Abstract
From antiquity to the present, schools of some form have, in one way or other, been involved in the material and symbolic reproduction of societies. As David Reidy puts it, ‘all or nearly all enduring liberal democracies have some form of compulsory education that directly or indirectly but almost always purposefully serves assimilationist ends’. The diachronic resilience of schooling along with its synchronic omnipresence often makes schools appear as natural, self-evident and unavoidable. The naturalization of schooling is then extended to its modern specification as compulsory in a universalist fashion. Thus, schools appear not only naturally and self-evidently compulsory but also universally compulsory in multiple senses. Schooling has become compulsory in a numerical-universal sense (all children must attend school and all liberal states rely on compulsory schooling); in a temporal-universal sense (school attendance lasts for a fixed period of time for all children); in a comprehensive-universal sense (all children must acquire a common threshold of knowledge); and, more recently, in a synchronizing-universal sense (this occurs through supra-state synchronization of global educational time and globalized curricular isomorphism. Such synchronizing universalized practices establish, for instance, common tests for measuring achievement of all children and common standards for assessing school performance around the globe).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Schools for the children of the King and the aristocracy had been founded in Egypt as early as 2,500 BC. There is also evidence of the significance of schooling for the China of Confucius’s times (circa fifth century BC). The first laws of compulsory education were set in the ancient Greek world by legislators such as Zaleucus (seventh century BC) (a law of compulsory education for all in the city Epizephyrioi Locroi is attributed to him) and Charondas (sixth century BC).
References
Aviram, A. (1986). The justification of compulsory education: The still neglected moral duty. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20(1), 51–58.
Gardner, P. (1984). The compulsory curriculum and beyond: A consideration of some aspects of the educational philosophy of J. P. White. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 18(2), 167–185.
Kleinig, J. (1981). Compulsory schooling. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 15(2), 191–203.
Merry, M. S., & Karsten, S. (2010). Restricted liberty, parental choice and homeschooling. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44(4), 497–514.
Reidy, D. (2001). Pluralism, liberal democracy, and compulsory education: Accommodation and assimilation. Journal of Social Philosophy, 32(4), 585–609.
Schinkel, A. (2010). Compulsory autonomy-promoting education. Educational Theory, 60(1), 97–116.
White, J. (1985). The compulsory curriculum and beyond: A reply to P. Gardner. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 19(1), 129–136.
Williams, K. (1990). In defence of compulsory education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24(2), 285–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Papastephanou, M. (2014). Philosophical Perspectives on Compulsory Education. In: Papastephanou, M. (eds) Philosophical Perspectives on Compulsory Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7311-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7311-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7310-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7311-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)