Zootaxa 0000: 0–0000 (2008)
www.mapress.com / zootaxa/
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)
ZOOTAXA
Diopatra tuberculantennata, a new species of Onuphidae (Polychaeta) from Belize
with a key to onuphids from the Caribbean Sea
NATALIYA BUDAEVA1 & KRISTIAN FAUCHALD2
1
P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology Russian Academy of Sciences, Nakhimovsky pr., 36 Moscow, 117997, RUSSIA.
E-mail: nbudaeva@mail.ru
2
Smithsonian Institution, NMNH, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, 10th and Constitution Ave., NW, P.O. Box 37012, MRC-0163,
Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. E-mail: fauchald@si.edu
Abstract
A new species of the genus Diopatra Audouin & Milne-Edwards, 1833 from the intertidal zone in the vicinity of the
Smithsonian field station (Carrie Bow Cay, Belize) is described. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov. is identifiable by a
combination of characters such as the presence of large lateral projections on both palpophores and antennophores,
bidentate pseudocompound hooks with moderately long pointed hoods in the first five chaetigers, eyespots on the prostomium, nuchal organs forming almost a circle and very large sensory papillae on antennostyles and frontal and upper lips.
Five 28-chaetiger juveniles were found inside the parental tube of one specimen. A pattern of anterior segment regeneration is described based on 12 specimens. A key for 20 species of onuphids known from the Caribbean Sea with the notes
on their distribution is provided.
Key words: diversity; taxonomy; juveniles; regeneration; distribution
Introduction
Diopatra cuprea (Bosc, 1802) was the only species of Diopatra reported by Fauchald (1980) from Belize. The
species was found in the vicinity of Carrie Bow Cay (Smithsonian Institution’s Caribbean Coral Reef Ecosystems (CCRE) program) and near Colson’s Point, both in Dangriga district (Fig. 1). Fauchald’s and Meredith
L. Jones’ material from Belize demonstrated some differences from the original description of D. cuprea
mostly in size and color pattern. Specimens that were obtained near the shoreline comply with the descriptions
of D. cuprea. However, specimens collected in coral reefs and fresh material collected at Carrie Bow Cay and
three neighboring islands in November 2006 are obviously different from D. cuprea and are here described as
a new species.
Diopatra contains approximately 50 species, widely distributed around the world, but typically inhabiting
warm shallow waters. Although Diopatra has been historically clearly recognized by the presence of the spiraled branchiae and the peristomial cirri, the species of Diopatra demonstrate a wide range of intraspecific
variability, and often lack distinct diagnostic characters (Paxton 1993; 2002). Diopatra species from Australia, Thailand, and complex of species frequently identified as D. chiliensis were recently revised by Paxton
(1993; 1998; 2002).
The new species differs from D. cuprea by the presence of large lateral projections on both palpophores
and ceratophores. Three other species of Diopatra have similar projections on prostomial appendages and are
compared to the new species below.
Twenty species of onuphids are presently recorded from the intertidal zone to bathyal depths of the Carib-
Accepted by A. Nygren: 18 Apr. 2008; published: ?? Month 2008
1
bean Sea. The most complete lists of Caribbean onuphids were published by Kiseleva (1968) and Fauchald
(1980); a complete key has never been provided for the region. Here we present a key with notes on the geographical distribution of all onuphids currently known from the Caribbean basin based on literature and on
material collected from Carrie Bow Cay and vicinity present in the collections of the National Museum of
Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
Material and methods
The specimens were shovel-sampled at 0.3–1.5 m depths. The obtained sediment was sieved through the 0.5
mm mesh size screen, and tubes with worms were handpicked and fixed in filtered 4% formalin in sea water
and after 2–3 days transferred into 70% ethanol. The holotype and 15 paratypes of the new species are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. (USNM). Comparative material examined was borrowed from the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen (ZMUC)
and the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH). Line drawings were made for the holotype (dorsal and
ventral views) and paratypes (parapodia, jaws and chaetae).
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), specimens stored in 70% ethanol were run through 75%, 95%,
100%, 100% ethanol, 10 minutes in each step, and critical point dried in a Balzers CPD-030 critical point
dryer using ethanol as the transition fluid. After drying, specimens were sputter coated with 20–30 nm of
gold:palladium alloy 60:40 wt % in a Cressington Scientific 108 sputter coater. SEM micrographs were taken
in a Leica Stereoscan 440 SEM with a lanthanum hexaboride electron source. Terminology for prostomial
appendages follows Paxton (1998).
Diopatra tuberculantennata, new species
Figs. 1–7
Diopatra cuprea: Fauchald, 1980: 797–829 (in part).
Type material: USNM 1112433, St. CBC-2006-34 (holotype); USNM 1112434, St. CBC-2006-31 (6
paratypes); USNM 1112435, St. CBC-2006-32 (1 paratype); USNM 1112436, St. CBC-2006-34 (1 paratype);
USNM 1112437, St. CBC-2006-39 (1 paratype); USNM 1112438, St. CBC-2006-41 (3 paratypes); USNM
1112439, St. CBC-2006-43 (3 paratypes).
Non type material examined: USNM 61213, St. CB-01 (2); USNM 61214, St. CB-02 (1); USNM
61215, St. CB-06 (1); USNM 61216, St. CB-11 (1); USNM 61217, CB-16 (1); USNM 61218, St. CB-28 (2);
USNM 61219, St. CB-34 (2); USNM 61223, St. CBC-F-28 (1); USNM 61222, St. CBC-F-09 (1); USNM
1112440, St. CBC-2006-01 (1); USNM 1112441, St. CBC-2006-03 (1); USNM 1112442, St. CBC-2006-05
(1); USNM 1112443, St. CBC-2006-07 (1); USNM 1112444, St. CBC-2006-10 (1);USNM 1112445, St. CBC2006-11 (1); USNM 1112446, St. CBC-2006-12 (1); USNM 1112447, St. CBC-2006-13 (1); USNM 1112448,
St. CBC-2006-16 (1); USNM 1112449, St. CBC-2006-17 (1); USNM 1112450, St. CBC-2006-21 (2); USNM
1112451, St. CBC-2006-23 (3); USNM 1112452, St. CBC-2006-26 (1); USNM 1112453, St. CBC-2006-28
(1); USNM 1112454, St. CBC-2006-29 (1); USNM 1112455, St. CBC-2006-31 (23); USNM 1112456, St.
CBC-2006-32 (2); USNM 1112457, St. CBC-2006-37 (1); USNM 1112458, St. CBC-2006-39 (1); USNM
1112459, St. CBC-2006-41 (4); USNM 1112460, St. CBC-2006-43 (3); USNM 1112461, St. CBC-2006-51
(1); USNM 1112462, St. CBC-2006-52 (3).
Comparative material examined: Diopatra dubia Day, 1960, BMNH-1961.20.1-2, st. FAL 237 (2
paratypes); BMNH-1961.9.930-933, st. FAL 309 (4); ZMUC: “Galathea”, st. 134 (7), “Galathea”st. 155 (1),
2 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
“Galathea”st. 167 (1). Diopatra angolensis Kirkegaard, 1988, ZMUC-Pol-1506, “Galathea”, st. 117 (holotype).
Type locality: Belize, Carrie Bow Cay, 16.8027° N, 88.0819° W, 0.5 m. Coordinates of all stations are
given in Table 1, map of stations is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Distribution of Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
3
TABLE 1. Station list.
Station
Locality
Biotope
Latitude
ºN
Longitude
ºW
Dept
h,m
Date
Collector
CB-01
Carrie Bow Cay sparse Thalassia, just west of island
16.8027 88.0819
1
04.04.1976 Jones, M.L.
CB-02
Carrie Bow Cay north-west of island, general transect
from bare sand area to coral rubble
16.8027 88.0819
1.5
05.04.1976 Jones, M.L.
CB-06
Carrie Bow Cay sandy areas at top of intertidal around
island
16.8027 88.0819
0.3
06.04.1976 Jones, M.L.
CB-11
Carrie Bow Cay 100 m NNE of island, associated with
Acropora curvicornis rubble
16.8027 88.0819
07.04.1976 Jones, M.L.
CB-16
Carrie Bow Cay sparse Thalassia, just west of island
16.8027 88.0819
CB-28
Carrie Bow Cay north-west of island, Thalassia and
coarse sand
16.8027 88.0819
1.5
13.05.1977 Jones, M.L.
11.05.1977 Jones, M.L.
CB-34
Carrie Bow Cay 100 m north of island
16.8027 88.0819
1.5
14.05.1977 Jones, M.L.
CBC-F-28
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, about 60 feet from shore, 16.8027 88.0819
Thalassia and sand
0.5
04.11.1977 Fauchald, K.
CBC-F-09
Carrie Bow Cay north of island, sand and small rubble
16.8027 88.0819
0.6
12.04.1979 Fauchald, K.
CBC-2006-01
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.5
2.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-03
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.5
3.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-05
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.5
3.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-07
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.5
3.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
1
4.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
4.11.2006
Budaeva, N
CBC-2006-10
Carrie Bow Cay north-east of island, Thalassia and sand 16.8027 88.0819
CBC-2006-11
Carrie Bow Cay north-east of island, Thalassia and sand 16.8027 88.0819
CBC-2006-12
Carrie Bow Cay north-east of island, Thalassia and sand 16.8027 88.0819
0.5
5.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-13
Carrie Bow Cay north-east of island, Thalassia and sand 16.8027 88.0819
0.5
5.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-16
Carrie Bow Cay north-west of island, near berth, Thalas- 16.8027 88.0819
sia and sand
1
6.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-17
Carrie Bow Cay north-west of island, near berth, Thalas- 16.8027 88.0819
sia and sand
1
6.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-21
Carrie Bow Cay west of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
1
6.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-23
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.3
6.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-26
Cat Cay
16.6714 88.1990
0.5
7.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
border between sand and Thalassia
CBC-2006-28
Cat Cay
border between sand and Thalassia
16.6714 88.1990
0.5
7.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-29
Cat Cay
border between sand and Thalassia
16.6714 88.1990
0.5
7.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
border between sand and Thalassia
CBC-2006-31
Cat Cay
16.6714 88.1990
0.5
7.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-32
Carrie Bow Cay west of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.7
8.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-34
Carrie Bow Cay east of island, Thalassia and sand
16.8027 88.0819
0.5
8.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-37
South Water
Cay
south of island, coarse sand, Thalassia
16.8133 88.0834
0.3
9.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-39
South Water
Cay
south-west of island, sand and mud,
Thalassia
16.8133 88.0834
1
9.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-41
Twin Cays
North point, inside Thalassia bed, sand 16.8346 88.1044
and peat
0.7
9.11.2006
Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-43
South Water
Cay
north of island, coarse sand and mud,
Thalassia
16.8189 88.0814
0.7
11.11.2006 Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-51
Ragged Cay
north-west side of nothern island,
Thalassia, sand, mud
16.8535 88.1289
0.5
12.11.2006 Budaeva, N.
CBC-2006-52
Sand Bores
between Carrie
Bow Cay and
Wee Wee Cay
"open sea", coarse sand
16.7719 88.1114
1.5
13.11.2006 Budaeva, N.
4 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
Diagnosis: Palpophores and antennophores with large lateral projections on median rings; first five chaetigers with bidentate pseudocompound hooks; hoods moderately long and pointed; nuchal organs forming
almost closed circles; very large sensory papillae irregularly distributed on antennostyles and on frontal, upper
and lower lips.
Description: Holotype complete specimen with 93 chaetigers, 43 mm long, 1.3 mm wide (at chaetiger 10,
without parapodia) (Fig. 2A–C). Complete specimens range from 0.6 mm width (41 chaetiger) to 1.3 mm
width (93 chaetigers). The greatest width of incomplete specimen is 2 mm. Anterior end of body including
first five chaetigers cylindrical, median and posterior parts of body dorsally flattened. Living specimens whitish dorsally, light rose-colored laterally and ventrally with scattered small brown spots, similar spots also on
antennae and palps. Brown band across chaetiger 5 (retained in most of preserved specimens). Some ethanolstored specimens with brown pigmentation dorsally in branchial region and brown antennae, in most cases of
the same color as body pigmentation. Staining with Methylene Blue yielding following, distinct patterns:
Each chaetiger in posterior 1/3 of body with wide, dark blue dorsal and ventral glandular cross-bands. Dorsal
cirri, frontal, upper and lower lips and palpostyles also staining dark blue; remaining body pale blue.
Prostomium with subulate frontal lips (Figs. 2A, 3A, K). Upper lips elongate; lower lip with median incision. Palps of holotype reaching chaetiger 2, varying in other specimens from chaetigers 1–3. All antennae
about equal in length, reaching chaetiger 7 in holotype; in other specimens reaching chaetigers 4–13. Length
of antennae quite variable, slightly depending on size of specimen (Fig. 4). Palpophores of holotype with five
rings; other specimens with up to six rings. Antennophores of holotype with eight rings, other specimens with
4–8 rings. Both palpophores and antennophores with large lateral projections on median rings (Figs. 2A, B,
3A). Palpophore projections usually on second ring, rarely on third. Second and third ring of holotype lateral
antennophores with projections, in other specimens on second to fourth ring. Projections of median antennophore on second to fourth rings in holotype; in other specimens projections present from first to fifth rings.
Palps, antennae, frontal, upper lips and anterior margin of lower lip covered by randomly distributed large
sensory papillae (Fig. 3B–D, K). Nuchal grooves curved, forming nearly circle in adults (Fig. 2B). One pair of
small brown eyespots present near base of lateral antennae. Peristomium as long as first chaetiger. Peristomial
cirri about as long as peristomium.
First five parapodia projecting laterally, directing slightly anteriorly but not enlarged. More posterior
parapodia similar; ridge-shaped and located laterally. Prechaetal lobes rounded, postchaetal lobes a low ridge
covering bases of chaetae, but with distinct median subulate projection, gradually decreasing in size towards
posterior region but still distinct at posterior end of the body (Fig. 3L, M). First five chaetigers with small ventral protrusions at base of postchaetal lobes (Fig. 2F). Ventral cirri cirriform on first five chaetigers in holotype
(Fig. 2A), in other specimens varying between four and five chaetigers (Fig. 3F), apparently almost independently of size of specimen (Fig. 5).
Anterior projecting parapodia (Figs. 2F, 3M) with 1–2 upper simple chaetae and 4–5 bidentate
pseudocompound hooks (Figs. 2N, 3H). Hooks with moderately long pointed hoods and two rows of blunt
small spines along their shafts. Remaining parapodia with mainly strongly serrated limbate chaetae (Figs. 2O,
3E). Pectinate chaetae are flat with straight distal margins, each has 18–20 teeth. Pectinate chaetae from chaetiger 6 in holotype, from chaetigers 5–6 in other specimens (Figs. 2L, 3I), one unusual specimen had pectinate
chaeta with nine very long teeth in second parapodia (Figs. 2M, 3J). Starting from chaetiger 9 in holotype, and
from chaetigers 7–12 in other specimens, lower limbate chaetae replaced by thick bidentate subacicular hooks
(Fig. 2G, H, J, K) with very thin translucent guards. Start of subacicular hooks slightly positively linked to
increasing size of specimens (Fig. 5).
Branchiae with up to five spiraled whorls of relatively short filaments (Fig. 2H, I) starting from chaetiger
5 (Figs. 2B, 3G) and continuing to chaetiger 34 in holotype, varying from chaetigers 14–37 in other specimens. Position of the last branchia strongly correlated with width of specimen (Fig. 5). Best developed branchiae present on chaetigers 6–7; branchiae becoming gradually reduced towards posterior chaetigers, but
almost all branchiae with several filaments; only last 1–2 pairs single.
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
5
FIGURE 2. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov: A, anterior end, ventral view; B, anterior end, dorsal view; C, pygidium, ventral view; D, maxillae; E, mandibles; F, parapodium of chaetiger 1, anterior view; G, parapodium of chaetiger
40, anterior view; H, parapodium of chaetiger 25, anterior view; I, parapodium of chaetiger 5, anterior view; J, subacicular hook from chaetiger 25; K, subacicular hook from chaetiger 40; L, pectinate chaeta from chaetiger 12; M, pectinate
chaeta from chaetiger 2; N, pseudocompound hooded hook from chaetiger 2; O, serrated limbate seta from chaetiger 12.
6 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
FIGURE 3. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov., adult: A, prostomium, dorsal view (scale 200 µm); B, distal end of lateral antennostyle (scale 50 µm); C, sensory papillae (scale 10 µm); D, enlarged sensory papilla (scale 2 µm); E, serrated
limbate chaetae (scale 20 µm); F, ventral view (scale 1 mm); G, dorsal view (scale 1 mm); H, pseudocompound hooded
hook from chaetiger 2 (scale 20 µm); I, pectinate chaeta from chaetiger 15 (scale 10 µm); J, pectinate chaeta from chaetiger 2 (scale 10 µm); K, frontal lip (scale 10 µm); L, parapodium of chaetiger 6, antero-lateral view (scale 20 µm); M,
parapodium of chaetiger 2, dorsal view (scale 100 µm); (ac) acicula, (br) branchia, (fl) frontal lip, (la) lateral antenna, (ll)
lower lip, (lp) lateral projection of ceratophore, (ls) limbate chaeta, (p) palp, (ph) pseudocompound hook, (prl) prechaetal
lobe, (ptl) projection of postchaetal lobe, (s) row of spines, (sp) sensory papilla, (ul) upper lip, (vc) ventral cirrus.
Mandibles weakly sclerotized with calcareous distal cutting plates (Fig. 2E). Distal indistinct indentations
along edge of cutting plates present. Sclerotization of maxillae invisible, appearing white, thick and calcareous (Fig. 2D). Maxillary formula (based on five specimens): Mx I = 1 + 1; Mx II = 8–9 + 9–10; Mx III = 7–8
+ 0; Mx IV = 6–7 + 7–9; Mx V = 1 + 1.
Pygidium with four anal cirri, ventral longer than dorsal ones (Fig. 2C). Tube, as characteristic for Diopatra, cylindrical and covered with debris, mostly parts of sea grass and pieces of shells attached on all sides
of tube; permanently buried part of tube thin-walled and covered by fine sand.
Intraspecific variability of the main morphological characters shown in Table 2.
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
7
TABLE 2. Intraspecific variability of the main morphological characters of Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.
Character
Range
Mean
SD
N
Lateral antennae reach chaetiger
4–13
8.06
2.01
54
Median antenna reaches chaetiger
1–11
7.57
2.09
51
Maximal number of rings on ceratophores
4–8
5.71
0.74
55
Branchiae start from chaetiger
5
invariant
Branchiae end on chaetiger
14–37
28.31
Number of chaetigers with pseudocompound hooks
5
invariant
Number of chaetigers with cirriform ventral cirri
4–5
4.38
0.49
58
Subacicular hooks start from chaetiger
7–12
9.33
0.78
58
Number of chaetigers (complete specimens)
41–93
66.00
0.28
17
Width (at chaetiger 10), mm
0.6–2
1.18
0.33
49
57
5.60
45
57
FIGURE 4. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.: relationship between body width (chaetiger 10, without parapodia)
and length of antennae.
Remarks: Diopatra dubia Day, 1960, D. papillata Fauchald, 1968 and D. angolensis Kirkegaard, 1988
are the three other species in the genus known to have lateral projections on the ceratophores (Tab. 3). The
new species can be distinguished from the other species by having scattered large sensory papillae on all
styles of the prostomial appendages, frontal and upper lips. Diopatra tuberculantennata differs from D. dubia
in having subulate frontal lips instead of partly fused spade-shaped ones; the nuchal grooves form almost a
circle instead of being crescentic; the antennae are relatively longer, reaching chaetiger 8 instead of chaetigers
8 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
2–3; the pseudocompound hooks have moderately long, pointed hoods on the first five chaetigers instead of
having hooks with very long hoods in the first four chaetigers, and in having, rather than lacking eyes. From
D. angolensis, D. tuberculantennata can be distinguished by the size and distribution of the lateral projections
on the ceratophores. Diopatra angolensis has very small lateral projections on the three basal rings of the
antennophores, while D. tuberculantennata has large projections on the median rings on both antennophores
and palpophores; the basal rings of the ceratophores are always smooth. In addition, D. tuberculantennata has
fewer branchial chaetigers (not more than 32 instead of 55) and the subacicular hooks start from chaetiger 9
(7–12) rather than from chaetiger 13 (14). Diopatra angolensis has long hoods on the anterior pseudocompound hooks instead of the moderate ones present in D. tuberculantennata. From D. papillata, D. tuberculantennata differs in having five anterior chaetigers with pseudocompound hooded hooks instead of three such
chaetigers.
TABLE 3. Comparison of Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov. with D. dubia, D. papillata and D. angolensis.
Character
D. dubia Day, 1960
D. papillata Fauchald, D. angolensis Kirkeg- D. tuberculantennata
1968
aard, 1988
sp. nov.
Frontal lips
spade-shaped, fused
subulate
subulate
subulate
Eyes
absent
absent
absent
present
Shape of nuchal grooves
crestentic
no data
forming nearly circle
forming nearly circle
Size of sensory papillae
small
?
small
large
Number of rings on ceratophores
4–5
5–6 (rarely 7 on
median antenna)
7–8
6 (4–8)
Lateral projections on antennophores
present
present
present
present
absent
absent
present
Lateral projections on palpophores present
Size of lateral projections
large
large
small
large
Length of antennae
up to chaetigers 1–2
up to chaetiger 9
up to chaetigers 12–
14
up to chaetiger 13
Start of branchiae
5 (4–6)
5
5
5
End of branchiae
28 (25–33)
35
60
28 (14–37)
Number of chaetigers with
pseudocompound hooks
4 (invariant)
3 (invariant)
5 (invariant)
5 (invariant)
Hoods on pseudocompound hooks long, pointed
moderately long,
pointed
long, pointed
moderately long,
pointed
Start of subacicular hooks
9 (10–11)
10
13
9 (7–12)
Number of chaetigers with cirriform ventral cirri
3–4
4
4
4–5
Number of examined specimens
2 paratypes + 9
literature data
holotype
50 (including holotype and 15
paratypes)
Locality
off South West Africa
upper end of the Gulf
of California
off South West Africa, Belize, east of DanAngola
griga
Depth, m
50–412
73–110
27–75
0–2
Biological notes: Five 28-chaetiger juveniles about 3 mm long and 0.3 mm wide were found inside the
parental tube of one specimen (Fig. 6A, B). All juveniles have well developed prostomial appendages with
sensory papillae (Fig. 6C, H). Antennophores have 3-4 rings with small lateral projections. Palpophores have
3 rings with tiny projections on the middle rings (Fig. 6D, E, G). Nuchal grooves are slightly crescentic (Fig.
6G, I). Distribution of chaetae is the same as in adults except that the pseudocompound hooded hooks are
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
9
present on first four rather than on five chaetigers as in the adults (Fig. 6F). Peristomial cirri are present. Provisional larval chaetae are absent. Spiraled branchiae with up to four filaments start from chaetiger 5 and are
present on six chaetigers.
FIGURE 5. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.: relationship between body width (chaetiger 10, without parapodia)
and number of chaetigers, end of branchiae, start of subacicular hooks and number of cirriform ventral cirri.
The complete development from egg to 40-chaetiger larva has been described for only one member of the
genus Diopatra, D. marocensis Paxton et al., 1995 (Fadlaoui et al. 1995). As D. marocensis, D. tuberculantennata broods larvae and juveniles, with direct development inside the parental tube and thus belongs to
group I designated by Paxton (1993). Although 28-chaetiger juveniles of D. marocensis are slightly larger
(width: 0.49 mm, length: 4 mm), they represent an earlier stage of development than in the new species in that
provisional chaetae are still present, peristomial cirri are absent and branchiae appear only on two chaetigers.
This difference could be related to differences in a brood size. Size of adults is relatively similar in the two
species but brood size of D. marocensis is 20–100 (Fadlaoui et al. 1995) whereas we found only 5 juveniles
inside the tube of D. tuberculantennata.
Twelve specimens with regenerating anterior ends of the body were found in the examined material.
Together they represent five consecutive stages of regeneration (Fig. 7). Different stages were recognized
10 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
based on degree of development of regenerated part of the body, e.g. number of chaetigers and presence of
chaetae.
Stage I: Short round prostomium with antennae represented by five tubercles and mouth aperture starting
to form on the anterior end (where the worm was cut, Fig. 7A, B, I).
FIGURE 6. Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov., juvenile: A, dorso-lateral view (scale 200 µm); B, ventral view (scale
200 µm); C, distal end of lateral antennostyle (scale 10 µm); D, anterior part of the body, dorsal view (scale 200 µm); E,
prostomium, frontal view (scale 200 µm); F, parapodium of chaetiger 2, lateral view (scale 20 µm); G, prostomium, dorsal view (scale 100 µm); H, enlarged sensory papilla (scale 2 µm); I, nuchal groove (scale 20 µm); (br) branchia, (dc)
dorsal cirrus, (fl) frontal lip, (la) lateral antenna, (lp) lateral projection of ceratophore, (ma) median antenna, (ng) nuchal
groove, (p) palp, (pc) peristomial cirrus, (pg) pygidium, (ph) pseudocompound hook, (sp) sensory papilla, (ul) upper lip,
(vc) ventral cirrus.
Stage II: Regenerating anterior end starting to differentiate ventrally into prostomium, peristomial ring
and four chaetigers with parapodia visible as ventro-lateral bulges; prostomial appendages increasing in
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
11
length to form five short cylindrical bosses; mouth aperture increasing in size, triangular in shape; frontal lips
appear as two weakly developed, but distinct expansions (Fig. 7C, D, J).
FIGURE 7. Regeneration of Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.: Stage I – A, anterior part of the body, frontal view
(scale 200 µm); B, prostomium, lateral view (scale 100 µm); I, mouth aperture (scale 10 µm); Stage II – C, dorsal view
(scale 100 µm); D, ventral view (scale 100 µm); J, mouth aperture (scale 20 µm); Stage III – G, ventral view (scale 100
µm); H, frontal view (scale 100 µm); Stage IV – K, ventral view (scale 100 µm); L, dorso-lateral view (scale 100 µm);
M, parapodium of chaetiger 1 (scale 20 µm); E, provisional curved chaeta from chaetiger 1 (scale 10 µm); Stage V – N,
lateral view (scale 200 µm); O, nuchal groove (scale 20 µm); F, pseudocompound hooded hooks from chaetiger 2 (scale
20 µm); (br) branchia, (cht) chaetiger, (cph) ceratophore, (dc) dorsal cirrus, (fl) frontal lip, (la) lateral antenna, (ll) lower
lip, (lp) lateral projection of ceratophore, (ma) median antenna, (map) mouth aperture, (ng) nuchal groove, (p) palp, (pc)
peristomial cirrus, (pcht) provisional chaeta, (per) peristomium, (pr) prostomium, (ul) upper lip, (vc) ventral cirrus.
12 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
Stage III: Prostomium, peristomium and five chaetigers distinctly separated from each other; prostomial
appendages becoming conical with two-ringed ceratophores and sensory papillae present both on palpostyles
and antennostyles; frontal lips appear as hemispherical tubercles; upper lips forming two well separated
spherical structures, lower lip present as a fold behind upper lips; nuchal grooves visible as thin almost
straight lines widely separated middorsally; peristomial cirri absent; parapodia are trilobate without chaetae,
gradually decreasing in size towards the posterior end of the regenerating part (Fig. 7G, H).
Stage IV: Segmentation more marked, but border between prostomium and peristomium on the dorsal side
still absent. All prostomial styles longer and covered by well developed sensory papillae; ceratophores have
three rings; frontal lips becoming more elongate; lower lip still not separated from peristomium; nuchal
grooves becoming more curved and thicker; peristomial cirri visible as bulges on the dorsal side; first 1–3
curved chaetae, resembling provisional chaetae of D. marocensis (Fadlaoui et al. 1995), appear in anterior
parapodia of regenerating part (Fig. 7E, K–M).
Stage V: Segmentation is well developed, prostomium, peristomium and seven following chaetigers are
separated from each other; all prostomial structures are present and have shape closely similar to the normal
condition, but width of regenerating part only about 1/2 the width of the normal segments of the non-regenerating body; each antennophore has four rings with small lateral projections on the second and third rings;
lower lip is distinct, nuchal grooves are crescentic, wide straps; eyespots are present; spiraled branchiae with
up to 4 filaments appear starting from chaetiger five; ventral cirri cirriform on first four chaetigers;
pseudocompound bidentate hooded hooks present in first four chaetigers (Fig. 7F, N, O).
The consecutive stages of regeneration imitate the ontogenesis in the genus Diopatra, but with some interesting differences. In the development of D. marocenis palpostyles and antennostyles form first, followed by
the frontal lips. Peristomial cirri appear at a very late (more than 38-chaetiger) stage when juveniles leave the
parental tubes (Fadlaoui et al. 1995). A similar pattern of development of the prostomium and peristomium
was shown in the present study. Provisional curved chaetae that are characteristic of all Diopatra larvae were
found in the first and second chaetigers of a regenerating specimen (stage IV). At stage V the provisional chaetae were replaced by pseudocompound hooded hooks. The early appearance of segmentation and chaetae in
ontogenesis, rather than early development of prostomial appendages is the main difference between ontogenesis and regeneration.
The ability to regenerate the anterior part of the body has been described in onuphids but only for three
species from the genus Diopatra: D. amboinensis Audouin et Milne-Edwards, 1833 (Pflugfelder 1929 in
Hyman 1940); D. dexiognatha Paxton & Bailey-Brock, 1986 (Bailey-Brock 1984 as D. leuckarti Kinberg,
1865; Paxton & Bailey-Brock 1986) and D. neapolitana (Delle Chiaje, 1841) (Conti, unpublished data in Bely
2006; see full review in Bely 2006).
The current species shows an ability to develop a new prostomium, peristomium and several chaetigers
even in a case when more than 9-10 anterior chaetigers had been lost: We found regenerating specimens with
subacicular hooks that normally start from chaetiger 9 in the first to the fourth chaetiger.
Although posterior segment regeneration is very common among polychaetes (Bely 2006) we did not find
specimens showing this state in our material.
Distribution: Caribbean Sea, East off Dangriga, Belize. Depth 0.5–2 m. Usually on the border between
free sand and areas covered with Thalassia.
Etymology: The specific name, tuberculantennata, refers to the unusual surface of antennae with its randomly dispersed large sensory papillae, each of which has a tubercular shape.
A key to Onuphidae from the Caribbean Sea
1
Subacicular hooks in median position in fascicle, pectinate chaetae scoop-shaped....................................2
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
13
2
Subacicular hooks in ventral position in fascicle, pectinate chaetae flat.....................................................5
Peristomial cirri absent; tubes transparent, wholly secreted by inhabitants, round in transverse section .....
....................................................................................................................... Hyalinoecia spp. (see below)
- Peristomial cirri present; tubes with a parchment-like inner lining and an outer layer of foreign particles 3
3 Anterior projecting parapodia with large auricular prechaetal lobes and a postchaetal lobe with a median
subulate projection; simple branchiae from chaetiger 11–12; tube flat and covered by small stones and
pieces of shells............................................................................................ Nothria conchylega Sars, 1835
Distribution: Arctic, North Atlantic, Mediterranean Sea, Eastern Russian seas, West Indies, Indian
Ocean, South Africa; shallow waters – 4000 m (Kiseleva 1968; Fauchald 1982).
- Anterior projecting parapodia with bi- to trilobate prechaetal and short, subconical postchaetal projection
.....................................................................................................................................................................4
4 Branchiae start from chaetiger 12, with up to 4 filaments; tridentate pseudocompound hooks present on
first two chaetigers........................................................................ Anchinothria pourtalesii (Ehlers, 1879)
Distribution: off Florida, off Cuba; 435–557 m (Ehlers 1879; Fauchald 1982).
- Branchiae absent; bidentate pseudocompound hooks present on first two chaetigers ..................................
........................................................................................................Anchinothria glutinatrix (Ehlers, 1887)
Distribution: Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, off the Sambos; 432 m (Ehlers 1887; Fauchald 1982).
5 Branchiae with filaments in spiraled arrangement ..................................................................................... 6
- Branchiae with filaments in pectinate arrangement or branchiae absent ....................................................8
6 Pseudocompound hooks on anterior projecting parapodia tridentate . Diopatra tridentata Hartman, 1944
Distribution: North Carolina, Southern California, south to Octavia Bay, Colombia including the Gulf of
California north to Consag Rock; Caribbean Sea and West Indies; Brazil; 5–75 m (Hartman 1944; Gathof
1984; Leon-Gonzalez et al. 2004).
- Pseudocompound hooks on anterior projecting parapodia bidentate ..........................................................7
7 Rings of ceratophores and palpophores smooth; relatively small sensory papillae on all ceratostyles organized in 16–18 longitudinal rows ................................................................. Diopatra cuprea (Bosc, 1802)
Distribution: New England to Florida, Gulf of Mexico, Panama, Brazil, West and South Africa, Indian
Ocean; 0–90 m (Kiseleva 1968; Fauchald 1980; Gathof 1984).
- Rings of ceratophores and palpophores with large lateral projections; relatively large sensory papillae
scattered on both palpostyles and antennostyles ................................ Diopatra tuberculantennata sp. nov.
Distribution: Caribbean Sea, Belize, east off Dangriga; 0–2 m.
8 Peristomial cirri inserted in the middle of peristomium .............. Americonuphis magna (Andrews, 1891)
Distribution: subtidal sand flats from North Carolina through the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico
(Fauchald 1980); West Indies, South Florida (Kiseleva 1968).
- Peristomial cirri inserted along frontal edge of peristomium ......................................................................9
9 First three pairs of parapodia projecting and prolonged with three distally curved weakly pseudocompound hooks; branchiae start from chaetiger 16–17...................Rhamphobrachium agassizii Ehlers, 1887
Distribution: Eastern North Atlantic: Florida and Puerto Rico; Western North Atlantic: Azores, Morocco
and Ivory Coast; ?40–2165 m (Paxton 1986).
- Anterior parapodia projecting, may be slightly enlarged but never prolonged .........................................10
10 Pseudocompound hooks on first projecting parapodia with long pointed hoods; branchiae absent .............
............................................................................................................. Paradiopatra fragosa Ehlers, 1887
Distribution: Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea off Sand Key, off Marquesas, off Bahia Honda; 557–792 m
(Ehlers 1887; Fauchald 1982).
- Pseudocompound hooks on first projecting parapodia with short blunt hoods .........................................11
11 Ceratophores of antennae with more than 10 rings; ringed palpohores longer than palpostyles ..............12
- Ceratophores of antennae with less than 10 rings; ringed palpophores as long as or shorter than palpo-
14 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
styles ..........................................................................................................................................................13
12 Branchiae simple and strap-like; digitiform postchaetal projections present on first 10 chaetigers .............
.......................................................................................................................Onuphis opalina Verrill, 1873
Distribution: Atlantic Ocean off New England (Verrill 1873; Fauchald 1982); from the Gulf of St.
Lawrence to off Chesapeake Bay, possibly also the West Indies; 26–2300 m (Kiseleva 1968; Hobson
1971).
- Branchiae pectinate with up to 6 filaments; digitiform postchaetal projections distinct on at least first 60
chaetigers ..................................................................... Onuphis eremita Audouin & Milne-Edwards, 1833
Distribution: Central California; Caribbean Sea, Mexico, Guatemala, Mediterranean Sea, Indian Ocean,
West and South Africa, China; 15–1600 m (Kiseleva 1968; Fauchald 1982).
13 Compound spinigers present.................................................... Mooreonuphis dangrigae (Fauchald, 1980)
Distribution: Caribbean Sea, Belize, west off Dangriga; 0–1.5 m (Fauchald 1980; 1982); Gulf of Mexico,
off Tabasco and Campeche (Granados-Barba & Solis-Weiss 1994).
- Compound spinigers absent .......................................................................................................................14
14 Anterior projecting parapodia without large median simple tridentate hooks; both bidentate and tridentate
preudocompound hooks present on anterior parapodia .......... Kinbergonuphis geminata (Fauchald, 1980)
Distribution: Known from the single locality north of Dangriga, Belize (Fauchald 1980; 1982).
- Anterior projecting parapodia with large median simple tridentate hooks present; only tridentate
pseudocompound hooks present on anterior parapodia.............................................................................15
15 Tridentate pseudocompound hooks present on 8 chaetigers... Kinbergonuphis vermillionensis (Fauchald,
1968)
Distribution: Gulf of California (Fauchald 1968; 1982) West Atlantic, Panama, Galeta reef, Thalassia
Zone (Fauchald 1977; 1982).
- Tridentate pseudocompound hooks present on first 6–7 chaetigers ..........................................................16
16 Tridentate pseudocompound hooks present on first 6 chaetigers; cirriform ventral cirri present on first 8–
11 chaetigers; subacicular hooks start from chaetiger 16–20 ... Kinbergonuphis pulchra (Fauchald, 1980)
Distribution: Belize, west off Dangriga (Fauchald 1980; 1982); continental shelf of the Gulf of California, from the Pacific side of the Baja California Peninsula; 0–55 m (Leon-Gonzalez 1994).
- Tridentate pseudocompound hooks present on first 7 chaetigers; cirriform ventral cirri present on first 11–
13 chaetigers; subacicular hooks start from chaetiger 22–23 ... Kinbergonuphis virgata (Fauchald, 1980)
Distribution: Known from the single locality north of Dangriga, Belize (Fauchald 1980; 1982).
The following species of Hyalinoecia have been reported from the Caribbean Sea. The taxonomy of this
genus is poorly resolved and needs to be revised before a key to the species of Hyalinoecia from the Caribbean Sea can be provided.
H. branchiata Treadwell,1934: Puerto Rico; 548 m (Treadwell 1934).
H. juvenalis Moore, 1911: from Southern California, south of Panama, and into West Indian region
through Colombia, Venezuela, and the West Indies; 15–410 m. (Moore 1911; Hartman 1944).
H. tubicola Malmgren, 1867: Greenland, Norway, North Sea, Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Florida, West
Indies, Gulf of Mexico, Japan, Indian ocean, West and South Africa; 13–4300 m (Kiseleva 1968).
H. varians Baird, 1870: West Indies (Baird 1980).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Danny Eibye-Jacobsen of the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen and
Ms. Emma Sherlock, Mr. Alexander Muir and Dr. Gordon Paterson of The Natural History Museum, London
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
15
for the loan of the comparative material. We are grateful to Mr. Scott Whittaker for assistance with SEM. Figure 1 was prepared by Ms. Molly K. Ryan. This research was supported in part by the Hunterdon Oceanographic Research Fund, The Smithsonian Institution Fellowship Program and Russian Foundation for Basic
Research, grant 06-04-48764. The present paper is contribution nr. ** of the Caribbean Coral Reef Ecosystems Program of the Smithsonian Institution.
References
Andrews, E.A. (1891) Report upon the Annelida Polychaeta of Beaufort, North Carolina. Proceedings of the United
States National Museum, 14, 277–302.
Audouin, J.V. & Milne-Edwards, H. (1833) Classification des Annélides, et description de celles qui habitent les côtes de
la France. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Paris, 28, 187–247.
Bailey-Brock, J.H. (1984) Ecology of the tube-building polychaete Diopatra leuckarti Kinberg, 1865 (Onuphidae) in
Hawaii: community structure and sediment stabilizing properties. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80,
191–199.
Baird, W. (1870) Remarks on several genera of Annelides belonging to the group Eunicea, with a notice of such species
as are contained in the collection of the British museum and a description of some others hitherto undescribed species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10, 341–361.
Bely, E. (2006) Distribution of segment regeneration ability in the Annelida. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 46,
508–518.
Bosc, L.A.C. (1802) Histoire naturelles des vers, contenant leur description et leur moeurs avec figures dessinées
d'après nature, vol. 1. Deterville Libraire, Paris, 324 pp.
Day, J.H. (1960) The Polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 5. Errant species dredged off Cape coasts. Annals of the
South African Museum, 45, 261–373.
Delle Chiaje, S. (1841) Descrizione e Notomia degli Animali Invertebrati della Sicilia Citeriore osservati vivi negli anni
1822-1830. Tomo 3 Molluschi Acefali, Bracciopedi, Cirropedi, Crostacei, Anellosi. Stabilimento Tipografico di C.
Batelli e Comp, Naples.
Ehlers, E. (1879) Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico,
by the United States Coast Survey Steamer Blake, Lieutenant-Commander C.D. Sigsbee, U.S.N., Commanding. IV.
Preliminary report on the Worms. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 5, 269–274.
Ehlers, E. (1887) Reports on the results of dredging, under the direction of L.F. Poutalès, during the years 1868-1870,
and of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877–78), and in the Caribbean Sea (1878-79), in the U.S. Coast
Survey steamer Blake, Lieut-Com. C.D. Sigsbee, U.S.N. and Commander J.R. Bartlett, U.S.N., commanding. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 15, 1–335.
Fadlaoui, S., Lechapt, J-P & Retière, C. (1995) Larval development of the onuphid Diopatra marocensis (Annelida:
Polychaeta) from the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 957–966.
Fauchald, K. (1968) Onuphidae (Polychaeta) from Western Mexico. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology, 3,
1–82.
Fauchald, K. (1977) Polychaetes from intertidal areas in Panama, with a review of previous shallow-water records.
Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 221, 1–81.
Fauchald, K. (1980) Onuphidae (Polychaeta) from Belize, Central America, with notes on related taxa. Proceedings of
the Biological Society of Washington, 93, 797–829.
Fauchald, K. (1982) Revision of Onuphis, Nothria, and Paradiopatra (Polychaeta: Onuphidae) based upon type material. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 356, 1–109.
Gathof, J.M. (1984) Family Onuphidae Kinberg, 1865. In Uebelacker, J.M. & Johnson, P.G. (Eds), Taxonomic Guide to
the Polychaetes of the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Final Report to the Minerals Management Service, contract 14-12001-29091. Barry A. Vittor & Assoc., Inc., Mobile, Alabama. 7 Vols., pp. 39-1–39-35.
Granados-Barba, A. & Solis-Weiss, V. (1994) New records of polychaetous annelids (order: Eunicida) from the southeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science, 54, 420–427.
Hartman, O. (1944) Polychaetous Annelids. Part V. Eunicea. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 10, 1–237.
Hobson, K.D. (1971) Some polychaetes of the superfamily Eunicea from the north Pacific and north Atlantic Oceans.
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 83, 527–544.
Hyman, L.H. (1940) Aspects of regeneration in annelids. American Naturalist, 74, 513–527.
Kinberg, J.G.H. (1865) Annulata nova. Öfversigt af Königlich Vetenskapsakademiens Förhandlingar, Stockholm, 21,
559-574.
16 · Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press
BUDAEVA & FAUCHALD
Kirkegaard, J.B. (1988) The Polychaeta of West Africa Part II. Errant Species. 2. Nephtyidae to Dorvilleidae. Atlantide
Report, 14, 7–89.
iseleva, M.I. (1968) Polychaety sublitorali tsentralno-amerikanskikh morei. I. Otryad Eunicemorpha. Issledovaniya Tsentralno-Amerikansikh Morei, Akademii Nauk Ukrainii Biologicheskaya Stantsiya Sevastopol, 2, 76–98.
Leon-Gonzalez, J.A. (1994) Soft bottom polychaetes from the western coast of Baja California sur, Mexico. 4.
Onuphidae. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 35, 57–67.
Leon-Gonzalez J.A, Rivera, C.G. & Romero, M.Y. (2004) Sublitoral Eunicidae and Onuphidae (Polychaeta) from soft
bottom off El Salvador, eastern Pacific. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 84,
93–101.
Malmgren, A.J. (1867) Annulata Polychaeta Spetsbergiae, Groenlandiae, Islandiae et Scandinaviae hactenus cognita.
Öfversigt af Königlich Vetenskapsakademiens förhandlingar, Stockholm, 24, 127–235.
Moore, J.P. (1911) The polychaetous annelids dredged by the U.S.S. 'Albatross' off the coast of southern California in
1904. III. Euphrosynidae to Goniadidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 62, 234–
318.
Paxton, H. (1986) Revision of the Rhamphobrachium complex (Polychaeta: Onuphidae). Records of the Australian
Museum, 38, 75–104.
Paxton, H. & Bailey-Brock, J.H. (1986) Diopatra dexiognatha, a new species of Onuphidae (Polychaeta) from Oahu,
Hawaiian Islands. Pacific Science, 40, 1–6.
Paxton, H. (1993) Diopatra Audouin and Milne Edwards (Polychaeta, Onuphidae) from Australia, with a discussion of
developmental patterns in the genus. The Beagle, Records of the Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences,
10, 115–154.
Paxton, H., Fadlaoui, S. & Lechapt, J.-P. (1995) Diopatra marocensis, a new brooding species of Onuphidae (Annelida:
Polychaeta). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 75, 949–955.
Paxton, H. (1998) The Diopatra chiliensis confusion – redescription of D. chiliensis (Polychaeta, Onuphidae) and implicated species. Zoologica Scripta, 27, 31–48.
Paxton, H. (2002) Diopatra Audouin and Milne Edwards (Polychaeta: Onuphidae) from Thailand. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication, 24, 101–114.
Pflugfelder, O. (1929) Histogenetische und organogenetische Prozesse bei der Regeneration Polychaeter Anneliden. I.
Regeneration des Vorderendes von Diopatra amboinensis. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 133, 121–210.
Sars, M. (1835) Beskrivelser og Iagttagelser over nogle moerkelige eller nye i Havet ved den Bergenske Kyst levende
Dyr af Polypernes, Acalephernes, Radiaternes, Annelidernes og Molluskernes classer, med en kort Oversigt over de
hidtil af Forfatteren sammesteds fundne Arter og deres Forekommen. Thorstein Hallagers Forlag hos Chr. Dahl, Bergen, 81 pp.
Treadwell, A.L. (1934) Reports on the collections obtained by the first Johnson- Smithsonian deep-sea expedition to the
Puerto Rican deep. New polychaetous annelids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 91, 1–9.
Verrill, A.D. (1873) Results of recent dredging expeditions on the coast of New England. American Journal of Science
and Arts, 5, 98–106.
A NEW POLYCHAETE SPECIES FROM BELIZE
Zootaxa 0000 © 2008 Magnolia Press ·
17