Research Article
Print
Research Article
Unloved, paraphyletic or misplaced: new genera and species of small to minute lucinid bivalves and their relationships (Bivalvia, Lucinidae)
expand article infoJohn D. Taylor‡, Emily A. Glover‡
‡ The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: John D. Taylor ( j.taylor@nhm.ac.uk )

Academic editor: Graham Oliver
© 2019 John D. Taylor, Emily A. Glover.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Taylor JD, Glover EA (2019) Unloved, paraphyletic or misplaced: new genera and species of small to minute lucinid bivalves and their relationships (Bivalvia, Lucinidae). ZooKeys 899: 109-140. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.899.47070
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9AA5216D-3150-475D-A165-B36EABCB61E2
Open Access

Abstract

Species identified as Pillucina are paraphyletic in molecular analyses and a new generic name, Rugalucina, is introduced for a complex of three similar species Rugalucina angela from the northern Indian Ocean and Red Sea, R. vietnamica from South East Asia, and R. munda from northern and north eastern Australia. Lucina concinna from the Red Sea, previously synonymised with P. vietnamica/angela is recognised as a Rugalucina-like species but with a very short anterior adductor scar. Divaricella cypselis from Karachi is similarly now recognised as a distinct species, probably related to Rugalucina but with oblique commarginal sculpture and a short adductor scar. A group of minute Indo-West Pacific lucinids with highly unusual multi-cuspate lateral teeth and previously classified as Pillucina are separated under a new genus Pusillolucina gen. nov., with the description of three new species P. arabica, P. africana, and P. biritika from the Arabian Gulf, Mozambique, and Madagascar. Finally, a new genus, Notocina, is introduced for the small southern Atlantic species, Epicodakia falklandica, shown in molecular analyses to be misplaced at subfamily level and now classified in Lucininae and not Codakiinae with Epicodakia.

Keywords

bivalves, chemosymbiosis, taxonomy, Indo-West Pacific, South Atlantic

Introduction

Within the chemosymbiotic bivalve family Lucinidae, genera in the Loripes group have been identified as monophyletic (Taylor et al. 2011, 2016) and characterised by a distinctive internally inset ligament. In the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Loripes orbiculatus is recognised as the most abundant lucinid in shallow water seagrass habitats and its important role in ecosystem function has been much studied (Johnson et al. 2002; Heide et al. 2012; Rossi et al. 2013; Geest et al. 2014). Other genera within the Loripes group include Lucinella and Keletistes in the Atlantic and from the Indo-West Pacific Pillucina, Wallucina, and Chavania. Of these, Pillucina is the most diverse with eleven currently recognised species (Glover and Taylor 2001; 2016) distributed from the Red Sea to the Hawaiian Islands. Some species have been recorded with high population densities in seagrass and peri-mangrove habitats (Nakaoka et al. 2002; Uede and Takahashi 2008, Meyer et al. 2008; Rattanachot and Prathep 2015). However, recent and ongoing molecular analyses indicate that Pillucina is paraphyletic with P. vietnamica Zorina, 1978 and P. pusilla Glover & Taylor, 2016 aligning distantly from five other Pillucina species (Taylor et al. 2011, 2016, Glover et al. 2016). Moreover, it is also now apparent that the reportedly widespread Pillucina vietnamica is a complex of three similar species with distinct distributional ranges. In view of the paraphyly and the separate status of the Pillucina vietnamica species group we propose a new genus and a reappraisal of the constituent species including two names resurrected from synonymy and recognition of an early available name from Australia.

The other lucinid separated by paraphyly and not closely related to the other Pillucina species is the minute Pillucina pusilla from the Philippines that possesses distinctive multi-cuspate lateral teeth. This extremely unusual character was first recognised in Pillucina denticula Glover & Taylor, 2001 from near Durban, South Africa. Recently, we have identified herein other species of minute lucinids with similar dentition from the Arabian Gulf, Mozambique and northern and southern Madagascar. Species with this dentition form a morphologically distinct clade that we recognise with a new generic name.

Additionally, amongst these small lucinids it is apparent that the southern Atlantic species Epicodakia falklandica Dell, 1964 is misclassified because molecular results (Taylor et al. 2011, 2016) place it in the large subfamily Lucininae rather than Codakiinae with other Epicodakia species. We review the morphology and relationships of this species and place it in a new genus.

During the last 20 years there has been a marked proliferation of generic categories within Lucinidae building on and revising the prior classifications of Chavan (1969) and Bretsky (1976). This is a reflection of increased taxonomic activity following the discovery of chemosymbiosis but also the clear indication from molecular results and more detailed morphological studies that a number of existing genera are paraphyletic or polyphyletic, with some species misclassified even at subfamily level. At species level increased sampling effort, with closer attention to smaller sieve size fractions, has revealed an unexpected range of minute lucinids and this, coupled with greater attention to museum collections and type material, has highlighted previously neglected species.

Institutional abbreviations

AMS Australian Museum, Sydney

BAS British Antarctic Survey

MCG Museo Civico, Genoa

MNHN Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris

NHMUK Natural History Museum, London

NMSA KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg South Africa

NMV National Museum of Victoria, Melbourne

NMW National Museum of Wales

UMZC University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, UK

WAM Western Australian Museum, Perth

ZISP Zoological Institute, St Petersburg, Russia

Other abbreviations

IWP Indo-West Pacific

L shell length

LV left valve

P1 protoconch 1 length

P2 protoconch 2 length

RV right valve

SEM scanning electron microscopy

sh complete shell both valves

v single valve

Systematics

Family Lucinidae Fleming, 1828

Subfamily Lucininae Fleming, 1828

Rugalucina gen. nov.

http://zoobank.org/09C8B8AD-4DF9-48A5-8D17-EACA3B276B11

Type species

Lucina (Codakia) angela Melvill, 1899. Here designated.

Diagnosis

Small L to 15 mm, sub-circular, sculpture of fine, commarginal lamellae crossed by strong radial ribs more prominent to anterior and posterior, with overall crinkled appearance, ligament largely internal, obliquely inset, anterior adductor muscle scar ventrally detached from pallial line for half of length, inner shell margin crenulate.

Etymology

From Latin ruga for wrinkle or crease and Lucina, feminine.

Included species

Lucina (Codakia) angela Melvill, 1899, Pillucina vietnamica Zorina, 1978, Lucina (Codakia) munda A. Adams, 1856. Tentatively included: Divaricella cypselis Melvill, 1918 and Lucina concinna H. Adams, 1871.

Comparison with other genera

Rugalucina is part of the broader Loripes group within the Lucininae, all having an obliquely inset internal ligament. Other genera within the group are Pillucina, Pusillolucina Wallucina, Lucinella, Chavania, and Keletistes. Of these only Pillucina, Pusillolucina, and Rugalucina have prominent radial sculpture. In shell characters Rugalucina differs from Pillucina in the more strongly divergent radial sculpture, the longer anterior adductor muscle scar and the more coarsely crenulate inner shell margin.

In molecular analyses members of the Loripes group form a monophyletic subclade of Lucininae. Seven species of putative Pillucina have been included in analyses (Taylor et al. 2016), P. pisidium, P. symbolica, P. australis, P. profusa, P. pacifica, ‘P.’ pusilla, and ‘P.’ vietnamica, the latter from Thailand, Abu Dhabi, and Queensland. Although the type species P. hawaiiensis has not yet been included, P. pacifica is similar in morphology and could be regarded as a proxy. The Pillucina species are not monophyletic in published trees or in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene tree (Fig. 1), with those identified as P. vietnamica and P. pusilla separated from the other species and now classified herein into two new genera with distinct morphological characters. Note: we use the cyt b gene in the analysis of the Loripes group shown in Fig. 1 as this best reflects species level relationships within clades of the subfamily Lucininae as shown by previous analyses using three genes (Taylor et al. 2011, 2016).

Previously, we regarded Pillucina vietnamica as a wide-ranging species in the northern Indian Ocean through south east Asia to southern China (Glover and Taylor 2001), the name replacing the earlier but preoccupied Lucina fischeriana Issel, 1869, with P. angela as an possible phenotype from the northern Arabian Sea. Although more comprehensive sampling across the whole range is desirable, evidence from analysis of the cytochrome b gene (Fig. 1) shows that specimens from Tin Can Bay and Moreton Bay, Qld, Australia differ from samples from Kungkraben Bay, Thailand and Abu Dhabi supporting a species level separation. Our evidence suggests that Pillucina ‘vietnamica’ from Arabia, Thailand and Queensland are distinct. After further study of type material, we use the name R. angela for the northern Indian Ocean species, P. vietnamica for the southeast Asian species, and P. munda for the northern Australian species.

Lucina concinna H. Adams, 1871 previously placed in the synonymy of P. vietnamica by Glover and Taylor (2001) is now recognised as having distinct morphological characters and renamed because the original species name is preoccupied. We also resurrect Divaricella cypselis Melvill, 1918 from the synonymy of R. angela and recognise it as another morphologically distinct species, from the Arabian Sea and southern India.

Figure 1. 

Single gene tree for the Loripes group of genera and species based on cytochrome b gene sequences, using Bayesian inference as implemented by MrBayes. Support values are posterior probabilities. Methods as in Taylor et al. (2011, 2016). GenBank numbers are attached to names. Newly sequenced species: Wallucina fijiensis Kavieng, Papua New Guinea (MNHN IM- IM-2013-54066), Pillucina pacifica, Kavieng, KAV 1 (MNHN IM- IM-2013-54743), KAV 2 (MNHN IM-2013-51690), Pillucina sp. Kavieng, PNG (MNHN IM-2013-54590), Rugalucina munda North Stradbroke Island, Moreton Bay, Qld, Australia (NHMUK 20191069), R. munda Tin Can Bay, Qld, Australia (NHMUK 20191070).

Rugalucina angela (Melvill, 1899)

Figs 2, 3

Lucina fischeriana Issel, 1869: 83–84, pl. 1, fig. 8 (non L. fischeriana d’Orbigny, 1845: Jurassic fossil).

Lucina (Codakia) angela Melvill, 1899: 98, pl. 2, fig. 8.

Loripes fischeriana: Lamy 1916: 151.

Pillucina fischeriana: Oliver 1992: 98, pl. 20, fig. 4.

Pillucina fischeriana: Oliver 1995: 236, fig. 1026.

Pillucina angela: Oliver 1995: 236, fig. 1025.

Pillucina vietnamica (part): Glover and Taylor 2001: 273.

Pillucina angela: Glover and Taylor 2001: 279, figs 9 h, i.

Pillucina angela (part): Huber 2015: 422, figs p. 76.

Type material

Lucina fischeriana 5 syntypes (MCG), type locality: Suez, Egypt.

L. angela two syntypes NHMUK1899.12.18.20-21; L 7.9 mm and 6.1 mm; 1 syntype NMW 1955.158.684.

Type locality

Gwadur, Pakistan, 8 fathoms (15 m).

Description

Small (L to 15 mm), subcircular, inflated. Colour white, yellow or orange. Waxy appearance. Sculpture of strong diverging radial ribs, broader and more widely spaced to the anterior and posterior. Ribs crossed by fine, closely spaced, commarginal lamellae which curve over ribs producing a roughly scabrous appearance. Central parts of shell generally without ribs. Lunule large, broadly lanceolate, smooth. Ligament internal, obliquely inset. Hinge: RV with single large cardinal tooth and short anterior and posterior lateral teeth, LV with two cardinal teeth, lateral teeth consisting of small sockets. Anterior adductor scar narrow, elongate, detached from pallial line for ca. half of length. Pallial line irregularly lobate, or slightly divided. Inner shell margin coarsely crenulate to anterior and posterior.

Distribution

Red Sea: Great Bitter Lake (Hoffman et al. 2006), Suez Canal, El Ballah (NHMUK 1950.11.10.1), Suez (NHMUK 1968.5.29.2), Safaga, Dongonab Bay (NHMUK), Oreste Point, Yemen (Dekker colln), Aden (NHMUK 1963340). Arabian Gulf: Kuwait (NHMUK), Tarut Bay, Qatar (NHMUK), Abu Dhabi (NHMUK), Ras al Khaimah (NHMUK). Arabian Sea: Khor Kalba, Sharjah (NHMUK), Karachi, dredged (NHMUK 1953.1.30.85). Oman: Masirah Island (NHMUK). Indian Ocean: South India: Chennai (Madras) (NHMUK 1953.1.30.169-73), Krusadai Island (NHMUK 1953.1.30.110), Kundugal Point, Krusadai Island (NHMUK1953.1.30.175-181), Tuticorin (NHMUK 1953.1.30.99-101). Sri Lanka: Trincomalee (NHMUK 1910.9.28.175-178).

Rugalucina angela (as Pillucina vietnamica) is recorded as an invasive species off Israel in the eastern Mediterranean (Steger et al. 2018).

Remarks

Rugalucina angela shows variation in shell morphology between various localities around the Arabian Peninsula and Red Sea. For example, shells from the Arabian Gulf are usually smaller, while those from the northern Red Sea as on Gulf of Suez shores are generally larger, and the marginal crenulations stronger. We regard these differences as ecophenotypic probably associated with the extreme environmental conditions such as the very high salinities experienced in the southern Arabian Gulf, usually more than 40 psu but in shallow lagoons as high as 52–55 psu (Price 1982) and approximately 40–46 psu at Safaga in the northern Red Sea (Zuschin and Oliver 2003) and probably higher for the habitats occupied by Rugalucina.

Rugalucina angela is closely similar in shell morphology to R. vietnamica and R. munda. The differences are subtle; externally they share diverging radial ribs that are stronger to anterior and posterior, and the fine commarginal lamellae. Rugalucina angela has a shorter anterior dorsal area, larger hinge plate and teeth, and a slightly more divergent anterior adductor scar. Rugalucina vietnamica is higher, with a longer anterior dorsal area. Rugalucina munda is similar but the radial sculpture is much less pronounced with finer margin denticulations and subdued commarginal sculpture.

Figure 2. 

Rugalucina angela (Melvill, 1899). A–C Syntype of Lucina (Codakia) angela Melvill, 1899 (NHMUK 1899.12.18.20), exterior of left valve and interiors of right and left valves. Gwadur, Pakistan, L 8.1mm D–F L. (C.) angela syntype (NHMUK 1899.12.18.20), exterior of left valve and interiors of right and left valves, L 6.1 mm G–M Rugalucina angela Ras al Khaimah, Arabian Gulf, (NHMUK 20191071) G exterior SEM of right valve, L 5.0 mm H, I interior SEM of right and left valves, L 7.7 mm J dorsal view, L 5.9 mm K exterior of left valve, L 7.9 mm L, M exterior of left valve, interior of right valve, L 7.6 mm N, O R. angela exterior and interior of left valve, Gulf of Suez (NHMUK1868.5.29.2), L 13.7 mm P R. angela exterior of right valve and interior of right and left valves, Egypt, 7km south of Hurgada, H Dekker colln 4569, L 12.8 mm Q interior of left and right valves, Egypt, Port Safaga, H Dekker colln 3263, L 9.4 mm R, S detail of hinge teeth of Q. T R. angela exterior of left valve. Red Sea, Yemen, Orestes Point, N of Midi, H Dekker colln 4553, L 9.8 mm U R. angela exterior of right and interior of left valves, Aden (NHMUK 1963340), L 10.6 mm V R. angela exterior and interior of right valve, Krusadai, India, (NHMUK 1953.1.30.69-76), L 8.4 mm.

Figure 3. 

Internal drawings of left valves of Rugalucina and Pusillolucina species. Not to scale.

Rugalucina vietnamica (Zorina, 1978)

Figs 3, 4

Pillucina vietnamica Zorina, 1978:195, figs 3 & 6).

Pillucina vietnamica: Lutaenko 2000: 383, pl. 1, figs 1, 2; pl. 3, fig. 1.

Pillucina vietnamica (part): Glover and Taylor 2001: 273, figs 7a-g.

Pillucina vietnamica: Glover et al. 2016: 553, fig. H, A-M.

Pillucina angela (Melvill, 1899) (part): Huber 2015: 422, figs p. 76.

Type material

Pillucina vietnamica syntypes (ZISP), 13 shells and 1 valve, L 5.5–8.9 mm.

Type locality

Intertidal, south coast of Hainan, China.

Description

Small (L to 10 mm), sub-circular, longer than high, posteriorly slightly truncate, moderately inflated. Shell white, slightly translucent and waxy in appearance. Sculpture of many, fine, low, commarginal lamellae and low radial ribs which are broader and more prominent towards the anterior and posterior. Radial ribs are conspicuously fluted where commarginal lamellae cross giving a crinkled appearance. Lunule elongate, lanceolate and impressed, slightly asymmetrical. Ligament internal, short, situated on a broadly triangular resilifer. Hinge: right valve with single, cardinal tooth, anterior and posterior lateral teeth small, posterior tooth elongate. Left valve with two narrow cardinal teeth, a small anterior lateral socket and posterior lateral narrow socket. Anterior adductor muscle scar medium-long, detached for ca. 50 % of length. Posterior scar ovate. Pallial line entire, sometimes partially discontinuous or irregularly lobate. Shell margin crenulate, with crenulations coarser towards anterior and posterior.

Distribution

Singapore: Pulau Semakau (NHMUK), Seringat Bay (NHMUK). Malaysia: Langkawi (AMS). Western Thailand: Ao Bang Ben, Kapoe (NHMUK), Ban Bang Ben (NHMUK), Tung Nam Dan, Phang Nga Province (NHMUK), Eastern Thailand: Kungkraben Bay (NHMUK). Cambodia: 5 km E of port, Sihanoukville (NHMUK). Vietnam: Dam Bay near Nha Trang (Zvonareva et al. 2019). China: Hainan (MNHN), Hong Kong (NHMUK), Daya Bay (NHMUK).

Habitat

Intertidal to shallow sub-tidal seagrass and muddy habitats. Recorded at high densities in muddy seagrass and mangrove fringe habitats of eastern and western Thailand (Meyer et al. 2008; Rattanachot and Prathep 2016). Gill structure and symbiotic bacteria are illustrated in Fig. 4N, O.

Remarks

Although we formerly recorded Rugalucina vietnamica with a broad longitudinal range from the northern Red Sea to southern China (Glover and Taylor 2001) we now regard it as having a narrower range along the continental margin of south eastern Asia with few records from islands. Despite intensive sampling by the MNHN Paris Expeditions around Panglao, Philippines (2004, 2005) and Papua New Guinea (2012, 2014) no R. vietnamica were recorded (Glover and Taylor 2016 and unpublished data).

Figure 4. 

Rugalucina vietnamica (Zorina, 1978). A–C Pillucina vietnamica Zorina, 1978 syntypes (ZISP), exterior of right valve and interior of left and right valves, Hainan, China, L 5.5–8.9 mm D internal drawing of C. E, F R. vietnamica Palau Semaku, Singapore (NHMUK 20150057), L 8.5 mm G–L R. vietnamica Kungkraben Bay, eastern Thailand (NHMUK 20191072) G exterior of right valve, L 7.0 mm. H exterior of left valve, L 7.0 mm I, J interior of left and right valves, L 7.7 mm K dorsal view L 5.6 mm L, M detail of hinge of I and J. N Section through gill of Rugalucina vietnamica Kungkraben Bay, Thailand showing filaments with ciliary (cz) and bacteriocyte zones (bz). Critical-point dried preparation O detail showing abundant bacterial symbionts in bacteriocytes. Scale bars: 20 µm (N); 10 µm (O).

Rugalucina munda (A. Adams, 1856)

Figs 3, 5

Lucina (Codakia) munda A. Adams, 1856: 225 not figured.

Type material

Syntypes : 3 whole shells NHMUK 20140004. H. Cuming colln, collected by Mr Strange. Shell lengths 11.3 mm, 11.2 mm, 10.4 mm. (Fig. 5A–H).

Type locality

Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia.

Material examined

Australia: Western Australia: Parry Harbour, Kimberley (WAM). Broome Bay (WAM). Northern Territory: Darwin, East Point. Gove (NMV), Groote Eylandt G. of Carpentaria (AMS). Friday Island, Torres Strait (AMS). Queensland: Somerset, Cape York (AMS), Port Douglas (16°28'48"S, 145°27'41"E) seaward edge of mangroves (NHMUK). Buchan Point, Cairns (AMS), Port Denison, Bowen (AMS), Seaforth, Mackay (AMS), Yeppoon (AMS), Tin Can Bay, Snapper Point (25°54'12.18"S, 153°00'58"E), mangroves, muddy sand. Moreton Bay, Redland Bay (27°37'03"S, 153°19'06"E), muddy seagrass, 1 m. North Stradbroke Island, near Dunwich, seagrass (27°29'44"S, 153°23'57"E).

Description

Small, L to 11 mm, sub-circular, posteriorly slightly truncate in juveniles, shallow posterior sulcus, moderately inflated. Shell colour white, internally often yellowish. Sculpture of fine, low commarginal lamellae crossed by low radial ribs which are broader and more prominent towards the anterior and posterior. Radial ribs are slightly fluted where crossed by commarginal lamellae. Lunule elongate, lanceolate, slightly asymmetrical. Ligament internal, short, situated on a broadly triangular resilifer. Hinge: right valve with single, narrow, cardinal tooth, anterior and posterior lateral teeth small; left valve with two narrow cardinal teeth, small anterior lateral and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar medium length, detached for ca. 50 % of length. Posterior scar ovate. Pallial line entire, irregularly lobate. Shell margin finely crenulate, with crenulations coarser towards anterior and posterior.

Distribution

Northern and north eastern Australia.

Habitat

Intertidal and shallow subtidal muddy sand, nearshore seagrass and mangrove fringe.

Remarks

Rugalucina munda is closely similar in shell morphology to R. vietnamica and R. angela and we previously confounded the species (Glover and Taylor 2001). In shell morphology the differences are subtle; R. munda is more ovoid, the radial ribs are finer, and the inner shell margin is less coarsely crenulated compared to R. angela and R. vietnamica. Furthermore, Glover and Taylor (2001: fig. 16) recorded a distributional gap between Australian and Asian records of ‘P. vietnamica’. Features of the anatomy and ctenidial bacteria of R. munda from Port Douglas, Qld were described by Glover and Taylor (2001, as Pillucina vietnamica).

Hedley (1913: 267) recommended that the name Lucina munda be rejected as unrecognisable because at that time type material had not been identified and the original description ambiguous. Later, because the incorrect type material had been isolated in the NHMUK collection the name Lucina munda had been regarded (e.g., Lamprell and Whitehead 1992) as a synonym of Ctena bella (Conrad, 1837). More recent recognition of the original type material (JDT & EAG) showed that Lucina (Codakia) munda (syntypes figured here for the first time from the Cuming collection and collected in Moreton Bay by Mr Strange) is a species similar to Rugalucina vietnamica and R. angela. In his description Adams (1856) highlights the dichotomously radiating ribs and the radially grooved inner shell margin and the yellowish shell interior. Rugalucina munda is thus the earliest name for the Australian species.

Figure 5. 

Rugalucina munda (Adams 1856). A–H Syntypes Lucina (Codakia) munda A. Adams, 1856 (NHMUK 20140004) Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia A–C exterior and interior of left and right valves, syntype A, L 11.3 mm D, E exterior of left valve and dorsal view, syntype B, L 11.2 mm F–H exterior of left valve and interior of left and right valves, syntype C, L.10.4 mm I, J Rugalucina munda exterior of left valve and interior of right valve, Redland Bay, Moreton Bay, Queensland (NHMUK 20191073), L 6.8 mm K–N R. munda Tin Can Bay, Queensland (NHMUK 20191074) K Exterior left valve, L 6.9 mm L interior of right valve, L 6.3 mm M interior of left valve, L 5.5 mm N exterior of left valve, L 6.7 mm O–S R. munda Port Douglas, Queensland (NHMUK 20191085) O exterior of right valve, L 6.5 mm P exterior of left valve, L 4.8 mm Q, R interior of right and left valves, L 7.2 mm S dorsal view, L 5.5 mm.

Rugalucina sensu lato

Here we include two species from the northern Indian Ocean and Red Sea that are similar externally to Rugalucina vietnamica but differ from it and each other in shell sculpture, hinge, and muscle scar characters. No molecular material is available for firmer placement of either species.

‘Rugalucina’ cypselis (Melvill, 1918)

Figs 3, 6

Divaricella cypselis Melvill, 1918: 156, pl. 5, fig. 33.

Type material

D. cypselis holotype NHMUK 1921.1.28.42. sh, L 5.2 mm.

Type locality

Karachi, Pakistan, 20–30 fathoms (36–55 m).

Other material examined

Pakistan: Karachi, Winckworth collection (NHMUK 20191075) 55 sh, 52 v. India: dredged Chennai (Madras), Winckworth Collection (NHMUK 1958.1.30.45) 1 sh. Chennai (Madras) (NHMUK 1953.1.30.169-73 part) 5 v.

Description

Small (L to 5.2 mm), sub-circular, inflated. Colour white or yellowish. Sculpture of diverging, curved, radial ribs prominent to anterior and posterior but are subdued or absent in middle parts of shell. Ribs crossed by closely spaced, narrow, low, commarginal lamellae that are aligned obliquely to the ventral shell margin (Fig. 6M). Radial ribs with small scales where crossed by commarginal lamellae. Early parts of shell relatively smooth. Protoconch P1 ca 88 µm, P2 ca 170 µm with growth increments (Fig. 6L). Lunule broadly lanceolate, smooth. Ligament largely internal, short, set on oblique resilifer. Hinge: right valve with single cardinal tooth and prominent anterior and posterior lateral teeth; left valve with two cardinal teeth, the anterior larger and sockets for anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar, short, broad, ventrally detached from pallial line for ca. 15 % of length, posterior scar ovoid. Pallial blood vessel scar visible. Pallial line discontinuous in small blocks. Shell margin dentate, coarser towards anterior and posterior.

Distribution

Known from the northern Arabian Sea and southern India. Probably more abundant in the northern Indian Ocean but unrecognised.

Remarks

Dekker and Goud (1995: 6) excluded D. cypselis from Divaricella more correctly suggesting placement in Pillucina. Whereas previously we included Divaricella cypselis in the synonymy of Pillucina angela because of the similarity of external sculpture (Glover and Taylor 2001) we now recognise it as a morphologically distinct species. The holotype and other specimens from the Karachi area all have a very short anterior adductor muscle scar (Figs 3, 7I–K) that is barely detached from the pallial line compared with the longer and ventrally detached scar of Rugalucina angela, R. vietnamica and R. munda. It also has a distinctive sculpture of oblique commarginal lamellae set at an angle to the ventral shell margin that is not seen in other Rugalucina. Similar radial ribs and dentate inner shell margin are present in Pusillolucina species, but they have multi-cuspate posterior lateral teeth and lack the oblique commarginal sculpture.

The obliquely inset internal ligament indicates placement in the Loripes group of genera and while the external sculpture resembles Rugalucina in radial ribbing the obliquely aligned commarginal lamellae are similar to that seen in Lucinella divaricata (Linnaeus, 1758) from the eastern Atlantic but that species lacks any radial ribbing.

Figure 6. 

‘Rugalucina’ cypselis (Melvill, 1918). A–D Holotype Divaricella cypselis Melvill, 1918 (NHMUK 1921. 1. 28. 92), Karachi, L 5.2 mm E–L ‘Rugalucina’ cypselis Karachi (NHMUK 20191075) Winckworth collection E right valve, L 3.1 mm, ob – oblique commarginal lamellae F left valve, L 3.0 mm G right valve, L 3.2 mm H dorsal view, L 1.9 mm I interior left valve, L 3.2 mm J interior right valve, L 3.2 mm K interior left valve, L 3.0 mm L protoconch M detail of ventral margin (F) showing obliquely aligned commarginal lamellae. Scale bar: 100 µm (L); 1 mm (M).

‘Rugalucina’ cracentis sp. nov. (replacement name)

http://zoobank.org/1D3FC94A-5371-40EC-AB78-B85AF858A230
Figs 3, 7

Lucina concinna H. Adams, 1871: 791, pl. 48, fig. 13 (non Lucina concinna Deshayes, 1857 an Eocene fossil).

Loripes concinnus: Lamy 1916: 15.

? Pillucina concinna: Oliver 1992: 98, pl 20, figs 5a, b.

Pillucina cypselis (Melvill, 1918): Dekker and Orlin 2000: 11.

Pillucina vietnamica: Zuschin and Oliver 2003: pl. 24, figs 24.8-24-13.

Type material

Holotype of Lucina concinna UMZC I.100470 Gulf of Suez, Red Sea. L 9.2 mm.

Etymology

cracentis Latin, genitive singular of cracens meaning neat, graceful. Adjective.

Diagnosis

Ovoid shape, slightly higher than long, diverging radial ribs, ligament short, largely internal, hinge with ventral flexure, right valve with single large cardinal tooth, anterior adductor muscle scar short.

Description

Small, L to 9 mm. ovoid, slightly higher than long (H/L 1.01), inflated, umbones prominent, rounded. Colour white or yellowish. Sculpture of diverging radial ribs, coarser and more widely spaced to anterior and posterior, ribs finer and more subdued in middle parts of shell. Ribs crossed by fine, low, closely spaced, commarginal lamellae. Lunule short, heart shaped. Ligament short, obliquely inset. Hinge line with ventral flexure (Fig. 7R, S), right valve with single, relatively large cardinal tooth and small anterior and posterior lateral teeth, left valve with two cardinal teeth the anterior larger and a central socket, small anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar short with lobate posterior dorsal edge, ventrally detached from pallial line for 15% of length; posterior scar ovate. Pallial line largely entire, irregularly lobate. Pallial blood vessel trace visible. Inner shell margin crenulate, more coarsely to anterior and posterior.

Distribution

Red Sea: Egypt: Gulf of Suez (ZMC), Port Safaga (Dekker colln), Ras Baghdadi (Dekker colln), Sharm el Naga (Dekker colln), Makadi Bay (Dekker colln), Gulf of Aqaba: Dahab (Blatterer colln), Yemen -al Durayhimi (Dekker colln), Aden (NHMUK 1902.12.30.749). Arabian Gulf: Kuwait (NHMUK), Saudi Arabia, Tarut Bay (NHMUK 20191076).

Remarks

Dekker and Orlin (2000) used Pillucina cypselis as a synonym of the preoccupied Lucina concinna but, as shown above, the species differ in external morphology. Although Glover and Taylor (2001) included this species in the synonymy of Pillucina vietnamica (NW Indian Ocean forms now Rugalucina angela) we consider it distinct. Externally, it is similar to Rugalucina angela but differs in the ovoid shape, the finer radial ribs, the much shorter anterior adductor scar, the ventral flexure of the hinge line and large cardinal tooth in the right valve.

The ovoid shape and flexured hinge line with the large cardinal tooth in the right valve are features of Pillucina s. s. but Pillucina species usually have less prominent radial ribbing (Glover and Taylor 2001, 2016). Molecular data are needed to determine placement in either Pillucina or Rugalucina.

Figure 7. 

‘Rugalucina’ cracentis sp. nov. A–E Lucina concinna Holotype (ZMC I.100470) Gulf of Suez, exterior and interior of right and left valves and dorsal view, L 9.2 mm F–H ‘Rugalucina cracentis’ exterior of right valve and interior of right and left valves Egypt, Dahab, Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. H. Blatterer colln, L 6.7 mm I, J R. cracentis exterior and interior of right valve Dahab, Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, H. Blatterer colln, L 8.5 mm K, L R cracentis exterior and interior of left valve Egypt, 4 km north of Port Safaga, H. Dekker colln 6930, L 8.3 mm M interior of right valve, L 8.8 mm N, O exterior and interior left valve Egypt, 4 km north of Port Safaga, H. Dekker colln 6930, L 7.1 mm P, Q interiors of right and left valves, H. Dekker colln 6930, L 8.7 mm R, S hinge details of P and Q.

Pusillolucina gen. nov.

http://zoobank.org/EE71DE26-9C58-44AE-9531-39C064CA866A

Type species

Pillucina pusilla Glover & Taylor, 2016. Here designated. Philippines.

Diagnosis

Very small, L to 3 mm, sub-circular, higher than long. Umbones prominent. Sculpture of thin commarginal lamellae, elevated to anterior and posterior, crossed by radial ribs that are more prominent to anterior and posterior. Lunule broadly lanceolate, concave. Ligament short, largely internal. Hinge: RV with single cardinal tooth, large anterior lateral tooth and a complex multi-cuspate posterior lateral tooth consisting of up to ten cusps; LV with two cardinal teeth, the anterior larger, posterior lateral tooth formed of sockets for projecting cusps of the right valve. Anterior adductor scar very short, barely detached from pallial line, pallial line irregularly discontinuous. Inner shell margin crenulate.

Etymology

Derived from Latin pusilla meaning very small and Lucina. Feminine

Comparison with other genera

Pusillolucina is similar in many external characters including shape and sculpture to some Pillucina (type species Pillucina spaldingi Pilsbry, 1921 = Pillucina hawaiiensis (Smith, 1885)). By comparison no Pillucina species possess the unusual multi-cuspate posterior dentition. Moreover, Pusillolucina pusilla is distinct in molecular analyses (Fig. 1 and Taylor et al. 2016) from most Pillucina including five common shallow water Indo-West Pacific species but aligns with ‘Pillucina vietnamica’. This latter is now placed in a separate genus, Rugalucina (see below), whose species are larger and, significantly, even in minute juveniles, lack the multi-cuspate posterior lateral teeth of P. pusilla and its congeners.

Included species

Pillucina pusilla, Pillucina denticula Glover & Taylor, 2001, Pusillolucina africana sp. nov., Pusillolucina arabica sp. nov., Pusillolucina biritika sp. nov. These species differ mainly in characters of the dentition.

Distribution

Indo-West Pacific, low intertidal to 70 m.

Pusillolucina pusilla Glover & Taylor, 2016

Figs 8 A–F

Pillucina pusilla Glover and Taylor 2016: 159, figs 41D, 44 A–L.

Type material

Holotype : MNHN-IM-2000-26591. Paratypes: 6 (MNHN-IM-2000-26592, IM-2009-10362). L 1.2–1.8 mm.

Type locality

Philippines, Bohol Island, Manga, 9°41.1'N, 123°51.4'E, 3–4 m, mud, [PANGLAO 2004: stn S19].

Description

Very small, glossy, L to 1.8 mm, sub-circular, higher than long, inflated. Umbones prominent. Sulci and dorsal areas poorly defined. Sculpture of thin commarginal lamellae elevated to anterior and posterior, with 17–25 low, rounded radial ribs, divaricate in anterior part of shell. Juvenile shell with elevated commarginal lamellae but no radial ribs. Microsculpture of fine growth increments only. Protoconch P1 +P 2 = 134 µm, P2 with numerous growth increments. Lunule broadly lanceolate, depressed, asymmetric, larger part in left valve. Ligament short, internal, oriented parallel to cardinal teeth. Hinge: right valve with single cardinal tooth, large anterior lateral tooth and posterior lateral tooth consisting of four or five cusps, left valve with two cardinal teeth, the anterior larger, anterior lateral socket, posterior lateral with sockets for cusps of the right valve. Anterior adductor scar very short, barely detached from pallial line, pallial line irregularly discontinuous. Inner shell margin coarsely crenulate.

Figure 8. 

Pusillolucina pusilla and P. denticula. A–D Pusillolucina pusilla (Glover & Taylor, 2016) A Pillucina pusilla Holotype (MNHN IM-2000-26591) Philippines, Bohol Island, L 1.2 mm B holotype dorsal view C, D P. pusilla interior of left and right valves, paratype (MNHN IM-2000-26592), L 1.05 mm E, F detail of hinge teeth in C, D. G–K Pusillolucina denticula (Glover & Taylor, 2001) Durban Bay, South Africa G exterior of right valve, paratype (NMSA), L 2.9 mm H, I interior of left and right valves, holotype (NMSA), L 3.5 mm J, K detail of hinge teeth.

Pusillolucina denticula (Glover & Taylor, 2001)

Figs 8 G–K

Pillucina denticula Glover & Taylor, 2001: 271, figs 7a–g.

Type material

Holotype : NMSA B310/T1758, L 3.5 mm; Paratypes: NMSA V8402/T1759, L 2.9 mm, 2.8 mm, 3.1 mm, NHMUK 20000377, L 3.5 mm.

Type locality

Durban Bay, South Africa.

Description

Shells small, L to 3.5 mm, robust, sub-circular to ovoid in outline. Sculpture of fine, closely spaced, commarginal lamellae crossed by low, rounded radial ribs that are prominent and broader towards anterior and posterior. Ribs inconspicuous in central part of shell. Lunule long, lanceolate. Ligament internal, short. Right valve with a single cardinal tooth, a prominent anterior lateral tooth and a long posterior lateral tooth divided into 8–10 small cusps. Left valve with two cardinal teeth, a small anterior lateral and a posterior tooth divided into sockets for cusps of the RV. Anterior adductor muscle scar short and barely detached from the pallial line. Inner shell margin crenulate, with crenulations more widely spaced anteriorly.

Pusillolucina arabica sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/BD3CBB6A-99A1-4F13-9553-BAC006538A64
Figs 3, 9, 10

Type material

Holotype : NHMUK 20191077 L 2.4 mm. Paratypes: figured L 2.1 mm, L 2.0 mm, L 1.9 mm, unfigured 11 sh, 2 v (NHMUK 20191078).

Type locality

Arabian Gulf, Tarut Bay, Saudi Arabia, dredged (17.5.1971) K. Smythe collection.

Material examined

NHMUK consultancy report ECM 5027C/06. Arabian Gulf: station 36 FC, 27°42'38"N, 52°11'16"E 25 m (NHMUK20191080), stn 39 FC, 27°42'05"N, 52°10'50"E 31 m, NHMUK 20191081), stn 41 FC, 27°42'31"N, 52°10'02"E 32 m (NHMUK 20191079), stn 48 FC, 27°45'0.27"N, 52°07'46"E 23 m (NHMUK 20191082).

Etymology

arabica from Latin arabicus. Used as an adjective.

Diagnosis

Pusillolucina with posterior lateral teeth divided into four or five cusps and sockets.

Description

Shell very small, L to 2.4 mm, ovate, umbones prominent, sculpture of closely spaced, narrow, commarginal lamellae, sometimes elevated at posterior and anterior dorsal margins, crossed at anterior and posterior by low radial ribs, juvenile shells with commarginal lamellae only. Colour: white, translucent when wet. Protoconch: P1 84 µm, P1 + P2 = 155 µm, P2 with numerous growth increments. Lunule broadly lanceolate, smooth. Ligament internal, short, set alongside cardinal teeth. Hinge: right valve with single cardinal tooth, anterior lateral tooth located above anterior adductor muscle. Posterior lateral tooth long, divided into four or five cusps, left valve with two cardinal teeth, the anterior larger, anterior lateral tooth small, posterior lateral tooth divided into four or five sockets for cusps of right valve. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, barely detached from pallial line, posterior scar ovoid. Inner shell margin crenulate, more strongly to anterior and posterior.

Remarks

Pusillolucina arabica differs from the Philippine P. pusilla by the more ovate outline, and the less prominent commarginal and radial sculpture. By comparison, P. africana has finer more closely spaced commarginal sculpture and more cusps (7–8) on the posterior lateral tooth. From South Africa P. denticula has much finer commarginal sculpture and up to 10 smaller cusps on the posterior lateral tooth. From Madagascar P. biritika sp. nov. has only three cusps on the posterior lateral tooth.

Despite its small size, P. arabica has the characteristic, thick inner ctenidial demibranchs with a well-developed bacteriocyte zone packed with symbiotic bacteria ca 3–4 µm (Fig. 10N, O) similar to other lucinids.

Figure 9. 

Pusillolucina arabica sp. nov. Tarut Bay, Saudi Arabia, Arabian Gulf. A–C Holotype (NHMUK 20191077) exterior of right valve and interior of left and right valves, L 2.4 mm D, E holotype, interior of left and right valves SEMs F–H paratype (NHMUK 20191078) exterior of right valve and interior of left and right valves, L 2.1 mm I, J paratype F-H (NHMUK 20191078) interior of left and right valves SEM K, L paratype (NHMUK 20191078) exterior of left and right valves, L 2.0 mm M paratype (NHMUK 20191078) dorsal view, L 1.9 mm N protoconch of holotype, scale bar 50 µm O, P paratype I–J detail of multi-cuspate posterior lateral hinge teeth. Scale bar: 200 µm.

Figure 10. 

Pusillolucina arabica sp. nov. Arabian Gulf NHMUK consultancy samples- see text for details. A Lateral view of right valve stn 41C (NHMUK 20191079) stained with Rose Bengal, L 1.3 mm B lateral view of left valve stn 41C (NHMUK 20191079), L 1.2 mm C, D exterior of left (L 1.5 mm) and right (L 1.3 mm) valves stn 39FC (NHMUK 20191081) E, F Interior of right (L 1.4 mm) and left (L 1.5 mm) valves stn 36FC (NHMUK 20191080) G dorsal view, stn 39FC (NHMUK 20191081), L 1.3 mm. H juvenile shell, stn 48FC (NHMUK 20191082), L 1.1 mm I juvenile shell, stn 36FC (NHMUK 20191080), L 0.9 mm J–L hinge teeth of left and right valves stn 36FC (NHMUK 20191080) M detail of posterior lateral tooth of right valve stn 36FC (NHMUK 20191080) N section through a ctenidial demibranch with thickened bacteriocyte zone, critical point dried preparation O symbiotic bacteria. Scale bars: 300 µm (J–L); 100 µm (M); 50 µm (N); 4 µm (O).

Pusillolucina africana sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/2533482F-2D76-413A-AB4E-1AC96BA998C9
Fig. 11

Type material

Holotype : MNHN-IM-2000-35107, sh, L 2.3 mm; Paratypes: 10 v, L 1.9–2.2 mm MNHN-IM-2000-35108, 3 v NHMUK 20191083.

Type locality

Mozambique, Inhaca Island, Baia Campessuane, 3–4 m, INHACA stn MD1, 26°03.6'S, 32°56.6'E. 25NOV2011.

Etymology

Named for Africa, used as an adjective.

Diagnosis

Pusillolucina with posterior lateral teeth divided into seven or eight cusps and sockets.

Description

Shell very small, L to 2.4 mm, ovate, umbones prominent, sculpture of closely spaced, narrow, commarginal lamellae, sometimes slightly elevated at posterior and anterior dorsal margins, crossed at anterior and posterior by low radial ribs, juvenile shells with commarginal lamellae only. Protoconch: P1 ca 75 µm, P1 + P2 = 140 µm, P2 with numerous growth increments. Lunule long, broadly lanceolate, smooth. Ligament internal, short, set on triangular resilifer alongside cardinal teeth. Hinge: right valve with single cardinal tooth, anterior lateral tooth located above anterior adductor muscle. Posterior lateral tooth long, divided into seven or eight cusps, left valve with two cardinal teeth, the anterior larger, anterior lateral tooth small, posterior lateral tooth with seven or eight sockets for cusps of right valve. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, barely detached from pallial line, posterior scar ovoid. Pallial line continuous. Inner shell margin crenulate, more strongly to anterior.

Remarks

For comparison with other species see P. arabica above.

Figure 11. 

Pusillolucina africana sp. nov. Mozambique, Inhaca Island, Baia Campessuane, 3–4 m, INHACA stn MD1. B–O Paratypes (MNHN-IM-2000-35108). A Holotype (MNHN-IM-2000-35107), L 2.3 mm B paratype exterior left valve, L 2.1 mm C interior of left valve, L 2.1 mm D interior right valve, L 1.9 mm E exterior right valve, L 2.2 mm F exterior left valve, L 2.2 mm G exterior of left valve, L 2.2 mm H dorsal view, L 2.4 mm I interior of left valve, L 2.1 mm J interior of right valve, L 2.1 mm K interior of right valve, L 2.1 mm L–N detail of hinges of I, J, K. O Protoconch. Scale bar: 50 µm (O).

Pusillolucina biritika sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/FBD2E714-389D-4B91-BE1A-8BCB5820ACE9
Fig. 12

Type material

Holotype : MNHN-IM-2000-35109 1.1 mm, Paratypes: MNHN-IM-2000-35110, MNHN-IM-2000-35111, MNHN-IM-2000-35181, NHMUK 20191084 lengths 1.1–1.5 mm.

Type locality

Holotype : South Madagascar east of Cap Antsirabe, 49–52 m, ATIMO-VATAE stn TP11, 25°02.8'S, 47°01.3'E. 06MAY2010 (MNHN-IM-2000-35109).

Paratypes : South Madagascar east of Cap Antsirabe, 49–52 m, ATIMO-VATAE stn TP11, 25°02.8'S, 47°01.3'E. 06MAY2010 (MNHN-IM-2000-35181 5 v).

South Madagascar off Baie Fort-Dauphin 54–56 m, ATIMO-VATAE stn TP18, 25°02.4'S, 47°03.2.6'E, 11MAY2010 (MNHN-IM-2000-35110 6 sh, 9 v. NHMUK 20191084 1 sh, 2 v).

Northwest Madagascar, S of Cap St Sébastien, 42–44 m, MIRIKY stn DW3202, 12°35.6'S, 48°49.9'E, 29JUN2009 (MNHN-IM-2000-35111 6 v).

Etymology

Biritika, meaning extremely small in Malagasy. Used as a noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Pusillolucina with posterior lateral teeth divided into three cusps and sockets.

Description

Very small, L 1.5 mm, sub-ovate, longer than high, umbones prominent. Sculpture of fine commarginal lamellae crossed at anterior and posterior by low, rounded, radial ribs, juvenile shells with commarginal lamellae only. Some lamellae extended as scales along posterior dorsal margin. Lunule long, lanceolate. Ligament short internal on short resilifer. Hinge: RV with single cardinal tooth and single anterior lateral tooth, posterior lateral tooth short, divided into three cusps, LV with two cardinal teeth the posterior-most thin, posterior lateral tooth with three sockets for cusps of the right valve. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, barely detached from pallial line, posterior scar ovate. Pallial line entire. Shell margin coarsely crenulate, more strongly to anterior and posterior.

Figure 12. 

Pusillolucina biritika sp. nov. A, B South Madagascar east of Cap Antsirabe, 49–52 m, ATIMO-VATAE stn TP11, 25°02.8'S, 47°01.3'E. (MNHN) C–E, L, M South Madagascar off Baie Fort-Dauphin 54–56 m, ATIMO-VATAE stn TP18, 25°02.45'S, 47°03.26'E (MNHN) F–K Northwest Madagascar, S of Cap St Sébastien, 42–44 m, MIRIKY stn DW3202, 12°35.6'S, 48°49.9'E (MNHN). A Holotype, stn TP11 (MNHN-IM-2000-35109), L 1.1 mm B paratype stn TP11 (MNHN-IM-2000-35181) L 1.5 mm C paratype stn TP18 (MNHN-IM-2000-35110) exterior of left valve, L 1.3 mm D paratype stn TP18 (MNHN-IM-2000-35110) interior of right valve, L 1.3 mm E paratype stn TP18 (MNHN-IM-2000-35110) exterior of left valve L 1.5 mm F paratype stn DW3202 (MNHN-IM-2000-35111). exterior of right valve L 1.4 mm G paratype stn DW3202 (MNHN-IM-2000-35111). exterior of right valve L 1.1 mm H paratype stn DW3202 (MNHN-IM-2000-35111) interior of left valve L1.4 mm I paratype stn DW3202 (MNHN-IM-2000-35111) interior of right valve L 1.3 mm J, K detail of hinge teeth of H and I. L, M Paratype TP18 (MNHN-IM-2000-35110) exterior of left valve and interior of right valve L 1.2 mm.

Notocina gen. nov.

http://zoobank.org/50070A53-D987-4091-958E-35BB99DE91A4

Type species

Epicodakia falklandica Dell, 1964. Here designated.

Diagnosis

Small (L to 3 mm), sub-ovoid, slightly longer than high. Umbones prominent. Posterior dorsal margin straight. Sculpture of low, rounded, commarginal lamellae with poorly defined fine radial ribs to anterior and posterior. Microsculpture densely punctate. Ligament short, protrudes above dorsal margin. Lunule broadly lanceolate. Hinge line narrow, left valve with two small cardinal teeth and anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Right valve with single, slightly bifid cardinal tooth and anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, slightly detached from pallial line, inner shell margin finely denticulate.

Etymology

notos in Greek meaning south, -cina as an abbreviation of Lucina. In reference to the southern Atlantic distribution. Female gender.

Remarks

Dell (1964) placed N. falklandica in Epicodakia (type species E. consettiana Iredale, 1930) because of some similarity of hinge teeth and sculpture. He remarked that only two species of Epicodakia were known (E. consettiana Iredale, 1930 and E. neozelanica Powell, 1937) but since then a number of other species from the Indo-West Pacific, Western Atlantic and Eastern Pacific have been classified in the genus (Glover and Taylor 2007; 2016; Taylor et al. 2016; MolluscaBase). Molecular analyses place Epicodakia in the subfamily Codakiinae, close to Ctena species (Taylor et al. 2016). Inclusion of ‘Epicodakia’ falklandica indicates it belongs in the subfamily Lucininae in a well-supported position as a sister species to Troendleina suluensis Glover & Taylor, 2106 from 150–600 m in the Sulu Sea. Troendleina includes three described species, all from deeper water; T. marquesana Cosel & Bouchet, 2008 from the Marquesas Islands, T. musculator Cosel & Bouchet, 2008 from the Solomon Islands and T. suluensis Glover & Taylor, 2016 from the Philippines and we are aware of further undescribed species. There is no close similarity of Troendleina to E. falklandica in shell characters: species of the former are larger with lengths of 30–40 mm, a sculpture of growth increments with fine radial threads, small cardinal teeth, obscure or absent lateral teeth, and a finely dentate inner shell margin. Notocina falklandica has some similarity to Parvilucina species in size and shell characters but is not closely aligned in molecular trees. Another unusual small species Guyanella clenchi from the southern Caribbean (Taylor et al. 2016) is similar to Notocina falklandica in size but differs in having a distinctive internal ligament and lacks any radial sculpture. Neither Troendleina, Parvilucina nor Guyanella species possess the punctate microsculpture that occurs in N. falklandica and sporadically amongst other Lucinidae including species of Myrteinae, some Ctena, Epicodakia and Codakia species (Codakiinae) and Funafutia levukana (Lucininae) (Glover and Taylor 2016).

Notocina falklandica (Dell, 1964)

Fig. 13

Epicodakia falklandica Dell, 1964: 206, fig. 4 (17, 18, 19).

Type material

Holotype : NHMUK 1962857/1; Paratypes: NHMUK 1962858/1; 1962859/1; 1962860/1; 1962861/2; 1962862/2.

Type locality

Off Falkland Islands, Discovery station WS 766. 44°58'S, 60°05'30"W, 545 m. Paratype depth range 105–219 m.

Material examined

South Georgia, 53.561108S, 37.88494W, 221 m BIOPEARL cruise 1, 05.04.2006 sample B-06-1167. GenBank numbers: 18S KF741615, 28S KF741644, cyt b KF741675.

Description

Shells small, L 2–3 mm, ovoid, slightly longer than high. Umbones prominent. Posterior dorsal margin straight. Sculpture of low rounded commarginal lamellae with narrow interspaces. Faint radial ribs visible to anterior and posterior. Microsculpture of dense fine punctae (2–3 µm in diameter). Protoconch: P1 = 188 µm, P1 + P2 = 242 µm, P2 with fine growth increments (South Georgia shell). Ligament short, protruding above posterior dorsal margin (Fig. 13J), set in shallow nymph. Escutcheon well defined, smooth. Lunule slightly impressed, broadly lanceolate. Hinge line narrow, left valve with two small cardinal teeth and anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Right valve with single, slightly bifid cardinal tooth and anterior and posterior lateral teeth. Anterior adductor muscle scar short, barely detached from pallial line, posterior adductor scar ovoid. Pallial line entire. Inner shell margin finely denticulate.

Distribution

South Atlantic: around Falkland Islands (Dell 1964), Argentina, outer continental shelf off Buenos Aires (Roux et al. 1993); Patagonia shelf, South Georgia, South Orkney Islands (Zelaya 2005). Depth range 100–545 m (distribution map at https://www.gbif.org/species/6523387).

Figure 13. 

Notocina falklandica (Dell, 1964). A–D Holotype of Epicodakia falklandica (NHMUK 1962857/1) exterior and interior views of both valves, L 2.5 mm E–J N. falklandica paratype (NHMUK 1962858) Falkland Islands, Discovery stn WS 214, 208 m E exterior of left valve, L 1.9 mm F, G interior of left and right valves, L 2.3 mm H dorsal view, L 1.9 mm I protoconch, arrow indicates boundary of P1 and P2 J detail of E showing punctate microsculpture. Scale bar: 100 µm (I); 20 µm (J).

Discussion

There is a general perception that bivalves having chemosymbiosis with thiotrophic or methanotrophic bacteria are large, as exemplified by Vesicomyidae (Calyptogena magnifica Boss & Turner, 1980, 263 mm), Modiolinae (Bathymodiolus boomerang Cosel amp; Olu, 1998, 360 mm), Solemyidae (Acharax bartschi (Dall, 1908), 210 mm) that live at hydrothermal vents and hydrocarbon seeps. Among the several bivalve families with chemosymbiotic life habits Lucinidae is by far the most diverse with more than 400 species occupying a wide range of habitats from the intertidal to bathyal depths and spanning a wide size range from 1.5 to 170 mm. The largest living species are Meganodontia acetabulum Bouchet & Cosel, 2004 with shell lengths up to 170 mm and Codakia distinguenda (Tryon, 1872) at 160 mm, while the Eocene fossil, Superlucina megameris (Dall, 1901), attained a shell height of 310 mm (Taylor and Glover 2009). Nevertheless, most species of Lucinidae are much smaller, with recent studies revealing minute species as small as 1.5 mm (Glover and Taylor 2016, Taylor et al. 2016). Additionally, with availability of molecular phylogenies, paraphyly is increasingly being recognised in genera and families previously classified by morphological characters. Such paraphyly has been found in the small lucinids previously assigned to Pillucina; one group consists of several species similar to the genotype of Pillucina and the other includes species some previously neglected but now assigned to the new genera, Rugalucina and Pusillolucina, that are also distinctive in morphology.

One of the foci of this paper has been the recognition of some very small lucinid species within the new genus Pusillolucina with adult shell lengths of 1–3 mm. All the species in this genus have a very unusual multi-cuspate lateral dentition not seen in any other lucinids. The recognition of these minute lucinids extends the morphological and functional range of Lucinidae. Even the smallest have chemosymbiosis with thickened ctenidial demibranchs occupied by symbiotic bacteria. Other minute lucinids include Guyanella clenchi (Altena, 1968) 1–2 mm and Parvilucina latens Taylor & Glover, 2016, 2–3 mm, both documented from Guadeloupe but likely occur more widely in the western Atlantic (Taylor et al. 2016). The latter species was first detected in molecular analyses having initially been confounded with Parvilucina pectinella (C.B. Adams, 1852). Additionally, most species of Liralucina, have shell lengths less than 5 mm (Glover and Taylor 2007), they are little recorded but common in some coral reef associated habitats (Glover and Taylor 2007).

Another small species that has been phylogenetically misplaced is Notocina falklandica widely recorded from outer shelf and bathyal depths around the Falkland Islands, Argentina and Uruguay. Since the original description by Dell (1964) its placement in Epicodakia (Codakiinae) had been problematic but molecular data now shows that it should be classified in the subfamily Lucininae in a monospecific genus close to Troendleina from the Indo-West Pacific with no comparable taxa known from the southern Atlantic.

Two species described here, Rugalucina angela and ‘R.’ cracentis, are abundant in the northern Red Sea where a surprising number of other lucinids have been recorded. From intensive sampling around Safaga Bay (Zuschin and Oliver 2003; 2005) lucinids were amongst the most abundant bivalves with 15 species comprising nearly 40 % of the shells recovered, most frequently Cardiolucina semperiana (Issel, 1869), Wallucina erythraea (Issel, 1869) and ‘Pillucina fischeriana’. With taxonomic refinements 19 species are now recognised from the Safaga area (Taylor and Glover 2005, herein). The northern Red Sea is a highly oligotrophic environment and, with a nutritional strategy of chemosymbiosis utilising sulphides from the benthic substrate, lucinids can survive in nutrient poor habitats where food availability for suspension feeding bivalves is limited.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to Suzanne Williams (NHMUK) for the molecular analysis of Figure 1 and Vassia Koutsouveli for help with sequencing. Katrin Linse (BAS) kindly provided molecular samples of Notocina falklandica. Kevin Webb and Richard Turney (NHMUK) provided much expert help with macro- and microphotography. We are very grateful to Henk Dekker for the generous loan of Red Sea samples of Rugalucina species that contributed to the figures and distribution data. Richard Preece and Matthew Lowe (ZMC) provided images of the holotype of Lucina concinna and Hubert Blatterer kindly allowed us to use his images of Pillucina concinna (= R. cracentis sp. nov.).

We are grateful to colleagues at the MNHN Paris (Philippe Bouchet, Virginie Héros, Barbara Buge, Philippe Maestrati), for help and the opportunity to work on samples from INHACA, ATIMO VATAE, MIRIKY, and KAVIENG expeditions. The ATIMO VATAE and MIRIKY expeditions to Madagascar (Principal Investigator, Philippe Bouchet) were part of a cluster of 2009–2010 Mozambique-Madagascar expeditions funded by the Total Foundation, Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, and Stavros Niarchos Foundation under “Our Planet Reviewed”, a joint initiative of Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle and Pro Natura International in partnership with Institut d’Halieutique et des Sciences Marines, University of Toliara and the Madagascar bureau of Wildlife Conservation Society. The INHACA expedition to Mozambique took place in 2011 at Estaçao de Biologia Marina de Inhaca as part of a collaboration between MNHN and Universidade Eduardo Mondlane in Maputo, through the good office of Jose Rosado.

Finally, we thank two reviewers and the editors of ZooKeys for helpful suggestions.

References

  • Adams A (1856) Descriptions of twenty-five new species of shells from the collections of Hugh Cuming, Esq. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1855: 221–226.
  • Adams CB (1852) Catalogue of species of Lucina, which inhabit the West Indian Seas. Contributions to Conchology 1: 1–17.
  • Adams H (1871) Descriptions of twenty-six new species of shells collected by Robert McAndrew, Esq., in the Red Sea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1870: 788–793.
  • Altena CO van (1968) The Holocene and Recent marine bivalve Mollusca of Surinam. Studies on the Fauna of Suriname and other Guyanas 42(10): 153–179.
  • Boss KJ, Turner RD (1980) The giant white clam from the Galapagos Rift, Calyptogena magnifica species novum. Malacologia 20: 161–194.
  • Bouchet P, Cosel R von (2004) The world’s largest lucinid is an undescribed species from Taiwan (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Zoological Studies 43: 704–711.
  • Bretsky SS (1976) Evolution and classification of the Lucinidae (Mollusca; Bivalvia). Palaeontographica Americana 8(50): 219–337.
  • Chavan A (1969) Superfamily Lucinacea Fleming, 1828. In: Moore RC (Ed.) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia, vol. 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder, Colorado, N491–N518.
  • Conrad TA (1837) Descriptions of new marine shells, from Upper California. Collected by Thomas Nutall Esq. Journal Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 7: 227–268.
  • Cosel R von, Bouchet P (2008) Tropical deep-water lucinids (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Indo-Pacific: essentially unknown, but diverse and occasionally gigantic. In: Héros V, Cowie RH, Bouchet P (Eds) Tropical Deep Sea Benthos 25. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle 196: 115–213.
  • Cosel R von, Olu K (1998) Gigantism in Mytilidae. A new Bathymodiolus from cold seep areas on the Barbados accretionary Prism. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences ser. 3 – Science de la Vie 321: 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(98)80005-X
  • Dall WH (1901) A gigantic fossil Lucina. The Nautilus 15: 40–42.
  • Dell RK (1964) Antarctic and sub Antarctic Mollusca: Amphineura, Scaphopoda and Bivalvia. Discovery Reports 33: 93–250.
  • Dekker H, Goud J (1995) Review of the Indo-West Pacific species of Divaricella sensu auct. with descriptions of two new species and a summary of the species from other regions. Vita Marina 43: 1–12.
  • Dekker H, Orlin Z (2000) Check-list of Red Sea Mollusca. Spirula 47 supplement: 2–46.
  • Fleming J (1828) A history of British animals, exhibiting the descriptive characters and systematical arrangement of the genera and species of quadrupeds, birds, reptiles, fishes, Mollusca and Radiata of the United Kingdom; including the indigenous, extirpated and extinct kinds; together with periodical and occasional visitants. Bell & Bradfute, Edinburgh, 565 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12859
  • Geest M van der, Sall AA, Ely SO, Nauta RW, Gils JA van, Piersma T (2014) Nutritional and reproductive strategies in a chemosymbiotic bivalve living in a tropical intertidal seagrass bed. Marine Ecology Progress Series 501: 113–126. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10702
  • Glover EA, Taylor JD (2001) Systematic revision of Australian and Indo-Pacific Lucinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia): Pillucina, Wallucina and descriptions of two new genera and four new species. Records of the Australian Museum 53: 263–292. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.53.2001.1349
  • Glover EA, Taylor JD (2007) Diversity of chemosymbiotic bivalves on coral reefs: Lucinidae of New Caledonia and Lifou (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Zoosystema 29: 109–181.
  • Glover EA, Taylor JD (2016) Lucinidae of the Philippines: highest known diversity and ubiquity of chemosymbiotic bivalves from intertidal to bathyal depths (Mollusca: Bivalvia). In: Héros V, Strong E, Bouchet P (Eds) Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos, volume 29. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle 20: 865–234.
  • Glover EA, Williams ST, Taylor JD (2016) Lucinid bivalves of Singapore and their relationships (Bivalvia: Lucinidae). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supplement 34: 539–565.
  • Heide T van der, Govers LL, Fouw J de, Olff H, Geest M van der, Katwijk MM van, Piersma T, Koppel J van de, Silliman BR, Smolders AJP, Gils JA van (2012) A three-stage symbiosis forms the foundation of seagrass ecosystems. Science 336: 1432–1434. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219973
  • Huber M (2015) Compendium of bivalves 2. ConchBooks, Harxheim, Germany, 907 pp.
  • Johnson MA, Fernandez C, Pergent G (2002) The ecological importance of an invertebrate chemoautotrophic symbiosis to phanerogam seagrass beds. Bulletin of Marine Science 71: 1343–1351.
  • Lamprell K, Whitehead T (1992) Bivalves of Australia, Crawford House Press, Bathurst, Australia, 182 pp.
  • Lamy E (1916) Les Lucines et les Diplodontes de la Mer Rouge (d’après les matériaux recueillis par M. de Dr Jousseaume). Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris 22: 145–155, 183–190.
  • Lutaenko K (2000) Russian contributions to studies of Vietnamese bivalves Part 2. List of species recorded by Russian authors or stored in Museums. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication 21: 361–390.
  • Melvill JC (1899) Notes on Mollusca from the Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf, and Gulf of Oman, mostly dredged by Mr. F.W. Townsend, with descriptions of twenty-seven species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 7(4): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939908678167
  • Melvill JC (1918) Descriptions of thirty-four species of marine Mollusca from the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea, collected by Mr. F.W. Townsend. Annals and Magazine of Natural History series 9(1): 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222931808562296
  • Meyer E, Nilkerd B, Glover EA, Taylor JD (2008) Ecological importance of chemoautotrophic lucinid bivalves in a peri-mangrove community in Eastern Thailand. Raffles Museum Bulletin of Zoology, supplement 18: 41–55.
  • Oliver PG (1992) Bivalved seashells of the Red Sea. Verlag Christa Hemmen & National Museum of Wales, Wiesbaden & Cardiff, 330 pp.
  • Oliver PG (1995) Bivalvia. In: Dance SP (Ed.) Seashells of Eastern Arabia Motivate Publishing, Dubai, 194–281.
  • Pilsbry HA (1921) Marine mollusks of Hawaii-XIV, XV. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 72: 360–382.
  • Powell AWB (1937) New species of marine Mollusca from New Zealand. Discovery Reports 26: 1153–222.
  • Rattanachot E, Prathep A (2015) Species-specific effects of seagrass on below ground biomass, redox potential and Pillucina vietnamica (Lucinidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95: 1693–1704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415000934
  • Rossi F, Colao E, Martinez MJ, Klein JC, Carcaillet F, Callier MD, de Wit R, Caro A (2013) Spatial distribution and nutritional requirements of the endosymbiont-bearing bivalve Loripes lacteus (sensu Poli, 1791) in a Mediterranean Nanozostera noltii (Hornemann) meadow. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 440: 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.010
  • Roux A, Bastida R, Bremec C (1993) Comunidades bentónicas de la plataforma continental Argentina, campaiías transección BIP “0ca Balda” 1987/88/89. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico, Sao Paulo 41: 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0373-55241993000100007
  • Smith EA (1885) Report on the Lamellibranchiata collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger 1873–76 13: 1–341.
  • Steger J, Stockinger M, Ivkić A, Galil BS, Albano PG (2018) New records of non-indigenous molluscs from the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Bioinvasions Records 7: 245–257. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.3.05
  • Taylor JD, Glover EA (2009) The giant lucinid bivalve from the Eocene of Jamaica – systematics, life habits and chemosymbiosis (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Lucinidae). Palaeontology 52: 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00839.x
  • Taylor JD, Glover EA (2013) New lucinid bivalves from shallow and deeper water of the Indo-West Pacific Oceans (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Lucinidae). ZooKeys 326: 69–90. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.326.5786
  • Taylor JD, Glover EA, Smith L, Dyal P, Williams ST (2011) Molecular phylogeny and classification of the chemosymbiotic bivalve family Lucinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163: 15–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00700.x
  • Taylor JD, Glover EA, Williams ST (2014) Diversification of chemosymbiotic bivalves: origins and relationships of deeper water Lucinidae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12208
  • Taylor JD, Glover EA, Smith L, Ikebe C, Williams ST (2016) New molecular phylogeny of Lucinidae: increased taxon base with focus on tropical western Atlantic species (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Zootaxa 4196: 381. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.2
  • Tryon GW (1872) Catalogue and synonymy of the Recent species of the family Lucinidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 24: 82–96.
  • Uede T, Takahashi Y (2008) Benthos communities of the Zostera japonica meadows in the intertidal zone of Takinai and Uchinoura, Tanabe Bay, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan. Japanese Journal of Benthology 63: 42–55. https://doi.org/10.5179/benthos.63.42
  • Zorina IP (1978) New species of bivalve molluscs (Bivalvia) of the Gulf of Tonkin (South China Sea). Trudy Zoological Institut, Leningrad 61: 193–203. [in Russian]
  • Zuschin M, Oliver PG (2003) Bivalves and bivalve habitats in the northern Red Sea. The northern Bay of Safaga (Red Sea, Egypt): an actuopalaeontological approach. VI. Bivalvia. Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, 304 pp.
  • Zuschin M, Oliver PG (2005) Diversity patterns of bivalves in a coral dominated shallow-water bay in the northern Red Sea high species richness on a local scale. Marine Biology Research 1: 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000500456262
login to comment