You are on page 1of 4

The 

cryptophyceae are a class of algae,[1] most of which have plastids. About 220 species are


known,[2] and they are common in freshwater, and also occur in marine and brackish habitats.
Each cell is around 10–50 μm in size and flattened in shape, with an anterior groove or pocket.
At the edge of the pocket there are typically two slightly unequal flagella.
Some exhibit mixotrophy.[3]

Contents

 1Characteristics
 2Classification
 3References
 4External links

Characteristics[edit]

Cell scheme: 1-contractile vacuole, 2-plastid, 3-thylakoid, 4-stigma, 5-nucleomorph, 6-starch granule, 7-


70S ribosome, 8-nucleus, 9-80S ribosome, 10-flagella, 11-invagination, 12-lipid globules, 13-ejectosomes,
14-mitochondrion, 15-pyrenoid, 16-Golgi apparatus, 17-endoplasmic reticulum, 18-chloroplast-endoplasmic
reticulum.

Cryptophytes are distinguished by the presence of


characteristic extrusomes called ejectosomes or ejectisomes, which consist of two connected
spiral ribbons held under tension.[4] If the cells are irritated either by mechanical, chemical or light
stress, they discharge, propelling the cell in a zig-zag course away from the disturbance. Large
ejectosomes, visible under the light microscope, are associated with the pocket; smaller ones
occur underneath the periplast, the cryptophyte-specific cell surrounding.[5][6]
Except for Chilomonas, which has leucoplasts, cryptophytes have one or two chloroplasts. These
contain chlorophylls a and c, together with phycobiliproteins and other pigments, and vary in
color (brown, red to blueish-green). Each is surrounded by four membranes, and there is a
reduced cell nucleus called a nucleomorph between the middle two. This indicates that the
plastid was derived from a eukaryotic symbiont, shown by genetic studies to have been a red
alga.[7] However, the plastids are very different from red algal plastids: phycobiliproteins are
present but only in the thylakoid lumen and are present only as phycoerythrin or phycocyanin. In
the case of "Rhodomonas" the crystal structure has been determined to 1.63Å;[8] and it has been
shown that the alpha subunit bears no relation to any other known phycobiliprotein.
A few cryptophytes, such as Cryptomonas, can form palmelloid stages, but readily escape the
surrounding mucus to become free-living flagellates again. Some Cryptomonas species may also
form immotile microbial cysts–resting stages with rigid cell walls to survive unfavorable
conditions. Cryptophyte flagella are inserted parallel to one another, and are covered by bipartite
hairs called mastigonemes, formed within the endoplasmic reticulum and transported to the cell
surface. Small scales may also be present on the flagella and cell body. The mitochondria have
flat cristae, and mitosis is open; sexual reproduction has also been reported.
The group have evolved a whole range of light-absorbing pigments, called phycobilins, which are
able to absorb wavelengths that are not accessible to other plants or algae, allowing them to live
in a variety of different ecological niches.[9]
While cryptophytes are usually seen as asexual, sexual reproductions do occur; both haploid and
diploid forms have been found. The two species Teleaulax amphioxeia and Plagioselmis
prolonga are now considered to be the same species, where T. amphioxeia is the diploid form
and P. prolonga is the haploid form. The diploid form is most common when there are more
nutrients in the water. Two haploid cells will often fuse to form a diploid cell, mixing their genes.[10]

Classification[edit]

Cryptophytes under SEM

Cryptophytes under light microscope

Further information: Wikispecies:Cryptophyceae
The first mention of cryptophytes appears to have been made by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg in
1831,[11] while studying Infusoria. Later, botanists treated them as a separate algae group, class
Cryptophyceae or division Cryptophyta, while zoologists treated them as
the flagellate protozoa order Cryptomonadina. In some classifications, the cryptomonads were
considered close relatives of the dinoflagellates because of their (seemingly) similar
pigmentation, being grouped as the Pyrrhophyta. There is considerable evidence that
cryptophyte chloroplasts are closely related to those of the heterokonts and haptophytes, and the
three groups are sometimes united as the Chromista. However, the case that the organisms
themselves are closely related is not very strong, and they may have acquired plastids
independently. Currently they are discussed to be members of the clade Diaphoretickes and to
form together with the Haptophyta the group Hacrobia. Parfrey et al. and Burki et al. placed
Cryptophyceae as a sister clade to the Green Algae.[12][13]
One suggested grouping is as follows: (1) Cryptomonas,
(2) Chroomonas/Komma and Hemiselmis, (3) Rhodomonas/Rhinomonas/Storeatula,
(4) Guillardia/Hanusia, (5) Geminigera/Plagioselmis/Teleaulax, (6) Proteomonas sulcata,
(7) Falcomonas daucoides.[14]

 Class Cryptophyceae Fritsch 1937 [Cryptomonadea Stein 1878 emend. Schoenichen 1925]


o Genus Wysotzkia Lemmermann 1899
o Genus Urgorri Laza-Martinez 2012
o Order Tetragonidiales Kristiansen 1992
 Family Tetragonidiaceae Bourelly ex Silva1980
 Genus Bjornbergiella Bicudo 1966
 Genus Tetragonidium Pascher 1914
o Order Pyrenomonadales Novarino & Lucas 1993
 Family Baffinellaceae Daugbjerg & Norlin 2018[15]
 Genus Baffinella Norlin & Daugbjerg 2018
 Family Chroomonadaceae Clay, Cugrens & Lee 1999
 Genus ?Smithimastix Skvortzov 1969 [Smithiella Skvortzov 1968 nom.
illeg.]
 Genus Chroomonas Hansgirg 1885
 Genus Falcomonas Hill 1991
 Genus Hemiselmis Parke 1949
 Genus Komma Hill 1991
 Genus Nodeana Skvortzov 1968
 Genus Planonephros Christensen 1978
 Genus Protochrysis Pascher 1911
 Family Geminigeraceae Clay, Cugrens & Lee 1999
 Genus Geminigera Hill 1991
 Genus Guillardia Hill & Wetherbee 1990
 Genus Phia Özdikmen 2009 [Hanusia Deane et al. 1998 non Cripps
1989]
 Genus Plagioselmis Butcher 1967 ex Novarino, Lucas & Morrall 1994
 Genus Teleaulax Hill 1991
 Family Pyrenomonadaceae Novarino & Lucas 1993
 Genus Proteomonas Hill & Wetherbee 1986
 Genus Rhinomonas Hill & Wetherbee 1988
 Genus Rhodomonas Karsten 1898 [Pyrenomonas Santore 1984]
 Genus Storeatula Hill 1991
o Order Cryptomonadales Pascher 1913
 Family ?Butschliellaceae Skvortzov 1968
 Genus Butschliella Skvortzov 1968
 Genus Skvortzoviella Bourelly 1970
 Family ?Cyathomonadaceae Pringsheim 1944
 Genus Cyathomonas de Fromentel 1874
 Family ?Hilleaceae Pascher 1967
 Genus Calkinsiella Skvortzov 1969
 Genus Hillea Schiller 1925
 Family ?Pleuromastigaceae Bourrelly ex Silva 1980
 Genus ?Opisthostigma Scherfffel 1911
 Genus Pleuromastix Scherffel 1912 non Namyslowski 1913
 Genus Xanthodiscus Schewiakoff 1892
 Family Cryptomonadaceae Ehrenberg 1831 [Campylomonadaceae Clay,
Kugrens & Lee 1999; Cryptochrysidaceae Pascher 1931]
 Genus ?Chilomonas Ehrenberg 1831
 Genus ?Protocryptochrysis Skvortzov 1969
 Genus Cryptella Pascher 1929
 Genus Cryptochloris Schiller 1925
 Genus Cryptochrysis Pascher 1911
 Genus Cryptomonas Ehrenberg 1832 [Campylomonas Hill 1991]
 Genus Cyanomastix Lackey 1936
 Genus Isoselmis Butcher 1967
 Genus Kisselevia Skvortzov 1969
 Genus Meyeriella Skvortzov 1968
 Genus Olivamonas Skvortzov 1969
 Genus Protocryptomonas Skvortzov 1969 ex Bicudo 1989

You might also like