Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fruit aroma and sensorial characteristics of traditional and innovative Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars grown in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plums are climacteric fruits with reduced shelf life and they represent a very appreciated product for fresh consumption. European consumers can find several plum cultivars that offer different organoleptic characteristics, flavor and aroma. In this study, chemical properties, such as total soluble solids (TSS), pH, titratable acidity, total phenolic and anthocyanin contents, aroma profile and sensory evaluation of seven plum cultivars were investigated. Significant differences in chemical properties were found in ‘Settembrine’ and ‘Angeleno’, the late ripening European plums that showed the highest TSS content and the lowest acidity values. As expected, a high level of anthocyanins was detected in red pulp and red flesh plums such as ‘Dofi Giudy’ and ‘Black Diamond’, though significant differences in their total phenolic amount were observed. ‘Dofi Giudy’, ‘Black Diamond’ and ‘Laroda’ showed the highest aroma profile among the investigated cultivars. Finally, a discrimination among the cultivars was obtained by combining the volatile profiles with a back-propagation neural network analysis (BPNN). The results showed that C6 compounds such as esters and aldehydes were strongly related to flavor perception of the panelists. ‘Dofi Giudy’ was the mostly appreciated plum due to its juiciness, sweetness and flavor intensity; furthermore, when compared to the other cultivars, it also showed remarkable levels of total soluble solids, total phenolic and anthocyanin contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAOSTAT (2017). Agriculture organization corporate statistical database. Production/crops. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E

  2. Morettini A (1963). Frutticoltura Generale e Speciale. Vol. R.E.D.A., Roma

  3. Faust M, Surányi D (1999) Origin and dissemination of plums. Hort Rev 23:179–231

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blazek J (2004) A survey of the genetic resources used in plum breeding. VIII international symposium on plum and prune genetics, breeding and pomology 734:31–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okie WR, Hancock JF (2008) Plums. Temperate fruit crop breeding. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nencetti V, Peano C, Palara U, Pirazzini P, Mezzetti B, Capocasa F, Mennone C, Sottile F, Catalano L (2008) Plum production in Italy: state of the art and perspectives. IX international symposium on plum and prune genetics, breeding and pomology 874:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohata K, Togano Y, Matsumoto T, Uchida Y, Kurahashi T, Itamura H (2017) Selection of prune (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars suitable for the East Asian Temperate Monsoon Climate: ripening characteristics and fruit qualities of certain prunes in a warm Southwest Region of Japan. Horticult J 86(4):437–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballistreri G, Continella A, Gentile A, Amenta M, Fabroni S, Rapisarda P (2013) Fruit quality and bioactive compounds relevant to human health of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars grown in Italy. Food 140(4):630–638

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walkowiak-Tomczak D, Reguła J, Łysiak G (2008) Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of selected plum cultivars fruit. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria 7(4):15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Calvo Villegas I (2009) El cultivo del ciruelo (Prunus doméstica) (No. CIDAB-SB359-I5c). Instituto Nacional de Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Boletin Tecnico 9:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozturk B, Yildiz K, Kucuker E (2015) Effect of pre harvest methyl jasmonate treatments on ethylene production water soluble phenolic compounds and fruit quality of Japanese plums. J Sci Food Agric 95(3):583–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Day KR (2008) Market life update for peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars grown in California. Adv Hortic Sci 22(3):201–204

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valero D, Martınez-Romero D, Valverde JM, Guillen F, Serrano M (2003) Quality improvement and extension of shelf life by 1-methylcyclopropene in plum as affected by ripening stage at harvest. Innov Food Sci Emerg 4(3):339–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahamishirazi S, Moehring J, Claupein W, Graeff-Hoenninger S (2017) Quality assessment of 178 cultivars of plum regarding phenolic, anthocyanin and sugar content. Food Chem 214:694–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kucuker E, Ozturk B, Aksit H, Genc N (2015) Effect of pre harvest aminoethoxyvinylglycine AVG application on bioactive compounds and fruit quality of plum Prunus salicina Lindell cv Black Beauty at the time of harvest and during cold storage. J Animal Plant Sci 25(3):763–770

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim DO, Jeong SW, Lee CY (2003) Antioxidant capacity of phenolic phytochemicals from various cultivars of plums. Food Chem 81(3):321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim DO, Chun OK, Kim YJ, Moon HY, Lee CY (2003) Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. J Agr Food Chem 51(22):6509–6515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Karaman S, Ozturk B, Genc N, Celik SM (2013) Effect of preharvest application of methyl jasmonate on fruit quality of plum Prunus salicina lindell cv fortune at harvest and during cold storage. J Food Process Preserv 37(6):1049–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ertekin C, Gozlekci S, Kabas O, Sonmez S, Akinci I (2006) Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L) cultivars. J Food Eng 75(4):508–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellini E, Nencetti V (2001) “Dofi-Giudy”: A new early red Japanese plum. VII international symposium on plum and prune genetics, breeding and pomology 577:221–222

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cobianchi D, Watkins R (1984). Plum descriptors: descriptor list for plum and allied species (Prunus). IBPGR

  22. Regione Emilia Romagna (2018). Disciplinari di Produzione Integrata–Susino (in Italian). http://agricoltura.regione.emilia-romagna.it/produzioni-agroalimentari/doc/disciplinari/produzione-integrata/Collezione-dpi/dpi_2018/norme/frutticole/difesa-susino/view

  23. Crisosto CH, Garner D, Crisosto GM, Bowerman E (2004) Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindell) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol Tec 34(3):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Garner D (2004) Understanding tree fruit consumer acceptance. V International Postharvest Symposium 682:865–870

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taiti C, Marone E, Lanza M, Azzarello E, Masi E, Pandolfi C, Giordani E, Mancuso S (2017) Nashi or Williams pear fruits? Use of volatile organic compounds, physicochemical parameters, and sensory evaluation to understand the consumer’s preference. Eur Food Res Technol 243(11):1917–1931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Blake RS, Monks PS, Ellis AM (2009) Proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Chem Rev 109(3):861–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taiti C, Marone E, Bazihizina N, Caparrotta S, Azzarello E, Petrucci AW, Pandolfi C, Giordani E (2016) Sometimes a little mango goes a long way: a rapid approach to assess how different shipping systems affect fruit commercial quality. Food Anal Method 9(3):691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindinger W, Hansel A, Jordan A (1998) On-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels by means of proton transfer- reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS): medical applications, food control, and environmental research. Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Process 173:191–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. White IR, Blake RS, Taylor AJ, Monks PS (2016) Metabolite profiling of the ripening of Mangoes Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Tommy Atkins’ by real-time measurement of volatile organic compounds. Metabolomics 12(3):57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee J, Durst RW, Wrolstad RE (2005) Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: collaborative study. J AOAC I 88(5):1269–1278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ainsworth EA, Gilliespie KM (2007) Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrate in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Nat Protoc 2(4):875–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zurada JM (1992) Introduction to artificial neural systems, vol 8. West publishing company, St, Paul

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zurada JM, Malinowski A (1994) Multilayer perceptron networks: selected aspects of training optimization. Appl Math Comp Sci 4:281–307

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morgan A, Boddy L, Mordue JEM, Morris CW (1998) Evaluation of artificial neural networks for fungal identification, employing morphometric data from spores of Pestalotiopsis species. Mycol Res 102:975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chai Q, Wu B, Liu W, Wang L, Yang C, Wang Y, Fang J, Liu Y, Li S (2012) Volatiles of plums evaluated by HS-SPME with GC–MS at the germplasm level. Food Chem 130(2):432–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pino JA, Quijano CE (2012) Study of the volatile compounds from plum (Prunus domestica L. cv. Horvin) and estimation of their contribution to the fruit aroma. Food Sci Technol 32(1):76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. El Hadi MAM, Zhang FJ, Wu FF, Zhou CH, Tao J (2013) Advances in fruit aroma volatile research. Molecules 18(7):8200–8229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Baietto M, Wilson AD (2015) Electronic-nose applications for fruit identification, ripeness and quality grading. Sensors 15:899–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bertin N, Génard M, Hertog M (2018) Quality of horticultural crops: a recurrent/new challenge for plant scientists in a changing world. Front Plant Sci 9:1151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pesis E (2005) The role of the anaerobic metabolites, acetaldehyde and ethanol, in fruit ripening, enhancement of fruit quality and fruit deterioration. Postharvest Biol Tec 37(1):1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pesis E, Faiman D, Dori S (1998) Postharvest effects of acetaldehyde vapour on ripening-related enzyme activity in avocado fruit. Postharvest Biol Tec 13(3):245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Palou P, Crisosto CH, Garner D, Basinal LM (2003) Effect of continuous exposure to exogenous ethylene during cold storage on postharvest decay development and quality attributes of stone fruits and table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol 27:243–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gomez E, Ledbetter CA (1994) Comparative study of the aromatic profiles of two different plum species: Prunus salicina Lindl and Prunus simonii L. J Sci Food Agri 65(1):111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lozano M, Vidal-Aragón MC, Hernández MT, Ayuso MC, Bernalte MJ, García J, Velardo B (2009) Physicochemical and nutritional properties and volatile constituents of six Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars. Eur Food Res Technol 228(3):403–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Crouzet J, Etievant P, Bayonove C (1990). Stoned fruit: Apricot, plum, peach, cherry. In: Morton ID, Macleod AJ (eds) Food flavours, Part C:The flavour of fruits, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, p 43–91

  46. Crisosto CH (1994) Stone fruit maturity indices: a descriptive. Postharvest News and Information 5(6):65N–68N

    Google Scholar 

  47. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Echeverria G, Puy J (2007) Segregation of plum and pluot cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics. Postharvest Biol Technol 44(3):271–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Díaz-Mula HM, Zapata PJ, Guillén F, Castillo S, Martínez-Romero D, Valero D, Serrano M (2008) Changes in physicochemical and nutritive parameters and bioactive compounds during development and on tree ripening of eight plum cultivars: a comparative study. J Sci Food Agri 88(14):2499–2507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Usenik V, Kastelec D, Veberič R, Štampar F (2008) Quality changes during ripening of plums (Prunus domestica L.). Food Chem 111(4):830–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kitzberger CSG, da Silva CM, dos Santos Scholz MB, Ferreira MIF, Bauchrowitz IM, Eilert JB, dos Santos Neto J (2017) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of plums accesses (Prunus salicina). AIMS AgriFood 2(1):101–112

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vangdal E, Flatland S, Hjeltnes SH, Sivertsen H (2004) September). Consumer preferences for new plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.). VIII international symposium on plum and prune genetics, breeding and pomology 734:169–172

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cevallos-Casals BA, Cisneros-Zevallos L (2003) Stoichiometric and kinetic studies of phenolic antioxidants from Andean purple corn and red-fleshed sweet potato. J Agric Food Chem 51:3313–3319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tomás-Barberán FA, Gil MI, Cremin P, Waterhouse AL, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2001) HPLC − DAD − ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. Agri Food Chem 49(10):4748–4760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Vizzotto M, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Byrne DH, Ramming DW, Okie WR (2006) Total phenolic, carotenoid, and anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity of peach and plum genotypes. Acta Hortic 713:453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rupasinghe HPV, Jayasankar S, Lay W (2006) Variation in total phenolics and antioxidants among European plum genotype. Sci Hortic 108:243–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ozturk B, Kucuker E, Karaman S, Yildiz K, Kılıc K (2013) Effect of aminoethoxyvinylglycine and methyl jasmonate on individual phenolics and post harvest fruit quality of three different japanese plums Prunus salicina lindell. Int J Food Eng 9(4):421–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Robertson JA, Meredith FI, Lyon BG, Norton JD (1991) Effect of cold storage effect of cold storage on the quality characteristics of “Au-Rumbrum” plum. J Food Quality 14(2):107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Daza A, García-Galavís PA, Grande MJ, Santamaría C (2008) Fruit quality parameters of ‘Pioneer’Japanese plums produced on eight different rootstocks. Sci Hortic 118(3):206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bozhkova V (2015) Chemical composition and sensory evaluation of plum fruits. Trakya University J Natural Sci 15(1):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cappellin L, Makhoul S, Schuhfried E, Romano A, del Pulgar JS, Aprea E, Farneti B, Costa F, Gasperi F, Biasioli F (2014) Ethylene: absolute real-time high-sensitivity detection with PTR/SRI-MS. The example of fruits, leaves and bacteria. Int J Mass Spectro 365:33–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Cappellin L, Costa F, Aprea E, Betta E, Gasperi F, Biasioli F (2015) Double clustering of PTR-ToF-MS data enables the mapping of QTLs related to apple fruit volatilome. Sci Horti 197:24–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bianchi T, Weesepoel Y, Koot A, Iglesias I, Eduardo I, Gratacós-Cubarsí M, Gurrero L, Hortos M, van Ruth S (2017) Investigation of the aroma of commercial peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) types by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and sensory analysis. Food Res Inter 99:133–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jardine K, Abrell L, Kurc SA, Huxman T, Ortega J, Guenther A (2010) Volatile organic compound emissions from Larrea tridentata (creosote bush). Atmos Chem Phys 10:12191–12206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Buhr K, van Ruth S, Delahunty C (2002) Analysis of volatile flavour compounds by Proton Transfer Reaction-Mass Spectrometry: fragmentation patterns and discrimination between isobaric and isomeric compounds. Int J Mass Spectro 221:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Taiti C, Costa C, Menesatti P, Caparrotta S, Bazihizina N, Azzarello E, Petrucci WA, Masi E, Giordani E (2015) Use of volatile organic compounds and physicochemical parameters for monitoring the post-harvest ripening of imported tropical fruits. Eur Food Res Technol 241(1):91–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pang X (2015) Biogenic volatile organic compound analyses by PTR-TOF-MS: calibration, humidity effect and reduced electric field dependency. J Environ Sci 32:196–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Brilli F, Ruuskanen TM, Schnitzhofer R, Müller M, Breitenlechner M, Bittner V, Wohlfahrt G, Loreto F, Hansel A (2011) Detection of plant volatiles after leaf wounding and darkening by proton transfer reaction “time-of-flight” mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF). PLoS ONE 6(5):e20419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee A, Goldstein AH, Kroll JH, Ng NL, Varutbangkul V, Flagan RC, Seinfeld JH (2006). Gas-phase products and secondary aerosol yields from the photooxidation of 16 different terpenes. J Geophys Res 111

  69. Tani A (2013) Fragmentation and reaction rate constants of terpenoids determined by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry. Environ Control Biol 51:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Aprea E, Romano A, Betta E, Biasioli F, Cappellin L, Fanti M, Gasperi F (2015) Volatile compound changes during shelf life of dried Boletus edulis: comparison between SPME-GC-MS and PTR-ToF-MS analysis. J Mass Spectro 50(1):56–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. de Gouw J, Warneke C (2007) Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the earth’s atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Mass Spectro Rev 26(2):223–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. De Gouw JA, Goldan PD, Warneke C, Kuster WC, Roberts JM, Marchewka M, Bertman SB, Pszenny AAP, Keene WC (2003). Validation of proton transfer reaction‐mass spectrometry (PTR‐MS) measurements of gas‐phase organic compounds in the atmosphere during the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS) in 2002. J Geophys Res Atmos, 108(D21)

  73. Farneti B, Khomenko I, Grisenti M, Ajelli M, Betta E, Algarra AA, Cappellin L, Aprea E, Gasperi F, Biasoli F, Giongo L (2017) Exploring blueberry aroma complexity by chromatographic and direct-injection spectrometric techniques. Fronti Plant Sci 8:617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Maleknia SD, Bell TL, Adams MA (2007) PTR-MS analysis of reference and plant-emitted volatile organic compounds. Int J Mass Spectrom 262:203–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank “Vivai Calderoni” for having supported the research. This study was also supported by “Fondazione CR Firenze” funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAGRI), University of Florence, Viale delle Idee 30, 50019, Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy

    Cosimo Taiti, Camilla Pandolfi, Stefania Caparrotta, Edgardo Giordani, Stefano Mancuso & Valter Nencetti

  2. School of Physics and Astronomy (SUPA), University of Glasgow, G128QQ, Glasgow, UK

    Matilde Dei

Authors
  1. Cosimo Taiti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camilla Pandolfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefania Caparrotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matilde Dei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edgardo Giordani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stefano Mancuso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Valter Nencetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Caparrotta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taiti, C., Pandolfi, C., Caparrotta, S. et al. Fruit aroma and sensorial characteristics of traditional and innovative Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars grown in Italy. Eur Food Res Technol 245, 2655–2668 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03377-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03377-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation