Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Untargeted Metabolomics for Integrative Taxonomy: Metabolomics, DNA Marker-Based Sequencing, and Phenotype Bioimaging
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Roles of SPATULA in the Control of Stomata and Trichome Number, and Anthocyanin Biosynthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Primula luquanensis sp. nov. (Primulaceae), a New Species from Southwestern China, Reveals a Novel Floral Form in the Heterostyly-Prevailing Genus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrative Taxonomy of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae), Description of the New Enigmatic Species and Key to All Currently Known Species

Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Zolotodolinskaya Str. 101, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(3), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030593
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 15 January 2023 / Accepted: 15 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrative Taxonomy of Plants)

Abstract

:
A new species, Nitraria iliensis sp. nov., is described from the Ili basin, Almaty region, Kazakhstan. It belongs to section Nitraria ser. Sibiricae and is morphologically similar to N. sibirica Pall. An integrative taxonomic approach based on molecular, biochemical and morphological analyses, along with palynological data, was used to delimit this new species. The studied species of the genus are illustrated, and photographs of authentic specimens of the new species, as well as a distribution map of the new species and segregate taxa, are provided. Morphological characters were investigated, more important traits for identification were found, and a new key to distinguish between all species of the genus was prepared.

1. Introduction

The genus Nitraria L. belongs to the monotypic family Nitrariaceae Bercht & J. Pres; this genus was previously assigned to the family Zygophyllaceae R. Br. [1,2]. It includes 9–11 species restricted to steppe, semi-desert and desert regions of Asia, North Africa, South-Eastern Europe (Romania), Papua New Guinea and Australia [3,4]. GBIF, Kew, Plant list, and IPNI databases list nine species: N. tangutorum Bobrov, N. sphaerocarpa Maxim., N. sibirica Pall., N. schoberi L., N. komarovii Iljin & Lava ex Bobrov, N. roborowskii Kom., N. pamirica L.I. Vassiljeva, N. billardierei DC., and N. retusa (Forsk.) Aschers.
The first data on Nitraria were reported by G. Schober, a famous scientist who explored the Volga region and the Caucasus of the Russian state in 1717–1720 [5]. K. Linnaeus grew plants from seeds collected by G. Schober in the lower reaches of the Volga river. These plants were later identified as the N. schoberi lectotype [6].
Later, P.S. Pallas [7] identified specimens of Nitraria growing in the vicinity of Astrakhan (lower reaches of the Volga river) as N. schoberi var. caspica and specimens from Siberia (according to the collections of G.V. Steller) as N. sibirica.
By the end of the 19th century, three more species of Nitraria had been described: in 1828, N. billardierei DC. from Australia; in 1876, N. retusa from North Africa; and in 1883, N. sphaerocarpa from Central Asia (Khami Gobi).
R.E. Trautvetter made an important contribution to the future description of another species from the eastern coast of the Caspian Sea near the town of Krasnovodsk (now known as Turkmenbashi, Turkmenistan) [8]. He distinguished this plant from N. schoberi by its long and narrow leaves gradually tapering toward the base. At the time, he named the taxon N. schoberi var. polygama Trautv. For the first time, the same plant was mentioned under a different name (N. komarovii) in the journal Priroda by M.M. Il’in [9] but without a legitimate diagnosis: “N. komarovii Iljin et Lava., sp. nov. (typus Krasnovodsk, littora maris Caspii, 22 October 1900, leg, Freyn)”. N.K. Kovtonyuk, M.A. Tomoshevich, and E.V. Banaev [10] conducted a detailed study to choose a lectotype, N. komarovii Iljin & Lava ex Bobrov, which was identified as a specimen of this plant from the herbarium of V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute, RAS: LE00050757. This specimen had been identified in 1960 by V.P. Bochantsev as a lectotype of N. komarovii but was not published properly.
The first major analysis of the genus Nitraria was carried out by V.L. Komarov [5]. He noted substantial variation of the morphological characters of N. schoberi vegetative organs without a clear-cut hiatus across the geographic range. In addition, he described another new species: N. roborowskii. According to his data, the plant from the Cherchen oasis (Kashgar) differed sharply from known specimens of N. schoberi in larger leaves, inflorescences, and drupes.
It should be pointed out that the taxonomic position and distribution of N. roborowskii is the subject of debate among researchers [11,12,13]. In particular, E.G. Bobrov [14] believed that if only quantitative traits (gigantism) are taken into account, N. roborowskii should be regarded not as a species but as an ecological form: N. sibirica f. majus.
The most complete review of Nitraria systematics can be credited to E.G. Bobrov [14,15]. He divided the genus into two sections (sect. Tridentatae and sect. Nitraria) and described two new species: N. tangutorum (from Tsaidam, China) and N. praevisa (from the Alashan Gobi, China).
The tenth species of Nitraria described by L.I. Vasilieva [16] grows at an altitude of ~4000 m a.s.l. in the Eastern Pamirs: N. pamirica. According to that author’s description, the new species and closely related N. sibirica and N. schoberi differ mainly in an elongated conical stone with a reticulate-veined and irregularly lacunous surface, whereas in the two species, the stone surface is free of veins and contains only a few, rounded, deeper dimples. Furthermore, according to L.I. Vasilieva, this new species differs from N. schoberi in shape, leaf size, and bush habitus, and from N. sibirica in a larger cherry (not black) drupe, inflorescence axes pubescent with adpressed hairs, and in the pistil that is almost twofold shorter than the petals.
Recent studies have revealed the morphological and genetic diversity, phylogeny, and putative origin of some species of the genus Nitraria [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Along with species polymorphism, there are data on natural hybridization between species of the genus Nitraria [23].
For the studied region (Siberia, Crimea, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan), only three Nitraria species (N. schoberi, N. sibirica, N. pamirica) are indicated in the literature [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Recently, another species, N. komarovii, has been recorded in the territory of Kazakhstan in the Balkhash-Alakol basin [31].
Recent studies of plants of the genus Nitraria in the territory of Kazakhstan have revealed a high genetic and morphological polymorphism of N. sibirica. Analysis of the sequence of the ITS of the nuclear ribosomal DNA identified two main N. sibirica ribotypes [32,33]. The heterogeneity of N. sibirica is also supported by data on composition and content of phenolic compounds in plants from Siberian and Kazakh populations [34] and the presence of morphological differences in plants from these populations [4,35].
The aim of the study was to comprehensively investigate the morphological (including palynological), molecular, genetic and biochemical traits of N. sibirica, N. schoberi, N. komarovii, and N. pamirica to confirm the possible taxonomic heterogeneity of the species. The relationship between these species and the new species described and referred to as Nitraria iliensis Banaev&Tomoshevich, sp. nov. was analyzed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphological Analysis

We compared 26 characters to distinguish between N. sibirica, N. schoberi, N. komarovii, N. pamirica, and N. iliensis (Table 1). Principal component analysis showed that the first two principal components accounted for 65.1% of the variance of the entire array of parameter data and exhibited the best species discrimination (Figure 1a). It was found that in terms of the first factor, which brought about 48% of the variance, all the studied populations (species) were divided into two groups; the most relevant characters were leaf length, leaf width, distance from the base to the widest point of the leaf blade, fruit length, fruit width, and stone length (Table 1, Figure 1b). The populations of the new species were clearly separated in the plane of the second factor from the populations of N. sibirica and N. pamirica; the most significant characters were height of bush and number of flowers per inflorescence (Table 1, Figure 1b).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA, LSD test) showed significant differences between N. iliensis and N. sibirica closest to it in leaf blade length, p = 0.0008; number of flowers per inflorescence, p = 0.0031; drupe parameters (length p = 0.0382; width p = 0.0262) and stone parameters (width p = 0.0001; area p = 0.0002; perimeter p = 0.0273).
At the same time, the LSD test did not reveal significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between populations within N. sibirica (11 populations) and N. iliensis (3 populations), which confirms the integrity and independence of these taxa.
Numerous researchers indicate indistinct morphological isolation of species of the genus Nitraria [14,15,16,32]. Some researchers [36,37] report the difficulty in identifying Nitraria species among herbarium specimens from West Siberia, as well as the need for studies of Nitraria species in natural populations. We previously showed that morphological characters of the species N. sibirica were not uniform across its distribution area [21]. In this study, for the first time, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the morphological characters of five species of the genus Nitraria from 31 populations, including a new species N. iliensis, and identified the most relevant diagnostic characters in the genus.

2.2. Palynological Analysis

The main features of the investigated pollen grains of Nitraria were summarized (Table 3) and presented with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs (Figure 2). The Nitraria species analyzed here had medium pollen grains and varied from subprolate to prolate shape. P/E ratios of pollen grains showed that the highest P/E values belong to N. sibirica (1.70–1.97), which are of a prolate shape. The lowest was detected in N. pamirica (1.22), which are characterized by a subprolate pollen grains.
Pollen grains of N. iliensis are medium in size and are radially symmetrical. The mean length of the polar axes of them is 33.82 (28.71–37.29) μm, and the mean length of the equatorial axes is 25.81 (21.10–27.08) μm. The mean P/E ratio of the pollen is 1.32 (1.10–1.53). They are subprolate or prolate in equatorial view and triangular convex or pseudo-hexagonal, circular in polar view and monad, isopolar.
The aperture is tricolporate. Ectoaperture—colpus, almost as long as the polar axis, open (4/5 of polar axis), straight, narrow, occasionally constricted at equator with ends acute; polar area asymmetric. Margin observed in polar view, costae colpi and fastigium conspicuous in equatorial view. Endoaperture—porus, conspicuous, lalongate, elliptic to rhombic in shape. Exine—tectate, exine slightly thicker in polar areas in relation to equatorial region; nexine is thicker than sexine. The surface ornamentation is striate and perforated. Striae are relatively loose, packed in the mesocolpia, and short (Figure 2e1,e2).
The specimens of N. iliensis have a longer equatorial axis and a shorter polar axis compared with N. sibirica specimens; they exhibit a different striate–perforate ornamentation of pollen grains. The pollen morphology of Nitraria and Peganum is of a distinctly phylogenetic structure. Ancient species such as N. sphaerocarpa and N. retusa are considered to have pollen with a polar axis shorter than that in later divergent taxa, and a perforated exine [3,38]. Previously, we showed that striate–perforate ornamentation is typical only of the populations Basshi, Taskarasu, Karatal of N. sibirica (now N. iliensis) and it does not occur in the other four studied species of the genus Nitraria [4].

2.3. Molecular Analysis

Phylogenetic trees constructed using UPGMA and ML were congruent. The phylogenetic tree (Figure 3 and Figure 4) showed that the new species (specimens of Nitraria sp.) is sister to N. sibirica. The specimen of N. komarovii included in this clade, the sequences of which were taken from the Genbank (KP087774; KP087766), is subject to debate (2.5.8. Notes). The monophyly of the new species, N. sibirica and N. schoberi, was supported.
The molecular approach is now becoming a common aspect of plant research at various taxonomic levels. Non-encoded regions of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA genes are the most promising molecular markers for plant taxa identification [39]. Analysis of the sequence polymorphism of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1, ITS2) revealed the Siberian and the Kazakh N. sibirica ribotypes [32,33]. Complete sequences of the chloroplast genomes reported for N. sibirica [40], N. tangutorum and N. roborowskii [41] determine the phylogenetic position of the species and the entire family Nitrariaceae in the Sapindales clade.
ISSR analysis revealed high interpopulation differentiation in N. sibirica in 22 natural populations (Russia and Republic of Kazakhstan) [22]. The authors report that the maximum genetic differences were recorded in Kazakhstani Nitraria specimens from the Ili basin. ISSR analysis of two marginal populations of N. schoberi from Romania, in contrast, showed low interpopulation diversity (He ≈ 0.2), which may be due to founder effects since populations most likely originated from a limited number of ancestral individuals [42].

2.4. HPLC-MS Analysis

Secondary metabolites of plants of the genus Nitraria are mainly represented by alkaloids and flavonoids [43]. Saleh et al. [44] highlighted the relationship between the composition of these compounds and the phylogeny of taxa of the Zygophyllaceae family. Literature analysis suggests the presence of specificity of individual components of secondary metabolites in species of the genus Nitraria [45,46,47,48,49]. A number of papers report on the specificity of phenolcarboxylic acids and flavonoids isolated from the leaves of N. tangutorum; therefore, they can be used in the taxonomy of the genus [50]. N. Barbhan et al. [51] showed that the chemical composition of the above-ground part of N. retusa differs from that of other species of the genus Nitraria.
Our phytochemical studies of N. sibirica, N. schoberi, N. komarovii, and N. pamirica from 58 populations of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan performed using HPLC showed that the species differ in the composition and content of phenolic compounds [52,53]. A total of 27 phenolic compounds were identified. The maximum number (16–18 compounds) was found in the leaves of N. sibirica. Nitraria specimens from the populations of the Almaty region, Kazakhstan, lack individual phenolic compounds found in all populations of N. sibirica. The phenolic composition of N. schoberi is weaker compared with that of N. sibirica. Plants of this species mainly contain not more than 14 compounds. In the leaves of N. pamirica, 12 compounds were found, and not less than 6–8 compounds were identified in the leaves of N. komarovii.
HPLC-MS analysis of N. sibirica and N. iliensis (Figure 5) showed a significant difference in the phenolic profiles of these species. The N. iliensis specimen contains a smaller number of phenolic compounds compared with N. sibirica (11 and 13 compounds, respectively). Only four compounds are common to both species (hyperoside, compounds 5,16,17); hyperoside is inherent in all studied species. Compound 5, and minor compounds 16 and 17 were not detected in N. schoberi, N. komarovii, and N. pamirica.

2.5. Taxonomy

A comprehensive analysis of the obtained data distinguished a new species and showed its uniqueness in comparison with four related species growing in the study area: N. sibirica, N. komarovii, N. pamirica, and N. schoberi.
Nitraria iliensis Banaev&Tomoshevich, sp.nov.
Type. Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, vicinity of Basshi village, 44°10′51′′ N, 78°44′31′′ E, 1021 m a.s.l., 25 May 2016, E. V. Banaev & M. A. Tomoshevich (holotype, NSK3001499) (Figure 6).
Paratype Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, vicinity of Basshi village, 44°10′51′′ N, 78°44′31′′ E, 1021 m a.s.l., 30 July 2013, E. V. Banaev & M. A. Tomoshevich (NSK3001277) (Figure 7).

2.5.1. Description

Bushes tend to be 0.6–1.8 m high, densely branched from the base, with slightly arched shoots sticking out in the center, and multispinous. The branches are bare with ash-gray, cracked bark; one-year-old shoots are yellowish, shiny, pubescent. The leaves (12) measure 14–17 (20) × 2–3 mm, are oblanceolate, gradually tapering towards the base, acute or obtuse at the apex, entire, green, fleshy. All leaves are pubescent on both sides. The ultimate inflorescence scorpioid cyme, with peduncle 5.5–15 cm; flowers 40–80. Flowers hermaphrodite, typically pentamerous. Peduncles and inflorescence axes slightly hairy. Resistant calyx up to 2.5 mm, fleshy, pubescent. Petals white, oblong-ovate, 2.8–3.9 × 1.5–2.6 mm, concave with incurved margins, claws short. The fruit is a fleshy black drupe, with black-green sap; oval or spherical, 4–6 mm long, 4–4.5 mm in diameter; finely pubescent; edible and salty-bitter. The sap of ripe berries stains white paper black–green. The stone is dark, reddish brown, narrow ovoid with a narrow pointed apex, 3.5–5 mm long, 2–2.6 mm in diameter.

2.5.2. Affinity

The new species N. iliensis belongs to the sect. Nitraria ser. Sibiricae Bobrov [14], which is evidenced by the results of molecular phylogenetic analysis. Differences between the five species studied in Russia, Tajikistan, and Kazakhstan are summarized in Table 1.
Nitraria iliensis is morphologically similar to N. sibirica (Figure 8) in spreading-branching, dense bush habit, oblanceolate leaf shape, flower shape and size, globate or oval black drupe.
The new species differs from other related species in the height of the bush (0.6–1.8 m), size and color of the leaf blade, showing a smaller size of the fruit and stone, and a larger number of flowers per inflorescence (Table 1, Figure 8 and Figure 9).

2.5.3. Phenology

Flowering: late May–early June, 5–7 days later than that in N. schoberi, but 2–3 days earlier compared with N. sibirica. Fruiting: end of July–beginning of August.

2.5.4. Distribution

Nitraria iliensis is confined to the Almaty region, Republic of Kazakhstan, the Ili basin.

2.5.5. Habitat and Ecology

Nitraria iliensis grows at an altitude of 400–1000 m a.s.l., in halophytic cenoses including Tamarix, Halimodendron, Nitraria schoberi, Artemisia, Achnatherum, Halocnemum, and Swaeda.

2.5.6. Etymology

The specific epithet of the new species comes from the type locality, Ili basin, Almaty region, Republic of Kazakhstan.

2.5.7. Additional Specimens Examined

Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, Karatalskii district, vicinity of Ushtobe city, on the terrace of the Karatal river, 45°21.995′ N, 77°55.048′ E, 29 May 2016, E.V. Banaev & M.A. Tomoshevich, 3000922 (NSK); Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, Karatalskii district, vicinity of Ushtobe city, on the terrace of the Karatal river, 45°21.995′ N, 77°55.048′ E, 15 August 2017, E.V. Banaev & M.A. Tomoshevich, 3001272 (NSK); Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, vicinity of Taskarasu village, 43°46′54.60′′ N, 79°27′16.56′′ E, 26 May 2016, E.V. Banaev & M.A. Tomoshevich, 3001244 (NSK).

2.5.8. Notes

The genebank contains sequences of nuclear and plastid DNA fragments isolated from voucher P. Farse, 13 May 1964, Afghanistan. This voucher specimen is stored in the herbarium of the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (PE) and referred to as N. komarovii. However, N. komarovii is exclusively littoral and grows on the sands along the coasts of large lakes. E.G. Bobrov [14] considered it the youngest of all known species associated with the history of formation of the Caspian basin. Previously, it was only known from three habitats: the Krasnovodsk Peninsula, in vicinity of Turkmenbashi city (Turkmenistan), the Apsheron peninsula (Azerbaijan), and the mouth of the Volga river. We have identified one more locality for N. komarovii [31] on the coast of the lake Balkhash. Therefore, the presence of N. komarovii in the flora of Afghanistan is debatable.
A similar situation can be observed for N. komarovii recorded from the flora of Iran. H. Akhani [54] reports the absence of N. komarovii in the flora of Iran, and Iranian records of N. komarovii Iljin & Lava [55] are referred to Atraphaxis suaedifolia Jaub. & Spach (Polygonaceae).
It should be noted that data on the genus Nitraria in various databases are currently controversial. For example, in the Kew, Plant list, and IPNI databases “https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:873338-1 (accessed on 22 December 2022)”, N. praevisa is a synonym for N. roborowskii according to E.G. Bobrov [14]. However, E.G. Bobrov is the author of the species N. praevisa, which he described in this work in 1965. In the key, he included N. praevisa along with N. roborowskii.

2.5.9. Key to Nitraria Species

All characters in the key of species of the genus Nitraria are described from the studied material from natural populations and authentic specimens stored in the LE herbarium.
1. Drupe juicy, oval or spherical; stone ovoid or conical.............................................................2
- Drupe dry, swollen, spherical up to 1 cm in diameter, with a membranous swollen pubescent shell; narrow stone, almost fusiform, 0.8 × 0.2–0.3 cm. Thorny bush, prostrate, up to 20–40 cm high, with curved branches, pillow-shaped. Branches are grayish-white in color. Leaves narrow, linear-lanceolate, 20–40 × 1–3 mm. Inflorescence shoot short, up to 5–10 cm. Flowers white, small, up to 0.5 cm....................................................N. sphaerocarpa Maxim
2. Leaves obovate, oblanceolate or linear, entire above, very rarely 1–2-toothed; stipules membranous, deciduous....3
- Leaves spatulate or cuneiform, entire above or 3–5 crenate-toothed; stipules present........N. retusa (Forsk.) Aschers
3. Leaves entire, blunt at the apex, rarely pointed...................................................................4
- Leaves are the largest of all species of the genus, 25–46 × 6–9 mm, either entire or 1–2-toothed at the apex (on vegetative shoots); drupe large, round, juicy, pale pink to maroon in color, stone 10–12 mm long, 3.5–4.5 mm wide, ovoid pointed to apex, barely pointed or almost blunt; bush 1–1.5 m high................................N. roborowskii Kom.
4. Bush above 0.5 m, spreading-branching..........................................................................5
- Bush 0.1–0.3 m high, spreading, dense; leaves green, matte, oblanceolate with a pointed apex; number of flowers in the inflorescence 9–15; petals white, oblong-oval with short claws; drupe cherry, 7–8 × 4–5 mm, stone oblong-conical, 5–6 × 2–2.5 mm.............................................................................N. pamirica L.I. Vassiljeva
5. Drupe maroon to black in color, oval or spherical.................................................................7
- Drupe yellow, orange, pale to bright red, oval, confined to Central Asia............................................6
- Bush grows in Australia, leaves narrow at the apex, slightly pointed, stone conically ovoid.........N. billardierei DC.
6. Stems ascending, leaves greenish-yellow, narrow, long, linear spatulate, 25–28 mm long, 2–3.5 mm wide; petals yellowish-white, ovate with short claws; number of flowers per inflorescence 17–30; drupe oval, 8–12 × 7–11 mm; stone conically ovoid with a recurved apex, 8.5–11 mm long, 4.5–6 mm wide; drupe sap light pink.......................................................................................................N. komarovii Iljin & Lava ex Bobrov
7. Drupe black, oval or spherical; stone smaller than 7 mm..........................................................8
- Drupe oval, maroon to black in color, 7–10 × 6–9 mm; stone ovoid, obtuse, 7–10 mm long, 4.5–6.5 mm wide; bush 0.7–1.5 m high, spreading-branching; stems arcuate, with large spines; leaves dark green, shiny, oblong-spatulate, 20–26 mm long, 3–6 mm wide; flowers yellowish-white in color; petals ovoid or diamond-shaped with short claws; number of flowers per inflorescence 11–28; fruit sap pale reddish................................................N. schoberi L.
- Drupe oval, burgundy to dark purple in color, 8 × 6 mm; stone ovoid, obtuse, 6 × 3 mm; leaves oblong-lanceolate, 24–25 x 4.5–6 mm; bush 1–2 m high (up to 3–4)...................................................N. tangutorum Bobrov
8. Leaves pubescent or slightly pubescent...................................................9
- Leaves silvery from dense pubescence, calyx densely hairy, petals and ovaries hairy on the outside; leaf 10–15 × 4–6 mm..........................................................................N. praevisa Bobrov
9. Bush 0.6–1.8 m high, dense, with small spines; leaves oblanceolate, elongated, green, 14–16 × 2–3 mm; number of flowers per inflorescence 40–80 (90); petals white, ovate or rhombic with short claws; drupe black, oval or spherical, 4–6 × 4–4.5 mm; stone narrowly ovoid with a narrow pointed apex; 3.5–5 mm long, 2–2.5 mm wide; fruit sap green-black.....................................................................................N. iliensis Banaev&Tomoshevich
- Bush 0.2–0.8 m high, dense, with tightly arranged small spines and oblanceolate bluish-green leaves, 10–13 mm long, 2–3 mm wide; number of flowers per inflorescence 20–48; flowers white, pale-purple in buds; petals white, pointed-elliptical with narrow claws; drupe black, 4–9 × 4–8 mm; stone ovoid-acuminate, 3.6–6 mm long and 2.5–3.5 mm wide; fruit sap dark blue..............................................................................N. sibirica Pall.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The specimens of N. sibirica (11 habitats), N. schoberi (14 habitats), N. komarovii, N. pamirica and N. iliensis were collected in expeditions in Siberia (Novosibirsk region, Altai Territory, Republic of Tuva), Crimea, the Republics of Kazakhstan and Tajikistan in 2011–2017 (Figure 10). Field work was carried out in different seasons to observe species both in the flowering stage and in the fruiting stage. In each population, 25–30 herbarium leaves were collected (more than 800 herbarium specimens in total), and specimens of flowers, fruits, and seeds, which were packed in paper bags, marked and delivered to the laboratory of dendrology of the CSBG SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) for morphometric analysis.
The specimens collected during the expeditions were deposited in the collection of the NSC CSSB SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia) and are available in the digital herbarium of the CSBG SB RAS “http://herb.csbg.nsc.ru:8081 (accessed on 22 December 2022)”. Sample voucher data are shown in Table 2.
Revision of herbarium materials was undertaken in the herbaria at LE, MW, NS, NSK, PE.

3.2. Morphological Analysis

The vegetative and reproductive morphology was studied on well-developed specimens of the generative age state. For numerical analysis, not less than 25 specimens were studied in each population of each species. Table 1 presents 26 morphological characters studied.
Morphological analysis was carried out using a Carl Zeiss Stereo Discovery V12 stereo microscope equipped with a high-resolution color digital camera AxioCam HRc and AxioVision 4.8 software for image acquisition, processing and analysis (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Göttingen, Germany), and the instrumental platform of the SIAMS Photolab image analysis system (SPF AVEK, 2013–2020) with the module morphometric analysis of plants.
Morphometric data were subjected to ANOVA using the STATISTICA 6.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The differences between means were tested for significance using the LSD test at p ≤ 0.05. In addition, clustering was performed with PCA. For PCA, relative metric parameters were additionally included: 4/3 is the ratio of leaf width to leaf length, 5/3 is the ratio of distance from the base to the widest point of the leaf blade to leaf length, and 24/25 is the ratio of stone length to stone width.

3.3. Palynological Analysis

For SEM examination, the air-dried pollen grains were dispersed evenly and put in double-sided adhesive-tape-covered aluminum stubs. The studs were coated with gold in a Mini SC 7620 sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, Great Britain) and photographed under 20.0 kV voltage using the EVO MA10 (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) scanning electron microscope.
About 25 pollen grains of each species were selected randomly, and the polar axis length (P) and equatorial axis length (E) of them were measured. All data were analyzed to calculate the mean (X), standard error (Sx), and the coefficient of variation (CV, %).
Palynological terminology was referenced from former works [56,57,58,59]. The pollen shape class, based on the P/E ratio, was identified using Erdtman’s system [60].

3.4. Molecular Analysis

Two spacer regions, one in the nuclear genome (ITS) and one in the plastid genome (trnH-psbA), were subjected to the molecular analysis. DNA was extracted from dried leaves using the conventional CTAB-based method [61]. The concentration and amount of the extracted DNA were evaluated in 0.8% agarose gel and using a spectrophotometer (NanoPhotometer P-Class, P-360, Implen, Munich, Germany). For amplification of different DNA sequences, a ready-made kit of GenePak® PCR Core reagents (Laboratory Izogen, Moscow, Russia) was used. For amplification of the ITS operon, which includes intergenic spacers ITS1, ITS2, and the 5.8 s gene, primers ITS6 and ITS9 developed for East Asian species of the tribe Spiraeeae [62] were used. The amplification cycle included denaturation at 94 °C for 1 m, primer annealing at 58 °C for 50 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 m within 30 cycles.
For amplification of the trnH–psbA chloroplast locus, universal primers were used [63]. The PCR cycle included denaturation at 95 °C for 40 s, primer annealing at 59 °C for 50 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 90 s within 32 cycles. The quality of the obtained PCR fragments was verified in 1.5% agarose gel and purified with a kit for rapid DNA elution from agarose gels Diatom DNA Elution (Laboratory Izogen, Moscow, Russia).
Sequencing was performed in both directions for ITS and trnH-psbA at ZAO Evrogen, using an automatic analyzer model ABI PRISM 3500. Sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v. 1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit. The subsequent purification of products was performed using the BigDye XTerminator Purification Kit.
The sequences were viewed using Data Collection v. 3.1 and were read using Sequencing Analysis Software v.6. The sequences were pairwise-aligned using the BioEdit v.7.1.9 program [64], multiple alignment was performed using the ClustalW2 program, followed by verification of ambiguous positions in the chromatograms and manual editing. Aligned sequences were analyzed using the MEGA X program [65]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the UPGMA method and the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura–Ney model [66]. To construct the phylogenetic tree, we employed fragments deposited in GenBankNCBI (N. sphaerocarpa: DQ267177; KP087761; N. retusa: KP087772; KP087764; N. roborowskii: DQ309042; KP087762; N. tangutorum: DQ267176, KP087763; N. billardieri: KP087775; KP087767; N. komarovii: KP087774; KP087766). Peganum harmala L. (KP087776; KP087768) was used as the outgroup closely related to the genus Nitraria.

3.5. HPLC-MS Analysis

Samples of air-dried and ground plant material (0.5 g leaves) were extracted with ethanol–water (50:50, v/v) in a water bath at 60–70 °C. The extract was purified using a C16 Diapack cartridge and dissolved in 70% ethanol. Mass spectrometric analysis was carried out at the Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia). HPLC-MS analysis was performed using an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, USA) and a micrOTOF-Q hybrid quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) with API-ES. Positive ions were identified in the range of 100–3000 m/z. Chromatographic separation was carried out at 30 °C using a Zorbax SB-C18 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, inner diameter 3.5 µm) with a ZorbaxSB-C8 guard column (2.1 mm × 12.5 mm, inner diameter 5 µm). The composition of the mobile phase changed in a linear gradient from 15:85 (v/v) methanol (phase A) and 2% formic acid in water (phase B) to 100:0 (v/v) in 30 min, then in isocratic mode from 30 to 45 min. The volume of the injected sample was 10 µL. UV detection was carried out at four wavelengths/bandwidths: 255/16, 270/16, 320/16, 340/32 nm. Mass detection operating parameters were as follows: dryer gas flow (nitrogen) 8 L/min, nitrogen temperature 230 °C, nebulizer pressure 1.6 bar.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V.B. and M.A.T.; methodology, M.A.T. and A.A.E.; software, A.S.E.; validation, A.S.E.; formal analysis, S.A.K.; investigation, S.A.K.; resources, E.V.B. and M.A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.T.; writing—review and editing, E.V.B.; visualization, A.A.E. and M.A.T.; project administration, E.V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program of the scientific research “Theoretical and applied aspects of studying gene pools of natural plant populations and conservation of plant diversity ‘outside the typical environment’ (ex situ)” (AAAA-A21-121011290027-6).

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this publication, materials of bioresource scientific collections of the CSBG SB RAS “Collections of living plants indoors and outdoors”, unique scientific unit USU_440534, and “Herbarium of higher plants, lichens and fungi (NS, NSK)” USU-4450537 were used.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Engler, A. Zygophyllaceae, Rutaceae, Simaroubaceae, Burseraceae. In Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed.; Engler, A., Prantl, K., Eds.; Engelmann: Leipzig, Germany, 1931; Volume 19a, pp. 144–184, 187–456. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachelier, J.B.; Endress, P.K.; Ronse de Craene, L. Comparative floral structure and development of Nitrariaceae (Sapindales) and systematic implications. In Flowers on the Tree of Life; Wantntorp, L., Ronse de Craene, L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 181–217. [Google Scholar]
  3. Woutersen, A.; Jardine, P.E.; Bogotá-Angel, R.G.; Zhang, H.; Silvestro, D.; Antonelli, A.; Gogna, E.; Erkens, R.H.J.; Gosling, W.D.; Dupont-Nivet, G.; et al. A novel approach to study the morphology and chemistry of pollen in a phylogenetic context, applied to the halophytic taxon Nitraria L. (Nitrariaceae). PeerJ 2018, 6, e5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tomoshevich, M.; Banaev, E.; Khozyaykina, S.; Erst, A. Pollen morphology of some species from genus Nitraria. Plants 2022, 11, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Komarov, V.L. Introduction to the floras of China and Mongolia. Tr. S.-Peterb. Bot. Sada 1908, 19, 1–179. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Chafoor, A. Zygophyllaceae. In Flora of West Pakistan; Nasir, E., Ali, S.I., Eds.; Department of Botany, University of Karachi: Karachi, Pakistan, 1974; Volume 76, pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pallas, P.S. Journey through Different Provinces of the Russian State. Part Three. Half First; Imperial Academy of Sciences: St. Petersburg, Russia, 1788; 655p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Trautvetter, R.E. Observations on plants by Dre. G. Radde in 1870 collected in Turcomania and Transcaucasia, and also in some other places. Acta Horti Petropolitani 1871, 1, 13–34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Il’in, M.M. Nitraria and the origin of desert flora. Priroda 1944, 5–6, 116–118. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kovtonyuk, N.K.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Banaev, E.V. Typification of the name Nitraria komarovii (Nitrariaceae). Bot. Pac. 2019, 8, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Petrov, M.P. Systematics and geography of Nitraria L. in Asia. In History of Flora and Vegetation of Eurasia; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1972; pp. 156–181. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Grubov, V.I. Guide for Identification of Vascular Plants of Mongolia; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1982; pp. 175–177. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Su, Z.; Lu, W.; Zhang, M. Phylogeographical patterns of two closely related desert shrubs, Nitraria roborowskii and N. sphaerocarpa (Nitrariaceae), from arid north-western China. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 108, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bobrov, E.G. On the origin of flora of the deserts of the Old World in conjunction with the review of Nitraria genus. Bot. Zh. 1965, 50, 1053–1057. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Bobrov, E.G. About Asian species of the genus Nitraria L. Sov. Bot. 1946, 14, 19–30. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Vasil’eva, L.I. A new species of the genus Nitraria L. from the Pamirs. Nov. Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 1974, 11, 341–344. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pan, X.-Y.; Wei, X.-P.; Yu, Q.-S.; Chen, J.-K.; Wang, G.-X. Polyploidy: Classification, evolution and applied perspective of the genus Nitraria. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2003, 20, 632–638. [Google Scholar]
  18. El-Kheir, Z.A.A.; El-Monayeri, M.O.; EL-Raof, D.A. Evaluation of genetic diversity between some Nitraria retusa populations using molecular markers. Al-Azhar Bull. Sci. 2006, 17, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Temirbayeva, K.; Zhang, M.L. Molecular phylogenetic and biogeographical analysis of Nitraria based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 2015, 30, 1897–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.-L.; Song, M.-F.; Guan, Y.-H.; Li, H.-T.; Niu, Y.-F.; Zhang, L.-X.; Ma, X.-J. DNA barcoding in medicinal plants: Testing the potential of a proposed barcoding marker for identification of Uncaria species from China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 60, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Yamtyrov, M.B. On variation of metric and qualitative characters of Nitraria L. species in the context of ecological-climatic conditions of habitats in Siberia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2017, 10, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Banaev, E.V.; Khozyaykina, S.A.; Dorogina, O.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A. Genetic diversity of Nitraria sibirica Pall. (Nitrariaceae) in the populations of Siberia and Kazakhstan based on the polymorphism of intermicrosatellite markers. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2022, 15, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fan, W.Y.; Zhou, C.J.; Wang, Y.C. Confirmation of natural hybrids between two species of Nitraria in Inner Mongolia based on molecular evidence. Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident. Sin. 2011, 31, 913–919. [Google Scholar]
  24. Baitenov, M.S. Flora of Kazakhstan, 1st ed.; Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1999; 400p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Baitenov, M.S. Flora of Kazakhstan, 2nd ed.; Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2001; 280p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ovchinnikov, P.N. Flora of the Tajik SSR, 6th ed.; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1981; 725p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Krasnoborov, I.M.; Lomonosova, M.N.; Shaulo, D.N.; Kutsev, M.G.; Krasnikov, A.A.; Shmakov, A.I.; German, D.A.; Smirnov, S.V.; Doronkin, V.M.; Durnikin, D.A.; et al. Key to Plants of the Altai Territory; Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Branch “Geo”: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2003; 492p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Krasnoborov, I.M.; Lomonosova, M.N.; Shaulo, D.N.; Vibe, E.I.; Zhirova, O.S.; Korolyuk, E.A.; Krasnikov, A.A.; Snytko, O.N.; Tupitsyna, N.N. Key to Plants of the Novosibirsk Region; Nauka SO RAN: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2000; 492p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shaulo, D.N.; Krasnoborov, I.M.; Lomonosova, M.N.; Krasnikov, A.A.; Artemov, I.A.; Baikov, K.S. Key to Plants of the Tyva Republic; Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2007; 706p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavlov, N.V. Flora of Kazakhstan, 6th ed.; Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR: Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 1963; pp. 52–53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tomoshevich, M.A.; Banaev, E.V.; Ak-Lama, T.A. Nitraria komarovii Iljin & Lava ex Bobrov (Nitrariaceae), a new record for the flora of Kazakhstan. Check List 2019, 15, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Polyakova, T.A.; Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A. Identification of species in the genus Nitraria L. (Nitrariaceae) based on nucleotide variability of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Vavilovskii Zh. Genet. Sel. 2020, 24, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banaev, E.V.; Poliakova, T.A.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Ak-Lama, T.A. Using the ITS2 transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA to identify species of the genus Nitraria. In Proceedings of the International Conferences Plant Diversity: Status, Trends, Conservation Concept, Novosibirsk, Russia, 30 September–3 October 2020; Volume 24, p. 00009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Voronkova, M.S.; Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Ak-Lama, T.A. Possibilities of using the HPLC method in the taxonomy of the genus Nitraria (Nitrariaceae). In Proceedings of the International Conferences Plant Diversity: Status, Trends, Conservation Concept, Novosibirsk, Russia, 30 September–3 October 2020; Volume 24, p. 00096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Ak-Lama, T.A. Morphological variability of Nitraria species in Central and Southern Kazakhstan. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2021, 14, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peshkova, G.A. Family Nitrariaceae. In Flora of Siberia; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1996; Volume 10, pp. 34–35. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Koropachinskii, I.Y. Tree Flora of Siberia; Botanica Pacifica: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2016. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang, M.L.; Temirbayeva, K.; Sanderson, S.; Chen, X. Young dispersal of xerophil Nitraria lineages in intercontinental disjunctions of the Old World. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Schneyer, V.S.; Rodionov, A.V. Plant DNA barcodes. Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol. Adv. Curr. Biol. 2018, 138, 531–538. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, L.; Li, X.; Hao, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhang, J.; Peng, Y.; Xu, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; et al. Phylogenetic studies and comparative chloroplast genome analyses elucidate the basal position of halophyte Nitraria sibirica (Nitrariaceae) in the Sapindales. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2018, 29, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dong, Q.; Hu, N.; Suo, Y.; Chi, X.; Wang, H. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of two species from Nitraria. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1229–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Paica, I.C.; Banciu, C.; Maria, G.M.; Vladimirescu, M.; Manole, A. Genetic diversity in marginal populations of Nitraria schoberi L. from Romania. Diversity 2022, 14, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Du, Q.; Xin, H.; Peng, C. Pharmacology and phytochemistry of the Nitraria genus (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saleh, N.A.M.; El-Hadidi, M.H. An approach to the chemosystematics of the Zygophyllaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1977, 5, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, M.Y.; Zuanazzi, J.A.; Kan, C.; Quirion, J.C.; Husson, H.P.; Bick, I.R.C. Alkaloids from Nitraria billardieri. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1995, 6, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sameh, R.H.; Salwa, A.K.; Mohamed, E.T.; Nabiel, A.M.; Saleh, N. Chemosystematic studies of Nitraria retusa and selected taxa of Zygophyllaceae in Egypt. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 277, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tulyaganov, T.S.; Allaberdiev, F.K. Alkaloids from plants of the Nitraria genus. Structure of sibiridine. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2003, 39, 292–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tulyaganov, T.S.; Nazarov, O.M.; Levkovich, M.G.; Abdullaev, N.D. Alkaloids of the Nitraria genus. Komavine and acetylkomavine. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2001, 37, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Turghun, C.; Bakri, M.; Zou, G.A.; Bobakulov, K.M.; Aisa, H.A. Phenolic compounds from leaves of Nitraria sibirica. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 987–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Duan, J.A.; Zhou, R.H.; Zhao, S.X. The chemical constituents of flavonoids and phenolic acid compounds of leaves from Nitraria tangutorum Bor. J. Plant Resour. Environ. 1999, 8, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  51. Barbhan, N.; Miladi, I.; Ali, S.I.; Poupon, E.; Mohamed, A.A.; Beniddir, M.A. Chemical constituents of Nitraria retusa grown in Egypt. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2017, 53, 994–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Banaev, E.V.; Voronkova, M.S.; Vysochina, G.I.; Tomoshevich, M.A. Population structure and differentiation of the Siberian representatives of the genus Nitraria L. (Nitrariaceae) based on the composition and content of phenolic compounds in leaves. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2015, 8, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Voronkova, M.S.; Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A. Comparative study of the composition and content of phenolic compounds of leaves of plants of the genus Nitraria (Nitrariaceae). Khim. Rast. Syr’ya 2017, 4, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Akhani, H. Notes on the flora of Iran: 1. Asparagus (Asparagaceae) and Nitraria (Zygophyllaceae). Edinb. J. Bot. 2002, 59, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. El-Hadidi, M.N. Zygophyllaceae. In Flora Iranica; Rechinger, K.H., Ed.; Akademische Druck-u.-Verlagsanstalt: Graz, Austria, 1972; Volume 98, pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  56. Erdtman, G. Pollen and Plant Taxonomy Angiosperms; Hafner Publ. Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1986; 553p. [Google Scholar]
  57. Punt, W.; Hoen, P.P.; Blackmore, S.; Nilsson, S.; Le Thomas, A. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2007, 143, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hessen, M.; Halbritter, H.; Zetter, R.; Weber, M.; Buchner, R.; Frosch-Radivo, A.; Ulrich, S. Pollen Terminology an Illustrated Handbook; SpringerWein: New York, NY, USA, 2009; 266p. [Google Scholar]
  59. Halbritter, H.; Ulrich, S.; Grímsson, F.; Weber, M.; Zetter, R.; Hesse, M.; Frosch-Radivo, A. Illustrated Pollen Terminology; Springer International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; p. 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Erdtman, G. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy–Angiosperms: An Introduction to Palynology; Almqvist & Wiksell: Stockholm, Sweden; Chronica Botanica: Waltham, MA, USA, 1952; Volume 1, 539p. [Google Scholar]
  61. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  62. Potter, D.; Still, S.M.; Grebenc, T.; Ballian, D.; Božič, G.; Franjiæ, J.; Kraigher, H. Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Spiraea (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 2007, 266, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sang, T.; Crawford, D.J.; Stuessy, T.F. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1997, 84, 1120–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of various morphological characters of Nitraria species. (a) Scatter plot of various populations represented in two major principal component axes. N. iliensis (red), N. sibirica (green), N. schoberi (grey), N. komarovii (blue) and N. pamirica (yellow). (b) Grouping of the variables in two principal components. The most relevant characters of each principal component are shaded. See Table 1 for character number, Table 2 for specimen number.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of various morphological characters of Nitraria species. (a) Scatter plot of various populations represented in two major principal component axes. N. iliensis (red), N. sibirica (green), N. schoberi (grey), N. komarovii (blue) and N. pamirica (yellow). (b) Grouping of the variables in two principal components. The most relevant characters of each principal component are shaded. See Table 1 for character number, Table 2 for specimen number.
Plants 12 00593 g001
Figure 2. SEM analysis of Nitraria pollen grains: N. sibirica (a1,a2); N. komarovii (b1,b2); N. shoberi (c1,c2); N. pamirica (d1,d2); N. iliensis (e1,e2); 1—equatorial view, 2—details of the exine surface.
Figure 2. SEM analysis of Nitraria pollen grains: N. sibirica (a1,a2); N. komarovii (b1,b2); N. shoberi (c1,c2); N. pamirica (d1,d2); N. iliensis (e1,e2); 1—equatorial view, 2—details of the exine surface.
Plants 12 00593 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from the combined ITS and cpDNA data using the UPGMA method. The number near branches are bootstrap values (BS > 50%). Red symbols—N. iliensis.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from the combined ITS and cpDNA data using the UPGMA method. The number near branches are bootstrap values (BS > 50%). Red symbols—N. iliensis.
Plants 12 00593 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree inferred from the combined ITS and cpDNA data using the ML method. The number near branches are bootstrap values (BS > 50%). Red symbols—N. iliensis.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree inferred from the combined ITS and cpDNA data using the ML method. The number near branches are bootstrap values (BS > 50%). Red symbols—N. iliensis.
Plants 12 00593 g004
Figure 5. HPLC-MS chromatograms of 70% water–ethanol extracts Nitraria leaves: (a) N. sibirica, (b) N. iliensis. The abscissa is the retention time, t, min; ordinate—optical density, e.o.p., mAU; 1—rutin; 6—quercitin; 13—hyperoside; 18—baicalin; 20—dihydroxymethoxyflavone; 25, 712, 14–17, 19—unidentified compounds.
Figure 5. HPLC-MS chromatograms of 70% water–ethanol extracts Nitraria leaves: (a) N. sibirica, (b) N. iliensis. The abscissa is the retention time, t, min; ordinate—optical density, e.o.p., mAU; 1—rutin; 6—quercitin; 13—hyperoside; 18—baicalin; 20—dihydroxymethoxyflavone; 25, 712, 14–17, 19—unidentified compounds.
Plants 12 00593 g005
Figure 6. Holotype of N. iliensis Banaev & Tomoshevich, sp. nov. (NSK 3001499).
Figure 6. Holotype of N. iliensis Banaev & Tomoshevich, sp. nov. (NSK 3001499).
Plants 12 00593 g006
Figure 7. Paratype of N. iliensis Banaev & Tomoshevich, sp. nov. (NSK 3001277).
Figure 7. Paratype of N. iliensis Banaev & Tomoshevich, sp. nov. (NSK 3001277).
Plants 12 00593 g007
Figure 8. Morphological differences amongst (a1a3) N. schoberi, (b1b3) N. komarovii, (c1c3) N. sibirica, (d1d3) N. iliensis, and (e1e3) N. pamirica at the flowering stage, 1—habit, 2—flowers, 3—inflorescence. Photo by Banaev E.V.
Figure 8. Morphological differences amongst (a1a3) N. schoberi, (b1b3) N. komarovii, (c1c3) N. sibirica, (d1d3) N. iliensis, and (e1e3) N. pamirica at the flowering stage, 1—habit, 2—flowers, 3—inflorescence. Photo by Banaev E.V.
Plants 12 00593 g008
Figure 9. Morphological differences amongst (a1a3) N. schoberi, (b1b3) N. komarovii, (c1c3) N. sibirica, (d1d3) N. iliensis and (e1e3) N. pamirica at fruiting stage, 1—habit, 2—fruit, 3—stone. Photo by Banaev E.V.
Figure 9. Morphological differences amongst (a1a3) N. schoberi, (b1b3) N. komarovii, (c1c3) N. sibirica, (d1d3) N. iliensis and (e1e3) N. pamirica at fruiting stage, 1—habit, 2—fruit, 3—stone. Photo by Banaev E.V.
Plants 12 00593 g009
Figure 10. Distribution map of research specimens of the genus Nitraria. The collectors of all the samples indicated on the map are Banaev E.V. and Tomoshevich M.A.
Figure 10. Distribution map of research specimens of the genus Nitraria. The collectors of all the samples indicated on the map are Banaev E.V. and Tomoshevich M.A.
Plants 12 00593 g010
Table 1. Morphological characters of Nitraria species.
Table 1. Morphological characters of Nitraria species.
Number of CharacterCharacterN. schoberiN. sibiricaN. komaroviiN. pamiricaN. iliensis
1Height of bush (m)0.7–1.50.2–0.8 0.5–10.1–0.30.6–1.8
2HabitSpreading-branchingSpreading-branching, dense Branching, gracefulSpreading, denseSpreading-branching, dense
3Leaf length (mm) 20–2610–1325–2813–1714–16
4Leaf width (mm)3–62–42–3,52–32–3
5Distance from the base to the widest point of the leaf blade (mm)15–168–9221010–12
6Leaf colorDark-green, shiny Glaucescent-green Pale green Green, matteGreen
7Leaf shapeOblanceolate OblanceolateNarrow, linear-spathulate Oblanceolate, with a pointed apexOblanceolate
8FlowersYellowish-white White (buds pale-violet) Yellowish-white WhiteWhite
9Number of flowers per inflorescence11–2820–4817–309–1540–80
10Flower spacing (mm) 0.4–0.80.2–0.30.3–0.70.2–0.30.3–0.5
11Petal shapeOvate or rhombic; claws short Acuminate-elliptica; claws narrow Ovate;
claws short
Ovate;
claws short
Ovate or rhombic; claws short
12Petal length (mm)3–4.72.6–41.7–3.92.1–2.33.5
13Petal width (mm)2–3.61–2.81–2.90.7–0.92.6
14Anther length (mm)1.2–1.40.6–0.91.3-0.8
15Anther width (mm)0.5–0.70.3–0.50.7-0.5–0.6
16Pestle length (mm)2.02–4.51.35–3.192.01–3.59-2.05
17Pestle width (mm)1.38–2.230.97–1.411.09–1.82-1.22
18Fruit colorDark-red to black Black Yellow, orange, or pale to bright red Cherry redBlack
19Fruit length (mm)7–104–98–127–84–6
20Fruit width (mm)6–114–87–114–54–4.5
21Weight of 100 fruits (g)270–600100–270380–49080–9080–130
22Fruit shapeOval Globate or oval Oval Oval Globate or oval
23Fruit sapPale reddish Dark-blue Pale pink Pale pink Black–green
24Stone length (mm)7–103,6–68,6–115–63.5–5
25Stone width (mm)4.5–6.52.5–3.54.7–62.0–2.52–2.6
26Stone shapeOvate, obtuse Ovate, pointed Conic-ovate with a pointed apex Oblong-conical, Narrow ovoid with a narrow pointed apex
Table 2. Vaucher specimens of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae).
Table 2. Vaucher specimens of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae).
No.TaxonSpecimenLocalityDateHerbarium, Specimen Number
1N. sibiricaNoven’koeRussia, Altai Krai, Loktevsky District, vicinity of Noven’koe village31 May 2011NSK3001284
2N. sibiricaVeseloyarskRussia, Altai Krai, Rubtsovsky District, vicinity of Veseloyarsk village31 May 2011NSK3001286
3N. sibiricaKulundaRussia, Altai Krai, Slavgorodskiy District, on the shore of Lake Kulundinskoe2 June 2011NSK3001276
4N. sibiricaBeleRussia, Republic of Tyva, Tandinsky kozhuun, northern shore of Lake Bele22 July 2011NSK3001016
5N. sibiricaBalansorRussia, Altai Krai, Uglovskiy District, on the shore of Lake Balansor1 June 2011NSK3001280
6N. sibiricaDzhiraRussia, Altai Krai, Kulundinsky District, eastern shore of Lake Dzhira2 June 2011NSK3001283
7N. sibiricaGornyakRussia, Altai Krai, Loktevsky District, vicinity of Gornyak village31 May 2011NSK3001289
8N. sibiricaKuchukRussia, Altai Krai, Blagoveshchensky District, vicinity of Nizhny Kuchuk village2 June 2011NSK3001274
9N. sibiricaYarovoeRussia, Altai Krai, Tabunsky District, southern shore of Bolshoye Yarovoe Lake3 June 2011NSK3001282
10N. sibiricaShara-NurRussia, Tyva Republic, Tes-Khemsky kozhuun, the shore of Lake Shara-Nur28 July 2011NSK3000991
11N. sibiricaRubtsovskRussia, Altai Krai, vicinity of Rubtsovsk city15 June 2013NSK3001785
12N. schoberiBalhashRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, on the shore of Lake Balkhash, sandy desert31 May 2016NSK3000948
13N. schoberiSariozekRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, 30 km north of Sariozek village25 May 2016NSK3000947
14N. schoberiBasshiRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, vicinity of Basshi village25 May 2016NSK3000982
15N. schoberiAidarliRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, Zhambylskii District, 17 km south of Aidarli village21 August 2017NSK3000958
16N. schoberiKoktalRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, vicinity of Koktal village30 July 2013NSK3000999
17N. schoberiLepsiRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, on the bank of the Lepsi River in outskirts of Lepsi village30 May 2016NSK3000981
18N. schoberiRaz’ezd_47Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty region, vicinity of the village of Molaly (railroad junction No. 47)15 August 2017NSK3000944
19N. schoberiBaganRussia, Novosibirskaya Oblast’, southwest of the village Grushevka, on the terrace of Lake Bol’shoy Bagan4 June 2011NSK3000973
20N. schoberiKaspiiRepublic of Kazakhstan, Mangistauskaya Oblast’, vicinity of Aktau city, on sandy mound12 June 2012NSK3000979
21N. schoberiActauRepublic of Kazakhstan, Mangistauskaya Oblast’, vicinity of Aktau city12 June 2012NSK3000978
22N. schoberiKrimCrimea, on the sandy coast of the Black Sea in Dvuyakornaya Bay16 September 2013NSK3000960
23N. schoberiPyandzhRepublic of Tajikistan, Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region, on the sandy bank of the Pyandzh River8 August 2014NSK3000994
24N. schoberiKulundaRussia, Altai Krai, Slavgorodskiy District, on the shore of Lake Kulundinskoe2 June 2011NSK3000975
25N. schoberiMalinovoeRussia, Altai Krai, Mikhailovskiy District, on the shore of Lake Malinovoe1 June 2011NSK3000971
26N. komaroviiBalhashRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, on the shore of Lake Balhash, sandy desert31 May 2016NSK3000920
27N. iliensisBasshi 1Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, vicinity of Basshi village25 May 2016NSK3001499
28N. iliensisBasshi 2Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, vicinity of Basshi village30 July 2013NSK3001277
29N. iliensisTaskarasuRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, vicinity of Taskarasu village26 May 2016NSK3001244
30N. iliensisKaratalRepublic of Kazakhstan, Almaty Region, Karatalskii District, vicinity of Ushtobe city, on the terrace of the Karatal River29 May 2016NSK3000922
31N. pamiricaShaimakRepublic of Tajikistan, Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Region, Eastern Pamir, on the cliff of the Djilga River10 August 2014NSK3001238
Table 3. Sizes (μm) and shape of pollen grains of Nitraria. The data are presented as the mean (X), standard error (Sx), and the coefficient of variation (CV, %).
Table 3. Sizes (μm) and shape of pollen grains of Nitraria. The data are presented as the mean (X), standard error (Sx), and the coefficient of variation (CV, %).
TaxaPolar Axis (P)Equatorial Axis (E)P/EShape
RangeX ± SxCV, %RangeX ± SxCV, %RangeX ± SxCV, %
N. sibirica36.11–43.3340.24 ± 0.344.317.07–23.5020.48 ± 0.307.51.73–2.281.97 ± 0.025.8prolate
N. komarovii23.38–29.5027.15 ± 0.305.614.23–18.9116.42 ± 0.309.11.44–1.891.66 ± 0.028.0prolate
N. schoberi38.19–49.9042.84 ± 0.627.222.28–32.5927.84 ± 0.6511.01.24–2.051.57 ± 0.0516.5prolate
N. pamirica30.13–36.0732.29 ± 0.324.924.87–30.6226.50 ± 0.285.31.18–1.271.22 ± 0.0052.0subprolate
N. iliensis31.41–36.0033.82 ± 0.324.821.10–27.0825.81 ± 0.509.71.10–1.511.32 ± 0.026.7subprolate or prolate
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banaev, E.V.; Tomoshevich, M.A.; Khozyaykina, S.A.; Erst, A.A.; Erst, A.S. Integrative Taxonomy of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae), Description of the New Enigmatic Species and Key to All Currently Known Species. Plants 2023, 12, 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030593

AMA Style

Banaev EV, Tomoshevich MA, Khozyaykina SA, Erst AA, Erst AS. Integrative Taxonomy of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae), Description of the New Enigmatic Species and Key to All Currently Known Species. Plants. 2023; 12(3):593. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030593

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banaev, Evgeny V., Maria A. Tomoshevich, Sofia A. Khozyaykina, Anna A. Erst, and Andrey S. Erst. 2023. "Integrative Taxonomy of Nitraria (Nitrariaceae), Description of the New Enigmatic Species and Key to All Currently Known Species" Plants 12, no. 3: 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030593

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop