Next Article in Journal
Global Status of Vegetable Soybean
Next Article in Special Issue
Ecological Preferences and Diversity of Essential Oil Composition in Endangered Wild-Growing Populations of Sideritis sipylea Boiss. (Lamiaceae) of the East Aegean Islands (Greece): Evidencing Antioxidant Potential, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Agronomic, Physicochemical, Aromatic and Sensory Characterization of Four Sweet Cherry Accessions of the Campania Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
(1′S)-1′-Acetoxyeugenol Acetate Enhances Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Medicinal Potential of Achillea grandifolia in Greek Wild-Growing Populations: Characterization of Volatile Compounds, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Inflorescences

by
Olga S. Tsiftsoglou
1,*,
Maria-Eleni Atskakani
1,
Nikos Krigas
2,*,
Michalis K. Stefanakis
3,
Christos Gounaris
1,
Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina
4 and
Diamanto Lazari
1
1
Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(3), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030613
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 30 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemistry of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants)

Abstract

:
Various species of the genus Achillea L. (Asteraceae) are traditionally used worldwide for wound healing against diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pains, as diuretic and emmenagogue agents. In the present study, the essential oils (EOs) obtained separately from the leaves and inflorescences of wild-growing Achillea grandifolia Friv. from Mt. Menoikio and Mt. Pelion (Greece) were analyzed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. The major compounds found in EOs of A. grandifolia inflorescences from Mt. Menoikio were as follows: cis-thujone (36.9%), 1,8-cineole (11.9%), camphor (10.0%), ascaridole (7.3%), α-terpinene (6.4%), sabinene (4.1%), trans-thujone (3.6%), and cis-jasmone (3.4%). In leaves from Mt. Menoikio, they were as follows: cis-thujone (50.8%), 1,8-cineole (20.0%), trans-thujone (5.5%), camphor (5.5%), borneol (3.6%), and α-terpineol (3.1%). In inflorescences from Mt. Pelion, they were as follows: camphor (70.5%), camphene (5.9%), cis-jasmone (3.2%), bornyl acetate (3.2%). In leaves from Mt. Pelion, they were as follows: camphor (83.2%), camphene (3.9%), and borneol (3.7%). Subsequently, the samples were first time tested for their antioxidant activities with the interaction of EOs with DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and their inhibition of lipid peroxidation, as well as for their anti-inflammatory activity through the soybean LOX (lipoxygenase) inhibition. All of the examined samples were found effective. A. grandifolia leaves presented the highest antioxidant potential according to the DPPH method, and the highest percentage of LOX inhibition. The study herein investigated for the first time the leaves and the inflorescences of A. grandifolia separately, and the results generally align with similar studies from neighboring countries (Turkey and Serbia) in terms of the yields and categorization of main EO compounds (oxygenated monoterpenes). However, the findings were not in agreement with previously studied Greek material, as a higher amount of cis-thujone and lower antioxidant activity are reported herein. Both the EOs of inflorescences and the leaves of the wild-growing population collected from Mt. Menoikio were characterized by a high quantity of cis-thujone (36.9% and 50.8%, respectively).

1. Introduction

The genus Achillea L. (Asteraceae) includes about 130 species worldwide [1]. The name Achillea has its roots in Greek mythology, originating from the ancient Greek hero Achilles, who is believed to have used yarrow to treat his soldiers’ wounds during the Trojan War [2]. The most common species in this genus is A. millefolium L., which is commonly known as “yarrow” and has been used for thousands of years in folk medicine due to its pharmaceutical properties such as anti-inflammatory of hepato-biliary and an anti-spasmodic effect on gastro-intestinal disorders [3]. The genus Achillea in Greece comprises about 25% of the genus’ diversity, namely 32 species and subspecies including 7 Greek endemic ones [4]. Today, many Achillea spp. have been traditionally used in wound healing, for abdominal pain, against diarrhea and flatulence, for symptomatic relief of colds and ulcer, as diuretic or emmenagogue, appetizer, carminative, and as insecticidal agents [5,6,7,8,9]. Besides their scientifically approved medicinal applications such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer, spasmolytic, and choleretic, Achillea spp. Are also used as additives in food products, in gardening as ornamentals, or for cut flowers, while their essential oils and extracts are also used in cosmetology [10,11].
Achillea grandifolia Friv. belongs to the Sectio Millefolium (DC.) W. Koch, together with the closely related and widespread A. millefolium. In contrast with the latter, A. grandifolia is a range-restricted species which is endemic to the south and central parts of the Balkan Peninsula extending to Anatolia in Turkey. Within this range, it is naturally found as a wild-growing native plant in woodlands and forest edges, from intermediate altitudes and forested mountainous areas to subalpine levels [12,13]. To date, literature data reporting the composition of the essential oils extracted from aerial parts of A. grandifolia are limited. All previous studies have investigated plant material from wild-growing populations [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], as well as from cultivated plants in Kazakhstan [22], and most of the extant information is related with the wild populations of Turkey [20,21] or Serbia [15,16,17,18,19]. There is only one study concerning the essential oil of wild-growing A. grandifolia from Greece, originating from the deciduous Carpinus forest of Vikos Gorge (Pindus Mountain range, Epirus) at an altitude of 500 m [14].
In this framework, the aim of this study was firstly to investigate the essential oil composition in the leaves and the inflorescences of the wild-growing populations of A. grandifolia found in Greece, and, consequently, to explore their respective antioxidant potential and anti-inflammatory activities. It must be mentioned that to the best of our knowledge there are no other reported studies concerning the anti-inflammatory activity of the essential oil of this particular Achillea species. The study herein is also the first one investigating separately the essential oils in the inflorescences and the leaves of this species; this is actually in line with similar investigations that have already been performed previously in other members of Achillea such as A. ligustica All. [23] and A. coarctata Poir. From Greece [24]. The investigation herein is aimed to update and amend an old phytochemical study that examined plant material originating from Greece [14], and to complement or contrast with other similar studies from Serbia [15,16,17,18,19] and Turkey [20,21].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Composition of the Studied Essential Oils

The more complex essential oils were those obtained from Mt. Menοikio inflorescences (AG-I-M) with 30 compounds, followed by the corresponding sample of leaves from the same area (AG-L-M) with 27 compounds, whereas Mt. Pelion’s inflorescences (AG-I-P) and leaves (AG-L-P) were quite simpler (11 and 6 compounds, respectively) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). It is notable that the relative compositions of the studied samples of essential oils were totally different. Despite the detected differences, however, the majority of the components were oxygenated monoterpenes while the essential oil obtained from the inflorescences in both cases (samples from Mt. Menoikio and Mt. Pelion) was almost 10% richer in detected compounds than that of the leaves. It should be noted that none of the two studied essential oils (leaves, inflorescences) from Mt. Pelion provided sesquiterpenoids. Moreover, the essential oils of the inflorescences were richer in monoterpenoids hydrocarbons compared to leaves from the same wild-growing populations. Furthermore, p-cymene and cis-jasmone were found in higher quantity in essential oil from inflorescences compared with that of the leaves. The proportion of α-terpinene and ascaridole in the essential oil from the inflorescences of Mt. Menoikio (AG-I-M) was high, and characterized only this particular sample. Previous phytochemical studies in A. grandifolia from Greece have reported that the most abundant compounds in its essential oil are camphor (25.6%), 1,8-cineole (12.8%), cis-thujone (11.9%), and trans-thujone (9.2%) [14]. However, these compounds and their proportions differ considerably from those reported in the present study.
Table 1 presents the yields of the volatile fractions separately for leaves and inflorescences, the percentage (%) of identified compounds, as well as major group compounds of the studied samples. All the different components (n = 38) of the essential oils of the studied samples are listed in Table 1 according to their increasing retention times. In all cases, the extracted oil was yellowish to green in color. The yields of the volatile fractions obtained from A. grandifolia from Mt. Pelion’s inflorescences (AG-I-P) and leaves (AG-L-P) were 0.38% and 0.12%, respectively, while those from Mt. Menoikio (AG-I-M and AG-L-M) were 0.25% and 0.16%, respectively, on dry weight basis.
Regarding A. grandifolia from Mt. Pelion, at least 11 compounds were identified in the essential oil from its inflorescences (representing 91.4% of the total oil extracted), and 7 compounds were identified in the essential oil of its leaves (representing 95.5% of the oil extracted), while 6 compounds were found both in its inflorescences and leaves. Both of these essential oils were classified as camphor chemotype. Concerning A. grandifolia from Mt. Menikio, at least 30 compounds were identified in the essential oil from its inflorescences (representing 97.9% of the total oil extracted) and 27 compounds were identified in the EO of its leaves (representing 97% of the oil extracted), while 23 compounds were found both in its inflorescences and leaves. Both of these essential oils were classified as cis-thujone chemotype.

2.2. Biological Activities

In this study, the essential oils were evaluated in vitro for their antioxidant activities through their anti-lipid peroxidation activities and their interaction with the free stable radical DPPH, as well as for their anti-inflammatory activity through the in vitro inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase (LOX). Lipoxygenase (LOX) is the key enzyme involved in membrane lipid peroxidation by forming hydroperoxides, thus it is considered a target for inflammatory diseases. LOX inhibitors may act either as radical scavengers or inhibitors of free radical production, since lipoxygenation occurs via a carbon-centered radical. LOX inhibitors bearing an antioxidant profile could be expected to offer protection in inflammatory conditions and lead to potentially effective drugs. For the in vitro study, the soybean lipoxygenase was used due to a homology with mammalian lipoxygenase. All the tested essential oils of A. grandifolia inhibited the LOX, and the results are given in Table 2. None of the examined samples was found to be a better inhibitor than the NDGA which was used as a reference compound. This experiment describes for the first time the anti-inflammatory activity of the studied essential oils. Despite the complex chemical differences reported herein, it seemed that the essential oil derived from the leaves of the studied plant materials (AG-L-M and AG-L-P) was more active than that of inflorescences in both cases examined (AG-I-M and AG-I-P). A probable reason for this is the high content of oxygenated monoterpenoids in the essential oil of the studied leaves. Among the examined oils, only AG-I-M (inflorescences from Mt. Menoikio) presented anti-lipid peroxidation, with 47% compared to TROLOX used as reference. This essential oil was the only one with sesquiterpenoids hydrocarbons (1.0%), and also was the one with high amounts of monterpenoid hydrocarbons (17%, two-fold more than the previous). In both cases of the essential oils extracted from inflorescences and leaves, their reducing ability was time dependent. Thus, it seemed that the antioxidant activity in the DPPH assay was increased only after an hour of interaction.
It is known that many parameters may influence the composition of the essential oils such as harvesting period, plant tissue, geographical and climate conditions, age and development stage, nutrition, post-harvest drying, etc. [25]. Such aspects are in accordance with the results of the current study reporting different essential oil profiles for different organs such as leaves and inflorescences.
The detection of ascaridole and cis-jasmone may provide support about the taxonomic identity of the plant material, since A. grandifolia is often misidentified in the wild by herb collectors as Tanacetum macrophyllum (Waldst. & Kit.) Sch. Bip. Despite the apparent external morphological similarities between the two species, there are significant phytochemical differences between the composition of their essential oils. The essential oil of A. grandifolia is characterized by cis-jasmone and ascaridole, coupled with low quantities of sesquiterpenoids; on the other hand, the essential oil of T. microphyllum is characterized by a high concentration of oxygenated sesquterpenoids [18].
Thujone is known to be toxic (neurotoxicant since 1800’s) [26], and, therefore, the long-term usage of thujone-containing plant materials such as cedar leaves or Artemisia absinthium L. or Salvia officinalis L. was prohibited in Europe, while in the USA such materials are not authorized for usage as flavoring substances (EMA/HMPC/732886/2010). Although their use has been permitted at least in Europe, the levels of thujone isomers have to be carefully controlled and should be kept under specified limits to be used. In an essential oil sample from Serbian plant material of A. grandifolia, trans-thujone (β-thujone), i.e., the less toxic of the two isomers, was one of the major constituents [18]. On the contrary, the herein presented results showed that cis-thujone (α-thujone), which is the most toxic isomer, was among the main compounds in the plant material examined from Mt. Menoikio.
Generally, the major category of compounds to be detected in the essential oil of every Achillea species is expected to be that of monoterpenoids (both hydrocarbons and oxygenated) [27]. In all of the essential oils of Achillea spp. extracted from plant material collected from Greece to date, the majority of monoterpenoids are reported to be oxygenated, and in almost every studied sample among them, camphor and 1,8-cineole are reported as prevailing compounds [14,23,24,28,29,30]. This general trend seems to be in accordance with the chemical profile of the essential oil of A. grandifolia, collected both from Mt. Pelion and from Mt. Menoikio. It must be mentioned that there are two studies revealing that the main compound of some Achillea species collected from Greece is that of sesquiterpenes, such as ascaridole (47%) in A. milefollium L. from North Greece [31] and α-bisabolol (53.88%) in A. cretica L. from Crete [32]. Both the essential oils of the inflorescences and leaves of the wild-growing population collected from Mt. Menoikio were characterized by a high quantity of cis-thujone (50.8% in leaves and 36.9% in inflorescence). There is no other study reporting such a high amount of cis-thujone and trans-thujone in A. grandifolia essential oils. Previous phytochemical analysis of A. grandifolia essential oil from Serbia [15,16,17,18] and Greece [14] also report that cis-thujone (α-thujone) is among the main compounds, but in moderate quantities, i.e., 7.5%, 14.0%, and 11.9%, respectively. Furthermore, none of the samples examined from wild-growing plant material collected in Turkey (n = 3) has been reported to detect thujone in noteworthy quantities, except some traces (amounts not more than 0.05%) found in a sample from Aydin province [21].
The antiradical capacity of the essential oils extracted from all aerial parts of A. grandifolia has been previously reported [16,17,19,20]. In previous studies, all the examined essential oils of A. grandifolia have been tested for antioxidant activity using in vitro (non-enzymatic systems employing different model substrates) methods such as 2,2- diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity tests (cation radical ABTS+•). The essential oil originating from Serbian plant material [19] seems to exhibit concentration-dependent antiradical activity, with a SC50 value at 6 µL/mL (DPPH). Moreover, this oil has also been tested using the TLC-DPPH assay, revealing a few light-yellow spots, which indicate that some of the components exhibit anti-DPPH activity. The same methods were also performed in other studies [16], and the results were almost the same as previously mentioned (SC50 value of 5.4 mg/mL and TLC-DPPH assay, revealing two main light-yellow spots, which indicate the anti-DPPH activity of 1,8-cineole and camphor). In other studies, the essential oil is reported to exhibit free radical scavenging activity against the DPPH radicals (52%) [17,20] and the ABTS+• cation radicals (TEAC 0.62 mM) [20], or moderate Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity (0.62 mM) against ABTS [17]. The results of the antioxidant activity assays herein showed that the oil of A. grandifolia could be considered as a source of effective antioxidants, indicating a moderate antioxidant activity which was lower compared to previous literature data.
A limited number of studies concerning the anti-inflammatory activity of essential oil extracted from Achillea spp. [33,34] has been published to date. Most of the published research has investigated the anti-inflammatory activity of the polar extracts from Achillea spp., especially extracts from A. millefolium, using in vivo techniques [35,36]. This is the first report on the anti-inflammatory activity of the essential oil of A. grandifolia. Specifically, AG-I-M presented the stronger anti-lipid peroxidation with 47%, compared to TROLOX used as a reference compound. None of the other essential oils exhibited any activity. These results are possibly related to the different composition of this essential oil, since it was the only one containing more than 10% of monoterpene hydrocarbons (17%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (1%), as well as ascaridole (7.5%).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Collection of Plant Material

The botanical collections were performed using a special collection permit issued by the Greek Ministry of Environment (182336/879 of 16-5-2019 and 64886/2959 of 6-7-2020). Above-ground parts of wild-growing populations of A. grandifolia (Figure 3) were collected during summer 2020 from Mountain Menoikio (Eastern Macedonia, Greece; Longitude: 23°42′32.77″ E, Latitude: 41°10′33.81″ N), and during summer 2019 from Mountain Pelion (Southeastern Thessaly, Greece; Latitude: 39°26′18.84″ N, Longitude: 23°02′46.57″ E). The original collection of samples in the wild comprised about 300 g of fresh above-ground plant material carefully excised with scissors to allow vegetative plant regeneration. The plant material was separated into leaves and inflorescences before drying. The collected materials were spotted in situ and later taxonomically identified by Dr. N. Krigas (experienced plant taxonomist), and voucher specimens from each locality (Lazari D. 7512 and No Lazari D. 7347) were deposited at the School of Pharmacy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece).

3.2. Essential Oil Isolation

The collected plant material was air-dried at room temperature in dark and shade for ten days. Each sample was submitted three times to hydrodistillation for two h, using a modified Clevenger-type apparatus with a water-cooled oil receiver to reduce hydrodistillation overheating artifacts. The volatiles were trapped in 5 mL gas chromatography grade n-pentane according to standard procedures [37], were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and were kept in closed, air-tight Pyrex containers at −4 °C. The essential oil yield was expressed as mL per 100 g d.w.

3.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

The essential oil analyses were performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010-GCMS-QP2010 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) system operating at 70 eV. This was equipped with a split/splitless injector (230 °C) and a fused silica HP-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm). The temperature program was from 50 °C to 290 °C, at a rate of 4 °C/min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume of each sample was 1.0 μL. Retention indices for all compounds were determined according to Van den Dool and Kratz [38], using n-alkanes as standards. The identification of the components was based on comparison of their mass spectra with those of NIST21 and NIST107 [39], and by comparison of their retention indices with literature data [40]. The studied essential oils were subjected to co-chromatography with authentic compounds (Fluka, Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA).

3.4. In Vitro Experiments

For the in vitro experiments, stock solutions of the studied essential oils containing 20 µL/100 µL of absolute ethanol were used, from which the appropriate samples were taken and used in the following assays. All the volumes used are indicated in Table 2, and reference compounds as 10 mM stock solutions in DMSO were also used (Table 2).

3.4.1. Inhibition of Linoleic Acid Lipid Peroxidation

For the inhibition of linoleic acid lipid peroxidation, the method of Hadjipavlou and Pontiki [41] was followed as described by Hodaj-Çelikuet al. [42]. In brief, the tested samples were dissolved in ethanol, and a stock solution containing 20 µL/100 µL in ethanol was prepared. The production of conjugated diene hydroperoxide by oxidation of linoleic acid in an aqueous dispersion was monitored at 234 nm in the presence of 2,2′-Azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) of 50 μL of 40 mM AAPH solution as a free radical initiator in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Oxidation was carried out in the presence of the tested samples (10 μL from the stock solution). The rate of oxidation at 30 °C room temperature was monitored by recording the increase in absorption at 234 nm caused by conjugated diene hydroperoxides. Trolox was used as a reference drug. For the calculation of the in vitro antioxidant assays, the formula (A0 – A1)/A0 × 100 was used, where A0 is the control absorbance and A1 is the sample’s absorbance.

3.4.2. Soybean Lipoxygenase Inhibition Study In Vitro

This analysis was performed according to the assay developed by Peperidou et al., [43] using 10 μL from a stock solution of 20 µL/100µL of absolute ethanol. Each of the samples was incubated at room temperature with sodium linoleate (0.1 mM) and 0.2 mL of enzyme solution (1/9 × 10−4 w/v in saline) in tris buffer pH 9. The conversion of sodium linoleate to 13-hydroperoxylinoleic acid was recorded at 234 nm and the percentage of inhibition resulted from essential oil was compared with the appropriate standard inhibitor nordihydroguaretic acid (NDGA). For the calculation of the in vitro LOX inhibition, the formula (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100 was used, where A0 is the control absorbance and A1 is the sample’s absorbance.

3.4.3. Interaction with DPPH

The tested samples were dissolved to a 10 μL solution of DPPH (0.1 mM in methanol), and 20 µL/100 µL ethanol stock solution was added after 20-60 min. The antioxidant activity was recorded at 517 nm and the percentage of reducing activity (RA) was calculated and compared to the reference compound NDGA (nordihydroguaiaretic acid). The method followed was according to the description of Peperidou et al. [43]. For the calculation of the in vitro antioxidant assays, the formula (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100 was used, where A0 is the control absorbance and A1 is the sample’s absorbance.

4. Conclusions

The study herein reports worldwide for the first time the essential oil’s composition in leaves and inflorescences of A. grandifolia examined separately and not as above-grounds parts. This research provides detailed insight regarding the chemical compounds (n = 38) of the essential oils in A. grandifolia plant material originating from Greece, aligning with similar studies from neighboring countries (Turkey and Serbia) in terms of yields, color, and smell, as well as the categorization of the main compounds of the essential oil (oxygenated monoterpenes). All examined essential oils were found effective in terms of antioxidant potential and anti-inflammatory activity, the latter reported for the first time herein. However, the findings are not in agreement with previous studies.
The analysis of the essential oils suggested the existence of distinct chemotypes of A. grandifolia in Greece, i.e., camphor chemotype from Mt. Pelion and cis-thujone chemotype from Mt. Menoikio, with the latter major compound being reported for the first time herein as prevailing both in leaves (almost 51%) and inflorescences (almost 37%). The results of the antioxidant activity assays herein showed that the oil of A. grandifolia could be considered as a source of effective antioxidants, and actually indicated a moderate antioxidant activity which was lower compared to previous literature data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.K. and D.L.; methodology, N.K., O.S.T., M.-E.A., D.H.-L. and D.L.; validation, N.K., D.H.-L. and D.L.; formal analysis, O.S.T., M.-E.A., D.H.-L. and D.L.; investigation, N.K., O.S.T. and M.K.S.; resources, N.K. and D.L.; data curation, O.S.T. and C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K., O.S.T. and C.G.; writing—review and editing, N.K., O.S.T., D.H.-L., M.K.S., C.G., M.-E.A. and D.L.; visualization, N.K. and O.S.T.; supervision, N.K. and D.L.; project administration, N.K. and D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge partial support of this work by the project “Upgrading the Plant Capital (PlantUp)” (MIS 5002803) which has been implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure” funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) which has been co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Data Availability Statement

All data referred to or generated in this study are included in tables or figures and are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions and Efthimia Antonopoulou for assistance during field work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nemeth, E. Achillea species used medicinally in Hungary. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 58, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baumann, H. The Greek Wild Flowers and Plant Lore in Ancient Greece; Herbert Press: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedek, B.; Kopp, B. Achillea millefolium L. s.l. revisited: Recent findings confirm the traditional use. Wien Med. Wochenschr. 2007, 157, 312–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Constantinidis, T.H.; Kalpoutzakis, E. A new species of Achillea (Asteraceae: Anthemideae) from south-east Peloponnisos, Greece. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 47, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baytop, T. (Ed.) Türkiye’de Bitkiler ile Tedavi (Treatment with Plants in Turkey); Istanbul University Publications: Istanbul, Turkey, 1999; Volume 40, p. 176. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ezer, N.; Arısan, Ö.M. Folk medicines in Merzifon (Amasya, Turkey). Turk. J. Bot. 2006, 30, 223–230. [Google Scholar]
  7. Honda, G.; Yeşilada, E.; Tabata, M.; Sezik, E.; Fujita, T.; Takeda, Y.; Takaishi, Y.; Tanaka, T. Traditional medicine in Turkey VI. Folk medicine in West Anatolia: Afyon, Kutahya, Denizli, Mugla, Aydin provinces. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1996, 53, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tuzlaci, E.; Erol, M.K. Turkish folk medicinal plants. Part II: Eğirdir (Isparta). Fitoterapia 1999, 70, 593–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sezik, E.; Yeşilada, E.; Honda, G.; Takaishi, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Tanaka, T. Traditional medicine in Turkey X. Folk medicine in Central Anatolia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nemeth, E.; Bernath, J. Biological activities of yarrow species (Achillea spp.). Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 3151–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Puricelli, C.; Ciuchi, D.; Segale, A.; Fico, G. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)—An alpine ethnobotanical study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huber-Morath, A. Achillea L. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands; Davis, P.H., Ed.; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1975; Volume 5, pp. 224–252. [Google Scholar]
  13. Franzen, R. Achillea L. In Mountain Flora of Greece; Strid, A., Tan, K., Eds.; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1991; Volume 2, pp. 431–450. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanlidou, E.; Kokkalou, E.; Kokkini, S. Volatile constituents of Achillea grandifolia. Planta Med. 1992, 58, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stojanović, J.P.; Stojanović, G.S.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.Z.; Zlatković, B.K.; Ickovski, J.D.; Zlatanović, I.G.; Jovanović, S.Č.; Miti, Z.S. Essential oils of six Achillea species: Chemical profiles, antimicrobial potential and toxicity toward crustaceans. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202100905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Drobac, M.M.; Kukić-Marković, J.M.; Milenković, M.T.; Niketić, M.S.; Petrović, S.D. The chemical composition, antimicrobial and antiradical properties of the essential oil of Achillea grandifolia aerial parts from Serbia. Bot. Serb. 2021, 45, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stankovic, N.; Mihajilov-Krstev, T.; Zlatkovic, B.; Matejic, J.; Jovanovic, V.S.; Kocic, B.; Comic, L. Comparative study of composition, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities of essential oils of selected aromatic plants from Balkan peninsula. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Radulović, N.S.; Blagojević, P.D.; Skropeta, D.; Zarubica, A.R.; Zlatković, B.K.; Palić, R.M. Misidentification of tansy, Tanacetum macrophyllum, as yarrow, Achillea grandifolia: A health risk or benefit? Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pavlovic, M.; Petrovic, S.; Milenkovic, M.; Kukic, J.; Couladis, M.; Tzakou, O. Composition and antiradical capacity of Achillea grandifolia essential oil from Serbia. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Özek, G. Phytochemical characterization of Achillea grandifolia Friv. essential oil and its potent against oxidative damage, acetylcholinesterase and α-amylase. Eskişehir Technol. Univ. J. Sci. Technol. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2018, 19, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Küçükbay, F.Z.; Çetin, H. Determination of some essential elements and composition of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia Friv.(Asteraceae) from different localities. Anal. Chem. Lett. 2012, 2, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suleimenov, Y.M.; Atazhanova, G.A.; Ozek, T.; Demirci, B.; Kulyyasov, A.T.; Adekenov, S.M.; Baser, K.H.C. Essential oil composition of three species of Achillea from Kazakhstan. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2001, 37, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A.; Verykokidou, E.; Roussis, V. Chemical constituents of the essential oil of Achillea ligustica All. from Greece. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1995, 7, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tzakou, O.; Couladis, M.; Milenkovic, M.; Vucicevic, D.; Kovacevic, N. Composition and antimicrobial activity of Achillea coarctata essential oils from Greece. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2009, 12, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barra, A. Factors affecting chemical variability of essential oils: A review of recent developments. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nemeth, E.Z.; Nguyen, H.T. Thujone, a widely debated volatile compound: What do we know about it? Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohammadhosseinia, M.; Sarker, S.D.; Akbarzadeh, A. Chemical composition of the essential oils and extracts of Achillea species and their biological activities: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 199, 257–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Magiatis, P.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Chinou, I.; Haroutounian, S.A. Chemical composition and in-vitro antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of three Greek Achillea species. Z. Naturforsch. 2002, 57, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tzakou, O.; Loukis, A. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Achillea umbellata growing in Greece. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kundakovic, T.; Fokialakis, N.; Kovacevic, N.; Chinou, I. Essential oil composition of Achillea lingulata and A. umbellata. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chatzopoulou, P.; Katsiotis, S.T.; Baerheim-Svendsen, A. An ascaridole containing essential oil of the Achillea millefolium L. complex growing wild in northern Greece. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 457–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ilardi, V.; D’Agostino, G.; Bruno, M. The chemical composition of the aerial parts essential oil of Achillea cretica L. (Asteraceae) growing wild in Crete (Greece). Nat. Prod. Res. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mohamed, M.E.; Elsayed, S.A.; Madkor, H.R.; Saad Eldien, H.M.; Mohafez, O.M. Yarrow oil ameliorates ulcerative colitis in mice model via regulating the ΝΚ-κB and PPAR-γ pathways. Intest. Res. 2021, 19, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alomair, M.K.; Alabduladheem, L.S.; Almajed, M.A.; Alobaid, A.A.; Alkhalifah, E.A.R.; Younis, N.S.; Mohamed, M.E. Achillea millefolium essential oil mitigates peptic ulcer in rats through Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Molecules 2022, 27, 7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Benedek, B.; Kopp, B.; Melzig, M.F. Achillea millefolium L. s.l.- Is the anti-inflammatory activity mediated by protease inhibition? J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 113, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Villalva, M.; Silvan, J.M.; Alarcón-Cavero, T.; Villanueva-Bermejo, D.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Martinez-Rodriguez, A.J. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties of an Achillea millefolium L. extract and its fractions obtained by supercritical anti-solvent fractionation against Helicobacter pylori. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia, 5th ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2005; pp. 217, 2567–2570. [Google Scholar]
  38. Van den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed as-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1963, 11, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Massada, Y. Analysis of Essential Oils by Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  40. Adams, R. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Pontiki, E. Aryl-acetic and cinnamic acids as lipoxygenase inhibitors with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1208, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hodaj-Çeliku, E.; Tsiftsoglou, O.; Shuka, L.; Abazi, S.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Lazari, D. Antioxidant activity and chemical composition of essential oils of some aromatic and medicinal plants from Albania. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 12, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peperidou, A.; Kapoukranidou, D.; Kontogiorgis, C.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. Multitarget molecular hybrids of cinnamic acids. Molecules 2014, 19, 20197–20226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatographs from the analysis of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia collected from Mt. Menoikio, Greece (AG-I-M: Inflorescence; AG-L-M: Leaves) during full flowering (July 2020).
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatographs from the analysis of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia collected from Mt. Menoikio, Greece (AG-I-M: Inflorescence; AG-L-M: Leaves) during full flowering (July 2020).
Plants 12 00613 g001
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatographs from the analysis of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia collected from Pelion, Greece (AG-I-P: Inflorescence; AG-L-P: Leaves) during full flowering (July 2019).
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatographs from the analysis of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia collected from Pelion, Greece (AG-I-P: Inflorescence; AG-L-P: Leaves) during full flowering (July 2019).
Plants 12 00613 g002
Figure 3. Leafy above-ground parts (A) in flower, and vertical view of the compound inflorescences (B) of Achillea grandifolia in its original habitat on Mt. Pelion (Greece).
Figure 3. Leafy above-ground parts (A) in flower, and vertical view of the compound inflorescences (B) of Achillea grandifolia in its original habitat on Mt. Pelion (Greece).
Plants 12 00613 g003
Table 1. Composition of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia (AG) inflorescences (-I) and leaves (-L) collected from Greek wild-growing populations during full flowering from Mt. Menoikio (-M) in July 2020 and Mt. Pelion (-P) in July 2019.
Table 1. Composition of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia (AG) inflorescences (-I) and leaves (-L) collected from Greek wild-growing populations during full flowering from Mt. Menoikio (-M) in July 2020 and Mt. Pelion (-P) in July 2019.
MountainMt. Menoikio (-M)Mt. Pelion (-P)
Percentage of Yield0.25%0.16%0.38%0.12%Retention Times
a Compoundsb MFc tRd RIexpe RIlitAG-I-MAG-L-MAG-I-PAG-L-P
1Santolina trieneC10H166.4549039060.2 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
2TricycleneC10H167.101920921ndnd0.3 ± 0.01ndRI, MS
3α-PineneC10H167.6219319320.5 ± 0.01nd0.2 ± 0.00ndRI, MS Co-GC
4CampheneC10H168.2879489460.8 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.015.9 ± 0.143.9 ± 0.01RI, MS
5SabineneC10H169.2579719694.1 ± 0.270.3 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
6β-PineneC10H169.4179759740.2 ± 0.000.1 ± 0.000.1 ± 0.01ndRI, MS, Co-GC
7Dehydro-1,8-CineoleC10H16O9.983989988nd0.1 ± 0.00ndndRI, MS
8δ-2-CareneC10H1610.16099410011.5 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
9Hexyl acetateC8H16O210.75210081007nd0.2 ± 0.00ndndRI, MS
10α-TerpineneC10H1611.084101610146.4 ± 0.190.1 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
11p-CymeneC10H1411.442102510221.6 ± 0.070.4 ± 0.012.00 ± 0.110.4 ± 0.03RI, MS, Co-GC
121,8-CineoleC10H18O11.7041032102611.9 ± 0.5220.0 ± 0.622.2 ± 0.071.3 ± 0.06RI, MS, Co-GC
13trans-β-OcimeneC10H1612.384104810440.2 ± 0.01ndndndRI, MS
14γ-TerpineneC10H1612.809105910540.3 ± 0.010.4 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS, Co-GC
15cis-Sabinene hydrateC10H18O13.339107210650.2 ± 0.010.4 ± 0.17ndndRI, MS
16Artemisia alcoholC10H18O13.735108110800.5 ± 0.00ndndndRI, MS
17TerpinoleneC10H1613.879108510860.2 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.00ndndRI, MS
18LinaloolC10H18O14.591110210950.6 ± 0.010.7 ± 0.01ndndRI, M, Co-GC MS
19cis-ThujoneC10H16O14.8161108110136.9 ± 0.9350.8 ± 1.451.5 ± 0.04ndRI, MS
20trans-ThujoneC10H16O15.253112011123.6 ± 0.035.5 ± 0.110.1 ± 0.01ndRI, MS
21cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-olC10H18O15.492112611180.1 ± 0.000.2 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
22trans-SabinolC10H16O16.089114111370.9 ± 0.021.1 ± 0.05ndndRI, MS
23CamphorC10H16O16.3761149114110.0 ± 0.275.5 ± 0.0870.5 ± 1.0783.2 ± 0.85RI, MS
24trans-VerbenolC10H16O16.65211451140ndndnd1.20± 0.01RI, MS
25cis-ChrysanthenolC10H16O16.99111651160nd0.2 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
26BorneolC10H18O17.317117311652.4 ± 0.513.6 ± 0.212.2 ± 0.183.7 ± 0.24RI, MS, Co-GC
27Terpinen-4-olC10H18O17.651118211740.9 ± 0.012.2 ± 0.14ndndRI, MS, Co-GC
28α-TerpineolC10H18O18.244119711861.2 ± 0.033.1 ± 0.02ndndRI, MS, Co-GC
29trans-PiperitolC10H18O18.75712121207nd0.1 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
30AscaridoleC10H16O219.870124212347.3 ± 0.08ndndndRI, MS
31Bornyl acetateC12H20O221.40812851287ndnd3.2 ± 0.04ndRI, MS
32EugenolC10H12O223.806135613560.2 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.00ndndRI, MS
33cis-JasmoneC11H16O25.173139613923.4 ± 0.150.7 ± 0.013.2 ± 0.331.8 ± 0.02RI, MS
34Methyl eugenolC11H14O225.47314051403trndndndRI, MS
35β-CaryophylleneC15H2425.867141814170.4 ± 0.00ndndndRI, MS, Co-GC
3610-epi-β-AcoradieneC15H2427.765147814740.6 ± 0.02ndndndRI, MS
37trans-NerolidolC15H26O30.351156315610.3 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.01ndndRI, MS
38Caryophyllene oxideC15H24O30.954158315820.5 ± 0.020.8 ± 0.09ndndRI, MS, Co-GC
Total %97.997.091.495.5
Monoterpene Hydrocarbons17.01.68.54.30
Oxygenated Monoterpenes76.793.679.789.4
Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons1.0ndndnd
Oxygenated Sesquiterpenes0.80.9ndnd
a Compounds listed in order of elution from an HP-5 MS capillary column; b MF: molecular formula; c tR: Retention time (min); d RIexp: Retention indices as determined on a HP-5 MS capillary column using a homologous series of n-alkanes (C9-C25); e RIlit: Retention indices according to literature; RI: Retention Index: MS: Mass Spectrum: Co-GC: co-injection with authentic compound; nd = not detected; tr: traces.
Table 2. Percentage (%) interaction of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia (AG) inflorescences (-I) and leaves (-L) collected from Greek wild-growing populations during full flowering from Mt. Menoikio (-M) in July 2020 and Mt. Pelion (-P) in July 2019 with DPPH, their soybean LOX inhibitory activity (%), and their inhibition of lipid peroxidation (%).
Table 2. Percentage (%) interaction of the essential oils of Achillea grandifolia (AG) inflorescences (-I) and leaves (-L) collected from Greek wild-growing populations during full flowering from Mt. Menoikio (-M) in July 2020 and Mt. Pelion (-P) in July 2019 with DPPH, their soybean LOX inhibitory activity (%), and their inhibition of lipid peroxidation (%).
ResultsInteraction (%) with the
Stable Free Radical of DPPH
Inhibition of LOX (%)Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation (%)
Time20 min60 min
Concentration20 μL20 μL10 μL10 μL
AG-I-M11.014.93047
AG-L-M7.632.170n.a.
AG-I-P 2n.a51n.a.
AG-L-P7n.a70n.a.
NDGA81.093.092.0
TROLOX 96.0
Stock solution 10 mM in DMSO; n.a.: no activity found under the experimental conditions. The results are the mean of 3–6 measurements and the standard deviation (SD) was less than 10%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsiftsoglou, O.S.; Atskakani, M.-E.; Krigas, N.; Stefanakis, M.K.; Gounaris, C.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.; Lazari, D. Exploring the Medicinal Potential of Achillea grandifolia in Greek Wild-Growing Populations: Characterization of Volatile Compounds, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Inflorescences. Plants 2023, 12, 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030613

AMA Style

Tsiftsoglou OS, Atskakani M-E, Krigas N, Stefanakis MK, Gounaris C, Hadjipavlou-Litina D, Lazari D. Exploring the Medicinal Potential of Achillea grandifolia in Greek Wild-Growing Populations: Characterization of Volatile Compounds, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Inflorescences. Plants. 2023; 12(3):613. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsiftsoglou, Olga S., Maria-Eleni Atskakani, Nikos Krigas, Michalis K. Stefanakis, Christos Gounaris, Dimitra Hadjipavlou-Litina, and Diamanto Lazari. 2023. "Exploring the Medicinal Potential of Achillea grandifolia in Greek Wild-Growing Populations: Characterization of Volatile Compounds, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Leaves and Inflorescences" Plants 12, no. 3: 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop