Save The Azaleas at the U.S. National Arboretum |
|
|
The National Arboretum's own publication, "Glenn Dale Hybrid Azaleas": states, "Nothing says spring like azaleas! One of the National Arboretum's most popular plantings, the Glenn Dale Azaleas draw thousands for annual spring viewing. Horticulturist Benjamin Y. Morrison worked for over 25 years to create this superior group of winter-hardy azaleas with large, colorful flowers suitable for the Washington, DC region. ... The south face of Mt. Hamilton at the National Arboretum in Washington, DC was planted with approximately 15,000 azaleas from Glenn Dale in 1946-47. In 1949, the Arboretum opened to the public for the first time during the azalea bloom." The Azalea Society of America published, "The Glenn Dale Azalea Hillside, the Morrison Garden, and the Frederic P. Lee Garden comprise the 12,000-plus Azalea Collection, the country's premier reference collection." When world-renowned azalea authority, Donald Hyatt spoke at the 2008 International Rhododendron Conference in Edinburgh, Scotland, he emphasized in his conclusion: "Although evergreen azaleas are probably the most commercially successful members of the genus Rhododendron, they still have much unrealized potential. It should be possible to develop new varieties with greater hardiness, better plant habits, distinctive foliage, and flowers with new forms and different colors. It is also important to find ways to preserve existing species and cultivars so they are more readily available to researchers, hybridizers, and gardeners. The author feels that the United States National Arboretum is probably the best repository of such genetic diversity in evergreen azaleas anywhere in the world and he hopes that it will remain so." |
What's New
|
Go to Introduction Return to Top
The section following is a list of concerns raised by Scott Aker, the Gardens Unit Leader at the U.S. National Arboretum, in a message he sent on Nov. 9, 2010 to Dr. Ramon Jordan, Barbara Bullock, Carole Bordelon, Margaret Poole and Ron Rabideau. In this section, Don Hyatt addresses the concerns raised by Scott Aker.
Scott Aker's statement |
Don Hyatt's reply |
| Scott Aker: "We have indeed been forced to plan the removal of most of the azaleas on the Glenn Dale Hillside." | Don Hyatt: "Scott's reasons for destroying a National Treasure like the original Glenn Dale Hillside planted by the first Director of the Arboretum in 1947 seems extremely flawed with little or no input from stakeholders. Originally, the National Arboretum had an Advisory Board that provided expert advice. Due to the cost of bringing in specialists from afar, that committee was abandoned by the prior Director, Dr. Elias. Such a committee could be easily reinstated using either local experts or even distant talent utilizing teleconferencing techniques or Internet tools. Any action should be postponed at least until a permanent Director is named and that person has a chance to review the ramifications of destroying one of the main floral attractions in our Nation's Capital. " |
| Scott Aker: "Recently, we learned that a donor that has supported two gardener positions on our staff will no longer be providing that support, and the loss of this staff has resulted in the need to deaccession collections." | Don Hyatt: "Destroying the National Boxwood Collection makes no sense at all. The reasoning cannot be the same as one of his key points about the azalea collection, the lack of documentation. The National Boxwood Collection is fully documented and its Curator has been there for 30 years. The Daylily collection, Peony Collection, and Daffodil Collection are also fully documented. To eliminate federally funded positions and entire collections of rare plants for the sole reason of adding staff to a single garden is ill-advised. " |
| Scott Aker: "We will be deaccessioning our National Boxwood Collection and the co-located Perennial Collections as well as the Glenn Dale Hillside portion of the Azalea Collection." | Don Hyatt: "Destroying the National Boxwood Collection makes no sense at all. The reasoning cannot be the same as one of his key points about the azalea collection, the lack of documentation. The National Boxwood Collection is fully documented and its Curator has been there for 30 years. The Daylily collection, Peony Collection, and Daffodil Collection are also fully documented. To eliminate federally funded positions and entire collections of rare plants for the sole reason of adding staff to a single garden is ill-advised." |
| Scott Aker: "We do not have documentation for any of the plants on the Glenn Dale Hillside." | Don Hyatt: "The plants on the Glenn Dale Hillside are not just a tangle of inferior seedlings from a hybridizing project, but were the top 2 or 3% of the 40,000 to 50,000 azaleas Morrison raised from seed. The historical significance of that monumental breeding project alone and its relation to the first Director of the Arboretum should be sufficient to keep the display. The Azalea Curator with the assistance of many volunteers has been making excellent progress on plant identification. Many of the original Glenn Dales have been positively identified by using plant records, Morrison's notes, registration data, and comparison with known forms. Even unnamed plants whose parentage may never be identified still have merit and can be introduced. The striking bicolor azalea ‘Ben Morrison’ is one of those unknown plants. It was named by another Arboretum Director, the late Dr. John Creech, to honor the original hybridizer. A thorough assessment of the azaleas on that hillside should be completed before any plants are destroyed. I'll attach a few pictures of specific plants I have admired that are not named forms. One is a stunning bicolor and the other is a strong cream to almost yellow. Beautiful flowers, and beautiful plants." [see below] |
 |
 |
Scott Aker: "Although volunteers have been active in restoring the Glenn Dale Hillside after a period of abandonment in the 1980s, it is inaccurate to state that the Hillside has been restored and maintained with volunteer labor alone. The staff hours spent in maintaining this area are greater than the volunteer hours spent there and have been consistently." |
Don Hyatt: "Volunteer hour records have been kept by the volunteer coordinator from the early 90's. The volunteer hours in the azalea garden are significant. They are typically at least 5 people one day a week all year long." |
| Scott Aker: "I cannot dispute the beauty of the display and its value as an attraction for our visitors. Currently, again in part to diminishing resources, we are now unable to accommodate the crowds of visitors in April and May when the azaleas are in bloom. We have inadequate parking and restroom facilities." | Don Hyatt: "The Arboretum has several large parking areas, and for years has provided a shuttle service to get around to the various attractions. The Potomac Valley Chapter of the American Rhododendron Society has held its flower show at the Arboretum during peak azalea time for nearly 40 years. Its members have not observed any difficulties, even in 2010 when the show coincided with the busy Friends of the National Arboretum plant sale. The Arboretum received $9 million in Federal stimulus funds as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. That money has been put toward the renovation of the Administration Building, which includes additional public restrooms. That building is temporarily closed now but is scheduled to reopen in approximately 18 months when renovations are complete. " |
| Scott Aker: "This is not being driven by the need to use the land for other purposes; it is rather driven by the need to reduce the total labor needed to maintain our collections in an acceptable manner." | Don Hyatt: "There has been no change in the labor position related to the Azalea Collection, so I fail to see the urgency in destroying the Glenn Dale Hillside that has been a focal point at the National Arboretum since it opened to the public in 1949. Cutting down so many huge azaleas that are more than 60 years old will be a costly expense for the Arboretum since it will be necessary to hire a contractor to cut down the azaleas and grind them into mulch. Denuding the hillside will make that land vulnerable to serious soil erosion that could be costly to control. Getting rid of the azaleas does not eliminate labor costs since staff will still be needed to control invasive alien plants. The most logical decision would be to leave the azaleas alone. " |
Don Hyatt is recognized as a preeminent international authority on azaleas and rhododendrons. Although professionally a mathematics and computer science teacher in the local public school system for 33 years, Donald has always maintained a strong interest in plants. His educational background includes a Bachelors degree in Horticulture. Now retired, he has focused his efforts on varied horticulture interests including the documentation of various native azalea populations in North America.
He has served on the national boards of both the Azalea Society of America (ASA) and the American Rhododendron Society (ARS). He received the Bronze Medal from the Potomac Valley Chapter of the ARS in 1978 and was awarded the prestigious Silver Medal from the national organization in 2002, citing his life-long passion for the genus Rhododendron and his many contributions to the ARS and its goals. In 2001, the Brookside Gardens Chapter of the ASA awarded Don the Fredrick P. Lee Commendation for distinguished contributions in furthering the knowledge and appreciation of azaleas. In 2009, the Azalea Society of America presented Don the Distinguished Service Award. Don served as President of the Potomac Valley Chapter of the ARS for four terms. He is also a past President of the Northern Virginia Chapter of the ASA.
He is a frequent speaker at conferences, has authored a number of articles on azaleas and rhododendrons, and is an accomplished botanical illustrator. He is a dynamic and entertaining speaker and has been asked to speak for many meetings including: 2001 ASA National Convention in Asheville, North Carolina; 2002 Joint ASA & ARS National Convention in Atlanta, Georgia; 2008 International Rhododendron Conference in Edinburgh, Scotland; 2009 ASA National Convention in Herndon, Virginia; 2009 ARS Eastern Regional Conference in Lionville, Pennsylvania; 2010 ARS National Convention on Long Island, New York; 2010 International Rhododendron Symposium in Bremen, Germany; 2010 ARS District 9 Luncheon in McLean, Virginia; and for many local ARS and ASA Chapters and community organizations.
Don has a website at http://www.donaldhyatt.com. Links to papers based on Don's addresses in 2008 at the Edinburgh Conference and in 2009 at the ASA Keynote Address are available in the links section of this page.
Go to National Arboretum's Statement Return to Top
Nov. 8, 2010: Aaron Cook Confirms National Arboretum's Intent To Remove Mt. Hamilton Azalea Hillside
Nov. 9, 2010: Correspondence from Scott Aker of National Arboretum to Ron Rabideau
Nov. 9, 2010: From Hale Booth, Congressional Contacts
Nov. 15, 2010: Notes by Henry Skinner in 1968 Regarding the mission of the National Arboretum
Nov. 21, 2010: From Don Hyatt, Save the Azaleas at the U.S. National Arboretum
Nov. 22, 2010: From Ramon Jordan, to Interim Director, U.S. National Arboretum to Aaron Cook
Nov. 24, 2010: From Aaron Cook, Good News, A Temporary Reprieve
Nov. 24, 2010: From FONA Chair, Jeanne Connelly, Responds to Director Ramon Jordan
Nov. 29, 2010: From Bob Stelloh: The Azaleas Are Not The Financial Problem
Nov. 29, 2010: Letters from Representative Eleanor Holmes Norton
Dec. 8, 2010: From Aaron Cook, Azaleas and Boxwoods Still at Risk
Dec. 18, 2010: Reply from National Arboretum accepts Tom Johnson's offer to save rare azaleas.
Jan. 3, 2011: From Dr. William L. Ackerman to Ms. Hefferan, Director, U.S. National Arboretum.
Jan. 20, 2011: Hearst TV: National Arboretum Plans To Axe Its Azaleas.
Coming: Azalea & Rhododendron Chapters Meet at Arboretum on April 26, 2011, from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM
From Aaron Cook, President of the American Azalea Society, Nov. 8, 2010
To Yahoo! Azalea Group and Yahoo! Rhodo Group
Ref: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/azaleas/message/15413 and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rhodo/message/25199
The rumors are true. I just got off the phone with Scott Aker, the Unit Garden Leader for the National Arboretum. Beginning in the summer of 2011 a large number of azaleas on the Mt. Hamilton hillside will be cut down and the stumps treated with herbicide.
This group of azaleas is selections of Glenn Dale hybrids made in 1939 and propagated by Ben Morrison for further study and selection. They were planted on the southern flank of Mt. Hamilton in organized groupings of between 3 and 20 plants sometime about 1946-47. No one knows the true number planted, but the estimate is somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000. Each group was labeled with a Bell-Number (which was the number assigned to all clones before they were officially selected and Introduced, and it traced back to the actual crosses, or parents of each of the groups.
Barbara Bullock became the Azalea curator in 1990 with the help of volunteers began to restore the hillside. Many of the Bell numbers were located and a map of their locations was produced. The Bell-numbers roughly correspond to a grex (offspring of a cross). Scott's point that (not one of the labels was ever found actually attached to any of the azaleas) is probably true but a moot point due to the labels being used to denote a group of offspring from a single cross. There is a map of the rough locations where Bell Numbered labels have been found, and each group of plants associated with the label should correspond to a unique grex.
Scott estimates that there are less than 1000 plants on a total of 3 acres. Barbara and others including myself would put the estimate to over 5000 plants. The hillside is in the best shape it has been in for many years.
I had many questions that Scott could not answer and he promised to get back to me. I intend to make this a huge PR nightmare for him if he continues to push for plant removal.
If you would like to call or email Scott directly to voice your opposition to this lunacy:
Scott M Aker
Gardens Unit
Supervisory Research Horticulturist
Phone: (202) 245-4533
Fax: (202) 245-5973
Room 136h
U.S. National Arboretum
Administration
3501 New York Avenue, NE.
Washington, DC, 20002-1958
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
To Mr. Rabideau, Manager Rarefind Nursery, Nov. 9, 2010
CC: Dr. Ramon Jordan, Barbara Bullock, Carole Bordelon, and Margaret Pooler
From Scott Aker, Gardens Unit Leader, U.S. National Arboretum
Ref: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rhodo/message/25241
Thank you for your inquiry. We have indeed been forced to plan the removal of most of the azaleas on the Glenn Dale Hillside. While we have only had slight reductions in financial resources for the past ten years, our costs have gone up steadily, and our staff numbers have steadily eroded to the point where we cannot sustain all of our collections. Recently, we learned that a donor that has supported two gardener positions on our staff will no longer be providing that support, and the loss of this staff has resulted in the need to deaccession collections. We will be deaccessioning our National Boxwood Collection and the co-located Perennial Collections as well as the Glenn Dale Hillside portion of the Azalea Collection.
We do not have documentation for any of the plants on the Glenn Dale Hillside. Although Morrison's breeding records do exist, no labels have been found attached to any plant so that we can know its provenance beyond conjecture. This does not fit the rigorous standard we require for plant records. In 2008, we instituted a program to gradually replace these azaleas with masses of known Glenn Dale cultivars of certain provenance. To date, we have propagated plants for this effort, and we will proceed to plant them to replace masses of unknown azaleas.
Although volunteers have been active in restoring the Glenn Dale Hillside after a period of abandonment in the 1980s, it is inaccurate to state that the Hillside has been restored and maintained with volunteer labor alone. The staff hours spent in maintaining this area are greater than the volunteer hours spent there and have been consistently.
I cannot dispute the beauty of the display and its value as an attraction for our visitors. Currently, again in part to diminishing resources, we are now unable to accommodate the crowds of visitors in April and May when the azaleas are in bloom. We have inadequate parking and restroom facilities. It is becoming progressively more difficult to ensure a positive and safe visitor experience during this time frame, and some shifting of priorities in the Azalea Collection are needed to address this. We plan to incorporate a greater diversity of azaleas, most notably late blooming native species and cultivars derived from them, as well as Kurume and Satsuki azaleas that bloom later. We will still have a very significant display of azaleas that bloom in the late April / early May time frame.
This is not being driven by the need to use the land for other purposes; it is rather driven by the need to reduce the total labor needed to maintain our collections in an acceptable manner.
There are many very significant new introductions aside from the Syringa you mention. We have introduced two new Hydrangea quercifolia cultivars, 'Ruby Slippers' and 'Munchkin'; Callicarpa 'Duet', Camellia 'Anacostia', Prunus 'First Lady', and Viburnum 'Adirondack' in recent years. There are very active breeding efforts with Catalpa, Prunus, and Hydrangea underway, though I do not know all the details related to these efforts.
Thank you for your interest in developments here at the U.S. National Arboretum.
Scott Aker
Gardens Unit Leader
U.S. National Arboretum
3501 New York Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002-1958
202-245-4533
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Hale Booth, President of Tennessee Valley Chapter ARS and past director of ASA, November 9, 2010:
To: Yahoo! Azalea Group
Ref: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/azaleas/message/15428
Aaron recently posted a notice that Mr. Scott Aker the Unit Garden Leader for the National Arboretum had decided the Glenn Dale azaleas at the National Arboretum should be destroyed next summer. As many of you know this collection on Mount Hamilton is very historic and is the result of a tremendous (and federally funded) breeding effort by Dr. Morrison in his long tenure with the USDA. I do not know the reasoning behind this decision, but there should be a rather direct route to stop this action. The US Congress budgets and approves the annual budget appropriation for USDA and thus the National Arboretum. Attached are links to both the US House of Representatives House Committee on Agriculture and the US Senate Agriculture Committee membership that oversee setting the budget for the department. If your Congressman or Senator is on one of these committees write him or her a note or letter (email is not as effective)and ask them to look into this and express your concern about the loss of this national treasure of Azaleas. These committee members will respond much better to someone writing them from their state or congressional district. Do not mail your note or letter to Washington, mail it to the local or state office of the Senator or Congressman. If you mail it directly to DC, it goes to some warehouse where it is treated and will show up next spring with the tulips, looking like it was on the bottom of a birdcage. You can Google your Congressman or Senator for their district or state office address.
This simple action of writing a letter about saving the historic, and valuable Glenn Dale Azalea planting at the National Arboretum can be very effective. Congress has many important and difficult issues to act on, if you bring this simple solvable issue to the attention of your member of this committee with funding oversight of the National Arboretum, they can likely solve it with a phone call.
http://ag.senate.gov/site/cmtemembers.html
http://agriculture.house.gov/singlepages.aspx?NewsID=34&LSBID=23|69&RBSUSDA=T
These links worked when I checked them, if they don’t work for you, simply Google Senate Agriculture Committee and House Committee on Agriculture and click on the respective members link.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From the History of the National Arboretum by Henry T. Skinner and edited by B. Y. Morrison. [1927-1967]
The Arboretum was to be an institution growing woody plants for the purpose of developing a careful appreciation and understanding for that part of the plant kingdom. It was constituted with the intention to investigate, to stimulate interest in woody plants, and to popularize knowledge of their characters and qualities, uses and cultivation. The Arboretum would assemble material, organize it, and make it available for study.
The functions of the National Arboretum can be itemized as follows:
a.) To popularize plant knowledge directly...by establishing a close affiliation with established garden clubs, nursery associations, botanical and other societies, also by means of lectures, publications and cooperation with the press.
b.) To preserve the rarer plant life of the world. There are many species of plants which are threatened with extinction ... Also we should not overlook the preservation of historic species and varieties of plants that were once of great service, but which are in danger of being lost through change in fashion or taste, difficulties of propagation or neglect.
c.) To maintain species collections of economic and ornamental plants.
d.) Exhibition of plants. The above-mentioned purpose leads directly to the exhibition of plants. ...Therefore the Arboretum should be developed with the stress placed on effect, rather than botanical relationship. This does not mean that related plants cannot be placed together because in general, related species have the same growth habit.
e.) To maintain research.
f.) To publish.
In the development of the USNA, stress would be placed on bringing together those species that are not hardy enough to be found in the other large arboreta of the country where climatic conditions are more rigorous than at Washington.
There are certain fields of research that the National Arboretum is preeminently fitted to undertake which in no way intrude on already existing lines of research pursued by the government. .... It will introduce into cultivation rare or unknown woody material, study it, and if found to serve some useful purpose, will recommend it's commercial cultivation along with full advice as to its propagation and treatment. Such material will be so arranged on the grounds of the Arboretum to show it to best advantage.
Around 1941, two types of plants were grown in the nurseries [of the Arboretum]: (1) those needed in quantity to establish a plant character that would differentiate this arboretum from others in the country and (2) those needed to build up the scientific collections that constitute the major purpose of the arboretum. These plants grew during the period of the emergency [WWII], and would be available, hopefully, for transplanting later to permanent locations in the Arboretum.
In the early 40's there were about 1,000 species growing [at the Arboretum]. Some additions were made to the collections of various families that had been started. .... One of the important projects that was started was the planting of Glenn Dale azaleas from Glenn Dale in 1947, Maryland to nurseries in the Arboretum [nurseries located where now Washington Youth Garden is located].
Glenn Dale Azaleas
The Glenn Dale azaleas were bred for a specific purpose by Mr. B. Y. Morrison, namely for the production of a garden race of azaleas that would be large-flowered and cold-hardy for the Washington, D. C. area and other regions of similar climate. The South had grown large-flowered azaleas, commonly known as the Southern Indicas, but these were not hardy in the North.
The seedlings of the hybrids were grown at Glenn Dale. When the plants had been sufficiently tested over a five-year period for hardiness, they were transplanted into a nursery in the Arboretum [where now WYG is located]. Here they were tested for about 5 years, and in 1947 were planted on the south slope of Mt. Hamilton. Approximately 7 acres of azaleas were planted on the hillside, consisting of 454 clones, and vegetatively propagated selections. (In other words, the hillside just may contain ALL of the named and many unnamed "selections"). These azaleas had a long period of flowering from early April to June. The setting for the azalea planting was one of the finest to be found anywhere in the United States. The valleys and hills, with plantings of evergreens [hemlocks, magnolias, & pseudolarix] provided a very beautiful display.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Ramon Jordan Interim Director, U.S. National Arboretum, November 22, 2010:
Dear Aaron Cook,
Please find attached is a letter that I am sending to you and other key U.S. National Arboretum stakeholders regarding our need to de-accession a few of our Collections. You have already spoken with Scott Aker, so you have most of this information already. The attached should address some of your earlier voiced concerns. I assure you, making the decision to remove any garden or collection is a painful one and not what any director or staff does without regret. However, due to the loss of long-standing support from a private donor, it is the only way, however, that currently available resources can be matched with the work involved in maintaining garden spaces at an acceptable standard.
Once you have read this letter, I would be happy to speak with you to discuss ways in which you could help support the gardens and collections of the National Arboretum. You have been a valuable partner in the past, and we look forward to strengthening this important relationship in the future.
Sincerely,
Ramon
---------- ----------
United States Department of Agriculture Research, Education, and Economics Agricultural Research Service United States National Arboretum 3501 New York Avenue, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002-1958 www.usna.usda.gov An Equal Opportunity Employer
November 15, 2010
Dear Aaron Cook; President, Azalea Society of America
[the same letter was also sent to Dear Ms. Leslie Zupan; President, Camellia Society of the Potomac Valley]
You may have heard that the National Arboretum's Gardens Unit will need to cut two gardener positions in 2012 due to the loss of long-standing support from a private donor. The lack of sufficient personnel to maintain all of the gardens and collections at the arboretum's D.C. campus has forced us to evaluate the best use of the unit's financial resources. We have determined that we have little choice but to de-accession collections. In the short-term, we will continue to examine other possible funding mechanisms.
Gardens Unit staff conducted a careful analysis of the collections and gardens to determine which should be proposed for de-accessioning. The analysis included the scientific value (germplasm) of each collection; its educational and interpretive value; its aesthetic value and appeal to visitors; and the current level of stakeholder involvement/support for the collection. The collections identified for de-accessioning would be removed—with important germplasm preserved through cuttings or transplanting, and some transplanted elsewhere on the arboretum grounds—and the space they occupied planted as low-maintenance woodland or meadow. Making the decision to remove any garden or collection is a painful one and not what any director or staff does without regret. It is the only way, however, that available resources can be matched with the work involved in maintaining garden spaces at an acceptable standard. For the first phase of withdrawing from the care of collections, we are proposing that the National Boxwood Collection and its associated Perennial Collections be de-accessioned. Also, while it has long been one of the most popular seasonal attractions at the National Arboretum, the extensive Glenn Dale Hillside of the Azalea Collections is for the most part undocumented plant material for which we cannot justify long-term maintenance.
The work to do this must be undertaken and started now so that it can be completed before the loss of the two staff positions in 2012. The process will consist of herbarium voucher documentation of identified plants in the collection, propagation of plants and shipment to other gardens, nurseries, and collections, and subsequent removal of the plants. Selected plants will be moved or propagated for new plantings in other areas at the arboretum. As a final step, native trees or meadow plants will be planted to restore the areas.
Long-term plans already exist to remove nearly all of the azaleas of unknown pedigree on the Glenn Dale Hillside (about 20-25% of the total azalea collection) so that they may be replaced with known Glenn Dale azalea introductions massed in large groups for visual impact, and to secure the germplasm holding with multiple plants. The plan now will shift to fast-track removal of azaleas of unknown pedigree so the area is less of a maintenance burden. Most removals are expected to take place in the summer of 2011.
2
The first steps in de-accessioning the National Boxwood Collection are the development of a complete and accurate inventory, communicating the availability of cuttings or rooted cuttings of the plants on the inventory, propagation of plants, and distribution of the resulting plants. Selected plants from the National Boxwood Collection and Perennials Collection will be moved or propagated to form the basis for new plantings elsewhere at the arboretum; for example, near the walled Morrison Garden in the Azalea Collections. This will create a smaller collection footprint that the Gardens Unit will be able to maintain with reduced resources. Removal of plants would not take place until autumn or winter of 2011-2012.
I know that you join me in wishing there were sufficient resources to retain these collections. I hope that you will understand that we cannot simply wait nor abandon collections when there is a reduction in staff. Because all signals currently point to a lack of financial resources sufficient to maintain existing collections by 2012, it would be irresponsible to allow the opportunity to distribute germplasm to pass by while we still have the staff to do the distribution or transplanting. While some might argue for the simple abandonment of garden spaces when staff positions are lost, this is not a responsible approach. Abandonment is environmentally harmful because of the potential for invasive species to become entrenched. It is nearly impossible to recover such collections after just a few years of abandonment without considerable expense.
Permanent sustained funding to support the minimum number of staff needed to develop and maintain our collections, but especially the boxwood and perennial collections and the azalea hillside, is the only viable way they can be saved. Should such funding become available, the replacement of unpedigreed plants with Glenn Dale cultivars on the Glenn Dale Hillside could be accomplished gradually, in a way that maintains the spring show while newly planted azaleas become established, and the de-accession of the National Boxwood Collection and Perennial Collections will not be necessary.
Managing resources through difficult economic times is challenging, but it can also offer opportunities. We will be carefully examining the resources we have to better engage the public and build strong support for the future. Visitation is trending upward, and the arboretum is still fortunate to have great potential in terms of location, land resource, and positive public recognition. Hopefully these assets will translate into a sound financial future if we can be prudent and deliberate with our resources in this time of transition.
I would be happy to speak with you to discuss ways in which you could help support the gardens and collections of the National Arboretum. You have been a valuable partner in the past, and we look forward to strengthening this important relationship in the future.
Sincerely,
Ramon Jordan
Interim Director, U.S. National Arboretum
---------- ----------
Greetings Dr. Jordan,
I am sorry but I find your arguments in support of destroying the collections completely unsubstantiated. If you follow through with the destruction of the Boxwood and Azalea collections, I can assure you that you will lose our support for any future National Arboretum projects. As well we will do every thing within our power, politically, economically, and using every media outlet available to lobby for new Arboretum leadership. There is already a "Save The National Arboretum Azaleas" website up on the web and a blog on the "Washington Gardener" website. The time to involve stakeholders is before decisions like this have been made, not after the fact.
Regards
Aaron Cook
President Azalea Society of America
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Aaron Cook; President, Azalea Society of America, November 24, 2010
Ref: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/azaleas/message/15499
Greetings All,
I am not saying we have won the war but I feel the tide is turning. I just got
off the phone with Dr. Joe Spence. He assured me that the plan to destroy the
Azaleas on Mt. Hamilton would be re-visited and that the Azalea Society and the
Rhododendron Society would have a seat at the table to discuss future plans. He
assured me that he has informed Dr. Jordan and Scott that they should not move
forward on any plans to remove plant material from the Arboretum at this time.
He also was very candid in saying he believes Scott overstepped his authority in
this instance. At this point I say let's keep up the pressure and remain
hopeful.
Best Regards
Aaron
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Jeanne Connelly, Chair of Friends of the National Arboretum, November 24, 2010
Ref: http://www.fona.org/storage/fona/documents/deaccession_letter_to_usna.pdf
November 24, 2010
Dr. Ramon Jordan
Interim Director
U.S. National Arboretum
3501 New York Avenue, NE
Washington DC 20002-1958
Dear Dr. Jordan:
I am writing in response to your letter to Friends of the National Arboretum (FONA) regarding the plans
of the U.S. National Arboretum (USNA) to de-accession several collections at the Arboretum.
FONA understands that in these difficult economic times all public entities need to tighten their belts
and carefully prioritize how they spend their funds. However, we believe that the decision made by
USNA to try and save money by destroying these important and vital plant and tree collections would be
a terrible loss for the Arboretum and the public which it serves. Over the years, millions of visitors have
come to view and enjoy these collections and they are an integral part of the Arboretum experience not
only for FONA members, but for all of the local, national and international visitors who come to the
Arboretum each year.
The main reason given for this decision is the loss of funding from a private trust which has annually
provided funds ($110,000) for two gardeners in the Asian Collection. These funds will no longer be
available as of February 2012. Because the trust funds flowed through FONA, we are well aware that
the restrictions governing these funds required that they be used only to supplement the regular work
of USNA in Asia Valley, and were not to supplant the government funds used to regularly maintain that
garden. Therefore, we cannot understand how the future loss of these funds can justify such a drastic
and irrevocable decision affecting other collections.
We believe that the decision will cause irreparable harm that could not be undone if additional funds
were later found. For example, the Azalea Collection is the premier draw for the general public to come
out to the Arboretum in the Spring, attracting thousands of visitors each year. The plan, which is to tear
out the azaleas on the Glen Dale Hillside and apply herbicide so that they cannot return, will leave a
barren eyesore in one of the most visible and frequently visited locations in the Arboretum. Similarly,
the Boxwood Collection forms a beautiful green barrier from the heavy traffic on Bladensburg Road and
thus contributes greatly to the serene ambience of the Arboretum. The plan would entail the removal of
every tree in this collection, leaving unobstructed views and sounds of the highway.
We are concerned that these decisions were made without any input from stakeholders with a long-
abiding interest in and relationship with the Arboretum. These stakeholders have also provided
significant financial support to USNA over many years. We are asking the USNA and the Department of
Agriculture to reconsider this decision and find within its budget the necessary funds to maintain these
vital collections. At a minimum, we ask the Department to suspend the decision while it engages in a
process with stakeholders to review the need for this action, the decision-making process that led to this
decision, and the alternative sources of funding that might be available.
The Arboretum is a national treasure – 446 acres of green space in the midst of a dense urban area, with
world class collections and gardens. We offer our assistance to the Department to find a way to reverse
this decision and save these vital and irreplaceable collections.
Sincerely,
Jeanne Connelly
Chair, Board of Directors
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Bob Stelloh; Webmaster, Azalea Society of America, November 29, 2010
Ref: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/azaleas/message/15516
Characterizing it as a financial problem is completely misleading, as
Aaron Cook and Don Hyatt have pointed out. The loss of the $100,000
grant money only removes two gardeners from the Asian Valley, and has
nothing to do with other areas of the arboretum unless they plan to
replace them with gardeners from other areas.
More importantly, renovating and maintaining the azalea hillside on
Mt Hamilton for the past 15 years or so has cost the arboretum
nothing, since the work was and is being done by Barbara Bullock's
team of loyal volunteers.
On the other hand, it will cost money to remove the azaleas from the
hillside, and it will also create an ongoing maintenance expense,
because the volunteers are not going to happily destroy the azaleas
they have worked so hard and long to maintain, nor are they apt to
maintain the hillside after those azaleas are destroyed.
Regards,
Bob Stelloh
Hendersonville NC
USDA Zone 7
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
November 29, 2010
Mr. Ronald E. Springwater
4615 43rd Street Northwest
Washington, D.C. 20016-4517
Dear Dr. Springwater:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the U.S. National Arboretum. I greatly appreciate hearing from you.
I am concerned about the possible destruction of the unique azalea collection. I have attached a copy of my letter to the U.S. National Arboretum seeking information and an explanation. I also am working with my colleagues to maintain funding for the U.S. National Arboretum. The U.S. National Arboretum is a national treasure, essential for horticulture research and display, and a great benefit to the District of Columbia economy, District and regional residents, and tourists from throughout the world.
Please continue to keep me informed of your views on legislation and other congressional issues, and I invite you to write me whenever you have a federal issue or a problem with which you think I can be helpful. I also hope you will visit my website at www.norton.house.gov, which is kept up-to-date on what I am doing in Congress.
Sincerely,
N
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Member of Congress
November 29, 2010
Dr. Ramon Jordan
Interim Director
U.S. National Arboretum
3501 New York Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
Dear Dr. Jordan,
A constituent recently wrote me concerning a proposal to minimize or destroy the unique azalea garden and other plant collections at the U.S. National Arboretum. I have worked with the Friends of the National Arboretum and with the U.S. National Arboretum to maintain this national treasure, essential for horticulture research and display, and a great benefit to the District of Columbia economy, District and regional residents, and tourists from throughout the world. I ask that you explain and update me on this matter and on what can be done to maintain this national attraction. I look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
N
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Member of Congress
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
By Jeanne Connelly, FONA Chairman; and Felix Laughlin, National Bonsai Foundation President. December 4, 2010
Ref: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/04/AR2010120403001.html?wprss=rss_print/metro
By Jeanne Connelly and Felix Laughlin, Washington
 An azalea in bloom at the U.S. National Arboretum |
Nothing says springtime in Washington like the cherry blossoms. Except perhaps azaleas in bloom at the U.S. National Arboretum.
Which explains why last week’s surprise announcement by the arboretum that it plans to destroy the most frequently visited section of the historic Azalea Collection and dismantle the entire National Boxwood Collection hit a horticultural nerve throughout the region. Countless fans, including members of the nonprofit Friends of the National Arboretum (FONA) and National Bonsai Foundation (NBF), have expressed opposition to the decision to eliminate one of nature’s most magnificent and scientifically important spring displays.
The Azalea Collection has long been a landmark in Washington. The lesser known but nationally recognized Boxwood Collection is the most complete collection in the world.
In fact, it was the magic of the spring azalea displays that first prompted the arboretum, a U.S. Agriculture Department research and education facility, to open its doors to the public in 1954. Twenty-eight years later, gardeners, horticulturists, landscape designers and other supporters established FONA to raise money and awareness about the federal arboretum — much like FONZ supports the National Zoo. Over the years, FONA and NBF and their members, along with corporate partners, foundations and other stakeholders, have contributed millions of dollars in support of this 446-acre green space to which visitors flock to see not only the azaleas but also the world-famous National Bonsai and Penjing Museum, the National Capitol Columns and many lesser-known gems such as the Gotelli Conifer Collection.
Given the draw of the azaleas and other treasures, the recent outpouring of support is hardly a surprise. What is a surprise — and a disappointment — is the arboretum’s shortsighted decision to eliminate these collections because of the loss of proceeds from a private trust
The money will not run out until more than a year from now, sufficient time to identify alternative funding to preserve these beloved collections. FONA has committed to help the arboretum explore ways to replace the lost funds. In turn, we call upon the arboretum to suspend its decision and consult with all stakeholders on preservation instead of destruction.
At the same time, this decision brings into sharp focus budget constraints the arboretum has faced for many years, and the pressing need to put this vital public asset on sound financial footing. With an eye toward the future, we call on Congress to hold a public hearing on the future of the arboretum and an alternate model for managing and operating the site that can provide financial sustainability for the long term. Successful examples of public institutions that operate as public-private partnerships exist throughout our region; Wolf Trap, Ford’s Theater and Glen Echo Park come to mind.
We recognize that in these difficult economic times, public institutions need to tighten their belts and carefully prioritize how they spend their funds. However, an irrevocable act of destruction would not be in the best interest of the arboretum or the public. For almost 60 years, the U.S. National Arboretum has been a vital public asset, providing generations with the opportunity for learning as well as enjoyment. Our goal is to ensure that the azaleas and the arboretum’s many other treasures will continue to be an integral part of the Washington experience for residents — and visitors from across the region and around the world — for many years to come.
The writers are chairman of the board of directors of Friends of the National Arboretum and president of the National Bonsai Foundation, respectively.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Aaron Cook; President, Azalea Society of America, December 8, 2010
Ref: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/azaleas/message/15566
Greetings All,
It has been an eventful couple of days. Just since the 1st of Dec., there have
been many calls, e-mails, and articles about the situation at the National
Arboretum. A new director has been appointed, and that is significant. I have
nothing against Dr. Colien Hefferan. I hope we can establish a good relationship
and work together to realize the full potential of the National Arboretum.
It is important to note that she was appointed to this position, and that her
background is in Economics, not Horticulture. By making this move the powers
that be are in effect making Scott more powerful, not less powerful as Dr.
Hefferan will be deferring all the day to day management decisions to Scott. I
have heard this from more than one person at the USDA.
In effect we are now looking at Scott as the de facto (director) of the U.S.
National Arboretum.
This is a bad turn of events for all those who want to save the Azaleas. I have
been offered a deal, which I declined. I was sent an e-mail that in affect said
if I would go along with the decision to remove the boxwoods they would postpone
any decision on the Azaleas. I told them in no uncertain terms. NO.
We need to keep the pressure on Scott until this is resolved. Keep calling,
keep posting, keep persueing every avenue available. DO NOT QUIT and DO NOT
GIVE UP. Scott has said publicly that he believes this will all blow over and
then they can quietly do whatever they want. In our last conversation I told
him point blank that I would never let him avoid the negative publicity that his
decision would generate. I also told him I would take before and after pictures
to post if he did achieve his objective of removing the Azaleas.
He said I was trying to paint him and the Arboretum in a bad light. I replied
that his decision had already beat me to it, and that he was only half right.
It was his decision and he needs to accept that fact.
My Kindest Regards To All
Aaron
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
From Tom Johnson, Director of Gardens at Magnolia Plantation and Gardens and chairman of the propagation committee of the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance, December 12, 2010
Ref: http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2010/dec/12/keep-heritageazaleas-aliveat-arboretum/
In an editorial in the Charleston, SC, Post and Courier, Tom Johnson stated:
"Magnolia Plantation and Gardens, along with the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance, has started an effort to save this azalea collection. But in the event that our efforts fail, we have requested that the destruction of the collection be postponed so we can take cuttings next summer to re-establish the collection in Charleston and at our 30 sister gardens around the country."
"It is unthinkable to destroy a popular collection of such beauty that has taken so many years to create. Contact our Congressional Delegation in Washington to enlist their help in saving the azaleas at the arboretum so we can pass their beauty to the next generation."
Here is the full text:
BY TOM JOHNSON
Sunday, December 12, 2010
The U.S. National Arboretum in Beltsville, Maryland, has plans next summer to destroy several thousand azaleas because of cuts to the agency's budget.
The arboretum also has said that because many of the plants in the popular azalea collection can't be identified, they must go.
If these plants are uprooted it could mean the loss of some rare varieties of azaleas that might not be enjoyed by future generations of Americans.
Magnolia Plantation and Gardens, along with the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance, has started an effort to save this azalea collection. But in the event that our efforts fail, we have requested that the destruction of the collection be postponed so we can take cuttings next summer to re-establish the collection in Charleston and at our 30 sister gardens around the country.
If the arboretum does not want the azaleas, why not allow them to be put in our garden in Charleston, a city known worldwide for its preservation efforts?
There is a ray of hope. Last week the arboretum got a new director. Colien Hefferan has accepted the position. Numerous websites and articles are popping up around the country. A Save the Azaleas at the National Arboretum page is on Facebook and a humorous cartoon is on YouTube.
The arboretum touts the azalea collection it wants to destroy. Admirers come to the arboretum each spring "to witness one of Washington's premier spring attractions," according to the arboretum's website. "Thousands of azaleas cover the flanks of Mount Hamilton in a blaze of color. The first warm days bring out the flowers, and the slopes take on a surreal, almost luminescent glow."
The mature azaleas, many of which are more than 60 years old, cover an estimated three to six acres of the 446-acre arboretum. Space should not be an issue, and the azaleas are not overgrown or in decline.
If the arboretum destroys the plants, they will also destroy part of its history. The arboretum apparently has forgotten that the azalea collection was developed by its first director, Benjamin Y. Morrison. Morrison's massive and unequaled breeding project produced the first large flowered azaleas hardy enough to survive in the Mid-Atlantic region.
The arboretum has said it lost funding from a private donor who paid the salaries of two gardeners. However, neither of the privately funded positions involved the azaleas and boxwoods and perennials that also are slated for removal.
The arboretum has said the azaleas attract too many visitors and that creates problems. The arboretum, however, has several large parking areas, which for years has provided a shuttle service to the various attractions.
The arboretum has said the azaleas on the Glenn Dale Hillside are not well documented even though the Morrison breeding records still exist. However, volunteers in the area are making progress to identify the plants, and it seems to me that even unidentified plants still have merit.
Unlike taxonomists on the arboretum's staff, whose goal it is to identify plants, I am a gardener who highly values plants even though their lineage might be unknown.
It is unthinkable to destroy a popular collection of such beauty that has taken so many years to create. Contact our Congressional Delegation in Washington to enlist their help in saving the azaleas at the arboretum so we can pass their beauty to the next generation.
Tom Johnson is director of gardens at Magnolia Plantation and Gardens and chairman of the propagation committee of the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
BY TOM JOHNSON
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Azalea lovers across America received an early Christmas gift last week when the U.S. National Arboretum said it will allow Magnolia Plantation and Gardens to take cuttings from several thousands azaleas slated for destruction this summer.
Even though the arboretum has refused to change its plans, the legacy of Ben Morrison's work will be carried on to preserve rare varieties of azaleas for the future.
Morrison, the arboretum's first director, developed the garden's azalea collection. His massive and unequaled breeding project produced the first large flowered azaleas that could withstand colder temperatures in the Mid-Atlantic region.
Officials at the arboretum have said the azaleas will be uprooted in late summer because many of the plants in the popular collection can't be identified and cuts in funding have reduced the gardening staff.
Earlier this month, on behalf of Magnolia and the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance, I asked the arboretum that if the collection can't be saved we would take cutting to re-establish the collection at Magnolia and at our 30 sister gardens around the country.
Ramon Jordan, the arboretum's interim associate director, responded to my letter to Dr. Edward Knipling, administrator and head of agricultural research at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In an e-mail Thursday, Jordan said: "I greatly appreciate your strong support for the (arboretum) and your interest in maintaining its collections.
"As you may know, however, within the next year USNA anticipates losing substantial long-standing private support for our gardens unit.
"We recognize, therefore, the possibility that the anticipated personnel shortage will affect our ability to preserve all of the gardens and collections at the arboretum's D.C. campus and thus require de-accessioning of some collections.
"Though among the most popular seasonal attractions at the National Arboretum, these azaleas are for the most part undocumented plant material for which we as principally a scientific organization cannot justify long-term maintenance with public funds and limited private support. According to the long-range plan, the azaleas of unknown pedigree (about 25 percent of the collection) would be removed, with some germplasm preserved and distributed, and the space they occupied replanted with documented azaleas.
"Moreover, it is certainly possible for the Magnolia Plantation and Gardens to take, propagate, and preserve some of the azaleas on your grounds in Charleston, South Carolina, or possibly with other gardens in The Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance," Jordan said. "We appreciate this generous offer."
Now our work at Magnolia begins. After the arboretum's staff informs us of the best time to take the cuttings, a four-member team from Magnolia will travel to Washington between June and July to collect as many as 8,000 cuttings that we'll bring home to Charleston. This mammoth undertaking will put our rooting beds at capacity with just this collection.
We greatly appreciate the arboretum's offer. We also would like to thank our supporters around the country who contacted the arboretum in this effort to save these azaleas.
Tom Johnson is director of gardens at Magnolia Plantation and Gardens and chairman of the propagation committee of the Great Gardens of America Preservation Alliance.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
January 3, 2011
Dear Ms. Hefferan,
The decision by the National Arboretum (NA), to destroy the Glenn Dale Azaleas on Mt. Hamilton, has had devastating repercussions throughout the NA and the visiting public.
Ironically, one of the justifications for their removal is their overwhelming popularity with the visitors to the NA, during the April-May blooming season. The reasoning is that this overloads the NA's facilities. This contradicts one of the basic functions of an Arboretum, which is to grow many different trees and shrubs for study and display to the public. There should be a warning here. Any institution that ceases to serve its primary functions, will no longer justify its existence.
A perfect example of this is the institution for which these azaleas were named. That is, the U.S. Plant Introduction Station, Glenn Dale, MD.
I have a personal interest in both the azaleas in question and the U.S. Plant Introduction Station. I knew the late Ben Morrison, during his latter years, and was involved with the Morrison azaleas as grown at the U.S. Plant Introduction Station, when I was Horticulturist in Charge (1959-1974) prior to my transfer to the research staff at the NA.
I am only too well aware of the sad fate of the Glenn Dale Station due to the gradual outsourcing of its primary functions. .Let not the proposed destruction of the Glenn Dale azalea collection be the precursor of the decline of the Arboretum's commitment to its visiting public - one of its primary justifications for its existence.
Should you question what the slow decline of an institution's function (receipt and evaluation of the USDA plant explorer's plant collecting world wide), I suggest you visit the U.S. Plant Introduction Station, in Glenn Dale, MD, and see for yourself. I did two years ago. Its dilapidated buildings are no longer safe to enter.
During the time I was involved with the Glenn Dale Station, all plant material subject to quarantine,was required to pass through the station and be evaluated and released from quarantine.. During its heyday of the 1960's and 1970's, we had three active virus indexing programs, one for stone fruits one for pomaceous fruits, and one for grapes. In addition, there was a sophisticated ornamental distribution program directed to state universities and nurserymen. In 1966, our staff consisted of 35 employees, including five research scientists.
Starting in the 1970's, the basic functions of the Station were taken over by others, beginning with the grape indexing being transferred to the West Coast. As the basic functions of the Station were gradually decreased, its staff was correspondingly reduced. The NA took it over for awhile, for growing out test blocks of promising plant material by the research scientists at NA.
The most recent activity, to the now vacant facility, was the consideration by Prince George's County of Maryland to evaluate its use for developing it into a recreation park. Due to the economy, this has not progressed further.
I believe the various ornamental collections at the NA are its very life blood - without them its justification for its existence no longer is viable and it may well eventually follow the path of the Glenn Dale Station.
Please give thoughtful consideration to the decisions taking place at the NA.
Sincerely,
William L. Ackerman, Ph.D.
Research Plant Geneticist (retired)
U.S. National Arboretum
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
 |
|||
 |
 |
|||
 |
 |
|||
 |
 |
|||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
On January 20, 2011, most Hearst TV stations broadcast a 2 minute clip about the imminent demise of the azaleas at the National Arboretum, hosted by Hearst reporter Sally Kidd. Above is a low resolution copy of the clip. Below is a transcript of the video.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- I am Sally Kidd at the National Arboretum where the proposal to cut down thousands of azaleas brings a public outcry. Those ... going on coming up.
...
[The National Arboretum in Washington is considered a national treasure, a showplace with more than 400 acres of botanic gardens.
But the Arboretum is losing money, and now plans are in the works to chop down thousands of mature azaleas to save money.]
The public outcry has been fierce, the azaleas are not only a huge attraction, they're also historically significant. [A group called "Save the Azaleas" is trying to stop the plan.]
Every spring, this National Arboretum hillside comes alive with 40,000 azaleas in full bloom, bursting with color -- a show-stopping display that draws crowds from all over.
Don Hyatt has made the trip just about every year since the age of 5.
"To walk through those with the azaleas towering overhead and the branches swaying in the breeze. -- it's just, it's ethereal, it's just absolutely gorgeous," Hyatt said.
But times are tough; the Arboretum is losing crucial grant money.
"We are having trouble and we have been for years and it's finally come to the point that something has to be done," National Arboretum Interim Director Ramon Jordan said.
So directors have decided that some of the azaleas must go...and this summer, ten thousand will be destroyed, unless additional funding can be found.
"It's a travesty because it's not only a waste -- they're destroying history," Hyatt said.
The azaleas destined for removal were planted in 1947, part of a colossal breeding project unlike any other of its time.
"It was a hard decision and I frankly said three times no before I said yes we have to do this," Jordan said.
Jordan says the older azaleas, while high on aesthetic value, are low on scientific value because documentation records have been lost over time," Jordan said.
"You know, when a plant is that beautiful, I don't care," Hyatt said.
The Arboretum is searching for alternatives, but without additional money these historic blooms will get the axe.
Now the Arboretum says saving the azaleas will cost about $150,000. That will provide at least a year's worth of funding and give them time to look for a longer term funding source.
Reporting from Washington, I am Sally Kidd.
Go to Correspondence Index Go to Top
January 21, 2011
For those of you who might be passing through the Washington DC are this April, I wanted to let you know that the local DC chapters of the Azalea Society of America and the American Rhododendron Society are planning a joint field trip to the Arboretum on Tuesday, April 26. It will be in the middle of the day, about 10:00 AM till 2:00 PM, so we avoid rush hour traffic. That is the week when the early Glenn Dales are usually coming into peak bloom. Come join us if you can or see them on your own. If we are not successful in our cause, this could be the last chance to do so.
Wish the azaleas luck!
Don Hyatt
McLean, VA
Go to Correspondence Return to Top
We can stop this insanity. But to do so we need your help; we need overwhelming pressure from all sides. Of course, Congress has ultimate control. USDA Administrators run the National Arboretum. The Washington Post is the DC area newspaper and reaches both the local population and national news sources. And the Friends of the National Arboretum are influential in providing private funding and wield serious power in determining what is done.
Write a letter in your own words to your Senators, Congressman, USDA Administrators, the Washington Post, and Friends of the National Arboretum. Tell your azalea and rhododendron friends, and your garden lover friends about this website "SaveTheAzaleas.org" and Don Hyatt's "Save The Azaleas Fact Sheet".
Don Hyatt created a one-page "Save The Azaleas Fact Sheet" to include when asking other people to help or a RTF document version that any editor can open to help in preparing your own letter.
If you know someone who we don't have on the list below that is influential, please let us know at
| Your Senators: | http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm | |
| Your Congressman: | https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml | |
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry:
|
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chairman |
Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) |
House Committee On Agriculture:
|
Frank D. Lucas, R-Okla. Chairman Bob Goodlatte (VA), Timothy V. Johnson (IL) |
Collin C. Peterson, D-Minn. Ranking Minority Member |
Eleanor Holmes Norton |
Email Phone: 202 225-8050 Fax: 202 225-3002 |
|
Roscoe Bartlett |
Email Phone: 202-225-2721 Fax: 202-225-2193 |
|
| ||
Kathleen Merrigan |
Email: kathleen.merrigan@osec.usda.gov |
|
Dr. Catherine Woteki |
Email: catherine.woteki@osec.usda.gov |
|
Edward B. Knipling |
Email:
|
|
Dr. Colien Hefferan |
Email:
|
|
Scott M Aker |
Email:
|
|
Judith St. John |
Email:
|
|
Dr. Joseph Spence |
Email:
|
|
Horticulturists |
Lynn Batdorf -
 - Horticulturist - (202) 245-5965Carole Bordelon - - Supervisory Research Horticulturist - (202) 245-5964Barbara Bullock - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-4511Christopher Carley - - Supervisory Research Horticulturist - (202) 245-5975Bradley Evans - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-4564Joan Feely - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-4512David Kidwell-Slak - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-2704Christine Moore - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-5093Mariya Navazio - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-5969Christopher Upton - - Horticulturist - (202) 245-2706 Gardens Unit Horticulturist U.S. National Arboretum 3501 New York Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002-1958 |
|
| Washington Post Letters to the Editor |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022000709.html | |
| Adrian Higgins Washington Post Gardening Columnist |
|
|
Friends of the National Arboretum Phone: (202) 544-8733; Fax: (202) 544-5398; http://www.fona.org/ |
||
Friends of the National Arboretum (FONA) |
Kathy Horan, Executive Director Email:
|
|
Friends of the National Arboretum (FONA) |
Chair - Jeanne K. Connelly, Consultant,
Robert Bartlett Jr. - The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. |
|
Friends of the National Arboretum (FONA) |
Senator Robert Bennett |
|
Go to How To help Return to Top
American Rhododendron Society: "Azaleas And Rhododendrons At The U. S. National Arboretum," 1954, by Henry T. Skinner describing "65,000 Glenn Dale hybrids in brilliant groupings of thirty five or forty plants to a clone."
American Rhododendron Society: "B. Y. Morrison and His Azaleas," 1968, by Frederick P. Lee
American Rhododendron Society: "Glenn Dale Azaleas," 1969, by Dr. Roy Magruder
Audubon Society: U.S. National Arboretum
Azalea Society of America: Listing and Photos of 454 Glenn Dale Azaleas
Azalea Society of America: "National Arboretum," 2004
Friends of the National Arboretum
Hyatt: 2008 Edinburgh: "What's New in Evergreen Azaleas"
Hyatt: 2009 ASA Keynote: "1) Evergreen Azaleas: Sorting Out the Confusion"
Hyatt: 2009 ASA Keynote: "2) Hybridizing Concerns: Color Inheritance, Polyploidy, and Sterility"
Hyatt: 2009 ASA Keynote: "3) Thoughts on Azalea Hybridizing"
Hyatt: 2009 ASA Keynote: "4) The Quest for the Yellow Evergreen Azalea"
Hyatt: "My Fascination with Knap Hill Azaleas"
Hyatt: Save The Azaleas Fact Sheet - 12/05/2010
National Arboretum: "A Mountain of Bright Spring Blossoms"
National Arboretum: "Azalea Blossom Watch"
National Arboretum: "Azalea Introductions, 459 cultivars listed"
National Arboretum: "Azalea Questions and Answers"
National Arboretum: "Azalea Walk"
National Arboretum: "Dr. Colien Hefferan Named Director of U.S. National Arboretum"
National Arboretum: "Fast Facts About The Arboretum" "pdf version"
National Arboretum: "Glenn Dale Azaleas Photo Gallery"
National Arboretum: Master Plan Introduction
National Arboretum: "Ramon Jordan, Interim Director"
National Arboretum: "Strategic Plan 2"
National Arboretum: "Summer Horticultural Internships"
National Arboretum: "Still Beautiful at 75; Volunteers to the Rescue"
National Arboretum: "Visitor Guide" which states "15,000 vividly colored Glenn Dale Azaleas grow on Mount Hamilton among native trees like the flowering dogwood"
National Arboretum: "Volunteering at the Arboretum"
the back quarter acre blog: Glenn Dale Azaleas
Washington Gardener Blog: Save the Azaleas at the U.S. National Arboretum
Washington Post: "going out guide: U.S. National Arboretum" by Maura Kelly
Washington Post: "Plans Wilt at National Arboretum," 2008, by Adrian Higgins
YouTube: With springtime also come millions of azalea blossoms to the National Arboretum - 2009
Active Rain - Maryland Real Estate Blog
1/7/11 "Help Save the Azaleas at the U.S. National Arboretum in DC"
American Rhododendron Society Rhododendron and Azalea News
12/13/10 "An appeal ... save the azaleas in National Arboretum"
American Rhododendron Society - Greater Philadelphia Chapter
1/10/11 "Help Save the Azaleas at the National Arboretum"
The Behnke Nurseries Co. Garden Blog by Susan Harris
11/22/10 "Help Save Gardens at the National Arboretum"
Charleston, SC, Post & Courier:
12/12/10 "
Keep heritage azaleas alive at arboretum" by Tom Johnson
Daily Kos:
11/24/10 "Azaleas by cliffenz"
11/27/10 "Azaleas Yet Again"
1/16/11 "Back To the Azaleas! Call For Action!"
DCist:
11/29/10 "National Arboretum's Azalea Hill in Jeopardy" by Aaron Morrissey
Facebook
11/22/10 "Save the Azalea Collection at the US National Arboretum"
11/23/10 "Save the Azalea Collection at the US National Arboretum"
Garden Rant:
11/22/10 "Lost a contributor? National Arboretum says it’s time to destroy some gardens!" By Susan Harris
GCV Horticulture - The Garden Club of Virginia:
11/29/10 "Arboretum to destroy azalea exhibit" by Ann Hohenberger
Greater Greater Washington:
11/23/10 "National Arboretum Funding Crisis" by Julianne F-M
Hill is Home, The (DC):
11/22/10 "Things We Take for Granted: The United States National Arboretum" by Maria Helena Carey
H-Net:
11/22/10 "Azalea (and boxwood) controversy at National Arboretum" by Matthew Gilmore
Hope in Hyattsville:
11/24/10 "Latest on the National Arboretum’s Azalea Collection Furor"
It's An Izel World:
12/10/10 "Shallow Vision Threatens Deep Rooted Azalea Legacy" by Claudio Vazquez
Like the Dew: A Journal of Southern Culture & Politics:
11/24/10 "Savaging the Azaleas at the National Arboretum"
Magnolia Plantation and Gardens
1/2011 "Magnolia Gardens Chosen to Save the Ben Morrison Hybrid Azaleas at the National Arboretum"
NBC/MSNBC:
11/22/10: "Are the Azaleas Doomed?" by P. J. Orvetti
11/23/10 "The Night Note: Save the Azaleas" by Brendan Williams-Kief
News & Advance, Lynchburg, Virginia:
12/14/10 "Washington's azaleas threatened" by Don Davis
Prince of Petworth (DC blog):
11/23/10 "national arboretum to destroy mature azaleas exhibit because it draws too many people"
Symbol And Sustenance:
11/22/10 "Do You Love The National Arboretum Azaleas?"
Takoma Park Patch:
12/4/10 "Anger Growing at Plan to Destroy Azaleas Bred By Takoma Park Resident"
VictorPost.com:
12/9/10 "Offshoots - Rants on plants at the National Arboretum" by Melody Burri
WashingtonGardener:
11/21/10 "Save the Azaleas at the U.S. National Arboretum" by Don Hyatt
11/24/10 "Save the USNA Azaleas ... and Boxwood, Daylilies, and Daffodils for that matter!" by Kathy Jentz
Washington Post:
11/23/10 "Save the azaleas!" DC-area blogs by Lori Aratani
11/28/10 "From shrubs to towering controversy: Plan to remove azaleas draws objections" by Adrian Higgins
11/29/10 "Azalea removal root of dispute" by Adrian Higgins
12/5/10 "A jewel of D.C.'s spring at risk at the arboretum" By Jeanne Connelly and Felix Laughlin
12/11/10 "Trims at National Arboretum could mar our cultural landscape" By Joel M. Lerner
You Wif and Hub:
11/22/10 Do You Love The National Arboretum Azaleas?
You Tube:
12/2/10 You Can Kiss My Hoary Azalea by Claudio Vazquez in Izel Blogs (animation)
Go to Editorials Return to Top
Click on any photo to see large version of it.
Photos are courtesy of Don Hyatt.
Thank you for visiting this site. I hope it inspires you to help Save The Azaleas at the National Arboretum. -
, President, Valley Forge Chapter, American Rhododendron Society
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Roscoe Bartlett
Tom Vilsack
Kathleen Merrigan
Dr. Catherine Woteki
Edward B. Knipling
Colien Hefferan
Scott Aker
Judith St. John
Dr. Joseph Spence
