south american Journal of herpetology, 7(2), 2012, 134‑148
© 2012 Brazilian society of herpetology
RedescRiption and moRphological vaRiation of
oxyrhopus clathratus duméRil, BiBRon and duméRil, 1854
(seRpentes: dipsadidae: Xenodontinae)
Pedro Henrique Bernardo1,2,5, FaBio a. MacHado1,4, roBert W. MurPHy2,3, and HussaM ZaHer1
1
Museu de Zoologia da universidade de são paulo, avenida Nazaré, 481, cEp 04263‑000, são paulo, sp, Brazil.
centre for Biodiversity and conservation Biology, royal ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s park, toronto, oN M5s 2c6, canada.
3 Key laboratory of Genetic resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, chinese academy of sciences, Kunming 650223, china.
4
Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, IB‑usp. rua do Matão, travessa 14, nº 227, cEp 05422‑970, são paulo, sp, Brasil.
5
E‑mail corresponding author: bernardoph@gmail.com
2
aBstract. the snake oxyrhopus clathratus, which has a restricted distribution within the atlantic forest domain, exhibits great
variability in color pattern, shape of the hemipenis, and scalation. the extent of variation has resulted in substantial taxonomic con‑
fusion. to date, identification and recognition are problematic, and this is reflected in the synonymy of the species. We examine the
type series and specimens from throughout the species’ distribution to assess intraspecific morphological variation. morphological
variability is correlated with geographical distribution and elevation. further, we explore whether the morphological data support
recognition of more than one species or not. the results suggest that o. clathratus is a single species that exhibits considerable
variation in morphology, including three distinct patterns of coloration (melanistic, melanistic with inconspicuous narrow light
bands, and with conspicuous dark and light bands alternating along the body) that overlap geographically. the morphology of the
ornamented hemipenes varies between “t‑shape” and “Y‑shape” forms, which occur without any meaningful or elevational struc‑
turing. the loreals are usually absent. Based on our results we designate a lectotype for the species.
KeyWords. taxonomy; external morphology; hemipenis; geographic variation;. morphometric analyses; polychromatism.
introduction
the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of
advanced snakes (serpentes, caenophidia) have ex‑
perienced great changes in recent years (vidal et al.,
2007, 2008, 2010; Zaher et al., 2009). currently, the
species oxyrhopus clathratus duméril, Bibron and
duméril, 1854 is allocated to the family dipsadi‑
dae, subfamily Xenodontinae and tribe pseudoboini.
this tribe is considered a monophyletic assemblage
(Zaher, 1994; Zaher, 1999; Zaher et al., 2009; vidal
et al., 2010) comprised of the genera Boiruna, clelia,
Drepanoides, Mussurana, oxyrhopus, phimophis,
pseudoboa, rhachidelus, and siphlophis.
among pseudoboines, the genus oxyrhopus re‑
tains a history of substantial nomenclatorial instabili‑
ty. until modern definition of the pseudoboine genera
(Bailey, 1970; Zaher, 1996), some species were allo‑
cated within clelia and pseudoboa (Boulenger, 1896;
stejneger, 1901; gomes, 1918; amaral, 1926; Bai‑
ley, 1967, 1970). currently, the genus is considered
to be a polyphyletic group (Zaher, 1994) consisting
of 14 species (Zaher and caramaschi, 2000; lynch,
2009) that occur from southern mexico to northern
argentina (Bailey, 1970; lynch, 2009). the taxono‑
my is well resolved for some species, such as o. gui‑
bei hoge and Romano 1977 (Zaher and caramaschi,
1992) but is still problematic for many others, such as
o. clathratus.
oxyrhopus clathratus is restricted to the atlan‑
tic forest domain (ab’sáber, 1977) of southeastern
south america (Bailey, 1970) and was described
based on specimens possessing a banded coloration
pattern and no loreal scales (duméril et al., 1854).
posteriorly, Werner (1903) and müller (1923) de‑
scribed o. doliatus var. viperina and clelia clathrata
pulcherrima, respectively. amaral (1930) transferred
o. clathratus to the genus pseudoboa schneider,
1801, and considered the last two species as junior
synonyms of pseudoboa clathrata. differing from
amaral (1930), prado (1945) placed the species in
the genus clelia. taxonomic chaos decreased after
Bailey (1967) reviewed all three genera, and three
years later (Bailey, 1970) recognized oxyrhopus
clathratus. however, problems with intraspecific
variation persist. the extent of morphological diver‑
sity throughout the geographic range of o. clathra‑
tus remains to be investigated. morato (2005) first
documented melanistic variation in o. clathratus,
suggesting a relationship between this character and
altitudinal elevation. he suggested that some popula‑
tions should be recognized as new species. Bernardo
and pires (2005) agreed with morato (2005) and also
suggested a correlation occurs between melanistic in‑
dividuals and high elevations.
herein, we examine variation in several morpho‑
logical characters involving color, shape of the hemi‑
penes and presence of loreal scales in o. clathratus
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
from specimens collected throughout the geographic
range of the species. our main objectives are to verify
the existence of distinct spatial patterns and to cor‑
relate these patterns with geographic and elevational
gradients, testing if the currently recognized species
is polytypic. to this end, we employ our analyses to
delimit the geographic distribution of the species and
to revise the species’ diagnosis.
Material and MetHods
material
We visited the following museums and analyzed
233 specimens of o. clathratus, which covered the
entire geographic range of the species (fig. 1; ap‑
pendix i): argentina – museo argentino de ciencias
naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (macn), Buenos
aires; Brazil – instituto Butantan (iBsp), são paulo,
sp; laboratório de Zoologia dos vertebrados da uni‑
versidade federal de ouro preto (lZv‑ufop), ouro
preto, mg; museu Biológico mello leitão (mBml),
santa teresa, es; museu de ciência e tecnologia da
pontifícia universidade católica do Rio grande do
sul (mcp), porto alegre, Rs; museu nacional, uni‑
versidade federal do Rio de Janeiro (mnRJ), Rio de
Janeiro, RJ; museu de Zoologia “João moogen” da
universidade federal de viçosa (mZufv), viçosa,
mg; museu de Zoologia da universidade estadual
135
santa cruz (mZuesc), ilhéus, Ba; museu de Zoo‑
logia da universidade de são paulo (mZusp), são
paulo, sp; museu de Zoologia da universidade es‑
tadual de campinas (Zuec), campinas, sp; and
France – muséum national d’histoire naturelle
(mnhn), paris.
our morphological assessment examined scala‑
tion, meristic, coloration, and hemipenial morphol‑
ogy. terminology for ventral scales followed dowl‑
ing (1951), whereas the terminology of the remaining
scales followed vanzolini et al. (1980). measurements
of specimens were made using a string stretched over
the ventral surface then stretched over a measuring
tape with 1 mm precision and a digital caliper with
0.01 mm precision. to improve the accuracy of small
measurements (head length and head width), we used
the morphometric software tpsdig2 version 2.1.4
(Rohlf, 2009) with high definition images acquired
by using a pentax K10d digital camera. a total of 48
hemipenes were analyzed. the preparation method
followed pesantes (1994) as modified by Zaher and
prudente (2003), and the terminology for hemipenial
morphology followed Zaher (1999).
geographical variation
We employed spatial analysis of morphometric
and meristic variables in order to identify the pres‑
ence of any patterning of morphological variation.
Figure 1. specimens analyzed and geographic distribution map of oxyrhopus clathratus.
136
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
our analysis used the following meristic variables:
mid‑dorsal scale rows (mdR), ventral scales (vent),
subcaudals scales (sc), bands on the body (BBd),
and bands on the tail (tBd). continuous charac‑
ters included the following: head length (hl), head
width (hW), tail length (tl), and snout vent length
(svl). these measurements were log‑transformed
and corrected for ontogenetic allometry using com‑
mon principal component analysis and Burnaby’s
back‑projection method (Burnaby, 1966). the vari‑
ance‑covariance matrix necessary for this analysis
was estimated pooling both sexes together while
after correcting for mean differences between them
(see Results). Residuals of this analysis and meristic
variables were used as two different datasets. even
though some variables showed no clear deviance
from normality in a quantile‑quantile plot, we opted
to analyze them using non‑parametric methods, be‑
cause each dataset contained at least one non‑normal
variable.
the geographical variation of these characters was
investigated using geographical coordinates of the
sampling site of each specimen. in order to account
for spatial autocorrelation between observations, we
employed a principal coordinate analysis of neigh‑
bors matrices filtering method (pcnm; dray et al.,
2006), which produced independent geographical
vectors that were used as variables in other statistical
analyses. We calculated the moran’s i associated with
each pcnm vector and tested its significance through
a parametric test in order to obtain the relevant vec‑
tors for analysis.
the presence of sexual dimorphism in each da‑
taset was investigated using a non‑parametric multi‑
variate analysis of variance (np‑manova), which
allowed control of variation from confounding fac‑
tors (anderson, 2001), such as geography (pcnm)
and altitude. the np‑manova used morphological
distances between specimens to test hypotheses. to
test for the presence of sexual dimorphism in meristic
characters, we used a gower distance among obser‑
vations to control differences in magnitude between
variables. for size‑controlled continuous variables,
we used euclidian distances between individuals be‑
cause the variables were already log‑transformed and
size‑corrected. significance of the np‑manova
was calculated through permutations.
to evaluate the presence of geographical pat‑
terning of morphological variation, we performed a
canonical trend surface analysis (ctsa; Warten‑
berg, 1985) using significant pcnm vectors as geo‑
graphical variables and both morphological datasets
separately. the significance of the ctsa was ac‑
cessed through a permutation procedure.
to investigate geographic variation in discrete
variables related to coloration and shape of hemi‑
penes, we analyzed differences in the geographical
distribution of individuals with different character
states using the np‑manova method as described
above. We employed mann‑Whitney tests to evalu‑
ate elevational variation associated with these charac‑
ters. We performed pair‑wise tests of color variation
for both geographical and elevational variation and
p‑values were adjusted for repeated tests with a Bon‑
ferroni correction.
all statistical analyses were performed using the
software R v. 2.14.2 (R development core team,
2012). the significance of non‑parametric methods
was accessed through 999 permutations, and em‑
pirical p‑values were evaluated at α = 0.05 (manly,
1997). the back‑projection size correction was done
with the “cpcbp” package v. 0.3.2 (mccoy et al.,
2006); pcnm analysis was performed with the
pcnm package v. 2.1‑2/r106 (legendre et al., 2012);
np‑manova and ctsa were implemented in the
package “vegan” v. 2.0‑3 (oksanen et al., 2010).
results
the pcnm analysis yielded 21 significant axes.
these were used as geographical variables (p < 0.047
for all axes, see online appendix for more details).
the np‑manovas detected significant deviations
from random for the count‑variables dataset associat‑
ed with sexual dimorphism (p = 0.001) after control‑
ling for geography and elevation. sexual dimorphism
explained approximately 11.52% of the overall varia‑
tion. females tended to have larger values for mdR,
vent, and BBd than males; males had larger values
of sc and tBd than females. analysis of allometri‑
cally corrected quantitative traits detected significant
sexual dimorphism (p = 0.002) after controlling for
geography and altitude, but explained only 2.9% of
the total variation; females had larger bodies and
heads (svl, hl, and hW) and males had larger tails
(tl). to correct for sexual dimorphism, we computed
the difference in means and medians of the morpho‑
metric and meristic variables, respectively, and added
the difference to all male individuals. Reanalyzes of
sexual dimorphism based on the corrected dataset did
not differentiate the sexes (p > 0.239).
only the count dataset showed a significant cor‑
relation with elevation (count: p = 0.035; continuous:
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
p = 0.335) after controlling for geographical varia‑
tion. however, this explained only 1.2% of the total
variation in meristic characters.
the ctsa was significant for both datasets
(p > 0.002). the adjusted R2 coefficients showed high
spatial structuring of meristic variables (42.9%), but
the morphometric variables showed a lower value
(8.94%). the weights of each variable on the canonical
axes showed a trend for meristic characters to increase
in BBd and tBd from the southwest to the northeast
(fig. 2a). variation in morphometric variables was
subtler, but we noticed a moderate increase in svl
and tl and an associated decrease in hl and hW on
the same geographical gradient (table 1, fig. 2B).
this may be related to an increase in overall size.
137
the np‑manova obtained a significant differ‑
ence between geographic distribution and the dif‑
ferent shapes of hemipenes (p = 0.024). t‑shaped
hemipenes tended to occur more to the southwest, the
Y‑shaped more in the northeast (fig. 2c). Regardless,
a considerable geographic overlap of the types of
hemipenes occurred (fig. 2c; fig. 3). the pair‑wise
comparison of geographical variation of individual
color showed a distinction only between the distri‑
butions of banded and melanic individuals (adjust‑
ed‑p = 0.017). Banded‑melanic individuals showed
no difference when compared to both other color
morphs (adjusted‑p > 0.05). Regardless, inspection
of the geographical distributions (fig. 2d showed
that these differences were mainly related to samples
Figure 2. geographic variation of oxyrhopus clathratus. darker symbols indicates higher values and whiter ones indicates lower values
for a and B. a: first canonical axis of meristic variation; B: first canonical axis of morphometric variation; c: geographic distribution
of hemipenis shape; d: geographic distribution of the different color morphs.
138
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
taBle 1. table of weights of canonical trend surface analyses.
canaxis 1 canaxis 2 canaxis 3
0.115
0.640
– 0,529
0,124
0,811
0,025
0,212
0,641
0,117
0,984
0,023
– 0,072
0,933
0,091
0,247
canaxis 1 canaxis 2 canaxis 3
svl
0,403
0,783
0,474
tl
0,692
– 0,615
0,378
hl
– 0,741
0,321
0,590
hW
– 0,387
0,258
– 0,885
mdR
vent
sc
BBd
tBd
canaxis 4 canaxis 5
– 0,096
0,536
0,385
0,422
– 0,478
– 0,550
0,146
– 0,060
– 0,243
0,018
taken from the northern edges of the distribution,
and the correlation could have been affected by sam‑
pling bias. thus, a np‑manova performed on all
color morphs simultaneously indicated that, despite
significant (p‑value = 0.017), these differences were
negligible (2.5% of the total geographic variation).
the analysis of elevation with respect to coloration
detected the co‑occurrence of melanistic and melanis‑
tic‑banded specimens (adjusted‑p = 0.462), and that
banded individuals tended to be found at lower eleva‑
tions (adjusted‑p = 0.0307 and 0.00046 for melanis‑
tic and melanistic‑banded specimens, respectively).
despite the large elevational superposition detected
between color morphs, melanistic individuals (either
fully melanistic or partially banded) were associated
with higher elevations.
there is no significant correlations between shape
of hemipenis and elevation, nor between the pres‑
ence of the loreal scale in relation to elevation and
geographic distribution (p‑value > 0. 7718 for all
analyses).
Figure 3. fully everted and maximally inflated hemipenes of oxyrhopus clathratus. hemipenis in t‑shape (mZusp 2848) in (a) sulcate
and (B) asulcate view. hemipenis in Y‑shape (mZusp 4111) in (a) sulcate and (B) asulcate view. Both specimens collected at the Biologi‑
cal station of Boracéia, salesópolis, são paulo, Brazil. scale = 10 mm.
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
overall, morphological variation in o. clathratus
was correlated with geographic distance. no distinct
break in morphology was found, indicating a grad‑
ual transition. no evidence served to reject the null
hypothesis of conspecificity, i.e., one species. thus,
o. clathratus was assumed to be a highly polymor‑
phic species.
oxyrhopus clathratus duméril, Bibron et duméril, 1854
oxyrhopus clathratus duméril, Bibron et duméril,
1854. erp. gén., 7:1026. type locality: Brazil.
oxyrhopus doliatus var. viperina Werner, 1903. Zool.
anz. 26:250. type locality: Brazil.
clelia clathrata pulcherrima müller, 1923. Zool.
anz. 57:153. type locality: humboldt, santa ca‑
tarina, Brazil.
oxyrhopus clathratus: Werner, 1925. arch. Berlin
90:127
cloelia clathrata pulcherrima: Werner, 1929. Zoo.
Jahrb. Jena. syst. 57:182
pseudoboa formosa clathrata: amaral, 1930. mem.
inst. But. 4:37
cloelia clathrata: prado, 1945. serp. Bras.: 83
pseudoboa clathrata: anthony, 1955. ann. des. nat.
Zool. 11:10
oxyrhopus clathratus: Bailey, 1970. in peters and
orejas‑miranda cat. neot. squa. part i: 231
type series: following the international code of
Zoological nomenclature (icZn, 1999) and the com‑
parative analysis of the syntypes, mnhn 3791 and
mnhn 3792, we designed specimen mnhn 3791
as the lectotype for the following reasons: (1) the
original description states that the loreal scale is al‑
most always absent, as in specimen mnhn 3791;
(2) the dorsal coloration of mnhn 3791 better fits
the original description as translated from french
into english as follows: “the front and upper back
of the body and tail are blackish‑brown or uniform
olive. on the flanks there are shades of yellow that
in juveniles vary from 70 to 100 bands or vertical
bars. With age, these yellow bands narrow forming
little triangular patches” (duméril et al., 1854:1027).
specimen mnhn 3791 clearly displays these bands,
while mnhn 3792 is melanistic, with a few almost
imperceptible bands; and (3) mnhn 3791 is in better
condition than mnhn 3792.
Description of the lectotype MNhN 3791 (fig. 4):
adult male, svl = 752 mm, tl = 192 mm. head
139
almost twice longer than wide (hl = 22.4 mm;
hW = 11.7 mm). Rostral wider than high, two inter‑
nasals, nasal divided, two prefrontals, which touch
the supraocular separating the frontal from the preoc‑
ular. loreal absent. one preocular; two postoculars;
temporal 2 + 3; 8 supralabials on each side, the 4th and
5th touching eye; 9 infralabials on each side, first four
scales touching anterior genial. dorsal scales smooth,
with two apical pits, arranged in 19:19:17 rows. the
reduction of dorsal rows occurs through the merger of
the 3rd and 4th rows on both sides at the level of 133
ventral scale on the left and 134 on the right. ventral
scales 203. anal plate single and 69 paired subcau‑
dals. the lectotype has conspicuous dark and light
bands alternating along the body, but because it is a
very old specimen some parts of the body are dis‑
colored and we were unable to count the side bands.
Bands are joined dorsally, forming a uniform black‑
ish brown dorsum (duméril et al., 1854). laterally
the alternating dark and light bands are clearly vis‑
ible (fig. 2e) and invade the edges of ventrals along
the entire body. the anterior portion of belly is pale
brown, with few darker spots, which increase in in‑
tensity posteriorly (duméril et al., 1854).
Diagnosis: oxyrhopus clathratus can be distin‑
guished from the sympatric species o. formosus,
o. rhombifer, and o. guibei by the following combi‑
nation of characters: preocular does not touch frontal
(preocular in contact with frontal in o. rhombifer and
o. guibei); the head is uniformly black (the head is
uniformly red or orange‑red in o. formosus); non‑
melanic specimens possess a banded dorsal pattern
of coloration with black and white/red/brown bands
uniformly distributed throughout the dorsum (black
bands are disposed in triads in o. guibei); the ven‑
tral edge of the black bands invade the ventral scales
(black bands never invade the ventrals in o. rhombi‑
fer and form complete rings throughout the ventrals
in o. formosus); the hemipenis lacks a naked area on
the tip of the lobes (o. guibei and o. rhombifer pos‑
sess a conspicuous nude area on the tip of the lobes).
morphological variation
pholidosis: loreal either present (n = 150), or absent
or fused to the pre‑frontal (n = 60), occasionally pres‑
ent on one side only (n = 16). anterior temporal scales
range from 1 to 3, with 99.13% of the observed individ‑
uals (n = 228) possessing 2 scales; posterior temporal
scales range from 2 to 3, with 99.13% of the observed
140
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
individuals (n = 228) possessing 3 scales. number of
supralabials ranges between 7 and 9, with 97.3% of
the observed individuals (n = 216) showing 8 supra‑
labials. the 4th and 5th supralabials usually touch the
orbit (98.2%; n = 218). number of infralabials ranges
from 8 to 10 with 78.4% of the observed individuals
(n = 171) with 9 infralabials. usually with two anterior
and two posterior genials, and the first four infralabi‑
als usually contact the anterior genial (92%; n = 207).
dorsal scales smooth with two apical pits, arranged
in rows of 19:19:17 (n = 220), 19:19:15 (n = 7), or
19:21:17 (n = 3). Reduction of dorsal rows similar on
both sides of the body, the left side reduction mainly
involving the merger of the third and fourth scale rows
(83.3%, n = 176) at the position of between the 115
and 158 ventral (x = 132; sd = 6.8; n = 210). likewise,
reduction on the right side usually involves fusion of the
third and fourth rows (93.3%, n = 181) and the reduc‑
tion occurs between the ventrals 111 and 156 (x = 132;
sd = 6.9; n = 194). number of ventrals ranges from
183 to 212 in males (x = 197.86; sd = 4.89; n = 115)
and 190 and 221 in females (x = 203.41; sd = 5.57;
n = 107). paired subcaudals range between 46 and 88
in males (x = 77; sd = 7; n = 111) and 59 and 85 in fe‑
males (x = 68; sd = 5; n = 96). mdR ranges from 193
to 220 in males (x = 205.92; sd = 4.98; n = 106) and
194 to 231 in females (x = 210.64; sd = 6.4; n = 105).
Morphometrics: a medium size snake, the largest
male measures 904 mm svl and 246 mm tl, and the
largest female measures 1008 mm svl and 196 mm
tl. the smallest specimens are a series of neonates,
Figure 4. oxyrhopus clathratus, mnhn 3791 (lectotype) head in (a) dorsal, (B) ventral, (c) right view, (d) left view, and mid‑body in
(e) left view. scale = 10 mm.
141
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
with one still inside the egg (mZufv 709a‑709d)
with svl ranging from 195 to 215 mm (x = 205;
sd = 8.52; n = 4) and tl ranging from 50 to 52 mm
(x = 51; sd = 1.15; n = 4).
hemipenial morphology: the hemipenes of o. clath‑
ratus may be t‑ or Y‑shaped. they are deeply bilobed,
bicalyculate, bicapitate and have four rows of well‑
developed enlarged lateral spines that originate on the
sulcate surface and extend to the lateral sides of the
organ until the asulcate surface (fig. 3). the sulcus
spermaticus divides midway on the hemipenial body
and each branch extends to the lateral sides of the or‑
gan in centrifugal orientation. the lobes do not have
a nude area at the tip and are fully ornamented with
papillate calyces that tend to be spinulate on the edges
of the capitulum. the intrasulcar region is expanded
and has two rows of spines adjacent to each capitu‑
lum. lobular crests are present but without spines
and covered with spinules as in the entire body of the
hemipenis. nude pockets on the lobular crotch are
present and very evident.
coloration in preservation: preserved juveniles and
adults exhibit one of the following three different dor‑
sal patterns (fig. 5): 1) body uniformly black (me‑
lanic), with no visible bands (n = 43); 2) body with
alternating light and black bands, but with some de‑
gree of melanism that makes it difficult to count the
black bands (n = 25); 3) body with a series of clearly
visible black bands (n = 164) alternating with light
cream bands. in the latter condition, the number of
black dorsal body bands varies between 29 and 94
in males (x = 50.99; sd = 14.34; n = 96) and between
31 and 100 in females (x = 63.43; sd = 18.5; n = 68).
Black dorsal tail bands range from 11 to 35 in males
(x = 19.83; sd = 5.41; n = 93) and 10 to 33 in females
(x = 19.21; sd = 5.69; n = 63). in all non‑melanic
specimens, black dorsal bands fuse mid‑dorsally and
invade the edges of ventrals ventrally. in all speci‑
mens, the belly is yellowish throughout the body, with
scattered black spots that increase in number from the
anterior to the posterior two‑thirds of the belly, while
the tail is either banded or uniformly black.
in melanic individuals, the dorsum is uniformly
black (fig. 6a) while the belly is white with scattered
black spots that increase in number from the anterior
to the posterior region. Rarely, in strongly melanic
specimens, the belly becomes largely invaded with
black from the edges to the center, leaving only an
uninterrupted white string in the middle of the venter.
the ventral part of the tail is always uniformly black.
all non‑melanic specimens have a black head
cap from the tip of the snout to the posterior border
of the parietals and anterior portion of the temporal
region. a strait white, red or brown light collar fol‑
lows the black head cap. the light collar covers no
more than three dorsal scales along the vertebral line.
the dorsum is banded with alternating light (white,
red or brown) and black bands distributed uniformly
throughout the body, while the belly is white through‑
out the body with the edges of ventral scales always
invaded by the black bands and occasional black
spots scattered throughout its posterior two‑thirds.
the ventral surface of the tail is either banded or uni‑
formly black. in some specimens, dorsal bands tend
to fuse together in the posterior part of the body.
light bands in banded specimens can be white,
red or brown, showing an ontogenetic color shift
from white to red or brown. light bands are white or
light cream in all young individuals (fig. 6B) where‑
as in juveniles the white bands are invaded with red
or brown, with the white parts being restricted to the
lateral and ventral edges of the bands (figs. 6c and
6d). in large adult specimens, the nuchal collar and
all light bands become entirely red or brown (figs. 6e
and 6f).
Distribution: oxyrhopus clathratus occurs only in the
atlantic forest domain (fig. 1; ab’sáber, 1977). the
northern limit for the species is near Barra do choça,
Bahia, Brazil (argôlo, 2001), with records extending
from the states of minas gerais and espírito santo
to Rio grande do sul in southern Brazil; and west in
forested areas of misiones, argentina (Bailey, 1970;
giraudo and scrocchi, 2002; argôlo, 2001).
discussion
coloration in life: live individuals of oxyrhopus
clathratus show significant polymorphism in body
coloration (fig. 6), ranging from completely melanic
to strongly banded specimens. the dorsal coloration
can be all black (melanic specimens), banded (black
bands alternated with lighter bands) or banded with
the posterior part of the body melanic.
a comparison of the scalation of o. clathratus and
other species of oxyrhopus is presented in table 2.
With few exceptions, the scalation in o. clathratus
does not differ from that of the other species. species
of oxyrhopus have usually eight supralabials (with
the exception of o. marcapatae with seven), nine or
142
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
Figure 5. coloration in preserved adult specimens of oxyrhopus clathratus. (a) dorsal and (B) ventral views of a melanic specimen (mcp
16881); (c) dorsal and (d) ventral views of a partially melanic specimen (lZv‑ufop 726); (d) dorsal and (e) ventral views of a banded
specimen (mZusp 15233). scale = 10 mm.
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
143
Figure 6. coloration in life: (a) melanic (arvoredo, santa catarina, Brazil); (B) banded with high degree of melanism (chapecó, santa ca‑
tarina, Brazil); (c) new born banded (mZusp 15139 from parque estadual Jacupiranga, são paulo, Brazil); (d) juvenile banded (mZusp
15233 from são miguel arcanjo, são paulo, Brazil); (e) adult “red banded” (camacan, Bahia, Brazil); and (f) subadult “brown banded”
(dZufRgs 6295 from praia grande, santa catarina, Brazil).
10 infralabials (with the exception of o. leucomelas,
which ranges between seven and eight), a single preoc‑
ular and two postoculars, two anterior genials and two
posterior genials, 2 + 3 temporals (except in o. mar‑
capatae which has 1 + 2), two apical pits (except for
o. erdisii, which has none), 19 rows of dorsal scales
(with the exceptions of o. marcapatae and o. leuco‑
melas), a single anal plate, and divided subcaudals.
the contact between the frontal and the preocu‑
lar is a conspicuous taxonomic character within the
genus oxyrhopus. this contact occurs in six species
while in the other eight, including o. clathratus, the
frontal does not touch the preocular. this is one of the
main characters that duméril et al. (1854) used in the
description of o. clathratus and it serves to diagnose
the species from two of the three sympatric species
144
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
taBle 2. comparison of the scalation between species of the genus oxyrhopus.
species
o. clathratus
o. doliatus
o. erdisii
o. fitzingeri
o. formosus
o. guibei
o. leucomelas
o. marcapatae
o. melanogenys
o. occipitalis
o. petolarius
o. rhombifer
o. trigeminus
o. vanidicus
supralabials
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
7 or 8
7 (3,4)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
8 (4,5)
infralabials
9 or 10
9
9
9
9
10
7 or 8
8
10
9
10
9 or 10
10
10
genials
2,2‑5
2,2‑4
2,2‑4
2,2‑4,5
2,2‑4
2,2‑5
2,2‑4,5
2,2‑4
2,2‑4
2,2‑5
2,2‑5
2,2‑4
2,2‑4
2,2‑4
dorsals
19:19:17
19
19:19:15
19
19
19:19:17
17:17:15
15
19:19:17
19:19:17
19:19:17
19:19:17
19:19:17
19:19:17
frontal contacting preocular loreal present
no
yes or no
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
References
4,8
2,3,9,18,20
3
2,4,16
1,4,6,7
8,11,19
12
2,5
2,14
10,12,13,18
9,8,12,15
8,9
9,19
12
References: (1) amaral, 1948; (2) Bailey, 1970; (3) Barbour, 1913; (4) Boulenger, 1896; (5) Boulenger, 1902; (6) cunha and nascimento,
1983; (7) gasc and Rodrigues, 1980; (8) giraudo, 2001; (9) griffin, 1916; (10) hoge et al., 1973; (11) hoge and Romano, 1977; (12) lynch,
2009; (13) macculloch et al., 2009; (14) nascimento et al., 1987; (15) Roze, 1957; (16) schmidt and Walker‑Jr., 1943; (17) stejenger,
1901; (18) Wagler, 1824; (19) Zaher and caramaschi, 1992; (20) Zaher and caramaschi, 2000.
(o. guibei and o. rhombifer). another conspicuous
character is the presence or absence of a loreal. oxy‑
rhopus clathratus is the only species within the genus
that shows significant polymorphism in this charac‑
ter. however, the presence or absence of the loreal
within o. clathratus is not correlated with any of the
tested variables.
the absence of a loreal and substantial color vari‑
ation are responsible for much taxonomic confusion
in o. clathratus. sometimes these characters lead to
misidentification. this confusion is partly due to the
species having three types of dorsal patterns and on‑
togenetic color changes that overlap geographically.
Regardless, our statistical analyses show that melanic
individuals tend to concentrate in the higher regions,
while banded individuals tend to occur in lower eleva‑
tions. additionally, the geographic analysis revealed
that there are some differences in the distribution of
both melanic and banded morphs, with melanic in‑
dividuals being more abundant in the southwestern
portion of the distribution while banded individuals
are more widespread throughout the distribution of
the species. Banded individuals show a clear reduc‑
tion in the number of bands in the southwestern part
of the species’ range, suggesting a correlation be‑
tween topography (high elevations) and/or geography
(southern provenance) with the overall “darkness” of
an individual.
our analyses include four melanic juveniles, and
this suggests that melanism does not appear ontoge‑
netically from a banded pattern; the extent of mela‑
nism seems to be both determined before birth and
independent from processes that influence the num‑
ber of bands.
differently from the black bands, light dorsal
bands in oxyrhopus clathratus undergo extensive on‑
togenetic color change from white to red or brown
throughout life. newly born and young individuals
have invariably white bands that are progressively in‑
vaded with red or brown in juvenile specimens, turn‑
ing into completely red or brown bands in large adult
individuals. color replacement tends to advance from
the mid dorsal region of the band towards its edges.
Both nuchal collar and light dorsal bands of large
adult specimens become entirely red or brown in the
later stages of ontogenetic color shift. observations
of live adult specimens suggest that individuals with
light brown bands tend to occur in higher altitude
areas, while specimens from low altitude areas tend
to have red bands instead. however, this hypothesis
could not be tested statistically since our sampling is
mainly composed of preserved specimens in which
coloration of lighter bands is not retained.
intraspecific geographic variation in coloration
occurs in many species of snakes (e.g., King, 1988;
forsman and aberg, 2008; Boback and siefferman,
2010) and some evidence indicates that distribu‑
tion and habitat usage are significantly increased in
species of non‑avian reptiles that display coloration
polymorphisms (forsman and aberg, 2008). this
ecological diversification can result from the sym‑
patric segregation of color morphs and subsequent
adaptation to different niches (forsman et al., 2008;
mckinnon and pierotti, 2010). however, given that
145
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
coloration in o. clathratus neither shows clear geo‑
graphic structuring nor is associated with other mor‑
phological polymorphisms, melanism is more likely
to be associated with local adaptation to different
thermal niches.
oxyrhopus clathratus is sexually dimorphic for
both qualitative and quantitative characters. females
tend to have a larger svl and a greater number of
ventrals than males. Rocha‑Barbosa et al., (2000) re‑
port this dimorphism in o. guibei and attribute this
difference to the storage of fat for vitellogenesis and
egg carrying. males have longer tails and a greater
number of subcaudal scales than females, which is
explained by the presence of the hemipenes and the
retractor muscle (Rocha‑Barbosa et al., 2000).
hemipenial morphology also varies in o. clathra‑
tus. dowling (1967) justified the use of hemipenial
characters in taxonomy (macroevolution) because
there is no direct relationship between this structure
and ecology, feeding habits, and locomotion. con‑
sidering the importance of this organ, but disagree‑
ing with the greater importance of these characters in
relation to others, Zaher and prudente (1999) docu‑
mented intraspecific variation in hemipenial charac‑
ters for siphlophis. they first described intraspecific
variation in the hemipenial morphology of o. clath‑
ratus and noted the t‑ and Y‑shapes on snakes of the
genus siphlophis, indicating that both conditions
also occur in o. clathratus. Zaher (1999) described
the t‑shaped hemipenis of o. clathratus but did not
comment on intraspecific variation. dowling (2002)
criticized these results claiming that the variation
found in siphlophis was an artifact of preparation.
Zaher and prudente (2003) countered the criticism
by detailing their preparation of the hemipenes and
illustrating that it was not an artifact of preparation.
as with siphlophis, the hemipenes of o. clathratus
varies between the t‑ and Y‑shapes, thus confirming
that intraspecific variability is possible (Zaher and
prudente, 1999) and seems to be more widespread in
pseudoboini than previously thought.
resuMo
a serpente oxyrhopus clathratus, que apresenta
distribuição restrita ao domínio tropical atlântico,
apresenta grande variação no padrão de coloração,
forma do hemipênis e folidose. a existência destas
variações resulta em uma confusão taxonômica signi‑
ficativa. até agora, o reconhecimento e identificação
tem sido problemáticos, o que reflete nos sinônimos
desta espécie. nós examinamos a série tipo e espé‑
cimes de toda área de ocorrência da espécies a fim
de analisar a variação morfológica intraespecífica.
as variações morfológicas foram correlacionadas
com a distribuição geográfica e altitude. além disso,
nós avaliamos se os dados morfológicos suportam o
reconhecimento de mais de uma espécie ou não. os
resultados sugerem que o. clathratus é uma espécie
única que apresenta uma variação morfológica signi‑
ficativa, incluindo três padrões distintos de coloração
(melânico, melânico com bandas claras finas e in‑
conspícuas, e com bandas clara e escuras conspícuas
ao longo do corpo) que se sobrepõem geograficamen‑
te. a morfologia hemipeniana apresenta um padrão
geral de ornamentação, mas com variação frequente
entre as formas “t” e “Y”, que ocorrem sem estrutu‑
ração geográfica expressiva ou de altitude. a escama
loreal está predominantemente ausente. Baseados nos
nossos resultados nós designamos neste trabalho o
lectótipo da espécie.
acKnoWledgMents
We thank g. g. montingelli, f. g. grazziotin (mZusp), and
c. Blair (Rom) for their comments and improvements on this
manuscript. fernando tavares and J. c. ortuza helped with data
collection. We are also grateful to a. giraudo and p. passos for
their insightful reviews of this manuscript. We are indebted to f.
l. franco and v. germano (iBsp), R. n. feio (mZufv), m. R. s.
pires (lZv‑ufop), g. prado (mBml), a. J. s. argôlo (uesc),
R. fernandes (mnRJ), p. manzani (Zuec), g. pontes (puc‑Rs),
J. faivovich and s. nenda (macn), R. Bour (mnhn), and c.
castro‑mello (mZusp), who allowed access to the specimens
under their care. We especially thank g. pontes (puc‑Rs) for her
invaluable assistance with the analysis of the type series and h. c.
costa, m. a. freitas, i. a. martins, o. a. v. marques, m. Borges‑
martins and i. R. dias for providing the photographs of live speci‑
mens. this research was supported by grants to phB (capes‑
master’s scholarship), fam (fapesp no. 07/52144‑5) and hZ
(Biota‑fapesp no. 02/13602‑4; cnpq no. 303785/2004‑7).
manuscript preparation was supported by a visiting professorship
for senior international scientists from the chinese academy of
sciences and by discovery grant 3148 from the natural sciences
and engineering Research council (canada) to RWm.
literature cited
ab’saber, a. n. 1977. os domínios morfoclimáticos na américa
do sul. primeira aproximação. Geomorfologia, 52:1‑21.
amaral, a. 1926. notas de ophiologia: da preferência do nome
genérico pseudoboa schneider 1801 a clelia fitzinger, 1826
e oxyrhopus Wagler, 1830. revista do Museu paulista,
14:10‑16.
amaral, a. 1930. estudo sobre ophidios neotropicos. Memórias
do Instituto Butantan, 4:3‑68.
146
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
amaral, a. 1948. ofídios do mato grosso (contribuição ii para o
conhecimento dos ofídios do Brasil). publicações. comissão
de linhas telegráficas estratégicas de mato grosso ao
amazonas, 84:1‑43.
anderson, m. 2001. a new method for non‑parametric
multivariate analysis of variance. austral Ecology, 26:32‑46.
argôlo, a. J. s. 2001. oxyrhopus clathratus – geographic
distribution. herpetological review, 32:61.
Bailey, J. R. 1967. the synthetic approach to colubrid
classification. herpetologica, 23:155‑161.
Bailey, J. R. 1970. oxyrhopus; pp. 229‑235. In: J. a. peters and B.
orejas‑miranda (eds.), catalogue of the neotropical squamata.
part i: snakes. smithsonian institution press, Washington.
Barbour, t. 1913. Reptiles collected by the Yale peruvian
expedition of 1912. proceedings of the academy of Natural
sciences of philadelphia, 65:506‑507.
Bernardo, p. h. and m. R. s. pires. 2005. Estudo taxonômico
de oxyrhopus clathrarus Duméril, Bibron e Duméril, 1854
(serpentes, xenodontinae). In: 13º seminário de iniciação
científica da universidade federal de ouro preto, ouro
preto, minas gerais, Brasil, 1 pp.
Boback, s. and l. siefferman. 2010. variation in color and
color change in island and mainland boas (Boa constrictor).
Journal of herpetology, 44:506‑515.
Boulenger, g. a. 1896. catalogue of the snakes in the British
museum (natural history). British museum (natural
history), london, 727 pp.
Boulenger, g. a. 1902. descriptions of new batrachians and
reptiles from the andes of peru and Bolivia. annals and
Magazine of Natural history, 7:401‑402.
Burnaby, t. 1966. growth‑invariant discriminant functions and
generalized distances. Biometrics, 22:96‑110.
cunha, o. R. and f. p. nascimento. 1983. ofídios da amazônia:
as espécies de oxyrhopus Wagler, com uma subespécie nova,
e pseudoboa schneider, na amazônia oriental e maranhão
(ophidia, colubridae). Boletim do Museu paraense Emílio
Goeldi, 122:1‑47.
dowling, h. g. 1951. a proposed standard system of counting
ventrals in snakes. British Journal of herpetology, 1:97‑99.
dowling, h. g. 1967. hemipenis and other characters in colubrid
classification. herpetologica, 23:138‑142.
dowling, h. g. 2002 “intraspecific variation of the hemipenis” a
correction, with comments on other erroneous descriptions.
herpetological review, 33:12‑14.
dray, s., p. legendre, and p. R. peres‑neto. 2006. spatial
modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal
coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (pcnm).
Ecological Modelling, 196:483‑493.
duméril, a. m. c., g. Bibron, and a. duméril. 1854. erpétologie
générale, 7:1026.
forsman, a. and v. Åberg. 2008. associations of variable
coloration with niche breadth and conservation status among
australian reptiles. Ecology, 89:1201‑1207.
forsman, a., J. ahnesjö, s. caesar, and m. Karlsoon. 2008. a
model of ecological and evolutionary consequences of color
polymorphism. Ecology, 89:34‑40.
gasc, J. p. and m. t. Rodrigues. 1980. liste preliminaire des
serpents de la guyane française. Bulletin de Muséum
National d’histoire Naturelle, ser. 4, 2:559‑598.
giraudo, a. R. 2001. serpientes de la selva paranaense y del
chaco húmedo. l. o. l. a., Buenos aires, argentina, 328 pp.
giraudo, a. R. and g. J. scrocchi. 2002. argentinian snakes: an
annotated checklist. smithsonian herpetological Information,
132:1‑53.
gomes, J. f. 1918. contribuição para o conhecimento dos
ophidios do Brasil. ii. ophidios do museu Rocha (ceará).
revista do Museu paulista, 10:505‑527.
griffin, l. e. 1916. a catalog of the ophidia from south america
at present (June 1916) contained in the carnegie museum
with descriptions of some new species. Memories of carnegie
Museum, 7:163‑277.
hoge, a. R., n. p. santos, c. heitor, l. a. lopes, and i. m. souza.
1973. serpentes coletadas pelo projeto Rondon vii em
iauaretê, Brasil. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 36:221‑232.
hoge, a. R., s. alma, and s. a. Romano. 1977. description of
a new subsp. of oxyrhopus Wagler (serpentes, coluridae).
Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 40/41:55‑62.
icZn [international commission on Zoological nomenclature].
1999. international code of Zoological nomenclature. the
international trust for Zoological nomenclature, padova,
306 pp.
King, R. 1988. polymorphic populations of the garter snake
thamnophis sirtalis near lake erie. herpetologica, 44:451‑458.
legendre, p., d. Borcard, f. g. Blanchet, and s. dray. 2012.
pcnm: mem spatial eigenfunction and principal coordinate
analyses. R package version 2.1‑2/r106. http://R‑forge.R‑
project.org/projects/sedar.
lynch, J. d. 2009. snakes of the genus oxyrhopus (colubridae:
squamata) in colombia: taxonomy and geographic variation.
papéis avulsos de Zoologia, 49:319‑337.
macculloch, R. d., a. lathrop, p. J. R. Kok, R. ernst, and m.
Kalamandeen. 2009. the genus oxyrhopus (serpentes:
dipsadidae: Xenodontinae) in guyana: morphology,
distributions and comments on taxonomy papéis avulsos de
Zoologia, 49:487‑495.
manly, B. f. J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and monte carlo
methods in Biology. london, chapman and hall, 461 p.
mccoy, m., B. Bolker, c. osenberg, B. miner, and J. vonesh.
2006. size correction: comparing morphological traits among
populations and environments. oecologia, 148:547‑554.
mckinnon, J. and m. pierotti. 2010. colour polymorphism and
correlated characters: genetic mechanisms and evolution.
Molecular Ecology, 19:5101‑5125.
morato, s. a. a. 2005. serpentes da Região atlântica do estado
do paraná, Brasil: diversidade, distribuição e ecologia.
ph.d dissertation, universidade federal do paraná, curitiba,
paraná, 165 pp.
müller, l. 1923. neue order seltene Reptilien und Batrachier
der Zoologischen sammlung des bayrischen staates.
Zoologischer anzeiger, 57:153‑154.
nascimento, f. p., t. c. Ávila‑pires, and o. R. cunha. 1987. os
répteis de carajás, pará, Brasil (squamata) ii. Boletim do
Museu paraense Emílio Goeldi, 3:33‑65.
oksanen J., f. g. Blanchet, R. Kindt, p. legendre, R. B. o’hara,
g. l. simpson, p. solymos, m. henry, h. stevens, and h.
Wagner. 2010. package vegan: community ecology package.
http://cRan.R‑project.org/package=vegan.
pesantes, o. s. 1994. a method for preparing the hemipenis of
preserved snakes. Journal of herpetology, 28:93‑95.
prado, a. 1945. serpentes do Brasil. editora sítios & fazendas,
são paulo, Brazil, 134 pp.
R development core team. 2012. R: a language and environment
for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical
computing, vienna, austria. www.R‑project.org.
Rocha‑Barbosa, o., m. g. salomão, g. puorto, i. l. ferreira, and
c. mandarim‑de‑lacerda. 2000. allometry and ecology of
the oxyrhopus guibei hoge and Romano, 1977 (serpentes;
colubridae). Biomedical research, 11:259‑264.
Bernardo, p.h. et al.
Rohlf, f. J. 2009. tpsdig2. department of ecology and
evolution, state university of new York at stony Brook.
available from: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph (accessed
15 march 2009).
Roze, J. a. 1957. ofidios coleccionados por la expedicion
franco‑venezoelana al alto orinoco: 1951 a 1952. Boletin
del Museo de ciencias Naturales de caracas, 1:179‑195.
schmidt, K. p. and W. f. Walker‑Jr. 1943. snakes of the peruvian
coastal region. publications of the Field Museum of Natural
history (Zool. ser.), 24:312‑315.
stejneger, l. 1901. an annotated list of batrachians and reptiles
collected in the vicinity of la guaira, venezuela, with
descriptions of two new species of snakes. proceedings of the
united states National Museum, 24:179‑202.
vanzolini, p. e., a. m. m. R. costa, and l. J. vitt. 1980. Répteis
das caatingas. academia Brasileira de ciências, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, 181 pp.
vidal, n., a. s. delmas, p. david, c. cruaud, a. couloux, and
s. B. hedges. 2007. the phylogeny and classification of
caenophidian snakes inferred from seven nuclear proteincoding
genes. comptes rendus Biologies, 330:182‑187.
vidal, n., W. R. Branch, o. s. g. pauwels, s. B. hedges, d.
g. Broadley, m. Wink, c. cruaud, u. Joger, and Z. t.
nagy. 2008. dissecting the major african snake radiation:
a molecular phylogeny of the lamprophiidae fitzinger
(serpentes, caenophidia). Zootaxa, 1945:51‑66.
vidal, n., m. dewynter, and d. gower. 2010. dissecting the
major american snake radiation: a molecular phylogeny of
the dipsadidae Bonaparte (serpentes, caenophidia). comptes
rendus Biologies, 333:48‑55.
Wagler, J. 1824. serpentum Brasiliensium species novae ou
histoire naturelle. animalia nova. monachii: franc. seraph.
hubschmann, 75 pp.
Wartenberg, d. 1985. canonical trend surface analysis: a
method for describing geographic patterns. systematic
Zoology, 34:259‑279.
147
Werner, f. 1903. neue Reptilien und Batrachier aus dem
naturhistorischen museum in Brüssel. Zoologischer anzeiger,
26:246‑253.
Zaher, h. 1994. phylogénie des pseudoboini et évolution des
Xenodontinae sud‑américains (serpentes, colubridae). 2
volumes. ph.d. dissertation, muséum national d’histoire
naturelle, paris, 205 pp.
Zaher, h. 1996. a new genus and species of pseudoboine
snake, with a revision of the genus clelia (serpentes,
Xenodontinae). Bollettino del Museo regionale di scienze
Naturali, 14:289‑337.
Zaher, h. 1999. hemipenial morphology of the south american
xenodontine snakes, with a proposal for a monophyletic
Xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colubroid hemipenis.
Bulletin of the american Museum of Natural history, 240:168.
Zaher, h. and a. l. c. prudente. 1999. intraspecific variation
of the hemipenis in siphlophis and tripanurgos. Journal of
herpetology, 33:698‑702.
Zaher, h. and a. l. c. prudente. 2003. hemipenes of siphlophis
(serpentes, Xenodontinae) and techniques of hemipenial
preparation in snakes: a response to dowling. herpetological
review, 34:302‑307.
Zaher, h. and u. caramaschi. 1992. sur le statut taxonomique
d’oxyrhopus trigeminus et o. guibei (serpentes,
Xenodontinae). Bulletin de Muséum National d’histoire
Naturelle (ser. 4), 14a:805‑827.
Zaher, h. and u. caramaschi. 2000. synonymisation of
oxyrhopus venezuelanus schreve, 1947, with oxyrhopus
doliatus duméril, Bibron e duméril, 1854, and revalidation of
oxyrhopus erdisii (Barbour, 1913) (serpentes, colubridae).
Dumerilia, 4:113‑122.
Zaher, h., f. g. grazziotin, J. e. cadle, R. W. murphy, J. c.
moura‑leite, and s. Bonatto. 2009. molecular phylogeny of
advanced snakes (serpentes, caenophidia) with an emphasis
on south american Xenodontines: a revised classification
and descriptions of new taxa. papéis avulsos de Zoologia,
49:115‑153.
submitted 29 february 2012
accepted 04 July 2012
148
morphological variation of oxyrhopus clathratus
aPPendix i
material examined
oxyrhopus clathratus (n = 233) aRgentina – Misiones: cainguás, dos de mayo (macn 3187). Iguazú:
arroyo, urugua‑í 30 km e puerto Bemberg (macn 12761, 12762). san pedro: tobuna (macn 12692). BRa‑
Zil – (mnhn 3791, mnhn 3792). Bahia: Barra do choça (mZuesc 4638, 6666, 7756). Espírito santo:
domingos martins, pedra azul (mBml 510, mnRJ 14342), domingos martins (iBsp 49690), guaçui (iBsp
50256), marechal floriano (mBml 606,747, 748, 773, 781), santa teresa (mBml 633, 724, 1740 5012), são
domingos, vila araguaia (iBsp 29099). Minas Gerais: andradas (iBsp 42216), araponga, parque estadual da
serra do Brigadeiro (mZufv 1563), Bueno Brandão (iBsp 56563), camanducaia (iBsp 31757, 40002, 43622,
60363), carangola (mZufv 1290), cedofeita (iBsp 298), extrema (iBsp 42799, 5517, 8335, 8372, 7051, 8928,
12328, 73462), itabirito (lZv‑ufop 475), itamonte (iBsp 56824), itinga (mZusp 10595, 10598), nova ponte
(mZufv 777), ouro Branco (lZv‑ufop 688‑90), ouro preto (lZv‑ufop 105, 126‑127, 725‑726, 831), pi‑
ranga (lZv‑ufop 112), poços de caldas (mZusp 14070‑71), Rio novo (mZufv 1060‑61), catas altas, Rppn
serra do caraça (mnRJ 16944‑46), sapucai‑mirim (iBsp 57352, 62248, mZusp 11584, 11687, 12890, 15689),
viçosa (mZufv 91, 91a, 91B, 369, 445, 525, 709a, 709B, 709c, 709d, 849, 1000, 1202, 1270, 1304, 1351),
alto caparaó, parque nacional da serra do caparaó (mZusp 7722). paraná: adrianópolis (iBsp 30380), an‑
tonina (iBsp 30193), Balsa nova (iBsp 16700), colombo (mcp 5802), cruz machado (mcp 16888), curitiba,
km 27 – entre Ribeira e curitiba (iBsp 30165), curitiba (iBsp 18049, 18117, 43685), mallet, dorizon (mcp
924), porto vitória (mcp 16880, 16886), são matheus do sul (mcp 16885), união da vitória (iBsp 18479,
23287,16252, 16263, 16271, 16878 16881). rio de Janeiro: Rio das flores, casal (iBsp 4763), itatiaia (iBsp
17066, 37258), lidice (iBsp 7723, 8535), mangaratiba, Reserva Rio das pedras (mnRJ 16446), mendes (iBsp
16848, 33506), miguel pereira (iBsp 7860), natividade (mnRJ 16372), niterói (Zuec 1592), nova fribur‑
go (iBsp 24168, 22841), paraty (iBsp 73514), petrópolis (mZufv 1079), Resende (iBsp 9856, 69986). rio
Grande do sul: Bento gonçalves (mcp 945, 12049, 14483), caí (mZusp 364), canela (mcp 5777), carlos Bar‑
bosa (mcp 9005), caxias do sul (iBsp 9958, mcp 10394, 12332, 12334), dom pedro de alcântara (mcp 6232,
6482, 6916, 9537, 9548, 15549, 15550), farroupilha (iBsp 71324), garibaldi (mcp 9006), itati (mcp 9731),
marcelino Ramos (mcp 3043), veranópolis (iBsp 9844). santa catarina: corupá (mZusp 361), irineópolis
(mcp 16876, 16882), Joinville (iBsp 24704, 25968, 33580, 49992, mcp 16259, 16266), peritiba (mcp 2932),
porto união (mcp 16256, 16258, 16276), são Bento do sul (mZusp 7573, 9451‑52), são francisco do sul
(iBsp 17831, 51159), tangara (iBsp 16070), três Barras (iBsp 55715, 16877), videira (iBsp 23131, 27603),
florianópolis, Rio vermelho (mZusp 9427). são paulo: apiaí (iBsp 41531, 27315, 45723), atibaia, parque
municipal da grota funda (Zuec 1626), Bananal, estação ecológica de Bananal (mZusp 13895, 13896, 15181,
15192, 15215‑16), Barra do turvo, parque estadual Jacupiranga – núcleo cedro (mZusp 15132, 15139), Ber‑
tioga, parque das neblinas (mZusp 17510), Biritiba mirim (iBsp 70697, 71043, 71570, 72177), caieiras (iBsp
62848), cajati (iBsp 52893), campos do Jordão, parque estadual de campos do Jordão (mZusp 17294, 12057),
cananéia (iBsp 28022, 55764, 71495, 71982), capão Bonito (Zuec 1110), cunha (iBsp 29261, 45544, 44590,
44594), despraiado, estação ecológica Juréia‑itatins (Zuec 2144), eldorado (Zuec 492), iguape (mZusp
362), itapeva (mZusp 12440), Juquiá (mnRJ 14033), Juquitiba (mnRJ 10599), mairiporã (mZusp 12966),
miracatu (iBsp 34142, 49584), mogi das cruzes (iBsp 58475), pariquera‑açu (iBsp 43907, mnRJ 14032),
Registro (mZusp 16259, Zuec 2238), Ribeirão pires (mcp 16278), salesópolis, estação Biológica Boracéia
(mZusp 2848, 3479‑80, 3709, 4111, 4527, 4666, 5064, 5891, 791), santo andré, vila de paranapiacaba (iBsp
29021), são Bento do sapucaí (mZusp 13975), são Bernardo do campo (mnRJ 10017, 10265), são José do
Barreiro, serra da Bocaina (mZusp 4644), são luiz do paraitinga (mcp 8445), são miguel arcanjo, parque
estadual de carlos Botelho (mZusp 15233‑34), são paulo (mcp 4806), sapucai mirim (iBsp 60088).