Next Article in Journal
Role of AMPK-SREBP Signaling in Regulating Fatty Acid Binding-4 (FABP4) Expression following Ethanol Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Early Cretaceous Keteleerioxylon Wood in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China, and Its Geographic and Environmental Implications
Previous Article in Journal
About the Analysis of 18S rDNA Sequence Data from Trypanosomes in Barcoding and Phylogenetics: Tracing a Continuation Error Occurring in the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Flower Bud from the Lower Cretaceous of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fossil Fruits of Ceratophyllum from the Upper Eocene and Miocene of South China

1
State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences/School of Ecology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology & Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology & Palaeontology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China
3
School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710065, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(11), 1614; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111614
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 29 October 2022 / Accepted: 30 October 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Palaeobotany)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Two fruit fossil species of Ceratophyllum L. are discovered from South China, namely C. cf. muricatum Chamisso from the upper Eocene of the Maoming Basin, Guangdong, and C. demersum L. from the Miocene of the Guiping Basin, Guangxi. Our findings provide evidence for the distribution of Ceratophyllum in South China in the late Eocene, and its wide expansion in subtropical China during the Miocene.

Abstract

Ceratophyllum L. is a cosmopolitan genus of perennial aquatic herbs that occur in quiet freshwaters. Fossils of this genus have been widely reported from the Northern Hemisphere, most of them occurring in the temperate zone. Here, we describe two species of fossil fruits discovered from subtropical areas of China. The fossil fruit discovered from the upper Eocene Huangniuling Formation of the Maoming Basin is designated as C. cf. muricatum Chamisso, and fruits discovered from the Miocene Erzitang Formation of the Guiping Basin are assigned to the extant species C. demersum L. The discovery of these two fossil species indicates that Ceratophyllum had spread to South China by the late Eocene and their distribution expanded in subtropical China during the Miocene.

1. Introduction

Ceratophyllaceae Gray is a family of submersed, hydrophilous, perennial, and herbaceous plants. It consists of only one cosmopolitan genus, Ceratophyllum L., and about six extant species [1]. Ceratophyllaceae is a sister group of the eudicots [2]. The infrageneric taxonomy of Ceratophyllum is largely based on fruit characters. It is generally divided into three sections, with two species in each section. Sect. Ceratophyllum has fruits with three to five long spines, sect. Muricatum has fruits with spiny and sometimes winged margins with stylar and basal spines and sect. Submersum has fruits with a spiny margin without stylar and basal spines [3,4].
Ceratophyllaceae is estimated to have diverged from the rest of the eudicots in the Early Cretaceous based on a time-calibrated global angiosperm phylogeny [5]. The earliest fruit fossil convincingly assigned to Ceratophyllum was reported from the Upper Cretaceous of Mexico, namely C. lesii Estrada-Ruiz, Calvillo-Canadell et Cevallos-Ferrizis [6]. Ceratophyllum has only one fossil record from the Paleocene: C. furcatispinum Herendeen, Les et Dilcher from Fort Union Formation, Montana, USA [7]. Ceratophyllum fossils have been recorded from the Eocene of North America and China, which are assigned to C. muricatum subsp. incertum (Berry) Herendeen, Les et Dilcher, and C. aff. muricatum Cham. [7,8]. Oligocene to Pleistocene fossil fruits are relatively abundant and widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, including North America, Europe, and Asia [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
In this paper, two species of Ceratophyllum fruit fossils are described from the late Eocene and Miocene strata of South China. The new fossil occurrences provide important insights into the palaeophytogeography of this genus.

2. Materials and Methods

The fossil specimens investigated here were collected from two localities within South China (Figure 1). One specimen was collected from the upper part of the Huangniuling Formation (21°42′33.2″ N, 110°53′19.4″ E) of the Maoming Basin, Guangdong. This formation is composed mainly of gray, yellow to white sandstones, siltstones, and conglomerates [18]. The age of Huangniuling Formation is late Eocene according to palaeomagnetic data [19] and pollen assemblages [20]. Other fruit specimens were collected from the Erzitang Formation (23°23′09.67″ N, 110°09′55.21″ E) of the Guiping Basin, Guangxi. The Erzitang Formation is mainly composed of greyish yellow and red mudstone. The geological age of this formation is Miocene based on the mammal fossil Prolipotes yujiangensis Zhou, Zhou et Zhao [21,22].
Specimens were photographed and measured using a Sony Alpha 6400 Camera and a Nikon SMZ25 stereo microscope. The pericarp of the fossil fruit was examined using a JSM–6330F scanning electron microscope. The terminology for Ceratophyllum fruit description follows that used in the monograph of Les [3]. All fossils described here are deposited in the Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.

3. Results

3.1. Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso

Family: Ceratophyllaceae Gray
Genus: Ceratophyllum L.
Section: Muricatum Les
Species: Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso
Specimen: MMJ3–2907
Locality: Maoming Basin, Guangdong, South China
Geological horizon and age: Huangniuling Formation, late Eocene
Description: Achene axis symmetric, elliptic to suborbicular, 3.6 mm long, 3.2 mm wide (excluding the spines), with a length/width ratio of about 1.1 (Figure 2A,C). The surface of the fruit has granular ornamentation (Figure 2B). The fruit body has five prominent spines: one stylar spine (incomplete, ca. 0.9 mm long), two lateral spines 0.9–1 mm long, and two basal spines 2.7–3.8 mm in length (Figure 2A,C). The impression of a marginal wing is clear, and slightly toothed at the apex (Figure 2A).
Remarks: The characteristics of Ceratophyllum fruit include shape, size, spine, surface, and wings [3], while the most informative taxonomic characters are the fruit size and the spines [25]. The morphological comparison of our fossil to other Ceratophyllum fruit fossils is summarized (Table 1).
The fossil fruit from Maoming is characterized by it being an axially symmetrical fruit with marginal wings and five spines: a stylar spine, two lateral spines and two basal spines. Accordingly, this fruit can be assigned to sect. Muricatum. This section includes two modern species, C. tanaiticum Sapjegin and C. muricatum Chamisso.
The fossil from Maoming in compared to Ceratophyllum tanaiticum has fewer lateral spines. C. tanaiticum is a Pontic-Caspian endemic relict plant [3]. Fruit of C. tanaiticum possess several short lateral and basal spines, with the length of spines about 0.35–3.15 mm and a minute stylar spine [4,26,27]. Meanwhile, our fossil has only two clear lateral spines and longer basal spines.
Instead, our fossil is more morphologically similar to Ceratophyllum muricatum. C. muricatum have at least two basal spines of achene margin, and fruit body length is less than 4.5 mm [27]. C. muricatum has three subspecies, among which, fruits of C. muricatum subsp. australe (Grisebach) Les and subsp. muricatum Cham. have more lateral spines compared with those of subsp. kossinskyi (Kuzen.) Les [4]. Our fossil fruit can be easily distinguished from previously reported fossil species assigned to sect. Muricatum based on the number of lateral spines: our fossil fruit has only two lateral spines, while those reported fossil species have at least five lateral spines [7,8,14]. Despite minor intraspecific variation, there is very small amount of evolutionary change in Ceratophyllum [28]. Therefore, we prefer to assign the fossil to Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso.

3.2. Ceratophyllum demersum L.

Family: Ceratophyllaceae Gray
Genus: Ceratophyllum L.
Section: Ceratophyllum L.
Species: Ceratophyllum demersum L.
Specimens: GP427–GP456
Locality: Guiping Basin, Guangxi, South China
Geological horizon and age: Erzitang Formation, Miocene
Description: The fruit bodies (excluding spines) are ovate, slightly broad at the apex, 3.42–4.68 mm long and 2.09–2.80 mm wide (Figure 3A,B), with a length/width ratio of 1.48–1.79. The surfaces of the fruit bodies are tuberculate, with striated grooves near the edge (Figure 3A,E,G,I,J). The achenes have an apical stylar spine and a pair of basal spines (Figure 3A). The largest stylar spine is 2.79 mm in length and 0.33 mm in width (Figure 3K). The length of stylar spines ranges from 0.22 to 2.79 mm, with a mean of 0.76 mm. The length of basal spines ranges from 0.15–1.35 mm, with a mean of 0.59 mm. Cotyledons are observed when the fruits are longitudinally split into two halves (Figure 3D,F,H). Two symmetrical holes are present on the base, which represent the pedicel connection (Figure 3C). There is a small projecting part at the base (Figure 3G,L).
The outer surface of the fruit exocarp consists of irregular polygonal cells with lengths of 10–25 μm (Figure 4A,B,E), with some of the cells having parallel partitions (Figure 4C,D). The inner surface of the endocarp is composed mainly of rectangular cells, about 20 μm × 40 μm in size (Figure 4F).
Remarks: Our fossils have three spines, two basal spines, and one stylar spine. The fruits have a rough surface and no marginal wings. These characteristics are consistent with the fruit features of sect. Ceratophyllum (fruits with three to five spines but no winged margins). Sect. Ceratophyllum includes two species: C. platyacanthum Chamisso and C. demersum L. The fruit of C. platyacanthum has five spines, which include two distinctive facial spines. Our three-spined fruit fossils can be distinguished from this species. In comparison, the fruit of C. demersum is 3.5–6 × 2–4 mm in size, with two basal spines and one stylar spine, lacks a marginal wing, and its facial spines are absent.
By carefully comparing the shape, size, and spines of our specimens and the fruit characters of the extant species C. demersum, we cannot discern any significant morphological differences between them. Additionally, the morphological data of our fossil materials is close to other fossils designated as C. demersum [11,17] (Table 1). So, these fossil fruits are assigned to C. demersum L.

4. Discussion

Species of the genus Ceratophyllum are known to be highly tolerant of a wide range of temperature and salinity values, leading to their broad distribution (Figure 5). The aquatic environment in which representatives of this genus live provides relatively buffered conditions minimizing pressure on its evolution and distribution [30].
Fossils of Ceratophyllum have been widely reported from the Northern Hemisphere (Figure 5). The earliest fossil C. lesii was found from the Upper Cretaceous of Mexico [6] and is similar to the modern species C. demersum. An extinct genus Donlesia Dilcher et Wang with affinities to Ceratophyllaceae was reported from the Lower Cretaceous of Kansas, USA [31,32]. Based on these findings, it is considered that Ceratophyllaceae may have originated in North and Central America during the Cretaceous, in accordance with the divergence time of Ceratophyllaceae from the rest of the eudicots based on a time-calibrated global angiosperm phylogeny [5].
The earliest Ceratophyllum fossil of sect. Muricatum was discovered from the Paleocene in the Fort Union Formation in the United States, designated as C. furcatispinum [7]. Later, C. muricatum subsp. incertum was discovered from the lower and middle Eocene in North America [7], and C. aff. muricatum from the middle Eocene of China [8]. The two species share a great number of morphological similarities. The discovery of fossils of Ceratophyllum in China suggests a floristic exchange between Asia and North America during the Eocene [8]. Our discovery of C. cf. muricatum from the upper Eocene of Maoming Basin provides further evidence supporting this supposition, which also suggests that Ceratophyllum was distributed in the subtropical region at that time.
Ceratophyllum fossils have also been reported from Asia in the Oligocene, such as C. zaisanicum Avakov from the Zaysan Basin of Kazakhstan [33], C. submersum L., and C. tenuicarpum Dorof. from Siberia, Russia [10,11]. The distribution area of this genus expanded during the Miocene, and Ceratophyllum fossils have been widely reported in Asia and Europe [11,12,16,17], such as the fruit fossils C. miocenicum Dorof. and C. pannonicum Dorof. from the Orlovka and Lgov, Russia, respectively [11], and C. lusaticum Mai from Leipzig, Germany [12]. From the middle Miocene Shanwang Formation of eastern China, stems and fruits referred to Ceratophyllum have been reported [9,14]. The discovery of Miocene fruit fossils of C. demersum from the Erzitang Formation of the Guiping Basin, Guangxi, together with the discovery of the same species from the upper Miocene of Huaning County, Yunnan, Southwest China [17], suggest that C. demersum was widely distributed in subtropical China in the Miocene.

5. Conclusions

Two fruit fossil species of Ceratophyllum are reported from low latitude of Asia in this paper. By morphological comparison with modern and fossil species, fruit fossil found from the upper Eocene Huangniuling Formation of the Maoming Basin, Guangdong, is assigned to C. cf. muricatum Chamisso. The discovery of this fossil indicates that Ceratophyllum has been distributed in South China by the late Eocene. Fossils discovered from the Miocene Erzitang Formation of the Guiping Basin, Guangxi, are designated to the extant species C. demersum L. The emergence of these fossils, together with the discovery of the same species from the upper Miocene of Yunnan, confirms the wide distribution of this genus in the subtropical China during the Miocene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.X., W.L., J.J. and C.Q.; Field sampling, J.J., C.Q., S.X., H.S. and H.X.; Funding acquisition, J.J., W.L. and C.Q.; Data processing and measurement, S.X., H.S. and H.X.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.X., W.L. and J.J.; Writing—review & editing, S.X., W.L., J.J., C.Q., H.S. and H.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42072020, 41820104002, 41872015, 42111530024), and State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS) (Grant No. 223110).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data dealing with this study are reported in the paper.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Robert Spicer from the Open University, UK, for linguistic improvement of this manuscript, and Tatiana M. Kodrul from Geological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia, for data collection and table sorting.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Les, D.H. The taxonomic significance of plumule morphology in Ceratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae). Syst. Bot. 1985, 10, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Les, D.H. The phytogeography of Ceratophyllum demersum and C. echinatum (Ceratophyllaceae) in glaciated North America. Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Les, D.H. The evolution of achene morphology in Ceratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae), IV. Summary of proposed relationships and evolutionary trends. Syst. Bot. 1989, 14, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Magallón, S.; Gómez-Acevedo, S.L.; Reyes, L.L.S.; Hernández-Hernández, T. A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 437–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Estrada-Ruiz, E.; Calvillo-Canadell, L.; Cevallos-Ferriz, S.R. Upper Cretaceous aquatic plants from Northern Mexico. Aquat. Bot. 2009, 90, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Herendeen, P.S.; Les, D.H.; Dilcher, D.L. Fossil Ceratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae) from the Tertiary of North America. Am. J. Bot. 1990, 77, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Del Rio, C.; Wang, T.X.; Wu, F.X.; Liang, X.Q.; Spicer, T.E.V.; Zhou, Z.K.; Su, T. Fossil record of Ceratophyllum aff. muricatum Cham. (Ceratophyllaceae) from the middle Eocene of central Tibetan Plateau, China. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2020, 281, 104284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, H.H.; Chaney, R.W. A Miocene Flora from Shantung Province, China; Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 1940. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dorofeev, P.I. The Tertiary Floras of Western Siberia; Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR: Leningrad, Russia, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  11. Takhtajan, A. Magnoliophyta Fossillia URSS, Volume I, Magnoliaceae-Eucommiaceae; Nauka Press: Leningrad, Russia, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mai, D.H.; Walther, H. Die Floren der Haselbacher Serie im Weisselster-Becken (Bezirk Leipzig, DDR); VEB Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie: Leipzig, German, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mai, D.H.; Wähnert, V. On the problems of the Pliocene floras in Lusatia and lower Silesia. Acta Palaeobot. 2000, 40, 165–205. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, Y.-F.; Ferguson, D.K.; Li, C.-S. Ceratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae) from the Miocene of Eastern China and its Paleoecological Significance. Syst. Bot. 2005, 30, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nikitin, V.P. Palaeocarpology and Stratigraphy of the Palaeogene and the Neogene Strata in Asian Russia; Academic Press: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2006; ISBN 5974700430. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yabe, A. Early Miocene terrestrial climate inferred from plant megafossil assemblages of the Joban and Soma areas, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Bull. Geol. Surv. Jpn. 2008, 59, 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, X.Q.; Lu, P.; Su, T. Fruits of Ceratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae) from the late Miocene in Huaning, Southwest China and its paleoecological and paleophytogeographical significances. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2020, 274, 104155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nan, Y.; Zhou, G.Q. Stratigraphy (Lithostratic) of Guangdong Province; University of Geosciences Press: Wuhan, China, 1996; ISBN 9787562511076. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, J.; Li, H.; Zhu, Z.; Seguin, M.K.; Yang, J.; Zhang, G. Magnetostratigraphy of Tertiary rocks from Maoming Basin, Guangdong Province, China. Chin. J. Geochem. 1994, 13, 165–175. [Google Scholar]
  20. Aleksandrova, G.N.; Kodrul, T.M.; Jin, J.H. Palynological and paleobotanical investigations of Paleogene sections in the Maoming basin, South China. Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 2015, 23, 300–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, K.Y.; Zhou, M.Z.; Zhao, Z.R. First discovery of a Tertiary platanistoid fossil from Asia. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 1984, 35, 173–181. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao, Z.R. Stratigraphy of the Miocene in Guiping, Guangxi. Geol. Guangxi 1988, 1, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  23. Herman, A.B.; Spicer, R.A.; Aleksandrova, G.N.; Yang, J.; Kodrul, T.M.; Maslova, N.P.; Spicer, T.E.; Chen, G.; Jin, J.H. Eocene–early Oligocene climate and vegetation change in southern China: Evidence from the Maoming Basin. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2017, 479, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, L.L.; Jin, J.H.; Quan, C.; Oskolski, A.A. New occurrences of Altingiaceae fossil woods from the Miocene and upper Pleistocene of South China with phytogeographic implications. J. Palaeogeogr. 2021, 10, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Les, D.H. Ceratophyllaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants Volume II; Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; ISBN 9783642081415. [Google Scholar]
  26. Csiky, J.; Szalontai, B.; Mesterházy, A.; Oláh, P.E. A morphological study of Ceratophyllum tanaiticum, a species new to the flora of Hungary. Preslia 2010, 82, 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  27. Szalontai, B.; Stranczinger, S.; Mesterházy, A.; Scribailo, R.W.; Les, D.H.; Efremov, A.N.; Jacono, C.C.; Kipriyanova, L.M.; Kaushik, K.; Laktionov, A.P.; et al. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Ceratophyllum L. taxa: A new perspective. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 188, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taylor, T.N.; Taylor, E.L.; Krings, M. Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants, 2nd ed.; Elsevier/Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA; London, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; New York, NY, USA, 2009; ISBN 9780123739728. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kerner, F.V. Neogenpflanzen vom Nordrande des Sinjsko polje in Mitteldalmatien. Jahrb. Geol. RA 1905, 55, 593–612. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bozukov, V.; Tsenov, B.; Valchev, V.; Georgiev, V.; Tsoneva, S. Genus Ceratophyllum L. in the Bulgarian Neogene Flora. C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2012, 65, 985–990. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dilcher, D.L.; Wang, H.S. An Early Cretaceous fruit with affinities to Ceratophyllaceae. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96, 2256–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, H.S.; Dilcher, D.L. A new species of Donlesia (Ceratophyllaceae) from the Early Cretaceous of Kansas, USA. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2018, 252, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Avakov, G.S. A new fossil Ceratophyllum from the Oligocene deposits of the Zaysan basin. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1962, 145, 185–186. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The geographic location, and stratigraphic sections of two fossil sites, one in the Maoming Basin and one in the Guiping Basin, South China. (A) Geographical location map of the Maoming and Guiping basins. (B) Field photo of lithological characteristics of the Huangniuling Formation, Maoming, the blue arrow indicates the fossil layer. (C) Stratigraphic column of the outcrop section in B, the upper part of Huangniuling Formation (modified from Herman et al. [23]). (D) Field photo of lithological characteristics of the Erzitang Formation from Guiping, the blue arrow indicates the fossil layer. (E) Stratigraphic column of the outcrop section in D (modified from Huang et al. [24]).
Figure 1. The geographic location, and stratigraphic sections of two fossil sites, one in the Maoming Basin and one in the Guiping Basin, South China. (A) Geographical location map of the Maoming and Guiping basins. (B) Field photo of lithological characteristics of the Huangniuling Formation, Maoming, the blue arrow indicates the fossil layer. (C) Stratigraphic column of the outcrop section in B, the upper part of Huangniuling Formation (modified from Herman et al. [23]). (D) Field photo of lithological characteristics of the Erzitang Formation from Guiping, the blue arrow indicates the fossil layer. (E) Stratigraphic column of the outcrop section in D (modified from Huang et al. [24]).
Biology 11 01614 g001
Figure 2. Fossil and reconstruction image of Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso from the Maoming Basin. (A) Fossil fruit of C. cf. muricatum with five prominent spines, red arrow shows marginal wing, the dotted line shows the position of seed, MMJ3–2907. (B) Enlargement of A, the middle part of the fruit exhibits a granular surface texture. (C) Fossil reconstruction, red arrow shows marginal wing. Scale Bars = 1 mm.
Figure 2. Fossil and reconstruction image of Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso from the Maoming Basin. (A) Fossil fruit of C. cf. muricatum with five prominent spines, red arrow shows marginal wing, the dotted line shows the position of seed, MMJ3–2907. (B) Enlargement of A, the middle part of the fruit exhibits a granular surface texture. (C) Fossil reconstruction, red arrow shows marginal wing. Scale Bars = 1 mm.
Biology 11 01614 g002
Figure 3. Fruit fossils of Ceratophyllum demersum L. from the Guiping Basin. (AC) GP427. The blue arrow shows striated grooves near the edge, yellow arrows show holes at the base. (D) GP428a. Inner view of fruit, the red arrow shows the trace of a cotyledon. (E,F) GP428b. The blue arrow indicates the grooves on the surface, the red arrow shows the trace of a cotyledon. (G) GP429a Fruit outer surface, showing the location of spines. (H) GP429b. Inner view of fruit, red arrows indicate cotyledon traces. (I) GP430. Fruit with a stylar spine. (J) GP432. Fruit with an irregular tuberculate surface. (K) GP436. Lateral view of the fruit, showing a long stylar spine. (L) GP439. Lateral view of the dehiscent fruit. Scale Bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 3. Fruit fossils of Ceratophyllum demersum L. from the Guiping Basin. (AC) GP427. The blue arrow shows striated grooves near the edge, yellow arrows show holes at the base. (D) GP428a. Inner view of fruit, the red arrow shows the trace of a cotyledon. (E,F) GP428b. The blue arrow indicates the grooves on the surface, the red arrow shows the trace of a cotyledon. (G) GP429a Fruit outer surface, showing the location of spines. (H) GP429b. Inner view of fruit, red arrows indicate cotyledon traces. (I) GP430. Fruit with a stylar spine. (J) GP432. Fruit with an irregular tuberculate surface. (K) GP436. Lateral view of the fruit, showing a long stylar spine. (L) GP439. Lateral view of the dehiscent fruit. Scale Bars = 0.5 mm.
Biology 11 01614 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopic image of the pericarp of Ceratophyllum demersum L., GP440. (AD) The outer surface of the exocarp with polygonal cells, red arrows show the parallel partitions. (E) Lateral view, showing the fiber structure of the pericarp. (F) The inner surface of the endocarp with rectangular cells. Scale Bars = 20 μm (A,B), 10 μm (C,D), 100 μm (E,F).
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopic image of the pericarp of Ceratophyllum demersum L., GP440. (AD) The outer surface of the exocarp with polygonal cells, red arrows show the parallel partitions. (E) Lateral view, showing the fiber structure of the pericarp. (F) The inner surface of the endocarp with rectangular cells. Scale Bars = 20 μm (A,B), 10 μm (C,D), 100 μm (E,F).
Biology 11 01614 g004
Figure 5. Geological distribution map of Ceratophyllum modern species, and fossil records.
Figure 5. Geological distribution map of Ceratophyllum modern species, and fossil records.
Biology 11 01614 g005
Table 1. Morphological comparison of two fruit fossils Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso and C. demersum L. with other Ceratophyllum fruit fossils.
Table 1. Morphological comparison of two fruit fossils Ceratophyllum cf. muricatum Chamisso and C. demersum L. with other Ceratophyllum fruit fossils.
SpeciesAchene ShapeLength (mm)Width (mm)L/W RatioSurfaces OrnamentLength of Stylar Spine (mm)Length of Basal Spine (mm)Facial SpinesMarginal WingLateral SpinesOccurrenceAgeReferences
Ceratophyllum cf. muricatumelliptic to suborbicular3.63.21.1granular0.92.7–3.8+2Guangdong, Chinalate EoceneThis paper
C. demersumovate3.42–4.682.09–2.801.48–1.79tuberculate, with striated grooves0.22–2.790.15–1.35Guangxi, ChinaMioceneThis paper
C. lesiielliptical2.112.1smoothincomplete4.2+Northern MexicoLate Cretaceous[6]
C. furcatispinum/4.81.82.7/2.3/+9–10Montana, USAPaleocene[7]
C. muricatum subspecies incertumelliptical3.42.21.65smooth1.83.38–11Tennessee, USAEocene[7]
C. aff. muricatumellipsoidal32.21.4smooth1.5/12Tibet, Chinamiddle Eocene[8]
C. zaisanicumelliptic4.02.71.48finely rugose//9–19Kazakhstanearly
Oligocene
[11]
C. tenuicarpumoblong///////narrow+Siberia, RussiaOligocene[11]
C. submersumelliptic2.7–3.51.7–2.61.44smooth, rarely slightly rugose//Rostov, Russia; Odessa, UkraineOligocene –Pliocene[11]
C. echinatumelliptical5.03.61.6not sure4.13.1+10–11Nevada, USAMiocene[7]
C. spinulosumwide-elliptic////wide+Siberia, RussiaMiocene[11]
C. miocenicumobovate2.0–2.11.8–1.91.11smooth or slightly
rugose
narrow, toothedRostov, Russia; Odessa, UkraineMiocene[11]
C. tanaiticumelliptic///////fimbriateUkraineMiocene[11]
C. pannonicumelliptic3.0–3.82.0–2.71.45finely rugose+//wide10–18UkraineMiocene[11]
C. pannonicum/3 (without stylus)2.31.3tuberculate//+4–5Klettwitz, GermanyMiddle Miocene[12]
C. sinjanum/6–82.5–3///////Sinj, CroatiaMiddle Miocene[29]
C. demersumovate to elliptical3.9 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.51.3papillae or are smooth5.95.2Yunnan, ChinaLate Miocene[17]
C. demersumelliptic3.6–4.12.1–2.81.6rugose++Siberia, Voronezh, Rostov, RussiaMiocene,
Pliocene
[11]
C. tenuicarpumoblong oval3.1–4.91.6–2.5/////Siberia, RussiaMiocene to Pliocene[10]
C. protanaiticumoblong////wide, with irregular margin+Voronezh Region, RussiaPliocene[11]
C. platyacanthumoblong///////++Bashkortostan, RussiaPliocene[11]
/: No description; (+): present; (−): absent.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, S.; Song, H.; Xiang, H.; Liu, W.; Quan, C.; Jin, J. Fossil Fruits of Ceratophyllum from the Upper Eocene and Miocene of South China. Biology 2022, 11, 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111614

AMA Style

Xu S, Song H, Xiang H, Liu W, Quan C, Jin J. Fossil Fruits of Ceratophyllum from the Upper Eocene and Miocene of South China. Biology. 2022; 11(11):1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Shenglan, Hanzhang Song, Helanlin Xiang, Weiqiu Liu, Cheng Quan, and Jianhua Jin. 2022. "Fossil Fruits of Ceratophyllum from the Upper Eocene and Miocene of South China" Biology 11, no. 11: 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111614

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop