21.09.2015 Views

Valley of Fire GMP, 2010 Page 1 of 61 - Nevada State Parks

Valley of Fire GMP, 2010 Page 1 of 61 - Nevada State Parks

Valley of Fire GMP, 2010 Page 1 of 61 - Nevada State Parks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


David K. Morrow Administrator<br />

J. Steve Weaver, Deputy Administrator<br />

Jenny Scanland, <strong>Parks</strong> and Recreation Program Manager<br />

Jim Hammons, <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> Park Supervisor<br />

Russ Dapsauski, Southern Regional Manager<br />

Assistance Partners:<br />

Deborah Reardon, NPS River and Trails Conservation Assistance<br />

National Park Service, Land and Water Conservation Fund<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas School <strong>of</strong> Architecture and Planning<br />

Contributing Partners:<br />

Elise McAllister, Partners in Conservation<br />

Matt LaCroix, Clark County<br />

Marilyn Peterson, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management<br />

Jim Holland NPS, Lake Mead National Recreation Area<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Executive Summary 4<br />

Chapter 1 – Introduction 8<br />

A. Purpose <strong>of</strong> Plan 8<br />

B. Park Setting 9<br />

Chapter 2 – Regional Influences 15<br />

A. Park History 15<br />

B. Demographics 18<br />

C. Recreational Demand 24<br />

D. Recreation Supply 26<br />

E. Regional Land Use Trends 28<br />

F. Supply/Demand Analysis 29<br />

Chapter 3 – The Existing Park 30<br />

A. Natural Resources 30<br />

B. Cultural Resources (Archaeological/Paleontological) 45<br />

C. Site Analysis Map/Summary 48<br />

D. Existing Facilities and Use 49<br />

Chapter 4 – General Management Plan 53<br />

A. Process 53<br />

B. Management Plan 55<br />

C. Development Plan 60<br />

Appendices<br />

Appendix 1.1 - Park Vicinity Map<br />

Appendix 1.2 - Land Ownership Map<br />

Appendix 1.3 - Park Acquisition History Map<br />

Appendix 3.1 - Slope Map<br />

Appendix 3.2 - Geology Map<br />

Appendix 3.3 - Soils Map<br />

Appendix 3.4 - Hydrology Map<br />

Appendix 3.5 - Vegetative Communities Map<br />

Appendix 3.6 - Developed Scenic Viewpoints Map<br />

Appendix 3.7 - Composite Site Analysis Map<br />

Appendix 3.8 - Facilities Map<br />

Appendix 3.9 - Utilities Map<br />

Appendix 3.10 - Circulation Map<br />

Appendix 3.11 - Core Trails Map<br />

Appendix 3.12 - Motorized Trails Map<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


18<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 6 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


I. INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park <strong>of</strong>fers some <strong>of</strong> the most unique natural land forms in the state <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nevada</strong>. <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>'s oldest and the largest state park, dedicated in 1934.<br />

The valley derives its name from the red sandstone formations and the stark beauty <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Mojave Desert. Ancient trees and early man are represented throughout the park by areas <strong>of</strong><br />

petrified wood and 3,000 year-old Indian petroglyphs.<br />

A. PURPOSE OF PLAN AMENDMENT<br />

1. Purpose<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this plan amendment is to update the 1990 long-range management plan<br />

for <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park. The plan begins with an introduction to the document and<br />

the park in Chapter 1. Chapter 2 discusses regional influences which directly and<br />

indirectly affect the park. Chapter 3 describes the park’s natural and cultural resources,<br />

including existing facilities and description <strong>of</strong> uses. Chapter 4 summarizes the planning<br />

process and the resulting plan.<br />

2. Planning Process<br />

The current <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> planning process encompasses work by the <strong>Nevada</strong> Division<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (NDSP), University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>, Las Vegas (UNLV), partnering agencies,<br />

technical assistance from the National Park Service River, Trails and Conservation<br />

Assistance (RTCA) Program, and input from the public from 2007-2009. Funding was<br />

provided by the <strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> and from the Land and Water<br />

Conservation Fund administered by the National Park Service. Details <strong>of</strong> the process can<br />

be found in Chapter 4.<br />

a. Past Plans<br />

Past plans addressing visual integrity and environmental sensitivity, recreation<br />

facilities and other issues were reviewed and used in identifying preliminary<br />

issues to be addressed during the planning effort. These plans included:<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park Master Plan (NDSP, 1990)<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong>’s <strong>State</strong>wide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) –<br />

Assessment and Policy Plan (NDSP, 2003)<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong> <strong>State</strong> Recreational Trails Plan (<strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

Planning and Development Section, 2005)<br />

Clark County, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (2000)<br />

BLM Logandale Trails Monitoring Plan (2007)<br />

BLM Integrated Resource and Recreation Area Management Plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Logandale Trails System (2007)<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 8 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Splendor Among the Rocks-Archeological Paper #4, Volumes 1 and 2, The<br />

Community College <strong>of</strong> Southern <strong>Nevada</strong> Field School, Dept. or Human<br />

Behavior, Dr. Devin Rafferty (July, 2004)<br />

NDOW <strong>State</strong> Action Plan (2005)<br />

Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> Open Space Plan; Clark County, NV (In progress)<br />

Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> Trails Study; Clark County, NV (In progress)<br />

Northeast Clark County Land Use Plan (2006)<br />

Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> Master Plan; <strong>Parks</strong> and Recreation, 20-Year Plan (2007)<br />

Lake Mead Mgmt. Plan (2002); General Mgmt. Plan/EA (Sept. 2005)<br />

b. Planning Team and Key Stakeholders<br />

Several people were instrumental in the gathering <strong>of</strong> information and the<br />

writing <strong>of</strong> the plan. Others were important in the issue identification and<br />

alternatives development meetings.<br />

1. Jenny Scanland, NDSP, <strong>Parks</strong> and Recreation Program Manager<br />

2. Deborah Reardon, National Park Service, Rivers, Trails and<br />

Conservation Assistance Program<br />

3. Jim Hammons, NDSP, <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> Supervisor<br />

4. Russ Dapsauski and Terry Hansen, NDSP, Southern Regional<br />

Managers<br />

5. Elise McAllister, Partners in Conservation<br />

6. Marilyn Peterson, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management, Recreation Planner<br />

7. Jim Holland, National Park Service, Lake Mead National Recreation<br />

Area<br />

8. Matt Lacroix, Clark County Liaison to Moapa <strong>Valley</strong><br />

9. J. Steve Weaver, NDSP, Deputy Administrator<br />

10. Dr. Kevin Rafferty, Department <strong>of</strong> Human Behavior, College <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern <strong>Nevada</strong><br />

B. PARK SETTING<br />

1. Description and Location<br />

a. Description <strong>of</strong> Park and Location<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park is located approximately six miles west <strong>of</strong> the northern<br />

arm <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead and 55 miles northeast <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas. It is reached via<br />

Interstate 15 and <strong>State</strong> Highway 169. The park currently encompasses 42,059.48<br />

acres (Certified by <strong>State</strong> Lands, 2009). <strong>State</strong> Highway 169 <strong>of</strong>fers access into the<br />

park at its east and west boundaries. (Figure 1.1; Park Location Map).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 9 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Developed facilities include family and group picnic areas, two<br />

campgrounds, trails, several vista/overlooks and rest areas. Also provided<br />

is a staffed visitor center with <strong>of</strong>fices, staff residences and maintenance<br />

facility. There are also memorial/historic markers, and interpretive sites<br />

for petroglyphs and petrified wood displays. Details <strong>of</strong> facilities provided<br />

are in Chapter 3.<br />

Figure 1.1 Park Location<br />

b. Physical setting <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

The park is situated in the valley created by the North Muddy Mountains to the<br />

west and Muddy Mountains to the south. The Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> lies to the northeast<br />

and the Overton Arm <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead to the east. The valley along with the<br />

surrounding mountains is sparsely vegetated and arid in character. The park <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

a wide variety <strong>of</strong> natural and cultural resources for visitors. The primary and<br />

most striking features <strong>of</strong> the park are the red sandstone formations found<br />

throughout the site. These formations and their color provide interesting contrast<br />

to the surrounding desert. In addition to these naturally carved formations, the<br />

park also has an extensive number <strong>of</strong> petroglyphs. The park's isolation adds to its<br />

uniqueness.<br />

c. Property Ownership<br />

Lands administered by the U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management border the park on<br />

the west, north and south. Lake Mead National Recreation Area, administered by<br />

the National Park Service, lies directly east <strong>of</strong> the park. The park is also bordered<br />

by lands managed by the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Lands Management<br />

and private property owners. (Appendix 1.1 Land Ownership Map) Since 1980,<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 10 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


the park has grown to encompass over 35,300 acres. (Appendix 1.2 History <strong>of</strong><br />

Acquisition)<br />

2. Legislation and Policy<br />

a. Legislated Goal<br />

The <strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> (Division) is one <strong>of</strong> many agencies<br />

within the Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation and Natural Resources. The<br />

Division is directed by legislative intent to: ―acquire, protect, develop and<br />

interpret a well balanced system <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> outstanding scenic,<br />

recreational, scientific and historical importance for the inspiration, use<br />

and enjoyment <strong>of</strong> the People <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong> and that such areas<br />

shall be held in trust as irreplaceable portions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>’s natural and<br />

historic heritage‖ (NRS 407.013).<br />

b. NV Administrative Code; Park Specific<br />

NAC 407.350 <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park. (NRS 407.0475, 407.065)<br />

1. Within the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park, a person shall not climb a rock<br />

formation or otherwise engage in rock climbing except in an area<br />

designated for such climbing by the Supervisor <strong>of</strong> the Park.<br />

2. A person climbing in such an area:<br />

(a) May use ropes, carabineers, web belts, webbing and cushioning<br />

materials.<br />

(b) Shall not use any pitons, chocks, or other such climbing devices or any<br />

magnesium carbonate chalk in climbing unless:<br />

(1) The person is engaged in emergency rescue operations; or<br />

(2) The Supervisor <strong>of</strong> the Park approves the use <strong>of</strong> such devices or chalk.<br />

[Div. <strong>of</strong> St. <strong>Parks</strong>, eff. 1-2-80]—(NAC A 8-17-82; 12-31-85, eff. 1-1-86;<br />

11-12-93; R118-01, 12-17-2001; R153-03, 1-16-2004; R149-05, 5-4-<br />

2006)<br />

c. Land and Water Conservation Fund Protection<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong> owned acreage within the boundary <strong>of</strong> the Park<br />

is under the protection <strong>of</strong> the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF)<br />

6(f)3 provision. By federal law, property acquired or developed with<br />

LWCF assistance shall be retained and used for public outdoor recreation<br />

uses only. Therefore, no portion <strong>of</strong> the park may be wholly or partly<br />

converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses without the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the National Park Service Regional Director pursuant to<br />

Section 6(f)3 <strong>of</strong> the LWCF Act and 36 CFR part 59. All facilities must be<br />

compatible and support outdoor recreation.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


3. 1990 Goals/Objectives<br />

This planning process will address the applicability <strong>of</strong> the 1990 goals and<br />

objectives from the past plan and update them to address the demands and<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> recreation while continuing to protect the park’s unique<br />

resources. The timeframe for this plan is 15 years, or from <strong>2010</strong> to 2025.<br />

Below are the goals and objectives for the park that are being considered<br />

for revision:<br />

a. 1990 Plan Concept<br />

The 1990 plan described the park concept as follows: <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

Park <strong>of</strong>fers some <strong>of</strong> the most unique natural land forms in the state <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nevada</strong>. The protection <strong>of</strong> these resources is the primary objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Parks</strong>.<br />

Along with resource conservation, in 1990, <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> was looking<br />

into ways to increase visitation and provide greater use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

resources through increased public access.<br />

Resource conservation and increased park access were both elements<br />

which were to be managed at an appropriate level to provide for a<br />

broad range <strong>of</strong> recreational activities from the most passive to the<br />

more demanding activities <strong>of</strong> primitive camping and climbing.<br />

The 1990 plan stated that access was the key to providing these<br />

activities to the broadest range <strong>of</strong> age groups and physical abilities.<br />

Paved access was to be provided to park staff and the public; in order<br />

to provide easier and more efficient means <strong>of</strong> patrolling and managing<br />

the park.<br />

The new Plan Concept was developed by staff and the public in<br />

December, 2009. This park concept consists <strong>of</strong> five mission statements<br />

that will direct the park’s management for the next 15 years or until<br />

amended or revised.<br />

Park Concept 2009:<br />

The <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park <strong>of</strong>fers some <strong>of</strong> the most unique<br />

natural landforms, archeological and paleontological resources and<br />

scenic values in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>.<br />

Sensitive areas in this desert ecosystem are protected for future<br />

generations while allowing for compatible recreational use; public<br />

access is controlled through designated trails, roadways and<br />

recreation areas.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


The Park provides extensive interpretation and educational<br />

programs and amenities with an emphasis on engaging youth.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park will continue to be an outdoor classroom<br />

through research partnerships that support the conservation and<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

All facilities in the park, including signs and interpretation, are<br />

designed to be unobtrusive, visually compatible with the natural<br />

landscape and consistent with scenic highway aesthetic standards.<br />

b. 1990 Natural/Cultural Resource Objectives<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

All natural components <strong>of</strong> the park (flora, fauna, soils and geology)<br />

were to be identified so that they may be protected, interpreted and<br />

managed adequately.<br />

Endangered, rare or protected species were to be identified, located<br />

and protected as befitted the situation.<br />

Cultural resources were to be protected and maintained in an<br />

appropriate manner; visitor safety and convenience were to be kept<br />

foremost when considering maintenance projects on historic structures.<br />

Since the site contains major works <strong>of</strong> prehistoric petroglyphs, great<br />

care was to be taken in exhibiting, interpreting, and protecting these<br />

resources for future generations.<br />

4. Major Current Issues<br />

a. Park Specific Issues<br />

Fragile Desert Ecosystem: <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> at first glance would appear to<br />

be a barren desolate desert with little or no life. In fact, <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> is a<br />

very fragile environment where hundreds <strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna<br />

live. Many <strong>of</strong> them are highly specialized to contend with the harsh desert<br />

environment. As such, minor alterations to the ecosystem could have<br />

dramatic effects. The cutting <strong>of</strong> indiscriminate 4WD trails and hiking,<br />

equestrian or biking social trails, can produce scars on the landscape that<br />

may take tens or even hundreds <strong>of</strong> years to erase.<br />

The unique geology and erosion which created the colorful geologic<br />

formations <strong>of</strong> the park is an ongoing process. Consequently, careful<br />

consideration must be given to the location <strong>of</strong> facilities to prevent scenic<br />

degradation or more practical considerations such as damage from<br />

flooding.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Human activities have impacted the environment <strong>of</strong> the park throughout<br />

its history. To date, the impact <strong>of</strong> man on the valley has left the park with<br />

unique rock carvings or petroglyphs. The site has been historically a site<br />

for hunting by many generations. The remote location and absence <strong>of</strong><br />

potable surface water has helped to protect the valley from incursions by<br />

modern man.<br />

1) Uncontrolled Access: Major concerns expressed during<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> the 1990 plan and that continue today are the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> access to the formations and areas in the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

park. Some participants wanted to see wide open access to the<br />

park from all points <strong>of</strong> entry. Logistically this seemed much too<br />

difficult from the aspect <strong>of</strong> staff resources available in 1990 and it<br />

still does today. The past plan recommended that a second fee<br />

booth be installed on the eastern entrance road in order to increase<br />

public contact and provide additional information and educational<br />

materials to the public. This has not occurred yet.<br />

2) Off-road vehicle (OHV): Unauthorized use is resulting in<br />

resource degradation in the north half <strong>of</strong> the park. The Park<br />

boundary marking is not comprehensive and the adjacent<br />

Logandale OHV trail system passes near and through the park in<br />

several places. Increased educational and directional signage is<br />

needed to direct the users to designated trails. The problem <strong>of</strong><br />

unauthorized public use is also enhanced by the number <strong>of</strong> access<br />

points to the park. The park has not been able to provide control<br />

<strong>of</strong> all access points and therefore gain control <strong>of</strong> undesirable park<br />

use. The lack <strong>of</strong> funding for operations in the park, education and<br />

interpretational signage has had to be utilized to the fullest extent<br />

affordable to control and redirect motorized use and reduce<br />

resource damage.<br />

3) Flora and Fauna, and their Habitat: The Multiple Species<br />

Habitat Conservation Plan for this region includes the VOF and<br />

the park is a partner in those efforts. Inventory <strong>of</strong> Threatened,<br />

Endangered and <strong>State</strong> Listed Species and habitats needs to occur<br />

in the park to aid management in protection <strong>of</strong> these species and<br />

their habitats. The Division utilizes our partner agency Natural<br />

Heritage to help identify known habitats and species presence.<br />

4) Vandalism <strong>of</strong> Petroglyphs and Petrified Wood Sites: Vandalism<br />

is a problem within the park and the fragile nature <strong>of</strong> these<br />

resources and their locations make them difficult to protect.<br />

Climbing within the park is addressed through NAC 407.350 (see<br />

previous section 2.b.) and prohibits these activities from leaving<br />

lasting effects on the park’s formations. Inventory <strong>of</strong><br />

paleontological and archaeological sites has occurred and<br />

mitigation as well as protective interpretive panels and facilities<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 14 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


are in place to protect known sites. However, fencing is not<br />

adequate to stop vandals from removing the petrified wood from<br />

the park at this time and theft occurred in 2007.<br />

5) Special Uses Movie Sets: The Park has been the site <strong>of</strong> many<br />

motion pictures, music videos and commercials. Problems have<br />

occurred which have resulted in the destruction and scarring <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landscape. Most <strong>of</strong> these problems have occurred due to<br />

carelessness and not through malicious activities. Additionally,<br />

there is a greater need for staging areas for movies and large<br />

events.<br />

6) Special Uses Weddings: The Park is under great demand for<br />

special use permits for weddings. The number <strong>of</strong> requests is over<br />

that which current staff can manage while still managing the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the park users, maintenance and administration.<br />

7) Trails: Due to the lack <strong>of</strong> natural water availability, extreme heat<br />

during the summers and the unsuitable nature <strong>of</strong> the soils, most <strong>of</strong><br />

the trails in the park are fairly short distance. The unstable nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soils does not allow for sustainable trails that are accessible<br />

in most areas.<br />

8) Day and Overnight Use: Conflicts have arisen in the past<br />

between car campers and RV campers related to noise and<br />

generators. The latest campground installation (2008) should help<br />

as it provides a RV hook-up section that is separated from the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the campsites. There is also a need to renovate the current<br />

group picnic facilities and group camping facilities.<br />

II.<br />

REGIONAL INFLUENCES<br />

A. PARK HISTORY<br />

1. History <strong>of</strong> the Area<br />

Recorded history at <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> began in 1826 when the first Europeans,<br />

mostly fur trappers, entered the valley. One <strong>of</strong> the first explorers to cross the<br />

valley was Jedediah Smith, a well known mountain man. Smith's route, which<br />

followed the Virgin River, brought travelers from Santa Fe westward. Another<br />

pioneer trail which passed near the park was known as the Spanish Trail and was<br />

actively used during the 1830's and 1840's. The Spanish Trail passes to the west<br />

<strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

The treaty <strong>of</strong> Guadalupe Hidalgo ceded land from Mexico to the United <strong>State</strong>s in<br />

1848 and this land treaty encompassed all <strong>of</strong> southern <strong>Nevada</strong>, including the<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 15 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Through the 1840's the Spanish Trail, also known as the Mormon Road, became a<br />

main route from Salt Lake City to southern California. The use <strong>of</strong> trails by white<br />

immigrants was a traumatic shock to the Paiute people who lived in the area.<br />

Occasional hostilities broke out between the two cultures concerning ownership<br />

<strong>of</strong> land and animals. Farming, which brought with it land ownership, slowly<br />

displaced the Native American population. Mormon colonists started to establish<br />

settlements along the Muddy and Virgin Rivers, adjacent to the park.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the better known legends which involves the park, concerns a Paiute<br />

Indian by the name <strong>of</strong> Mouse. Mouse was considered a renegade by the white<br />

settlers and an outcast by his own tribe. As with many legends, the facts are not<br />

always clear or agreed upon. According to one story, Mouse was employed by<br />

George Bonelli, a merchant and rancher as a hand on a ferry at Bonelli's Landing.<br />

Mouse's trouble began when he shot up an Indian camp while drinking one<br />

evening. Mouse was locked up and later ferried across the river and left in<br />

Arizona. He then, reportedly, killed two white prospectors and fled to the <strong>Valley</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>.<br />

Several searches were conducted to locate him and bring him to justice. Mouse's<br />

hideout within the rugged landscape <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> made him difficult to track.<br />

From his hideout, Mouse made several forays into the settlement to steal goods<br />

and materials. The search parties were always puzzled how Mouse could live<br />

within the valley since no running water was available. However, Mouse knew<br />

the valley very well and discovered a natural depression within the rocks which<br />

would hold rain water for months at a time. This depression is known today as<br />

"Mouse's Tank" and is a popular attraction within the park.<br />

Mouse was finally found on July 11, 1897 by a posse which ordered him to<br />

surrender near Muddy Spring. Mouse did not surrender and instead had an hour<br />

long running gun fight with his pursuers before finally being shot.<br />

The Moapa Indian Reservation was created in 1872 along the Muddy River. The<br />

reservation contains approximately 72,000 acres near the park. As time<br />

progressed, the river valley became more intensively farmed with the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern irrigation and fertilizers.<br />

In addition to farming, mining for minerals such as gypsum, magnetite, silica,<br />

borates and lithium took place in the area. The valley did not contain large<br />

mineral deposits and was not intensively mined. The mines that used to operate in<br />

the park are closed and rehabilitated as <strong>of</strong> 2007.<br />

The <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> became a wagon road cut<strong>of</strong>f to Las Vegas in the latter part <strong>of</strong><br />

the 19th century and early 20th century. In 1914 Clark County built a dirt road<br />

through the <strong>Valley</strong> to serve as part <strong>of</strong> the Arrowhead Trail between Salt Lake City<br />

and Los Angeles. The route was abandoned in 1925 when a more northerly route<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 16 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


was established along present-day Interstate 15. Before the trail was abandoned,<br />

an <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>of</strong> the American Automobile Association named the <strong>Valley</strong> after<br />

seeing it near sunset ablaze with red-orange color.<br />

Beginning in 2007, the neighboring Lake Mead National Recreation Area began<br />

to lose significant amounts <strong>of</strong> water due to drought. The impacts <strong>of</strong> the lowering<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lake on the use <strong>of</strong> that NRA has not been measured yet in terms <strong>of</strong> it's<br />

impact on the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park. The lake remains at record low levels and<br />

current use is reflecting those low levels.<br />

2. History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park<br />

In 1914, Clark Co. helped in the building <strong>of</strong> a rough road through the valley to<br />

serve a segment <strong>of</strong> the Arrowhead Trail. In the 1920's, Governor James<br />

Scrugham recognized the beauty <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Valley</strong> and requested transfer <strong>of</strong> the land<br />

from federal public domain to the state. <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> was <strong>of</strong>ficially dedicated as<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong>'s first state park in 1934. The first major construction within the park<br />

occurred between 1933 and 1935. This construction included a road and the<br />

"Cabins" built by the Civilian Conservation Corps. The "Cabins", small stone<br />

structures, were built to accommodate overnight travelers. The CCC was under<br />

the direction <strong>of</strong> Colonel Thomas W. Miller <strong>of</strong> Caliente, <strong>Nevada</strong> and continued for<br />

several years.<br />

In the decades that followed, legislative appropriations were very meager with no<br />

personnel available for maintenance. Funds for the park were cut<strong>of</strong>f entirely<br />

during World War II. The Baker Act, passed in 1940, eliminated the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Fire</strong> from the <strong>State</strong> park system, ironically based on the premise that the park was<br />

too isolated and inaccessible and had no recreational value.<br />

Several prominent <strong>Nevada</strong>ns opposed the closing, including former Governor<br />

Scrugham, Colonel Miller and the Perkins family. As a result <strong>of</strong> this vocal<br />

opposition, the Baker Act was repealed around 1955. During this period,<br />

Governor Charles H. Russell stimulated the park system by appointing a new<br />

commission which elected Colonel Miller as chairman. The colonel's appearance<br />

at a hearing <strong>of</strong> the 1955 legislature led to a biennium appropriation <strong>of</strong> $4,000 for<br />

the commission. <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>, soon after, was given its first superintendent and<br />

ranger. An <strong>of</strong>fice was leased and a truck was purchased for the park. The<br />

"Cabins" were allocated $500 for improving the structure.<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> the modern <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park began with the addition <strong>of</strong><br />

facilities such as campgrounds and a Visitor Information Center in the late 1960's.<br />

(1969,Wirth; Park System Plan, 1997) From 1990 to 2008 many improvements<br />

have been made in the park. Trails have been designated and signed, petroglyphs<br />

have been made more accessible with stairs and protected from visitors touching<br />

or scraping the sites. Interpretive programs have been developed and implemented<br />

as well. The White Domes road was paved and Arch Rock and Atlatl Rock<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 17 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


campgrounds were developed. A new campground loop at Atlatl Rock was<br />

installed in 2008 which provides additional sites that have full RV hookups. Many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the toilets were upgraded in the 90’s and shade structures at the group sites<br />

were improved. The most current development project is that <strong>of</strong> new <strong>of</strong>fices, staff<br />

living quarters and an upgraded Visitors Center, which is in progress.<br />

The Park has undergone significant changes in landownership through the years.<br />

Prior to 1973 the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park included approximately 34,000 acres<br />

and included those lands which make up the main core <strong>of</strong> the park. In 1973 a<br />

Patent was applied for through the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management, Recreation and<br />

Public Purpose Lease program for acreage on the north backcountry section and a<br />

few acres on the east side <strong>of</strong> the park. The acreages in those applications changed<br />

many times as the process was completed. In 2006 an additional 420 acre inholding<br />

was acquired in the northern section <strong>of</strong> the Park called the White-Gro<br />

mine. The current total acreage <strong>of</strong> park land is 42,059.48.<br />

B. DEMOGRAPHICS<br />

1. Historic<br />

The <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> derives its name from red sandstone formations, formed from<br />

great shifting sand dunes during the age <strong>of</strong> dinosaurs, 150 million years ago.<br />

Complex uplifting and faulting <strong>of</strong> the region, followed by extensive erosion, have<br />

created the present landscape. Prehistoric users <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> included the<br />

Basket Maker people and later the Anasazi Pueblo farmers from the nearby fertile<br />

Moapa <strong>Valley</strong>. The approximate span <strong>of</strong> occupation has been dated from 300 B.C.<br />

to 1150 A.D. Their visits probably involved hunting, food gathering, and religious<br />

ceremonies, although scarcity <strong>of</strong> water would have limited the length <strong>of</strong> their stay.<br />

The growth around <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park was never explosive but did increase<br />

through the settlement <strong>of</strong> the farms and ranches near Overton and the Moapa<br />

<strong>Valley</strong>. The greatest impact <strong>of</strong> population on the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> has been and still<br />

is from the urban center <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas.<br />

2. Existing/Projected<br />

The park is situated in the valley created by the North Muddy Mountains to the<br />

west and Muddy Mountains to the south. The Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> lies to the northwest<br />

and the Overton Arm <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead to the east. The valley along with the<br />

surrounding mountains is sparsely vegetated and arid in character. The park <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

a wide variety <strong>of</strong> natural and cultural resources for visitors. The primary and<br />

most striking features <strong>of</strong> the park are the red sandstone formations found<br />

throughout the site. These formations and their color provide interesting contrast<br />

to the surrounding desert. In addition to these naturally carved formations, the<br />

park also has an extensive number <strong>of</strong> petroglyphs. The park's isolation also helps<br />

give the park its unique character<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 18 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


a. Clark County Demographics<br />

Demographics and socioeconomic condition for Clark County, Las Vegas and<br />

the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong> are in flux during this planning period due to a significant<br />

national economic recession.<br />

Average Annual Population Growth 1990-2008 5.22% (declining)<br />

Source: Clark County Annual Population Estimates<br />

Average Monthly In-Migration - 2008 -2,396 (declining)<br />

Source: Clark County Comprehensive Planning / NV Bureau <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

Planning & Statistics Preliminary '07 Annual Birth & Death Rates<br />

Annual Job Growth Rate Las Vegas- - 4 . 5 % (declining)<br />

Unemployment Rate - Las Vegas-Paradise MSA 10.1% (increasing)<br />

Source: <strong>Nevada</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Employment, Training & Rehabilitation (2/09)<br />

As <strong>of</strong> the 2000 census, approximately 1.4 million people resided in the county.<br />

Population estimates by Clark County for 2008 were 1,986,146 and growing.<br />

However, due to the economic recession, Clark County and Las Vegas have<br />

experienced a large number <strong>of</strong> home foreclosures and job losses. This has resulted<br />

in a drop in population. University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>, Reno economist Tom Cargill<br />

estimated that there would be a declining population in Clark County due to the<br />

recession in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

However, this is disputed by the Clark County 2009 Comprehensive planning<br />

Demographer estimates which show increases in population through 2035.<br />

Described below are the results <strong>of</strong> the 2005 census estimates, combined<br />

with 2006 and 2009 data as provided by the County and <strong>State</strong>.<br />

The racial makeup <strong>of</strong> the county in 2005 was 54.5% Caucasian Non<br />

Hispanic, 26.1% Hispanic, 10.1% Black or African American, 1.0%<br />

Native American Indian, 6.7% Asian, 0.6% Pacific Islander, and 2.8%<br />

from two or more races (Figure 2.1 Clark County Racial Make Up).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 19 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Clark County Racial Demographics<br />

Caucasian Non-<br />

Hispanic<br />

Hispanic<br />

African American<br />

Nativ e American<br />

Indian<br />

Asian<br />

Pacific Islander<br />

Two or More<br />

Figure 2.1 Clark County Racial Makeup<br />

Minorities make up almost half <strong>of</strong> Clark County’s population.<br />

(US Census, 2005)<br />

By 2005, there were 637,740 households <strong>of</strong> which 414,377 were family<br />

households (Figure 2.2 Clark County Household Demographics). Of the<br />

family households, 47% had children under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 living with them.<br />

There were 122,383 family households comprised <strong>of</strong> single parent<br />

households, with approximately two times as many single female parents<br />

as male parents. There were 171,314 households with individuals living<br />

alone. There were 132,5<strong>61</strong> households with one or more people 65 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age or older. The average household size was 2.65 and the average<br />

family size was 3.25 (US Census, 2005).<br />

Clark County Household Demographics<br />

Married-couple<br />

families<br />

Single male<br />

families<br />

Single female<br />

families<br />

Non-family liv ing<br />

alone<br />

Other non-family<br />

households<br />

(US Census, 2005)<br />

Figure 2.2 Clark County Household Demographics<br />

There is a large family community and significant percentage <strong>of</strong> individuals living alone.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 20 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


The age demographics <strong>of</strong> Clark County indicate that 26% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population is under the age <strong>of</strong> 18, 9% from 18 to 24, 31% from 25 to 44,<br />

23% from 45 to 64, and 11% who were 65 years <strong>of</strong> age or older (Figure<br />

2.3 Clark County Age Demographics). The median age was 34.4 years.<br />

Clark County Age Demographics<br />

Under 18<br />

18-24<br />

25-44<br />

45-64<br />

Ov er 65<br />

Figure 2.3 Clark County Age Demographics<br />

(US Census, 2005)<br />

There is a fairly even distribution <strong>of</strong> age groups with a slight lean towards<br />

children and 25-44 yrs which supports the large 'family' demographics<br />

below.<br />

b. Las Vegas Demographics<br />

Las Vegas is a census-designated place (CDP) located in Clark County,<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong>. The demographics <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas represent urban Clark<br />

County.<br />

Las Vegas is located at 36°10'34" North, 115°8'13" West (39.176, -<br />

115.137) (Wikipedia, 2007). According to the United <strong>State</strong>s Census<br />

Bureau, the CDP has a total area <strong>of</strong> 340.0 km² (131.3 mi²). As <strong>of</strong> the<br />

census <strong>of</strong> 2000, there were 478,434 people, 176,750 households, and<br />

117,538 families residing in the city. The population density was<br />

1,630.3/km² (4,222.5/mi²). There were 190,724 housing units at an<br />

average density <strong>of</strong> 649.9/km² (1683.3/mi²) (US Census Bureau, 2000).<br />

The racial makeup <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas in 2005 was very similar to that <strong>of</strong> Clark<br />

County: 52.3% White, 28.5% Hispanic, 11.1% African American, 0.6%<br />

Native American, 4.7% Asian, 0.4% Pacific Islander, 3.0% from two or<br />

more races (US Census Bureau, 2005).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 21 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Las Vegas Household Demographics<br />

Married-couple<br />

families<br />

Single male<br />

families<br />

Single female<br />

families<br />

Non-family liv ing<br />

alone<br />

Other non-family<br />

households<br />

(US Census, 2005)<br />

Figure 2.4 Las Vegas Household Demographics; about a third <strong>of</strong> the households in Las<br />

Vegas are non-family.<br />

There are a slightly smaller proportion <strong>of</strong> families in the City <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas<br />

when compared to the demographics <strong>of</strong> overall Clark County. In 2005,<br />

there were 204,688 households <strong>of</strong> which 132,735 are family households<br />

(Figure 2.4 Las Vegas Household Demographics). Of the family<br />

households, 48% had children under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 living with them. Of<br />

these family households, 41,098 are single parent households with more<br />

than two times as many single female parents as male parents. There were<br />

56,733 households made up <strong>of</strong> individuals living alone. There were 45,667<br />

households with one or more people 65 years <strong>of</strong> age or older. The average<br />

household size was 2.63 and the average family size was 3.26 (US Census,<br />

2005).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 22 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Las Vegas Age Demographics<br />

Under 18<br />

18-24<br />

25-44<br />

45-64<br />

Ov er 65<br />

(US Census, 2005)<br />

Figure 2.5 Las Vegas Age Demographics<br />

In Las Vegas the population was spread out with 27% under the age <strong>of</strong> 18,<br />

8% from 18 to 24, 32% from 25 to 44, 22% from 45 to 64, and 12% who<br />

were 65 years <strong>of</strong> age or older (Figure 2.5 Las Vegas Age Demographics).<br />

Las Vegas demographics show slightly larger percentage <strong>of</strong> people under<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> 18 and over 65 than Clark County. The median age was 34.8<br />

years.<br />

c. Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> Demographics<br />

The City <strong>of</strong> Overton lies just under 20 miles from the park and resides in<br />

the Census Designated Place (CDP) <strong>of</strong> Moapa <strong>Valley</strong>. Census statistics<br />

also include the towns <strong>of</strong> Logandale and Moapa.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> the 2000 census there were 5,784 people, 1,934 households, and<br />

1,525 families residing in the CDP. Clark County’s estimate for 2008 was<br />

7,200.<br />

In 2005, there were 1,934 households out <strong>of</strong> which 38.8% had children<br />

under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 living with them, 69.8% were married couples living<br />

together, 6.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and<br />

21.1% were non-families. 17.8% <strong>of</strong> all households were made up <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals and 10.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

or older. The average household size was 2.99 and the average family size<br />

was 3.43.<br />

In the CDP the population was spread out with 33.5% under the age <strong>of</strong> 18,<br />

6.7% from 18 to 24, 23.0% from 25 to 44, 21.6% from 45 to 64, and<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 23 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


15.2% who were 65 years <strong>of</strong> age or older. The median age was 36 years.<br />

For every 100 females there were 101.7 males. For every 100 females age<br />

18 and over, there were 98.2 males.<br />

The median income for a household in the CDP was $39,942, and the<br />

median income for a family was $47,575. Males had a median income <strong>of</strong><br />

$42,348 versus $26,442 for females. The per capita income for the CDP<br />

was $16,696. About 5.7% <strong>of</strong> families and 6.9% <strong>of</strong> the population were<br />

below the poverty line, including 7.3% <strong>of</strong> those under age 18 and 8.3% <strong>of</strong><br />

those age 65 or over.<br />

The Las Vegas metropolitan region augments the population <strong>of</strong> the Moapa<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> as a bedroom community to Las Vegas. Other future development<br />

in the area such as Coyote Springs to the North appears to be increasing<br />

use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park by regional and local users.<br />

C. RECREATIONAL DEMAND<br />

1. Effect <strong>of</strong> Population Increases and socioeconomics and Demand<br />

Past rapid development in the Las Vegas, Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> and Clark County in<br />

general increases pressure on all recreation facilities in the region. Increasing<br />

populations raise demand for these facilities at all levels. City and County<br />

recreation providers continue to try to catch up and to keep pace with demand and<br />

use. Residents may apply increasing pressure on the <strong>State</strong> system to meet their<br />

needs.<br />

The recession that began at the end <strong>of</strong> the decade has reminded recreation<br />

providers that recreation areas continue to be in high demand during economic<br />

stress. There is a "stay close to home" need with less folks traveling as far to<br />

recreation due to cost. At this point, due to demand, the <strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Parks</strong> (NDSP) is currently upgrading old facilities and has already added and<br />

upgraded the campgrounds at <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>. The lack <strong>of</strong> projected funding for the<br />

<strong>State</strong> in the next decade demands that maintenance is critical to our parks. The<br />

increasing proximity <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas development reduces travel time to the Park,<br />

making the park more accessible and increasing demands. International visitation<br />

is also increasing and the park is currently upgrading the visitor's center to help<br />

meet those demands.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> data sources provide insight into the socioeconomic condition <strong>of</strong><br />

regional residents and park visitors. This information can be used to help<br />

determine the ability <strong>of</strong> regional residents to participate in the full range <strong>of</strong><br />

recreational activities available. The <strong>2010</strong> Census is getting underway and no data<br />

is available at present. The 2005 Census data for Clark County shows a slightly<br />

lower percentage <strong>of</strong> poverty level families and senior citizens than that <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 24 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


<strong>of</strong> the United <strong>State</strong>s. The population <strong>of</strong> the area leans towards families, and<br />

therefore affordable family and group activities areas are needed. Due to this<br />

demand, <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> is adding and upgrading camping facilities and other older<br />

facilities. The Park is also upgrading the trail signage and interpretive/education<br />

signage to meet these needs.<br />

The median income for a household in the county was $44,<strong>61</strong>6, and the median<br />

income for a family was $50,485. Males had a median income <strong>of</strong> $35,243 versus<br />

$27,077 for females. The per capita income for the county was $21,885 (U.S.<br />

Census Bureau, 2000).<br />

The U.S. Census Bureau described the national poverty line for 2005 as an<br />

individual income <strong>of</strong> $10,160 or less. A total <strong>of</strong> 10.8% <strong>of</strong> the Clark County<br />

population and 7.9% <strong>of</strong> Clark County families were below the poverty line which<br />

are significantly lower than the national percentages <strong>of</strong> 12.6 and 10.8. 14.1% <strong>of</strong><br />

those under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 and 7.3% <strong>of</strong> those 65 and older in Clark County were<br />

living below the poverty line (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000). According to Clark<br />

County data, the poverty rate in Clark County, <strong>Nevada</strong> has increased by 0.4<br />

percent from the levels reported in the Decennial Census <strong>of</strong> 2000, moving from<br />

10.8 percent to 11.2 percent in 2006.<br />

2. Visitation Characteristics<br />

Overall visitation to all <strong>Nevada</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> has gradually increased between 1990<br />

and 2008 with relatively smaller fluctuations. Following its peak <strong>of</strong> 3,472,248<br />

visitors in 2000, overall visitation leveled <strong>of</strong>f in the last few years at<br />

approximately 3,200,000 visitors, which is larger than the mean <strong>of</strong> 3,165,657.<br />

3. Activity Preferences and Demand<br />

The 2009 NDSP <strong>State</strong>wide Visitor Survey Report listed the following outdoor<br />

activities as being the most popular in NV <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> based on participation:<br />

relaxing outdoors, walking, both vehicle camping and tent camping, picnicking<br />

and hiking. Water-based activities are the most popular where water bodies and<br />

fishable streams are available. Past surveys from the 2003 <strong>State</strong>wide<br />

Comprehensive Recreation Plan and the 2005 <strong>Nevada</strong> Trails Plan resulted in<br />

similar preferences: pleasure driving, picnicking, walking, wildlife viewing, and<br />

hiking. The trails plan brought forth biking and OHV use as two <strong>of</strong> the addition<br />

top five trail uses.<br />

The <strong>Nevada</strong> 2005 <strong>State</strong> Recreational Trail Plan Survey information on demands<br />

for trail activities was a statewide random sample <strong>of</strong> trail users was asked to select<br />

the activities that they engaged in during the twelve months preceding the survey.<br />

The percentage is <strong>of</strong> total survey respondents who indicated participation in each<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 25 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


trail activity. Respondents could pick more than one activity; therefore, the sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the percentages is greater than one hundred.<br />

Facilities Visitors Would Like To See Expanded<br />

showers<br />

restrooms<br />

campgrounds/campsite<br />

RV hook ups<br />

picnic shelters<br />

picnic areas<br />

grills/fire rings<br />

fishing piers<br />

trails/trailheads<br />

cabins/yurts<br />

boat ramps<br />

parking lots<br />

interpretive exhibits<br />

groups areas<br />

roads<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%<br />

Figure 2.6 2009 <strong>State</strong>wide Survey<br />

Applying 2009 <strong>State</strong>wide and regional data to <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> we can see that users<br />

are asking for renovated or updated facilities that provide for highly developed<br />

camping, picnicking, family gathering, hiking, scenic views photography and<br />

visiting historical, paleontological and archaeological sites.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> surveys indicated a demand for more interpretation and protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Paleolithic sites and better signage for all trails. Users <strong>of</strong> the backcountry<br />

on the Logandale trails system asked for better signage on the trails and for the<br />

Park to consider the possibility <strong>of</strong> a dry campground for OHV/ATV's in the north<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the park. Separation <strong>of</strong> the generator vs. non generator campers is a<br />

continuing issue.<br />

D. RECREATIONAL SUPPLY<br />

1. <strong>Valley</strong> Of <strong>Fire</strong><br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park provides the park visitors with the opportunity to escape<br />

the urban pace <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas and enjoy the unrestrained beauty <strong>of</strong> the Mojave<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 26 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Desert. Developed activities include camping, group camping, individual family<br />

and group picnicking, an events center, guided historic and nature tours, wildlife<br />

and nature viewing, and historic interpretation.<br />

a. Family Picnic and Group Use Areas<br />

Shaded picnic areas with restrooms are located at Atlatl Rock, Seven Sisters,<br />

the Cabins, near Mouse's Tank trail head and White Domes. There are three<br />

group areas, accommodating up to 45 persons. They are available for<br />

overnight camping and picnicking by reservation only.<br />

b. Visitor Center<br />

The visitor center provides exhibits on the geology, ecology, prehistory, and<br />

history <strong>of</strong> the park and the nearby region. A gift shop is located within as<br />

well as restrooms and refreshments. The staff <strong>of</strong>fices are located behind the<br />

visitor's center.<br />

c. Historic Attractions<br />

Petroglyphs and other Native American points <strong>of</strong> interest like Mouse’s Tanks<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer visitors a view into the past <strong>of</strong> a people who first made the Desert their<br />

home. The CCC Cabin site and the Historic Arrowhead Trail and other<br />

historic markers provide historic sites for the public.<br />

d. Camping<br />

Two campgrounds with RV hookup sites, and three walk-in camp sites.<br />

Campsites are equipped with shaded tables, grills, water, and restrooms.<br />

Dumpsites and showers are also available.<br />

e. Trails, Access and Regional Connectivity<br />

Walking and hiking are popular activities for people visiting <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>.<br />

The park has 16 trails ranging from .1 mile to 6.8 miles in length. There is<br />

currently 24.9 miles <strong>of</strong> trail in the park. This includes sections <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Logandale trail which crosses into the north end <strong>of</strong> the park in several places.<br />

Connectivity outside the park is limited to the Logandale trails system. There<br />

is opportunity to create connectivity with the Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> Trails plan, the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Overton and Clark County in the future in the north end <strong>of</strong> the park<br />

for non-motorized and motorized uses as the Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> trails and open<br />

space plans are completed. See Chapter 3 for details on each trail<br />

(Attachment 3.10 Circulation Map; 3.11 Core Trails Map; and 3.12<br />

Motorized Trails Map).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 27 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


2. Regional Facilities<br />

Other <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> in the region are Spring Mountain Ranch and the Old Las<br />

Vegas/Mormon Fort. The Lost City Museum in Overton <strong>of</strong>fers fine displays <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian artifacts and reconstruction's <strong>of</strong> the original pit dwellings and pueblo found<br />

in the Moapa <strong>Valley</strong>. The Lake Mead National Recreation area is six miles away<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fers a myriad <strong>of</strong> water based recreation opportunities. Other public<br />

recreation providers in the region include the incorporated cities <strong>of</strong> Las Vegas,<br />

North Las Vegas, Henderson, Boulder City, Pahrump, Blue Diamond, and Clark<br />

County. Typical urban facilities provided by these groups include swimming<br />

pools, ball fields, tennis courts, playgrounds, open multi-use turf areas, golf<br />

courses, and picnicking sites.<br />

The federal government actively manages recreation areas in the region also.<br />

These include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at the Desert National Wildlife<br />

Refuge, the National Park Service at Lake Mead National Recreation Area, the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Forest Service at Mt. Charleston, and <strong>of</strong> course, the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Management in the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area. Picnicking,<br />

boating, swimming, hiking, mountain climbing, hunting and other backcountry<br />

experiences are examples <strong>of</strong> activities available in these areas.<br />

E. REGIONAL LAND USE TRENDS<br />

1. Ownership and Land Use<br />

The Park boundary consists <strong>of</strong> two large areas separated by BLM and private<br />

lands. Lands administered by the U.S. Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management border the<br />

park on the west, north and south. Lake Mead National Recreation Area,<br />

administered by the National Park Service, lies directly east <strong>of</strong> the park. The park<br />

is also bordered by lands managed by the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation and private<br />

property owners. (Appendix 1.2 Land Ownership Map)<br />

2. Patterns and Trends.<br />

Since 1980, the park has grown to encompass over 35,300 acres (Appendix 1.3<br />

Park Acquisition History Map). Land use surrounding the park is all outdoor<br />

recreation. In cooperating with the Clark County and the Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> trails and<br />

open space plans meetings and with the NPS and BLM in this process, there are<br />

no plans for changing any <strong>of</strong> these lands to non-outdoor recreation use. Plans<br />

include collaborative trail building and cooperation in management <strong>of</strong> the<br />

motorized trail system in the north.<br />

3. Zoning<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 28 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


The park lies within the Northeast Planning Area for Clark County. The park is<br />

within the Public Facilities and rural open land districts. Therefore the park is in<br />

compliance with County zoning and no conflicts exist.<br />

4. Existing Access<br />

Two entry/rest stations are located at the east and west entrances into the park<br />

along <strong>State</strong> Highway 169. The main park road bisects the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

park from east to west. This main road is paved and well maintained. The second<br />

main road is the White Domes Road. There are also several secondary roads<br />

within the park including Atlatl Rock loop road, Beehives road, Cabins road that<br />

are open to the public. There are other tertiary roads for staff use only<br />

(Attachment 3.10 Circulation Map).<br />

There is a third heavily used entry point at the Logandale Trails area through the<br />

BLM lands on the north end <strong>of</strong> the park (Attachment 3.10 Circulation Map and<br />

3.12 Motorized Trails Map). The park also has a number <strong>of</strong> un<strong>of</strong>ficial access<br />

points which are found mostly in the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the site. Most <strong>of</strong> these<br />

access points require 4WD vehicles and are difficult to traverse due to constant<br />

wash outs.<br />

F. SUPPLY/DEMAND ANALYSIS<br />

A supply demand analysis using uncertain demand and demographic data is<br />

difficult. However, the future <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>, Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong><br />

General Fund Budget future which supports maintenance and operations is<br />

anticipated to be inadequate. It is anticipated that demand may increase while<br />

supply is going to remain constant, and operating and maintenance budgets will<br />

likely decrease.<br />

Economists are estimating that the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong> Government budget and the<br />

economy may take a decade to recover. The same is being said for the nation.<br />

Worldwide impacts cannot be estimated at this point either. Because <strong>of</strong> this, it is<br />

only prudent to focus on maintaining current facilities as the priority <strong>of</strong> this plan.<br />

The National <strong>Parks</strong> Service Newsletter, January <strong>2010</strong>, The Connections included<br />

an article from Rick Potts, Chief, NPS Conservation & Outdoor Recreation<br />

Division. In it he explained best a problem with nationwide park implications,<br />

including <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>: "You cannot love a park to death. When a special place<br />

has a constituency <strong>of</strong> people who personally know and experience it, their love <strong>of</strong><br />

that place rises up to protect it when it is threatened. When people know and love<br />

a place, they protect it. For all their importance, physical connections between<br />

parks and the land or communities near them are not enough to protect the parks.<br />

<strong>Parks</strong> also need deep connections with the hearts <strong>of</strong> people all around them.<br />

Although love cannot kill an area, apathy and irrelevance surely can. "<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 29 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


During 2009, the park saw a visitation increase <strong>of</strong> over 16% and set an all-time<br />

record number <strong>of</strong> visitors at 1,519,732. Therefore, we must anticipate continued<br />

increasing visitation impact and demand. The facilities, natural beauty and<br />

valuable archaeological resources within the park are the features that draw the<br />

users. Therefore, their upkeep, maintenance and protection will hold priority over<br />

that <strong>of</strong> redevelopment or new facilities.<br />

III.<br />

THE EXISTING PARK<br />

A. NATURAL RESOURCES<br />

1. Physiography/Slopes<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park is located approximately 60 miles northeast <strong>of</strong><br />

Las Vegas, <strong>Nevada</strong> in Clark Co. It lies in the Basin & Range<br />

physiographic province, with typical north-south trending valleys and<br />

ridges. The park possesses a series <strong>of</strong> rock formations which are unique<br />

to the basin area. The elevations <strong>of</strong> the park range from a low point <strong>of</strong><br />

1320 and climb to an elevation <strong>of</strong> 3009 feet.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 30 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> lies in the Muddy <strong>Valley</strong> and lies to the west <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Overton Arm <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead. The dominant Muddy Mountains lie to the<br />

south <strong>of</strong> the park boundary and rise to an elevation <strong>of</strong> 5363 feet at Muddy<br />

Mountain. The Muddy <strong>Valley</strong> along with the Virgin <strong>Valley</strong> is unique for<br />

Clark County in that it does not contain a central basin. These valleys<br />

drain into the Colorado River and are the only open drained basins in<br />

Clark Co. Two parallel ridges lie to the west <strong>of</strong> the park. These ridges<br />

are known as the Weiser Ridge and the North Muddy Mountains.<br />

Slopes range in the park from near level to near vertical relief. In some<br />

areas overhangs and land bridges are common. Limestone formations are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten moderately high, steeply sloping ridges which are grey in color.<br />

The less resistant sandstone formations form low ridges or valleys; these<br />

units form the spectacular displays <strong>of</strong> color and interesting erosional<br />

features (See Appendix 3.1 Slope Map). The most striking formations are<br />

located within the core <strong>of</strong> the park and to the north. Visitor use areas are<br />

typically flat except in trail areas.<br />

2. Climate<br />

a. Temperature<br />

The park has predominately two seasons <strong>of</strong> summer and winter. Fall and<br />

spring are typically very short compared to areas in the north and north<br />

central portion <strong>of</strong> the state. The park’s location in the low-latitude desert<br />

is characterized by mild winters and hot summers. The southern<br />

subtropical desert region averages 20 degrees (F) warmer than areas in the<br />

northern portion <strong>of</strong> the state. Approximately half <strong>of</strong> this variation is due<br />

to latitude and the other half to elevation. Winters in the park may be<br />

cool but a zero degree (F) temperature has never been recorded.<br />

Summers in the park are very hot with a July mean temperature <strong>of</strong> 90<br />

degrees (F) and daily highs well over 100 degrees (F). The highest<br />

temperature set in <strong>Nevada</strong> <strong>of</strong> 122 degrees (F) was recorded on June 23,<br />

1954 near the park in Overton, NV.<br />

As in many desert areas where clear skies exist, there is usually a large<br />

variation in temperatures from day to night. In the park that range can<br />

reach as high as 24.4 degrees (F) in July.<br />

b. Precipitation<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 31 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Rainfall within the park is slight as is typical to most low lying southern<br />

deserts. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> rain within the park is infrequent with the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> precipitation occurring in the winter months. Summer rains<br />

are in the form <strong>of</strong> highly localized thunder showers which may <strong>of</strong>fer rain<br />

to portions <strong>of</strong> the park while leaving other areas dry.<br />

Due to the topography <strong>of</strong> the rock formations and soil characteristics, there<br />

is a high potential for flash floods. Flash floods may occur with even<br />

moderate rainfalls within the park. During flash floods erosion and silt<br />

damage may also occur. The largest recorded rainfall at the park was<br />

2.36 inches in November <strong>of</strong> 1987.<br />

c. Solar and Wind<br />

The park is in full sun approximately 83% <strong>of</strong> the time which makes it one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sunniest locations in the country. June and September have full sun<br />

for 92% <strong>of</strong> the month. The least sunny month at the park is December<br />

which is sunny 73% <strong>of</strong> the month (Houghton, Sakamoto, Gifford, 1975).<br />

Surface winds in <strong>Nevada</strong> are governed primarily by the prevailing storm<br />

tracks and the basin-range topography. The highest wind speeds are<br />

generally recorded in May in the extreme southern portion <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />

The average high wind speed is 10.9 MPH. The lowest average wind<br />

speeds are recorded in November and December, 6.8 MPH.<br />

The prevailing wind direction is southwesterly from February through<br />

September and changes to westerly from October through January. The<br />

diurnal effects <strong>of</strong> wind result in calm morning winds with winds picking<br />

up in the afternoon.<br />

3. Geology <strong>of</strong> the Area<br />

The geologic evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> dates well into prehistory. The<br />

Cambrian period, 500 to 600 million years ago, provides a good starting<br />

point for the explanation <strong>of</strong> its unique geology. During the Cambrian<br />

period a large inland sea covered all <strong>of</strong> the Great Basin, leaving a thick<br />

deposit <strong>of</strong> limestone. Located above these formations were the deposits <strong>of</strong><br />

red Kaibab limestone <strong>of</strong> the Permian period, which ended approximately<br />

200 million years ago.<br />

The visible geology <strong>of</strong> the park began with the Triassic period. Sediments<br />

including shale, sandstone, gypsum and marine deposits were known as<br />

the Moenkopi formation. These sediments were washed down from<br />

surrounding uplift areas to form layers called Shinarump Conglomerate.<br />

This layer was formed in the late Triassic period and after they were<br />

formed a layer <strong>of</strong> Chinle shales were deposited above them.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 32 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Along the park borders, many petrified logs can be found and are a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> the extruded conglomerate. These petrified logs are the fossilized<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> a long extinct pine like conifer.<br />

During the Jurassic period, from 135 to 180 million years ago, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

region underwent a period <strong>of</strong> drying. These desert-like conditions are<br />

evidenced by the thick layer <strong>of</strong> sandstone which was cross bedded by wind<br />

driven particles. The bright, brick-red layers are what give the park its<br />

unique core. This Aztec Sandstone is exhibited in low, rugged, lowland<br />

belts. As the formations are followed from the north boundary they bend<br />

to the southeast and east in response to the anticlinal uplift directly north<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Arrowhead fault. The anticline is broken by faults which cause irregularities<br />

in outcrops. The most striking natural formations are located<br />

on the north limb <strong>of</strong> this structure.<br />

Above the Aztec Sandstone that borders the park are thick Cretaceous<br />

deposits, made <strong>of</strong> conglomerate, sandstone, clay, and volcanic ash. The<br />

deposits were laid down after the initial disturbance <strong>of</strong> the older rocks but<br />

the Cretaceous beds were in turn highly tilted, and in a local area they<br />

were overridden by a plate <strong>of</strong> Aztec Sandstone (Longwell, Pampeyan,<br />

Bowyer, and Roberts, 1965).<br />

Mountain-building occurred after the Jurassic period and eventually<br />

created the Muddy Mountains. Materials which were displaced and relocated<br />

by water went to the formation <strong>of</strong> the Baseline and Willow Tank<br />

formations located in the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 33 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


4. Soils<br />

Seven Sisters<br />

In the early Cenozoic times about 70 million years ago, major uplifting,<br />

folding, and faulting resulted in the Willow Tank Thrust and the Glendale<br />

Thrust. The Glendale Thrust resulted in the highlands which were eroded<br />

on one side to produce huge alluvial fans. This produced the Overton<br />

Flaglomerate which is now displayed by the steeply tilted ridges along the<br />

park's eastern boundaries. From this point on, the primary geologic<br />

process at work in the valley has been erosion. Extremely low rainfall is<br />

typical to the area, however, even this small amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall over the<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> years has stripped <strong>of</strong>f most <strong>of</strong> the upper layers from the<br />

Glendale highland and has cut deep canyons in the Aztec Sandstone.<br />

Along with the action <strong>of</strong> erosion, wind also has scoured the exposed walls<br />

<strong>of</strong> buttes and canyons, pockmarking and gouging them into strange textures<br />

and unusual shapes.<br />

(Appendix 3.2 Geology Map)<br />

a. Description<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> falls into a mapping unit known as a Bard-Colorock-<br />

Tonapah. This unit covers the entire site and is moderately deep and<br />

deep, well drained and excessively drained. The land is near level to<br />

strongly sloping on broad alluvial fans and old terraces. This map unit<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> large areas characterized by mountain ranges and by depressional<br />

areas consisting <strong>of</strong> drainage ways through mountains. Bard soils<br />

make up 36% <strong>of</strong> the unit and Tonopah soils about 10%. Arizo, Arrolime,<br />

Cave, St. Thomas, and Badland make up the remaining 30%.<br />

The Bard soils are found on old terraces and alluvial fans. These are<br />

shallow, have indurated, lime-cemented hard pan. These soils are well<br />

drained and are gently to strongly sloping. The surface layer is pink<br />

gravelly fine sandy loam about 5 inches in depth. The underlying<br />

material is pink sandy loam about 14 inches thick over an indurated, limecemented<br />

hardpan about 27 inches in depth. This layer overlies a light<br />

grey very gravelly sandy loam that extends to a depth <strong>of</strong> 60 inches or<br />

more. The vegetation which is supported by this soil type include;<br />

creosote bush, white bursage, cholla and other cacti, and annuals.<br />

Colorock soils are typically located on smooth, broad alluvial fans. These<br />

soils are generally shallow over hard pan. They are well drained and<br />

gently sloping to moderately sloping. A 3 inch layer <strong>of</strong> pink very gravelly<br />

clay loam make up the upper portion <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The next layer is a<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 34 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


pink very gravelly sandy loam about 12 inches in depth. Below this is an<br />

indurated, lime-cemented hardpan about 27 inches thick over light grey<br />

very gravelly sandy loam that extends to a depth <strong>of</strong> 60 inches or more.<br />

The vegetation on these soils is mainly creosote bush, white bursage,<br />

cacti, and annuals.<br />

Tonopah soils are alluvial fans and terraces. These soils are deep,<br />

somewhat extensively drained, and nearly level to strongly sloping. The<br />

surface layer is light brown gravelly sand loam about 6 inches in depth.<br />

The underlying material is light brown very gravelly sand and extends to a<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 60 inches. These soils host several plants including; creosote<br />

bush, white bursage, and annuals (Soil Conservation Service, Virgin River<br />

Area, 1980).<br />

Another soil survey was completed in 1985 which covers the entire park<br />

boundary (Appendix 3.3 Soils Map). This survey was done by the Bureau<br />

<strong>of</strong> Land Management as part <strong>of</strong> an Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental<br />

Assessment. This survey <strong>of</strong> soil associations generally parallels the SCS<br />

survey in many areas especially those containing the Badland and Rock<br />

Outcrops units. The major differences occur within the valley itself<br />

which exhibits a far greater degree <strong>of</strong> alluvial fan soils. These soil<br />

associations include Weiser-Cave-Arizo, Weiser-Isom, Tencee-Weiser-<br />

Normud, Canutio-Elvada, and Canutio-Nickel-Cajon. These associations<br />

dominate the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park and are considered deep, well<br />

drained soils occurring on alluvial fans (<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>, Environmental<br />

Assessment, 1985).<br />

b. Soils Constraints<br />

These soil units are not suited for crops and have only limited uses for<br />

livestock grazing. They provide limited food, water, and cover for wildlife<br />

species that normally inhabit the area. The location <strong>of</strong> facilities should<br />

avoid obvious dry washes and other drainage ways. These areas can be<br />

very erosive during localized heavy thunder storms (See Appendix 3.4<br />

Soils Map).<br />

5. Water Resources<br />

a. Watershed/Streams<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the normal run<strong>of</strong>f in the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> follows moderate to heavy<br />

rain which occurs on a sporadic basis and follows dry washes. The<br />

largest <strong>of</strong> these dry washes, <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> Wash, occurs in the southern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the park and roughly parallels the main road from west to east.<br />

Another major wash, Overton Wash, occurs in the northern reaches <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 35 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


park and runs from the southern edge <strong>of</strong> the Weiser Ridge to the Overton.<br />

In addition to these two main washes there are several secondary washes<br />

which also are prominent in the park, such as the <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon, Kaolin,<br />

Magnesite, Wieber, and Logan Washes. As with the other main washes<br />

these washes also run west to east where they eventually tie into the<br />

Overton Arm <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead.<br />

Typical <strong>of</strong> all desert areas with extremes <strong>of</strong> topography, run<strong>of</strong>f occurs<br />

rapidly in the form <strong>of</strong> flash floods as soils typically are non-permeable.<br />

The park contains no permanent, free-flowing streams within its<br />

boundaries. (Appendix 3.5 Hydrology Map)<br />

There are only three small springs located in the park. They are all low<br />

volume springs with little to no run<strong>of</strong>f. These springs are Charlie's spring,<br />

another just east <strong>of</strong> it in same wash, and one in Magnesite wash.<br />

b. Water Rights<br />

There are no known surface water rights in the park. There is one<br />

operating well with underground rights located at Atlatl Rock dump<br />

station. There are underground water rights at the reverse osmosis plant to<br />

be moved to the well in the future.<br />

6. Park Ecology<br />

a. Communities/Vegetation Types<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park, with its location near the borders <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>,<br />

Utah and Arizona, lies in a broad transition corridor between Mojave and<br />

Great Basin Deserts. There are a large number <strong>of</strong> native species <strong>of</strong> shrubs,<br />

grasses, cacti, and wildflower/annuals which occur in the Muddy<br />

Mountains and surrounding valleys.<br />

Patterns <strong>of</strong> association within the park and the adjacent Muddy Mountains<br />

are complex, reflecting the effects <strong>of</strong> climate, substrate, and physiography.<br />

This highly varied geology, elevation and soils results in a large diversity<br />

<strong>of</strong> plants in what at first glance would be considered a desolate desert<br />

landscape.<br />

Community Types as described by the EPA Southwest Re-Gap database<br />

for Clark County include:<br />

<br />

<br />

Inter-Mt. Basins Semi Desert Shrub Steppe.<br />

Mojave Mid-Elevation Mixed Desert Scrub.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 36 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


North American Warm Desert: Badland, Bedrock Cliff and Outcrop,<br />

Pavement, Playa, Riparian Mesquite Bosque, Riparian Woodland and<br />

Shrubland, and Desert Wash.<br />

Sonora-Mohave Creosote bush-White Bursage Desert Scrub<br />

Sonora-Mohave Mixed Salt Desert Scrub.<br />

(Appendix 3.5 Vegetative Communities Map)<br />

B. Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan<br />

The <strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>, as a partner in the Clark County<br />

Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), has agreed to<br />

implement a total <strong>of</strong> approximately 650 specific conservation measures.<br />

The conservation measures include:<br />

• Public information and involvement<br />

• Research<br />

• Inventory<br />

• Monitoring<br />

• Protective measures<br />

• Restoration and enhancement measures<br />

• Land use policies and actions<br />

The MSHCP incorporates agreements such as the Spring Mountains<br />

National Recreation Area Conservation Agreement, the Blue Diamond<br />

Cholla Conservation Agreement, the Las Vegas Bear poppy Memorandum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agreement, and existing general management plans and land use plans<br />

and the recently approved BLM Las Vegas Resource Management Plan.<br />

The MSHCP provided a landscape-scale perspective for addressing the<br />

conservation needs <strong>of</strong> plant and wildlife species in the park and the<br />

habitats upon which they depend. In order to implement an ecosystembased<br />

approach to the conservation <strong>of</strong> biological resources in the Park, the<br />

plan area was organized by elevation and range into ecological zones and<br />

ecosystem types:<br />

ECOSYSTEM TYPE (MSHCP)<br />

Alpine<br />

Bristlecone Pine<br />

Mixed Conifer (White Fir, Ponderosa Pine, Ponderosa Pine/Mountain Shrub)<br />

Pinyon-Juniper (Mountain Shrub, Pinyon Pine, Pinyon Juniper, Juniper)<br />

Sagebrush (Sagebrush and Sagebrush/Perennial Grasslands)<br />

Blackbrush (Blackbrush and Hopsage)<br />

Salt Desert Scrub<br />

Mojave Desert Scrub (Creosote-Bursage and Mojave Mixed Scrub)<br />

Mesquite/Catclaw<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 37 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Desert Riparian/Aquatic (Lowland Riparian, including Muddy and Virgin River<br />

systems and Las Vegas Wash)<br />

Springs<br />

Other (sand dune, gypsiferous soil, rock outcrop, dry lake bed and playa, barren,<br />

agriculture, non-native grassland, urban)<br />

The MSHCP recommended that recreational land management decisions<br />

and mitigation be based on each habitat and its associated species needs.<br />

In addition to these major ecosystems that occur in the Park, several other<br />

assemblages <strong>of</strong> species with shared characteristics or habitat requirements<br />

may not be adequately addressed at the ecosystem level (as defined in the<br />

MSHCP). These include bats, Mojave desert lizards and snakes,<br />

butterflies, and species associated with rock outcrops, boulder fields, lava<br />

flows, sand dunes, gypsum soils, dry lake beds and playas, and boreal<br />

islands.<br />

Based on the criteria and analyses detailed in the MSHCP, for the entire<br />

Clark County area, there were 79 species included as Covered Species.<br />

Another 103 species are listed as Evaluation Species and 51 as Watch List<br />

Species. The general measurable biological goals for all species during<br />

Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the MSHCP that are applicable to master planning for the Park<br />

are to manage the resource to allow for no net unmitigated loss or<br />

fragmentation <strong>of</strong> habitat and therefore maintain stable or increasing<br />

population numbers.<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park, by <strong>Nevada</strong> Natural Heritage resulted<br />

in the following habitats and/or species protected by Federal or <strong>State</strong> Law<br />

that will be considered in this planning document.<br />

c. Rare, Threatened or Endangered Plants<br />

With such a large and diverse park, the site is host for many uncommon<br />

and rare plants. These plants are found in very specific locations which<br />

are determined by a combination <strong>of</strong> soils, temperature, orientation and<br />

other physical factors which provide a very specialized growing environment.<br />

The following species were provided by <strong>Nevada</strong> Natural Heritage as<br />

At Risk Taxa Recorded near the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park Project Area.<br />

The list was compiled by the <strong>Nevada</strong> Natural Heritage Program for the<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong>, May 2007. Note that all cacti, yuccas, and<br />

Christmas trees are protected by <strong>Nevada</strong> state law (NRS 527.060-.120),<br />

including taxa not tracked by this <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

SCIENTIFIC NAME<br />

Plants<br />

Astragalus geyeri var. triquetrus,<br />

Arctomecon californica<br />

COMMON NAME<br />

Three corner milkvetch<br />

Las Vegas bearpoppy<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 38 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Enceliopsis argophylla<br />

Helianthus deserticola<br />

Pediomelum castoreum<br />

Penstemon bicolor ssp. roseus<br />

Perityle intricata<br />

silverleaf sunray<br />

dune sunflower<br />

Beaver Dam breadroot<br />

rosy two-tone beardtongue<br />

desert rockdaisy<br />

d. Rare, Threatened or Endangered Animals<br />

SCIENTIFIC NAME<br />

Invertebrates<br />

Hesperopsis gracielae<br />

Megandrena mentzeliae<br />

Reptiles<br />

Sauromalus ater<br />

Gopherus agassizii<br />

Heloderma suspectum cinctum<br />

Birds<br />

Phainopepla nitens<br />

COMMON NAME<br />

MacNeill sooty wing skipper<br />

red-tailed blazing star bee<br />

chuckwalla<br />

desert tortoise (Mojave Desert pop.)<br />

banded gila monster<br />

Phainopepla<br />

Desert Tortoise: On April 2, 1990, the desert tortoise was listed as<br />

threatened by the USFWS (1990a), thereby bringing it under full<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the Federal ESA <strong>of</strong> 1973. This listing was based on ongoing<br />

threats to the continued existence <strong>of</strong> the species, including loss <strong>of</strong> habitat<br />

to urban development and agriculture, potential degradation <strong>of</strong> habitat by<br />

grazing and <strong>of</strong>f-highway vehicle (OHV) use, illegal collection, spread <strong>of</strong><br />

an upper respiratory tract disease, excessive predation <strong>of</strong> juvenile tortoises<br />

by common ravens, and other contributing factors. The April listing was<br />

preceded by an emergency listing <strong>of</strong> the tortoise as endangered on August<br />

4, 1989. In <strong>Nevada</strong>, the tortoise has been categorized as ―protected‖<br />

pursuant to <strong>Nevada</strong> Revised Statute (NRS) 501.110 and <strong>Nevada</strong><br />

Administrative Codes (NAC) 503.080 and 503.090.<br />

Surveys for tortoise burrows and mitigation are completed on a case by<br />

case basis upon development or change <strong>of</strong> management in the park rather<br />

than at the master plan scale.<br />

e. Fish<br />

There are no streams or lakes that support fish within the park. The Fairy<br />

Shrimp (Apus Longicaudatus) has been observed in natural water holding<br />

tanks. These natural tanks hold water sporadically depending on available<br />

rainfall.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 39 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


f. Weeds and Non-Natives<br />

There have been many plant introductions within the park boundaries. A<br />

few shade trees have been planted near the staff housing area such as<br />

Chilean Mesquite and Palo Verde. The site is also host to several nonnative<br />

weed species which are distributed along existing road and<br />

disturbed areas:<br />

SCIENTIFIC NAME<br />

(Amaranthus spp)<br />

(Conyza canadensis)<br />

(Conyza coulteri)<br />

(Helianthus annuus)<br />

(Sonchus asper)<br />

(Capsella bursa-pastoris)<br />

(Cardaria pubescens)<br />

(Descurainina pinnata)<br />

(Descurainina sophia)<br />

(Malcolmia africana)<br />

(Streptanthella longirostris)<br />

(Atriplex semibaccata)<br />

(Salsola paulsenii)<br />

(Melilotus indicus)<br />

(Malva parvifolia)<br />

(Plantago lanceolata)<br />

(Rumex crispus)<br />

(Bothriochloa barbinodis)<br />

(Sorgham halepense)<br />

COMMON NAME<br />

Palmer Amaranth<br />

Canada Horseweed<br />

Coulter Horseweed<br />

Common Sunflower<br />

Spinny Leaf Sow-Thistle<br />

Shepperd Purse<br />

Whitetop (Noxious Weed)<br />

Pinnate Tansy Mustard<br />

Flixweed<br />

African Malcomia<br />

Long Beak Twistflower<br />

Australian Saltbrush<br />

Barbwire Russia Thistle<br />

Indian Sweetclover<br />

Cheeseweed<br />

English Plantain<br />

Curry Leaf Dock<br />

Cane Beardgrass<br />

Johnson Grass<br />

7. Perceptual<br />

Scenic views abound in this park, therefore, appendix 3.8 identifies those<br />

developed viewpoints separate from the Composite analysis. This map identifies<br />

areas which <strong>of</strong>fer good views and vistas. (Appendix 3.8 Developed Scenic<br />

Viewpoints Map).<br />

a. Scenic Attributes<br />

The name <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> comes from the intense red color <strong>of</strong> the eroding<br />

sandstone located throughout the park. The dominant red sandstone<br />

formations are located in the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park and run eastwest<br />

along the existing park road. Other isolated formations are located<br />

throughout the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park. Another major concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> these formations exists within the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the park. All red<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 40 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


ock formations are best viewed when the sun is on a low angle such as in<br />

early morning and late afternoon.<br />

The red sandstone formations are carved into intricate patterns. Spires,<br />

serrate ridges, domes, and even anthropomorphic shapes have been carved<br />

into the sandstone by water and primarily wind. In the park area are also<br />

some mesa remnants capped with gravel. The most predominate mesa is<br />

Baseline Mesa which has a nearly flat top that extends for nearly one mile.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> also has a large collection <strong>of</strong> petrified wood located just<br />

east <strong>of</strong> the Beehives. Although significant, there are not many full logs<br />

but instead a large number <strong>of</strong> fragments. This area has been fenced <strong>of</strong>f to<br />

prevent the public from vandalizing the site and taking home pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

petrified wood. One prime example <strong>of</strong> a petrified log is located along the<br />

main park road and west <strong>of</strong> the Cabins road.<br />

Along with the spectacular views <strong>of</strong> the park’s natural resources, the park<br />

also contains excellent petroglyphs which have national and international<br />

significance. The park also contains significant paleontological resources<br />

to interpret and protect.<br />

b. Location and Direction <strong>of</strong> Views<br />

The primary views are along the existing park road. The park is accessed<br />

by two main points <strong>of</strong> entry, one each on the east and the west side. Both<br />

entrances provide excellent views <strong>of</strong> formations as the visitor travels the<br />

main park road. The eastern entrance is most striking when entered in the<br />

early morning. At this time the early morning sun strikes the formations<br />

providing the most intense color. The western entrance is best for viewing<br />

the formations in late afternoon. Views <strong>of</strong> Lake Mead are also afforded<br />

while traveling to the east along the main park road.<br />

The park presently has two main vistas, <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon and Rainbow Vista.<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Canyon is viewed to the south and Rainbow Vista looks out to the<br />

north. Both vistas are located near the end <strong>of</strong> the Mouse's Tank road on<br />

top <strong>of</strong> the main formations.<br />

This analysis indicates a potential location for an additional vista located<br />

on the northwest side <strong>of</strong> the park. This vista is accessed by a paved<br />

mining road which intersects Interstate 15 northeast <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong><br />

exit. This vista is highly desirable due to its location on top <strong>of</strong> the Weiser<br />

Ridge, accessed from the Byron Exit <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> I15. The access crosses BLM<br />

lands and coordination to gain access is needed.<br />

The views looking to the east are expansive from Lake Mead to Rainbow<br />

Vista. This vista gives the visitor a unique view <strong>of</strong> the rugged and colorful<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 41 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


ack country <strong>of</strong> the park. The road is presently used for mining operations<br />

and visitation is not allowed. However, the site may be <strong>of</strong> significance<br />

when the mining operations are completed.<br />

Views are also excellent within the formations <strong>of</strong> the northern back<br />

country. These views are primarily <strong>of</strong> smaller formations with a minor<br />

vista toward the Weiser Ridge. Access to these views is through another<br />

mining road which enters the park near Logandale, NV <strong>of</strong>f Highway 169.<br />

The views are excellent within the tight confines <strong>of</strong> the formations but<br />

access is difficult, requiring a 4WD vehicle.<br />

Undesirable views within the park consist <strong>of</strong> road clearing scars in several<br />

locations, views <strong>of</strong> active mining claims, and existing structures within the<br />

park's residential area. The site is so large and remote that it has not been<br />

severely impacted by the encroachment <strong>of</strong> man.<br />

The southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park also <strong>of</strong>fers views <strong>of</strong> interesting isolated<br />

formations. These formations include; Beehives, Atlatl Rock, Seven<br />

Sisters, and Elephant Rock.<br />

Beehive rock is located just <strong>of</strong>f the main park road near the west entrance.<br />

This formation carved into a beehive is one <strong>of</strong> the most photographed<br />

rocks within the park. Its location also makes it extremely accessible to all<br />

visitors.<br />

Atlatl Rock is located across the main park road from the Beehives and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers excellent views <strong>of</strong> red rock formations as well as a large collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> petroglyphs.<br />

Seven Sisters is a collection <strong>of</strong> monoliths located on the south side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

main park road near the middle <strong>of</strong> the park. These monoliths have a<br />

nearly vertical relief and are located in the valleys which enhance their<br />

unique character.<br />

Elephant Rock is located near the east entry station and is a remarkable<br />

theriomorphic formation. The rock is not directly accessible to the main<br />

road and does require a short hike. This formation is also one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

photographed by visitors.<br />

An area which has been largely unexplored is the Pinnacles located near<br />

the western entrance to the park. Located in a valley just north <strong>of</strong> the park<br />

maintenance complex, the Pinnacles are very striking with their near<br />

vertical relief, red color and isolated location. These formations are<br />

surrounded by the drab grey color <strong>of</strong> the desert limestone which helps<br />

accentuate their red color. Compared to other formations within the park<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 42 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


the Pinnacles are not particularly large but their isolation from surrounding<br />

formations makes them particularly interesting.<br />

Also located in the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park, are other points <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

including the CCC cabins and petrified logs. Throughout the park are<br />

located several theriomorphic rock formations which are a favorite <strong>of</strong><br />

visitors. These formations are extremely varied and include spires, land<br />

bridges, caves, and balancing rocks.<br />

Proceeding northward on the Mouse's Tank Road, the visitor is taken to<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the main formations where an interpretive trail takes them to<br />

Mouse's Tank through Petroglyph Canyon. Petroglyph Canyon is a<br />

narrow wash that contains several excellent examples <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

petroglyphs. The interpretive trail terminates at the Mouse's Tank. The<br />

Tank is a natural basin formed out <strong>of</strong> the surrounding rock. The basin can<br />

hold water for months at a time and has other historical/cultural<br />

significance.<br />

North <strong>of</strong> the Mouse's Tank trail are two main vista/overlooks. Rainbow<br />

Vista, which provides excellent views <strong>of</strong> multi-colored rock formations to<br />

the north, is the terminus <strong>of</strong> White Domes road. <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon is located<br />

east <strong>of</strong> Rainbow Vista and provides a colorful view to the south.<br />

The areas north <strong>of</strong> Rainbow Vista <strong>of</strong>fer exceptional views and recreational<br />

opportunities including White Domes, Duck Rock, and large expanses <strong>of</strong><br />

red rock formations. White Domes is typified by large white dome<br />

formations and isolated canyons.<br />

The isolation and size <strong>of</strong> the park aid in its protection from unsightly<br />

views. There are a few less attractive views located on site including the<br />

park staff residences and abandoned roadways which cut through the<br />

desert landscape. Other potentially obtrusive views such as maintenance<br />

facilities are well screened by natural formations.<br />

c. Significant Areas Outside <strong>of</strong> Park Boundaries<br />

There are several areas outside <strong>of</strong> the park boundaries which <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

excellent views and recreational opportunities. The Lake Mead National<br />

Recreation Area lies to the south and east <strong>of</strong> the park boundary. The<br />

recreation area is expansive and <strong>of</strong>fers excellent views, natural springs,<br />

boat launches, and other recreational activities. Also located near the park<br />

are two scenic areas, Arrow Canyon and the Virgin Mountains which are<br />

managed by the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management.<br />

A narrow hiking and climbing trail is located just east <strong>of</strong> the park<br />

boundary at the Overton Ridge. This wash is known as the Overton Wash<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 43 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


and is a major water course during rain storms. The wash bisects two<br />

huge ridges and produces an extremely narrow passage between the two.<br />

Following this wash to the west will provide views into the north central<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

Vehicular, access to this area is difficult since the existing road is washed<br />

out in several places. This road would be the only possible vehicle access<br />

to the park in the area, but the upper wash itself narrows in places to three<br />

feet. Overton Ridge and Wash are primarily located on BLM lands<br />

adjacent to the park. But, a Recreation and Public Purposes Act (R&PP)<br />

land transfer application is currently under review for the eastern portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

An excellent vista is provided at an existing mining site located in<br />

northwest portion <strong>of</strong> the park. This mining operation is accessed from I-<br />

15 via the Byron exit and is a paved road which terminates at the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the Weiser Ridge. The mine site looks out to the east at expansive red<br />

rock formations with Lake Mead in the distance.<br />

North <strong>of</strong> the existing park lies a huge area <strong>of</strong> red rock which is contained<br />

in another Recreation and Public Purposes application. This R&PP<br />

application contains areas <strong>of</strong> excellent scenic value. The northern red rock<br />

formations are typified by a long, continuous escarpment which runs from<br />

north to the south with a small scale interior valley. The other escarpment<br />

which frames this interior valley is located to the east but is broken in<br />

several locations and is not as unique as the western escarpment.<br />

The interior valley <strong>of</strong>fers many interesting views and recreational<br />

opportunities. A large sand dune area is located at the north end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

valley. Extremely fine sand which has a slight red to orange color<br />

predominates in the dunes area. These dunes are located in a confined<br />

area which combined with orientation and wind direction has resulted in<br />

these formations. Also located in this northern valley are several narrow<br />

canyon views, minor land bridges or windows and echo effects against the<br />

escarpment.<br />

Proceeding south along this valley is a point <strong>of</strong> rock several hundred feet<br />

high separating the sand dune valley from the rest <strong>of</strong> the interior valley.<br />

This point is covered on its northern face by a huge wind driven sand<br />

dune. The views provided by this point are exceptional both to the north<br />

and south.<br />

Moving southward, a series <strong>of</strong> open valleys appear with excellent views <strong>of</strong><br />

red rock formations. At the southern end <strong>of</strong> the interior valley lies an area<br />

known as Buffington's Pocket. There is an oasis like appearance to the<br />

pocket area which is a result <strong>of</strong> an abandoned dam structure. This dam<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 44 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


which was originally built for water retention by ranchers has long since<br />

silted over and provides additional moisture for the desert environment.<br />

Additional moisture has allowed the growth <strong>of</strong> cottonwood trees which are<br />

found very rarely within the park and surrounding desert. These trees,<br />

which reach an approximate height up to thirty feet, provide shade and a<br />

welcome relief from the wide open desert. The pocket also encourages the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> grasses and shrubs which are not seen in the surrounding desert<br />

landscape. In addition to its isolated quality Buffington's Pocket also<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers several notable petroglyphs.<br />

d. Sounds, Smells, and Sources<br />

The park is essentially free <strong>of</strong> noise pollution due to its isolation.<br />

Although Nellis Air Force Base is located 50 miles to the south, low level<br />

jet operations do not normally occur above the park. The park has<br />

helicopter tours flying overhead every evening. Offensive odors are<br />

ordinarily limited to garbage placed in garbage bins or some smells<br />

associated with the pit toilets. Both <strong>of</strong> these instances are highly localized<br />

and occur only on a sporadic basis.<br />

e. Spatial Patterns<br />

Two camping loops are located at Atlatl Rock in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

park. These campsites are established within the rock formations,<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering a degree <strong>of</strong> privacy and sense <strong>of</strong> enclosure. There are other manmade,<br />

spatially defining, elements throughout the park including picnic<br />

shelters and shade structures. Power lines within the park are primarily<br />

below ground and do not interfere with views.<br />

The park is defined primarily by basically two spatial types: wide open<br />

desert valley and broken rock formations. The valleys are flat with no<br />

defining vertical elements. In contrast, the rock formations <strong>of</strong>fer a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> enclosures and vertical scale. The sense <strong>of</strong> enclosure changes from<br />

"canyon like" to small scale with vertical sheer walls. <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon is an<br />

excellent example <strong>of</strong> the "canyon like" spatial pattern.<br />

Petroglyph Canyon, which leads to Mouse's Tank, runs along a dry wash<br />

which exhibits the vertical sheer walls typical <strong>of</strong> a small scale enclosure.<br />

These spaces defined by the formations provide a stark contrast to the<br />

wide open spaces <strong>of</strong> the valleys.<br />

B. CULTURAL RESOURCES<br />

1. ARCHAEOLOGICAL and PALEONTOLOGICAL<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 45 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


The major users <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> area were the people <strong>of</strong> the Lost City. The<br />

Lost City was an enormous cluster <strong>of</strong> pit houses and pueblo villages which were<br />

located along the flood plain <strong>of</strong> the Muddy River, running east <strong>of</strong> the park. These<br />

Lost City residents (300 B.C. to 500 A.D.) used the valley primarily for hunting<br />

wild game with darts and atlatl. The Indians also would gather wild seeds from<br />

the park area. It is doubtful that any permanent residences were established<br />

within the valley due to its lack <strong>of</strong> water. This period <strong>of</strong> Lost City occupation by<br />

the Anasazi is called the Moapa Phase and is along the same period as the Basket<br />

maker II Period in Arizona and New Mexico.<br />

The succeeding period (500 to 700 A.D.) was known as the Muddy River Phase.<br />

During this phase the pit house dwellers gathered to form small villages where the<br />

inhabitants grew crops <strong>of</strong> corn and squash. During this period clay pottery was<br />

also being made.<br />

The Lost City Phase (700 to 1100 A.D.) was the next major phase which saw the<br />

river village grow enormously. The inhabitants moved from thatched pit houses<br />

into surface pueblos made <strong>of</strong> adobe and stone. The Indians also at this time<br />

exploited the mineral resources <strong>of</strong> the area including salt and turquoise. During<br />

this Lost City Phase the Southern Paiute began to filter into Lost City territory.<br />

The final period, Mesa House Period (1100 to 1150 A.D.) was very brief and<br />

populations dwindled as they moved to high ridges away from the river. The<br />

Anasazi finally abandoned the area to the Southern Paiute.<br />

Although no permanent pit houses have ever been located, several rock shelters<br />

show usage as temporary shelter during hunting forays into the park. Within the<br />

natural rock shelters artifacts such as pottery shards, projectile points, stone tools,<br />

and petroglyphs have been discovered. Pictographs are found at only one rock<br />

shelter within the park.<br />

By far the most striking archaeological finds have been the number and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

petroglyphs throughout the park. One the best and largest examples <strong>of</strong><br />

petroglyphs are found at Atlatl Rock. Both geometric and naturalistic designs are<br />

found within the park.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 46 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


The geometric designs include: straight lines, rectangles, zig zag lines, crosshatching,<br />

lines with pendant triangles, crosses, concentric crosses, stars, rakes,<br />

gridirons, circles, concentric circles, connected circles, dots, rows <strong>of</strong> dots, spirals,<br />

sundisks, wavy lines, and mazes.<br />

The naturalistic designs are both anthropomorphic and theriomorphic and<br />

included: hand and foot prints, human figures, rows <strong>of</strong> human figures with joined<br />

hands, mountain sheep, birds, lizards, snakes, and centipedes. The most popular<br />

naturalistic designs were humans and mountain sheep.<br />

The meaning <strong>of</strong> these designs is not fully understood, however it is not considered<br />

a written language. Some <strong>of</strong> the drawings may represent aboriginal doodling<br />

while others may have had important ceremonial significance. Many primitive<br />

hunters practice imitative magic by drawing the animals they wish to kill. The<br />

carvings are also believed to represent various clans within the Indians society.<br />

Of the 18 sites with petroglyphs, 10 sites have groups <strong>of</strong> outstanding petroglyphs.<br />

These petroglyphs are outstanding as to their form, number and variety. There are<br />

six Petroglyph sites which are considered exceptional. The petroglyphs at all the<br />

sites are slowly eroding away as the so-called desert varnish is shaling and falling<br />

<strong>of</strong>f. Measures must be taken to save these carvings from natural forces as well as<br />

vandals. Continued partnerships in surveying, research and protection consulting<br />

with organization and institutions such as Dr. Kevin Rafferty, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Behavior, College <strong>of</strong> Southern <strong>Nevada</strong> is crucial to protection <strong>of</strong> these<br />

resources.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 47 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


2. HISTORICAL<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> does not contain a significant wealth <strong>of</strong> old or historical structures.<br />

However, there are several historical elements which should be included in the<br />

resource inventory.<br />

The <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> became a wagon road cut<strong>of</strong>f to Las Vegas in the latter part <strong>of</strong><br />

the 19th century and early 20th century. In 1914 Clark County built a dirt road<br />

through the <strong>Valley</strong> to serve as part <strong>of</strong> the Arrowhead Trail between Salt Lake City<br />

and Los Angeles. Portions <strong>of</strong> this road still exist within the park boundaries. The<br />

Route was abandoned in 1925 when a more northerly route was established along<br />

present day Interstate 15. Before the trail was abandoned, an <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>of</strong> the<br />

American Automobile Association named the <strong>Valley</strong> after seeing it near sunset<br />

ablaze with red orange color.<br />

CCC “The Cabins”<br />

The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) constructed roads and buildings within<br />

the <strong>Valley</strong> from 1933 to 1935. Their work remains today in the form <strong>of</strong> the stone<br />

shelters known as "The Cabins". These structures are the only standing historic<br />

structures within the park.<br />

C. SITE ANALYSIS MAP/SUMMARY<br />

The Composite Site Analysis indicates the constraints and opportunities available<br />

within the park. The Composite Site Analysis also indicates areas which are and<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 48 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


are not suitable for development.<br />

development are:<br />

The determining factors for restrictive<br />

Slope and Soils (Appendix 3.1 and 3.3)<br />

Soils Constraints (Appendix 3.5)<br />

USDA NRCS Soils database (online)<br />

FEMA flood and stream data (online)<br />

(See Appendix 3.8 Composite Site Analysis Map)<br />

a. Site Limitations<br />

Most site limitations are in the high slope and highly erosive areas <strong>of</strong> the park.<br />

These same areas provide the geological features and views which draw visitors<br />

to the park (Appendix 3.8 Composite Site Analysis).<br />

b. Development Opportunities<br />

The lower elevation and lower slope areas that make up the core development<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the current park can be seen on the map in Appendix 3.8. There are areas<br />

within the core that have slight limitations for all types <strong>of</strong> soil disturbing uses.<br />

However, there are adjacent areas that are slightly more fragile that should be<br />

avoided when placing facilities, trails or campgrounds.‖ (Appendix 3.7 Composite<br />

Site Analysis).<br />

D. Existing Facilities and Use<br />

The existing facilities at <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park consist <strong>of</strong> two campground<br />

loops, restrooms, picnic sites, group use areas, an interpretive trail, scenic<br />

overlooks, a trailer dump station, entry stations, and visitor center. The park also<br />

has staff facilities including residences, a maintenance shop, and <strong>of</strong>fices. The<br />

following is a more detailed inventory <strong>of</strong> these facilities and comments<br />

concerning their use (See Appendix 3.9 Facilities Map).<br />

1. Camping<br />

The camping facilities consist <strong>of</strong> two campgrounds. Atlatl Rock Campground has<br />

20 RV sites w/ water & electrical hook-ups,18 vehicle sites and 3 walk-in sites.<br />

These sites are serviced by two plumbed restrooms. One restroom contains<br />

showers and the other is a restroom only.<br />

Arch Rock Campground contains 29 vehicle sites with two restrooms. The<br />

restrooms in loop "B" contain no shower facilities and are pit/vault toilets. A<br />

trailer dump station services both loops and is located near the entrance to Atlatl<br />

Rock Campground.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 49 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


2. Picnicking and Day Use<br />

Picnic sites are located throughout the park's main core and contain various<br />

amenities. Atlatl contains 2 sites with approximately 14 tables, two shade<br />

structures, and one pit/vault restroom.<br />

White Dome's road, at Rainbow Vista turn<strong>of</strong>f, has one site with 4 picnic tables,<br />

one restroom and no shade structures. Also located on White Dome's road is the<br />

Mouse's Tank picnic area with 12 tables, one shade structure and pit/vault<br />

restrooms. A small picnic area with a shade structure and a pit/vault restroom is<br />

located at the White Dome's trailhead.<br />

The Cabin area contains one picnic site with a shade structure and pit/vault toilet.<br />

Seven Sisters, located just west <strong>of</strong> the Cabins, has 2 main sites and 6 secondary<br />

picnic areas. There are 5 shade structures and one pit/vault toilet.<br />

The Beehives is the only group day use area within the park. This area contains 3<br />

group sites which each have their own pit/toilet restroom, fire ring, outdoor<br />

kitchen, and large shade structure with approximately 6 tables. All three group<br />

use sites will accommodate from 12 - 15 vehicles each. (Appendix 3.8 Facilities).<br />

Picnic Site Parking/ADA Picnic Shelters Restroom<br />

Cabins X X X<br />

Seven Sisters X X X<br />

Atlatl X X X<br />

Arch Rock Campground X X X<br />

Beehives (Group Use<br />

reservation only)<br />

X X X<br />

3. Visitor Center/Offices<br />

A modern visitor center is located at the foot <strong>of</strong> Mouse's Tank/White Domes<br />

Road. The visitor center has recently been renovated and a newly designed<br />

interpretive display is under construction. The visitor center <strong>of</strong>fers flush<br />

restrooms, drinking water, and a retail sales area. The park staff <strong>of</strong>fice is located<br />

behind the Visitors Center and was completed in 2009.<br />

4. Maintenance Shop<br />

The maintenance shop is located near the west entrance to the park and accessed<br />

<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> the main park road. The maintenance area is well sited with a natural<br />

screen provided by a ridge. The maintenance facility includes an <strong>of</strong>fice, service<br />

bay, wood working shop, and restroom. The maintenance contains fuel pumps<br />

and a dry storage shed.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 50 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


5. Staff Residences<br />

Park staff housing is located near the park's west entrance and shares an access<br />

road with the maintenance shop. There are a total <strong>of</strong> five houses for full time<br />

staff. The residences are not visually obtrusive to visitors on the main park road.<br />

6. Roads and Circulation<br />

The main park road bisects the southern portion <strong>of</strong> the park from east to west.<br />

This main road is paved and well maintained. There are many secondary roads<br />

within the park including White Domes road, Atlatl Rock loop road, Beehives<br />

road, Cabins road. There are a number <strong>of</strong> other roads for staff use only (Appendix<br />

3.10 Circulation Map).<br />

The park also has a number <strong>of</strong> un<strong>of</strong>ficial access points which are found mostly in<br />

the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the site. Most <strong>of</strong> these access points require 4WD vehicles<br />

and are difficult to traverse due to constant wash outs.<br />

Two entry/rest stations are located at the east and west entrances into the park<br />

along <strong>State</strong> Highway 169. The west entry station has a flush toilet and the east is<br />

a SST vault toilet. Both have open air pavilions which contains interpretive<br />

plaques. The west entry station has a fee/information booth, the east does not.<br />

The east entry station also serves as the trailhead for the Arrowhead to Elephant<br />

Rock loop trails. There is a third entry point at the Logandale Trails area through<br />

the BLM lands on the north end <strong>of</strong> the park (Attachment 3.10 Circulation Map<br />

and 3.12 Logandale Trails System Map).<br />

TRAILS: Since the 1990 plan, there have been a total <strong>of</strong> 16 trails and routes<br />

developed. Some <strong>of</strong> these trails have informal parking areas with no trailhead<br />

facilities. Some trails have development <strong>of</strong> facilities in progress (P). There is no<br />

water available on any trails. The west entry point, campgrounds and the Visitor<br />

Center have potable water. (Appendix 3.11 Trails Map).<br />

Use: These uses are recommended based on trail suitability. Motorized use is only<br />

allowed on trails designated for Motorized use (M).<br />

Mt. Bikes are not recommended on most trails in the park due to the deep sand<br />

and difficult access. H - Hiking, B - Mt. Biking, E - Equestrian, M - Motorized.<br />

Technical Rock Climbing routes are by permit only.<br />

Trail or<br />

Route<br />

Use<br />

Develope<br />

d<br />

Trailhead<br />

Parkin<br />

g<br />

ADA Restroom Picnic<br />

Shelter<br />

Route/not<br />

maintained<br />

Distance<br />

in Miles<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 51 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Elephant Rock<br />

Trail<br />

Arrowhead<br />

Trail<br />

Old<br />

Arrowhead<br />

Trail<br />

Natural Arch<br />

Trail<br />

Charlie's<br />

Spring Trail<br />

Balancing<br />

Rock -<br />

Visitors<br />

Center<br />

Mouse's Tank<br />

and<br />

Petroglyphs<br />

Rainbow Vista<br />

Trail<br />

White Domes<br />

Trail<br />

H X X X X .3<br />

H X X X X 1.2<br />

H, E,<br />

B<br />

X X 6.8<br />

H X X<br />

H, E X X 5.5<br />

H X X X .5<br />

H X X X X X .75<br />

H X X P P X 1.0<br />

H X X X X X 1.1<br />

Prospect Trail H, E X X 11.0<br />

Pinnacles H, E X X X X X X 4.5<br />

Trail<br />

Logandale M X (BLM) X X X<br />

Trail<br />

Duck Rock H X X .25<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Canyon H P P P P X .1<br />

Cabins H X X X X X X .1<br />

Petrified Logs H X .1<br />

Logandale Trails<br />

The Logandale Motorized Trails System crosses through a small portion <strong>of</strong> the park at the<br />

northern end. This trail system was planned cooperatively with the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Management and completed in 2008. The majority <strong>of</strong> the trail lies on BLM lands with<br />

small sections that cross into the park boundary and back out (Attachment 3.10<br />

Circulation Map and 3.12 Logandale Trails System Map).<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 52 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


IV.<br />

GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

A. PROCESS FOR THIS PLAN UPDATE<br />

Data Inventory and Analysis - Staff collected site and regional area information for<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park in the following categories: land use trends (ownership, land<br />

use, zoning, transportation, trails and utilities), natural resources (topography, geology,<br />

hydrology, vegetation, soils, slope, wildlife, climate, air quality and perceptual<br />

attributes), and cultural resources (existing facilities, archaeological and historical<br />

resources). This information was then analyzed to identify development limitations and<br />

site opportunities. User survey data from the past 5 years were analyzed and graphics<br />

were developed to present findings to the public at the first public workshop.<br />

Public Participation – An assistance grant was applied for and received from the<br />

National Park Service Rivers and Trails Assistance Program. Deborah Reardon from the<br />

Las Vegas <strong>of</strong>fice assisted in strategic planning, meeting facilitation and public<br />

participation planning through the entire process.<br />

Among the methods used to be responsive to existing and future needs were: 1) Survey <strong>of</strong><br />

users, 2) Public meetings, 3) Continued liaison with community groups by staff, and 4)<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 53 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Monitoring <strong>of</strong> trends and actual park use, 5) An additional survey was completed to<br />

include the internet, mailing and hard copies which were handed out at the visitors center.<br />

The first rounds <strong>of</strong> public meetings were held June <strong>of</strong> 2009 in both Las Vegas and in<br />

Logandale. The 1990 Plan Goals and Issues were presented, as well as those brought up<br />

through surveys, staff and partners prior to the first public meeting. Maps, pictures, site<br />

inventory information, current demographics and trends, site analysis information and<br />

user survey results were presented at the public workshops.<br />

The public was asked to provide input on issues, goals and objectives. They were also<br />

asked to put forth opportunities and ideas that the staff could use in development <strong>of</strong><br />

alternatives.<br />

An interdisciplinary team was gathered to include Partners in Conservation, Bureau <strong>of</strong><br />

Land Management, Clark County, and the National Park Service to ensure that the public<br />

and private land owners adjacent to the park had ample opportunity to give input to the<br />

management plan development. Based on all available information, three alternatives<br />

were developed.<br />

These alternatives were then presented for public comment at a second public meeting on<br />

December 8 and 9, 2009.<br />

Participants<br />

Participants in the development <strong>of</strong> the first phase <strong>of</strong> data inventory and analysis and<br />

assistance with the gathering <strong>of</strong> initial data and public meeting input include but are not<br />

limited to:<br />

National Park Service, Rivers and Trails Assistance Program<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management<br />

Lake Mead National Recreation Area<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>, Las Vegas Landscape Architecture and Planning<br />

Research Office<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong> Natural Heritage Program<br />

Clark County <strong>Parks</strong> and Recreation<br />

The Nature Conservancy<br />

Partners in Conservation (PIC)<br />

<strong>Nevada</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife<br />

In 2009, four public workshops were held to discuss future development and<br />

management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park. Together, with the public and partners, we<br />

looked closely at 15 <strong>of</strong> the main issues for the park. We developed three alternatives for<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the issues. These alternatives were based on "level <strong>of</strong> development" themes.<br />

They ranged from a low level <strong>of</strong> development/management through a relatively moderate<br />

level to a relatively higher level. The alternatives are provided in Appendix 4.1. The main<br />

park issues are provided to you below with the chosen alternative or management and<br />

development strategies for each.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 54 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


B. MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

The new plan concept was developed by staff and the public in December, 2009. This<br />

park concept consists <strong>of</strong> five mission statements that will direct the park’s management<br />

for the next 15 years or until amended or revised.<br />

Park Concept<br />

The <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park <strong>of</strong>fers some <strong>of</strong> the most unique natural landforms,<br />

archeological and paleontological resources and scenic values in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong>.<br />

Sensitive areas in this desert ecosystem are protected for future generations while<br />

allowing for compatible recreational use; public access is controlled through<br />

designated trails, roadways and recreation areas.<br />

The Park provides extensive interpretation and educational programs and amenities<br />

with an emphasis on engaging youth.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>State</strong> Park will continue to be an outdoor classroom through research<br />

partnerships that support the conservation and protection <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

All facilities in the park, including signs and interpretation, are designed to be<br />

unobtrusive, visually compatible with the natural landscape and consistent with<br />

scenic highway aesthetic standards.<br />

1. General Management and Development Guidelines<br />

a. Design Guidelines: Examine ways to incorporate green technologies in<br />

new facilities. Create designs that are consistent with the "desert<br />

ecosystem and Paleolithic" theme. New trails or facilities will not impact<br />

rock formations and be consistent with the <strong>State</strong> Scenic Byway standards<br />

for aesthetics.<br />

b. Visitors Center: Continue updating existing visitor center to address<br />

current educational needs and environmental treasures <strong>of</strong> the park and<br />

region. Continue to provide informational and educational books,<br />

pamphlets etc. related to natural history. Continue collaboration with<br />

school groups and classes.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 55 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


c. Park Land Protection: The Park is encumbered under federal law which<br />

prohibits conversion <strong>of</strong> park lands into non-recreational/conservation use;<br />

therefore, non-conforming uses (i.e. cell towers) are not allowed.<br />

d. Geo-caching is allowed by permit only and is managed under statewide<br />

policies.<br />

e. Hunting is not permitted due to public safety concerns in the park’s many<br />

congested areas.<br />

f. Safety Improvements: Install public safety kiosks and signs at trails that<br />

are long-distance, flash flood prone or where other dangers are known.<br />

g. Park Entrances and Fee Collection: Add fee booth at east entrance and<br />

add public safety notice kiosks.<br />

h. System-wide Trail Enhancements: Define parking areas at all trailheads<br />

and scenic viewpoint to halt vehicle parking on undesignated, sensitive<br />

areas. Add trail signs and educational signs with safety messages, desert<br />

ecosystem and Paleolithic theme. Pursue partnerships grants and<br />

alternative funding sources to complete these projects.<br />

2. Issue Specific Guidelines<br />

a. Utilities and Park Infrastructure<br />

<br />

<br />

The utilities in the state park are mostly original. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

facilities for visitors have been upgraded or renovated but for a few<br />

restrooms. Constant maintenance with multiple delays in water and<br />

electrical service occurs.<br />

Due to the lack <strong>of</strong> projected general funding for the next decade, it<br />

has been determined that the renovation <strong>of</strong> the basic infrastructure<br />

to park utilities, with service the park staff and visitors is the<br />

priority <strong>of</strong> this development plan. (See Development Plan below).<br />

b. Natural Resource Management<br />

Continue to work cooperatively with the <strong>Nevada</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Wildlife & US Fish and Wildlife Service to manage plants and<br />

animal habitats under the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat<br />

Conservation Plan.<br />

Continue weed abatement especially on tamarisk.<br />

Continue collaboration with <strong>Nevada</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> Cooperative<br />

Association (NSPCA) on informational and educational books,<br />

pamphlets etc. related to natural history. Continue collaboration<br />

with school groups and classes.<br />

c. Protect and interpret the historic, cultural, archaeological and<br />

Paleontological resources<br />

Continue partnerships with pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups and UNLV to<br />

complete comprehensive surveys.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 56 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Continue interpretive planning and upgrade or add educational<br />

displays at all significant sites as determined needed and<br />

appropriate.<br />

In areas where the significance <strong>of</strong> the find, or the level <strong>of</strong><br />

vandalism is extraordinary; management may include prohibiting<br />

access to resources with the use <strong>of</strong> barriers, fences, obscuring<br />

areas, or bury in situ if needed. Relocate resources or obscure from<br />

public view as needed.<br />

d. Northern Management Area - (NMA) - [Includes Logandale<br />

Motorized Trails within the <strong>State</strong> Park.] Motorized use and<br />

supporting facilities should be permitted in the north half <strong>of</strong> the park<br />

(This area includes the Logandale trails within <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong>)<br />

Motorized use will be allowed on designated trails only associated<br />

with the Logandale trail system. Strive to find and designate one<br />

connector trail through north end <strong>of</strong> park through future<br />

cooperative efforts with BLM and Clark Co.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> the area should be under annual state park permit, or park<br />

day use fee.<br />

Signage and public education must be significantly increased<br />

through partnerships with local clubs, BLM, and grants.<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> designated Logandale trails in the northern<br />

management areas, motorized use is limited to street legal vehicles<br />

on designated roads.<br />

e. Northern Management Area (NMA) - Special OHV Events<br />

The number and type <strong>of</strong> special OHV events to be permitted in<br />

NMA is contingent upon state park policy.<br />

Determine routes for current permits and special events and allow<br />

under permit only.<br />

Install signs designating exact route(s) for events.<br />

GPS these routes and make available for download from park<br />

website.<br />

Designate these same routes for use by general public (fee based).<br />

f. Northern Management Area (NMA) Includes Logandale area which<br />

crosses into the <strong>State</strong> Park - Equestrian and Pedestrian Trails<br />

Allow equestrian use on same trails as motorized OHV. However,<br />

there will be no <strong>of</strong>ficial designations for equestrian trails or<br />

equestrian trailhead development on those trails.<br />

Investigate other equestrian and pedestrian - non motorized trails in<br />

the north that are separate from motorized.<br />

Identify equestrian parking/trailheads in collaboration with BLM,<br />

Clark County, Moapa <strong>Valley</strong> and Overton; work cooperatively with<br />

stakeholders to designate and sign these trails.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 57 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


g. Northern Management Area (NMA) - Camping<br />

Identify and designate primitive camp areas to be used by permit<br />

only and fee based. These would be dry camping sites/areas and<br />

fire rings and sanitary facilities would be installed if feasible.<br />

h. Southern Management Area (SMA) - Trails<br />

Formally design/build, designate and sign current trails shown<br />

below.<br />

Trail system includes both constructed trails and routes.<br />

Upgrade all trailheads to include interpretive and safety kiosks.<br />

Mediate problems with "migrating parking areas" with defined<br />

borders <strong>of</strong> rock/curbing and/or pavement where needed based on<br />

soils stability and natural environment. Install barriers where<br />

needed for protection <strong>of</strong> resources. Add the Duck Rock equestrian<br />

route and trailhead, <strong>Fire</strong> Wash trail and equestrian trailhead.<br />

Close road located past <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon Vista to motorized vehicles;<br />

open only for marathon, pedestrian and administrative use.<br />

Trail or Route Use Developed<br />

Trailhead<br />

Parking Restroom Picnic<br />

Shelter<br />

Route -<br />

marked but<br />

not<br />

maintained<br />

Distance in<br />

Miles<br />

Petrified Logs H X X .1<br />

Elephant Rock Trail H From East Entrance .3<br />

Arrowhead Trail H 1.2<br />

Old Arrowhead Trail H, E, B Three access pts, west, sisters, and East from<br />

6.8<br />

Arrowhead<br />

Natural Arch Trail H From East Entrance .5<br />

Charlie's Spring Trail H, E From Arrowhead X 5.5<br />

Balancing Rock Trail H From Visitors Center (VC) .5<br />

Mouse's Tank Trail H X X X X .75<br />

Rainbow Vista Trail H X X X X 1.0<br />

White Domes Trail H X X X X 1.1<br />

Prospect Trail H, E X X X 11.0<br />

Pinnacles Trail H, E X X X X X 4.5<br />

Logandale Trail M X (BLM) X X X<br />

Duck Rock H Combined with Equestrian .25<br />

Duck Rock Equestrian E X X Unknown<br />

(NEW)<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Canyon H X X X X .1<br />

Cabins H X X X X X .1<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Wash (NEW) H,E, B 1. Near campground loop and 2. VC Unknown<br />

Mt. Bikes are not recommended on most trails in the park due to the deep sand and difficult access.<br />

H - Hiking, B - Mt. Biking, E - Equestrian, M - Motorized. Technical Rock Climbing routes are by permit only.<br />

i. Biking and Marathon Use<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 58 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Expand shoulders where feasible to improve user safety.<br />

Define and mark pull-outs.<br />

Work with neighboring agencies to plan potential extensions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bike lane in the future.<br />

j. Camping in Southern Management Area<br />

Maintain current sites. Add walk-in tent sites. Determine where to<br />

implement tent and car camping ―non-generator‖ sites at Arch<br />

Rock.<br />

k. Day Use Picnicking (SMA) and Group Use area<br />

Improve facilities including upgraded restrooms, interpretive signs,<br />

parking and roads, BBQ grills and shade structures.<br />

Redesign Group use area behind beehives to accommodate<br />

additional use and provide drinking water where feasible.<br />

Pave roads and parking areas where needed based on soils stability<br />

and natural environment. Install barriers where needed for<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

If water development becomes feasible, upgrade water<br />

developments in all areas as affordable. Otherwise, manage as dry<br />

sites.<br />

l. Staging Area for Movies and Special Events<br />

Re-grade unpaved parking area and add drainage improvements.<br />

Design staging area to be lower than road, hidden from view <strong>of</strong><br />

Visitors Center and scenic byway.<br />

If future water development improves the quality and quantity<br />

sufficiently, reconsider providing comfort facilities.<br />

m. Atlatl Rock Picnic Area and Proposed Amphitheater<br />

Upgrade/replace restrooms, signs and kiosks. Develop an<br />

amphitheater to seat 50-100 people based on architect’s design and<br />

redesign <strong>of</strong> parking area. Follow design guidelines to blend<br />

structures in with rock and natural environment.<br />

n. Weddings<br />

Specific areas for weddings by permit only. Four existing areas:<br />

Visitors Center, Rainbow, Seven Sisters and Cabins.<br />

Monitor sites for damage and close/rehab as needed. New areas can<br />

be opened to meet demand or increased per day with addition <strong>of</strong><br />

permanent full-time staff needed to manage workload.<br />

o. Land Acquisition Plan<br />

<strong>State</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> continues to explore opportunities to consolidate<br />

management boundaries and connect park lands. Continually<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 59 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


investigate opportunities for acquisition <strong>of</strong> private lands that link<br />

north end with south end. Dispose <strong>of</strong> or consider trades for<br />

outlying park parcels in order to consolidate park lands for<br />

increased recreation viability and management efficiency.<br />

p. Interpretation and Education - Level <strong>of</strong> investment for interpretation<br />

and education.<br />

Strive to find funding to increase interpretive/education.<br />

Increase focus on education <strong>of</strong> children in the outdoors.<br />

Strive to find funding to hire one FTE interpreter.<br />

Develop partnerships with local communities and regional partners<br />

to take <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> interpretive messages to the community.<br />

C. DEVELOPMENT PLAN<br />

Available funding and funding opportunities will drive the priority <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing the upgrades and improvements in this plan. There are no<br />

improvements that must occur prior to or in support <strong>of</strong> another, therefore,<br />

there are no phases.<br />

Development Task<br />

Replace dilapidated electric line and conduit<br />

Replace dilapidated water line and tanks<br />

Replace dilapidated and outdated telemetry system<br />

Continue to explore water availability<br />

Design, layout and construct <strong>Fire</strong> Wash trail, trailheads, parking and signs. Add water source on the<br />

trail if feasible<br />

Design and construct equestrian trailhead in <strong>Fire</strong> Wash if water is feasible.<br />

Design and construct amphitheater at Atlatl Rock Picnic Area.<br />

Develop a new combined trailhead for Clark's Monument, Clarks Wash, and Arrowhead Trails.<br />

Maintain and therefore widen the main road shoulders to accommodate non-motorized traffic for<br />

special events and general public; runners, walkers and bicycles.<br />

Redesign parking areas at trailheads and scenic vistas and delineate parking areas with structures<br />

that eliminate undesignated parking.<br />

Renovate/replace old signs and kiosks<br />

Install public safety kiosks and signs at trails that are long-distance, flash flood prone or where<br />

other dangers are known.<br />

Reseed and naturalize social trails in all areas <strong>of</strong> the park that are no designated trails or routes<br />

Install signs, directional signage etc… and restore undesignated trails in the Logandale trails area<br />

on <strong>State</strong> Park lands<br />

Upgrade toilets were needed using green technology if feasible<br />

Redesign and re-develop Beehives parking area and road to group use area.<br />

Redesign and re-develop group use area.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 60 <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>


Designate or develop tent sites at Atlatl Campground<br />

Design and construct new trailhead parking at Duck Rock.<br />

Design and construct new parking area and interpretive kiosks at <strong>Fire</strong> Canyon Scenic Vista<br />

Place directional signage on all trails and routes as needed<br />

Reconstruct and maintain trails as needed<br />

Add fee booth at East Entrance<br />

Design and place protective barriers around paleontological and archeological sites.<br />

<strong>Valley</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> <strong>GMP</strong>, <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Page</strong> <strong>61</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>61</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!