Skip to main content

Zusatzfunktionen in der Sonographie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultraschall in der Urologie

Zusammenfassung

In den vergangenen Jahren führten eine kontinuierliche Innovation auf dem Gebiet der Elektronik, der Wandlerproduktion und der Signalverarbeitung sowie die Einführung des Kontrastmittels in die Sonographie zu einem eindrucksvollen Fortschritt in der sonographischen Bildgebung. Power-Doppler (PW), kontrastmittelgestützter Ultraschall (KUS), Pulssequenzverfahren (CPS) und Elastographie ergänzen die konventionelle Sonographie und die farbkodierte Doppler-Sonographie und erweitern die Bandbreite der strahlenfreien Diagnostik in der Urologie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bhayani S, Siegel C (2007) Urinary tract imaging: basic principles. In: Campells urology, 9. Aufl. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho JY, Kim SH, Lee SE (1998) Diffuse prostatic lesions: role of color and power Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 17:283–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clevert DA, Stock K, Klein B et al (2009) Evaluation of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal tumors of unknown etiology in comparison to histological findings. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 43:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A et al (2001) Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur Radiol 11:1316–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey BJ, Nelson RC, Bradway DP et al (2008) In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography. Phys Med Biol 53:279–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frauscher F, Klauser A, Volgger H et al (2002) Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 167:1648–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail M, Gomella LG, Alexander AA (1997) Color Doppler sonography of the prostate. Tech Urol 3:140–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khaled W, Reichling S, Bruhns OT et al (2006) Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue. Ultrasonics 44(Suppl 1):199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P et al (2007a) Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol 17:2278–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P et al (2007b) Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 100:42–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallwein L, Aigner F, Faschingbauer R et al (2008a) Prostate cancer diagnosis: value of real-time elastography. Abdom Imaging 33:729–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Gradl J et al. (2008b) Diagnostic evaluation of small renal masses: value of contrast enhanced US in comparison to multidetector CT. J Urol 179(Suppl 4):331 (abstract 960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Pelzer A et al (2008c) Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances. Eur Radiol 18:707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek G, Wilkinson ER, Bharat S et al (2006) Elastography measurements of in-vivo radiofrequency ablationlesions of the kidney. J Endourol 20:959–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH et al (2007) Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 61:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P, Gardner E (2004) Contrast-agent detection and quantification. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 8):4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaia E (2007) Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 17:1995–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin MD, Sudakoff GS, Alexander AA (1993) Prostate: techniques, results, and potential applications of color Doppler US scanning. Radiology 186:509–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelaar JP, van Leenders GJ, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA et al (2001) Microvessel density: correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 40:285–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer EA, Golijanin DJ, Davis RS et al (2006) What’s new in urologic ultrasound? Urol Clin North Am 33:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabaugh TK, Machaidze Z, Hennigar R et al (2005) Monitoring radiofrequency renal lesions in real time using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a porcine model. J Endourol 19:579–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeyer D, Frauscher F, Klauser A et al (2001) Contrast-enhanced transrectal color Doppler ultrasonography (TRCDUS) for assessment of angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 21:2907–2913

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamai H, Tkigushi Y, Oka M et al (2005) Contrastenhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors. J Ultrasound Med 24:1635–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukimura O, Mitterberger M, Okihara K et al (2008) Realtime virtual ultrasonography radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 101:707–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal D, Sedelaar JP, Aarnink RG et al (2000) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography and conventional examination methods: the value of diagnostic predictors of prostate cancer. BJU Int 86:58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SR, Greenbaum LD, Goldberg BB (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles? AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna P et al (2007a) Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study. J Endourol 21:466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink MH, Laguna MP, Lagerveld BW et al (2007b) Contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the follow-up of cryoablation of renal tumors: a feasibility study. BJU Int 99:1371–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wink M, Frauscher F, Cosgrove D et al (2008) Contrast enhanced ultrasound and prostate cancer; a multicentre European research coordination project. Eur Urol 54:982–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondergem N, de la Rosette JJ (2007) HIFU and cryoablation non or minimal touch techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. Is there a role for contrast enhanced ultrasound? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 16:22–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de la Rosette, J.J.M.C.H. (2021). Zusatzfunktionen in der Sonographie. In: Hegele, A., Hofmann, R., Heers, H. (eds) Ultraschall in der Urologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60397-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics