Next Article in Journal
New Methylcitrate Synthase Inhibitor Induces Proteolysis, Lipid Degradation and Pyruvate Excretion in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Multigene Phylogeny Revealed Three New Species of Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Pleosporales) from China
Previous Article in Journal
MoMaf1 Mediates Vegetative Growth, Conidiogenesis, and Pathogenicity in the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four Novel Species of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from China: A Checklist for Corynespora Reported Worldwide

1
College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
2
Instituto de Investigaciones de Sanidad Vegetal, Calle 110 No. 514 e/5ta B y 5ta F, Playa, Havana 17200, Cuba
3
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(1), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010107
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Ascomycete Fungi)

Abstract

:
Plant debris are habitats favoring survival and multiplication of various microbial species. During continuing mycological surveys of saprobic microfungi from plant debris in Yunnan Province, China, several Corynespora-like and Dendryphiopsis-like isolates were collected from dead branches of unidentified perennial dicotyledonous plants. Four barcodes, i.e., ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α, were amplified and sequenced. Morphological studies and multigene phylogenetic analyses by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference revealed three new Corynespora species (C. mengsongensis sp. nov., C. nabanheensis sp. nov. and C. yunnanensis sp. nov.) and a new Kirschsteiniothelia species (K. nabanheensis sp. nov.) within Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota. A list of identified and accepted species of Corynespora with major morphological features, host information and locality was compiled. This work improves the knowledge of species diversity of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia in Yunnan Province, China.

1. Introduction

Hyphomycetes are highly diverse and distributed in terrestrial and freshwater habitats. More than 1500 Hyphomycetes genera and 30,000 species have been recorded worldwide [1,2]. These fungi show distinct morphological features, which often allow for species identification, as DNA sequences have been hitherto unavailable for most genera and species. Given the large amount of hyphomycetes, it is challenging to classify their taxonomic placement based on morphology alone because some of them may belong to the same species or even to different genera. The introduction of molecular phylogenetic analyses led to a better understanding of the heterogenous genera and species and further clarified their taxonomic status. Investigating fungal diversity is an important task in assembling the fungal tree of life (AFToL) [3], which contributes to the knowledge of biological diversity and the exploration and utilization of fungal resources.
Corynespora was established by Güssow [4] with C. mazei as the type species. Wei [5] provided a historical review and considered C. mazei a synonym of the previously described Helminthosporium cassiicola Berk. & M.A. Curtis and transferred the latter species, resulting in the new combination Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) C.T. Wei. This genus is mainly characterized by distinct, determinate or percurrently extending conidiophores and monotretic, integrated, terminal conidiogenous cells that produce solitary or sometimes catenate, distoseptate conidia [6]. To date, 198 epithets for Corynespora have been listed in Species Fungorum [7], but many species associated with leaf spots were defined at least partially on the basis of host identity. Siboe et al. [8] provided a synopsis of basic characteristics of 50 accepted Corynespora species, but C. kenyensis was not discussed. An additional 93 additional species have since been added to the genus [9,10,11,12,13,14], 87 of which are present in two tables in a format similar to that used by Siboe et al. [8,9,13]. However, C. alternarioides [15], C. camagueyensis [16], C. garciniae [17], C. inornata [18], C. mulanjeensis [19] and C. obclavata [20] were not congeneric with the generic characters in producing euseptate or muriform conidia or synnematous conidiophores with polytretic conidiogenous cells and were excluded from Corynespora [21,22,23,24,25]. Corynespora cespitosa [26], C. endiandrae [11], C. leucadendri [10] and C. olivacea [27] show the main characters of Corynespora but were transferred to Helminthosporium by Voglmayr and Jaklitsch [28] based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses. “Corynespora aeria” [29], “C. ipomoeae” [30] (Art. F.5.1: no identifier number cited), “C. masseeanum” [31] (Art. 41.1: lacking a full and direct basionym reference) and C. ruelliae [32] (Art. 40.1: without assigning a type) were not validly published based on the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants [33]. Thus, Corynespora currently contains 129 valid species. Most Corynespora species were introduced primarily based on morphology, and only 10 species with DNA sequences have been used for multigene phylogenetic analyses [12].
Sivanesan [34] introduced the family Corynesporascaceae Sivan. with Corynesporasca carotae Sivan. (= Corynespora calicioidea (Berk. & Broome) M.B. Ellis) [2] as the type species, and first connected the teleomorph (Corynesporasca caryotae) and anamorph (Corynespora) state through cultural studies. Rossman et al. [35] recommended using Corynespora over Corynesporasca, considering its widespread use, priority and number of species. Subsequently, phylogenetic analyses of five gene regions, i.e., SSU, ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α, revealed that Corynespora smithii forms a separate, distant clade, together with the generic type, C. cassiicola, and is treated in the monotypic Corynesporascaceae in Pleosporales [28].
The genus Kirschsteiniothelia was erected by Hawksworth [36] with K. aethiops as the type species and is mainly characterized by superficial to semi-immersed, subglobose to globose, dark brown to black ascomata; cylindrical clavate, bitunicate, spored asci; and brown to dark brown, ellipsoidal, 1(–2)-septate ascospores with or without a mucilaginous sheath [36,37]. The genus has been linked with two anamorph types, viz., Dendryphiopsis-like and Sporidesmium-like, based on phylogenetic analyses [38]. The Dendryphiopsis-like asexual morph is characteristically macronematous, simple or branched at the apex, forming a stipe and head, brown to dark brown conidiophores with monotretic, integrated, terminal or discrete, determinate or percurrently extending conidiogenous cells that produce solitary, acrogenous, euseptate conidia [38]. The Sporidesmium-like asexual morph has macronematous, unbranched conidiophores with monoblastic, integrated, terminal, determinate or irregular extending conidiogenous cells that produce solitary, acrogenous, euseptate conidia with or without a mucilaginous sheath [38]. Based on morphology and molecular data, previous studies have confirmed that Dendryphiopsis is the anamorph of Kirschsteiniothelia [37,39], and Wijayawardene et al. [40] further demonstrated that Dendryphiopsis atra (generic type) is synonymous with Kirschsteiniothelia atra and suggested using Kirschsteiniothelia rather than Dendryphiopsis, considering the requirement for fewer name changes. Subsequently, seven Sporidesmium-like asexual morphs were reported in Kirschsteiniothelia [38,41,42,43,44].
The early taxonomic placements of Kirschsteiniothelia are uncertain. The genus was originally placed in Pleosporaceae by Hawksworth [36] and Barr [45] and subsequently assigned to Pleomassariaceae by Barr [46] based on asexual morph connection and morphology. Schoch et al. [47] revealed that K. aethiops (generic type) does not cluster with Pleosporaceae in phylogenetic analyses and suggested that Kirschsteiniothelia should be transferred to a new family. Schoch et al. [39] further showed that K. elaterascus and K. maritma cluster within Mytilinidion (Mytilinidiaceae) and Morosphaeria (Morosphaeriaceae), respectively, according to phylogenetic analyses [48], and both species were excluded from Kirschsteiniothelia by Boonmee et al. [37]. In addition, Boonmee et al. [37] introduced a new family, Kirschsteiniotheliaceae, to accommodate taxa grouping with K. aethiops based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses. Hernandez-Restrepo et al. [49] proposed the monotypic order Kirschsteiniotheliales for Kirschsteiniotheliaceae due to its distant relation to other orders in Dothideomycetes.
Yunnan Province is located in southwestern China. It lies at 21°09′–29°15′ N and 97°32′–106°12′ E and includes vast territory with distinct climatic characteristics and abundant natural resources. Its average annual temperatures is 12–22 °C, and the total annual precipitation is approximately 1500 mm. Such favorable conditions support more than 18,000 higher plant species (51.6% of China’s total) in this province, resulting in a very wide range of habitats favoring the growth of various microbial species. However, its mycobiota, especially microfungi, is poorly understood. During our survey of the taxonomy and diversity of saprobic microfungi in Yunnan Province, a Dendryphiopsis-like fungus and three Corynespora-like fungi were collected on dead branches from terrestrial habitats. Based on multilocus phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics, we introduced four novel species of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia in Dothideomycetes. This study broadens our understanding of the diversity of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia taxa.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Isolation and Morphology

Samples of dead branches were collected randomly from humid environments and river banks, where there is a deep litter layer comprising rotten softwood, dead branches and decayed leaves of various plants in the forest ecosystems of Yunnan Province. Dead branches are a rich habitat for saprobic hyphomycetes. Samples were placed in ZiplocTM bags for transport to the laboratory, where they were processed and examined as described by Ma et al. [50]. Colonies on decaying wood surface were examined and visually observed with a stereomicroscope (Motic SMZ-168, Xiamen, China) from low (0.75 times) to high (5 times) magnification. Fresh colonies were picked with sterile needles at a stereomicroscope magnification of 5 times, placed on a slide with a drop of lactic acid–phenol solution (lactic acid, phenol, glycerin, sterile water; 1:1:2:1, respectively), then placed under an Olympus BX 53 light microscope fitted with an Olympus DP 27 digital camera (Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) for microscopic morphological characterization. The tip of a sterile toothpick dipped in sterile water was used to capture the conidia of the target colony directly from the specimen; the conidia were then streaked on the surface of potato dextrose agar (PDA; 20% potato + 2% dextrose + 2% agar, w/v) and incubated in an incubator at 25 °C overnight. The single germinated conidia were transferred to fresh PDA plates [51]. Cultures were grown on PDA and incubated in an incubator at 25 °C for 2 weeks; then, morphological characters, including color, shape and size, were recorded. All fungal strains were stored in 10% sterilized glycerin at 4 °C for further studies. The studied specimens and cultures were deposited in the Herbarium of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Plant Pathology, Nanchang, China (HJAUP). The names of the new taxa were registered in Index Fungorum [2].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Fungal hyphae were scraped from the surface of colonies growing on PDA plates, transferred to 2 mL safe-lock tubes and ground with liquid nitrogen; then, DNA was extracted using a Solarbio fungal genomic DNA extraction kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA amplification was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the respective loci (ITS, SSU, LSU and tef1-α). The following primer sets were used for these genes: ITS: ITS5/ITS4; SSU: NS1/NS4 [52]; LSU: 28S1-F/28S3-R [53]; and tef1-α: EF1-983F/EF1-2218R [54].
The final volume of the PCR reaction was 25 μL, comprising 1 μL of DNA template, 1 μL of each forward and reward primer, 12.5 μL of 2 × Power Taq PCR MasterMix and 9.5 μL of double-distilled water (ddH2O). The PCR thermal cycling conditions of ITS, SSU and LSU were initialized at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 50 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min before being maintained at 4 °C; the tef1-α were initialized at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min before being maintained at 4 °C. The PCR products were checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis staining with ethidium bromide. Purification and DNA sequencing were carried out at Beijing Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. China. New sequences generated in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 10 December 2022; Table 1 and Table 2).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The newly generated sequences, together with other sequences obtained from GenBank (four loci: ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α (Table 1); three loci: ITS, LSU and SSU (Table 2)), were separately aligned using the MAFFTv.7 [55] online server (http://maffTh.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/, accessed on 23 December 2022) and manually optimized when needed. Phylogenetic analyses were first conducted individually for each locus, then for a combined dataset of these loci. The four ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α alignment datasets and the three ITS, LSU and SSU alignment datasets were concatenated with Phylosuite software v1.2.2 [56], and absent sequence data in the alignments were treated with a question mark as missing data. Phylosuite software v1.2.2 [56] was used to construct separate phylogenetic trees based on ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α sequence data, as well as ITS, LSU and SSU sequence data. The concatenated and aligned datasets were analyzed separately using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). The maximum-likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE [57] under an edge-linked partition model for 10000 ultrafast bootstraps [58]. For Corynespora, the final tree was selected among suboptimal trees from each run by comparing the likelihood scores using SYM+G4 for ITS, TNe+G4 for LSU+tef1-α and K2P+I for the SSU substitution model. Bayesian inference phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 [59] under a partition model (2 parallel runs, 2000000 generations), in which the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in. The best-fit model was SYM+G4 for ITS, GTR+F+G4 for LSU+tef1-α and K2P+I for SSU. For Kirschsteiniothelia, the final tree was selected among suboptimal trees from each run by comparing the likelihood scores using TIM2e+R3 for ITS+SSU and TN+F+G4 for the LSU substitution model. Bayesian inference phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 [59] under a partition model (2 parallel runs, 2000000 generations), in which the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in. The best-fit model was SYM+G4 for ITS+LSU+SSU. ModelFinder [60] was used to select the best-fit partition model (edge-linked) using the BIC criterion. The trees were viewed in FigTree v. 1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree, accessed on 10 December 2022) and further edited in Adobe Illustrator 2021.

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny

The phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) inferred from maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses based on combined ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α sequence data consisted of three families (Corynesporascaceae, Periconiaceae and Cyclothyriellaceae). The concatenated sequence matrix comprised 23 sequences with 3147 total characters (the combined dataset, ITS: 1–498, LSU: 499–1348, SSU: 1349–2374, tef1-α: 2375–3147), 537 distinct patterns, 375 parsimony-informative sites, 147 singleton sites and 2625 constant sites; Cyclothyriella rubronotata (TR) and C. rubronotata (TR9) were regarded as an outgroup. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses of the combined dataset resulted in phylogenetic reconstructions with largely similar topologies; the best-scoring ML tree is shown in Figure 1. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood higher than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.90 are shown above the nodes. The best-scoring ML consensus tree (lnL = –8859.832) with ultrafast bootstrap values from ML analyses and posterior probabilities from MrBayes analysis at the nodes is shown in Figure 1. The strains of Corynespora mengsongensis form a distinct clade sister to C. nabanheensis with good statistical support (ML/BI = 85/0.95); C. yunnanensis forms a high-support clade (ML/BI = 99/1.00) with the lineage consisting of C. mengsongensis and C. nabanheensis, and they form a sister clade to C. submersa (ML/BI =85/0.75).
The phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) inferred from maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses based on combined ITS, LSU and SSU sequence data consisted of four orders (Acrospermales, Kirschsteiniotheliales, Monoblastiales and Strigulales). The concatenated sequence matrix comprised 36 sequences with 1260 total characters (combined dataset, ITS: 1–162, LSU: 163–471, SSU: 472–1260), 413 distinct patterns, 253 parsimony-informative sites, 183 singleton sites and 824 constant sites; Pseudorobillarda eucalypti (MFLUCC 12–0422) and P. phragmitis (CBS 398.61) were regarded as an outgroup. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses of the combined dataset resulted in phylogenetic reconstructions with largely similar topologies; the best-scoring ML tree is shown in Figure 2. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood higher than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.90 are shown above the nodes. The best-scoring ML consensus tree (lnL = –6307.741) with ultrafast bootstrap values from ML analyses and posterior probabilities from MrBayes analysis at the nodes is shown in Figure 2. The strains of K. nabanheensis form a separate clade closely related to K. thailandica, K. thujina, K. tectonae and K. rostrata, with strong statistical support (ML/BI = 95/0.98).

3.2. Taxonomy

Corynespora mengsongensis Jing W. Liu & Jian Ma, sp. nov., Figure 3.
Indexfungorum number: IF900076
Etymology: The name refers to Mengsong, the township where the fungus was collected.
Holotype: HJAUP M2000.
Description: Saprobic on decaying wood in terrestrial habitats. Teleomorph: undetermined. Anamorph (Figure 3): Hyphomycetes. Colonies on natural substratum are effuse, brown to dark brown and hairy. Mycelium is superficial and immersed, composed of branched, septate, pale brown to brown, smooth-walled hyphae. Conidiophores are macronematous, mononematous, unbranched, erect, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, smooth, brown to dark brown and septate, with up to 2 successive cylindrical extensions (267–)746–938 × 12.5–17 μm ( X ¯ = 829 × 14.5 μm, n = 15). Conidiogenous cells are integrated, terminal, monotretic, cylindrical, pale brown to brown and smooth, with dimensions of 25–29 × 8.5–10.5 µm ( X ¯ = 27 × 9.4 μm, n = 15). Conidia are acrogenous, solitary, obclavate, rostrate, rounded at the apex, straight or slightly curved, 13–18-distoseptate, brown to golden brown and smooth, with dimensions of 96–146 × 16.5–20.5 μm ( X ¯ = 118.5 × 18.5 μm, n = 20), tapering to 3–4 μm near the apex and truncate at the base, with a protuberant dark-brown hilum that is 6–8 μm wide at the base.
Culture characteristics: Colony on PDA reaching 80–88 mm diam. after 2 weeks in an incubator under dark conditions at 25 °C; irregular circular, velvety surface with dense, gray–white mycelia along the entire margin; reverse brown to dark brown.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Menghai County, Mengsong Township, on dead branches of an unidentified broadleaf tree, 12 July 2021, J.W. Liu (HJAUP M2000, holotype; ex-type culture permanently preserved in a metabolically inactive state, HJAUP C2000).
Notes: Phylogenetic analyses showed that C. mengsongensis cluster with C. nabanheensis (Figure 1). BLASTn analysis of C. mengsongensis (HJAUP C2000T) and C. nabanheensis (HJAUP C2048T) shows 90% identity (540/598, 22 gaps) using ITS, 97% identity (559/578, 3 gaps) using LSU and 99% identity (1021/1026, no gaps) using SSU. Corynespora mengsongensis are morphologically similar to C. merrilliopanacis [61], but the latter differ in terms of their longer conidiophores (260–1200 μm), with up to 5 successive cylindrical extensions and longer conidia (130–260 μm) with 12–25 distosepta. Furthermore, C. mengsongensis differ from C. nabanheensis, which have smaller conidiophores (282–528 × 6–8 μm) with 3–4 successive cylindrical extensions and smaller conidia (56–84 × 12–14 μm) with 9–13 distosepta.
Corynespora nabanheensis Jing W. Liu & Jian Ma, sp. nov., Figure 4.
Index Fungorum number: IF900077
Etymology: The name refers to Nabanhe Nature Reserve, the locality where the fungus was collected.
Holotype: HJAUP M2048.
Description: Saprobic on decaying wood in terrestrial habitats. Teleomorph: undetermined. Anamorph (Figure 4): hHyphomycetes. Colonies on natural substratum are effuse, brown to dark brown and hairy. Mycelia are superficial and immersed, composed of branched, septate, pale brown to brown, smooth-walled hyphae. Conidiophores are macronematous, mononematous, unbranched, erect, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, smooth and brown to dark brown, with 10–17-septate with 3–4 successive cylindrical extensions and dimensions of 282–528 × 6–8 μm ( X ¯ = 388 × 7 μm, n = 15). Conidiogenous cells are integrated, terminal, monotretic, cylindrical, pale brown to brown and smooth, with dimensions of 20–32 × 5–8 µm ( X ¯ = 25.5 × 6.5 μm, n = 15). Conidia are acrogenous, solitary, obclavate, rostrate and straight or slightly curved with 9–13-distoseptate, brown to golden brown, smooth and usually expanded to a rounded shape at the apex, with dimensions of 56–84 × 12–14 μm ( X ¯ = 66.5 × 13 μm, n = 20) and 4–6 μm near the apex and truncated at the base, with a protuberant dark brown hilum that is 4–5 μm wide at the base.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reach 85–90 mm diam. after 2 weeks in an incubator under dark conditions at 25 °C, with an irregular, circular, velvety surface and dense, gray mycelia along the entire margin; reverse brown to black.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, the Nabanhe National Nature Reserve, on dead branches of an unidentified broadleaf tree, 12 July 2021, J.W. Liu (HJAUP M2048, holotype; ex-type culture permanently preserved in a metabolically inactive state HJAUP C2048).
Notes: Phylogenetic analyses showed that C. nabanheensis cluster with C. mengsongensis (Figure 1). BLASTn analysis of C. nabanheensis (HJAUP C2048T) and C. mengsongensis (HJAUP C2000T) shows 90% identity (540/598, 22 gaps) using ITS, 97% identity (559/578, 3 gaps) using LSU and 99% identity (1021/1026, no gaps) using SSU. Corynespora nabanheensis are morphologically similar to C. doipuiensis [12], but the latter differ in terms of their shorter and wider conidiophores (212–426 × 10–15 μm), with fewer successive cylindrical extensions and larger, obconical, guttulate, subhyaline to moderately brown conidia (136–165 × 5–25.5 μm). Furthermore, C. nabanheensis differ from C. mengsongensis, which have larger conidiophores (746–938 × 12.5–17 μm), with up to 2 successive cylindrical extensions and larger conidia (96–146 × 16.5–20.5 μm) with 13–18 distosepta.
Corynespora yunnanensis Jing W. Liu & Jian Ma, sp. nov., Figure 5.
Index Fungorum number: IF900078.
Etymology: The name refers to Yunnan, the province where the fungus was collected.
Holotype: HJAUP M2132.
Description: Saprobic on decaying wood in terrestrial habitats. Teleomorph: undetermined. Anamorph (Figure 5): Hyphomycete. Colonies on natural substratum are effuse, brown to dark brown and hairy. Mycelia are superficial and immersed, composed of branched, septate, pale brown to brown, smooth-walled hyphae. Conidiophores are macronematous, mononematous, unbranched, erect, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, smooth, septate and brown to dark brown, with 1–4 successive cylindrical extensions and dimensions of 380–844 × 8–16 μm ( X ¯ = 547 × 12.5 μm, n = 15). Conidiogenous cells are integrated, terminal, monotretic, cylindrical, pale brown to brown and smooth, with dimensions of 44–120(–332) × 6–8 µm ( X ¯ = 55.5 × 6.5 μm, n = 15). Conidia are acrogenous, solitary, obclavate, rostrate, rounded at the apex, straight or slightly curved, 3–16-distoseptate, brown to golden brown and smooth, with dimensions of 80–128 × 16–19 μm ( X ¯ = 117 × 18 μm, n = 25), tapering to 4–8 μm near the apex, and truncated at the base with a protuberant dark brown hilum that is 6–8 μm wide at the base.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reach 78–85 mm diam. after 2 weeks in an incubator under dark conditions at 25 °C, with an irregular, circular, velvety surface with dense, gray mycelia along the entire margin; reverse brown to black.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Jinghong City, Gasa Township, on dead branches of an unidentified broadleaf tree, 12 July 2021, J.W. Liu (HJAUP M2132, holotype; ex-type culture permanently preserved in a metabolically inactive state HJAUP C2132).
Notes: Phylogenetic analyses showed that C. yunnanensis cluster with C. mengsongensis and C. nabanheensis, and they form a sister clade to C. submersa (Figure 1). BLASTn analysis of C. yunnanensis (HJAUP C2132T) and C. mengsongensis (HJAUP C2000T) shows 99% identity (567/569, 2 gaps) using ITS, 98% identity (577/587, 7 gaps) using LSU and 99% identity (1028/1029, no gaps) using SSU. BLASTn analysis of C. yunnanensis (HJAUP C2132T) and C. nabanheensis (HJAUP C2048T) shows 91% identity (518/569, 20 gaps) using ITS, 97% identity (543/558, 1 gap) using LSU and 99% identity (1024/1028, no gaps) using SSU. BLASTn analysis of C. yunnanensis (HJAUP C2132T) and C. submersa (MFLUCC 16-1101) shows 100% identity (487/487, no gaps) using ITS and 99% identity (544/547, 1 gap) using LSU. Corynespora yunnanensis are morphologically similar to C. submersa [12], but the latter differ by in terms of their shorter and narrower conidiophores (150–370 × 10–12 μm) and larger, catenate conidia (100–150 × 16–24 μm), with 9–13 distosepta. Furthermore, C. yunnanensis differ from C. mengsongensis, which have larger conidiophores (746–938 × 12.5–17 μm), with up to 2 successive cylindrical extensions, and larger conidia (96–146 × 16.5–20.5 μm) with 13–18 distosepta, as well as from C. nabanheensis, which have smaller conidiophores (282–528 × 6–8 μm) and smaller conidia (56–84 × 12–14 μm) with 9–13 distosepta.
Kirschsteiniothelia nabanheensis Jing W. Liu & Jian Ma, sp. nov., Figure 6.
Index Fungorum number: IF900082.
Etymology: The name refers to Nabanhe Nature Reserve, the locality where the fungus was collected.
Holotype: HJAUP M2004.
Description: Saprobic on decaying wood in terrestrial habitats. Teleomorph: undetermined. Anamorph (Figure 6): Hyphomycetes. Colonies on natural substratum are effuse, brown to black and hairy. Mycelia are superficial and immersed, composed of branched, septate, pale brown to brown, smooth-walled hyphae. Conidiophores are macronematous, mononematous, erect, irregular or subscorpioid branched near the apex, solitary, smooth, cylindrical, straight to flexuous, septate and black–brown to brown, with dimensions of (200–)320–588 × 8–12 μm ( X ¯ = 405 × 9.5 μm, n = 15). Conidiogenous cells are monotretic, integrated, terminal or intercalary, cylindrical or doliiform, determinate, smooth and brown to dark brown, with dimensions of 20–24 × 4–6 µm ( X ¯ = 22 × 5 μm, n = 15). Conidia are acrogenous, solitary, obclavate or fusiform, sometimes rostrate, straight or slightly curved, 3–7-euseptate, dark brown to brown and smooth, with dimensions of 32–112 × 8–12 μm ( X ¯ = 55.5 × 10 μm, n = 25), tapering to 3–4 μm near the apex, with a width of 4–5 μm at the base.
Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA reach 85–90 mm diam. after 2 weeks in an incubator under dark conditions at 25 °C, with an irregular, circular, velvety surface with dense, gray–brown mycelia along the entire margin; reverse brown to dark brown.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, the Nabanhe National Nature Reserve, on dead branches of an unidentified broadleaf tree, 12 July 2021, J.W. Liu (HJAUP M2004, holotype; ex-type culture permanently preserved in a metabolically inactive state HJAUP C2004 = HJAUP C2006).
Notes: Phylogenetic analyses showed that K. nabanheensis cluster with K. thailandica, K. thujina, K. tectonae and K. rostrata, and they form a sister clade to K. submersa (Figure 2). BLASTn analysis of K. nabanheensis (HJAUP C2004T) and K. rostrata (MFLUCC 15–0619T) shows 85% identity (473/558, 27 gaps) using ITS, 95% identity (519/548, 4 gaps) using LSU and 99% identity (875/886, no gaps) using SSU. BLASTn analysis of K. nabanheensis (HJAUP C2004T) and K. tectonae (MFLUCC 12–0050T) shows 84% identity (458/548, 35 gaps) using ITS and 95% identity (523/548, 4 gaps) using LSU. Kirschsteiniothelia nabanheensis are morphologically similar to K. shimlaensis, but the latter differ in terms of their shorter and wider conidiophores (110–268 × 12–19 μm), and shorter and wider, obovoid, oblong, clavate or cylindrical conidia (41–81 × 13–17.5 μm) with 2–5(–6) eusepta [62]. Furthermore, K. nabanheensis differ from K. submersa which have smaller conidiophores (220–280 × 6–7 μm) and holoblastic conidiogenous cells producing smaller conidia (37.5–51.5 × 8.5–9.5 μm) with 4–6 eusepta [42].

4. Discussion

In this study, we collected saprophytic hyphomycetes on dead branches from terrestrial habitats in Yunnan Province, China. Based on the morphomolecular approach, four novel taxa are introduced: Corynespora mengsongensis sp. nov., C. nabanheensis sp. nov., C. yunnanensis sp. nov. and Kirschsteiniothelia nabanheensis sp. nov.
Corynespora show high morphological similarity to Corynesporina, Corynesporopsis, Hemicorynespora and Solicorynespora in terms of their terminal, monotretic, conidiogenous cells and differ only on the basis of single conidial characteristics (e.g., single or catenate, euseptate or distoseptate, basipetal chain or acropetal chain) [63]. The weak differentiation of these similar genera should only be maintained until sufficient molecular analysis allows for a more phylogenetic classification of genera. In addition, it is challenging to separate Corynespora from Helminthosporium based on morphology alone, as four Corynespora species, C. caespitosa, C. endiandrae, C. leucadendri and C. olivacea, were transferred to Helminthosporium based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, which led to the genus Helminthosporium also meeting the criteria of Corynespora [28].
The genus Corynespora produces conspicuous morphological features, and its generic type, C. cassiicola, is a ubiquitous species, mainly in tropical and subtropical areas, and has been recorded from a wide range of plants [64]. Most Corynespora species are known as saprobes and plant pathogens from woody and herbaceous hosts [8,9,13], but occasionally, C. cassiicola is also found in nematodes, sponges and human skin [64]. To date, 132 species of Corynespora (Table 3) have been be accepted worldwide, whereas four invalid names enclosed in quotation marks are also listed in Table 3. Many species have been identified only based on morphological studies, and only 13 species, including our three new species, have been subjected to molecular phylogenetic analyses. Morphological comparison is important for species identification, but the lack of a large amount of molecular data made it difficult to evaluate previously described Corynespora species by molecular methods. Thus, we recommend supplementary sequence data for previously described Corynespora species by re-examining their type materials or collecting fresh new specimens and using molecular phylogenetic analyses to evaluate their taxonomic placement as necessary.
Hawksworth [36] established the genus Kirschsteiniothelia and regarded K. aethiops as the type species. Boonmee et al. [37] treated the genus in a new family, Kirschsteiniotheliaceae, based on evidence from morphological and phylogenetic analyses. Hernandez-Restrepo et al. [49] raised Kirschsteiniotheliaceae to the new order Kirschsteiniotheliales in Dothideomycetes, although this order does not form a well-supported clade within Dothideomycetidae as a sister clade to Asterinales; the two orders diverged approximately 221 MYA according to divergence time estimates [65].
Sun et al. [38] accepted five former Dendryphiopsis species, D. arbuscula, D. binsarensis, D. biseptata, D. fascicularis and D. goaensis, in Kirschsteiniothelia following the latest treatment of Dendryphiopsis by Wijayawardene et al. [40]. However, these five species were invalidly introduced as new combinations in Kirschsteiniothelia on the basis of Art. F.5.1 (no identifier number cited) and Art. 41.1 (lacking a full and direct basionym reference) of the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants [33]. In addition, Sun et al. [38] provided a checklist for 35 Kirschsteiniothelia species including the distribution, habitat, host and morphology type of each species, but K. ebriosa [66] and K. vinigena [66] are not included. Subsequently, Verma et al. [62] described a new species, K. shimlaensis, from decaying stump in India.
Table 3. Synopsis of conidial characteristics, host information and locality compared across Corynespora species.
Table 3. Synopsis of conidial characteristics, host information and locality compared across Corynespora species.
SpeciesConidaHost/LocalityReferences
ProductionMorphologyColorSize (µm)Septation
Corynespora acaciaeSolitary ObclavateDark brown 16–30 × 6–8 1–5 On phyllodes of Acacia pycnantha, Australia[67]
C. acalyphaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Pale brown to brown 85–120 × 9–11 8–16 On dead branches of Acalypha hamiltoniana, Indonesia [68]
C. achradisSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rostrate Pale olivaceous brown 60–95 × 6–75–10On leaves of Achras sapota, Brunei[69]
C. aeriaSolitary Obclavate Subhyaline to olivaceous Up to 350 × 2–51–5 Isolated from air, India [29]
C. albiziicolaSolitary Obclavate, ellipsoid or clavate Pale olivaceous yellow 20–70.1 × 10–18.5 1–6 On leaves of Albizia lebbek, India [70]
C. alstoniaeSolitary or catenateCylindrical to obclavateSubhyaline to light olivaceous48–154 × 8–21.52–15On leaves of Alstonia scholaris, Nepal[71]
C. annonaceaSolitary or catenate Obclavate to obclavate–cylindricalSubhyaline to olivaceous brown 25–135 × 10–18 1–10 On living leaves of Annona squamosa, India[72]
C. aquaticaSolitary Obclavate to cylindrical Pale brown 34–46 × 3–4.5 (1–)2(–3) On decaying leaves submerged in stream, Mexico [24]
C. arctesporaSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavateBrown to pale brown13–63 × 4–72–20On twigs of Vaccinium, USA[73]
C. asclepiadacearumMostly solitary Obclavato-cylindric to cylindrical Pale olivaceous brown 44–192 × 10–25 Up to 26 On leaves of Cryptolepis buchananii, India [74]
C. azadirachtianaSolitary or catenate Obclavate Pale yellow 32–303.5 × 7–21.5 1–20 On leaves of Azadirachta indica, India [75]
C. barleriicolaSolitary Obclavate to cylindrical Olivaceous yellow 41–246 × 10–18.5 3–14 On leaves of Barleria cristata, India [75]
C. bdellomorphaSolitary ObclavateMid to dark-reddish brown90–138 × 12–1712–19On dead stems of Chusquea valdiviensis, Chile[26]
C. beilschmiediaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to brown 52–144.5 × 8.5–11 7–19 On dead branches of Beilschmiedia intermedia, China [76]
C. bombacearumSolitary or catenate Obclavato-cylindrical to cylindricalPale to mid-olivaceous 26–206 × 8.5–17 Up to 15 On leaves of Bombax malabaricum, India [77]
C. bombacinaSolitary or catenateObclavate to cylindricalLight olivaceous 45–180 × 10–16 5–15 On living leaves of Bombax ceiba, India[78]
C. calicioideaSolitaryObclavateSubhyaline to pale golden brown50–170 × 10–156–21On wood, Sri Lanka [79]
C. carrisaeSolitaryObclavate to cylindricalOlivaceous to very light brown75–242 × 6–14 4–17 On leaves of Carissa spinarum, India[80]
C. caryotaeSolitary Obclavate to elongate Pinkish brown 45–120 × 6–10 Up to 18 On dead rachis of Caryota mitis, Singapore [81]
C. cassiaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 107.5–214 × 11–14 10–21 On dead branches of Cassia surattensis, China [76]
C. cassiicolaSolitary or catenateObclavate to cylindricalSubhyaline to pale olivaceous brown 40–220 × 9–224–20On leaves of Cassia, Cuba[5]
C. catenulataSolitary or catenate Obclavate to obclavato-cylindrical Dark olivaceous yellow to pale olivaceous brown 27.5–225.5 × 11–191–24 On leaves of Clerodendrum indicum, India [75]
C. catharanthicolaSolitary or catenate CylindricalBrown140–310 × 5.5–114–25On leaves of Catharanthus roseus, China[82]
C. celastriSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindricalOlivaceous to very light brown55–120 × 8–15 7–17 On living leaves of Celastrus paniculatus, India [83]
C. chinensisCatenate Obclavate Pale brown 31–61 × 5–7.51–5On dead branches of Angiospermae, China [14]
C. citricolaSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavateSubhyaline 48–150 × 4.5–84–18On leaves of Citrus aurantiifolia, Australia[79]
C. clerodendrigenaSolitary or catenateObclavate to cylindricalLight olivaceous 60–220 × 16–22 3–13 On leaves of Clerodendrum viscosum, India [84]
C. colebrookianaSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rarely cylindrical Pale yellow 45–330 × 6–22 4–16 On leaves of Colebrookea oppositifolia, India [75]
C. combreliSolitaryObclavate, rostratePale olivaceous brown to olivaceous brown 40–122 × 8–114–10On dead branches of Combretum zeyheri, Zambia[85]
C. cubensisSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavatePale brown to dark rusty brown 40–80 × 8–126–15On dead petiole of Coccothrinax, Cuba[86]
C. cucurbiticolaSolitary or catenate Obclavato-cylindrical Subhyaline to pale olivaceous 38.5–230 × 6.5–20 6–23 On leaves of Coccinia grandis, Nepal [87]
C. curvisporaSolitary or catenate Narrow obclavate Straw-colored to mid-brown 40–250 × 10–12 5–10 On fallen herbaceous stems, USA [88]
C. doipuiensisSolitaryObclavate to cylindricalSubhyaline to moderately brown136–165 × 5–25.5On dead herbaceous branches, Thailand[12]
C. donacisSolitary Obclavate Olivaceous brown 45–70 × 8–12 10–14 On dead branches of Donax, China [89]
C. elaeidicolaSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavateSubhyaline or pale olivaceous brown43–65 × 4–73–7On dead leaves of Elaeis guineensis, Malaysia[27]
C. encephalartiSolitaryObclavateMedium olivaceous brown100–150 × 11–151–12 On leaves of Encephalartos, South Africa[90]
C. eranthemiSolitaryObclavateBrown to pale olivaceous brown65–176 × 11–145–25On leaves of Eranthemum wattii, Singapore[32]
C. erythropsidisSolitary Ellipsoid, doliiform to broad clavate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 25–31 × 9–12 4On dead branches of Erythropsis colorata, China [91]
C. euphorbiacearumSolitary or catenate ObclavateSubhyaline to light olivaceous brown59–235 × 11–22.55–18On leaves of Manihot esculenta, India[71]
C. euryaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to brown 36–67 × 6–9 5–9 On dead branches of Eurya inaequalis, China [92]
C. fici-altissimaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Dark brown 55–85 × 9–12 11–18 On dead branches of Ficus altissima, China [89]
C. fici-benjaminaeSolitary Obclavate Pale olivaceous brown 51.5–71 × 8–11 5–10On dead branches of Ficus benjamina, China [76]
C. ficigenaSolitaryObclavate to cylindricalLight olivaceous brown90–165 × 9–20 7–13 On leaves of Ficus religiosa, India[93]
C. flagellataSolitary Obclavate, rostrate, smooth or verrucose Dark brown 50–100 × 9–11 5–10 On wood of Citrus, Ghana [94]
C. fujianensisSolitaryObclavateBrown31–90 × 6.5–10 4–10 On dead branches of Myrioneuron faberi, China[95]
C. gigasporaSolitaryObclavate, rostrate Pale to dark golden brown 100–270 × 19–289–52On dead wood, Sri Lanka[79]
C. gorakhpurensisSolitary Obclavate to ellipsoid Pale olivaceous yellow 21–157 × 13–20 3–13 On leaves of Erythrina indica, India [70]
C. gracilisSolitary Cylindric to obclavate Olivaceous 92–138 × 5–7 10–22 On dead branches of Piper betle, Indonesia [68]
C. gymnocladiSolitary Obclavate Brown to dark brown 15–40 × 7–10.5 2–6 On dead branches of Gymnocladus chinensis, China [92]
C. hamataSolitary Obclavate, hamatate at apex Pale olivaceous brown 158–198 × 9–11 14–19 On dead wood, Indonesia [68]
C. hansfordiiSolitary Obclavate, rostrateStraw-colored to brown 70–100 × 9–137–10On dead wood, Uganda[27]
C. hemigraphidisSolitary ObclavatePale olivaceous brown72–218 × 12–155–25On leaves of Hemigraphis alternat, Singapore[32]
C. heterosporaSolitary Cylindrical to obclavatePale olivaceous brown to olivaceous brown75–170 × 6–206–12On leaves of Manihot utilissima, Malaysia[96]
C. holopoteleaeSolitary or catenate Obclavato-cylindrical to cylindrical Mid olivaceous 23–234 × 3.6–19.5 0–17 On leaves of Holoptelea integrifolia, India [77]
C. holopteleicolaSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindricalOlivaceous brown33–148 × 5–20 0–11 On living leaves of Holoptelea integrifolia, India[72]
C. homaliicolaSolitaryObclavate, cylindricalSubhyaline to straw-colored110–220 × 11–2213–28On dead branches of Homalium aylmeri, Sierra Leone[79]
C. ipomoeaeSolitary or catenateObclavate to cylindricalSubhyaline to pale olivaceous40–380 × 5–152–35On leaves of Ipomoea obscura, India[30]
C. jasminicolaSolitary Obclavate Pale olivaceous 39.5–176 × 10–21 2–18 On leaves of Jasminum arborescens, Nepal [87]
C. kamatiiSolitaryObclavateStraw-colored60–70 × 10–137–12On dead twigs of Vitis, India[69]
C. kenyensisSolitary Obclavate to obpyriform, rostrate Subhyaline to pale brown 60–125 × 16–25 8–15 On dead stems of Sericostachys scandens, Kenya [8]
C. keskaliicolaSolitary or catenate Obclavato-cylindrical to cylindrical Mid olivaceous 64–164 × 16–28 Up to 17 On leaves of Hemidesmus indicus, India [74]
C. laevistipitataSolitary Broadly ellipsoid Red–brown 17.5–24 × 7–8 (0–)1–2 (–3) On Pertusaria ophthalmiza (lichen), USA [97]
C. lanneicolaSolitary ObclavateStraw-colored to brown 40–58 × 10–154–5 On dead branches of Lannea afzelii, Sierra Leone[79]
C. lasianthiSolitary Obclavate, sometimes rostrate Pale brown to dark brown 50–103.5 × 8.5–10 4–8 On dead branches of Lasianthus chinensis, China [76]
C. leptoderridicolaSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Subhyaline to straw-colored70–120 × 14–176–16On dead branches of Leptoderris fasciculata, Sierra Leone[79]
C. leucaenaeSolitary Obclavate, obovoid or ellipsoid Pale yellow 16–298 × 10–19 1–28 On leaves of Leucaena leucocephala, India [70]
C. lignicolaSolitary or catenate CylindricalSubhyaline to pale brown 110–156 × 7–9 On submerged decaying wood, China[12]
C. ligustriSolitary or catenate Obclavate to cylindricalStraw-colored to brown 25–225 × 7.5–304–20On leaves of Ligustrum lucidum, China[98]
C. litseaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 105–235 × 10–12 14–34 On dead branches of Litsea elongata, China [99]
C. longisporaSolitary CylindricalSubhyaline to pale brown 120–330 × 5.5–811–24On dead herbaceous stems, India[100]
C. maculiformisSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavateSubhyaline to pale olivaceous brown 20–86 × 5–102–8On rotten wood, Czech Republic[101]
C. masseeanumSolitaryElongate to obclavatePale olivaceous80–120 × 18–20 7–11 On branches of Helicteres Isora, India [31]
C. matuszakiiSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavatePale brown to straw-colored or mid brown 56–260 × 10–12.52–10On herbaceous stems of Compositae, USA[102]
C. merremiaeSolitary or catenate Cylindrical to obclavatePale olivaceous brown to pale brown 37–150 × 6–12.54–22On leaves of Merremia hirta, China[98]
C. merrilliopanacisSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Straw-colored to brown 130–260 × 17–21 12–25 On dead branches of Merrilliopanax listeri, China [61]
C. micheliaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Subyhaline to brown 333–360 × 15–19 12–28 On dead branches of Michelia champaca, China [61]
C. millettiaeSolitary or catenate Obclavate, smoothOlivaceous brown to mid brown30–182 × 7.5–142–15On leaves of Millettia, China[98]
C. moracearumSolitaryObclavate to cylindricalLight olivaceous brown27–163 × 12–20 5–16 On living leaves of Ficus hispida, India[103]
C. morindae-tinctoriaeSolitary Obclavate Pale olivaceous 44–127 × 15–26.5 6–15 On leaves of Morinda tinctoria, India [104]
C. myrioneuronisSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to brown 30–46 × 6.5–8 3–4 On dead branch of Myrioneuron faberi, China [92]
C. mengsongensisSolitary Obclavate to cylindrical, rostrateBrown to golden brown96–146 × 16.5–20.513–18On dead branches, China This study
C. nanaSolitary Obclavate Subhyaline to pale olivaceous brown 49.5–110 × 9–18.5 4–14 On leaves of Lantana indica, India [104]
C. nabanheensisSolitary Obclavate to cylindrical, expanded to a rounded shape at the apexPale brown to brown 56–84 × 12–149–13On dead branches, China This study
C. occidentalisSolitary Ovoid to ellipsoidalSubyhaline to pale brown 30–54 × 15–193–6On leaves of Cordia collococca, Cuba[105]
C. palmicolaSolitaryObclavate to subcylindricalPale brown 40–70 × 6–9 5–7 On leaves of Cocos australis, Paraguay [106]
C. parapyrenariaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to brown 70–100 × 11–14 5–9 On dead branches of Parapyrenaria multisepala, China [99]
C. parvisporaSolitary Ovoid Brown 13–15 × 4.5–7.5 1–2 On dead twigs of Gynotroches axillaris, Singapore [81]
C. pedaliacearumSolitary or catenate Obclavato-cylindrical to slightly acicular Pale olivaceous 16–163 × 3.2–6 3–28 On leaves of Sesamum indicum, India [107]
C. peristrophicolaSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindrical Olivaceous to very light brown60–135 × 5–16 5–12 On leaves of Peristrophe bicalyculata, India [80]
C. phylloshureaeSolitary Obclavate Brown 30–50 × 8–10 6–10 On dead branches of Phyllostachys sulphurea, China [89]
C. pogostemonicolaSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindricalOlivaceous to olivaceous brown77–288 × 8–14 5–24 On leaves of Pogostemon plectrantoides, India[108]
C. polyphragmiaSolitary or catenate Obclavate Pale to mid golden brown110–280 × 14–1710–25On decorticated branches of Camellia japonica, Japan[109]
C. pongamiicolaSolitaryObclavate, ellipsoidal, clavate or club-shapedLight olivaceous yellow18–65.2 × 8–16.5 1–6 On living leaves of Pongamia pinnata, India[110]
C. premnigenaSolitary or catenate Obclavate to obclavato-cylindrical Subhyaline to pale yellow 52–265 × 10–15 1–19 On leaves of Premna mucronata, India [75]
C. proliferataSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rostrate Pale brown to brown 30–300 × 9–123–17On wood of Fagus sylvatica, the Netherlands[111]
C. pruniSolitary or catenate Obclavate Olivaceous brown or brown50–130 × 10–164–9On bark of Prunus serotina, USA[27]
C. pseudocassiicolaSolitarySubcylindrical to obclavateMedium brown95–160 × 9–10 (4–)8–12(–17) On leaves of Byrsonima, Colombia[112]
C. queenslandicaSolitaryObclavate Pale brown72–114 × 8–106–9On phyllodes of Acacia leiocalyx, Australia[15]
C. rhapidis-humilisSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 90–130 × 6–8 12–16 On dead branches of Rhapis humilis, China [94]
C. rhododendriSolitary Obclavate to long rostrate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 180–400 × 7.5–11 19–36 On dead branches of Rhododendron hainanense, China [113]
C. ripogoniSolitary Obclavate Brown 60–160 × 10–13.5 7–15 On dead stems of Ripogonum scandens, New Zealand [9]
C. rosacearumSolitary or catenate Obclavate to obclavato-cylindrical Subhyaline to pale olivaceous brown 26.5–269 × 9–18.5 1–18 On leaves of Eriobotrya japonica, India [104]
“C. ruelliae”Solitary Obclavate Brown to pale olivaceous brown60–150 × 12–155–16 On leaves of Ruellia macrophylla and Ruellia dipteracanthus, Singapore[32]
C. sacchariSolitary Obclavate, rostrate, verrucose or smooth Pale brown to olivaceous brown 80–120 × 8–9 10–14 On dead branches of Saccharum sinense, China [114]
C. salasiaeSolitary Ellipsoidal, doliiform Brown17–20 × 8–120–2On dead stems of grass, Cuba[115]
C. schleichericolaSolitary or catenate Obclavate Pale olivaceous brown22.5–66 × 3.8–8.5 1–12 On leaves of Schleichera trijuga, India [107]
C. scolopiaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to brown 90–150 × 10–13 8–11 On dead branches of Scolopia chinensis, China [116]
C. sed-acaciaeSolitary Obclavate Pale brown to olivaceous brown 40–70 × 11–13.5 8–12 On dead branches of Acacia confusa, China [113]
C. sidaeSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindricalOlivaceous brown to very light brown25–220 × 7–17 2–24 On leaves of Sida acuta, India[117]
C. sinensisCatenateObclavate or fusiform, ellipsoidBrown21–42 × 8–9.5 3(–4)On dead branches, China [13]
C. siwalikaSolitaryObclavate, rostratePale straw-colored to golden brown 88–140 × 15–209–19 On branches of Helicteres isora, India[109]
C. smithiiSolitary or catenate CylindricalSubhyaline to golden brown70–410 × 12–197–45On bark of Ilex, UK[79]
C. solaniSolitary or catenate Obclavate to cylindrical Olivaceous yellow 80.6–276 × 8–10 1–17 On leaves of Solanum indicum, India [118]
C. subcylindricaCatenate Broadly ellipsoid, subcylindrical Pale brown 18–60(–90) × 5–13 0–3(–6) On leaves of Lippia sidoides, Brazil [63]
C. submersaSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rostrateSubhyaline to golden brown100–150 × 16–249–13On submerged decaying wood, China[12]
C. supkhariiSolitary Obclavate Pale olivaceous brown 22.5–142.5 × 10–17.5 2–11 On leaves of Phyllanthus parvifolius, India [119]
C. tanacetiSolitary Obclavate, smooth or verruculose Pale brown to olivaceous brown 60–104 × 12–16 7–12 On dead branches of Tanacetum vulgare, China [116]
C. tectonaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrate, verrucose or smooth Pale brown to olivaceous brown 110–160 × 10–12 12–18 On dead branches of Tectona grandis, China [114]
C. thailandicaMostly solitaryObclavateBrown80–110 × 10–12 4–8 On wood, Thailand [120]
C. thoriiCatenateSubcylindrical, broadly ellipsoid to almost obovoidPale brown to medium olivaceous brown20–30 × 5–7(0–)1(–3)On thallus, apothecia of Lecanora, Japan[121]
C. titarpaniensisSolitaryObclavate to cylindricalOlivaceous brown to light brown50–340 × 5–205–35On living leaves of Lepidagathis, India[122]
C. tomenticolaSolitaryCylindricalOlivaceous brown to brown50–230 × 10.5–20.5 3–6 On living leaves of Terminalia tomentosa, India [110]
C. toonaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrate Pale brown to dark brown 65–144 × 7–9 4–14 On dead branches of Toona sinensis, China [114]
C. torulosaSolitaryClavateDark olivaceous brown 35–60 × 13–20 3–5 On dead leaves of Musa sapientum Brazil [123]
C. tremaeSolitaryObclavate to obclavato-cylindricalLight brown to brown50–160 × 4–12 5–20 On dead petiole of Trema orientalis, India[124]
C. trematicolaSolitary Obclavate to ellipsoid Pale olivaceous brown 104–296 × 11–16 1–12 On leaves of Trema orientalis, India [118]
C. trichiliaeSolitary Obclavate, rostrateSubhyaline to straw-colored53–74 × 9–114–6 On branches of Trichilia heudelotii, Sierra Leone[27]
C. trichoidesSolitary Obclavato-cylindrical or obclavate Pale olivaceous brown29–170 × 10–15 3–14 On leaves of Triumfetta rhomboidea, Nepal [87]
C. ulmacearumSolitary Obclavate Subhyaline to pale olivaceous brown15–106 × 3.5–10 2–16 On leaves of Trema orientalis, India [107]
C. vismiaeSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rostratePale olivaceous brown or straw-colored55–107 × 6–93–5 On leaves of Vismia guineensis, Sierra Leone[85]
C. viticisSolitary or catenate CylindricalPale brown80–383 × 6–9On leaves of Vitex rotundifolia, China[98]
C. viticolaSolitary or catenate Obclavate, cylindrical to obovoid Pale olivaceous brown34–170 × 7–17.5 1–14 On leaves of Cayratia carnosa, India [118]
C. woodfordianaSolitary or catenate Obclavate, rostrateLight olivaceous brown40–170 × 9.5–174–14 On leaves of Woodfordia fruticosa, India[71]
C. yerbaeSolitary or catenate ObclavateSubhyaline to pale golden brown 72–170 × 16–188–19On dead branches of Ilex paraguayensis, Argentina[26]
C. yunnanensisSolitary Obclavato-cylindrical, rostrateBrown to golden brown80–128 × 16–193–16On dead branches, China This study
C. ziziphaeSolitary Obclavato-cylindrical, cylindrical or clavate Mid olivaceous brown to straw-colored 33–215 × 10–27 Up to 15 On leaves of Ziziphus giraldii, India [77]
All conidia are smooth, except where indicated; 2“–”, the number of septation is not given.
Kirschsteiniothelia is one genus of many lignicolous fungi encountered in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Following the treatment of Sun et al. [38], the genus currently consists of 39 species including K. nabanheensis [38,62,66], but most species have been identified based on morphological studies, and to date, only 17 species are represented by DNA sequences in GenBank. Kirschsteiniothelia has mainly been reported in the USA (nine species), China (eight species) and Thailand (six species), and little published information is has been recorded in other regions [38,62,66]. Thus, it is unclear whether is closely related with geographic regions.
Studies conducted to date on Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia have mainly focused on their alpha taxonomy, and most knowledge of both genera is related to woody and herbaceous hosts, whereas we have a less developed understanding of many natural substrates, such as dung, insects and other fungi, including lichens. Because most species of both genera lack cultures, some of them may have received scant consideration in single-spore isolation before the advent of Sanger sequencing and even have particular substrate requirements. Similarly, little attention has been accorded to the roles of these genera in decomposition and nutrient recycling, their geographical distribution, substrate specificities and teleomorph relationships. Therefore, it is not yet possible to quantify their roles in ecosystem function. Although this study broadens our understanding of the diversity of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia taxa, additional large-scale surveys of fungal resources in aquatic and terrestrial habitats within different geographic regions and with different ecological environments, host information and climatic conditions are needed, which will contribute to a comprehensive knowledge of the fungal diversity of these genera. Further collaboration will also be necessary to quantify their functional roles and strengthen our ability to conserve fungal resources.

Author Contributions

J.L., Y.H., X.L., J.X., Z.X. and J.M. designed the study and were involved in the writing of the paper. J.L. and X.S. were responsible for sample collections. J.L. and L.Z. were involved in phylogenetic analyses. R.F.C.-R., R.C. and J.M. contributed to planning and editing of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32160006, 31970018, 31360011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seifert, K.; Morgan-Jones, G.; Gams, W.; Kendrick, B. The genera of hyphomycetes. CBS Biodivers. Ser. 2011, 9, 1–997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Index Fungorum. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 6 January 2023).
  3. Celio, G.J.; Padamsee, M.; Dentinger, B.T.M.; Bauer, R.; McLaughlin, D.J. Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life: Constructing the Structural and Biochemical Database. Mycologia 2006, 98, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Güssow, H.T. Notes on a disease of cucumbers. II. J. Royal Agric. Soc. Engl. 1905, 65, 271–272. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wei, C.T. Notes on Corynespora. Mycol. Pap. 1950, 34, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes; Kew, Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Surrey, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  7. Species Fungorum. 2023. Available online: http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 6 January 2023).
  8. Siboe, G.M.; Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F. New dematiaceous hyphomycetes from Kenyan rare plants. Mycotaxon 1999, 73, 283–302. [Google Scholar]
  9. McKenzie, E.H.C. Three new phragmosporous hyphomycetes on Ripogonum from an ‘ecological island’ in New Zealand. Mycotaxon 2010, 111, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quaedvlieg, W.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Shin, H.D.; Barreto, R.W.; Alfenas, A.C.; Swart, W.J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Sizing up Septoria. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 307–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Schumacher, R.K.; Summerell, B.A.; Giraldo, A.; Gené, J.; Guarro, J.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Camporesi, E.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 281–319. Persoonia 2014, 33, 212–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hyde, K.D.; de Silva, N.I.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Boonmee, S.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Senanayake, I.C.; et al. AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100. Asian J. Mycol. 2020, 3, 22–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Z.H.; Kuang, W.G.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, X.G.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Ma, J. Corynespora sinensis sp. nov. from Jiangxi, China. Mycotaxon 2020, 135, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.W.; Zhang, X.G.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Ma, J. Corynespora chinensis sp. nov. from Hainan, China. Mycotaxon 2022, 137, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sutton, B.C.; Pascoe, I.G. Some dematiaceous hyphomycetes from branches and phyllodes on Acacia in Australia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 1988, 1, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F. Deuteromycotina de Cuba. Hyphomycetes III; Instituto de Investigaciones Fundamentales en Agricultura Tropical “Alejandro de Humboldt”: Habana, Cuba, 1985; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. II. Mycol. Pap. 1961, 79, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  18. Deighton, F.C. Observations on Phaeoisariopsis. Mycol. Res. 1990, 94, 1096–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sutton, B.C. Mitosporic fungi from Malawi. Mycol. Pap. 1993, 167, 1–93. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dyko, B.J.; Sutton, B.C. New and interesting dematiaceous hyphomycetes from Florida. Mycotaxon 1979, 8, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  21. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Zhang, X.G.; Li, D.W.; Gusmão, L.F.P.; Pérez-Martínez, S.; Sosa, D. Notes on Vamsapriya and V. camagueyensis comb. nov. Mycotaxon 2017, 132, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Delgado-Rodríguez, G.; Mena-Portales, J.; Calduch, M.; Decock, C. Hyphomycetes (Hongos Mitospóricos) del area protegida Mil Cumbres, Cuba Occidental. Cryptog. Mycol. 2002, 23, 277–293. [Google Scholar]
  23. Heredia, G.; Li, D.W.; Wendt, L.; Reblová, M.; Arias, R.M.; Gamboa-Angulo, M.; Štěpánek, V.; Stadler, M.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F. Natonodosa speciosa gen. et sp. nov. and rediscovery of Poroisariopsis inornata: Neotropical anamorphic fungi in Xylariales. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Heredia, G.P.; Arias, R.M.; Saikawa, M.; Minter, D.W.; Stadler, M.; Guarro, J.; Decock, C. Two new hyphomycetes from rainforests of Mexico, and Briansuttonia, a new genus to accommodate Corynespora alternarioides. Mycotaxon 2004, 89, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  25. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Kendrick, B. Conidial fungi from Cuba: II. Univ. Waterloo. Biol. Ser. 1990, 33, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. IV. Mycol. Pap. 1963, 87, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. I. Mycol. Pap. 1960, 76, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  28. Voglmayr, H.; Jaklitsch, W.M. Corynespora, Exosporium and Helminthosporium revisited—New species and generic reclassification. Stud. Mycol. 2017, 87, 43–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Swapana, S.; Nair, N.N. Corynespora aeria: A new species recorded amongst aero mycoflora of Kerala, India. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 4, 487–492. [Google Scholar]
  30. Verma, N.K.; Surywanshi, J.S.; Rai, A.N. Corynespora ipomoeae, a novel taxon of dematiaceous hyphomycetes. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 2014, 44, 466–469. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirk, P.M. Nomenclatural novelties. Index Fungorum 2014, 120, 1. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yen, J.M.; Lim, G. Étude sur les champignons parasites du Sud-Est asiatique. 39. Les Corynespora de Malaisie. Cryptog. Mycol. 1980, 1, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  33. Turland, N.J.; Wiersema, J.H.; Barrie, F.R.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Herendeen, P.S.; Knapp, S.; Kusber, W.H.; Li, D.Z.; Marhold, K.; et al. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code) Adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress, Shenzhen, China, July 2017; Regnum Vegetabile 159; Koeltz Botanical Books: Glashütten, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sivanesan, A. Corynesporasca caryotae gen. et sp. nov. with a Corynespora anamorph, and the family Corynesporascaceae. Mycol. Res. 1996, 100, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rossman, A.Y.; Crous, P.W.; Hyde, K.D.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Aptroot, A.; Bezerra, J.L.; Bhat, J.D.; Boehm, E.; Braun, U.; Boonmee, S.; et al. Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes. IMA Fungus 2015, 6, 507–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hawksworth, D.L. Kirschsteiniothelia, a new genus for the Microthelia incrustans-group (Dothideales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1985, 91, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boonmee, S.; Ko, T.W.K.; Chukeatirote, E.; Hyde, K.D.; Chen, H.; Cai, L.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Kodsueb, R.; Hassan, B.A. Two new Kirschsteiniothelia species with Dendryphiopsis anamorphs cluster in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae fam. nov. Mycologia 2012, 104, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sun, Y.R.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Hyde, K.D.; Wang, Y. Kirschsteiniothelia thailandica sp. nov. (Kirschsteiniotheliaceae) from Thailand. Phytotaxa 2021, 490, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schoch, C.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Boehm, E.; Burgess, T.I.; De Gruyter, J.; De Hoog, G.S.; Dixon, L.; Grube, M.; Gueidan, C. A class-wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Crous, P.W.; Kirk, P.M.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Dai, D.Q.; D’souza, M.J.; Diederich, P.; Dissanayake, A.; et al. Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes–2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names. Fungal Divers. 2014, 69, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bao, D.F.; Luo, Z.L.; Liu, J.K.; Bhat, D.J.; Sarunya, N.; Li, W.L.; Su, H.Y.; Hyde, K.D. Lignicolous freshwater fungi in China III: Three new species and a new record of Kirschsteiniothelia from northwestern Yunnan Province. Mycosphere 2018, 9, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Su, H.Y.; Hyde, K.D.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Luo, Z.L.; Promputtha, I.; Tian, Q.; Lin, C.G.; Shang, Q.J.; Zhao, Y.C.; et al. The families Distoseptisporaceae fam. nov.; Kirschsteiniotheliaceae, Sporormiaceae and Torulaceae, with new species from freshwater in Yunnan Province, China. Fungal Divers. 2016, 80, 375–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Abreu, V.P.; Bazzicalupo, A.; Chethana, K.W.T.; Clericuzio, M.; Dayarathne, M.C.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Ekanayaka, A.H.; He, M.Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 603–708: Taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Divers. 2017, 87, 1–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, G.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Zhao, R.L.; Hongsanan, S.; Abdel-Aziz, F.A.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Alvarado, P.; Alves-Silva, G.; Ammirati, J.F.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 78, 1–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Barr, M.E. Prodromus to Class Loculoascomycetes; Lubrecht & Cramer, Limited: Amherst, MA, USA, 1987; pp. 1–168. [Google Scholar]
  46. Barr, M.E. Notes on the Pleomassariaceae. Mycotaxon 1993, 49, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schoch, C.L.; Shoemaker, R.A.; Seifert, K.A.; Hambleton, S.; Spatafora, J.W.; Crous, P.W. A multigene phylogeny of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear loci. Mycologia 2006, 98, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Suetrong, S.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W.; Kohlmeyer, J.; Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B.; Sakayaroj, J.; Phongpaichit, S.; Tanaka, K.; Hirayama, K.; Jones, E.B.G. Molecular systematics of the marine Dothideomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hernandez-Restrepo, M.; Gené, J.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Mena-Portales, J.; Crous, P.W.; Guarro, J. Phylogeny of saprobic microfungi from Southern Europe. Stud. Mycol. 2017, 86, 53–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ma, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, L.G.; Zhang, Y.D.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Zhang, X.G. Three new species of Neosporidesmium from Hainan, China. Mycol. Prog. 2011, 10, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Goh, T.K. Single-spore isolation using a hand-made glass needle. Fungal Divers. 1999, 2, 47–63. [Google Scholar]
  52. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xia, J.W.; Ma, Y.R.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.G. Acrodictys-like wood decay fungi from southern China, with two new families Acrodictyaceae and Junewangiaceae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 2005, 97, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.L.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Shang, Z.Q.; Zhang, X.G. Two new Corynespora species from Jiangsu, China. Mycotaxon 2007, 100, 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  62. Verma, R.K.; Prasher, I.B.; Sushma; Gautam, A.K.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F. Kirschsteiniothelia shimlaensis sp. nov. from Himachal Pradesh, India. Mycotaxon 2021, 136, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Siqueira, M.V.; Braun, U.; Souza-Motta, C.M. Corynespora subcylindrica sp. nov., a new hyphomycete species from Brazil and a discussion on the taxonomy of corynespora-like genera. Sydowia 2008, 60, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  64. Farr, D.F.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungal Databases; U.S. National Fungus Collections, USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Sarma, V.V.; Boonmee, S.; Lücking, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Liu, N.G.; et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1553–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rodríguez-Andrade, E.; Stchigel, A.M.; Guarro, J.; Cano-Lira, J.F. Fungal diversity of deteriorated sparkling wine and cork stoppers in Catalonia, Spain. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Swart, H.J. Australian leaf-inhabiting fungi. XVIII. Corynespora acaciae sp. nov. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1985, 84, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wulandari, N.F. Three new species of Corynespora from Indonesia. Mycotaxon 2006, 97, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ellis, M.B. More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes; Kew, Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Surrey, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sharma, N.; Singh, P.N.; Kamal. Three new taxa of Corynespora causing foliar blight in forest plants of North Eastern Uttar Pradesh. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 2003, 33, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  71. Meenu, K.; Singh, A.; Singh, S.K. Some new species of Corynespora. Indian Phytopath. 1997, 50, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Gond, D.K.; Saini, D.C. Two new species of Corynespora from Uttar Pradesh, India. Mycosphere 2012, 3, 864–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Carris, L.M. Vaccinium fungi: Corynespora arctespora, comb. nov. Mycotaxon 1987, 30, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  74. Dubey, R.K.; Rai, A.N. Two new hyphomycetous fungi from India. Indian Phytopath. 2003, 56, 486–490. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sharma, N.; Chaudhary, R.K.; Kamal. Five undescribed species of Corynespora. Indian Phytopath. 2002, 55, 458–463. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang, K.; Fu, H.B.; Zhang, X.G. Taxonomic studies of Corynespora from Hainan, China. Mycotaxon 2009, 109, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jain, S.L.; Rai, A.N.; Mehta, P. Additions to the genus Corynespora from India. Indian Phytopath. 2002, 55, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kumar, S.; Singh, A.; Singh, R.; Dubey, N.K. Corynespora bombacina causing foliar disease on Bombax ceiba from Sonebhadra forest of Uttar Pradesh, India. Can. J. Plant Prot. 2013, 1, 76–77. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ellis, M.B. Some species of Corynespora. Mycol. Pap. 1957, 65, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  80. Singh, R.; Kamal. Two new species of Corynespora from northeastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Mycotaxon 2011, 118, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Subramanian, C.V. Hyphomycetes from South East Asia—Novelties from Singapore and Malaysia. Kavaka 1994, 22, 52–76. [Google Scholar]
  82. Chi, P.K. Fungal Diseases of Cultivated Medicinal Plants in Guangdong Province; Guangdong Science and Technology Press: Guangzhou, China, 1994; pp. 1–275. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kumar, S.; Singh, R. Corynespora celastri sp. nov. on Celastraceae from India. Stud. Fung. 2016, 1, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Singh, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Dubey, N.K. Corynespora clerodendrigena sp. nov. causing foliar disease on Clerodendrum viscosum from Sonebhadra forest of Uttar Pradesh, India. Plant Pathol. Quar. 2013, 3, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. V. Mycol. Pap. 1963, 93, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  86. Holubová-Jechová, V.; Mercado Sierra, A. Studies on hyphomycetes from Cuba II. Hyphomycetes from the Isla de la Juventud. Ceská Mykol. 1984, 38, 96–120. [Google Scholar]
  87. Meenu; Kharwar, R.N.; Bhartiya, H.D. Some new forms of genus Corynespora from Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Indian Phytopath. 1998, 51, 146–151. [Google Scholar]
  88. Raja, H.A.; Stchigel, A.M.; Miller, A.N.; Crane, J.L.; Shearer, C.A. Hyphomycetes from the great Smoky mountains national park, including three new species. Fungal Divers. 2007, 26, 271–286. [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang, X.G.; Xu, J.J. Taxonomic studies of Corynespora from Guangxi, China. Mycotaxon 2005, 92, 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  90. Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Sharma, R.; Mughini, G.; Noordeloos, M.E.; Santini, A.; Shouche, Y.S.; Bezerra, J.D.P.; Dima, B.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 868–950. Persoonia 2019, 42, 291–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, X.M.; Zhang, X.G. A new species of Corynespora from Yunnan, China. Mycotaxon 2007, 101, 77–79. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ma, J.; Zhang, X.G. Three new species of Corynespora from China. Mycotaxon 2007, 99, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  93. Singh, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Dubey, N.K. A new species of Corynespora causing foliar disease on Ficus religiosa from forest of Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh, India. Mycosphere 2012, 3, 890–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, X.G.; Ji, M. Taxonomic studies of Corynespora from Yunnan, China. Mycotaxon 2005, 92, 425–429. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ma, L.G.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.D.; Zhang, X.G. Craspedodidymum and Corynespora spp. nov. and a new anamorph recorded from southern China. Mycotaxon 2011, 117, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yen, J.M. Étude sur les champignons parasites du Sud-Est asiatique. 37. Champignons Parasites de Malaisie. 20. Bull. Soc. myc. Fr. 1980, 96, 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  97. Heuchert, B.; Braun, U. On some dematiaceous lichenicolous hyphomycetes. Herzogia 2006, 19, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  98. Guo, Y.L. Four new species of Corynespora. Acta Mycol. Sin. 1984, 3, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ma, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.G. Taxonomic studies of Corynespora from Hainan, China. Mycotaxon 2008, 104, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  100. Saikia, U.N.; Sarbhoy, A.K. Hyphomycetes of North-East India II. Indian Phytopath. 1980, 33, 466–470. [Google Scholar]
  101. Holubová-Jechová, V. Revisiones generum obscurorum hyphomycetum: Four genera described by A.C.J. Corda. Sydowia 1994, 46, 238–246. [Google Scholar]
  102. Morgan-Jones, G. Notes on hyphomycetes. LX. Corynespora matuszakii, an undescribed species with narrow, cylindrical, catenate conidia and highly-reduced conidial cell lumina. Mycotaxon 1988, 33, 483–487. [Google Scholar]
  103. Singh, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Dubey, N.K. A new species of Corynespora from Sonebhadra forest of Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr. Res. Envir. App. Myc. 2014, 4, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meenu, K.; Kamal. New species of Corynespora. Mycol. Res. 1998, 102, 344–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F. Fungi Cubenses III; Instituto de Investigaciones Fundamentales en Agricultura Tropical “Alejandro de Humboldt”: Habana, Cuba, 1988; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  106. Braun, U.; Crous, P.W.; Nakashima, C. Cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) 2. Species on monocots (Acoraceae to Xyridaceae, excluding Poaceae). IMA Fung. 2014, 5, 203–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Singh, A.; Singh, S.K.; Kamal. Three new species of Corynespora from India. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 2000, 30, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kumar, S.; Singh, R.; Saini, D.C.; Kamal. A new species of Corynespora Güssow from terai forest of northeastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Mycosphere 2012, 3, 410–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ellis, M.B. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. III. Mycol. Pap. 1961, 82, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  110. Singh, D.P.; Mall, T.P. Two novel additions to Corynespora Güssow from India. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 6, 321–324. [Google Scholar]
  111. Loerakker, W.M. A new species of Corynespora. Persoonia 1975, 8, 220–222. [Google Scholar]
  112. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Burgess, T.I.; Hardy, G.E.S.t.J.; Gené, J.; Guarro, J.; Baseia, I.G.; García, D.; Gusmão, L.F.P.; Souza-Motta, C.M.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784. Persoonia 2018, 40, 240–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, K.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.G. Two new species of Corynespora from Hainan, China. Mycotaxon 2008, 104, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhang, X.G.; Shi, C.H. Taxonomic studies of Corynespora from China. Mycotaxon 2005, 92, 417–423. [Google Scholar]
  115. Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Guarro, J.; Cano, J. Notes on conidial fungi. I. A new species of Corynespora. Mycologia 1995, 87, 271–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, G.M.; Zhang, X.G. Two new species of Corynespora from Guangdong, China. Mycotaxon 2007, 99, 347–352. [Google Scholar]
  117. Kumar, S.; Singh, R. Biodiversity, distribution and taxonomy of conidial fungus Corynespora (Corynesporascaceae) associated with Malvaceae. J. Biodivers. Endanger. Species 2016, 4, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Sharma, N.; Chaudhary, S.; Kamal. Three new species of genus Corynespora. Indian Phytopathol. 2002, 55, 178–181. [Google Scholar]
  119. Sharma, N.; Soni, K.K.; Jamaluddin; Verma, R.K. A new species of Corynespora from central India. Indian Phytopathol. 2005, 58, 503–504. [Google Scholar]
  120. Crous, P.W.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Wingfield, M.J.; Carnegie, A.J.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Lombard, L.; Roux, J.; Barreto, R.W.; Baseia, I.G.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 2018, 41, 238–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhurbenko, M.P.; Braun, U.; Heuchert, B.; Kobzeva, A.A. New lichenicolous hyphomycetes from Eurasia. Herzogia 2015, 28, 584–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kushwaha, P.; Singh, R.; Kumar, S. Corynespora titarpaniensis sp. nov., on Lepidagathis from Central India. Mycotaxon 2017, 132, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Guarro, J.; Cheewangkoon, R.; van der Bank, M.; Swart, W.J.; Stchigel, A.M.; Cano-Lira, J.F.; Roux, J.; Madrid, H.; et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 154–213. Persoonia 2013, 31, 188–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kumar, S.; Singh, R. Diversity, distribution and taxonomy of Corynespora associated with Cannabaceae and Ulmaceae. Plant Pathol. Quar. 2016, 6, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogram of Pleosporales based on combined ITS, SSU, LSU and tef1-α sequences. ML and BI bootstrap support values above 75% and 0.90 are shown at the first and second position, respectively. The tree is rooted to Cyclothyriella rubronotata (TR) and C. rubronotata (TR9). Strains from the current study are indicated in red.
Figure 1. Phylogram of Pleosporales based on combined ITS, SSU, LSU and tef1-α sequences. ML and BI bootstrap support values above 75% and 0.90 are shown at the first and second position, respectively. The tree is rooted to Cyclothyriella rubronotata (TR) and C. rubronotata (TR9). Strains from the current study are indicated in red.
Jof 09 00107 g001
Figure 2. Phylogram of Kirschsteiniotheliales, Acrosperales, Strigulales and Monoblastiales based on combined ITS, SSU and LSU sequences. The ML and BI bootstrap support values above 75% and 0.90 are shown at the first and second position, respectively. The tree is rooted to Pseudorobillarda eucalypti (MFLUCC 12–0422) and P. phragmitis (CBS 398.61). Strains from the current study are indicated in red.
Figure 2. Phylogram of Kirschsteiniotheliales, Acrosperales, Strigulales and Monoblastiales based on combined ITS, SSU and LSU sequences. The ML and BI bootstrap support values above 75% and 0.90 are shown at the first and second position, respectively. The tree is rooted to Pseudorobillarda eucalypti (MFLUCC 12–0422) and P. phragmitis (CBS 398.61). Strains from the current study are indicated in red.
Jof 09 00107 g002
Figure 3. Corynespora mengsongensis (HJAUP M2000, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (cf) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia; (g) conidia; (h) conidiogenous cells with developing conidia.
Figure 3. Corynespora mengsongensis (HJAUP M2000, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (cf) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia; (g) conidia; (h) conidiogenous cells with developing conidia.
Jof 09 00107 g003
Figure 4. Corynespora nabanheensis (HJAUP M2048, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d,e) conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; (fh) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia.
Figure 4. Corynespora nabanheensis (HJAUP M2048, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d,e) conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; (fh) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia.
Jof 09 00107 g004
Figure 5. Corynespora yunnanensis (HJAUP M2132, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d) conidiogenous cells and conidia; (eg) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia.
Figure 5. Corynespora yunnanensis (HJAUP M2132, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d) conidiogenous cells and conidia; (eg) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia.
Jof 09 00107 g005
Figure 6. Kirschsteiniothelia nabanheensis (HJAUP M2004, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d) conidiogenous cells and conidia; (eg) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia; (h) conidiophores and conidiogenous cells.
Figure 6. Kirschsteiniothelia nabanheensis (HJAUP M2004, holotype). (a) Surface of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (b) reverse of colony after 2 weeks on PDA; (c) conidia; (d) conidiogenous cells and conidia; (eg) conidiophores, conidiogenous cells and conidia; (h) conidiophores and conidiogenous cells.
Jof 09 00107 g006
Table 1. List of Corynespora species and GenBank accessions used in the phylogenetic analyses. New sequences are indicated in bold.
Table 1. List of Corynespora species and GenBank accessions used in the phylogenetic analyses. New sequences are indicated in bold.
TaxonStrain NumberGenBank Accession Numbers
SSULSUITStef1-α
Corynespora cassiicolaCBS 100822GU296144GU301808GU349052
C. citricolaCBS 169.77FJ852594
C. doipuiensisMFLUCC 14–0022MN648318MN648326MN648322
C. encephalartiCBS 145555MK876424MK876383
C. lignicolaMFLUCC 16–1301MN860554MN860549
C. mengsongensisHJAUP C2000TOQ060575OQ060578OQ060574
C. nabanheensisHJAUP C2048TOQ060576OQ060580OQ060577OQ067526
C. pseudocassiicolaCPC 31708MH327830MH327794MH327877
C. smithiiL120 KY984297 KY984297 KY984435
C. smithiiL130 KY984419 KY984298KY984298 KY984436
C. smithiiCABI 5649bGU323201FJ852597GU349018
C. smithiiCBS 139925KY984299KY984299
C. submersaMFLUCC 16–1101MN860553MN860548
C. torulosaCBS 136419MH877634MH866095
C. thailandicaCBS 145089MK047505MK047455MK047567
C. yunnanensisHJAUP C2132TOQ060584OQ060583OQ060579
Periconia byssoidesH 4600AB797280 AB807570 LC014581AB808546
P. digitataCBS 510.77AB797271 AB807561 LC014584AB808537
P. igniariaCBS 845.96AB797277AB807567LC014586AB808543
P. macrospinosaCBS 135663KP184080KP184038KP183999
P. pseudodigitataKT 1395NG_064850 NG_059396 NR_153490 AB808540
Cyclothyriella rubronotataTR, CBS 121892 KX650541 KX650541 KX650516
C. rubronotataTR9, CBS 141486 KX650507 KX650544 KX650544 KX650519
“–”, sequence is unavailable. Strain with T (ex-type). Abbreviations: CABI: International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane, U.K.; CBS: Central Bureau voor Schimmel cultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Collection of Pedro Crous housed at CBS; HJAUP: Herbarium of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Plant Pathology; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; SSU: Small Subunit Ribosomal; LSU: Large Subunit Ribosomal; ITS: Internal Transcribed Spacer; tef1-α: Transcriptional Enhancer Factor 1-alpha; others are not registered abbreviations.
Table 2. List of Kirschsteiniothelia species and GenBank accessions used in the phylogenetic analyses. New sequences are in bold.
Table 2. List of Kirschsteiniothelia species and GenBank accessions used in the phylogenetic analyses. New sequences are in bold.
TaxonStrainGenbank Accession Numbers
ITSLSUSSU
Acrospermum adeanumM133 EU940180 EU940104 EU940031
A. compressumM151 EU940161 EU940084 EU940012
A. gramineumM152 EU940162 EU940085 EU940013
Anisomeridium ubianumMPN94 GU327709 JN887379
Flavobathelium epiphyllumMPN67 GU327717 JN887382
Kirschsteiniothelia aethiopsCBS 109.53 AY016361 AY016344
K. aethiopsMFLUCC 16–1104 MH182583 MH182589 MH182615
K. aethiopsS–783 MH182586 MH182595 MH182617
K. aethiopsMFLUCC 15–0424 KU500571 KU500578 KU500585
K. aquaticaTMFLUCC 17–1685 MH182587 MH182594 MH182618
K. arasbaranicaIRAN 2509C KX621986 KX621987 KX621988
K. arasbaranicaTIRAN 2508C KX621983 KX621984 KX621985
K. cangshanensisTMFLUCC 16–1350 MH182584 MH182592
K. fluminicolaTMFLUCC 16–1263 MH182582 MH182588
K. lignicolaTMFLUCC 10–0036 HQ441567 HQ441568 HQ441569
K. nabanheensisTHJAUP C2004OQ023197OQ023273OQ023038
K. nabanheensisHJAUP C2006OQ023274OQ023275OQ023037
K. phoenicisTMFLUCC 18–0216 MG859978 MG860484 MG859979
K. rostrataTMFLUCC 15–0619 KY697280 KY697276 KY697278
K. rostrataMFLUCC 16–1124 MH182590
K. submersaTMFLUCC 15–0427 KU500570 KU500577 KU500584
K. submersaS–481 MH182591 MH182616
K. submersaS–601 MH182585 MH182593
K. tectonaeTMFLUCC 12–0050 KU144916 KU764707
K. thailandicaTMFLUCC 20–0116 MT985633 MT984443 MT984280
K. thujinaJF 13210 KM982716 KM982718 KM982717
Megalotremis verrucosaMPN104 GU327718 JN887383
Phyllobathelium anomalumMPN 242 GU327722 JN887386
P. firmumERP 3175 GU327723
Pseudorobillarda eucalyptiMFLUCC 12–0422 KF827451 KF827457 KF827463
P. phragmitisCBS 398.61 MH858101 EU754203 EU754104
Strigula guangxiensisTHMAS-L0138040 NR_146255MK206256
S. nemathoraMPN 72 JN887405 JN887389
Tenuitholiascus porinoidesTHMAS-L0139638 MK206259 MK352441
T. porinoidesHMAS-L0139639 MK206258 MK352442
T. porinoidesHMAS-L0139640 MK206260 MK352443
“–”, sequence is unavailable; strain with T, ex type. Abbreviations: CBS: Central Bureau voor Schimmel cultures, Utrecht, the Netherlands; HJAUP: Herbarium of Jiangxi Agricultural University, Plant Pathology; HMAS: Fungarium-Lichenum of the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; IRAN: Iranian Fungal Culture Collection, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; ITS: internal transcribed spacer; LSU: large subunit ribosomal; SSU: small subunit ribosomal; others are not registered abbreviations.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Hu, Y.; Luo, X.; Castañeda-Ruíz, R.F.; Xia, J.; Xu, Z.; Cui, R.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L.; Ma, J. Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four Novel Species of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from China: A Checklist for Corynespora Reported Worldwide. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010107

AMA Style

Liu J, Hu Y, Luo X, Castañeda-Ruíz RF, Xia J, Xu Z, Cui R, Shi X, Zhang L, Ma J. Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four Novel Species of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from China: A Checklist for Corynespora Reported Worldwide. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(1):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jingwen, Yafen Hu, Xingxing Luo, Rafael F. Castañeda-Ruíz, Jiwen Xia, Zhaohuan Xu, Ruqiang Cui, Xugen Shi, Lianhu Zhang, and Jian Ma. 2023. "Molecular Phylogeny and Morphology Reveal Four Novel Species of Corynespora and Kirschsteiniothelia (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from China: A Checklist for Corynespora Reported Worldwide" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 1: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9010107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop