Invertebrate Biology 133(3): 274–280.
© 2014, The American Microscopical Society, Inc.
DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12063
Evolutionary changes in the integument of the onychophoran
Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis (Peripatidae)
Ivo de Sena Oliveira,1,a Carsten L€
uter,2 Klaus W. Wolf,3 and Georg Mayer1
1
2
Animal Evolution and Development, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
Museum f€
ur Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
3
Electron Microscopy Unit, University of the West Indies (Mona), Kingston 7, Jamaica
Abstract. The dorsal integument of nearly all species of Peripatidae—one of the two major
subgroups of Onychophora (velvet worms)—typically exhibits 12 plicae (=annuli) per segment. The only exception might occur in Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis, from which 24 putative plicae per segment have been reported. Hence, the number of plicae might have been
duplicated in this species. If so, one would expect that the structure of the duplicated plicae
would resemble that of all other onychophoran species, and that the structures commonly
associated with the plicae, including crater-shaped papillae and hyaline organs, would also
have been duplicated. To clarify whether there was indeed such duplication, we compared
the structure of the integument in embryos and adults of Pl. jamaicensis (with the putative
number of 24 plicae per segment) and Principapillatus hitoyensis (with the common number
of 12 plicae per segment). Our scanning electron microscopic data revealed that embryos of
both species have 12 plicae per segment. While this number persists in adults of Pr. hitoyensis, 12 additional rows of papillae (=pseudoplicae) occur in the dorsal integument in adults
of Pl. jamaicensis. These pseudoplicae differ from the typical plicae of other onychophorans
in that they are not equipped with primary papillae and are situated in furrows between the
true plicae, as evidenced by the position of hyaline organs and crater-shaped papillae. Our
data further show that the number of the ventrolateral plicae, crater-shaped papillae, and
hyaline organs is similar in the two species studied. This suggests that the plicae have not
been duplicated in the integument of Pl. jamaicensis, but rather that additional pseudoplicae
have been inserted between the 12 original plicae. These pseudoplicae might have led to a
denser package of dermal papillae in the dorsal integument of Pl. jamaicensis, but the functional significance of this evolutionary change is unknown.
Additional key words: annulation, annuli, cuticle, plicae, segment, velvet worms
The body wall of many soft-bodied ecdysozoans
(=molting animals), including priapulids, nematodes,
and onychophorans, is micro-annulated (Fig. 1A,B).
The presence of a similar cuticular organization into
numerous rings or annuli in fossil ecdysozoans suggests that it might be an ancestral feature of the
entire group (e.g., Whittington 1978; Budd 2001;
Nielsen 2012; Ou et al. 2012). Among extant panarthropods, the annuli have persisted only in onychophorans, but have been lost in tardigrades and
arthropods (Budd 2001; Nielsen 2012). The annuli
of onychophorans, also called plicae (see Oliveira
et al. 2010 for synonyms), are typically covered with
a
Author for correspondence.
E-mail: ivo.de_sena_oliveira@uni-leipzig.de
numerous dermal papillae, but they are still recognizable as separate folds or dermal ridges, which are
clearly delineated from each other by transverse furrows (Fig. 1B; Read 1988a,b; Reid 1996; Oliveira
et al. 2011, 2012, 2013a).
Although the onychophoran cuticle and integument have been interpreted as being “essentially
unsegmented” (Budd 2001) due to the lack of distinct segmental boundaries (Mayer & Whitington
2009), the plicae are clearly arranged in segmentally
repeated sets along the antero-posterior body axis
(Oliveira et al. 2011, 2012). For example, incomplete
and/or anastomosing (=branching) plicae that exist
in various onychophoran species are located in specific positions within each segment along the dorsum
(Bouvier 1905; Zilch 1954; Ruhberg 1985; Oliveira
The integument of Plicatoperipatus
275
Fig. 1. Examples of body annulation in two soft-bodied ecdysozoans. Scanning electron micrographs. Anterior is left.
A. Body surface of an unidentified nematode from Chile in ventral view illustrating regular annulation. The nematode
was collected from the body surface of specimens of the onychophoran Metaperipatus inae (see Mayer 2007 for details
on the collection site). Scale bar=5 lm. B. Body surface of the onychophoran Principapillatus hitoyensis in dorso-lateral
view. Note the numerous annuli (=plicae) covered with dermal papillae. Scale bar=250 lm. An, annulus; dp, dermal
papilla; lg, leg/lobopod; pf, plical furrow; pl, plicae.
et al. 2010, 2011, 2012). Evidence for a segmental
organization of the onychophoran integument is
also provided by other structures, such as ventral
and preventral organs, interpedal structures, and
sets of crater-shaped papillae, which are associated
with specific plicae in each segment (Bouvier 1905;
Oliveira et al. 2012, 2013a,b).
While the number of plicae per segment varies
from 12 to 18 among peripatopsid species, most species of the other major onychophoran subgroup, the
Peripatidae, show a conserved number of twelve
plicae per segment (Bouvier 1905, 1907; Clark 1913;
Fuhrmann 1914; Froehlich 1968; Peck 1975; Ruhberg 1985; Reid 1996; Oliveira et al. 2010, 2011,
2012, 2013a). The only exception has been reported
from the peripatid Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis
(GRABHAM & COCKERELL 1892), which is believed to
have 24 plicae per segment (Bouvier 1905; Clark
1913; Peck 1975; Oliveira et al. 2012). Thus, the
number of plicae might have been duplicated in this
species. In this case, one would expect that the associated structures, including the crater-shaped papillae and the hyaline organs (Bouvier 1905; Oliveira
et al. 2012, 2013a), would also be duplicated. Moreover, close morphological resemblance of the duplicated and the original plicae would be anticipated.
To clarify the evolutionary changes in the integument of Pl. jamaicensis, we applied scanning electron microscopy to embryos and adult specimens of
this species. In addition, we carried out pepsin digestion of the body wall to reveal the internal structure
of the cuticle and integument in adult specimens.
For comparison, we analyzed embryos, adult specimens, and molted skins of another peripatid species,
Principapillatus hitoyensis OLIVEIRA ET AL. 2012,
which shows the common number of twelve plicae
per segment.
Methods
Specimens of Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis (n=16) were
obtained from leaf litter and in heaps of limestone in a
banana plantation near Ecclesdown, Parish Portland,
Jamaica, West Indies (18°020 09.2″N, 76°190 09.8″W).
Specimens of Principapillatus hitoyensis were collected
as described previously (Oliveira et al. 2012).
For scanning electron microscopy, adult specimens of both sexes (n=4), as well as flexed-stage
embryos (n=2) dissected from the female uteri, were
fixed and preserved as described previously (Oliveira
et al. 2012). After dehydration in an ethanol series,
specimens were dried in a critical point dryer (CPD
030 Bal-Tec AG, Balzers, Liechtenstein, or K850,
Emitech Ltd., Kent, England), coated with gold in a
SCD 050 Sputter Coater (Balzers Union, Balzers,
Liechtenstein) or SC 7640 Sputter Coater (Quorum
Technologies, Polaron, Newhaven, UK), and examined with Quanta 200 (FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon,
USA) or EVO LS 10 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)
scanning electron microscopes. Trunk pieces (4–5
segments) from adult specimens of Pl. jamaicensis
were rinsed twice in distilled water for 30 min and
digested overnight in a solution containing 10%
pepsin (0.3 g pepsin in 3 mL distilled water with
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
276
Oliveira, L€
uter, Wolf, & Mayer
two drops of 2 mol L1 HCl). The detached skin
was removed carefully from the rest of the body
using fine forceps. The skins and the remaining
body parts were postfixed in 4% formalin for 2 h,
rinsed several times in distilled water, dehydrated in
an ethanol series, and processed further for scanning
electron microscopy as described above.
Freshly molted skins obtained from living specimens of Pr. hitoyensis were spread on water surface
according to Holliday (1944), placed on glass slides,
and analyzed with a stereomicroscope (Wild M10,
Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped
with a digital camera (PCO AG SensiCam, Kelheim,
Germany). For the terminology of morphological
features used, see Oliveira et al. (2010, 2012).
Embryos were staged according to Walker &
Campiglia (1990).
Light and scanning electron micrographs were
processed and artificial colors added with Adobe
(San Jose, CA, USA) Photoshop CS4. Final panels
were designed with Adobe Illustrator CS4 and
exported in the Tagged Image File Format.
sponded to the segmental set of twelve plicae in
Pr. hitoyensis (Fig. 2D), which were also equipped
with relatively large primary papillae (Fig. 3D).
Only seven of these twelve plicae passed to the ventral body surface in both species (Fig. 2E,F),
whereas none of the pseudoplicae of Pl. jamaicensis
did so (Fig. 2E). The pseudoplicae instead terminated laterally in each interpedal region.
An analysis of the internal structure of the cuticle
and integument of Pl. jamaicensis after digestion
with pepsin revealed that the bases of the accessory
papillae, which belonged to the pseudoplicae, were
elongated and narrower than those of the plical
papillae (Fig. 3A,B). Moreover, the accessory papillae did not form coherent, independent folds or
ridges comparable to the typical plicae, but rather
seemed to be positioned in furrows between the
plicae (Fig. 3B). This inserted position was reflected
by the corresponding arrangement of the cratershaped papillae and hyaline organs, which in Pl.
jamaicensis were associated with the pseudoplicae
(Figs. 2E, 3C), whereas they were clearly located in
the plical furrows in Pr. hitoyensis (Figs. 2F, 3D).
Results
Scanning electron microscopy of the flexed-stage
embryos of Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis and Principapillatus hitoyensis revealed a thin, smooth cuticle
that covered the entire body, including the developing plicae and dermal papillae (Fig. 2A,B). At this
developmental stage, the adjacent plicae were clearly
separated from each other by prominent plical furrows (Fig. 2A,B). The embryos of both species each
had twelve plicae per segment along the dorsum
(Fig. 2A,B; herein we use the midline of each leg as
a segmental landmark). In contrast to the regular
arrangement of plicae in Pl. jamaicensis, a few
incomplete plicae and anastomoses were evident in
the dorsal integument of Pr. hitoyensis (Fig. 2B).
While the initial arrangement of the integument
(with twelve plicae per segment and no additional
rows of papillae) is retained in adults of Pr. hitoyensis, it changes substantially in Pl. jamaicensis
(Fig. 2C–F). The dorsal integument in adults of this
species had a large number of small dermal papillae
that were pine cone shaped and arranged in 24
transverse rows per segment (Fig. 2C). However,
only twelve of these rows (Fig. 2C) were equipped
with primary papillae, characterized by an apical
piece and a sensory bristle (cf. Oliveira et al. 2010),
whereas the remaining twelve rows (=pseudoplicae;
Fig. 2C) consisted exclusively of accessory papillae
(Fig. 3A–C). Thus, only the twelve rows bearing the
primary papillae in Pl. jamaicensis (Fig. 2C) corre-
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
Discussion
The putatively duplicated number of plicae in Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis has been used as a name-giving
feature for this monotypic genus (plicato=plicated,
folded, crumpled; Clark 1913; Grabham & Cockerell
1928; Brown 1956). Accordingly, one would expect
that the additional plicae have a structure similar to
the typical plicae of other onychophoran species and
that the associated dermal structures, including the
crater-shaped papillae and the hyaline organs, are
doubled as well (Fig. 4A–D). However, our observations revealed that this is not the case.
First, the structures associated with plicae are not
doubled in Pl. jamaicensis, as the number of the crater-shaped papillae and hyaline organs in each body
segment corresponds to that in other representatives
of Peripatidae, including Principapillatus hitoyensis
(Fig. 4A,B,E,F; Bouvier 1905; Oliveira et al. 2012,
2013a). Second, the number of plicae that pass to
the ventral body surface between each two successive leg pairs is also the same as in other peripatid
species (Fig. 4A,B,E,F; Bouvier 1905; Oliveira et al.
2012, 2013a). Third, only 12 of 24 transverse rows
of papillae in the dorsal integument of Pl. jamaicensis (cyan in Fig. 4E,F) correspond in structure and
position to the plicae of other peripatids (e.g., Bouvier 1905; Marcus & Marcus 1955; Froehlich 1968;
Peck 1975; Read 1988b). In contrast, the remaining
twelve rows in Pl. jamaicensis (orange in Fig. 4E,F),
The integument of Plicatoperipatus
277
Fig. 2. Comparison of the integument in two onychophoran species. Scanning electron micrographs of flexed-stage
embryos (A, B) and adults (C–F). Anterior is up in A–D; posterior is right in E and F. Note the segmentally repeated
set of plicae (numbered 1–12), pseudoplicae (numbered 10 –120 ), and crater-shaped papillae. Note that only seven plicae
extend to the ventral body surface in both species studied (numbered 1–7 in E and F). A, C, E. Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis. B, D, F. Principapillatus hitoyensis. Arrowheads point to the incomplete plicae; arrow indicates anastomosing
plicae (see Oliveira et al. 2011, 2012 for more details). Scale bars=200 lm (A–D) and 100 lm (E, F). Cp, crater-shaped
papilla; dp, dermal papilla; lg, leg/lobopod; pf, plical furrow.
which we have dubbed pseudoplicae, cannot be
regarded as true plicae because they lack primary
papillae and are positioned in furrows between the
actual plicae, as evidenced by the position of the
crater-shaped papillae and hyaline organs in the two
species studied (Fig. 4A,B,E,F).
We therefore conclude that the structure of the
dorsal integument in Pl. jamaicensis has not resulted
from a duplication of annuli, but rather from an
insertion of the pseudoplicae in furrows between the
true plicae. This modification has led to a denser
arrangement of dermal papillae in the dorsal
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
278
Oliveira, L€
uter, Wolf, & Mayer
Fig. 3. Organization of the dorsal integument in two onychophoran species. Scanning electron micrographs from
Plicatoperipatus jamaicensis (A–C) and stereomicrograph from Principapillatus hitoyensis (D). Anterior is up in all
images. Arrows indicate primary papillae in A and B. A. Internal perspective of the skin after digestion with pepsin.
B. Surface of the integument, from which the overlying cuticle has been removed after digestion with pepsin. Note that
the pseudoplicae are narrow and positioned in furrows between the plicae. Note also that only the plicae bear primary
papillae, recognizable by remnants of their apical pieces. C. External view of dorsal body surface. Note the position of
hyaline organs on each pseudoplica. D. External view of dorsal body surface in molted skin. Note the position of hyaline organs within each plical furrow (arrowheads). Scale bars=50 lm (A–C) and 250 lm (D). Ap, accessory papilla;
dm, dorsal midline; ho, hyaline organ; pp, primary papilla.
integument of Pl. jamaicensis. Although the functional significance of this modification is unknown,
the pseudoplicae are a derived feature of P. jamaicensis, as they have not been reported from any other
onychophoran species. Intriguingly, we found that
embryos of both species studied initially bear only
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
the twelve plicae per segment. While this arrangement persists in adult specimens of Pr. hitoyensis,
additional pseudoplicae appear in the integument of
Pl. jamaicensis late in development. Thus, the initial
structure of the integument in embryos of Pl. jamaicensis, with twelve plicae per segment and no
The integument of Plicatoperipatus
279
Fig. 4. Diagrams comparing the arrangement of plicae, hyaline organs, and crater-shaped papillae in Plicatoperipatus
jamaicensis and the remaining species of Peripatidae. A, B. Pattern found in all species of Peripatidae, except for
Pl. jamaicensis. C, D. Expected pattern in Pl. jamaicensis, if the number of plicae was duplicated. D, E. Arrangement
of plicae and associated structures in Pl. jamaicensis revealed in this study. Arrowhead (in A, C, E) points to a cratershaped papilla. Dm, dorsal midline; ho, hyaline organ; lg, leg/lobopod; pl, plica; ps, pseudoplica.
pseudoplicae, can be regarded as an ontogenetic
recapitulation of the ancestral state, which was present in the last common ancestor of Peripatidae.
Despite the evolutionary changes that have taken
place in the integument of Pl. jamaicensis, our data
show a strictly segmental organization of plicae and
associated structures in the two onychophoran species studied. Both species exhibit 12 segmental plicae
per trunk segment, only seven of which extend to
the ventral body surface (Fig. 4A,E). Likewise, the
rows of five to six crater-shaped papillae are also
repeated in a segmental fashion in each interpedal
region. Therefore, contrary to a previous view
(Budd 2001; Mayer & Whitington 2009), our findings suggest that, at least in representatives of Peripatidae, the cuticle and the integument do have a
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
280
Oliveira, L€
uter, Wolf, & Mayer
segmental organization, although the underlying
segment patterning mechanisms, in particular in the
dorsal body region, are unknown.
Acknowledgments. The authors are thankful to Ms.
Anke S€
anger (MfN, Berlin) for assisting with scanning
electron microscopy, Vladimir Gross for proofreading the
manuscript, and the staff of the Instituto Nacional de
Biodiversidad (INBio, Heredia, Costa Rica) for providing
the permits. This study was supported by a PhD fellowship of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Cientıfico e Tecnol
ogico (CNPq: 290029/2010-4) to ISO.
GM is a Research Group Leader supported by the Emmy
Noether Programme of the German Research Foundation
(DFG: Ma 4147/3-1).
References
Bouvier EL. 1905. Monographie des Onychophores. Ann.
Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol. Anim. [9e Serie] 2: 1–383.
———— 1907. Monographie des Onychophores. Ann. Sci.
Nat. Zool. Biol. Anim. [9e Serie] 5: 61–318.
Brown RL. 1956. Composition of Scientific Words.
Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC. 882 pp.
Budd GE 2001. Why are arthropods segmented? Evol.
Dev. 3: 332–342.
Clark AH 1913. A revision of the American species of
Peripatus. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 26: 15–19.
Froehlich CG 1968. On some Brazilian onychophores.
Beitr. Neotrop. Fauna 5: 160–171.
Fuhrmann O 1914. Quelques nouveaux Peripates americaines. In: Voyage d’Exploration Scientifique en Colombie [Memoires de la Societe neuch^ateloise des Sciences
Naturelles, Volume 5]. Fuhrmann O & Mayor E, eds.,
pp. 176–192. Attinger Freres, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Grabham M & Cockerell TDA 1892. Peripatus re-discovered in Jamaica. Nature 46: 514.
———— 1928. Peripatus re-discovered in Jamaica. Jamaica
Nat. 1: 9–10.
Holliday RA 1944. Further notes on Natal Onychophora.
Ann. Natal Mus. 10: 433–436.
Marcus E & Marcus E 1955. A new Peripatus from Minas Gerais, Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 27: 189–193.
Mayer G 2007. Metaperipatus inae sp. nov. (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae) from Chile with a novel ovarian
type and dermal insemination. Zootaxa 1440: 21–37.
Mayer G & Whitington PM 2009. Neural development in
Onychophora (velvet worms) suggests a step-wise evolution of segmentation in the nervous system of Panarthropoda. Dev. Biol. 335: 263–275.
Nielsen C. 2012. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of
the Living Phyla. Oxford University Press Inc., New
York. 402 pp.
Invertebrate Biology
vol. 133, no. 3, September 2014
Oliveira IS, Wieloch AH, & Mayer G 2010. Revised taxonomy and redescription of two species of the Peripatidae (Onychophora) from Brazil: a step towards
consistent terminology of morphological characters.
Zootaxa 2493: 16–34.
Oliveira IS, Lacorte GA, Fonseca CG, Wieloch AH, & Mayer
G 2011. Cryptic speciation in Brazilian Epiperipatus (Onychophora: Peripatidae) reveals an underestimated diversity
among the peripatid velvet worms. PLoS ONE 6: 1–13.
Oliveira IS, Franke FA, Hering L, Schaffer S, Rowell
DM, Weck-Heimann A, Monge-Najera J, MoreraBrenes B, & Mayer G 2012. Unexplored character diversity in Onychophora (velvet worms): a comparative
study of three peripatid species. PLoS One 7: 1–20.
Oliveira IS, Schaffer S, Kvartalnov PV, Galoyan EA, Palko IV, Weck-Heimann A, Geissler P, Ruhberg H, &
Mayer G 2013a. A new species of Eoperipatus (Onychophora) from Vietnam reveals novel morphological
characters for the South-East Asian Peripatidae. Zool.
Anz. 252: 495–510.
Oliveira IS, Tait NN, Str€
ubing I, & Mayer G 2013b. The
role of ventral and preventral organs as attachment
sites for segmental limb muscles in Onychophora.
Front. Zool. 10: 73.
Ou Q, Shu D, & Mayer G 2012. Cambrian lobopodians
and extant onychophorans provide new insights into
early cephalization in Panarthropoda. Nat. Commun.
3: 1–7.
Peck SB 1975. A review of the New World Onychophora
with the description of a new cavernicolous genus and
species from Jamaica. Psyche 82: 341–358.
Read VMSJ 1988a. The application of scanning electron
microscopy to the systematics of the neotropical Peripatidae (Onychophora). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 187–223.
———— 1988b. The Onychophora of Trinidad, Tobago and
the Lesser Antilles. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 225–257.
Reid AL 1996. Review of the Peripatopsidae (Onychophora) in Australia, with comments on peripatopsid
relationships. Invertebr. Taxon. 10: 663–936.
Ruhberg H 1985. Die Peripatopsidae (Onychophora).
€
Systematik, Okologie,
Chorologie und phylogenetische
Aspekte. Zoologica 137: 1–183.
Walker M & Campiglia S 1990. Some observations on
the placenta and embryonic cuticle during development
in Peripatus acacioi Marcus & Marcus (Onychophora,
Peripatidae). In: Proceedings of the 7th International
Congress of Myriapodology. Minelli A, ed., pp. 449–
459. E.J. Brill, Leiden, New York.
Whittington HB 1978. The lobopod animal Aysheaia
pedunculata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale,
British Columbia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 284: 165–
197.
Zilch A 1954. Onychophoren aus El Salvador. Senckenb.
Biol. 35: 147–150.