, once tested through IHC on both CRC and PDAC paraffin-embedded samples, confirmed its specificity for hERG1/β1 complex. Overall, the scDb–hERG1–β1 antibody could be used as a potential new treatment for cancer patients and as an early molecular diagnostic marker, thus configured as one of the first examples of companion diagnostics targeting ion channels ([123], unpublished data).

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Cancer diagnosis has been greatly affected by antibody application. The advent of a completenew class of antibodies, represented by recombinant antibodies with smaller sizes but retained specificities, has increased the possible uses of such a class of proteins for both cancer diagnosis and even for a theranostic approach to cancer. Considering possible novel biomarkers, ion channels are emerging as a new class of proteins and potential novel cancer biomarkers, since they are highly expressed in cancers and are involved in cancer establishment and progression. So far, due to the high complexity of such proteins, only a few antibodies have been developed against ion channels. Hence, there is still a lack of appropriate ion channel mAbs described in the literature and applied either in preclinical or in clinical trials. For these reasons, the example we propose in the present review regarding the antibodies developed against hERG1 by our group will also be remarkably interesting for market opportunities and new targets in the global clinical pipeline.

8. Patents

In the present review, we have extensively reviewed the work accomplished using the antibodies patented under the following patent references, n° FI2006A000008, patent Ref: 102017000083637. It is worth noting that the anti-hERG1 antibody developed by the University of Florence was licensed to MCK Therapeutics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, C.D. and A.A.

Funding

This research was funded by AIRC 2015 grant n IG 15627, AIRC 2018 grant n IG 21510 and Omiterc Project “Applicazione degli OMIcs dalla biopsia solida alla biopsia liquida per una TERapia personalizzata del Cancro.” Bando FAS 2014 to AA.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge Elena Lastraioli and Jessica Iorio for their contribution in drafting Table 4. The authors also want to acknowledge Giovanni Navalesi.

Conflicts of Interest

A.A. is co-founder of MCK Therapeutics, a spin off of the University of Florence that owns the licence for patent n° FI2006A000008 and patent Ref: 102017000083637. C.D. declares no Conflicts of Interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Soori, G.; Dobleman, T.J.; Xiao, G.G. The application of monoclonal antibodies in cancer diagnosis. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2014, 14, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Scott, A.M.; Allison, J.P.; Wolchok, J.D. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer Immun. 2012, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Matsuhashi, N.; Takahashi, T.; Matsui, S.; Tanahashi, T.; Imai, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yoshida, K. A novel therapeutic strategy of personalized medicine based on anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moek, K.L.; Giesen, D.; Kok, I.C.; de Groot, D.J.A.; Jalving, M.; Fehrmann, R.S.N.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; Brouwers, A.H.; de Vries, E.G.E. Theranostics Using Antibodies and Antibody-Related Therapeutics. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58 (Suppl. 2), 83S–90S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Olsen, D.; Jørgensen, J.T. Companion diagnostics for targeted cancer drugs—Clinical and regulatory aspects. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ivell, R.; Teerds, K.; Hoffman, G.E. Proper application of antibodies for immunohistochemical detection: Antibody crimes and how to prevent them. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Finotello, F.; Eduati, F. Multi-Omics Profiling of the Tumor Microenvironment: Paving the Way to Precision Immuno-Oncology. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Su, Y.; Shi, Q.; Wei, W. Single cell proteomics in biomedicine: High-dimensional data acquisition, visualization, and analysis. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, K.; Tavaré, R.; Zettlitz, K.A.; Mumenthaler, S.M.; Mallick, P.; Zhou, Y.; Marks, J.D.; Wu, A.M. Anti-MET immunoPET for non-small cell lung cancer using fully human antibody fragments. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Korb, M.L.; Hartman, Y.E.; Kovar, J.; Zinn, K.R.; Bland, K.I.; Rosenthal, E.L. Use of monoclonal antibody-irdye800cw bioconjugates in the resection of breast cancer. J. Surg. Res. 2014, 188, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Day, K.E.; Sweeny, L.; Kulbersh, B.; Zinn, K.R.; Rosenthal, E.L. Preclinical comparison of near-infrared-labeled cetuximab and panitumumab for optical imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2013, 15, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Holliger, P.; Hudson, P.J. Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. James, M.L.; Gambhir, S.S. A molecular imaging primer: Modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Knowles, S.M.; Wu, A.M. Advances in immuno-positron emission tomography: Antibodies for molecular imaging in oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 3884–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arslan, M.; Karadağ, D.; Kalyoncu, S. Protein engineering approaches for antibody fragments: Directed evolution and rational design approaches. Turk. J. Biol. 2019, 43, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Massa, S.; Xavier, C.; De Vos, J.; Caveliers, V.; Lahoutte, T.; Muyldermans, S.; Devoogdt, N. Site-specific labeling of cysteine-tagged camelid single-domain antibody-fragments for use in molecular imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schoonooghe, S.; Laoui, D.; Van Ginderachter, J.A.; Devoogdt, N.; Lahoutte, T.; De Baetselier, P.; Raes, G. Novel applications of nanobodies for in vivo bio-imaging of inflamed tissues in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Immunobiology 2012, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Desplancq, D.; King, D.J.; Lawson, A.D.; Mountain, A. Multimerization behaviour of single chain Fv variants for the tumour-binding antibody B72.3. Protein Eng. 1994, 7, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suurs, F.V.; Lub-de Hooge, M.N.; de Vries, E.G.E.; de Groot, D.J.A. A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Viola-Villegas, N.T.; Sevak, K.K.; Carlin, S.D.; Doran, M.G.; Evans, H.W.; Bartlett, D.W.; Wu, A.M.; Lewis, J.S. Noninvasive imaging of PSMA in prostate tumors with 89Zr-Labeled huJ591 engineered antibody fragments: The faster alternatives. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bannas, P.; Well, L.; Lenz, A.; Rissiek, B.; Haag, F.; Schmid, J.; Hochgräfe, K.; Trepel, M.; Adam, G.; Ittrich, H.; Koch-Nolte, F. In vivo near-infrared fluorescence targeting of T cells: Comparison of nanobodies and conventional monoclonal antibodies. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zielinski, R.; Hassan, M.; Lyakhov, I.; Needle, D.; Chernomordik, V.; Garcia-Glaessner, A.; Ardeshirpour, Y.; Capala, J.; Gandjbakhche, A. Affibody-DyLight conjugates for in vivo assessment of HER2 expression by near-infrared optical imaging. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iezzi, M.E.; Policastro, L.; Werbajh, S.; Podhajcer, O.; Canziani, G.A. Single-Domain Antibodies and the Promise of Modular Targeting in Cancer Imaging and Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kwon, L.Y.; Scollard, D.A.; Reilly, R.M. 64Cu-labeled trastuzumab fab-PEG24-EGF radioimmunoconjugates bispecific for HER2 and EGFR: Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and tumor imaging by PET in comparison to monospecific agents. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ogasawara, A.; Tinianow, J.N.; Vanderbilt, A.N.; Gill, H.S.; Yee, S.; Flores, J.E.; Williams, S.P.; Ashkenazi, A.; Marik, J. ImmunoPET imaging of phosphatidylserine in pro-apoptotic therapy treated tumor models. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013, 40, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Razumienko, E.; Dryden, L.; Scollard, D.; Reilly, R.M. MicroSPECT/CT imaging of co-expressed HER2 and EGFR on subcutaneous human tumor xenografts in athymic mice using 111In-labeled bispecific radioimmunoconjugates. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013, 138, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Prevarskaya, N.; Skryma, R.; Shuba, Y. Ion Channels in Cancer: Are Cancer Hallmarks Oncochannelopathies? Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 559–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Arcangeli, A.; Becchetti, A. Complex functional interaction between integrin receptors and ion channels. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Becchetti, A.; Petroni, G.; Arcangeli, A. Ion Channel Conformations Regulate Integrin-Dependent Signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Arcangeli, A.; Crociani, O.; Lastraioli, E.; Masi, A.; Pillozzi, S.; Becchetti, A. Targeting ion channels in cancer: A novel frontier in antineoplastic therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 66–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lastraioli, E.; Iorio, J.; Arcangeli, A. Ion channel expression as promising cancer biomarker. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848, 2685–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ding, X.W.; Yan, J.J.; An, P.; Lü, P.; Luo, H.S. Aberrant expression of ether à go-go potassium channel in colorectal cancer patients and cell lines. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fraser, S.P.; Grimes, J.A.; Diss, J.K.; Stewart, D.; Dolly, J.O.; Djamgoz, M.B. Predominant expression of Kv1.3 voltage-gated K+ channel subunit in rat prostate cancer cell lines: Electrophysiological, pharmacological and molecular characterisation. Pflugers Arch. 2003, 446, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ota, M.; Ito, T.; Umemura, T.; Katsuyama, Y.; Yoshizawa, K.; Hamano, H.; Kawa, S. Polymorphism in the KCNA3 gene is associated with susceptibility to autoimmune pancreatitis in the Japanese population. Dis. Markers. 2011, 31, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhong, X.; Lü, M.; Wan, J.; Zhou, T.; Qin, B. Long noncoding RNA kcna3 inhibits the progression of colorectal carcinoma through down-regulating YAP1 expression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hauptman, N.; Jevšinek Skok, D.; Spasovska, E.; Boštjančič, E.; Glavač, D. Genes CEP55, FOXD3, FOXF2, GNAO1, GRIA4, and KCNA5 as potential diagnostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer. BMC Med. Genom. 2019, 12, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dong, Z.; Yang, P.; Qiu, X.; Liang, S.; Guan, B.; Yang, H.; Li, F.; Sun, L.; Liu, H.; Zou, G.; Zhao, K. KCNQ1OT1 facilitates progression of non-small-cell lung carcinoma via modulating miRNA-27b-3p/HSP90AA1 axis. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 11304–11314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oeggerli, M.; Tian, Y.; Ruiz, C.; Wijker, B.; Sauter, G.; Obermann, E.; Güth, U.; Zlobec, I.; Sausbier, M.; Kunzelmann, K.; Bubendorf, L. Role of KCNMA1 in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bloch, M.; Ousingsawat, J.; Simon, R.; Schraml, P.; Gasser, T.C.; Mihatsch, M.J.; Kunzelmann, K.; Bubendorf, L. KCNMA1 gene amplification promotes tumor cell proliferation in human prostate cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26, 2525–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Walavalkar, N.M.; Dozmorov, M.G.; Rich, S.S.; Civelek, M.; Guertin, M.J. Identification of breast cancer associated variants that modulate transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, S.; Zhu, L.; Yang, J.; Hu, L.; Gu, J.; Xing, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z. Integrated expression profiling of potassium channels identifys KCNN4 as a prognostic biomarker of pancreatic cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 494, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, T.; Wang, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, S.; Linghu, E.; Guo, M. Epigenetic regulation of voltage-gated potassium ion channel molecule Kv1.3 in mechanisms of colorectal cancer. Discov. Med. 2017, 23, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang, X.; Jan, L.Y. Targeting potassium channels in cancer. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 206, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kammerer, S.; Sokolowski, A.; Hackl, H.; Platzer, D.; Jahn, S.W.; El-Heliebi, A.; Schwarzenbacher, D.; Stiegelbauer, V.; Pichler, M.; Rezania, S.; et al. KCNJ3 is a new independent prognostic marker for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 84705–84717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Alvarez-Baron, C.P.; Jonsson, P.; Thomas, C.; Dryer, S.E.; Williams, C. The two-pore domain potassium channel KCNK5: Induction by estrogen receptor alpha and role in proliferation of breast cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 25, 1326–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dookeran, K.A.; Zhang, W.; Stayner, L.; Argos, M. Associations of two-pore domain potassium channels and triple negative breast cancer subtype in The Cancer Genome Atlas: Systematic evaluation of gene expression and methylation. BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, C.J.; Cho, Y.G.; Jeong, S.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Nam, S.W.; Lee, S.H.; Yoo, N.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, W.S. Altered expression of KCNK9 in colorectal cancers. APMIS 2004, 112, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yamaci, R.F.; Fraser, S.P.; Battaloglu, E.; Kaya, H.; Erguler, K.; Foster, C.S.; Djamgoz, M.B.A. Neonatal Nav1.5 protein expression in normal adult human tissues and breast cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2017, 213, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guzel, R.M.; Ogmen, K.; Ilieva, K.M.; Fraser, S.P.; Djamgoz, M.B.A. Colorectal cancer invasiveness in vitro: Predominant contribution of neonatal Nav1.5 under normoxia and hypoxia. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 6582–6593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, B.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Xie, H.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Chen, P. Mechanistic insights into Nav1.7-dependent regulation of rat prostate cancer cell invasiveness revealed by toxin probes and proteomic analysis. FEBS J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Campbell, T.M.; Main, M.J.; Fitzgerald, E.M. Functional expression of the voltage-gated Na+-channel Nav1.7 is necessary for EGF-mediated invasion in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 4939–4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, B.; Sekido, Y.; Maximov, A.; Saad, M.; Forgacs, E.; Latif, F.; Wei, M.H.; Lerman, M.; Lee, J.H.; Perez-Reyes, E.; Bezprozvanny, I.; Minna, J.D. Functional properties of a new voltage-dependent calcium channel alpha(2)delta auxiliary subunit gene (CACNA2D2). J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12237–12242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mariot, P.; Vanoverberghe, K.; Lalevee, N.; Rossier, M.F.; Prevarskaya, N. Overexpression of an alpha 1H (Cav3.2) T-type calcium channel during neuroendocrine differentiation of human prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 10824–10833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wanajo, A.; Sasaki, A.; Nagasaki, H.; Shimada, S.; Otsubo, T.; Owaki, S.; Shimizu, Y.; Eishi, Y.; Kojima, K.; Nakajima, Y.; et al. Methylation of the calcium channel-related gene, CACNA2D3, is frequent and a poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jin, Y.; Cui, D.; Ren, J.; Wang, K.; Zeng, T.; Gao, L. CACNA2D3 is downregulated in gliomas and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mol. Carcinog. 2017, 56, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Peters, A.A.; Milevskiy, M.J.; Lee, W.C.; Curry, M.C.; Smart, C.E.; Saunus, J.M.; Reid, L.; da Silva, L.; Marcial, D.L.; Dray, E.; et al. The calcium pump plasma membrane Ca(2+)-ATPase 2 (PMCA2) regulates breast cancer cell proliferation and sensitivity to doxorubicin. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, S.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.Y. Orai1 and STIM1 are critical for breast tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2009, 15, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, S.H.; Rigas, N.K.; Lee, C.R.; Bang, A.; Srikanth, S.; Gwack, Y.; Kang, M.K.; Kim, R.H.; Park, N.H.; Shin, K.H. Orai1 promotes tumor progression by enhancing cancer stemness via NFAT signaling in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 43239–43255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hasna, J.; Hague, F.; Rodat-Despoix, L.; Geerts, D.; Leroy, C.; Tulasne, D.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H.; Kischel, P. Orai3 calcium channel and resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer cells: The p53 connection. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Benzerdjeb, N.; Sevestre, H.; Ahidouch, A.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Orai3 is a predictive marker of metastasis and survival in resectable lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81588–81597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sauter, D.R.P.; Novak, I.; Pedersen, S.F.; Larsen, E.H.; Hoffmann, E.K. ANO1 (TMEM16A) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pflugers Arch. 2015, 467, 1495–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, X.; Hu, W.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Y.; Peng, J.; Yuan, Y.; Yu, J.; Zheng, S. CLCA1 suppresses colorectal cancer aggressiveness via inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017, 15, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, X.; Cowell, J.K.; Sossey-Alaoui, K. CLCA2 tumour suppressor gene in 1p31 is epigenetically regulated in breast cancer. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Bustin, S.A.; Li, S.R.; Dorudi, S. Expression of the Ca2+-activated chloride channel genes CLCA1 and CLCA2 is downregulated in human colorectal cancer. DNA Cell Biol. 2001, 20, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, P.; Zhang, C.; Yu, P.; Tang, B.; Liu, T.; Cui, H.; Xu, J. Regulation of colon cancer cell migration and invasion by CLIC1-mediated RVD. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2012, 365, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, C.D.; Wang, C.S.; Huang, Y.H.; Chien, K.Y.; Liang, Y.; Chen, W.J.; Lin, K.H. Overexpression of CLIC1 in human gastric carcinoma and its clinicopathological significance. Proteomics 2007, 7, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Macpherson, I.R.; Rainero, E.; Mitchell, L.E.; van den Berghe, P.V.; Speirs, C.; Dozynkiewicz, M.A.; Chaudhary, S.; Kalna, G.; Edwards, J.; Timpson, P.; et al. CLIC3 controls recycling of late endosomal MT1-MMP and dictates invasion and metastasis in breast cancer. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 3893–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chodon, D.; Guilbert, A.; Dhennin-Duthille, I.; Gautier, M.; Telliez, M.S.; Sevestre, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Estrogen regulation of TRPM8 expression in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, L.; Barritt, G.J. TRPM8 in prostate cancer cells: A potential diagnostic and prognostic marker with a secretory function? Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yee, N.S. TRPM8 Ion Channels as Potential Cancer Biomarker and Target in Pancreatic Cancer. Adv. Protein. Chem. Struct. Biol. 2016, 104, 127–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kuipers, A.J.; Middelbeek, J.; Vrenken, K.; Pérez-González, C.; Poelmans, G.; Klarenbeek, J.; Jalink, K.; Trepat, X.; van Leeuwen, F.N. TRPM7 controls mesenchymal features of breast cancer cells by tensional regulation of SOX4. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 2409–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yee, N.S.; Chan, A.S.; Yee, J.D.; Yee, R.K. TRPM7 and TRPM8 Ion Channels in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Potential Roles as Cancer Biomarkers and Targets. Scientifica (Cairo) 2012, 2012, 415158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Büch, T.R.H.; Büch, E.A.M.; Boekhoff, I.; Steinritz, D.; Aigner, A. Role of Chemosensory TRP Channels in Lung Cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Azimi, I.; Milevskiy, M.J.G.; Kaemmerer, E.; Turner, D.; Yapa, K.T.D.S.; Brown, M.A.; Thompson, E.W.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; Monteith, G.R. TRPC1 is a differential regulator of hypoxia-mediated events and Akt signalling in PTEN-deficient breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 2292–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Li, X.W.; Zhang, Z.F. Knocking down TRPC1 expression by siRNA inhibits proliferation and invasiveness of human lung adenocarcinoma cell A549 in vitro. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013, 93, 2241–2243. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wang, Y.; Qi, Y.X.; Qi, Z.; Tsang, S.Y. TRPC3 Regulates the Proliferation and Apoptosis Resistance of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells through the TRPC3/RASA4/MAPK Pathway. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiang, H.N.; Zeng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Daskoulidou, N.; Fan, H.; Qu, J.M.; Xu, S.Z. Involvement of TRPC channels in lung cancer cell differentiation and the correlation analysis in human non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, L.L.; Liu, B.C.; Lu, X.Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhai, Y.J.; Bao, Q.; Doetsch, P.W.; Deng, X.; Thai, T.L.; Alli, A.A.; Eaton, D.C.; Shen, B.Z.; Ma, H.P. Inhibition of TRPC6 reduces non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 5123–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shi, Y.; Ding, X.; He, Z.H.; Zhou, K.C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.Z. Critical role of TRPC6 channels in G2 phase transition and the development of human oesophageal cancer. Gut 2009, 58, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schwartz, E.S.; La, J.H.; Scheff, N.N.; Davis, B.M.; Albers, K.M.; Gebhart, G.F. TRPV1 and TRPA1 antagonists prevent the transition of acute to chronic inflammation and pain in chronic pancreatitis. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 5603–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, W.H.; Choong, L.Y.; Mon, N.N.; Lu, S.; Lin, Q.; Pang, B.; Yan, B.; Krishna, V.S.; Singh, H.; Tan, T.Z.; et al. TRPV4 Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Extravasation, Stiffness and Actin Cortex. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Wissenbach, U.; Niemeyer, B.; Himmerkus, N.; Fixemer, T.; Bonkhoff, H.; Flockerzi, V. TRPV6 and prostate cancer: Cancer growth beyond the prostate correlates with increased TRPV6 Ca2+ channel expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 322, 1359–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fernández-Valle, Á.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Rodríguez-Santamarta, T.; Villaronga, M.Á.; Álvarez-Teijeiro, S.; García-Pedrero, J.M.; Suárez-Fernández, L.; Lequerica-Fernández, P.; de Vicente, J.C. HERG1 potassium channel expression in potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa and prognostic relevance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2016, 38, 1672–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Menéndez, S.T.; Villaronga, M.Á.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Álvarez-Teijeiro, S.; Urdinguio, R.G.; Fraga, M.F.; Suárez, C.; García-Pedrero, J.M. HERG1A potassium channel is the predominant isoform in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Evidence for regulation by epigenetic mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Masi, A.; Becchetti, A.; Restano-Cassulini, R.; Polvani, S.; Hofmann, G.; Buccoliero, A.M.; Paglierani, M.; Pollo, B.; Taddei, G.L.; Gallina, P.; et al. hERG1 channels are overexpressed in glioblastoma multiforme and modulate VEGF secretion in glioblastoma cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 93, 781–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Arcangeli, A.; Bianchi, L.; Becchetti, A.; Faravelli, L.; Coronnello, M.; Mini, E.; Olivotto, M.; Wanke, E.A. novel inward-rectifying K+ current with a cell-cycle dependence governs the resting potential of mammalian neuroblastoma cells. J. Physiol. 1995, 489, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Glassmeier, G.; Hempel, K.; Wulfsen, I.; Bauer, C.K.; Schumacher, U.; Schwarz, J.R. Inhibition of HERG1 K+ channel protein expression decreases cell proliferation of human small cell lung cancer cells. Pflugers Arch. 2012, 463, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lastraioli, E.; Perrone, G.; Sette, A.; Fiore, A.; Crociani, O.; Manoli, S.; D’Amico, M.; Masselli, M.; Iorio, J.; Callea, M.; et al. hERG1 channels drive tumour malignancy and may serve as prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 2015, 112, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Feng, J.; Yu, J.; Pan, X.; Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, B.; Yang, L.; Xu, H.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Z. HERG1 functions as an oncogene in pancreatic cancer and is downregulated by miR-96. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 5832–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhi, D.; Zhao, X.; Dong, M.; Yan, C. miR-493 inhibits proliferation and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells and inversely regulated hERG1 expression. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 7398–7404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lastraioli, E.; Bencini, L.; Bianchini, E.; Romoli, M.R.; Crociani, O.; Giommoni, E.; Messerini, L.; Gasperoni, S.; Moretti, R.; Di Costanzo, F.; Boni, L.; Arcangeli, A. hERG1 Channels and Glut-1 as Independent Prognostic Indicators of Worse Outcome in Stage I and II Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study. Transl. Oncol. 2012, 5, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Lastraioli, E.; Guasti, L.; Crociani, O.; Polvani, S.; Hofmann, G.; Witchel, H.; Bencini, L.; Calistri, M.; Messerini, L.; Scatizzi, M.; et al. herg1 gene and HERG1 protein are overexpressed in colorectal cancers and regulate cell invasion of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Muratori, L.; Petroni, G.; Antonuzzo, L.; Boni, L.; Iorio, J.; Lastraioli, E.; Bartoli, G.; Messerini, L.; Di Costanzo, F.; Arcangeli, A. hERG1 positivity and Glut-1 negativity identifies high-risk TNM stage I and II colorectal cancer patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2016, 9, 6325–6332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Iorio, J.; Lastraioli, E.; Tofani, L.; Petroni, G.; Antonuzzo, L.; Messerini, L.; Perrone, G.; Caputo, D.; Francesconi, M.; Amato, M.M.; et al. A signalling pathway centred on hERG1 potassium channel identifies metastatic colorectal cancer patients with a positive response to Bevacizumab. (Submitted to International Journal of Cancer).
  95. Lastraioli, E.; Taddei, A.; Messerini, L.; Comin, C.E.; Festini, M.; Giannelli, M.; Tomezzoli, A.; Paglierani, M.; Mugnai, G.; De Manzoni, G.; et al. hERG1 channels in human esophagus: Evidence for their aberrant expression in the malignant progression of Barrett’s esophagus. J. Cell Physiol. 2006, 209, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lastraioli, E.; Lottini, T.; Iorio, J.; Freschi, G.; Fazi, M.; Duranti, C.; Carraresi, L.; Messerini, L.; Taddei, A.; Ringressi, M.N.; et al. hERG1 behaves as biomarker of progression to adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus and can be exploited for a novel endoscopic surveillance. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 59535–59547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Crociani, O.; Lastraioli, E.; Boni, L.; Pillozzi, S.; Romoli, M.R.; D’Amico, M.; Stefanini, M.; Crescioli, S.; Masi, A.; Taddei, A.; et al. hERG1 channels regulate VEGF-A secretion in human gastric cancer: Clinicopathological correlations and therapeutical implications. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 1502–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shao, X.D.; Wu, K.C.; Guo, X.Z.; Xie, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Fan, D.M. Expression and significance of HERG protein in gastric cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2008, 7, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Ding, X.W.; Yang, W.B.; Gao, S.; Wang, W.; Li, Z.; Hu, W.M.; Li, J.J.; Luo, H.S. Prognostic significance of hERG1 expression in gastric cancer. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2010, 55, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, R.; Tian, P.; Chi, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Liu, Y.; Tian, S.; Zhang, Q. Human ether-à-go-go-related gene expression is essential for cisplatin to induce apoptosis in human gastric cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 27, 433–440. [Google Scholar]
  101. Antonuzzo, L.; Iorio, J.; Lastraioli, E.; Tofani, L.; Laffi, A.; Antonelli, A.; Messerini, L.; Boni, L.; Di Costanzo, F.; Arcangeli, A. hERG1 in pancreatic neuroendocrine cancers. (Manuscript in preparation).
  102. Becchetti, A.; Crescioli, S.; Zanieri, F.; Petroni, G.; Mercatelli, R.; Coppola, S.; Gasparoli, L.; D’Amico, M.; Pillozzi, S.; Crociani, O.; et al. The conformational state of hERG1 channels determines integrin association, downstream signaling, and cancer progression. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaaf3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Iorio, J.; Meattini, I.; Bianchi, S.; Bernini, M.; Maragna, V.; Dominici, L.; Casella, D.; Vezzosi, V.; Orzalesi, L.; Nori, J.; et al. hERG1 channel expression associates with molecular subtypes and prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cherubini, A.; Taddei, G.L.; Crociani, O.; Paglierani, M.; Buccoliero, A.M.; Fontana, L.; Noci, I.; Borri, P.; Borrani, E.; Giachi, M.; et al. HERG potassium channels are more frequently expressed in human endometrial cancer as compared to non-cancerous endometrium. Br. J. Cancer. 2000, 83, 1722–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Asher, V.; Khan, R.; Warren, A.; Shaw, R.; Schalkwyk, G.V.; Bali, A.; Sowter, H.M. The Eag potassium channel as a new prognostic marker in ovarian cancer. Diagn. Pathol. 2010, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Asher, V.; Warren, A.; Shaw, R.; Sowter, H.; Bali, A.; Khan, R. The role of Eag and HERG channels in cell proliferation and apoptotic cell death in SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cell line. Cancer Cell Int. 2011, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Cicek, M.S.; Koestler, D.C.; Fridley, B.L.; Kalli, K.R.; Armasu, S.M.; Larson, M.C.; Wang, C.; Winham, S.J.; Vierkant, R.A.; Rider, D.N.; et al. Epigenome-wide ovarian cancer analysis identifies a methylation profile differentiating clear-cell histology with epigenetic silencing of the HERG K+ channel. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 3038–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Afrasiabi, E.; Hietamäki, M.; Viitanen, T.; Sukumaran, P.; Bergelin, N.; Törnquist, K. Expression and significance of HERG (KCNH2) potassium channels in the regulation of MDA-MB-435S melanoma cell proliferation and migration. Cell Signal. 2010, 22, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Arcangeli, A.; Romoli, M.R.; Boni, L.; Gerlini, G.; Tofani, L.; Urso, C.; Borgognoni, L. High hERG1 expression in advanced melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2013, 23, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zeng, W.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, J. Silencing of hERG1 Gene Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion, and Induces Apoptosis in Human Osteosarcoma Cells by Targeting the NF-κB Pathway. J. Cancer. 2016, 7, 746–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wilkinson, T.C.; Gardener, M.J.; Williams, W.A. Discovery of functional antibodies targeting ion channels. J. Biomol. Screen. 2015, 20, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sun, H.; Li, M. Antibody therapeutics targeting ion channels: Are we there yet? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hutchings, C.J.; Colussi, P.; Clark, T.G. Ion channels as therapeutic antibody targets. MAbs 2019, 11, 265–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Buell, G.; Chessell, I.P.; Michel, A.D.; Collo, G.; Salazzo, M.; Herren, S.; Gretener, D.; Grahames, C.; Kaur, R.; Kosco-Vilbois, M.H.; Humphrey, P.P. Blockade of human P2 × 7 receptor function with a monoclonal antibody. Blood 1998, 92, 3521–3528. [Google Scholar]
  115. Lin, F.F.; Elliott, R.; Colombero, A.; Gaida, K.; Kelley, L.; Moksa, A.; Ho, S.Y.; Bykova, E.; Wong, M.; Rathanaswami, P.; et al. Generation and characterization of fully human monoclonal antibodies against human Orai1 for autoimmune disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013, 345, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cox, J.H.; Hussell, S.; Søndergaard, H.; Roepstorff, K.; Bui, J.V.; Deer, J.R.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.G.; Lamberth, K.; Kvist, P.H.; et al. Antibody-mediated targeting of the Orai1 calcium channel inhibits T cell function. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lee, J.H.; Park, C.K.; Chen, G.; Han, Q.; Xie, R.G.; Liu, T.; Ji, R.R.; Lee, S.Y. A monoclonal antibody that targets a NaV1.7 channel voltage sensor for pain and itch relief. Cell 2014, 157, 1393–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Agarwal, J.; Griesinger, F.; Stuhmer, W.; Pardo, L. The potassium channel Ether a go-go is a novel prognostic factor with functional relevance in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gómez-Varela, D.; Zwick-Wallasch, E.; Knötgen, H.; Sánchez, A.; Hettmann, T.; Ossipov, D.; Weseloh, R.; Contreras-Jurado, C.; Rothe, M.; Stühmer, W.; et al. Monoclonal antibody blockade of the human Eag1 potassium channel function exerts antitumor activity. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7343–7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Fleuren, E.D.G.; Versleijen-Jonkers, Y.M.H.; Heskamp, S.; van Herpen, C.M.L.; Oyen, W.J.G.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Boerman, O.C.; Van Herpen, C.M.L.; Van Der Graaf, W.T.A. Theranostic applications of antibodies in oncology. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 799–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Guasti, L.; Crociani, O.; Redaelli, E.; Pillozzi, S.; Polvani, S.; Masselli, M.; Mello, T.; Galli, A.; Amedei, A.; Wymore, R.S.; Wanke, E.; Arcangeli, A. Identification of a posttranslational mechanism for the regulation of hERG1 K+ channel expression and hERG1 current density in tumor cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28, 5043–5060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Duranti, C.; Carraresi, L.; Sette, A.; Stefanini, M.; Lottini, T.; Crescioli, S.; Crociani, O.; Iamele, L.; De Jonge, H.; Gherardi, E.; Arcangeli, A. Generation and characterization of novel recombinant anti-hERG1 scFv antibodies for cancer molecular imaging. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 34972–34989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Duranti, C.; Lottini, T.; Stefanini, M.; Iorio, J.; Petroni, G.; Lastraioli, E.; Arcangeli, A. A novel bispecific antibody to harness the hERG1-β1 macromolecular complex for cancer therapy. (Manuscript in preparation).
  124. Sanguinetti, M.C. HERG1 channelopathies. Pflugers Arch. 2009, 460, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pillozzi, S.; Masselli, M.; De Lorenzo, E.; Accordi, B.; Cilia, E.; Crociani, O.; Amedei, A.; Veltroni, M.; D’Amico, M.; Basso, G.; et al. Chemotherapy resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia requires hERG1 channels and is overcome by hERG1 blockers. Blood 2011, 117, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Arcangeli, A.; di Costanzo, F.; Antonuzzo, L.; Messerini, L.; Lastraioli, E.; Iorio, J.; Petroni, G.; Boni, L.; Tofani, L.; Coppola, R.; et al. Predictive power of hERG1 potassium channel expression for response to Bevacizumab in metastatic in colorectal cancer patients. In Proceedings of the EACR AACR SIC 2017, Florence, Italy, 24–27 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  127. Pointer, K.B.; Clark, P.A.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Salamat, M.S.; Robertson, G.A.; Kuo, J.S. Administration of Non-Torsadogenic human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene Inhibitors Is Associated with Better Survival for High hERG-Expressing Glioblastoma Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Grippo, P.J.; Tuveson, D.A. Deploying mouse models of pancreatic cancer for chemoprevention studies. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 2010, 3, 1382–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibodies 08 00033 g001 550
Figure 1. Engineered antibody formats. Different antibody formats are reported in the figure, showing their different size compared to intact IgG. Ig, Immunoglobulin; scFv, single-chain variable fragment; V domain, variable domain. In the figure, the size (KDa) of each different antibody format and their half-lives (t1/2, i.e., time needed to eliminate half of the molecule from circulation) are also reported.
Figure 1. Engineered antibody formats. Different antibody formats are reported in the figure, showing their different size compared to intact IgG. Ig, Immunoglobulin; scFv, single-chain variable fragment; V domain, variable domain. In the figure, the size (KDa) of each different antibody format and their half-lives (t1/2, i.e., time needed to eliminate half of the molecule from circulation) are also reported.
Antibodies 08 00033 g001
Antibodies 08 00033 g002 550
Figure 2. Ion channels topology expressed in solid cancers. The main ion channels and their structures are reported. These represent the main proteins expressed in solid cancers. Kir, inward-rectifier potassium channel.
Figure 2. Ion channels topology expressed in solid cancers. The main ion channels and their structures are reported. These represent the main proteins expressed in solid cancers. Kir, inward-rectifier potassium channel.
Antibodies 08 00033 g002
Antibodies 08 00033 g003 550
Figure 3. Voltage-gated K+ ion channel topology. The six transmembrane segments S1–S6 are reported. The S5 and S6 domain are connected with a loop that control selectivity. In green, the loop portion towards which the hERG1-mAb was developed is highlighted (see the following paragraphs). Both the N- and C- terminus are intracellular.
Figure 3. Voltage-gated K+ ion channel topology. The six transmembrane segments S1–S6 are reported. The S5 and S6 domain are connected with a loop that control selectivity. In green, the loop portion towards which the hERG1-mAb was developed is highlighted (see the following paragraphs). Both the N- and C- terminus are intracellular.
Antibodies 08 00033 g003
Table
Table 1. Antibody-based in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) which are already approved by the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) and/or EMA (European Medicine Agency) and used for cancer diagnosis. CTA, Cancer-testis antigen; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; TAG-72, tumor-associated glycoprotein 72; PDL-1, programmed death-ligand 1; HER 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
Table 1. Antibody-based in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) which are already approved by the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) and/or EMA (European Medicine Agency) and used for cancer diagnosis. CTA, Cancer-testis antigen; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; TAG-72, tumor-associated glycoprotein 72; PDL-1, programmed death-ligand 1; HER 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
IVD Commercial NameManufacturerAntigenAntibody FormatTumor TypeDiagnostic SignificancePossibility of Companion Diagnostic
Humaspect®Organon TeknicaCTAHumanized mAbColorectal cancer/tumor detection NA
CEA-scan® ImmunomedicsCEAMurine Fab fragmentColorectal cancer/tumor detectionTumor marker, Prognostic markerNA
ProstaScint®CytogenPSMAMurine mAbProstate adenocarcinoma/tumor detectionPrognostic markerNA
Verluma® (Diagnostic)Boehringer Ingelheim, NeoRxCD-20Murine Fab fragmentSmall-cell lung cancer/tumor detection NA
OncoScint®CytogenTAG-72Murine mAbColorectal and ovarian cancer/tumor detection NA
PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDxDako North America Inc.PDL-1Murine mAbNon-small-cell lung cancer/tumor detection Yes
Keytruda (pembrolizuma)—BLA 125514
VENTANA PD-L1(SP142) AssayVentana Medical Systems, Inc.PDL-1Rabbit mAb Non-small-cell lung cancer and urothelial cancer/tumor detection Yes
Tecentriq (atezolizumab)—NDA 761034/S012
Dako EGFR pharmDx KitDako North America, Inc.EGFRMurine mAb, (clone 2-18C9)Colorectal cancer/tumor detection Yes
Erbitux (cetuximab)—BLA 125084
Vectibix (panitumuma)—BLA 125147
PATHWAY anti-Her2/neu (4B5)Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.HER2Rabbit mAbBreast cancer/tumor detection Yes
Herceptin (trastuzumab)—BLA 103792
Bond Oracle HER2 IHC SystemLaica BiosystemHER2mAb
(CB11 clone)		Breast cancer detectionTumor marker, Prognostic markerYes
Herceptin (trastuzumab)—BLA 103792
HercepTestDako Denmark A/SHER2Rabbit mAbBreast cancer detectionTumor marker, Prognostic markerYes
Herceptin (trastuzumab)—BLA 103792
VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx AssayVentana Medical Systems, Inc.ALKRabbit mAbNon-small-cell lung carcinoma detectionTumor marker, Prognostic markerYes
Zykadia (ceritinib)—NDA 205755
Xalkori (crizotinib)— NDA 202570
Alecensa (alectinib)—NDA 208434
Table
Table 2. Antibodies for in vivo use in tumor imaging diagnostics approved by the FDA and/or EMA and present on the market. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Tc, technetium; In, indium.
Table 2. Antibodies for in vivo use in tumor imaging diagnostics approved by the FDA and/or EMA and present on the market. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Tc, technetium; In, indium.
A) Monoclonal Antibodies
Commercial NameCompanyAntibody FormatAntigenConjugated ProbeTumor Application
Capromab pendetide (ProstaScint) Cytogen 7E11-C5.3, mouse IgG1 100-kDa glycoprotein 111In Prostate carcinoma
Votumumab (HumaSPECT) Intracel 88BV59, human IgG3 Altered cytokeratins “Colorectal, ovarian and breast carcinoma
Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) Spectrum Pharms 2B8, mouse IgG1 CD20“Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Tositumomab (Bexxar) SmithKline Beecham B1, mouse IgG2a “““
Cetuximab Cetuximab-IRDye800CWHuman-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb)EGFR IRDye800CWHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma, pancreatic cancer
Trastuzumab(111In-DTPA)n-trastuzumab-(IRDye 800CW)Humanized monoclonal antibodyHER2“Breast cancer
B) Engineered Antibody Fragments
Arcitumomab (CEA-Scan) Immunomedics IMMU-4, mouse IgG1 Fab’ CEA 99mTc Colorectal and ovarian carcinoma
Nofetumomab merpentan (Verluma) Boehringer Ingelheim NR-LU-10, mouse IgG2b Fab 40-kDa glycoprotein “Small-cell and non-small-cell lung carcinoma
Bectumomab (LymphoScan) Immunomedics LL2, mouse IgG2a Fab’ CD2299mTc “
Igovomab (Indimacis-125) CIS Bio International OC125, mouse IgG1 F(ab’)2 CA125111In Ovarian cancer
Table
Table 3. Main ion channels expressed in solid cancers, with their role in tumor biology. Ion channels are indicated using the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) classification. Cancers are indicated using the acronyms as follows: BC, breast cancer; PDAC, pancreatic cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; LC, lung cancer; HC, head cancer; PC, prostate cancer; EC, esophageal cancer; GC, gastric cancer. Firstly, voltage-gated potassium channels are reported, followed by calcium-activated potassium channels. For each channel, it has been indicated whether it is an early biomarker (eb), which allows early detection of the cancer in a noninvasive way and thus the secondary prevention of the cancer; a prognostic biomarker (pb), which is a clinical or biological characteristic that provides information on the likely course of the disease and gives information about the outcome of the patient; or a tumor marker (tm), which are proteins that can be elevated by the presence of one or more types of cancer.
Table 3. Main ion channels expressed in solid cancers, with their role in tumor biology. Ion channels are indicated using the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) classification. Cancers are indicated using the acronyms as follows: BC, breast cancer; PDAC, pancreatic cancer; CRC, colorectal cancer; LC, lung cancer; HC, head cancer; PC, prostate cancer; EC, esophageal cancer; GC, gastric cancer. Firstly, voltage-gated potassium channels are reported, followed by calcium-activated potassium channels. For each channel, it has been indicated whether it is an early biomarker (eb), which allows early detection of the cancer in a noninvasive way and thus the secondary prevention of the cancer; a prognostic biomarker (pb), which is a clinical or biological characteristic that provides information on the likely course of the disease and gives information about the outcome of the patient; or a tumor marker (tm), which are proteins that can be elevated by the presence of one or more types of cancer.
NameTumor TypeRole in Tumor BiologyExploitation for Diagnostic PurposesReference
Potassium
KCNH1BC, EC, PDAC, CRCModulation of cell cycle and proliferationtm, pm[32]
KCNH2 Reviwed in detail in Table 4
KCNA3PC, PDAC, CRCTumor progression, Metastatic spreadingtm, pm[33,34,35]
KCNA5““tm[36]
KCNQ1LCHypoxia Resistance tm[37]
KCNQ5CRCCell proliferationtm[38]
KCNMA1BC, PCModulation of cell cycle and proliferation, Cell proliferationtm, pm[39,40]
KCNN4BC, PDACModulation of cell cycle and Cell proliferationtm, pm[41,42]
KCNC4CRC“tm[43]
KCNJ3BC, PDACModulation of cell cycle and Cell proliferationtm, pm[43,44]
KCNK5BCModulation of cell cycle and proliferationtm, pm[45]
KCNK9BC, CRC“pm[46,47]
Sodium
SCN5ABC, CRCCell proliferation and invasivenesstm[48,49]
SCN9APC, LCMigration and metastatic spreadingtm, pm[50,51]
Calcium
CACNA2DBCCell proliferationNA[52]
CACNA1HPC“tm[53]
CACNAEC, CRCCell proliferation, Cell invasiontm[54,55]
CACNA2D3GC, HCTumor suppressiontm[56,57]
ATP2C1BCCell proliferationtm, pm[58]
ATP2B2““tm[59]
ORAI1BC, PCCell invasion, Cell survivaltm“
ORAI3BC, LCCell proliferation and invasivenesstm[60]
Chloride
ANO1BC, PDACCell proliferation and invasivenesstm[61,62]
CLCA1CRCCell proliferation and invasivenesstm[63]
CLCA2BCTumor suppressiontm[64]
CRCCell differentiationtm[65]
CLCA4“Tumor suppressiontm[65]
CLIC1CRC, GCMigration and metastatic spreading, Cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasivenesstm[66]
CLIC3PDACCell survivaltm[67]
TRP
TRPM8BC, PC, PDAC“tm, pm[68,69,70]
TRPM7BC, PDACCell proliferation and invasivenesstm[71,72]
TRPA1LCCell survivaltm, pm[73]
TRPC1BC, PC, LC Cell proliferation, Migration and metastatic spreading AND Cell survivaltm[74,75]
TRPC3BC, LCCell proliferation, Cell survivaltm[76]
TRPC4LCCell proliferation, Cell survivaltm[77]
TRPC6LC, EC“tm, eb, pm[78,79]
TRPV1PDACCell proliferationtm, pm[80]
TRPV4BCMigration and metastatic spreadingtm[81]
TRPV6PCReduction of cell growthtm[82]
Table
Table 4. Different human solid tumors in which the Kv11.1 (hERG1) ion channel is expressed, enlightening pre-clinical and clinical aspects in which it is involved. The different types of cancers have been indicated using acronyms as follows: Head&Neck, HNSCC; Oral squamous cell carcinoma, OSCC; Glioblastoma Multiforme, GBM; NB, neuroblastoma; BC, breast cancer; PDAC, pancreatic cancer; P. NET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; CRC, colorectal cancer; LC, lung cancer; HC, head cancer; PC, prostate cancer; EC, esophageal cancer; GC, gastric cancer; BE, Barrett’s Esophagus; EC, endometrial cancer; OC, ovarian cancer; ML, melanoma; OSR, osteosarcoma.
Table 4. Different human solid tumors in which the Kv11.1 (hERG1) ion channel is expressed, enlightening pre-clinical and clinical aspects in which it is involved. The different types of cancers have been indicated using acronyms as follows: Head&Neck, HNSCC; Oral squamous cell carcinoma, OSCC; Glioblastoma Multiforme, GBM; NB, neuroblastoma; BC, breast cancer; PDAC, pancreatic cancer; P. NET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; CRC, colorectal cancer; LC, lung cancer; HC, head cancer; PC, prostate cancer; EC, esophageal cancer; GC, gastric cancer; BE, Barrett’s Esophagus; EC, endometrial cancer; OC, ovarian cancer; ML, melanoma; OSR, osteosarcoma.
Tumor TypehERG1 Involvement in Cancer Biology AspectsReferences
Effect in vitroSignaling pathway affectedConsequences of hERG1 blockade in vivo
HNSCC
OSCC		HNSCC: Migration OSCC: InvasivenessSphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptorsNA[83,84]
GBMProliferation, Ki67VegfNA[85]
NBCell cycle regulationNAReduction of mean tumor weight in mice treated with hERG1 and hERG1b inhibitor ZC88 [86]
LCProliferation (small-cell lung cancer (SCLC))NANA[87]
PDACProliferation
Migration Invasiveness		EGF-R signaling pathwayBlock of local growth and of metastatic spread[88,89,90]
CRCInvasiveness Angiogenesis
Metastasis		Akt, NFkB, HIF-1/2α, VEGFHIF-1/2αBlock of local growth and of metastatic spread[91,92,93,94]
BE, ECNANANA[95,96]
GCCell proliferation
Apoptosis
VEGF-A secretion		AKT, pAKT, HIF2α, VEGFBlock of local growth
Combined activity of hERG1 blockers and anti-VEGF-A antibodies (Bevacizumab)		[97,98,99,100]
P. NETNANANA[101]
BCInduction of cell senescence
Activation of p21/waf transcription
Metastasis		Ras-dependent
DNA damage
Actin assembly		 Block of metastatic spread[102,103]
ECNANANA[104]
OCProliferationNANA[105,106,107]
MLProliferation
Migration		MAP kinase/c-fos pathway.NA[108,109]
OSCProliferation, Migration, ApoptosisPI3K/Akt/NFkBNA[110]
Table
Table 5. Ion channel-targeting antibody-based tools developed or under development. P2X7, ionotropic ATP-gated receptors; Eag-1, ether-à-go-go-1.
Table 5. Ion channel-targeting antibody-based tools developed or under development. P2X7, ionotropic ATP-gated receptors; Eag-1, ether-à-go-go-1.
TargetIon Channel TypeAntibody FormatAssayReference
P2X7Ligand-gatedmAbCell-binding assays, whole-cell patch clamp and recognition of native P2X7[114]
Orai1Calcium release-activated channelmAbCell-binding assays, store-operated calcium influx, and NFAT-dependent luciferase activity[115]
Orai1Calcium release-activated channelmAb peptide based ELISA cell-binding assays, calcium flux, Orai1 internalization, and T-cell proliferation[116]
TrpA1Transient receptor potential channelmAbCell-binding and radioactive calcium uptake assay[73]
Nav1.7Voltage-gatedmAbELISA using purified sensor domain protein and whole-cell patch clamp[117]
Eag-1Voltage-gatedmAbELISA and SPR, whole-cell patch clamp [119]
hERG1Voltage-gated K+ channelmAbELISA and SPR, whole-cell patch clamp and IHC[121]
“scFvELISA and SPR, IHC ex vivo, in vivo imaging[122]
hERG1/β1Voltage-gated K+ channelscDbIn vivo tumor targeting[123]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duranti, C.; Arcangeli, A. Ion Channel Targeting with Antibodies and Antibody Fragments for Cancer Diagnosis. Antibodies 2019, 8, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib8020033

AMA Style

Duranti C, Arcangeli A. Ion Channel Targeting with Antibodies and Antibody Fragments for Cancer Diagnosis. Antibodies. 2019; 8(2):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib8020033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duranti, Claudia, and Annarosa Arcangeli. 2019. "Ion Channel Targeting with Antibodies and Antibody Fragments for Cancer Diagnosis" Antibodies 8, no. 2: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib8020033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop