Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/228384040
CITATIONS READS
396 667
1 author:
Hendrik H. Segers
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
201 PUBLICATIONS 4,801 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Rotifers of Ecuador and Galápagos Islands: From the morphological taxonomy to the "Barcode" and aspects on ecology View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Hendrik H. Segers on 03 June 2014.
HENDRIK SEGERS
Magnolia Press
Auckland, New Zealand
HENDRIK SEGERS
Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy
and distribution
(Zootaxa 1564)
104 pp.; 30 cm.
31 August 2007
ISBN 978-1-86977-129-4 (paperback)
ISBN 978-1-86977-130-0 (Online edition)
HENDRIK SEGERS
Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Freshwater Laboratory, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B - 1000 Brus-
sels Belgium. E-mail: Hendrik.segers@naturalsciences.be
Table of contents
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Future prospects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Abstract
Phylum Rotifera comprises about 2030 known species classified in three main groups, the marine Seisonida (3 species),
the Monogononta (1570 species) and the unique, exclusively parthenogenetic Bdelloidea with 461 clonal species. Here I
present an annotated checklist of the taxon, giving the global distribution of the valid species. This checklist contains
over 3,000 available names at the genus- and species-group level, including valid names and a non-comprehensive list of
synonyms. A number of taxonomic and nomenclatural suggestions following from the review is presented. Suggestions
include several new synonyms and two nomina nova: Dissotrocha kostei for Dissotrocha aculeata Koste, 1996 non
Ehrenberg, 1838 (stat. nov., ex. Dissotrocha hertzogi aculeata) and Lepadella zigzag for Lepadella bractea Myers, 1934
non (Ehrenberg, 1838). This contribution also describes features of an on-line, global names database of the Rotifera, on
which this checklist is based.
Introduction
In recent years science has witnessed a rapid evolution from print to electronic media in the production of tax-
onomic resources. This inevitable evolution (see Godfray, 2002) is fostered by a large number of initiatives
like the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, http://www.gbif.org/), the Integrated Taxonomic
Information System (ITIS, http://www.itis.usda.gov/), Species2000 (http://www.sp2000.org), and Universal
Biological Indexer and Organizer (uBIO: http://www.ubio.org), to name a few. Even long-established
resources like the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999; see http://
www.iczn.org/) are turning towards the World Wide Web, (e.g., with the ZooBank initiative: http://
www.zoobank.org/; Polaszek, 2005) notwithstanding the obvious difficulty the ephemeral character of elec-
tronic media pose to a stable scientific nomenclature.
Approach
The checklist is based on the taxonomy of rotifers as presented in monographs listed in Table 1, and numerous
recent publications. For practical reasons, only names or taxonomic changes published before November 1,
2006 are included.
Considering that subsequent lumping of distributional data is easy whereas the inverse is not, a splitting
rather than lumping approach to taxonomy has been adopted. As a consequence, the diversity of rotifers turns
out to be higher than previous estimates. This is especially so for genera like Lepadella and Lecane. In Lep-
adella, the lack of any comprehensive revision is responsible for the discrepancy, while Lecane is exemplary
of the tendency towards a less inclusive species concept in Rotifera during recent years. This approach has
been corroborated by recent research using molecular (e.g., Goméz et al., 2002) or detailed morphological
techniques (Giri & José de Paggi, 2006), or combining different approaches (Ricci, 2001) and biogeography
(Segers & Shiel, 2003), showing that diversity has generally been underestimated in Rotifera. On the other
hand, many rotifer taxa exhibit wide morphological variability, either as a result of phenotypic plasticity and/
or distortion during fixation or dehydration. Although this has long been known and is well documented (see
Dumont, 1983; Koste & Shiel, 1989c; Segers, 1998), variants are still frequently being described as subspe-
cies of common species. Such taxa, together with insufficiently described ones, are included in the present
checklist as their names are available, but are tagged species inquirenda in the absence of a critical taxonomic
revision. Names listed as referring to unrecognizable taxa in recent revisions listed in Table 1 have not been
included. The taxonomy reflected in the list may not be satisfactory, especially in taxa for which no recent
comprehensive reviews are available (e.g., Brachionidae, Lepadellidae, and Notommatidae).
The treatment of synonyms in the database is not comprehensive, but focuses on synonyms that occur in
recent literature or that are occasionally listed as valid taxa. Older synonyms (especially in the morphologi-
cally variable Brachionidae: Brachionus and Keratella) can be found in Harring (1913) and Wiszniewski
(1954). When necessary, care was taken to correct names in accordance with the International Code of Zoo-
logical Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999). Incorrect subsequent spellings are generally not taken into account
unless they have some nomenclatural significance beyond their mere existence: keeping track of published
spelling variants and nomina nuda in the vast ecological literature on rotifers is a daunting task with dubious
relevance.
Data on distribution are presented for taxa considered valid only. This information is mostly drawn from
the literature as in Table 1 and, as much as feasible, included only after critical assessment. A more complete
analysis of the biodiversity and distribution of the rotifers, based on the data presented here, is as in Segers (in
press).
Scope
The checklist and database, in its present version, contain 2127 species-level taxa of Rotifera, of which 109
are presently considered species inquirenda, and some 800 synonymous or alternative genus- and species-
Valid names of genus- and species-level taxa with authority, and the original combination of species-level
names. Genera and species within genera are arranged alphabetically in the checklist in order to facilitate
information retrieval. This ordering is consistent with Harring (1913) and Wiszniewski (1954).
Names with authority of synonyms of available genus-and species-level names, the latter in their original
combination. The synonymy is incomplete for taxa in which a high number of older synonyms exist. For these
I refer to Harring (1913) and Wiszniewski (1954).
Names with authority of some species inquirendae not included in recent revisions (see Table 1).
Taxonomic comments. This includes indication of taxonomically problematic cases, or instances where
synonyms are in use as names of infrasubspecific variants. Unavailable names of infrasubspecific taxa are
added in comments, except for those in genera like Brachionus and Keratella, where citing the exceedingly
high number of names of variants, forms etc. would only add to confusion.
Occurrence in eight large biogeographical regions (Palearctic, Afrotropical, Oriental, Nearctic, Neotropi-
cal, Australian, Pacific and Antarctic), as circumscribed in Martens et al. (in press; see Figure 1), for all valid
and recognisable species-level fresh- and/or brackishwater taxa. Marine, parasitic and interstitial taxa are
mentioned as such. If relevant, a comment on distribution is added, mostly indicating that a regional record of
a species is dubious, or that such a record may result from species introduction.
FIGURE 1. Definition of the eight regions used in this work (after Martens et al., in press.)
In addition, the database includes a higher-level classification of the free-living rotifers, after Segers
(2002) and Wallace et al. (2006). The Acanthocephala, of which several authors argue that they are highly
adapted parasitic representatives of the group (Mark Welch, 2000; see also Garcia-Varela et al., 2000; Giribet
et al., 2000), are excluded.
B‘rziÃÓ (1973) contains two alternative spellings for the single species of Anchitestudinella: mekogensis
and mekongensis. Subsequent authors have used either spelling, but none has ever clarified which of the
two should be considered the correct spelling. Considering the etymology of the name, which is derived
from River Mekong, I suggest treating the latter, with -n-, as correct original spelling under Art. 24.2.3 of
the ICZN.
Brachionus inermispinosus De Smet, 1989 = Epiphanes brachionus spinosa Rousselet, 1901 (new synonym).
The detailed description and, especially, figures of the habitus and trophi of B. inermispinosus by De Smet
(1989) reveal that the animal does not belong in Brachionus; rather, it is an Epiphanes and, most likely,
synonymous with E. brachionus spinosa.
Brachionus anchorporus Xu, Chen & Rao, 1997 = B. durgae Dhanapathi, 1974 (new synonym).
The description by Xu et al. (1997) undoubtedly depicts B. durgae, a taxon of which these authors were
apparently unaware.
The name B. angularis orientalis is a potential junior homonym of B. orientalis Rodewald, 1937, if the
name would ever be used at the species level. Sudzuki’s (1989) species, however, is based on a relatively
common variant of B. angularis and is treated as a synonym rather than a different subspecies. This is in
agreement with Sudzuki’s (1998) treatment of the taxon as of infrasubspecific rank, although he reverts to
listing it as a subspecies in Sudzuki (1999).
Brachionus angularis pseudokeikoa Sudzuki, 1992; B. angularis pyriformis Sudzuki & Huang, 1997; B.
angularis donghuensis Sudzuki & Huang, 1997; B. morondavaensis Sudzuki, 1998 = B. angularis Gosse,
1851 (new synonyms)
Sudzuki (1999) cites the three subspecies listed above as species, in which case Sudzuki & Huang’s
(1997) B. pyriformis would have to be treated as a junior homonym of B. pyriformis Barrois & Daday,
1894, an established junior synonym of B. angularis. All four fall within the range of variability of B.
angularis; B. angularis donghuensis is a poorly contracted specimen of B. angularis bidens, according to
a photograph in Sudzuki (1999). A fifth taxon, B. angularis daitojimensis Sudzuki, 1992 is listed as an
infrasubspecific variant, hence a synonym, of B. angularis by Sudzuki (1999) himself.
Sudzuki (1992) named three new Brachionus subspecies “isigakiensis”. All three are easily recognized as
belonging to previously established taxa, as far as can be judged from the relevant descriptions and photo-
graphs in Sudzuki (1992, 1999):
B. dimidiatus isigakiensis Sudzuki, 1992 (Brachionus isigakiensis in Sudzuki 1998, 1999) is a poorly
contracted B. bennini Leissling (new synonym).
B. durgae isigakiensis Sudzuki 1992 falls within the range of variability of the nominal species, hence
it is here considered a synonym of B. durgae Dhanapathi (new synonym).
As all three enter into synonymy, there appears to be no imminent danger of nomenclatural confusion
between the three potential homonyms.
Brachionus brevispinus Sudzuki & Huang, 1997 = B. huangi Zhuge & Koste, 1996 (new synonym).
Although the taxonomic separation of the short-spined B. huangi and B. brevispinus versus B. diversicor-
nis Daday may require substantiation, B. huangi and B. brevispinus are obviously identical. As B.
brevispinus Sudzuki & Huang, 1997 enters into synonymy, there is no danger of confusion with its senior
homonym B. brevispinus Ehrenberg, 1832, itself a synonym, and representing a well-known and common
infrasubspecific variant, of B. quadridentatus Hermann.
Brachionus lyratus yonaguniensis Sudzuki, 1992 = B. angularis Gosse, 1851 (new synonym).
This taxon, listed as B. yonaguniensis by Sudzuki (1999), appears to be yet another variant of B. angu-
laris. An appurtenance to B. lyratus is not evident from the available description and photographs.
Brachionus variabilis kasumigaurensis Sudzuki, 1998 = B. rubens Ehrenberg, 1838 (new synonym).
The available pictures of B. variabilis kasumigaurensis (see Sudzuki, 1999), especially the shape of
antero-dorsal spines and minute size of the rounded process on the dorsal foot aperture margin reveal a
synonymy with B. rubens.
De Smet in De Smet & Pourriot (1997) argued that the description of Encentrum grande (Western) is
unrecognisable, and proposed to refer to Harring & Myers’ (1928) description as reference for the taxo-
nomic identity of E. grande. Considering the poor quality of many original descriptions of Rotifera and
the absence of type material, this is common practice in rotifer taxonomy. However, he further retained E.
grande (Western) as species inquirenda, and included a E. grande Harring & Myers, 1928 in his treat-
ment. This confusingly results in the recognition of two homonymous taxa, one E. grande (Western) and
E. grande sensu Harring & Myers (1928) which, in fact, should be attributed to De Smet (1997). The
name Encentrum kulmatyckii (Wiszniewski, 1953), a junior synonym of E. grande sensu Harring &
Myers (1926), is available for the latter taxon.
Koste’s (1996) taxon has distinct body outgrowths (none in D. hertzogi), and lacks the extraordinarily
long rostrum ciliae and offset spur tips of Dissotrocha hertzogi (see Donner, 1965). These morphological
differences are of a nature and magnitude that is generally considered relevant at the species level in bdel-
loid rotifer taxonomy. In addition, it is particularly difficult to conform a species, let alone a subspecies,
definition to an exclusive parthenogenetically reproducing taxon. I therefore suggest treating the two as
separate species-level taxa and, because of the homonymy of Koste’s name with Ehrenberg’s, I have the
pleasure to suggest the name Dissotrocha kostei, honouring Dr h.c. W. Koste, as replacement name for the
taxon (nomen novum).
Both Dartnall’s (2005) and Paggi’s (1981) descriptions point to the absence of a foundation pattern on the
dorsal lorica, small size of antero-median and antero-intermedian, but large and ventrally-pointed antero-
lateral spines as characteristic features of their new species. As Dartnall (2005) does not mention K. kostei
in his text, he may not have been aware of the existence of that name. The species occurs in Patagonia,
Argentina (Paggi, 1981), and on the Falkland Islands and South Georgia (Dartnall, 2005).
Pompholyx acutangula Wu, 1981 = Testudinella brevicaudata Yamamoto, 1951 (new synonym).
Wu’s (1981) clear and detailed illustrations depict an animal with a large foot aperture. It therefore does
not belong to Pompholyx, rather it is a previously described Testudinella, T. brevicaudata.
Testudinella tridentata obtusa Wu, 1981 = Testudinella greeni Koste, 1981 (new synonym).
The figures and photographs of Wu’s T. tridentata obtusa unmistakably depict a T. greeni. Apparently, Wu
(1981) was not aware of the latter species.
Hemimonostyla blachei tutiurensis Sudzuki, 1998 = Lecane stenroosi Meissner, 1908 (new synonym).
The photograph of H. blachei tutiurensis by Sudzuki (1998) leaves no doubt as to its synonymy with L.
stenroosi.
Lecane kasumiensis Sudzuki, 1998 = Lecane papuana (Murray, 1913) (new synonym).
Again, the photograph of L. kasumiensis by Sudzuki (1998) leaves no doubt as to its synonymy with L.
papuana.
Myers’ name is threatened by its homonymy with Squamella bractea Ehrenberg, an established junior
synonym of Lepadella patella Müller, 1786. Here, a replacement name is in order as confusion between
the two has occurred (Nogrady in Boyko, 1994), notwithstanding that Ehrenberg’s name is hardly ever
found in combination with the genus name Lepadella. Myers’ (1934) animal is a remarkable but rare
Northeast North American endemic that is unmistakable by the prominent zig-zag crest on its dorsal lor-
ica. I suggest the name Lepadella zigzag as nomen novum for the taxon.
Lepadella parvula De Graaf, 1956 is a junior homonym of Lepadella parvula Bryce, 1893 and of the pre-
viously replaced L. parvula Montet, 1915 (valid name: Lepadella minuta Weber & Montet, 1919). As
Lepadella parvula De Graaf is an established junior synonym of Lepadella patella Müller, there is no
imminent need for a replacement name.
Macrotrachela ligulata Haigh, 1965; Macrotrachela nana ligulata Schulte, 1954; Macrotrachela quadri-
cornifera ligulata B‘rziÃÓ, 1950
Awaiting a revision of the large and complex genus Macrotrachela, I merely point out that Macrotrachela
quadricornifera ligulata B‘rziÃÓ, 1950 and M. nana ligulata Schulte, 1954 are potential senior hom-
onyms of M. ligulata Haigh, 1965, if any or both of the first-mentioned ones would ever be raised to spe-
cies rank.
The genus Diplois Gosse, and its single species D. daviesae Gosse are here considered genus et species
inquirendae. Scrutiny of the available literature on the taxon, and consultation with colleagues revealed that
only Gosse’s description exists, and that there are no reliable records or sightings of the species (W.H. De
Smet, in lit., R.J. Shiel, in lit., C. Jersabek, in lit.). The description of Pseudoembata parasitica by Wycliffe &
Michael (1968) does not enable recognition of the taxon; the arguments for erection of a new genus are not
supported in the literature (see Donner, 1965). Also this taxon is therefore considered genus et species
inquirendae.
Future prospects
The database mentioned here will be made freely accessible through the World Wide Web. In a first phase,
researchers will be offered the possibility to select and extract a structured name list from the database. By this
service, it is hoped to reduce the number of misspellings and other inconsistencies in the published literature.
In a second phase, the possibility will be offered to submit and save regional or local (georeferenced)
checklists to the database, together with metadata on these checklists. One of the goals of the database is to
provide a resource to as reliable as possible data on the distribution of Rotifera. Hence, we envisage installing
a system comparing submitted lists with reviewed distributional data so that new regional species records will
be highlighted and, eventually, reviewed by peers. This review process may involve submitting material
enabling the positive identification of the species concerned and, if this is possible by the nature of the taxon,
by illustrating remarkable records through relevant photographs or original drawings on the web site.
Acknowledgements
The present work was done as part of the project “Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment”, funded by the
Belgian Science Policy Office, and benefited greatly from a previous compilation of a European species regis-
ter under the EU-funded (FP5) Fauna Europaeae project. The Belgian Biodiversity Platform (www.biodiver-
sity.be), especially A. Heughebaert, and N. Youdjou, transposed information from a spreadsheet to a database
and to structured text, performed quality control and developed a web site and portal for the database.
I’m indebted to R.L. Wallace and an anonymous referee for reviewing the manuscript of this paper, and to
W.H. De Smet and, especially, C. Jersabek for suggestions and corrections to the list.
Ahlstrom, E.H. (1940) A revision of the Rotatorian genera Brachionus and Platyias with descriptions of one new species
and two new varieties. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 77, 148–84.
Ahlstrom, E.H. (1943) A revision of the rotatorian genus Keratella with descriptions of three new species and five new
varieties. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 80: 411–457.
B‘rziÃÓ, B. (1973) Some Rotifers from Cambodia. Hydrobiologia, 41, 453–459.
B‘rziÃÓ, B. (1982) Die Unterarten von Dissotrocha aculeata (macrostyla). Limnologisches Institut, Lund, 10 pp., 4
plates.
Boyko, C.B. (1994) Catalog of Recent Type Specimens in the Department of Invertebrates, American Museum of Natu-
ral History. I. Micro-Invertebrates (Phyla Sarcomastigophora, Gnathostomula, Gastrotricha, Rotifera, and Tardi-
grada). American Museum Novitates, 3106, 44 pp.
Dartnall, H.J.G. (2005) A new species of Keratella (Rotifera, Monogononta: Brachionidae) from South Georgia and the
Falkland Islands. Quekett Journal of Microscopy, 40, 41–46.
De Ridder, M. (1986) Annotated checklist of non-marine rotifers (Rotifera) from African inland waters. Zoologische
Documentatie, Koninklijk Museum voor Midden-Afrika, Tervuren, Belgium, 21, 123 pp.
De Ridder, M. (1991) Additions to the"Annotated checklist of non-marine rotifers (Rotifera) from African inland
waters". Revue d’Hydrobiologie tropicale, 24, 25–46.
De Ridder, M. (1993) Additions II to the"Annotated checklist of non-marine rotifers (Rotifera) from African inland
waters". Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea, 61, 99–153.
De Ridder, M. & Segers, H. (1997) Monogonont Rotifera recorded in the World literature (except Africa) from 1960 to
1992. Studiedocumenten van het KBIN, 88, Brussels, Belgium, 481 pp.
De Smet, W.H. (1989) Rotifera uit de Galápagoseilanden. Natuurwetenschappelijk Tijdschrift, 69, 110–131.
De Smet, W.H. (1996) The Proalidae (Monogononta). In Nogrady T. (Ed.) Rotifera 4 In Dumont H.J. (Ed.) Guides to the
Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World 9. SPB Academic, The Hague, The
Netherlands, 102 pp.
De Smet, W.H. (2006) Asciaporrectidae, a new family of Rotifera (Monogononta: Ploima) with description of Asciapor-
recta arcellicola gen. et sp. nov. and A. difflugicola gen. et sp. nov. inhabiting shells of testate amoebae (Protozoa).
Zootaxa, 1339, 31–49.
De Smet W.H. & Pourriot R. (1997) The Dicranophoridae (Monogononta) and the Ituridae (Monogononta). In Nogrady
T. (Ed.) Rotifera 5 In Dumont H.J. (Ed.) Guides to the Identificationof the Microinvertebrates of the Continental
Waters of the World 12. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands, 344 pp.
Donner, J. (1965) Ordnung Bdelloidea (Rotatoria, Rädertiere). Bestimmungsbücher zur Bodenfauna Europas 6: 1–267.
Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 297 pp.
Dumont, H.J. (1983) Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia, 104, 19–30.
Fontaneto, D., Herniou, E.A., Barraclough, T.G. & Ricci, C. (in press) On the global distribution of microscopic animals:
new worldwide data on bdelloid rotifers. Zootaxa.
García-Varela, M., Pérez-Ponce de Leon, G., de la Torre, P., Cummings, M. P., Sarma, S. S. S. & Laclette, J. P. (2000)
Phylogenetic relationships of Acanthocephala based on analysis of 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Journal of
Molecular Evolution, 50, 532–540.
Giri, F. & José de Paggi, S. (2006) Geometric morphometric and biometric analysis for the systematic elucidation of
Brachionus caudatus Barrois and Daday, 1894 (Rotifera Monogononta Brachionidae) forms. Zoologischer Anzeiger,
244, 171–180.
Giribert, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer,W. & Wheeler, W.C. (2000) Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the
acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined
approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology, 49(3), 539–562.
Godfray, H.C.J. (2002) Challenges for taxonomy. Nature, 417, 17–19.
Gómez, A., Serra, M., Carvalho, G.R. & Lunt, D.H. (2002). Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence
from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution, 56, 1431–1445.
Harring, H. K. (1913) Synopsis of the Rotatoria. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 81, 1–226.
Harring, H.K. & Myers, F.J. (1928) The rotifer fauna of Wisconsin, IV. The Dicranophorinae. Transactions of the Wis-
consin Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, 23, 667–808.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The
International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
Jersabek, C.D. (2003) Freshwater Rotifera (Monogononta) from Hawai'i - a preliminary checklist. Bishop Museum occa-
sional papers, 74, 46–72.
Koste,W. (1978) Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart, 2 vols: 673 pp., 234 plates.
Koste, W. (1996) On soil Rotatoria from a Lithotelma near Halali Lodge in Etosha National Park in N-Namibia, South
Bdelloidea: Donner (1965) (taxonomy), B‘rziÃÓ (1982) (Dissotrocha aculeata group), Fontaneto et al. (in
press) and Ricci et al (2003) (distribution).
Monogononta: Koste (1978) (taxonomy), De Ridder (1986, 1991, 1993), De Ridder & Segers (1997) and Jers-
abek (2003) (distribution).
Legend: AFR: Afrotropical region; ANT: Antarctic region; AUS: Australian region; NEA: Nearctic
region; NEO: Neotropical region; ORI: Oriental region; PAC: pacific region; PAL: Palearctic region
(see Figure 1).
Albertia crystallina Schultze, 1851 (Endoparasitic in marine and brackish water Oligochaeta)
Albertia naidis Bousfield, 1886 (Endoparasitic in freshwater Oligochaeta)
Syn.: Albertia bernardi Hlava, 1904
Syn.: Albertia caudata Manfredi, 1927
Syn.: Albertia intrusor Gosse, 1886
Syn.: Albertia soyeri Coineau & Kunst, 1964
Albertia ovagranulata Valovaya, 1991 (Endoparasitic in marine Oligochaeta)
Albertia reicheltae Koste, 1970 (Endoparasitic in freshwater Oligochaeta)
Albertia typhlina Harring & Myers, 1928 (Ecology unknown)
Albertia vermiculus Dujardin, 1938 (Endoparasitic in terrestrial Oligochaeta and Mollusca)
Albertia woronkowi Zenkewitsch, 1922 (Endoparasitic in freshwater Oligochaeta; Baikal endemic)
Anuraeopsis coelata de Beauchamp, 1932: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Anuraeopsis lata singapurensis Sudzuki, 1989
Anuraeopsis coelata coelata de Beauchamp, 1932
Anuraeopsis coelata kehjengi Sudzuki, 1989 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis cristata Bērziņš, 1956: ORI
Anuraeopsis fissa Gosse, 1851: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Anuraeopsis hypelasma Gosse, 1886
Anuraeopsis fissa beauchampi Bērziņš, 1962 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis fissa donghuensis Sudzuki & Huang, 1997 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis fissa fissa Gosse, 1851
Anuraeopsis fissa haueri Bērziņš, 1962 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis fissa neali Bērziņš, 1962 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis fissa pseudonavicula Sudzuki & Huang, 1997 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis lata Bērziņš, 1962 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis miracleae Koste, 1991: PAL
Anuraeopsis navicula Rousselet, 1911: AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Anuraeopsis congolensis Evens, 1947
Syn.: Anuraeopsis racenisi Bērziņš, 1962
Anuraeopsis navicula berzinsi Sudzuki, 1998 (species inquirenda)
Anuraeopsis navicula navicula Rousselet, 1911
Anuraeopsis quadriantennata (Koste, 1974): NEO
Beauchampia crucigera (Dutrochet, 1812): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Rotifer crucigere Dutrochet, 1812
Syn.: Cephalosiphon candidus Hudson, 1886 (synonym occasionally considered an infrasubspecific variant
of B. crucigera)
Syn.: Melicerta cephalosiphon Gosse, 1862
Claria segmentata Kutikova, Markevich & Spiridonov, 1990 (Endoparasitic in terrestrial Oligochaeta)
Colurella adriatica Ehrenberg, 1831: AFR, ANT, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL (includes the
infrasubspecific variants angusta Donner, 1964; lata Donner, 1964 and α, β, γ Hauer (1924), marine and brackish water)
Syn.: Monura bartonia Gosse, 1887
Syn.: Colurus caudatus Ehrenberg, 1834
Syn.: Monura dulcis Ehrenberg, 1838
Syn.: Colurus leptus Gosse, 1887
Syn.: Colurus navalis Lord, 1884
Colurella anodonta Carlin, 1939: AFR, NEA, NEO, PAL
Colurella aquaeducti Török, 1956: PAL
Colurella collaris Wulfert, 1965: AFR
Colurella colurus (Ehrenberg, 1830)
Monura colurus Ehrenberg, 1830
Conochilus (Conochiloides) coenobasis (Skorikov, 1914): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Conochiloides coenobasis Skorikov, 1914
Conochilus (Conochiloides) deltaicus (Rudescu, 1960) (species inquirenda)
Conochiloides deltaicus Rudescu, 1960
Conochilus (Conochiloides) dossuarius Hudson, 1885: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Conochilus (Conochiloides) exiguus Ahlstrom, 1938: NEA
Conochilus (Conochiloides) natans (Seligo, 1900): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Tubicularia natans Seligo, 1900
Conochilus (Conochilus) hippocrepis (Schrank, 1803): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Linza hippocrepis Schrank, 1803
Syn.: Conochilus volvox Ehrenberg, 1834
Conochilus (Conochilus) unicornis Rousselet, 1892: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Conochilus leptopus Forbes, 1893
Syn.: Conochilus limneticus Stenroos, 1898
Syn.: Conochilus norvegicus Burckhardt, 1943 (synonym considered an infrasubspecific variant of C. uni-
cornis)
Cupelopagis vorax (Leidy, 1857): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Dictyophora vorax Leidy, 1857
Syn.: Cupelopagis bucinedax Forbes, 1882
Syn.: Apsilus lentiformis Metchnikov, 1866
1. Segers & Wallace contains a reference as if it were published in 2000. However, the actual date of publication is
January, 2001.
Cyrtonia tuba (Ehrenberg, 1834): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Notommata tuba Ehrenberg, 1834
Elosa spinifera Wiszniewski, 1932: ORI, PAL (occasionally considered an infrasubspecific variant of E. wor-
rallii)
Elosa worrallii Lord, 1891: AUS, NEA, NEO, PAC, PAL
Eosphora anthadis Harring & Myers, 1922: AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Eosphora ehrenbergi Weber & Montet, 1918: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Notommata najas Ehrenberg, 1832
Eosphora gibba Garner, 1937: PAL
Eosphora najas Ehrenberg, 1830: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Eosphora therina Harring & Myers, 1922: NEA
Eosphora thoa Harring & Myers, 1924: AUS, NEA, NEO, PAL
Eosphora thoides Wulfert, 1935: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, PAL
Lacinularia elliptica Shephard, 1897: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Lacinularia racemovata Thorpe, 1893
Lacinularia elongata Shephard, 1896 (species inquirenda)
Lacinularia flosculosa (Müller, 1773): AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL (For a full account on the synonymy
of L. flosculosa see Harring (1913))
Lepadella (Heterolepadella) apsicora Myers, 1934: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI
Lepadella (Heterolepadella) cyrtopus Harring, 1914: AFR, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Lepadella (Heterolepadella) ehrenbergii (Perty, 1850): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Notogonia ehrenbergii Perty, 1850
Syn.: Metopidia albuferensis Arévalo, 1918
Lepadella (Heterolepadella) heterodactyla Fadeew, 1925: AFR, AUS, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Lepadella nympha Donner, 1943
Lepadella (Heterolepadella) heterostyla (Murray, 1913): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Metopidia heterostyla Murray, 1914
Limnias ceratophylli Schrank, 1803: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Syn.: Melicerta biloba Ehrenberg, 1832
Syn.: Rotifer confervicola Dutrochet, 1812
Syn.: Limnias socialis Leidy, 1874 (synonym occasionally considered an infrasubspecific variant of L. cerato-
phylli)
Syn.: Limnias sphagnicola Zacharias, 1886 (synonym occasionally considered an infrasubspecific variant of
L. ceratophylli)
Limnias cornuella Rousselet, 1889 (species inquirenda)
Limnias melicerta Weisse, 1848: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Syn.: Limnias annulatus Bailey, 1855
Syn.: Limnias corniculata Ehrenberg, 1853
Syn.: Melicerta cubitti Cubitt, 1871
Syn.: Limnias doliolum Schoch, 1868
Lindia (Lindia) annecta Harring & Myers, 1922: AUS, NEA, PAL
Lindia (Lindia) caerulea Myers, 1933: NEA
Lindia (Lindia) candida Harring & Myers, 1922: NEA, ORI, PAL
Lindia (Lindia) ecela Myers, 1933: AUS, NEA
Lindia (Lindia) euchromatica Edmondson, 1938: AUS, NEA, PAL
Syn.: Lindia europaea Koch-Althaus, 1962
Lindia (Lindia) fulva Harring & Myers, 1922: NEA, NEO
Lindia (Lindia) gracilis Myers, 1938: NEA
Lindia (Lindia) janickii Wiszniewski, 1934: AFR, ORI, PAL
Lindia (Lindia) pallida Harring & Myers, 1922: AUS, NEA, NEO, PAC, PAL
Lindia (Lindia) producta Harring & Myers, 1922: NEA
Lindia (Lindia) torulosa Dujardin, 1841: AFR, ANT, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Syn.: Notommata roseola Perty, 1850
Syn.: Notommata tardigrada Leydig, 1854
Lindia (Lindia) truncata (Jennings, 1894): AUS, NEA, NEO, PAC, PAL
Notommata truncata Jennings, 1894
Mikrocodides chlaena (Gosse, 1886): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Stephanops chlaena Gosse, 1886
Syn.: Mikrocodides dubius Bergendal, 1892
Syn.: Microcodides mobilis Rodewald, 1940
Syn.: Rhinops orbiculodiscus Thorpe, 1891
Mikrocodides hertha Wulfert, 1961: PAL
Mikrocodides robustus (Glascott, 1893): NEA, NEO, PAL
Microcodon robustus Glascott, 1893
Microcodon clavus Ehrenberg, 1830: AFR, ANT, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Pompholyx complanata Gosse, 1851: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Pompholyx sulcata Hudson, 1885: AFR, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Pompholyx triloba Pejler, 1957: NEA, PAL
Ptygura agassizi Edmondson, 1948: NEA (occasionally considered an infrasubspecific variant of P. melicerta)
Ptygura barbata Edmondson, 1939: AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI
Ptygura beauchampi Edmondson, 1940: NEA, NEO, PAL (Oecistes cf. crystallinus after de Beauchamp,
1932)
Syn.: Ptygura lacunosa Summerfield-Wright, 1957 (synonym considered an infrasubspecific variant of P.
beauchampi)
1. There is considerable confusion in literature regarding the identity and synonymy of Rotaria macrura (Ehrenberg)
and Vorticella macroura Hermann, 1783 (Rotifer macrourus: Schrank, 1803). The exact taxonomic identity of the latter
can’t be inferred from the original description; however, it is clear that the two are not conspecific (Harring, 1913). I
therefore follow Harring (1913) rather than Donner (1965), who lists Vorticella marcoura as synonym of Rotaria
macrura (Schrank).
Scaridium bostjani Daems & Dumont, 1974: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Scaridium elegans Segers & De Meester, 1994: AFR, AUS, NEO, ORI (record from China by Zhuge
(1997) is S. longicaudum)
Scaridium elongatum Segers, 1996: NEO
Scaridium grande Segers, 1995: AFR, ORI
Scaridium longicaudum (Müller, 1786): AFR, ANT, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Trichoda longicauda Müller, 1786
Scaridium montanum Segers, 1995: PAL
Scaridium neglectum Segers, 1997: NEA
Squatinella bifurca (Bolton, 1884): PAL (includes the infrasubspecific variant gigantea Pourriot, 1971)
Stephanops bifurcus Bolton, 1884
Squatinella geleii Varga, 1933: PAL
Squatinella lamellaris (Müller, 1786): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Brachionus lamellaris Müller, 1786
Syn.: Squatinella aurita Wulfert, 1950 (incl. the infrasubspecific variant myersi Voigt, 1957)
Syn.: Stephanops dichthapsis Anderson, 1889
Syn.: Squatinella donneri Wulfert, 1956
Syn.: Stephanops emarginatus Bilfinger, 1894
Syn.: Stephanops groenlandicus Bergendal, 1892
Syn.: Stephanops intermedius Burn, 1889
Syn.: Squatinella minor Wulfert, 1961
Syn.: Stephanops muticus Ehrenberg, 1832 (synonym considered an infrasubspecific variant (f. mutica) of S.
lamellaris)
Syn.: Stephanops tridentatus Fresenius, 1858 (synonym considered an infrasubspecific variant (f. tridentata)
Taphrocampa annulosa Gosse, 1851: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Taphrocampa clavigera Stokes, 1896: NEA, NEO, PAC, PAL
Tetrasiphon hydrocora Ehrenberg, 1840: AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE ROTIFERS Zootaxa 1564 © 2007 Magnolia Press · 101
Trichocerca taurocephala (Hauer, 1931): NEA, PAL
Diurella taurocephala Hauer, 1931
Trichocerca tenuidens (Hauer, 1931) (species inquirenda)
Diurella tenuidens Hauer, 1931
Trichocerca tenuior (Gosse, 1886): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Coelopus tenuior Gosse, 1886
Syn.: Mastigocerca flectocaudatus Hilgendorf, 1899
Syn.: Trichocerca neeli Edmondson, 1948
Trichocerca tigris (Müller, 1786): AFR, ANT, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Trichoda tigris Müller, 1786
Syn.: Heterognathus macrodactylus Schmarda, 1859
Trichocerca uncinata (Voigt, 1902): NEA, PAL
Coelopus uncinatus Voigt, 1902
Trichocerca unidens (Stenroos, 1898) (species inquirenda)
Mastigocerca unidens Stenroos, 1898
Trichocerca valga (Ehrenberg, 1834) (species inquirenda)
Monocerca valga Ehrenberg, 1834
Trichocerca vargai Wulfert, 1961: PAL
Trichocerca vassilijevae Kutikova & Arov, 1985
Trichocerca vernalis (Hauer, 1936): AUS, NEA, ORI, PAL
Diurella vernalis Hauer, 1936
Trichocerca voluta (Murray, 1913): NEO, ORI
Diurella voluta Murray, 1913
Syn.: Trichocerca tropis Hauer, 1937
Trichocerca wanarra Segers & Shiel, 2003: AUS
Trichocerca weberi (Jennings, 1903): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Diurella weberi Jennings, 1903
Trichocerca weberi (Jennings, 1903): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Diurella weberi Jennings, 1903
Tripleuchlanis plicata (Levander, 1894): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAC, PAL
Euchlanis plicata Levander, 1894
ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE ROTIFERS Zootaxa 1564 © 2007 Magnolia Press · 103
Encentrum ricciae Harring, 1913
Wierzejskiella sabulosa (Wiszniewski, 1932): PAL
Encentrum sabulosum Wiszniewski, 1932
Wierzejskiella subterranea Remane, 1949 (marine psammon)
Wierzejskiella vagneri Koniar, 1955: PAL
Wierzejskiella velox (Wiszniewski, 1932): AUS, NEA, PAL
Encentrum velox Wiszniewski, 1932
Syn.: Wierzejskiella fluviatilis Neiswestnowa-Shadina, 1935
Wolga spinifera (Western, 1894): AFR, AUS, NEA, NEO, ORI, PAL
Distyla spinifera Western, 1894
Syn.: Cathypna spinifera Murray, 1913