Biodiversity Journal, 2016, 7 (1): 103–115
M ONOGRAPH
A revision of the Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato, 1884) complex, with the
description of a new species (Mollusca Gastropoda)
Francesco Pusateri1, Riccardo Giannuzzi-Savelli2* & Stefano Bartolini3
via Castellana 64, 90135 Palermo, Italy; e-mail: francesco@pusateri.it
via Mater Dolorosa 54, 90146 Palermo, Italy; e-mail: malakos@tin.it
3
via e. Zacconi 16, 50137 Firenze, Italy; e-mail: stefmaria.bartolini@libero.it
*
Corresponding author
1
2
ABSTRACT
In the present work we present a complex of species of the family Raphitomidae (Mollusca
Gastropoda) comprising three entities: two have multispiral protoconchs, Raphitoma pupoides
(Monterosato, 1884), the less known R. radula (Monterosato, 1884) and a new species with
paucispiral protoconch.
KEY WORDS
Mollusca; Conoidea; Raphitomidae; new species; Mediterranean Sea.
Received 02.03.2016; accepted 24.03.2016; printed 30.03.2016
Proceedings of the Ninth Malacological Pontine Meeting, October 3rd-4th, 2015 - San Felice Circeo, Italy
INTRODUCTION
the family of Raphitomidae is a well supported
clade of the Conoidea (Bouchet et al., 2011). the
genus Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847 as currently
conceived includes, based on our estimates, ca. 40
Mediterranean species, some of which are still
undescribed. Propaedeutic to the general revision
of the Mediterranean Raphitoma s.l., we have
focused on several pairs of species, differing only
or mostly in the size and shape of the protoconch
(Pusateri et al., 2012, 2013). the specific distinction
is based on the assumption that the dichotomy
multispiral protoconch/planktrotrophic development vs. paucispiral protoconch/lecithotrophic development (Jablonski & Lutz, 1980) can be used in
caenogastropods to recognise distinct sister species
(Bouchet, 1989; Oliverio, 1996a, 1996b, 1997).
Anyway, it should not be abused to create polyphyletic genera by artificially separating closely
related species among different genera only based
on their larval development (Bouchet, 1990).
In the present work we present the results on
a complex of species comprising three entities:
two have multispiral protoconchs, R. pupoides
(Monterosato, 1884), and the less known R. radula
(Monterosato, 1884); the other was discovered
while revising the materials in the Monterosato
collection, where a lot (MCZR 16905) included
some specimens with paucispiral protoconch, labelled by Monterosato himself “V. tomentosa/
Monts./Palermo”, never published, that we describe
hereby as new to Science.
ABBRevIAtIONS AND ACRONYMS. d =
diameter; h = height; sh = empty shell(s); LMG-NS:
Leeds Museums and Galleries - Natural Science;
MNHN: Musée Nationale Histoire Naturelle, Paris,
France; MRSNt: Museo Regionale Storia Naturale,
terrasini, Italy; NMW: National Museum of Wales,
United Kingdom; SMF: Senckenberg Museum,
104
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
Frankfurt/M, Germany; SMNH: Swedish Museum
of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; MCZR:
Museo Civico di Zoologia, Roma, Italy; HUJ:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; ARD:
Roberto Ardovini collection (Rome, Italy); BOG:
Cesare Bogi collection (Livorno, Italy); DUR:
Sergio Duraccio collection (Napoli, Italy); GeR:
Alfio Germanà collection (trecastagni, Catania,
Italy); GOR: Sandro Gori collection (Livorno,
Italy); HOA: André Hoarau collection (Fréjus,
France); MAC: Gabriele Macrì collection (Scorrano, Lecce, Italy); MAR: Alessandro Margelli
collection (Livorno, Italy); PAG: Attilio Pagli
collection (Lari, Pisa, Italy); PAO: Paolo Paolini
collection (Livorno, Italy); PRK: Jakov Prkić
collection (Split, Croatia); PSI: Peter Sossi collection (trieste, Italy); PUS: Francesco Pusateri collection (Palermo, Italy); SBR: Carlo Sbrana
collection (Livorno, Italy); SeR: Gabriele Sercia
collection (Palermo, Italy); SPA: Gianni Spada
collection (vagrigneuse, France); SQU: ennio
Squizzato collection (Loreggia, Padova, Italy); tIS:
Morena tisselli collection (S. Zaccaria, Ravenna,
Italy); tRI: Lionello tringali collection (Rome,
Italy); vAZ: Angelo vazzana collection (Reggio
Calabria, Italy).
RESULTS
Systematic
Citation of unpublished names is not intended for
taxonomic purposes.
Familia RAPHItOMIDAe Bellardi, 1875
Genus Raphitoma Bellardi, 1847
type species: Pleurotoma hystrix Cristofori et Jan,
1832 (nomen nudum, validated by Bellardi, 1847
as "Pleurotoma histrix Jan.") by subsequent designation (Monterosato, 1872: 54).
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato, 1884)
Figs. 1–9, 24
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi, 1836 non G.B. Sowerby
I, 1834 nec Philippi, 1836
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi, Weinkauff, 1868: 130
(see Remarks)
Pleurotoma reticulatum var. rudis Sc., Petit de la
Saussaye, 1869: 154
Pleurotoma (Defrancia) rudis Sc., Monterosato,
1875: 44 (see Remarks)
Pleur. rude Scacchi, Aradas & Benoit, 1876: 249 n.
662 (see Remarks)
Pleurotoma rudis Sc., Monterosato, 1878: 106 (see
Remarks)
Clathurella rudis Scacchi, B.D.D., 1883: 94 pl. 14
figs. 8, 9
Cordieria pupoides Monterosato, 1884: 132
[nomen novum]
Clathurella pupoidea Monterosato, Locard, 1886:
114 [error pro pupoides]
Clathurella pupoidea Monterosato, Locard, 1891:
66 fig. 52 [error pro pupoides]
Clathurella rudis (B.D.D.), Carus, 1893: 426
Clathurella pupoidea de Monterosato, Locard &
Caziot, 1900: 248
Clathurella pupoidea var. major, Locard & Caziot,
1900: 248 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella pupoidea var. minor, Locard & Caziot,
1900: 248 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella pupoidea var. ventricosa, Locard &
Caziot, 1900: 248 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella pupoidea var. curta, Locard & Caziot,
1900: 248 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella pupoidea Mtrs., Kobelt, 1905: 351
Mangilia (Clathurella) pupoides Monterosato,
Cipolla, 1914: 146, pl. 13, figs. 16 (fossil)-17
(recent)
Cordieria pupoides Montrs., Bellini, 1929: 32
Philbertia (Philbertia) rudis Scacchi, Priolo, 1967:
697
Raphitoma (Cyrtoides) rudis (Scacchi), Nordsieck,
1968: 176 pl. 30, fig. 20
Raphitoma (Cyrtoides) rudis pupoidea (Monterosato),
Nordsieck, 1968: 176 pl. 30 fig. 21
Raphitoma rudis pupoidea Monts, Parenzan, 1970:
207 pl. 44, fig. 842
Raphitoma (C.) pupoidea (Monterosato), Nordsieck,
1977: 52, pl. 16, fig. 126 (error pro pupoides)
Raphitoma (C.) neapolitana Nordsieck, 1977: 52,
pl. 16 figs. 124, 125 (nomen vanum)
Raphitoma pupoides (Mts), terreni, 1981: 40 n. 328
Raphitoma pupoidea (Monterosato), Nordsieck,
1982: 272, pl. 101, fig. 98.11
Raphitoma neapolitana Nordsieck, 1982: 272, pl.
101, fig. 98.10
Raphitoma neapolitana form a Nordsieck, 1982:
272, pl. 101, fig. 98.10a
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
Raphitoma (R.) pupoides (Monterosato), van Aartsen
et al., 1984: 91
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Orlando &
Palazzi, 1986: 44
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), tenekidis,
1989: n. 58.50
Raphitoma (Raphitoma) pupoides (Monterosato),
Sabelli et al., 1990–1992: 44, 216, 411
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Poppe & Goto,
1991: 174
Raphitoma (Cyrtoides) pupoides (Monterosato),
Delamotte & vardala-theodorou, 1994: 287
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Cecalupo &
Quadri, 1995: 109
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Giribet &
Peñas, 1997: 53
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Marquet,
1998: 276
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Oztürk et al.,
2004: 59
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Repetto et al.,
2005: 220 fig. 910
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi, Cretella et al., 2005: 125
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Cretella et al.,
2005: 125
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato), Cossignani &
Ardovini, 2011: 31, 328
Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato, 1884), Scuderi
& terlizzi, 2012 (see Remarks)
tYPe LOCALItY. Coast of Provence, France,
Mediterranean Sea.
exAMINeD MAteRIAL. type material: neotype,
from “Artufel/Provenza” [Provence, M. Artufel
legit] (18.7 x 7.7 mm) (MCZR 16492).
OtHeR exAMINeD MAteRIAL. France. “Artufel/
Provenza” 3 sh (MCZR 16492, with Monts label
“H. pupoides”); Marseille, 4 sh (coll. Locard
MNHN); St. Raphael, 3 sh coll. Locard (MNHN),
1 sh (coll. Hoarau); Cassis, 2 sh coll. (Locard
MNHN); Le Brusc, 4 sh (coll. Locard MNHN, 4
sh); Coste di Provenza, 2 sh (coll. Chaster NMW n.
01894); Bastia, 2 sh (coll. Monterosato, MCZR lot
16861).
Italy. Gulf of Baratti, 7 sh (PAO), 1 sh (PAG);
Punta Ripalti (elba Isl.), 2 sh -25 m (GOR); Lazio
1 sh (PAG); Circeo, 1 sh (tRI); Napoli, 1 sh
(coll. Coen HUJ, n. 8082c sub nomine “Philbertia
(Cordieria) cordieri cancellata”); Sorrento
105
(Napoli), 2 sh (DUR); Palinuro (Salerno), 1 sh (SPA);
Scilla (Reggio Calabria), 4 sh (vAZ); Palermo,
Sicily, 10 sh with Monterosato handwritten label
“pupoides/Monts./Pal!!/et/v. decolorata, Pallary”,
1 sh with non-Monterosato label “Cordieria/pupoides Monts./dr. Golfo di Palermo” and 15 sh with
non-Monterosato label “Cordieria/pupoides Monts./
drag. Golfo di Palermo” (MCZR 16492, with
Monts label “H. pupoides”); Porticello (Palermo),
2 sh sub nomine R. reticulata (coll. MRSNt n.
4759); Isola delle Femmine (Palermo), 1 sh (SeR),
8 sh (PUS); trapani, 1 sh (SeR); Catania, 1 sh
(GeR); Pozzillo Inferiore (Catania), 1 sh (PAG);
Canale di Sicilia, 1 sh (tRI), 1 sh (coll. MRSNt n.
7312); Sicilia, 6 sh sub nomine R. purpurea (coll.
MRSNt n. 29824); Jesolo (venezia), 1 sh (SQU).
“Coste d'Africa”. 1 sh, coll. Monterosato
MCZR, lot 16901.
Croatia. Unprecised locality, 1 sh (DeL); Dalmatia, 1 sh (PRK).
DeSCRIPtION. In squared parentheses data of the
neotype. Shell of medium size for the genus, height
10–21 mm [18.7] (mean 15.05, std 3.81), width 5–
8 mm [7.7] (mean 6.57, std 1.27), cirto-pupoid,
slender, h/d 2.1–2.57 [2.43] (mean 2.26, std 0.19).
Protoconch multispiral, only part of the last whorl
known, with traces of diagonally cancellate sculpture. teleoconch of 6–8 [7] whorls, evenly convex
(more convex in juveniles). Suture fine and undulate. Axial sculpture of 12–24 [18] sligthly opisthocline, non-equidistant ribs, and interspaces broader
than the ribs (with interspace width varying with
shell size). Axial sculpture evident, but becoming
obsolescent in largest shells. In particularly large
shells (gerontic), axial ribs revert to same strength
as the spiral cords on the last quarter of whorl. Spiral
sculpture on the last whorl of 7–10 [9] cordlets, thinner that axial ribs. Cancellation squared in juveniles,
becoming rectangular in adults. Secondary cordlets
appearing occasionally and thereafter becoming as
strong as the others. Subsutural ramp narrow, devoid
of evident sculpture. Columella simple, slightly
sinuous anteriorly, gently angled posteriorly. Outer
lip thickened and crenulated externally, with 11–13
[12] strong inner denticles, the most posterior smaller, delimiting the wide and short anal sinus, the
most anterior more robust and delimiting the funnellike siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole of 6 nodulose
cordlets, neatly spaced from the last spiral cordlet.
Colour uniformly ligth chestnut brown in the back-
106
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
ground, with darker blotches, more evident in larger
shells (>20 mm), and same darker colour bordering
the siphonal fasciole and inside the aperture. violet
hue on the first 3–4 whorls of particularly fresh specimens. Comma-shaped white spots on the subsutural ramp, arrow-like white spots inside some
cancellation interspaces. Soft parts unknown.
DIStRIBUtION. Western and Central Mediterranean. Adriatic. the records under this name from
Greece by Koukouras (2010) and Delamotte &
vardala-theodorou (1994: 287) were in turn based
on tenekides (1989) who reported under this name
another species (probably R. echinata).
ReMARKS. the protoconch was always either
lacking, broken or corroded in almost specimens
studied. Anyway parts of the apical whorls showing
traces of a diagonally cancellate sculpture, indicating a multispiral protoconch.
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi, 1836 was introduced
with the following diagnosis: “testa fusca fascis
pallidioribus, anfractibus rotundatis, cancellatis et
muricatis; labro crasso interne striato, cauda vix
ultra labrum producta. Alta lin. 10–11. P. echinatae
similis; at labro crassiore, cauda breviore, et minus
aspera; saepe fascis pallidioribus ornata. In sinu
neapolitano et tarentino” (Scacchi, 1836), Fig. 17.
Weinkauff (1868), Petit de la Saussaye (1869)
and Aradas & Benoit (1876) considered it as a
variety or synonym of R. echinata (as Defrancia
reticulata Renier). Monterosato (1875, 1878) at first
included it within Pleurotoma purpurea sensu
Philippi non Montagu. thereafter (Monterosato,
1884), he separated to two species and introduced
the replacement name Cordieria pupoides noticing
an alleged homonymy with “P. rudis Broderip”. Actually, Broderip introduced, in 1834, Placunanomia
rudis (a bivalve), the abbreviation P. rudis having
possibly mislead Monterosato. However, Pleurotoma rudis Sacchi is preoccupied by P. rudis G.B.
Sowerby I, 1834 (currently accepted as Crassispira
rudis) and by P. rudis Philippi, 1836 (currently
accepted as Clathromangelia granum (Philippi,
1844): note that Philippi’s work preceeds Scacchi’s
one according to Cretella et al., 2005: 115), and the
replacement name by Monterosato still holds valid.
Regrettably, the type material of Pleurotoma rudis
Scacchi is lost (Cretella et al., 2005: 123) and
we have established hereby a neotype based on
Monterosato’s material. the original material of
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi has gone lost. We designate, for the sake of stability, a shell from the
Monterosato collection, upon which he based his
concept of Cordieria pupoides, as the neotype of
Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi.
Some Authors (Bucquoy et al., 1883: 93) included, in the synonymy of R. rudis, Pleurotoma
reticulata var. brevis Requién, 1848. However,
this is a nomen nudum and thus, not available.
Nordsieck (1977) used this name (brevis) and
provided the first valid introduction, but referring
to a distinct species.
Nordsieck (1968: 176) split R. rudis Scacchi into
four subspecies: R. rudis rudis, R. rudis pupoidea
[sic!], R. rudis cylindrica and R. rudis intermedia.
Descriptions of R. rudis rudis and R. rudis pupoidea
[sic! error pro pupoides] are quite similar and migth
be referred to the same species (R. pupoides). Concerning the two other “subspecies”, R. cylindrica
(erroneously ascribed to Monterosato, actually
introduced by Locard & Caziot, 1899) is a distinct
unrelated species; “R. rudis intermedia n. ssp.” had
a scanty description and was not figured. Subsequently, Nordsieck raised it to species level and
provided a description and figure of R. intermedia
(Nordsieck, 1977: 56, pl. 18 fig. 140). this is R.
laviae, as confirmed by the study of a syntype (SMF,
sine numero, with autograph Nordsieck’s label). to
increase confusion, Nordsieck (1977: 52) also introduced R. (Cyrtoides) neapolitana as a replacement
name pro Pleurotoma rudis Scacchi, 1836 non Broderip, evidently neglecting Monterosato’s introduction: R. neapolitana is thus not available. Material
on which Nordsieck based his concept of R. neapolitana (SMF 340337, 3403379 and 340338) included
small size specimens of R. laviae and R. bicolor.
Raphitoma cfr. pupoides as figured by Cavallo
& Repetto (1992: 147 fig. 401) and R. cfr. pupoides
as figured by Cachia et al. (2001: 69 pl. 10 fig. 9)
are not referable to the present species. Raphitoma
pupoides as figured by Scuderi & terlizzi (2012: pl.
xvIII n. 6) is rather to be referred to R. cordieri
sensu Auctores.
Raphitoma pupoides can be easily distinguished
from R. echinata sensu Auctores by its cyrtoconoid
not stepped outline and the shorter siphonal canal.
Specimens of R. pupoides with strong sculpture on
the last whorls may be confused with R. radula,
which is however diagnosed by its more acute spire,
the ligther colour without blotches or spots.
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
107
Figures 1–8. Shells of Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato, 1884). Fig. 1: Lectotype: Provenza, (MCZR lotto 16492), h: 18.7
mm with label of the lot; Fig. 2: sine locus (MNHN-IM-2000-3240), h: 16.5 mm; Fig. 3: Palinuro, close-up of the sculpture;
Fig. 4: Anzio, h: 20 mm; Fig. 5: Anzio, h: 17 mm; Fig. 6: Jesolo (venezia), h: 20 mm; Fig. 7: Saint-Raphael, est La
Chrétienne (France), h: 15.7; Fig. 8: Isola delle Femmine (Palermo), juveniles, h: 9.1 mm.
108
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
Figure 9. Raphitoma pupoides (Monterosato, 1884), Adriatic, h: 12 mm.
Figure 10. Raphitoma radula (Monterosato, 1884), Palermo, coll. Melville-tomlin, NMW, h: 11.5 mm, with label.
Raphitoma alida Pusateri et Giannuzzi-Savelli
n. sp. - Figs. 11–15, 25
exAMINeD MAteRIAL. Holotype and 3 paratypes
from Palermo (coll. Monterosato, MCZR 16905),
with handwritten Monterosato label: “V. tomentosa/
Monts./Palermo”; 2 paratypes, Gulf of Palermo
(PUS).
OtHeR exAMINeD MAteRIAL. Italy. Gulf of Baratti, 1 sh (MAR), 1 sh (BOG); Livorno, 1 sh (BOG);
Scilla (Reggio Calabria), 3 sh (vAZ); Palermo, 1 sh
sub nomine ms. “perfecta” (coll. Monterosato,
16905); sine loco probably Palermo, 1 sh, (coll.
Monterosato, MCZR 16905); Gulf of Palermo, 2 sh
(PUS).
“Coste d’Africa”. 1 sh (coll. Monterosato,
MCZR 16905).
DeSCRIPtION OF HOLOtYPe. Shell of medium size
for the genus, height 17.1 mm, width 7 mm, fusiform-pupoid, slender, h/d 2.44 mm. Protoconch
paucispiral, only protoconch I of of 1.5 convex
whorls, height 540 μm, width 480 μm; sculpture
orthogonally cancellate. teleoconch of 7 convex
whorls. Suture not incised, evident. Axial sculpture
of 16 sligthly opisthocline (somethimes orthocline),
elevated and strong ribs, and interspaces twices as
broad as the ribs. Spiral sculpture on the last whorl
of 6 cordlets, thinner that axial ribs and interspaces
twices as broad as the cordlets. Cancellation rectangular, with spinulose tubercles at the intersections.
Secondary cordlets appearing occasionally and
thereafter becoming as strong as the others.
Subsutural ramp wide, devoid of evident sculpture.
Columella simple, slightly sinuous anteriorly,
gently angled posteriorly. Outer lip thickened and
crenulated externally, with 9 strong inner denticles,
the most posterior smaller, delimiting the wide and
deep anal sinus, the most anterior more robust and
delimiting the funnel-like siphonal canal. Siphonal
fasciole of 7 nodulose cordlets, neatly spaced from
the last spiral cordlet. Colour straw yellow, becoming gradually orange-brownish in the subsutural
area, and with an orange-brown band visible inside
the aperture. Comma-shaped white spots on the
subsutural ramp, arrow-like white spots inside some
cancellation interspaces. Soft parts are unknown.
vARIABILItY. Paratypes shells: height 12–17 mm
(mean 14.4, std 1.66), width 5.5–7 mm (mean 6.36,
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
109
Figures 11–14. Shells of Raphitoma alida n. sp. Fig. 11: Holotype, Palermo (coll. Monterosato MCZ, lot 16905), h: 17.1
mm; Fig. 12: Paratype A, Palermo (coll. Monterosato MCZR, lot 16905), h: 14.8 mm; Fig. 13: Paratype e, Gulf of Palermo,
(PUS n. 405), h: 12.1 mm (sz = subsutural zone; sc = secondary cordlet); Fig. 14: Gulf of Palermo, h: 12.8 mm. Figure 15.
Raphitoma alida n.sp., protoconch of the holotype.
110
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
std 0.57), h/d 2.12–2.36 mm (mean 2.26, std 0.10);
axial sculpture of 14–16 ribs; outer lip with 9–10
denticles. Soft parts are unknown.
etYMOLOGY. From the two granddaughters of the
authors (Alice Giannuzzi Savelli and Ida Pusateri),
ali[ce]+ida, used as a noun in apposition.
DIStRIBUtION. this new species is known only
for the examined material, from tyrrhenian and
Central Mediterranean. type locality is Palermo.
ReMARKS. Raphitoma alida n. sp. differ from R.
pupoides mainly in its paucispiral protoconch (v.
multispiral in R. pupoides). Shells without protoconch of the new species could be confused with
shells of R. pupoides with a non-obsolete sculpture
on the last whorl; R. alida n. sp. can be distinguished by its different background colour (chestnut
v. yellowish), 7 nodulose cordlet on the fasciole v.
6 less nodulose in R. pupoides, and the less pupoid
and more fusiform outline.
Some recent Authors (Nordsieck, 1968, 1977;
Piani, 1980) erroneously ascribed to Monterosato
a validly published “Raphitoma tomentosa”.
Although the epithet “tomentosa” was evidently
especially liked by Monterosato, he has never
published such binomen. the epithet "tomentosa"
was, for mysterious reasons, to be particularly dear
and pleasing to Monterosato so that in schedis, gave
this name to various entities: - Philbertia tomentosa,
lot 16682 = some mixed specimens of R. philberti
var. - D. tomentosa, lotto 16901 = 4 specimens of
R. horrida. - P. tomentosa lotto 16696 = 5 specimens of R. lineolata. - Philbertia tomentosa,
Monterosato’s label in coll Coen lot 1912 = 2 specimens of R. pruinosa.
Nordsieck (1968: 177) reported Raphitoma philberti tomentosa with a useless scanty description
(“kleiner, gedrungen mit konvexen Umgangen.
Schlanker stiel. Hell reh-weiss”; small, stout, with
convex whorls. Slender tail. Light fawn and white)
and without any figure. Nordsieck (1977: 58 n.
A149) again reported Raphitoma (Philbertia) tomentosa ascribing it to Monterosato, 1884, with
an apparently good description and a figure (Nordsieck, 1977: pls. 19 n. 149). However, the four lots
labelled under this name in the coll. Nordsieck
inckluded the following materials:
SMF 341803/1, labelled “Philbertia tomentosa
Mtrs. egina”, one worn shell, 5.4 mm long, with
two holes, protoconch missing, probably R. laviae;
SMF 341804/1, labelled “Philbertia tomentosa
Mtrs. Karpathos”, one very worn shell, 3.2 mm
long, protoconch missing, probably R. bicolor juv.;
SMF 341805/1, labelled “Philbertia tomentosa
Mtrs, Cataldo (Brindisi)”, one very worn shell, 5.9
mm long, protoronch missing, indeterminable.
Nordsieck (1977: 58) reported “Palermo, Cataldo”:
although there is a beach called San Cataldo near
terrasini (Palermo), it is more likely that the true
locality was San Cataldo, not far from Brindisi;
SMF 341802/5, labelled as “Philbertia tomentosa
Mtrs., Ibiza”, 5 shells, 2.5–6.5 mm long, four too
worn to be identified, one referable to R. bicolor
juv., with a portion of multispiral protoconch.
None of these shells matched the description,
the size (7 x 3.2 mm) or the figure provided by
Nordsieck, including the described paucispiral
protoconch, whilst all but one shells (with traces
of multispiral protoconch) lacked the apex. It is
worthy of notice that Nordsieck's "descriptions"
were not necessarily based (only) on actual specimens but frequently included also a compilation
from literature. Same holds for his drawings, often
compound artwork of actual specimens and figures
from the literature. this explains why so rarely specimens can be found which match his figures (our
unpublished observations and R. Janssen, SMF,
personal communication). Nordsieck included this
entity in the subgenus Philbertia, which in his
scheme comprised species (R. philberti, R. laviae,
R. lineolata, R. atropurpurea, R. densa, etc.) that
have nothing to do with the R. pupoides-complex.
Parenzan (1970: 212 n. 862) cited R. philberti var.
tomentosa Monterosato evidently mutuating it after
Nordsieck (1968). this name is anyway unavailable, having been introduced as a varietal name
after 1960 (ICZN, 1999: art. 15.2).
Raphitoma radula (Monterosato, 1884) [Cordieria]
Figs. 10, 16–23, 26
Cordieria radula Monterosato, 1884: 132
Clathurella radula de Monterosato, Locard, 1886:
117
Clathurella radula de Monterosato, Locard, 1891: 67
Clathurella radula de Monterosato, Locard &
Caziot, 1899: 250
Clathurella radula var. elongata, Locard & Caziot,
1899: 250 (nomen nudum)
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
111
Figures 16–22. Shells of Raphitoma radula (Monterosato, 1884). Fig. 16: Lectotype, Palermo, (MCZR), h: 14.8 mm; Fig.
17: particular (sc = secondary cordlet); Fig. 18: Palermo (coll. Monterosato MCZR), Paralectotype A, h: 17 mm; Fig. 19:
Isola d’elba, h: 18 mm; Fig. 20; Palermo (coll. Monterosato MCZR), Paralectotype F, h: 6 mm; Fig. 21: Antignano (Livorno),
h: 9.9 mm; Fig. 22: Gulf of Palermo, h: 12.7 mm. Figure 23. Raphitoma radula, protoconch of paralectotype F.
112
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
Figures 24–26. Siphonal fasciole of Raphitoma pupoides (Fig. 24), R. alida (Fig. 25), and R. radula (Fig. 26).
Clathurella radula var. fuscescens, Locard &
Caziot, 1899: 250 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella radula var. lutescens, Locard & Caziot,
1899: 250 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella radula var. minor, Locard & Caziot,
1899: 250 (nomen nudum)
Clathurella radula var. ventricosa, Locard &
Caziot, 1899: 250 (nomen nudum)
Cordieria radula Monterosato, Pallary, 1900: 256
Raphitoma reticulata radula Nordsieck, 1968: 175,
pl. 29 fig. 94.16
Raphitoma echinata cordieri form d (radula)
Monterosato, Nordsieck, 1977: 51
Cordieria radula (Monterosato), Sabelli et al.,
1990: 217
tYPe LOCALItY. Palermo.
exAMINeD MAteRIAL. Lectotype (here designated, 14.8 x 6.4 mm) Monterosato coll (MCZR
16476), with handwritten label by Monterosato
“Cordieria/radula, Monts/Nomencl. p. 132/Palermo”;
and 11 paralectotypes Monterosato coll (MCZR
16476) with handwritten label by Monterosato “C.
radula/ Pal!!”. Spain. Alboran, -80 m, 1 sh, (SBR);
Cadiz, 1 sh (MNHN).
France. St. Henry (Marseille), 4 sh (coll. Locard
MNHN); Marseille, 5 sh (coll. Locard MNHN);
toulon, 1 sh (coll. Locard MNHN); St. Raphael, 1
sh (coll. Locard MNHN); Sète, 2 sh (coll. Locard
MNHN).
Italy. Secca delle vedove, -120/130 m, 2 sh
(PAO); Castiglioncello (Livorno), 1 sh (MAR);
Capraia Isl., 1 sh (BOG); Napoli, 2 sh (coll.
Monterosato, MCZR, sine numero, sub nomine ms.
var. aspera); Puolo (Napoli), 1 sh (DUR); Ischia Isl.,
1 sh (tRI); Gulf of Palermo, 10 sh (PUS); Gulf
of Palermo, 3 sh (coll. Monterosato, MCZR lot
16492, 3), 2 sh (coll. Monterosato, MCZR lot
17342); Porto di Palermo, 2 sh (coll. Monterosato,
MCZR lot 16476); Palermo, 3 sh (coll. Melvilletomlin, NMW); Mondello (Palermo), 1 sh (coll.
Monterosato sine numero, sub nomine “purpurea
albina”); Sciacca, 1 sh (coll. Monterosato, MCZR
lot 16492); Catania, (coll. Monterosato ex Aradas,
MCZR, lot 16476, 2 sh).
Algeria. Sine loco, 2 sh (coll. Monterosato,
MCZR lot 16492); Orano, 1 sh (coll. Pallary
MNHN).
Croatia. Between Pula and Ligthouse of Porer,
1 sh, legit W. Koers (SMNH lot 70484).
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
DeSCRIPtION. In squared parentheses data of the
lectotype. Shell of medium size for the genus,
height 9–19 mm [14.8] (mean 13.81, std 2.90),
width 4–8 mm [6.4] (mean 5.90, std 1.10), fusiform-pupoid, slender, h/d 2.2–2.5 [2.31] (mean
2.32, std 0.09). Protoconch multispiral of 2.7 convex whorls, height 580 μm, width 440 μm; protoconch I of 1.1 whorls, width 210 μm, with
irregularly placed small tubercles and orthogonally
cancellate sculpture; protoconch II of 1.6 whorls,
with a diagonally cancellate sculpture. teleoconch
of 7–8 [7] convex whorls. Suture not impressed.
Axial sculpture of 12–17 [16] sligthly opisthocline,
elevate, strong ribs, and interspaces as broad as the
ribs (or sligthly broader). Growth lines visible
between the ribs on the last whorl. Spiral sculpture
on the last whorl of 5–6 [5] cordlets above the
aperture, thinner than axial ribs, with interspaces
three times as broad as the cordlets, and a secondary
cordlet bordering the subsutural ramp. Cancellation
squared. Secondary cordlets appearing occasionally
and thereafter becoming as strong as the others.
Subsutural ramp narrow, devoid of evident sculpture. Columella simple, slightly sinuous anteriorly,
gently angled posteriorly. Outer lip thickened and
crenulated externally, with 8–9 [9] (rarely up to 11)
strong inner denticles, the most posterior smaller,
delimiting the wide and deep anal sinus, the most
anterior more robust and delimiting the funnel-like
siphonal canal. Siphonal fasciole of 7–8 [7] nodulose cordlets, neatly spaced from the last spiral
cordlet. Colour from uniformly whitish to very ligth
chestnut brown, with darker subsutural ramp and
darker band on the lower part of the last whorl.
violet hue on the background in particularly fresh
specimens. Comma-shaped white spots on the subsutural ramp, arrow-like white spots inside some
cancellation interspaces. Soft parts are unknown.
DIStRIBUtION. Provence, Western Mediterranean and tyrrhenian. A single record from neighbouring Atlantic (Cadiz).
ReMARKS. Raphitoma radula could be confused
with shells of R. pupoides with non-obsolescent
sculpture, but it is easily diagnosed by its homogeneous ligth coloration with violet hue. It could
me mixed with very ligth or albinistic shells of R.
echinata (of similar size) from which it differs in
the less elevate spirals, the shorter and more rounded aperture and the violet hue in fresh specimens.
113
Monterosato (1884: 132) introduced Cordieria
radula for the erroneously identified P. purpureum sensu Philippi (non Mtg.), referring to the
examen (ex typo) of a specimen provided by
Philippi himself to Sylvanus Hanley. According
to Clare Brown (Leeds Museum Discovery
Centre) “Hanley’s collection came to us [LMGNS] in the 1950s after being broken up and many
parts sold on. Sadly, it seems as if the Philippi P.
purpurea didn’t make it to Leeds”. However, there
is little doubt that the type material of Cordieria
radula Monterosato consists of the type series at
MCZR.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Roberto Ardovini (Rome, Italy), Cesare Bogi
(Livorno, Italy), Philippe Bouchet (MNHN), Clare
Brown (LMG-NS), Sergio Duraccio (Napoli,
Italy), Jennifer Gallichan (NMW), Alfio Germanà
(trecastagni, Catania, Italy), Sandro Gori (Livorno,
Italy), virginie Héros (MNHN), André Hoarau
(Fréjus, France), Piera Iacovelli (MRSNt), Ronald
Janssen (SFM), Gabriele Macrì (Scorrano, Lecce,
Italy), Alessandro Margelli (Livorno, Italy), Paolo
Mariottini (Rome, Italy), Henk Mienis (HUJ),
Attilio Pagli (Lari, Pisa, Italy), Paolo Paolini
(Livorno, Italy), Jakov Prkić (Split, Croatia), Paolo
Russo (venezia, Italy), Carlo Sbrana (Livorno,
Italy), Gabriele Sercia (Palermo, Italy), Carlo
Smriglio (Rome, Italy), Peter Sossi (trieste, Italy),
Gianni Spada (vagrigneuse, France), ennio
Squizzato (Loreggia, Padova, Italy), Morena
tisselli (S. Zaccaria, Ravenna, Italy), Lionello
tringali (Rome, Italy), evi vardala-theodoru
(Athens, Greece), Angelo vazzana (Reggio Calabria, Italy), Anders Warén (SMNH), provided material and informations. the staff at the Museo
Civico di Zoologia di Roma (MCZR), and particularly Director Claudio Manicastri and Curator
Massimo Appolloni, continuously supported our
researches. Gianni Repetto (Alba, Italy) provided
precious bibliographic material. SeM photographs
were done at the “LIMe” (Interdepartmental
Laboratory of electron Microscopy) by Andrea Di
Giulio (Dept. of Biology, “Roma tre” University,
Rome). Marco Oliverio (Rome, Italy) for the critical review of the manuscript and for helpful suggestions.
114
FRANCESCO PUSATERI ET ALII
REFERENCES
Aartsen J.J. van, Menkhorst H.P.M.G. & Gittenberger e.,
1984. the marine Mollusca of the Bay of Algeciras,
Spain, with general notes on Mitrella, Marginellidae
and turridae. Basteria, suppl. 2: 1–135.
Aradas A. & Benoit L., 1872–1876. Conchigliologia
vivente marina della Sicilia e delle isole che la
circondano. Atti Accademia Gioenia di Scienze
Naturali di Catania, 3 (6) (1):1–113 (pars), pl. 1–2
(1872); 6 (2): 113–226, pl. 3–4 (1874); 6 (3): 227–
324, pl. 5 (1876).
Bellini R., 1929. I molluschi del Golfo Napoli (Studi
precedenti, l'ambiente, enumerazione e sinonimia).
Annali del Museo Zoologico R. Università di Napoli,
6: 1–87.
Bouchet P., 1989. A review of poecilogony in gastropods.
Journal of Molluscan Studies, 55: 67–78.
Bouchet P., 1990. turrid genera and mode of development: the use and abuse of protoconch morphology.
Malacologia, 32: 69–77.
Bouchet P., Kantor Y.I., Sysoev A. & Puillandre N., 2011.
A new operational classification of the Conoidea.
Journal of Molluscan Studies, 77: 273–308.
Bucquoy e., Dautzenberg P. & Dollfuss G., 1883. Les
mollusques marins de Roussillon. tome premier:
Gastropodes avec atlas de 66 planches. J.-B.
Baillière & Fils, Paris, 570 pp., 66 pls. [turrids are
in fascicule 1 (3): 85–135, pls. 11–15].
Cachia C., Mifsud C. & Sammut P.M., 2001.the Marine
Mollusca of the Maltese Islands Part three Sub-Class
Prosobranchia to Sub-Class Pulmonata, Order
Basommatophora. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 266
pp.
Carus J.v., 1893. Prodromus Faunae Mediterraneae sive
Descriptio Animalium Maris Mediterranei Incolarum
quam Comparata Silva rerum Quatenus Innotuit
Adiectis Locis et Nominibus vulgaribus. vol. II.
Brachiostomata. Mollusca. tunicata. vertebrata. e.
Schweizerbart’sche, Stuttgart, ix + 854 pp.
Cavallo O. & Repetto G., 1992. Conchiglie fossili del
Roero Atlante iconografico. Associazione Naturalistica Piemontese, Memorie, 2: 1–251.
Cecalupo A. & Quadri P., 1996 (1995). Contributo alla
conoscenza malacologica del nord dell’Isola di Cipro
(terza ed ultima parte). Bollettino Malacologico, 31:
95–118.
Cipolla F., 1914. Le Pleurotomidi del Pliocene di Altavilla
(Palermo). Palaeontographia Italica, 20: 105–182.
Cossignani t. & Ardovini R., 2011. Malacologia Mediterranea. L’Informatore Piceno, Ancona, 536 pp.
Cretella M., Crovato C., Crovato P., Fasulo G. & toscano
F., 2005 (2004). the malacological works of Arcangelo Scacchi (1810–1893). Part II: A critical review of
Scacchian taxa. Bollettino Malacologico, 40: 114–131.
Delamotte M. & vardala-theodorou e., 1994. Κοχύλια
από τις ελληνικές θάλασσες. the Goulandris Natural
History Museum, Kifissia, 317 pp.
Giribet G. & Peñas A., 1997. Fauna malacológica del
litoral del Garraf (Ne de la Península Ibérica). Iberus,
15: 41–93.
ICZN, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Iv ed.). La Garangola, Padova, 306 pp.
Jablonski D. & Lutz R.A., 1980. Larval shell morphology: ecological and paleontological applications. In
Rhoads D.C. & Lutz R.A. (eds.), Skeletal growth of
aquatic organisms, Plenum Press, New York, 323–377.
Kobelt W., 1904–1905. Iconographie der schalentragenden europäischen Meeresconchylien. Weisbaden:
C. W. Kreidel. vol. 3: 219–406, pls. 79-98. [Pp. 219–
272, pls. 79–84, 86, & 87 = 1904; pp. 273–406, pls.
85, 88–98 = 1905; dates and pagination from Aartsen
et al., 1984].
Koukouras A., 2010. Check-list of marine species from
Greece. Aristotle University of thessaloniki. (available at: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p
=sourcedetails&id=142068).
Locard A., 1886. Prodrome de malacologie Française
mollusques marins. Annales de la Société d’Agriculture et d’Histoire Naturelle de Lyon, série 5, 8: 1–216.
Locard A., 1891. Les coquilles marines des côtes de
France. Annales de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, 37:
1–385. [Also published as a separate].
Locard A. & Caziot e., 1899. Les coquilles marines des
côtes de Corse. Annales de la Société Linnéenne,
Lyon, 46: 193–274. the pages 193–274 were published in 1899. A reprint of this work was published
as separate book with the same title in 1900 by J.B.
Baillière et fils, Paris.
Marquet R., 1998. the Pliocene turrid gastropods of
Belgium part 2: Conidae (genera Asthenotoma,
Comarmondia, Cytharella, Mangelia, Lusitanops,
Raphitoma and Philbertia). Bulletin de l’Institut
Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Sciences
de la terre, 68: 263–287.
Monterosato t.A. di Maria di, 1875. Nuova rivista delle
conchiglie mediterranee. Atti dell’Accademia di
Scienze, Lettere ed Arti di Palermo, nuova serie, 5:
1–50.
Monterosato t.A. di Maria di, 1878. enumerazione e
sinonimia delle conchiglie mediterranee. Giornale
Scienze Naturali ed economiche, Palermo 13: 61–
115.
Monterosato t.A. di Maria di, 1872. Notizie Intorno alle
Conchiglie Mediterranee. Michele Amenta, Palermo,
61 pp.
Monterosato t.A. di Maria di, 1884. Nomenclatura generica e specifica di alcune conchiglie mediterranee.
Stabilimento tipografico virzì, Palermo, 152 pp.
Mediterranean Raphitomidae, 3: on the Raphitoma pupoides complex, with the description of a new species
Nordsieck F., 1968. Die europäischen Meeres-Gehäuseschnecken (Prosobranchia) vom eismeer bis Kapverden
und Mittelmeer. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, viii + 273
pp., 33 pls.
Nordsieck F., 1977. the turridae of the european Seas.
Roma, ed. La Piramide, pp. 131, 26 pls.
Nordsieck F., 1982. Die europäischen Meeres-Gehäuseschnecken 2. Auflage. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, xii +
539, pls. 108.
Oliverio M., 1996a. Life-histories, speciation and biodiversity in Mediterranean prosobranchs gastropods.
vie et Mileu, 46: 163–169.
Oliverio M., 1996b. Chapter 22. Contrasting developmental strategies and speciation in N.e. prosobranchs: a preliminary analysis. In: taylor J.D. (ed.),
Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca,
Oxford University Press, 261–266.
Oliverio M., 1997. Global biodiversity and life-history
evolution in prosobranchs gastropods. Iberus, 16: 73–
79.
Orlando v.e. & Palazzi S., 1986 (1985). Malacofauna del
Golfo di Castellamare (Sicilia NO). Il Naturalista
siciliano, 9: 29–77.
Oztürk B., Buzzurro G. & Avni Benli H.A., 2004 .
Marine molluscs from Cyprus: new data and checklist. Bollettino Malacologico, 39 (2003): 49–78.
Pallary P., 1900. Coquilles marines du littoral du Départment d'Oran. Journal de Conchyliologie 48: 211–422,
19 figs., pls. 6–8, 1 map.
Parenzan P., 1970. Carta d'identità delle conchiglie del
Mediterraneo, volume primo Gasteropodi. taranto,
ed. Bios taras, 283 pp.
Petit de la Saussae S., 1869. Catalogue des Mollusques
testacées des Mers d’europe. F. Savy, Paris, 312 pp.
Piani P., 1980. Catalogo dei molluschi conchiferi viventi
nel Mediterraneo. Bollettino Malacologico 16: 113–
224.
115
Poppe G.t. & Goto Y., 1991. european Seashells. vol. 1
(Polyplacophora, Caudofoveata, Solenogastra,
Gastropoda). verlag Christa Hemmen, Wiesbaden,
352 pp.
Pusateri F., Giannuzzi-Savelli R. & Oliverio M., 2012. A
revision of the Mediterranean Raphitomidae 1: on the
sibling species Raphitoma contigua Monterosato,
1884 and Raphitoma spadiana n. sp. (Gastropoda,
Conoidea). Iberus, 30: 41–52.
Puateri F., Giannuzzi-Savelli R. & Oliverio M., 2013.
A revision of the Mediterranean Raphitomidae 2: On
the sibling species Raphitoma lineolata (B.D.D.,
1883) and Raphitoma smriglioi n. sp. Iberus, 31: 11–
20.
Priolo O., 1967. Nuova revisione delle conchiglie marine
di Sicilia. Memoria xvIII. Atti Accademia Gioenia
di Scienze Naturali di Catania, serie 6, 14: 667–718.
Repetto G., Orlando F. & Arduino G., 2005. Conchiglie
del Mediterraneo. edizioni Amici del Museo “Federico eusebio”, Alba, 392 pp.
Sabelli B., Giannuzzi-Savelli R. & Bedulli D., 1990–
1992. Catalogo Annotato dei Molluschi Marini del
Mediterraneo. vols. 1–3. edizioni Libreria Naturalistica Bolognese, Bologna, 781 pp + xiv.
Scacchi A., 1836. Catalogus Conchyliorum Regni Neapolitani quae usque adhuc Reperit. ed. 2, 44 pp.
Scuderi D. & terlizzi A., 2012. Manuale di malacologia
dell'Alto Jonio. edizioni Grifo, Lecce, 188 pp.
tenekidis N., 1989. Μια ςυλλογη κογχυλιων απο τις
Ελληνικες ταλαςςες (A collection of shells from the
Greek seas). Athens, 188 pp.
terreni G., 1981. Molluschi conchiferi del mare antistante la costa toscana. Benvenuti & Cavacioppi,
Livorno, 106 pp., 9 pls.
Weinkauff H.C., 1868. Die Conchylien des Mittelmeeres,
ihre Geographische und Geologische verbreitung. t.
Fischer, Cassel, 512 pp.