|
Acanthosphaera actinota
(Haeckel) (Figure 15.25) [=Acanthosphaera tenuissima].
Single shell with large, regular polygonal meshes
separated by very thin bars. Nodal points bear short,
bristle-shaped spines; no primary (conspicuously larger)
radial spines (broken-off on specimen photographed).
Shell diameter: 60-90 µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Acanthosphaera dodecastyla
Mast (Figure 15.26). Single shell with large circular
pores with very conspicuous polygonal frames, many
(10-20) robust, three-bladed spines. Shell diameter
without spines: 50-80 µm. Ref: Popofsky (1913), Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Acanthosphaera pinchuda Boltovskoy and Riedel (Figure 15.28). Single shell with regular,
subcircular pores surrounded by conspicuous protruding
frames which extend into thin, thread-like spines at the
nodal points. No primary (conspicuously larger) radial
spines. Shell diameter without spines: 90-120 µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Actinomma antarcticum (Haeckel) group? (Figure 15.48) [=Diploplegma banzare, Diploplegma
aquatica]. Three concentric shells. Cortical shell
composed of a very irregular, sometimes sponge-like
network of thick anastomosing bars. Second shell large,
irregularly shaped, spongy. First shell small, circular,
rarely visible. Nigrini (1967) described Actinomma medianum,
which difffers from A. antarcticum in that it has
a simply latticed cortical shell and a more delicate
medullary meshwork. Cortical shell diameter: 200-400 µm.
Ref: Riedel (1958), Nigrini (1967). |
|
Actinomma arcadophorum Haeckel (Figure 15.49). Medullary shells similar to Actinomma
antarcticum; cortical shell is composed of an
irregular, sponge-like or lace-like network of very thin,
delicate anastomosing bars. Cortical shell diameter:
200-250 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887), Nigrini and Moore
(1979). |
|
Actinomma leptodermum (Jorgensen) (Figure 15.37) [=Echinomma leptodermum].
Three concentric shells, pores on outermost shell
relatively large, subcircular, irregularly arranged;
surface covered by numerous short three-bladed spines; no
primary (conspicuously larger) radial spines. Outermost
shell diameter without spines: 60-120 µm. Ref: Nigrini and Moore
(1979). |
|
Actinomma sol Cleve (Figure 15.44) [=Thecosphaera radians].
Three concentric shells. Outermost with regular, circular
pores with well developed polygonal frames, usually
bearing short bristle-shaped spines on the nodes (broken
off in the specimen photographed); no primary
(conspicuously larger) radial spines (see remark for Thecosphaera
inermis). Outermost shell diameter: 70-100 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960), Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Arachnosphaera myriacantha Haeckel (Figure 15.45). Fully grown specimens with many
(up to over seven; four in the specimen illustrated)
concentric spheres, the innermost with regular hexagonal
meshes and cylindrical spines arising from the nodes. At
regular distances these spines produce branches which
anastomose laterally forming subsequent spheres with a
delicate, irregular, cobweb-like network. Branching
spines protrude from the surface of the last shell.
Diameter of innermost shell: ca. 100 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1862). |
|
Astrosphaera hexagonalis Haeckel (Figure 15.40). Two shells and many (>6)
primary radial spines. Inner shell with regular polygonal
meshes and thin bars. Outer shell with very large,
triangular meshes formed by anastomosing of lateral
branches produced by the long, three-bladed primary
spines arising from the first shell. Spines extend beyond
the very open outer shell. Diameter of inner shell: 150
µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Carposphaera acanthophora
(Popofsky) (Figure 15.39). One latticed cortical shell and
one medullary shell represented by an irregular formation
of anastomosing centripetal bars arising from the
cortical shell (may be missing in poorly preserved
materials; not focused in specimen illustrated). Pores on
outer shell irregular in shape and size, generally
subcircular. Surface rough or thorny. Diameter of
cortical shell: 150-270 µm. Ref: Benson (1966). |
|
Cenosphaera spp. group (Figure 15.29) [=Cenosphaera elysia, C.
compacta, C. hirsuta]. Single sphere, often
thick-walled. Pores more or less regular, circular, or
irregular, of variable shape and size, with or without
polygonal frames, with or without thin, bristle-shaped
by-spines or thorns. No primary (conspicuously larger)
radial spines. Highly variable group with many different
morphotypes present chiefly in middle and high latitudes
(e.g., C. cristata Haeckel in Antarctic waters,
cf. Petrushevskaya 1967; C. compacta Haeckel and C.
elysia Haeckel in subantarctic-transitional areas,
cf. Boltovskoy and
Riedel 1980). Shell
diameter: 50-320 µm. Ref: Petrushevskaya (1967), Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Centrocubus cladostylus Haeckel (Figure 15.58). Medullary shell single, composed
of bars that define a small cube (Figure 2C); cortical
shell a spongy meshwork arising immediately from the
medullary shell, supported by many large, three-bladed
spines that protrude outside of the spongy mass. Cortical
shell diameter without spines: 150-200 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Cladococcus cervicornis Haeckel (Figure 15.41). Single shell with very irregular
sub-polygonal pores; at many nodal points slightly
curved, cylindrical spines project radially dichotomizing
repeatedly starting about 2/3 of the way from the
cortical shell. Shell diameter without spines: ca. 70
µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Cladococcus megaceros Hollande and Enjumet (Figure 15.42). Similar to Cladococcus
cervicornis, differs in that spines can be
three-bladed, thickening toward their distal end;
branches are short and dull, resembling the horns or a
reindeer. Pores are more irregular in size and shape.
Shell diameter without spines: ca. 60 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960), Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Cromyechinus antarctica (Dreyer) (Figure 5A, 5A', 14, 15.30). Fully grown specimens with four
concentric, latticed shells. Outermost thin-walled, with
very small pores. Third shell thicker, with large,
irregularly shaped pores. Surface covered with many
short, stout, three-bladed spines, at one of the poles
spines may be denser and larger, forming a pylome. Major
diameter of outermost shell: 100-160 µm. Ref: Petrushevskaya (1967). |
|
Cromyechinus icosacanthus Haeckel (Figure
2B). Fully grown
specimens with four latticed concentric shells and many
(>6) stout, three-bladed spines. Outermost shell
thin-walled, delicate, with very small, regular, circular
pores. Third shell with large, irregular, polygonal
pores. Outermost shell diameter without spines: ca. 160
µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Cromyomma circumtextum Haeckel (Figure 15.47). Fully grown specimens with four
latticed concentric shells and many three-bladed spines
of irregular size and distribution. Outermost shell very
delicate, thin-walled, with thread-like bars and large,
irregular, polygonal meshes; third shell with large,
irregular pores and thick bars. Due to its delicacy, the
fourth shell is very likely to be absent in sedimentary
materials, in which case this species may be identified
as Hexalonche aristarchi (see below). Outermost
shell diameter without spines: ca. 220 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Druppatractus irregularis Popofsky (Figure 15.27). Two latticed shells, outermost
thin-walled, smooth, with small regular, circular pores;
medullary shell pear-shaped. Two main polar spines of
equal or different size (additional, usually smaller
spines may be present as well). Cortical shell diameter
without spines: ca. 80 µm. Ref: Benson (1966). |
|
Heliaster hexagonium Hollande and Enjumet (Figure 15.46). Two latticed shells, medullary as
in Carposphaera acanthophora (may be missing in
poorly preserved materials). Pores on cortical shell very
regular, polygonal, with thin bars; bristle-shaped spines
on nodes. Outer shell diameter without spines: ca. 230
µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Heliosoma echinaster Haeckel (Figure 15.43) [=Tetrapetalon elegans].
Two concentric shells. Medullary shell composed of a
loose network of thin anastomosing bars. Outer shell
similar to that of Heliaster hexagonium, except
for the presence of many (>6) long, three-bladed
primary spines. Outer shell diameter without spines: ca.
160 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Hexacontium aristarchi
(Haeckel) (Figure 15.33) [=Hexalonche aristarchi].
Similar to Hexacontium armatum/hostile, except
that pores on outermost shell are larger and more
irregular in size and distribution. May have one
medullary shell (?). It is probable that H. aristarchi
is a developmental form of Cromyomma circumtextum,
from which it differs by lacking the outermost, very
slender and delicate fourth shell. Outermost shell
diameter without spines: ca. 130 µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Hexacontium armatum/hostile Cleve group (Figure 15.32). [=Hexacontium armatum,
Hexacontium hostile, ?Hexacontium entacanthum].
Three concentric latticed shells; surface of outermost
usually thorny or spiny, pores medium-sized, regular or
irregular in size and distribution, with or without
polygonal frames. Usually 6 main spines opposite in pairs
in three dimensive axes perpendicular to one another.
Outermost shell diameter without spines: 70-100 µm.
Poorly defined morphotype, probably includes several
related species. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Hexacontium laevigatum Haeckel (Figure 15.31). Similar to Hexacontium
armatum/hostile, except that the surface of the
outermost shell is smooth, and pores are smaller,
circular, unframed of regular size and distribution.
Outermost shell diameter without spines: 70-120 µm. Ref:
Benson (1966), Nigrini and Moore
(1979). |
|
Octodendron cubocentron Haeckel (Figure 15.56). Similar to Centrocubus
cladostylus, except that spongy meshwork starts at
some distance from the cubical medullary shell. Outer
shell diameter without spines: ca. 200 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Plegmosphaera entodictyon Haeckel (Figure 15.54). Shell is a spongy mass with a
central cavity; the spongy meshwork is denser in the
vicinity of the central cavity than at the periphery of
the shell. Shell diameter: ca. 200 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Plegmosphaera exodictyon Haeckel (Figure 15.55). Similar to Plegmosphaera
entodictyon, except that the spongy meshwork is
denser both in the vicinity of the central cavity and at
the periphery of the shell, and looser midway. Shell
diameter: ca. 400 µm. Ref: Haeckel (1887). |
|
Plegmosphaera pachyplegma Haeckel (Figure 15.53). Similar to Plegmosphaera
entodictyon, except that the spongy meshwork is
denser at the periphery of the shell than in the vicinity
of the central cavity. Shell diameter: ca. 200 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Saturnalis circularis Haeckel (Figure 15.36). Two concentric latticed shells,
the cortical with circular to subcircular pores and rough
surface. Two primary radial polar spines (which extend as
internal beams joining the two shells) joined distally by
a circular ring. Cortical shell diameter without spines:
70-80 µm. Ref: Nigrini (1967). |
|
Spongodictyon spongiosum (Müller) (Figure 15.57) [=Dictyosoma spongiosum].
Generally similar to Spongoplegma rugosa, except
that center hosts a double medullary shell; second
medullary shell usually incompletely developed. Outermost
shell diameter: 200 µm. Ref: Müller (1858). |
|
Spongoplegma antarcticum
Haeckel (Figure 15.51). Spongy mass with a single
irregular, sponge-like medullary shell in the center.
Outer shell diameter: ca. 150 µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
Spongoplegma rugosa Hollande and Enjumet (Figure 15.52). Spongy mass with a single
latticed medullary shell in the center (not focused in
the illustration); spongy meshwork is looser toward the
periphery of the shell. Outer shell diameter: ca. 300
µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Spongosphaera streptacantha Haeckel (Figure 15.59) [= ?Rhizoplegma boreale].
Two concentric, spherical, latticed medullary shells and
one spongy cortical shell. With large, three-bladed
spines with serrated edges originating in the second
medullary shell and protruding conspicuously outside of
the spongy outermost shell. Outer shell diameter without
spines: ca. 300 µm. Ref: Hollande and
Enjumet (1960). |
|
Stylatractus spp. group (Figure 2A; 15.35). [= ?Stylatractus, ?Axoprunum,
?Stylosphaera, ?Xiphosphaera, ?Lithatractus,
?Xiphatractus]. Usually two latticed shells,
outermost spherical to oval-shaped, often thick-walled
with irregular pores; medullary shell spherical. Two
polar spines of equal or different size, with or without
secondary spines. Two-spined and usually two-shelled
actinommids comprise a large, sometimes abundant, highly
variable and very poorly studied group. Outer shell
diameter without spines: 100-150 µm. Ref: Nigrini and Moore
(1979). |
|
Stylosphaera melpomene Haeckel (Figure 15.34) [=Stylacontarium bispiculum].
Two or three (?) latticed shells, outermost with
characteristically sub-quadrangular outline, moderately
thick-walled, thorny, with irregularly shaped pores;
medullary shell spherical. Six stout beams join the two
shells; usually two of these beams protrude outside as
short, three-bladed polar spines, but the other two pairs
may also extend slightly beyond the cortical shell-wall.
Polar spines of equal or different size. Outermost shell
diameter without spines: 80-130 µm. Ref: Benson (1966). |
|
Styptosphaera spumacea Haeckel (Figure 15.50). Shell is an irregular spongy mass
without central cavity. Shell diameter: ca. 450 µm. Ref:
Boltovskoy and
Jankilevich (1985). |
|
Thecosphaera inermis (Haeckel) (Figure 15.38). Three concentric latticed shells;
pores on outermost relatively small, circular, regularly
arranged, without frames (in some specimens frames around
the pores can develop, in which case this species merges
with Actinomma sol). Cortical shell usually
smooth, barren of spines. Cortical shell diameter: ca. 80
µm. Ref: Boltovskoy and
Riedel (1980). |
|
|