Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Different models have defined the term disability and grouped persons with disabilities accordingly. Time and again, various terms and phrases have been used in different languages to identity persons according to the differences in their bodies and the level of functioning of those bodies. Analogies and metaphors create stereotypes and can affect the formation of an individual's self-concept. Clichés like " divyang " , ie one who has some divine powers to compensate for the deficiency in the body, based on the supercrip theory of disability, can distort the self-concept and hamper identity formation. Society and the state cannot and must not shrug off their responsibility by using such sugar-coated terms to label individuals. The real requirement is the creation of a non-disabling environment and the provision of equal opportunities to those with disabilities rather than coining of new terms.
2011 •
THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMAL LEARNING FROM PERSONAL L2 USAGE ON THE ACQUISITION OF SEMANTICALLY OPAQUE PHRASAL VERBS AMONG STUDENTS IN A SWISS CLASSROOM
Module Number (1-6; Diss) Diss Title of Degree Programme: MA Applied Linguistic Title of Module: Diss2020 •
Important Declaration: Please read this carefully before submitting: 1) In submitting this essay/dissertation, you are declaring that it complies with the School specifications for the formatting of assessed work (which includes the 'specified maximum word limit'); 2) In submitting this essay/dissertation, you are declaring that it is your own work and that it complies with the University of Birmingham rules on plagiarism; no part of it is copied from the published or unpublished work of anyone else expect where such quotations are properly cited and acknowledged; 3) If you believe that your performance may have been affected by illness or similar matter, your submission declares that you have followed the guidance on extenuating circumstances and extensions. Please indicate if you have submitted evidence relating to extenuating circumstances* in connection with this piece of work, by ticking this box: * Please contact the School Welfare Officers for guidance regarding an application for extenuating circumstances-edacswelfare@contacts.bham.ac.uk
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
JOURNALNX-CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS OF TERMS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS2020 •
A certain term can be used in many different ways. In morphology-linguistics it means word structure, in botany it means plant structure. The logical connection and the commonality of the task really move the term from one area to another. Depending on the closeness of the content, the terms form lexical-semantic rows. The term should be understood by a particular scientific community, and socio-political terms should be understood by the general public. It is better to use some terms in their own way, because they are clear to everyone.
2016 •
Since its establishment as an independent discipline in the early twentieth century, linguistics has undergone rapid development, as is witnessed by the great diversity of theories, methodologies, and practices in the area. This prosperity is, on the one hand, a blessing for all linguists considering the wealth of linguistic knowledge that we have gained, but on the other, it leads to the segmentation of the discipline that should be an organic entirety. According to the Legitimation Coding Theory of Karl Maton (2014: 106), segmentalism in intellectual fields arises with the accumulation of new ideas or approaches that fail to integrate existing knowledge, which is caused by the strong classification and framing values both inside and outside the field. As an intellectual field, linguistics at its current state of development is also characterized by segmentalism, as is shown by the strong boundaries between different schools and subfields, and by the strong framing of research methods and procedures adopted in each school and subfield. Each school has its own premises, aim, methodology, theory, and practices that clearly demarcates its field and prevents trespassers with different backgrounds. As a result, different subfields have their own realms that are often mutually incompatible, which renders it difficult, if not impossible, to integrate them into a coherent whole. Scholars from different backgrounds no longer sit together to communicate; and even if we want, we find it difficult to understand each other as we speak different “languages”. To facilitate further development of linguistics, we need to eliminate this segmentalism, cross the boundaries, and sit together to communicate with each other. It is out of this belief that the Free Linguistics Conference (FLC) was initiated, which aims at providing a widely accessible forum for linguists in all areas of research to come together and share their diverse perspectives and findings. The 8th Annual International Free Linguistics Conference (The 8th FLC), held at the School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 26-27 September, 2014, is another significant step toward this aim. In this all-inclusive forum are congregated more than 180 scholars from more than 20 countries/regions. Presentations delivered cover a wide range of mainstream linguistics, including both theoretical linguistics (phonetics and phonology, lexicology, syntax, and semantics), and applied linguistics (such as sociolinguistics, educational linguistics, language teaching and acquisition, computational linguistics, translation studies, and discourse analysis), and involve more than ten languages such as English, German, Chinese, Tibetan, Arabic, Tagalog and Pashto. In one word, as trespassers of both geographical and intellectual borders, scholars with different intellectual backgrounds sit together, share their insights and discoveries, and make concerted efforts to further our studies of languages. This book, Multiperspective Studies of Language: Theory and Application, is the fruition of the concerted efforts of the scholars presenting at the 8th FLC. It consists includes 20 selected papers that are organized into four parts according to the subfields they belong to: theoretical linguistics, educational linguistics, social linguistics, translation studies and computational linguistics. All papers included in this volume were selected after going through a double-blind peer-review process.
Synthetic Metals
Post polymerization processing of conductive polymers: A tool for technical applications1989 •
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Including model uncertainty in the model predictive control with output feedback2002 •
PROCEEDINGS-AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL …
The gap between probability and prevalence: loneliness in vector spaces2001 •
Cadernos de Pesquisa
Alunos do ensino médio e atratividade da carreira docente no Brasil2010 •
2004 •
2021 •
2008 •
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
A Retrospective Review of SBRT for Larger Brain Metastases or Postresection Cavities2012 •
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
LHC-like Proteins: The Guardians of PhotosynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Energy Efficient Management of Pipelines in Buildings Using Linear Wireless Sensor Networks2018 •
Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy
Simultaneous Analysis of 12 Aphrodisiacs in Traditional Medicine using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass SpectrometryNatural Hazards
The role of faith-based institutions in urban disaster risk reduction for immigrant communities2020 •
IEE proceedings
Absorption detection of enzymatic reaction using optical microfluidics based intermittent flow microreactor system2006 •
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Mehrphasenreaktionen an katalytisch aktiven Metallschwämmen2012 •
The Astronomical Journal
The Trans-Neptunian Object (84922) 2003 VS2 through Stellar Occultations2019 •
Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine
Oral cholera vaccines; current perspective and future need; towards the development of Novel DNA vaccine for Vibrio species