Academia.eduAcademia.edu
The Journal of Rheumatology Volume 40, no. 8 Spondyloarthritis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Two Different Diseases That Continue to Intersect IGNAZIO OLIVIERI, SALVATORE D'ANGELO, CARLO PALAZZI and ANGELA PADULA J Rheumatol 2013;40;1251-1253 http://www.jrheum.org/content/40/8/1251 1. Sign up for our monthly e-table of contents http://www.jrheum.org/cgi/alerts/etoc 2. Information on Subscriptions http://jrheum.com/subscribe.html 3. Have us contact your library about access options Refer_your_library@jrheum.com 4. Information on permissions/orders of reprints http://jrheum.com/reprints.html The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman featuring research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields. Downloaded from www.jrheum.org on October 18, 2016 - Published by The Journal of Rheumatology Editorial Spondyloarthritis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Two Different Diseases That Continue to Intersect Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are different diseases obliged to converge1. SpA is an inflammatory disease involving the axial skeleton and the peripheral entheses and joints and showing a wide clinical spectrum that encompasses ankylosing spondylitis (AS), reactive arthritis (ReA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and forms that do not meet established criteria for these definite categories and are designated as undifferentiated SpA (uSpA)2,3. Recently, classification criteria have been suggested by ASAS (Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society) for axial and peripheral SpA4,5. In contrast, DISH is a degenerative condition characterized by calcification and ossification of ligaments and entheseal sites in the axial and the peripheral skeleton6. Classification criteria for DISH used so far require involvement of the spine6 although extravertebral bone proliferations are frequent and characteristic and may precede axial changes7,8. An international study for the development of new criteria is in progress8. At the beginning of the story, AS and DISH resembled each other only on radiographs because of the bony outgrowths they produce in the spine1. Clinically, they were considered very different diseases. Symptoms of AS begin at a young age, frequently in second and third decades, and consist of inflammatory back pain and buttock pain, reduced spinal movement, and progressive typical postural abnormalities known as “Bechterew stoop.” In contrast, DISH was considered a disease with an asymptomatic course or with mild dorsolumbar pain and/or some restriction of spinal motion. Radiographically, DISH is characterized by “flowing mantles” of ossifications occurring in the anterior longitudinal ligament, and to a lesser extent, in the paravertebral connective tissue and the peripheral part of the annulus fibrosus6. Frequently on lateral view, radiolucency is noted between new bone and the vertebral body. The thoracic region is mostly affected but all level levels may be involved. The ossifications are mostly marked along the anterior and right anterolateral vertebral borders, on the lower half of the dorsal spine. The predominant involvement of the left side in patients with situs inversus viscerum suggests that pulsation of the descending thoracic aorta may have an effect on site of ossification. DISH may also involve the sacroiliac (SI) joints. The upper (ligamentous) portion of the joint may exhibit abnormalities such as narrowing, sclerosis, vacuum phenomenon, and even partial or complete bony ankylosis. The lower two-thirds (synovial area) of the joint is spared. However, ossification of the joint capsule on the anterior surface of the joint can occur, which sometimes resembles fusion of the SI joints on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and may mistakenly be interpreted as postinflammatory ankylosis of the joint (grade 4 sacroiliitis)9. Computed tomography (CT) can be helpful in these cases by demonstrating the normal aspect of the joint space and bony margins together with the presence of the anterior capsular ossification9. Radiographic views of axial involvement of SpA are characterized by bone damage caused by sacroiliitis and by inflammation at the discovertebral junction at the attachment of the annulus fibrosus1. The consequent adjacent subchondral osteitis is radiologically characterized by a destructive vertebral lesion and sclerosis confined to the anterior corners of the vertebral bodies (“Romanus lesion”). The healing of these lesions and the adjacent periosteal reaction results in “squaring” of the vertebral bodies on lateral view of the spine. Simultaneously, healing takes place in the periphery of the annulus fibrosus, resulting in the formation of syndesmophytes that are vertical bony bridges joining adjacent vertebral bodies anteriorly and laterally and ultimately forming a “bamboo spine.” The inflammatory process also involves the costotransverse, costovertebral, and zygapophyseal joints, slowly resulting in their ankylosis, which causes impairment of chest expansion and spinal mobility. The ossification of the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments can result in the formation of a vertical radioopaque stripe in the midline on anteroposterior view of spinal radiographs, the so-called “tram-track” and “dagger” signs. See DISH in PsA, page 1367 Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved. Olivieri, et al: Editorial Downloaded from www.jrheum.org on October 18, 2016 - Published by The Journal of Rheumatology 1251 Presence of concomitant osteoporosis adds to the risk of development of progressive spinal kyphosis. McEwen and coworkers identified 2 different forms of spondylitis10. Primary AS and spondylitis associated with IBD showed bilateral sacroiliitis, symmetrical and marginal syndesmophytes, ligamentous ossification, and progression of syndesmophytes from the lumbar to the cervical spine. In contrast, spondylitis associated with psoriasis and ReA was characterized more often by asymmetrical findings both in the SI joints and the syndesmophytes; moreover, the syndesmophytes were mostly paramarginal rather than marginal. The bone proliferations of DISH are more frequently confused with these last syndesmophytes. However, the radiological findings of axial involvement in SpA and DISH are so different that in patients with coexisting DISH and AS, it is possible to recognize the changes due to the 2 diseases at any spinal level11,12,13. As regards peripheral enthesopathy, in general the bone proliferative changes of enthesitis of SpA are ill-defined and finely speculated and differ from the course and well defined noninflammatory bone outgrowths of DISH14. In the second phase of the story, it was realized that the differential diagnosis of DISH and long-lasting advanced AS is not limited to radiological findings but extends to the clinical aspects. More than 15 years ago, Mata and coworkers examined 56 patients with DISH, 43 control patients with spondylosis, and 31 healthy control patients15. Patients with DISH reported a history of upper extremity pain, medial epicondylitis, patellar and heel enthesitis, and dysphagia more frequently than patients with spondylosis, and they had more extremity and spinal pain and stiffness than healthy controls. In addition, patients with DISH had a greater reduction in neck rotation and thoracic movement in comparison with spondylosis patients or healthy controls and had a greater reduction of lumbar movement than healthy subjects. In 2007, we described 15 patients with DISH showing severe limitation of spinal mobility together with the typical postural abnormalities of advanced AS16. In the clinical field the differential diagnosis also extends to peripheral entheses. Recently, we encountered patients with typical postural abnormalities of long-lasting AS who also showed diffuse swelling at the insertion of Achilles tendon, resembling the typical fusiform soft-tissue swelling of Achilles enthesitis of SpA17. However, instead of the inflammatory findings of enthesitis, palpation of the region revealed the bony consistency of large spurs, also seen on radiographs. In this issue of The Journal, a Toronto-based study group on PsA opens a third phase of the story18. The authors evaluated the frequency of DISH in 938 patients with PsA and the features associated with its occurrence. The most relevant conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) DISH can be diagnosed in patients with psoriatic spondylitis, confirming that a rheumatologist or a radiologist with expertise in DISH and SpA can easily differentiate the 2 diseases and recognize the typical aspects of both when they coexist in the same patient. (2) Patients with PsA and DISH have increased limitation of spinal movement and decreased quality of life in comparison with patients with only PsA, confirming the observation that DISH is not an asymptomatic disease. (3) Patients with PsA and DISH have more damage in peripheral joints than patients with PsA without DISH. The peripheral joints may be involved in patients with isolated DISH and show juxtaarticular bone proliferation in the absence of joint surface abnormalities7. Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and DISH show more hypertrophic joints compared with patients with isolated OA19. Similarly, the damage to peripheral joints of PsA, which is characterized by juxtaarticular new bone formation, can be worse if DISH coexists. (4) Patients with PsA are at increased risk for cardiovascular morbidities20, and the presence of DISH may identify patients at higher risk. A new phase has begun in the understanding of relationships between DISH and SpA. Establishing the presence of DISH in patients with SpA can be useful in better evaluating the damage to the musculoskeletal system and the cardiovascular risk. It is desirable that interest in DISH continue to expand because an understanding of the mechanisms involved in the bone proliferation of DISH could also elucidate the relationships between inflammation and bone proliferation in axial and peripheral SpA21. IGNAZIO OLIVIERI, MD, Consultant, Director, Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera; SALVATORE D’ANGELO, MD, PhD, Researcher, Rheumatology Department of Lucania; CARLO PALAZZI, MD, Senior Investigator; ANGELA PADULA, MD, Senior Registrar; Rheumatology Department of Lucania, Potenza, Italy Address correspondence to Dr. Olivieri, Rheumatology Department of Lucania-San Carlo Hospital, Contrada Macchia Romana, 85100-Potenza, Italy. E-mail: ignazioolivieri@tiscalinet.it REFERENCES 1. Olivieri I, D’Angelo S, Palazzi C, Padula A, Mader R, Khan MA. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: differentiation from ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2009;11:321-8. 2. Amor B, Dougados M, Mijiyawa M. Criteria of the classification of spondylarthropathies. [French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1990;57:85-9. 3. Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, Huitfeldt B, Amor B, Calin A, et al. The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:1218-27. 4. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, et al. The development of Assessment of Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved. 1252 The Journal of Rheumatology 2013; 40:8; doi:10.3899/jrheum.130647 Downloaded from www.jrheum.org on October 18, 2016 - Published by The Journal of Rheumatology 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis II: validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777-83. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Chou CT, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25-31. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology 1976;119:559-68. Mader R, Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, Olivieri I, Pappone N, Verlaan JJ, et al. Extraspinal manifestations of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Rheumatology 2009;48:1478-81. Mader R, Buskila D, Verlaan JJ, Atzeni F, Olivieri I, Pappone N, et al. Developing new classification criteria for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: back to square 1. Rheumatology 2013;52:326-30. Yagan R, Khan MA, Marmolya G. Role of abdominal CT, when available in patient’s records, in the evaluation of degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joints. Spine 1987;12:1046-51. McEwen C, DiTata D, Lingg C, Porini A, Good A, Rankin T. Ankylosing spondylitis and spondylitis accompanying ulcerative colitis, regional enteritis, psoriasis and Reiter’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 1971;14:291-318. Olivieri I, Trippi D, Gheradi S, Pasero G. Coexistence of ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: another report. J Rheumatol 1987;14:1058-60. Olivieri I, Vitali C, Gemignani G, Pasero G. Concomitant ankylosing spondylitis and DISH. J Rheumatol 1989;16:1170-2. Olivieri I, Oranges GS, Sconosciuto F, Padula A, Ruju GP, Pasero G. Late onset peripheral seronegative spondyloarthropathy: report of two additional cases. J Rheumatol 1993;20:390-3. 14. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Entheses and enthesopathy. Radiology 1983;146:1-9. 15. Mata S, Fortin PR, Fitzcharles MA, Starr MR, Joseph L, Watts CS, et al. A controlled study of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Clinical features and functional status. Medicine 1997;76:104-17. 16. Olivieri I, D’Angelo S, Cutro MS, Padula A, Peruz G, Montaruli M, et al. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis may give the typical postural abnormalities of advanced ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 2007;46:1709-11. 17. Olivieri I, D’Angelo S, Borraccia F, Padula A. Heel enthesopathy of diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis resembling enthesitis of spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:192-3. 18. Haddad A, Thavaneswaran A, Toloza S, Chandran V, Gladman DD. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2013;40:1367-73. 19. Schlapbach P, Beyeler C, Gerber NJ, van del Linden S, Burgi U, Fuchs WA, et al. The prevalence of palpable finger joints nodules in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). A controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 1992;31:531-4. 20. Gladman DD, Ang M, Su L, Tom BD, Schentag CT, Farewell VT. Cardiovascular morbidity in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1131-5. 21. Baraliakos X, Listing J, Buschmann J, von der Recke A, Braun J. A comparison of new bone formation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a retrospective cohort study over six years. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1127-33. J Rheumatol 2013;40:1251–3; doi:10.3899/jrheum.130647 Personal non-commercial use only. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved. Olivieri, et al: Editorial Downloaded from www.jrheum.org on October 18, 2016 - Published by The Journal of Rheumatology 1253