SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 111
Presented by
Dr. Debraj Samanta
DEPARTMENT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
HIDSAR,WEST BENGAL
INTRODUCTION
 Craniofacial anomalies, one of
the subtypes of congenital
disorders, are characterized by
the abnormal development of
soft tissues and bones of the face
and the skull that results in the
formation of different head and
facial features.
 Early closure of skull bones
results in a new head shape that
restricts the normal growth and
development of the brain.
HISTORY
 The first surgical repair of craniosynostosis was
performed by Lannelongue in 1892.
 Mohr et al. published their experience in
craniosynostosis repair emphasizing the etiologic
involvement of the anterior skull base, and employing
extensive vault reconstruction.
 In 1978, Jane et al. published their pi (p) technique to
accomplish immediate reconstruction of frontal bossing.
 Anderson, in 1981, described his experience in the
treatment of coronal and metopic synostosis.
 In 1984, Jane et al. published their technique for the
treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis, which
included dural plication.
 In 1985, Albright described his correction of sagittal
synostosis, which included extensive occipital circular,
and parietal wedge craniectomies.
Embryologic development of cranial sutures
 This morphogenic developmental process starts at an early
embryonic phase (twentieth week) and ends during
adulthood.
 The cranium is divided into two parts: the neurocranium
that protects the brain and the viscerocranium that forms
the face skeleton, which occurs through the
intramembranous (IM) and endochondral (EC) bone
formation, respectively.
During cranial vault development, IM ossification initiates undifferentiated
mesenchymal cell condensation and surrounds the sutures.
Initially, after the condensation begins, cells start to proliferate from the
osteogenic fronts.
The condensation of mesenchymal differentiation triggers the proliferation of
chondrocytes and perichondrial cells.
During this ossification process, some transcription factors play an important
role, such as RUNX2 and OSX in osteoblast development, transforming growth
factor beta (TGF-b) in inhibition of chondrocyte proliferation, and MSX2 in
inhibition of calvarial osteoblast differentiation.
Anatomy
Anterior fontanelle
 Diamond shaped & lies b/w 2 parietal & 2
frontal bones
 Found at intersection of the sagittal,
coronal, & frontal sutures.
 Largest fontanelle and closes at 18-24
months.
Posterior fontanelle
 Lies b/w 2 occipital & parietal bones
 Closes at 2-3 months after birth
Anterolateral fontanelle
 Formed b/w frontal, parietal, & sphenoid
bones.
 Closes at 6 months
CLASSIFICATION
Unilateral Coronal Synostosis
 Unilateral coronal synostosis
results in flatness on the
ipsilateral side of the
forehead and supraorbital
ridge region.
 The head is inherently
asymmetrical in shape with a
flattened or retropositioned
forehead on the ipsilateral
side.
 The frontal bone is flat, and the
supraorbital ridge and lateral
orbital rim are recessed and the
anterior cranial base is short in
the anteroposterior dimension.
 The root of the nose may be
constricted and deviated to the
affected side.
 The ipsilateral zygoma and
infraorbital rim also may be flat
and recessed.
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
 Multiple surgical
approaches for the
correction of unilateral
coronal synostosis.
 Rim advancement and
frontal bone reshaping are
ideally performed at 6 to 8
months of age.
 Stabilization is achieved
by using direct
intraosseous wires or
resorbable plates and
screws.
Bilateral Coronal Synostosis
 Bilateral coronal synostosis is the most common
cranial vault suture synostosis pattern associated
with Apert’s and Crouzon’s syndromes.
 Bilateral coronal synostosis results in recession
of the supraorbital ridges, which causes the
overlying eyebrows to sit posterior to the
corneas.
 The orbits are also shallow (exorbitism), with
the eyes bulging (exophthalmus) and
abnormally separated (orbital hypertelorism).
 The recessed supraorbital bone, the forehead
appears to be lower and there is sagittal
shortening of the skull.
 The term for this cranial vault deformity is
brachycephaly.
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
 The treatment of bilateral coronal
synostosis requires suture release and
simultaneous bilateral orbital rim and
frontal bone advancements.
 Surgery is performed when the
patient is between 6 and 8 months of
age.
 The osteotomies for the bilateral orbital
rim advancement are made superior to
the nasofrontal and frontozygomatic
sutures and extend to the squamous
portion of the temporal bone.
 Stabilization is achieved with direct
transosseous wires or resorbable plates
and screws.
anterior cranial vault and orbits after
osteotomies, reshaping, and fixation of
segments
Metopic Synostosis
 Metopic synostosis usually occurs
in isolation and results in a
triangular shape to the skull.
 The term for this cranial vault
deformity is trigonocephaly.
 The associated cranial vault deformity
consists of relative hypotelorism, an
elevated supraorbital ridge medially,
and posteroinferior recession of the
lateral orbital rims and lateral aspect
of the supraorbital ridges.
SURGICAL MANAGEMET
 Surgical treatment of metopic synostosis
involves metopic suture release, simultaneous
bilateral orbital rim advancements, and lateral
widening via frontal bone advancement.
 These procedures are usually performed at 6 to
8 months of age.
 Orbital hypotelorism is corrected by splitting
the supraorbital ridge unit vertically in the
midline and placing autogenous cranial bone
grafts to increase the intraorbital distance.
 Stabilization is achieved with direct
transosseous wires or resorbable microplate
fixation.
 The microplate fixation is usually placed at the
inner surface of the cranial bone.
split vertically at the midline and and
interpositional autogenous cranial
bone graft placed to correct
hypotelorism.
proposed osteotomy
and bifrontal
craniotomy sites
Superior view of
bandeau before
reshaping
Observation of the gap between the
bandeau and the anterior cranial
base assists in assessing ideal
placement and bitemporal expansion
anterior cranial vault
after osteotomies,
reshaping, and fixation
Sagittal Synostosis
 Sagittal synostosis, the most
common form, is rarely
associated with increased
intracranial pressure.
 The skull typically has
anteroposterior elongation
with a compensatory
transverse narrowing.
 The term for this cranial vault
deformity is scaphocephaly.
Unilateral Lambdoid Synostosis
 Unilateral lambdoid
synostosis results in flatness
of the affected ipsilateral
parieto-occipital region.
 The location of the ear canal
and external ear is more
posterior and inferior on the
ipsilateral side than on the
contralateral side.
 The term for this cranial vault
deformity is posterior
plagiocephaly.
FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
 Brain Growth and Intracranial Pressure
 Vision
 Hydrocephalus
 Musculoskeletal anomalies
 Neurological abnormalities
 Effects of Midface Deficiency on Airway
 Dentition and Occlusion
 Hearing
 Extremity Anomalies
FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Brain Growth and Intracranial
Pressure
 Premature fusion of sutures causes
limited and abnormal skeletal
expansion in the presence of
continued brain growth.
 A “beaten-copper” appearance along
the inner table of the cranial vault
seen on a plain radiograph or the loss
of brain cisternae as observed on a
computed tomography (CT) scan may
suggest elevated ICP.
Vision
 Untreated craniosynostosis with
elevated ICP will cause papilledema
and eventual optic nerve atrophy,
resulting in partial or complete
blindness.
 orbits are shallow (exorbitism) and the
eyes are proptotic (exophthalmos), as
occurs in the CFD syndromes, the
cornea may be exposed and abrasions
or ulcerations may occur.
 CFD result in a marked degree of
orbital hypertelorism, which may
compromise visual acuity and restrict
binocular vision.
Hydrocephalus
 Hydrocephalus affects as many as 10% of
patients with a CFD syndrome
 hydrocephalus may be secondary to a
generalized cranial base stenosis with
constriction of all the cranial base
foramina, which affects the patient’s
cerebral venous drainage and
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics.
 Hydrocephalus may be identified with
the help of CT or magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) to document
progressively enlarging ventricles.
MUSCULOSKELETAL
ANOMALIES
 Cervical abnormalities are
common and including-
BUTTERFLY VERTERAE
POSTERIOR FUSION
NEUROLOGICAL
ABNORMALITIES
 Acquired chiari malformation(
chronic tonsilar herniation) are
present in 72.7% of crouzan
syndrome.
 Due to premature fusion of sagittal
and lambdoid sutures leads to very
small postyerior fossa that causes
cerebellar tonsilar herniation.
Effects of Midface Deficiency on Airway
 have diminished nasal and nasopharyngeal
spaces with resulting increased nasal airway
resistance (obstruction).
 The affected child is thus forced to breathe
through the mouth
 Clinical symptoms of OSA will include
heavy snoring, difficulty in awake breathing,
observed apnea during sleep, excessive
perspiration during sleep, and daytime
somnolence.
 Polysomnography remains the gold
standard for diagnosis.
Dentition and Occlusion
 The incidence of dental and oral
anomalies is higher among children
with CFD syndromes than in the general
population.
 In Apert’s syndrome in particular, the
palate is high and constricted in width.
 The incidence of isolated cleft palate in
patients with Apert’s syndrome
approaches 30%.
 An Angle class III skeletal
relationship in combination with
anterior open bite deformity is typical.
Hearing
 Hearing deficits are more common
among patients with the CFD
syndromes than in the general
population.
 In Crouzon’s syndrome, conductive
hearing deficits are common, and
atresia of the external auditory canals
may also occur.
 Otitis media is more common in
Apert’s syndrome
Extremity Anomalies
 Apert’s syndrome results in joint fusion
and bony and soft tissue syndactyly of the
digits of all four limbs.
 These Apert associated extremity
deformities are often symmetrical. Partial
or complete fusion of the shoulder, elbow,
or other joints is common.
 Broad thumbs, broad great toes, and partial
soft tissue syndactyly of the hands may be
seen in Pfeiffer’s syndrome.
 Preaxial polysyndactyly of the feet may
also be seen in Carpenter’s syndrome.
MORPHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS
 Frontoforehead Aesthetic Unit
 Orbitonasozygomatic Aesthetic Unit
 Maxillary–Nasal Base Aesthetic Unit
 CT Scan Analysis
 Cephalometric Analysis
MORPHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS
Frontoforehead Aesthetic Unit
 The frontoforehead region is dysmorphic in
an infant with CFD.
 The forehead may be considered as two
separate aesthetic components:
 The supraorbital ridge–lateral orbital rim
region includes the glabella and
supraorbital rim extending inferiorly down
each frontozygomatic suture toward the
infraorbital rim and posteriorly along each
temporoparietal region.
 The morphology and position of the
supraorbital ridge–lateral orbital rim region
is a key element of upper facial aesthetics.
Orbitonasozygomatic Aesthetic Unit
 In CFD syndromes, the orbitonasozygomatic regional deformity is a
reflection of the cranial base malformation.
 In Crouzon’s syndrome when bilateral coronal suture synostosis is
combined with skull base and midfacial deficiency, the
orbitonasozygomatic region will be dysmorphic and consistent with
a short (anteroposterior) and wide (transverse) anterior cranial
base.
 In Apert’s syndrome, the nasal bones, orbits, and zygomas, like
the anterior cranial base, are transversely wide and horizontally
short (retruded), resulting in a shallow hyperteloric upper midface
(zygomas, orbits, and nose)
Maxillary–Nasal Base Aesthetic Unit
 In the CFD patient with midface
deficiency, the upper anterior face (nasion
to maxillary incisor) is vertically short, and
there is a lack of horizontal
anteroposterior projection of the midface.
 These findings may be confirmed with
cephalometric analysis that indicates a
sella-nasion angle (SNA) below the mean
value and a short upper anterior facial
height (nasion to anterior nasal spine).
CT Scan Analysis
 The use of CT scans has clarified our appreciation of the
dysmorphology of a child born with a craniofacial malformation.
 Accurate standardized points of reference have been identified in
the cranio-orbitozygomatic skeleton based on axial CT images.
Cephalometric Analysis
 The interpretation of cephalometric radiographs remains useful
in the analysis of facial heights and maxillary, mandibular, and
chin positions and their relationships to one another, the cranial
base, and the dentition
PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
 Multidisciplinary Team Approach
 Current Surgical Approach
CRANIOFACIAL MANAGEMENT
 Philosophy Regarding Timing of Intervention
 Incision Placement
 Subperiosteal dissection and osteotomies
 Overcorrection, stabilization/fixation, and grafting
 Management of Cranial Vault Dead Space
 Management of intracranial-aerodigestive
communication
 Soft Tissue Management
Philosophy Regarding Timing of
Intervention
 In attempting to limit functional impairment and also achieve
long-term ideal facial aesthetics, an essential question the
surgeon must ask is, “During the course of craniofacial
development, does the operated-on facial skeletal of the child
with CFD tend to grow abnormally, resulting in further
distortions and dysmorphology or are the initial positive skeletal
changes (achieved at operation) maintained during ongoing
growth?”
 Unfortunately, the theory that craniofacial procedures carried
out early in infancy will “unlock growth” has not been
documented through the scientific method
Incision Placement
 For exposure of the craniofacial skeleton above
the Le Fort I level, the approach used is the
coronal (skin) incision.
 That allows for a relatively camouflaged access
to the anterior and posterior cranial vault,
orbits, nasal dorsum, zygomas, upper maxilla,
pterygoid fossa, and temporomandibular
joints.
 For added cosmetic advantage, placement of
the coronal incision more posteriorly on the
scalp and with postauricular rather than
preauricular extensions is useful.
 When exposure of the maxilla at the Le
Fort I level is required, a circumvestibular
maxillary intraoral incision is used.
Subperiosteal dissection &
osteotomies
 Dissection in a superiosteal
plane with wide exposure to
provide clear & direct
visualization.
 Tessier’s original concept
in dissection of pericranium
and periorbita would allow
all osteotomies ad
reconstruction without
interfering with ocular,
oculomotor, palpebral, or
lacrimal function.
Overcorrection, stabilization/fixation
and grafting
 Relapse is an expected component of healing for patients
 Stabilization of reconstructed skeletal structures using bone
plates and screws (titanium or resorbable) further promotes
maintenance of the surgical result.
 Fresh, autogenous bone grafts should be used to fill all
possible defects to promote healing and stability with open
reconstructive procedures.
Management of Cranial Vault Dead
Space
 Cranial reshaping in the CFD patient provides space for the
compressed brain to expand into.
 Unfortunately, after anterior cranial vault expansion and monobloc
advancement, an immediate extradural (retrofrontal) dead space is
combined with the osteotomy-created gap across the skull base
(connecting the anterior cranial fossa and the nasal cavity).
 This combination of factors may complicate the postoperative
recovery (e.g., CSF leakage, infection, bone loss, fistula formation).
 In the CFD patient, relatively rapid (6–8 wk) filling of the surgically
expanded intracranial volume by the previously compressed frontal
lobes of the brain has been documented after cranio-orbital expansion
in infants.
 The use of fibrin glue to seal the anterior cranial base provides a temporary
separation between the cavities, allowing time for the re-epithelialization
(healing) of the torn nasal mucosa.
 To reconstruct the defect across the skull base, (gap) bone grafts of various types
have also been used.
 Until the torn nasal mucosa heals, potential communication between the nasal
cavity and the cranial fossa may result in the transfer of air, fluid, bacteria and
nasocranial fistula formation.
 To facilitate nasal mucosa healing and limit a pressure gradient across the
communication, postoperative endotracheal intubation may be extended for 3
to 5 days and/ or bilateral nasopharyngeal airways may be placed after
extubation.
 The avoidance of positive-pressure ventilation, enforcement of sinus
precautions, and restriction of nose blowing further limit reflux of air, fluid, and
bacteria (nose to cranial fossa) during the early postoperative period.
Management of Intracranial-Aerodigestive
Communication
 The management of any cranial base communication between
the sterile intracranial compartment and the bacteria-rich
aerodigestive tract when performing combined intracranial and
extracranial surgery (monobloc advancement, facial bipartition,
intracranial Le Fort III).
Soft Tissue Management
 A layered closure of the coronal incision (galea and skin)
optimizes healing and limits scar widening.
 Resuspension of the midface periosteum to the temporalis fascia
in a superior and posterior direction facilitates redraping of the
soft tissues.
 Each lateral canthus should be adequately suspended or
reattached in a superoposterior direction to the lateral orbital
rim.
 The use of chromic gut for closure of the scalp skin in children
may be used to obviate the need for postoperative suture or staple
removal.
Algorithm of Care
Infants and Toddlers (Birth to 4 Years)
The Young Child (4 to 13 Years)
The Adolescent (13+ Years)
SYNDROMES ASSOCIATED
CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS
CROUZAN’S SYNDROME
APERT SYNDROME
PFEIFFER’S SYNDROME
CARPENTER’S SYNDROME
SAETHRE-CHOTZEN SYNDROME
CROUZON’S SYNDROME
 Crouzon’s syndrome is a frequent form of CFD.
 It is characterized by multiple anomalies of the
craniofacial skeleton with an autosomal dominant
inheritance pattern.
 Approximately 4.8% of all craniosynostosis is due to
Crouzon syndrome, which has an estimated prevalence
of 1 in 60,000.
 Crouzon syndrome may be caused by either one of two
different mutations.
 Ninety-five percent of cases are due to a mutation in
the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (FGFR2) on
chromosome 10q25.
 A mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 leads
to Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans
characterized by less severe hearing loss, odontogenic
tumors, and acanthosis nigricans
Characteristics
Craniosynostosis
 Coronal suture fusion and relatively
early sagittal and lambdoid suture fusion
are the most common synostoses seen in
Crouzon syndrome patients.
Midface hypoplasia
 The extensive cranial suture fusion
results in severe midface hypoplasia in
all dimensions (transverse, vertical, and
sagittal).
 This leads to the characteristic
exorbitism, hypertelorism,
pseudoprognathism, and trapezoid
lips seen in both Apert and Crouzon
syndromes.
Ocular abnormalities
Impaired vision-overall 61%
Ocular atrophy-7% to 16.7%
Exposure keratopathy-4.2%
Amblyopia-6.3% to 21%
Ametropia-25%
ocular complications can be greatly
reduced with early Le Fort III
advancement.
Musculoskeletal anomalies
 Cervical abnormalities are common and
include butterfly vertebrae and
posterior fusions.
Raised intracranial pressure
 Elevated ICP is ubiquitous in
patients with Crouzon syndrome
and may occur at any age during the
first 5 years of life.
 Overt papilledema is present in greater
than 50% of this patient population.
 The presence of ICP in this patient
population is multifactorial and
includes craniocerebral disproportion,
venous hypertension, upper airway
obstruction, and hydrocephalus.
Obstructive sleep apnea
 Obstructive sleep apnea is common in Crouzon patients due
to the common incidence of extreme midface hypoplasia.
 Obstructive sleep apnea leads to CO2 retention, which acts as
a potent cerebral vasodilator, increasing blood flow to an
intracranial system, which is likely already experiencing
venous congestion and ventriculomegaly.
Neurological Abnormalities
 Acquired Chiari malformations (chronic
tonsillar herniation) are present in 72.7% of
Crouzon syndrome patients.
 This rate is significantly higher than that
found in Apert syndrome (1.9% to 29%)
patients.
 It is suggested that the reason lies in the
increased incidence of premature fusion of
the sagittal and lambdoid sutures found in
Crouzon syndrome.
 This leads to a very small posterior fossa that
is associated with an increased incidence of
cerebellar tonsillar herniation (Chiari
malformation).
Treatment Recommendations: Team
Approach
Surgical treatment
 Craniosynostosis
 Craniofacial synostosis release (usually bilateral coronal) between 6 to
12 months old; earlier may be necessary if turribrachycephaly is
present.
 Midface deficiency
 Correction of midface deficiency using Le Fort III advancement by
distraction osteogenesis during childhood (5 to 9 years old) as late as
possible but dependent on excessive exorbitism, psychological, and
obstructive sleep apnea needs
 Orthognathic
 Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity (14 to 16 years old,
female; 18 to 20 years old, male)
Monitoring
 Imaging
Follow child with yearly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
and magnetic resonance venography
CT head scan prior to cranial vault surgery
 Medical
Proton pump inhibitor until 2 years old
Polysomnography yearly into adulthood
Hearing
 Audiology evaluation
 Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing is recommended in the syndromic synostosis
population
 Regular ear, nose, and throat (ENT) visits
 Evaluation of hearing loss
Ophthalmologic exam
 Managing amblyopia
 Twice yearly cycloplegic refraction
 Managing potential visual pathway dysfunction
 Visual evoked potentials to monitor for visual pathway dysfunction, which indirectly
monitors changes in ICP
 Funduscopy for optic disc visualization and monitoring
 Managing the cornea
 Regular evaluation with fluorescein staining monitoring for neovascularization (sign of
chronic exposure)
 Especially important after craniofacial surgery
 Consider lateral tarsorrhaphy with midface advancement and hourly lubricant to the eye
 Early pediatric dentistry and orthodontic intervention
Maintaining and restoring health of dentition, as well as
alleviating dental crowding
Preparation for surgical orthodontics
 Speech therapy
Start at 1 year old
 Psychological
Yearly assessment of general development
 Genetic counseling
Primary Cranio-orbital Decompression:
Reshaping in Infancy
 The initial treatment for Crouzon’s syndrome generally
requires bilateral coronal suture release and simultaneous
anterior cranial vault and upper orbital osteotomies with
reshaping and advancement.
 Our preference is to carry this out when the child is 9 to 11
months of age unless clear signs of increased ICP are
identified earlier in life.
Repeat Craniotomy for Additional Cranial Vault Expansion
and Reshaping in Young Children
 The “repeat” craniotomy carried out for further
decompression and reshaping in the child with Crouzon’s
syndrome is often complicated by brittle cortical bone
(which lacks a diploic space and contains sharp spicules
piercing the dura), the presence of previously placed fixation
devices in the operative field (e.g., Silastic sheeting, metal
clips, stainless steel wires, plates, and screws), and
convoluted thin dura compressed against (or herniated into)
the inner table of the skull.
Management of “Total Midface”
Deformity in Childhood
 The type of osteotomies selected to manage the
“total midface” deficiency or deformity and
residual cranial vault dysplasia should depend
on the extent and location of the presenting
dysmorphology rather than on a fixed approach
to the midface malformation.
 The selection of a monobloc (with or without
additional orbital segmentation), facial
bipartition (with or without additional orbital
segmental osteotomies), or Le Fort III
osteotomy to manage the basic horizontal,
transverse, vertical orbital, and upper midface
deficiencies or deformities in a patient with
Crouzon’s syndrome depends on the patient’s
presenting midface and anterior cranial vault
morphology.
Lateral skull radiograph with “fingerprinting” indicates longstanding
increased ICP
Orthognathic Procedures for Definitive Occlusal and
Lower Facial Aesthetic Reconstruction
 An Angle class III malocclusion, resulting from
maxillary retrusion, with anterior open bite often
results.
 A Le Fort I osteotomy to allow for horizontal
advancement, transverse widening, and vertical
adjustment is generally required in combination
with an osteoplastic genioplasty (vertical
reduction and horizontal advancement) to further
correct the lower face deformity.
 Secondary deformities of the mandible should be
simultaneously corrected through sagittal split
ramus osteotomies.
 The elective orthognathic surgery is carried out in
conjunction with orthodontic treatment planned
for completion at the time of early skeletal
maturity (~13–15 yr in girls and 15– 17 yr in boys)
Apert Syndrome
 Apert syndrome occurs in 1 in
65,000 to 150,000 live births
 Generally, a more severe
craniofacial dysmorphology is
observed in Apert syndrome when
compared to Crouzon.
 Autosomal dominant inheritance
with variable penetrance is common
among the craniosynostosis
syndromes.
 Apert syndrome is due to a
mutation in the gene for
fibroblast growth factor receptor
2 (FGFR2) on chromosome 10q.
Characteristics
 four-limb complex syndactly of the hands
and feet.
 Fusion and malformation of other joints,
including the elbows and shoulders, often occur.
 In Apert’s syndrome, fused cervical
vertebrae (68%), usually C5–6 can occur.
 Hydrocephalus is less frequent than in
Crouzon’s syndrome (2% vs. 10%).
 The integument (soft tissue envelope) also
varies from that in Crouzon’s syndrome,
with a greater downward slant to the lateral
canthi and a distinctive, S-shaped upper
eyelid ptosis.
 The quality of the skin often varies from normal
with acne and hyperhidrosis being prominent
features.
Treatment Recommendations: Team
Approach
Surgical treatment
 Craniosynostosis
 Craniofacial synostosis release (usually bilateral coronal) between the ages of 6 to 12
months old.
 Midface deficiency
 Correction of midface deficiency using Le Fort III advancement during childhood (5
to 9 years old) as late as possible but dependent on psychological and obstructive
sleep apnea needs. The Le Fort III is preferably advanced using distraction
osteogenesis.
 Cleft palate repair may be delayed due to obstructive sleep apnea concerns—without
concern for development of velopharyngeal insufficiency.
 Orthognathic
 Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity (14 to 16 years old, female; 18 to 20
years old, male).
 Orthopedic
 Syndactyly repair, generally in two stages (1 to 5 years old).
Primary Cranio-orbital Decompression:
Reshaping in Infancy
 The initial craniofacial procedure for
Apert’s syndrome generally requires
bilateral coronal suture release and
anterior cranial vault and upper
three-quarter orbital osteotomies to
expand the anterior cranial vault and
reshape the upper orbits and
forehead.
 Our preference is to carry this out
when the child is 9 to 11 months of
age, unless signs of increased ICP
are identified earlier in life.
orbital osteotomy
unit before
reshaping
orbital
osteotomy unit
after reshaping.
cranial base
before surgery
anterior interorbital distance diminished from 29 to 25 mm,
Further Craniotomy for Additional Cranial Vault
Expansion and Reshaping in Young Children
 after the initial suture release, decompression, and
reshaping carried out during infancy, the child is observed
clinically at intervals by the craniofacial surgeon, pediatric
neurosurgeon, pediatric ophthalmologist, and
developmental pediatrician and undergoes interval CT
scanning.
 Should signs of increased ICP develop, further decompression
with reshaping of the cranial vault to expand the intracranial
volume is performed.
 In Apert’s syndrome, the posterior cranial vault more
commonly requires expansion.
 child born with Apert’s syndrome underwent bilateral “lateral
canthal advancement” procedures when she was 6 weeks of age,
carried out by the neurosurgeon working independently.
 At 18 months of age, she returned with turricephaly and a
constricted anterior cranial vault requiring further cranio-orbital
decompression and reshaping.
 At 5 years of age, she underwent anterior cranial vault and facial
bipartition osteotomies withreshaping.
 As part of her staged reconstruction, she will require
orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment planned for the
teenage years
at 8 months of age after
a lateral canthal
advancement procedure
with residual deformity
Midorbits indicates dystopia,
hypertelorism, and proptosis
views of the cranio-orbital region after three
quarter orbital osteotomies and reshaping and
anterior advancement
Craniofacial morphology
with planned and completed
osteotomies and reconstruction.
upper orbits after osteotomies with
reshaping.
Management of the “Total Midface”
Deformity in Childhood
 In Apert’s syndrome, for almost all patients, facial bipartition
osteotomies combined with further cranial vault reshaping
permit a more complete correction of the abnormal craniofacial
skeleton than can be achieved through other midface procedure
options (i.e., monobloc or Le Fort III osteotomies).
 When using the facial bipartition approach, a more normal arc of
rotation of the midface complex is achieved with the midline
split.
 This further reduces the stigmata of the preoperative “flat, wide,
and retrusive” facial appearance.
CT scan views through the midorbits before and
after reconstruction indication correction of
orbital hyperteleorism and proptosis
Orthognathic Procedures for Definitive Occlusal and
Lower Facial Aesthetic Reconstruction
 The mandible has normal basic growth potential in Apert’s syndrome.
The extent of maxillary hypoplasia will result in an Angle class
III malocclusion with severe anterior openbite deformity.
 A Le Fort I osteotomy is required to allow for horizontal
advancement, transverse widening, and vertical adjustment in
combination with an osteoplastic genioplasty to vertically
reduce and horizontally advance the chin, often combined with
bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible.
 The elective orthognathic surgery is carried out in conjunction with
detailed orthodontic treatment planned for completion at the time of
early skeletal maturity (~13–15 yr in girls and 15–17 yr in boys).
Pfeiffer Syndrome
 Pfeiffer syndrome occurs in 1 in 100,000 live births
 It is unique among the FGFR related syndromes in
that it has been separated into three clinical
categories.
 Type I is the most common (61%) and is associated
with FGFR1 or FGFR2 mutations. It is consistent with
a mild presentation, normal neurologic and
intellectual development, and good outcomes.
 Presentations of Types II (25%) and III (14%) are
sporadic, severe, and associated with a mutation in
the FGFR2 gene only.
 Types II and III are associated with developmental
delay, chronic tonsillar herniation, respiratory
problems, and high mortality rates (25% to 85%)
Etiology
 Autosomal dominant inheritance
with high penetrance
 The majority (95%) of Pfeiffer
syndrome is caused by a
mutation in FGFR2
(chromosome 10q26) with the
remaining 5% attributable to a
mutation in FGFR1
(chromosome 8p11.2- p11)
Pfeiffer Syndrome Presentations
Type I: “Classic” Pfeiffer Syndrome
Craniosynostosis-coronal
Neurologic
 Hydrocephalus may occur
 Conductive hearing loss may occur
 Chiari malformation may occur
Developmental
 Normal intelligence
Musculoskeletal
 Syndactyly variable, brachydactyly common
 Broad thumbs and great toes
Midface deficiency
 Hypoplastic midface with relative mandibular
prognathism
 Exorbitism—due to shallow orbits
Type II: Cloverleaf Skull Pfeiffer
Syndrome
Severe craniosynostosis-“cloverleaf/kleeblattschädel skull” Can
commonly can cause limited brain growth and mental retardation
Neurologic
 Hydrocephalus and conductive hearing loss common
 Chiari malformation 100%
Developmental delay
 No delay to severe delay possible
Musculoskeletal
 Broad thumbs and great toes
 Elbow ankylosis or synostosis
Midface deficiency
 Hypoplastic midface with relative mandibular prognathism
 Extreme exorbitism
 Cleft palate may be present
Obstructive sleep apnea and airway abnormalities
 Obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea common
 Tracheal abnormalities including: tracheal sleeve and tracheal stenosis
Type III: Severe Pfeiffer Syndrome
without Cloverleaf Skull Deformity
 These individuals have similar
features to Type II Pfeiffer syndrome;
however, they do not have the
cloverleaf skull
 External auditory canal atresia 100%
Treatment Recommendations: Team
Approach
Surgical treatment
 Caveats for Pfeiffer syndrome Types II and III
 Tracheostomy placement in all Type II and III patients
 Preemptive tarsorrhaphy
 If bilateral auditory canal atresia, consider bone-
anchored hearing aid (BAHA) placement-ideally after
all posterior vault remodeling has been performed
 Craniosynostosis
 Early, 2 to 4 months old, primary cranioplasty for
surgical decompression followed by additional cranial
vault procedure between 13 to 18 months old, with
posterior enlargement of foramen magnum if
indicated.
 Orthognathic
 Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity
(14 to 16 years old, female; 18 to 20 years old, male)
MUENKE SYNDROME
 It is characterized by bilateral or less
commonly unilateral coronal suture
synostosis with broad great toes,
brachydactyly, or clinoductyly.
 Mutation in FGFR3 gene
 Autosomal dominant
 Mild facial hypoplasia, mild ptosis,
high arched palate.
 Mild to moderate sensorineural
hearing loss common
Treatment Recommendations: Team
Approach
Surgical treatment
 Craniosynostosis
Craniofacial synostosis release (usually unilateral or bilateral
coronal) between 6 to 12 months old
Monitoring
 Imaging
Follow child with MRI and magnetic resonance venography
every year
CT head prior to cranial vault surgery
CARPENTER’S SYNDROME
 Carpenter’s syndrome is
characterized by craniosynostosis
often associated with preaxial
polysyndactyly of the feet, short
fingers with clinodactyly, and
variable soft tissue syndactyly,
sometimes postaxial
polydactyly, and other
anomalies such as congenital
heart defects, short stature,
obesity, and mental deficiency.
 It was first described by
Carpenter in 1901 and was later
recognized to be an autosomal
recessive syndrome.
SAETHRE-CHOTZEN SYNDROME
 Saethre-Chotzen syndrome has an
autosomal dominant inheritance pattern
with a high degree of penetrance and
expressivity.
 Its pattern of malformations may include
craniosynostosis, low-set frontal
hairline, ptosis of the upper eyelids,
facial asymmetry, brachydactyly,
partial cutaneous syndactyly, and
other skeletal anomalies.
 As part of the reconstruction, cranio-
orbital reshaping will almost certainly be
required and is similar to that described
for Crouzon’s syndrome.
Jackson-Weiss Syndrome
 Jackson-Weiss syndrome results from
multiple mutations in FGFR2.
 It is clinically characterized by coronal
synostosis; midface hypoplasia;
exorbitism; hypertelorism; tarsal and
metatarsal fusion; and short, broad,
and medially deviated great toes.
 Hearing loss is present in 68% of
patients.
 Of the patients with hearing loss, 53% is
conductive, 20% is mixed, and 26% is
sensorineural.
Beare-Stevenson Syndrome
 Beare-Stevenson syndrome is a rare
craniofacial syndrome also associated
with mutation in the FGFR2 signaling
pathway.
 It is clinically characterized by cutis
gyrate (furrowed skin), acanthosis
nigricans, severe craniosynostosis,
severe developmental impairments,
umbilical and anogenital anomalies,
and early mortality.
 Death commonly occurs in infancy
with the longest survivor of the
syndrome being only 4 years old
Antley-Bixler Syndrome
 Antley-Bixler syndrome is an extremely
rare craniosynostosis syndrome, resulting
from a mutation in one of two genes: P450
oxidoreductase gene or FGFR2 (S351C)
 characterized by bicoronal
craniosynostosis (rarely lambdoid and
metopic) and radiohumeral synostosis.
 Commonly there may be midface
hypoplasia, choanal stenosis/ atresia,
multiple joint contractures,
hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation,
obstructive sleep apnea, cervical spine
fusions, and visceral anomalies.
 Mortality may be as high as 80% in the neonatal period, but
it improves dramatically with age.
 Management is similar to that of a Type II or III Pfeiffer
syndrome patient and should be targeted initially at
lifesaving therapies, such as early tracheostomy or nasal
stenting for choanal atresia, cranial vault reshaping for
elevated ICP, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts for
hydrocephalus
DEFORMITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ABNORMALITIES OF
THE FIRST AND SECOND BRANCHIAL ARCHES
 Treacher Collins Syndrome (Franceschetti-Zwahlen-Klein
Syndrome)
 Hemifacial Microsomia(facio-auriculo-vertebral spectrum,
first and second branchial arch syndrome, oculoauriculo-
vertebral syndrome, and oculo-auriculo-vertebral dysplasia)
Treacher Collins Syndrome
 Treacher Collins syndrome is the
most common mandibulofacial
dysostosis and occurs in
approximately 1 in 25,000 to
50,000 births.
 It equally affects both sexes, is
frequently familial (40%), and is
commonly transferred in an
autosomal dominant pattern.
Pathogenesis
 Treacher Collins syndrome are involved in pre-
rRNA transcription.
 It is hypothesized that the loss of these essential
cellular proteins results in apoptosis of cells
involved in neural crest cell migration to the first
and second branchial arches during the fifth to
eighth weeks of gestation, leading to the
characteristic deformities seen in individuals with
Treacher Collins syndrome.
 The majority of affected individuals (81% to 93%)
carry a mutation in the TCOF1 gene located on
5q32-q33.
Characteristics of Treacher Collins
Patients
Staging of Craniofacial Reconstruction
Initial consultation
 When the deformity is severe, the
craniofacial treatment team is
commonly consulted immediately to
evaluate airway patency.
Classification of Temporomandibular
Joint and Mandibular Malformation
Cleft palate
 If a cleft palate is present, repair may be performed at
the standard time, 10 to 18 months old.
 if airway concerns are also present, a delayed repair
is advised.
Zygomatic and malar reconstruction
 Definitive reconstruction of the zygomatico-malar
region is best delayed until after the age of 7, which
is when cranio-orbito-zygomatic maturation is near
complete.
 At this time, adult sized malar prominences may be
constructed without concern of future growth.
 This can be done using bicortical calvarial bone
grafts or alternatively with the use of alloplastic
implants.
Ear and hearing rehabilitation and reconstruction
 Hearing rehabilitation should begin at the earliest age possible.
 Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) consists of a permanent titanium
fixture that is surgically implanted into the skull bone behind the ear and a
small detachable sound processor that clips onto the fixture.
 BAHAs are suitable for people with conductive or mixed hearing loss who
cannot adequately benefit from or prefer not to use conventional hearing
aids.
 Once the patient is older than 3 years old, a BAHA is recommended.
 Functional atresiaplasty is not currently recommended due to the
significant postoperative residual hearing deficit and high complication rate
 External ear reconstruction may commence when the child reaches the age
of 6.
 At this time, the synchondrotic region of ribs 6 and 7 provides a sufficient
amount of cartilage for reconstruction.
 Approximately four to five surgeries are necessary to reconstruct the
external ear.
Ophthalmologic intervention
 Lateral tarsorrhaphy or lower lid skin grafts may be necessary to
provide adequate corneal coverage in the perinatal period.
 In order to minimize vision loss, amblyopia and the correction of
refractive errors is aggressively treated prior to surgical correction
of motility problems.
 Strabismus surgery may proceed upon diagnosis.
 Colobomas and pseudocolobomas are treated surgically, and
timing is dependent on the deformity and the presence of corneal
exposure.
Maxillomandibular reconstruction
 There are three different times when the
mandible may need to be addressed.
 In infancy, if the patient has a significant
mandibular deformity resulting in the inability
to maintain the airway, it is necessary to
perform a tracheostomy and/or mandibular
distraction.
 In early childhood (between 6 to 12 years old),
the extent of the mandibular deformity dictates
the treatment needed.
 If the child has a significant deformity resulting
in a compromised temporomandibular joint
apparatus, costochondral grafts are likely
necessary.
 Orthognathic surgery is almost universally
needed once the patient reaches skeletal
maturity (between 13 to 18 years old).
Nasal reconstruction and orbital rim secondary
reconstruction
 Treacher Collins patients consistently have increased width and
a mid-dorsal hump.
 Definitive rhinoplasty is best performed after orthognathic
surgery.
 Persistent deficiency of the orbital rims may be best treated
with alloplastic reconstruction.
Soft tissue refinements
 If the patient has significant temporal hollowing, these areas
may be addressed simultaneously with orthognathic surgery or
during the rhinoplasty procedure.
HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA
 Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is an asymmetric
craniofacial malformation, variably affecting
structures derived from the first and second
pharyngeal arches.
 It is characterized by structural abnormalities of
the orbit, maxilla, mandible, external and
middle ear, cranial nerves, and facial soft tissues.
 HFM is the second most common craniofacial
anomaly after cleft lip and palate.
 the most frequently reported incidence is 1 in
5600 live births
PATHOGENESIS
 The mechanism by which HFM develops in humans is unknown.
 Two pathogenic theories exist, one involving the vascular system
and the other neuroectodermal cell migration.
 The “stapedial artery hematoma” theory was proposed by Poswillo in
1973.
 Hemorrhage from the developing stapedial artery produced a
hematoma in the region of the first and second pharyngeal arches.
 The size of the hematoma and resultant tissue destruction determined
the extent and variability of the deformity.
 This explanation may be applicable to humans, because it provides an
adequate explanation for the variability of HFM.
 The “alteration in neural crest cell migration theory” is based on
the work of Johnson and Bronsky.
Modified O.M.E.N.S (+) Classification of
Hemifacial Microsomia
Approach to Treatment of
Oculoauriculovertebral Spectrum
Deformity Typical Age of Reconstruction
 Cleft lip- 3 months or later
 Cleft palate- 9-14 months
 Cranio-orbital asymmetry- 2-5 years or later
 Oribital hypoplasia/ microphthalmia- 5 years or later
 Zygomatic hypoplasia - 5 years or later
 Kaban type III TMJ (atretic TMJ/ramus)- 5 years or later
 Maxillomandibular asymmetry- 14-16 years or later in females &
16-18 years or later in males
 Soft tissue deficiency, lateral face- After orthognathic procedures
 External ear - 5 years of age or later
CONCLUSION
 The preferred approach to the management of a patient with
syndromic craniosynostosis is to stage reconstruction based
on craniofacial growth patterns, functional demands
(cognition, vision, breathing, swallowing, speech, chewing,
hearing), and psychosocial effects.
 Resultant deformities of the cranio-orbital tissues, zygoma,
ear, lip, palate, maxilla, mandible, and airway require a
thoughtful staged reconstruction that is interdisciplinary.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgery
Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgeryComplications of mandibular orthognathic surgery
Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgeryJamil Kifayatullah
 
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracture
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fractureNaso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracture
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracturesailesh kumar
 
Middle face fracture
Middle face fractureMiddle face fracture
Middle face fractureEhab Napih
 
Controversies in maxillofacial trauma
Controversies in maxillofacial traumaControversies in maxillofacial trauma
Controversies in maxillofacial traumaDr. SHEETAL KAPSE
 
Complications orthognathic surgery
Complications  orthognathic surgeryComplications  orthognathic surgery
Complications orthognathic surgeryShivani Saluja
 
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMES
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMESDEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMES
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMESAditi Rajvanshi
 
Surgical assessment in rhinoplasty
Surgical assessment in rhinoplastySurgical assessment in rhinoplasty
Surgical assessment in rhinoplastytherhinoplastycourse
 
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetry
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetryHemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetry
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetryDr Sylvain Chamberland
 
Craniofacial anomalies
Craniofacial anomaliesCraniofacial anomalies
Craniofacial anomaliesMasuma Ryzvee
 
Fascial Space Infection part 2
Fascial Space Infection part  2Fascial Space Infection part  2
Fascial Space Infection part 2Arjun Shenoy
 
surgical approaches to the mandibular condyle
surgical approaches to the mandibular condylesurgical approaches to the mandibular condyle
surgical approaches to the mandibular condyleJamil Kifayatullah
 
Complication.of orthognathic surgery
Complication.of  orthognathic surgeryComplication.of  orthognathic surgery
Complication.of orthognathic surgeryIndian dental academy
 
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options and rec...
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options  and rec...Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options  and rec...
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options and rec...Dibya Falgoon Sarkar
 
Surgical correction of anterior openbite
Surgical correction of anterior openbiteSurgical correction of anterior openbite
Surgical correction of anterior openbiteMaher Fouda
 

What's hot (20)

Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgery
Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgeryComplications of mandibular orthognathic surgery
Complications of mandibular orthognathic surgery
 
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracture
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fractureNaso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracture
Naso orbito ethmoid (noe) complex fracture
 
Middle face fracture
Middle face fractureMiddle face fracture
Middle face fracture
 
Controversies in maxillofacial trauma
Controversies in maxillofacial traumaControversies in maxillofacial trauma
Controversies in maxillofacial trauma
 
Complications orthognathic surgery
Complications  orthognathic surgeryComplications  orthognathic surgery
Complications orthognathic surgery
 
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMES
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMESDEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMES
DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES - CRANIOFACIAL SYNDROMES
 
Surgical assessment in rhinoplasty
Surgical assessment in rhinoplastySurgical assessment in rhinoplasty
Surgical assessment in rhinoplasty
 
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetry
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetryHemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetry
Hemimandibular hyperplasia and facial asymmetry
 
Craniofacial anomalies
Craniofacial anomaliesCraniofacial anomalies
Craniofacial anomalies
 
Fascial Space Infection part 2
Fascial Space Infection part  2Fascial Space Infection part  2
Fascial Space Infection part 2
 
Distraction osteogenesis (8)
Distraction osteogenesis (8)Distraction osteogenesis (8)
Distraction osteogenesis (8)
 
Surgical anatomy of tmj & its approaches
Surgical anatomy of tmj & its approachesSurgical anatomy of tmj & its approaches
Surgical anatomy of tmj & its approaches
 
Bad splits in bsso
Bad splits in bssoBad splits in bsso
Bad splits in bsso
 
surgical approaches to the mandibular condyle
surgical approaches to the mandibular condylesurgical approaches to the mandibular condyle
surgical approaches to the mandibular condyle
 
microtia
microtiamicrotia
microtia
 
Complication.of orthognathic surgery
Complication.of  orthognathic surgeryComplication.of  orthognathic surgery
Complication.of orthognathic surgery
 
Distraction osteogenesis
Distraction osteogenesisDistraction osteogenesis
Distraction osteogenesis
 
Hemifacial microsomia2.1
Hemifacial microsomia2.1Hemifacial microsomia2.1
Hemifacial microsomia2.1
 
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options and rec...
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options  and rec...Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options  and rec...
Naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures: Management principles, options and rec...
 
Surgical correction of anterior openbite
Surgical correction of anterior openbiteSurgical correction of anterior openbite
Surgical correction of anterior openbite
 

Similar to SURGERY OF CRANIOFACIAL ANOMALIES.pptx

Cranial remodelling orthosis
Cranial remodelling orthosisCranial remodelling orthosis
Cranial remodelling orthosisPOLY GHOSH
 
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis Dr Ratnesh Shukla
 
Skeletal dysplasia grand round
Skeletal dysplasia   grand round Skeletal dysplasia   grand round
Skeletal dysplasia grand round Amr Mansour Hassan
 
A Radiological Approach to Craniosynostosis
A Radiological Approach to CraniosynostosisA Radiological Approach to Craniosynostosis
A Radiological Approach to CraniosynostosisFelice D'Arco
 
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docxKevinjrHWatsono
 
Cervical spondylosis
Cervical spondylosisCervical spondylosis
Cervical spondylosisranjan mishra
 
Cranium of the skull copy
Cranium of the skull copyCranium of the skull copy
Cranium of the skull copydrjopogs
 
Congenital muscular torticolis
Congenital muscular torticolisCongenital muscular torticolis
Congenital muscular torticolisGaurav Singh
 
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)College of Medicine, Sulaymaniyah
 
Growth and development /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...
Growth and development  /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...Growth and development  /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...
Growth and development /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...Indian dental academy
 
Miscellaneous Affections of Bone
Miscellaneous Affections of BoneMiscellaneous Affections of Bone
Miscellaneous Affections of BoneDr. Anshu Sharma
 
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusion
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusionCranial base angle in relation to malocclusion
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusionNawaz Khan Panezai
 
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptx
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptxEar Reconstruction_084051.pptx
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptxdrazizsaleh94
 

Similar to SURGERY OF CRANIOFACIAL ANOMALIES.pptx (20)

Cranial remodelling orthosis
Cranial remodelling orthosisCranial remodelling orthosis
Cranial remodelling orthosis
 
Anterior cranial-fossa
Anterior cranial-fossaAnterior cranial-fossa
Anterior cranial-fossa
 
Femoroacetabular impingement
Femoroacetabular impingementFemoroacetabular impingement
Femoroacetabular impingement
 
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis
Anesthesia management of Craniosynostosis
 
Skeletal dysplasia grand round
Skeletal dysplasia   grand round Skeletal dysplasia   grand round
Skeletal dysplasia grand round
 
Femoroacetabular impingement in young adults Dr.sandeep agrawal agrasen hospi...
Femoroacetabular impingement in young adults Dr.sandeep agrawal agrasen hospi...Femoroacetabular impingement in young adults Dr.sandeep agrawal agrasen hospi...
Femoroacetabular impingement in young adults Dr.sandeep agrawal agrasen hospi...
 
A Radiological Approach to Craniosynostosis
A Radiological Approach to CraniosynostosisA Radiological Approach to Craniosynostosis
A Radiological Approach to Craniosynostosis
 
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx
1- Why isn't Jamie allowed unlimited use of aspirin for pain- 2- Why d.docx
 
Cervical spondylosis
Cervical spondylosisCervical spondylosis
Cervical spondylosis
 
perthes.pptx
perthes.pptxperthes.pptx
perthes.pptx
 
Cranium of the skull copy
Cranium of the skull copyCranium of the skull copy
Cranium of the skull copy
 
Congenital muscular torticolis
Congenital muscular torticolisCongenital muscular torticolis
Congenital muscular torticolis
 
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)
Surgery 5th year, 1st lecture/part two (Dr. Khalid Shokor Mahmood)
 
achondroplasia.pptx
achondroplasia.pptxachondroplasia.pptx
achondroplasia.pptx
 
Fai and open surgery
Fai and open surgeryFai and open surgery
Fai and open surgery
 
Faciomaxillary Injuries
Faciomaxillary InjuriesFaciomaxillary Injuries
Faciomaxillary Injuries
 
Growth and development /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...
Growth and development  /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...Growth and development  /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...
Growth and development /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental...
 
Miscellaneous Affections of Bone
Miscellaneous Affections of BoneMiscellaneous Affections of Bone
Miscellaneous Affections of Bone
 
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusion
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusionCranial base angle in relation to malocclusion
Cranial base angle in relation to malocclusion
 
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptx
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptxEar Reconstruction_084051.pptx
Ear Reconstruction_084051.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementmkooblal
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomnelietumpap1
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxDr.Ibrahim Hassaan
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.arsicmarija21
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 

Recently uploaded (20)

What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of managementHierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
Hierarchy of management that covers different levels of management
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 

SURGERY OF CRANIOFACIAL ANOMALIES.pptx

  • 1. Presented by Dr. Debraj Samanta DEPARTMENT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY HIDSAR,WEST BENGAL
  • 2. INTRODUCTION  Craniofacial anomalies, one of the subtypes of congenital disorders, are characterized by the abnormal development of soft tissues and bones of the face and the skull that results in the formation of different head and facial features.  Early closure of skull bones results in a new head shape that restricts the normal growth and development of the brain.
  • 3. HISTORY  The first surgical repair of craniosynostosis was performed by Lannelongue in 1892.  Mohr et al. published their experience in craniosynostosis repair emphasizing the etiologic involvement of the anterior skull base, and employing extensive vault reconstruction.  In 1978, Jane et al. published their pi (p) technique to accomplish immediate reconstruction of frontal bossing.  Anderson, in 1981, described his experience in the treatment of coronal and metopic synostosis.  In 1984, Jane et al. published their technique for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis, which included dural plication.  In 1985, Albright described his correction of sagittal synostosis, which included extensive occipital circular, and parietal wedge craniectomies.
  • 4. Embryologic development of cranial sutures  This morphogenic developmental process starts at an early embryonic phase (twentieth week) and ends during adulthood.  The cranium is divided into two parts: the neurocranium that protects the brain and the viscerocranium that forms the face skeleton, which occurs through the intramembranous (IM) and endochondral (EC) bone formation, respectively.
  • 5. During cranial vault development, IM ossification initiates undifferentiated mesenchymal cell condensation and surrounds the sutures. Initially, after the condensation begins, cells start to proliferate from the osteogenic fronts. The condensation of mesenchymal differentiation triggers the proliferation of chondrocytes and perichondrial cells. During this ossification process, some transcription factors play an important role, such as RUNX2 and OSX in osteoblast development, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b) in inhibition of chondrocyte proliferation, and MSX2 in inhibition of calvarial osteoblast differentiation.
  • 6.
  • 8. Anterior fontanelle  Diamond shaped & lies b/w 2 parietal & 2 frontal bones  Found at intersection of the sagittal, coronal, & frontal sutures.  Largest fontanelle and closes at 18-24 months. Posterior fontanelle  Lies b/w 2 occipital & parietal bones  Closes at 2-3 months after birth Anterolateral fontanelle  Formed b/w frontal, parietal, & sphenoid bones.  Closes at 6 months
  • 10. Unilateral Coronal Synostosis  Unilateral coronal synostosis results in flatness on the ipsilateral side of the forehead and supraorbital ridge region.  The head is inherently asymmetrical in shape with a flattened or retropositioned forehead on the ipsilateral side.
  • 11.  The frontal bone is flat, and the supraorbital ridge and lateral orbital rim are recessed and the anterior cranial base is short in the anteroposterior dimension.  The root of the nose may be constricted and deviated to the affected side.  The ipsilateral zygoma and infraorbital rim also may be flat and recessed.
  • 12. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT  Multiple surgical approaches for the correction of unilateral coronal synostosis.  Rim advancement and frontal bone reshaping are ideally performed at 6 to 8 months of age.  Stabilization is achieved by using direct intraosseous wires or resorbable plates and screws.
  • 13. Bilateral Coronal Synostosis  Bilateral coronal synostosis is the most common cranial vault suture synostosis pattern associated with Apert’s and Crouzon’s syndromes.  Bilateral coronal synostosis results in recession of the supraorbital ridges, which causes the overlying eyebrows to sit posterior to the corneas.  The orbits are also shallow (exorbitism), with the eyes bulging (exophthalmus) and abnormally separated (orbital hypertelorism).  The recessed supraorbital bone, the forehead appears to be lower and there is sagittal shortening of the skull.  The term for this cranial vault deformity is brachycephaly.
  • 14. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT  The treatment of bilateral coronal synostosis requires suture release and simultaneous bilateral orbital rim and frontal bone advancements.  Surgery is performed when the patient is between 6 and 8 months of age.  The osteotomies for the bilateral orbital rim advancement are made superior to the nasofrontal and frontozygomatic sutures and extend to the squamous portion of the temporal bone.  Stabilization is achieved with direct transosseous wires or resorbable plates and screws.
  • 15. anterior cranial vault and orbits after osteotomies, reshaping, and fixation of segments
  • 16. Metopic Synostosis  Metopic synostosis usually occurs in isolation and results in a triangular shape to the skull.  The term for this cranial vault deformity is trigonocephaly.  The associated cranial vault deformity consists of relative hypotelorism, an elevated supraorbital ridge medially, and posteroinferior recession of the lateral orbital rims and lateral aspect of the supraorbital ridges.
  • 17. SURGICAL MANAGEMET  Surgical treatment of metopic synostosis involves metopic suture release, simultaneous bilateral orbital rim advancements, and lateral widening via frontal bone advancement.  These procedures are usually performed at 6 to 8 months of age.  Orbital hypotelorism is corrected by splitting the supraorbital ridge unit vertically in the midline and placing autogenous cranial bone grafts to increase the intraorbital distance.  Stabilization is achieved with direct transosseous wires or resorbable microplate fixation.  The microplate fixation is usually placed at the inner surface of the cranial bone. split vertically at the midline and and interpositional autogenous cranial bone graft placed to correct hypotelorism.
  • 18. proposed osteotomy and bifrontal craniotomy sites Superior view of bandeau before reshaping Observation of the gap between the bandeau and the anterior cranial base assists in assessing ideal placement and bitemporal expansion anterior cranial vault after osteotomies, reshaping, and fixation
  • 19. Sagittal Synostosis  Sagittal synostosis, the most common form, is rarely associated with increased intracranial pressure.  The skull typically has anteroposterior elongation with a compensatory transverse narrowing.  The term for this cranial vault deformity is scaphocephaly.
  • 20. Unilateral Lambdoid Synostosis  Unilateral lambdoid synostosis results in flatness of the affected ipsilateral parieto-occipital region.  The location of the ear canal and external ear is more posterior and inferior on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side.  The term for this cranial vault deformity is posterior plagiocephaly.
  • 21. FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS  Brain Growth and Intracranial Pressure  Vision  Hydrocephalus  Musculoskeletal anomalies  Neurological abnormalities  Effects of Midface Deficiency on Airway  Dentition and Occlusion  Hearing  Extremity Anomalies
  • 22. FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Brain Growth and Intracranial Pressure  Premature fusion of sutures causes limited and abnormal skeletal expansion in the presence of continued brain growth.  A “beaten-copper” appearance along the inner table of the cranial vault seen on a plain radiograph or the loss of brain cisternae as observed on a computed tomography (CT) scan may suggest elevated ICP.
  • 23. Vision  Untreated craniosynostosis with elevated ICP will cause papilledema and eventual optic nerve atrophy, resulting in partial or complete blindness.  orbits are shallow (exorbitism) and the eyes are proptotic (exophthalmos), as occurs in the CFD syndromes, the cornea may be exposed and abrasions or ulcerations may occur.  CFD result in a marked degree of orbital hypertelorism, which may compromise visual acuity and restrict binocular vision.
  • 24. Hydrocephalus  Hydrocephalus affects as many as 10% of patients with a CFD syndrome  hydrocephalus may be secondary to a generalized cranial base stenosis with constriction of all the cranial base foramina, which affects the patient’s cerebral venous drainage and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics.  Hydrocephalus may be identified with the help of CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document progressively enlarging ventricles.
  • 25. MUSCULOSKELETAL ANOMALIES  Cervical abnormalities are common and including- BUTTERFLY VERTERAE POSTERIOR FUSION
  • 26. NEUROLOGICAL ABNORMALITIES  Acquired chiari malformation( chronic tonsilar herniation) are present in 72.7% of crouzan syndrome.  Due to premature fusion of sagittal and lambdoid sutures leads to very small postyerior fossa that causes cerebellar tonsilar herniation.
  • 27. Effects of Midface Deficiency on Airway  have diminished nasal and nasopharyngeal spaces with resulting increased nasal airway resistance (obstruction).  The affected child is thus forced to breathe through the mouth  Clinical symptoms of OSA will include heavy snoring, difficulty in awake breathing, observed apnea during sleep, excessive perspiration during sleep, and daytime somnolence.  Polysomnography remains the gold standard for diagnosis.
  • 28. Dentition and Occlusion  The incidence of dental and oral anomalies is higher among children with CFD syndromes than in the general population.  In Apert’s syndrome in particular, the palate is high and constricted in width.  The incidence of isolated cleft palate in patients with Apert’s syndrome approaches 30%.  An Angle class III skeletal relationship in combination with anterior open bite deformity is typical.
  • 29. Hearing  Hearing deficits are more common among patients with the CFD syndromes than in the general population.  In Crouzon’s syndrome, conductive hearing deficits are common, and atresia of the external auditory canals may also occur.  Otitis media is more common in Apert’s syndrome
  • 30. Extremity Anomalies  Apert’s syndrome results in joint fusion and bony and soft tissue syndactyly of the digits of all four limbs.  These Apert associated extremity deformities are often symmetrical. Partial or complete fusion of the shoulder, elbow, or other joints is common.  Broad thumbs, broad great toes, and partial soft tissue syndactyly of the hands may be seen in Pfeiffer’s syndrome.  Preaxial polysyndactyly of the feet may also be seen in Carpenter’s syndrome.
  • 31. MORPHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS  Frontoforehead Aesthetic Unit  Orbitonasozygomatic Aesthetic Unit  Maxillary–Nasal Base Aesthetic Unit  CT Scan Analysis  Cephalometric Analysis
  • 32. MORPHOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS Frontoforehead Aesthetic Unit  The frontoforehead region is dysmorphic in an infant with CFD.  The forehead may be considered as two separate aesthetic components:  The supraorbital ridge–lateral orbital rim region includes the glabella and supraorbital rim extending inferiorly down each frontozygomatic suture toward the infraorbital rim and posteriorly along each temporoparietal region.  The morphology and position of the supraorbital ridge–lateral orbital rim region is a key element of upper facial aesthetics.
  • 33. Orbitonasozygomatic Aesthetic Unit  In CFD syndromes, the orbitonasozygomatic regional deformity is a reflection of the cranial base malformation.  In Crouzon’s syndrome when bilateral coronal suture synostosis is combined with skull base and midfacial deficiency, the orbitonasozygomatic region will be dysmorphic and consistent with a short (anteroposterior) and wide (transverse) anterior cranial base.  In Apert’s syndrome, the nasal bones, orbits, and zygomas, like the anterior cranial base, are transversely wide and horizontally short (retruded), resulting in a shallow hyperteloric upper midface (zygomas, orbits, and nose)
  • 34. Maxillary–Nasal Base Aesthetic Unit  In the CFD patient with midface deficiency, the upper anterior face (nasion to maxillary incisor) is vertically short, and there is a lack of horizontal anteroposterior projection of the midface.  These findings may be confirmed with cephalometric analysis that indicates a sella-nasion angle (SNA) below the mean value and a short upper anterior facial height (nasion to anterior nasal spine).
  • 35. CT Scan Analysis  The use of CT scans has clarified our appreciation of the dysmorphology of a child born with a craniofacial malformation.  Accurate standardized points of reference have been identified in the cranio-orbitozygomatic skeleton based on axial CT images. Cephalometric Analysis  The interpretation of cephalometric radiographs remains useful in the analysis of facial heights and maxillary, mandibular, and chin positions and their relationships to one another, the cranial base, and the dentition
  • 36. PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT  Multidisciplinary Team Approach  Current Surgical Approach
  • 37. CRANIOFACIAL MANAGEMENT  Philosophy Regarding Timing of Intervention  Incision Placement  Subperiosteal dissection and osteotomies  Overcorrection, stabilization/fixation, and grafting  Management of Cranial Vault Dead Space  Management of intracranial-aerodigestive communication  Soft Tissue Management
  • 38. Philosophy Regarding Timing of Intervention  In attempting to limit functional impairment and also achieve long-term ideal facial aesthetics, an essential question the surgeon must ask is, “During the course of craniofacial development, does the operated-on facial skeletal of the child with CFD tend to grow abnormally, resulting in further distortions and dysmorphology or are the initial positive skeletal changes (achieved at operation) maintained during ongoing growth?”  Unfortunately, the theory that craniofacial procedures carried out early in infancy will “unlock growth” has not been documented through the scientific method
  • 39. Incision Placement  For exposure of the craniofacial skeleton above the Le Fort I level, the approach used is the coronal (skin) incision.  That allows for a relatively camouflaged access to the anterior and posterior cranial vault, orbits, nasal dorsum, zygomas, upper maxilla, pterygoid fossa, and temporomandibular joints.  For added cosmetic advantage, placement of the coronal incision more posteriorly on the scalp and with postauricular rather than preauricular extensions is useful.  When exposure of the maxilla at the Le Fort I level is required, a circumvestibular maxillary intraoral incision is used.
  • 40. Subperiosteal dissection & osteotomies  Dissection in a superiosteal plane with wide exposure to provide clear & direct visualization.  Tessier’s original concept in dissection of pericranium and periorbita would allow all osteotomies ad reconstruction without interfering with ocular, oculomotor, palpebral, or lacrimal function.
  • 41. Overcorrection, stabilization/fixation and grafting  Relapse is an expected component of healing for patients  Stabilization of reconstructed skeletal structures using bone plates and screws (titanium or resorbable) further promotes maintenance of the surgical result.  Fresh, autogenous bone grafts should be used to fill all possible defects to promote healing and stability with open reconstructive procedures.
  • 42. Management of Cranial Vault Dead Space  Cranial reshaping in the CFD patient provides space for the compressed brain to expand into.  Unfortunately, after anterior cranial vault expansion and monobloc advancement, an immediate extradural (retrofrontal) dead space is combined with the osteotomy-created gap across the skull base (connecting the anterior cranial fossa and the nasal cavity).  This combination of factors may complicate the postoperative recovery (e.g., CSF leakage, infection, bone loss, fistula formation).  In the CFD patient, relatively rapid (6–8 wk) filling of the surgically expanded intracranial volume by the previously compressed frontal lobes of the brain has been documented after cranio-orbital expansion in infants.
  • 43.  The use of fibrin glue to seal the anterior cranial base provides a temporary separation between the cavities, allowing time for the re-epithelialization (healing) of the torn nasal mucosa.  To reconstruct the defect across the skull base, (gap) bone grafts of various types have also been used.  Until the torn nasal mucosa heals, potential communication between the nasal cavity and the cranial fossa may result in the transfer of air, fluid, bacteria and nasocranial fistula formation.  To facilitate nasal mucosa healing and limit a pressure gradient across the communication, postoperative endotracheal intubation may be extended for 3 to 5 days and/ or bilateral nasopharyngeal airways may be placed after extubation.  The avoidance of positive-pressure ventilation, enforcement of sinus precautions, and restriction of nose blowing further limit reflux of air, fluid, and bacteria (nose to cranial fossa) during the early postoperative period.
  • 44. Management of Intracranial-Aerodigestive Communication  The management of any cranial base communication between the sterile intracranial compartment and the bacteria-rich aerodigestive tract when performing combined intracranial and extracranial surgery (monobloc advancement, facial bipartition, intracranial Le Fort III).
  • 45. Soft Tissue Management  A layered closure of the coronal incision (galea and skin) optimizes healing and limits scar widening.  Resuspension of the midface periosteum to the temporalis fascia in a superior and posterior direction facilitates redraping of the soft tissues.  Each lateral canthus should be adequately suspended or reattached in a superoposterior direction to the lateral orbital rim.  The use of chromic gut for closure of the scalp skin in children may be used to obviate the need for postoperative suture or staple removal.
  • 46. Algorithm of Care Infants and Toddlers (Birth to 4 Years) The Young Child (4 to 13 Years) The Adolescent (13+ Years)
  • 47. SYNDROMES ASSOCIATED CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS CROUZAN’S SYNDROME APERT SYNDROME PFEIFFER’S SYNDROME CARPENTER’S SYNDROME SAETHRE-CHOTZEN SYNDROME
  • 48. CROUZON’S SYNDROME  Crouzon’s syndrome is a frequent form of CFD.  It is characterized by multiple anomalies of the craniofacial skeleton with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.  Approximately 4.8% of all craniosynostosis is due to Crouzon syndrome, which has an estimated prevalence of 1 in 60,000.  Crouzon syndrome may be caused by either one of two different mutations.  Ninety-five percent of cases are due to a mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (FGFR2) on chromosome 10q25.  A mutation in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 leads to Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans characterized by less severe hearing loss, odontogenic tumors, and acanthosis nigricans
  • 49. Characteristics Craniosynostosis  Coronal suture fusion and relatively early sagittal and lambdoid suture fusion are the most common synostoses seen in Crouzon syndrome patients. Midface hypoplasia  The extensive cranial suture fusion results in severe midface hypoplasia in all dimensions (transverse, vertical, and sagittal).  This leads to the characteristic exorbitism, hypertelorism, pseudoprognathism, and trapezoid lips seen in both Apert and Crouzon syndromes.
  • 50. Ocular abnormalities Impaired vision-overall 61% Ocular atrophy-7% to 16.7% Exposure keratopathy-4.2% Amblyopia-6.3% to 21% Ametropia-25% ocular complications can be greatly reduced with early Le Fort III advancement.
  • 51. Musculoskeletal anomalies  Cervical abnormalities are common and include butterfly vertebrae and posterior fusions. Raised intracranial pressure  Elevated ICP is ubiquitous in patients with Crouzon syndrome and may occur at any age during the first 5 years of life.  Overt papilledema is present in greater than 50% of this patient population.  The presence of ICP in this patient population is multifactorial and includes craniocerebral disproportion, venous hypertension, upper airway obstruction, and hydrocephalus.
  • 52. Obstructive sleep apnea  Obstructive sleep apnea is common in Crouzon patients due to the common incidence of extreme midface hypoplasia.  Obstructive sleep apnea leads to CO2 retention, which acts as a potent cerebral vasodilator, increasing blood flow to an intracranial system, which is likely already experiencing venous congestion and ventriculomegaly.
  • 53. Neurological Abnormalities  Acquired Chiari malformations (chronic tonsillar herniation) are present in 72.7% of Crouzon syndrome patients.  This rate is significantly higher than that found in Apert syndrome (1.9% to 29%) patients.  It is suggested that the reason lies in the increased incidence of premature fusion of the sagittal and lambdoid sutures found in Crouzon syndrome.  This leads to a very small posterior fossa that is associated with an increased incidence of cerebellar tonsillar herniation (Chiari malformation).
  • 54. Treatment Recommendations: Team Approach Surgical treatment  Craniosynostosis  Craniofacial synostosis release (usually bilateral coronal) between 6 to 12 months old; earlier may be necessary if turribrachycephaly is present.  Midface deficiency  Correction of midface deficiency using Le Fort III advancement by distraction osteogenesis during childhood (5 to 9 years old) as late as possible but dependent on excessive exorbitism, psychological, and obstructive sleep apnea needs  Orthognathic  Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity (14 to 16 years old, female; 18 to 20 years old, male)
  • 55. Monitoring  Imaging Follow child with yearly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance venography CT head scan prior to cranial vault surgery  Medical Proton pump inhibitor until 2 years old Polysomnography yearly into adulthood
  • 56. Hearing  Audiology evaluation  Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing is recommended in the syndromic synostosis population  Regular ear, nose, and throat (ENT) visits  Evaluation of hearing loss Ophthalmologic exam  Managing amblyopia  Twice yearly cycloplegic refraction  Managing potential visual pathway dysfunction  Visual evoked potentials to monitor for visual pathway dysfunction, which indirectly monitors changes in ICP  Funduscopy for optic disc visualization and monitoring  Managing the cornea  Regular evaluation with fluorescein staining monitoring for neovascularization (sign of chronic exposure)  Especially important after craniofacial surgery  Consider lateral tarsorrhaphy with midface advancement and hourly lubricant to the eye
  • 57.  Early pediatric dentistry and orthodontic intervention Maintaining and restoring health of dentition, as well as alleviating dental crowding Preparation for surgical orthodontics  Speech therapy Start at 1 year old  Psychological Yearly assessment of general development  Genetic counseling
  • 58. Primary Cranio-orbital Decompression: Reshaping in Infancy  The initial treatment for Crouzon’s syndrome generally requires bilateral coronal suture release and simultaneous anterior cranial vault and upper orbital osteotomies with reshaping and advancement.  Our preference is to carry this out when the child is 9 to 11 months of age unless clear signs of increased ICP are identified earlier in life.
  • 59. Repeat Craniotomy for Additional Cranial Vault Expansion and Reshaping in Young Children  The “repeat” craniotomy carried out for further decompression and reshaping in the child with Crouzon’s syndrome is often complicated by brittle cortical bone (which lacks a diploic space and contains sharp spicules piercing the dura), the presence of previously placed fixation devices in the operative field (e.g., Silastic sheeting, metal clips, stainless steel wires, plates, and screws), and convoluted thin dura compressed against (or herniated into) the inner table of the skull.
  • 60. Management of “Total Midface” Deformity in Childhood  The type of osteotomies selected to manage the “total midface” deficiency or deformity and residual cranial vault dysplasia should depend on the extent and location of the presenting dysmorphology rather than on a fixed approach to the midface malformation.  The selection of a monobloc (with or without additional orbital segmentation), facial bipartition (with or without additional orbital segmental osteotomies), or Le Fort III osteotomy to manage the basic horizontal, transverse, vertical orbital, and upper midface deficiencies or deformities in a patient with Crouzon’s syndrome depends on the patient’s presenting midface and anterior cranial vault morphology.
  • 61. Lateral skull radiograph with “fingerprinting” indicates longstanding increased ICP
  • 62. Orthognathic Procedures for Definitive Occlusal and Lower Facial Aesthetic Reconstruction  An Angle class III malocclusion, resulting from maxillary retrusion, with anterior open bite often results.  A Le Fort I osteotomy to allow for horizontal advancement, transverse widening, and vertical adjustment is generally required in combination with an osteoplastic genioplasty (vertical reduction and horizontal advancement) to further correct the lower face deformity.  Secondary deformities of the mandible should be simultaneously corrected through sagittal split ramus osteotomies.  The elective orthognathic surgery is carried out in conjunction with orthodontic treatment planned for completion at the time of early skeletal maturity (~13–15 yr in girls and 15– 17 yr in boys)
  • 63. Apert Syndrome  Apert syndrome occurs in 1 in 65,000 to 150,000 live births  Generally, a more severe craniofacial dysmorphology is observed in Apert syndrome when compared to Crouzon.  Autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetrance is common among the craniosynostosis syndromes.  Apert syndrome is due to a mutation in the gene for fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) on chromosome 10q.
  • 64. Characteristics  four-limb complex syndactly of the hands and feet.  Fusion and malformation of other joints, including the elbows and shoulders, often occur.  In Apert’s syndrome, fused cervical vertebrae (68%), usually C5–6 can occur.  Hydrocephalus is less frequent than in Crouzon’s syndrome (2% vs. 10%).  The integument (soft tissue envelope) also varies from that in Crouzon’s syndrome, with a greater downward slant to the lateral canthi and a distinctive, S-shaped upper eyelid ptosis.  The quality of the skin often varies from normal with acne and hyperhidrosis being prominent features.
  • 65. Treatment Recommendations: Team Approach Surgical treatment  Craniosynostosis  Craniofacial synostosis release (usually bilateral coronal) between the ages of 6 to 12 months old.  Midface deficiency  Correction of midface deficiency using Le Fort III advancement during childhood (5 to 9 years old) as late as possible but dependent on psychological and obstructive sleep apnea needs. The Le Fort III is preferably advanced using distraction osteogenesis.  Cleft palate repair may be delayed due to obstructive sleep apnea concerns—without concern for development of velopharyngeal insufficiency.  Orthognathic  Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity (14 to 16 years old, female; 18 to 20 years old, male).  Orthopedic  Syndactyly repair, generally in two stages (1 to 5 years old).
  • 66. Primary Cranio-orbital Decompression: Reshaping in Infancy  The initial craniofacial procedure for Apert’s syndrome generally requires bilateral coronal suture release and anterior cranial vault and upper three-quarter orbital osteotomies to expand the anterior cranial vault and reshape the upper orbits and forehead.  Our preference is to carry this out when the child is 9 to 11 months of age, unless signs of increased ICP are identified earlier in life.
  • 67. orbital osteotomy unit before reshaping orbital osteotomy unit after reshaping. cranial base before surgery anterior interorbital distance diminished from 29 to 25 mm,
  • 68. Further Craniotomy for Additional Cranial Vault Expansion and Reshaping in Young Children  after the initial suture release, decompression, and reshaping carried out during infancy, the child is observed clinically at intervals by the craniofacial surgeon, pediatric neurosurgeon, pediatric ophthalmologist, and developmental pediatrician and undergoes interval CT scanning.  Should signs of increased ICP develop, further decompression with reshaping of the cranial vault to expand the intracranial volume is performed.  In Apert’s syndrome, the posterior cranial vault more commonly requires expansion.
  • 69.  child born with Apert’s syndrome underwent bilateral “lateral canthal advancement” procedures when she was 6 weeks of age, carried out by the neurosurgeon working independently.  At 18 months of age, she returned with turricephaly and a constricted anterior cranial vault requiring further cranio-orbital decompression and reshaping.  At 5 years of age, she underwent anterior cranial vault and facial bipartition osteotomies withreshaping.  As part of her staged reconstruction, she will require orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment planned for the teenage years
  • 70. at 8 months of age after a lateral canthal advancement procedure with residual deformity Midorbits indicates dystopia, hypertelorism, and proptosis views of the cranio-orbital region after three quarter orbital osteotomies and reshaping and anterior advancement
  • 71. Craniofacial morphology with planned and completed osteotomies and reconstruction. upper orbits after osteotomies with reshaping.
  • 72. Management of the “Total Midface” Deformity in Childhood  In Apert’s syndrome, for almost all patients, facial bipartition osteotomies combined with further cranial vault reshaping permit a more complete correction of the abnormal craniofacial skeleton than can be achieved through other midface procedure options (i.e., monobloc or Le Fort III osteotomies).  When using the facial bipartition approach, a more normal arc of rotation of the midface complex is achieved with the midline split.  This further reduces the stigmata of the preoperative “flat, wide, and retrusive” facial appearance.
  • 73. CT scan views through the midorbits before and after reconstruction indication correction of orbital hyperteleorism and proptosis
  • 74.
  • 75. Orthognathic Procedures for Definitive Occlusal and Lower Facial Aesthetic Reconstruction  The mandible has normal basic growth potential in Apert’s syndrome. The extent of maxillary hypoplasia will result in an Angle class III malocclusion with severe anterior openbite deformity.  A Le Fort I osteotomy is required to allow for horizontal advancement, transverse widening, and vertical adjustment in combination with an osteoplastic genioplasty to vertically reduce and horizontally advance the chin, often combined with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible.  The elective orthognathic surgery is carried out in conjunction with detailed orthodontic treatment planned for completion at the time of early skeletal maturity (~13–15 yr in girls and 15–17 yr in boys).
  • 76. Pfeiffer Syndrome  Pfeiffer syndrome occurs in 1 in 100,000 live births  It is unique among the FGFR related syndromes in that it has been separated into three clinical categories.  Type I is the most common (61%) and is associated with FGFR1 or FGFR2 mutations. It is consistent with a mild presentation, normal neurologic and intellectual development, and good outcomes.  Presentations of Types II (25%) and III (14%) are sporadic, severe, and associated with a mutation in the FGFR2 gene only.  Types II and III are associated with developmental delay, chronic tonsillar herniation, respiratory problems, and high mortality rates (25% to 85%)
  • 77. Etiology  Autosomal dominant inheritance with high penetrance  The majority (95%) of Pfeiffer syndrome is caused by a mutation in FGFR2 (chromosome 10q26) with the remaining 5% attributable to a mutation in FGFR1 (chromosome 8p11.2- p11)
  • 78. Pfeiffer Syndrome Presentations Type I: “Classic” Pfeiffer Syndrome Craniosynostosis-coronal Neurologic  Hydrocephalus may occur  Conductive hearing loss may occur  Chiari malformation may occur Developmental  Normal intelligence Musculoskeletal  Syndactyly variable, brachydactyly common  Broad thumbs and great toes Midface deficiency  Hypoplastic midface with relative mandibular prognathism  Exorbitism—due to shallow orbits
  • 79. Type II: Cloverleaf Skull Pfeiffer Syndrome Severe craniosynostosis-“cloverleaf/kleeblattschädel skull” Can commonly can cause limited brain growth and mental retardation Neurologic  Hydrocephalus and conductive hearing loss common  Chiari malformation 100% Developmental delay  No delay to severe delay possible Musculoskeletal  Broad thumbs and great toes  Elbow ankylosis or synostosis Midface deficiency  Hypoplastic midface with relative mandibular prognathism  Extreme exorbitism  Cleft palate may be present Obstructive sleep apnea and airway abnormalities  Obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea common  Tracheal abnormalities including: tracheal sleeve and tracheal stenosis
  • 80. Type III: Severe Pfeiffer Syndrome without Cloverleaf Skull Deformity  These individuals have similar features to Type II Pfeiffer syndrome; however, they do not have the cloverleaf skull  External auditory canal atresia 100%
  • 81. Treatment Recommendations: Team Approach Surgical treatment  Caveats for Pfeiffer syndrome Types II and III  Tracheostomy placement in all Type II and III patients  Preemptive tarsorrhaphy  If bilateral auditory canal atresia, consider bone- anchored hearing aid (BAHA) placement-ideally after all posterior vault remodeling has been performed  Craniosynostosis  Early, 2 to 4 months old, primary cranioplasty for surgical decompression followed by additional cranial vault procedure between 13 to 18 months old, with posterior enlargement of foramen magnum if indicated.  Orthognathic  Definitive orthognathic surgery at skeletal maturity (14 to 16 years old, female; 18 to 20 years old, male)
  • 82. MUENKE SYNDROME  It is characterized by bilateral or less commonly unilateral coronal suture synostosis with broad great toes, brachydactyly, or clinoductyly.  Mutation in FGFR3 gene  Autosomal dominant  Mild facial hypoplasia, mild ptosis, high arched palate.  Mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss common
  • 83. Treatment Recommendations: Team Approach Surgical treatment  Craniosynostosis Craniofacial synostosis release (usually unilateral or bilateral coronal) between 6 to 12 months old Monitoring  Imaging Follow child with MRI and magnetic resonance venography every year CT head prior to cranial vault surgery
  • 84. CARPENTER’S SYNDROME  Carpenter’s syndrome is characterized by craniosynostosis often associated with preaxial polysyndactyly of the feet, short fingers with clinodactyly, and variable soft tissue syndactyly, sometimes postaxial polydactyly, and other anomalies such as congenital heart defects, short stature, obesity, and mental deficiency.  It was first described by Carpenter in 1901 and was later recognized to be an autosomal recessive syndrome.
  • 85. SAETHRE-CHOTZEN SYNDROME  Saethre-Chotzen syndrome has an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with a high degree of penetrance and expressivity.  Its pattern of malformations may include craniosynostosis, low-set frontal hairline, ptosis of the upper eyelids, facial asymmetry, brachydactyly, partial cutaneous syndactyly, and other skeletal anomalies.  As part of the reconstruction, cranio- orbital reshaping will almost certainly be required and is similar to that described for Crouzon’s syndrome.
  • 86. Jackson-Weiss Syndrome  Jackson-Weiss syndrome results from multiple mutations in FGFR2.  It is clinically characterized by coronal synostosis; midface hypoplasia; exorbitism; hypertelorism; tarsal and metatarsal fusion; and short, broad, and medially deviated great toes.  Hearing loss is present in 68% of patients.  Of the patients with hearing loss, 53% is conductive, 20% is mixed, and 26% is sensorineural.
  • 87. Beare-Stevenson Syndrome  Beare-Stevenson syndrome is a rare craniofacial syndrome also associated with mutation in the FGFR2 signaling pathway.  It is clinically characterized by cutis gyrate (furrowed skin), acanthosis nigricans, severe craniosynostosis, severe developmental impairments, umbilical and anogenital anomalies, and early mortality.  Death commonly occurs in infancy with the longest survivor of the syndrome being only 4 years old
  • 88. Antley-Bixler Syndrome  Antley-Bixler syndrome is an extremely rare craniosynostosis syndrome, resulting from a mutation in one of two genes: P450 oxidoreductase gene or FGFR2 (S351C)  characterized by bicoronal craniosynostosis (rarely lambdoid and metopic) and radiohumeral synostosis.  Commonly there may be midface hypoplasia, choanal stenosis/ atresia, multiple joint contractures, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, obstructive sleep apnea, cervical spine fusions, and visceral anomalies.
  • 89.  Mortality may be as high as 80% in the neonatal period, but it improves dramatically with age.  Management is similar to that of a Type II or III Pfeiffer syndrome patient and should be targeted initially at lifesaving therapies, such as early tracheostomy or nasal stenting for choanal atresia, cranial vault reshaping for elevated ICP, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts for hydrocephalus
  • 90.
  • 91. DEFORMITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ABNORMALITIES OF THE FIRST AND SECOND BRANCHIAL ARCHES  Treacher Collins Syndrome (Franceschetti-Zwahlen-Klein Syndrome)  Hemifacial Microsomia(facio-auriculo-vertebral spectrum, first and second branchial arch syndrome, oculoauriculo- vertebral syndrome, and oculo-auriculo-vertebral dysplasia)
  • 92. Treacher Collins Syndrome  Treacher Collins syndrome is the most common mandibulofacial dysostosis and occurs in approximately 1 in 25,000 to 50,000 births.  It equally affects both sexes, is frequently familial (40%), and is commonly transferred in an autosomal dominant pattern.
  • 93. Pathogenesis  Treacher Collins syndrome are involved in pre- rRNA transcription.  It is hypothesized that the loss of these essential cellular proteins results in apoptosis of cells involved in neural crest cell migration to the first and second branchial arches during the fifth to eighth weeks of gestation, leading to the characteristic deformities seen in individuals with Treacher Collins syndrome.  The majority of affected individuals (81% to 93%) carry a mutation in the TCOF1 gene located on 5q32-q33.
  • 94. Characteristics of Treacher Collins Patients
  • 95.
  • 96. Staging of Craniofacial Reconstruction Initial consultation  When the deformity is severe, the craniofacial treatment team is commonly consulted immediately to evaluate airway patency.
  • 97. Classification of Temporomandibular Joint and Mandibular Malformation
  • 98.
  • 99. Cleft palate  If a cleft palate is present, repair may be performed at the standard time, 10 to 18 months old.  if airway concerns are also present, a delayed repair is advised. Zygomatic and malar reconstruction  Definitive reconstruction of the zygomatico-malar region is best delayed until after the age of 7, which is when cranio-orbito-zygomatic maturation is near complete.  At this time, adult sized malar prominences may be constructed without concern of future growth.  This can be done using bicortical calvarial bone grafts or alternatively with the use of alloplastic implants.
  • 100.
  • 101. Ear and hearing rehabilitation and reconstruction  Hearing rehabilitation should begin at the earliest age possible.  Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) consists of a permanent titanium fixture that is surgically implanted into the skull bone behind the ear and a small detachable sound processor that clips onto the fixture.  BAHAs are suitable for people with conductive or mixed hearing loss who cannot adequately benefit from or prefer not to use conventional hearing aids.  Once the patient is older than 3 years old, a BAHA is recommended.  Functional atresiaplasty is not currently recommended due to the significant postoperative residual hearing deficit and high complication rate  External ear reconstruction may commence when the child reaches the age of 6.  At this time, the synchondrotic region of ribs 6 and 7 provides a sufficient amount of cartilage for reconstruction.  Approximately four to five surgeries are necessary to reconstruct the external ear.
  • 102. Ophthalmologic intervention  Lateral tarsorrhaphy or lower lid skin grafts may be necessary to provide adequate corneal coverage in the perinatal period.  In order to minimize vision loss, amblyopia and the correction of refractive errors is aggressively treated prior to surgical correction of motility problems.  Strabismus surgery may proceed upon diagnosis.  Colobomas and pseudocolobomas are treated surgically, and timing is dependent on the deformity and the presence of corneal exposure.
  • 103. Maxillomandibular reconstruction  There are three different times when the mandible may need to be addressed.  In infancy, if the patient has a significant mandibular deformity resulting in the inability to maintain the airway, it is necessary to perform a tracheostomy and/or mandibular distraction.  In early childhood (between 6 to 12 years old), the extent of the mandibular deformity dictates the treatment needed.  If the child has a significant deformity resulting in a compromised temporomandibular joint apparatus, costochondral grafts are likely necessary.  Orthognathic surgery is almost universally needed once the patient reaches skeletal maturity (between 13 to 18 years old).
  • 104. Nasal reconstruction and orbital rim secondary reconstruction  Treacher Collins patients consistently have increased width and a mid-dorsal hump.  Definitive rhinoplasty is best performed after orthognathic surgery.  Persistent deficiency of the orbital rims may be best treated with alloplastic reconstruction. Soft tissue refinements  If the patient has significant temporal hollowing, these areas may be addressed simultaneously with orthognathic surgery or during the rhinoplasty procedure.
  • 105. HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA  Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is an asymmetric craniofacial malformation, variably affecting structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches.  It is characterized by structural abnormalities of the orbit, maxilla, mandible, external and middle ear, cranial nerves, and facial soft tissues.  HFM is the second most common craniofacial anomaly after cleft lip and palate.  the most frequently reported incidence is 1 in 5600 live births
  • 106. PATHOGENESIS  The mechanism by which HFM develops in humans is unknown.  Two pathogenic theories exist, one involving the vascular system and the other neuroectodermal cell migration.  The “stapedial artery hematoma” theory was proposed by Poswillo in 1973.  Hemorrhage from the developing stapedial artery produced a hematoma in the region of the first and second pharyngeal arches.  The size of the hematoma and resultant tissue destruction determined the extent and variability of the deformity.  This explanation may be applicable to humans, because it provides an adequate explanation for the variability of HFM.  The “alteration in neural crest cell migration theory” is based on the work of Johnson and Bronsky.
  • 107. Modified O.M.E.N.S (+) Classification of Hemifacial Microsomia
  • 108.
  • 109. Approach to Treatment of Oculoauriculovertebral Spectrum Deformity Typical Age of Reconstruction  Cleft lip- 3 months or later  Cleft palate- 9-14 months  Cranio-orbital asymmetry- 2-5 years or later  Oribital hypoplasia/ microphthalmia- 5 years or later  Zygomatic hypoplasia - 5 years or later  Kaban type III TMJ (atretic TMJ/ramus)- 5 years or later  Maxillomandibular asymmetry- 14-16 years or later in females & 16-18 years or later in males  Soft tissue deficiency, lateral face- After orthognathic procedures  External ear - 5 years of age or later
  • 110. CONCLUSION  The preferred approach to the management of a patient with syndromic craniosynostosis is to stage reconstruction based on craniofacial growth patterns, functional demands (cognition, vision, breathing, swallowing, speech, chewing, hearing), and psychosocial effects.  Resultant deformities of the cranio-orbital tissues, zygoma, ear, lip, palate, maxilla, mandible, and airway require a thoughtful staged reconstruction that is interdisciplinary.